Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement for Securities of a Real Estate Company — Form S-11
Filing Table of Contents
Document/Exhibit Description Pages Size
1: S-11/A Pre-Effective Amendment to Registration Statement HTML 1.20M
for Securities of a Real Estate Company
2: EX-1.1 Underwriting Agreement 35 113K
3: EX-3.1 Articles of Incorporation/Organization or By-Laws HTML 188K
4: EX-4.1 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 233 781K
5: EX-4.2 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 8 22K
6: EX-4.4 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 44 155K
7: EX-4.5 Instrument Defining the Rights of Security Holders 133 487K
8: EX-5.1 Opinion re: Legality 3 16K
9: EX-8.2 Opinion re: Tax Matters 2 11K
10: EX-10.1 Material Contract HTML 105K
11: EX-10.2 Material Contract HTML 563K
12: EX-10.3 Material Contract 17 65K
13: EX-10.4 Material Contract 17 66K
14: EX-10.5 Material Contract 23 78K
15: EX-25.1 Statement re: Eligibility of Trustee HTML 40K
16: EX-99.1 Miscellaneous Exhibit 2 11K
EX-99.1 — Miscellaneous Exhibit
EX-99.1 | 1st Page of 2 | TOC | ↑Top | Previous | Next | ↓Bottom | Just 1st |
---|
Exhibit 99.1
[*]
Australian Securitisation Management Pty Limited
Level 6
12 Castlereagh Street
Sydney NSW 2000
Dear Sirs
ARMS II GLOBAL FUND 3
We have acted for Australian Securitisation Management Pty Limited in connection
with ARMS II Global Fund 3 constituted under the Master Trust Deed between
Permanent Custodians Limited and Australian Mortgage Securities Ltd dated 7
March 1995, as amended and restated from time to time.
Definitions in the Prospectus as filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission under the US Securities Act of 1933 (the PROSPECTUS) apply in this
opinion. RELEVANT JURISDICTION means the Commonwealth of Australia or New South
Wales. No assumption or qualification in this opinion limits any other
assumption or qualification in it.
1. DOCUMENTS
We have examined a copy of the Prospectus.
2. ASSUMPTION
For the purposes of giving this opinion we have assumed that where a
document has been submitted to us in draft form it will be executed in the
form of that draft.
3. QUALIFICATIONS
Our opinion is subject to the qualification that we express no opinion as
to any laws other than the laws of each Relevant Jurisdiction as in force
at the date of this opinion and, in particular, we express no opinion as to
the laws of England or the United States.
4. OPINION
Based on the assumptions and subject to the qualifications set out above
(which, except where expressly stated, apply equally to each of the
opinions below) we are of the following opinion.
(a) Any final and conclusive judgment of a court of the State of New York,
United States of America, or the United States Federal Court having
jurisdiction recognised by the Relevant Jurisdiction, in respect of an
obligation under an
OUR REF STHS
[ALLENS ARTHUR ROBINSON LOGO]
Offshore Bond, which is for a fixed sum of money and which has not
been stayed or satisfied in full, would be enforceable by action in
the courts of each Relevant Jurisdiction without a re-examination of
the merits of the issues determined by the proceedings in the New York
State Court or the United States Federal Court (as applicable) unless:
(i) the proceedings in the New York State Court or the United
States Federal Court (as applicable) involved a denial of the
principles of natural justice;
(ii) the judgment is contrary to the public policy of the Relevant
Jurisdiction;
(iii) the judgment was obtained by fraud or duress or was based on a
clear mistake of fact;
(iv) the judgment is a penal or revenue judgment; or
(v) there has been a prior judgment in another court between the
same parties concerning the same issues as are dealt with in
the judgment of the New York State Court or the United States
Federal Court (as applicable).
In particular, actions in a Relevant Jurisdiction (including as
original actions or as actions to enforce judgments of a United States
Court) relating to civil liabilities predicated on securities laws of
the United States may not be enforceable in a Relevant Jurisdiction.
(b) A judgment by a court in a Relevant Jurisdiction may be given in some
cases only in Australian dollars.
We consent to the filing of this letter as an exhibit to the Registration
Statement on Form S-11 filed with the Prospectus, without admitting that we are
"experts" within the meaning of the Securities Act of 1933 or the rules and
regulations of the commission issued under that Act with respect to any part of
the Registration Statement, including this exhibit.
Yours faithfully
ALLENS ARTHUR ROBINSON
Matthew Allchurch
Partner
Page 2
↑Top
Filing Submission 0001047469-04-001463 – Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)
Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
About — Privacy — Redactions — Help —
Thu., Apr. 25, 4:59:21.1am ET