SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

African Development Bank – ‘ANNLRPT’ for 9/15/14

On:  Tuesday, 9/16/14, at 1:27pm ET   ·   For:  9/15/14   ·   Accession #:  930413-14-4005   ·   File #:  83-00004

Previous ‘ANNLRPT’:  ‘ANNLRPT’ on 6/30/14 for 12/31/13   ·   Next:  ‘ANNLRPT’ on 9/8/15 for 8/28/15   ·   Latest:  ‘ANNLRPT’ on 8/9/23 for 12/31/22

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 9/16/14  African Development Bank          ANNLRPT     9/15/14    1:2.6M                                   Command Financial

Annual Report by an International Development Bank
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: ANNLRPT     Annual Report by an International Development Bank  HTML   1.15M 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential)   (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page  –  Filing Submission
"Information Statement
2Availability Of Information
3Table Of Contents
4Summary Information
9The Bank
"Membership Of Certain Countries
"Governmental Approval Of Borrowings
10Capitalisation
15Summary Statement Of Income And Expenses
16Operations Of The Bank
24Administration Of The Bank
27The Agreement Establishing The African Development Bank
28General Description Of The Securities
"Taxation
29Management Report Regarding The Effectiveness Of Internal Controls
30Independent Auditor's Report Regarding The Effectiveness Of Internal Controls
32Financial Highlights For The Years 2013, 2012 and 2011
34Report Of The External Auditors and ADB Financial Statements
"Report of the External Auditors
37Balance Sheet -- Assets
38Balance Sheet -- Liabilities, Reserves and Capital
39Income Statement
40Statement of Comprehensive Income
41Statement of changes in Equity
42Statement of Cash Flows
44Notes to the Financial Statements
122Membership Of France
"Membership Of Germany
"Membership Of Japan
"Membership Of Switzerland
"Membership Of The United Kingdom
123Membership Of The United States Of America

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]

ANNLRPT1st “Page” of 123TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

INFORMATION STATEMENT

 

African Development Bank

 

 

The African Development Bank (the “Bank” or “ADB”) intends from time to time to issue debt securities (the “Securities”) with maturities and on terms related to market conditions at the time of sale. The Securities may be sold to dealers or underwriters, who may resell the Securities in public offerings or otherwise. In addition, the Securities may be sold by the Bank directly or indirectly through agents

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

The specific aggregate principal amount, status, maturity, interest rate, or interest rate formula and dates of payment of interest, purchase price to be paid to the Bank, any terms for redemption or other special terms, currency or currencies, form and denomination of Securities, information as to stock exchange listings and the names and any compensation of the dealers, underwriters or agents in connection with the sale of the Securities being offered at a particular time (“Offered Securities”) will be set forth or referred to in a prospectus, offering circular, information memorandum, supplemental information statement, or pricing supplement, together with the terms of offering of the Offered Securities.

 

Securities issued by the Bank are not required to be registered under the U.S. Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Accordingly, no registration statement has been filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “Commission” or the “SEC”). The Securities have not been approved or disapproved by the Commission or any state securities commission nor has the Commission or any state securities commission passed upon the accuracy or adequacy of this Information Statement. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offence in the United States of America.

 

Recipients of this Information Statement should retain it for future reference, since it is intended that each prospectus, offering circular, information memorandum, or supplemental information statement or pricing supplement prepared in connection with the issuance of Offered Securities will refer to this Information Statement for a description of the Bank and its financial condition and results of operation, until a new information statement is issued.

 

15 September 2014

 C: 
 C: 1
ANNLRPT2nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
</PAGE>

AVAILABILITY OF INFORMATION

 

The Bank will provide additional copies of this Information Statement and other information with respect to the Bank, including the Agreement Establishing the African Development Bank, as amended (the “Agreement” or the “Bank Agreement”) and its annual report to the Boards of Governors, upon request. Written or telephone requests may be directed to the Bank’s Temporary Relocation Agency address at 15 Avenue du Ghana BP 323 – 1002 Tunis Belvédčre, Tunisia, Attention: The Treasurer, telephone +216-71-10-20-28 and +216-71-10-21-06, facsimile +216-71-33-06-32 or +216-71-25-26-93. The Information Statement is also available on the Bank’s website (http://www.afdb.org). The annual report and the documents and information on the Bank’s website are not intended to be incorporated by reference in this Information Statement.

 

In the United States, this Information Statement is to be filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) electronically through the EDGAR system and will be available at the website address http://www.sec.gov/edgarhp.htm. The Bank has also filed unaudited quarterly financial statements with the SEC. These filings are also available electronically through the EDGAR system.

 

The issuance of this Information Statement or any prospectus, offering circular, information memorandum, supplemental information statement, pricing circular and the offering and sale of Securities are not a waiver by the Bank or by any of its members, Governors, Directors, Alternates, officers or employees of any of the rights, immunities, privileges or exemptions conferred upon any of them by the Agreement, or by any statute, law or regulation of any member of the Bank or any political subdivision of any member, all of which are hereby expressly reserved.

 

The Bank uses a unit of account (the “Unit of Account” or “UA”) equivalent to the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) as its reporting currency. The value of the SDR, which may vary from day to day, is currently computed daily in U.S. dollars by the IMF. Except as otherwise specified, all amounts in this Information Statement and any prospectus, offering circular, information memorandum, supplemental information statement or pricing supplement are expressed in UA. Currencies have been translated into UA at the rates of exchange used by the Bank and prevailing on the last day of the period presented. In certain instances, amounts in UA have also been presented in U.S. dollars at the conversion rates set forth below. Such presentations are made solely for convenience and should not be construed as a representation that the UA actually represents, has been or could be converted into U.S. dollars at these or any other rates.

 

In recent years, there have been significant changes in the relative values of the U.S. dollar and the component currencies of the UA. The Bank makes no representation that would indicate that the U.S. dollar or any other currency accurately reflects the historical financial performance or present financial condition of the Bank. Exchange rates used by the Bank for converting UA into U.S. dollars are as follows:

 

As at 31 December

 

  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Rate of 1 UA = US$ 1.54000 1.53692 1.53527 1.54003 1.56769
 C: 
2
ANNLRPT3rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
</PAGE>

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Information Statement   1
Availability Of Information   2
Table Of Contents   3
Summary Information   4
The Bank   9
Membership Of Certain Countries   9
Governmental Approval Of Borrowings   9
Capitalisation   10
Summary Statement Of Income And Expenses   15
Operations Of The Bank   16
Administration Of The Bank   24
The Agreement Establishing The African Development Bank   27
General Description Of The Securities   28
Taxation   28
Management Report Regarding The Effectiveness Of Internal Controls   29
Independent Auditor’s Report Regarding The Effectiveness Of Internal Controls   30
Financial Highlights For The Years 2013, 2012 and 2011   32
Report Of The External Auditors and ADB Financial Statements   34
Membership Of France   122
Membership Of Germany   122
Membership Of Japan   122
Membership Of Switzerland   122
Membership Of The United Kingdom   122
Membership Of The United States Of America   123

 

LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS

 

ADB   African Development Bank
ADF   African Development Fund
CEAS   Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions
DAC   Development Assistance Committee
ECP   Euro Commercial Programme
EDGAR   Electronic Data-Gathering, Analysis & Retrieval System
GCI-IV   Fourth General Capital Increase
GCI-V   Fifth General Capital Increase
GCI-VI   Sixth General Capital Increase
GDIF   Global Debt Issuance Facility
HIPC   Heavily Indebted Poor Countries
IAS   International Accounting Standard
IMF   International Monetary Fund
NTF   Nigeria Trust Fund
OECD   Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development
PSO   Private Sector Operations
RMC   Regional Member Countries
SDR   Special Drawing Right
SEC   Securities and Exchange Commission
UA   Unit of Account
 C: 
3
ANNLRPT4th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
</PAGE>

SUMMARY INFORMATION

(All numerical data are as of 31 December 2013, except as otherwise indicated.)

 

General

 

The Bank is a regional multilateral development institution established in 1963. The Bank’s membership consists of 53 African states (the “regional member countries” or “RMCs”) and 26 non-African states1. (the “non-regional member countries”).

 

The central goal of the Bank’s activities is promoting sustainable economic growth and reducing poverty in Africa. The Bank provides financing for a broad range of development projects and programmes. In addition, it provides policy-based loans and equity investments, finances non-publicly guaranteed private sector loans, offers technical assistance for projects and programmes that provide institutional support, promotes the investment of public and private capital, and responds to requests for assistance in co-ordinating RMC development policies and plans. National and multinational projects and programmes that promote regional economic co-operation and integration are also given high priority. The Bank’s 2013-2022 strategy focuses on achieving inclusive growth and to help Africa gradually transition to green growth. The strategy is built around five core operational priorities, specifically infrastructure development, regional integration, private sector development, governance, skills and technology.

 

The Bank’s capital stock is owned by its member countries. On 27 May 2010, at its forty-sixth Annual Meeting, the Board of Governors adopted Resolution B/BG/ 2010/08 authorising the Sixth General Capital Increase (GCI-VI). Under the capital structure of the Bank, the share in the Bank’s overall share capital of regional member countries is 60 percent and that of non-regional member countries is 40 percent. As of 31 December 2013, the authorised capital of the Bank stands at UA 66.98 billion2.

 

Assets

 

Loan Portfolio – The Bank’s principal asset is its portfolio of loans. The Bank lends to governments of its regional member countries, their agencies and political subdivisions, and to public and private enterprises operating within such countries. It is the general policy of the Bank for sovereign lending that each loan to an entity other than a government should carry the guarantee of the government within whose jurisdiction the financed project lies. Loans may be granted to eligible private sector entities without a government guarantee. Generally such loans are secured by collateral. As at 31 December 2013, cumulative loans and grants signed, net of cancellations, amounted to UA 31.11 billion, and total disbursed and outstanding loans, before the accumulated provision for impairment, were UA 11.59 billion. Although the Bank experiences delays in payments on some of its loans, the Bank expects that sovereign guaranteed loans will eventually be paid and such delays will only affect the timing of the cash flows on the loans. Delays in cash flows are taken into consideration in the determination of impairment on loans and charges receivable. Prior to 1 January 2005, the Bank placed in non-accrual status all loans to, or guaranteed by a member country, if principal, interest or other charges with respect to any such loan were overdue by six months or more. Upon the adoption of the revised IAS 39 on 1 January 2005, the Bank no longer places loans in non-accrual status. Interest and charges are accrued on all loans including those in arrears. The revised standard requires that both principal and charges receivable on loans be assessed for impairment using the incurred loss model. Cumulative amounts that had previously been non-accrued as a result of the former non-accrual policy amounting to UA 526.13 million (net of provision) were transferred to reserves on 1 January 2005.

 

Liquidity –The Bank holds sufficient liquid assets to secure the continuity of normal operations even in the unlikely event that it is unable to obtain additional resources from the capital markets for one year. To achieve this, the Bank computes a prudential minimum level of liquidity (PML) based on the projected net cash requirement for a rolling one-year period. The liquidity policy sets the PML as the Bank’s projected net cash requirements for a one year horizon and computed quarterly as the sum of (1) one year net loan disbursements if greater than zero, (2) one year debt service requirements, (3) the loan equivalent value of signed guarantees, and (4) undisbursed equity investments. The maximum level of liquidity is determined by the Bank’s debt limits.

 

 
1 See page 11 for further details
2 On 29 May 2014, Luxembourg became 79th member country of the Bank’s and 26th non-regional member country.
 C: 
4
ANNLRPT5th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
</PAGE>

Liabilities, Capital and Reserves

 

Liabilities – As at 31 December 2013, the Bank’s total borrowings (including subordinated debts of UA 462.20 million) amounted to UA 12,947.44 million. The Bank raises resources in cost-effective manner across markets to finance programs and projects in its regional member countries and meet its liquidity requirements. The debt to usable capital ratio limits the Bank’s total outstanding debt to 100 percent of the usable capital. The Bank defines usable capital as the sum of paid in capital, reserves and callable capital from non-borrowing countries rated A- or better. At 31st December 2013, the Bank’s usable capital amounted to 27,089.68 million and its debt to usable capital ratio was 47.81 percent.

 

Capital and ReservesSubscriptions to the capital stock of the Bank are made up of initial subscriptions to the capital, a voluntary capital increase, a series of special capital increases and general increases of the capital. On 27 May 2010, the Board of Governors of the Bank approved the Sixth General Capital Increase (GCI-VI). GCI-VI increased the authorised capital of the Bank from 2,394,746 shares to 6,768,746 shares. The par value of one share of the Bank’s capital is UA 10,000. The newly created 4 374 000 GCI-VI shares are composed of paid-up shares (6%) and callable shares (94%).. The shares are allocated to the regional and non-regional members such that, when fully subscribed, the regional members will hold 60 percent of the total stock of the Bank and non-regional members would hold the balance of 40 percent. Seventy two member countries (49 regional member countries and 23 non-regional member countries) had subscribed to GCI-VI as at 31 December 2013.

 

At 31 December 2013, of the Bank’s total subscribed capital of UA 65,210.13 million, an amount of UA 4,962.34 million (7.61 percent) represented the paid-up portion and UA 60,247.79 million (92.39 percent) was callable. The portion of paid-up capital for which the Bank has received payment, referred to as paid-in capital, amounted to UA 3,147.30 million as at 31 December 2013.

 

At 31 December 2013, the callable capital of the Bank’s 25 non-borrowing member countries was UA 24,036.69 million, which represented 185.65 percent of the Bank’s total outstanding borrowings. At 31 December 2013, the callable capital of the Bank’s 18 industrialised member countries that are also members of the Development Assistance Committee (“DAC”) of the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (“OECD”) (Austria, Belgium, Canada, Denmark, Finland, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, the Netherlands, Norway, Portugal, Republic of Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, the United Kingdom, and the United States) was UA 22,633.10 million, representing 175 percent of the Bank’s total outstanding borrowings.

 

Under the Agreement establishing the Bank, the total amount outstanding in respect of the ordinary operations of the Bank (consisting of approved loans less cancellations and repayments, plus equity participations) shall not at any time exceed the total amount of its unimpaired subscribed capital, reserves, and surplus. Such total amount outstanding as at 31 December 2013 was UA 16,959.68 million and such total capital (net of the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (“CEAS”), reserves and surplus) was UA 67,894.14 million, resulting in a ratio of 25 percent. The ratio of disbursed and outstanding loans (including irrevocable commitments to pay undisbursed amounts) to equity was 199 percent. The Bank’s total equity (paid-in capital and reserves net of (CEAS) also referred to as risk capital, amounted to UA 5,831.31 million. The risk capital utilization rate, which measures the amount of capital consumed by the Bank’s activities, was 62%.

 

Profitability

 

Although profit maximisation is not a primary objective, the Bank has earned a profit in every year since it began operations in 1966. For 2013, income before transfers approved by the Board of Governors amounted to UA 180.33 million. The Bank does not distribute dividends to its shareholders. Under the Agreement Establishing the Bank, reserves have first claim on net income. After a determination has been made regarding the amount to be retained in reserves, any remaining amount is allocated to (i) fulfil commitments or conditional undertakings approved by the Board of Governors (ii) a surplus account, and/or (iii) distributed to key initiatives.

 

Accounting Standards

 

The financial statements of the Bank are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) (formerly International Accounting Standards) promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board.

 C: 
5
ANNLRPT6th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
</PAGE>

Risk Management and Internal Control

 

The Bank seeks to minimise its exposure to risks that are not essential to its core business of providing development finance and related assistance. Accordingly the Bank’s risk management policies, guidelines and practices are designed to reduce exposure to interest rate, currency, liquidity, counterparty, legal and other operational risks while maximising the Bank’s capacity to assume credit risks to public and private sector clients, within its approved risk limits. The Bank’s risk management policies and practices are included in the notes to the financial statements.

 

Following the approval by the Board of Directors in 2004, the Bank established an Internal Control Unit (ICU) to implement, among other duties, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations (COSO) control framework to regularly evaluate the effectiveness of its internal controls in all significant business operations. Management and the External Auditors issue an annual attestation on the effectiveness of the Bank’s internal controls over financial reporting as part of the annual audit process. The attestations at the end of 2013 are included elsewhere in this document.

 

The above information is qualified by the detailed information and financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Information Statement.

 C: 
6
ANNLRPT7th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
</PAGE>

SUMMARY OF SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

(Amounts expressed in millions of UA)

 

Years Ended 31 December
2013 2012
Restated
2011 2010
Cash, Investments 7,039.57 7,368.96 7,934.63 7,829.25
Approved Loans less Cancellations:        
Disbursed and outstanding 11,585.84 11,014.31 9,373.52 8,293.00
Undisbursed(1) 4,490.13 4,463.23 5,301.02 4,855.33
Outstanding Borrowings:        
Total 12,947.44 13,278.80 12,902.96 11,980.57
Senior 12,485.24 12,518.00 11,980.57 11,203.69
Subordinated 462.20 760.80 795.21 776.88
Authorised Capital 66,975.050 66,975.050 66,054.50 67,687.46
Subscribed Capital and Reserves:        
Paid-up capital 4,962.33 4,962.68 3,289.06 2,375.63
Callable capital 60,247.79 60,252.36 34,032.95 21,549.00
Total callable - non-borrowing members 24.036.69 26,442.36 19,699.40 10,411.35
Total callable - members of the DAC of the OECD 22,633.10 22,650.77 17,875.58 8,856.69
Total Reserves 2,856.88 2,667.44 2,536.18 2,627.28
Cash and Investments as a Percentage of        
Undisbursed portion of approved loans 156.78% 165.2% 149.7% 161.3%
Outstanding borrowings 54.37% 55.5% 61.5% 65.3%
Disbursed and Outstanding Loans as a Percentage of        
Subscribed Capital plus Reserves(2)(3) 17.06% 16.2% 23.6% 31.4%
Total Outstanding Borrowings as a Percentage of        
Total callable capital 21.49% 22.0% 37.91% 55.60%
Callable capital of non-borrowing members 53.87% 50.2% 65.5% 115.1%
Callable capital of DAC members of OECD 57.21% 58.6% 72.2% 135.3%
Senior Debt as a Percentage of        
Total callable capital 20.72% 20.8% 34.5% 52.0%
Callable capital of non-borrowing members 51.94% 47.3% 59.68% 107.6%
Callable capital of DAC members of OECD 55.16% 55.3% 65.8% 126.5%

Total Outstanding Borrowings as a Percentage of Usable Capital:(4)

47.81% 49.88% 54.60% 83.70%
Total Reserves as a Percentage of        
Disbursed and outstanding loans(3) 24.66% 24.2% 27.1% 31.7%
Total outstanding borrowings 22.07% 20.1% 19.7% 21.9%
Income before transfers approved by the Board of Governors 180.33 195.71 164.51 213.66
Weighted Average Interest Rate on:        
Disbursed and Outstanding Loans for the Year 2.96% 3.47% 3.57% 3.71%
Weighted Average Cost of:        
Debt contracted during the year 0.21% 0.64% 1.15% 0.84%
Outstanding borrowings 1.20% 1.74% 1.83% 1.93%
Average Life of Outstanding Borrowings (Years) 4.4 4.02 5.6 4.1
Interest coverage ratio(5) (1.25x)(6) 1.94X 1.91X 1.80X 2.21X
Risk Capital Utilization Rate (RCUR)(7) 62.00% 58.00% 59.60% 58.00%

 

(1) Excludes loans approved but unsigned.
(2) Subscribed capital is net of the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions.
(3) Net of the Special Reserve. Disbursed and outstanding loans include irrevocable reimbursement guarantees.
(4) The Bank’s policy limits the debt to usable capital ratio to 100%.The usable capital is defined as the sum of paid in capital, reserves and callable capital from non-borrowing countries rated A- or better
 C: 
7
ANNLRPT8th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
</PAGE>
(5) Operating income plus interest expense, divided by interest expense.
(6) Indicates the Bank’s target ratio.
(7) The Bank’s policy limits the RCUR to 100%

 

The above information should be read in conjunction with the notes to the financial statements for the receptive period and is qualified by the detailed information and financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Information Statement.

 C: 
8
ANNLRPT9th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
</PAGE>

THE BANK

 

The Bank is a regional multilateral development institution with membership comprising 533 African states and 264 non-African states from the Americas, Asia, and Europe (the “regional members” and “non- regional members”, respectively). The Bank was established in 1963 and operates under the Agreement Establishing the African Development Bank signed in Khartoum, Sudan, on 4 August 1963. The Bank began operations in 1966 with 29 regional members. The Agreement was amended on 7 May 1982 to permit non-regional countries to be admitted as members. A list of the members at 31 December 2013 showing each member’s voting power and the amount of its subscription to the Bank’s capital stock is provided in Note N to the financial statements included herein. In conformity with the finding of the UN General Assembly, the membership of former Yugoslavia was formally suspended by the Board of Directors of the Bank (see Note N to the financial statements included herein).

 

The Bank’s headquarters is located in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. However, since February 2003, the Bank has temporarily relocated operations from Abidjan to Tunis, Tunisia. On 30 May 2013 the Board of Governors approved a roadmap for an orderly and phased return of the Bank to Abidjan in 2014.

 

The central goal of the Bank’s activities is promoting sustainable economic growth and reducing poverty in Africa. The Bank provides financing for a broad range of development projects and programmes. In addition, it provides policy-based loans and equity investments, finances non-publicly guaranteed private sector loans, offers technical assistance for projects and programmes that provide institutional support, promotes the investment of public and private capital, and responds to requests for assistance in co-ordinating RMC development policies and plans. National and multinational projects and programmes that promote regional economic co-operation and integration are also given high priority. The Bank’s 2013-2022 strategy focuses on achieving inclusive growth and to help Africa gradually transition to green growth. The strategy is built around five core operational priorities, specifically infrastructure development, regional integration, private sector development, governance, skills and technology.

 

The Bank’s ordinary operations are financed from its ordinary capital resources. The ordinary capital resources include subscribed capital stock, borrowings by the Bank, loan repayments, income from loans, equity investments and guarantees and other funds and income received by the Bank in its ordinary operations. The capital stock of the Bank is divided into paid-up capital and callable capital. The Bank’s paid-up capital is the amount of capital payable over a period specified in the Board of Governors’ resolution approving the relevant Capital Increase. The callable capital is subject to call only as and when required by the Bank, to meet obligations incurred on funds borrowed or loans guaranteed.

 

In addition to its ordinary operations, the Bank administers the African Development Fund (the “ADF”), which provides loan financing on concessionary terms to RMCs that are in the greatest need of such financing. The ADF is legally and financially separate from the Bank, and the Bank is not liable for any obligations of the ADF. The Bank also administers, under separate agreements and arrangements, the Nigeria Trust Fund (the “NTF”) and several other special and trust funds. The resources of these special and trust funds are held, committed and otherwise disposed of entirely separately from the Bank’s ordinary capital resources (see Note V-3 & V-4 to the financial statements included herein).

 

MEMBERSHIP OF CERTAIN COUNTRIES

 

Information with respect to the membership and total subscription of certain member countries, including the United States, Japan, France, Germany, Switzerland and United Kingdom, is included on the inside back cover in copies of this Information Statement circulated in such respective countries.

 

GOVERNMENTAL APPROVAL OF BORROWINGS

 

As required by the Agreement, offerings of Securities will only be made in the currency or markets of a member country after the government of such member has consented to the raising of funds by the Bank and the issuance of Securities in such currency or markets and has agreed that the proceeds from the sale of Securities may be exchanged for the currency of any other country without restriction.

 

3 On 1 June 2012, the Board of Governors approved the application of the Republic of South Sudan to join the Bank. Upon completion of the prescribed procedures, South Sudan will become the 54th regional member country.

4 On 29 October 2013, the Republic of Turkey was formally admitted as the 78th member country of the Bank, and on 29 May 2014 Luxembourg became the Bank’s 79th member country.

 C: 
9
ANNLRPT10th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
</PAGE>

CAPITALISATION

 

General

 

The following table sets forth the outstanding borrowings, capital stock and reserves and net income of the Bank at 31 December 2013:

 

In UA
millions
Outstanding Borrowings(1)
Debt Payable in:
U.S. Dollar 7,910.96
Japanese Yen 1,007.97
Other currencies 4,029.69
Total debt (*) 12,948.62
Pre-issuance costs (1.16)
Total Borrowing 12,947.46
Of which : Total Senior Debt (*) 12,485.26
Total Subordinated Debt (*) 462.20
   
Capital Stock and Reserves(2)  
Authorised capital 66,975.05
Unsubscribed capital (1,764.92)
Subscribed capital 65,210.13
Less: Callable capital (60,247.79)
Paid-up capital 4,962.34
Shares to be issued upon payment of future instalment (1,815.39)
Amount paid in advance 0.36
Amount in arrears (0.22)
Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (CEAS) (172.65)
Capital net of CEAS 2,974.43
Reserves and Net Income for the Year 2,856.88
   
Total Capital and Reserves 5,831.31

 

(1) For a description of the Bank’s borrowing policies and the currency distributions and other details with respect to borrowings, as well as the effects of currency and interest rate swaps undertaken by the Bank on the currency composition and weighted average interest cost of the Bank’s payment obligations, see “Borrowings” and Note M to the financial statements included herein.
   
(2) For a more complete description of subscriptions to the capital stock and voting power, see Note N to the financial statements included herein. For a more complete description of Reserves, see Note N to the financial statements included herein.
   
(*) Figures are for Principal amount at face value
 C: 
10
ANNLRPT11th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
</PAGE>

Authorised Capital

 

The Bank’s original authorised capital stock of UA 250 million has been increased in line with the provisions of the Agreement, which provides that the authorised capital stock may be increased as and when the Board of Governors deems it advisable. The authorised capital stock of the Bank has undergone several increases recently. Two special capital increases were approved in 2008 (Resolution B/BG/2008/07) and 2009 (Resolution B/BG/2009/05) to enable membership and subscription of shares by the Republic of Turkey and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg respectively. The effect of these special capital increases was to increase the authorised capital of the Bank from UA 21.87 billion to UA 22.12 billion.

 

In 2009, Canada and Korea responded favourably to the Bank’s need for expanded financial capacity pending decisions on a GCI-VI of the Bank by a temporary increase of their callable capital with no attached voting rights. The special capital increase adopted by Board of Governors Resolution B/BG/2010/02, brought the authorised capital of the Bank to UA 23.95 billion. The Resolution provided for the retirement and cancellation of the temporary callable capital subscribed by Canada (UA 1.63 billion) and the Republic of Korea (UA 0.19 billion) upon the effectiveness of their respective subscriptions to a general capital increase and pursuant to authorization by the Board of Governors.

 

The GCI-VI was approved by Board of Governors’ Resolution B/BG/2010/08, raising the authorised capital of the Bank from UA 23.95 billion to UA 67.69 billion. This represents a 200% increase of the Bank’s authorised capital (excluding Canada and Korea’s temporary callable capital and special capital increases for Turkey and Luxembourg) with a paid-up capital of 6%. The new shares created under GCI-VI are to be allocated to regional and non-regional members in such proportions that, when fully subscribed, the regional would hold 60 percent of the total capital stock and the non-regional group 40 percent. Pursuant to due authorisation by resolutions of the Board of Governors, the temporary callable shares of Canada and Korea were cancelled in 2011 and 2012 respectively.

 

On 31 May, 2012 by its Resolution B/BG/2012/04, the Board of Governors approved a Special Capital Increase of the authorised share capital of the Bank to allow for: (i) subscription by a new regional member country (the Republic of South Sudan) of the minimum number of shares required for it to become a member; and (ii) the resulting subscription by non-regional members of the number of shares necessary to comply with the 60/40 ratio requirement between the shareholding of regional and non-regional members. Accordingly, the Board of Governors decided to increase the authorised capital of the Bank by the creation of 111,469 new shares, out of which 66,881 are available for subscription by the Republic of South Sudan, and 44,588 are available for subscription by non-regional members. The additional shares are subject to the same terms and conditions as the shares authorised in the GCI-VI. The membership of the Republic of South Sudan shall become effective upon completion of the formalities specified in the Agreement establishing the Bank and in the General Rules Governing Admission of Regional Countries to Membership of the Bank

 

At 31 December 2013, the authorised capital stock of the Bank was UA 66,975.05 million.

 

Subscribed Capital

 

Member countries subscribe to the capital of the Bank by depositing an instrument of subscription. The subscription is deemed effective when the member country pays the first installment of the paid-up capital. The shares representing the paid-up portion are issued when the Bank receives the actual payments for such shares, while the entire callable shares are issued upon the payment of the first installment of the paid-up capital. At 31 December 2013, total subscribed capital of the Bank amounted to UA 65,210.13 million of which, an amount of UA 4,962.34 million (7.61 percent) was paid-up capital and UA 60,247.79 million (92.39 percent) was callable capital.

 

The Agreement provides that shares of capital stock are to be issued at par value (UA 10,000 per share), unless the Board of Governors decides by a majority vote to issue them on other terms. The liability of the members is limited to the unpaid portion of the issue price of the shares. Shares are transferable only to the Bank.

 

Callable Capital

 

At 31 December 2013, the Bank’s total callable capital was UA 60,247.79 million. Of this amount, UA 24,036.69 million represented the callable capital of the Bank’s 25 non-borrowing member countries. The callable capital of the 18 Bank members who are also members of the DAC of the OECD was UA 22,633.10 million.

 C: 
11
ANNLRPT12th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
</PAGE>

Callable capital is that portion of the subscribed capital stock subject to call only as and when required by the Bank to meet its obligations on borrowing of funds for inclusion in its ordinary capital resources or guarantees chargeable to such resources. In the event of a call, payment must be made by the member countries concerned in gold, convertible currency or in the currency required to discharge the obligation of the Bank for which the call was made.

 

Calls on the callable capital are required to be uniform in percentage on all shares of capital stock, but obligations of the members to make payment upon such calls are independent of each other. The failure of one or more members to make payments on any such call would not excuse any other member from its obligation to make payment. Further calls can be made on non-defaulting members if necessary to meet the Bank’s obligations. However, no member could be required to pay more than the unpaid balance of its ordinary capital subscription. No call has ever been made on the callable capital of the Bank.

 

Paid-up Capital

 

At 31 December 2013, the total paid-up capital stock of the Bank amounted to UA 4,962.34 million.

 

The Board of Governors determines the modes of payment for paid-up capital stock as well as the period over which payment is to be made. Prior to May 1981, all payments in respect of the paid-up capital were required to be made in convertible currencies. However, with respect to subscriptions under the capital increases authorised in May 1979 (but effective December 1982) and May 1981, regional members had the following two options for making their payments: (i) five equal annual instalments, of which at least 50 percent is payable in convertible currency and the remainder in local currency; or (ii) five equal annual instalments, of which 20 percent is payable in convertible currency and 80 percent in non-negotiable, non-interest bearing notes. Such notes were payable solely in convertible currency in ten equal annual instalments, commencing on the fifth anniversary of the first subscription payment date. Non-regional members were required to make their payments solely in convertible currencies.

 

For GCI-IV, regional members were required to make payment for their subscriptions as follows: (i) 50 percent in five equal annual instalments in cash in freely convertible currencies; and (ii) 50 percent by the deposit of five non-negotiable, non-interest-bearing notes of equal value denominated in UA and payable between the sixth and tenth year of subscription in convertible currencies according to a specific schedule. For non-regional members, payments were to be made in five equal annual instalments in their national currencies, if such currencies were freely convertible, or in notes denominated in convertible currencies and payable on demand.

 

For GCI-V, the paid-up portion of the shares were payable in eight equal and consecutive annual instalments, in convertible currencies.

 

For GCI-VI, the paid-up portion of the shares is to be paid in twelve equal and consecutive annual instalments for those members eligible to receive financing exclusively from the ADF, and in eight equal and consecutive annual instalments by all other members. Payments can only be made in convertible currencies. Shares representing the paid-up portion of subscriptions are only issued when the Bank receives actual payments for such shares.

 

The paid-in capital is the portion of the paid-up capital for which payment has been received. .As of 31 December 2013, the total paid-in capital of the Bank (i.e. the portion of paid up capital for which payment has been received) was 3,146.94 million made up of: (1) UA 3,030.38 million paid in convertible currencies, (2) UA 115.16 million paid in local currencies and (3) UA 1.54 million paid by the deposit of non-negotiable, non-interest bearing notes.

 

In accordance with the Bank’s Share Transfer Rules, shares for which payment has become due and remain unpaid are forfeited after 120 days from the due date and offered for subscription to member countries within the same membership group (i.e. regional or non-regional). As at 31 December 2013 arrears on subscription amounted to UA 0.22 million

 

For a more complete description of subscriptions to capital stock, including amounts due but unpaid, and voting power of members, see Note N to the financial statements.

 C: 
12
ANNLRPT13th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
</PAGE>

Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (CEAS)

 

At 31 December 2013, the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (“CEAS”) representing the translation difference on subscriptions was a negative UA 172.65 million. It should be noted that prior to GCI-IV, payments on the share capital subscribed by the non-regional member countries were fixed in terms of their national currencies. Furthermore, payments by regional and non-regional members in US dollars were fixed at an exchange rate of 1 UA= US$ 1.20635 (GCI-IV and GCI-V), and, at a fixed exchange rate of 1 UA = 1.30777.for Euro. Fixed exchange rates are also used for GCI-VI. As a result, losses and gains could arise from converting these currencies to UA when received. Such conversion differences are reported in the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscription account.

 

Non-Borrowing Members

 

The following table sets forth the callable portion of the capital subscription and the total capital subscription of non-borrowing members as at 31 December 2013(1).

 

(Expressed in millions of UA)

Country Callable capital Total capital subscription
Argentina 52.36 58.47
Austria* 270.66 284.76
Belgium* 389.18 407.36
Brazil 269.70 282.30
Canada* 2,276.56 2,434.49
China 677.55 712.86
Denmark* 701.74 755.91
Finland* 296.31 311.75
France* 2,276.56 2,395.21
Germany* 2,499.14 2,615.89
India 135.50 142.56
Italy* 1,467.85 1,544.35
Japan* 3,329.18 3,502.70
Korea* 270.66 284.76
Kuwait 87.35 97.07
Netherlands* 520.97 547.63
Norway* 701.74 738.31
Portugal* 145.75 152.64
Saudi Arabia 117.44 122.93
Spain* 643.44 691.83
Sweden* 936.64 985.45
Switzerland* 888.95 935.28
Turkey 63.72 64.22
United Kingdom* 1,019.22 1,072.34
United States of America* 3,998.52 4,185.37
Total 24,036.69 25,326.44

 

* Member of the DAC of the OECD.

 

(1) See Note N to the financial statements included herein for a more complete description of the capital subscriptions of all members of the Bank at 31 December 2013. At 31 December 2013, the 25 members listed above held 39.95 percent of the total voting powers of the Bank.

 

Maintenance of Currency Values

 

Pursuant to the Agreement, each member is required to pay to the Bank any additional amount of its national currency necessary to maintain the value of all such national currency paid to the Bank on account of its subscription whenever the par value of the member’s currency in terms of the UA or its foreign exchange value has, in the opinion of the Bank, depreciated to a significant extent. In the event of an increase in such par value or such foreign exchange value, the Bank is required, pursuant to the Agreement, to pay to the member an amount of its currency necessary to adjust in a similar way the value of all such national currency held by the Bank on account of its subscription.

 

It was decided in 1979 by the Board of Governors that the application of the maintenance of value would be suspended until such time as the Board of Directors determines that the Special Drawing Right (SDR) is being definitively applied as the unit of value applicable to members’ subscriptions in the International Bank for Reconstruction and Development (the “World Bank”) for purposes of the maintenance of value provisions of its

 C: 
13
ANNLRPT14th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
</PAGE>

Articles of Agreement. In October 1986, the World Bank decided that the capital stock of the World Bank would be valued in terms of the SDR, at the rate at which the SDR was valued in terms of U.S. dollars immediately before the introduction of the basket method of valuing the SDR on 1 July 1974. This value was 1 SDR=$1.20635.

 

Voting Rights

 

Each member country has 625 votes and, in addition, one vote for each share of the capital stock of the Bank held by that member. In effect, a member country is allowed to exercise (1) the votes attributed to the portion of the paid-up shares which have been issued to such member, (2) the votes attributable to the entire callable capital portion of the stock subscribed when the subscription of such member is deemed effective.

 

In the event of any delay or default in payment of the paid-up capital, the member’s right to vote the corresponding callable shares will be suspended until the payment is received by the Bank.

 

Reserves

 

Reserves consist of retained earnings, fair value gains/losses on investments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income, gains/losses on fair-valued borrowings arising from “own credit”, and remeasurements of defined benefit liability. Retained earnings include the net income for the period, after taking into account transfers approved by the Board of Governors, and net charges recognized directly in equity. Retained earnings also include the transition adjustments resulting from the adoption of new or revised financial reporting standards, where applicable. Income before transfers approved by the Board of Governors for the year ended 31 December 2013 amounted to UA 180.33 million.

 C: 
14
ANNLRPT15th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
</PAGE>

SUMMARY STATEMENT OF INCOME AND EXPENSES

 

The following summary of income and expenses relating to the ordinary capital resources of the Bank for the years ended 31 December, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 has been derived from the audited financial statements of the Bank for the respective years. The summary should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and related notes.

 

(Expressed in millions of UA) Years ended 31 December
  2013 2012 (Restated) 2011 2010 2009
OPERATIONAL INCOME & EXPENSES          
Income from:          
Loans 335.01 351.16 314.92 293.36 288.24
Investments and related derivatives 131.24 199.35 168.85 219.22 222.96
Other debt securities 3.95 4.83 5.41 6.74 7.68
Total income from loans and investments 470.2 555.34 489.18 519.32 518.88
           
Borrowing expenses          
Interest and amortised issuance costs (302.99) (356.41) (316.82) (303.04) (306.32)
Net interest on borrowing-related derivatives 111.85 139.16 112.16 126.26 73.28
Unrealised gain/(loss) on fair-valued borrowings and related derivatives 46.82 (30.45) (13.00) (27.61) 17.38
Unrealised gain/(loss) on derivatives, non-fair-valued borrowings and others (12.72) 20.28 9.96 (13.33) (20.30)
Loss on sale of investment at amortized cost (4.80) (1.70)      
           
Provision for impairment on loan principal and charges receivables (41.14) (29.69) (17.68) (26.76) (11.29)
Provision for impairment on investments 9.95 0.24 6.24 17.68 1.07
Translation gains/(losses) 13.33 (2.27) (27.95) 4.86 19.63
Other income/loss 12.46 15.29 4.46 (1.72) 7.34
Net operational income 302.98 309.79 246.55 295.66 299.67
           
OTHER EXPENSES          
Total Bank Group administrative expenses 337.24 293.35 239.21 239.42 221.51
Share of expenses allocated to ADF and NTF (226.27) (185.81) (159.71) (164.42) (158.45)
Net administrative expenses 110.97 107.54 79.50 75.00 63.06
Depreciation - Property, equipment and intangible assets 6.70 4.59 4.46 4.59 4.68
Sundry expenses/(income) 4.98 1.94 (1.93) 2.41 0.77
Total other expenses 122.65 114.07 82.04 82.00 68.51
Income before transfers approved by the Board of Governors 180.33 195.71 164.51 213,66 231.16
Transfers of income approved by the Board of Governors (107.50) (110.00) (113.00) (146.37) (162.68)
NET INCOME 72.83 85.71 51.51 67.29 68.48

The notes accompanying the financial statements form part of this Statement

 

Amounts may not add up exactly due to rounding

 C: 
15
ANNLRPT16th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
</PAGE>

OPERATIONS OF THE BANK

 

Lending Operations

 

The Bank is authorised under the Agreement to make, participate in or guarantee loans to governments of its regional member countries, their agencies and political subdivisions, and to public and private enterprises operating within such countries, as well as to international or regional entities concerned with economic development in the region. It is the general policy of the Bank that all loans be made to or guaranteed by national governments, central banks or other governmental entities engaging the full faith and credit of such governments. The Bank, however, has adopted a strategy and policies for the promotion of the private sector in RMCs under which loans, equity and equity linked products such as subordinated loans may be granted to eligible private sector entities without a government guarantee. Such loans are generally secured by collateral.

 

Under the Agreement, the total amount outstanding in respect of the ordinary operations of the Bank (comprised of approved loans less cancellations and repayments, plus equity participations) may not at any time exceed the total amount of its unimpaired subscribed capital, reserves and surplus included in its ordinary capital resources. At 31 December 2013, such total outstanding amount was UA 16,959.68 million, UA 674.11 million higher than the UA 16,285.57 million outstanding at 31 December 2012.

 

In evaluating projects, the Bank considers a wide variety of factors, including the economic, technical and financial feasibility of the project, the effect on the general development activity of the country concerned, the contribution to the removal of impediments to economic development, the capacity of the borrowing country to service additional external debt, and the effect on the balance of payments. Other factors include the effect of new technologies on productivity, and the effect of the project on employment opportunities and the environment. In addition, the Bank considers the ability of the borrower to obtain financing elsewhere on terms and conditions that the Bank considers reasonable. One of the principal functions of the Bank is to direct resources to projects that form part of a national or regional development programme, and which benefit two or more regional member countries, particularly projects designed to stimulate intra-African trade and economic development.

 

It is the policy of the Board of Directors to consider loans and other financial products only on the basis of written reports prepared by staff of the Bank. These reports set forth detailed information regarding the technical feasibility and economic merits of the project to be financed and relevant financial and legal matters, as well as the economic situation of the country in which the project is located. The process of identifying and appraising a project and of approving and disbursing a project loan often extends over several years. The average time to prepare a project from the project concept note stage to Board approval is approximately ten months. The appraisal of projects is carried out by the Bank’s staff, in some cases with the help of external consultants. After approval of a loan, an additional period averaging eight months elapses before the loan becomes effective. Loans do not become effective until certain legal requirements are fulfilled by the borrower. The Bank generally requires that borrowers seek competitive bids from potential suppliers, that engineering plans and specifications are drawn up independently of suppliers or manufacturers and, if appropriate, that independent consultants be retained by borrowers. The Bank supervises the disbursements of its loans to ensure that the proceeds are applied only for project expenditures as incurred and are used by the borrower only for the procurement of goods and services required for the project being financed. In order to monitor the effective implementation of projects being financed, the Bank maintains a continuous relationship with the borrower after a loan is made.

 

The Bank’s policy of loan administration and project supervision involves field missions, where necessary, and the submission of progress reports on a regular basis. Subsequent to physical completion, the project is evaluated to determine the extent to which productivity and other goals such as envisaged contribution towards economic growth and development outcomes were met. Since loan disbursements are made against project expenditures, the disbursement period frequently extends over five to seven years.

 

Loans are disbursed in four ways: (1) by reimbursement to borrowers, (2) by direct payment to suppliers for expenses incurred in connection with approved projects, (3) by advances to borrowers of up to 10 percent of a given loan commitment to be accounted for by the borrower, or (4) by the issuance of irrevocable commitments to commercial banks backing their letters of credit to suppliers for shipment of specified goods to borrowers.

 

The Bank’s lending operations have since 1987 included non-project lending in the form of sector investment and rehabilitation and structural adjustment lending. The Bank’s participation in such non-project lending has generally been in conjunction with other development organisations, including the World Bank.

 C: 
16
ANNLRPT17th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
</PAGE>

In July 2013, the Board of Directors approved the Private Sector Development Strategy for the period 2013-2017. The Strategy’s thrust is threefold. First, it aims to improve Africa’s investment and business climate by supporting the efforts of countries to strengthen the legal and regulatory environment in relation to business, nationally and regionally. Second, it aims at the expansion of business access to social and economic infrastructure, both hard transport, telecommunications, water, power systems, and fixed assets needed to provide education, health and sanitation, and soft—legal and regulatory frameworks, payments clearance and settlement systems, financial intermediaries and capital markets, collateral registries, credit rating agencies, and skills development. Third, it aims at the promotion of enterprise development through improved access to finance, skills enhancement and value addition. Closely aligned to the Bank’s Ten-Year Strategy, further goals include supporting fragile states with emphasis on achieving quick and tangible results. Moreover, it aims to put emphasis on support to women as well as to agriculture and rural development. The range of financial instruments includes equity and quasi-equity investment, lines of credit to private financial institutions and guarantees, coupled with technical assistance in some cases. In 2013, the Bank committed UA 1.05 billion to finance 37 new private sector operations, an increase of 39.4 percent over the UA 753 million approvals in 2012.

 

Detailed information on loans approved by the Bank to 31 December 2013 (excluding fully repaid loans and cancelled loans) are set forth in Note D and Note I to the financial statements included herein.

 

Approvals and Disbursements

 

From its inception to 31 December 2013, the Bank has approved 1,432 operations (including loans, grants, private and public equity investments, emergency operations, HIPC debt relief, loan reallocations, guarantee and Post Conflict Country Facility) amounting to UA 43.61 billion for the financing of programmes or projects in its borrowing regional member countries. The Bank’s approvals in 2013 totalled UA 1.83 billion compared to UA 2.08 billion in 2012. Disbursements of the Bank were UA 1.43 billion in 2013 as compared to 2.22 billion in 2012.

 

Currency composition of loans

 

The following table sets forth the Bank’s disbursed and outstanding loans by currency at 31 December 2013 and 2012:

 

Disbursed and Outstanding Loans by Currency

[Amount in UA millions]

 

  2013 2012
  Amount % Amount %
Euro 5,391.28 46.53 4,654.70 42.26
Japanese Yen 295.12 2.55 389.85 3.54
Pound Sterling 2.60 0.02 2.55 0.02
South African Rand 1,026.62 8.86 1,084.61 9.85
Swiss Franc 5.02 0.04 132.89 1.21
US Dollar 4,858.73 41.94 4,746.31 43.09
Others 6.47 0.06 3.40 0.03
Total 11,585.84 100.00 11,014.31 100.00
 C: 
17
ANNLRPT18th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
</PAGE>

Overdue and Non-Performing Loans

 

Prior to the revision of IAS 39, the Bank placed in non-accrual status all loans, if principal, interest or other charges with respect to such loans were over due by six months or more. Upon adoption of the revised standard, that became effective on January 1, 2005, the Bank no longer places loans on non-accrual status. Interest and charges are accrued on all loans including those in arrears. The revised standard requires that both principal and charges receivable on loans be assessed for impairment using the incurred loss model. The ‘incurred loss model’ excludes future losses no matter how likely they might be.

 

For sovereign guaranteed loans, the estimated impairment representing present value losses arises from delays that may be experienced in receiving amounts due from borrowers. For non-sovereign-guaranteed loans, the impairment reflects management’s best estimate of the non-collectability, in whole or in part, of amounts due as well as delays in the receipt of such amounts

 

The Bank has never written off any of its sovereign guaranteed outstanding loans. In line with the status of the Bank and its relationship with its borrowers and guarantors, the Bank expects that each of these loans will ultimately be repaid and, accordingly, has no expectation of writing off outstanding loans in the future. The Bank maintains a continuous dialogue with its borrowers as part of its efforts to ensure prompt payment on all of its loans.

 

Loan Terms

 

Loans are stated at their principal amounts outstanding less any allowance for impairment. Except for private sector development loans, all of the Bank’s loans are made to, or guaranteed by, regional member countries. Amounts disbursed on loans are repayable in the currency or currencies disbursed by the Bank or in other freely convertible currency or currencies approved by the Bank. The amount repayable in each of these currencies shall be equal to the amount disbursed in the original currency. Loans are granted for a maximum period of 25 years, including a grace period not exceeding 8 years, which is typically the period of project implementation.

 

The following table sets forth the maturity structure of disbursed and outstanding loans as at 31 December 2013 & 2012:

 

Maturity Structure of Loans as at 31 December 2013 & 2012

(Amounts expressed in UA millions)

Periods 2013 2012
One year or less 1,007.41 934.69
More than one year but less than two years 1,039.20 723.57
More than two years but less than three years 891.68 995.21
More than three years but less than four years 887.97 834.92
More than four years but less than five years 894.02 820.91
More than five years 6,865.56 6,705.01
Total 11,585.84 11,014.31

 

Borrowing Policies

 

The Board of Directors of the Bank has authorised the issuance of two classes of debt, senior debt and subordinated debt. All debt of the Bank is senior debt unless by its terms it is expressly subordinated in right of payment to other debt of the Bank. Both classes rank pari passu except in the event of a call by the Bank on its callable capital, whereupon the holders of the subordinated debt of the Bank will be subordinated in right of payment to holders of senior debt.

 

The Bank’s policy limits its debt to usable capital ratio to 100 percent. The Bank has also adopted the working principle that, within the limitations set forth, the actual amount of its senior debt outstanding at any time should be a function of its objective of obtaining and maintaining a rating on its securities at the highest levels from recognised rating agencies. As of the 31 December 2013, the amount of total outstanding borrowings of UA 12,947.44 million, represented by both senior and subordinated debt, 47.81 percent of usable capital and 21.49 percent of total callable capital of UA 60,247.79 million of all members of the Bank.

 C: 
18
ANNLRPT19th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
</PAGE>

In December 2001, the Bank established the unlimited Global Debt Issuance Facility (GDIF) to replace its Euro-Medium Term Note Programme (EMTN) and US Medium Term Note (MTN) Programme with respect to its future borrowings. The Bank also has a Euro Commercial Paper (ECP) programme of EUR 2 billion in place. Both the GDIF and the ECP enable the continuous issuance of notes in the Euro market, the US market and other domestic markets thereby maximizing the Bank’s financing flexibility.

 

The Bank has entered into arrangements whereby, in the event of a call on its callable capital, it would request its member countries to make payment in response to such a call into a special account established by the Bank with the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, or its successor duly designated for the purpose. The terms of such account provide that the proceeds of a call must first be applied in payment of, or in provision for full settlement of all outstanding obligations of the Bank incurred in connection with the issuance of senior debt before any other payment shall be made with such proceeds.

 

The weighted average life of the Bank’s outstanding borrowings at 31 December 2013, 2012, 2011 and 2010 was 4.4, 4.02, 5.6 and 4.1 years, respectively.

 

At 31 December 2013, the Bank’s outstanding borrowings were denominated in sixteen currencies or currency units (without taking into account currency swaps).

 

The table below sets forth the maturity structure of the Bank’s outstanding borrowings at 31 December 2013:

 

(UA millions) Outstanding Borrowings  
Periods At Fair
Value
At Amortised
Cost
Total
One year or less 2,434.26 21.48 2,455.74
More than one year but less than two years 767.97 296.58 1,064.55
More than two years but less than three years 2,771.98 7.71 2,779.69
More than three years but less than four years 1,286.24 - 1,286.24
More than four years but less than five years 2,384.10 28.27 2,412.37
More than five years 2,483.36 466.65 2,950.01
Sub total 12,127.91 820.69 12,948.60
Net unamortised premium and discount - -1.16 -1.16
Total 12,127.91 819.53 12,947.44

 

The following table sets forth for the periods indicated the average interest rates on the Bank’s loans, the return on its average earning assets, the average cost of its funded debt and other funds available and its interest coverage ratio:

 

Selected Financial Ratios

 

  2013 2012 2011 2010
Weighted average interest rate on disbursed and outstanding loans for the year(1) 2.96% 3.44% 3.57% 3.71%
Weighted average cost of:        
Outstanding borrowings 1.20% 1.74% 1.83% 1.93%
Interest coverage ratio(2) 1.94x 1.91x 1.80x 2.21x
(1.25x)(3)        

 

(1)Undisbursed loans include loans approved but not yet effective. Interest accrues only on disbursed loan amounts.
  
(2)Operating income plus interest expense, divided by interest expense.
  
(3)Indicates the Bank’s target ratio.
 C: 
19
ANNLRPT20th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
</PAGE>

Asset and Liability Management

 

The Bank’s ALM activities include all debt funding transactions, investment of liquid resources, managing the currency exposure and operational aspects of the Bank’s lending and equity investment operations.

 

The principal objective of the Bank’s asset and liability management operations is to ensure that the Bank is able to provide flexible lending and investment products that meet client needs, while simultaneously reducing exposure to non-core risks such as market risk (interest rate, foreign exchange and liquidity risk), counterparty credit risk and operational risk in line with the Bank’s over-arching risk management philosophy.

 

Liquid Assets and Liquidity Policy

 

The Bank’s principal liquidity risk management objective is to hold sufficient liquid resources to enable it to meet all probable cash flow needs for a rolling 1-year horizon without additional financing from the capital markets.

 

In order to minimize liquidity risk, the Bank maintains a prudential minimum level of liquidity (PML) based on the projected net cash requirement for a rolling one-year period. The PML is updated quarterly and computed as the sum of four components: 1) 1-year debt service payments; 2) 1-year projected net loan disbursements (loans disbursed less repayments) if greater than zero; 3) loan equivalent value of commit-ted guarantees; and 4) undisbursed equity investments. The maximum level of liquidity is determined by the Bank’s debt limit.

 

Generally, liquid assets of the Bank are invested in marketable securities issued or guaranteed by the member countries or public entities thereof, supranational, corporate and financial institution obligations, and time deposits. The Bank also has limited exposure to asset and mortgage backed securities. All marketable securities are valued at market value with the exception of certain investments in debt securities intended to be held to maturity which are carried at amortised cost using the effective interest method.

 

The Bank’s cash and treasury investments (net of repurchase agreements) as of 31 December 2013 totalled UA 7.04 billion, compared to UA 7.37 billion at the end of 2012. Investment income for 2013 amounted to UA 126.45 million or a return of 1.59 percent on an average liquidity of UA 7.97 billion, compared to an income of UA 197.65 million, or a return of 2.31 percent, on an average liquidity of UA 8.57 billion in 2012.

 

The Bank’s liquid assets are tranched into three portfolios, namely operational portfolio, prudential portfolio, and equity-backed portfolio, each with a different benchmark that reflects the cash flow and risk profile of its assets and funding sources. These benchmarks are one-month LIBID for the operational portfolio, and 6-month LIBOR, resetting on February 1 and August 1 for the prudential portfolio. The equity-backed portfolio is managed against a repricing profile benchmark with 10 percent of the Bank’s net assets repricing uniformly over a period of 10 years.

 

Bank Rating

 

The Bank monitors and manages its key financial strength metrics in a stringent manner and is rated by four major rating agencies. For 2013, the rating agencies, Standard & Poor’s, Moody’s, Fitch Ratings, and the Japan Credit Rating Agency have reaffirmed their AAA and AA+ rating of the African Development Bank’s senior and subordinated debts respectively, with a stable outlook. Their ratings reflect and confirm the Bank’s strong liquidity and capital position, strong membership support, its preferred creditor status, sound capital adequacy and prudent financial management and policies.

 

Equity Participations

 

The Bank may take equity positions in privately owned productive enterprises and financial intermediaries, public sector companies that are in the process of being privatised or regional and sub-regional institutions. The Bank’s objective in such equity investments is to promote the economic development of its regional member countries and in particular the development of their private sectors. The Bank’s equity participation is also intended to promote efficient use of resources, promoting African participation, playing a catalytic role in attracting other investors and lenders and mobilizing the flow of domestic and external resources to financially viable projects, which also have significant economic merit.

 C: 
20
ANNLRPT21st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
</PAGE>

Unless otherwise approved by the Board of Directors, the Bank’s equity participation shall not exceed 25 percent of the equity capital of the entity in which it invests. The Bank currently holds less than 20 percent of the total equity capital of most of the institutions in which it participates. The Bank therefore does not seek a controlling interest in the companies in which it invests, but closely monitors its equity investments through Board representation. In accordance with the Board of Governors’ Resolution B/BG/2009/10 of 13 May 2009, total equity investment by the Bank shall not at any time exceed 15 percent of the aggregate amount of the Bank’s paid-in capital and reserves and surplus (risk capital) included in its ordinary capital resources. Total equity participations risk capital consumption at 31 December 2013 amounted to UA 788 million representing 14.5 percent of risk capital.

 

The Bank has equity participations in, among others, various regional and sub-regional development banks and other public and private sector financial institutions such as the African Export-Import Bank, Shelter-Afrique, Africa Re, and PTA Bank, commercial banks as well as in several regional private equity funds. The Bank is also a participant in the equity of the African Development Fund.

 

Prior to January 1, 2011, the Bank classified its equity investments (other than African Development Fund) as Available for Sale. For such assets, the Bank assessed at each balance sheet date whether there was objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets was impaired. For available-for-sale equity instruments carried at fair value, a significant or prolonged decline in the fair value of the security below its cost was considered in determining whether the assets were impaired. Following adoption of phase 1 of IFRS 9 with effect from January 1, 2011, the Bank no longer classifies its assets as available-for-sale and has opted to designate all its equity investments as at fair value through Other Comprehensive Income.

 

Special Operations of the Bank

 

In addition to its ordinary resources, the Bank administers various special and trust funds for purposes consistent with the Bank’s objective of promoting the economic development and social progress of its regional member countries. Under the Agreement, the total amount outstanding in respect of the special operations of the Bank relating to any special fund may not exceed the total amount of the unimpaired special resources pertaining to that special fund. The resources of special and trust funds are required to be held, used, committed, invested or otherwise disposed of entirely separate from the ordinary capital resources of the Bank and from each other. The administration of each of these funds is subject to the Bank Agreement and financial regulations, specific rules and regulations, and applicable policies of the Bank. The Bank normally receives an administrative fee for managing these funds.

 

Two major funds managed by the Bank are the African Development Fund (the “ADF”) and the Nigeria Trust Fund (the “NTF”), both of which supplement the activities of the Bank.

 

African Development Fund

 

The African Development Fund (“ADF” or “the Fund”) was established in 1972 pursuant to an agreement between the Bank and 15 non-regional members (the “ADF Agreement”) to provide loans on concessionary terms to the RMCs. The ADF and all of its resources are separate and entirely independent from those of the Bank. The Bank assumes no liability for any of the obligations of the ADF.

 

The ADF Agreement designates a Board of Governors as the ADF’s highest policy making organ. The Board of Governors meets at least once annually. The ADF Board of Directors, which includes seven non-regional members nominated by their constituencies and seven executive directors representing the ADB, is responsible for overseeing the general operations of the ADF.

 

The ADF uses the UA as the measure of the subscription of its participants and of its loans and for statistical and financial reporting purposes. Following amendment of the ADF Agreement, the UA of the ADF has been aligned with the UA of the Bank with effect from 1 January 1993.

 

The purpose of the ADF is to assist the Bank in making an effective contribution to the economic progress and social development of the regional member countries and to promote co-operation among them. The operations of the ADF supplement those of the Bank. In contrast to the lending policy of the Bank, the ADF provides long-term financing for projects on concessionary terms. The ADF’s loan

 C: 
21
ANNLRPT22nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
</PAGE>

financing is directed primarily at those RMCs which, in the opinion of the ADF, are in the greatest need of such financing.

 

The resources of the ADF primarily consist of subscriptions by the Bank, subscriptions and contributions by State Participants, as well as other resources received by the Fund.

 

Subsequent to the initial subscriptions, additional resources have been provided to the ADF in the form of periodic general replenishments, typically done every three years. The twelfth (ADF-12) replenishment was adopted by the Board of Governors on January 20, 2011 and became effective on May 3, 2011 with the total resource envelope amounting to UA 6.1 billion including an Advanced Commitment Capacity, or internally generated resources, of UA 2.01 billion. The replenishment covers the 2011-2013 operational period. As of December 31, 2013, Donors had subscribed a total amount of UA 3.77 billion. Of these subscriptions, UA 315.14 million, or 8.3 percent of the replenishment amount, remain qualified as of that date.

 

Negotiations for the thirteenth replenishment of the Fund (ADF-13) were concluded in September 2013. Deputies reaffirmed their commitment to supporting Africa’s economic transformation and agreed on an ADF-13 resource level of UA 5.35 billion covering the three-year operational period, 2014-2016. This figure includes projected internally generated resources of UA 0.98 billion. ADF-13 became effective on 31 March 2014.

 

At 31 December 2013, the cumulative ordinary and special subscriptions to ADF amounted to UA 22.77 billion of which UA 22.42 billion was fully paid-in. The Bank’s subscription to the ADF at 31 December 2013 was UA 111.74 million, which was fully paid-in. The Bank has 50 percent of the voting power of the ADF.

 

For the year ended 31 December 2013, loans and grants approved under ADF amounted to UA 2.05 billion and the level of cumulative loans and grants signed, net cancellations amounted to UA 25.24 billion.

 

Prior to the ADF-12 replenishment, no interest was charged on ADF loans. Instead they carried a service charge of 0.75 percent per annum on outstanding balances, and a commitment fee of 0.50 percent per annum on undisbursed commitments. These ADF loans have a maturity period of 50 years, including a 10-year grace period. However, for ADF-12, the Board of Directors approved differentiated ADF loan lending terms to ADF-eligible countries classified as blend, gap and graduating under the African Development Bank Group country classification. Accordingly, new loans extended under ADF-12 and beyond to blend, gap and graduating countries will have a maturity period of 30 years, including an 8-year grace period with an interest rate of 1 percent per annum. In addition, the standard commitment and service fees that apply to all ADF loans will be charged.

 

Nigeria Trust Fund

 

The Agreement Establishing the Nigeria Trust Fund (the “NTF Agreement”) was signed on 26 February 1976, between the Bank and the Federal Republic of Nigeria and became effective on 25 April 1976. The purpose of the NTF is to assist in the economic development of the most needy regional member countries of the Bank by the provision of funds on terms intermediate between those of the Bank and those of the ADF. NTF loans currently bear an interest rate of between 2 and 4 percent, a repayment period of up to 25 years including a grace period of up to five years prior to the commencement of principal repayments and a commission of 0.75 percent payable on undisbursed balances. The resources of the NTF come from contributions from the Federal Republic of Nigeria and the net income of the NTF.

 

In April 2003, the ADB Board of Directors endorsed the Initiatives to Enhance the Development Effectiveness of the Nigeria Trust Fund. The enhancements subsequently approved by the Board of Governors include: (i) participation in the HIPC debt relief initiative by contributing 10 percent of the annual net income of the NTF to the HIPC Trust Fund; (ii) an adjustment of the interest rate for NTF loans from 4 percent to a range of 2 to 4 percent to increase the concessionality of such loans; (iii) the execution of a Technical Cooperation Agreement (TCA) with the Bank Group for purposes of providing resources for the financing of technical and institutional support programs for the benefit of RMCs; and (iv) the introduction of more flexibility in the investment of the resources of the NTF, pending their use in financing projects.

 C: 
22
ANNLRPT23rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
</PAGE>

At 31 December 2013, the NTF had total assets of UA 168 million. Upon expiry of the original Agreement establishing NTF on 25 April 2008, the NTF Agreement was renewed for another period of ten years commencing from 25 April 2008.

 

Other Funds

 

The Bank has been entrusted with the administration of other funds, including the Mamoun Beheiry Fund (to reward outstanding employees of the Bank), the Arab Oil Fund (for concessionary loans to specific African countries affected by high oil prices), and the Special Emergency Assistance Fund (to provide assistance to African countries affected by drought and famine). The total resources and assets of these funds at 31 December 2013 amounted to UA 3.90 million. In addition, the Bank administers grant funds on behalf of donors, including member countries, agencies and other entities. Grant resources are restricted for specific uses which include the co-financing of Bank lending projects, and technical assistance for borrowers including feasibility studies and project preparation. Details of these funds are disclosed in Note V-4 to the financial statements included herein.

 

Litigation

 

The Bank is not a party to any material litigation.

 

Temporary Relocation

 

The Board of Directors decided in February 2003 to evacuate the Bank’s staff from Côte d’Ivoire following the deterioration in the security situation as assessed by the United Nations. The Board of Directors also decided to temporarily move the Bank’s operations to the Temporary Relocation Agency in Tunis. By successive resolutions the Board of Governors subsequently extended the temporary relocation period. On 30 May 2013, the Board of Governors approved a roadmap for the Bank’s orderly and phased return to its Headquarters in Abidjan in 2014.

 C: 
23
ANNLRPT24th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
</PAGE>

ADMINISTRATION OF THE BANK

 

Board of Governors

 

All the powers of the Bank are vested in the Board of Governors, which consists of a Governor and an Alternate Governor appointed by each member of the Bank, who exercises the voting power to which that member country is entitled. Each Governor and Alternate Governor serves for a term of five years, subject to termination of appointment or to reappointment at any time at the discretion of the appointing member country.

 

The Board of Governors may delegate to the Board of Directors all its powers except certain specified powers, such as the power to increase or decrease the authorised capital and to approve, after reviewing the report of the auditors, the balance sheet and statement of income and expenses of the Bank.

 

The Board of Governors holds an annual meeting and such other meetings as may be provided for the Board of Governors or called by the Board of Directors. Meetings of the Board of Governors are called by the Board of Directors whenever requested by five members of the Bank, or by members having one- quarter of the total voting power.

 

Board of Directors

 

Without prejudice to the powers of the Board of Governors, the Board of Directors is responsible for the conduct of the general operations of the Bank, and, for this purpose, exercises all the powers delegated to it by the Board of Governors. Prior to 28 May 2010, the Board of Directors was composed of eighteen members twelve of whom are elected by the Governors representing RMCs, and six by the Governors representing non-regional member countries. On 28 May 2010, the Board of Governors increased the membership of the Board of Directors from eighteen to twenty. Thirteen members represent regional member countries and seven represent non-regional member countries.

 

Each Director appoints an Alternate Director who acts in his/her absence. Directors and their Alternates are required to be nationals of member countries. An Alternate Director may participate in meetings of the Board of Directors but may vote only when acting in place of the absent Director.

 

Directors are elected for a term of three years and may be re-elected provided that no Director shall serve for more than two three-year terms. Members of the Board of Directors of the Bank as at 31 December 2013 are listed below.

 

Board of Directors – Countries Represented as at 31 December 2013

 

Regional Member Countries

 

Abdelmajid Mellouki Morocco, Togo, and Tunisia
Hadji Babaammi, Algeria, Guinea Bissau, and Madagascar
Amadou Kone Côte d’Ivoire, Equatorial Guinea, and Guinea
Mahomed R. J. Mahomed Angola, Mozambique, Namibia, and Zimbabwe
Abdallah Msa Benin, Burkina Faso, Cape Verde, Chad, Comoros, Gabon, Mali,
  Niger, and Senegal
Mohamed Samy S. Zaghloul Egypt and Djibouti
Petronella M.N.Mwangala Botswana, Malawi, Mauritius, and Zambia
Leonard Sentore, Burundi, Cameroon, Central African Republic, Congo, and Democratic
  Republic of Congo
Abdul-Magid Gadad Libya, Mauritania, and Somalia
Alieu Momodou Ngum The Gambia, Ghana, Liberia, Sierra Leone, and Sudan
Mulu Ketsela Eritrea, Ethiopia, Kenya, Rwanda, Seychelles, Tanzania, and Uganda
Shehu Yahaya Nigeria and Sao Tome & Principe
Moegamat Shahid Khan Lesotho, South Africa, and Swaziland,

 

Non-Regional Member Countries

 

Hau Sing Tse Canada, China, Korea, Turkey and Kuwait
Heikki Tuunanen Denmark, Finland, India, Norway and Sweden
François Kruger Belgium, France, and Spain
 C: 
24
ANNLRPT25th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
</PAGE>
(Vacant) United States of America
Christoph Kohlmeyer Germany, Portugal, and Switzerland
Tomoya Asano Argentina, Austria, Brazil, Japan and Saudi Arabia
  Italy, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom

 

President and Management

 

The Board of Governors elects the President of the Bank by a vote of a majority of the total voting power of the members, including a majority of the total voting power of the regional member countries. The Agreement provides that the President shall be a national of a regional member country. The President is the chief executive officer of the Bank and conducts the current business of the Bank under the direction of the Board or Directors. The President is elected for a term of five years and may be re- elected provided that no person may be elected President for more than two successive five-year terms.

 

The President is the Chairman of the Board of Directors but has no vote except a deciding vote in case of a tie. The President may participate in meetings of the Board of Governors but has no vote. The President is the legal representative of the Bank.

 

The Principal Officers of the Bank as at 31 December 2013 are listed below.

 

Presidency, Units Reporting to The President & Units Reporting to The Boards

Donald Kaberuka President
Anne Namara Kabagambe Director of Cabinet/Chief of Staff
Timothy Turner Group Chief Risk Officer
Geraldine. J. Fraser-Moleketi Special Envoy on Gender
Kalidou Gadio General Counsel
Joel Serunkuma Kibazo Director, Communication & External Relations
Mohammad Ali Mubarak Kisubi Director, Staff Integrity & Ethics
Tarek Rouchdy Auditor General
Anna Bossman Director, Integrity & Anti-Corruption
Sekou Toure Director, Compliance Review & Mediation
Rakesh Nangia Director, Operations Evaluation

 

First Vice Presidency / Chief Operating Officer

Emmanuel Ebot Mbi First Vice President, Chief Operating Officer
Zate Raymond Zoukpo Director Office of First Vice President/COO
Kapil Kapoor Director, Strategy & Operational Policies
Neside Tas Anvaripour Director, Business Development
Nnenna Lily Nwabufo Director, Programming & Budget
Antoinette Dinga-Dzondo Director, Operations Committee Secretary
Simon Mizrahi Director, Results & Quality Assurance
Jean-Paul Aka Ehounou Director, Permanent Committee on Decentralization & Inspection

 

Secretary General

Cecilia Akintomide Secretary General & Vice President
Ossey Olivier Litumba Pinzi Director, Language Services
Catherine Baumont-Keita Officer in Charge, Board Affairs
Antoinette Batumubwira Officer in Charge, Protocol & Conference

 

Office of The Chief Economist

Mthuli Ncube The Chief Economist
Victor Murinde Director, African Development Institute
Steve Kayizzi-Mugerwa Director, Development Research
Charles Leyeka Lufumpa Director, Statistics

 

Corporate Services

Susan Wardell Vice President
Jean-Baptiste Bile Director, General Services & Procurement
Joseph Oluwafemi Badaki Director, Human Resources Management
 C: 
25
ANNLRPT26th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
</PAGE>
Zhi Huan Wu Director, Corporate IT Services
Nono Matondo-Fundani Director, Abidjan Return Directorate

 

Finance

 
Charles Owusu Boamah Vice President
Anthony Odusole Odukomaiya Director, Financial Control
Trevor Neil De Kock Officer in Charge, Financial Management
Pierre Van Peteghem Director, Treasury
Desiré J. Vencatachellum Director, Resource Mobilization & External Finance

 

Operations I: Country & Regional Programs & Policy
Zondo Thomas Sakala Vice President
Gabriel Negatu Director, Eastern Africa Regional Resource Center
Marlene Eva Kanga Director, Central Africa Region
Abdirahman D. Beileh Director, Special Programs
Jacob Kolster Director, North Africa Region
Ousmane Dore Director, Nigeria Country Office
Vinay Sharma Director, Procurement & Fiduciary Services
Franck Joseph Marie Perrault Director, West Africa Region
Sibry Tapsoba Director, Fragile States
Ebrima Faal Director, Southern Africa Regional Resource Center

 

Operation II: Sector Operations  
Aly Abdel-Hamed Abou-Sabaa Vice President
Sheila Khama Director, Africa Natural Resources Center
Chiji Chinedum Ojukwu Director, Agriculture & Agro Industry
Isaac Samuel Lobe Ndoumbe Director, Governance & Financial Management
Agnes Soucat Director, Human Development
Mohamed El Azizi Director, Water & Sanitation

 

Operations III: Infrastructure, Private Sector & Regional Integration
Gilbert Mbesherubusa Vice President
Amadou Oumarou Director, Transport & ICT
Alex Rugamba Director, Energy, Environment & Climate Change
Janvier Kpourou Litse Director, NEPAD, Regional Integration & Trade
Mouhamadou Niang Officer in Charge , Private Sector
Stefan Luis Nalletamby Director, Financial Sector Development
 C: 
26
ANNLRPT27th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
</PAGE>

THE AGREEMENT ESTABLISHING THE AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

 

The Agreement constitutes the Bank’s governing charter and establishes the status, immunities, exemptions and privileges of the Bank, describes its purpose, membership, capital structure and organisation, authorises the kinds of transactions in which it may engage and prescribes limitations on such transactions. The Agreement also includes provisions with respect to the admission of additional members, the increase of the authorised capital stock, the terms and conditions under which the Bank may make or guarantee loans, the use of currencies held by it, the withdrawal and suspension of member countries and the suspension and termination of the operations of the Bank.

 

The Agreement may be amended only by a resolution of the Bank’s Board of Governors approved by a two-thirds majority of the total number of Governors representing not less than three-quarters of the total voting power of the member countries, including two-thirds of the regional members having three-quarters of the total voting power of the regional members. The unanimous agreement of the Board of Governors is required for the approval of any amendment modifying the right to withdraw from the Bank, the pre-emptive rights to subscribe capital stock or the limitation on the liability of the member countries. No such amendment has been made to the Agreement to date. The Agreement provides that any question of interpretation of its provisions arising between any member country and the Bank or between member countries shall be referred to the Board of Directors for decision. Such decision may then be referred to the Board of Governors whose decision shall be final.

 

Membership of the Bank

 

Any African country that has the status of an independent state may become a regional member of the Bank. The geographical area to which the regional membership and the development activities of the Bank extend consists of the continent of Africa and the African islands. Non-regional countries that are, or become, participants in the ADF or that have made, or are making, contributions to the ADF may be admitted to the Bank.

 

Although any member may withdraw from the Bank by delivering written notice, any such member remains liable for all direct and contingent obligations to the Bank (including its obligations in respect of callable capital) so long as any part of the loans or guarantees contracted before the termination date is outstanding. No member has withdrawn from the Bank since its establishment. However, membership of the former Yugoslavia was suspended by the Bank’s Board of Directors, in conformity with resolutions and determinations of the UN General Assembly (see Note N to the financial statements included herein).

 

Legal Status, Immunities and Privileges

 

The following is a summary of the principal provisions of the Agreement relating to the legal status, immunities and privileges of the Bank in the territories of its members.

 

The Bank has full juridical personality with capacity to contract, to acquire and dispose of immovable and movable property, and to institute legal proceedings. It is immune from every form of legal process, except in cases arising out of the exercise of its borrowing powers when it may be sued only in a court of competent jurisdiction in the territory of a member in which it has its principal office, or in the territory of a member or non-member where it has appointed an agent for the purpose of accepting service or notice of process or has issued or guaranteed securities. No actions against the Bank may be brought by members or persons acting for or deriving claims from members.

 

The property and assets of the Bank are immune from all forms of seizure, attachment or execution before the delivery of final judgment against the Bank. Such property and assets are also immune from search, requisition, confiscation, expropriation or any other form of taking or foreclosure by executive or legislative action. The archives of the Bank are inviolable. The Governors, Directors, Alternate Directors, officers and employees of the Bank and experts and consultants performing missions for the Bank are immune from legal process with respect to acts performed by them in their official capacity. The Agreement enables the Board of Directors to waive any of these immunities where in its opinion it would further the interest of the Bank to do so.

 

The Bank, its property, other assets, income and the operations and transactions it carries out pursuant to the Agreement are exempt from all taxation and from all customs duties in the member states. The Bank is also exempt from any other obligation relating to the payment, withholding or collection of any tax or duty.

 C: 
27
ANNLRPT28th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
</PAGE>

GENERAL DESCRIPTION OF THE SECURITIES

 

Each prospectus, offering circular, information memorandum, supplemental information statement or pricing supplement will include the following information regarding the terms of Offered Securities: (a) the aggregate principal amount, (b) status (and subordination, in the case of subordinated securities), (c) the maturity date, (d) the interest rate, (e) the currency or currencies, including composite currencies, of denomination and payment, (f) the dates on which such interest will be payable, (g) the redemption dates and prices and provisions for a sinking fund, if applicable, (h) the form and denomination and (i) if applicable, the fiscal or paying agent or agents with respect to the Securities.

 

Securities will be repayable from the ordinary capital resources of the Bank. The Board of Directors of the Bank has authorised the issuance of two classes of debt securities, senior (“Senior Securities”) and subordinated (“Subordinated Securities”). All debt securities of the Bank are Senior Securities unless by their terms they are expressly subordinated in right of payment to other debt securities of the Bank. Both classes of debt securities rank pari passu except in the event of a call on the callable capital of the Bank, whereupon the holders of Subordinated Securities of the Bank will be subordinated in right of payment to holders of debt which is not expressly so subordinated.

 

The Securities will not be the obligation of any government, and their terms and conditions will contain a statement to that effect. The specific terms and conditions of each issue of Offered Securities will be set forth or referred to in the prospectus, offering circular or supplemental information statement relating to the Offered Securities.

 

The Securities will not contain any limitations on the right of the Bank to issue any other bonds, notes or obligations.

 

TAXATION

 

The Securities and the interest on them generally will not be exempt from taxation.

 

Under the Agreement, the Securities and the interest paid on them are not subject to any tax by a member of the Bank (i) which discriminates against the Securities solely because they are issued by the Bank or (ii) if the sole jurisdictional basis for the tax is the place or currency in which the Securities are issued, made payable or paid, or the location of any office or place of business maintained by the Bank. Also, under the Agreement, the Bank is not under any obligation to withhold or pay any taxes on any interest on the Securities it issues.

 C: 
28
ANNLRPT29th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
</PAGE>

MANAGEMENT REPORT REGARDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROLS

 

Managements Report regarding effectiveness of Internal Controls
Over External Financial Reporting

Date: March 26, 2014

 

The Management of the African Development Bank (The Bank) is responsible for the preparation, fair presentation and overall integrity of the published financial statements of the African Development Bank. The financial statements for the African Development Bank have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (“IFRS”) issued by the International Accounting Standards Board.

 

The financial statements have been audited by the independent audit firm KPMG, who were given unrestricted access to all financial records and related data, including minutes of all meetings of the Boards of Directors and committees of the Boards. Management believes that all representations made to the external auditors during their audit were valid and appropriate. The external auditors’ reports accompany the audited financial statements.

 

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining effective internal controls over external financial reporting. The system of internal control contains monitoring mechanisms and actions that are taken to correct deficiencies identified. Internal controls for external financial reporting are subject to ongoing scrutiny and testing by management and internal audit and are revised as considered necessary. Management believes that such controls support the integrity and reliability of the financial statements.

 

There are inherent limitations to the effectiveness of any system of internal control, including the possibility of human error and the circumvention or overriding of controls. Accordingly, an effective internal control system can provide only reasonable, as opposed to absolute, assurance with respect to financial statements preparation and presentation. Furthermore, the effectiveness of an internal control system can change over time.

 

The Boards of Directors of the Bank have established an Audit and Finance Committee (AUFI) to assist the Boards, among other things, in their oversight responsibility for the soundness of the Bank accounting policies and practices and the effectiveness of internal controls. AUFI, which is comprised entirely of selected members of the Board of Directors, oversees the process for the selection of external auditors and makes a recommendation for such selection to the Board of Directors, which in turn makes a recommendation for the approval of the Board of Governors. AUFI meets periodically with management to review and monitor matters of financial, accounting or auditing significance. The external auditors and the internal auditors regularly meet with AUFI to discuss the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting and any other matter that may require AUFI’s attention.

 

The Bank’s assessment of the effectiveness of internal controls was based on the framework provided by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on the results of this assessment, Management asserts that the Bank maintained effective internal controls over its financial reporting as contained in the financial statements as of December 31, 2013. Management is not aware of any material control weakness that could affect the reliability of the 2013 financial statements.

 

In addition to providing an audit opinion on the fairness of the financial statements for 2013, the external auditors of the Bank conducted an independent assessment of the effectiveness of the Bank’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2013 and their opinion thereon is presented separately in this annual report.

 

         
  Donald Kaberuka  
  PRESIDENT  
     
Charles O. Boamah       Anthony O. Odukomaiya
VICE PRESIDENT, FINANCE       CONTROLLER
 C: 
29
ANNLRPT30th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
</PAGE>

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT REGARDING THE EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERNAL CONTROLS

 

 

  KPMG Audit Telephone : +33 (0)1 55 68 68 68
Le Belvédčre Telefax: +33 (0)1 55 68 73 00
1, Cours Valmy Internet : www.kpmg.fr
CS 60034    
92923 Paris La Défense Cedex    
France    

 

African Development Bank

 

Temporary Relocation Agency
15, Avenue du Ghana
1002 Tunis Belvédčre
Tunisia

 

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Board of Governors of the African Development
Bank regarding the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting

 

Year ended 31 December 2013

 

Scope

 

We have examined the internal control over financial reporting of the African Development Bank as of 31 December 2013, based on criteria established in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO).

 

Management’s responsibilities

 

The management of the Bank is responsible for implementing and maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of such internal control. Management has asserted the effectiveness of internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31st 2013.

 

Independent Auditor’s responsibilities

 

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Bank internal control over financial reporting based on our procedures.

 

We conducted our engagement in accordance with International Standard on Assurance Engagements (ISAE) 3000, issued by the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board. That standard requires that we plan and perform our procedures to obtain reasonable assurance about whether, in all material respects, effective internal control was maintained over financial reporting.

 

An assurance engagement includes obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, based on the assessed risk. It also includes performing such other procedures as considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that the evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

          Sičge social :
      Société anonyme d’expertise   KPMG S.A.
      comptable et de commissariat   Immeuble Le Palatin
      aux comptes ŕ directoire et   3 cours du Triangle
      conseil de surveillance.   92939 Paris La Défense Cedex
      Inscrite au Tableau de l’Ordre   Capital : 5 497 100 €.
  KPMG S.A.,   ŕ Paris sous le n° 14-30080101   Code APE 6920Z
  société française membre du réseau KPMG   et ŕ la Compagnie Régionale   775 726 417 R.C.S. Nanterre
  constitué de cabinets indépendants adhérents de   des Commissaires aux Comptes   TVA Union Européenne
  KPMG International Cooperative, une entité de droit suisse.   de Versailles.   FR 77 775 726 417

 C: 
30
ANNLRPT31st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
</PAGE>
African Development Bank
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Board of
Governors of the African Development Bank
regarding the effectiveness of internal controls over
financial reporting

 

Inherent limitation

 

An entity’s system of internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. An entity’s system of internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records, that in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the entity; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the entity are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the entity; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the entity’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, a system of internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Further, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

Opinion

 

In our opinion, the Bank, in all material respects, maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of 31st December 2013, based on criteria established in “Internal Control – Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

 

We have audited the financial statements of the African Development Bank as of and for the year ended December 31, 2013, in accordance with the International Standards on Auditing, and we have expressed unqualified opinions on those financial statements.

 

  Paris La Défense, 26th March 2014
   
  KPMG Audit
  A division of KPMG S.A.
   
 
  Valéry Foussé
  Partner
 C: 
31
ANNLRPT32nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
</PAGE>

FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS FOR THE YEARS 2013, 2012 AND 2011

 

Net Operational Income

 

Net operational income is comprised of the net interest income on earning assets, the provision for loan and investment losses, the changes in fair value of borrowings, investments and derivatives, translation losses or gains and other income. Table below shows the breakdown of the net operational income for the last three years.

 

(In UA millions) 2013

2012

(Restated)

2011
Interest income from loans and statutory commission 325.64 339.85 306.03
Interest income from investments and related derivatives 171.76 205.39 224.93
Income from other debt securities 3.95 4.83 5.41
Borrowing expenses (191.14) (217.25) (204.66)
Net interest income 310.21 332.81 331.71
Provision for impairment on loans (principal and charges) (41.14) (29.69) (17.68)
Provision for impairment on investments 9.95  0.24 6.23
Realized and unrealised fair value gains/(losses) (Borrowings, investments and derivatives) (11.20) (17.91) (59.12)
Translation (losses)/gains 13.33 (2.27) (27.94)
Other income 21.83 26.61 13.35
Net Operational Income 302.98 309.79 246.55

 

FY 2013 vs. FY 2012

 

Net interest income decreased by UA 22.59 million in 2013 as compared to 2012. Interest income on loans decreased by UA 14.21 million in 2013 compared to 2012. The Bank also earned income of UA 3.95 million (2012: UA 4.83 million) on investments in debt instruments issued by entities in its regional member countries. Investment income decreased during the year due to the low interest rates. Borrowing expenses decreased by UA 26.11 million as a result of decreased borrowings.

 

During the year, there was a write back of impairment on investments of UA 9.95 million compared to a write-back of UA 0.24 million in 2012. Other items that affected income in 2013 included: a) provision for impairment on loans and charges receivable of UA 41.14 million compared to UA 29.69 million in 2012; b) realized and unrealised losses on investment portfolio, borrowings and derivatives amounting to UA 11.20 million compared to realized and unrealised losses of UA 17.91 million in 2012; and c) translation gains of UA 13.33 million in 2013 compared to translation losses of UA 2.27 million in 2012. The Bank had other miscellaneous income of UA 21.83 million in 2013 compared to an income of UA 26.61 million in 2012.

 

FY 2012 vs. FY 2011

 

Net interest income increased by UA 1.10 million in 2012 as compared to 2011. Interest income on loans increased by UA 33.82 million in 2012 compared to 2011. The Bank also earned income of UA 4.83 million (2011: UA 5.41 million) on investments in debt instruments issued by entities in its regional member countries. Investment income decreased during the year due to the low interest rates. Borrowing expenses increased by UA 12.59 million as a result of increased borrowings.

 

During the year, there was a write back of impairment on investments of UA 0.24 million compared to a write-back of UA 6.23 million in 2011. Other items that affected income in 2012 included: a) provision for impairment on loans and charges receivable of UA 29.69 million compared to UA 17.68 million in 2011; b) realized and unrealised losses on investment portfolio, borrowings and derivatives amounting to UA 17.91 million compared to realized and unrealised losses of UA 59.12 million in 2011; and c) translation losses of UA 2.27 million in 2012 compared to translation losses of UA 27.94 million in 2011. The Bank had other miscellaneous income of UA 26.61 million in 2011 compared to an income of UA 13.35 million in 2011.

 C: 
32
ANNLRPT33rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
</PAGE>

Non-interest expenses

 

Non-interest expenses include the administrative expenses, provisions for the depreciation of property, equipment, intangible assets and other sundry expenses. Total administrative expenses relate to the expenses incurred on behalf of the ADF, the NTF and for the operations of the Bank itself. The ADF and NTF reimburse the Bank for their share of the total administrative expenses, based on an agreed-upon cost-sharing formula. Table below shows the breakdown of the net non-interest expenses for the last three years.

 

(In UA Million) 2013 2012 (Restated) 2011
Personnel Expenses 261.22 223.11 180.14
Other expenses 76.02 70.24 59.07
Total Administrative Expenses 337.24 293.35 239.21
Reimbursable by ADF (225.87) (185.27) (159.33)
Reimbursable by NTF (0.40) (0.54) (0.39)
Net Administrative Expenses 110.97 107.55 79.50
Depreciation – Property, equipment and intangible assets 6.78 4.59 4.46
Sundry (income)/expenses 4.90 1.94 (1.93)
Net non-interest expense 122.65 114.07 82.04

 

FY 2013 vs. FY 2012

 

Net non-interest expenses which mainly consist of personnel expenses increased from UA 114.07 million in 2012 to UA 122.65 million in 2013. Total Bank Group administrative expenses increased from UA 293.35 million in 2012 to UA 337.24 million in 2013. Total manpower expenses increased by UA 38.11 million (i.e. 17.1 percent) from UA 180.14 million in 2011 to UA 223.11 million in 2012. This was mainly due to increases in headcount and annual performance-based salaries and benefits. Other administrative expenses increased by 8.2 percent from UA 70.24 million in 2012 to UA 76.02 million in 2012 due mainly to increased operations; The Bank’s share of the total administrative expenses increased by UA 3.42 million, or 3.18 percent, from UA 107.55 million in 2012 to UA 110.97 million in 2013.

 

FY 2012 vs. FY 2011

 

Net non-interest expenses which mainly consist of personnel expenses increased from UA 82.04 million in 2011 to UA 114.07 million in 2012. Total Bank Group administrative expenses increased from UA 239.21 million in 2011 to UA 293.35 million in 2012. Total manpower expenses increased by UA 42.97 million (i.e. 23.8 percent) from UA 180.14 million in 2011 to UA 223.11 million in 2012. This was mainly due to increases in headcount and annual performance-based salaries and benefits. Other administrative expenses increased by 18.8 percent from UA 59.07 million in 2011 to UA 70.2 million in 2012 due mainly to increased operations; The Bank’s share of the total administrative expenses increased by UA 28.05 million, or 35.0 percent, from UA 79.50 million in 2011 to UA 107.55 million in 2012.

 

Financial Condition

 

The Bank’s loan disbursements reached UA 1,430.78 million; representing a decrease of 35.2 percent over the UA 2,208.17 million disbursed in 2012. In 2013, loan repayment amounted to UA 767.03 million compared to UA 543.14 million in 2012, representing an increase of 41 percent over the previous year.

 

The Bank’s reserves increased by UA 189.45 million during the year from UA 2,667.43 million as at 31 December 2012 to UA 2,856.88 million as at 31 December 2013. Net income after distributions approved by the Board of Governors was UA 72.83 million compared to UA 85.71 million in 2012. Distributions approved by the Board of Governors charged to income in 2013 was UA 107.5 million compared to UA 110 million in 2012.

 C: 
33
ANNLRPT34th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
</PAGE>

REPORT OF THE EXTERNAL AUDITORS FOR 2013 AND ADB FINANCIAL STATEMENTS FOR THE YEARS ENDED 31 DECEMBER 2013 and 2012

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

Report of the External Auditors 34
   
Balance Sheet – Assets 37
   
Balance Sheet – Liabilities, Reserves and Capital 38
   
Income Statement 39
   
Statement of Comprehensive Income 40
   
Statement of changes in Equity 41
   
Statement of Cash Flows 42
   
Notes to the Financial Statements 44

 C: 
34
ANNLRPT35th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
</PAGE>

 

 

  KPMG Audit Telephone : +33 (0)1 55 68 68 68
Le Belvédčre Telefax: +33 (0)1 55 68 73 00
1, Cours Valmy Internet : www.kpmg.fr
CS 60034    
92923 Paris La Défense Cedex    
France    

 

African Development Bank

Temporary Relocation Agency

15 Avenue du Ghana

1002 Tunis Belvédčre

Tunisia

 

Independent Auditor’s Report to the Board of Governors of the African Development Bank

 

Year ended 31 December 2013

 

We have audited the accompanying financial statements of the African Development Bank (the Bank) which comprise the balance sheet as at 31 December 2013 and the income statement, the statement of comprehensive income, the statement of changes in equity and the statement of cash flows for the year then ended, and a summary of significant accounting policies and other explanatory notes as set out in notes A to V.

 

The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards, for the purpose of submitting approved and audited financial statements to the Board of Governors as required by Article 32(d) of the Agreement establishing the Bank. This report is made solely to the Bank’s Board of Governors, as a body, in accordance with Article 32(d) of the Agreement establishing the Bank. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to the Bank’s members those matters we are required to state to them in an auditor’s report and for no other purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume responsibility to anyone other than the Bank and the Bank’s members as a body, for our audit work, for this report, or for the opinions we have formed.

 

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards. This responsibility includes: designing, implementing and maintaining internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatements, whether due to fraud or error; selecting and applying appropriate accounting policies; and making accounting estimates that are reasonable in the circumstances.

 

          Sičge social :
      Société anonyme d’expertise   KPMG S.A.
      comptable et de commissariat   Immeuble Le Palatin
      aux comptes ŕ directoire et   3 cours du Triangle
      conseil de surveillance.   92939 Paris La Défense Cedex
      Inscrite au Tableau de l’Ordre   Capital : 5 497 100 €.
  KPMG S.A.,   ŕ Paris sous le n° 14-30080101   Code APE 6920Z
  société française membre du réseau KPMG   et ŕ la Compagnie Régionale   775 726 417 R.C.S. Nanterre
  constitué de cabinets indépendants adhérents de   des Commissaires aux Comptes   TVA Union Européenne
  KPMG International Cooperative, une entité de droit suisse.   de Versailles.   FR 77 775 726 417

 C: 
35
ANNLRPT36th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
</PAGE>

 
African Development Bank
Independent Auditor’s Report to the Board of Governors
of the African Development Bank

 

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit. We conducted our audit in accordance with International Standards on Auditing. Those standards require that we comply with relevant ethical requirements and plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.

 

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting principles used and the reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

 

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.

 

Opinion

In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Bank as at 31 December 2013, and its financial performance and its cash flows for the year then ended in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards.

 

   
  Paris La Défense, 26th March 2014
   
  KPMG Audit
  A division of KPMG S.A.
   
 
  Valéry Foussé
  Partner
 C: 
36
ANNLRPT37th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
</PAGE>

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK

BALANCE SHEET ASSETS

 

For the years ended 31 December, 2013 and 2012

(Expressed in Thousands of UA Note B)

 

A S S E T S  2013   2012 
         
CASH   954,133    881,453 
DEMAND OBLIGATIONS   3,801    3,801 
TREASURY INVESTMENTS (Note F)   6,085,451    6,487,512 
DERIVATIVE ASSETS (Note G)   985,959    1,558,333 
NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF CAPITAL (Note H)   1,204    1,974 
ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE          
Accrued income and charges receivable on loans (Note I)   188,374    195,212 
Other accounts receivable   655,481    567,456 
DEVELOPMENT FINANCING ACTIVITIES          
Loans, net (Notes D & I )   11,440,695    10,885,804 
Hedged loans- fair value adjustment (Note G)   32,494    86,854 
Equity participations   525,013    438,555 
Other debt securities (Note K)   82,901    76,537 
    12,081,103    11,487,750 
OTHER ASSETS          
Property, equipment and intangible assets (Note L)   40,672    30,421 
Miscellaneous   543    641 
    41,215    31,062 
TOTAL ASSETS   20,996,721    21,214,553 

 

The accompanying notes to the financial statements form part of this statement.

 C: 
37
ANNLRPT38th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
</PAGE>

AFRICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK
BALANCE SHEET
LIABILITIES RESERVES AND CAPITAL

 

For the years ended 31 December 2013 and 2012

 

(Expressed in Thousands of UA - Note B)

LIABILITIES & EQUITY  2013   2012 
           
ACCOUNTS PAYABLE          
Accrued financial charges   432,341    440,804 
Other accounts payable   813,773    1,642,268 
    1,246,114    2,083,072 
DERIVATIVE LIABILITIES (Note G)   971,852    512,596 
           
BORROWINGS (Note M)   12,947,444    13,278,800 
EQUITY (Note N)          
Capital          
Subscriptions paid   3,147,084    2,839,475 
Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (CEAS)   (172,654)   (166,825)
Subscriptions paid (net of CEAS)   2,974,430    2,672,650 
Reserves   2,856,881    2,667,435 
Total equity   5,831,311    5,340,085 
TOTAL LIABILITIES & EQUITY   20,996,721    21,214,553 

 

The accompanying notes to the financial statements form part of this Statement.

 C: 
38
ANNLRPT39th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
</PAGE>

INCOME STATEMENT
For the years ended 31 December 2013 and 2012

(Expressed in Thousands in UA - Note B)

 

Restated

(Notes B & C)

 

   2013   2012 
           
OPERATIONAL INCOME & EXPENSES          
Income from:          
Income from loans (Note O)   335,012    351,164 
Income from investments and related derivatives (Note O)   131,242    199,345 
Other debt securities   3,949    4,827 
Total income from loans and investments   470,203    555,336 
Borrowing expenses (Note P)          
Interest and amortised issuance costs   (302,992)   (356,410)
Net interest on borrowing-related derivatives   111,850    139,156 
Unrealised gain/(loss) on fair-valued borrowings and related derivatives   34,108    (10,172)
Unrealised gain/(loss) on derivatives on non fair-valued borrowings and others   (4,796)   (1,698)
Provision for impairment (Note I)          
Loan principal   (22,886)   (12,339)
Loan charges   (18,249)   (17,349)
Provision for impairment on equity investments (Note J)   758    (49)
Provision for impairment on investments   9,191    288 
Translation (losses)/gains   13,334    (2,266)
Other income / (loss)   12,456    15,288 
Net operational income   302,977    309,785 
OTHER EXPENSES          
Administrative expenses (Note Q)   (110,969)   (107,546)
Depreciation - Property, equipment and intangible assets (Note L)   (6,697)   (4,586)
Sundry (expenses)/gains   (4,982)   (1,940)
Total other expenses   (122,648)   (114,072)
Income before distributions approved by the Board of Governors   180,329    195,713 
Transfers of income approved by the Board of Governors (Note N)   (107,500)   (110,000) 
NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR   72,829    85,713 
 C: 
39
ANNLRPT40th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
</PAGE>

STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
For the years ended 31 December 2013 and 2012

 

(Expressed in Thousands of UA - Note B)

 

Restated

(Notes B & C)

 

   2013   2012 
         
NET INCOME FOR THE YEAR   72,829    85,713 
Net gains/(losses) on available for-sale-investments taken to equity         
Net Gains / (losses) on financial assets at fair value through Other Comprehensive Income   24,629    55,299 
Remeasurements of defined benefit liability   45,905    (89,742) 
Unrealized gain / (loss) on fair-valued borrowings arising from “own credit”   46,083    79,984 
Total Other Comprehensive Income   116,617    45,541 
TOTAL COMPREHENSIVE INCOME FOR THE YEAR   189,446    131,254 

 

The accompanying notes to the financial statements form part of this Statement.

 C: 
40
ANNLRPT41st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
</PAGE>

STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
For the years ended 31 December 2013 and 2012

 

(Expressed in Thousands of UA - Note B)

 

         Reserves     
   Capital
Subscriptions
 Paid
  Cumulative
 Exchange
Adjustment on
Subscriptions
  Retained Earnings  Remusurme
 nts of
Defined
Benefit
Liability
  Net Losses/ (Gains) on Available-For-
 Sale
Investments
  Net losses on
Financial
Assets at Fair
value Through
Other
Comprehensive
Income
 Unrealized
Loss on Fair-
Valued
Borrowings
Arising from
“Own Credit”
  Total Equity 
Balance at 1 January 2012  2,505,975  -160,633  2,803,296  -166,403    -37,203  -63,509  4,881,523 
Net income for the year before restatement      88,618         88,618 
Effect of revised IAS 19      -2,905         -2,905 
Restated net income for the year      85,713         85,713 
Other comprehensive income                         
Net losses on financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income            55,299    55,299 
Unrealized loss on fair-valued borrowings arising from “own credit”             79,984  79,984 
Actuarial losses on defined benefit plans         (92,647)      (92,647)
Effect of revised IAS 19      2,905         2,905 
Total other comprehensive income      2,905  (92,647)   55,299  79,984  45,541 
Net increase in paid-up capital  333,500             333,500 
Net conversion gains on new subscriptions    (6,192)          (6,192)
Balance at December 31, 2012 and January 1, 2013  2,839,475  -166,825  2,891,914  -259,050    18,096  16,475  5,340,085 
Net income for the year      72,829      0  0  72,829 
Other comprehensive income                         
Net gains on financial assets at fair value through “other comprehensive income”            24,629    24,629 
Unrealized gain on fair-valued borrowings arising from “own credit”                46,083  46,083 
Remeasurements of defined benefit liability        45,905       45,905 
Total other comprehensive income        45,905    24,629  46,083  116,617 
Net increase in paid-up capital  307,609             307,609 
Net conversion losses on new subscriptions    (5,829)          (5,829)
Balance at 31 December 2013  3,147,084  -172,654  2,964,743  -213,145    42,725  62,558  5,831,311 
                          
 C: 
41
ANNLRPT42nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
</PAGE>

STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
For the years ended 31 December, 2013 and 2012

 

(Expressed in Thousands of UA - Note B)

 

Restated

(Notes B & C)

 

   2013   2012 
           
CASH FLOWS FROM          
Operating activities:          
Net income   72,829    85,713 
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:          
Depreciation   6,697    4,586 
Provision for impairment on loan principal and charges   41,135    29,687 
Unrealised (gains)/losses on investments and related derivatives   23,294    (10,680)
Amortisation of discount or premium treasury investments at amortised cost   (4,670)   (8,709)
Amortisation of borrowing issuance costs   26,277    6,488 
Unrealised (gains)/losses on borrowings related derivatives and others   (65,995)   10 172 
Provision for impairment on equity investments and treasury investments   (9,949)   (239)
Translation losses/(gains)   (13,334)   2,266 
Share of profits in associate   489    397 
Net movement in derivatives   3,914    52,196 
Changes in accrued income on loans   (1,683)   (16,887)
Changes in accrued financial charges   (8,463)   5,551 
Changes in other receivables and payables   (811,180)   162,335 
Net cash provided by operating activities   (740,639)   322,876 
Investing, lending and development activities:          
Disbursements on loans   (1,430,781)   (2,208,170)
Repayments of loans   767,028    543,145 
Investments maturing after 3 months of acquisition:          
Investments at amortised cost   (209,494)   342,283 
Investments at fair value through profit or loss   400,855    88,689 
Changes in other assets   (16,952)   (22,311)
Equity participations movement   (85,875)   (77,083)
Net cash (used in)/provided by investing, lending and development activities   (555,962)   (1,324,752)
 C: 
42
ANNLRPT43rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
</PAGE>
   2013   2012 
         
Financing activities:          
New issues on borrowings   4,892,935    4,151,028 
Repayments on borrowings   (4,050,175)   (3,648,034)
Net cash from capital subscriptions   301,780    328,378 
Net cash provided by financing activities   1,144,540    831,372 
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents   7,738    (1,236)
Increase/(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents   (144,323)   (171,740)
Cash and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year   1,411,843    1,583,583 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year   1,267,520    1,411,843 
Composed of:          
Investments maturing within 3 months of acquisition:          
Investments at amortised cost          
Investments at fair value through profit or loss   313,387    530,390 
Cash   954,133    881,453 
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the year   1,267,520    1,411,843 
Supplementary disclosure:          
Movement resulting from exchange rates:          
Loans   89,841    23,515 
Borrowings   (852,269)   (196,071)
Currency swaps   803,065    181,222 
 C: 
43
ANNLRPT44th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
</PAGE>

NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

 

NOTE A –  OPERATIONS AND AFFILIATED ORGANIZATIONS

 

The African Development Bank (ADB or the Bank) is a multilateral development finance institution dedicated to the economic and social progress of its regional member states. The Bank’s headquarters is located in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. However, since February 2003, the Bank has managed its operations largely from its temporary relocation facilities in Tunis, Tunisia. The Bank finances development projects and programs in its regional member states, typically in cooperation with other national or international development institutions. In furtherance of this objective, the Bank participates in the selection, study and preparation of projects contributing to such development and, where necessary, provides technical assistance. The Bank also promotes investments of public and private capital in projects and programs designed to contribute to the economic and social progress of the regional member states. The activities of the Bank are complemented by those of the African Development Fund (ADF or the Fund), which was established by the Bank and certain countries; and the Nigeria Trust Fund (NTF), which is a special fund administered by the Bank. The ADB, ADF, and NTF each have separate and distinct assets and liabilities. There is no recourse to the ADB for obligations in respect of any of the ADF or NTF liabilities. The ADF was established to assist the Bank in contributing to the economic and social development of the Bank’s regional members, to promote cooperation and increased international trade particularly among the Bank’s members, and to provide financing on concessional terms for such purposes.

 

In accordance with Article 57 of the Agreement Establishing the Bank, the Bank, its property, other assets, income and its operations and transactions shall be exempt from all taxation and customs duties. The Bank is also exempt from any obligation to pay, withhold or collect any tax or duty.

 

NOTE B –  SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

 

The Bank’s individual financial statements are prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) promulgated by the International Accounting Standards Board. The financial statements have been prepared under the historical cost convention except for certain financial assets and financial liabilities that are carried at fair value.

 

The significant accounting policies applied by the Bank in preparation of the financial statements are summarized below.

 

Revenue Recognition

Interest income is accrued and recognized based on the effective interest rate for the time such instrument is outstanding and held by the Bank. The effective interest rate is the rate that discounts the estimated future cash flows through the expected life of the financial asset to the asset’s net carrying amount.

 

Income from investments includes realized and unrealized gains and losses on financial instruments measured at fair value through profit or loss.

 

Dividends are recognized in income statement when the Bank’s right to receive the dividends is established in accordance with IAS 18 – Revenue.

 

Functional and Presentation Currencies

The Bank conducts its operations in the currencies of its member countries. As a result of the application of IAS 21 revised, “The Effects of Changes in Foreign Exchange Rates”, the Bank prospectively changed its functional currency from the currencies of all its member countries to the Unit of Account (UA) effective January 1, 2005, as it was concluded that the UA most faithfully represented the aggregation of economic effects of the underlying transactions, events and conditions of the Bank conducted in different currencies. The UA is also the currency in which the financial statements are presented. The value of the Unit of Account is defined in Article 5.1 (b) of the Agreement establishing the Bank (the Agreement) as equivalent to one Special Drawing Right (SDR) of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) or any unit adopted for the same purpose by the IMF.

 

Currency Translation

Income and expenses are translated to UA at the rates prevailing on the date of the transaction. Monetary assets and liabilities are

 C: 
44
ANNLRPT45th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
</PAGE>

translated into UA at rates prevailing at the balance sheet date. The rates used for translating currencies into UA at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are reported in Note V-1. Non-monetary assets and liabilities are translated into UA at historical rates. Translation differences are included in the determination of net income. Capital subscriptions are recorded in UA at the rates prevailing at the time of receipt. The translation difference relating to payments of capital subscriptions is reported in the financial statements as the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (CEAS). This is composed of the difference between the UA amount at the predetermined rate and the UA amount using the rate at the time of receipt. When currencies are converted into other currencies, the resulting gains or losses are included in the determination of net income.

 

Member Countries’ Subscriptions

Although the Agreement establishing the ADB allows for a member country to withdraw from the Bank, no member has ever withdrawn its membership voluntarily, nor has any indicated to the Bank that it intends to do so. The stability in the membership reflects the fact that the members are African and non-African countries, committed to the purpose of the Bank to contribute to the sustainable economic development and social progress of its Regional Member Countries individually and jointly. Accordingly, as of December 31, 2013, the Bank did not expect to distribute any portion of its net assets due to member country withdrawals.

 

In the unlikely event of a withdrawal by a member, the Bank shall arrange for the repurchase of the former member’s shares. The repurchase price of the shares is the value shown by the books of the Bank on the date the country ceases to be a member, hereafter referred to as “the termination date”. The Bank may partially or fully offset amounts due for shares purchased against the member’s liabilities on loans and guarantees due to the Bank. The former member would remain liable for direct obligations and contingent liabilities to the Bank for so long as any parts of the loans or guarantees contracted before the termination date are outstanding. If at a date subsequent to the termination date, it becomes evident that losses may not have been sufficiently taken into account when the repurchase price was determined, the former member may be required to pay, on demand, the amount by which the repurchase price of the shares would have been reduced had the losses been taken into account when the repurchase price was determined. In addition, the former member remains liable on any call, subsequent to the termination date, for unpaid subscriptions, to the extent that it would have been required to respond if the impairment of capital had occurred and the call had been made at the time the repurchase price of its shares was determined.

 

Were a member to withdraw, the Bank may set the dates in respect of payments for shares repurchased. If, for example, paying a former member would have adverse consequences for the Bank’s financial position, the Bank could defer payment until the risk had passed, and indefinitely if appropriate. Furthermore, shares that become unsubscribed for any reason may be offered by the Bank for purchase by eligible member countries, based on the share transfer rules approved by the Board of Governors. In any event, no payments shall be made until six months after the termination date.

 

If the Bank were to terminate its operations, all liabilities of the Bank would first be settled out of the assets of the Bank and then, if necessary, out of members’ callable capital, before any distribution could be made to any member country. Such distribution is subject to the prior decision of the Board of Governors of the Bank and would be based on the pro-rata share of each member country.

 C: 
45
ANNLRPT46th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
</PAGE>

Employee Benefits

 

1) Pension Obligations

The Bank operates a contributory defined benefit pension plan for its employees. The Staff Retirement Plan (SRP) provides benefit payments to participants upon retirement. A defined benefit plan is a pension plan that defines an amount of pension benefit that an employee will receive on retirement, usually dependent on one or more factors such as age, years of service and compensation. An actuarial valuation of the cost of providing benefits for the SRP is determined using the Projected Unit Credit Method. Upon reaching retirement age, pension is calculated based on the average remuneration for the final three years of pensionable service and the pension is subject to annual inflationary adjustments. Actuarial gains and losses as well as the differences between expected and real returns on assets are recognized immediately in other comprehensive income in the year they occur. When benefits of a plan are changed or when a plan is curtailed, the resulting change in benefit that relates to past service or the gain or loss on curtailment is recognized immediately in profit or loss. The pension liability is recognized as part of other accounts payable in the balance sheet. The liability represents the present value of the Bank’s defined benefit obligations, net of the fair value of plan assets.

 

2) Post-Employment Medical Benefits

The Bank operates a contributory defined Medical Benefit Plan (MBP), which provides post-employment healthcare benefits to eligible former staff, including retirees. Membership of the MBP includes both staff and retirees of the Bank. The entitlement to the post-retirement healthcare benefit is usually conditional on the employee contributing to the Plan up to retirement age and the completion of a minimum service period. The expected costs of these benefits derive from contributions from plan members as well as the Bank and are accrued over the period of employment and during retirement. Contributions by the Bank to the MBP are charged to expenses and included in the income statement. The MBP Board, an independent body created by the Bank, determines the adequacy of the contributions and is authorised to recommend changes to the contribution rates of both the Bank and plan members. Actuarial gains and losses as well as the difference between expected and real return on assets are recognized immediately in other comprehensive income in the year they occur. The medical plan liability is recognized as part of other accounts payable in the balance sheet. The liability represents the present value of the Bank’s post-employment medical benefit obligations, net of the fair value of plan assets.

 

Further details and analysis of the Bank’s employee benefits are included in Note R – Employee Benefits.

 

Financial Instruments

 

Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognized on the Bank’s balance sheet when the Bank assumes related contractual rights or obligations.

 

1) Financial Assets

In accordance with IFRS 9, the Bank manages its financial assets in line with the applicable business model and, accordingly, classifies its financial assets into the following categories: financial assets at amortized cost; financial assets at fair value through profit or loss (FVTPL); and financial assets at fair value through other comprehensive income (FVTOCI). In line with the Bank’s business model, financial assets are held either for the stabilization of income through the management of net interest margin or for liquidity management. The Bank’s investments in the equity of enterprises, whether in the private or public sector is for the promotion of economic development of its member countries and not for trading to realize fair value changes. Management determines the classification of its financial assets at initial recognition.

 

i) Financial Assets at Amortized Cost

A financial asset is classified as at ‘amortized cost’ only if the asset meets two criteria: the objective of the Bank’s business model is to hold the asset to collect the contractual cash flows; and the contractual terms give rise on specified dates to cash flows that are solely payments of principal and interest on the principal outstanding. The nature of any derivatives embedded in debt investment are considered in determining whether the cash flows of the investment are solely payment of principal and interest on the principal outstanding and are not accounted for separately.

 

If either of the two criteria above is not met, the financial asset is classified as at fair value through profit or loss.

 

Financial assets at amortized cost include some loans and receivables on amounts advanced to borrowers and certain debt investments

 C: 
46
ANNLRPT47th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
</PAGE>

that meet the criteria of financial assets at amortized cost. Receivables comprise demand obligations, accrued income and receivables from loans and investments and other amounts receivable. Loans and receivables meeting the two criteria above are carried at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

 

Loan origination fees are deferred and recognized over the life of the related loan as an adjustment of yield. However, incremental direct costs associated with originating loans are expensed as incurred; as such amounts are considered insignificant. The amortization of loan origination fee is included in income from loans.

 

Investments classified as financial assets at amortized cost include investments that are non-derivative financial assets with fixed or determinable payments and fixed maturities. These investments are carried and subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective interest method.

 

ii) Financial Assets at Fair Value through Profit or Loss (FVTPL)

Debt instruments that do not meet the amortized cost criteria as described above are measured at FVTPL. This category includes all treasury assets held for resale to realize short-term fair value changes as well as certain loans for which either of the criteria for recognition at amortized cost is not met. Gains and losses on these financial assets are reported in the income statement in the period in which they arise. Derivatives are also categorized as financial assets at fair value through profit or loss.

 

In addition, debt instruments that meet amortized cost criteria can be designated and measured at FVTPL. A debt instrument may be designated as at FVTPL upon initial recognition if such designation eliminates or significantly reduces a measurement or recognition inconsistency that would arise from measuring assets or liabilities or recognizing the gains and losses on them on different bases.

 

iii) Financial Assets at Fair Value through Other Comprehensive Income (FVTOCI)

On initial recognition, the Bank can make an irrevocable election (on an instrument-by-instrument basis) to designate investments in equity instruments not held for trading as financial assets measured at FVTOCI.

 

Equity investments are initially measured at fair value plus transaction costs. Subsequently, they are measured at fair value with gains and losses arising from changes in fair value recognized in other comprehensive income. The cumulative gains or losses are not reclassified to profit or loss on disposal of the investments and no impairments are recognized in the profit or loss. Dividends earned from such investments are recognized in profit and loss unless the dividends clearly represent a repayment of part of the cost of the investment.

 

Recognition and Derecognition of Financial Assets

Purchases and sales of financial assets are recognized or derecognized on a trade-date basis, which is the date on which the Bank commits to purchase or sell the asset. Loans are recognized when cash is advanced to the borrowers. Financial assets not carried at fair value through profit or loss are initially recognized at fair value plus transaction costs. Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive cash flows from the financial assets have expired or where the Bank has transferred substantially all risks and rewards of ownership.

 

Securities Purchased Under Resale Agreements, Securities Lent Under Securities Lending Agreements and Securities Sold Under Repurchase Agreements and Payable for Cash Collateral Received

Securities purchased under resale agreements, securities lent under securities lending agreements, and securities sold under repurchase agreements are recorded at market rates. The Bank receives securities purchased under resale agreements, monitors the fair value of the securities and, if necessary, closes out transactions and enters into new repriced transactions. The securities transferred to counterparties under the repurchase and security lending arrangements and the securities transferred to the Bank under the resale agreements do not meet the accounting criteria for treatment as a sale. Therefore, securities transferred under repurchase agreements and security lending arrangements are retained as assets on the Bank balance sheet, and securities received under resale agreements are not recorded on the Bank balance sheet. In cases where the Bank enters into a “reverse repo” – that is, purchases an asset and simultaneously enters into an agreement to resell the same at a fixed price on a future date – a receivable from reverse repurchase agreement is recognized in the statement of financial position and the underlying asset is not recognized in the financial statements.

 

Cash and Cash equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents comprise cash on hand, demand deposits and other short-term, highly liquid investments that are readily

 C: 
47
ANNLRPT48th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
</PAGE>

convertible to a known amount of cash, are subject to insignificant risk of changes in value and have a time to maturity upon acquisition of three months or less.

 

2) Financial Liabilities

 

i) Borrowings

In the ordinary course of its business, the Bank borrows funds in the major capital markets for lending and liquidity management purposes. The Bank issues debt instruments denominated in various currencies, with differing maturities at fixed or variable interest rates. The Bank’s borrowing strategy is driven by three major factors, namely: timeliness in meeting cash flow requirements, optimizing asset and liability management with the objective of mitigating exposure to financial risks, and providing cost-effective funding.

 

In addition to long and medium-term borrowings, the Bank also undertakes short-term borrowing for cash and liquidity management purposes only. Borrowings not designated at fair value through profit or loss are carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost with interest expense determined using the effective interest method. Borrowing expenses are recognized in profit or loss and include the amortization of issuance costs, discounts and premiums, which is determined using the effective interest method. Borrowing activities may create exposure to market risk, most notably interest rate and currency risks.

 

The Bank uses derivatives and other risk management approaches to mitigate such risks. Details of the Bank’s risk management policies and practices are contained in Note D to these financial statements. Certain of the Bank’s borrowings obtained prior to 1990, from the governments of certain member countries of the Bank, are interest-free loans. In accordance with the provisions of IAS 20 – Accounting for Government Grants and Disclosure of Government Assistance, such borrowings are carried at the amounts at which they are repayable on their due dates.

 

ii) Financial Liabilities at Fair Value through Profit or Loss

This category has two sub-categories: financial liabilities held for trading, and those designated at fair value through profit or loss at inception. Derivatives are categorized as held-for-trading. The Bank applies fair value designation primarily to borrowings that have been swapped into floating-rate debt using derivative contracts. In these cases, the designation of the borrowing at fair value through profit or loss is made in order to significantly reduce accounting mismatches that otherwise would have arisen if the borrowings were carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost while the related swaps are carried on the balance sheet at fair value.

 

In accordance with IFRS 9, fair value changes for financial liabilities that are designated as at fair value through profit or loss, that is attributable to changes in the Bank’s “own credit” risk is recognized in other comprehensive income. Changes in fair value attributable to the Bank’s credit risk are not subsequently reclassified to profit or loss.

 

iii) Other Liabilities

All financial liabilities that are not derivatives or designated at fair value through profit or loss are recorded at amortized cost. The amounts include certain borrowings, accrued finance charges on borrowings and other accounts payable.

 

Financial liabilities are derecognized when they are discharged or cancelled or when they expire.

 

Derivatives

The Bank uses derivative instruments in its portfolios for asset/liability management, cost reduction, risk management and hedging purposes. These instruments are mainly cross-currency swaps and interest rate swaps. The derivatives on borrowings are used to modify the interest rate or currency characteristics of the debt the Bank issues. This economic relationship is established on the date the debt is issued and maintained throughout the terms of the contracts. The interest component of these derivatives is reported as part of borrowing expenses.

 

The Bank classifies all derivatives at fair value, with all changes in fair value recognized in the income statement. When the criteria for the application of the fair value option are met, then the related debt is also carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in the income statement.

 

The Bank assesses its hybrid financial assets (i.e. the combined financial asset host and embedded derivative) in its entirety to

 C: 
48
ANNLRPT49th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
</PAGE>

determine their classification. A hybrid financial asset is measured at amortized cost if the combined cash flows represent solely principal and interest on the outstanding principal; otherwise it is measured at fair value. As at December 31, 2013, the Bank had hybrid financial assets that were measured at fair value in accordance with IFRS 9.

 

Derivatives embedded in financial liabilities or other non-financial host contracts are treated as separate derivatives when their risks and characteristics were not closely related to those of the host contract and the host contract was not carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses reported in profit or loss. Such derivatives were stripped from the host contract and measured at fair value with unrealized gains and losses reported in profit or loss.

 

Hedge Accounting

The Bank applies fair value hedge accounting to interest rate swaps contracted to hedge the interest rate risk exposure associated with its fixed rate loans. Under fair value hedge accounting, the change in the fair value of the hedging instrument and the change in the fair value of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk are recognized in the income statement.

 

At inception of the hedge, the Bank documents the relationship between the hedging instrument and the hedged item, along with its risk management objectives and its strategy for undertaking the hedge transactions. Furthermore, at the inception of the hedge and on an ongoing basis, the Bank documents whether the hedging instrument is highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values of the hedged item attributable to the hedged risk. Hedge accounting is discontinued when the Bank revokes the hedging relationship, when the hedging instrument expires or is sold, terminated, or exercised, or when it no longer qualifies for hedge accounting. The cumulative fair value adjustment to the carrying amount of the hedged item arising from the hedged risk is amortized to profit or loss from that date.

 

Impairment of Financial Assets

 

Assets Carried at Amortized Cost

The Bank first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists individually for financial assets. If the Bank determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed financial asset, that asset is included in a group of financial assets with similar credit characteristics and collectively assessed for impairment. Assets that are individually assessed for impairment and for which an impairment loss is or continues to be recognized are not included in a collective assessment of impairment. A financial asset or a group of financial assets is impaired and impairment losses are incurred if, and only if, there is objective evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that occurred after the initial recognition of the asset (a ‘loss event’) and that loss event (or events) has an impact on the estimated future cash flows of the financial asset or group of financial assets that can be reliably estimated.

 

If the Bank determines that there is objective evidence that an impairment loss on loans and receivables or investments carried at amortized cost has been incurred, the amount of the impairment loss is measured as the difference between the asset’s carrying amount and the present value of estimated future cash flows (excluding future credit losses that have not been incurred) discounted at the financial asset’s original effective interest rate. For sovereign-guaranteed loans, the estimated impairment representing present value losses arises from delays that may be experienced in receiving amounts due. For non-sovereign-guaranteed loans, the impairment reflects management’s best estimate of the non-collectability, in whole or in part, of amounts due as well as delays in the receipt of such amounts.

 C: 
49
ANNLRPT50th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
</PAGE>

The carrying amount of the asset is reduced through the use of an allowance account and the amount of the loss is recognized in the income statement. If a loan or investment carried at amortized cost has a variable interest rate, the discount rate for measuring any impairment loss is the current effective interest rate determined under the contract. Interest and charges are accrued on all loans including those in arrears. When a subsequent event causes the amount of impairment loss to decrease, the decrease in impairment loss is reversed through profit or loss.

 

Offsetting of Financial Instruments

Financial assets and liabilities are offset and reported on a net basis when there is a current legally enforceable right to offset the recognized amounts. A current legally enforceable right exists if the right is not contingent on a future event and is enforceable both in the normal course of business and in the event of default, insolvency or bankruptcy of the entity and all counterparties and there is an intention on the part of the Bank to settle on a net basis, or realize the asset and settle the liability simultaneously. The Bank discloses all recognized financial instruments that are set off and those subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement, irrespective of whether they are offset. Information relating to financial assets and liabilities that are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangement is provided in Note D.

 

Fair Value Disclosure

In liquid or active markets, the most reliable indicators of fair value are quoted market prices. A financial instrument is regarded as quoted in an active market if quoted prices are regularly available from an exchange, dealer, broker, industry group, pricing service or regulatory agency, and those prices represent actual and regularly occurring market transactions on an arm’s length basis. If the above criteria are not met, the market is regarded as being inactive. Indications that a market might be inactive include when there is a wide bid-offer spread or significant increase in the bid-offer spread or there are few or no recent transactions observed in the market. When markets become illiquid or less active, market quotations may not represent the prices at which orderly transactions would take place between willing buyers and sellers and therefore may require adjustment in the valuation process. Consequently, in an inactive market, price quotations are not necessarily determinative of fair values. Considerable judgment is required to distinguish between active and inactive markets.

 

Fair value is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. The fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities that are traded in active markets are based on quoted market prices or dealer price quotations. For all other financial instruments the Bank measures fair values using other valuation techniques that incorporate the maximum use of market data inputs.

 

The objective of the valuation techniques applied by the Bank is to arrive at a reliable fair value measurement.

 

Other valuation techniques include net present value, discounted cash flow analysis, option pricing models, comparison to similar instruments for which market observable prices exists and other valuation models commonly used by market participants. Assumptions and inputs used in valuation techniques include risk free and benchmark interest rates, credit spreads and other premiums used in estimating discount rates, bond and equity prices, foreign currency exchange rates and expected price volatilities and correlations.

 

The Bank uses widely recognized valuation models for measuring the fair value of common and more simple financial instruments, like interest rate and currency swaps that use only observable market data and require little management judgment and estimation. Availability of observable market prices and model inputs reduces the need for management judgment and estimation and also reduces the uncertainty associated with the measurement of fair value. Observable market prices and inputs available vary depending on the products and markets and are subject to changes based on specific events and general conditions in the financial markets.

 

Where the Bank measures portfolios of financial assets and financial liabilities on the basis of net exposures, it applies judgment in determining appropriate portfolio level adjustments such as bid-ask spread. Such judgments are derived from observable bid-ask spreads for similar instruments and adjusted for factors specific to the portfolio.

 C: 
50
ANNLRPT51st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
</PAGE>

The following three hierarchical levels are used for the measurement of fair value:

 

Level 1: Quoted prices in active markets for the same instrument (i.e. without modification or repackaging).

 

Level 2: Quoted prices in active markets for similar assets or liabilities or other valuation techniques for which all significant inputs are based on observable market data. Included in this category are instruments valued using: quoted market prices in active markets for similar instruments, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are considered less than active, or other valuation techniques where all significant inputs are directly or indirectly observable from market data.

 

Level 3: Valuation techniques for which significant input is not based on observable market data and the unobservable inputs have a significant effect on the instrument’s valuation. Instruments that are valued based on quoted market prices for similar instruments where significant unobservable adjustments or assumptions are required to reflect differences between the instruments are included in this category.

 

The level in the fair value hierarchy within which the fair value measurement is categorised in its entirety is determined on the basis of the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. For this purpose, the significance of an input is assessed against the fair value measurement in its entirety. If a fair value measurement uses observable inputs that require significant adjustment based on unobservable inputs, that measurement is a Level 3 measurement. A valuation input is considered observable if it can be directly observed from transactions in an active market, or if there is compelling external evidence demonstrating an executable exit price. 

 

The methods and assumptions used by the Bank in measuring the fair values of financial instruments are as follows:

 

Cash: The carrying amount is the fair value.

 

Investments: Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices, where available. If quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted market prices of comparable instruments.

 

Borrowings: The fair values of the Bank’s borrowings are based on market quotations when possible or valuation techniques based on discounted cash flow models using LIBOR market-determined discount curves adjusted by the Bank’s credit spread. Credit spreads are obtained from market data as well as indicative quotations received from certain counterparties for the Bank’s new public bond issues. The Bank also uses systems based on industry standard pricing models and valuation techniques to value borrowings and their associated derivatives. The models use market-sourced inputs such as interest rates, yield curves, exchange rates and option volatilities. Valuation models are subject to internal and periodic external reviews. When a determination is made that the market for an existing borrowing is inactive or illiquid, appropriate adjustments are made to the relevant observable market data to arrive at the Bank’s best measure of the price at which the Bank could have sold the borrowing at the balance sheet date.

 

For borrowings on which the Bank has elected fair value option, the portion of fair value changes on the valuation of borrowings relating to the credit risk of the Bank is reported in Other Comprehensive Income in accordance with IFRS 9.

 

Equity Investments: The underlying assets of entities in which the Bank has equity investments are periodically fair valued both by fund managers and independent valuation experts using market practices. The fair value of investments in listed enterprises is based on the latest available quoted bid prices. The fair value of investments in unlisted entities is assessed using appropriate methods, for example, discounted cash flows. The fair value of the Bank’s equity participations is measured as the Bank’s percentage ownership of the net asset value of the funds.

 

Derivative Financial Instruments: The fair values of derivative financial instruments are based on market quotations when possible or valuation techniques that use market estimates of cash flows and discount rates. The Bank also uses valuation tools based on industry standard pricing models and valuation techniques to value derivative financial instruments. The models use market-sourced inputs such as interest rates, yield curves, exchange rates and option volatilities. All financial models used for valuing the Bank’s financial instruments are subject to both internal and periodic external reviews.

 

Loans: The Bank does not sell its sovereign loans, nor does it believe there is a comparable market for these loans. The Bank’s loan

 C: 
51
ANNLRPT52nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
</PAGE>

assets, except for those at fair value, are carried on the balance sheet at amortized cost. The fair value of loans carried at amortized cost are reported in these financial statements for disclosure purposes only and represents Management’s best measures of the present value of the expected cash flows of these loans. The fair valuation of loans has been measured using a discounted cash flow model based on year-end market lending rates in the relevant currency including impairment, when applicable, and credit spreads for non-sovereign loans. In arriving at its best estimate Management makes certain assumptions about the unobservable inputs to the model, the significant ones of which is the expected cash flows and the discount rate. These are regularly assessed for reasonableness and impact on the fair value of loans. An increase in the level of fore-cast cash flows in subsequent periods would lead to an increase in the fair value and an increase in the discount rate used to discount the forecast cash flows would lead to a decrease in the fair value of loans. Changes in fair value of loans carried at fair value through profit and loss are reported in the income statement. The estimated fair value of loans is disclosed in Note I.

 

Valuation Processes Applied by the Bank

The fair value measurements of all qualifying treasury investments, borrowings, loans and equity investments are reported to and reviewed by the Assets & Liabilities Committee (ALCO) in line with the Bank’s financial reporting policies.

 

Where third-party information from brokers or pricing experts are used to measure fair value, documents are independently assessed and the evidence obtained from the third parties to support the conclusions.

 

The assessment and documentation involves ensuring that (i) the broker or pricing service provider is duly approved for use in pricing the relevant type of financial instrument, (ii) the fair value arrived at represents actual market transactions, (iii) where prices for similar instruments have been adopted, that the same have been, where necessary, adjusted to reflect the characteristics of the instrument subject to measurement and where a number of quotes for the same financial instrument have been obtained, fair value has been properly determined using those quotes.

 

Day One Profit and Loss

The fair value of a financial instrument at initial recognition is based on fair value as defined under IFRS 13. A gain or loss may only be recognized on initial recognition of a financial instrument if the fair value of that instrument is evidenced by comparison with other observable current market transactions in the same instrument (i.e. without modification or repackaging) or based on a valuation technique whose variables include only data from observable markets. On initial recognition, a gain or loss may not be recognized when using a fair value which is not defined under IFRS 13. The Bank only recognizes gains or losses after initial recognition to the extent that they arise from a change in a factor (including time) that market participants would consider in setting a price.

 

The Bank holds financial instruments, some maturing after more than ten years, where fair value is not based on quoted prices in an active market at the measurement date. Such financial instruments are initially recognized at the transaction price, although the value obtained from the relevant market participants may differ. The difference between the transaction price and the fair value measurement that is not evidenced by a quoted price in an active market or by a valuation technique that uses only observable market data, commonly referred to as “day one profit and loss”, is either: (a) amortized over the life of the transaction; or (b) deferred until the instrument’s fair value can be measured using market observable inputs or is realized through settlement. The financial instrument is subsequently measured at fair value, adjusted for the deferred day one profit and loss. Subsequent changes in fair value are recognized immediately in the income statement without immediate reversal of deferred day one profits and losses.

 

Investment in Associate

Under IAS 28, “Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures”, the ADF and any other entity in which the Bank has significant influence are considered associates of the Bank. An associate is an entity over which the Bank has significant influence, but not control, over the entity’s financial and operating policy decisions. The relationship between the Bank and the ADF is described in more detail in Note J. IAS 28 requires that the equity method be used to account for investments in associates. Under the equity method, an investment in an associate is initially recognized at cost and the carrying amount is increased or decreased to recognize the investor’s share of the profit or loss of the investee after the date of acquisition. The investor’s share of the profit or loss of the investee is recognized in the investor’s income statement. The subscriptions by the Bank to the capital of the ADF occurred between 1974 and 1990. At December 31, 2013, such subscriptions cumulatively represented less than 1 percent of the economic interest in the capital of the ADF.

 

Although ADF is a not-for-profit entity and has never distributed any dividend to its subscribers since its creation in 1972, IAS 28 require that the equity method be used to account for the Bank’s investment in the ADF. Furthermore, in accordance with IAS 36, the net

 C: 
52
ANNLRPT53rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
</PAGE>

investment in the ADF is assessed for impairment. Cumulative losses as measured under the equity method are limited to the investment’s original cost as the ADB has not guaranteed any potential losses of the ADF.

 

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment is measured at historical cost less depreciation. Historical cost includes expenditure directly attributable to the acquisition of the items. Subsequent costs are included in the asset’s carrying amount or are recognized as a separate asset, as appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the item will flow to the Bank and the cost of the item can be measured reliably. Repairs and maintenance are charged to the income statement when they are incurred.

 

Land is not depreciated. Depreciation on other assets is calculated using the straight-line method to amortize the difference between cost and estimated residual values over estimated useful lives. The estimated useful lives are as follows:

 

· Buildings: 15-20 years
· Fixtures and fittings: 6-10 years
· Furniture and equipment: 3-7 years
· Motor vehicles: 5 years

 

The residual values and useful lives of assets are reviewed periodically and adjusted if appropriate. Assets that are subject to amortization are reviewed annually for impairment. An asset’s carrying amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the asset’s carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable amount. The recoverable amount is the higher of the asset’s fair value less costs to disposal and its value in use. Gains and losses on disposal are determined as the difference between proceeds and the asset’s carrying amount and are included in the income statement in the period of disposal.

 

Intangible Assets

Intangible assets include computer systems software and are stated at historical cost less amortization. An intangible asset is recognized only when its cost can be measured reliably and it is probable that the expected future economic benefits attributable to it will flow to the Bank. Amortization of intangible assets is calculated using the straight-line method to write down the cost of intangible assets to their residual values over their estimated useful lives of 3-5 years.

 

Leases

The Bank has entered into several operating lease agreements, including those for its offices in Tunisia and in certain other member countries. Under such agreements, all the risks and benefits of ownership are effectively retained by the lessor. Payments made under operating leases are charged to the income statement on a straight-line basis over the period of the lease. Benefits received and receivable as an incentive to enter into an operating lease are also recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term. When an operating lease is terminated before the lease period has expired, any payment required to be made to the lessor by way of penalty is recognized as an expense in the period in which the termination takes place.

 

Allocations and Distributions of Income Approved by the Board of Governors

In accordance with the Agreement establishing the Bank, the Board of Governors is the sole authority for approving allocations from income to surplus account or distributions to other entities for development purposes. Surplus consists of earnings from prior years which are retained by the Bank until further decision is made on their disposition or the conditions of distribution for specified uses have been met. Distributions of income for development purposes are reported as expenses on the Income Statement in the year of approval. Distributions of income for development purposes may be funded from amounts previously transferred to surplus account or from the current year’s income.

 C: 
53
ANNLRPT54th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
</PAGE>

Retained Earnings

Retained earnings of the Bank consist of amounts allocated to reserves from prior years’ income, balance of amounts allocated to surplus after deducting distributions approved by the Board of Governors, unallocated current year’s net income, and expenses recognized directly in equity as required by IFRS.

 

Critical Accounting Judgments and Key Sources of Estimation Uncertainty

In the preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRS, Management makes certain estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue and expenses as well as the disclosure of contingent liabilities. Actual results could differ from such estimates. Estimates and judgments are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.

 

The most significant judgments and estimates are summarized below:

 

1) Significant Judgments

The Bank’s accounting policies require that assets and liabilities be designated at inception into different accounting categories. Such decisions require significant judgment and relate to the following circumstances:

 

Fair Value through Profit and Loss – In designating financial assets or liabilities at fair value through profit or loss, the Bank has determined that such assets or liabilities meet the criteria for this classification.

 

Amortized Cost and Embedded Derivatives – The Bank follows the guidance of IFRS 9 on classifying financial assets and those with embedded derivatives in their entirety as at amortized cost or fair value through profit or loss. In making this judgment, the Bank considers whether the cash flows of the financial asset are solely payment of principal and interest on the principal outstanding and classifies the qualifying asset accordingly and those with embedded derivatives without separating the derivative.

 

Consolidation – The Bank follows the guidance of IFRS 10 in ascertaining if there are any entities that it controls, and that may require consolidation.

 

2) Significant Estimates

The Bank also uses estimates for its financial statements in the following circumstances:

 

Impairment Losses on Financial Assets Measured at Amortized Cost – At each financial statements reporting date, the Bank reviews its financial assets measured at amortized cost for impairment. The Bank first assesses whether objective evidence of impairment exists for individual assets. If such objective evidence exists, impairment is determined by discounting expected future cash flows using the asset’s original effective interest rate and comparing this amount to the asset’s net carrying amount. Determining the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired assets requires significant judgment. If the Bank determines that no objective evidence of impairment exists for an individually assessed asset, that asset is included in a group of assets with similar credit characteristics and collectively assessed for impairment. Objective evidence of impairment for a group of assets may include observable data indicating that there has been an adverse change in the payment status of borrowers in a group, or national or local economic conditions that correlate with defaults on assets in the group. Management uses estimates based on historical loss experience for assets with credit risk characteristics and objective evidence of impairment similar to those in the portfolio when scheduling its future cash flows. The methodology and assumptions used for estimating both the amount and timing of future cash flows are reviewed regularly to reduce any differences between loss estimates and actual loss experience.

 

Fair Value of Financial Instruments – The fair value of financial instruments that are not quoted in active markets is measured by using valuation techniques. Where valuation techniques (for example, models) are used to measure fair values, they are validated and periodically reviewed by qualified personnel independent of the area that created them. All valuation models are calibrated to ensure that outputs reflect actual data and comparative market prices. To the extent practical, valuation models use only observable data; however, areas such as credit risk (both own and counterparty), volatilities and correlations require management to make estimates. Changes in assumptions about these factors could affect the reported fair value of financial instruments. Assessing the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, considering factors specific to the asset or liability. The determination of what constitutes ‘observable’ requires significant judgment by the Bank.

 C: 
54
ANNLRPT55th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
</PAGE>

Post-employment Benefits – The present value of retirement benefit obligations is sensitive to the actuarial and financial assumptions used, including the discount rate. At the end of each year, the Bank determines the appropriate discount rate and other variables to be used to determine the present value of estimated future pension obligations. The discount is based on market yields at the end of the year of high-quality corporate bonds in the currencies comprising the Bank’s UA, and the estimates for the other variables are based on the bank best judgment.

 

Events after the Balance Sheet date

The financial statements are adjusted to reflect events that occurred between the balance sheet date and the date when the financial statements are authorised for issue, provided they give evidence of conditions that existed at the balance sheet date.

 

Events that are indicative of conditions that arose after the balance sheet date are disclosed, but do not result in an adjustment of the financial statements themselves.

 

Reclassification and Restatement

Certain reclassifications of prior year’s amounts have been made to conform to the presentation in the current year. These reclassifications have no significant impact on previously reported result. Also, the application of the amendments to IAS 19 resulted in the restatement of the 2012 income statement and statement of other compressive income. As a result of the restatement, the net income previously reported for 2012 has been reduced by UA 2.90 million with a compensating increase of the same amount in the other comprehensive income. Reserves as previously reported in the balance sheet remained unchanged.

 

NOTE C –  THE EFFECT OF NEW AND REVISED INTERNATIONAL FINANCIAL REPORTING STANDARDS

 

At the date of issue of these financial statements, the following new and amended International Financial Reporting Standards and Interpretations were effective for application by the Bank and have been applied in preparing these financial statements. In addition the revisions to IAS 32 which becomes effective on January 1, 2014, have been early adopted by the Bank due to their linkages with those in IFRS 7 which became effective on January 1, 2013.

 

IFRS 10: “Consolidated Financial Statements”

IFRS 10 replaces the portion of IAS 27, “Consolidated and Separate Financial Statements”, that addresses the accounting for consolidated financial statements. It introduces a new control model to determine whether an investee should be consolidated. This IFRS defines the principle of control and establishes control as the sole basis for determining which entities should be consolidated by the reporting entity. It also establishes principles for the presentation and preparation of consolidated financial statements when an entity has determined that it controls one or more other entities. Compared with the requirements that were in IAS 27, the changes introduced by IFRS 10 require management to exercise significant judgment to determine which entities are controlled, and therefore, are required to be consolidated by the Bank.

 

IFRS 10 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 but its adoption has no effect on the Bank’s financial statements because, based on the control criteria, management does not consider that any entities with which the Bank is involved, excluded from consolidation need to be included following the adoption of the new standard.

 

IFRS 12: “Disclosure of Interest in Other Entities”

IFRS 12 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. IFRS 12 requires an entity to disclose information that enables users of financial statements to evaluate the nature of, and risks associated with, its interests in other entities; and the effects of those interests on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows. IFRS 12 is required to be applied by an entity that has an interest in any of the following entities: subsidiaries; joint arrangements; associates; and unconsolidated structured entities. This standard requires disclosures of interests in subsidiaries and associates and also expands the disclosure requirements for unconsolidated structured entities. The new disclosures also cover, among other issues, judgments made in determining if the entity controlled, has joint control or significant influence over an entity.

 

Following the adoption of IFRS 10 an assessment, of the Bank’s relationship with the African Development Fund (ADF) in which it

 C: 
55
ANNLRPT56th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
</PAGE>

exercises a 50 percent voting power as stipulated in the Agreement establishing the Fund, was made for possible consolidation. The Agreement establishing the Fund also stipulates that in the event of termination of the ADF’s operations, the assets of the Fund shall be distributed pro-rata to its participants in proportion to the amounts paid-in by them on account of their subscriptions, after settlement of any outstanding claims against the participants. As at December 31, 2013 the pro-rata share of the Bank in the net assets of ADF was 0.54 percent. Further the Bank does not derive any right to variable returns from its relationship with the ADF. Consequently, the ADF cannot be consolidated in the Bank’s financial statements as the conditions for consolidation under IFRS 10 are not fully met. Detailed disclosure relating to the relationship of the Bank to non-consolidated entities is presented in Note J of these financial statements.

 

The adoption of IFRS 12 has no significant impact on the Bank’s financial position or performance as it only relates to disclosures.

 

IFRS 13: “Fair Value”

IFRS 13 defines fair value; sets out in a single IFRS a framework for measuring fair value; and requires disclosures about fair value measurements.

 

IFRS 13 explains how to measure fair value for financial reporting which is a market-based measurement, not an entity-specific measurement. It does not require fair value measurements in addition to those already required or permitted by other standards and is not intended to establish valuation standards or affect valuation practices outside financial reporting. However, this standard expands the concepts and principles behind fair valuation. In addition, extensive disclosures about fair value are required under IFRS 13, and in particular when an entity relies on unobservable valuation inputs under the “level 3” fair valuation hierarchy.

 

IFRS 13 is effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The Bank believes that there is no significant impact of this standard on its financial position or performance. However, in response to the expanded disclosure requirements, additional disclosures relating to information about the sensitivity of fair value measurements to changes in unobservable estimation inputs and a detailed commentary on the Bank’s valuations methods and procedures have been provided in the relevant Notes to these financial statements.

 

IAS 19 Revised: “Employee Benefits”

The amendments to IAS 19 are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The key changes in the amended standard involve the elimination of the option to defer the recognition of actuarial gains and losses, known as the ‘corridor method’. Accordingly, under the amended standard, all actuarial gains and losses have to be recognized immediately in OCI. In addition, an entity is no longer able to recognize in profit or loss the long term expected return on assets held and; past service costs are now recognized in profit or loss at the earlier of when the amendment occurs or when the related restructuring or termination costs are recognized. Finally, the amended standard requires enhanced disclosures about defined benefit plans, including quantitative sensitivity.

 

Other than the enhanced disclosures about defined benefit plans, the adoption of the amended IAS 19 will only affect the Bank to the extent of the changes in the basis for determining the income or expense related to net defined benefit plans. The Bank now determines this by applying the discount rate used to measure the defined benefit obligation at the beginning of the annual period to the net defined benefit liability (asset) at the beginning of the annual period, taking into account any changes in the net defined benefit liability (asset) during the period as a result of contributions and benefit payments. Previously interest income or expense on plan assets was determined by the Bank based on their long-term rate of expected return. As actuarial valuations are carried out annually, at the end of the year, the change in accounting policy had no impact on net assets as at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2013.

 

In accordance with the exception to retrospective application, provided for in the amendments, the Bank has opted not to adjust the carrying amount of assets outside the scope of IAS 19 such as property, plant and equipment for changes in employee benefit costs that were included in their carrying amount before the date of initial application.

 C: 
56
ANNLRPT57th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
</PAGE>

The application of the amendments to IAS 19 resulted in the restatement of the 2012 income statement and the statement of other comprehensive income. As a result of the restatement, the 2012 net income was reduced by UA 2.90 million with an increase of the same amount in other comprehensive income with no change to the previously reported reserves in the 2012 balance sheet.

 

IFRS 7: “Financial Instruments: Disclosures” and IAS 32: “Financial Instruments: Presentation”

In December 2011, IASB issued new disclosure requirements in respect of the effect of offsetting arrangements on an entity’s financial position, as part of a common project with the US Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB). The new requirements are set out in “Disclosures-Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (amendment to IFRS 7), and are related to financial assets and liabilities that are offset in the statement of financial position or that are subject to master netting arrangements or similar agreements. As part of the same project, the IASB also published “Disclosures-Offsetting Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (amendment to IAS 32) clarifying the offsetting criteria in IAS 32 to address inconsistency in their application.

 

The amendments to IFRS 7 are to be applied in the financial statements for the annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013 with those relating to IAS 32 being effective from annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2014. The application of the amendments relating to IFRS 7 revisions have no impact on the financial position or performance of the Bank as the amendments primarily relate to disclosure and presentation of financial instruments and derivatives which are offset in the statement of financial position or are part of an enforceable master netting arrangements or similar agreements. The Bank has early adopted the revisions to IAS 32 but the application has no impact on the financial position of the Bank as the amendments merely clarify the offsetting criteria and how these are to be applied in practice.

 

NOTE D –  RISK MANAGEMENT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES

 

In carrying out its development mandate, the Bank seeks to maximize its capacity to assume core business risks resulting from its lending and investing operations while at the same time minimizing its non-core business risks (market risk, counterparty risk, and operational risk) that are incidental but nevertheless critical to the execution of its mandate.

 

Risk Governance and Risk Appetite

The highest level of risk management oversight in the Bank is assured by the Board of Executive Directors, which is chaired by the President. The Board of Directors is committed to the highest standards of corporate governance. In addition to approving all risk management policies, the Board of Directors regularly reviews trends in the Bank’s risk profiles and performance to ensure compliance with the underlying policies.

 

Three management level committees perform monitoring and oversight roles: the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO), the Credit Risk Committee (CRC) and the Operations Committee (OPSCOM). The ALCO is the oversight and control organ of the Bank’s finance and treasury risk management activities. It is the Bank’s most senior management forum on finance and treasury risk management issues and is chaired by the Vice President for Finance. The Credit Risk Committee (CRC) ensures effective implementation of the Bank’s credit policies and oversees all credit risk issues related to sovereign and non-sovereign operations, prior to their submission to OPSCOM. OPSCOM is chaired by the First Vice President and Chief Operating Officer and reviews all operational activities before they are submitted to the Board of Directors for approval.

 

The ALCO, CRC and OPSCOM meet on a regular basis to perform their respective oversight roles. Among other functions, the ALCO reviews regular and ad-hoc finance and treasury risk management reports and financial projections and approves proposed strategies to manage the Bank’s balance sheet. The Credit Risk Committee is responsible for end-to-end credit risk governance, credit assessments, portfolio monitoring and rating change approval amongst other responsibilities. ALCO and CRC are supported by several standing working groups that report on specific issues including country risk, non-sovereign credit risk, interest rate risk, currency risk, operational risk, financial projections, and financial products and services.

 

Day-to-day operational responsibility for implementing the Bank’s financial and risk management policies and guidelines are delegated to the appropriate business units. The Financial Management Department is responsible for monitoring the day- to-day compliance with those policies and guidelines. In late 2013, a Group Chief Risk Officer position was created reporting directly to the President of the Bank.

 C: 
57
ANNLRPT58th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
</PAGE>

The degree of risk the Bank is willing to assume to achieve its development mandate is limited by its risk-bearing capacity. This institutional risk appetite is embodied in the Bank’s capital adequacy policy and its commitment to maintain a prudent risk profile consistent with the highest credit rating. The Bank allocates its risk capital between non-core risks (10 percent), with sovereign and non-sovereign operations sharing equally the remaining balance (45 percent each).

 

Policy Framework

The policies, processes and procedures by which the Bank manages its risk profile continually evolve in response to market, credit, product, and other developments. The guiding principles by which the Bank manages its risks are governed by the Bank’s Capital Adequacy Policy, the General Authority on Asset Liability Management (the ALM Authority), the General Authority on the Bank’s Financial Products and Services (the FPS Authority) and the Bank’s Credit Risk Management Guidelines.

 

The ALM Authority is the overarching framework through which Management has been vested with the authority to manage the Bank’s financial assets and liabilities within defined parameters. The ALM Authority sets out the guiding principles for managing the Bank’s interest rate risk, currency exchange rate risk, liquidity risk, counterparty credit risk and operational risk. The ALM Authority covers the Bank’s entire array of ALM activities such as debt-funding operations and investment of liquid resources, including the interest rate and currency risk management aspects of the Bank’s lending and equity investment operations.

 

The FPS Authority provides the framework under which the Bank develops and implements financial products and services for its borrowers and separate guidelines prescribe the rules governing the management of credit and operational risk for the Bank’s sovereign and non-sovereign loan, guarantee and equity investment portfolios.

 

Under the umbrella of the FPS Authority and the ALM Authority, the President is authorised to approve and amend more detailed operational guidelines as necessary, upon the recommendations of the Asset and Liability Management Committee (ALCO), the Credit Risk Committee (CRC) and the Operations Committee (OPSCOM).

 

The following sections describe in detail the manner in which the different sources of risk are managed by the Bank.

 

Credit Risk

Credit risk arises from the inability or unwillingness of counterparties to discharge their financial obligations. It is the potential for financial loss due to default of one or more debtors/obligors. Credit risk is the largest source of risk for the Bank arising essentially from its lending and treasury operations.

 

The Bank manages three principal sources of credit risk: (i) sovereign credit risk in its public sector portfolio; (ii) non-sovereign credit risk in its portfolio of non-sovereign and enclave projects; and (iii) counterparty credit risk in its portfolio of treasury investments and derivative transactions used for asset and liability management purposes. These risks are managed within an integrated framework of credit policies, guidelines and processes, which are described in more detail in the sections that follow.

 C: 
58
ANNLRPT59th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
</PAGE>

The Bank’s maximum exposure to credit risk before collateral received or other credit enhancements for 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

Assets 2013 2012
Cash 954,133 881,453
Demand obligations 3,801 3,801
Treasury investments at amortized cost 3,110,539 2,898,638
Treasury investments at fair value 2,974,912 3,597,839
Derivative assets 985,959 1,558,333
Non-negotiable instruments on account of capital 1,204 1,974
Accrued income and charges receivable on loans 394,699 393,016
Other accounts receivable 683,950 540,002
Loans 11,585,840 11,014,312
Equity participations 574,656 488,467
Other debt securities 82,901 76,537

 

1) Sovereign Credit Risk

When the Bank lends to public sector borrowers, it generally requires a full sovereign guarantee or the equivalent from the borrowing member state. In extending credit to sovereign entities, the Bank is exposed to country risk which includes potential losses arising from a country’s inability or unwillingness to service its obligations to the Bank. The Bank manages country credit risk through its policies related to the quality at entry of project proposals, exposure management, including individual country exposures and overall creditworthiness of the concerned country. These include the assessment of the country’s risk profile as determined by its macroeconomic performance, debt sustainability, socio-political conditions and the conduciveness of its business environment.

 C: 
59
ANNLRPT60th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
</PAGE>

Country Exposure

The Bank’s exposures as at December 31, 2013 to borrowing member countries as well as the private sector and enclave projects from its lending activities are summarized below:

 

(Amounts in UA thousands)

   N° of  Total  Unsigned Loan  Undisbursed  Outstanding  % of Total
Outstanding
Country  Loans*  Loans*  Amounts  Balances  Balances  Loans
Botswana  3  1,072,013  -  125,357  946,656  8.17
Cabo Verde  6  118,441  -  53,959  64,482  0.56
Cameroon  1  24,977  -  17,197  7,780  0.07
Congo  2  5,470  -  -  5,470  0.05
Côte d’Ivoire  1  2,894  -  -  2,894  0.02
Democratic Republic of Congo  10  552,817  -  -  552,817  4.77
Egypt  13  1,589,506  -  521,352  1,068,154  9.22
Equatorial Guinea  3  65,403  -  61,218  4,185  0.04
Ethiopia  1  97  -  -  97  -
Gabon  11  526,388  -  283,776  242,612  2.09
Mauritius  8  472,343  -  194,977  277,366  2.39
Morocco  48  3,585,651  -  1,153,636  2,432,015  20.99
Namibia  5  210,976  -  184,594  26,382  0.23
Nigeria  5  299,414  -  194,805  104,609  0.90
Seychelles  4  26,555  -  6,494  20,061  0.17
Somalia**  3  4,264  -  -  4,264  0.04
South Africa  8  1,777,599  -  667,355  1,110,244  9.58
Sudan** (1)  4  52,083  -  -  52,083  0.45
Swaziland  5  32,808  -  -  32,808  0.28
Tunisia  35  2,252,253  -  385,946  1,866,307  16.11
Zimbabwe**  12  194,650  -  -  194,650  1.68
Multinational  2  20,886  -  -  20,886  0.18
Total Public Sector  190  12,887,488  -  3,850,666  9,036,822  77.99
Total Private Sector  107  3,947,556  759,072  639,466  2,549,018  22.01
Total  297  16,835,044  759,072  4,490,132  11,585,840  100.00

 

*Excludes fully repaid loans and cancelled loans.
**Countries in non-accrual status as at December 31, 2013.

 

(1)The outcome of the referendum conducted in South Sudan in January 2011 supported the creation of an independent state of South Sudan. After the split of the current state of Sudan into two separate nations became effective in July 2011, the number and amounts of loans shown against Sudan in this statement would be split between the emerging states, on a basis agreed upon following the ongoing negotiations between the North and South Sudan. At the end of December 2013, no decision has been taken by the states of the North and South Sudan regarding the terms and conditions of such exchange.

 

Slight differences may occur in totals due to rounding.

 

The Bank is also exposed to some of its borrowers on account of trade finance and repayment guarantees for an amount of UA 73.78 million of which UA 72.73 million relate to trade finance as at December 31, 2013.

 

Systematic Credit Risk Assessment

The foundation of the Bank’s credit risk management is a systematic credit risk assessment framework, through underlying models and their associated risk factors that have been optimized to ensure more predictive power of the rating parameters and to better align with widely-used rating scales and ensure consistency with best practices. The credit risk assessment is measured using a uniform internal 22-grade master scale, optimized to provide: (i) increased granularity; (ii) better differentiation between obligors; (iii) smoother grade distribution to alleviate the current grade concentration; and finally (iv) to create a common framework when communicating credit risks to risks takers. The level of granularity helps in measuring probabilities of default in order to better differentiate between obligors.

 C: 
60
ANNLRPT61st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
</PAGE>

The credit ratings at the sovereign level are derived from a risk assessment of five risk indices that include macroeconomic performance, debt sustainability, socio-political factors, business environment and the Bank’s portfolio performance. These five risk indices are combined to derive a composite country risk index for both sovereign and non-sovereign portfolios. The country risk ratings are validated against the average country risk ratings from different international rating agencies and other specialized international organizations. The CRC reviews the country ratings on a quarterly basis to ensure that they reflect the expected risk profiles of the countries. The CRC also assesses whether the countries are in compliance with their country exposure limits and approves changes in loss provisioning, if required.

 

The following table presents the Bank’s internal measurement rating scales compared with the international rating scales:

 

        International Ratings    
Risk Class   Revised Rating Scale   S&P – Fitch   Moody’s   Assessment
Very Low Risk   1+   A+ and above   A1 and above   Excellent
  1   A   A2  
  1-   A-   A3  
  2+   BBB+   Baa1   Strong
  2   BBB   Baa2  
  2-   BBB-   Baa3  
Low Risk   3+   BB+   Ba1   Good
  3   BB   Ba2  
  3-   BB-   Ba3  
Moderate Risk   4+   B+   B1   Satisfactory
  4   B   B2  
  4-      
  5+   B-   B3   Acceptable
  5      
High Risk   5-   CCC+   Caa1   Marginal
  6+      
  6   CCC   Caa2   Special Attention
  6-      
Very High Risk   7   CCC-   Caa3   Substandard
  8      
  9   CC   Ca   Doubtful
  10   C   C   Loss

 

Portfolio Risk Monitoring

The weighted average risk rating of the Bank’s sovereign and sovereign-guaranteed portfolio was 2.73 at the end of December 2013, compared to 2.38 as of December 31, 2012. The distribution of the sovereign portfolio across the Bank’s five risk classes is shown in the table below:

 

   Risk Profile of the Outstanding Sovereign-Guaranteed Loan Portfolio
   Very Low Risk  Low Risk  Moderate Risk  High Risk  Very High Risk
2013   54%   24%   12%    9%    1% 
2012   73%   15%    1%    10%    1% 
2011   70%   15%    1%    13%    1% 
2010   76%    2%    5%    13%    4% 
2009   44%   33%    6%    13%    4% 
2008   37%   33%    6%    16%    8% 
 C: 
61
ANNLRPT62nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
</PAGE>

It is the Bank’s policy that if the payment of principal, interest or other charges with respect to any Bank Group credit becomes 30 days overdue, no new loans to that member country, or to any public sector borrower in that country, will be presented to the Board of Directors for approval, nor will any previously approved loan be signed, until all arrears are cleared. Furthermore, for such countries, disbursements on all loans to or guaranteed by that member country are suspended until all overdue amounts have been paid. These countries also become ineligible in the subsequent billing period for a waiver of 0.5% on the commitment fees charged on qualifying undisbursed loans.

 

Although the Bank benefits from the advantages of its preferred creditor status and rigorously monitors the exposure on non-performing sovereign borrowers, some countries have experienced difficulties in servicing their debts to the Bank on a timely basis. As previously described, the Bank makes provisions for impairment on its sovereign loan portfolio commensurate with the assessment of the incurred loss in such portfolio.

 

To cover potential Expected Losses (EL) and Unexpected Losses (UL) related to credit, the Bank maintains a prudent risk capital cushion for credit risks. The Bank’s capital adequacy policy articulates differentiated risk capital requirements for public sector and private sector credit-sensitive assets (loans and equity investments), as well as for contingent liabilities (guarantees and client risk management products) in each risk class. Risk capital requirements are generally higher for private sector operations which have a higher probability of default and loss-given default than public sector operations. At the end of December 2013, the Bank’s public sector loan portfolio used up to 27.7% percent of the Bank’s total risk capital based on the Bank’s capital adequacy framework. The Bank defines risk capital as the sum of paid-in capital net of exchange adjustments, plus accumulated reserves. Callable capital is not included in the computation of risk capital.

 

2) Non-Sovereign Credit Risk

When the Bank lends to private sector borrowers and to enclave projects, it does not benefit from full sovereign guarantees. The Bank may also provide financing to creditworthy commercially oriented entities that are publicly owned, without a sovereign guarantee.

 

To assess the credit risk of non-sovereign projects or facilities, the Bank uses several models to assess the risk of every project at entry. The models are tailored to the specific characteristics and nature of the transactions. The result of the credit risk assessment is measured using a uniform internal 22-grade master scale as described above.

 

Non-sovereign transactions are grouped into the following three main categories: a) project finance; b) financial institutions; and c) private equity funds. Internal credit ratings are derived on the basis of pre-determined critical factors.

 

a) Project Finance

The first factor involves the overall evaluation and assessment of the borrower’s financial strength. This assesses:

 

Primarily, i) the capacity of the project to generate sufficient cash flow to service its debt; ii) the company’s operating performance and profitability; and iii) the project company’s capital structure, financial flexibility and liquidity positions.

 

Secondly, the following, four main non-financial parameters are analysed: i) the outlook of the industry in which the project company operates; ii) the competitive position of the project company within the industry; iii) the strength of the project company’s management with particular emphasis on its ability to deal with adverse conditions; and iv) the quality of the information on which the analysis is based.

 

Finally, the project company’s risk rating is adjusted to reflect the overall host country risk rating.

 

b) Financial Institutions

The assessment of financial institutions follows the uniform rating system commonly referred to as the CAMELS model: i) Capital adequacy – analyses of the composition, adequacy and quality of the institution’s capital; ii) Asset quality, operating policies and procedures and risk management framework; iii) Management quality and decision-making framework; iv) Earnings and market position – an evaluation of the quality and level of profitability; v) Liquidity and funding adequacy – an assessment focusing on the entity’s ability to access debt market; and vi) Sensitivity to market risk – an assessment of the impact of interest rate changes and exchange rate fluctuations.

 C: 
62
ANNLRPT63rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
</PAGE>

c) Private Equity Funds

The assessment of Private Equity Funds takes into consideration the analysis of the following qualitative and quantitative factors:

 

Financial strength and historic fund performance;
Investment strategy and risk management;
Industry structure;
Management and corporate governance; and
Information quality.

 

All new non-sovereign projects require an initial credit rating and undergo a rigorous project approval process. The Non-Sovereign Working Group of the CRC reviews the non-sovereign credit rating of each project on a quarterly basis and may recommend changes for approval by CRC if justified by evolving country and project conditions.

 

Since 2009, the Bank has been increasing its non-sovereign loan and equity exposures. The weighted-average risk rating was 3.58 at the end of 2013 compared to 3.47 at the end of 2012. The distribution of the non-sovereign portfolio across the Bank’s five credit risk classes is shown in the table below.

 

   Risk Profile of the Outstanding Non-Sovereign Loan and Equity Portfolio
   Very Low Risk  Low Risk  Moderate Risk  High Risk  Very High Risk
2013   36%   17%   31%   14%    2% 
2012   33%   19%   36%    9%    3% 
2011   36%   20%   35%    5%    4% 
2010   24%   20%   30%   24%    2% 
2009   27%   18%   28%   24%    3% 
2008   13%   16%   41%   28%    2% 

 

In compliance with IFRS, the Bank does not make general provisions to cover the expected losses in the performing non-sovereign portfolio. For the non-performing portfolio, the Bank makes a specific provision based on an assessment of the credit impairment, or incurred loss, on each loan. At the end of 2013, the cumulative impairment allowance to cover the incurred loss on impaired loan principal in the non-sovereign portfolio was UA 52.49 million compared to UA 34.96 million at the end of 2012.

 

In addition to private sector lending, the Bank makes equity investments in private sector entities, either directly or through investment funds.

 

To cover potential unexpected credit-related losses due to extreme and unpredictable events, the Bank maintains a risk capital cushion for non-sovereign credit risks derived from Basel II Advanced Internal Rating-Based Approach (IRB). At the end of December 2013, the Bank’s non-sovereign portfolio required as risk capital approximately 28 percent of the Bank’s total on-balance sheet risk capital sources. This level is still below the limit of 45 percent determined by the Bank for total non-sovereign operations. Out of the Bank’s non-sovereign portfolio, equity participations consumed as risk capital, approximately 10.4 percent of the Bank’s total on-balance sheet risk capital sources. This is still below the statutory limit of 15 percent established by the Board of Governors for equity participations.

 

Credit Exposure Limits

The Bank operates a system of exposure limits to ensure the maintenance of an adequately diversified portfolio at any given point in time. The Bank manages credit risk at the global country exposure limit (combined sovereign-guaranteed and non-sovereign portfolios) by ensuring that in aggregate, the total exposure to any country does not exceed 15 percent of the Bank’s total risk capital. This threshold and other determinants of country limit allocation are clearly spelt out in the Bank’s capital adequacy framework.

 C: 
63
ANNLRPT64th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
</PAGE>

In the revised capital adequacy and exposure management approved by the Board in May 2011, the 15 percent (of the Bank’s total risk capital) global country concentration limit is meant to allow for adequate portfolio diversification. However, in order to ensure that: (i) the allocation in aggregate does not exceed 100 percent of risk capital available for core lending activities, and (ii) there is fairness of allocation among RMCs, a Performance-Based Adjusted Country Limits formula (PACL) is used.

 

The credit exposure on the non-sovereign portfolio is further managed by regularly monitoring the exposure limit with regard to the specific industry/sectors, equity investments and single obligor. In addition, the Bank generally requires a range of collateral (security and/or guarantees) from project sponsors to partially mitigate the credit risk for direct private sector loans.

 

3) Counterparty Credit Risk

In the normal course of business, and beyond its development related exposures, the Bank utilizes various financial instruments to meet the needs of its borrowers, manage its exposure to fluctuations in market interest and currency rates, and to temporarily invest its liquid resources prior to disbursement. All of these financial instruments involve, to varying degrees, the risk that the counterparty to the transaction may be unable to meet its obligation to the Bank. Given the nature of the Bank’s business, it is not possible to completely eliminate counterparty credit risk; however, the Bank minimizes this risk by executing transactions within a prudential framework of approved counterparties, minimum credit rating standards, counterparty exposure limits, and counterparty credit risk mitigation measures.

 

Counterparties must meet the Bank’s minimum credit rating requirements and are approved by the Bank’s Vice President for Finance. For local currency operations, less stringent minimum credit rating limits are permitted in order to provide adequate availability of investment opportunities and derivative counterparties for implementing appropriate risk management strategies. The ALCO approves counterparties that are rated below the minimum rating requirements.

 

Counterparties are classified as investment counterparties, derivative counterparties, and trading counterparties. Their ratings are closely monitored for compliance with established criteria.

 

For trading counterparties, the Bank requires a minimum short-term credit rating of A-2/P-2/F-2 for trades settled under delivery vs. payment (DVP) terms and a minimum long-term credit rating of A/A2 for non DVP-based transactions.

 

The following table details the minimum credit ratings for authorised investment counterparties:

 

      Maturity    
  6 months 1 year 5 years 10 years 15 years 30 years
Government   A/A2     AA-/Aa3 AAA/Aaa
Government agencies and supranationals   A/A2     AA-/Aa3 AAA/Aaa
Banks A/A2   AA-/Aa3 AAA/Aaa    
Corporations including non-bank financial institutions A/A2   AA-/Aa3 AAA/Aaa    
MBS/ABS

 

AAA

Maximum legal maturity of 50 years for ABS/MBS with the underlying collateral originated in the UK and 40-year maximum legal maturity for all other eligible ABS/MBS. Also, the maximum weighted average life for all ABS/MBS at the time of acquisition shall not exceed 5 years.

 

The Bank may also invest in money market mutual funds with a minimum rating of AA-/Aa3 and enters into collateralized securities repurchase agreements.

 

The Bank uses derivatives in the management of its borrowing portfolio and for asset and liability management purposes. As a rule, the Bank executes an ISDA master agreement and netting agreement with its derivative counterparties prior to undertaking any transactions. Derivative counterparties are required to be rated AA-/Aa3 by at least two approved rating agencies or A-/A3 for counterparties with whom the Bank has entered into a collateral exchange agreement. Lower rated counterparties may be used exceptionally for local currency transactions. These counterparties require the approval of ALCO. Approved transactions with derivative counterparties include swaps, forwards, options and other over-the-counter derivatives.

 C: 
64
ANNLRPT65th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
</PAGE>

 

Daily collateral exchanges enable the Bank to maintain net exposures to acceptable levels. The Bank’s derivative exposures and their credit rating profiles are shown in the tables below:

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

      Derivatives     Credit Risk Profile of Net Exposure
   Notional Amount  Fair Value*  Net Exposure**  AAA  AA+ to AA-  A+ and lower
2013   15,898    544    134     0%    90%   10%
2012   15,209    1,047    109     0%    54%   46%
2011   15,393    1,192    146     0%    68%   32%
2010   14,504    1,090     96     0%    80%   20%
2009   13,503    288     84    13%   45%   42%

 

Fair value net of collateral.
** After collateral received in cash or securities.

 

The financial assets and liabilities that are subject to offsetting, enforceable master netting arrangement as at December 31, 2013, are summarized below:

 

Financial Assets Subject to Offsetting, Enforceable Master Netting Arrangements and Similar Agreements

 

(UA millions)

  Gross Amounts Gross Amounts
of Recognized
Financial
Liabilities
Set Off in the
Statement
Net Amounts of
Financial Assets
Presented in
the Statement
Related Amounts not Set Off in the
Statement of Financial Position
 
December 31, 2013 of Recognized
Financial Assets
of Financial
Position
of Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Collateral
Received
Net Amount
Derivative financial instruments 654 (110) 544 - (408) 136
Total 654 (110) 544 - (408) 136

 

Financial Liabilities Subject to Offsetting, Enforceable Master Netting Arrangements and Similar Agreements

 

(UA millions)

  Gross Amounts Gross Amounts
of Recognized
Financial Assets
Set Off in the
Net Amounts
of Financial
Liabilities
Presented in
Related Amounts not Set Off in the
Statement of Financial Position
 
December 31, 2013 of Recognized
Financial
Liabilities
Statement
of Financial
Position
the Statement
of Financial
Position
Financial
Instruments
Cash
Collateral
Pledged
Net amount
Derivative financial instruments 880 (290) 590 - 3 593
Total 880 (290) 590 - 3 593

 

In addition to the minimum rating requirements for derivative counterparties, the Bank operates within a framework of exposure limits to different counterparties based on their credit rating and size, subject to a maximum of 12 percent of the Bank’s total risk capital (equity and reserves) for any single counterparty. Individual counterparty credit exposures are aggregated across all instruments using the Bank for International Settlements (BIS) potential future exposure methodology and monitored regularly against the Bank’s credit limits after considering the benefits of any collateral.

 C: 
65
ANNLRPT66th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
</PAGE>

The credit exposure of the investment and related derivative portfolios continues to be dominated by highly rated counterparties as shown in the table below. The proportion of exposure to AAA-rated entities decreased from the previous year as a result of the downgrade of some agencies.

 

   Credit Risk Profile of the Investment and Derivative Portfolios
   AAA  AA+ to AA-  A+ and lower
2013   51%   44%    5% 
2012   62%   31%    7% 
2011   58%   33%    9% 
2010   69%   24%    7% 
2009   65%   25%   10%
2008   59%   21%   20% 

 

The Bank’s exposure to the stressed Eurozone economies remains limited to approximately UA 25 million or less than 1 percent of the portfolio.

 

To cover potential unexpected credit losses due to extreme and unpredictable events, the Bank maintains a conservative risk capital cushion for counterparty credit risks in line with the current BIS standards. At the end of December 2013, the Bank’s counterparty credit portfolio including all investments and derivative instruments required as risk capital 1.4 percent of the Bank’s total on-balance sheet risk capital sources.

 

Liquidity Risk

Liquidity risk is the potential for loss resulting from insufficient liquidity to meet cash flow needs in a timely manner. Liquidity risk arises when there is a maturity mismatch between assets and liabilities. The Bank’s principal liquidity risk management objective is to hold sufficient liquid resources to enable it to meet all probable cash flow needs for a rolling 1-year horizon without additional financing from the capital markets for an extended period. In order to minimize this risk, the Bank maintains a prudential minimum level of liquidity (PML) based on the projected net cash requirement for a rolling one-year period. The PML is updated quarterly and computed as the sum of four components: 1) 1-year debt service payments; 2) 1-year projected net loan disbursements (loans disbursed less repayments) if greater than zero; 3) loan equivalent value of commit-ted guarantees; and 4) undisbursed equity investments.

 

To strike a balance between generating adequate investment returns and holding securities that can be easily sold for cash if required, the Bank divides its investment portfolio into tranches with different liquidity objectives and benchmarks. The Bank’s core liquidity portfolio (operational portfolio) is invested in highly liquid securities that can be readily liquidated if required to meet the Bank’s short term liquidity needs. Probable redemptions of swaps and borrowings with embedded options are included in the computation of the size of the operational tranche of liquidity. In addition to the core liquidity portfolio, the Bank maintains a second tranche of liquidity (the prudential portfolio) that is also invested in relatively liquid securities to cover its expected medium-term operational cash flow needs. A third tranche of liquidity, which is funded by the Bank’s equity resources, is held in a portfolio of fixed income securities intended to collect contractual cash flows with the objective of stabilizing the Bank’s net income. In determining its level of liquidity for compliance with the PML, the Bank includes cash, deposits and securities in all the treasury investments, with appropriate haircuts based on asset class and credit rating.

 C: 
66
ANNLRPT67th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
</PAGE>

The contractual maturities of financial liabilities and future interest payments at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

Contractual Maturities of Financial Liabilities and Future Interest Payments at December 31, 2013

 

(UA thousands)

        More than More than More than More than  
        1 year but 2 years but 3 years but 4 years but  
  Carrying Contractual 1 year   less than 2 less than 3 less than 4 less than 5 More than
  Amount Cash Flow or less years years years years 5 years
Financial liabilities with                
derivatives                
Derivative liabilities 20,939 321,036 (5,879) 225,641 37,294 25,705 (75,190) 113,465
Borrowings at fair value 12,127,916 13,836,576 2,705,544 1,004,655 2,915,874 1,394,405 2,517,315 3,298,783
  12,148,855 14,157,612 2,699,665 1,230,296 2,953,168 1,420,110 2,442,125 3,412,248
                 
Financial liabilities without                
derivatives                
Accounts payable 1,246,114 1,246,114 1,246,114 - - - - -
Borrowings at amortized cost 819,528 1,260,612 89,778 364,180 52,024 44,045 80,605 629,980
  2,065,642 2,506,726 1,335,892 364,180 52,024 44,045 80,605 629,980
                 
Total financial liabilities 14,214,497 16,664,338 4,035,557 1,594,476 3,005,192 1,464,155 2,522,730 4,042,228
                 
Represented by:                
Derivative liabilities 20,939 321,036 (5,879) 225,641 37,294 25,705 (75,190) 113,465
Accounts payable 1,246,114 1,246,114 1,246,114 - - - - -
Borrowings 12,947,444 15,097,188 2,795,322 1,368,835 2,967,898 1,438,450 2,597,920 3,928,763

 

Contractual Maturities of Financial Liabilities and Future Interest Payments at December 31, 2012

 

(UA thousands)

      More than More than More than More than  
  Carrying Contractual 1 year 1 year but 2 years but 3 years but 4 years but  
  less than 2 less than 3 less than 4 less than 5 More than
  Amount Cash Flow or less years years years years 5 years
Financial liabilities with                
derivatives                
Derivative liabilities (993,780) (1,033,780) 45,126 (239,959) (306,862) (51,961) 19,694 (499,818)
Borrowings at fair value 12,175,956 13,265,739 3,337,816 2,169,485 1,001,629 2,540,107 1,243,953 2,972,749
  11,182,176 12,231,959 3,382,942 1,929,526 694,767 2,488,146 1,263,647 2,472,931
                 
Financial liabilities without derivatives                
Accounts payable 2,083,072 2,083,072 2,083,072 - - - - -
Borrowings at amortized cost 1,102,844 1,603,018 406,258 77,260 321,898 43,719 43,719 710,164
  3,185,916 3,686,090 2,489,330 77,260 321,898 43,719 43,719 710,164
                 
Total financial liabilities 14,368,092 15,918,049 5,872,272 2,006,786 1,016,665 2,531,865 1,307,366 3,183,095
                 
Represented by:                
Derivative liabilities (993,780) (1,033,780) 45,126 (239,959) (306,862) (51,961) 19,694 (499,818)
Accounts payable 2,083,072 2,083,072 2,083,072 - - - - -
Borrowings 13,278,800 14,868,757 3,744,074 2,246,745 1,323,527 2,583,826 1,287,672 3,682,913
 C: 
67
ANNLRPT68th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
</PAGE>

Currency Exchange Risk

Currency risk is the potential loss due to adverse movements in market foreign exchange rates. To promote stable growth in its risk-bearing capacity, the Bank’s principal currency risk management objective is to protect its risk capital from translation risk due to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates by matching the currency composition of its net assets to the currency composition of the SDR (UA). The agreement establishing the Bank explicitly prohibits it from taking direct currency exchange exposures by requiring liabilities in any one currency to be matched with assets in the same currency. This is achieved primarily by holding or lending the proceeds of its borrowings (after swap activities) in the same currencies in which they were borrowed (after swap activities). To avoid creating new currency mismatches, the Bank requires its borrowers to service their loans in the currencies disbursed.

 

Because a large part of its balance sheet is funded by equity resources, which are reported in Units of Account (equivalent to the SDR), the Bank has a net asset position that is potentially exposed to translation risk when currency exchange rates fluctuate. The Bank’s policy is to minimize the potential fluctuation of the value of its net worth measured in Units of Account by matching, to the extent possible, the currency composition of its net assets with the currency basket of the SDR (the Unit of Account). In keeping with the Bank’s currency risk management policy, spot currency transactions are carried out to realign the net assets to the SDR basket each time there is a misalignment or when there is a revision to the SDR currency composition.

 

The Bank also hedges its exposure to adverse movements on currency exchange rates on its administrative expenses. The distribution of the currencies of the Bank’s recurring administrative expenditures shows a high concentration of expenses in Euros, US Dollars and Tunisian Dinar.

 C: 
68
ANNLRPT69th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
</PAGE>

Net currency position at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

Net Currency Position at December 31, 2013

 

(UA thousands)

    United            
  Euro States Japanese Pound     Units of  
  Dollar Yen Sterling Other Subtotal Account Total
Assets                
Cash 75,461 3,444 - 8,437 866,791 954,133 - 954,133
Demand obligations - - - - 3,801 3,801 - 3,801
Investments – measured at                
fair value (a) 1,085,492 1,836,259 14,700 27,470 46,037 3,009,958 - 3,009,958
Investments at amortized cost 1,110,603 1,254,194 69,973 675,769 - 3,110,539 - 3,110,539
Non-negotiable instruments on                
account of capital - 1,204 - - - 1,204 - 1,204
Accounts receivable 216,282 341,457 38,384 42,990 219,279 858,392 (14,537) 843,855
Loans 5,402,723 4,749,216 284,405 2,399 1,034,446 11,473,189 - 11,473,189
Equity participations 66,382 354,154 - - 42,379 462,915 62,098 525,013
Other securities - 20,998 - - 61,903 82,901 - 82,901
Other assets - - - - - - 41,215 41,215
  7,956,943 8,560,926 407,462 757,065 2,274,636 19,957,032 88,776 20,045,808
Liabilities                
Accounts payable 139,145 35,487 (90,124) (668) (1,057,128) (973,288) (272,826) (1,246,114)
Borrowings (53,696) (7,909,731) (1,007,961) - (3,976,056) (12,947,444) - (12,947,444)
Currency swaps on borrowings                
and related derivatives (b) (6,012,085) 2,103,779 1,070,138 - 2,817,229 (20,939) - (20,939)
  (5,926,636) (5,770,465) (27,947) (668) (2,215,955) (13,941,671) (272,826) (14,214,497)
Currency position of equity                
as at December 31, 2013 2,030,307 2,790,461 379,515 756,397 58,681 6,015,361 (184,050) 5,831,311
                 
% of subtotal 33.75 46.39 6.31 12.57 0.98 100.00 - 100.00
SDR composition as at                
December 31, 2013 37.84 42.84 7.46 11.86 - 100.00 - 100.00
                 
                 
(a)  Investments measured at fair value comprise:            
Investments measured at fair value   2,974,912          
Derivative assets     35,659          
Derivative liabilities     (613)          
 Amount per statement of net currency position 3,009,958          
               
(b)  Currency swaps on borrowings comprise:              
Derivative assets     950,300          
Derivative liabilities     (971,239)          
 Net swaps on borrowings per statement of              
 net currency position   (20,939)          
 C: 
69
ANNLRPT70th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
</PAGE>

Net Currency Position at December 31, 2012

 

(UA thousands)

    United            
  Euro States Japanese Pound     Units of  
  Dollar Yen Sterling Other Subtotal Account Total
Assets                
Cash 257,972 90,403 253,254 4,187 275,637 881,453 - 881,453
Demand obligations - - - - 3,801 3,801 - 3,801
Investments – measured at                
fair value (a) 1,591,915 1,714,312 11,712 189,416 142,441 3,649,796 - 3,649,796
Investments at amortized cost 874,404 1,368,458 201,055 445,756 - 2,889,673 - 2,889,673
Non-negotiable instruments on                
account of capital - 1,690 - - - 1,690 284 1,974
Accounts receivable 77,953 293,450 42,391 41,370 276,771 731,935 30,733 762,668
Loans 4,704,154 4,669,029 376,905 2,354 1,220,216 10,972,658 - 10,972,658
Equity participations 46,821 285,949 - - 43,957 376,727 61,828 438,555
Other securities - - - - 76,537 76,537 - 76,537
Other assets - - - - - - 31,062 31,062
  7,553,219 8,423,291 885,317 683,083 2,039,360 19,584,270 123,907 19,708,177
Liabilities                
Accounts payable (1,090,479) 135,102 (117,042) (31,813) (684,924) (1,789,156) (293,916) (2,083,072)
Borrowings - (7,236,808) (1,540,755) - (4,501,237) (13,278,800) - (13,278,800)
Currency swaps on borrowings                
and related derivatives (b) (4,657,100) 1,065,808 1,250,560 - 3,334,512 993,780 - 993,780
  (5,747,579) (6,035,898) (407,237) (31,813) (1,851,649) (14,074,176) (293,916) (14,368,092)
Currency position of equity                
as at December 31, 2012 1,805,640 2,387,393 478,080 651,270 187,711 5,510,094 (170,009) 5,340,085
                 
% of subtotal 32.77 43.33 8.67 11.82 3.41 100.00 - 100.00
SDR composition as at                
December 31, 2012 36.30 42.96 9.10 11.64 - 100.00 - 100.00
                 
                 
(a)  Investments measured at fair value comprise:            
Investments measured at fair value   3,597,839          
Derivative assets     55,383          
Derivative liabilities     (3,426)          
 Amount per statement of net currency position 3,649,796          
               
(b)  Currency swaps on borrowings comprise:              
Derivative assets     1,502,950          
Derivative liabilities     (509,170)          
 Net swaps on borrowings per statement of              
 net currency position     993,780          

 

Currency Risk Sensitivity Analysis

As described in the previous section, the Bank manages its currency risk exposure by matching, to the extent possible, the currency composition of its net assets with the currency basket of the SDR. The SDR is composed of a basket of four currencies, namely the US dollar, Euro, Japanese yen and Pound sterling. The weight of each currency in the basket is determined and reviewed by the International Monetary Fund (IMF) every five years and the last revision became effective on January 1, 2011 based on the value of exports of goods and services and international reserves. The SDR rate represents the sum of specific amounts of the four basket currencies valued in U.S dollars, on the basis of the exchange rates quoted at noon each day in the London market.

 C: 
70
ANNLRPT71st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
</PAGE>

Currency risks arise with the uncertainty about the potential future movement of the exchange rates between these currencies on the one hand, and between the exchange rates of the SDR currencies and the other non-SDR currencies (mainly African currencies) used by the Bank on the other hand. In this regard, the Bank carries out an annual sensitivity analysis of the translation results of its net assets with regard to the movement of the different exchange rates. The analysis consists of a set of scenarios where the exchange rates between the US dollar and the other SDR and African currencies are stretched out by large margins (10 percent appreciation/depreciation).

 

The following tables illustrate the sensitivity of the Bank’s net assets to currency fluctuations due to movements in the exchange rate of the currencies in the SDR basket as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The sensitivity analysis shown assumes a separate 10 percent appreciation/depreciation for each currency in the basket against the US dollar. Due to a moderate change in the African currency holdings the table also includes the effect of a 10 percent appreciation/depreciation of each African currency against the SDR. Under the different scenarios, the currency risk management strategy of the Bank shows a minimal change in net assets as a result of currency mismatches.

 

Sensitivity of the Bank’s Net Assets to Currency Fluctuations at December 31, 2013

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

            Change in Basis Point
      Japanese Pound Other   Change of
        Net Assets Total Net
  US Dollar Euro Yen Sterling Currencies Net Assets Gain/(Loss) Assets
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
appreciation against the USD                
EUR 2,391.23 2,292.90 418.62 682.29 (1.27) 5,783.77 (2.28) 4bps
GBP 2,452.40 2,137.77 429.33 769.72 (1.27) 5,787.94 1.88 3bps
JPY 2,463.17 2,147.16 474.33 702.82 (1.27) 5,786.21 0.15 0bp
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
appreciation of each African                
currency against the SDR 2,481.59 2,163.22 434.44 708.08 (1.40) 5,785.92 (0.13) 0bp
                 
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
depreciation against the USD                
EUR 2,569.88 2,036.52 449.89 733.27 (1.27) 5,788.28 2.23 4bps
GBP 2,508.75 2,186.89 439.19 650.75 (1.27) 5,784.30 (1.75) 3bps
JPY 2,498.58 2,178.03 397.65 712.92 (1.27) 5,785.91 (0.14) 0bp
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
depreciation of each African                
currency against the SDR 2,481.59 2,163.22 434.44 708.08 (1.16) 5,786.17 0.12 0bp
                 
Assumptions:                
Base net assets 2,688.45 2,117.72 317.58 708.08 (0.52) 5,831.31    
Currency weight 0.66 0.42 12.10 0.11 - - - -
Base exchange rate 1.54 1.12 161.77 0.93 - - - -
 C: 
71
ANNLRPT72nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
</PAGE>

Sensitivity of the Bank’s Net Assets to Currency Fluctuations at December 31, 2012

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

              Change in Basis Point
      Japanese Pound Other   Change of
        Net Assets Total Net
  US Dollar Euro Yen Sterling Currencies Net Assets Gain/(Loss) Assets
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
appreciation against the USD                
EUR 2,263.63 2,118.32 467.27 608.59 7.50 5,465.32 1.57 3bps
GBP 2,318.68 1,972.57 478.64 685.73 7.50 5,463.12 (0.63) 1bp
JPY 2,324.51 1,977.53 527.82 624.96 7.50 5,462.33 (1.42) 3bps
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
appreciation of each African                
currency against the SDR 2,345.75 1,995.60 484.22 630.67 8.25 5,464.50 0.75 1bp
                 
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
depreciation against the USD                
EUR 2,425.74 1,876.05 500.74 652.18 7.50 5,462.22 (1.53) 3bps
GBP 2,370.91 2,017.01 489.42 579.49 7.50 5,464.33 0.58 1bp
JPY 2,365.40 2,012.32 443.89 635.95 7.50 5,465.06 1.31 2bps
Net assets resulting from a 10%                
depreciation of each African                
currency against the SDR 2,345.75 1,995.60 484.22 630.67 6.82 5,463.07 (0.68) 1bp
                 
Assumptions:                
Base net assets 2,299.56 1,759.73 488.98 630.67 161.34 5,340.28    
Currency weight 0.66 0.42 12.10 0.11 - - - -
Base exchange rate 1.54 1.17 132.42 0.95 - - - -

 

Interest Rate Risk

The Bank’s interest rate risk sensitivity is comprised of the following two elements:

 

1)the sensitivity of the interest margin between the rate the Bank earns on its assets and the cost of the borrowings funding such assets;

 

2)the sensitivity of the income on assets funded by equity resources to changes in interest rates.

 

The Bank’s principal interest rate risk management objective is to generate a stable overall net interest margin that is not overly sensitive to sharp changes in market interest rates, but yet adequately responsive to general market trends.

 C: 
72
ANNLRPT73rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
</PAGE>

Interest rate risk position as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

Interest Rate Risk Position as at December 31, 2013

 

(UA thousands)

    More than More than More than More than   Non  
  1 year or 1 year but 2 years but 3 years but 4 years but   interest  
  less than less than less than less than More than bearing  
  less 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 5 years funds Total
Assets                
Cash 954,133 - - - - - - 954,133
Demand obligations 3,801 - - - - - - 3,801
Treasury investments (a) 3,350,819 460,040 312,310 340,640 451,430 1,199,600 5,658 6,120,497
Non-negotiable instruments on                
account of capital 509 451 105 68 49 22 - 1,204
Accounts receivable 1,050,180 - - - - - (206,325) 843,855
Loans – disbursed and                
outstanding 8,549,417 253,591 308,916 269,864 275,029 1,930,165 (1,142) 11,585,840
Hedged loans – fair value                
adjustment - - - - - - 32,494 32,494
Accumulated impairment for                
loan losses - - - - - - (145,145) (145,145)
Equity participations - - - - - - 525,013 525,013
Other securities 20,998 - - - - 61,903 - 82,901
Other assets - - - - - - 41,215 41,215
  13,929,857 714,082 621,331 610,572 726,508 3,191,690 251,768 20,045,808
                 
Liabilities                
Accounts payable (1,246,114) - - - - - - (1,246,114)
Borrowings (b) (12,738,108) (5,918) (234,001) (235) (235) (154,085) 164,199 (12,968,383)
Macro-hedge swaps (312,286) 104,544 97,067 91,558 - 19,117 - -
  (14,296,508) 98,626 (136,934) 91,323 (235) (134,968) 164,199 (14,214,497)
                 
Interest rate risk position                
as at December 31, 2013* (366,651) 812,708 484,397 701,895 726,273 3,056,722 415,967 5,831,311
               
* Interest rate risk position represents equity.              
                 
(a)  Treasury investments comprise:              
Treasury investments     6,085,451          
Derivative assets – investments   35,659          
Derivative liabilities – investments   (613)          
 Amount per statement of interest rate risk   6,120,497          
                 
(b)  Borrowings comprise:              
Borrowings     12,947,444          
Derivative assets – borrowings   (950,300)          
Derivative liabilities – borrowings   971,239          
 Net borrowings per statement of interest rate risk 12,968,383          
 C: 
73
ANNLRPT74th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
</PAGE>

Interest Rate Risk Position as at December 31, 2012

 

(UA thousands)

    More than More than More than More than   Non  
  1 year or 1 year but 2 years but 3 years but 4 years but   interest  
  less than less than less than less than More than bearing  
  less 2 years 3 years 4 years 5 years 5 years funds Total
Assets                
Cash 881,453 - - - - - - 881,453
Demand obligations 3,801 - - - - - - 3,801
Treasury investments (a) 4,171,158 321,470 481,230 275,130 331,810 992,550 (33,879) 6,539,469
Non-negotiable instruments on                
account of capital 768 510 452 105 68 71 - 1,974
Accounts receivable 960,472 - - - - - (197,804) 762,668
Loans – disbursed and                
outstanding 8,323,002 231,290 224,256 279,831 233,495 1,722,438 - 11,014,312
Hedged loans – fair value                
adjustment - - - - - - 86,854 86,854
Accumulated impairment for                
loan losses - - - - - - (128,508) (128,508)
Equity participations - - - - - - 438,555 438,555
Other securities - - - - - 76,537 - 76,537
Other assets - - - - - - 31,062 31,062
  14,340,654 553,270 705,938 555,066 565,373 2,791,596 196,280 19,708,177
                 
Liabilities                
Accounts payable (2,083,072) - - - - - - (2,083,072)
Borrowings (b) (11,672,232) (202,015) (241) (245,219) (241) (174,834) 9,762 (12,285,020)
Macro-hedge swaps (444,639) 50,100 103,514 103,309 95,974 91,742 - -
  (14,199,943) (151,915) 103,273 (141,910) 95,733 (83,092) 9,762 (14,368,092)
                 
Interest rate risk position                
as at December 31, 2012* 140,711 401,355 809,211 413,156 661,106 2,708,504 206,042 5,340,085
               
* Interest rate risk position represents equity.              
                 
(a)  Treasury investments comprise:            
Treasury investments     6,487,512          
Derivative assets – investments 55,383          
Derivative liabilities – investments   (3,426)          
 Amount per statement of interest rate risk 6,539,469          
                 
(b)  Borrowings comprise:                
Borrowings     13,278,800          
Derivative assets – borrowings   (1,502,950)          
Derivative liabilities – borrowings   509,170          
 Net borrowings per statement of interest rate risk 12,285,020          
 C: 
74
ANNLRPT75th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
</PAGE>

Interest Rate Risk on Assets Funded by Debt

Two thirds of the Bank’s interest-rate-sensitive assets are funded by debt. The Bank seeks to generate a stable net interest margin on assets funded by debt by matching the interest rate characteristics of each class of assets with those of the corresponding liabilities.

 

In 1990, the Bank began offering “variable rate” loans. The interest rate on these loans resets semi-annually based on the average cost of a dedicated pool of the Bank’s borrowings. These pools are funded with a mix of fixed rate and floating rate borrowings to provide borrowers with broadly stable interest rates that gradually track changes in market interest rates. The cost of funds pass-through formulation incorporated in the lending rates charged on the Bank’s pool-based loans has traditionally helped to minimize the interest rate sensitivity of the net interest margin on this part of its loan portfolio. In view of declining demand for this product in favour of market-based loans, the Bank is carefully managing the gradual winding down of the designated funding pools.

 

Since 1997, the Bank offers fixed and floating rate loans whose interest rate is directly linked to market interest rates (market-based loans). For the market-based loan products, the Bank’s net interest margin is preserved by using swaps to align the interest rate sensitivity of the loans with that of the Bank’s underlying funding reference (six-month Libor floating rate). The Bank may also provide borrowers with risk management products such as swaps to modify the currency and interest rate terms of its market-based loan products. Although it retains the credit risks of the borrower, the Bank eliminates the associated market risk on these risk management products by simultaneously laying off market risks with an approved derivative counterparty.

 

For the portfolio of liquid assets funded by borrowings, the Bank protects its net interest margin by managing its investments within limits around benchmarks that replicate the interest rate characteristics of the underlying funding for each portfolio tranche. The portfolio of liquid assets funded by borrowings is currently divided into two tranches to reflect the different business purposes and underlying funding. The core part of the investment portfolio is held to comply with the Bank’s liquidity policy and uses a six-month Libor floating rate benchmark. The operational liquidity portfolio is managed to meet projected operational cash flow needs and uses a one-month Libor floating rate benchmark.

 

The Bank diversifies the sources of its funding by issuing debt in a variety of markets and instruments. Unless fixed rate funding is required for one of its pool-based loan products, the Bank protects its net interest margin by simultaneously swapping all new borrowings into floating rate in one of the Bank’s active currencies on a standard six-month Libor rate reference. Where the Bank issues structured debt, the Bank simultaneously enters into a swap with matching terms to synthetically create the desired six-month Libor-based floating rate funding. For risk management purposes, callable funding is considered as one alternative to issuing short-term debt such as Euro Commercial Paper. The Bank manages refinancing risk by: (i) limiting the amount of debt that will mature or is potentially callable within one year to 25 percent of the outstanding debt portfolio, and (ii) trying to match the average maturity of loans priced with a fixed spread with borrowing with similar lifetime.

 

Interest Rate Risk on Assets Funded by Equity

The second principal source of interest rate risk is the interest rate sensitivity of the income earned from funding a significant portion of the Bank’s assets with equity resources. These assets are mostly made up of fixed rate loans and investments with a lifetime of 10 years. Changes in market interest rates in the currencies of the Bank’s equity resources (the SDR) affect the net interest margin earned on assets funded by equity. In general, lower nominal market interest rates result in lower lending and investment rates, which in the long-term reduce the nominal earnings on the Bank’s equity resources.

 

The Bank manages the interest rate profile of the assets funded by equity resources with the objective of reducing the sensitivity of the net interest margin to fluctuations in market interest rates. This is achieved by continuously adjusting the repricing profile of the assets funded by the Bank’s equity resources (fixed rate loans and investments) to match a repricing profile benchmark. The Bank’s repricing profile benchmark is a 10-year ladder whereby a uniform 10 percent of the Bank’s assets is funded by equity and repriced in each year. Using this benchmark, the Bank’s net interest margin on assets funded by equity tends to track a 10-year moving average of 10-year maturity SDR interest rates.

 

At the end of 2012 and 2013, the Bank’s overall repricing profile was closely aligned to the benchmark in almost all annual buckets.

 C: 
75
ANNLRPT76th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
</PAGE>

Net Interest Margin Sensitivity

A parallel upward shift in the SDR curve of 100 bps would have generated a maximum gain in income statement of UA 5.66 million and UA 5.67 million as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

Fair Value Sensitivity

Movements in interest rates also have an impact on the values of assets and liabilities that are reported in the financial statements at fair value through profit or loss. The table below shows the effect of a parallel yield curve movement of +/- 100 bps of each of the currencies in the investment portfolio and the borrowings and derivative portfolios as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. However, due to the low level of interest rates across the Japanese Yen yield curve, the sensitivity analysis in 2013 and 2012 for assets and liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen reflect a parallel movement in the yield curve of +/- 10 bps.

 

(UA thousands)

   Upward Parallel Shift   Downward Parallel Shift 
   2013   2012   2013   2012 
   Gain/(Loss)   Gain/(Loss)   Gain/(Loss)   Gain/(Loss) 
Investments at fair value through profit or loss   (9,511)   (9,151)   11,706    11,229 
Fair-valued borrowings and derivative portfolios   (149,795)   66,451    149,428    (77,118)

 

Prepayment Risk

In addition to the two principal sources of interest rate risk described above, the Bank is exposed to prepayment risk on loans committed before 1997 on which the Bank is unable to charge a prepayment penalty. In practice the level of prepayments on such loans has generally been within acceptable levels. For all market-based loans issued since 1997, the Bank protects itself from prepayment risk by linking the prepayment penalty to the cost of redeploying the funds at current market rates. Since 2006, total annual prepayments on loans particularly those committed prior to 1997 have been declining over the years. Prepayments in 2013 amounted to UA 96.73 million (2012: UA 21.71 million) none of which relate to loans committed prior to 1997.

 

Operational Risk

Like all financial institutions, the Bank is exposed to operational risks arising from its systems and processes.

 

Operational risks include the risks of losses resulting from inadequate or failed internal processes, people, and/or systems, and from external events which could have a negative financial or adverse reputational impact. Operational risk is present in virtually all the Bank’s transactions and includes losses attributable to failures of internal processes in credit and market operations.

 

The Internal Control Unit (ICU) of the Bank is responsible for implementing the Integrated Internal Control Framework (IICF) which consists of two phases. Phase one relates to the implementation of Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR) based on the COSO Framework as a means of regularly evaluating the effectiveness and efficiency of the Bank’s internal controls in all significant business processes with financial statement impact. As part of this process, Management’s attestation on the adequacy of internal controls over financial reporting is published in the Bank’s annual report.

 

Phase two of the IICF entails the implementation of Operational Risk Management Framework which is intended to address risks inherent in other business processes not covered by ICFR. The Operational Risk Management Framework (ORM) was approved by the Board of Directors in March 2012 as the first step in addressing risks related to business processes and the implementation process is ongoing. Full implementation of ORM will ensure a structured and well-coordinated approach to risk identification and assessment, risk mitigation and control as well as risk reporting across the Bank. It will also provide the basis for applying advanced measurement approach in measuring operational risk capital. Currently, the Bank’s Capital Adequacy and Exposure Management Framework provides for an operational risk capital charge of 15 percent of the average operating income for the preceding 3 years, in line with Basel II recommendations for operational risk.

 C: 
76
ANNLRPT77th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
</PAGE>

It is the primary responsibility of the management of each business unit to implement adequate controls in their respective business processes based on the prevailing institutional standards.

 

Compliance with institutional standards is verified through periodic reviews undertaken by the Office of the Auditor General of the Bank. The results of internal audit reviews are discussed with the Management of the relevant business unit(s), with summaries submitted to Senior Management of the Bank and the Audit and Finance Committee of the Board of Directors.

 

The Bank also has a contingency and business continuity plan which aims to ensure the continuity of its operations and protect the interests of all the key stakeholders of the Bank Group, namely, the member countries (borrowing and non-borrowing), bondholders and other creditors as well as employees and their families, in the event of any disturbance in its office locations. Three key organs in the Bank ensure the oversight and implementation of the plan: (i) the Executive Crisis Committee, chaired by the President of the Bank, which makes the key decisions based on recommendations from the Operations Crisis Committee (OCC); (ii) the OCC, chaired by the Corporate Vice President, that closely monitors all developments affecting the Bank and advises on measures necessary to mitigate the relevant risks; and (iii) the business continuity Unit (BCPU) that follows up on the implementation of decisions made and is also responsible for periodic tests of the overall business continuity preparedness of the Bank and staff.

 

Other elements of the Bank’s operational risk management practices include compliance with the Code of conduct and staff rules, the work of the Integrity and Anti-Corruption Department (IACD) and the existence of a Whistleblower Protection Policy. 

 

NOTE E – FINANCIAL ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

The tables below set out the classification of each class of financial assets and liabilities, and their respective fair values as at December 31, 2013 and 2012:

 

Analysis of Financial Assets and Liabilities by Measurement Basis

 

(UA thousands)

   Financial Assets and Liabilities   Fair Value Financial Assets      
   through Profit or Loss   through Other   and Liabilities      
   Mandatorily   Designated   Comprehensive   at Amortized  Total Carrying   
December 31, 2013  at Fair Value   at Fair Value   Income   Cost  Amount  Fair Value
Cash   -    -    -    954,133   954,133   954,133
Demand obligations   -    -    -    3,801   3,801   3,801
Treasury investments   2,974,912    -    -    3,110,539   6,085,451   6,217,886
Derivative assets   985,959    -    -    -   985,959   985,959
Non-negotiable instruments on                           
account of capital   -    -    -    1,204   1,204   1,204
Accounts receivable   -    -    -    843,855   843,855   843,855
Loans   16,466    -    -    11,424,229   11,440,695   11,155,856
Equity participations   -    -    525,013    -   525,013   525,013
Other securities   -    -    -    82,901   82,901   82,901
Total financial assets   3,977,337    -    525,013    16,420,662   20,923,012   20,770,608
                            
Accounts payable   -    -    -    1,246,114   1,246,114   1,246,114
Derivative liabilities   971,852    -    -    -   971,852   971,852
Borrowings   -    12,127,916    -    819,528   12,947,444   13,073,058
Total financial liabilities   971,852    12,127,916    -    2,065,642   15,165,410   15,291,024
 C: 
77
ANNLRPT78th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
</PAGE>

(UA thousands)

   Financial Assets and Liabilities   Fair Value   Financial Assets      
   through Profit or Loss   through Other   and Liabilities      
   Mandatorily   Designated   Comprehensive   at Amortized  Total Carrying   
December 31, 2012  at Fair Value   at Fair Value   Income   Cost  Amount  Fair Value
Cash   -    -    -    881,453   881,453   881,453
Demand obligations   -    -    -    3,801   3,801   3,801
Treasury investments   3,597,839    -    -    2,889,673   6,487,512   6,751,879
Derivative assets   1,558,333    -    -    -   1,558,333   1,558,333
Non-negotiable instruments on                           
account of capital   -    -    -    1,974   1,974   1,974
Accounts receivable   -    -    -    762,668   762,668   762,668
Loans   16,707    -    -    10,869,097   10,885,804   11,105,922
Equity participations   -    -    438,555    -   438,555   438,555
Other securities   -    -    -    76,537   76,537   76,537
Total financial assets   5,172,879    -    438,555    15,485,203   21,096,637   21,581,122
                            
Accounts payable   -    -    -    2,083,072   2,083,072   2,083,072
Derivative liabilities   512,596    -    -    -   512,596   512,596
Borrowings   -    12,175,956    -    1,102,844   13,278,800   13,482,135
Total financial liabilities   512,596    12,175,956    -    3,185,916   15,874,468   16,077,803

 

The table below classifies the Bank’s financial instruments that were carried at fair value at December 31, 2013 and 2012 into three levels reflecting the relative reliability of the measurement bases, with level 1 as the most reliable.

 

(UA thousands)

        Valuation techniques    Valuation techniques for     
   Quoted prices in active    for which all significant    which any significant     
   markets for the same    inputs are based on    input is not based on     
   instrument    observable market data    observable market data    Total
   (Level 1)    (Level 2)     (Level 3)         
    2013    2012   2013    2012   2013    2012   2013    2012
Treasury investments   1,710,782    2,158,492   1,085,275    1,313,023   178,855    126,324   2,974,912    3,597,839
Derivative assets   3,790    3,415   976,322    1,533,916   5,847    21,002   985,959    1,558,333
Loans   -    -   16,466    16,707   -    -   16,466    16,707
Equity participations   12,597    6,473   -    -   512,416    432,082   525,013    438,555
Total financial assets   1,727,169    2,168,380   2,078,063    2,863,647   697,118    579,408   4,502,350    5,611,434
                                     
Derivative liabilities   -    -   (917,812)   (509,975)  (54,040)   (2,621)  (971,852)   (512,596)
Borrowings   (6,449,233)   (4,928,074)  (5,435,277)   (7,022,769)  (243,405)   (225,114)  (12,127,916)   (12,175,956)
Total financial liabilities   (6,449,233)   (4,928,074)  (6,353,089)   (7,532,744)  (297,445)   (227,735)  (13,099,768)   (12,688,552)

 

The Bank’s policy is to recognize transfers out of level 3 as of the date of the event or change in circumstances that caused the transfer.

 

Investments whose values are based on quoted market prices in active markets, and are therefore classified within Level 1, include active listed equities, exchange-traded derivatives, US government treasury bills and certain non-US sovereign obligations. The Bank does not adjust the quoted price for these instruments.

 C: 
78
ANNLRPT79th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
</PAGE>

Financial instruments that trade in markets that are not considered to be active but are valued based on quoted market prices, dealer quotations or alternative pricing sources supported by observable inputs are classified within Level 2. These include investment-grade corporate bonds and certain non-US sovereign obligations, listed equities over-the-counter derivatives and a convertible loan. As Level 2 investments include positions that are not traded in active markets and/or are subject to transfer restrictions, valuations may be adjusted to reflect illiquidity and/or non-transferability, which are generally based on available market information.

 

Investments classified within Level 3 have significant unobservable inputs, as they trade infrequently or do not trade at all. Instruments in Level 3 include loans to Regional Member Countries, private equity and corporate debt securities including some structured asset and mortgage-backed instruments. As observable prices are not available for these securities, the Bank has used valuation techniques to derive the fair value. However as noted earlier, the fair values for loans and some securities are derived merely for disclosure purposes rather than for reporting on the balance sheet.

 

The primary products classified at Level 3 are as follows:

 

Debt Securities – Asset- and Mortgage-Backed Securities

Due to the lack of liquidity in the market and the prolonged period of time under which many securities have not traded, obtaining external prices is not a strong enough measure to determine whether an asset has an observable price or not. Therefore, once external pricing has been verified, an assessment is made whether each security is traded with significant liquidity based on its credit rating and sector. If a security is of low credit rating and/or is traded in a less liquid sector, it will be classified as Level 3. Where third party pricing is not available, the valuation of the security will be estimated from market standard cash flow models with input parameter assumptions which include prepayment speeds, default rates, discount margins derived from comparable securities with similar vintage, collateral type, and credit ratings. These securities are also classified as Level 3.

 

Equity Shares – Private Equity

The fair value of investments in unlisted entities is assessed using appropriate methods, for example, discounted cash flows or net asset value (NAV). The fair value of the Bank’s equity participations is estimated as the Bank’s percentage ownership of the net asset value of the investments.

 

Derivatives

Trading derivatives are classified at Level 3 if there are parameters which are unobservable in the market, such as products where the performance is linked to more than one underlying. Examples are derivative transactions and derivatives attached to local currency transactions. These unobservable correlation parameters could only be implied from the market, through methods such as historical analysis and comparison to historical levels or benchmark data.

 C: 
79
ANNLRPT80th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
</PAGE>

Reconciliation of Level 3 Fair Value Balances

Reconciliation of fair value balances measured using valuation techniques with no significant input from observable market data (level 3 hierarchy) at December 31, 2013 and 2012 is as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

       Investments             
   Investments   at Fair Value             
   at Fair Value   through Other             
   through Profit   Comprehen-   Derivative   Derivative     
   and Loss   sive Income   Assets   Liabilities   Borrowings 
2012                         
Balance at January 1, 2012   60,806    306,073    75,361    (34,990)   (260,839)
Unrealized (losses)/gains recognized in income statement   (4,646)   -    5,592    -    (17,808)
Gains recognized in statement of comprehensive income   -    52,473    -    397    - 
Purchases, issues and settlements (net)   69,894    68,388    (14,089)   (326)   30,951 
Reclassification   -    -    -    -    - 
Translation effects   270    5,148    (12,174)   (1,390)   22,582 
Transfer between assets and liabilities   -    -    (33,688)   33,688    - 
Balance at December 31, 2012   126,324    432,082    21,002    (2,621)   (225,114)
                          
2013                         
Balance at January 1, 2013   126,324    432,082    21,002    (2,621)   (225,114)
Unrealized (losses)/gains recognized in income statement   (13,950)   -    3,802    (10,919)   (12,643)
Gains recognized in statement of comprehensive income   -    24,629    -    -    - 
Purchases, issues and settlements (net)   67,013    66,623    (8,317)   (37,520)   (37,449)
Reclassification   -    -    -    -    - 
Translation effects   (532)   (10,918)   (8,651)   (4,969)   31,800 
Transfer between assets and liabilities   -    -    (1,989)   1,989    - 
Balance at December 31, 2013   178,855    512,416    5,847    (54,040)   (243,406)

 

Fair Value of Financial Assets and Liabilities at Amortized Cost Based on Three-Level Hierarchy

 

The table below classifies the fair value of Bank’s financial instruments that were carried at amortized cost at December 31, 2013 into three levels reflecting the relative reliability of the measurement bases, with level 1 as the most reliable.

 

(UA thousands)

       Valuation techniques for   Valuation techniques for     
   Quoted prices in active   which all significant inputs   which any significant input     
   markets for the same   are based on observable   is not based on observable     
   instrument   market data   market data   Total 
   (Level 1)   (Level 2)   (Level 3)     
Treasury investments   2,907,454    161,054    174,466    3,242,974 
Loans   -    -    11,139,390    11,139,390 
Total financial assets   2,907,454    161,054    11,313,856    14,382,364 
                     
Borrowings   -    (865,691)   (80,609)   (946,300)
Total financial liabilities   -    (865,691)   (80,609)   (946,300)
 C: 
80
ANNLRPT81st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
</PAGE>

Quantitative Information about Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)

The table below shows the valuation techniques used in the determination of fair values for financial assets within level 3 of the measurement hierarchy as well as the key unobservable inputs used in the valuation models. The Bank has determined that market participants would use the same inputs in pricing the financial instruments. Management considers that changing the unobservable inputs described below to reflect other reasonably possible alternative assumptions would not result in a significant change in the estimated fair value.

 

Type of Financial Instrument   Valuation Approach   Key Unobservable Input   Inter-relationship between
Key Unobservable Inputs and
Fair Value Measurement
Treasury investments
Time deposits
Asset-backed securities
Government and agency
obligations
Corporate bonds
Financial institutions
Supranational
  Discounted cash flow
Comparable pricing
  Credit spread
Conditional prepayment rate
Constant default rate
Expected payments profile
following default
Loss given default yield
Increase in rate reduces fair value
Loans
Fixed rate
Floating rate
  Discounted cash flow   Average cost of capital
Probability of default, loss given
default
A high probability of default
results

in lower fair value
Derivative assets   Options model   Volatility of credit
Counterparty credit risk
Own credit risk
 
Equity participations   Net asset value   N/A N/A
Derivative liabilities   Discounted cash flow   Volatility of credit
Credit spreads
   
Borrowings   Consensus pricing   Offered quotes
Own credit
   

 

Significant Unobservable Inputs

Although the Bank believes that its estimates of fair value are appropriate, the use of different methodologies or assumptions could lead to different fair value results.

 

The valuation techniques applied with significant unobservable inputs are described briefly below:

 

Comparable Pricing

Comparable pricing refers to the method where valuation is done by calculating an implied yield from the price of a similar comparable observable instrument. The comparable instrument for a private equity investment is a comparable listed company. The comparable instrument in case of bonds is a similar comparable but observable bond. This may involve adjusting the yield to derive a value for the unobservable instrument.

 

Yield

Yield is the interest rate that is used to discount the future cash-flows in a discounted cash-flow model.

 

Correlation

Correlation is the measure of how movement in one variable influences the movement in another variable. Credit correlation generally refers to the factor that describes the relationship between the probability of individual entities to default on obligations and the joint probability of multiple entities to default on obligations. Similarly, equity correlation is the correlation between two equity instruments. An interest rate correlation refers to the correlation between two swap rates. FX correlation represents the correlation between two different exchange rates.

 

Liquidity Discount

A liquidity discount is primarily applied to unlisted firms to reflect the fact that these stocks are not actively traded. An increase in liquidity discount in isolation will result in unfavourable movement in the fair value of the unlisted firm.

 C: 
81
ANNLRPT82nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
</PAGE>

Volatility

Volatility represents an estimate of how much a particular instrument, parameter or Index will change in value over time. Volatilities are generally implied from the observed option prices. For certain instruments, volatility may change with strike and maturity profile of the option.

 

Credit Spreads

Credit Spreads represent the additional yield that a market participant would demand for accepting an exposure to the credit risk of an instrument. A change in the assumptions could lead to different fair value results.

 

Sensitivity Analysis of Valuations of Level 3 Assets and Liabilities Using Unobservable Inputs

For fair value measurements in level 3, changing one or more of the assumptions used would have the following effects:

 

Investments

The fair value of level 3 investments is sensitive to sources of pricing used. The fair value variance arising from using other sources of prices amounted to UA 0.25 million or 0.14 percent.

 

Borrowings and Derivatives

The table below shows the effect of a parallel yield curve movement of +/- 100 bps of each of the currencies in the level 3 borrowings and derivative portfolios as of December 31, 2013. However, due to the low level of interest rates across the Japanese Yen yield curve, the sensitivity analysis in 2013 for liabilities denominated in Japanese Yen reflect a parallel movement in the yield curve of +/- 10 bps:

 

(UA thousands)

  Upward Parallel Shift Downward Parallel Shift
  2013  
  Gain/(Loss)
Fair-valued level 3 borrowings and derivative portfolios (37,195) 38,293

 

Day One Profit and Loss – Unrecognized Gains/Losses as a Result of the Use of Valuation Models Using Unobservable Inputs

 

The unamortized balances of day one profit and loss at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were made up as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

   2013   2012 
Balance at January 1   129,017    133,258 
New transactions   52,706    22,931 
Amounts recognized in income statement during the year   (12,677)   (16,872)
Translation effects   (22,504)   (10,300)
Balance at December 31   146,542    129,017 
 C: 
82
ANNLRPT83rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
</PAGE>
NOTE F –  TREASURY INVESTMENTS

 

As part of its overall portfolio management strategy, the Bank invests in government, agency, supranational, bank and corporate obligations, time deposits, mortgage and asset-backed securities, funded risk participation program, secured lending transactions, resale agreements and related derivative instruments including futures, forward contracts, cross-currency swaps, interest rate swaps, options and short sales.

 

For government, agency and supranational obligations with final maturity longer than 1 year and less than 15 years, the Bank may only invest in obligations with counterparties having a minimum credit rating of AA- or unconditionally guaranteed by governments of member countries or other official entities with the same rating criteria. For maturities beyond 15 years and up to 30 years, a AAA rating is required. For mortgage and asset-backed securities, the Bank may only invest in securities with a AAA credit rating. For bank and corporate obligations with final maturity longer than 6 months and less than 5 years, the Bank may only invest with counterparties having a minimum credit rating of AA-. AAA rating is required for debt obligations beyond 5 years and up to 10 years. The purchases of currency or interest rate options are permitted only if the life of the option contract does not exceed 1 year. Such transactions are only executed with counterparties with credit ratings of AA- or above. All derivative transactions, including options, cross-currency and interest rate swaps including asset swap transactions, are only permitted with approved counterparties or guaranteed by entities with which the Bank has entered into Master Derivative Agreements and a Collateral Support Agreement with minimum credit ratings of A-/A3 at the time of the transaction.

 

As at December 31, 2013, the Bank had received collateral with fair value of UA 416 million in connection with swap agreements. Of this amount, a total UA 146 million was in the form of cash and has been recorded on the balance sheet with a corresponding liability included in “Other accounts payable”. The balance of UA 270 million was in the form of liquid financial assets and is kept in custody by the Bank.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Bank had no securities sold under repurchase agreements (repos).

 

The composition of treasury investments as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

    2013   2012  
Treasury investments mandatorily measured at fair value through profit or loss   2,974,912   3,597,839  
Treasury investments at amortized cost   3,110,539   2,898,638  
Provision for impairment on investments   -   (8,965 )
Total   6,085,451   6,487,512  
 C: 
83
ANNLRPT84th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
</PAGE>

Treasury Investments Mandatorily Measured at Fair Value Through Profit or Loss (FVTPL)

A summary of the Bank’s treasury investments mandatorily measured at FVTPL as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA millions)

  US Dollar Euro GBP Other Currencies All Currencies
  2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Time deposits 121.28 233.61 - - 27.80 137.17 46.04 142.43 195.12 513.21
Asset-backed                    
securities 86.11 60.69 88.29 56.04 - 9.55 - - 174.40 126.28
Government and                    
agency obligations 984.24 833.21 408.11 511.79 - 10.70 - - 1,392.35 1,355.70
Corporate bonds 152.27 26.89 37.80 0.32 - - 14.57 11.71 204.64 38.92
Financial institutions 392.23 442.35 491.45 821.73 - 10.02 - - 883.68 1,274.10
Supranational 70.83 72.17 53.89 194.88 - 22.58 - - 124.72 289.63
Total 1,806.96 1,668.92 1,079.54 1,584.76 27.80 190.02 60.61 154.14 2,974.91 3,597.84

 

The nominal value of treasury investments mandatorily measured at FVTPL as at December 31, 2013 was UA 2,966.30 million (2012: UA 3,579.31 million). The average yield of treasury investments mandatorily measured at FVTPL for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 0.79% (2012: 1.89%).

 

The contractual maturity structure of treasury investments mandatorily measured at FVTPL as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA millions)

    2013   2012
One year or less   1,328.49   2,084.38
More than one year but less than two years   663.45   912.85
More than two years but less than three years   754.46   462.27
More than three years but less than four years   23.40   7.52
More than four years but less than five years   49.94   19.81
More than five years   155.17   111.01
Total   2,974.91   3,597.84

 

Treasury Investments at Amortized Cost

A summary of the Bank’s treasury investments at amortized cost at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA millions)

  US Dollar Euro GBP Other Currencies All Currencies
  2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012 2013 2012
Asset-backed                    
securities 160.65 188.30 - - - - - - 160.65 188.30
Government and                    
agency obligations 660.87 692.11 687.18 567.69 359.84 210.19 69.97 140.31 1,777.86 1,610.30
Corporate bonds 18.11 83.56 - - 12.83 25.69 - - 30.94 109.25
Financial institutions 15.00 23.61 77.90 148.32 32.49 18.73 - 60.75 125.39 251.41
Supranational 399.57 389.84 345.53 158.39 270.60 191.15 - - 1,015.70 739.38
Total 1,254.20 1,377.42 1,110.61 874.40 675.76 445.76 69.97 201.06 3,110.54 2,898.64
 C: 
84
ANNLRPT85th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 85th
</PAGE>

The nominal value of treasury investments at amortized cost as at December 31, 2013 was UA 3,104.88 million (2012: UA 2,932.52 million). The average yield of treasury investments at amortized cost for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 3.33% (2012: 3.70%).

 

The contractual maturity structure of treasury investments at amortized cost as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA millions)

    2013   2012
One year or less   340.28   531.26
More than one year but less than two years   456.89   320.03
More than two years but less than three years   303.56   474.03
More than three years but less than four years   353.53   274.62
More than four years but less than five years   445.18   332.87
More than five years   1,211.10   965.83
Total   3,110.54   2,898.64

 

The fair value of treasury investments at amortized cost as at December 31, 2013 was UA 3,242.97 million (2012: UA 3,154.00 million).

 

NOTE G –  DERIVATIVE ASSETS AND LIABILITIES

 

The fair values of derivative financial assets and financial liabilities at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

    2013 2012
    Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities
Borrowings-related:          
Cross-currency swaps   746,184 824,365 1,237,105 378,198
Interest rate swaps   179,625 50,629 253,508 1,183
Loan swaps   24,491 96,008 12,337 128,871
Embedded derivatives   - 237 - 918
    950,300 971,239 1,502,950 509,170
Investments-related:          
Asset swaps   3,016 613 4,370 3,426
Macro-hedge swaps and others   32,643 - 51,013 -
    35,659 613 55,383 3,426
Total   985,959 971,852 1,558,333 512,596
 C: 
85
ANNLRPT86th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 86th
</PAGE>

The notional amounts of derivative financial assets and financial liabilities at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

    2013   2012
Borrowings-related:        
Cross-currency swaps   9,875,479   8,980,284
Interest rate swaps   4,320,644   4,297,187
Loan swaps   1,706,174   1,284,002
Embedded derivatives   11,100   13,532
    15,913,397   14,575,005
Investments-related:        
Asset swaps   105,923   202,489
Macro-hedge swaps and others   466,216   444,639
    572,139   647,128
Total   16,485,536   15,222,133

 

Loan Swaps

The Bank has entered into interest rate swaps to effectively convert fixed rate income on loans in certain currencies into variable rate income.

 

Futures Contracts

The Bank has entered into futures contracts to hedge fixed interest rate bonds against interest rate variations. As at December 31, 2013, the Bank had 1,947 contracts in Euro and 8,961 contracts in US Dollars. The nominal value of each contract is one million of each currency unit, except for 60 contracts with a nominal value of Euro 100,000 for each contract.

 

Forward Exchange Transactions to Hedge

To insulate the Bank from possible significant increases in administrative expenses that could arise from an appreciation of the principal currencies of administrative expenditure i.e. EUR, GBP, TND and USD vis-ŕ-vis the UA, the Bank executed forward exchange transactions to economically hedge its administrative expenses. As at December 31, 2013 there were no open positions with respect to forward exchange transactions.

 

Hedge Accounting

The Bank applies fair value hedge accounting to interest rate swaps contracted to hedge its interest rate risk exposure associated to fixed rate loans. Changes in the fair value of the derivative hedging instruments are recognized in profit or loss. The hedged item is adjusted to reflect changes in its fair value in respect of the risk being hedged with the gain or loss attributable to the hedged risk being recognized in profit or loss.

 

The fair value of the loan swaps designated and effective as hedging instruments as at December 31, 2013 was a liability of UA 67.74 million. The fair value gain on these loan swaps for the period ended December 31, 2013 was UA 60.62 million. The fair value loss on the hedged loans attributable to the hedged risk was UA 62.44 million. Therefore, the hedge ineffectiveness recognized in profit or loss was a loss of UA 1.82 million.

 

Hedge accounting treatment for swaps at the designation date requires the amortization of the difference between the net carrying amount of loans and their fair value from inception. For 2013, the amortization of fair value adjustment on the hedged risk amounted to UA 5.19 million.

 C: 
86
ANNLRPT87th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 87th
</PAGE>
NOTE H –  NON-NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ON ACCOUNT OF CAPITAL

 

Prior to May 1981, all payments in respect of paid-up capital had been made in convertible currencies. However, for the capital increases authorised in May 1979 (but effective December 1982) and May 1981, regional members had the following two options for making their payments:

 

1)Five (5) equal annual installments, of which at least 50 percent is payable in convertible currency and the remainder in local currency; or

 

2)Five (5) equal annual installments, of which 20 percent is payable in convertible currency and 80 percent in non-negotiable, non-interest-bearing notes. Such notes are redeemable by the Bank solely in convertible currency in installments commencing on the fifth anniversary of the first subscription payment date.

 

Non-regional members were required to make their payments solely in convertible currencies.

 

The paid-up portion of subscriptions, authorised in accordance with Board of Governors’ Resolution B/BG/87/11 relating to the Fourth General Capital Increase (GCI-IV), is to be paid as follows:

 

1) Regional Members – 50 percent in five (5) equal annual installments in cash in freely convertible currency or freely convertible currencies selected by the member state, and 50 percent by the deposit of five non-negotiable, non-interest-bearing notes of equal value denominated in Units of Account. Such notes are redeemable by the Bank solely in convertible currency in five (5) equal annual installments commencing on the fifth anniversary of the first subscription payment date.

 

2) Non-Regional Members – five (5) equal annual installments in their national currencies, where such currencies are freely convertible or in notes denominated in freely convertible currencies encashable on demand.

 

Under the Fifth General Capital Increase (GCI-V), there is no distinction in the payment arrangements between regional and non-regional members. Each member is required to pay for the paid-up portion of its subscribed shares in eight (8) equal and consecutive annual installments. The first installments shall be paid in cash and in a freely convertible currency. The second to the eighth installments shall be paid in cash or notes encashable on demand in a freely convertible currency.

 

Under the Sixth General Capital Increase (GCI-VI), approved in accordance with the Board of Governors’ Resolution B/ BG/2010/08 of May 27, 2010 each member eligible to receive financing exclusively from the African Development Fund only shall pay for the paid-up portion of its subscribed shares in twelve (12) equal and consecutive annual installments; while Middle Income Countries, Blend countries and Non-Regional Member Countries shall pay for the paid-up portion of their respective subscribed shares in eight (8) equal and consecutive annual installments.

 

Payments for shares under GCI-VI are to be made in freely convertible currencies in cash or promissory notes encashable on or before the due date for payment.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the non-negotiable notes balances were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013   2012  
Balance at January 1 1,974   3,044  
Net movement for the year (770 ) (1,070 )
Balance at December 31 1,204   1,974  
 C: 
87
ANNLRPT88th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 88th
</PAGE>
NOTE I –  LOANS AND GUARANTEES

 

Loans

The Bank’s loan portfolio comprises loans granted to, or guaranteed by borrowing member countries as well as certain other non-sovereign-guaranteed loans. Amounts disbursed on loans are repayable in the currency or currencies disbursed by the Bank or in other freely convertible currency or currencies approved by the Bank. The amount repayable in each of these currencies shall be equal to the amount disbursed in the original currency. Loans are granted for a maximum period of twenty years, including a grace period, which is typically the period of project implementation. Loans are for the purpose of financing development projects and programs, and are not intended for sale. Furthermore, management does not believe there is a comparable secondary market for the type of loans made by the Bank.

 

The types of loans currently held by the Bank and the rates charged are described below:

 

Loan Portfolio: The Bank’s loan portfolio is currently made up of three primary types of loans based on the financial terms: fixed rate, floating rate and variable rate loans. Fixed rate and variable rate loans have both multicurrency and single currency terms – that is, offered in multicurrency or in a single currency. While floating rate loans only bear single currency terms.

 

Others loans: The Bank also offers parallel co-financing and A/B loan syndications. Through syndications the Bank is able to mobilize co-financing by transferring some or all of the risks associated with its loans and guarantees to other financing partners. Thus, syndications decrease and diversify the risk profile of the Bank’s financing portfolio. Syndications may be on a funded or unfunded basis, and they may be arranged on an individual, portfolio, or any other basis consistent with industry practices.

 

The Bank also offers its RMCs local currency loans if the Bank is able to fund efficiently in the local currency market. The local currency loans are offered under the fixed spread loan pricing framework with a “cost-pass-through” principle for local currency loans to ensure that the overall cost of funds is compensated.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, outstanding loans were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013   2012  
Outstanding balance of loans – amortized cost 11,569,374   10,997,605  
Outstanding balance of loans – fair value 16,466   16,707  
  11,585,840   11,014,312  
Less: accumulated provision for impairment (145,145 ) (128,508 )
Balance at December 31 11,440,695   10,885,804  
 C: 
88
ANNLRPT89th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 89th
</PAGE>

Fair Value of Loans

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the carrying and estimated fair values of outstanding loans were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
  Carrying   Estimated Carrying   Estimated
  Value   Fair Value Value   Fair Value
Loans at amortized cost            
Fixed rate loans 9,107,483   8,759,406 8,179,735   8,278,621
Floating rate loans 2,252,117   2,174,023 2,568,919   2,562,523
Variable rate loans 209,774   205,961 248,951   248,071
Subtotal 11,569,374   11,139,390 10,997,605   11,089,215
Loans at fair value  16,466   16,466 16,707   16,707
Total 11,585,840   11,155,856 11,014,312   11,105.922
Accumulated provision for impairment on loans at amortized cost (145,145 ) - (128,508 ) -
Net loans 11,440,695   11,155,856 10,885,804   11,105,922

 

In 2012, the Bank disbursed a loan that is measured at FVTPL due to the existence of a conversion option in the loan that could potentially change the future cash flows to no longer represent solely payments of principal and interest as required by IFRS 9. The fair value of this loan has been determined using the expected cash flows model with inputs including interest rates and the borrower’s credit spread which was estimated based on the Bank’s internal rating methodology for non-sovereign loans.

 

Maturity and Currency Composition of Outstanding Loans

The contractual maturity structure of outstanding loans as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA millions)

  2013 2012
Periods Fixed Rate Floating Rate Variable Rate Total Total
One year or less 490.05 320.54 196.82 1,007.41 934.69
More than one year but less than two years 596.01 438.13 5.06 1,039.20 723.57
More than two years but less than three years 619.06 268.90 3.72 891.68 995.21
More than three years but less than four years 656.13 228.82 3.02 887.97 834.92
More than four years but less than five years 696.07 196.81 1.14 894.02 820.91
More than five years 6,050.16 815.38 0.02 6,865.56 6,705.01
Total 9,107.48 2,268.58 209.78 11,585.84 11,014.31

 

Borrowers may repay loans before their contractual maturity, subject to the terms specified in the loan agreements. 

 C: 
89
ANNLRPT90th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 90th
</PAGE>

The currency composition and types of outstanding loans as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

          2013 2012
          Amount % Amount %
Fixed Rate:   Multi-Currency   Euro 190.78   71.71  
        Japanese Yen 260.85   341.06  
        Pound Sterling 2.60   2.55  
        Swiss Franc 3.85   131.53  
        US Dollar 173.99   186.86  
        Others 0.02   0.37  
          632.09 5.46 734.08 6.66
    Single Currency   Euro 4,681.59   4,032.46  
        Japanese Yen 5.18   8.12  
        South African Rand 879.34   891.01  
        US Dollar 2,902.84   2,511.03  
        Others 6.45   3.03  
          8,475.40 73.15 7,445.65 67.60
Floating Rate:   Single Currency   Euro 456.80   469.55  
        Japanese Yen 12.68   17.53  
        South African Rand 147.28   193.60  
        US Dollar 1,651.81   1,904.94  
          2,268.57 19.58 2,585.62 23.48
Variable Rate:   Multi-Currency   Euro 40.22   51.03  
        Japanese Yen 1.00   1.79  
        US Dollar 101.20   102.66  
          142.42 1.23 155.48 1.41
    Single Currency   Euro 21.89   29.94  
        Japanese Yen 15.41   21.35  
        Swiss Franc 1.17   1.37  
        US Dollar 28.89   40.82  
          67.36 0.58 93.48 0.85
Total         11,585.84 100.00 11,014.31 100.00

 

The weighted average yield on outstanding loans for the year ended December 31, 2013 was 3.00% (2012: 3.47%).

 

A comparative summary of the currency composition of outstanding loans at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

  2013 2012
  Amount % Amount %
Euro 5,391.28 46.53 4,654.70 42.26
Japanese Yen 295.12 2.55 389.85 3.54
Pound Sterling 2.60 0.02 2.55 0.02
South African Rand 1,026.62 8.86 1,084.61 9.85
Swiss Franc 5.02 0.04 132.89 1.21
US Dollar 4,858.73 41.94 4,746.31 43.09
Others 6.47 0.06 3.40 0.03
Total 11,585.84 100.00 11,014.31 100.00
 C: 
90
ANNLRPT91st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 91st
</PAGE>

Accrued Income and Charges Receivable on Loans

The accrued income and charges receivable on loans as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Accrued income and charges receivable on loans 394,699 393,016
Less: accumulated provision for impairment (206,325) (197,804)
Balance at December 31 188,374 195,212

 

Provision for Impairment on Loan Principal and Charges Receivable

At December 31, 2013, outstanding loans with an aggregate principal balance of UA 330.35 million (2012: UA 310.92 million), of which UA 260.32 million (2012: UA 269.13 million) was overdue, were considered to be impaired.

 

The gross amounts of loans and charges receivable that were impaired and their cumulative impairment at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Outstanding balance on impaired loans 330,347 310,916
Less: accumulated provision for impairment (145,145) (128,508)
Net balance on impaired loans 185,202 182,408
     
Charges receivable and accrued income on impaired loans 287,271 278,687
Less: accumulated provision for impairment (206,325) (197,804)
Net charges receivable and accrued income on impaired loans 80,946 80,883

 

The movements in the accumulated provision for impairment on outstanding loan principal for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Balance at January 1 128,508 118,024
Provision for impairment on loan principal for the year 22,886 12,339
Provision reversal for loan written off (4,728) (798)
Translation effects (1,521) (1,057)
Balance at December 31 145,145 128,508

 

Accumulated provisions for impairment on outstanding loan principal included the provisions relating to public and private sector loans. During the year ended December 31, 2013, provision for impairment made on private sector loans amounted to UA 22.32 million (2012: UA 11.13 million). The accumulated provisions on private sector loans at December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 52.49 million (2012: UA 34.96 million).

 C: 
91
ANNLRPT92nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 92nd
</PAGE>

The movements in the accumulated provision for impairment on loan interest and charges receivable for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Balance at January 1 197,804 184,888
Provision for impairment on loan charges for the year 18,249 17,349
Provision reversal for loan written off (5,171) (1,478)
Translation effects (4,557) (2,955)
Balance at December 31 206,325 197,804

 

Accumulated provisions for impairment on loan interest and charges receivable included the provisions relating to public and private sector loans. During the year ended December 31, 2013, provision for impairment was made on interest and charges receivable on private sector loans in the amount of UA 4.69 million (2012: UA 2.98 million). The accumulated provision on interest and charges receivable on private sector loans at December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 14.61 million (2012: UA 15.15 million).

 

Guarantees

The Bank may enter into special irrevocable commitments to pay amounts to borrowers or other parties for goods and services to be financed under loan agreements. At December 31, 2013, there were no outstanding irrevocable reimbursement guarantees issued by the Bank to commercial banks on undisbursed loans (2012: UA 3.29 million).

 

Also, the Bank provides trade finance and repayment guarantees to entities within its Regional Member Countries for development loans granted to such entities by third parties. Guarantees represent potential risk to the Bank if the payments guaranteed for an entity are not made. Guarantees provided by the Bank outstanding at December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 73.78 million (2012: UA 14.27 million).

 

NOTE J – EQUITY PARTICIPATIONS

 

Investment in ADF

The ADF was established in 1972 as an international institution to assist the Bank in contributing to the economic and social development of African countries, to promote cooperation and increased international trade particularly among the African countries, and to provide financing on highly concessional terms for such purposes. The Fund’s original subscriptions were provided by the Bank and the original State Participants to the ADF Agreement, and State Participants acceding to the Agreement since the original signing date. Thereafter, further subscriptions were received from participants in the form of Special General Increases and General Replenishments.

 

The ADF has a 14-member Board of Directors, made up of 7 members selected by the African Development Bank and 7 members selected by State Participants. The Fund’s Board of Directors reports to the Board of Governors made up of representatives of the State Participants and the ADB. The President of the Bank is the ex-officio President of the Fund.

 

To carry out its functions, the Fund utilizes the offices, staff, organization, services and facilities of the Bank, for which it pays a share of the administrative expenses. The share of administrative expenses paid by the Fund to the Bank is calculated annually on the basis of a cost-sharing formula, approved by the Board of Directors, which is driven in large part by the number of programs and projects executed during the period. Based on the cost-sharing formula, the share of administrative expenses incurred by ADF for the year ended December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 225.87 million (2012: UA 185.27 million), representing 68.69 percent (2012: 65.91 percent) of the shareable administrative expenses incurred by the Bank. The accounts of the ADF are kept separate and distinct from those of the Bank.

 C: 
92
ANNLRPT93rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 93rd
</PAGE>

Although the ADB by agreement exercises 50 percent of the voting powers in the ADF, the Agreement establishing the ADF also provides that in the event of termination of the ADF’s operations, the assets of the Fund shall be distributed pro-rata to its participants in proportion to the amounts paid-in by them on account of their subscriptions, after settlement of any out-standing claims against the participants. At December 31, 2013, the Bank’s pro-rata or economic share in ADF was 0.54 percent (2012: 0.58 percent).

 

Notwithstanding the exercise of 50 percent voting power in the Fund by the Bank, the conditions for control under IFRS 10 Consolidated Financial Statements are not met since the Bank does not have absolute voting interest to control ADF, no rights to variable returns from its relationship with ADF and has an economic interest of less than 1 percent in the Fund. Consequently, the Fund cannot be consolidated in the Bank’s Financial Statements.

 

As a result of the implementation in 2006 of the Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative described in Note V-2, the net asset value of ADF which is the basis for determining the value of the Bank’s investment in the Fund declined, resulting in impairment loss on the Bank’s investment. The net assets of ADF is made up of its net development resources less outstanding demand obligations plus disbursed and outstanding loans excluding balances due from countries that have reached their HIPC completion points and, are therefore due for MDRI loan cancelation at the balance sheet date.

 

Other Equity Participations

The Bank may take equity positions in privately owned productive enterprises and financial intermediaries, public sector companies that are in the process of being privatized or regional and sub-regional institutions. The Bank’s objective in such equity investments is to promote the economic development of its Regional Member Countries and in particular the development of their private sectors. The Bank’s equity participation is also intended to promote efficient use of resources, promoting African participation, playing a catalytic role in attracting other investors and lenders and mobilizing the flow of domestic and external resources to financially viable projects, which also have significant economic merit.

 

Unless otherwise approved by the Board of Directors, the Bank’s equity participation shall not exceed 25 percent of the equity capital of the entity in which it invests. The Bank does not seek a controlling interest in the companies in which it invests, but closely monitors its equity investments through Board representation. In accordance with the Board of Governors’ Resolution B/BG/2009/10 of May 13, 2009, total equity investment by the Bank shall not at any time exceed 15 percent of the aggregate amount of the Bank’s paid-in capital and reserves and surplus (risk capital) included in its ordinary capital resources.

 

Under IFRS 9 equity investments must be measured at fair value through profit or loss. However, where the equity investment is not held for trading, an entity has the option to take fair value changes into other comprehensive income (OCI), with no recycling of the change in fair value to profit or loss if the investment is subsequently derecognized. As the Bank’s equity investments are currently held for strategic purposes of enhancing development in Regional Member Countries rather than for trading, the Bank has opted to designate all its equity investments as at fair value through other comprehensive income.

 C: 
93
ANNLRPT94th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 94th
</PAGE>

The Bank’s equity investments at the end of 2013 and 2012 are summarized below:

 

(Amounts in UA thousands)

          Carrying Value 
Institutions  Year Established   Callable Capital  2013   2012 
African Development Fund   1972    -   111,741    111,741 
Accumulated share of profit/(loss) & impairment on January 1            (49,912)   (49,466)
Share of loss for the year            (489)   (397)
Impairment for the year            758    (49)
         -   62,098    61,829 
DIRECT INVESTMENTS                   
Development Finance Institutions                   
African Export and Import Bank   1993    9,740   25,711    21,447 
African Guarantee Fund   2011    -   6,248    6,458 
Central African Development Bank (BDEAC)   1975    2,456   748    850 
East African Development Bank   1967    9,090   11,381    4,279 
Eastern and Southern African Trade and Development Bank   1985    35,325   27,403    10,942 
Great Lakes Development Bank (BDEGL)*   1980    -   -    - 
Shelter Afrique   1982    -   12,048    11,778 
TCX Investment Company Mauritius Limited   2007    144   19,758    19,290 
West African Development Bank (BOAD)   1973    2,320   3,359    3,173 
         59,075   106,656    78,217 
Commercial Banks                   
United Bank for Africa   1961    -   12,597    6,473 
         -   12,597    6,473 
Microfinance Institutions                   
AB Microfinance Bank Nigeria Limited   2007    -   1,127    748 
Access Bank Liberia Limited   2008    -   968    865 
Access Bank Tanzania Limited   2007    -   663    363 
Advans Banque Congo   2008    -   933    1,116 
K-REP Bank Limited   1997    -   3,086    2,525 
MicroCred Côte d’Ivoire S.A.   2013    -   488    - 
         -   7,265    5,617 
Insurance                   
Africa Trade Insurance Agency   2013    -   9,740    - 
Africa-Re   1977    -   33,356    31,845 
Eastern and Southern African Reinsurance Company   2011    -   8,117    9,407 
         -   51,213    41,252 
TOTAL DIRECT INVESTMENTS        59,075   177,731    131,559 
                    
FUNDS                   
Africa Capitalization Fund   2010    9,779   20,335    13,897 
Africa Health Fund LLC   2009    4,156   5,737    3,261 
Africa Joint Investment Fund   2010    1,469   8,109    9,320 
African Agriculture Fund LLC   2010    14,792   9,362    5,405 
African Infrastructure Investment Fund 2   2009    12,922   3,072    2,486 
AfricInvest Fund II LLC   2008    875   16,711    11,651 
Agri-Vie Fund PCC   2008    1,044   7,654    4,427 
Argan Infrastructure Fund   2010    9,300   3,054    1,053 
Atlantic Coast Regional Fund LLC   2008    37   7,855    10,173 
Aureos Africa Fund LLC   2007    2,790   17,192    16,251 
Carlyle Sub-Saharan Africa Fund   2012    26,673   1,895    3,767 
Catalyst Fund I LLC   2010    6,254   2,646    1,844 
Cauris Croissance II Fund   2012    2,092   2,133    944 
ECP Africa Fund I LLC   1998    77   941    2,275 
ECP Africa Fund II PCC   2005    6,615   23,740    24,081 
ECP Africa Fund III PCC   2008    10,894   27,656    21,879 
Eight Miles LLP   2012    9,981   1,663    103 
Evolution One Fund   2010    850   1,953    2,353 
GEF Africa Sustainable Forestry Fund   2011    2,046   9,942    9,896 
GroFin Africa Fund   2008    3,524   4,850    4,946 
Helios Investors II (Mauritius) Limited   2011    6,267   15,954    9,859 
I & P Afrique Entrepreneurs   2012    4,733   1,176    808 
Investment Fund for Health in Africa   2010    2,031   7,206    6,609 
Maghreb Private Equity Fund II (Mauritius) PCC   2008    760   19,490    16,243 
Maghreb Private Equity Fund III (Mauritius) PCC   2012    6,999   9,808    3,709 
New Africa Mining Fund II   2010    12,840   708    17 
Pan African Housing Fund   2013    4,356   27    - 
Pan African Infrastructure Development Fund   2007    6,328   23,907    17,021 
Pan-African Investment Partners II Limited   2008    715   5,246    7,615 
South Africa Infrastructure Fund   1996    727   23,444    31,963 
West Africa Emerging Market Fund   2011    4,274   1,718    1,311 
TOTAL FUNDS        176,200   285,184    245,167 
TOTAL DIRECT INVESTMENTS AND FUNDS        235,275   462,915    376,726 
GRAND TOTAL        235,275   525,013    438,555 

 

* Amounts fully disbursed, but the value is less than UA 100, at the current exchange rate.
**The cost of equity investments carried at fair value at December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 402.50 million (2012: UA 335.59 million).
 C: 
94
ANNLRPT95th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 95th
</PAGE>

Dividends earned on equity investments amounted to UA 7.06 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 (2012: 4.29 million).

 

NOTE K –  OTHER SECURITIES

 

The Bank may invest in certain debt instruments issued by entities in its Regional Member Countries (RMCs) for the purpose of financing development projects and programs. The Bank may also invest in other securities including trade financing that meet the development objectives of its borrower member countries.

 

These investments are classified as financial assets at amortized cost.

 

The carrying amount of “Other securities” at December 31, 2013 was UA 82.90 million (2012: UA 76.54 million).

 

NOTE L –  PROPERTY, EQUIPMENT AND INTANGIBLE ASSETS

 

(UA thousands)

                         Intangible  Grand 
           Property and Equipment         Assets  Total 
                            Property, 
           Building and   Furniture,   Equipment  Total     Equipment 
       Capital Work   Improve-   Fixtures &   & Motor  Property &  Computer  & Intangible 
2013  Land   in Progress   ments   Fittings   Vehicles  Equipment  Software  Assets 
Cost:                                     
Balance at January 1   480    11,341    22,753    13,282    58,170   106,026   20,835   126,861 
Additions during the year   -    11,687    103    1,032    3,167   15,989   963   16,952 
Disposals during the year   -    -    -    -    (53)  (53)  -   (53)
Balance at December 31   480    23,028    22,856    14,314    61,284   121,962   21,798   143,760 
                                      
Accumulated Depreciation:                                     
Balance at January 1   -    -    21,893    10,094    44,528   76,515   19,925   96,440 
Depreciation during the year   -    -    102    1,102    4,829   6,033   664   6,697 
Disposals during the year   -    -    -    -    (49)  (49)  -   (49)
Balance at December 31   -    -    21,995    11,196    49,308   82,499   20,589   103,088 
Net Book Values:
December 31, 2013
   480    23,028    861    3,118    11,976   39,463   1,209   40,672 
 C: 
95
ANNLRPT96th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 96th
</PAGE>

(UA thousands)

                         Intangible  Grand 
           Property and Equipment         Assets  Total 
                            Property, 
           Building and   Furniture,   Equipment  Total     Equipment 
       Capital Work   Improve-   Fixtures &   & Motor  Property &  Computer  & Intangible 
2012  Land   in Progress   ments   Fittings   Vehicles  Equipment  Software  Assets 
Cost:                                     
Balance at January 1   480    -    24,314    11,098    48,816   84,708   20,103   104,811 
Reclassification   -    2,000    (1,561)   -    (439)  -   -   - 
Additions during the year   -    9,341    -    2,242    10,072   21,655   732   22,387 
Disposals during the year   -         -    (58)   (279)  (337)  -   (337)
Balance at December 31   480    11,341    22,753    13,282    58,170   106,026   20,835   126,861 
                                      
Accumulated Depreciation:                                     
Balance at January 1   -    -    21,791    9,280    41,617   72,688   19,494   92,182 
Depreciation during the year   -    -    102    871    3,182   4,155   431   4,586 
Disposals during the year   -    -    -    (57)   (271)  (328)  -   (328)
Balance at December 31   -    -    21,893    10,094    44,528   76,515   19,925   96,440 
Net Book Values:
December 31, 2012
   480    11,341    860    3,188    13,642   29,511   910   30,421 

 

Under the Headquarters Agreement with Côte d’Ivoire, the Government granted to the Bank land for purposes of erecting a building to serve for the business of the Bank only. The Bank was given unlimited right of occupancy on this land, which remains the property of the Government. If the Bank transfers its headquarters from Côte d’Ivoire or otherwise gives up the use of the lands and buildings, these would have to be surrendered to the Host Country. The Government would then pay the Bank the value of the buildings as assessed at the time of the surrender. Therefore, the Bank cannot transfer the rights on the properties to a third party.

 

NOTE M –  BORROWINGS

 

As at December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Bank’s borrowings were as follows:

 

(UA millions)

   2013   2012 
Borrowings at fair value   12,127.91    12,175.96 
Borrowings at amortized cost   819.53    1,102.84 
Total   12,947.44    13,278.80 

 

The Bank’s borrowings as at December 31, 2013 included subordinated borrowings in the amount of UA 462.20 million (2012: UA 760.80 million).

 

The capital adequacy framework approved by the Board of Directors adopted the use of a single debt to usable capital ratio to monitor the Bank’s leverage. The ratio caps the Bank’s total outstanding debt at 100 percent of usable capital. Usable capital comprises the equity of the Bank and the callable capital of its non-borrowing members rated A- or better. The Bank’s usable capital at December 31, 2013 was UA 27.09 billion.

 C: 
96
ANNLRPT97th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 97th
</PAGE>

The Bank uses derivatives in its borrowing and liability management activities to take advantage of cost-saving opportunities and to lower its funding costs.

 

Certain long-term borrowing agreements contain provisions that allow redemption at the option of the holder at specified dates prior to maturity. Such borrowings are reflected in the tables on the maturity structure of borrowings using the put dates, rather than the contractual maturities. Management believes, however, that a portion of such borrowings may remain outstanding beyond their earliest indicated redemption dates.

 

The Bank has entered into cross-currency swap agreements with major international banks through which proceeds from borrowings are converted into a different currency and include a forward exchange contract providing for the future exchange of the two currencies in order to recover the currency converted. The Bank has also entered into interest rate swaps, which transform a floating rate payment obligation in a particular currency into a fixed rate payment obligation or vice-versa.

 

A summary of the Bank’s borrowings portfolio at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

Borrowings and Swaps at December 31, 2013

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

      Direct Borrowings   Currency Swap Agreements (a)   Interest Rate Swaps 
              Wgtd.   Wgtd.       Wgtd.       Notional   Wgtd.     
          Carried at   Avg.   Average   Amount   Avg.   Average   Amount   Avg.   Average 
      Carried at   Amortized   Cost (b)   Maturity   Payable/   Cost (b)   Maturity   Payable/   Cost (b)   Maturity 
Currency  Rate Type  Fair Value   Cost   (%)   (Years)   (Receivable)   (%)   (Years)   (Receivable)   (%)   (Years) 
Euro  Fixed   53.70    -    0.0    0.0    277.17    6.18    5.5    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (12.33)   2.60    0.6    -    -    - 
  Adjustable   -    -    -    -    5,970.20    0.13    4.4    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (277.45)   0.05    1.4    -    -    - 
Japanese Yen  Fixed   445.02    126.42    1.72    22.7    -    -    -    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (456.31)   0.91    31.1    -    -    - 
  Adjustable   425.43    11.10    3.74    4.0    -    -    -    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (403.92)   3.54    9.0    -    -    - 
US Dollar  Fixed   6,633.14    590,91    2.39    3.3    -    -    -    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (3,323.62)   2.00    3.4    (3,312.46)   2.00    3.0 
  Adjustable   686.90    -    0.66    0.9    2,837.85    0.09    7.9    3,595.86    0.40    2.9 
      -    -    -    -    (1,454.64)   0.11    3.4    (370.12)   0.93    1.2 
Others (d)  Fixed   3,812.68    89.04    3.28    4.6    5.68    3.92    1.5    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (3,635.13)   3.28    4.7    (638.06)   1.37    6.0 
  Adjustable   71.05    3.22    4.35    4.1    802.73    4.45    4.4    517.86    2.57    4.6 
      -    -    -    -    (312.06)   1.21    5.6    -    -    - 
Total  Fixed   10,944.54    806,37    2.65    4.6    282.85    6.13    6.4    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (7,427.39)   2.56    5.7    (3,950.52)   1.90    3.4 
  Adjustable   1,183.38    14.32    2.01    2.3    9,610.78    0.48    5.4    4,113.72    0.67    3.1 
      -    -    -    -    (2,488.07)   0.81    4.4    (370.12)   0.93    1.2 
Principal at face value   12,127.92    820.69    2.59    4.4    18.17    -    -    (206.92)   -    - 
                                                      
Net unamortized premium/(discount)   -    (1.16)   -    -    711.25    -    -    205.86    -    - 
       12,127.92    819.53    2.59    4.4    729.42    -    -    (1.06)   -    - 
                                                      
Fair valuation adjustment   -    -    -    -    (641.81)(c)   -    -    (127.94)(c)   -    - 
Total      12,127.92    819.53    2.59    4.4    87.61    -    -    (129.00)          

 

Supplementary disclosure (direct borrowings):

The notional amount of borrowings at December 31, 2013 was UA 13,320.27 million and the estimated fair value was UA 13,073.06 million.

 

a.Currency swap agreements include cross-currency interest rate swaps.
b.The average repricing period of the net currency obligations for adjustable rate borrowings was six months. The rates indicated are those prevailing at December 31, 2013.
c.These amounts are included in derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.
d.These amounts relate mainly to borrowings and derivatives in AUD, CHF, NZD, TRY and ZAR.

 

Slight differences may occur in totals due to rounding.

 C: 
97
ANNLRPT98th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 98th
</PAGE>

Borrowings and Swaps at December 31, 2012

 

(Amounts in UA millions)

      Direct Borrowings   Currency Swap Agreements (a)   Interest Rate Swaps 
              Wgtd.   Wgtd.       Wgtd.       Notional   Wgtd.     
          Carried at   Avg.   Average   Amount   Avg.   Average   Amount   Avg.   Average 
      Carried at   Amortized   Cost (b)   Maturity   Payable/   Cost (b)   Maturity   Payable/   Cost (b)   Maturity 
Currency  Rate Type  Fair Value   Cost   (%)   (Years)   (Receivable)   (%)   (Years)   (Receivable)   (%)   (Years) 
Euro  Fixed   -    -    -    -    146.37    8.71    6.8    -    -    - 
  Adjustable   -    -    -    -    4,545.59    0.48    2.5    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (265.90)   0.37    2.4    -    -    - 
Japanese Yen  Fixed   484.84    454.82    2.85    15.3    -    -    -    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (679.57)   1.63    23.8    -    -    - 
  Adjustable   587.73    13.53    2.26    3.8    -    -    -    68.41    0.01    0.4 
      -    -    -    -    (534.51)   2.08    13.3    (68.41)   1.53    0.4 
US Dollar  Fixed   5,984.53    592.09    2.91    3.3    -    -    -    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (2,179.19)   2.77    3.0    (2,912.64)   2.12    2.9 
  Adjustable   661.84    -    0.59    2.0    2,676.92    0.49    8.8    3,153.79    0.68    3.0 
      -    -    -    -    (1,279.63)   0.26    3.8    (318.82)   0.53    3.1 
Others (d)  Fixed   4,440.04    41.24    3.56    4.5    5.54    3.92    2.6    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (3,812.15)   3.36    4.5    (964.78)   2.93    5.5 
  Adjustable   16.98    3.03    9.55    3.6    782.03    4.22    3.4    792.28    2.08    4.6 
      -    -    -    -    (228.84)   1.07    6.1    -    -    - 
Total  Fixed   10,909.41    1,088.15    3.15    4.5    151.91    8.54    6.6    -    -    - 
      -    -    -    -    (6,670.91)   2.99    5.9    (3,877.42)   2.32    3.6 
  Adjustable   1,266.55    16.56    1.51    2.9    8,004.53    0.85    4.7    4,014.48    0.94    3.2 
      -    -    -    -    (2,308.88)   0.77    6.1    (387.23)   0.71    2.6 
Principal at face value   12,175.96    1,104.71    2.99    4.4    (823.35)   -    -    (250.17)   -    - 
                                                      
Net unamortized premium/(discount)   -    (1.87)   -    -    803.16    -    -    249.54    -    - 
       12,175.96    1,102.84    2.99    4.4    (20.19)   -    -    (0.63)   -    - 
                                                      
Fair valuation adjustment   -    -    -    -    (838.72)(c)   -    -    (251.70) (c)   -    - 
Total      12,175.96    1,102.84    2.99    4.4    (858.91)   -    -    (252.33)          

 

Supplementary disclosure (direct borrowings):

The notional amount of borrowings at December 31, 2012 was UA 13,367.67 million and the estimated fair value was UA 13,482.14 million.

 

a. Currency swap agreements include cross-currency interest rate swaps.
b. The average repricing period of the net currency obligations for adjustable rate borrowings was six months. The rates indicated are those prevailing at December 31, 2012.
c. These amounts are included in derivative assets and liabilities on the balance sheet.
d. These amounts relate mainly to borrowings and derivatives in AUD, CHF, NZD, TRY and ZAR.

 

Slight differences may occur in totals due to rounding.

 

The contractual (except for callable borrowings) maturity structure of outstanding borrowings as at December 31, 2013 was as follows:

 

i) Borrowings Carried at Fair Value

 

(UA millions)

Periods  Ordinary   Callable   Total 
One year or less   2,194.74    239.52    2,434.26 
More than one year but less than two years   744.42    23.55    767.97 
More than two years but less than three years   2,771.98    -    2,771.98 
More than three years but less than four years   1,286.24    -    1,286.24 
More than four years but less than five years   2,384.10    -    2,384.10 
More than five years   2,483.05    0.31    2,483.36 
Total   11,864.53    263.38    12,127.91 
 C: 
98
ANNLRPT99th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 99th
</PAGE>

ii) Borrowings Carried at Amortized Cost

 

(UA millions)      
Periods Ordinary Callable Total
One year or less 10.38 11.10 21.48
More than one year but less than two years 296.58 - 296.58
More than two years but less than three years 7.71 - 7.71
More than three years but less than four years - - -
More than four years but less than five years 28.27 - 28.27
More than five years 466.65 - 466.65
Subtotal 809.59 11.10 820.69
Net unamortized premium and discount (1.16) - (1.16)
Total 808.43 11.10 819.53

 

The contractual (except for callable borrowings) maturity structure of outstanding borrowings as at December 31, 2012 was as follows:

 

i) Borrowings Carried at Fair Value

 

(UA millions)       
Periods Ordinary Callable Total
One year or less 2,704.70 376.90 3,081.60
More than one year but less than two years 2,031.34 - 2,031.34
More than two years but less than three years 842.53 - 842.53
More than three years but less than four years 2,490.01 - 2,490.01
More than four years but less than five years 1,185.55 - 1,185.55
More than five years 2,544.56 0.37 2,544.93
Total 11,798.69 377.27 12,175.96

 

ii) Borrowings Carried at Amortized Cost

 

(UA millions)      
Periods Ordinary Callable Total
One year or less 314.97 13.53 328.50
More than one year but less than two years 15.62 - 15.62
More than two years but less than three years 260.26 - 260.26
More than three years but less than four years - - -
More than four years but less than five years - - -
More than five years 500.33 - 500.33
Subtotal 1,091.18 13.53 1,104.71
Net unamortized premium and discount (1.87) - (1.87)
Total 1,089.31 13.53 1,102.84

 

The fair value of borrowings carried at fair value through profit or loss at December 31, 2013 was UA 12,127.91 million (2012: UA 12,175.96 million). For these borrowings, the amount the Bank will be contractually required to pay at maturity at December 31, 2013 was UA 12,499.58 million (2012: UA 12,262.95 million). The surrender value of callable borrowings is equivalent to the notional amount plus accrued finance charges.

 C: 
99
ANNLRPT100th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 100th
</PAGE>

As per Note P, there was a net gain of UA 46.82 million on fair-valued borrowings and related derivatives for the year ended December 31, 2013 (2012: net loss of UA 30.45 million). The fair value gain attributable to changes in the Bank’s credit risk included in the other comprehensive income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was UA 46.08 million (2012: UA 79.98 million).

 

Fair value changes attributable to changes in the Bank’s credit risk are determined by comparing the discounted cash flows for the borrowings designated at fair value through profit or loss using the Bank’s credit spread on the relevant liquid markets for ADB quoted bonds versus LIBOR both at the beginning and end of the relevant period. The Bank’s credit spread was not applied for fair value changes on callable borrowings with less than one year call date.

 

For borrowings designated at fair value through profit or loss at December 31, 2013, the cumulative unrealized fair value losses to date were UA 611.04 million (2012: UA 935.04 million).

 

NOTE N – EQUITY

 

Equity is composed of capital and reserves. These are further detailed as follows:

 

Capital

Capital includes subscriptions paid-in by member countries and cumulative exchange adjustments on subscriptions (CEAS). The Bank is not exposed to any externally imposed capital requirements.

 

Subscriptions Paid In

Subscriptions to the capital stock of the Bank are made up of the subscription to the initial capital, a voluntary capital increase and the six General Capital Increases (GCI) made so far. The Fifth General Capital Increase (GCI-V) was approved by the Board of Governors of the Bank on May 29, 1998 and became effective on September 30, 1999 upon ratification by member states and entry into force of the related amendments to the Agreements establishing the Bank. The GCI-V increased the authorised capital of the Bank by 35 percent from 1.62 million shares to 2.187 million shares with a par value of UA 10,000 per share. The GCI-V shares, a total of 567,000 shares, are divided into paid-up and callable shares in proportion of six per-cent (6%) paid-up and ninety-four percent (94%) callable. The GCI-V shares were allocated to the regional and non-regional members such that, when fully subscribed, the regional members shall hold 60 percent of the total stock of the Bank and non-regional members shall hold the balance of 40 percent.

 

Prior to the GCI-V, subscribed capital was divided into paid-up capital and callable capital in the proportion of 1 to 7. With the GCI-V, the authorised capital stock of the Bank consists of 10.81 percent paid-up shares and 89.19 percent callable shares.

 

Prior to the sixth General Capital Increase (GCI-VI) and by its resolutions B/BG/2008/07 and B/BG/2009/05, the Board of Governors authorised two capital increases bringing the Authorised Capital of the Bank from UA 21,870 million to UA 22,120 million to allow the Republic of Turkey and the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg to become members of the Bank. The membership of these two countries will become effective upon completion of the formalities specified in the Agreement establishing the Bank and in the General Rules Governing Admission of Non-Regional Countries to Membership of the Bank. On October 29, 2013, the Republic of Turkey was formally admitted as the 78th member country of the Bank. As at December 31, 2013, such formalities had not been completed by the Grand Duchy of Luxembourg.

 

In 2009, the Board of Directors endorsed a proposal made by Canada and Republic of Korea offering to subscribe, temporarily, to additional non-voting callable capital of the Bank in the amounts of UA 1.63 billion and UA 0.19 billion, respectively. This proposal was adopted by the Board of Governors on February 22, 2010. Accordingly, the authorised capital stock of the Bank increased from UA 22,120 million to UA 23,947 million by the creation of additional 182,710 non-voting shares. These non-voting callable shares were to be absorbed by the subscriptions of Canada and the Republic of Korea to GCI-VI when they become effective.

 C: 
100
ANNLRPT101st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 101st
</PAGE>

The GCI-VI was approved by the Board of Governors of the Bank on May 27, 2010. GCI-VI increased the authorised capital stock of the Bank from UA 23,947 million to UA 67,687 million with the creation of 4,374,000 new shares. The new shares created are to be allocated to the regional and non-regional groups in such proportions that, when fully subscribed, the regional group shall hold 60 percent of the total capital stock of the Bank, and the non-regional group 40 percent. The new shares and the previous ones described above shall be divided into paid-up and callable shares in the proportion of 6 per-cent paid-up shares and 94 percent callable shares.

 

Upon conclusion of the GCI VI capital increase and following the Board of Governors’ resolutions, the temporary non-voting callable shares of Canada and Korea described above were effectively retired in 2011 and 2012, respectively thereby reducing the authorised capital of the Bank for each of these periods by 163,296 and 19,414.

 

Following its Resolution B/BG/2012/04 of May 31, 2012, the Board of Governors authorised a Special Capital Increase of the authorised share capital of the Bank to allow for: (i) subscription by a new regional member country (the Republic of South Sudan) of the minimum number of shares required for it to become a member; and (ii) the resulting subscription by non-regional members of the number of shares necessary to comply with the 60/40 ratio requirement between the shareholding of regional and non-regional members. Accordingly, the Board of Governors, decided to increase the authorised capital of the Bank by the creation of 111,469 new shares, out of which 66,881 shall be available for subscription by the Republic of South Sudan, and 44,588, shall be available for subscription by non-regional members. The additional shares are subject to the same terms and conditions as the shares authorised in the GCI-VI. The membership of the Republic of South Sudan shall become effective upon completion of the formalities specified in the Agreement establishing the Bank and in the General Rules Governing Admission of Regional Countries to Membership of the Bank. As at December 31, 2013, such formalities had not been completed.

 

The Bank’s capital as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
2013 2012
Capital Authorised (in shares of UA 10,000 each) 66,975,050 66,975,050
Less: Unsubscribed (1,764,919) (1,760,009)
Subscribed Capital 65,210,131 65,215,041
Less: Callable Capital (60,247,795) (60,252,358)
Paid-up Capital 4,962,336 4,962,683
Shares to be issued upon payment of future installments (1,815,390) (2,123,360)
Add: Amounts paid in advance 359 405
  3,147,305 2,839,728
Less: Amounts in arrears (221) (253)
Capital at December 31 3,147,084 2,839,475

 

Included in the total unsubscribed shares of UA 1,764.92 million at December 31, 2013 was an amount of UA 38.83 million representing the balance of the shareholding of the former Socialist Federal Republic of Yugoslavia (former Yugoslavia).

 

Since the former Yugoslavia has ceased to exist as a state under international law, its shares (composed of UA 38.83 million callable, and UA 4.86 million paid-up shares) have been held by the Bank in accordance with Article 6 (6) of the Bank Agreement. In 2002, the Board of Directors of the Bank approved the proposal to invite each of the successor states of the former Yugoslavia to apply for membership in the Bank, though such membership would be subject to their fulfilling certain conditions including the assumption pro-rata of the contingent liabilities of the former Yugoslavia to the Bank, as of December 31, 1992. In the event that a successor state declines or otherwise does not become a member of the Bank, the pro-rata portion of the shares of former Yugoslavia, which could have been reallocated to such successor state, would be reallocated to other interested non-regional members of the Bank in accordance with the terms of the Share Transfer Rules. The proceeds of such reallocation will however be transferable to such successor state. Furthermore, pending the response from the successor states, the Bank may, under its Share Transfer Rules, reallocate the shares of former Yugoslavia to interested non-regional member states and credit the proceeds on a pro-rata basis to the successor states. In 2003, one of the successor states declined the invitation to apply for membership and instead offered to the Bank, as part of the state’s Official Development Assistance its pro-rata interest in the proceeds of any reallocation of the shares of former Yugoslavia. The Bank accepted the offer.

 

Subscriptions by member countries and their voting power at December 31, 2013 were as follows:

 C: 
101
ANNLRPT102nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 102nd
</PAGE>
(Amounts in UA thousands)            
    Total % of Total Amount Callable Number % of Total
  Member States Shares Shares Paid Capital of Votes Voting Power
1 Algeria 268,126 4.229 124,745 2,556,520 268,751 4.207
2 Angola 73,933 1.166 35,918 703,412 74,558 1.167
3 Benin 12,361 0.195 6,085 117,533 12,986 0.203
4 Botswana 69,102 1.090 58,179 632,845 69,727 1.092
5 Burkina Faso 27,012 0.426 12,784 257,345 27,637 0.433
6 Burundi 15,066 0.238 8,031 142,626 15,691 0.246
7 Cabo Verde 4,869 0.077 2,593 46,100 5,494 0.086
8 Cameroon 69,113 1.090 30,641 660,281 69,561 1.089
9 Central African Republic 2,833 0.045 1,510 26,822 3,458 0.054
10 Chad 4,762 0.075 2,380 45,250 5,387 0.084
11 Comoros 541 0.009 596 4,826 1,166 0.018
12 Congo 28,660 0.452 13,567 273,050 29,285 0.458
13 Côte d’Ivoire 235,110 3.709 117,482 2,233,620 235,735 3.690
14 Democratic Republic of Congo 64,962 1.025 34,496 615,125 65,587 1.027
15 Djibouti 1,213 0.019 1,517 10,618 1,838 0.029
16 Egypt 342,666 5.405 163,178 3,263,490 343,291 5.374
17 Equatorial Guinea 10,140 0.160 5,350 96,057 10,765 0.169
18 Eritrea 2,003 0.032 2,506 17,522 2,628 0.041
19 Ethiopia 100,937 1.592 46,433 962,940 101,562 1.590
20 Gabon 76,128 1.201 40,537 720,758 76,753 1.202
21 Gambia 9,696 0.153 4,560 92,413 10,321 0.162
22 Ghana 144,264 2.276 65,329 1,377,321 144,889 2.268
23 Guinea 25,741 0.406 12,451 244,961 26,366 0.413
24 Guinea Bissau 1,641 0.026 810 15,600 2,266 0.035
25 Kenya 90,890 1.434 41,655 867,250 91,515 1.433
26 Lesotho 3,666 0.058 3,916 32,760 4,291 0.067
27 Liberia 12,318 0.194 6,557 116,637 12,943 0.203
28 Libya 257,215 4.057 120,463 2,451,688 257,800 4.036
29 Madagascar 41,103 0.648 18,918 392,120 41,728 0.653
30 Malawi 17,780 0.280 9,387 168,420 18,405 0.288
31 Mali 27,673 0.437 12,847 263,881 28,298 0.443
32 Mauritania 3,698 0.058 4,067 32,916 4,323 0.068
33 Mauritius 41,581 0.656 25,582 390,230 42,206 0.661
34 Morocco 222,615 3.512 117,169 2,108,990 223,240 3.495
35 Mozambique 39,953 0.630 18,393 381,158 40,578 0.635
36 Namibia 21,653 0.342 11,734 204,800 22,278 0.349
37 Niger 16,037 0.253 8,014 152,363 16,662 0.261
38 Nigeria 592,080 9.340 284,979 5,635,853 592,705 9.278
39 Rwanda 8,422 0.133 3,914 80,303 9,047 0.142
40 Săo Tomé & Príncipe 4,320 0.068 2,162 41,054 4,945 0.077
41 Senegal 66,841 1.054 30,175 638,241 67,466 1.056
42 Seychelles 1,813 0.029 1,640 16,499 2,438 0.038
43 Sierra Leone 15,376 0.243 7,685 146,081 16,001 0.250
44 Somalia 1,941 0.031 2,427 16,986 2,566 0.040
45 South Africa 306,882 4.841 119,558 2,949,270 307,507 4.814
46 Sudan 24,167 0.381 12,758 228,907 24,792 0.388
47 Swaziland 7,251 0.114 8,230 64,280 7,876 0.123
48 Tanzania 49,047 0.774 24,271 466,217 49,672 0.778
49 Togo 10,018 0.158 5,006 95,171 10,644 0.167
50 Tunisia 89,258 1.408 48,321 844,260 89,844 1.406
51 Uganda 31,957 0.504 15,536 304,047 32,582 0.510
52 Zambia 79,704 1.257 37,074 759,945 80,329 1.257
53 Zimbabwe 130,685 2.061 63,111 1,243,748 131,310 2.056
  Total Regionals 3,806,823 60.050 1,857,224 36,211,106 3,839,690 60.108

 

Slight differences may occur in totals due to rounding.

 C: 
102
ANNLRPT103rd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 103rd
</PAGE>
(Amounts in UA thousands)            
    Total % of Total Amount Callable Number % of Total
  Member States Shares Shares Paid Capital of Votes Voting Power
  Total Regionals 3,806,823 60.050 1,857,224 36,211,106 3,839,690 60.108
54 Argentina 5,847 0.092 6,108 52,364 6,472 0.101
55 Austria 28,476 0.449 14,108 270,660 29,101 0.456
56 Belgium 40,736 0.643 18,185 389,180 41,361 0.647
57 Brazil 28,230 0.445 12,615 269,696 28,856 0.452
58 Canada 243,449 3.840 157,930 2,276,560 244,074 3.821
59 China 71,286 1.124 35,314 677,550 71,911 1.126
60 Denmark 75,591 1.192 54,179 701,740 76,216 1.193
61 Finland 31,175 0.492 15,444 296,310 31,800 0.498
62 France 239,521 3.778 118,654 2,276,560 240,146 3.759
63 Germany 261,589 4.126 116,750 2,499,140 262,214 4.105
64 India 14,256 0.225 7,068 135,500 14,881 0.233
65 Italy 154,435 2.436 76,504 1,467,850 155,060 2.427
66 Japan 350,270 5.525 173,520 3,329,180 350,895 5.493
67 Korea 28,476 0.449 14,108 270,660 29,101 0.456
68 Kuwait 9,707 0.153 9,720 87,350 10,332 0.162
69 Netherlands 54,763 0.864 26,668 520,970 55,388 0.867
70 Norway 73,831 1.165 36,578 701,740 74,456 1.166
71 Portugal 15,264 0.241 6,895 145,750 15,889 0.249
72 Saudi Arabia 12,293 0.194 5,490 117,440 12,918 0.202
73 Spain 69,183 1.091 48,393 643,440 69,808 1.093
74 Sweden 98,545 1.554 48,814 936,640 99,170 1.552
75 Switzerland 93,528 1.475 46,331 888,950 94,153 1.474
76 Turkey 6,422 0.101 509 63,720 7,047 0.110
77 United Kingdom 107,234 1.692 53,123 1,019,220 107,859 1.688
78 United States of America 418,537 6.602 186,856 3,998,519 419,162 6.562
  Total Non Regionals 2,532,643 39.950 1,289,860 24,036,689 2,548,270 39.892
  Grand Total 6,339,466 100.000 3,147,084 60,247,795 6,387,960 100.000

 

The subscription position including the distribution of voting rights at December 31, 2013 reflects the differences in the timing of subscription payments by member countries during the allowed subscription payment period for GCI-VI. After the shares have been fully subscribed, the regional and non- regional groups are expected to hold 60 percent and 40 percent voting rights, respectively.

 

Slight differences may occur in totals due to rounding.

 

Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions (CEAS)

Prior to the fourth General Capital Increase (GCI-IV), payments on the share capital subscribed by the non-Regional Member Countries were fixed in terms of their national currencies. Under GCI-IV, and subsequent capital increases payments by regional and non-regional members in US dollars were fixed at an exchange rate of 1 UA = US$ 1.20635. This rate represented the value of the US Dollar to the SDR immediately before the introduction of the basket method of valuing the SDR on July 1, 1974 (1974 SDR). As a result of these practices, losses or gains could arise from converting these currencies to UA when received. Such conversion differences are reported in the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions account.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Cumulative Exchange Adjustment on Subscriptions was as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
  2013 2012
Balance at January 1 166,825 160,633
Net conversion losses on new subscriptions 5,829 6,192
Balance at December 31 172,654 166,825

 

Reserves

Reserves consist of retained earnings, fair value gains/losses on investments designated at fair value through other comprehensive income, gains/losses on fair-valued borrowings arising from “own credit”, and remeasurements of defined benefit liability.

 C: 
103
ANNLRPT104th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 104th
</PAGE>

Retained Earnings

Retained earnings included the net income for the period, after taking into account transfers approved by the Board of Governors, and net charges recognized directly in equity. Retained earnings also included the transition adjustments resulting from the adoption of new or revised financial reporting standards, where applicable.

 

The movements in retained earnings during 2012 and 2013 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)  
Balance at January 1, 2012 2,803,296
Net income for the current year 85,713
Net gains recognized directly in equity 2,905
Balance at December 31, 2012 2,891,914
   
Net income for the current year 72,829
Net gains recognized directly in equity -
Balance at December 31, 2013 2,964,743

 

During the year, the Board of Governors approved the distribution of UA 107.50 million (2012: UA 110 million) from income and the surplus account to certain entities for development purposes.

 

With effect from 2006, Board of Governors’ approved distributions to entities for development purposes are reported as expenses in the Income Statement in the year such distributions are approved.

 

The movement in the surplus account during 2012 and 2013 is as follows:

 

(UA thousands)  
Balance at January 1, 2012 42,292
Distribution to Middle Income Country Technical Assistance Fund (2,000)
Distribution to Special Relief Fund (5,000)
Balance at December 31, 2012 35,292
   
Allocation from 2012 net income 8,150
Distribution to Special Relief Fund (10,000)
Balance at December 31, 2013 33,442

 

Distributions to entities for development purposes, including those made from the surplus account, for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
2013 2012
African Development Fund (ADF) 35,000 35,000
Post Conflict Assistance – DRC 62,500 68,000
Middle Income Country Technical Assistance Fund - 2,000
Special Relief Fund 10,000 5,000
Total 107,500 110,000
 C: 
104
ANNLRPT105th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 105th
</PAGE>
NOTE O – INCOME FROM LOANS AND INVESTMENTS AND RELATED DERIVATIVES

 

Income from Loans

Income from loans for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
  2013 2012
Interest income on loans not impaired 302,533 316,762
Interest income on impaired loans 22,832 22,784
Commitment charges 9,371 11,319
Statutory commission 276 299
Total 335,012 351,164

 

Income from Investments and Related Derivatives

Income from investments for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
2013 2012
Interest income 171,756 205,385
Realized fair value losses on fair value investments (17,220) (18,535)
Unrealized fair value (losses)/gains on fair value investments (23,294) 12,495
Total 131,242 199,345

 

Total interest income on investments at amortized cost for the year ended December 31, 2013 was UA 102.61 million (2012: UA 112.89 million). Certain financial assets measured at amortized cost with nominal value of UA 32.53 million were sold during the year for UA 27.73 million. The loss on sale of these investments of UA 4.80 million was absorbed by the reversal of prior years’ impairment provision of UA 9.19 million. The sale was made due to significant deterioration in the credit risk of such assets. Such sales are permissible within the business model of the Bank.

 

NOTE P – BORROWING EXPENSES

 

Interest and Amortized Issuance Costs

Interest and amortized issuance costs on borrowings for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
2013 2012
Charges to bond issuers 308,602 358,382
Amortization of issuance costs (5,610) (1,972)
Total 302,992 356,410
     

 

Total interest expense for financial liabilities not at fair value through profit or loss for the year ended December 31, 2013 was UA 101.06 million (2012: UA 93.98 million).

 C: 
105
ANNLRPT106th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 106th
</PAGE>

Net Interest on Borrowing-Related Derivatives

Net interest on borrowing-related derivatives for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
  2013 2012
Interest on derivatives payable 160,770 202,324
Interest on derivatives receivable (272,620) (341,480)
Total (111,850) (139,156)

 

Unrealized Gains/Losses on Borrowings, Related Derivatives and Others

Unrealized gains/losses on borrowings, related derivatives and others for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
  2013 2012
Unrealized gains/(losses) on fair-valued borrowings and related derivatives 46,824 (30,454)
Unrealized (losses)/gains on derivatives on non-fair valued borrowings and others (12,716) 20,282
Total 34,108 (10,172)

 

Fair value gain attributable to changes in the Bank’s “own credit” for the year ended December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 46.08 million (2012: UA 79.98 million) and was included in the other comprehensive income.

 

The net unrealized loss on derivatives on non-fair-valued borrowings and others for the year ended December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 12.72 million (2012: gain of UA 20.28 million). This included the income statement effects of the hedge accounting, consisting of unrealized loss of UA 1.82 million, representing hedge ineffectiveness and UA 5.19 million of amortization of fair value adjustments on the hedged risk (See Note G).

 

NOTE Q – ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES

 

Total administrative expenses relate to expenses incurred for the operations of the Bank and those incurred on behalf of the ADF and the NTF. The ADF and NTF reimburse the Bank for their share of the total administrative expenses, based on an agreed-upon cost-sharing formula, which is driven by certain selected indicators of operational activity for operational expenses and relative balance sheet size for non-operational expenses. However, the expenses allocated to the NTF shall not exceed 20 percent of the NTF’s gross income.

 

Administrative expenses comprised the following:

 

(UA thousands)    
  Restated
  2013 2012
Manpower expenses 261,219 223,111
Other general expenses 76,021 70,241
Total 337,240 293,352
     
Reimbursable by ADF (225,874) (185,270)
Reimbursable by NTF (397) (536)
Net 110,969 107,546

 

Included in general administrative expenses is an amount of UA 10.11 million (2012: UA 7.75 million) incurred under operating lease agreements for offices in Tunisia and in certain other member countries, where the Bank has offices.

 C: 
106
ANNLRPT107th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 107th
</PAGE>

At the balance sheet date, the Bank had outstanding commitments under operating leases which fall due as follows:

 

(UA thousands)    
  2013 2012
Within one year 8,551 8,390
In the second to fifth years inclusive 8,048 13,134
Total 16,599 21,524

 

Leases are generally negotiated for an average term of one (1) to five (5) years and rentals are fixed for an average of one (1) year. Leases may be extended for periods that are not longer than the original term of the leases.

 

NOTE R – EMPLOYEE BENEFITS

 

Staff Retirement Plan

The Staff Retirement Plan (SRP), a defined benefit plan established under Board of Governors’ Resolution 05-89 of May 30, 1989, became effective on December 31, 1989, following the termination of the Staff Provident Fund. Every person employed by the Bank on a full-time basis, as defined in the Bank’s employment policies, is eligible to participate in the SRP, upon completion of 6 months service without interruption of more than 30 days.

 

The SRP is administered as a separate fund by a committee of trustees appointed by the Bank on behalf of its employees. In November 2004, the Board of Directors of the Bank approved certain revisions to the SRP, including simplification of the calculation of the employee contribution rate, more explicit reference to the Bank’s residual responsibility and rights as the SRP sponsor, changes in survivor child benefits and an increase in the pension accumulation rate from 2 percent to 2.5 percent for each year of service. Also, new members from the Field Offices of the Bank joined the Plan in 2007. Accordingly the associated past service costs associated with these changes were reported in the financial statements of respective years.

 

In 2008, the early retirement provisions and the death benefits to spouses were modified, resulting in a net negative prior service cost of UA 8.12 million, which was immediately recognized. Under the revised SRP, employees contribute at a rate of 9 percent of regular salary. A tax factor included in the basis for the determination of contribution in the previous SRP has been eliminated. The Bank typically contributes twice the employee contribution, but may vary such contribution based on the results of annual actuarial valuations.

 

In 2011, the Board of Directors approved the extension of the mandatory staff retirement age in the Bank from 60 to 62 years effective January 1, 2012. Participants of the Plan as of May 11, 2011 were given up to December 31, 2012 to make the election on either to retire at 60 years with no penalty for early retirement or accept the extension and retire at age 62. The option to retire at age 60 is not available to staff joining the Bank from January 1, 2012, the date of effectiveness of the change. Most of the existing participants opted for the revised retirement age. The impact of the change on the actuarial valuation of SRP was a curtailment of UA 10.90 million and was reported in the financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

All contributions to the SRP are irrevocable and are held by the Bank separately in a retirement fund to be used in accordance with the provisions of the SRP. Neither the contributions nor any income thereon shall be used for or diverted to purposes other than the exclusive benefit of active and retired participants or their beneficiaries or estates, or for the satisfaction of the SRP’s liabilities. At December 31, 2013, virtually all of the SRP’s investments were under external management and these were invested in indexed funds, with the following objectives: a) Equity portfolio – to track as closely as possible, the returns of the Morgan Stanley Capital International World Index as well as hedging the currency exposure of the SRP’s anticipated future liabilities; b) Bond portfolio – to track as closely as possible, the returns of the Citigroup World Government Bond Index as well as hedge the currency exposure of the SRP’s anticipated future liabilities.

 C: 
107
ANNLRPT108th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 108th
</PAGE>

Post-Employment Medical Benefit Plan

The Medical Benefit Plan (MBP) was created under the Board of Directors’ resolution B/BD/2002/17 and F/BD/2002/18 of July 17, 2002 and became effective on January 1, 2003. Under the MBP, all plan members including existing staff or retirees contribute a percentage of their salary or pension while the Bank typically contributes twice the employee contribution, but may vary such contribution based on the results of annual actuarial valuations.

 

Contribution rates by staff members and retirees are based on marital status and number of eligible children. An MBP board, composed of selected officers of the Bank and representatives of retirees and the staff association, oversees the management and activities of the MBP. The contributions from the Bank, staff and retirees are deposited in a trust account. In accordance with the directive establishing the Plan, all Plan members including staff and retirees are eligible as beneficiaries for making claims for medical services provided to them and their recognized dependents.

 

The pension and post-employment medical benefit expenses for 2013 and 2012 for the Bank, the ADF and the NTF combined (the Bank Group) comprised the following:

 

(UA millions)    
  Staff Retirement Plan Medical Benefit Plan
    Restated   Restated
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Current service cost – gross 43.85 32.58 15.47 10.81
Less: estimated employee contributions (9.35) (8.76) (2.33) (2.12)
Net current service cost 34.50 23.82 13.14 8.69
Interest cost 19.31 18.32 5.38 4.22
Expected return on plan assets (15.36) (16.83) - -
Expense for the year 38.45 25.31 18.52 12.91

 

At December 31, 2013, the Bank had a liability to the SRP amounting to UA 96.30 million (2012: UA 107.29 million) while the Bank’s liability to the post-employment aspect of the MBP amounted to UA 130.80 million (2012: UA 133 million).

 C: 
108
ANNLRPT109th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 109th
</PAGE>

At December 31, 2013 and 2012 the determination of these liabilities, which are included in “Other accounts payable” on the Balance Sheet is set out below:

 

(UA millions)

  Staff Retirement Plan Medical Benefit Plan
    Restated   Restated
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Fair value of plan assets:        
Market value of plan assets at beginning of year 415.84 364.94 25.85 22.14
Actual return on assets 22.03 36.01 0.30 0.43
Employer’s contribution 19.42 17.51 4.67 4.23
Plan participants’ contribution during the year 9.71 8.76 2.34 2.12
Benefits paid (12.99) (11.38) (2.36) (3.07)
Market value of plan assets at end of year 454.01 415.84 30.80 25.85
         
Present value of defined benefit obligation:        
Benefit obligation at beginning of year 523.13 411.00 158.85 110.15
Current service cost 34.50 23.82 13.14 8.68
Employee contributions 9.71 8.76 2.33 2.12
Interest cost 19.31 18.32 6.23 5.32
Actuarial (gain)/loss (23.35) 72.61 (16.59) 35.65
Benefits paid (12.99) (11.38) (2.36) (3.07)
Benefit obligation at end of year 550.31 523.13 161.60 158.85
         
Funded status:        
Liability recognized on the balance sheet at December 31,
representing excess of benefit over plan asset
(96.30) (107.29) (130.80) (133.00)

 

There were no unrecognized past service costs at December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2013, the cumulative net actuarial losses recognized directly in equity through other comprehensive income for the SRP were UA 166.61 million (2012: losses of UA 196.64 million). The cumulative net actuarial losses recognized directly in equity through other comprehensive income for MBP were UA 46.53 million (2012: losses of UA 62.41 million).

 

The following summarizes the funding status of the SRP at the end of the last five fiscal years:

 

(UA millions)

    Restated      
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Staff Retirement Plan:          
Fair value of Plan assets 454.01 415.84 364.94 345.40 302.25
Present value of defined benefit obligation (550.31) (523.13) (411.01) (338.25) (304.68)
(Deficit)/Excess funding (96.30) (107.29) (46.07) 7.15 (2.43)
           
Experience adjustments on plan assets (26.37) (33.05) (48.95) (41.48) (47.40)
Experience adjustments on plan liabilities (140.24) (163.59) (90.98) (35.84) (28.38)
Net (166.61) (196.64) (139.93) (77.32) (75.78)
 C: 
109
ANNLRPT110th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 110th
</PAGE>

The funding status of the Medical Benefit Plan at the end of the last five fiscal years was as follows:

 

(UA millions)

    Restated      
  2013 2012 2011 2010 2009
Medical Benefit Plan:          
Fair value of Plan assets 30.81 25.85 22.14 18.67 15.67
Present value of defined benefit obligation (161.60) (158.85) (110.15) (74.22) (67.08)
Deficit funding (130.79) (133.00) (88.01) (55.55) (51.41)
           
Experience adjustments on plan assets (2.89) (2.18) (1.90) (1.22) (0.43)
Experience adjustments on plan liabilities (43.64) (60.23) (24.59) 2.05 0.30
Net (46.53) (62.41) (26.49) 0.83 (0.13)

 

Assumptions used in the latest available actuarial valuations at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(Percentages)

  Staff Retirement Plan Medical Benefit Plan
    Restated   Restated
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Discount rate 4.12 3.63 4.12 3.63
Rate of salary increase 3.80 3.73 3.80 3.73
Future pension increase 2.30 2.23    
Health care cost growth rate        
– at end of fiscal year     6.00 6.00
– ultimate health care cost growth rate     5.00 5.00
Year ultimate health cost growth rate reached     2014 2014

 

The SRP mortality assumptions are based on the Self-Administered Pension Schemes 2008 (SAPS08) tables, specifically referenced from the experience of United Kingdom self-administered pension schemes. Similarly, the MBP mortality assumptions are also based on the Self-Administered Pension Schemes (SAPS) tables, specifically referenced from the experience of United Kingdom occupational schemes. These SAPS tables assume normal health participants, and have been updated using Continuous Mortality Investigations (CMI) 2009 projections to factor in future longevity improvements.

 

The expected return on plan assets is an average of the expected long-term (10 years or more) returns for debt securities and equity securities, weighted by the portfolio allocation. Asset class returns are developed based on historical returns as well as forward-looking expectations. Equity return expectations are generally based upon the sum of expected inflation, expected real earnings growth and expected long-term dividend yield. Bond return expectations are based upon the sum of expected inflation, real bond yield, and risk premium. The discount rate used in determining the benefit obligation is selected by reference to the long-term year-end rates on AAA corporate bonds.

 

The medical cost inflation assumption is the rate of increase in the cost of providing medical benefits. This is influenced by a wide variety of factors, such as economic trends, medical developments, and patient utilization. For the purposes of these calculations, the initial medical cost inflation rate was assumed at 6 percent per annum between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013, thereafter a constant rate of 5 percent per annum will be used.

 

The Bank’s obligation and costs for post-retirement medical benefits are highly sensitive to assumptions regarding medical cost inflation.

 

The average duration of SRP and MBP is 16.5 years and 22 years respectively.

 C: 
110
ANNLRPT111th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 111th
</PAGE>

The following table shows projected benefit cash flow outgo:

 

(UA millions)

            2019
  2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 to 2023
Cash flow for MBP 2.50 2.60 2.80 2.90 3.00 17.60
Cash flow for SRP 13.94 17.17 19.20 22.11 24.69 157.96

 

The following table shows the effects of a one percentage point change in the assumed health care cost growth rate:

 

(UA thousands)

  1% Increase 1% Decrease
    Restated   Restated
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Effect on total service and interest cost 6,169 4,112 (4,498) (3,029)
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation 40,874 43,179 (31,607) (32,994)

 

The following table shows the effect of a one percent point change in the discount rate for the SRP:

 

(UA thousands)

  1% Increase 1% Decrease
  2013 2012 2013 2012
Effect on total service and interest cost 7,121 7,872 (8,741) (9,775)
Effect on post-retirement benefit obligation 79,735 80,818 (94,219) (96,592)

 

No SRP assets are invested in any of the Bank’s own financial instruments, nor any property occupied by, or other assets used by the Bank. All investments are held in active markets.

 

The following table presents the weighted-average asset allocation at December 31, 2013 and 2012 for the Staff Retirement Plan:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Debt securities 202,152 177,801
Equity securities 166,255 135,502
Property 68,362 63,393
Others - 36,408
Total 436,769 413,104

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the assets of the MBP were invested primarily in short-term deposits and bonds.

 

The Bank’s estimate of contributions it expects to make to the SRP and the MBP for the year ending December 31, 2014, are UA 35.27 million and UA 21.40 million, respectively.

 C: 
111
ANNLRPT112th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 112th
</PAGE>
NOTE S –  RELATED PARTIES

 

The following related parties have been identified:

 

The Bank makes or guarantees loans to some of its members who are also its shareholders, and borrows funds from the capital markets in the territories of some of its shareholders. As a multilateral development institution with membership comprising 53 African states and 25 non-African states (the “regional members” and “non-regional members”, respectively), subscriptions to the capital of the Bank are made by all its members. All the powers of the Bank are vested in the Board of Governors, which consists of the Governors appointed by each member of the Bank, who exercise the voting power of the appointing member country. Member country subscriptions and voting powers are disclosed in Note N. The Board of Directors, which is composed of twenty (20) Directors elected by the member countries, is responsible for the conduct of the general operations of the Bank, and for this purpose, exercises all the powers delegated to it by the Board of Governors. The Bank also makes or guarantees loans to certain of the agencies of its Regional Member Countries and to public and private enterprises operating within such countries. Such loans are approved by the Board of Directors.

 

In addition to its ordinary resources, the Bank administers the resources of other entities under special arrangements. In this regard, the Bank administers the resources of the ADF. Furthermore, the Bank administers various special funds and trust funds, which have purposes that are consistent with its objectives of promoting the economic development and social progress of its Regional Member Countries. In this connection, the Bank administers the NTF as well as certain multilateral and bilateral donor funds created in the form of grants.

 

The ADF was established pursuant to an agreement between the Bank and certain countries. The general operation of the ADF is conducted by a 14-member Board of Directors of which 7 members are selected by the Bank. The Bank exercises 50 percent of the voting power in the ADF and the President of the Bank is the ex-officio President of the Fund. To carry out its functions, the ADF utilizes the officers, staff, organization, services and facilities of the Bank, for which it reimburses the Bank based on an agreed cost-sharing formula, driven in large part by the number of programs and projects executed during the year.

 

The Bank’s investment in the ADF is included in Equity Participations and disclosed in Note J. In addition to the amount reported as equity participation, the Bank periodically makes allocations from its income to the Fund, to further its objectives. Net income allocations by the Bank to ADF are reported as Other Resources in the Fund’s financial statements. Net income allocation to the Fund in 2013 amounted to UA 35 million (2012: UA 35 million).

 

The NTF is a special fund administered by the Bank with resources contributed by Nigeria. The ADB Board of Directors conducts the general operations of NTF on the basis of the terms of the NTF Agreement and in this regard, the Bank consults with the Government of Nigeria. The NTF also utilizes the offices, staff, organization, services and facilities of the Bank for which it reimburses to the Bank its share of administrative expenses for such utilization. The share of administrative expenses reimbursed to the Bank by both the ADF and NTF is disclosed in Note Q.

 

Grant resources administered by the Bank on behalf of other donors, including its member countries, agencies and other entities are generally restricted for specific uses, which include the co-financing of Bank’s lending projects, debt reduction operations and technical assistance for borrowers including feasibility studies. Details of the outstanding balance on such grant funds at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are disclosed in Note V-5.

 

The Bank charges fees for managing some of these funds. Management fees received by the Bank for the year ended December 31, 2013 amounted to UA 2.05 million (2012: UA 1.78 million).

 

The Bank also administers the SRP and MBP. The activities of the SRP and MBP are disclosed in Note R.

 C: 
112
ANNLRPT113th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 113th
</PAGE>

Management Personnel Compensation

Compensation paid to the Bank’s management personnel and executive directors during the years ended December 31, 2013, and 2012 was made up as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Salaries 20,203 18,973
Termination and other benefits 8,310 7,205
Contribution to retirement and medical plan 4,075 3,798
Total 32,588 29,976

 

The Bank may also provide personal loans and advances to its staff, including those in management. Such loans and advances, guaranteed by the terminal benefits payable at the time of departure from the Bank, are granted in accordance with the Bank’s rules and regulations. At December 31, 2013 outstanding balances on loans and advances to management staff amounted to UA 6.71 million (2012: UA 4.71 million).

 

NOTE T –  SEGMENT REPORTING

 

The Bank is a multilateral development finance institution dedicated to the economic and social progress of its regional member states. The Bank’s products and services are similar and are structured and distributed in a fairly uniform manner across borrowers.

 

Based on the evaluation of the Bank’s operations, management has determined that ADB has only one reportable segment since the Bank does not manage its operations by allocating resources based on a determination of the contribution to net income from individual borrowers.

 

The products and services from which the Bank derives its revenue are mainly loans, treasury and equity investments.

 

External revenue for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is detailed as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  2013 2012
Interest income from loans:    
Fixed rate loans 252,005 246,325
Variable rate loans 15,749 18,795
Floating rate loans 57,612 74,426
  325,366 339,546
Commitment charges and commissions 9,646 11,618
Total income from loans 335,012 351,164
Income from investments 131,242 199,345
Income from other debt securities 3,949 4,827
Other income 12,456 15,288
Total external revenue 482,659 570,624

 

Revenues earned from transactions with a single borrower country of the Bank amounting to UA 51.57 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 exceeded 10 percent of the Bank’s revenue (2012: UA 61.07 million).

 

The Bank’s development activities are divided into five sub-regions of the continent of Africa for internal management purposes, namely: Central Africa, East Africa, North Africa, Southern Africa, and West Africa. Activities involving more than one single country from the continent of Africa are described as multinational activities. Treasury investment activities are carried out mainly outside the continent of Africa, and are therefore not included in the table below. In presenting information on the basis of the above geographical areas, revenue is based on the location of customers.

 C: 
113
ANNLRPT114th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 114th
</PAGE>

Geographical information about income from loans for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 is detailed as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

  Central Africa East Africa North Africa Southern
Africa
West Africa Multinational Total
2013              
Income from sovereign loans 55,640 4,292 95,912 68,806 1,687 385 226,722
Income from non-sovereign loans 4,919 10,921 14,254 36,671 21,976 19,549 108,290
  60,559 15,213 110,166 105,477 23,663 19,934 335,012
               
2012              
Income from sovereign loans 67,299 4,910 105,921 72,454 3,165 559 254,308
Income from non-sovereign loans 4,764 9,921 10,815 34,517 22,537 14,302 96,856
  72,063 14,831 116,736 106,971 25,702 14,861 351,164

 

As of December 31, 2013, land and buildings owned by the Bank were located primarily at the Bank’s headquarters in Abidjan, Côte d’Ivoire. More than 90 percent of other fixed and intangible assets were located at the Bank’s Temporary Relocation Facilities in Tunis, as well as the regional resource centres in Nairobi and Pretoria.

 

NOTE U –  EVENTS AFTER THE BALANCE SHEET DATE

 

On March 26, 2014, the Board of Directors authorised these financial statements for issue to the Board of Governors. The financial statements are expected to be approved by the Board of Governors at its annual meeting in May 2014.

 C: 
114
ANNLRPT115th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 115th
</PAGE>
NOTE V –   SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURES

 

NOTE V–1: EXCHANGE RATES

 

The rates used for translating currencies into Units of Account at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

      2013   2012 
1 UA = SDR =  Algerian Dinar   120.349000   120.224000 
   Angolan Kwanza   150.322000    146.642000 
   Australian Dollar   1.737170    1.488350 
   Botswana Pula   13.473300    11.969800 
   Brazilian Real   3.624860    3.148070 
   Canadian Dollar   1.638560    1.529540 
   Chinese Yuan   9.397700    9.666000 
   CFA Franc   732.914000    764.734000 
   Danish Kroner   8.335560    8.697620 
   Egyptian Pound   10.719000    9.760980 
   Ethiopian Birr   29.560900    27.796800 
   Euro   1.142710    1.165830 
   Gambian Dalasi   60.768400    52.716400 
   Ghanaian Cedi   3.328790    3.017280 
   Guinean Franc   10,688.000000    10,590.100000 
   Indian Rupee   95.484500    84.295700 
   Japanese Yen   162.162000    133.020000 
   Kenyan Shilling   133.553000    131.893000 
   Korean Won   1,625.62000    1,648.350000 
   Kuwaiti Dinar   0.434665    0.432105 
   Libyan Dinar   1.932400    1.932400 
   Mauritian Rupee   46.392700    46.931600 
   Moroccan Dirham   12.551900    12.961600 
   New Zambian Kwacha   8.475380    - 
   New Zealand Dollar   1.886330    1.872240 
   Nigerian Naira   238.993000    238.295000 
   Norwegian Krone   9.413980    8.554320 
   Pound Sterling   0.935148    0.953662 
   Sao Tomé Dobra   27,664.500000    28,938.600000 
   Saudi Arabian Riyal   5.775010    5.784160 
   South African Rand   16.154400    13.065600 
   Swedish Krona   10.022900    10.014000 
   Swiss Franc   1.372910    1.408740 
   Tunisian Dinar   2.554380    2.390220 
   Turkish Lira   3.099970    2.734570 
   Ugandan Shilling   3,875.620000    4,126.140000 
   United States Dollar   1.540000    1.536920 
   Vietnamese Dong   32,606.400000    32,011.000000 
   Zambian Kwacha   -    7.947570 

 

* No representation is made that any currency held by the Bank can be or could have been converted into any other currency at the cross rates resulting from the rates indicated above.

 C: 
115
ANNLRPT116th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 116th
</PAGE>
NOTE V–2: OTHER DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE ACTIVITIES

 

i) Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC)

In connection with an internationally coordinated effort between the Bank, the International Monetary Fund (the IMF), the World Bank and other bilateral and multilateral donors to assist the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) in its reconstruction efforts, the Board of Directors on June 26, 2002, approved an arrears clearance plan for the DRC. Under the arrears clearance plan, contributions received from the donor community were used immediately for partial clearance of the arrears owed by the DRC. The residual amount of DRC’s arrears to the Bank and loan amounts not yet due were consolidated into new contractual receivables, such that the present value of the new loans was equal to the present value of the amounts that were owed under the previous contractual terms. The new loans carry the weighted average interest rate of the old loans. In approving the arrears clearance plan, the Board of Directors considered the following factors: a) the arrears clearance plan is part of an internationally coordinated arrangement for the DRC; b) the magnitude of DRC’s arrears to the Bank ruled out conventional solutions; c) the prolonged armed conflict in the DRC created extensive destruction of physical assets, such that the DRC had almost no capacity for servicing its debt; and d) the proposed package would result in a significant improvement in its repayment capacity, if appropriate supporting measures are taken. Furthermore, there was no automatic linkage between the arrears clearance mechanism and the debt relief that may be subsequently provided on the consolidated facility. In June 2004, the DRC reached its decision point under the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) initiative. Consequently, the consolidated facility has since that date benefited from partial debt service relief under HIPC.

 

A special account, separate from the assets of the Bank, was established for all contributions towards the DRC arrears clearance plan. Such contributions may include allocations of the net income of the Bank that the Board of Governors may from time to time make to the special account, representing the Bank’s contribution to the arrears clearance plan. The amount of such net income allocation is subject to the approval of the Boards of Governors of the Bank, typically occurring during the annual general meeting of the Bank. Consequently, income recognized on the consolidated DRC loans in current earnings is transferred out of reserves to the special account only after the formal approval of such transfer, in whole or in part, by the Board of Governors of the Bank.

 

ii) Post-Conflict Countries Assistance/Fragile States Facility

The Post Conflict Countries’ Fund was established as a framework to assist countries emerging from conflict in their efforts towards re-engagement with the donor community in order to reactivate development assistance and help these countries reach the Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) decision point to qualify for debt relief after clearing their loan arrears to the Bank Group. The framework entails the setting aside of a pool of resources through a separate facility with allocations from the ADB’s net income, and contributions from the ADF and other private donors.

 

Resources from the facility are provided on a case-by-case basis to genuine post-conflict countries not yet receiving debt relief to fill financing gaps after maximum effort by the post-conflict country to clear its arrears to the Bank Group. In this connection, the Board of Governors by its Resolution B/BG/2004/07 of May 25, 2004, established the Post-Conflict Countries Facility (PCCF) under the administration of the ADF and approved an allocation of UA 45 million from the 2003 net income of the Bank. The Board of Governors also, by its resolution B/BG/2005/05 of May 18, 2005, approved an additional allocation of UA 30 million from the 2004 net income as the second installment of the Bank’s contribution to the facility and by its resolution B/BG/2006/04 of May 17, 2006, the Board of Governors also approved the third and final installment of the Bank’s allocation of UA 25 million from the 2005 net income. In March 2008, the Board of Directors approved the establishment of the Fragile States Facility (FSF) to take over the activities of the PCCF and in addition provide broader and integrated framework for assistance to eligible states. The purposes of the FSF are to consolidate peace, stabilize economies and lay the foundation for sustainable poverty-reduction and long-term economic growth of the eligible countries. By policy, contributions made by ADB to the PCCF/FSF are not used to clear the debt owed to the Bank by beneficiary countries.

 

iii) Heavily Indebted Poor Countries (HIPC) Initiative

The Bank participates in a multilateral initiative for addressing the debt problems of countries identified as HIPCs. Under this initiative, creditors provide debt relief for eligible countries that demonstrate good policy performance over an extended period- to bring their debt burdens to sustainable levels. Under the original HIPC framework, selected loans to eligible beneficiary countries were paid off by the HIPC Trust Fund at a price equivalent to the lower of the net present value of the loans or their nominal values, as calculated using the methodology agreed under the initiatives.

 

Following the signature of a HIPC debt relief agreement, the relevant loans were paid off at the lower of their net present value or

 C: 
116
ANNLRPT117th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 117th
</PAGE>

their carrying value. On average, loans in the ADB’s portfolio carry higher interest rates than the present value dis-count rates applied and therefore the net present value of the loans exceeds the book value. Consequently, affected ADB loans were paid off by the HIPC Trust Fund at book values.

 

The HIPC initiative was enhanced in 1999 to provide greater, faster and more poverty-focused debt relief. This was achieved by reducing the eligibility criteria for qualification under the initiative and by commencing debt relief much earlier than under the original framework. Under the enhanced framework, where 33 African countries are eligible, the debt relief is delivered through annual debt service reductions, as well as the release of up to 80 percent of annual debt service obligations as they come due until the total debt relief is provided. In addition, interim financing between the decision and completion points of up to 40 percent of total debt relief is provided whenever possible within a 15-year horizon.

 

As at end December 2013, the implementation of the HIPC initiative shows that out of the 33 eligible countries, 29 RMCs have reached their completion points while Chad is still in interim period. Three countries, Somalia, Sudan and Eritrea (pre-point decision) are yet to reach the decision point.

 

iv) Multilateral Debt Relief Initiative (MDRI)

At the Gleneagles Summit on July 8, 2005, the Group of 8 major industrial countries agreed on a proposal for the ADF, the International Development Association (IDA), and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) to cancel 100 percent of their claims on countries that have reached, or will reach, the completion point under the enhanced HIPC Initiative.

 

The main objective of the MDRI is to complete the process of debt relief for HIPCs by providing additional resources to help 38 countries worldwide, 33 of which are in Africa, to make progress towards achieving the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), while simultaneously safeguarding the long-term financing capacity of the ADF and the IDA. The debt cancelation would be delivered by relieving post-completion-point HIPCs’ repayment obligations and adjusting their gross assistance flows downward by the same amount. To maintain the financial integrity of the ADF, donors have committed to make additional contributions to the ADF to match “dollar-for-dollar” the foregone principal and service charge payments.

 

The MDRI became effective for the ADF on September 1, 2006. As of that date, the ADF wrote down its balance of disbursed and outstanding loans net of HIPC relief by an amount of UA 3.84 billion, with a corresponding decrease as of that date in the ADF’s net assets. Reduction in ADF net assets results in a decrease in the value of the Bank’s investment in the Fund. Subsequent write-down of loan balances is effected as and when other countries reach their HIPC completion point and are declared beneficiaries of MDRI loan cancelation. The reduction in the net asset value of the ADF does not include loans outstanding to MDRI countries that have not reached their HIPC completion points at the end of the year.

 C: 
117
ANNLRPT118th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 118th
</PAGE>
NOTE V–3: SPECIAL FUNDS

 

Under Article 8 of the Agreement establishing the Bank, the Bank may establish or be entrusted with the administration of special funds.

 

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the following funds were held separately from those of the ordinary capital resources of the Bank:

 

i) The NTF was established under an agreement signed on February 26, 1976 (the Agreement) between the African Development Bank and the Federal Republic of Nigeria. The Agreement stipulates that the NTF shall be in effect for a period of 30 years from the date the Agreement became effective and that the resources of the NTF shall be transferred to the Government of Nigeria upon termination. However, the 30-year sunset period may be extended by mutual agreement between the Bank and the Federal Republic of Nigeria. At the expiry of the initial 30-year period on April 25, 2006, the Bank and the Federal Republic of Nigeria agreed to 2 interim extensions (each for 12 months) to allow for further consultations and an independent evaluation of the NTF.

 

Following the positive result of the independent evaluation, the NTF Agreement was renewed for a period of ten years starting from April 26, 2008. The initial capital of the NTF was Naira 50 million payable in two equal installments of Naira 25 million each, in freely convertible currencies. The first installment, equivalent to US$ 39.90 million, was received by the Bank on July 14, 1976, and payment of the second installment, equivalent to US$ 39.61 million, was made on February 1, 1977.

 

During May 1981, the Federal Republic of Nigeria announced the replenishment of the NTF with Naira 50 million. The first installment of Naira 35 million (US$ 52.29 million) was paid on October 7, 1981. The second installment of Naira 8 million (US$ 10.87 million) was received on May 4, 1984. The payment of the third installment of Naira 7 million (US$ 7.38 million) was made on September 13, 1985.

 

The resources of the NTF at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized below:

 

(UA thousands)

   2013   2012 
Contribution received   128,586    128,586 
Funds generated (net)   153,423    152,060 
Adjustment for translation of currencies   (116,237)   (116,025)
    165,772    164,621 
Represented by:          
Due from banks   13,656    4,905 
Investments   107,097    121,664 
Accrued income and charges receivable on loans   1,286    1,518 
Accrued interest on investments   49    67 
Other amounts receivable   3    3 
Loans outstanding   45,607    50,840 
    167,698    178,997 
Less: Current accounts payable   (1,926)   (14,376)
    165,772    164,621 

 

ii) The Special Relief Fund (for African countries affected by drought) was established by Board of Governors’ Resolution 20-74 to assist African countries affected by unpredictable disasters. The purpose of this fund was subsequently expanded in 1991 to include the provision of assistance, on a grant basis, to research institutions whose research objectives in specified fields are likely to facilitate the Bank’s objective of meeting the needs of Regional Member Countries in those fields. The resources of this Fund consist of contributions by the Bank, the ADF and various member states.

 C: 
118
ANNLRPT119th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 119th
</PAGE>

The summary statement of the resources and assets of the Special Relief Fund (for African countries affected by drought) as at December 31, 2013 and 2012 follows:

 

(UA thousands)

   2013   2012 
Fund balance   82,462    72,464 
Funds generated   4,718    4,762 
Funds allocated to Social Dimensions of Structural Adjustment (SDA)   1    1 
Less: Relief disbursed   (80,076)   (74,028)
    7,105    3,199 
Represented by:          
Due from bank   1,780    921 
Investments   5,324    2,277 
Interest receivable   1    1 
    7,105    3,199 

 

At December 31, 2013, a total of UA 2.60 million (2012: UA 3.12 million) had been committed but not yet disbursed under the Special Relief Fund.

 

NOTE V–4: TRUST FUNDS

 

The Bank has been entrusted, under Resolutions 11-70, 19-74 and 10-85 of the Board of Governors, with the administration of the Mamoun Beheiry Fund, the Arab Oil Fund, and the Special Emergency Assistance Fund for Drought and Famine in Africa. These funds, held separately from those of the ordinary capital resources of the Bank, are maintained and accounted for in specific currencies, which are translated into Units of Account at exchange rates prevailing at the end of the year.

 

i) The Mamoun Beheiry Fund was established under Board of Governors’ Resolution 11-70 of October 31, 1970, whereby Mr. Mamoun Beheiry, former President of the Bank, agreed to set up a fund, which could be used by the Bank to reward staff members who had demonstrated outstanding performance in fostering the objectives of the Bank.

 

ii) The Arab Oil Fund (contribution of Algeria) was established following Board of Governors’ Resolution 19-74 of July 4, 1974. Under a protocol agreement dated November 15, 1974, the Bank received the sum of US$ 20 million from the Government of Algeria to be kept as a Trust Fund from which loans could be granted to member countries affected by high oil prices. On August 11, 1975, an amount of US$ 5.55 million was refunded to Algeria upon request, leaving a balance of US$ 14.45 million, from which loans refundable directly to Algeria have been made. At December 31, 2013, a total of US$ 13.45 million (2012: US$ 13.45 million) had been so repaid.

 

iii) The Special Emergency Assistance Fund for Drought and Famine in Africa (SEAF) was established by the 20th Meeting of Heads of State and Government of member countries of the African Union formerly Organization of African Unity (OAU) held in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, from November 12 to 15, 1984, under Resolution AHG/Res. 133 (XX), with the objective of giving assistance to African member countries affected by drought and famine.

 C: 
119
ANNLRPT120th “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 120th
</PAGE>

The financial highlights of these Trust Funds at December 31, 2013 and 2012 are summarized below:

 

(UA thousands)

        2013     2012  
i)   Mamoun Beheiry Fund              
    Contribution     151     152  
    Income from investments     200     194  
          351     346  
    Less: Prize awarded     (29 )   (30)  
    Gift     (25 )   (25)  
          297     291  
    Represented by:              
    Short-term deposits     282     277  
    Due from banks     15     14  
          297     291  
ii)   Arab Oil Fund (contribution of Algeria)              
    Net contribution     649     651  
    Represented by:              
    Loans disbursed net of repayments     649     651  
                   
iii)   Special Emergency Assistance Fund for Drought and Famine in Africa              
    Contributions     20,768     20,810  
    Funds generated     5,551     5,558  
          26,319     26,368  
    Relief granted     (23,370 )   (23,092)  
          2,949     3,276  
    Represented by:              
    Due from banks     1,072     745  
    Investments     1,877     2,531  
          2,949     3,276  
    Total Resources & Assets of Trust Funds     3,895     4,218  

 

NOTE V–5: GRANTS (Donor funds)

 

The Bank administers grants on behalf of donors, including member countries, agencies and other entities. Resources for Grants are restricted for specific uses, which include the co-financing of the Bank’s lending projects, debt reduction operations, technical assistance for borrowers including feasibility studies and project preparation, global and regional programs and research and training programs. These funds are placed in trust and are not included in the assets of the Bank. In accordance with Article 11 of the Agreement establishing the Bank, the accounts of these grants are kept separate from those of the Bank.

 C: 
120
ANNLRPT121st “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 121st
</PAGE>

The undisbursed balances of the grant resources at December 31, 2013 and 2012 were as follows:

 

(UA thousands)

    2013     2012  
Africa Water Facility Fund   67,757     66,909  
African Trade Fund   9,251     9,859  
African Legal Support Facility   12,189     11,088  
African Economic Outlook   298     32  
African Community of Practice   1,739     2,502  
Agriculture Fast Track Fund   1,313     -  
AMINA   1,439     1,442  
Canada   1,355     14,850  
Chinese Government Grant   365     371  
Clean Technology Fund   2,520     2,271  
Congo Basin   70,125     64,530  
Fertilizer Financing Mechanism   8,961     8,596  
Finland   6,389     3,525  
France-BAD (Fonds d’Assistance Technique)   1,101     1,233  
Global Agriculture and Food Security Programme (GAFSP)   22,596     11,490  
Global Environment Facility (GEF)   4,933     2,596  
Global Strategy to improve Agriculture and Rural Statistics (GARS)   1,946     -  
Governance Trust Fund (GTF)   2,364     3,835  
ICA-Infrastructure Consortium for Africa   1,869     1,590  
International Comparison Programme – Africa (ICP-Africa)   25     27  
IMDE (Initiative Migration and Development)   6,157     5,425  
India   3,058     3,683  
Investment Climate Facility for Africa   23,803     27,186  
Italy   1,406     2,139  
Japan (FAPA)   20,656     21,545  
Korea Trust Fund   16,164     14,275  
Making Finance Work for Africa   1,360     960  
MENA Transition Fund   4,617     -  
Microfinance Trust Fund   4,588     4,397  
Multi-donor Water Partnership Program   1,236     1,451  
Nepad Infrastructure   32,621     17,224  
Norway   1,352     1,307  
Portuguese Technical Cooperation Trust Fund   1095     1,337  
Programme for Infrastructure Development in Africa (PIDA)   189     165  
Rural Water Supply and Sanitation Initiative   77,780     65,294  
SFRD (Great Lakes)   713     714  
South South Cooperation Trust Fund   3,433     1,986  
Statistical Capacity Building (SCB)   4,438     2,234  
Strategic Climate Fund   8,533     3,740  
Sustainable Energy Fund for Africa   28,842     29,635  
Swedish Trust Fund for Consultancy Services   205     205  
Switzerland Technical Assistance Grant   434     79  
The Nigeria Technical Cooperation Fund   12,972     16,015  
The United Kingdom   1,406     3,005  
The United Nations Development Programme   37     2  
Trust Fund for Countries Transition   2,940     -  
Value for Money Fund   404     -  
Zimbabwe Multi-donor Trust Fund   68,870     78,120  
Others   39     47  
Total   547,883     508,916  
 C: 
121
ANNLRPT122nd “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 122nd
</PAGE>

MEMBERSHIP OF FRANCE

 

France became a member on 30 December 1983. At 31 December 2013, France had subscribed to 231,521 shares of the capital stock (par value UA 10,000 per share) of the Bank. Of this subscription of UA 2,315,210,000, an amount of UA 2,276,560,000 was callable capital and UA 118,650,000 was paid-in capital.

 

At 31 December 2013, France was entitled to cast 240,146 votes (3.759 percent) of the total votes of all members. As at that date, France was represented on the Bank’s Board of Governors by Mr. Ramon Fernandez as Governor.

 

MEMBERSHIP OF GERMANY

 

Germany became a member of the Bank on 18 February 1983. At 31 December 2013, Germany had subscribed to 261,589 shares of the capital stock (par value UA 10,000 per share) of the Bank. Of this subscription of UA 2,615,890,000, an amount of UA 2,499,140,000 was callable capital and UA 116,750,000 was paid-in capital.

 

At 31 December 2013, Germany was entitled to cast 262,214 votes (4.105 percent) of the total votes of all members. As at that date, Germany was represented on the Bank’s Board of Governors by Ms. Gudrun Kopp as Governor.

 

MEMBERSHIP OF JAPAN

 

Japan became a member of the Bank on 3 December 1982. At 31 December 2013, Japan had subscribed to 350,270 shares of the capital stock (par value UA 10,000 per share) of the Bank. Of this subscription of UA 3,502,700,000, an amount of UA 3,329,180,000 was callable capital and UA 173,520,000 was paid-in capital.

 

At 31 December 2013, Japan was entitled to cast 350,895 votes (5.493 percent) of the total votes of all members. As at that date, Japan was represented on the Bank’s Board of Governors by Taro Aso as Governor.

 

MEMBERSHIP OF SWITZERLAND

 

Switzerland became a member of the Bank on 30 December 1992. At 31 December 2013, Switzerland had subscribed to 93,528 shares of the capital stock (par value UA 10,000 per share) of the Bank. Of this subscription of UA 935,280,000, an amount of UA 888,950,000 was callable capital and UA 46,330,000 was paid-in capital.

 

At 31 December 2013, Switzerland was entitled to cast 94,153 votes (1.474 percent) of the total votes of all members. As at that date, Switzerland was represented on the Bank’s Board of Governors by Ms Beatrice Maser Mallor as Governor.

 

MEMBERSHIP OF THE UNITED KINGDOM

 

The United Kingdom became a member of the Bank on 29 April 1983. At 31 December 2013, the United Kingdom had subscribed to 107,234 shares of the capital stock (par value UA 10,000 per share) of the Bank. Of this subscription of UA 1,072,340,000, an amount of UA 1,019,220,000 was callable capital and UA 53,120,000 was paid-in capital.

 

At 31 December 2013, the United Kingdom was entitled to cast 107,859 votes (1.688 percent) of the total votes of all members. As at that date, the United Kingdom was represented on the Bank’s Board of Governors by Rt. Hon. Justine Greening MP.

 C: 
122
ANNLRPTLast “Page” of 123TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 123rd
</PAGE>

MEMBERSHIP OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

 

The United States of America became a member of the Bank on 8 February 1983 pursuant to the African Development Bank Act.

 

At 31 December 2013, pursuant to subscription letters, the United States had subscribed to 418,537 shares of the capital stock (par value UA 10,000 per share) of the Bank. Of the subscription of UA 4,185,370,000, an amount of UA 3,998,519,000 was callable capital and UA 186,856,000 was paid-in capital.

 

The General Counsel of the Treasury Department of the United States has rendered an opinion to the effect that the portion of the United States subscription to the callable capital that has been provided for in budgetary and appropriations legislation is an obligation backed by the full faith and credit of the United States, although appropriations by the United States Congress would be required to enable the Secretary of the Treasury to pay any part of the subscription to callable capital if it were called by the Bank.

 

At 31 December 2013, the United States was entitled to cast 419,162 votes (6.562 percent) of the total votes of the members. As at that date, the United States of America was represented on the Bank’s Board of Governors by Mr. Jacob J. Lew as Governor.

 C: 
123

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘ANNLRPT’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
12/31/14111QRTLYRPT
Filed on:9/16/14
For Period End:9/15/14
3/26/1429114
1/1/145557
12/31/1322121ANNLRPT
10/29/13100
1/1/1341110
12/31/1241121
5/31/12101
1/1/1280107
12/31/11107
5/11/11107
5/3/1122
1/20/1122
1/1/112170
5/27/1087101
2/22/10100
5/13/0993
4/26/08118
9/1/06117
5/17/06116
4/25/06118
7/8/05117
5/18/05116
1/1/051844
5/25/04116
1/1/03108
7/17/02108
6/26/02116
9/30/99100
5/29/98100
12/31/92101
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0000930413-14-004005   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Fri., Apr. 19, 3:59:09.2am ET