SEC Info℠ | Home | Search | My Interests | Help | Sign In | Please Sign In | ||||||||||||||||||||
As Of Filer Filing For·On·As Docs:Size Issuer Filing Agent 2/23/12 Railamerica Inc/DE 10-K 12/31/11 46:7.6M Donnelley … Solutions/FA |
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size 1: 10-K Annual Report HTML 1.52M 2: EX-21.1 Subsidiaries List HTML 30K 3: EX-23.1 Consent of Experts or Counsel HTML 13K 4: EX-31.1 Certification of Principal Executive Officer HTML 20K 5: EX-31.2 Certification of Principal Financial Officer HTML 20K 6: EX-32.1 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 HTML 15K 7: EX-32.2 Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C Section 1350 HTML 15K 29: R1 Document and Entity Information HTML 43K 22: R2 Consolidated Balance Sheets HTML 117K 27: R3 Consolidated Balance Sheets (Parenthetical) HTML 30K 31: R4 Consolidated Statements of Operations HTML 134K 42: R5 Consolidated Statements of Operations HTML 22K (Parenthetical) 23: R6 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity HTML 98K 26: R7 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows HTML 151K 21: R8 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies HTML 60K 15: R9 Acquisitions HTML 35K 43: R10 Earnings Per Share HTML 29K 33: R11 Stock-Based Compensation HTML 40K 32: R12 Discontinued Operations HTML 25K 37: R13 Other Balance Sheet Data HTML 23K 38: R14 Property, Plant and Equipment HTML 29K 36: R15 Goodwill and Intangible Assets, Net HTML 71K 39: R16 Long-Term Debt and Leases HTML 53K 28: R17 Derivative Financial Instruments HTML 41K 30: R18 Fair Value of Financial Instruments HTML 34K 35: R19 Common Stock Transactions HTML 33K 46: R20 Income Tax Provision HTML 112K 40: R21 Pension and Other Benefit Programs HTML 214K 24: R22 Commitments and Contingencies HTML 28K 34: R23 Related Party Transactions HTML 31K 25: R24 Impairment of Assets HTML 18K 14: R25 Track Maintenance Agreement HTML 19K 41: R26 Other Income (Loss) HTML 18K 44: R27 Subsequent Events HTML 22K 19: R28 Unaudited Quarterly Financial Data HTML 39K 18: R29 Segment Information HTML 51K 20: R30 Guarantor Financial Statement Information HTML 497K 45: XML IDEA XML File -- Filing Summary XML 58K 17: EXCEL IDEA Workbook of Financial Reports (.xls) XLS 1.27M 8: EX-101.INS XBRL Instance -- ra-20111231 XML 1.47M 10: EX-101.CAL XBRL Calculations -- ra-20111231_cal XML 121K 11: EX-101.DEF XBRL Definitions -- ra-20111231_def XML 47K 12: EX-101.LAB XBRL Labels -- ra-20111231_lab XML 448K 13: EX-101.PRE XBRL Presentations -- ra-20111231_pre XML 268K 9: EX-101.SCH XBRL Schema -- ra-20111231 XSD 63K 16: ZIP XBRL Zipped Folder -- 0001193125-12-075205-xbrl Zip 99K
FORM 10-K |
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
x | Annual Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2011,
or
¨ | Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 001-32579
RAILAMERICA, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 65-0328006 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
7411 Fullerton Street, Suite 300, |
32256 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (800) 342-1131
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
TITLE OF EACH CLASS |
NAME OF EACH EXCHANGE ON WHICH REGISTERED | |
Common Stock, $.01 Par Value | New York Stock Exchange |
Securities Registered Pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | x | |||
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | ¨ |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The aggregate market value of voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates of the registrant at the close of business on June 30, 2011 was $228,803,600 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange.
The number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock, $.01 par value per share, as of February 21, 2012 was 50,530,991.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
The information required by Part III (Items 10, 11, 12, 13 and 14) will be incorporated by reference from the registrant’s Definitive Proxy Statement for its 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission pursuant to Regulation 14A.
PAGE | ||||||
PART I |
||||||
Item 1. |
3 | |||||
Item 1A. |
11 | |||||
Item 1B. |
21 | |||||
Item 2. |
21 | |||||
Item 3. |
23 | |||||
Item 4. |
23 | |||||
PART II |
||||||
Item 5. |
24 | |||||
Item 6. |
27 | |||||
Item 7. |
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
28 | ||||
Item 7A. |
45 | |||||
Item 8. |
46 | |||||
Item 9. |
Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure |
46 | ||||
Item 9A. |
47 | |||||
Item 9B. |
47 | |||||
PART III |
||||||
Item 10. |
48 | |||||
Item 11. |
48 | |||||
Item 12. |
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters |
48 | ||||
Item 13. |
Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence |
48 | ||||
Item 14. |
48 | |||||
PART IV |
||||||
Item 15. |
49 | |||||
51 |
2
Certain statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K and other information we provide from time to time may constitute forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, but not necessarily limited to, statements relating to future events and financial performance. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “believes,” “may,” “will,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “seeks,” “estimates” and variations on these words and similar expressions are intended to identify such forward-looking statements. These statements are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of factors that could lead to actual results materially different from those described in the forward-looking statements. We can give no assurance that its expectations will be attained. Accordingly, you should not place undue reliance on any forward-looking statements contained in this report. Factors that could have a material adverse effect on our operations and future prospects or that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to, prolonged capital markets disruption and volatility, general economic and business conditions, our relationships with Class I railroads and other connecting carriers, our ability to obtain railcars and locomotives from other providers on which we are currently dependent, legislative and regulatory developments including rulings by the Surface Transportation Board or the Railroad Retirement Board, strikes or work stoppages by our employees, our transportation of hazardous materials by rail, rising fuel costs, goodwill assessment risks, acquisition risks, competitive pressures within the industry, risks related to the geographic markets in which we operate; and other risks detailed in our filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). In addition, new risks and uncertainties emerge from time to time, and it is not possible for us to predict or assess the impact of every factor that may cause our actual results to differ from those contained in any forward-looking statements. Such forward-looking statements speak only as of the date of this report. We expressly disclaim any obligation to release publicly any updates or revisions to any forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect any change in our expectations with regard thereto or change in events, conditions or circumstances on which any statement is based. Except where the context otherwise requires, the terms “RailAmerica,” “we,” “us,” or “our” refer to the business of RailAmerica, Inc. and its consolidated subsidiaries.
PART I
ITEM 1. | BUSINESS |
OVERVIEW
We are a leading owner and operator of short line and regional freight railroads in North America, operating a portfolio of 43 individual railroads with approximately 7,400 miles of track in 27 U.S. states and three Canadian provinces. Our railroad portfolio represents an important component of North America’s transportation infrastructure, carrying large quantities of freight for a highly diverse customer base. In 2011, our railroads transported approximately 840,000 carloads of freight for approximately 1,500 customers, hauling a wide range of products such as farm and food products, lumber and forest products, paper and paper products, metals, chemicals and coal.
We were incorporated in Delaware on March 31, 1992 as a holding company for two pre-existing railroad companies. On February 14, 2007, we were acquired by RR Acquisition Holding LLC, an entity wholly-owned by certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”). On October 16, 2009, we completed an initial public offering. During the period from our formation until today, we have grown both through the expansion of the traffic base on our existing railroads and through acquisitions of additional North American railroads and railroad-related properties.
Our Internet website address is www.railamerica.com. We make available free of charge, on or through our website, our Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to these reports, as soon as reasonably practicable after they are filed with the SEC. The SEC maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and information statements and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. We also make available on our website other registration statements, prospectuses, and reports filed with the SEC under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”) and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), including proxy statements and reports filed by officers and directors under Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act. These filings may be found by selecting the option entitled “SEC FILINGS” in the “INVESTOR RELATIONS” section on our website. Additionally, our corporate governance guidelines, board committee charters, code of business conduct and ethics and code of ethics for principal executive and senior financial officers are available on our website and in print to any stockholder who requests them. Information contained in or connected to our website is not part of this report.
3
BUSINESS STRATEGY
We plan to grow our revenue, cash flow and earnings by employing the following growth strategies:
Growing freight revenue: We are focused on growing our freight revenue by seeking new business opportunities at our individual railroads and by centralizing key commercial and pricing decisions. We believe that shippers often seek to locate their operations on short lines because of possible access to multiple Class I railroads and the resulting negotiating leverage it affords them. To this end, our commercial team actively solicits customers to locate their manufacturing and warehousing facilities on our railroads. We also seek to generate new business by converting customers located on or near our railroads from other modes of transportation to rail. Members of our senior management team have significant prior experience in the marketing departments of both Class I and short line railroads. Additionally, by centralizing and carefully analyzing pricing decisions based on prevailing market conditions and competitive analysis, we leverage our expertise in setting rates for freight services.
Expanding our non-freight services and revenue: We intend to continue to expand and grow the non-freight services we offer to both our rail customers and other parties. Non-freight services offered to our rail customers include switching (i.e., managing and positioning railcars within a customer’s facility), storing customers’ excess or idle railcars on inactive portions of our rail lines, third-party railcar repair, engineering infrastructure services and demurrage. Many of these services leverage our existing customer relationships and generate additional revenue at attractive margins with minimal capital investment. We also seek to grow our revenue from non-transportation uses of our land holdings such as land leases, crossing or access rights, subsurface rights, signboards and cellular communication towers, among others. These sources of revenue are an important area of focus by our management as such revenue has minimal associated operating costs or capital expenditures and represents a recurring, high margin cash flow stream.
Pursuing opportunistic acquisitions: The North American short line and regional railroad industry is highly fragmented, with approximately 558 short line and regional railroads operating approximately 43,000 miles of track. We believe that opportunistically acquiring additional short line and regional railroads, or other railroad-related or transportation-related businesses, will enable us to grow our revenue and achieve a number of additional benefits including, among others, expanding and enhancing our services, further diversifying our portfolio and achieving economies of scale by leveraging senior management experience and corporate costs over a broader revenue base.
Continuing to improve operating efficiency and lowering costs: We continue to focus on driving financial improvement through a variety of cost savings initiatives. To identify and implement cost savings, we have organized our 43 railroads into five regional groups which, in turn, report to senior management where many functions such as pricing, purchasing, capital spending, finance, insurance, real estate and other administrative functions are centralized. We believe that this strategy enables us to achieve cost and pricing efficiencies and leverage the experience of senior management in commercial, operational and strategic decisions. To date, we have implemented a number of cost savings initiatives broadly at all of our railroads targeting safer operations, lower fuel consumption, more efficient equipment utilization and lower costs for third-party services, among others, and continue to be extremely focused on ongoing opportunities to further reduce our costs.
INDUSTRY OVERVIEW
The North American economy is dependent on the movement of freight ranging from raw materials such as coal, ores, aggregates, lumber and grain to finished goods, such as food products, paper products, automobiles and machinery. Railroads represent the largest component of North America’s freight transportation industry, carrying more freight than any other mode of transportation on a ton-mile basis. With a network of over 138,000 miles of track in the U.S., railroads link businesses with each other domestically and with international markets through connections with ports and other international terminals.
Industry Structure
According to the Association of American Railroads (“AAR”), there are 565 railroads in the United States operating over 138,000 miles of track. The AAR classifies railroads operating in the United States into one of three categories based on the amount of revenues and track-miles. Class I railroads, which are individual railroads with over $398.7 million in revenues in 2010, represent approximately 94% of total rail revenues. Regional and local/short line railroads operate approximately 43,000 miles of track in the United States. The primary function of these smaller railroads is to provide feeder traffic to the Class I carriers. Regional and local/short line railroads combined account for approximately 6% of total industry rail revenues.
4
Classification of Railroads |
Number | Aggregate Miles Operated |
% of Revenue |
Revenues and Miles Operated in 2010 | ||||||||||
Class I (1) |
7 | 95,573 | 94 | % | Over $398.7 million | |||||||||
Regional |
21 | 10,407 | 2 | % | $31.9 to $398.7 million and/or 350 or more miles operated with a minimum revenue of $40 million | |||||||||
Local/Short line |
537 | 32,596 | 4 | % | Less than $31.9 million and/or less than 350 miles or more than 350 miles and less than $40 million in revenue | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
565 | 138,576 | 100 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | Includes CSX Transportation, BNSF Railway Co., Norfolk Southern, Kansas City Southern Railway Company, Union Pacific, Canadian National Railway and Canadian Pacific Railroad Co. |
Source: | Association of American Railroads, Railroad Facts, 2011 Edition. |
Class I railroads operate across many different states and concentrate largely, though not exclusively, on long-haul, high-density intercity traffic lanes. Regional railroads typically operate 400-650 miles of track and provide service to selected areas of the country, mainly connecting neighboring states and/or economic centers. Typically, short line railroads serve as branch lines connecting customers with Class I railroads. Short line railroads have more predictable and straightforward operations as they generally perform point-to-point service over short distances, without the complex networks associated with the large Class I railroads.
Use of regional and short line railroads is largely driven by interchange traffic between carriers. In many cases, a short line will originate the freight transport and hand off to a Class I railroad, which will transport the freight the majority of the distance, usually hundreds or thousands of miles. The Class I railroad will then drop the freight off with a short line, which provides the final step of service directly to the customer. Most short line railroads depend on Class I traffic for a substantial portion of their revenue. Our portfolio of 43 railroads is a mix of regional and short line railroads.
Regional and Short line Railroads
Regional and short line railways have always been a part of the rail industry in North America. In the 1800s, most North American railroads were constructed to serve a local or regional interest. Today’s Class I railroads are descended from hundreds of short lines and regionals that came together in successive waves of consolidation.
During the 1980s, the number of regional and short line railroads increased dramatically. Deregulation of U.S. railroads simplified abandonment and sales regulations, allowing the major carriers to gain many of the savings of abandonment while preserving the traffic on the rail lines. Carriers created through this divestiture process now account for the majority of regional and short line railroads. Regional and short line railroads today serve important roles in moving freight within their service areas and function as a critical traffic “feeder” network for the Class I railroads.
Over the past decade, the number of regional and short line railroads has remained relatively constant. While some new entrants were formed through spin-offs or divestitures of Class I railroads, they have generally been offset by other existing regional and short lines either exiting the business or being merged with or acquired by other railroads. With the growth of multi-carrier holding companies, the number of operators of regional and short line railroads has decreased. The consolidation brought on by multi-carrier holding companies has induced a number of shippers with private railroads to sell those railroads to the major short line operators. Similarly, Class I railroads sell and lease rail lines to smaller rail entities in order to address a range of issues impacting costs and productivity.
5
RAIL TRAFFIC
Revenue Model
We generated freight revenue, during the year ended December 31, 2011, under three different types of service, which are summarized below.
Service Type |
Description |
% of Freight Revenue |
||||
Interchange |
Freight transport between a customer’s facility and a connection point with a Class I railroad |
87 | % | |||
Local |
Freight that both originates and terminates on the same line |
4 | % | |||
Bridge |
Freight transport from one connecting Class I railroad to another |
9 | % |
For the majority of our customers, our railroads transport freight between a customer’s facility or plant and a connection point (“interchange”) with a national Class I railroad. Each of our 43 railroads connects with at least one Class I railroad, and many connect with multiple Class I railroads. Interchange circumstances vary by customer shipping needs, with freight either (i) originating at the customer’s facility (such as a coal mine, an ethanol production plant or a lumber yard) for transport by the Class I railroad via the interchange to other North American destinations or ports or (ii) received from the Class I interchange and hauled to a customer’s plant where the freight is subsequently consumed or stored (such as a coal-burning power generation plant). In other cases, a RailAmerica rail line transports freight that both originates and terminates on the same line, which is referred to as “local” traffic, or provides a pass-through connection between one Class I railroad and another railroad without the freight originating or terminating on the line, which is known as “bridge” traffic.
Typically, we provide our freight services under a contract or similar arrangement with either the customer located on our rail line or the connecting Class I railroad. Contracts and arrangements vary in terms of duration, pricing and volume requirements. Because we normally provide transportation for only a segment of a shipment’s total distance, with the Class I railroad carrying the freight the majority of the distance, as a convenience, customers are generally billed once for the movement of their freight, typically by the Class I carrier, for the total cost of rail transport. The Class I railroad is obligated to pay us in a timely manner upon delivery of service regardless of whether or when the Class I railroad actually receives the total payment from the customer.
Our railroads are often integrated into a customer’s facility and serve as an important component of that customer’s distribution or input. In many circumstances, our customers have made significant capital investments in facilities on or near our railroads (as in the case of electric utilities, industrial plants or major warehouses) or are geographically unable to relocate (as in the case of coal mines and rock quarries). The quality of our customers and our level of integration with their facilities provide a stable and predictable revenue base.
Freight Revenue
Commodities
Products hauled over our network include a dozen major commodity groups, such as coal, forest products, chemicals, agricultural products, food products, metallic ores and metals, and petroleum products. Agricultural products traffic represented the largest contributor to freight revenue at 16% in 2011. The top ten commodities represented approximately 95% of total freight revenue earned in 2011.
6
Year ended December 31, 2011 | Year ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight Revenue |
Carloads | Average Freight Revenue per Carload |
Freight Revenue |
Carloads | Average Freight Revenue per Carload |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except average freight revenue per carload) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Agricultural Products |
$ | 65,177 | 126,727 | $ | 514 | $ | 63,999 | 132,952 | $ | 481 | ||||||||||||||
Chemicals |
63,374 | 94,615 | 670 | 59,038 | 96,105 | 614 | ||||||||||||||||||
Metallic Ores and Metals |
43,431 | 70,251 | 618 | 37,825 | 66,626 | 568 | ||||||||||||||||||
Pulp, Paper and Allied Products |
39,609 | 67,678 | 585 | 37,379 | 65,308 | 572 | ||||||||||||||||||
Non-Metallic Minerals and Products |
39,329 | 84,614 | 465 | 34,646 | 80,376 | 431 | ||||||||||||||||||
Coal |
34,460 | 151,687 | 227 | 39,880 | 178,735 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||
Forest Products |
30,516 | 48,884 | 624 | 27,017 | 47,048 | 574 | ||||||||||||||||||
Food or Kindred Products |
30,161 | 56,601 | 533 | 28,027 | 56,812 | 493 | ||||||||||||||||||
Waste and Scrap Materials |
24,914 | 58,459 | 426 | 23,765 | 57,121 | 416 | ||||||||||||||||||
Petroleum |
18,470 | 37,712 | 490 | 19,542 | 41,952 | 466 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other |
14,118 | 30,001 | 471 | 10,937 | 29,883 | 366 | ||||||||||||||||||
Motor Vehicles |
7,591 | 12,731 | 596 | 6,694 | 11,553 | 579 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 411,150 | 839,960 | $ | 489 | $ | 388,749 | 864,471 | $ | 450 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Customers
In 2011, we served approximately 1,500 customers in North America. Although most of our North American railroads have a well-diversified customer base, several smaller rail lines have one or two dominant customers. In 2011 and 2010, our 10 largest customers accounted for approximately 18% of our freight revenue, with no individual customer accounting for more than approximately 5% of freight revenue.
Pricing
Our contracts typically stipulate either inflation-based or market-based pricing. Market-based pricing is based on negotiated rates. Pricing and escalation terms for these contracts are negotiated prior to the signing or renewal of a contract. This type of pricing provides us the ability to price contracts at prevailing market rates. Inflation-based pricing is based on a fixed revenue per carload with inflation-based escalators. This type of pricing is common for “handling line” railroads where the contract is with an interchanging Class I railroad. These contracts are typically long-term and were often entered into at the time the short line was purchased from the Class I railroad.
We operate fuel surcharge programs that vary by railroad and by customer. The goal of these programs is to offset the majority of fuel price increases by charging customers a fuel surcharge on top of their regular contracted rates. Fuel surcharge programs are typically either revenue-based or mileage-based. Revenue-based programs charge a surcharge based on additional revenue per carload while mileage-based programs charge a surcharge based on miles hauled. Both programs charge their surcharge based on fuel price per gallon above a threshold price. Approximately 85% of fuel price increases are offset directly by fuel surcharges, while additional cost recovery is obtained through increases in revenue per carload upon contract renewal or regular rate updates.
A substantial portion of our freight revenue is generated under contracts and similar arrangements with either the customers we serve or the Class I railroads with which we connect. Approximately 36% of our total freight revenue is generated under contracts directly with Class I railroads and 64% of our freight revenue is generated under traditional rail transportation rate mechanisms. Individual rate mechanisms vary in terms of duration, pricing and volume requirements, but can generally be categorized as follows:
Contracts directly with customers/shippers: In many cases, our individual railroads are parties to contracts directly with customers. The contracts can be in the form of a signed agreement or an unsigned deregulated rate quotation. Contracts stipulate the term and pricing mechanics and often include minimum customer volume requirements with liquidated damages paid to us to the extent volumes fall below certain levels. In general, these contracts are one to three years in length, although in certain instances the term can be longer. Typically, a long-term contract contains a stipulated rate escalation. Deregulated rate quotations typically have a term of one year and do not contain volume commitments or liquidated damages.
7
Contracts directly with Class I railroads: In these cases, our individual railroads act as an agent for the connecting Class I railroad, with the Class I railroad typically maintaining a contract directly with the customer/shipper for the entire length of haul. The Class I railroad pays us upon providing the service for our portion of the total haul, and the Class I railroad pays us regardless of whether the customer pays the Class I railroad, which results in low credit expose and timely payment. The contracts are typically long-term in nature with an average duration of approximately 25 years.
Published rate, no contract: In the remaining cases, our individual railroads generate freight revenue using tariffs. Tariffs account for about 12% of RailAmerica’s total revenue. Rates can typically be adjusted as market conditions merit – usually with 20-days notice
Non-Freight Revenue
In addition to providing freight services, we also generate non-freight revenue from other sources such as railcar storage, demurrage, engineering infrastructure services, leases of equipment to other users (including Class I railroads), and real estate leases and use fees. Right-of-way income is generated through crossing licenses and leases with fiber optic, telecommunications, advertising, parking and municipal users. These sources of revenue and value are an important area of focus by our management as revenue from real estate and right-of-way has minimal associated operating costs or capital expenditures and represents a recurring, stable cash flow stream.
Competition
Railroads compete against each other and other forms of freight transportation based on cost, location and service. The cost of transporting goods and services via different forms of freight transportation is a major factor in determining which means of transportation a shipper will utilize. With respect to location, potential customers often experience geographic constraints that significantly impact the relative freight transportation costs of different alternatives. For example, a shipper can be constrained by railroad trackage, accessible waterways, access to pipelines and proximity to major highways. As a result, short line and regional railroad operators often evaluate the feasibility of other forms of freight transportation available to a customer when developing their rate and service offerings.
Some short line and regional railroad customers have multiple forms of freight transportation available. Depending on circumstances, truck, water, or other railroads may be competitive alternatives for a shipment. In such instances, customers will compare the relative costs, reliability of on-time delivery and quality of service when determining what mode(s) of transport to use.
The railroad industry has increased its share of freight ton-miles compared to other forms of freight transportation over the past quarter-century. Since deregulation in 1980, the railroad industry has continually improved its cost structure compared to other forms of freight transportation as it consumes less fuel and has lower labor costs per ton transported than other forms of freight transportation. According to the AAR, railroads are estimated to be approximately four times more fuel efficient than truck transportation and a single train can haul the equivalent of up to approximately 280 trucks. In 1980, one gallon of diesel fuel moved one ton of freight by rail an average of 235 miles, versus 2010 where the equivalent gallon of diesel fuel moved one ton of freight an average of 484 miles by rail representing a 106% increase over 1980. As a result, the railroad industry’s share of U.S. freight ton-miles has steadily increased from 30% in 1980 to 43% in 2011.
EMPLOYEES
We had 1,808 employees on December 31, 2011 of which 1,059 were non-unionized and 749 were unionized. Unions representing our employees are highly fragmented, with representation at the railroad level rather than system-wide. In total, our railroads are party to 36 labor agreements, which are separately negotiated by the individual railroads.
8
SAFETY
We endeavor to conduct safe railroad operations for the benefit and protection of employees, customers and the communities served by our railroads. Our safety program involves all of our employees and is administered by each Regional Vice President. Operating personnel are trained and certified in train operations, hazardous materials handling, personal safety and all other areas subject to federal regulations. Each U.S. employee involved in train operations is subject to pre-employment and random drug testing as required by federal regulation. We believe that each of our North American railroads complies in all material respects with federal, state, provincial and local regulations. Additionally, each railroad is given flexibility to develop more stringent safety rules based on local requirements or practices. We also participate in committees of the AAR, governmental and industry-sponsored safety programs, including Operation Lifesaver (the national grade crossing awareness program) and numerous American Short Line and Regional Railroad Association Committees. Our Federal Railroad Administration (“FRA”) reportable injury frequency ratio, measured as reportable injuries per 200,000 man hours worked, was 1.9 in 2011 as compared to 2.1 in 2010. Our total FRA personal injuries decreased to 25 in the year ended December 31, 2011 from 28 in the year ended December 31, 2010.
ENVIRONMENTAL
Our rail operations are subject to various federal, state, provincial and local laws and regulations relating to pollution and the protection of the environment. In the United States, these environmental laws and regulations, which are implemented principally by the federal Environmental Protection Agency (the “U.S. EPA”) and comparable state agencies, govern such matters as the management of wastes, the discharge of pollutants into the air and into surface and underground waters, the manufacture and disposal of regulated substances and remediation of contaminated soil and groundwater. Similarly, in Canada, these functions are administered at the federal level by Environment Canada and the Ministry of Transport and comparable agencies at the provincial level.
We believe that our railroads operate in material compliance with current environmental laws and regulations. We estimate that any expenses incurred in maintaining compliance with current environmental laws and regulations will not have a material effect on our earnings or capital expenditures. However, there can be no assurance that new, or more stringent enforcement of existing, requirements or discovery of currently unknown conditions will not result in significant expenditures in the future.
There are no material environmental claims currently pending or, to our knowledge, threatened against any of our railroads.
INSURANCE
We maintain liability and property insurance coverage. Our primary liability policies have self-insured retentions of up to $2.0 million per occurrence applicable as to all of our railroads, except for Kiamichi Railroad Company L.L.C. and Otter Tail Valley Railroad Company, Inc. where the self-insured retention is $50,000 per occurrence. In addition, we maintain excess liability policies that provide supplemental coverage for losses in excess of our primary policy limits of up to $250 million per occurrence.
With respect to the transportation of hazardous commodities, our liability policies cover sudden releases of hazardous materials, including expenses related to evacuation, up to the same excess coverage limits and subject to the same self-insured retentions. Personal injuries associated with grade crossing accidents are also covered under liability policies.
Employees of our United States railroads are covered by the Federal Employers’ Liability Act (the “FELA”), a fault-based system under which claims resulting from injuries and deaths of railroad employees are settled by negotiation or litigation. FELA-related claims are covered under our liability insurance policies. Employees of our industrial switching business are covered under workers’ compensation policies.
Employees of our Canadian railroads are covered by the applicable provincial workers’ compensation policy, which is a no-fault compensation system outside of our liability insurance coverage.
Our property damage policies provide coverage for track, infrastructure, business interruption, and all locomotives and rail cars in our care, custody and control. This policy provides coverage up to $25.0 million per occurrence, subject to self-insurance retention of $1.5 million per occurrence.
9
REGULATION
United States. Our subsidiaries in the United States are subject to various safety and other laws and regulations administered by numerous government agencies, including (1) regulation by the U.S. Department of Transportation (the “USDOT”) and the Surface Transportation Board of the USDOT (the “STB”), successor to the Interstate Commerce Commission, through the FRA, (2) labor-related statutes including the Railway Labor Act, the Railroad Retirement Act, the Railroad Unemployment Insurance Act, and the FELA, and (3) some limited regulation by agencies in the states in which we do business.
The STB, established by the ICC Termination Act of 1995 (the “ICC Termination Act”), has jurisdiction over, among other matters, the construction, acquisition, or abandonment of rail lines, the consolidation or merger of railroads, the assumption of control of one railroad by another railroad, the use by one railroad of another railroad’s tracks through lease, joint use or trackage rights, the rates charged for regulated transportation services, and the service provided by rail carriers.
As a result of the Staggers Rail Act of 1980 (the “Staggers Rail Act”), the rail industry is entrusted with considerable rate and market flexibility including the ability to obtain wholesale exemptions from numerous provisions of the Interstate Commerce Act. The Staggers Rail Act allowed the deregulation of all containerized and truck trailer traffic handled by railroads. Requirements for the creation of new short line railroads or the expansion of existing short line railroads were substantially expedited and simplified under the exemption process. On regulated traffic, railroads and shippers are permitted to enter into contracts for rates and provision of transportation services without the need to file tariffs. Moreover, on regulated traffic, the Staggers Rail Act allows railroads considerable freedom to raise or lower rates without objection from captive shippers, although certain proposed shipper-backed legislative initiatives threaten to limit some of that pricing freedom. While the ICC Termination Act retained maximum rate regulation on traffic over which railroads have exclusive control, the new law relieved railroads from the requirements of filing tariffs and rate contracts with the STB on all traffic other than agricultural products.
The FRA regulates railroad safety and equipment standards, including track maintenance, handling of hazardous shipments, locomotive and rail car inspection and repair requirements, and operating practices and crew qualifications.
Canada. Our Canadian railroad subsidiaries are subject to regulation by various governmental departments and regulatory agencies at the federal or provincial level, depending on whether the railroad in question falls within federal or provincial jurisdiction. A Canadian railroad generally falls within the jurisdiction of federal regulation if the railroad crosses provincial or international borders, or if the Parliament of Canada has declared the railroad to be a federal work or undertaking and in selected other circumstances. Any company which proposes to construct or operate a railway in Canada that falls within federal jurisdiction is required to obtain a certificate of fitness under the Canada Transportation Act (the “CTA”). Under the CTA, the sale of a federally regulated railroad line is not subject to federal approval, although a process of advertising and negotiating may be required in connection with any proposed discontinuance of a federal railway. Federal railroads are governed by federal labor-relations laws.
Short line railroads located within the boundaries of a single province which do not otherwise fall within the federal jurisdiction are regulated by the laws of the province in question, including laws as to licensing and labor relations. Most of Canada’s ten provinces have enacted new legislation, which is more favorable to the operation of short line railroads than previous provincial laws. Many of the provinces require as a condition of licensing under the short line railroads acts that the licensees comply with federal regulations applicable to safety and other matters and remain subject to inspection by federal railway inspectors. Under some provincial legislation, the sale of a provincially regulated railroad line is not subject to provincial approval, although a process of advertising and negotiating may be required in connection with any proposed discontinuance of a provincial railway.
Acquisition of additional railroad operations in Canada, whether federally or provincially regulated, may be subject to review under the Investment Canada Act (the “ICA”), a federal statute which applies to the acquisition of a Canadian business or establishment of a new Canadian business by a non-Canadian. In the case of an acquisition that is subject to review, the non-Canadian investor must observe a statutory waiting period prior to completion and satisfy the minister responsible for the administration of the ICA that the investment will be of net benefit to Canada, giving regard to certain evaluative factors set out in the legislation.
Any contemplated acquisitions may also be subject to the provisions of the Competition Act (Canada) (the “CA”). The CA contains provisions relating to premerger notification as well as substantive merger provisions. An acquisition that exceeds certain financial thresholds set out in the CA may be subject to notification and observance of a statutory waiting period prior to completion, during which time the Commissioner of Competition (the “Commissioner”) will evaluate the impact of the acquisition upon competition. In addition, the Commissioner has the jurisdiction under the CA to review an acquisition that is a “merger” within the meaning of the CA in certain circumstances, even where notification is not filed.
10
RAILROAD RETIREMENT
Railroad industry personnel are covered by the Railroad Retirement System instead of Social Security. Our contributions under the Railroad Retirement System have been approximately triple those of employees in industries covered by Social Security. The Railroad Retirement System, funded primarily by payroll taxes on covered employers and employees, includes a benefit roughly equivalent to Social Security (Tier I), an additional benefit similar to that allowed in some private defined-benefit plans (Tier II), and other benefits. For 2011, the Railroad Retirement System required up to a 19.75% contribution by railroad employers on eligible wages, while the Social Security and Medicare Acts only required a 7.65% contribution on similar wage bases.
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS |
Risks Related to Our Business
Volatile macroeconomic and business conditions have and could continue to impact our business negatively.
The global financial markets recently have undergone and may continue to experience significant volatility and disruption. The depth and sustainability of the current economic recovery is uncertain and additional macroeconomic, business and financial disruptions could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity. Certain of our customers and suppliers have been directly affected by the economic downturn and continue to face credit issues and could experience cash flow problems that have and could continue to give rise to payment delays, increased credit risk, bankruptcies and other financial hardships that could decrease the demand for our rail services. Adverse economic conditions could also affect our costs for insurance and our ability to acquire and maintain adequate insurance coverage for risks associated with the railroad business if insurance companies experience credit downgrades or bankruptcies.
Given the asset intensive nature of our business, a renewed economic downturn increases the risk of significant asset impairment charges since we are required to assess for potential impairment of non-current assets whenever events or changes in circumstances, including economic circumstances, indicate that the respective asset’s carrying amount may not be recoverable. This could limit our ability to sell our assets to the extent we need, or find it desirable, to do so. In addition, our railroads compete directly with other modes of transportation, including motor carriers, and ship, barge and pipeline operators. If these alternative methods of transportation become more cost-effective to our customers due to macroeconomic changes, or if legislation is passed providing materially greater opportunity for motor carriers with respect to size or weight restrictions, our operating results, financial condition and liquidity could be materially adversely affected.
Rising fuel costs could materially adversely affect our business.
Fuel costs were approximately 10%, 9% and 8% of our total operating revenue for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Fuel prices and supplies are influenced significantly by international, political and economic circumstances. If fuel supply shortages or unusual price volatility were to arise for any reason, the resulting higher fuel prices would significantly increase our operating costs.
As part of our railroad operations, we frequently transport hazardous materials, the accidental release of which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results.
We are required to transport hazardous materials to the extent of our common carrier obligation. An accidental release of hazardous materials could result in significant loss of life and extensive property damage. The costs associated with an accidental release could have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or liquidity.
Some of our employees belong to labor unions and strikes or work stoppages could materially adversely affect our operations.
Many of our employees are union-represented. Our union employees work under collective bargaining agreements with various labor organizations. Our inability to negotiate acceptable contracts with these labor organizations could result in, among other things, strikes, work stoppages or other slowdowns by the affected workers. If our union-represented employees were to engage in a strike, work stoppage or other slowdown, or other employees were to become unionized or the terms and conditions in labor agreements were renegotiated, we could experience significant disruption of our operations and higher ongoing labor costs.
11
Because we depend on Class I railroads and certain important customers for our operations, our business and financial results may be materially adversely affected if our relationships with Class I railroads and certain important customers deteriorate.
The railroad industry in the United States and Canada is dominated by a small number of Class I railroads that have substantial market control and negotiating leverage. Approximately 89% of our total carload volume in 2011 was derived from Class I traffic. Our ability to provide rail service to our customers depends in large part upon our ability to maintain cooperative relationships with Class I railroads with respect to, among other matters, freight rates, car supply, switching, interchange, fuel surcharges and trackage rights (an arrangement where the company that owns the line retains all rights, but allows another company to operate over certain sections of its track). In addition, loss of customers or service interruptions or delays by our Class I interchange partners relating to customers who ship over our track may decrease our revenue. Class I railroads are also sources of potential acquisition candidates as they continue to divest branch lines. Failure to maintain good relationships may materially adversely affect our ability to negotiate acquisitions of branch lines.
Although our operations served approximately 1,500 customers in 2011, freight revenue from our 10 largest freight revenue customers accounted for approximately 18% of our total freight revenues in 2011. Substantial reduction in business with or loss of important customers could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
If the track maintenance tax credit is not renewed by Congress past December 31, 2011, we will not be able to earn or assign credits for track maintenance, after such date.
We were eligible to receive tax credits for certain track maintenance expenditures under Section 45G of the Internal Revenue Code, as amended (the “Code”), through December 31, 2011. Pursuant to Section 45G, these credits are assignable under limited circumstances. In 2011, 2010 and 2009, we received approximately $22.6, $22.3 and $22.4 million from the assignment of these credits, respectively. Section 45G expired on December 31, 2011, and unless Section 45G is renewed, we will no longer be able to earn or assign credits for track maintenance expenditures. There can be no assurance that legislation renewing the availability of the Section 45G tax credit will be enacted.
We are subject to the risks of doing business in Canada, including changes in Canadian economic conditions, exchange rate fluctuations and other economic uncertainties.
We currently have railroad operations in Canada. The risks of doing business in Canada include:
• | adverse changes in the economy of Canada; |
• | exchange rate fluctuations; and |
• | economic uncertainties including, among others, risk of renegotiation or modification of existing agreements or arrangements with governmental authorities, exportation and transportation tariffs, foreign exchange restrictions and changes in taxation structure. |
Unfavorable developments related to these risks could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial results.
We are subject to environmental and other governmental regulation of our railroad operations, which could impose significant costs.
The failure to comply with environmental and other governmental regulations could have a material adverse effect on us. Our railroad and real estate ownership is subject to foreign, federal, state and local environmental laws and regulations. We could incur significant costs, fines and penalties as a result of any allegations, even if such allegations are unsubstantiated, or findings to the effect that we have violated or are strictly liable under these laws or regulations. We may be required to incur significant expenses to investigate and remediate environmental contamination.
We are also subject to governmental regulation by a significant number of foreign, federal, state and local regulatory authorities with respect to our railroad operations and a variety of health, safety, labor, maintenance and other matters. Our failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations could have a material adverse effect on us.
12
Additionally, future changes in foreign, federal, state and local laws and regulations governing railroad rates, operations and practices and the ability to grant non-freight occupancies and derive real estate revenues on governmental grants of rail corridors could likewise have a material adverse effect on us.
Severe weather and natural disasters could disrupt normal business operations, which could result in increased costs and liabilities and decreases in revenues.
Severe weather conditions and other natural phenomena, including earthquakes, hurricanes, tornadoes, fires and floods, may cause significant business interruptions and result in increased costs, increased liabilities and decreased revenue.
We face possible catastrophic loss and liability and our insurance may not be sufficient to cover our damages or damages to others.
The operation of any railroad carries with it an inherent risk of catastrophe, mechanical failure, collision, and property loss. In the course of our operations, spills or other environmental mishaps, cargo loss or damage, business interruption due to political developments, as well as labor disputes, strikes and adverse weather conditions, could result in a loss of revenues or increased liabilities and costs. Collisions, cargo leaks or explosions, environmental mishaps, or other accidents can cause serious bodily injury, death, and extensive property damage, particularly when such accidents occur in heavily populated areas. Additionally, our operations may be affected from time to time by natural disasters, such as earthquakes, volcanoes, floods, hurricanes or other storms. The occurrence of a major natural disaster could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial condition. We maintain insurance that is consistent with industry practice against the accident-related risks involved in the conduct of our business and business interruption due to natural disaster. However, this insurance is subject to a number of limitations on coverage, depending on the nature of the risk insured against. This insurance may not be sufficient to cover our damages or damages to others and this insurance may not continue to be available at commercially reasonable rates. In addition, we are subject to the risk that one or more of our insurers may become insolvent and would be unable to pay a claim that may be made in the future. Even with insurance, if any catastrophic interruption of service occurs, we may not be able to restore service without a significant interruption to operations which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition.
We may face liability for casualty losses which are not covered by insurance.
We have obtained insurance coverage for losses sustained by our railroads arising from personal injury and for property damage in the event of derailments or other incidents. Personal injury claims made by our railroad employees are subject to the FELA rather than state workers’ compensation laws. Currently, we are responsible for the first $2.0 million of expenditures per each incident under our general liability insurance policy and $1.5 million of expenditures per each incident under our property insurance policy. Severe accidents or personal injuries could cause our liability to exceed our insurance limits which might have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition. Our annual insurance limits are $250 million and $25 million on liability and property, respectively. In addition, adverse events directly and indirectly attributable to us, including such things as derailments, accidents, discharge of toxic or hazardous materials, or other like occurrences in the industry, can be expected to result in increases in our insurance premiums and/or our self-insured retentions and could result in limitations to the coverage under our existing policies.
We depend on our management and key personnel, and we may not be able to operate or grow our business effectively if we lose the services of our management or key personnel or are unable to attract qualified personnel in the future.
The success of our business is heavily dependent on the continued services and performance of our current management and other key personnel and our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel in the future. The loss of key personnel could affect our ability to run our business effectively. Competition for qualified personnel is intense, and we cannot assure you that we will be successful in attracting and retaining such personnel. Although we have entered into employment agreements with certain of our key personnel, these agreements do not ensure that our key personnel will continue in their present capacity with us for any particular period of time. The loss of any key personnel requires the remaining key personnel to divert immediate and substantial attention to seeking a replacement. An inability to find a suitable replacement for any departing executive officer on a timely basis could materially adversely affect our ability to operate or grow our business.
13
Future acts of terrorism or war, as well as the threat of acts of terrorism or war, may cause significant disruptions in our business operations.
Terrorist attacks, such as those that occurred on September 11, 2001, as well as the more recent attacks on the transportation systems in Madrid, London and Moscow, any government response to those types of attacks and war or risk of war may materially adversely affect our results of operations, financial condition or liquidity. Our rail lines and facilities could be direct targets or indirect casualties of an act or acts of terror. Such acts could cause significant business interruption and result in increased costs and liabilities and decreased revenues, which could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition. Such effects could be magnified where releases of hazardous materials are involved. Any act of terror, retaliatory strike, sustained military campaign or war or risk of war may have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition by causing or resulting in unpredictable operating or financial conditions, including disruptions of rail lines, volatility or sustained increase of fuel prices, fuel shortages, general economic decline and instability or weakness of financial markets which could restrict our ability to raise capital. In addition, insurance premiums charged for some or all of our coverage could increase dramatically, or certain coverage may not be available to us in the future.
The availability of qualified personnel and an aging workforce may materially adversely affect our operations.
Changes in demographics, training requirements and the availability of qualified personnel, particularly train crew members, could negatively affect our service levels. Unpredictable increases in demand for rail services may exacerbate these risks and may have a material adverse effect on our operating results, financial condition or liquidity.
We have a substantial amount of indebtedness, which may materially adversely affect our cash flow and our ability to operate our business, including our ability to incur additional indebtedness.
As of December 31, 2011, our total indebtedness was approximately $575.7 million, which represented approximately 45.8% of our total capitalization. Our substantial amount of indebtedness increases the possibility that we may be unable to generate sufficient cash to pay, when due, the principal of, interest on or other amounts due with respect to our indebtedness.
Our substantial indebtedness could have important consequences for you, including:
• | increasing our vulnerability to adverse economic, industry or competitive developments; |
• | requiring a substantial portion of cash flow from operations to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on our indebtedness, therefore reducing our ability to use our cash flow to fund our operations, capital expenditures and future business opportunities; |
• | restricting us from making strategic acquisitions or causing us to make non-strategic divestitures; |
• | limiting our ability to obtain additional financing for working capital, capital expenditures, product development, debt service requirements, acquisitions and general corporate or other purposes; and |
• | limiting our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business or the industry in which we operate, placing us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors who are less highly leveraged and who, therefore, may be able to take advantage of opportunities that our leverage prevents us from exploiting. |
The revolving credit facility and the indenture governing our senior secured notes contains a number of restrictions and covenants that, among other things, limit our ability to incur additional indebtedness, make investments, pay dividends or make distributions to our stockholders, grant liens on our assets, sell assets, enter into new or different lines of business, enter into transactions with our affiliates, merge or consolidate with other entities or transfer all or substantially all of our assets, and enter into sale and leaseback transactions. Credit market conditions could negatively impact our ability to obtain future financing or to refinance our outstanding indebtedness.
Our ability to comply with these restrictions and covenants in the future is uncertain and will be affected by the levels of cash flow from our operations and events or circumstances beyond our control. Our failure to comply with any of the restrictions and covenants under the indenture governing our senior secured notes could result in a default under the indenture, which could cause all of our existing indebtedness to be immediately due and payable. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not be able to repay our indebtedness or borrow sufficient funds to refinance it. In addition, in the event of an acceleration, holders of our senior secured notes could proceed against the collateral securing the notes, which includes nearly all of our assets. Even if we are able to obtain new financing, it may not be on commercially reasonable terms or on terms that are acceptable to us. If our indebtedness is in default for any reason, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In addition, complying
14
with these restrictions and covenants may also cause us to take actions that are not favorable to our stockholders and may make it more difficult for us to successfully execute our business plan and compete against companies that are not subject to such restrictions and covenants.
Our inability to acquire businesses or integrate acquired businesses successfully or to realize the anticipated cost savings and other benefits of acquisitions could have materially adverse consequences to our business.
We expect to grow through acquisitions. Evaluating acquisition targets gives rise to additional costs related to legal, financial, operating and industry due diligence. Acquisitions generally result in increased operating and administrative costs and, to the extent financed with debt, additional interest costs. We may not be able to manage or integrate the acquired companies or businesses successfully. The process of acquiring and integrating businesses may be disruptive to our business and may cause an interruption or reduction of our business as a result of the following factors, among others:
• | loss of key employees or customers; |
• | possible inconsistencies in or conflicts between standards, controls, procedures and policies among the combined companies and the need to implement company-wide financial, accounting, information technology and other systems; |
• | failure to maintain the quality of services that have historically been provided; |
• | integrating employees of rail lines acquired from other entities into our regional railroad culture; |
• | failure to coordinate geographically diverse organizations; and |
• | the diversion of management’s attention from our day-to-day business as a result of the need to manage any disruptions and difficulties and the need to add management resources to do so. |
These disruptions and difficulties, if they occur, may cause us to fail to realize the cost savings, revenue enhancements and other benefits that we expect to result from integrating acquired companies and may cause material adverse short- and long-term effects on our operating results, financial condition and liquidity.
Even if we are able to integrate the operations of acquired businesses into our operations, we may not realize the full benefits of the cost savings, revenue enhancements or other benefits that we may have expected at the time of acquisition. The expected revenue enhancements and cost savings are based on analyses completed by members of our management. These analyses necessarily involve assumptions as to future events, including general business and industry conditions, the longevity of specific customer plants and factories served, operating costs and competitive factors, most of which are beyond our control and may not materialize. While we believe these analyses and their underlying assumptions to be reasonable, they are estimates that are necessarily speculative in nature. In addition, even if we achieve the expected benefits, we may not be able to achieve them within the anticipated time frame. Also, the cost savings and other synergies from these acquisitions may be offset by costs incurred in integrating the businesses, increases in other expenses or problems in the business unrelated to these acquisitions.
An impairment in the carrying value of goodwill could negatively impact our consolidated results of operations and net worth.
Goodwill is recorded at fair value, at the time of an acquisition and is not amortized, but is reviewed for impairment at least annually or more frequently if impairment indicators arise. In evaluating the potential for impairment of goodwill, we make assumptions regarding future operating performance, business trends, and market and economic conditions. Such analyses further require us to make judgmental assumptions about sales, operating margins, growth rates, and discount rates. There are inherent uncertainties related to these factors and to management’s judgment in applying these factors to the assessment of goodwill recoverability. We could be required to evaluate the recoverability of goodwill prior to the annual assessment if we experience disruptions to the business, unexpected significant declines in operating results, divestiture of a significant component of our business or sustained market capitalization declines. While not determined to have goodwill impairment during 2011, certain of our reporting units have limited numbers of customers and therefore are at risk of impairment in future periods. We will continue to monitor the operations and customers at these reporting units and will evaluate for potential goodwill impairment if impairment indicators arise. If no impairment indicators arise, we will evaluate these reporting units during our annual assessment.
15
A sustained decline in our market capitalization relative to our book value may result in, or be indicative of, a goodwill impairment charge in the future. We utilize market capitalization in corroborating our assessment of the fair value of our reporting units.
Impairment charges could substantially affect our reported earnings in the periods of such charges. In addition, impairment charges could negatively impact our financial ratios and could limit our ability to obtain financing in the future. As of December 31, 2011, we had $211.8 million of goodwill, which represented approximately 13.3% of total assets.
Future compensation expense may materially adversely affect our net income.
The compensation that we pay to attract and retain our employees and key personnel reduces our net income. The compensation paid to our employees for 2011 is not necessarily indicative of how we will compensate our employees in the future. Any increase in compensation will further reduce our net income. For example, we have adopted an equity incentive plan that permits the issuance of share options, share appreciation rights, restricted shares, deferred shares, performance shares, unrestricted shares and other share-based awards to our employees. We may grant restricted shares and other share-based awards to our employees in the future as a recruiting and retention tool based on specific criteria determined by our board of directors (or the compensation committee of the board of directors).
The table below compares our net income to our total executive compensation costs (each in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
|||||||
Net Income |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 19,117 | ||||
Executive Compensation Cost(1) |
$ | 6,572 | $ | 6,003 |
(1) | Executive Compensation Cost is computed in the manner computed for purposes of the Summary Compensation Table for 2011 to be included in our 2012 proxy statement. |
Adverse determinations of the Railroad Retirement Board may increase our employment costs.
The Railroad Retirement Board (the “Board”) makes determinations as to whether railroad affiliated employers and their employees are covered by the Railroad Retirement System. Adverse determinations by the Board could expose our administrative service and Atlas Railroad Construction employees to Railroad Retirement System coverage and increase our employment costs.
Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure
If the ownership of our common stock continues to be highly concentrated, it may prevent minority stockholders from influencing significant corporate decisions and may result in conflicts of interest.
As of December 31, 2011, an entity wholly owned by certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress (the “Initial Fortress Stockholder”), owns approximately 59.9% of our outstanding common stock. The Initial Fortress Stockholder owns shares sufficient for the majority vote over all matters requiring a stockholder vote, including: the election of directors; mergers, consolidations or acquisitions; the sale of all or substantially all of our assets and other decisions affecting our capital structure; the amendment of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws; and our winding up and dissolution. This concentration of ownership may delay, deter or prevent acts that would be favored by our other stockholders. The interests of the Initial Fortress Stockholder may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of our other stockholders. This concentration of ownership may also have the effect of delaying, preventing or deterring a change in control of RailAmerica. Also, the Initial Fortress Stockholder may seek to cause us to take courses of action that, in its judgment, could enhance its investment in us, but which might involve risks to our other stockholders or materially adversely affect us or our other stockholders. As a result, the market price of our common stock could decline or stockholders might not receive a premium over the then-current market price of our common stock upon a change in control. In addition, this concentration of share ownership may materially adversely affect the trading price of our common stock because investors may perceive disadvantages in owning shares in a company with significant stockholders.
16
We are a holding company with no operations and rely on our operating subsidiaries to provide us with funds necessary to meet our financial obligations and to pay dividends.
We are a holding company with no material direct operations. Our principal assets are the equity interests we directly or indirectly hold in our operating subsidiaries, which own our operating assets. As a result, we are dependent on loans, dividends and other payments from our subsidiaries to generate the funds necessary to meet our financial obligations and to pay dividends on our common stock. Our subsidiaries are legally distinct from us and may be prohibited or restricted from paying dividends or otherwise making funds available to us under certain conditions. If we are unable to obtain funds from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to, or our board may exercise its discretion not to, pay dividends.
We do not anticipate paying any dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
We do not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, as we intend to use cash flow generated by operations to grow our business. Our revolving credit facility and our senior secured notes indenture restrict our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock, and we may also enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that restrict or limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.
Certain provisions of our stockholders agreement, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws could hinder, delay or prevent a change in control of RailAmerica, which could materially adversely affect the price of our common stock.
Certain provisions of our stockholders agreement, our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could make it more difficult for a third party to acquire us without the consent of our board of directors or the Initial Fortress Stockholder. These include:
• | provisions providing for a classified board of directors with staggered three-year terms; |
• | provisions providing for the removal of directors only for cause and only with the affirmative vote of at least 80% of the voting interest of stockholders entitled to vote (provided, however, that for so long as the Fortress Stockholders (as defined below) own at least 40% of our issued and outstanding common stock, directors may be removed with or without cause with the affirmative vote of a majority of the voting interest of stockholders entitled to vote); |
• | provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws preventing stockholders from calling special meetings of our stockholders (provided, however, that for so long as the Fortress Stockholders beneficially own at least 25% of our issued and outstanding common stock, any stockholders that collectively beneficially own at least 25% of our issued and outstanding common stock may call special meetings of our stockholders); |
• | provisions providing advance notice requirements by stockholders with respect to director nominations and actions to be taken at annual meetings; |
• | provisions in our stockholders agreement providing certain rights to the Fortress Stockholders with respect to the designation of directors for nomination and election to our board of directors, including the ability to appoint a majority of the members of our board of directors for so long as the Fortress Stockholders continue to hold at least 40% of the outstanding shares of our common stock; |
• | no provision in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation for cumulative voting in the election of directors, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding shares of our common stock can elect all the directors standing for election; |
• | provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws that only permit action by our stockholders outside a meeting by unanimous written consent, provided, however, that for so long as the Fortress Stockholders beneficially own at least 25% of our issued and outstanding common stock, our stockholders may act without a meeting by written consent of a majority of our stockholders; and |
• | provisions providing our board of directors the authority to cause the issuance of preferred stock from time to time in one or more series and to establish the terms, preferences and rights of any such series of preferred stock, all without approval of our stockholders. Nothing in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation precludes future issuances without stockholder approval of the authorized but unissued shares of our common stock. |
17
In addition, these provisions may make it difficult and expensive for a third party to pursue a tender offer, change in control or takeover attempt that is opposed by the Initial Fortress Stockholder, our management and/or our board of directors. Public stockholders who might desire to participate in these types of transactions may not have an opportunity to do so, even if the transaction is favorable to stockholders. These anti-takeover provisions could substantially impede the ability of public stockholders to benefit from a change in control or change our management and board of directors and, as a result, may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock and your ability to realize any potential change of control premium.
Certain of our stockholders have the right to engage or invest in the same or similar businesses as we do.
The Initial Fortress Stockholder and certain other affiliates of Fortress and permitted transferees, (collectively, the “Fortress Stockholders”) have other investments and business activities in addition to their ownership of us. Under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, the Fortress Stockholders have the right, and have no duty to abstain from exercising such right, to engage or invest in the same or similar businesses as we do, do business with any of our clients, customers or vendors or employ or otherwise engage any of our officers, directors or employees. If the Fortress Stockholders or any of their officers, directors or employees acquire knowledge of a potential transaction that could be a corporate opportunity, they have no duty, to the fullest extent permitted by law, to offer such corporate opportunity to us, our stockholders or our affiliates.
In the event that any of our directors or officers who is also a director, officer or employee of any of the Fortress Stockholders acquires knowledge of a corporate opportunity or is offered a corporate opportunity, provided that this knowledge was not acquired solely in such person’s capacity as a director or officer of RailAmerica and such person acts in good faith, then to the fullest extent permitted by law such person is deemed to have fully satisfied such person’s fiduciary duties owed to us and is not liable to us, if the Fortress Stockholder pursues or acquires the corporate opportunity or if the Fortress Stockholder does not present the corporate opportunity to us.
Risks Related to our Common Stock
The market price and trading volume of our common stock may be volatile, which could result in rapid and substantial losses for our stockholders.
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile and could be subject to wide fluctuations. In addition, the trading volume in our common stock may fluctuate and cause significant price variations to occur. If the market price of our common stock declines significantly, you may be unable to resell your shares at or above your purchase price, if at all. We cannot assure you that the market price of our common stock will not fluctuate or decline significantly in the future. Some of the factors that could negatively affect our share price or result in fluctuations in the price or trading volume of our common stock include:
• | variations in our quarterly or annual operating results; |
• | changes in our earnings estimates (if provided) or differences between our actual financial and operating results and those expected by investors and analysts; |
• | the contents of published research reports about us or our industry or the failure of securities analysts to cover our common stock; |
• | litigation and governmental investigations; |
• | changes in market valuations of similar companies; |
• | speculation or reports by the press or investment community with respect to us or our industry; |
• | increases in market interest rates that may lead purchasers of our shares to seek higher returns; |
18
• | announcements by us or our competitors of significant contracts, acquisitions, dispositions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments; |
• | changes or proposed changes in laws or regulations affecting the railroad industry or enforcement of these laws and regulations, or announcements relating to these matters; and |
• | general market, political and economic conditions, including any such conditions and local conditions in the markets in which our customers are located. |
These broad market and industry factors may decrease the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. The stock market in general has from time to time experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations. In addition, in the past, following periods of volatility in the overall market and the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been instituted against these companies. This litigation, if instituted against us, could result in substantial costs and a diversion of our management’s attention and resources.
Future offerings of debt or equity securities by us may materially adversely affect the market price of our common stock.
In the future, we may attempt to obtain financing or to further increase our capital resources by issuing additional shares of our common stock or offering debt or additional equity securities, including commercial paper, medium-term notes, senior or subordinated notes or shares of preferred stock. Issuing additional shares of our common stock or other additional equity offerings may dilute the economic and voting rights of our existing stockholders or reduce the market price of our common stock, or both. Upon liquidation, holders of such debt securities and preferred shares, if issued, and lenders with respect to other borrowings, would receive a distribution of our available assets prior to the holders of our common stock. Preferred shares, if issued, could have a preference with respect to liquidating distributions or a preference with respect to dividend payments that could limit our ability to pay dividends to the holders of our common stock. Because our decision to issue securities in any future offering will depend on market conditions and other factors beyond our control, we cannot predict or estimate the amount, timing or nature of our future offerings. Thus, holders of our common stock bear the risk of our future offerings reducing the market price of our common stock and diluting their share holdings in us.
The market price of our common stock could be negatively affected by sales of substantial amounts of our common stock in the public markets.
As of December 31, 2011, there were 50,605,440 shares of common stock outstanding. All issued and outstanding shares of our common stock are freely transferable, except for any shares held by our “affiliates,” as that term is defined in Rule 144 under the Securities Act. Approximately 59.9% of our outstanding common stock is held by the Initial Fortress Stockholder and can be resold into the public markets in the future in accordance with the requirements of Rule 144.
Pursuant to our stockholders agreement, the Initial Fortress Stockholder and certain of its affiliates and permitted third-party transferees have the right to require us, in certain instances, at our expense, to file registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, covering public resales of their approximately 30,350,000 shares of our common stock. Upon the effectiveness of such a registration statement, all shares covered by the registration statement will be freely transferable and the resulting resale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock into the market could cause the market price of our common stock to decline.
The future issuance of additional common stock in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions or otherwise will dilute all other shareholdings.
As of December 31, 2011, we had an aggregate of 349,394,560 shares of common stock authorized but unissued with approximately 3.7 million shares reserved for issuance under our incentive plans. We may issue all of these shares of common stock without any action or approval by our stockholders, subject to certain exceptions. We also intend to continue to evaluate acquisition opportunities and may issue common stock in connection with these acquisitions. Any common stock issued in connection with our incentive plans, acquisitions, the exercise of outstanding stock options or otherwise would dilute the percentage ownership held by holders of our common stock.
19
We cannot assure you that our stock repurchase program will enhance long-term stockholder value and stock repurchases, if any, could increase the volatility of the price of our common stock and will diminish our cash reserves.
On August 30, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase program. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased, if any, will depend on a variety of factors including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, trading volume and general market conditions. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. Repurchases pursuant to our stock repurchase program could affect our stock price and increase its volatility. The existence of a stock repurchase program could also cause our stock price to be higher than it would be in the absence of such a program and could potentially reduce the market liquidity for our stock. Additionally, repurchases under our stock repurchase program will diminish our cash reserves, which could impact our ability to pursue possible future strategic opportunities and acquisitions and could result in lower overall returns on our cash balances. There can be no assurance that any stock repurchases will enhance stockholder value because the market price of our common stock may decline below the levels at which we repurchased shares of stock. Although our stock repurchase program is intended to enhance long-term stockholder value, short-term stock price fluctuations could reduce the program’s effectiveness. We had $4.6 million remaining for the repurchase of outstanding shares of common stock under this program as of December 31, 2011.
Risks Related to Taxation
Our ability to use net operating loss and tax credit carryovers and certain built-in losses to reduce future tax payments is limited by provisions of the Internal Revenue Code.
Section 382 and 383 of the Code contain rules that limit the ability of a company that undergoes an ownership change, which is generally any change in ownership of more than 50% of its stock over a three-year period, to utilize its net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certain built-in losses recognized in years after the ownership change. These rules generally operate by focusing on ownership changes involving stockholders owning directly or indirectly 5% or more of the stock of a company and any change in ownership arising from a new issuance of stock by the company. Generally, if an ownership change occurs, the yearly taxable income limitation on the use of net operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and certain built-in losses is equal to the product of the applicable long-term tax exempt rate and the value of the company’s stock immediately before the ownership change. As a result of transactions that have taken place in the past with respect to our common stock, our use of our $48 million of federal net operating losses, our $95 million of tax credits and certain built-in losses is subject to annual taxable income limitations. As a result, we may be unable to offset our taxable income with losses, or our tax liability with credits, before such losses and credits expire and therefore would incur larger federal income tax liability.
In addition, it is possible that future transactions (including issuances of new shares of our common stock and sales of shares of our common stock) will cause us to undergo one or more additional ownership changes. In that event, we generally would not be able to use our pre-change loss or credit carryovers or certain built-in losses prior to such ownership change to offset future taxable income in excess of the annual limitations imposed by Sections 382 and 383 of the Code, and those attributes already subject to limitations (as a result of our prior ownership changes) may be subject to more stringent limitations.
Gain recognized by Non-U.S. Holders on the sale or other disposition of our common stock may be subject to U.S. federal income tax.
We expect to be treated as a “United States real property holding corporation” under section 897(c) of the Code (“USRPHC”). Generally, stock issued by a corporation that has been a USRPHC at any time during the preceding five years (or a Non-U.S. Holder’s holding period for such securities, if shorter) is treated as a United States real property interest (“USRPI”), and gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Holder on the sale or other disposition of stock is subject to regular U.S. federal income tax, as if such gain were effectively connected with the conduct by such holder of a U.S. trade or business. Shares of our common stock will not be treated as USRPIs in the hands of a Non-U.S. Holder provided that: (i) our common stock is regularly traded on an established securities market, and (ii) such Non-U.S. Holder has not owned or been deemed to own (directly or under certain constructive ownership rules) more than 5% of our common stock at any time during the five-year period ending on the date of the sale or other taxable disposition. No assurance can be given that our common stock will continue to be regularly traded on an established securities market in the future. If gain recognized by a Non-U.S. Holder from the sale or other disposition of our common stock is subject to regular federal income tax under these rules and our common stock is not regularly traded on an established securities market at such time, the transferee of such common stock may be required to deduct and withhold a tax equal to 10% of the amount realized on the sale or other disposition, unless certain exceptions apply. Any tax withheld may be credited against the U.S. federal income tax owed by the Non-U.S. Holder for the year in which the sale or other disposition occurs.
20
ITEM 1B. | UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS |
None.
We operate a portfolio of 43 individual railroads with approximately 7,400 miles of track in 27 U.S. states and three Canadian provinces. Of our approximately 7,400 total track-miles, we own approximately 4,400 track-miles and lease approximately 3,000 track-miles.
21
The following table provides a brief description of each of the railroads that we owned or leased as of February 23, 2012. Track miles under operating agreements are excluded:
Name |
No. of Railroads |
Track- Miles |
Major Commodities Hauled | |||||||
Central Region: |
||||||||||
Missouri & Northern Arkansas Railroad |
1 | 594 | Coal, Agricultural Products | |||||||
Consolidated Dallas Railroads |
2 | 337 | Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Kyle Railroad Company |
1 | 625 | Agricultural Products | |||||||
Kiamichi Railroad |
1 | 261 | Coal, Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Point Comfort & Northern Railway |
1 | 19 | Metallic Ores and Metals | |||||||
Otter Tail Valley Railroad |
1 | 80 | Agricultural Products, Coal | |||||||
Rockdale, Sandow & Southern Railroad |
1 | 8 | Waste and Scrap Materials, Metallic Ores and Metals | |||||||
Bauxite & Northern Railway |
1 | 6 | Metallic & Non-Metallic Ores | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total — Central Region |
9 | 1,930 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Northeast Region: |
||||||||||
New England Central Railroad |
1 | 396 | Forest Products, Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Ottawa Valley Railway |
1 | 179 | Pulp, Paper and Allied Products | |||||||
Cape Breton & Central Nova Scotia Railway |
1 | 295 | Pulp, Paper and Allied Products, Coal | |||||||
Goderich-Exeter Railway |
1 | 181 | Chemicals, Agricultural Products | |||||||
Southern Ontario Railway |
1 | 46 | Petroleum, Chemicals | |||||||
Connecticut Southern Railroad |
1 | 42 | Waste and Scrap Materials, Other | |||||||
Massena Terminal Railroad |
1 | 4 | Metallic Ores and Metals | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total — Northeast Region |
7 | 1,143 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Midwest Region: |
||||||||||
Indiana & Ohio Railway |
1 | 570 | Agricultural Products, Motor Vehicles | |||||||
Chicago, Ft. Wayne & Eastern Railroad |
1 | 311 | Agricultural Products, Chemicals | |||||||
Huron and Eastern Railway |
1 | 384 | Agricultural Products, Chemicals | |||||||
Toledo, Peoria & Western Railway |
1 | 247 | Agricultural Products, Chemicals | |||||||
Consolidated Michigan Railroads |
3 | 184 | Agricultural Products, Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Central Railroad Company of Indiana |
1 | 96 | Motor Vehicles, Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Central Railroad Company of Indianapolis |
1 | 64 | Agricultural Products | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total — Midwest Region |
9 | 1,856 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Southeast Region: |
||||||||||
Alabama & Gulf Coast Railway |
1 | 348 | Pulp, Paper and Allied Products | |||||||
Consolidated Virginia Railroads |
2 | 140 | Metallic Ores and Metals, Waste and Scrap Materials | |||||||
South Carolina Central Railroad |
2 | 129 | Waste and Scrap Materials, Metallic Ores and Metals | |||||||
Indiana Southern Railroad |
1 | 196 | Coal | |||||||
Three Notch Railroad |
1 | 37 | Chemicals, Agricultural Products | |||||||
Eastern Alabama Railway |
1 | 31 | Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Wiregrass Central Railroad |
1 | 20 | Agricultural Products, Food or Kindred Products | |||||||
Conecuh Valley Railroad |
1 | 13 | Agricultural Products, Chemicals | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total — Southeast Region |
10 | 914 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Western Region: |
||||||||||
Central Oregon & Pacific Railroad |
1 | 394 | Forest Products | |||||||
San Joaquin Valley Railroad |
1 | 382 | Food or Kindred Products, Petroleum | |||||||
California Northern Railroad |
1 | 261 | Food or Kindred Products | |||||||
Arizona & California Railroad |
1 | 203 | Petroleum, Non-Metallic Minerals and Products | |||||||
Puget Sound & Pacific Railroad |
1 | 108 | Waste and Scrap Materials, Agricultural Products | |||||||
San Diego and Imperial Valley Railroad (1) |
1 | — | Petroleum | |||||||
Cascade & Columbia River Railroad |
1 | 148 | Non-Metallic Minerals and Products, Forest Products | |||||||
Ventura County Railroad |
1 | 17 | Motor Vehicles | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total — Western Region |
8 | 1,513 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total Company |
43 | 7,356 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
(1) | No track miles shown as this railroad operates exclusively under an operating agreement. |
22
Track and Equipment
Track
Of our 7,356 total track-miles, we own 4,401 track-miles and lease 2,955 track-miles. In most cases, leases involve little to no annual lease payment (but may have involved a one-time, upfront payment) and have long-term or perpetual durations. In addition, we operate approximately 895 track-miles under trackage rights and operating agreements. Generally, trackage rights are rights granted by other railroads to transport freight over their tracks (but not directly serve customers on their rail lines) while operating agreements grant us the right to operate (and typically serve customers) on track owned by third parties. Generally, trackage rights and operating agreements do not convey any other rights (such as real estate rights) to us.
Locomotives and Railcars
Our locomotive fleet at December 31, 2011 totaled 405 units (comprised of 247 owned units and 158 leased units) and 8,297 railcars comprised of 567 owned railcars and 7,730 leased railcars. The average age of our locomotives and railcars is 40 and 41 years, respectively, across our entire portfolio of railroads.
A summary of the rolling stock owned and leased by us is presented in the table below:
Railcars | Locomotives | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Owned | Leased | Total | Owned | Leased | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Covered hopper cars |
78 | 3,256 | 3,334 | Horsepower/unit: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Open top hopper cars |
238 | 30 | 268 | Over 3,000 | 119 | 66 | 185 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Box cars |
35 | 3,137 | 3,172 | 2,000 to 2,999 | 88 | 62 | 150 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Flat cars |
194 | 800 | 994 | Under 2,000 | 40 | 30 | 70 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tank cars |
6 | — | 6 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gondolas |
5 | 507 | 512 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other/passenger cars |
11 | — | 11 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total railcars |
567 | 7,730 | 8,297 | Total locomotives | 247 | 158 | 405 | |||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ITEM 3. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
In the ordinary course of conducting our business, we have become involved in various legal actions and other claims. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, the outcome of individual litigated matters is not predictable with assurance, and it is reasonably possible that some of these matters may be decided unfavorably to RailAmerica. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to our current litigation outstanding will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
Our operations are subject to extensive environmental regulation. There are no material environmental claims currently pending or, to our knowledge, threatened against us or any of our railroads.
We are subject to claims for employee work-related and third-party injuries. Work-related injuries for employees are primarily subject to the FELA. We retain an independent actuarial firm to assist management in assessing the value of personal injury claims and cases. An analysis has been performed by an independent actuarial firm and is reviewed by management. The methodology used by the actuary includes a development factor to reflect growth or reduction in the value of these personal injury claims. It is based largely on our historical claims and settlement experience. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, we had $12.5 million and $12.9 million, respectively, accrued for personal injury claims and cases. Actual results may vary from estimates due to the type and severity of the injuries, costs of medical treatments and uncertainties in litigation.
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES |
Not applicable
23
PART II
ITEM 5. | MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES |
Market Information
Our common stock began trading on the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) on October 13, 2009 under the symbol “RA”.
Our Principal Stockholder
RR Acquisition Holding LLC, an entity wholly-owned by certain private equity funds managed by an affiliate of Fortress, owns approximately 59.9% of our outstanding common stock. RR Acquisition Holding LLC is referred to in this Form 10-K as our Initial Stockholder. The Initial Stockholder owns shares sufficient for the majority vote over fundamental and significant corporate matters and transactions. See “Risk Factors — Risks Related to Our Organization and Structure.”
Description of Common Stock
A total of 400 million shares of common stock are authorized, of which 50,605,440 shares were outstanding as of December 31, 2011. Each share is entitled to one vote in all matters requiring a vote of shareholders. As of February 22, 2012, there were approximately 58 holders of record and we believe at least 5,858 beneficial owners of our common stock. Weighted average common shares outstanding used in the calculation of diluted earnings per share was approximately 52,519,000 as of December 31, 2011, and is expected to decrease in 2012 due to the Company’s stock repurchase program.
In June 2009, we declared and paid a cash dividend in the amount of $20.0 million to our common stockholders. We do not expect to declare or pay any cash or other dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, as we intend to use cash flow generated by operations to grow our business, pay down debt or buy back common stock. Our revolving credit facility and our senior secured notes indenture will restrict our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock, and we may also enter into credit agreements or other borrowing arrangements in the future that restrict or limit our ability to pay cash dividends on our common stock.
Stock Market Results
Set forth below is the high and low price information for our common stock as reported on the NYSE for each period presented.
2010 |
High Sales Price | Low Sales Price | ||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 14.47 | $ | 10.94 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 13.61 | $ | 9.73 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 11.60 | $ | 9.27 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 13.13 | $ | 9.16 | ||||
2011 |
High Sales Price | Low Sales Price | ||||||
First Quarter |
$ | 17.17 | $ | 11.97 | ||||
Second Quarter |
$ | 17.34 | $ | 13.66 | ||||
Third Quarter |
$ | 15.77 | $ | 11.06 | ||||
Fourth Quarter |
$ | 15.10 | $ | 12.43 | ||||
2012 |
High Sales Price | Low Sales Price | ||||||
First Quarter (January through February 21) |
$ | 20.89 | $ | 14.52 |
24
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers
During the three months ended December 31, 2011, the following purchases of the Company’s shares of Common Stock were made by or on behalf of the Company or any “affiliated purchaser” of the Company (as such term is defined in Rule 10b-18(a)(3) of the Securities Act of 1934, as amended). During the three months ended December 31, 2011, the Company accepted 33,010 shares in lieu of cash payments by employees for payroll tax withholdings relating to stock based compensation.
Period |
Total Number of Shares Purchased |
Average Price Paid per Share |
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs |
Approximate Dollar Value of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs |
||||||||||||
October 1 through October 31, 2011 |
353,775 | $ | 13.78 | 345,911 | $ | 12,685,337 | ||||||||||
November 1 through November 30, 2011 |
359,548 | $ | 13.66 | 358,665 | $ | 8,479,150 | ||||||||||
December 1 through December 31, 2011 |
258,062 | $ | 14.17 | 233,540 | $ | 4,563,430 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total |
971,385 | $ | 13.84 | 938,116 | $ | 4,563,430 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Repurchase Program
On February 23, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase program. Under the program, we were authorized to repurchase up to $50.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased depended on a variety of factors including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, trading volume and general market conditions. We completed this stock repurchase program on April 18, 2011, repurchasing a total of 3,036,769 shares at a weighted average price of $16.46 per share.
On August 30, 2011, we announced that our Board of Directors had approved a stock repurchase program. Under the program, we are authorized to repurchase up to $25.0 million of our outstanding shares of common stock from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased will depend on a variety of factors including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, trading volume and general market conditions. The program may be suspended or discontinued at any time without prior notice. During the year ended December 31, 2011, we purchased a total of 1,521,240 shares at a weighted average price of $13.43. We had $4.6 million remaining for repurchase of outstanding shares, under this program, as of December 31, 2011.
25
Stock Performance Graph
The following graph compares the cumulative total return for our common stock (stock price change plus reinvested dividends) with the comparable return of two indices: the Russell 2000 Index and S&P 1500 Composite Railroads. The graph assumes an investment of $100 in the Company’s common stock and in each of the indices on October 13, 2009, when our common stock first traded on the New York Stock Exchange, and that all dividends were reinvested. The past performance of our common stock is not an indication of future performance.
26
ITEM 6. | SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA |
The consolidated financial information labeled as “Predecessor” includes financial reporting periods prior to the merger on February 14, 2007, in which we were acquired by certain private equity funds managed by affiliates of Fortress (the “Acquisition”) and the consolidated financial information labeled as “Successor” includes financial reporting periods subsequent to the Acquisition. On October 16, 2009, we completed an initial public offering of 22,000,000 shares of common stock.
The information in the following tables gives effect to the 90-for-1 stock split of our common stock, which occurred on September 22, 2009.
The selected consolidated statement of operations data for the Successor years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and the selected Successor consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from our audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data for the Successor year ended December 31, 2008, Successor period February 15, 2007 through December 31, 2007, the Predecessor period January 1, 2007 through February 14, 2007 and the selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2009, 2008 and 2007 have been derived from our audited financial statements that are not included in this report on Form 10-K.
Predecessor | Successor | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Period from January 1, 2007 to February 14, 2007 |
Period from February 15, 2007 to December 31, 2007 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Year ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS DATA: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 55,766 | $ | 424,154 | $ | 508,466 | $ | 425,774 | $ | 490,291 | $ | 551,123 | ||||||||||||||
Operating expenses |
57,157 | 355,776 | 422,418 | 311,569 | 375,784 | 429,501 | ||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(1,391 | ) | 68,378 | 86,048 | 114,205 | 114,507 | 121,622 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization costs |
(3,275 | ) | (42,996 | ) | (61,678 | ) | (86,878 | ) | (83,775 | ) | (71,923 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
284 | 7,129 | (9,008 | ) | (8,117 | ) | (4,759 | ) | 1,331 | |||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
(4,382 | ) | 32,511 | 15,362 | 19,210 | 25,973 | 51,030 | |||||||||||||||||||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes |
935 | (1,747 | ) | 1,599 | 16,299 | 6,856 | 14,162 | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations |
(5,317 | ) | 34,258 | 13,763 | 2,911 | 19,117 | 36,868 | |||||||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations |
— | (756 | ) | 2,764 | 12,931 | — | — | |||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (5,317 | ) | $ | 33,502 | $ | 16,527 | $ | 15,842 | $ | 19,117 | $ | 36,868 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.46 | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations per share of common stock: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.70 | |||||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.14 | ) | $ | 0.80 | $ | 0.32 | $ | 0.07 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.70 | |||||||||||||
OPERATING DATA: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight carloads (continuing operations) |
141,006 | 1,021,657 | 1,056,710 | 829,012 | 864,471 | 839,960 |
As of December 31, | ||||||||||||||||||||
2007 | 2008 | 2009 | 2010 | 2011 | ||||||||||||||||
BALANCE SHEET DATA: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,483,239 | $ | 1,470,447 | $ | 1,598,629 | $ | 1,603,653 | $ | 1,597,380 | ||||||||||
Long-term debt, including current maturities |
636,941 | 629,580 | 643,778 | 573,711 | 575,694 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity |
512,749 | 471,520 | 659,331 | 704,749 | 680,125 |
27
ITEM 7. | MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS |
This management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. You should read the following discussion in conjunction with our historical consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto. The results of operations for the periods reflected herein are not necessarily indicative of results that may be expected for future periods.
General
Our Business
We are a leading owner and operator of short line and regional freight railroads in North America, operating a portfolio of 43 individual railroads with approximately 7,400 miles of track in 27 states and three Canadian provinces. In addition, we provide non-freight services, such as engineering services, railcar storage, demurrage, leases of equipment and real estate leases and use fees.
Recent Acquisitions and Business Development
On May 11, 2011, we acquired three short-line freight railroads in the state of Alabama for a total purchase price of $12.7 million. The acquisition was funded from existing cash on hand. The three railroads, known individually as the Three Notch Railroad (TNHR), the Wiregrass Central Railroad (WGCR), and the Conecuh Valley Railroad (COEH), comprise approximately 70 miles and primarily haul agricultural and chemical products. The railroads were acquired from affiliates of Gulf and Ohio Railways, Inc. The results of operations of the railroads have been included in our consolidated financial statements since May 11, 2011, the acquisition date.
In August 2010, our New England Central Railroad, (“NECR”) was awarded a federal government grant of $50 million through the State of Vermont to improve and upgrade the track on its property. As part of the agreement, the NECR has committed to contribute up to approximately $19 million of capital funds to the project. In September 2011, the grant agreement was amended and the NECR was awarded an additional $2.7 million to extend and improve its centralized traffic control system, upgrade communications systems, improve culverts and ditching, and provide passenger bussing in lieu of Amtrak service. The amendment did not require any additional monetary commitment by the NECR. The project is expected to be completed within two years from the grant date.
On July 1, 2010, we acquired Atlas Railroad Construction Company (“Atlas”) and related assets for $23.9 million in cash including closing adjustments for working capital, which were approximately $2.4 million, net of cash acquired. The acquisition was funded from existing cash on hand. Atlas is a railroad engineering, construction, maintenance and repair company operating primarily in the U.S. Midwest and Northeast. Atlas provides railroad construction services principally to short line and regional railroads, public-transit agencies and industrial customers. The results of operations of Atlas have been included in our consolidated financial statements since July 1, 2010, the acquisition date.
Managing Business Performance
We manage our business performance by (i) growing our freight and non-freight revenue, (ii) driving financial improvements through a variety of cost savings initiatives, and (iii) continuing to focus on safety to lower the costs and risks associated with operating our business.
Changes in carloads and revenue per carload have a direct impact on freight revenue. Carloads declined in 2009 due to the global economic slowdown. Carloads increased in 2010 as the economy improved, but declined in 2011, primarily due to lower coal shipments. The diversity in our customer base helps mitigate our exposure to severe downturns in local economies. We continue to implement more effective pricing by carefully analyzing pricing decisions to improve our freight revenue per carload.
Non-freight services offered to our customers include switching (i.e., managing and positioning railcars within a customer’s facility), storing customers’ excess or idle railcars on inactive portions of our rail lines, engineering infrastructure services, third party railcar repair, and car hire and demurrage (i.e., allowing our customers and other railroads to use our railcars for storage or transportation in exchange for a daily fee). Each of these services leverages our existing business relationships and generates additional revenue with minimal capital investment. Management also continues to grow non-freight revenue from users of our land holdings for non-transportation purposes.
Our operating costs include labor, equipment rents (locomotives and railcars), purchased services (contract labor and professional services), diesel fuel, casualties and insurance, materials, joint facilities and other expenses.
Management is focused on improving operating efficiency and lowering costs. Many functions, such as pricing, purchasing, capital spending, finance, insurance, real estate and other administrative functions are centralized, which enables us to achieve cost efficiencies and leverage the experience of senior management in commercial, operational and strategic decisions. A number of cost savings initiatives have been broadly implemented at all of our railroads targeting lower fuel consumption, safer operations, more efficient equipment utilization and lower costs for third party services, among others.
28
Commodity Mix
Each of our 43 railroads operates independently with its own customer base. Our railroads are spread out geographically and carry diverse commodities. For the year ended December 31, 2011, coal, agricultural products and chemicals accounted for 18%, 15% and 11%, respectively, of our carloads. As a percentage of our freight revenue, which is impacted by several factors including the length of the haul, agricultural products, chemicals and metallic ores and metals generated 16%, 15% and 11%, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011.
Overview
Operating revenue in the year ended December 31, 2011, was $551.1 million, compared with $490.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. The net increase in our operating revenue of $60.8 million or 12% was primarily due to changes in commodity mix, rate increases and an increase in our non-freight revenue, partially offset by a decrease in carloads.
Freight revenue increased $22.4 million, or 6%, in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a change in commodity mix and rate increases, partially offset by a 3% decrease in carloads. Non-freight revenue increased $38.4 million, or 38%, in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to increases in engineering services revenue of $25.7 million (primarily due to the acquisition and growth of Atlas), demurrage revenue of $5.6 million, car repair revenue of $2.5 million, switching revenue of $2.1 million and real estate lease income of $1.8 million.
Our operating ratio, defined as total operating expenses divided by total operating revenue, was 77.9% in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with an operating ratio of 76.6% in the year ended December 31, 2010. This increase was primarily due to an increase in diesel fuel expense, impairments and materials and purchased services due to the increase in engineering services in 2011, partially offset by a decrease in equipment rent expense in 2011. Operating expenses were $429.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared with $375.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $53.7 million, or 14%.
In 2011 and 2010, we entered into track maintenance agreements with an unrelated third-party customer (“Shipper”). Under the agreements, the Shipper paid for qualified railroad track maintenance expenditures during 2011 and 2010 in exchange for the assignment of railroad track-miles which permits the Shipper to claim certain tax credits pursuant to Section 45G of the Code. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Shipper paid for $17.1 million of maintenance expenditures and $5.5 million of capital expenditures. For the year ended December 31, 2010, the Shipper paid for $18.0 million of maintenance expenditures and $4.3 million of capital expenditures. We incurred $0.5 million and $0.4 million for related consulting fees in the years ended December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, respectively.
Net income in the year ended December 31, 2011, was $36.9 million, compared with $19.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2010.
During the year ended December 31, 2011, we generated $102.3 million in cash from operating activities. We purchased $130.8 million of property, equipment and received $16.4 million in cash from the disposition of assets and $37.2 million of grant money for the NECR project.
29
Results of Operations
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010
The following table sets forth the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
Year
Ended December 31, 2011 |
Year
Ended December 31, 2010 |
|||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 551,123 | 100.0 | % | $ | 490,291 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Labor and benefits |
164,674 | 29.9 | % | 153,993 | 31.4 | % | ||||||||||
Equipment rents |
34,816 | 6.3 | % | 34,119 | 7.0 | % | ||||||||||
Purchased services |
48,075 | 8.7 | % | 37,971 | 7.7 | % | ||||||||||
Diesel fuel |
54,861 | 10.0 | % | 43,316 | 8.8 | % | ||||||||||
Casualties and insurance |
13,844 | 2.5 | % | 17,574 | 3.6 | % | ||||||||||
Materials |
27,896 | 5.0 | % | 19,607 | 4.0 | % | ||||||||||
Joint facilities |
9,667 | 1.8 | % | 8,667 | 1.8 | % | ||||||||||
Other expenses |
39,414 | 7.1 | % | 35,226 | 7.2 | % | ||||||||||
Track maintenance expense reimbursement |
(16,714 | ) | (3.0 | %) | (17,589 | ) | (3.6 | %) | ||||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
(50 | ) | 0.0 | % | (2,191 | ) | (0.5 | %) | ||||||||
Impairment of assets |
5,169 | 0.9 | % | — | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,849 | 8.7 | % | 45,091 | 9.2 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
429,501 | 77.9 | % | 375,784 | 76.6 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
121,622 | 22.1 | % | 114,507 | 23.4 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization costs |
(71,923 | ) | (83,775 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
1,331 | (4,759 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
51,030 | 25,973 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
14,162 | 6,856 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 19,117 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased by $60.8 million, or 12%, to $551.1 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, from $490.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. Total carloads during the year ended December 31, 2011 decreased 3% to 839,960 in 2011, from 864,471 in the year ended December 31, 2010. The increase in operating revenue was primarily due to changes in commodity mix, negotiated rate increases and the acquisition and growth of Atlas, partially offset by a 3% decrease in carloads.
The increase in the average revenue per carload to $489 in the year ended December 31, 2011, from $450 in the comparable period in 2010 was primarily due to commodity mix and negotiated rate increases.
Non-freight revenue increased by $38.4 million, or 38%, to $140.0 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 from $101.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to increases in engineering services revenue of $25.7 million (primarily due to the acquisition and growth of Atlas), demurrage revenue of $5.6 million, car repair revenue of $2.5 million, switching revenue of $2.1 million and real estate lease income of $1.8 million.
30
The following table compares our freight revenue, carloads and average freight revenue per carload for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010:
Year ended December 31, 2011 | Year ended December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight Revenue |
Carloads | Average Freight Revenue per |
Freight Revenue |
Carloads | Average
Freight Revenue per Carload |
|||||||||||||||||||
Carload | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except average freight revenue per carload) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Products |
$ | 211,507 | 371,447 | $ | 569 | $ | 195,180 | 368,548 | $ | 530 | ||||||||||||||
Agricultural Products |
95,338 | 183,328 | 520 | 92,026 | 189,764 | 485 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction Products |
69,845 | 133,498 | 523 | 61,663 | 127,424 | 484 | ||||||||||||||||||
Coal |
34,460 | 151,687 | 227 | 39,880 | 178,735 | 223 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 411,150 | 839,960 | $ | 489 | $ | 388,749 | 864,471 | $ | 450 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight revenue was $411.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $388.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, an increase of $22.4 million, or 6%. This increase was primarily due to the net effect of the following:
• | Industrial products revenue increased $16.3 million, or 8%, primarily due to revenue per carload increases of 7% for the category resulting from higher rates and mix, a 5% increase in shipments of metallic ores and metals resulting from increased production at manufacturing facilities we serve in Canada and the Midwest, higher traffic hauled for other railroads and a 10% increase in shipments of motor vehicles resulting from increased production at facilities we serve, partially offset by a 10% decrease in petroleum shipments as a result of fewer movements for Class I railroads; |
• | Agricultural products revenue increased $3.3 million, or 4%, primarily due to revenue per carload increases of 7% resulting from higher rates and mix, partially offset by a 3% decline in carloads; |
• | Construction products revenue increased $8.2 million, or 13%, as a result of non-metallic minerals and products carloads increasing 5% and forest products carloads increasing 4% and due to revenue per carload increases of 8% for the category due to higher rates and mix; and |
• | Coal revenue decreased $5.4 million, or 14%, primarily due to a 15% decrease in carloads resulting from a sourcing shift impacting our Indiana traffic, partially offset by revenue per carload increases of 2%. |
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased to $429.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, from $375.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. The operating ratio was 77.9% in 2011 compared to 76.6% in 2010. The increase in the operating ratio was primarily due to asset impairments, increased diesel fuel expenses as a result of higher costs per gallon in 2011, increased purchased services expenses related to engineering services, and increased materials expense related to car repair activity.
The net increase in operating expenses was due to the following:
• | Labor and benefits expense increased $10.7 million, or 7%, primarily due to an increase in salaries and wages as a result of increased headcount and overtime of $5.1 million, the acquisition and growth of Atlas which contributed $4.0 million, severance of $3.1 million and an increase in amortization expense related to the Company’s stock-based compensation plan of $1.9 million, partially offset by a decrease in healthcare costs of $1.8 million and a decrease in profit sharing costs of $1.8 million. |
• | Equipment rents expense increased $0.7 million, or 2%, primarily due to an increase in car hire expense of $2.1 million, partially offset by a reduction in railcar lease expense from the expiration of certain railcar leases of $1.7 million; |
• | Purchased services expense increased $10.1 million, or 27%, primarily due to a $10.3 million increase related to the acquisition and growth of Atlas and an increase of $1.2 million in data processing and professional fees, partially offset by a decrease in legal fees of $1.2 million; |
31
• | Diesel fuel expense increased $11.5 million, or 27%, primarily due to higher average fuel costs of $3.29 per gallon in 2011 compared to $2.44 per gallon in 2010, resulting in a $13.7 million increase in fuel expense, offset by a favorable consumption variance of $2.1 million in 2011; |
• | Casualties and insurance expense decreased $3.7 million, or 21%, primarily due to the $1.2 million reduction of reserves as a result of the expiration of the statute of limitations related to the Indiana & Ohio Railway (“IORY”) styrene incident and lower derailment and personal injury costs of $1.2 million and $1.0 million, respectively; |
• | Materials expense increased $8.3 million, or 42%, primarily due to additional expenses of $6.1 million related to the acquisition and growth of Atlas and an increase of $2.9 million in car repair material purchases as a result of an increase in car repair activity, partially offset by a decrease in track materials expenses of $0.6 million; |
• | Joint facilities expense increased $1.0 million, or 12%, partially due to changes in traffic patterns; |
• | Other expenses increased $4.2 million, or 12%, primarily due to the acquisition and growth of Atlas of $2.2 million, increases in railroad-related rent expense of $1.0 million, increases in automotive fuel expense of $0.7 million, increases in bad debt expense of $0.5 million and increases in other taxes of $0.4 million; |
• | The execution of track maintenance agreements resulted in the Shipper paying for $16.7 million and $17.6 million of maintenance expenditures, net of related consulting fees in 2011 and 2010, respectively; |
• | Asset sales resulted in a minimal net gain in 2011 and a $2.2 million net gain in 2010, primarily due to land and easement sales along our corridor of track; |
• | Impairment of assets was $5.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2011 as a result of plans to reduce the fleet of owned locomotives; and |
• | Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.8 million, or 6%, due to the capitalization and depreciation of 2011 and 2010 capital projects and the acquisition of Atlas. |
Other Income (Expense) Items
Interest Expense. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, decreased $11.9 million to $71.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, from $83.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. This decrease is primarily due to the redemption of $74 million of senior secured notes in June 2010 and lower interest rate swap amortization in 2011. Interest expense includes $11.9 million and $20.9 million of swap amortization costs for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. In connection with the repayment of the bridge credit facility in 2009, we terminated our existing interest rate swap. Per Derivatives and Hedging Topic, ASC 815, since the hedged cash flow transactions, future interest payments did not terminate, but continued with our senior secured notes, the fair value of the hedge on the termination date in accumulated comprehensive loss is amortized into interest expense over the shorter of the remaining life of the swap or the maturity of the notes.
Other Income (Loss). Other income of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2011 includes $2.0 million of management fee income that is recorded in connection with the transactions where our employees receive restricted stock awards from related parties, partially offset by a $0.7 million write-off of deferred loan costs related to the replacement of our asset backed loan facility with our revolving credit facility. Other loss of $4.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily relates to costs incurred in connection with the repurchase of senior secured notes during the second quarter of 2010, partially offset by a $2.0 million transaction break-up fee, or $1.8 million net of expenses, in the third quarter of 2010 and $1.8 million of management fee income that is recorded in connection with the transactions where our employees receive restricted stock awards from related parties. As part of the restricted stock transactions, we recorded an offsetting expense in labor and benefits.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 for continuing operations were a provision of 27.8% and 26.4%, respectively. The tax rate is affected by recurring items such as tax rates in foreign jurisdictions and the relative amount of income earned in jurisdictions. It is also affected by discrete items that may occur in any given year, but are not consistent from year to year. The overall tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2011 was favorably impacted by the adjustment of deferred tax balances resulting from the change in tax laws and change in estimates of the apportioned state rates ($3.7 million). The overall effective tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was favorably impacted by a decrease in the valuation allowance ($2.9
32
million) and a reduction of tax reserves due to the lapse of the statute of limitations ($1.1 million). These favorable tax adjustments were partially offset by an expense relating to change in estimates of apportioned state tax rates and other adjustments ($1.2 million) and by an expense relating to stock-based compensation plans ($0.7 million). For the year ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 we paid cash taxes of $4.1 million and $7.4 million, respectively.
Comparison of Operating Results for the Years Ended December 31, 2010 and 2009
The following table sets forth the results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Year Ended December 31, |
Year Ended December 31, |
|||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 490,291 | 100.0 | % | $ | 425,774 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Labor and benefits |
153,993 | 31.4 | % | 143,604 | 33.7 | % | ||||||||||
Equipment rents |
34,119 | 7.0 | % | 35,978 | 8.5 | % | ||||||||||
Purchased services |
37,971 | 7.7 | % | 30,914 | 7.3 | % | ||||||||||
Diesel fuel |
43,316 | 8.8 | % | 33,290 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||
Casualties and insurance |
17,574 | 3.6 | % | 16,795 | 3.9 | % | ||||||||||
Materials |
19,607 | 4.0 | % | 11,399 | 2.7 | % | ||||||||||
Joint facilities |
8,667 | 1.8 | % | 6,942 | 1.6 | % | ||||||||||
Other expenses |
35,226 | 7.2 | % | 33,037 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||
Track maintenance expense reimbursement |
(17,589 | ) | (3.6 | %) | (16,656 | ) | (3.9 | %) | ||||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
(2,191 | ) | (0.5 | %) | (25,839 | ) | (6.1 | %) | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
45,091 | 9.2 | % | 42,105 | 9.9 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Total operating expenses |
375,784 | 76.6 | % | 311,569 | 73.2 | % | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
Operating income |
114,507 | 23.4 | % | 114,205 | 26.8 | % | ||||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization costs |
(83,775 | ) | (86,878 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
(4,759 | ) | (8,117 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
25,973 | 19,210 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
6,856 | 16,299 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
19,117 | 2,911 | ||||||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of discontinued business |
— | 12,931 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,117 | $ | 15,842 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
Operating Revenue
Operating revenue increased by $64.5 million, or 15%, to $490.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, from $425.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. Total carloads during the year ended December 31, 2010 increased 4% to 864,471 in 2010, from 829,012 in the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in operating revenue was primarily due to changes in commodity mix, rate increases, a 4% increase in carloads and the acquisition of Atlas.
The increase in the average revenue per carload to $450 in the year ended December 31, 2010, from $416 in the comparable period in 2009 was primarily due to commodity mix and rate increases.
Non-freight revenue increased by $20.3 million, or 25%, to $101.5 million in the year ended December 31, 2010 from $81.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2009, primarily due to a $15.1 million increase in engineering services revenue, partially due to the acquisition of Atlas, and increases in car repair revenue of $5.2 million, partially offset by a decrease in other revenue of $4.5 million related to the termination of our Ottawa Valley Railway (“OVRR”) lease during the fourth quarter of 2009.
33
The following table compares our freight revenue, carloads and average freight revenue per carload for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009:
Year ended December 31, 2010 | Year ended December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Freight Revenue |
Carloads | Average Freight Revenue per Carload |
Freight Revenue |
Carloads | Average Freight Revenue per Carload |
|||||||||||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, except average freight revenue per carload) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Industrial Products |
$ | 195,180 | 368,548 | $ | 530 | $ | 167,489 | 349,238 | $ | 480 | ||||||||||||||
Agricultural Products |
92,026 | 189,764 | 485 | 81,844 | 178,981 | 457 | ||||||||||||||||||
Construction Products |
61,663 | 127,424 | 484 | 58,320 | 122,765 | 475 | ||||||||||||||||||
Coal |
39,880 | 178,735 | 223 | 36,914 | 178,028 | 207 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 388,749 | 864,471 | $ | 450 | $ | 344,567 | 829,012 | $ | 416 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Freight revenue was $388.7 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $344.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2009, an increase of $44.1 million or 13%. This increase was primarily due to the net effect of the following:
• | Industrial products revenue increased $27.7 million, or 17%, primarily due to a 60% increase in shipments of metallic ores and metals as a result of increased demand from automotive manufacturing and energy production facilities, a 17% increase in shipments of chemicals as a result of chemical manufacturing keeping pace with increased demand for both intermediates and final products and increased shipments of waste and scrap material, partially offset by a 38% decrease in other revenues as a result of fewer movements for Class I railroads; |
• | Agricultural products revenue increased $10.2 million, or 12%, primarily due to increased demand for animal feed ingredients for domestic livestock and exports; |
• | Construction products revenue increased $3.3 million, or 6%, primarily due to increased demand for construction aggregates; and |
• | Coal revenue increased $3.0 million, or 8%, primarily due to favorable mix changes and pricing activity. |
Operating Expenses
Operating expenses increased to $375.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, from $311.6 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. The operating ratio was 76.6% in 2010 compared to 73.2% in 2009. The increase in the operating ratio was primarily due to a gain associated with a lease termination in 2009, increased diesel fuel expenses as a result of increased carloads and higher costs per gallon in 2010, expenses related to Atlas, and increased materials expense related to car repair activity. The year ended December 31, 2009 includes a non-cash charge of $6.3 million in labor and benefits expense related to the initial public offering for the expiration of a repurchase feature under the former stock compensation agreements. During the year ended December 31, 2009, operating expenses also include $1.4 million of costs related to the restructuring and relocation of our corporate headquarters to Jacksonville, Florida. The costs incurred during the year ended December 31, 2009 are included within labor and benefits ($1.2 million) and purchased services ($0.2 million).
The net increase in operating expenses was due to the following:
• | Labor and benefits expense increased $10.4 million, or 7%, primarily due to the acquisition of Atlas which contributed $4.7 million, an increase in salaries and wages as a result of the increase in carload volumes of $4.0 million, an increase in healthcare costs of $3.9 million and an increase in amortization expense related to the Company’s stock-based compensation plan of $3.1 million, partially offset by the non-cash initial public offering charge noted above which was incurred in 2009; |
• | Equipment rents expense decreased $1.9 million, or 5%, primarily due to a reduction in railcar lease expense from the expiration of certain railcar leases; |
• | Purchased services expense increased $7.1 million, or 23%, primarily due to a $1.9 million increase related to Atlas, an increase of $1.5 million in professional fees for special projects and public company related costs and a $1.3 million increase in legal fees; |
34
• | Diesel fuel expense increased $10.0 million, or 30%, primarily due to higher average fuel costs of $2.44 per gallon in 2010 compared to $1.94 per gallon in 2009, resulting in an $8.6 million increase in fuel expense and an unfavorable consumption variance of $1.3 million due to increased carloads in 2010; |
• | Casualties and insurance expense increased $0.8 million, or 5%, primarily due to an increase in insurance premiums and incident reserves. FRA reportable personal injuries increased slightly to 27 in the year ended December 31, 2010 from 23 in the year ended December 31, 2009. Our FRA personal injury frequency ratio, which is measured as the number of reportable injuries per 200,000 person hours worked, was 2.1 at December 31, 2010, compared to 1.8 at December 31, 2009. FRA reportable train accidents decreased to 30 in the year ended December 31, 2010 from 34 in the year ended December 31, 2009; |
• | Materials expense increased $8.2 million, or 72%, primarily due to an increase of $4.2 million in car repair material purchases as a result of an increase in car repair activity and additional expenses of $3.4 million related to Atlas; |
• | Joint facilities expense increased $1.7 million, or 25%, partially due to the increased carload volume; |
• | Other expenses increased $2.2 million, or 7%, primarily due to an increase of $1.4 million in travel and automotive fuel expense, an increase of $1.0 million for Atlas and an increase in public company costs of $0.7 million; |
• | The execution of track maintenance agreements in 2010 and 2009 resulted in the Shipper paying for $17.6 million and $16.7 million of maintenance expenditures, net of related consulting fees, respectively; |
• | Asset sales and a lease termination resulted in net gains of $2.2 million and $25.8 million in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The gains on sales of assets in 2010 are primarily due to land and easement sales along our corridor of track. In 2009, we terminated the lease of the OVRR line, which resulted in a gain on disposal of $26.8 million and we sold a portion of track owned by the Central Railroad of Indianapolis at a price set by the STB of $0.4 million, which resulted in a loss on disposition of $1.5 million. We also sold a portion of track owned by the Central Oregon and Pacific Railroad, known as the Coos Bay Line, to the Port of Coos Bay for $16.6 million. The carrying value of this line approximated the sale price; and |
• | Depreciation and amortization expense increased $3.0 million, or 7%, due to the capitalization and depreciation of 2009 and 2010 capital projects and the acquisition of Atlas. |
Other Income (Expense) Items
Interest Expense. Interest expense, including amortization of deferred financing costs, decreased $3.1 million to $83.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, from $86.9 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. This decrease is primarily due to the redemption of $74 million of senior secured notes in June 2010 and in November 2009. Interest expense also includes $20.9 million and $16.6 million of swap amortization costs for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In connection with the repayment of the bridge credit facility in 2009, we terminated our existing interest rate swap. Per Derivatives and Hedging Topic, ASC 815, since the hedged cash flow transactions, future interest payments did not terminate, but continued with our senior secured notes, the fair value of the hedge on the termination date in accumulated comprehensive loss is amortized into interest expense over the shorter of the remaining life of the swap or the maturity of the notes.
Other Loss. Other loss of $4.8 million and $8.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, primarily relates to costs incurred in connection with the repurchase of senior secured notes during the second quarter of 2010 and fourth quarter of 2009 and the write-off of unamortized deferred loan costs associated with our former bridge credit facility in the second quarter of 2009. Other loss also includes $1.8 million and $0.2 million of management fee income that is recorded in connection with the transactions where our employees receive restricted stock awards from related parties in the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. As part of the restricted stock transactions, we recorded an offsetting expense in labor and benefits. Other loss during the year ended December 31, 2010 was partially offset by a $2.0 million transaction break-up fee, or $1.8 million net of expenses, in the third quarter of 2010.
Income Taxes. The effective income tax rates for the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 for continuing operations were a provision of 26.4% and 84.8%, respectively. The overall tax rate for the year ended December 31, 2010 was favorably impacted by a decrease in the valuation allowance ($2.9 million) and a reduction of tax reserves due to the lapse of the statute of limitations ($1.1 million). These favorable tax adjustments were partially offset by an expense relating to the change in estimates of apportioned state tax
35
rates and other adjustments ($1.2 million) and by an expense relating to stock-based compensation plans ($0.7 million). The overall effective tax rate for continuing operations for the year ended December 31, 2009 was unfavorably impacted by the repatriation of OVRR’s Canadian earnings ($15.0 million) and by an increase in the valuation allowance ($4.0 million). These unfavorable adjustments were partially offset by the resolution of the Australian tax audit ($2.5 million), the conversion of certain operating subsidiaries to single member limited liability companies ($1.0 million) and the adjustment of deferred tax balances resulting from a change in tax laws and a change in estimates of the apportioned state rates ($2.3 million). For the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009 we paid cash taxes of $7.4 million and $3.4 million, respectively.
Discontinued Operations. In January 2006, we completed the sale of our Alberta Railroad Properties for $22.1 million in cash. In the year ended December 31, 2009, we recorded an adjustment of $0.2 million, or $0.2 million, after tax, as a gain on disposal of discontinued operations related to outstanding liabilities associated with the disposed entities.
In August 2004, we completed the sale of our Australian railroad, Freight Australia, to Pacific National for AUD $285 million (U.S. $204 million). On May 14, 2009, we received a notice from the Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) indicating that they would not be taking any further action in relation to its audit of the reorganization transactions. As a result, during the second quarter of 2009, we removed the previously recorded tax reserves resulting in a benefit to the continuing operations tax provision of $2.5 million, an adjustment to the gain on disposal of discontinued operations of $12.3 million and reduced our accrual for consulting fees resulting in a gain on disposal of discontinued operations of $0.7 million, or $0.5 million after tax.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The discussion of liquidity and capital resources that follows reflects our consolidated results and includes all subsidiaries. We have historically met our liquidity requirements primarily from cash generated from operations and borrowings under our credit agreements which are used to fund capital expenditures and debt service requirements. For the year ended December 31, 2011, there was a net cash inflow from operations of $102.3 million primarily due to cash flow generated by operations. We believe that we will be able to generate sufficient cash flow from operations or use borrowings under our credit agreements to meet our capital expenditures, debt service requirements and fund our announced acquisitions of the Marquette Rail LLC (“Marquette”), the Wellsboro and Corning Railroad (“WCOR”) and Industrial Waste Group (“IWG”).
Operating Activities
Cash provided by operating activities was $102.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $117.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to working capital changes.
Cash provided by operating activities was $117.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The increase in cash provided by operating activities was primarily due to cash payments made for the termination of the interest rate swap in connection with the repayment of the bridge credit facility in June 2009 of $55.8 million.
Investing Activities
Cash used in investing activities was $90.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Cash used in investing activities included cash used for the acquisition of three short line railroads for $12.7 million in 2011 and Atlas Railroad Construction Company for $23.9 million in 2010. Capital expenditures were $130.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $60.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. The capital expenditures were partially offset by $37.2 million and $2.5 million of NECR government grant reimbursements in the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Asset sale/disposition proceeds were $16.4 million, primarily due to scrap sales related to the NECR project for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Cash used in investing activities was $77.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to cash provided by investing activities of $42.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2009. The 2010 results include $23.9 million in cash used for the acquisition of Atlas. Capital expenditures were $60.3 million in the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to $47.8 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. Cash received from NECR government grants was $2.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. Asset sale/disposition proceeds were $4.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 compared to $90.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2009, primarily due to the termination of the OVRR lease agreement for $68.6 million and the sale of the Coos Bay Line for $16.6 million in 2009.
36
Financing Activities
Cash used in financing activities was $74.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2011, compared to $77.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2010. The cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2011 was primarily due to the repurchase of common stock of $70.6 million as part of the stock repurchase programs announced on February 23, 2011 and August 30, 2011. The cash used in financing activities in the year ended December 31, 2010 was primarily for the repayment of $74.0 million of the senior secured notes in the second quarter of 2010.
Cash used in financing activities was $77.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, compared to cash provided by investing activities of $111.2 million in the year ended December 31, 2009. The decrease in cash provided by financing activities from 2009 to 2010 was due to the common stock proceeds generated from the initial public offering in October 2009 and the issuance of the 9.25% senior secured notes, partially offset by the cash used to repay the existing bridge credit facility and financing costs associated with the issuance of the notes. On November 16, 2009, we redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date. On June 24, 2010, we redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date.
Working Capital
As of December 31, 2011, we had working capital of $36.2 million, including cash on hand of $91.0 million, compared to working capital of $152.0 million, including cash on hand of $153.0 million, as of December 31, 2010. The working capital decrease at December 31, 2011, compared to December 31, 2010, is primarily due to the use of cash for the repurchase of common stock and the reclass of $71.7 million ($74 million, net of $2.3 million of related original issue discount) of Senior Secured Notes that were redeemed on January 5, 2012 to current liabilities during the year ended December 31, 2011.
Our cash flows from operations and borrowings under our credit agreements historically have been sufficient to meet our ongoing operating requirements, to fund capital expenditures for property, plant and equipment, and to satisfy our debt service requirements. We expect to continue to sufficiently meet our ongoing operating requirements with our cash flows from operations and borrowings under the revolving credit facility.
Capital Expenditures
The following table sets forth our track and related assets capital expenditures by major type for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010, and 2009.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(amounts in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Ties |
$ | 28,690 | $ | 19,594 | $ | 19,472 | ||||||
Bridges |
10,737 | 8,309 | 7,328 | |||||||||
Surfacing |
8,114 | 5,817 | 5,358 | |||||||||
Rail |
41,696 | 9,744 | 3,521 | |||||||||
Crossings |
7,620 | 3,379 | 3,086 | |||||||||
Turnouts |
2,888 | 896 | 1,306 | |||||||||
Signals |
4,990 | 1,858 | 1,258 | |||||||||
Other |
— | — | 632 | |||||||||
Casualty related |
9,132 | 1,800 | 92 | |||||||||
NECR grant reimbursements |
(37,212 | ) | (2,455 | ) | — | |||||||
Capital reimbursements |
(4,400 | ) | (4,686 | ) | (5,478 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
$ | 72,255 | $ | 44,256 | $ | 36,575 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The increase in track and related assets capital expenditures in 2011 compared to 2010 and in 2010 compared to 2009 was primarily due to the NECR track upgrade grant project.
37
The following table sets forth the approximate number of ties installed and replaced, miles of rail installed and replaced and track miles resurfaced during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009.
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Ties (each, in thousands) |
||||||||||||
Installed |
— | — | 3 | |||||||||
Replaced |
414 | 346 | 346 | |||||||||
Rail (miles) |
||||||||||||
Installed |
— | — | 1 | |||||||||
Replaced |
169 | 22 | 16 | |||||||||
Surfaced (miles) |
920 | 768 | 873 |
Long-term Debt
$740 million 9.25% Senior Secured Notes
On June 23, 2009, we sold $740.0 million of 9.25% senior secured notes due July 1, 2017 in a private offering for gross proceeds of $709.8 million after deducting the initial purchaser’s fees and the original issue discount. The notes are secured by first-priority liens on substantially all of our and the guarantors’ assets. The guarantors are defined essentially as our existing and future wholly owned domestic restricted subsidiaries. The net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes were used to repay the outstanding balance of the $650 million bridge credit facility, as described below, and $7.4 million of accrued interest thereon, pay costs of $57.1 million to terminate interest rate swap arrangements, including $1.3 million of accrued interest, entered in connection with the bridge credit facility and pay fees and expenses related to the offering and for general corporate purposes.
On November 2, 2009, we commenced an exchange offer of the privately placed senior secured notes for senior secured notes which have been registered under the Securities Act. The registered notes have terms that are substantially identical to the privately placed notes. The exchange offer expired on December 2, 2009.
We may redeem up to 10% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued during any 12-month period commencing on the issue date at a price equal to 103% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. We may also redeem some or all of the notes at any time before July 1, 2013, at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date and a make-whole premium. In addition, prior to July 1, 2012, we may redeem up to 35% of the notes at a redemption price of 109.25% of their principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, with the proceeds from an equity offering. Subsequent to July 1, 2013, we may redeem the notes at 104.625% of their principal amount. The redemption price then reduces to 102.313% commencing on July 1, 2014 and then 100% on July 1, 2015 and thereafter. On November 16, 2009, we redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date. On June 24, 2010, we redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date.
Subsequent to year end, on January 5, 2012, we redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date. In connection with early retirement of the indebtedness, we incurred charges of approximately $7 million pre-tax in the first quarter of 2012. Approximately $4.8 million of the charge is non-cash.
On February 1, 2012, we announced that we commenced a cash tender offer to purchase up to $444 million in aggregate principal amount of our outstanding 9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2017. The tender offer is scheduled to expire at 12:00 midnight, New York City time, on February 29, 2012, unless extended or earlier terminated by us at our sole discretion. The Total Consideration payable for each $1 thousand principal amount of notes validly tendered at or before the early tender date and accepted for purchase is equal to $1.12 thousand. The tender offer is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including our entering into a new credit facility on terms and conditions satisfactory to us. We had $10.4 million in deferred loan costs and $18.4 million in original issue discount associated with these notes as of December 31, 2011. A percentage of these deferred costs will be written off depending on the ultimate amount of bonds tendered.
38
We may issue from time to time additional debt, without notice to or consent of the existing senior secured notes holders, having identical terms and conditions to the existing senior secured notes. Any additional notes issued shall be treated as a single class along with the existing senior secured notes.
$40 million ABL Facility
In connection with the issuance of the senior secured notes on June 23, 2009, we also entered into a $40 million Asset Backed Loan (“ABL”) Facility. The ABL Facility would have matured on June 23, 2013 and bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.00%. Obligations under the ABL Facility were secured by a first-priority lien in the ABL collateral. ABL collateral included accounts receivable, deposit accounts, securities accounts and cash. As of December 31, 2010, we had no outstanding balance under the ABL Facility and approximately $21.4 million of undrawn availability, taking into account borrowing base limitations.
On June 10, 2010, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the ABL Facility improving certain terms of the ABL Facility. Among other things, Amendment No. 1 eliminated the LIBOR-based interest rate floor of 2.5%, modified the borrowing base calculation and reporting requirements to require less frequent financial reporting in certain circumstances, adjusted the limitations on permitted acquisitions and restricted payments and amended the financial covenants to incorporate cash balances in certain definitions.
On February 23, 2011, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the ABL Facility. Amendment No. 2 adjusted certain terms of the ABL Facility and increased the threshold for Restricted Payments, as defined in the ABL Facility, to allow share repurchases of our common stock in an amount not to exceed $75 million without affecting other Restricted Payment baskets.
The ABL Facility was replaced by our $75 million Revolving Credit Facility on August 29, 2011.
$650 million Bridge Credit Facility
As part of the merger transaction in which we were acquired by certain private equity funds managed by affiliates of Fortress, we terminated the commitments under our former amended and restated credit agreement and repaid all outstanding loans and other obligations in full under that agreement. In order to fund this repayment of debt and complete the merger transaction, on February 14, 2007, we entered into a $650 million bridge credit facility agreement. The facility consisted of a $587 million U.S. dollar term loan commitment and a 38 million Canadian dollar term loan commitment, as well as a $25 million revolving loan facility with a 20 million U.S. dollar tranche and a 5 million Canadian dollar tranche. We entered into an amendment on July 1, 2008 to extend the maturity of the bridge credit facility for one year with an additional one year extension at our option. Under the amended bridge credit facility agreement, the term loans and revolving loans paid interest at LIBOR plus 4.00%. Prior to amendment, the bridge credit facility agreement, including the revolving loans, paid interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%.
In November 2008, we entered into Amendment No. 1 to the amended bridge credit facility agreement which permitted us to enter into employee and office space sharing agreements with affiliates and included a technical amendment to the definitions of interest coverage ratio and interest expense.
The U.S. and Canadian dollar term loans and the U.S. and Canadian dollar revolvers were collateralized by the assets of and guaranteed by us and most of our U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries. The loans were provided by a syndicate of banks with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as co-lead arrangers, Citicorp North America, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as syndication agent.
As discussed above, all borrowings under the bridge credit facility were repaid with the proceeds from the issuance of the senior secured notes in 2009.
$75 Million Revolving Credit Facility
On August 29, 2011, we entered into a credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) among us and our subsidiary RailAmerica Transportation Corp. (“RATC”, and together with us, the “Borrowers”), the lenders party thereto from time to time, Citibank N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, that provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $75 million to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.
39
The Revolving Credit Facility has a five-year term, with a maturity date of August 29, 2016. Amounts available under the Revolving Credit Facility are available for immediate drawdown, subject to the applicable financial covenants and restrictions, certain of which are described below.
The loans under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the Borrowers’ option, at a rate per annum of either (a) the Eurodollar Rate plus 3.50% or (b) the Adjusted Base Rate plus 2.50%. In each instance, if certain financial covenants and restrictions are met by the Borrowers, the applicable margin shall be reduced by 0.25%. In connection with the Revolving Credit Facility, the Borrowers will pay a commitment fee of 0.50% based on the daily amount of unused commitments made available under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Revolving Credit Facility is fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantors” and “Guarantees,” as the case may be) on a joint and several basis by certain of our existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries. All amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility (and all obligations under the Guarantees) are secured on a pari passu basis with the liens under the Company’s 9.25% senior secured notes due July 1, 2017 on: (a) stock and other equity interests owned by Borrowers and Guarantors, and (b) certain (i) real property, (ii) equipment and inventory, (iii) patents, trademarks and copyrights, (iv) general intangibles related to the foregoing, and (v) substantially all of the tangible personal property and intangible assets of the Borrowers and Guarantors. Further, all amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility (and all obligations under the Guarantees) are secured on a first priority basis with liens on accounts receivable, deposit and security accounts, and general intangibles relating to the foregoing.
There were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011. Subsequent to year end, on January 3, 2012 we borrowed $7.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility, which was repaid in February 2012.
Covenants to Senior Secured Notes
The indenture governing our senior secured notes contains certain limitations and restrictions on us and our restricted subsidiaries’ (as of the date of this report, all of our subsidiaries were restricted subsidiaries) ability to, among other things, incur additional indebtedness; issue preferred and disqualified stock; purchase or redeem capital stock; make certain investments; pay dividends or make other payments or loans or transfer property; sell assets; enter into certain types of transactions with affiliates involving consideration in excess of $5.0 million; create liens on certain assets; and sell all or substantially all of our assets or our guarantor’s assets or merge with or into another company.
The covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications described below.
We and our restricted subsidiaries are prohibited from incurring or issuing additional indebtedness and disqualified stock and our restricted subsidiaries are prohibited from issuing preferred stock unless our fixed charge coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to the sum of Consolidated Interest Expense and all cash dividend payments, for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters would have been at least 2.00 to 1.00 on a pro forma basis. In addition, we may, among other things, incur certain credit facilities debt not to exceed the greater of (i) $60 million and (ii) the borrowing base; purchase money indebtedness or capital lease obligations not to exceed the greater of (i) $80 million and (ii) 5.0% of total assets; indebtedness of foreign subsidiaries not to exceed the greater of (i) $25 million and (ii) 15% of total assets of foreign subsidiaries; acquired debt so long as we would be permitted to incur at least an additional $1 of indebtedness under its fixed charge ratio or such ratio is greater following the transaction; and up to $100 million (limited to $50 million for restricted subsidiaries) of indebtedness, disqualified stock or preferred stock, subject to increase from the proceeds of certain equity sales and capital contributions.
40
Furthermore, we and our restricted subsidiaries are prohibited from purchasing or redeeming capital stock; making certain investments, paying dividends or making other payments or loans or transfers of property, unless we could incur an additional dollar of indebtedness under our fixed charge ratio and such payment is less than 50% of our consolidated net income plus certain other items that increase the size of the payment basket. In addition, we may, among other things, make any payment from the proceeds of a capital contribution or concurrent offering of equity interests of us; make stock buy-backs from current and former employees/directors in an amount not to exceed $5 million per year, subject to carryover of unused amounts into subsequent years (capped at $10 million in any year) and subject to increase for cash proceeds from certain equity issuances to employees/directors and cash proceeds from key man life insurance; make investments in unrestricted subsidiaries in an amount not to exceed the greater of (i) $10 million and (ii) 0.75% of total assets; pay dividends following a public offering up to 6% per annum of the net proceeds received by us; make any payments up to $25 million. Moreover, we may make investments in an amount not to exceed the greater of (i) $25 million and (ii) 2.0% of total assets, investments in a similar business not to exceed the greater of (i) $50 million and (ii) 3% of total assets and advances to employees not in excess of $5 million.
Covenants to Revolving Credit Facility
The Revolving Credit Facility includes customary affirmative and negative covenants, including, among other things, restrictions on (i) the incurrence of indebtedness and liens, (ii) mergers, acquisitions and asset sales, (iii) investments and loans, (iv) dividends and other payments with respect to capital stock, (v) redemption and repurchase of capital stock, (vi) payments and modifications of other debt (including the notes), (vii) affiliate transactions, (viii) altering our business, (ix) engaging in sale-leaseback transactions and (x) entering into agreements that restrict our ability to create liens or repay loans or issue capital stock. In addition, we will be subject to a minimum coverage ratio of Consolidated Senior Secured Debt to Adjusted EBITDA (which for purposes of the minimum coverage ratio will exclude the tax credits available under Section 45G of the Internal Revenue Code) beginning at 5.0 to 1.0 in the third quarter 2011 and gradually reducing to 3.5 to 1.0 beginning in the fourth quarter of 2015, in all cases on a pro forma basis.
The covenants are subject to important exceptions and qualifications described below.
We may, among other things, incur certain indebtedness that (a) provides for a maturity date of no less than 91 days after the maturity date of the Revolving Credit Facility, (b) does not provide for any mandatory redemption or prepayment. Such indebtedness must also allow us to conform with the following requirements: on a pro forma basis, the fixed charge coverage ratio, defined as the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to the sum of Consolidated Interest Expense and all cash dividend payments, for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters must be at least 2.00 to 1.00; purchase money indebtedness or capital lease obligations may not to exceed the greater of (i) $80 million and (ii) 5.0% of total assets; indebtedness of foreign subsidiaries not to exceed the greater of (i) $25 million and (ii) 15% of total assets of foreign subsidiaries; our fixed charge coverage ratio for the most recently ended four full fiscal quarters must be at least 2.00 to 1.00 or such ratio is greater following the transaction; and we may incur up to $100 million (limited to $50 million for restricted subsidiaries) of indebtedness, disqualified stock or preferred stock, subject to increase from the proceeds of certain equity sales and capital contributions.
Adjusted EBITDA, as defined in the indenture governing the senior secured notes and the credit agreement governing the Revolving Credit Facility, is the key financial covenant measure that monitors our ability to undertake key investing and financing functions, such as making investments, transferring property, paying dividends, and incurring additional indebtedness.
41
The following table sets forth the reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA from our cash flow from operating activities (in thousands):
Year Ended December 31, 2011 |
Year Ended December 31, 2010 |
Year Ended December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities to Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation: |
||||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 102,289 | $ | 117,169 | $ | 9,540 | ||||||
Changes in working capital accounts |
25,770 | (10,849 | ) | 32,850 | ||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization of debt issuance |
(52,702 | ) | (49,847 | ) | (52,340 | ) | ||||||
Amortization of swap termination costs |
(11,908 | ) | (20,891 | ) | (16,616 | ) | ||||||
Net gain on sale or disposal of properties |
50 | 2,191 | 26,766 | |||||||||
Impairment of assets |
(5,169 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Foreign exchange gain on debt |
— | — | 1,160 | |||||||||
Swap termination costs |
— | — | 55,750 | |||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
— | (8,357 | ) | (9,499 | ) | |||||||
Equity compensation costs |
(10,219 | ) | (7,534 | ) | (10,712 | ) | ||||||
Financing costs |
(719 | ) | — | — | ||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(10,524 | ) | (2,765 | ) | (21,057 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
36,868 | 19,117 | 15,842 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Add: Discontinued operations gain |
— | — | (12,931 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from continuing operations |
36,868 | 19,117 | 2,911 | |||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
14,162 | 6,856 | 16,299 | |||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization costs |
71,923 | 83,775 | 86,878 | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,849 | 45,091 | 42,105 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
EBITDA |
170,802 | 154,839 | 148,193 | |||||||||
Add: |
||||||||||||
Equity compensation costs |
10,219 | 7,534 | 10,712 | |||||||||
Severance - non equity portion |
2,351 | — | — | |||||||||
Impairment of assets |
5,169 | — | — | |||||||||
Foreign exchange gain on debt |
— | — | (1,160 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
— | 8,357 | 9,499 | |||||||||
Financing costs |
719 | — | — | |||||||||
Acquisition expense (income, net of expense) |
1,063 | (1,300 | ) | — | ||||||||
Gain on OVRR lease termination |
— | — | (26,811 | ) | ||||||||
Non-recurring headquarter relocation costs |
— | — | 1,403 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Adjusted EBITDA |
$ | 190,323 | $ | 169,430 | $ | 141,836 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Based on current levels of Adjusted EBITDA, we are not restricted in undertaking key investing and financing functions as discussed above.
Adjusted EBITDA, as presented herein, is a supplemental measure of liquidity that is not required by, or presented in accordance with, generally accepted accounting principles in the Unites States (“GAAP”). We use non-GAAP financial measures as a supplement to our GAAP results in order to provide a more complete understanding of the factors and trends affecting our business. However, Adjusted EBITDA has limitations as an analytical tool. It is not a measurement of our cash flows from operating activities under GAAP and should not be considered as an alternative to cash flow from operating activities as a measure of liquidity.
42
Interest Rate Swaps
On February 14, 2007, we entered into an interest rate swap with a termination date of February 15, 2014. The total notional amount of the swap started at $425 million for the period commencing February 14, 2007 through November 14, 2007, increasing to a total notional amount of $525 million for the period commencing November 15, 2007 through November 14, 2008, and ultimately increased to $625 million for the period commencing November 15, 2008 through February 15, 2014. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, we were required to pay a fixed interest rate of 4.95% on the notional amount while receiving a variable interest rate equal to the 90 day LIBOR. This swap qualified, was designated and was accounted for as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815. Interest expense of $0.3 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2009 for the portion of the hedge deemed ineffective. This interest rate swap agreement was terminated in June 2009, in connection with the repayment of the bridge credit facility, and thus had no fair value at December 31, 2011. Pursuant to ASC 815, the fair value balance of the swap at the termination date remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, and is amortized into interest expense over the remaining life of the original swap (through February 14, 2014). As a result of the $74 million redemption of the notes during June 2010, an additional $1.7 million of unamortized expense was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2010. This was the result of reducing the face value of the outstanding senior secured notes below the notional amount of the swap. As of December 31, 2011, accumulated other comprehensive loss included $5.6 million, net of tax, of unamortized loss relating to the terminated swap. Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense in the next twelve months will be approximately $5.3 million, or $3.2 million, net of tax.
For derivative instruments in an asset position, we analyze the credit standing of the counterparty and factor it into the fair value measurement. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, ASC 820, states that the fair value of a liability must reflect the nonperformance risk of the reporting entity. Therefore, the impact of our credit worthiness has also been factored into the fair value measurement of the derivative instruments in a liability position.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Contractual Obligations
Two primary uses of the cash provided by our operations are capital expenditures and debt service. The following table represents the minimum future payments on our long-term debt and our existing lease obligations as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Total | 2012 | 2013 - 2014 | 2015 - 2016 | After 2016 |
||||||||||||||||
Senior secured notes |
$ | 592,000 | $ | 74,000 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 518,000 | ||||||||||
Other long term debt |
2,121 | 294 | 640 | 667 | 520 | |||||||||||||||
Interest payments on senior secured notes |
301,180 | 54,760 | 109,520 | 109,520 | 27,380 | |||||||||||||||
Interest payments on long term debt |
638 | 148 | 245 | 166 | 79 | |||||||||||||||
Operating lease obligations |
64,706 | 20,104 | 21,244 | 7,199 | 16,159 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total contractual cash obligations(1) |
$ | 960,645 | $ | 149,306 | $ | 131,649 | $ | 117,552 | $ | 562,138 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) | There were no material purchase obligations outstanding as of December 31, 2011. Table excludes any reserves for income taxes under Income Taxes Topic, ASC 740-10-25, because we are unable to reasonably predict the ultimate amount or timing of settlement of our unrecognized tax benefits beyond 2010. As of December 31, 2011, our reserves for income taxes totaled approximately $5.0 million. |
Critical Accounting Policies and Use of Estimates
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. These estimates are based on management’s current expectations and beliefs and are subject to a number of factors that could lead to actual results materially differing from the estimates. The factors impacting management’s estimates are set forth below.
43
The critical financial statement accounts that are subject to significant estimation are reserves for litigation, casualty and environmental matters, allowance for doubtful accounts, deferred income taxes, property, plant and equipment depreciation methods and goodwill and intangible assets.
In accordance with Contingencies Topic, ASC 450, an accrual for a loss contingency is established if information available prior to the issuance of the financial statements indicates that it is probable that a liability has been incurred or an asset has been impaired and can be reasonably estimated. These estimates have been developed in consultation with outside counsel handling our defense in these matters and are based upon an analysis of potential results, assuming a combination of litigation and settlement strategies. Subsequent changes to those estimates are reflected in our statements of operations in the period of the change.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized based on differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of assets and liabilities. We regularly review our deferred tax assets for recoverability and establish a valuation allowance based on historical taxable income, projected future taxable income, and the expected timing of the reversals of existing temporary differences. If we are unable to generate sufficient future taxable income, or if there is a material change in the statutory tax rates or time period within which the underlying temporary differences become taxable or deductible, we could be required to establish an additional valuation allowance against a portion of our deferred tax asset, resulting in an increase in our effective tax rate and an adverse effect on earnings. Additionally, changes in our estimates regarding the statutory tax rates to be applied to the reversal of deferred tax assets and liabilities could materially affect our effective tax rate.
Property, plant and equipment comprised 64% of our total assets as of December 31, 2011. These assets are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation. For track and related assets, we use the group method of depreciation under which a single depreciation rate is applied to the gross investment of each asset type. Service lives and salvage values for each group of assets are determined by completing periodic life studies and applying our assumptions regarding service lives of our property. A life study is the periodic review of asset lives for groups of assets conducted and analyzed by us with the assistance of a third-party expert. Upon normal sale or retirement of track assets, cost less net salvage value is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. As part of the life studies, we make an assessment of the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation. Any deficiency (excess), including any deferred gains or losses, will be amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining useful life of the asset group until the next life study. In the event that large groups of assets are removed from service as a result of unusual acts or sale, gains or losses are recognized immediately. Building, equipment and other fixed assets are specifically identified and we utilize straight line depreciation methods on a per asset basis.
Expenditures that increase asset values or extend useful lives are capitalized. Repair and maintenance expenditures are charged to operating expense when the work is performed. For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 repairs and maintenance expenditures charged to operating expense represented approximately 50% of our total spend (including capitalized expenditures) for track and related assets. We self-construct portions of our track structure and rebuild certain rolling stock. In addition to direct labor and material we capitalize certain indirect costs. We periodically review the carrying value of our long-lived assets for impairment. This review is based upon our projections of anticipated future cash flows. While we believe that our estimates of future cash flows are reasonable, different assumptions regarding such cash flows could materially affect our evaluations.
We review the carrying values of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually to assess impairment since these assets are not amortized. Additionally, we review the carrying value of goodwill or any intangible asset whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. Management assesses impairment by comparing the fair value of an intangible asset or goodwill with its carrying value. Specifically, we test for impairment in accordance with Intangibles- Goodwill and Other Topic, ASC 350. For goodwill, a two-step impairment model is used. The first step compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill. The determination of fair value involves significant management judgment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, goodwill would be considered impaired. The second step measures the goodwill impairment as the excess of recorded goodwill over the asset’s implied fair value. Impairments are recognized when incurred.
For the indefinite-lived intangible assets the impairment test compares the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. We have certain railroad leases that are recorded as indefinite-lived intangible assets.
No circumstances have occurred to indicate an impairment and management believes that goodwill and the indefinite-lived intangible assets are not impaired based on the results of the annual impairment test. However, a change in circumstances in the future that may negatively impact cash flows including, but not limited to, a loss of a key customer, a significant reduction in the forecast of
44
a reporting unit’s carloadings, regulatory or legislative changes or a decrease in our market capitalization could result in an interim impairment test. The result of such an impairment test could result in the write-off of goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets in a future accounting period.
While not determined to have goodwill impairment during 2011, certain of our reporting units have limited numbers of customers and therefore are at risk of impairment in future periods. Additionally, a reporting unit had a fair value that exceeded its book value by a small amount. The goodwill associated with this reporting unit represented 4% of our consolidated goodwill at December 31, 2011. An adverse change in the customer base, operations, or projected cash flow of these reporting units could cause a potential impairment. Management will continue to monitor the operations and customers at these reporting units and will evaluate for potential goodwill impairment if impairment indicators arise. If no impairment indicators arise, management will evaluate these reporting units during our annual assessment.
For a complete description of our accounting policies, see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU No. 2011-04”), which amends current guidance to result in common fair value measurement and disclosures between GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments explain how to measure fair value. They do not require additional fair value measurements and are not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). The amendments in ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not believe that the adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU No. 2011-05”), which improves the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increases the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) by eliminating the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this standard require that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Subsequently in December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU No. 2011-12”), which indefinitely defers the requirement in ASU No. 2011-05 to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of OCI are presented. The amendments in these standards do not change the items that must be reported in OCI, when an item of OCI must be reclassified to net income, or change the option for an entity to present components of OCI gross or net of the effect of income taxes. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-05 and ASU No. 2011-12 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 and ASU No. 2011-12 will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU No. 2011-08”), which allows entities to use a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. ASU No. 2011-08 is effective for annual and interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-08 in 2011. The adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
ITEM 7A. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK |
We are exposed to market risks from changing foreign currency exchange rates, interest rates and diesel fuel prices. Changes in these factors could cause fluctuations in earnings and cash flows.
45
Foreign Currency. Our foreign currency risk arises from owning and operating railroads in Canada. As of December 31, 2011, we had not entered into any currency hedging transactions to manage this risk. A decrease in the Canadian dollar could negatively impact our reported revenue and earnings for the affected period. During 2011, the Canadian dollar decreased 2% in value in comparison to the U.S. dollar, while the average rate for the year ended 2011 was 4% higher than it was for 2010. The increase in the average Canadian dollar exchange rate led to an increase of $2.7 million in reported revenue and a $0.8 million increase in reported operating income in 2011, compared to 2010. A 10% unfavorable change in the 2011 average exchange rate would have negatively impacted 2011 revenue by $6.7 million and operating income by $2.6 million.
Interest Rates. Our senior secured notes issued in June 2009 are fixed rate instruments, and therefore, interest expense would not be impacted by changes in interest rates. Our potential interest rate risk results from our Revolving Credit Facility as an increase in interest rates would result in lower earnings and increased cash outflows. As of December 31, 2011, we did not have any outstanding balances under this facility, but if we were to draw upon it, we would be subject to changes in interest rates. Subsequent to year end, on January 3, 2012 we borrowed $7.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility.
Diesel Fuel. We are exposed to fluctuations in diesel fuel prices, as an increase in the price of diesel fuel would result in lower earnings and increased cash outflows. Fuel costs represented 10.0% of total operating revenues during the year ended December 31, 2011. Due to the significance of fuel costs to our operations and the historical volatility of fuel prices, we participate in fuel surcharge programs which provide additional revenue to help offset the increase in fuel expense. These fuel surcharge programs fluctuate with the price of diesel fuel with a lag of three to nine months. Each one-cent change in the price of fuel would result in approximately a $0.2 million change in fuel expense on an annual basis.
Counterparty Risk. We monitor our hedging positions and the credit ratings of our counterparties and do not anticipate losses due to counterparty non-performance.
ITEM 8. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA |
The Consolidated Financial Statements of RailAmerica, the accompanying notes thereto and the report of the independent registered certified public accounting firm are included as part of this Form 10-K and immediately follow the signature page of this Form 10-K.
ITEM 9. | CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE. |
None.
46
ITEM 9A. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
DISCLOSURE CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. Based on an evaluation by our management, with the participation of our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as of the end of the period covered by this report, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer have concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) are effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in SEC’s rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive and chief financial officers, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
MANAGEMENT’S REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our principal executive officer and principal financial officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting based on the framework included in Internal Control – Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”). Based on our evaluation under the COSO framework, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2011. Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements, has issued an attestation report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011. The report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, is on page F-3.
CHANGES IN INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING. There have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the last fiscal quarter covered by this report that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B. | OTHER INFORMATION |
None.
47
PART III
ITEM 10. | DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
Information concerning directors, executive officers and nominees and our code of ethics is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC on or before April 30, 2012.
ITEM 11. | EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION |
Information concerning executive compensation is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC on or before April 30, 2012.
ITEM 12. | SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS |
Information concerning security ownership and securities issuable under equity compensation plans is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC on or before April 30, 2012.
ITEM 13. | CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE |
Information concerning certain relationships and related transactions, and director independence, is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC on or before April 30, 2012.
ITEM 14. | PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES |
Information concerning principal accountant fees and services is incorporated by reference from our definitive proxy statement relating to our 2012 Annual Meeting of Stockholders to be filed with the SEC on or before April 30, 2012.
48
PART IV
ITEM 15. | EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES |
(a) | The financial statements filed as part of this report are listed separately in the Index of Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1 of this report. |
The information required by Schedule II, Valuation and Qualifying Accounts, is included in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements. All other Financial Statement schedules are not applicable.
(b) | Exhibits |
Exhibit No. |
Description | |
3.1 | Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-4 (File No. 333-162575) filed on October 20, 2009). | |
3.2 | Amended and Restated Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-4 (File No. 333-162575) filed on October 20, 2009). | |
4.1 | Stockholders Agreement by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and RR Acquisition Holding, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-4 (File No. 333-162575) filed on October 20, 2009). | |
4.2 | Indenture, dated as of June 23, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc., the guarantors named therein, as Guarantors, and U.S. Bank National Association, as Trustee and Notes Collateral Agent (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on July 27, 2009). | |
4.3 | Form of 9.25% Notes due 2017 (included in Exhibit 4.2). | |
10.1 | Credit Agreement, dated as of June 23, 2009, among RailAmerica, Inc., RailAmerica Transportation Corp., the several lenders from time to time parties thereto, Citicorp North America, Inc. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to Amendment No. 1 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1(File No. 333-160835) filed on September 1, 2009). | |
10.2 | RailAmerica, Inc. 2008 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Amendment No. 2 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 22, 2009).+ | |
10.3 | RailAmerica, Inc. 2009 Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 99.1 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-8 (File No. 333-162428) filed on October 13, 2009).+ | |
10.4 | Form of Indemnification Agreement with directors and officers (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to Amendment No. 2 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 22, 2009). | |
10.5 | Form of Management Shareholder Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.6 | Form of Amended and Restated Restricted Share Agreement for Bonus Restricted Shares under the RailAmerica, Inc. Omnibus Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.6 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.7 | Form of Director Restricted Share Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.7 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.8 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and John Giles (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.8 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.9 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and Clyde Preslar (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.9 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.10 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and David Rohal (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.10 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.11 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and Paul Lundberg (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ |
49
10.12 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and Charles Patterson (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.12 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.13 | Employment Agreement, dated as of September 28, 2009, by and between RailAmerica, Inc. and Scott Williams (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.13 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.14 | Form of FECR Rail Corp. Consulting Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.14 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.15 | Form of FECR Rail Corp. Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.15 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.16 | Form of Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. Consulting Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.16 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.17 | Form of Florida East Coast Industries, Inc. Restricted Stock Unit Award Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.17 to Amendment No. 3 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form S-1 (File No. 333-160835) filed on September 29, 2009).+ | |
10.18 | Amendment No. 1 to the Asset Backed Loan Facility entered into on June 10, 2010 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-32579) filed on June 15, 2010). | |
10.19 | Amendment No. 2 to the Asset Backed Loan Facility entered into on February 23, 2011 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-32579) filed on February 23, 2011). | |
10.20 | Credit Agreement, dated as of August 29, 2011, among RailAmerica, Inc., RailAmerica Transportation Corp., Citibank N.A. and Citigroup Global Markets Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.20 to RailAmerica, Inc.’s Form 8-K (File No. 1-32579) filed on August 31, 2011.) | |
21.1 | Subsidiaries of the Registrant. | |
23.1 | Consent of Ernst & Young LLP. | |
31.1 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Principal Executive Officer | |
31.2 | Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of the Principal Financial Officer | |
32.1 | Principal Executive Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
32.2 | Principal Financial Officer Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | |
101 | The following materials from RailAmerica’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011, formatted in XBRL (eXtensible Business Reporting Language); (i) Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2011 and December 31, 2010, (ii) Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, (iii) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements* |
* | Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections. |
+ | Executive Compensation Plan or Arrangement. |
50
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
RAILAMERICA, INC. | ||
By: | /s/ B. CLYDE PRESLAR | |
B. Clyde Preslar, Senior Vice President and | ||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | ||
Dated: February 23, 2012 |
In accordance with the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
SIGNATURES |
TITLE |
DATE | ||
/s/ JOHN E. GILES |
President and Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) |
February 23, 2012 | ||
/s/ WESLEY R. EDENS |
Chairman of the Board of Directors | February 23, 2012 | ||
Joseph P. Adams, Jr. |
Deputy Chairman of the Board of Directors | February 23, 2012 | ||
/s/ PAUL R. GOODWIN |
Director | February 23, 2012 | ||
Director | February 23, 2012 | |||
/s/ ROBERT SCHMIEGE |
Director | February 23, 2012 | ||
/s/ RANDY T. PIANIN |
Vice President and Corporate Controller (Principal Accounting Officer) |
February 23, 2012 |
51
INDEX OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
F-1
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of RailAmerica, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of RailAmerica, Inc. and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of RailAmerica, Inc. and subsidiaries at December 31, 2011 and 2010, and the consolidated results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2011, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), RailAmerica, Inc.’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 23, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Independent Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
F-2
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of RailAmerica, Inc.
We have audited RailAmerica, Inc. and subsidiaries’ internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). RailAmerica, Inc. and subsidiaries’ management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, RailAmerica, Inc. and subsidiaries maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2011 based on the COSO criteria.
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the 2011 consolidated financial statements of RailAmerica, Inc. and our report dated February 23, 2012 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.
Independent Certified Public Accountants
Jacksonville, Florida
F-3
RAILAMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
December 31, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
(In thousands, except share data) | ||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 90,999 | $ | 152,968 | ||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance of $7,291 and $6,767, respectively |
96,813 | 74,668 | ||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
9,886 | 12,769 | ||||||
Other current assets |
17,967 | 15,200 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current assets |
215,665 | 255,605 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
1,021,545 | 981,622 | ||||||
Intangible assets |
134,851 | 140,546 | ||||||
Goodwill |
211,841 | 212,495 | ||||||
Other assets |
13,478 | 13,385 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,597,380 | $ | 1,603,653 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
$ | 71,991 | $ | 403 | ||||
Accounts payable |
78,844 | 66,258 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
28,616 | 36,913 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total current liabilities |
179,451 | 103,574 | ||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
1,827 | 2,147 | ||||||
Senior secured notes |
501,876 | 571,161 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
213,421 | 202,985 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
20,680 | 19,037 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities |
917,255 | 898,904 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Commitments and contingencies |
||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 400,000,000 shares authorized; 50,605,440 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2011; and 54,859,261 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2010 |
506 | 549 | ||||||
Additional paid in capital and other |
591,341 | 636,757 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
84,272 | 65,503 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
4,006 | 1,940 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
680,125 | 704,749 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 1,597,380 | $ | 1,603,653 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-4
RAILAMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
For the Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
(In thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 551,123 | $ | 490,291 | $ | 425,774 | ||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||
Labor and benefits |
164,674 | 153,993 | 143,604 | |||||||||
Equipment rents |
34,816 | 34,119 | 35,978 | |||||||||
Purchased services |
48,075 | 37,971 | 30,914 | |||||||||
Diesel fuel |
54,861 | 43,316 | 33,290 | |||||||||
Casualties and insurance |
13,844 | 17,574 | 16,795 | |||||||||
Materials |
27,896 | 19,607 | 11,399 | |||||||||
Joint facilities |
9,667 | 8,667 | 6,942 | |||||||||
Other expenses |
39,414 | 35,226 | 33,037 | |||||||||
Track maintenance expense reimbursement |
(16,714 | ) | (17,589 | ) | (16,656 | ) | ||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
(50 | ) | (2,191 | ) | (25,839 | ) | ||||||
Impairment of assets |
5,169 | — | — | |||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,849 | 45,091 | 42,105 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total operating expenses |
429,501 | 375,784 | 311,569 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Operating income |
121,622 | 114,507 | 114,205 | |||||||||
Interest expense, including amortization costs of $16,759, $25,655, and $26,889, respectively |
(71,923 | ) | (83,775 | ) | (86,878 | ) | ||||||
Other income (loss) |
1,331 | (4,759 | ) | (8,117 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
51,030 | 25,973 | 19,210 | |||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
14,162 | 6,856 | 16,299 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from continuing operations |
36,868 | 19,117 | 2,911 | |||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of discontinued business (net of income tax benefit of $12,006) |
— | — | 12,931 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 19,117 | $ | 15,842 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Dividends declared and paid per common share |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | 0.46 | ||||||
Basic earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
— | — | 0.28 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||
Diluted earnings per common share: |
||||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.07 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
— | — | 0.28 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net income |
$ | 0.70 | $ | 0.35 | $ | 0.35 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||
Basic |
52,519 | 54,793 | 45,979 | |||||||||
Diluted |
52,519 | 54,793 | 45,979 |
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-5
RAILAMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Stockholders’ Equity | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Shares Issued |
Par Value |
Additional Paid-in Capital and Other |
Retained Earnings |
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) |
Total | |||||||||||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2009 |
43,531 | $ | 435 | $ | 470,578 | $ | 50,029 | $ | (49,522 | ) | $ | 471,520 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
— | — | — | 15,842 | — | 15,842 | ||||||||||||||||||
Change in market value of derivative instruments, net |
— | — | — | — | 5,322 | 5,322 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of terminated swap costs, net |
— | — | — | — | 10,303 | 10,303 | ||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss associated with pension and postretirement benefit plans |
— | — | — | — | (843 | ) | (843 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
— | — | — | — | 16,488 | 16,488 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 47,112 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
10,500 | 105 | 143,018 | — | — | 143,123 | ||||||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
— | — | — | (19,485 | ) | — | (19,485 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Other equity contributions |
— | — | 819 | — | — | 819 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(49 | ) | — | (685 | ) | — | — | (685 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
382 | 4 | 16,923 | — | — | 16,927 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2009 |
54,364 | $ | 544 | $ | 630,653 | $ | 46,386 | $ | (18,252 | ) | $ | 659,331 | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
— | — | — | 19,117 | — | 19,117 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of terminated swap costs, net |
— | — | — | — | 13,306 | 13,306 | ||||||||||||||||||
Write-off of swap costs, net |
— | — | — | — | 1,047 | 1,047 | ||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial gain associated with pension and postretirement benefit plans |
— | — | — | — | 172 | 172 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
— | — | — | — | 5,667 | 5,667 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 39,309 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of common stock |
— | — | (106 | ) | — | — | (106 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(112 | ) | (1 | ) | (1,318 | ) | — | — | (1,319 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
607 | 6 | 7,528 | — | — | 7,534 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2010 |
54,859 | $ | 549 | $ | 636,757 | $ | 65,503 | $ | 1,940 | $ | 704,749 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Net income |
— | — | — | 36,868 | — | 36,868 | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of terminated swap costs, net |
— | — | — | — | 7,132 | 7,132 | ||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss associated with pension and postretirement benefit plans |
— | — | — | — | (2,663 | ) | (2,663 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustments |
— | — | — | — | (2,403 | ) | (2,403 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 38,934 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Stock repurchases |
(4,777 | ) | (48 | ) | (55,642 | ) | (18,099 | ) | — | (73,789 | ) | |||||||||||||
Stock based compensation |
523 | 5 | 10,226 | — | — | 10,231 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2011 |
50,605 | $ | 506 | $ | 591,341 | $ | 84,272 | $ | 4,006 | $ | 680,125 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-6
RAILAMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 19,117 | $ | 15,842 | ||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization of debt issuance costs classified in interest expense |
52,702 | 49,847 | 52,340 | |||||||||
Amortization of swap termination costs |
11,908 | 20,891 | 16,616 | |||||||||
Net gain on sale or disposal of properties |
(50 | ) | (2,191 | ) | (26,766 | ) | ||||||
Impairment of assets |
5,169 | — | — | |||||||||
Foreign exchange gain on debt |
— | — | (1,160 | ) | ||||||||
Swap termination costs |
— | — | (55,750 | ) | ||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
— | 8,357 | 9,499 | |||||||||
Financing costs |
719 | — | — | |||||||||
Equity compensation costs |
10,219 | 7,534 | 10,712 | |||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
10,524 | 2,765 | 21,057 | |||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and dispositions: |
||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(22,283 | ) | (2,435 | ) | 10,873 | |||||||
Other current assets |
(2,778 | ) | 7,512 | (3,093 | ) | |||||||
Accounts payable |
9,465 | 7,574 | (3,182 | ) | ||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(8,125 | ) | 1,268 | (16,677 | ) | |||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(2,049 | ) | (3,070 | ) | (20,771 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
102,289 | 117,169 | 9,540 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Purchase of property plant and equipment |
(130,779 | ) | (60,281 | ) | (47,789 | ) | ||||||
NECR government grant reimbursement |
37,212 | 2,455 | — | |||||||||
Proceeds from sale/disposition of assets |
16,353 | 4,108 | 90,340 | |||||||||
Deferred costs and other |
(144 | ) | — | (355 | ) | |||||||
Acquisitions, net of cash acquired |
(12,716 | ) | (23,926 | ) | — | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(90,074 | ) | (77,644 | ) | 42,196 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES: |
||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of senior secured notes |
— | — | 709,830 | |||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(428 | ) | (622 | ) | (625,898 | ) | ||||||
Repurchase of senior secured notes |
— | (76,220 | ) | (76,220 | ) | |||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(70,574 | ) | ||||||||||
Sale of common stock |
— | (106 | ) | 143,123 | ||||||||
Other |
12 | — | — | |||||||||
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
— | — | (19,485 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred financing costs paid |
(3,028 | ) | (224 | ) | (20,175 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities |
(74,018 | ) | (77,172 | ) | 111,175 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
(166 | ) | 397 | 356 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net (decrease) increase in cash |
(61,969 | ) | (37,250 | ) | 163,267 | |||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
152,968 | 190,218 | 26,951 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 90,999 | $ | 152,968 | $ | 190,218 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Supplemental cash flow information: |
||||||||||||
Interest Paid |
$ | 55,178 | $ | 57,986 | $ | 72,641 | ||||||
Income Taxes Paid |
$ | 4,112 | $ | 7,444 | $ | 3,416 |
The accompanying Notes are an integral part of the Consolidated Financial Statements.
F-7
RAILAMERICA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. | SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES |
ORGANIZATION
RailAmerica, Inc. (“RailAmerica” or the “Company”) is a leading owner and operator of short line and regional freight railroads in North America, operating a portfolio of 43 individual railroads with approximately 7,400 miles of track in 27 states and three Canadian provinces. The Company’s principal operations consist of rail freight transportation and ancillary rail services.
On November 14, 2006, RR Acquisition Holding LLC, a Delaware limited liability company (“Holdings”) and RR Acquisition Sub Inc., a Delaware corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (“Subsidiary”), both formed by investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”) entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (“Agreement”) with RailAmerica, a Delaware corporation. On February 14, 2007 shortly after the approval of the proposed merger by the shareholders of RailAmerica, Subsidiary merged with and into RailAmerica, with RailAmerica continuing as the entity surviving the merger as a wholly owned subsidiary of Holdings (the “Acquisition”).
On October 16, 2009, the Company completed an initial public offering of 22,000,000 shares of common stock at $15.00 per share. The Company sold 10,500,000 shares of common stock and Holdings sold 11,500,000 shares of common stock. Proceeds to the Company were $143.1 million net of the underwriters’ discount and expenses. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of its common stock by Holdings.
PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of RailAmerica and all of its subsidiaries. All of RailAmerica’s consolidated subsidiaries are wholly owned. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States (“GAAP”) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
The Company considers all highly liquid instruments purchased with a maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. The Company maintains its cash in demand deposit accounts, which at times may exceed insurance limits.
ALLOWANCE FOR DOUBTFUL ACCOUNTS
Allowances for doubtful accounts are recorded by management based upon the Company’s analysis of accounts receivable aging and specific identification of customers in financial distress (e.g., bankruptcy or poor payment record). Management reviews material past due balances on a monthly basis. Account balances are charged off against the allowance when management determines it is probable that the receivable will not be recovered.
F-8
Activity in the Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts was as follows (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of year |
$ | 6,767 | $ | 4,557 | ||||
Provisions |
1,267 | 3,544 | ||||||
Charges |
(743 | ) | (1,334 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance, end of year |
$ | 7,291 | $ | 6,767 | ||||
|
|
|
|
MATERIALS AND SUPPLIES
Materials and supplies, which are included in other current assets in the consolidated balance sheet, are stated principally at average cost, which is not in excess of replacement cost. Materials are stated at an amount which does not exceed estimated realizable value.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Depreciation Method
Property, plant and equipment, which is recorded at historical cost, is depreciated and amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. Costs assigned to property purchased as part of an acquisition are based on the fair value of such assets on the date of acquisition.
Track and Related Assets
For track and related assets, the Company uses the group method of depreciation under which a single depreciation rate is applied to the gross investment of each asset type. The Company reevaluated the useful lives of its track and related assets and established new depreciable lives based on reviews performed by valuation experts during purchase accounting in 2007.
Depreciation has been computed using the estimated economic useful lives as follows:
Railroad track and ties |
30-40 years | |||
Railroad track improvements |
3-10 years |
Under the group method, the service lives and salvage values for each group of assets are determined by completing periodic life studies and applying management’s assumptions regarding the service lives of its properties. A life study is the periodic review of asset lives for group assets conducted and analyzed by the Company’s management with the assistance of a third-party expert. The results of the life study process determine the service lives for each asset group under the group method.
There are several factors taken into account during the life study and they include statistical analysis of historical life, retirements and salvage data for each group of property, evaluation of current operations, review of the previous assessment of the condition of the assets and the outlook for their continued use, consideration of technological advances and maintenance schedules and comparison of asset groups to peer companies.
The Company’s policy is to perform life studies every five years for road (e.g. bridges and signals) and track (e.g., rail, ties and ballast) assets. Since the Company’s fixed assets were recently fair valued as part of purchase accounting in 2007, the first life study will be completed in 2012. Changes in asset lives due to the results of the life study, if any, will be applied on a prospective basis and could significantly impact future periods’ depreciation expense, and thus, the Company’s results of operations.
Building, Equipment and Other Fixed Assets
Building, equipment and other fixed assets (such as locomotives and freight cars) are specifically identified. The Company utilizes straight line depreciation methods on a per asset basis. The Company reevaluated the useful lives of its buildings, equipment and other fixed assets and established new depreciable lives based on reviews performed by valuation experts during purchase accounting in 2007.
F-9
Depreciation has been computed using the estimated economic useful lives as follows:
Buildings and improvements |
20-33 years | |||
Locomotives, transportation and other equipment |
5-30 years | |||
Office equipment and capitalized software |
5-10 years |
Capital Expenditures
Rail operations are capital-intensive and the Company accounts for these costs in accordance with GAAP. Routine repairs and maintenance costs, for all asset categories, are expensed as incurred. The Company self-constructs portions of its track structure and rebuilds certain of its rolling stock. In addition to direct labor and material, certain indirect costs are capitalized. Expenditures which significantly increase asset values or extend useful lives are capitalized.
Capital spending related to locomotives and freight cars includes purchase costs of locomotives and freight cars as well as certain equipment leases that are considered to be capital leases in accordance with the Leases Topic in the Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”). In addition, costs to modify or rebuild these assets are capitalized if the spending incurred extends the asset’s useful life or improves utilization. Improvement projects must meet specified dollar thresholds to be capitalized and are reviewed by management to determine proper accounting treatment.
The Company incurs certain direct labor, contract service and other costs associated with the development and installation of internal-use computer software. Costs for newly developed software or significant enhancements to existing software are capitalized. Research, preliminary project planning, operations, maintenance and training costs are charged to operating expense when the work is performed.
Disposals and Retirements
Track and Related Assets
Upon normal sale or retirement of track assets, cost less net salvage value is charged to accumulated depreciation and no gain or loss is recognized. As part of the life study in 2012, an assessment will be made of the recorded amount of accumulated depreciation. Any deficiency (or excess), including any deferred gains or losses, will be amortized as a component of depreciation expense over the remaining useful life of the asset group until the next required life study. Since the overall assumption with group method is that the assets within the group on average have the same life and characteristics, it is therefore concluded that the deferred gains and losses offset over time.
The Company utilizes a first-in, first-out approach to track and related asset retirements. Generally, the Company estimates the historical cost of the replaced assets using historical accounting records and/or inflation indices published by the Bureau of Labor Statistics which are applied to the replacement value based on the age of the retired asset. These indices closely correlate with the major cost of the materials comprising the applicable road assets.
In the event that large groups of assets are removed from service as a result of unusual acts or sales, resulting gains and losses are recognized immediately. These acts are not considered to be in the normal course of business and are therefore recognized when incurred. Examples of such acts would be the major destruction of assets due to significant storm damage (e.g. major hurricanes) and the sale, disposal or abandonment of a rail line segment. There were no abnormal losses during the periods ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Building, Equipment and Other Fixed Assets
Upon retirement or disposal of any of the building, equipment and other fixed assets, resulting gains and losses are recognized in earnings.
Impairment Reviews
The Company periodically reviews its assets for impairment when indicators are present, by comparing the projected undiscounted cash flows of those assets to their recorded amounts. Impairment charges are based on the excess of the recorded amounts over their estimated fair value, as measured by discounted cash flows.
F-10
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company evaluated its locomotive usage and determined that certain of its surplus locomotives were not expected to be placed back into service. As a result of this determination, the Company engaged a locomotive and railcar market advisor to assist management in evaluating the market value (level 2) of the identified locomotives based on recent sales and current market conditions. The evaluation resulted in the Company recording an impairment charge of $5.2 million ($3.2 million after tax, $0.06 per share).
GRANT PROCEEDS
The Company accounts for grant proceeds as contra-assets within property, plant and equipment and are amortized over the life of the related asset.
GOODWILL AND INDEFINITE-LIVED INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the value assigned to the net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of RailAmerica.
The Company reviews the carrying values of goodwill and identifiable intangible assets with indefinite lives at least annually to assess impairment since these assets are not amortized. Additionally, the Company reviews the carrying value of goodwill or any intangible asset whenever such events or changes in circumstances indicate that its carrying amount may not be recoverable. The Company assesses impairment by comparing the fair value of an intangible asset or goodwill with its carrying value. Specifically, the Company tests for impairment in accordance with Intangibles- Goodwill and Other Topic, ASC 350. For goodwill, a two-step impairment model is used. The first step either compares the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying amount, including goodwill or performs a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. The determination of fair value involves significant management judgment. If the fair value of the reporting unit is less than the carrying amount, goodwill would be considered impaired. The second step measures the goodwill impairment as the excess of recorded goodwill over the asset’s implied fair value. Impairments are recognized when incurred. Management believes that goodwill is not impaired based on the results of the annual impairment test.
For the indefinite-lived intangible assets the impairment test compares the fair value of an intangible asset with its carrying amount. If the carrying amount of an intangible asset exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss is recognized in an amount equal to that excess. The Company has certain railroad leases that are recorded as indefinite-lived intangible assets. Management believes that indefinite-lived intangible assets are not impaired based on the results of the annual impairment test.
AMORTIZABLE INTANGIBLE ASSETS
The Company has amortizable intangible assets recorded at the fair value of locomotive, railcar and railroad leases as well as customer relationships or contracts. These intangible assets are generally amortized on a straight-line basis over the contractual length of the lease or expected economic longevity of the customer relationship, the facility served, or the length of the customer contract. For amortizable intangible assets, Property, Plant and Equipment Topic, ASC 360, requires a company to perform an impairment test on amortizable intangible assets when specific impairment indicators are present. No circumstances have occurred to indicate the possibility of impairment.
INCOME TAXES
The Company utilizes the liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes. This method requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements or tax returns. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the difference between the financial and tax bases of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are also established for the future tax benefits of loss and credit carryovers. The liability method of accounting for deferred income taxes requires a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets if, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
F-11
REVENUE RECOGNITION
The Company recognizes freight revenue after the freight has been moved from origin to destination, which is not materially different from the recognition of revenue as shipments progress due to the relatively short length of the Company’s railroads. Other revenue, which primarily includes demurrage, switching, and storage fees, is recognized when the service is performed. The Company recognizes engineering revenue on a percentage of completion method.
FOREIGN CURRENCY TRANSLATION
The financial statements and transactions of the Company’s foreign operations are maintained in their local currency, which is their functional currency. Where local currencies are used, assets and liabilities are translated at current exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Translation adjustments, which result from the process of translating the financial statements into U.S. dollars, are accumulated in the cumulative translation adjustment account, which is a component of accumulated other comprehensive income in stockholders’ equity. Revenue and expenses are translated at the average exchange rate for each period. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions are included in net income. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, accumulated other comprehensive income included $11.5 million and $13.9 million of cumulative translation gains, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2009, other income (loss) included $1.2 million of exchange rate gains on the U.S. dollar denominated debt formerly held by a Canadian entity that has the Canadian dollar as its functional currency.
RECLASSIFICATIONS
Certain reclassifications have been made to the prior years’ financial statements to conform to the current period classifications.
NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
In May 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-04, “Amendments to Achieve Common Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure Requirements in U.S. GAAP and IFRSs” (“ASU No. 2011-04”), which amends current guidance to result in common fair value measurement and disclosures between accounting principles generally accepted in the United States and International Financial Reporting Standards. The amendments explain how to measure fair value. They do not require additional fair value measurements and are not intended to establish valuations standards or affect valuation practices outside of financial reporting. ASU No. 2011-04 clarifies the application of certain existing fair value measurement guidance and expands the disclosures for fair value measurements that are estimated using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3 inputs). The amendments in ASU No. 2011-04 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011. The Company does not believe that the adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-04 will have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In June 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-05, “Presentation of Comprehensive Income” (“ASU No. 2011-05”), which improves the comparability, consistency, and transparency of financial reporting and increases the prominence of items reported in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) by eliminating the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders’ equity. The amendments in this standard require that all nonowner changes in stockholders’ equity be presented either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements. Subsequently in December 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-12, “Deferral of the Effective Date for Amendments to the Presentation of Reclassifications of Items Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income” (“ASU No. 2011-12”), which indefinitely defers the requirement in ASU No. 2011-05 to present on the face of the financial statements reclassification adjustments for items that are reclassified from OCI to net income in the statement(s) where the components of net income and the components of OCI are presented. The amendments in these standards do not change the items that must be reported in OCI, when an item of OCI must be reclassified to net income, or change the option for an entity to present components of OCI gross or net of the effect of income taxes. The amendments in ASU No. 2011-05 and ASU No. 2011-12 are effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2011 and are to be applied retrospectively. The adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-05 and ASU No. 2011-12 will not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In September 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-08, “Testing Goodwill for Impairment” (“ASU No. 2011-08”), which allows entities to use a qualitative approach to test goodwill for impairment. ASU No. 2011-08 permits an entity to first perform a qualitative assessment to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value. If it is concluded that this is the case, it is necessary to perform the currently prescribed two-step goodwill impairment test. Otherwise, the two-step goodwill impairment test is not required. ASU No. 2011-08 is effective for annual and
F-12
interim goodwill impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2011. Early adoption is permitted. The Company adopted ASU No. 2011-08 in 2011. The adoption of the provisions of ASU No. 2011-08 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations.
2. | ACQUISITIONS |
On May 11, 2011, the Company acquired three short-line freight railroads in the state of Alabama for a total purchase price of $12.7 million. The acquisition was funded from existing cash on hand. The three railroads (the “Southeastern Alabama Railroads”), known individually as the Three Notch Railroad (TNHR), the Wiregrass Central Railroad (WGCR), and the Conecuh Valley Railroad (COEH), comprise approximately 70 miles and primarily haul agricultural and chemical products. The railroads were acquired from affiliates of Gulf and Ohio Railways, Inc. The results of operations of the railroads have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since May 11, 2011, the acquisition date.
In accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, Business Combinations Topic, the acquisition was accounted for under the acquisition method of accounting. Assets acquired and liabilities assumed were recorded at their estimated fair value.
The allocation of purchase price is as follows (in thousands):
Intangible assets |
$ | 1,212 | ||
Property, plant and equipment |
11,645 | |||
|
|
|||
Total assets acquired |
12,857 | |||
Liabilities assumed |
(141 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Total liabilities assumed |
(141 | ) | ||
Purchase price |
$ | 12,716 | ||
|
|
Definite-lived intangible assets were assigned the following amounts and weighted average amortization periods (dollars in thousands):
Value Assigned |
Weighted Average Life (Years) |
|||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 620 | 10.0 | |||||
Lease right of way |
$ | 592 | 15.0 |
On July 1, 2010, the Company acquired Atlas Railroad Construction Company (“Atlas”) and related assets for $23.9 million in cash including closing adjustments for working capital, which were approximately $2.4 million, net of cash acquired. The acquisition was funded from existing cash on hand. Atlas is a railroad engineering, construction, maintenance and repair company operating primarily in the U.S. Midwest and Northeast. Atlas provides railroad construction services principally to short line and regional railroads, public-transit agencies and industrial customers. The results of operations of Atlas have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements since July 1, 2010, the acquisition date.
3. | EARNINGS PER SHARE |
For the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, basic and diluted earnings per share is calculated using the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. The basic earnings per share calculation includes all vested and unvested restricted shares as a result of their dividend participation rights.
F-13
The following is a summary of the income from continuing operations available for common stockholders and weighted average shares outstanding (in thousands):
For the Years Ended | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Income from continuing operations (basic and diluted) |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 19,117 | $ | 2,911 | ||||||
Compensation expense recorded for dividends paid to unvested restricted shares, net of tax |
— | — | 307 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income from continuing operations available to common stockholders |
||||||||||||
(basic and diluted) |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 19,117 | $ | 3,218 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding (basic and diluted) |
52,519 | 54,793 | 45,979 |
4. | STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION |
Throughout 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company entered into individual equity award agreements with employees, including executive officers. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company issued 551,441, 662,296 and 401,647 time-based restricted shares to employees. The restricted shares granted to employees are scheduled to vest over three to five year periods. The grant date fair values of the restricted shares are based upon the fair market value of the Company at the time of grant. The Company recognizes stock-based compensation expense for restricted shares on a straight-line basis. Prior to the Company’s initial public offering in October 2009, the Company engaged an unrelated valuation specialist to perform a fair value analysis of the Company at the end of each quarter.
Stock-based compensation expense related to restricted stock grants for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $10.2 million, $7.5 million and $4.4 million, respectively.
Repurchase provisions that existed in the equity award agreements expired as of the initial public offering date. As a result, the Company recorded a charge of $6.3 million related to the value of these repurchase features as of the grant date during the year ended December 31, 2009. The value of the repurchase features was calculated using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. Expected volatilities were based on historical volatility of industry peer common stock. Expected lives, which represent the period of time that repurchase features were expected to be outstanding, were based on the anticipated amount of time between the grant date of the related equity award and the anticipated future initial public offering of the Company. The risk free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury rate with a maturity date corresponding to the options’ expected lives.
At December 31, 2011, there was $9.6 million of unrecognized compensation expense related to unvested restricted share compensation arrangements, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of 1.38 years. The total fair value of shares vested during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 was $10.9 million, $4.9 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
A summary of the status of restricted shares as of December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, and the changes during the periods then ended and the weighted average grant date fair values is presented below:
Time Based | ||||||||
Balance at January 1, 2009 |
1,100,961 | $ | 12.20 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Granted |
401,647 | $ | 15.22 | |||||
Vested |
(196,362 | ) | $ | 12.11 | ||||
Cancelled |
(19,917 | ) | $ | 12.43 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
1,286,329 | $ | 13.10 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Granted |
662,296 | $ | 11.90 | |||||
Vested |
(418,440 | ) | $ | 13.06 | ||||
Cancelled |
(53,960 | ) | $ | 13.38 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
1,476,225 | $ | 12.59 | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Granted |
551,441 | $ | 13.67 | |||||
Vested |
(740,808 | ) | $ | 12.70 | ||||
Cancelled |
(27,939 | ) | $ | 13.72 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
1,258,919 | $ | 12.97 | |||||
|
|
|
|
F-14
5. | DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS |
Alberta Railroad Properties
During the fourth quarter of 2005, the Predecessor Company committed to a plan to dispose of the Alberta Railroad Properties, comprised of the Lakeland & Waterways Railway, Mackenzie Northern Railway and Central Western Railway. The sale of the Alberta Railroad Properties was completed in January 2006 for $22.1 million in cash. In 2008, the Company settled working capital claims with the buyer and as a result recorded an adjustment of $1.3 million, or $1.2 million, after income taxes, through the gain on sale of discontinued operations. During the year ended December 31, 2009, the Company recorded an adjustment of $0.2 million, or $0.2 million, after tax, as an adjustment to the gain on sale of discontinued operations related to outstanding liabilities associated with the disposed entities.
Freight Australia
In August 2004, the Company completed the sale of its Australian railroad, Freight Australia, to Pacific National for AUD $285 million (U.S. $204 million). The Australian Taxation Office (“ATO”) performed an audit of the reorganization transactions undertaken by the Company’s Australian subsidiaries prior to the sale. On May 14, 2009, the Company received a notice from the ATO indicating that they would not be taking any further action in relation to its audit of the reorganization transactions. As a result, the Company has removed the previously recorded tax reserves resulting in a benefit to the continuing operations tax provision of $2.5 million related to the accrual of interest subsequent to the Company’s acquisition, an adjustment to the gain on sale of discontinued operations of $12.3 million and reduced its accrual for consulting fees resulting in a gain on sale of discontinued operations of $0.7 million, or $0.5 million after tax, during the year ended December 31, 2009.
6. | OTHER BALANCE SHEET DATA |
Accrued expenses consisted of the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Accrued compensation and benefits |
$ | 10,731 | $ | 13,554 | ||||
Accrued incident expense |
5,974 | 8,214 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
11,911 | 15,145 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 28,616 | $ | 36,913 | |||||
|
|
|
|
7. | PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT |
Property, plant and equipment consist of the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Land |
$ | 187,716 | $ | 186,688 | ||||
Buildings and improvements |
9,342 | 7,024 | ||||||
Railroad track and improvements |
887,649 | 826,747 | ||||||
Locomotives, transportation and other equipment |
103,905 | 88,545 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
1,188,612 | 1,109,004 | |||||||
Less: accumulated depreciation |
(167,067 | ) | (127,382 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
$ | 1,021,545 | $ | 981,622 | |||||
|
|
|
|
Depreciation expense, including amortization of assets recorded under capital leases, for the periods ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, was $41.8 million, $37.7 million, and $34.6 million.
F-15
8. | GOODWILL AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET |
Goodwill
Goodwill, which totaled $211.8 million and $212.5 million as of December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively, includes the excess of the purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets associated with the acquisition of RailAmerica by Fortress in 2007 and the acquisition of Atlas by RailAmerica in 2010. As described in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, on February 14, 2007, RailAmerica and Fortress completed a merger in which RailAmerica was acquired by certain private equity funds managed by affiliates of Fortress.
The table below reflects the change in the carrying amount of goodwill for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands).
Balance at December 31, 2009 |
$ | 200,769 | ||
Addition for the acquisition of Atlas |
11,326 | |||
Impact of change in foreign exchange rates |
400 | |||
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2010 |
$ | 212,495 | ||
|
|
|||
Impact of change in foreign exchange rates |
(654 | ) | ||
|
|
|||
Balance at December 31, 2011 |
$ | 211,841 | ||
|
|
Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets
Perpetual railroad leases for trackage rights and the Atlas trade name are considered indefinite-lived intangible assets. The carrying value of the non-amortizing intangibles decreased by $0.8 million during the year ended December 31, 2011 due to foreign exchange translation adjustments.
Definite-Lived Intangible Assets
Definite-lived intangible asset classes were assigned the following amounts and weighted-average amortization periods (dollars in thousands):
Intangible Asset Class |
Value Assigned |
Weighted Average Life (Years) |
||||||
Customer contracts |
$ | 25,115 | 5.3 | |||||
Railroad leases |
$ | 10,427 | 16.8 | |||||
Rolling stock leases |
$ | 2,107 | 4.5 | |||||
Locomotive leases |
$ | 5,943 | 6.2 | |||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 6,720 | 20.0 | |||||
Project backlog |
$ | 110 | 0.5 | |||||
Non-compete agreements |
$ | 810 | 4.2 |
F-16
The following table provides the gross and net carrying amounts for each major class of intangible assets (in thousands):
December 31, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Book Value |
Gross Carrying Amount |
Accumulated Amortization |
Net Book Value |
|||||||||||||||||||
Amortizable intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Customer contract intangibles |
$ | 25,115 | $ | (22,746 | ) | $ | 2,369 | $ | 24,495 | $ | (18,406 | ) | $ | 6,089 | ||||||||||
Railroad leases intangibles |
10,427 | (4,300 | ) | 6,127 | 9,835 | (3,808 | ) | 6,027 | ||||||||||||||||
Rolling stock leases intangibles |
2,107 | (2,085 | ) | 22 | 2,107 | (2,061 | ) | 46 | ||||||||||||||||
Locomotive leases intangibles |
5,943 | (5,343 | ) | 600 | 5,943 | (4,663 | ) | 1,280 | ||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
6,720 | (504 | ) | 6,216 | 6,720 | (168 | ) | 6,552 | ||||||||||||||||
Project backlog |
110 | (110 | ) | — | 110 | (110 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||||
Non-compete agreements |
810 | (293 | ) | 517 | 810 | (98 | ) | 712 | ||||||||||||||||
Non-amortizable intangible assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Railroad leases intangibles |
115,715 | — | 115,715 | 116,555 | — | 116,555 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trade names |
1,790 | — | 1,790 | 1,790 | — | 1,790 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other intangible assets |
1,495 | — | 1,495 | 1,495 | — | 1,495 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||
Total intangible assets |
$ | 170,232 | $ | (35,381 | ) | $ | 134,851 | $ | 169,860 | $ | (29,314 | ) | $ | 140,546 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table sets forth the amortization expense over the next five years (in thousands):
2012 |
$ | 4,077 | ||
2013 |
1,211 | |||
2014 |
891 | |||
2015 |
794 | |||
2016 |
779 | |||
Thereafter |
8,099 | |||
|
|
|||
$ | 15,851 | |||
|
|
9. | LONG-TERM DEBT AND LEASES |
Long-term debt consists of the following as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
9.25% Senior Secured Notes (net of original issue discount of $18,427 and $20,839,respectively) |
$ | 573,573 | $ | 571,161 | ||||
Other long-term debt (including capital leases) |
2,121 | 2,550 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
575,694 | 573,711 | |||||||
Less: current maturities |
71,991 | 403 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
$ | 503,703 | $ | 573,308 | ||||
|
|
|
|
The aggregate annual maturities of long-term debt are as follows (in thousands):
2012 |
$ | 74,294 | ||
2013 |
311 | |||
2014 |
329 | |||
2015 |
323 | |||
2016 |
344 | |||
Thereafter |
518,520 | |||
|
|
|||
$ | 594,121 | |||
|
|
$740 Million 9.25% Senior Secured Notes
On June 23, 2009, the Company sold $740.0 million of 9.25% senior secured notes due July 1, 2017 in a private offering, for gross proceeds of $709.8 million after deducting the initial purchaser’s fees. The notes were secured by first-priority liens on substantially
F-17
all of the Company’s and the guarantors’ assets. The guarantors are defined essentially as the Company’s existing and future wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries. The net proceeds received from the issuance of the notes were used to repay the outstanding balance of the $650 million bridge credit facility, as described below, and $7.4 million of accrued interest thereon, pay costs of $57.1 million to terminate interest rate swap arrangements, including $1.3 million of accrued interest, entered into in connection with the bridge credit facility, pay fees and expenses related to the offering and for general corporate purposes.
On November 2, 2009, the Company commenced an exchange offer of the privately placed senior secured notes for senior secured notes which have been registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The registered notes have terms that are substantially identical to the privately placed notes. The exchange offer expired on December 2, 2009.
The Company may redeem up to 10% of the aggregate principal amount of the notes issued during any 12-month period commencing on the issue date at a price equal to 103% of the principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any. The Company may also redeem some or all of the notes at any time before July 1, 2013, at a price equal to 100% of the aggregate principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, to the redemption date and a make-whole premium. In addition, prior to July 1, 2012, the Company may redeem up to 35% of the notes at a redemption price of 109.25% of their principal amount thereof plus accrued and unpaid interest, if any, with the proceeds from an equity offering. Subsequent to July 1, 2013, the Company may redeem the notes at 104.625% of their principal amount. The premium then reduces to 102.313% commencing on July 1, 2014 and then 100% on July 1, 2015 and thereafter. On November 16, 2009, the Company redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date. On June 24, 2010, the Company redeemed an additional $74 million aggregate principal amount of the notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date.
Subsequent to year end, on January 5, 2012, the Company redeemed $74 million of its 9.25% Senior Secured Notes, in accordance with the terms of the indenture. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus accrued interest up to but not including, January 5, 2012.
$40 Million ABL Facility
In connection with the issuance of the senior secured notes on June 23, 2009, the Company also entered into a $40 million Asset Backed Loan Facility (“ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility would have matured on June 23, 2013 and bore interest at LIBOR plus 4.00%. Obligations under the ABL Facility were secured by a first-priority lien on the ABL collateral. ABL collateral included accounts receivable, deposit accounts, securities accounts and cash. As of December 31, 2010, the Company had no outstanding balance under the Facility and approximately $21.4 million of undrawn availability, taking into account borrowing base limitations.
On June 10, 2010, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to its ABL Facility improving certain terms of the ABL Facility. Among other things, Amendment No. 1 eliminated the LIBOR-based interest rate floor of 2.5%, modified the borrowing base calculation and reporting requirements to require less frequent financial reporting in certain circumstances, adjusted the limitations on permitted acquisitions and restricted payments and amended the financial covenants to incorporate cash balances in certain definitions.
On February 23, 2011, the Company entered into Amendment No. 2 to its ABL Facility. This amendment adjusted certain terms of the ABL Facility and increased the threshold for Restricted Payments, as defined in the ABL Facility, to allow share repurchases of the Company’s common stock in an amount not to exceed $75 million without affecting other Restricted Payment baskets.
The ABL Facility was replaced by the Company’s $75 million Revolving Credit Facility on August 29, 2011.
The ABL Facility and indenture governing the senior secured notes contained various covenants and restrictions that limited the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, make certain investments, sell or transfer certain assets, create liens, designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries, consolidate, merge or sell substantially all the assets, and enter into certain transactions with affiliates.
$650 Million Bridge Credit Facility
As part of the merger transaction in which the Company was acquired by certain private equity funds managed by affiliates of Fortress, the Company terminated the commitments under its former amended and restated credit agreement and repaid all outstanding loans and other obligations in full under this agreement. In order to fund this repayment of debt and complete the merger transaction, on February 14, 2007, the Company entered into a $650 million bridge credit facility agreement. The facility consisted of a
F-18
$587 million U.S. dollar term loan commitment and a $38 million Canadian dollar term loan commitment, as well as a $25 million revolving loan facility with a $20 million U.S. dollar tranche and a $5 million Canadian dollar tranche. The Company entered into an amendment on July 1, 2008 to extend the maturity of the bridge credit facility for one year with an additional one year extension at its option. Under the amended bridge credit facility agreement, the term loans and revolving loans carried an interest rate of LIBOR plus 4.0%. Prior to amendment, the bridge credit facility agreement, including the revolving loans, paid interest at LIBOR plus 2.25%.
In November 2008, the Company entered into Amendment No. 1 to the amended bridge credit facility agreement which permitted the Company to enter into employee and office space sharing agreements with affiliates and included a technical amendment to the definitions of interest coverage ratio and interest expense.
The U.S. and Canadian dollar term loans and the U.S. and Canadian dollar revolvers were collateralized by the assets of and guaranteed by the Company and most of its U.S. and Canadian subsidiaries. The loans were provided by a syndicate of banks with Citigroup Global Markets, Inc. and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc., as co-lead arrangers, Citicorp North America, Inc., as administrative agent and collateral agent and Morgan Stanley Senior Funding, Inc. as syndication agent.
As discussed above, all borrowings under the bridge credit facility were repaid with the proceeds from the issuance of the senior secured notes in 2009.
$75 Million Revolving Credit Facility
On August 29, 2011, the Company entered into a credit agreement (the “Revolving Credit Facility”) among the Company, RailAmerica Transportation Corp. (“RATC”, and together with the Company, the “Borrowers”), the lenders party thereto from time to time, Citibank N.A., as administrative agent and collateral agent, and Citigroup Global Markets Inc., as sole lead arranger and sole bookrunner, that provides for a revolving line of credit of up to $75 million to be used for working capital and general corporate purposes.
The Revolving Credit Facility has a five year term, with a maturity date of August 29, 2016. Amounts available under the Revolving Credit Facility are available for immediate drawdown, subject to the applicable financial covenants and restrictions, certain of which are described below.
The loans under the Revolving Credit Facility bear interest, at the Borrowers’ option, at a rate per annum of either (a) the Eurodollar Rate plus 3.50% or (b) the Adjusted Base Rate plus 2.50%. In each instance, if certain financial covenants and restrictions are met by the Borrowers, the applicable margin shall be reduced by 0.25%. In connection with the Revolving Credit Facility, the Borrowers will pay a commitment fee of 0.50% based on the daily amount of unused commitments made available under the Revolving Credit Facility.
The Revolving Credit Facility is fully and unconditionally guaranteed (the “Guarantors” and “Guarantees,” as the case may be) on a joint and several basis by certain of the Company’s existing and future direct and indirect subsidiaries. All amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility (and all obligations under the Guarantees) are secured on a pari passu basis with the liens under the Company’s 9.25% senior secured notes due July 1, 2017 on: (a) stock and other equity interests owned by Borrowers and Guarantors, and (b) certain (i) real property, (ii) equipment and inventory, (iii) patents, trademarks and copyrights, (iv) general intangibles related to the foregoing, and (v) substantially all of the tangible personal property and intangible assets of the Borrowers and Guarantors. Further, all amounts outstanding under the Revolving Credit Facility (and all obligations under the Guarantees) are secured on a first priority basis with liens on accounts receivable, deposit and security accounts, and general intangibles relating to the foregoing.
F-19
There were no outstanding borrowings under the Revolving Credit Facility as of December 31, 2011. Subsequent to year end, on January 3, 2012 the Company borrowed $7.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility. The borrowings were repaid in February 2012.
The Revolving Credit Facility and indenture governing the senior secured notes contain various covenants and restrictions that limit the ability of the Company and its restricted subsidiaries to incur additional indebtedness, pay dividends, make certain investments, sell or transfer certain assets, create liens, designate subsidiaries as unrestricted subsidiaries, consolidate, merge or sell substantially all the assets, and enter into certain transactions with affiliates. It is anticipated that proceeds from any future borrowings would be used for general corporate purposes.
Leases
The Company has several finance leases for equipment and locomotives. The Company also operates some of its railroad properties under operating leases. The minimum annual lease commitments at December 31, 2011 are as follows (in thousands):
Operating Leases |
||||
2012 |
$ | 20,104 | ||
2013 |
12,742 | |||
2014 |
8,502 | |||
2015 |
3,901 | |||
2016 |
3,298 | |||
Thereafter |
16,159 | |||
|
|
|||
Total minimum lease payments |
$ | 64,706 | ||
|
|
Rental expense under operating leases was approximately $25.7 million, $25.8 million, and $28.7 million for the periods ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
10. | DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
The Company adopted Derivatives and Hedging Topic, ASC 815-10-65, on January 1, 2009, which enhances the disclosure requirements about an entity’s derivative instruments and hedging activities. The expanded disclosure required by ASC 815 is presented below.
The Company may use derivatives to hedge against increases in interest rates. The Company formally documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, as well as the risk management objective and strategy for the use of the hedging instrument. This documentation includes linking the derivatives that are designated as cash flow hedges to specific assets or liabilities on the balance sheet, commitments or forecasted transactions. The Company assesses at the time a derivative contract is entered into, and at least quarterly, whether the derivative item is effective in offsetting the changes in fair value or cash flows. Any change in fair value resulting from ineffectiveness is recognized in current period earnings. For derivative instruments that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative instrument is recorded in accumulated other comprehensive income as a separate component of stockholders’ equity and reclassified into earnings in the period during which the hedge transaction affects earnings. During the periods ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company reclassified $7.1 million, $14.4 million and $24.6 million, respectively from other comprehensive loss to interest expense. At December 31, 2010, accumulated other comprehensive loss included $12.7 million, net of income taxes of $8.4 million, of unamortized loss relating to the terminated swap, as discussed below. At December 31, 2011, accumulated other comprehensive loss included a loss of $5.6 million, net of income taxes of $2.5 million, relating to the interest rate swaps.
For derivative instruments in an asset position, the Company analyzes the credit standing of the counterparty and factors it into the fair value measurement. Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic, ASC 820 states that the fair value of a liability must reflect the nonperformance risk of the reporting entity. Therefore, the impact of the Company’s credit worthiness has also been factored into the fair value measurement of the derivative instruments in a liability position. The Company monitors its hedging positions and the credit ratings of its counterparties and does not anticipate losses due to counterparty nonperformance.
F-20
On February 14, 2007, the Company entered into an interest rate swap with a termination date of February 15, 2014. The total notional amount of the swap started at $425 million for the period from February 14, 2007 through November 14, 2007, increased to a total notional amount of $525 million for the period from November 15, 2007 through November 14, 2008, and ultimately increased to $625 million for the period from November 15, 2008 through February 15, 2014. Under the terms of the interest rate swap, the Company was required to pay a fixed interest rate of 4.9485% on the notional amount while receiving a variable interest rate equal to the 90 day LIBOR. This swap qualified, was designated and was accounted for as a cash flow hedge under ASC 815. Interest expense of $0.5 million was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2008 for the portion of the hedge deemed ineffective, respectively. This interest rate swap agreement was terminated in June 2009, in connection with the repayment of the bridge credit facility, and thus had no fair value at December 31, 2010 or December 31, 2011. Pursuant to ASC 815, the fair value balance of the swap at termination remains in accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax, and is amortized to interest expense over the remaining life of the original swap (through February 14, 2014). As a result of the $74 million redemption of the notes during June 2010, an additional $1.7 million of unamortized expense was recognized during the year ended December 31, 2010. This was the result of the face value of outstanding senior secured notes dropping below the notional amount of the swap. As of December 31, 2011, accumulated other comprehensive loss included $5.6 million, net of tax, of unamortized loss relating to the terminated swap. Interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, included $11.9 million and $20.9 million, respectively, of amortization expense related to the terminated swap. As a result of the $74 million redemption of the notes in January 2012, an additional $1.2 million of unamortized expense will be recognized during the year ended December 31, 2012. Reclassifications from accumulated other comprehensive loss to interest expense in the next twelve months will be approximately $5.3 million, or $3.2 million net of tax.
For the year ended December 31, 2009, the amount of loss recognized in the consolidated statement of operations was as follows (in thousands):
The Effect of Derivative Instruments on Statement of Operations | ||||||||||||||||||||
Derivatives in ASC 815 Cash Flow Hedging Relationships |
Amount of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (AOCI) on Derivative (Effective Portion) |
Location of
Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
Amount of Gain (Loss) Reclassified from AOCI into Income (Effective Portion) |
Location of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) |
Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion) |
|||||||||||||||
Interest Rate Swap |
$ | 5,322 | Interest Expense | $ | (7,270 | ) | Interest Expense | $ | (278 | ) |
See Note 11 for additional information regarding the fair value of derivative instruments.
11. | FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
Effective beginning second quarter 2009, ASC 825 requires disclosures about fair value of financial instruments in quarterly reports as well as in annual reports. For RailAmerica, this statement applies to certain investments, such as cash equivalents, and long-term debt. Also, ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair value for financial reporting, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and requires additional disclosures about the use of fair value measurements.
The following methods and assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of each class of financial instrument held by the Company:
• | Current assets and current liabilities: The carrying value approximates fair value due to the short maturity of these items. |
• | Long-term debt: The fair value of the Company’s senior secured notes is based on secondary market indicators. The carrying amount of the Company’s other long term debt approximates its fair value. |
• | Derivatives: The carrying value is based on fair value as of the balance sheet date. Companies are required to maximize the use of observable inputs (Level 1 and Level 2), when available, and to minimize the use of unobservable inputs (Level 3) when determining fair value. The Company’s measurement of the fair value of interest rate derivatives is based on estimates of the |
F-21
mid-market values for the transactions provided by the counterparties to these agreements. For derivative instruments in an asset position, the Company also analyzes the credit standing of the counterparty and factors it into the fair value measurement. ASC 820 states that the fair value of a liability also must reflect the nonperformance risk of the reporting entity. Therefore, the impact of the Company’s credit worthiness has also been factored into the fair value measurement of the derivative instruments in a liability position. This methodology is a market approach, which under ASC 820 utilizes Level 2 inputs as it uses market data for similar instruments in active markets. See Note 10 for further fair value disclosure of the Company’s interest rate swap. As the Company terminated its interest rate swap agreement in conjunction with the refinancing of its bridge credit facility on June 23, 2009, the swap had no fair value as of December 31, 2011 or 2010. |
The carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments were as follows:
December 31, 2011 | ||||||||
Carrying Amount |
Fair Value |
|||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 90,999 | $ | 90,999 | ||||
9.25% Senior secured notes |
$ | 573,573 | $ | 648,240 |
12. | COMMON STOCK TRANSACTIONS |
On October 16, 2009, the Company completed an initial public offering of 22,000,000 shares of common stock at $15.00 per share. The Company sold 10,500,000 shares of common stock and Holdings sold 11,500,000 shares of common stock. Proceeds to the Company were $143.1 million net of the underwriters’ discount and expenses. The Company did not receive any proceeds from the sale of its common stock by Holdings. On November 16, 2009, the Company redeemed $74 million aggregate principal amount of the senior secured notes at a cash redemption price of 103%, plus accrued interest thereon to, but not including, the redemption date. The Company intends to use the remainder of the net proceeds from the initial public offering for working capital and other general corporate purposes, including potential strategic investments and acquisitions.
Effective September 22, 2009, the Board of Directors approved a stock split of 90 to 1 and increased the total authorized shares to 500,000,000, consisting of 400,000,000 shares of common stock and 100,000,000 shares of preferred stock. All prior period share and per share amounts have been adjusted to reflect the stock split.
During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company accepted 219,314 and 113,381 shares in lieu of cash payments by employees for payroll tax withholdings relating to stock based compensation.
Stock Repurchase Program
On February 23, 2011, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a $50 million stock repurchase program. Under the program, the Company was authorized to repurchase up to $50 million of its outstanding shares of common stock from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased depended on a variety of factors including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, trading volume and general market conditions. The Company completed this stock repurchase program on April 18, 2011, repurchasing a total of 3,036,769 shares at a weighted average price of $16.46 per share.
On August 30, 2011, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved a $25 million stock repurchase program. Under the program, the Company is authorized to repurchase up to $25 million of its outstanding shares of common stock from time to time at prevailing prices in the open market or in privately negotiated transactions. The timing and actual number of shares repurchased depends on a variety of factors including the price and availability of the Company’s shares, trading volume and general market conditions. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company repurchased a total of 1,521,240 shares at a weighted average price of $13.43 per share related to the August 30, 2011 repurchase program. The Company had $4.6 million remaining for the repurchase of outstanding shares, under this program, as of December 31, 2011.
F-22
13. | INCOME TAX PROVISION |
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, consists of (in thousands):
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Domestic |
$ | 37,689 | $ | 14,019 | $ | (15,725 | ) | |||||
Foreign subsidiaries |
13,341 | 11,954 | 34,935 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
$ | 51,030 | $ | 25,973 | $ | 19,210 | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The provision (benefit) for income taxes for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, consists of (in thousands):
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Federal income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Current |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
Deferred |
15,431 | 4,022 | 13,868 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
15,431 | 4,022 | 13,868 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
State income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Current |
953 | 18 | (333 | ) | ||||||||
Deferred |
(5,952 | ) | 103 | 910 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
(4,999 | ) | 121 | 577 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Foreign income taxes: |
||||||||||||
Current |
2,685 | 4,073 | 6,279 | |||||||||
Deferred |
1,045 | (1,360 | ) | (16,431 | ) | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
3,730 | 2,713 | (10,152 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total income tax provision |
$ | 14,162 | $ | 6,856 | $ | 4,293 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table summarizes the total income tax provision (benefit) for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Continuing operations |
$ | 14,162 | $ | 6,856 | $ | 16,299 | ||||||
Discontinued operations |
— | — | (12,006 | ) | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total income tax provision |
$ | 14,162 | $ | 6,856 | $ | 4,293 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-23
The differences between the U.S. federal statutory tax rate and the Company’s effective rate from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
Income tax expense at federal statutory rate |
$ | 17,861 | $ | 9,091 | $ | 6,724 | ||||||
Foreign tax rate differential |
(736 | ) | (379 | ) | (1,726 | ) | ||||||
Net (benefit) expense due to change in tax law,apportionment factors and other adjustments |
(3,704 | ) | 1,159 | (3,315 | ) | |||||||
State income tax refunds net of federal benefit |
— | — | (760 | ) | ||||||||
Non-deductible/nontaxable items |
710 | 411 | 318 | |||||||||
Tax expense on foreign repatriation |
— | — | 14,952 | |||||||||
Expired tax attributes |
— | — | 1,447 | |||||||||
Tax contingencies and settlements |
(391 | ) | (1,118 | ) | (4,601 | ) | ||||||
State income taxes net of federal benefit |
710 | (174 | ) | (797 | ) | |||||||
Stock-based compensation |
— | 720 | — | |||||||||
Change in valuation allowance |
(252 | ) | (2,871 | ) | 4,024 | |||||||
Other, net |
(36 | ) | 17 | 33 | ||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Income tax expense |
$ | 14,162 | $ | 6,856 | $ | 16,299 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
The components of deferred income tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2011 and 2010 are as follows (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Deferred tax assets: |
||||||||
Net operating loss carryforward |
$ | 27,054 | $ | 38,064 | ||||
Alternative minimum tax credit |
1,363 | 1,459 | ||||||
General business credit carryovers |
94,819 | 94,819 | ||||||
Tax effect of unrecognized tax positions |
163 | 740 | ||||||
Accrued expenses |
18,973 | 20,355 | ||||||
Other |
719 | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deferred tax assets |
143,091 | 155,437 | ||||||
Less: valuation allowance |
(7,824 | ) | (8,076 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deferred tax assets, net |
135,267 | 147,361 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities: |
||||||||
Property, plant and equipment |
(328,693 | ) | (326,900 | ) | ||||
Intangibles |
(10,109 | ) | (10,310 | ) | ||||
Other |
— | (367 | ) | |||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total deferred tax liabilities |
(338,802 | ) | (337,577 | ) | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Net deferred tax liabilities |
$ | (203,535 | ) | $ | (190,216 | ) | ||
|
|
|
|
The Company maintains a valuation allowance on net operating losses in jurisdictions for which, based on the weight of available evidence, it is more likely than not that some or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. It is management’s belief that it is more likely than not that a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The Company has established a valuation allowance of $7.8 million and $8.1 million at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The following table summarizes the net operating loss carryforwards by jurisdiction as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Amount | Expiration Period |
|||||||
U.S. — Federal |
$ | 48,367 | 2021 -2030 | |||||
U.S. — State |
254,323 | 2012 -2031 | ||||||
Canada |
770 | 2014 -2031 |
F-24
The following table summarizes general business credits available to the Company in the U.S. as of December 31, 2011 (in thousands):
Amount | Expiration Period |
|||||||
Track maintenance credit |
$ | 94,742 | 2025 -2028 | |||||
GO Zone tax credit |
77 | 2026 | ||||||
|
|
|||||||
Total credits |
$ | 94,819 | ||||||
|
|
The Company’s net operating loss carryforwards and general business credits for federal and state income tax purposes are limited by Internal Revenue Code Section 382 and Internal Revenue Code Section 383, respectively.
United States income taxes have not been provided on $37.0 million of undistributed earnings of international subsidiaries because of our intention to reinvest those earnings indefinitely. The U.S. tax effects of the permanently reinvested foreign earnings that have not been accrued were approximately $13.0 million, exclusive of any foreign withholding taxes.
A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax positions is as follows (in thousands):
2011 | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 5,170 | $ | 6,097 | $ | 29,995 | ||||||
Additions based on tax positions related to the current year |
— | — | — | |||||||||
Additions for tax positions of prior years |
— | 43 | 128 | |||||||||
Reductions for tax positions of prior years |
(6 | ) | — | (497 | ) | |||||||
Settlements with taxing authorities |
— | — | (20,993 | ) | ||||||||
Lapse of statute of limitations |
(473 | ) | (970 | ) | (2,536 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Balance at end of year |
$ | 4,691 | $ | 5,170 | $ | 6,097 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2011, the Company’s liability for uncertain tax positions was $4.7 million, $4.5 million of which would reduce its effective tax rate if recognized. The Company anticipates the liability for uncertain tax positions will decrease by $0.9 million over the next twelve months.
The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax positions in its provision for income taxes. During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company reduced its accrual for interest and penalties by $0.1 million as a result of the lapse of statutes of limitations. During the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company recognized approximately $0.0 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of interest and penalties. The Company had approximately $0.2 million and $0.3 million for the payment of interest and penalties accrued at December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
In November 2005, the ATO initiated an audit of the reorganization transactions undertaken by the Company’s Australian subsidiaries prior to the sale of Freight Australia to Pacific National in August 2004. On May 14, 2009, the Company received a notice from the ATO indicating that they would not be taking any further action in relation to its audit of the reorganization transactions. As a result, the Company reduced its previously recorded tax reserves by $21.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2009. Of this amount, $2.5 million, which related to the accrual of interest subsequent to the Company’s acquisition, resulted in a benefit to the continuing operations tax provision, with the balance resulting in an adjustment to the gain on sale of discontinued operations.
The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, various U.S. state jurisdictions and foreign jurisdictions. With few exceptions, the Company or one of its subsidiaries is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by authorities for years before 2000.
14. | PENSION AND OTHER BENEFIT PROGRAMS |
Canadian Employees
The Company maintains a pension plan for a majority of its Canadian railroad employees, with both defined benefit and defined contribution components.
F-25
DEFINED CONTRIBUTION COMPONENT — The defined contribution component applies to a majority of the Company’s Canadian railroad employees that are not covered by the defined benefit component. The Company contributes 3% of a participating employee’s salary to the plan. Pension expense for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, for the defined contribution members was $0.5 million, $0.5 million, and $0.5 million, respectively.
DEFINED BENEFIT COMPONENT — The defined benefit component applies to approximately 60 employees who transferred employment directly from Canadian Pacific Railway (“CP”) to a subsidiary of the Company. The defined benefit portion of the plan is a mirror plan of CP’s defined benefit plan. The employees that transferred and joined the mirror plan were entitled to transfer or buy back prior years of service. As part of the arrangement, CP transferred to the Company the appropriate value of each employee’s pension entitlement.
The assumed discount rate included below is based on rates of return on high-quality fixed-income investments currently available and expected to be available during the period up to maturity of the pension benefits. The rate of 4.5% used as of December 31, 2011 is within the range recommended by PC Bond Analytics. PC Bond Analytics distributes discount rate information to defined benefit plan sponsors to assist in reporting for pension disclosures. The discount rate data is derived from the 2011 PC Bond Analytics Database, which consists of data from Standard & Poor’s Institutional Market Services database as well as proprietary analysis created by PC Bond Analytics.
U.S. Employees
The Company maintains a contributory profit sharing plan as defined under Section 401(k) of the U.S. Internal Revenue Code. The Company makes contributions to this plan at a rate of 50% of the employees’ contribution up to $2,500 for Railroad Retirement employees and $5,000 for employees under the Federal Insurance Contributions Act. An employee becomes 100% vested with respect to the employer contributions after completing four years of service. Employer contributions during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, were approximately $1.5 million, $1.3 million, and $1.2 million, respectively.
The Company maintains a pension and post retirement benefit plan for 43 employees who transferred employment directly from Alcoa, Inc. to RailAmerica. The defined benefit portion of the plan is a mirror plan of Alcoa’s Retirement Plan II, Rule IIE defined benefit plan. The accrued benefits earned under the Alcoa Pension Plan as of October 1, 2005 are an offset to the RailAmerica plan. No assets were transferred as part of the arrangement. However, the Company assumed accrued post retirement benefits of $2.6 million as part of the Alcoa Railroad acquisition in 2005.
F-26
The following chart summarizes the benefit obligations, assets, funded status and rate assumptions associated with the defined benefit plans for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
Canadian 2011 |
U.S. 2011 |
Total 2011 |
Canadian 2010 |
U.S. 2010 |
Total 2010 |
Canadian 2009 |
U.S. 2009 |
Total 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of period |
$ | 10,552 | $ | 861 | $ | 11,413 | $ | 9,780 | $ | 738 | $ | 10,518 | $ | 6,496 | $ | 572 | $ | 7,068 | ||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
143 | 92 | 235 | 119 | 83 | 202 | 101 | 73 | 174 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
596 | 45 | 641 | 621 | 43 | 664 | 487 | 35 | 522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan participants’ contributions |
79 | — | 79 | 74 | — | 74 | 84 | — | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Actuarial loss (gain) |
2,977 | 215 | 3,192 | 342 | 21 | 363 | 1,736 | 59 | 1,795 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(407 | ) | (65 | ) | (472 | ) | (846 | ) | (24 | ) | (870 | ) | (306 | ) | (1 | ) | (307 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate changes |
(237 | ) | — | (237 | ) | 462 | — | 462 | 1,182 | — | 1,182 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at end of period |
$ | 13,703 | $ | 1,148 | $ | 14,851 | $ | 10,552 | $ | 861 | $ | 11,413 | $ | 9,780 | $ | 738 | $ | 10,518 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSET S |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period |
$ | 10,124 | $ | 609 | $ | 10,733 | $ | 7,613 | $ | 548 | $ | 8,161 | $ | 5,282 | $ | 343 | $ | 5,625 | ||||||||||||||||||
Actual return on plan assets |
(184 | ) | (7 | ) | (191 | ) | 961 | (7 | ) | 954 | 1,030 | (6 | ) | 1,024 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Employer contribution |
748 | 169 | 917 | 1,936 | 93 | 2,029 | 592 | 212 | 804 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Plan participants’ contributions |
79 | — | 79 | 74 | — | 74 | 84 | — | 84 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Benefits paid |
(407 | ) | (65 | ) | (472 | ) | (846 | ) | (24 | ) | (870 | ) | (306 | ) | (1 | ) | (307 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency exchange rate changes |
(227 | ) | — | (227 | ) | 386 | — | 386 | 931 | — | 931 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of period |
$ | 10,133 | $ | 706 | $ | 10,839 | $ | 10,124 | $ | 610 | $ | 10,734 | $ | 7,613 | $ | 548 | $ | 8,161 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Funded status — accrued benefit cost |
$ | (3,570 | ) | $ | (442 | ) | $ | (4,012 | ) | $ | (428 | ) | $ | (251 | ) | $ | (679 | ) | $ | (2,167 | ) | $ | (190 | ) | $ | (2,357 | ) | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
ASSUMPTIONS |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Discount rate |
4.50 | % | 4.50 | % | N/A | 5.70 | % | 5.30 | % | N/A | 6.40 | % | 5.90 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
6.50 | % | 6.00 | % | N/A | 6.50 | % | 6.00 | % | N/A | 6.50 | % | 6.00 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
Rate of compensation increase |
3.25 | % | 4.56 | % | N/A | 3.50 | % | 4.56 | % | N/A | 3.50 | % | 4.56 | % | N/A | |||||||||||||||||||||
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST IN PERIOD |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 143 | $ | 92 | $ | 235 | $ | 119 | $ | 83 | $ | 202 | $ | 101 | $ | 73 | $ | 174 | ||||||||||||||||||
Interest cost |
596 | 45 | 641 | 621 | 43 | 664 | 487 | 35 | 522 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Expected return on plan assets |
(658 | ) | (39 | ) | (697 | ) | (495 | ) | (35 | ) | (530 | ) | (343 | ) | (25 | ) | (368 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of prior service cost |
24 | — | 24 | 24 | — | 24 | 23 | — | 23 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial loss |
99 | 34 | 133 | 126 | 30 | 156 | 21 | 22 | 43 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Net periodic pension cost |
$ | 204 | $ | 132 | $ | 336 | $ | 395 | $ | 121 | $ | 516 | $ | 289 | $ | 105 | $ | 394 | ||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||
Canadian | U.S. | Total | ||||||||||
Expected Employer Contribution in 2012 |
$ | 140 | $ | 206 | $ | 346 | ||||||
Expected Employee Contribution in 2012 |
80 | — | 80 | |||||||||
Amortization of Loss in 2012 |
475 | 59 | 534 | |||||||||
Amortization of Prior Service Cost in 2012 |
21 | — | 21 | |||||||||
Expected Benefit Payments in |
||||||||||||
2012 |
$ | 296 | $ | 45 | $ | 341 | ||||||
2013 |
327 | 59 | 386 | |||||||||
2014 |
369 | 70 | 439 | |||||||||
2015 |
411 | 72 | 483 | |||||||||
2016 |
460 | 76 | 536 | |||||||||
2017 - 2022 |
3,150 | 412 | 3,562 |
F-27
Adjustments to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Unrecognized net actuarial (loss) gain |
$ | (3,751 | ) | $ | 175 | |||
Foreign currency translation |
(17 | ) | 277 | |||||
Unrecognized transition obligation |
24 | 24 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total adjustment to AOCI, before tax |
$ | (3,744 | ) | $ | 476 | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total adjustment to AOCI, after tax |
$ | (2,663 | ) | $ | 329 | |||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance in AOCI, net of tax of $(914) and $167, respectively |
$ | (2,234 | ) | $ | 429 | |||
|
|
|
|
Plan Assets (Market Value) for the years ended:
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
Target Allocation 2012 |
||||||||||
Integra Strategic Allocated Pool Fund |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||
Fund holdings by class: |
||||||||||||
a) Equity securities |
56.20 | % | 59.90 | % | 60.00 | % | ||||||
b) Debt securities |
42.90 | % | 32.70 | % | 40.00 | % | ||||||
c) Other (including cash) |
0.90 | % | 7.40 | % | 0.00 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Total |
100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | 100.00 | % | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Expected long-term rate of return on assets |
6.50 | % | 6.50 | % | ||||||||
Expected rate of return on equity securities |
7.50 | % | 7.50 | % | ||||||||
Expected rate of return on debt securities |
5.50 | % | 5.50 | % |
The overall objective of the defined benefit portion of the plan is to fund its liabilities by maximizing the long term rate of return through investments in a portfolio of money market instruments, bonds, and preferred and common equity securities while being mindful of the yield, marketability and diversification of the investments. All assets are currently invested in readily marketable investments to provide sufficient liquidity. Investments are not permitted in derivative securities or in any asset class not listed below without the written approval of the Company.
The primary investment objective of the plan is to achieve a rate of return that exceeds the Consumer Price Index by 4.0% over rolling four-year periods. The secondary investment objectives of the plan are to achieve a rate of return that exceeds the benchmark portfolio by 0.7% before fees over rolling four-year periods and to rank above the median manager in comparable funds over rolling four-year periods.
The initial limits of the proportion of the market value of the portfolio that may be invested in the following classes of securities are:
Asset Mix Limits: |
Policy Mix |
Minimum Limit |
Maximum Limit |
|||||||||
Canadian Equity |
30 | % | 20 | % | 40 | % | ||||||
U.S. Equity |
15 | % | 5 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
International Equity |
15 | % | 5 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
Real Estate |
0 | % | 0 | % | 10 | % | ||||||
Total Equity |
60 | % | 25 | % | 70 | % | ||||||
Bonds |
40 | % | 30 | % | 75 | % | ||||||
Mortgages |
0 | % | 0 | % | 10 | % | ||||||
Short Term |
0 | % | 0 | % | 20 | % | ||||||
Total Fixed Income |
40 | % | 30 | % | 75 | % |
F-28
The following chart summarizes the benefit obligations, assets, funded status and rate assumptions associated with the Alcoa Post-Retirement Benefit Plan for the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 (in thousands):
January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2011 |
January 1, 2010 to December 31, 2010 |
January 1, 2009 to December 31, 2009 |
||||||||||
CHANGE IN BENEFIT OBLIGATION |
||||||||||||
Benefit obligation at beginning of period |
$ | 2,278 | $ | 2,201 | $ | 1,980 | ||||||
Service cost |
39 | 43 | 43 | |||||||||
Interest cost |
120 | 129 | 123 | |||||||||
Actuarial gain |
601 | (92 | ) | 55 | ||||||||
Benefits paid |
(39 | ) | (3 | ) | — | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Benefit obligation at end of period |
$ | 2,999 | $ | 2,278 | $ | 2,201 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
CHANGE IN PLAN ASSETS |
||||||||||||
Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period |
$ | 0 | $ | 0 | $ | 0 | ||||||
Employer direct benefit payments |
39 | 3 | — | |||||||||
Direct benefit payments |
(39 | ) | (3 | ) | — | |||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Fair value of plan assets at end of period |
$ | — | $ | — | $ | — | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Funded status — (accrued) benefit cost |
$ | (2,999 | ) | $ | (2,278 | ) | $ | (2,201 | ) | |||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
ASSUMPTIONS |
||||||||||||
Discount rate |
4.50 | % | 5.30 | % | 5.90 | % | ||||||
Current year health care cost trend rate (ultimate rate reached in 2006) |
N/A | N/A | N/A | |||||||||
COMPONENTS OF NET PERIODIC BENEFIT COST IN PERIOD |
||||||||||||
Service cost |
$ | 39 | $ | 43 | $ | 43 | ||||||
Interest cost |
120 | 129 | 123 | |||||||||
Amortization of net actuarial gain |
(83 | ) | (61 | ) | (71 | ) | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||
Net periodic benefit cost |
$ | 76 | $ | 111 | $ | 95 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Adjustments to Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income |
December 31, 2011 |
December 31, 2010 |
||||||
(In thousands) | ||||||||
Unrecognized net actuarial gain |
$ | 33 | $ | 33 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total adjustment to AOCI, before tax |
$ | 33 | $ | 33 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Total adjustment to AOCI, after tax |
$ | 21 | $ | 21 | ||||
|
|
|
|
|||||
Balance in AOCI, net of tax of $193 and $193, respectively |
$ | 316 | $ | 316 | ||||
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Benefit Payments |
||||
(In thousands) | ||||
2012 |
$ | 141 | ||
2013 |
145 | |||
2014 |
172 | |||
2015 |
194 | |||
2016 |
206 | |||
2017 - 2021 |
1,175 |
15. | COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES |
In the ordinary course of conducting its business, the Company becomes involved in various legal actions and other claims. Litigation is subject to many uncertainties, the outcome of individual litigated matters is not predictable with assurance, and it is reasonably possible that some of these matters may be decided unfavorably to the Company. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows. Settlement costs associated with litigation are included in Casualties and insurance on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
F-29
The Company’s operations are subject to extensive environmental regulation. The Company records liabilities for remediation and restoration costs related to past activities when the Company’s obligation is probable and the costs can be reasonably estimated. Costs of ongoing compliance activities to current operations are expensed as incurred. The Company’s recorded liabilities for these issues represent its best estimates (on an undiscounted basis) of remediation and restoration costs that may be required to comply with present laws and regulations. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate liability, if any, with respect to these matters will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
The Company is subject to claims for employee work-related and third-party injuries. Work-related injuries for employees are primarily subject to the Federal Employers’ Liability Act. The Company retains an independent actuarial firm to assist management in assessing the value of personal injury claims and cases. An analysis has been performed by an independent actuarial firm and is reviewed by management. The methodology used by the actuary includes a development factor to reflect growth or reduction in the value of these personal injury claims. It is based largely on the Company’s historical claims and settlement experience. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had $12.5 million and $12.9 million, respectively, accrued for personal injury claims and cases. Actual results may vary from estimates due to the type and severity of the injury, costs of medical treatments and uncertainties in litigation.
The Company is subject to ongoing tax examinations and governmental assessments in various U.S. and foreign jurisdictions. Specifically, the ATO initiated an audit, in November 2005, of the reorganization transactions undertaken by the Company’s Australian subsidiaries prior to the sale of Freight Australia to Pacific National in August 2004. On May 14, 2009, the Company received a notice from the ATO indicating that they would not be taking any further action in relation to its audit of the reorganization transactions. As a result, the Company reversed the recorded tax reserves in the second quarter of 2009 and recorded a benefit to the continuing operations tax provision of $2.5 million and an adjustment to the gain on disposal of discontinued operations of $12.3 million.
On August 28, 2005, a railcar containing styrene located on the Company’s Indiana & Ohio Railway (“IORY”) property in Cincinnati, Ohio, began venting, due to a chemical reaction. Styrene is a potentially hazardous chemical used to make plastics, rubber and resin. Because of the chemical release, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (“U.S. EPA”) investigated whether criminal negligence contributed to the incident, and whether charges should be pressed. A series of conferences with the Company’s attorneys and the U.S. EPA attorneys took place through 2009 and into 2011, at which times legal theories and evidence were discussed in an effort to influence the U.S. EPA’s charging decision. The IORY submitted a proffer addendum in May 2009 analyzing its compliance under the Clean Air Act. The statute of limitations was extended by a tolling agreement as to the IORY only (the Company had been dropped from this violation) through February 27, 2011. The U.S. EPA attorneys decided not to press charges and allowed the statute of limitations to lapse resolving this matter. As a result, the Company released approximately $1.2 million previously accrued for this incident, in Casualties and insurance on the Consolidated Statements of Operations, in February 2011.
Government grants
In August 2010, the Company’s New England Central Railroad (“NECR”) was awarded a federal government grant of $50 million through the State of Vermont to improve and upgrade the track on its property. As part of the agreement, the NECR has committed to contribute up to approximately $19 million of capital funds and materials to the project. In September 2011, the grant agreement was amended and NECR was awarded an additional $2.7 million to extend and improve its centralized traffic control system, upgrade communications systems, improve culverts and ditching, and provide passenger bussing in lieu of Amtrak service. The amendment did not require any additional monetary commitment by the NECR. The project is expected to be completed within two years from the grant date. The Company accounts for proceeds from government grants as reductions to expense for expenditures that are expensed or as contra-assets within property, plant and equipment which are amortized over the life of the related asset for expenditures that are capitalized.
16. | RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS |
Investment funds managed by Fortress Investment Group LLC (“Fortress”) own a majority of the Company’s stock. As of January 1, 2009, the Company was party to five short-term operating lease agreements with Florida East Coast Railway LLC, (“FECR”) an entity also owned by investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress. During 2009, the Company entered into five additional lease agreements with the same entity. All but one of these agreements relate to the leasing of locomotives between the companies for ordinary business operations, which are based on current market rates for similar assets. During 2010, these locomotive lease agreements were combined into one master lease agreement. With respect to such agreements, during the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, on a net basis the Company paid FECR $1.2 million, $2.0 million and $0.6 million, respectively. At December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had no amounts payable to FECR under this agreement.
F-30
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company purchased 26 of the previously leased locomotives, discussed above, for a total purchase price of $4.5 million, based on current market values. Subsequent to this transaction, the Company continues to lease six locomotives from FECR, which have been consolidated under one master lease agreement.
The remaining lease relates to the sub-leasing of office space by FECR to the Company. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, FECR billed the Company approximately $1.1 million, $1.0 million and $1.0 million, respectively, under the sub-lease agreement. As of December 31, 2011 and 2010, the Company had a payable of $0.1 million due to FECR under this agreement.
Effective January 1, 2010, the Company entered into a Shared Services Agreement with FECR and its affiliates which provided for services to be provided from time to time by certain of our senior executives and other employees and for certain reciprocal administrative services, including finance, accounting, human resources, purchasing and legal. This agreement was generally consistent with arms-length arrangements with third parties providing similar services. The agreement was canceled in 2011. The net amount of payments made by us under this agreement was approximately $0.5 million and $0.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010, respectively. As of December 31, 2011, there were no amounts due to or from FECR under this agreement.
In October 2009, certain of the Company’s executives entered into consulting agreements with FECR. Under the terms of these agreements, the executives are to provide assistance to FECR with strategic initiatives designed to grow FECR’s revenue and enhance the value of the franchise. Consideration for the executive’s performance is in the form of restricted stock units of FECR common stock that will vest 25% over four years. Since the consulting agreements are with a related-party, the Company is required to recognize compensation expense over the vesting period in labor and benefits expense with a corresponding credit in other income (loss) for management fee income. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense and $0.8 million, $0.5 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of management fee income related to these consulting agreements.
In October 2009, certain of the Company’s executives entered into consulting agreements with Florida East Coast Industries, Inc., (“FECI”) an entity also owned by investment funds managed by affiliates of Fortress. Under the terms of these agreements, the executives are to provide assistance to FECI with strategic initiatives designed to enhance the value of FECI’s rail-related assets. Consideration for the executive’s performance is in the form of restricted stock units of FECI common stock that will vest 50%, 25%, and 25% over the next three years. Since the consulting agreements are with a related-party, the Company is required to recognize compensation expense over the vesting period in labor and benefits expense with a corresponding credit in other income (loss) for management fee income. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Company recognized $1.2 million, $1.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of compensation expense and $1.2 million, $1.3 million and $0.1 million, respectively, of management fee income related to these consulting agreements.
Effective June 1, 2011, the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiary, Atlas, entered into an agreement to provide engineering and construction services to FECR. During the year-ended December 31, 2011 Atlas recorded revenues of $9.4 million and received payments totaling $3.6 million related to this project. As of December 31, 2011, Atlas had a receivable of $6.0 million related to this project.
The Company previously utilized Brown & Associates to provide certain sales and use tax advisory and preparation services. The son of the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer was an independent contractor of Brown & Associates. During the years ended December 31, 2010 and 2009, Brown & Associates billed the Company approximately $0.3 million and $0.7 million for its services, respectively.
17. | IMPAIRMENT OF ASSETS |
During the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company evaluated its locomotive usage and determined that certain of its surplus locomotives were not expected to be placed back into service. As a result of this determination, the Company engaged a locomotive and railcar market advisor to assist management in evaluating the market value of the identified locomotives based on recent sales and current market conditions. The evaluation resulted in the Company recording an impairment of $5.2 million ($3.2 million after tax, $0.06 per share), in accordance with ASC 360, Property, Plant, and Equipment. The market value was based on level 2 indicators.
F-31
18. | TRACK MAINTENANCE AGREEMENT |
In the first quarter of 2011, the Company entered into a track maintenance agreement with an unrelated third-party customer (“Shipper”). Under the agreement, the Shipper paid for qualified railroad track maintenance expenditures during 2011 in exchange for the assignment of railroad track miles which permits the Shipper to claim certain tax credits pursuant to Section 45G of the Internal Revenue Code. The Company entered into similar agreements in the fourth quarter of 2010 and in the first quarter of 2009. During the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, the Shipper paid for $17.1 million, $18.0 million and $17.1 million of maintenance expenditures and $5.5 million, $4.3 million and $5.3 million of capital expenditures, respectively. The Company incurred $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.4 million of consulting fees related to the agreements in each of the years ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The track maintenance tax credit expired on December 31, 2011 and has not yet been renewed by Congress, for 2012 and beyond.
19. | OTHER INCOME (LOSS) |
In August 2010, the Company entered into a purchase agreement to acquire warrants and other securities of a railroad which was contingent upon that railroad’s principal stockholder not consummating a refusal right to purchase the same securities. The principal stockholder exercised this right and thus based on the terms of the purchase agreement, the Company received a break-up fee of $2 million from the seller. This break-up fee is reflected, net of expenses incurred of $0.2 million, as part of Other income (loss) on the Company’s consolidated statement of operations.
20. | SUBSEQUENT EVENTS |
On January 3, 2012 we borrowed $7.0 million under the Revolving Credit Facility, which was repaid in February 2012.
On January 5, 2012, the Company redeemed $74 million of its 9.25% Senior Secured Notes, in accordance with the terms of the indenture. The notes were redeemed at a redemption price of 103% of the principal amount of the notes being redeemed, plus accrued interest up to but not including, January 5, 2012. Upon completion of the redemption, $518 million aggregate principal amount of the senior secured notes remained outstanding. In connection with early retirement of the indebtedness, the Company incurred charges of approximately $7 million pre-tax in the first quarter of 2012. Approximately $4.8 million of the charge is non-cash. After the redemption, annual interest expense on the Senior Notes for 2012 will decline by $8.1 million of which $6.8 million is cash interest.
On February 1, 2012, the Company announced that it signed an agreement to acquire Marquette Rail LLC (“Marquette”) for $40 million subject to final adjustments for working capital. Headquartered in Ludington, MI, Marquette operates 126 miles of track running from Grand Rapids, MI to Ludington and Manistee, MI. Marquette interchanges with CSXT in Grand Rapids and serves customers primarily in the chemical, pulp & paper, and non-metallics industries. Marquette hauled approximately fifteen-thousand carloads of freight during the fiscal year ended 2011.
On February 1, 2012, the Company announced that it signed an agreement to acquire a seventy-percent interest in the Wellsboro and Corning Railroad (“WCOR”) and Industrial Waste Group (“IWG”) from Myles Group for $18.0 million. The WCOR operates 38 miles of track running from Wellsboro, PA to Corning, NY handling a variety of industrial products primarily used in the natural resources industry. IWG performs transload, storage, and other value-added services for customers in the energy and waste management industries. It operates four transloading facilities located in Wellsboro, PA; Corning, NY; Toledo, OH; and Amelia, VA.
On February 1, 2012, the Company announced that it commenced a cash tender offer to purchase up to $444.0 million in aggregate principal amount of its outstanding 9.25% Senior Secured Notes due 2017. The tender offer is scheduled to expire at 12:00 midnight, New York City time, on February 29, 2012, unless extended or earlier terminated by the Company at its sole discretion. The Total Consideration payable for each $1,000 principal amount of notes validly tendered at or before the early tender date and accepted for purchase is equal to $1,120. The tender offer is subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, including the Company entering into a new credit facility on terms and conditions satisfactory to the Company. The company had $10.4 million in deferred loan costs and $18.4 million in original issue discount associated with these notes as of December 31, 2011. A percentage of these deferred costs will be written off depending on the ultimate amount of the bonds tendered.
F-32
21. | UNAUDITED QUARTERLY FINANCIAL DATA |
Quarterly financial data for 2011 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
|||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 124,937 | $ | 139,215 | $ | 139,665 | $ | 147,306 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 24,203 | $ | 28,698 | $ | 31,488 | $ | 37,233 | ||||||||
Net income |
$ | 4,085 | $ | 8,700 | $ | 9,058 | $ | 15,025 | ||||||||
Basic net income per share |
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
Diluted net income per share |
$ | 0.07 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.17 | $ | 0.29 |
Quarterly financial data for 2010 is as follows (in thousands, except per share amounts):
First Quarter |
Second Quarter |
Third Quarter |
Fourth Quarter |
|||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 114,941 | $ | 119,457 | $ | 128,257 | $ | 127,636 | ||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 19,201 | $ | 23,060 | $ | 28,491 | $ | 43,755 | ||||||||
Net (loss) income |
$ | (2,514 | ) | $ | (4,221 | ) | $ | 7,968 | $ | 17,884 | ||||||
Basic net (loss) income |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.33 | ||||||
Diluted net (loss) income |
$ | (0.05 | ) | $ | (0.08 | ) | $ | 0.15 | $ | 0.33 |
The second quarter of 2010 includes a loss on extinguishment of debt of $8.4 million related to the 10% paydown of the senior secured notes (See Note 9). The fourth quarter of 2010 operating income includes $17.6 million related to the track maintenance agreement the Company entered into as a result of Congress extending tax credits pursuant to Section 45G of the Internal Revenue Service Code (See Note 19).
F-33
22. | SEGMENT INFORMATION |
The Company’s continuing operations consists of one business segment, North American rail transportation. The North American rail transportation segment includes the operations of the Company’s operating subsidiaries in the United States and Canada, as well as corporate expenses.
Business and geographical segment information for the periods ended December 31, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is as follows (in thousands):
North America | ||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2011: |
Consolidated | United States | Canada | |||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 551,123 | $ | 483,698 | $ | 67,425 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
47,849 | 43,986 | 3,863 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
51,030 | 37,689 | 13,341 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
71,923 | 67,941 | 3,982 | |||||||||
Total assets |
1,597,380 | 1,384,031 | 213,349 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures, net |
93,567 | 86,522 | 7,045 | |||||||||
North America | ||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2010: |
Consolidated | United States | Canada | |||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 490,291 | $ | 427,017 | $ | 63,274 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
45,091 | 41,867 | 3,224 | |||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
25,973 | 14,019 | 11,954 | |||||||||
Interest expense |
83,775 | 79,246 | 4,529 | |||||||||
Total assets |
1,603,653 | 1,396,922 | 206,731 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures, net |
57,826 | 51,845 | 5,981 | |||||||||
North America | ||||||||||||
Year Ended December 31, 2009: |
Consolidated | United States | Canada | |||||||||
Revenue |
$ | 425,774 | $ | 370,265 | $ | 55,509 | ||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
42,105 | 39,088 | 3,017 | |||||||||
Income (loss) from continuing operations before income taxes |
19,210 | (16,730 | ) | 35,940 | ||||||||
Interest expense |
86,878 | 82,767 | 4,111 | |||||||||
Total assets |
1,598,629 | 1,402,794 | 195,835 | |||||||||
Capital expenditures |
47,789 | 42,815 | 4,974 |
F-34
23. | GUARANTOR FINANCIAL STATEMENT INFORMATION |
In June 2009, the Company sold in a private offering $740.0 million aggregate principal amount of 9.25% senior secured notes which mature on July 1, 2017. In October 2009, the Company filed with the SEC a Form S-4 registration statement to exchange the privately placed notes with registered notes. The terms of the registered notes are substantially identical to those of the privately placed notes. The notes are jointly and severally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by all of the Company’s existing and future wholly-owned domestic restricted subsidiaries, with certain exceptions. All guarantor subsidiaries are 100% owned by the Company. All amounts in the following tables are in thousands.
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Balance Sheet
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | — | $ | 83,360 | $ | 7,639 | $ | — | $ | 90,999 | ||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance |
210 | 84,323 | 12,280 | — | 96,813 | |||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
9,886 | — | — | — | 9,886 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
257 | 15,358 | 2,352 | — | 17,967 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current assets |
10,353 | 183,041 | 22,271 | — | 215,665 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
804 | 937,069 | 83,672 | — | 1,021,545 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible Assets |
— | 99,080 | 35,771 | — | 134,851 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
— | 204,205 | 7,636 | — | 211,841 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
10,611 | 2,867 | — | — | 13,478 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
1,245,081 | 1,179,035 | 43,494 | (2,467,610 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,266,849 | $ | 2,605,297 | $ | 192,844 | $ | (2,467,610 | ) | $ | 1,597,380 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
$ | 71,697 | $ | 249 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 71,991 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
1,939 | 68,922 | 7,983 | — | 78,844 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
2,813 | 22,711 | 3,092 | — | 28,616 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
76,449 | 91,927 | 11,075 | — | 179,451 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
— | 1,827 | — | — | 1,827 | |||||||||||||||
Senior secured notes |
501,876 | — | — | — | 501,876 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
3,496 | 189,722 | 20,203 | — | 213,421 | |||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
4,903 | 12,195 | 3,582 | — | 20,680 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
506 | 1,493 | — | (1,493 | ) | 506 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
591,341 | 2,231,528 | 128,467 | (2,359,995 | ) | 591,341 | ||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
84,272 | 76,477 | 18,985 | (95,462 | ) | 84,272 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
4,006 | 128 | 10,532 | (10,660 | ) | 4,006 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
680,125 | 2,309,626 | 157,984 | (2,467,610 | ) | 680,125 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 1,266,849 | $ | 2,605,297 | $ | 192,844 | $ | (2,467,610 | ) | $ | 1,597,380 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-35
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2011
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 232 | $ | 483,466 | $ | 67,425 | $ | — | $ | 551,123 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Labor and benefits |
25,610 | 123,025 | 16,039 | — | 164,674 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment rents |
114 | 32,494 | 2,208 | — | 34,816 | |||||||||||||||
Purchased services |
7,729 | 37,497 | 2,849 | — | 48,075 | |||||||||||||||
Diesel fuel |
— | 45,912 | 8,949 | — | 54,861 | |||||||||||||||
Casualties and insurance |
868 | 11,643 | 1,333 | — | 13,844 | |||||||||||||||
Materials |
154 | 26,103 | 1,639 | — | 27,896 | |||||||||||||||
Joint facilities |
— | 9,631 | 36 | — | 9,667 | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
3,232 | 31,725 | 4,457 | — | 39,414 | |||||||||||||||
Track maintenance expense reimbursement |
(16,714 | ) | — | — | — | (16,714 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
— | (48 | ) | (2 | ) | — | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
— | 4,943 | 226 | — | 5,169 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
39 | 43,947 | 3,863 | — | 47,849 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
21,032 | 366,872 | 41,597 | — | 429,501 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(20,800 | ) | 116,594 | 25,828 | — | 121,622 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(13,719 | ) | (54,222 | ) | (3,982 | ) | — | (71,923 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
61,170 | — | — | (61,170 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
11,902 | (2,066 | ) | (8,505 | ) | — | 1,331 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income from continuing operations beforeincome taxes |
38,553 | 60,306 | 13,341 | (61,170 | ) | 51,030 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
1,685 | 8,468 | 4,009 | — | 14,162 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 51,838 | $ | 9,332 | $ | (61,170 | ) | $ | 36,868 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-36
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended December 31, 2011
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 36,868 | $ | 51,838 | $ | 9,332 | $ | (61,170 | ) | $ | 36,868 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization costs classified in interest expense |
4,385 | 44,466 | 3,851 | — | 52,702 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(61,170 | ) | — | — | 61,170 | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of swap termination costs |
11,908 | — | — | — | 11,908 | |||||||||||||||
Net gain on sale or disposal of properties |
— | (48 | ) | (2 | ) | — | (50 | ) | ||||||||||||
Impairment of assets |
4,943 | 226 | 5,169 | |||||||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
— | 719 | — | — | 719 | |||||||||||||||
Equity compensation costs |
10,219 | — | — | — | 10,219 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
10,075 | — | 449 | — | 10,524 | |||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and disposals: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(95 | ) | (18,404 | ) | (3,784 | ) | — | (22,283 | ) | |||||||||||
Other current assets |
(52 | ) | (1,435 | ) | (1,291 | ) | — | (2,778 | ) | |||||||||||
Accounts payable |
(17,644 | ) | 23,853 | 3,256 | — | 9,465 | ||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(1,127 | ) | (6,896 | ) | (102 | ) | — | (8,125 | ) | |||||||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(600 | ) | (801 | ) | (648 | ) | — | (2,049 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(7,233 | ) | 98,235 | 11,287 | — | 102,289 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(358 | ) | (123,376 | ) | (7,045 | ) | — | (130,779 | ) | |||||||||||
NECR Grant reimbursements |
— | 37,212 | — | — | 37,212 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
— | 16,105 | 248 | — | 16,353 | |||||||||||||||
Acquisitions net of cash acquired |
— | (12,716 | ) | — | — | (12,716 | ) | |||||||||||||
Deferred acquisition/disposition costs and other |
(144 | ) | — | — | — | (144 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash used in by investing activities |
(502 | ) | (82,775 | ) | (6,797 | ) | — | (90,074 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
— | (428 | ) | — | — | (428 | ) | |||||||||||||
Receipts/(disbursements) on intercompany debt |
78,297 | (65,979 | ) | (12,318 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Other |
12 | 12 | ||||||||||||||||||
Repurchase of common stock |
(70,574 | ) | — | — | — | (70,574 | ) | |||||||||||||
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
— | — | — | — | — | |||||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs paid |
— | (3,028 | ) | — | — | (3,028 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
7,735 | (69,435 | ) | (12,318 | ) | — | (74,018 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
— | — | (166 | ) | — | (166 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net decrease in cash |
— | (53,975 | ) | (7,994 | ) | — | (61,969 | ) | ||||||||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
— | 137,335 | 15,633 | — | 152,968 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | — | $ | 83,360 | $ | 7,639 | $ | — | $ | 90,999 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-37
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Balance Sheet
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
ASSETS | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current Assets: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | — | $ | 137,335 | $ | 15,633 | $ | — | $ | 152,968 | ||||||||||
Accounts and notes receivable, net of allowance |
116 | 65,920 | 8,632 | — | 74,668 | |||||||||||||||
Current deferred tax assets |
12,769 | — | — | — | 12,769 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
205 | 13,976 | 1,019 | — | 15,200 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current assets |
13,090 | 217,231 | 25,284 | — | 255,605 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net |
485 | 898,155 | 82,982 | — | 981,622 | |||||||||||||||
Intangible Assets |
— | 103,935 | 36,611 | — | 140,546 | |||||||||||||||
Goodwill |
— | 204,679 | 7,816 | — | 212,495 | |||||||||||||||
Other assets |
12,401 | 984 | — | — | 13,385 | |||||||||||||||
Investment in and advances to affiliates |
1,265,556 | 1,119,507 | 33,534 | (2,418,597 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,291,532 | $ | 2,544,491 | $ | 186,227 | $ | (2,418,597 | ) | $ | 1,603,653 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY | ||||||||||||||||||||
Current Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Current maturities of long-term debt |
$ | — | $ | 403 | $ | — | $ | — | $ | 403 | ||||||||||
Accounts payable |
7,311 | 54,150 | 4,797 | — | 66,258 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
3,939 | 29,362 | 3,612 | — | 36,913 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total current liabilities |
11,250 | 83,915 | 8,409 | — | 103,574 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Long-term debt, less current maturities |
— | 2,147 | — | — | 2,147 | |||||||||||||||
Senior secured notes |
571,161 | — | — | — | 571,161 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes |
(1,087 | ) | 182,747 | 21,325 | — | 202,985 | ||||||||||||||
Other liabilities |
5,459 | 13,113 | 465 | — | 19,037 | |||||||||||||||
Stockholders’ equity: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Common stock |
549 | 1,493 | — | (1,493 | ) | 549 | ||||||||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
636,757 | 2,218,338 | 130,816 | (2,349,154 | ) | 636,757 | ||||||||||||||
Retained earnings |
65,503 | 42,633 | 9,653 | (52,286 | ) | 65,503 | ||||||||||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
1,940 | 105 | 15,559 | (15,664 | ) | 1,940 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity |
704,749 | 2,262,569 | 156,028 | (2,418,597 | ) | 704,749 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity |
$ | 1,291,532 | $ | 2,544,491 | $ | 186,227 | $ | (2,418,597 | ) | $ | 1,603,653 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-38
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2010
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 203 | $ | 426,814 | $ | 63,274 | $ | — | $ | 490,291 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Labor and benefits |
21,838 | 116,560 | 15,595 | — | 153,993 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment rents |
127 | 32,012 | 1,980 | — | 34,119 | |||||||||||||||
Purchased services |
6,414 | 28,716 | 2,841 | — | 37,971 | |||||||||||||||
Diesel fuel |
— | 36,067 | 7,249 | — | 43,316 | |||||||||||||||
Casualties and insurance |
1,003 | 14,499 | 2,072 | — | 17,574 | |||||||||||||||
Materials |
169 | 17,662 | 1,776 | — | 19,607 | |||||||||||||||
Joint facilities |
— | 8,643 | 24 | — | 8,667 | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
3,096 | 28,471 | 3,659 | — | 35,226 | |||||||||||||||
Track maintenance expense reimbursement |
(17,589 | ) | — | — | — | (17,589 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
— | (2,142 | ) | (49 | ) | — | (2,191 | ) | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
54 | 41,813 | 3,224 | — | 45,091 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
15,112 | 322,301 | 38,371 | — | 375,784 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(14,909 | ) | 104,513 | 24,903 | — | 114,507 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(17,117 | ) | (62,129 | ) | (4,529 | ) | — | (83,775 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
54,203 | — | — | (54,203 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
2,126 | 1,537 | (8,422 | ) | — | (4,759 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
24,303 | 43,921 | 11,952 | (54,203 | ) | 25,973 | ||||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
5,186 | (1,726 | ) | 3,396 | — | 6,856 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,117 | $ | 45,647 | $ | 8,556 | $ | (54,203 | ) | $ | 19,117 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-39
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended December 31, 2010
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 19,117 | $ | 45,647 | $ | 8,556 | $ | (54,203 | ) | $ | 19,117 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization costs classified in interest expense |
4,419 | 42,206 | 3,222 | — | 49,847 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(54,203 | ) | — | — | 54,203 | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of swap termination costs |
20,891 | — | — | — | 20,891 | |||||||||||||||
Net gain on sale or disposal of properties |
— | (2,142 | ) | (49 | ) | — | (2,191 | ) | ||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
8,357 | — | — | — | 8,357 | |||||||||||||||
Equity compensation costs |
7,534 | — | — | — | 7,534 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
1,649 | 2,308 | (1,192 | ) | — | 2,765 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and disposals: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(56 | ) | (1,201 | ) | (1,178 | ) | — | (2,435 | ) | |||||||||||
Other current assets |
(19 | ) | 6,258 | 1,273 | — | 7,512 | ||||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
5,105 | 1,846 | 623 | — | 7,574 | |||||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
481 | 2,940 | (2,153 | ) | — | 1,268 | ||||||||||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(1,301 | ) | (219 | ) | (1,550 | ) | — | (3,070 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
11,974 | 97,643 | 7,552 | — | 117,169 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(442 | ) | (53,858 | ) | (5,981 | ) | — | (60,281 | ) | |||||||||||
NECR Grant reimbursements |
— | 2,455 | — | — | 2,455 | |||||||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
— | 3,948 | 160 | — | 4,108 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred acquisition/disposition costs and other |
— | (23,926 | ) | — | — | (23,926 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(442 | ) | (71,381 | ) | (5,821 | ) | — | (77,644 | ) | |||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
— | (622 | ) | — | — | (622 | ) | |||||||||||||
Repurchase of senior secured notes |
(76,220 | ) | — | — | — | (76,220 | ) | |||||||||||||
(Disbursements)/receipts on intercompany debt |
(57,152 | ) | 56,996 | 156 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Sale of common stock |
(106 | ) | — | — | — | (106 | ) | |||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs paid |
(95 | ) | (129 | ) | — | — | (224 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(133,573 | ) | 56,245 | 156 | — | (77,172 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
— | — | 397 | — | 397 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net increase in cash |
(122,041 | ) | 82,507 | 2,284 | — | (37,250 | ) | |||||||||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
122,041 | 54,828 | 13,349 | — | 190,218 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | — | $ | 137,335 | $ | 15,633 | $ | — | $ | 152,968 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-40
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Statement of Operations
For the year ended December 31, 2009
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Operating revenue |
$ | 172 | $ | 370,093 | $ | 55,509 | $ | — | $ | 425,774 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating expenses: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Labor and benefits |
24,222 | 104,586 | 14,796 | — | 143,604 | |||||||||||||||
Equipment rents |
51 | 33,832 | 2,095 | — | 35,978 | |||||||||||||||
Purchased services |
5,644 | 23,599 | 1,671 | — | 30,914 | |||||||||||||||
Diesel fuel |
— | 27,934 | 5,356 | — | 33,290 | |||||||||||||||
Casualties and insurance |
606 | 13,067 | 3,122 | — | 16,795 | |||||||||||||||
Materials |
82 | 9,749 | 1,568 | — | 11,399 | |||||||||||||||
Joint facilities |
— | 6,916 | 26 | — | 6,942 | |||||||||||||||
Other expenses |
1,990 | 25,938 | 5,109 | — | 33,037 | |||||||||||||||
Track maintenance expense reimbursement |
(16,656 | ) | — | — | — | (16,656 | ) | |||||||||||||
Net gain on sale of assets |
— | 936 | (26,775 | ) | — | (25,839 | ) | |||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
209 | 38,879 | 3,017 | — | 42,105 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
16,148 | 285,436 | 9,985 | — | 311,569 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Operating (loss) income |
(15,976 | ) | 84,657 | 45,524 | — | 114,205 | ||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(41,169 | ) | (41,598 | ) | (4,111 | ) | — | (86,878 | ) | |||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
53,366 | — | — | (53,366 | ) | — | ||||||||||||||
Other income (loss) |
3,023 | (5,666 | ) | (5,474 | ) | — | (8,117 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income from continuing operations before income taxes |
(756 | ) | 37,393 | 35,939 | (53,366 | ) | 19,210 | |||||||||||||
Provision for income taxes |
(5,482 | ) | 13,861 | 7,920 | — | 16,299 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Income from continuing operations |
4,726 | 23,532 | 28,019 | (53,366 | ) | 2,911 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Discontinued operations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gain on disposal of discontinued business (net of income taxes) |
11,116 | 1,651 | 164 | — | 12,931 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 15,842 | $ | 25,183 | $ | 28,183 | $ | (53,366 | ) | $ | 15,842 | |||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-41
RailAmerica, Inc.
Consolidating Statement of Cash Flows
For the year ended December 31, 2009
Company (Parent) |
Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Non Guarantor Subsidiaries |
Eliminations | Consolidated | ||||||||||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 15,842 | $ | 25,183 | $ | 28,183 | $ | (53,366 | ) | $ | 15,842 | |||||||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
||||||||||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization, including amortization costs classified in interest expense |
3,276 | 45,360 | 3,704 | — | 52,340 | |||||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of subsidiaries |
(53,366 | ) | — | — | 53,366 | — | ||||||||||||||
Amortization of swap termination costs |
16,616 | — | — | — | 16,616 | |||||||||||||||
Net loss (gain) on sale or disposal of properties |
1,201 | (949 | ) | (27,018 | ) | — | (26,766 | ) | ||||||||||||
Foreign exchange gain on debt |
— | — | (1,160 | ) | — | (1,160 | ) | |||||||||||||
Swap termination costs |
(55,750 | ) | — | — | — | (55,750 | ) | |||||||||||||
Loss on extinguishment of debt |
7,415 | 1,875 | 209 | — | 9,499 | |||||||||||||||
Equity compensation costs |
10,712 | — | — | — | 10,712 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred income taxes and other |
(1,780 | ) | 14,891 | 7,946 | — | 21,057 | ||||||||||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions and disposals: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accounts receivable |
29 | 9,117 | 1,727 | — | 10,873 | |||||||||||||||
Other current assets |
47 | (2,652 | ) | (488 | ) | — | (3,093 | ) | ||||||||||||
Accounts payable |
3,361 | 511 | (7,054 | ) | — | (3,182 | ) | |||||||||||||
Accrued expenses |
(4,548 | ) | (11,580 | ) | (549 | ) | — | (16,677 | ) | |||||||||||
Other assets and liabilities |
(22,865 | ) | 2,320 | (226 | ) | — | (20,771 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(79,810 | ) | 84,076 | 5,274 | — | 9,540 | ||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of property, plant and equipment |
(44 | ) | (42,771 | ) | (4,974 | ) | — | (47,789 | ) | |||||||||||
Proceeds from sale of assets |
— | 21,381 | 68,959 | — | 90,340 | |||||||||||||||
Deferred acquisition/disposition costs and other |
(355 | ) | — | — | — | (355 | ) | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash (used in) provided by investing activities |
(399 | ) | (21,390 | ) | 63,985 | — | 42,196 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of senior secured notes |
709,830 | — | — | — | 709,830 | |||||||||||||||
Principal payments on long-term debt |
(112,000 | ) | (475,898 | ) | (38,000 | ) | — | (625,898 | ) | |||||||||||
Repurchase of senior secured notes |
(76,220 | ) | — | — | — | (76,220 | ) | |||||||||||||
(Disbursements)/receipts on intercompany debt |
(427,167 | ) | 454,443 | (27,276 | ) | — | — | |||||||||||||
Sale of common stock |
143,123 | — | — | — | 143,123 | |||||||||||||||
Dividends paid to common stockholders |
(19,485 | ) | — | — | — | (19,485 | ) | |||||||||||||
Deferred financing costs paid |
(19,035 | ) | (1,140 | ) | — | — | (20,175 | ) | ||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
199,046 | (22,595 | ) | (65,276 | ) | — | 111,175 | |||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Effect of exchange rates on cash |
— | — | 356 | — | 356 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Net increase in cash |
118,837 | 40,091 | 4,339 | — | 163,267 | |||||||||||||||
Cash, beginning of period |
3,204 | 14,737 | 9,010 | — | 26,951 | |||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||||
Cash, end of period |
$ | 122,041 | $ | 54,828 | $ | 13,349 | $ | — | $ | 190,218 | ||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-42
This ‘10-K’ Filing | Date | Other Filings | ||
---|---|---|---|---|
7/1/17 | ||||
8/29/16 | ||||
7/1/15 | ||||
7/1/14 | ||||
2/15/14 | ||||
2/14/14 | ||||
7/1/13 | ||||
6/23/13 | ||||
12/31/12 | ||||
7/1/12 | ||||
4/30/12 | ||||
2/29/12 | 4 | |||
Filed on: | 2/23/12 | |||
2/22/12 | 4 | |||
2/21/12 | ||||
2/1/12 | 8-K | |||
1/5/12 | ||||
1/3/12 | ||||
For Period end: | 12/31/11 | 4, ARS | ||
12/15/11 | 4, 8-K | |||
11/30/11 | ||||
10/31/11 | ||||
8/31/11 | 8-K | |||
8/30/11 | ||||
8/29/11 | 8-K | |||
6/30/11 | 10-Q | |||
6/1/11 | 4 | |||
5/11/11 | ||||
4/18/11 | ARS | |||
2/27/11 | ||||
2/23/11 | 8-K | |||
1/1/11 | ||||
12/31/10 | 10-K, ARS | |||
7/1/10 | ||||
6/24/10 | ||||
6/15/10 | 8-K | |||
6/10/10 | 4/A, 8-K | |||
1/1/10 | ||||
12/31/09 | 10-K | |||
12/2/09 | ||||
11/16/09 | ||||
11/2/09 | 424B3, EFFECT | |||
10/20/09 | 4, S-4 | |||
10/16/09 | 4 | |||
10/13/09 | 4, 424B4, CERTNYS, EFFECT, S-8 | |||
9/29/09 | S-1/A | |||
9/28/09 | ||||
9/22/09 | CORRESP, S-1/A | |||
9/1/09 | CORRESP | |||
7/27/09 | ||||
6/23/09 | ||||
5/14/09 | ||||
1/1/09 | ||||
12/31/08 | ||||
11/15/08 | ||||
11/14/08 | ||||
7/1/08 | ||||
12/31/07 | ||||
11/15/07 | ||||
11/14/07 | ||||
2/15/07 | ||||
2/14/07 | 15-12B, 4, SC 13G/A | |||
1/1/07 | ||||
11/14/06 | 8-K | |||
10/1/05 | ||||
8/28/05 | ||||
9/11/01 | ||||
3/31/92 | ||||
List all Filings |