SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

Metlife Investors Variable Life Account One – ‘N-6’ on 11/14/14

On:  Friday, 11/14/14, at 6:18pm ET   ·   As of:  11/17/14   ·   Accession #:  1193125-14-413577   ·   File #:  333-200257

Previous ‘N-6’:  ‘N-6’ on 11/17/14   ·   Latest ‘N-6’:  This Filing

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

11/17/14  Metlife Investors Var Life A… One N-6        11/14/14   14:1.7M                                   RR Donnelley/FABrighthouse Variable Life Account One Custom Select Flexible Premium Variable Life New Class/Contract!

Registration Statement for a Separate Account (Unit Investment Trust)   —   Form N-6
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: N-6         Custom Select Variable Life (Ca)                     487   2.72M 
 2: EX-99.(1)(B)  Mli Board Resolutions and Plan of Merger             9     32K 
 3: EX-99.(1)(C)  Micc Board Resolutions of the Separate Account       2     14K 
 4: EX-99.(3)(A)(II)  Amendment to Distribution and Principal          2     12K 
                          Underwriting Agreement                                 
 5: EX-99.(5)(E)  Merger Endorsement                                   1     10K 
 6: EX-99.(6)(A)  Copy of Certificate of Incorporation and             5     21K 
                          Certificate of Amendment                               
 7: EX-99.(6)(B)  Copy of By-Laws of the Company                      15     55K 
12: EX-99.2(I)  Opinion and Consent of Counsel                         2     13K 
13: EX-99.3     Powers of Attorney                                    15     71K 
14: EX-99.4     Consent of Independent Registered Public               1      9K 
                          Accounting Firm (Deloitte & Touche LLP)                
 8: EX-99.9(B)(IV)  Amendment to Participation Agreement With Met      4     16K 
                          Investors Series Trust                                 
 9: EX-99.9(C)(V)  Amendment to Participation Agreement With          10     33K 
                          Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance                  
10: EX-99.9(D)(IV)  Amendment to Participation Agreement With Aim      2     14K 
                          Variable Insurance Funds                               
11: EX-99.9(E)(II)  Amendment to Participation Agreement With          3     15K 
                          Putnam Variable Trust                                  


N-6   —   Custom Select Variable Life (Ca)
Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
2MetLife USA
5Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
16Invesco V.I
30Mist
36Msf
"MSF Neuberger Berman Genesis Sub-Account
"Msf T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Sub-Account
38Msf T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Sub-Account
"Msf Western Asset Management U.S. Government Sub-Account
"Putnam Vt Multi-Cap Growth Sub-Account
"Putnam VT
65Mergers
93Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
95Consolidated Balance Sheets
96Consolidated Statements of Operations
97Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)
98Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity
"Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
"Balance at December 31,
99Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
101Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements
1021. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (Continued)
"Separate Accounts
105Retained earnings
106Insurance
107Other Policy-Related Balances
108Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles
109Reinsurance
111Investments
112Mortgage Loans
"Policy Loans
113Short-Term Investments
"Other Invested Assets
"Other invested assets consist principally of the following:
114Derivatives
116Fair Value
"Goodwill
117Income Tax
119Other Revenues
137Dac
141Premiums
143Related Party Reinsurance Transactions
146Fixed Maturity Securities
148Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities
151Equity Securities
154Recorded Investment
159Securities Lending
161Variable Interest Entities
162CSEs
164Net investment income
165Net Investment Gains (Losses)
167Related Party Investment Transactions
172Net Derivative Gains (Losses)
181Recurring Fair Value Measurements
184Securities, Short-term Investments and Long-term Debt of CSEs
185U.S
"U.S. Treasury and Agency Securities
187Separate Account Assets
191Direct and Assumed Guaranteed Minimum Benefits
202Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements
205Premiums, Reinsurance and Other Receivables
"PABs
206Long-term debt
"Other Liabilities
"Separate account liabilities
208Balance at December 31, 2012
209Return of capital
220Summary
"Insolvency Assessments
"Other assets
222Equity
224Schedule I
225Schedule II
229Schedule III
231Schedule IV
232Financial Statements
245Other limited partnership interests
261Voba
293Securities and Short-term Investments
295Non-redeemable preferred stock
298Direct Guaranteed Minimum Benefits
365Assumed Guaranteed Minimum Benefits
381Expenses
"Mortality and Expense Risk Charge
"Annual Operating Expenses
383Other Information
"MetLife Investors
"Distribution
"Federal Tax Status
"Introduction
384Diversification
"Tax Treatment of the Policy
"Policy Proceeds
385Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders
386Multiple Policies
"Tax Treatment of Assignments
"Qualified Plans
"Income Tax Withholding
"Life Insurance Purchases by Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Corporations
387Non-Individual Owners and Business Beneficiaries of Policies
"Split-Dollar Arrangements
"Estate, Gift and Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes
388Possible Tax Law Changes
"The Company's Income Taxes
389Appendix A
394Transfers
"Market Timing
"Restrictions on Transfers
396Distributor
"Ownership
399Business Uses of Policy
400Alternative Minimum Tax
441Flexible
443Special Terms
4441. the Variable Life Insurance Policy
"2. Purchases
"4. Expenses
"Tax Charges
445Selection and Issue Expense Charge
"Monthly Policy Charge
"Charges for Additional Benefit Riders
447Surrender Charge
"5. Death Benefit
"6. Taxes
"7. Access to Your Money
4488. Other Information
449Part I
"Application for a Policy
"Unscheduled Premiums
"Lapse and Grace Period
450Reinstatement
"Allocation of Premium
"Accumulation Account Value of Your Policy
"Method of Determining Accumulation Account Value of an Investment Fund
451Net Investment Factor
"Our Right to Reject or Return a Premium Payment
4523. Investment Funds
453Substitution and Limitations on Further Investments
455Dollar Cost Averaging
"Portfolio Rebalancing
456Approved Asset Allocation Programs
457Sales Charge
"Monthly Cost of Insurance Charge
459Transaction Charges
"Investment Fund Expenses
"Applicable Percentage of Accumulation Account Value Table For Insureds Less than Age 100
460Change of Death Benefit
"Change in Face Amount
461Life Insurance in General
"Taking Money Out of Your Policy
462Loan Interest Charged
"Security
"Repaying Policy Debt
"Partial Withdrawals
463Pro-Rata Surrender
"Full Surrenders
465The Separate Account
"The General Account
"Suspension of Payments or Transfers
466Adjustment of Charges
"Part II
"Executive Officers and Directors
467Voting
468Disregard of Voting Instructions
"Our Right to Contest
"Additional Benefits
473Reports to Owners
"Legal Proceedings
N-61st Page of 487TOCTopPreviousNextBottomJust 1st
 

As filed with U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on November 14, 2014 Registration No. 333-_______ UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION Washington, D.C. 20549 FORM S-6 REGISTRATION STATEMENT UNDER THE SECURITIES ACT OF 1933 MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One (Exact Name of Registrant) MetLife Insurance Company USA (Name of Depositor) 11225 North Community House Road Charlotte, NC 28277 (Address of Depositor's Principal Executive Offices) Name and complete address of agent for service: Eric T. Steigerwalt President MetLife Insurance Company USA 11225 North Community House Road Charlotte, NC 28277 Copy to: W. Thomas Conner, Esquire Reed Smith LLP 1301 K Street, N.W. Washington, D.C. 20005-3373 Approximate Date of Proposed Filing: As soon as possible after the effective date of this registration statement. The Registrant hereby amends this registration statement on such dates as may be necessary to delay its effective date until the Registrant shall file a further amendment that specifically states that this registration statement shall thereafter become effective in accordance with Section 8(a) of the Securities Act of 1933 or until the registration statement shall thereafter become effective on such date as the Commission, acting pursuant to Section 8(a), may determine. Title of securities being registered: Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy. This Registration Statement relates to Registration Statement No. 333-160847.
N-62nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 2nd
METLIFE INSURANCE COMPANY USA METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE PROSPECTUS SUPPLEMENT DATED NOVEMBER 17, 2014 This supplement describes the recent merger involving MetLife Investors Insurance Company, the insurer that issued your variable life insurance contract, and what it means for you. The supplement updates certain information contained in, and should be read in conjunction with, the prospectus for your contract. Please read it and keep it with your prospectus for future reference. You may obtain a copy of the prospectus for your contract by writing to MetLife Insurance Company USA, 11225 North Community House Road, Charlotte, NC 28277, or by calling 1-800-638-5000, or by accessing the Securities and Exchange Commission's website at http://www.sec.gov. Effective following the close of business on November 14, 2014, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. were merged into MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut was then renamed MetLife Insurance Company USA ("MetLife USA"). Simultaneously, MetLife USA changed its domicile from Connecticut to the state of Delaware. Accordingly, all references in your prospectus to MetLife Investors Insurance Company are replaced with MetLife USA. As a result of the merger, MetLife USA assumed legal ownership of all of the assets of MetLife Investors Insurance Company, including the separate account referenced above and the assets held in the separate account. MetLife USA is now responsible for administering your contract and paying any benefits due to you under the contract. In other words, you are now a contract owner of MetLife USA. The transfer of your contract to MetLife USA will not impact the administration of your contract. In particular: . There are no changes in our obligations or your rights and benefits under your contract as a result of the merger. . All of the investment options previously available to you under your contract remain available for investment as of the date of this supplement. . MetLife USA will continue to service and maintain your contract in accordance with its terms and there has been no change in the contact information for the administrative offices for your contract. . Your cash value is not affected by the merger and no charges have been or will be imposed in connection with the merger. . The merger did not result in any federal income tax consequences to you. THE FOLLOWING REPLACES THE SECTION OF YOUR PROSPECTUS TITLED METLIFE INVESTORS: METLIFE USA MetLife Insurance Company USA is a stock life insurance company originally chartered in Connecticut in 1863 and currently subject to the laws of the state of Delaware. MetLife USA was previously known as MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut but changed its name to MetLife Insurance Company USA when it changed its state of domicile from Connecticut to Delaware on November 14, 2014. MetLife USA is licensed to conduct business in all states of the United States, except New York, and in the District of Columbia, Puerto Rico, Guam, the U.S. and British Virgin Islands and the Bahamas. MetLife USA is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., a publicly-traded company. MetLife, Inc., through its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading provider of insurance and financial services to individuals and institutional customers. MetLife USA's principal executive offices are located at 11225 North Community House Road, Charlotte, NC 28277.
N-63rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 3rd
Prior to November 17, 2014, the contract was issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company (MetLife Investors). On November 14, 2014, following the close of business, MetLife Investors merged into MetLife USA and MetLife USA replaced MetLife Investors as the issuer of the contract. * * * * * The information found under "OTHER INFORMATION" regarding the General American Life Insurance Company guarantee agreement is hereby deleted because the guarantee has terminated in accordance with its terms. While in effect, the guarantee agreement had provided that, for contracts issued on or before December 31, 2002, General American Life Insurance Company, the former parent of MetLife Investors, would ensure that MetLife Investors would have sufficient funds to meet its obligations under those contracts. In addition, on or about November 17, 2014, MetLife USA terminated a net worth maintenance agreement with MetLife, Inc. and a contingent reinsurance agreement with General American Life Insurance Company. The net worth maintenance agreement was originally entered into between MetLife, Inc. and MetLife Investors on December 31, 2002. Under the agreement MetLife, Inc. had agreed, without limitation as to the amount, to cause MetLife Investors to have certain minimum capital and surplus levels and liquidity necessary to enable it to meet its current obligations on a timely basis. The contingent reinsurance agreement was originally entered into between General American Life Insurance Company and MetLife Investors on January 1, 2003. Under this agreement, in the event that MetLife Investors' statutory capital and surplus fell below certain levels, General American Life would assume as assumption reinsurance, subject to regulatory approvals and required consents, all of MetLife Investors' life insurance and annuity contracts. * * * * * THE FOLLOWING IS ADDED TO THE FIRST PARAGRAPH OF THE DISCLOSURE IN YOUR PROSPECTUS UNDER THE CAPTION "THE SEPARATE ACCOUNT": On November 14, 2014, following the close of business, MetLife Investors merged into MetLife USA and the Separate Account became a separate account of MetLife USA. In November of 2009, the Separate Account was subject to a merger pursuant to which all of the assets of MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five were transferred to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One. * * * * * THE FOLLOWING REPLACES THE DISCLOSURE IN YOUR PROSPECTUS UNDER THE CAPTION "INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM" OR "EXPERTS": The financial statements and financial highlights comprising each of the Sub-Accounts of MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One included in this Prospectus Supplement, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such financial statements and financial highlights are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The consolidated financial statements and related financial statement schedules of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and subsidiaries, included in this Prospectus Supplement, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein. Such financial statements and financial statement schedules are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The financial statements of MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MLI"), included in this Prospectus Supplement, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unmodified opinion and includes an other matter paragraph related
N-64th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 4th
to MLI being a member of a controlled group). Such financial statements are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The financial statements of Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("Exeter"), included in this Prospectus Supplement, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, independent auditors, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unmodified opinion and includes an emphasis of matter paragraph related to restatements of the statements of cash flows, and an other matters paragraph related to a change in Exeter's presentation of insurance liabilities and to Exeter being a member of a controlled group). Such financial statements are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The principal business address of Deloitte & Touche LLP is 30 Rockefeller Plaza, New York, New York 10112-0015. THE FOLLOWING REPLACES THE DISCLOSURE IN YOUR PROSPECTUS UNDER THE CAPTION "FINANCIAL STATEMENTS": The financial statements of MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One, the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, giving effect to the merger on a pro forma basis, and the consolidated financial statements of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut are included herewith. Also included are the financial statements of MetLife Investors Insurance Company and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. (affiliates of MetLife USA that were merged into MetLife USA effective as of November 14, 2014). The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and the consolidated financial statements of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut should be considered only as bearing upon the ability of MetLife USA to meet its obligations under the contracts. THIS SUPPLEMENT SHOULD BE READ AND RETAINED FOR FUTURE REFERENCE
N-65th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 5th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Policy Owners of MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One and Board of Directors of MetLife Investors Insurance Company We have audited the accompanying statements of assets and liabilities of MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One (the "Separate Account") of MetLife Investors Insurance Company (the "Company") comprising each of the individual Sub-Accounts listed in Note 2.A. as of December 31, 2013, the related statements of operations and changes in net assets for the respective stated periods in the three years then ended, and the financial highlights in Note 8 for the respective stated periods in the five years then ended. These financial statements and financial highlights are the responsibility of the Separate Account's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial highlights based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements and financial highlights are free of material misstatement. The Separate Account is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Separate Account's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our procedures included confirmation of investments owned as of December 31, 2013, by correspondence with the custodian or mutual fund companies. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, the financial statements and financial highlights referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of each of the Sub-Accounts constituting the Separate Account of the Company as of December 31, 2013, the results of their operations and changes in their net assets for the respective stated periods in the three years then ended, and the financial highlights for the respective stated periods in the five years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Certified Public Accountants Tampa, Florida March 27, 2014
N-66th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 6th
This page is intentionally left blank.
N-67th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 7th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES DECEMBER 31, 2013 [Enlarge/Download Table] FTVIPT TEMPLETON INVESCO V.I. MIST MIST FOREIGN INTERNATIONAL CLARION GLOBAL CLEARBRIDGE SECURITIES GROWTH REAL ESTATE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value............ $ 134,751 $ 53,908 $ 331,011 $ 372,489 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company.................. 17 -- -- -- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Total Assets.................... 134,768 53,908 331,011 372,489 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees......................... 15 13 40 45 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company.................. -- 4 7 19 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Total Liabilities............... 15 17 47 64 -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- NET ASSETS.............................. $ 134,753 $ 53,891 $ 330,964 $ 372,425 ==================== ==================== ==================== ==================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 1
N-68th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 8th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -- (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 2013 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST MIST MIST MIST GOLDMAN SACHS HARRIS OAKMARK INVESCO INVESCO MID CAP VALUE INTERNATIONAL COMSTOCK MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 606,545 $ 1,862,722 $ 671,626 $ 398,226 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- -- 700 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 606,545 1,862,722 671,626 398,926 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 33 46 23 18 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 14 21 18 -- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 47 67 41 18 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 606,498 $ 1,862,655 $ 671,585 $ 398,908 ==================== =================== ==================== =================== MIST MIST MIST MIST INVESCO LOOMIS SAYLES LORD ABBETT METLIFE SMALL CAP GROWTH GLOBAL MARKETS BOND DEBENTURE AGGRESSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 851,338 $ 520,468 $ 1,725,951 $ 536,437 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- -- -- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Total Assets............ 851,338 520,468 1,725,951 536,437 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 34 26 46 41 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 25 8 2,111 11 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Total Liabilities....... 59 34 2,157 52 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 851,279 $ 520,434 $ 1,723,794 $ 536,385 =================== ==================== =================== ==================== MIST MIST METLIFE METLIFE BALANCED STRATEGY DEFENSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 3,339,721 $ 9,557 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 3,339,721 9,557 ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 17 7 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 14 4 ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 31 11 ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 3,339,690 $ 9,546 =================== =================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 2
N-69th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 9th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 3
N-610th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 10th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -- (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 2013 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST MIST MIST MIST METLIFE METLIFE MFS EMERGING MFS RESEARCH GROWTH STRATEGY MODERATE STRATEGY MARKETS EQUITY INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 3,393,542 $ 1,473,903 $ 379,970 $ 1,298,415 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- 12 -- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 3,393,542 1,473,903 379,982 1,298,415 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 31 31 33 42 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 14 10 -- 57 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 45 41 33 99 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 3,393,497 $ 1,473,862 $ 379,949 $ 1,298,316 =================== =================== =================== =================== MIST MIST MIST MORGAN STANLEY PIMCO INFLATION PIMCO MIST MID CAP GROWTH PROTECTED BOND TOTAL RETURN PIONEER FUND SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 230,767 $ 987,996 $ 3,028,010 $ 491,109 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- -- 178 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 230,767 987,996 3,028,010 491,287 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 3 46 39 -- Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 178 3 5 -- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 181 49 44 -- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 230,586 $ 987,947 $ 3,027,966 $ 491,287 =================== =================== =================== =================== MIST MIST T. ROWE PRICE T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 6,095,470 $ 1,633,322 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 8,910 -- ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 6,104,380 1,633,322 ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 44 48 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- 27 ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 44 75 ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 6,104,336 $ 1,633,247 =================== =================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 4
N-611th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 11th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 5
N-612th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 12th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -- (CONTINUED) DECEMBER 31, 2013 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST MSF MSF MSF THIRD AVENUE BLACKROCK BLACKROCK BLACKROCK SMALL CAP VALUE BOND INCOME CAPITAL APPRECIATION MONEY MARKET SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 982,855 $ 9,370 $ 176,587 $ 1,378,092 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- -- -- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 982,855 9,370 176,587 1,378,092 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 40 18 32 38 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 22 1 12 5,819 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 62 19 44 5,857 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 982,793 $ 9,351 $ 176,543 $ 1,372,235 =================== =================== ==================== =================== MSF MSF MSF MSF DAVIS FRONTIER JENNISON MET/ARTISAN VENTURE VALUE MID CAP GROWTH GROWTH MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 2,516,054 $ 280,860 $ 2,334,904 $ 940,629 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- -- 12,942 -- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 2,516,054 280,860 2,347,846 940,629 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 51 45 35 38 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 23 9 -- 43 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 74 54 35 81 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 2,515,980 $ 280,806 $ 2,347,811 $ 940,548 =================== =================== =================== =================== MSF MSF METLIFE NEUBERGER BERMAN STOCK INDEX GENESIS SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value... $ 1,793,645 $ 1,009,842 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... -- 1 ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets............ 1,793,645 1,009,843 ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees................ 40 61 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company......... 23 -- ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities....... 63 61 ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS..................... $ 1,793,582 $ 1,009,782 =================== =================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 6
N-613th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 13th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 7
N-614th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 14th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES -- (CONCLUDED) DECEMBER 31, 2013 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF MSF MSF T. ROWE PRICE WESTERN ASSET T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP MANAGEMENT PUTNAM VT LARGE CAP GROWTH GROWTH U.S. GOVERNMENT MULTI-CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ASSETS: Investments at fair value............... $ 498,874 $ 20,490 $ 76,298 $ 20,362 Due from MetLife Investors Insurance Company..................... 101 -- -- 31 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Assets........................ 498,975 20,490 76,298 20,393 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- LIABILITIES: Accrued fees............................ 30 16 30 2 Due to MetLife Investors Insurance Company..................... -- 8 6 -- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Total Liabilities................... 30 24 36 2 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET ASSETS................................. $ 498,945 $ 20,466 $ 76,262 $ 20,391 =================== =================== =================== =================== The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 8
N-615th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 15th
This page is intentionally left blank.
N-616th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 16th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] FTVIPT TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 3,069 $ 3,160 $ 2,002 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 35 51 57 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 3,034 3,109 1,945 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... (72) (620) (2,040) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... (72) (620) (2,040) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 22,649 14,588 (10,842) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.......................... 22,577 13,968 (12,882) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations.................................. $ 25,611 $ 17,077 $ (10,937) ==================== ===================== ==================== INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 604 $ 592 $ 719 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 1 4 4 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 603 588 715 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 232 175 3,056 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 232 175 3,056 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 7,703 4,927 (5,865) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.......................... 7,935 5,102 (2,809) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations.................................. $ 8,538 $ 5,690 $ (2,094) ==================== ===================== ==================== MIST CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 22,242 $ 6,401 $ 13,350 --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 1,756 1,650 1,739 --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 20,486 4,751 11,611 --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 4,902 (4,619) (6,582) --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 4,902 (4,619) (6,582) --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (12,829) 69,616 (19,550) --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.......................... (7,927) 64,997 (26,132) --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations.................................. $ 12,559 $ 69,748 $ (14,521) ===================== ==================== ===================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 10
N-617th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 17th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 11
N-618th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 18th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 1,545 $ 893 $ 440 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 1,589 2,348 2,383 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... (44) (1,455) (1,943) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 86,551 16,618 19,422 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 86,551 16,618 19,422 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 53,141 59,994 (3,188) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 139,692 76,612 16,234 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 139,648 $ 75,157 $ 14,291 =================== =================== =================== MIST GOLDMAN SACHS MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 6,905 $ 4,798 $ 3,887 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 2,716 3,053 3,258 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 4,189 1,745 629 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 22,220 -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 31,424 5,216 7,703 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 53,644 5,216 7,703 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 106,485 83,927 (42,592) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 160,129 89,143 (34,889) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 164,318 $ 90,888 $ (34,260) =================== =================== ==================== MIST HARRIS OAKMARK INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 48,069 $ 29,693 $ 470 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 8,519 8,848 9,474 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 39,550 20,845 (9,004) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 137,352 (18,913) (16,090) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 137,352 (18,913) (16,090) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 287,702 415,301 (232,084) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 425,054 396,388 (248,174) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 464,604 $ 417,233 $ (257,178) =================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 12
N-619th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 19th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 13
N-620th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 20th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST INVESCO COMSTOCK SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 7,557 $ 7,250 $ 5,285 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 2,792 2,537 2,338 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 4,765 4,713 2,947 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 28,592 2,955 (1,233) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 28,592 2,955 (1,233) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 141,422 68,426 (9,895) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 170,014 71,381 (11,128) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 174,779 $ 76,094 $ (8,181) =================== =================== =================== MIST INVESCO MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 3,384 $ 2,083 $ 2,514 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 35 52 57 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 3,349 2,031 2,457 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 5,742 (260) (887) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 5,742 (260) (887) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 88,086 41,739 (9,181) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 93,828 41,479 (10,068) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 97,177 $ 43,510 $ (7,611) =================== =================== =================== MIST INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 3,084 $ -- $ -- ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 3,384 3,207 3,165 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... (300) (3,207) (3,165) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 41,917 37,112 -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 36,224 24,206 17,401 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 78,141 61,318 17,401 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 163,736 34,660 (19,066) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 241,877 95,978 (1,665) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 241,577 $ 92,771 $ (4,830) =================== =================== ==================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 14
N-621st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 21st
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 15
N-622nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 22nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST LOOMIS SAYLES GLOBAL MARKETS SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 12,124 $ 7,775 $ 2,954 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 2,593 2,025 635 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 9,531 5,750 2,319 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 2,217 1,248 (1,889) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 2,217 1,248 (1,889) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 62,328 45,002 (4,203) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 64,545 46,250 (6,092) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 74,076 $ 52,000 $ (3,773) ==================== =================== ==================== MIST LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 110,343 $ 122,219 $ 128,055 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 4,317 5,714 7,752 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 106,026 116,505 120,303 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 14,353 58,896 26,780 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 14,353 58,896 26,780 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 4,967 43,141 (51,867) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 19,320 102,037 (25,087) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 125,346 $ 218,542 $ 95,216 =================== ==================== =================== MIST METLIFE AGGRESSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 7,190 $ 6,675 $ 10,241 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 2,443 4,321 4,634 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 4,747 2,354 5,607 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 70,107 (2,347) 31,044 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 70,107 (2,347) 31,044 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 79,320 118,719 (60,014) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 149,427 116,372 (28,970) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 154,174 $ 118,726 $ (23,363) ==================== =================== ==================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 16
N-623rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 23rd
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 17
N-624th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 24th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST METLIFE BALANCED STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 62,473 $ 56,222 $ 43,737 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 15,694 13,452 12,768 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 46,779 42,770 30,969 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 25,407 14,068 10,630 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 25,407 14,068 10,630 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 453,723 245,210 (106,177) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 479,130 259,278 (95,547) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 525,909 $ 302,048 $ (64,578) =================== =================== ==================== MIST METLIFE DEFENSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 2,514 $ 2,034 $ 1,448 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 181 367 308 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 2,333 1,667 1,140 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 1,874 573 -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 7,081 120 90 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 8,955 693 90 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (6,849) 4,318 (402) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 2,106 5,011 (312) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 4,439 $ 6,678 $ 828 =================== =================== ==================== MIST METLIFE GROWTH STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 53,725 $ 47,107 $ 46,874 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 16,268 14,354 14,967 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 37,457 32,753 31,907 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 35,645 19,835 (1,678) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 35,645 19,835 (1,678) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 630,791 331,481 (141,055) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 666,436 351,316 (142,733) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 703,893 $ 384,069 $ (110,826) ==================== ==================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 18
N-625th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 25th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 19
N-626th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 26th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST METLIFE MODERATE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 35,529 $ 34,017 $ 22,952 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 6,101 6,769 6,271 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 29,428 27,248 16,681 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 2,474 -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 12,287 3,692 3,345 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 14,761 3,692 3,345 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 136,070 108,049 (23,480) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 150,831 111,741 (20,135) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 180,259 $ 138,989 $ (3,454) =================== =================== ==================== MIST MFS EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 4,422 $ 3,064 $ 9,497 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 1,853 2,025 3,336 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 2,569 1,039 6,161 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 1,079 37,884 (2,325) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 1,079 37,884 (2,325) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (23,875) 51,043 (131,793) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... (22,796) 88,927 (134,118) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ (20,227) $ 89,966 $ (127,957) =================== =================== =================== MIST MFS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 35,592 $ 30,533 $ 41,150 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 4,909 6,543 9,045 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 30,683 23,990 32,105 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 2,412 (57,267) (145,661) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 2,412 (57,267) (145,661) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 193,594 263,290 (80,831) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 196,006 206,023 (226,492) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 226,689 $ 230,013 $ (194,387) =================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 20
N-627th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 27th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 21
N-628th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 28th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 1,570 $ -- $ 1,377 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 29 43 50 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 1,541 (43) 1,327 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- 4,855 Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 4,031 4,639 13,481 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 4,031 4,639 18,336 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 60,340 11,222 (30,804) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 64,371 15,861 (12,468) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 65,912 $ 15,818 $ (11,141) =================== =================== =================== MIST PIMCO INFLATION PROTECTED BOND SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 30,960 $ 56,812 $ 33,839 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 5,896 9,643 9,773 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 25,064 47,169 24,066 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 73,677 104,259 86,922 Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... (7,524) 29,923 32,819 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 66,153 134,182 119,741 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (198,310) (34,741) 41,480 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... (132,157) 99,441 161,221 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ (107,093) $ 146,610 $ 185,287 =================== =================== =================== MIST PIMCO TOTAL RETURN SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 144,628 $ 113,386 $ 89,944 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 13,171 16,788 16,403 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 131,457 96,598 73,541 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 63,489 -- 96,762 Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 15,258 63,111 39,769 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 78,747 63,111 136,531 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (276,499) 129,629 (119,415) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... (197,752) 192,740 17,116 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ (66,295) $ 289,338 $ 90,657 =================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 22
N-629th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 29th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 23
N-630th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 30th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST PIONEER FUND SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 14,262 $ 5,929 $ 5,162 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. -- -- -- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 14,262 5,929 5,162 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 13,299 7,729 17,337 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 13,299 7,729 17,337 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 98,521 26,112 (39,356) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 111,820 33,841 (22,019) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 126,082 $ 39,770 $ (16,857) =================== ==================== =================== MIST T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 97,809 $ 83,309 $ 45,099 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 12,333 12,871 13,856 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 85,476 70,438 31,243 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 263,099 (22,553) (87,769) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 263,099 (22,553) (87,769) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 1,267,456 764,715 (141,705) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 1,530,555 742,162 (229,474) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 1,616,031 $ 812,600 $ (198,231) =================== ==================== =================== MIST T. ROWE PRICE MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 6,233 $ -- $ -- -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 6,853 7,999 8,572 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... (620) (7,999) (8,572) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 77,008 187,945 39,279 Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 107,436 50,662 97,972 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 184,444 238,607 137,251 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 284,405 (41,529) (146,593) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 468,849 197,078 (9,342) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 468,229 $ 189,079 $ (17,914) ==================== =================== ==================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 24
N-631st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 31st
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 25
N-632nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 32nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST THIRD AVENUE SMALL CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 13,197 $ -- $ 19,179 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 4,941 7,325 8,160 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 8,256 (7,325) 11,019 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 139,254 1,093 10,631 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 139,254 1,093 10,631 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 149,644 222,173 (161,327) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 288,898 223,266 (150,696) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 297,154 $ 215,941 $ (139,677) =================== =================== ==================== MSF BLACKROCK BOND INCOME SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 443 $ 358 $ 576 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 25 53 63 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 418 305 513 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 270 86 -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 52 224 49 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 322 310 49 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (848) 270 286 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... (526) 580 335 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ (108) $ 885 $ 848 ==================== =================== =================== MSF BLACKROCK CAPITAL APPRECIATION SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 1,454 $ 502 $ 309 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 50 107 105 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 1,404 395 204 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 31,970 5,636 5,458 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 31,970 5,636 5,458 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 15,385 15,237 (20,463) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 47,355 20,873 (15,005) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 48,759 $ 21,268 $ (14,801) ==================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 26
N-633rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 33rd
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 27
N-634th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 34th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ -- $ -- $ -- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 8,822 17,476 17,436 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net investment income (loss)................... (8,822) (17,476) (17,436) ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... -- -- -- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... -- -- -- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. -- -- -- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... -- -- -- ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ (8,822) $ (17,476) $ (17,436) ================= ================ ================ MSF DAVIS VENTURE VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 34,941 $ 24,753 $ 37,659 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 11,575 15,597 17,694 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 23,366 9,156 19,965 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 41,731 -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 228,951 43,829 62,202 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 270,682 43,829 62,202 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 426,985 277,376 (216,138) ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 697,667 321,205 (153,936) ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 721,033 $ 330,361 $ (133,971) ================ ================ ================ MSF FRONTIER MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------- 2013 (a) ----------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ -- ----------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 783 ----------------- Net investment income (loss)................... (783) ----------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 3,538 ----------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 3,538 ----------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 48,657 ----------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 52,195 ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 51,412 ================= MSF JENNISON GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 8,732 $ 2,479 $ 2,824 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 9,920 9,660 5,670 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net investment income (loss)................... (1,188) (7,181) (2,846) ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 21,434 174,651 -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 59,203 66 24,074 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 80,637 174,717 24,074 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 573,524 (72,196) (21,181) ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 654,161 102,521 2,893 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 652,973 $ 95,340 $ 47 ================ ================= ================= (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 28
N-635th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 35th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 29
N-636th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 36th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF MET/ARTISAN MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 9,218 $ 8,425 $ 8,286 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 4,210 4,562 4,661 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 5,008 3,863 3,625 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 34,175 (19,295) (38,362) ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 34,175 (19,295) (38,362) ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 239,251 101,754 84,351 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 273,426 82,459 45,989 ----------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 278,434 $ 86,322 $ 49,614 ================= ================ ================ MSF METLIFE STOCK INDEX SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 29,617 $ 27,234 $ 23,077 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 7,377 8,367 7,849 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net investment income (loss)................... 22,240 18,867 15,228 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 24,032 10,932 8,492 Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 186,892 23,173 7,780 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 210,924 34,105 16,272 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 236,918 164,621 (11,145) ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 447,842 198,726 5,127 ---------------- ---------------- ---------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 470,082 $ 217,593 $ 20,355 ================ ================ ================ MSF NEUBERGER BERMAN GENESIS SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------- 2013 (a) ----------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ -- ----------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 2,233 ----------------- Net investment income (loss)................... (2,233) ----------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 8,016 ----------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 8,016 ----------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 209,163 ----------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 217,179 ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 214,946 ================= MSF T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 514 $ 177 $ 112 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 941 56 52 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net investment income (loss)................... (427) 121 60 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 7,111 1,293 885 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net realized gains (losses).................... 7,111 1,293 885 ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 115,168 22,589 (2,365) ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 122,279 23,882 (1,480) ---------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 121,852 $ 24,003 $ (1,420) ================ ================= ================= (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 30
N-637th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 37th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 31
N-638th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 38th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS -- (CONCLUDED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 59 $ -- ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 1 3 4 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 58 (3) (4) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... 904 1,354 -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 160 129 737 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 1,064 1,483 737 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 5,274 568 (447) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 6,338 2,051 290 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 6,396 $ 2,048 $ 286 =================== ==================== =================== MSF WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT U.S. GOVERNMENT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 2,091 $ 2,140 $ 1,489 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 457 566 604 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 1,634 1,574 885 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- 3,417 Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 336 170 1,665 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 336 170 5,082 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (2,897) 1,103 (619) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... (2,561) 1,273 4,463 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ (927) $ 2,847 $ 5,348 ==================== =================== =================== PUTNAM VT MULTI-CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INVESTMENT INCOME: Dividends........................................... $ 126 $ 74 $ 56 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- EXPENSES: Mortality and expense risk charges.................. 43 62 63 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net investment income (loss).................... 83 12 (7) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- NET REALIZED AND CHANGES IN UNREALIZED GAINS (LOSSES) ON INVESTMENTS: Realized gain distributions......................... -- -- -- Realized gains (losses) on sale of investments...... 254 170 137 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized gains (losses)..................... 254 170 137 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 5,141 2,021 (870) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net realized and changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments........................... 5,395 2,191 (733) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................... $ 5,478 $ 2,203 $ (740) =================== ==================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 32
N-639th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 39th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 33
N-640th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 40th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] FTVIPT TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 3,034 $ 3,109 $ 1,945 Net realized gains (losses)......................... (72) (620) (2,040) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 22,649 14,588 (10,842) --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 25,611 17,077 (10,937) --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 326 253 253 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 2,854 931 476 Policy charges...................................... (2,586) (2,605) (2,151) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (21) -- (11,354) --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... 573 (1,421) (12,776) --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 26,184 15,656 (23,713) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 108,569 92,913 116,626 --------------------- -------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 134,753 $ 108,569 $ 92,913 ===================== ==================== ==================== INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 603 $ 588 $ 715 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 232 175 3,056 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 7,703 4,927 (5,865) -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 8,538 5,690 (2,094) -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 102 102 102 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 3,610 650 (389) Policy charges...................................... (722) (638) (713) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (7) (3) (7,827) -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... 2,983 111 (8,827) -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 11,521 5,801 (10,921) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 42,370 36,569 47,490 -------------------- -------------------- --------------------- End of year......................................... $ 53,891 $ 42,370 $ 36,569 ==================== ==================== ===================== MIST CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 20,486 $ 4,751 $ 11,611 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 4,902 (4,619) (6,582) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (12,829) 69,616 (19,550) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 12,559 69,748 (14,521) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 13,379 41,213 22,396 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (9,053) (16,996) (22,435) Policy charges...................................... (18,448) (20,073) (21,537) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (6,309) (18,321) (37,279) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... (20,431) (14,177) (58,855) -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (7,872) 55,571 (73,376) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 338,836 283,265 356,641 -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 330,964 $ 338,836 $ 283,265 ==================== ===================== ==================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 34
N-641st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 41st
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 35
N-642nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 42nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ (44) $ (1,455) $ (1,943) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 86,551 16,618 19,422 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 53,141 59,994 (3,188) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 139,648 75,157 14,291 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 38,965 38,299 34,794 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 69,909 (41,902) (47,341) Policy charges...................................... (29,056) (32,642) (32,727) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (297,394) (13,291) (50,710) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (217,576) (49,536) (95,984) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (77,928) 25,621 (81,693) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 450,353 424,732 506,425 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 372,425 $ 450,353 $ 424,732 ==================== =================== =================== MIST GOLDMAN SACHS MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 4,189 $ 1,745 $ 629 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 53,644 5,216 7,703 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 106,485 83,927 (42,592) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 164,318 90,888 (34,260) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 15,134 15,954 19,837 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (36,320) (18,940) (60,263) Policy charges...................................... (23,041) (27,116) (28,548) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (82,072) (33,739) (33,575) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (126,299) (63,841) (102,549) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 38,019 27,047 (136,809) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 568,479 541,432 678,241 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 606,498 $ 568,479 $ 541,432 =================== ==================== =================== MIST HARRIS OAKMARK INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 39,550 $ 20,845 $ (9,004) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 137,352 (18,913) (16,090) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 287,702 415,301 (232,084) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 464,604 417,233 (257,178) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 54,950 63,083 63,892 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (5,918) (9,838) 27,784 Policy charges...................................... (88,084) (92,579) (95,917) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (335,502) (91,401) (397,326) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (374,554) (130,735) (401,567) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 90,050 286,498 (658,745) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,772,605 1,486,107 2,144,852 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,862,655 $ 1,772,605 $ 1,486,107 =================== ==================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 36
N-643rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 43rd
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 37
N-644th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 44th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST INVESCO COMSTOCK SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 4,765 $ 4,713 $ 2,947 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 28,592 2,955 (1,233) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 141,422 68,426 (9,895) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 174,779 76,094 (8,181) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 29,655 12,619 21,554 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (8,297) 26,673 56,765 Policy charges...................................... (29,154) (27,145) (27,049) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (10,848) (12,481) (4,269) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (18,644) (334) 47,001 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 156,135 75,760 38,820 NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 515,450 439,690 400,870 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 671,585 $ 515,450 $ 439,690 ==================== =================== =================== MIST INVESCO MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 3,349 $ 2,031 $ 2,457 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 5,742 (260) (887) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 88,086 41,739 (9,181) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 97,177 43,510 (7,611) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 281 281 281 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 1,241 518 (1,749) Policy charges...................................... (11,076) (10,196) (9,361) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (16,948) (276) (43,376) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (26,502) (9,673) (54,205) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 70,675 33,837 (61,816) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 328,233 294,396 356,212 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 398,908 $ 328,233 $ 294,396 =================== ==================== =================== MIST INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ (300) $ (3,207) $ (3,165) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 78,141 61,318 17,401 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 163,736 34,660 (19,066) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 241,577 92,771 (4,830) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 46,728 48,310 34,956 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 17,487 7,237 37,443 Policy charges...................................... (37,272) (38,732) (39,779) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (15,663) (29,015) (61,570) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ 11,280 (12,200) (28,950) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 252,857 80,571 (33,780) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 598,422 517,851 551,631 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 851,279 $ 598,422 $ 517,851 =================== ==================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 38
N-645th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 45th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 39
N-646th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 46th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST LOOMIS SAYLES GLOBAL MARKETS SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 9,531 $ 5,750 $ 2,319 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 2,217 1,248 (1,889) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 62,328 45,002 (4,203) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 74,076 52,000 (3,773) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 10,007 3,410 3,327 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 10,506 109,378 197,555 Policy charges...................................... (12,874) (10,371) (7,378) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (247) (360) (38) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... 7,392 102,057 193,466 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 81,468 154,057 189,693 NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 438,966 284,909 95,216 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 520,434 $ 438,966 $ 284,909 ==================== ==================== =================== MIST LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 106,026 $ 116,505 $ 120,303 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 14,353 58,896 26,780 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 4,967 43,141 (51,867) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 125,346 218,542 95,216 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 38,626 44,813 40,930 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 69,471 (502,808) (232) Policy charges...................................... (60,869) (80,694) (102,868) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (60,053) (73,065) (237,484) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... (12,825) (611,754) (299,654) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 112,521 (393,212) (204,438) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,611,273 2,004,485 2,208,923 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,723,794 $ 1,611,273 $ 2,004,485 ==================== =================== ==================== MIST METLIFE AGGRESSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 4,747 $ 2,354 $ 5,607 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 70,107 (2,347) 31,044 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 79,320 118,719 (60,014) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 154,174 118,726 (23,363) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 24,207 20,105 24,599 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (279,260) (262) 236 Policy charges...................................... (16,363) (22,898) (25,421) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (160,794) (39,196) (477,577) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... (432,210) (42,251) (478,163) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (278,036) 76,475 (501,526) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 814,421 737,946 1,239,472 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 536,385 $ 814,421 $ 737,946 ==================== =================== ==================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 40
N-647th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 47th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 41
N-648th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 48th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST METLIFE BALANCED STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 46,779 $ 42,770 $ 30,969 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 25,407 14,068 10,630 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 453,723 245,210 (106,177) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 525,909 302,048 (64,578) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 96,488 114,155 161,838 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 272,483 175,708 (259,065) Policy charges...................................... (138,823) (135,250) (139,988) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (19) (858) (10,884) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... 230,129 153,755 (248,099) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 756,038 455,803 (312,677) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 2,583,652 2,127,849 2,440,526 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 3,339,690 $ 2,583,652 $ 2,127,849 =================== =================== ==================== MIST METLIFE DEFENSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 2,333 $ 1,667 $ 1,140 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 8,955 693 90 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (6,849) 4,318 (402) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 4,439 6,678 828 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ -- 4,035 7,814 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 4,805 34 8 Policy charges...................................... (784) (1,352) (1,370) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (71,942) (3) (6) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... (67,921) 2,714 6,446 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (63,482) 9,392 7,274 NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 73,028 63,636 56,362 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 9,546 $ 73,028 $ 63,636 =================== =================== ==================== MIST METLIFE GROWTH STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 37,457 $ 32,753 $ 31,907 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 35,645 19,835 (1,678) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 630,791 331,481 (141,055) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................ 703,893 384,069 (110,826) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 108,447 123,020 137,933 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 15,444 150,717 (26,152) Policy charges...................................... (186,746) (175,873) (173,502) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (46,107) (275,721) (7,002) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions....................... (108,962) (177,857) (68,723) -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 594,931 206,212 (179,549) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 2,798,566 2,592,354 2,771,903 -------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 3,393,497 $ 2,798,566 $ 2,592,354 ==================== ==================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 42
N-649th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 49th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 43
N-650th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 50th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST METLIFE MODERATE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 29,428 $ 27,248 $ 16,681 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 14,761 3,692 3,345 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 136,070 108,049 (23,480) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 180,259 138,989 (3,454) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 52,296 54,412 54,579 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 11,641 49,216 24,187 Policy charges...................................... (67,072) (68,741) (63,548) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (6,172) (89) (28,888) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (9,307) 34,798 (13,670) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 170,952 173,787 (17,124) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,302,910 1,129,123 1,146,247 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,473,862 $ 1,302,910 $ 1,129,123 =================== =================== ==================== MIST MFS EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 2,569 $ 1,039 $ 6,161 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 1,079 37,884 (2,325) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (23,875) 51,043 (131,793) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. (20,227) 89,966 (127,957) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 11,984 14,123 18,926 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 79,094 (275,574) 27,235 Policy charges...................................... (13,828) (19,811) (35,902) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (267) (7,693) (8,492) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ 76,983 (288,955) 1,767 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 56,756 (198,989) (126,190) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 323,193 522,182 648,372 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 379,949 $ 323,193 $ 522,182 =================== =================== =================== MIST MFS RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 30,683 $ 23,990 $ 32,105 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 2,412 (57,267) (145,661) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 193,594 263,290 (80,831) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 226,689 230,013 (194,387) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 39,658 49,614 63,879 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (29,971) (290,260) (266,436) Policy charges...................................... (61,499) (78,741) (101,719) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (289,423) (52,388) (774,267) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (341,235) (371,775) (1,078,543) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (114,546) (141,762) (1,272,930) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,412,862 1,554,624 2,827,554 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,298,316 $ 1,412,862 $ 1,554,624 =================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 44
N-651st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 51st
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 45
N-652nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 52nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 1,541 $ (43) $ 1,327 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 4,031 4,639 18,336 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 60,340 11,222 (30,804) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 65,912 15,818 (11,141) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 207 207 207 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 3,868 4,994 (6,305) Policy charges...................................... (3,740) (3,877) (3,803) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (5,170) (15,705) (20,491) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (4,835) (14,381) (30,392) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 61,077 1,437 (41,533) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 169,509 168,072 209,605 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 230,586 $ 169,509 $ 168,072 =================== =================== =================== MIST PIMCO INFLATION PROTECTED BOND SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 25,064 $ 47,169 $ 24,066 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 66,153 134,182 119,741 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (198,310) (34,741) 41,480 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. (107,093) 146,610 185,287 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 29,142 72,609 73,016 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (220,064) (185,185) 171,414 Policy charges...................................... (47,073) (87,054) (91,658) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (361,778) (72,943) (143,874) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (599,773) (272,573) 8,898 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (706,866) (125,963) 194,185 NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,694,813 1,820,776 1,626,591 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 987,947 $ 1,694,813 $ 1,820,776 =================== =================== =================== MIST PIMCO TOTAL RETURN SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 131,457 $ 96,598 $ 73,541 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 78,747 63,111 136,531 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (276,499) 129,629 (119,415) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. (66,295) 289,338 90,657 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 52,477 83,821 77,123 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 239,051 (44,965) 250,556 Policy charges...................................... (142,949) (173,831) (175,823) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (380,017) (168,193) (293,650) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (231,438) (303,168) (141,794) ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (297,733) (13,830) (51,137) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 3,325,699 3,339,529 3,390,666 ------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 3,027,966 $ 3,325,699 $ 3,339,529 =================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 46
N-653rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 53rd
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 47
N-654th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 54th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST PIONEER FUND SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 14,262 $ 5,929 $ 5,162 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 13,299 7,729 17,337 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 98,521 26,112 (39,356) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 126,082 39,770 (16,857) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ -- -- -- Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (7,558) (12,912) 5,620 Policy charges...................................... (8,640) (8,206) (8,335) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (15,323) (4,649) (39,152) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (31,521) (25,767) (41,867) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 94,561 14,003 (58,724) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 396,726 382,723 441,447 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 491,287 $ 396,726 $ 382,723 =================== ==================== =================== MIST T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 85,476 $ 70,438 $ 31,243 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 263,099 (22,553) (87,769) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 1,267,456 764,715 (141,705) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 1,616,031 812,600 (198,231) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 102,078 117,888 128,242 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (177,805) (185,450) (197,054) Policy charges...................................... (194,653) (208,463) (217,179) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (254,729) (250,563) (804,445) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (525,109) (526,588) (1,090,436) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 1,090,922 286,012 (1,288,667) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 5,013,414 4,727,402 6,016,069 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 6,104,336 $ 5,013,414 $ 4,727,402 =================== ==================== =================== MIST T. ROWE PRICE MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ (620) $ (7,999) $ (8,572) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 184,444 238,607 137,251 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 284,405 (41,529) (146,593) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 468,229 189,079 (17,914) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 50,932 47,287 63,487 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (79,145) (69,846) 12,282 Policy charges...................................... (72,338) (79,924) (84,456) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (194,575) (90,110) (197,595) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (295,126) (192,593) (206,282) -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 173,103 (3,514) (224,196) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,460,144 1,463,658 1,687,854 -------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,633,247 $ 1,460,144 $ 1,463,658 ==================== =================== ==================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 48
N-655th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 55th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 49
N-656th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 56th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST THIRD AVENUE SMALL CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 8,256 $ (7,325) $ 11,019 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 139,254 1,093 10,631 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 149,644 222,173 (161,327) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 297,154 215,941 (139,677) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 37,239 42,179 54,376 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (156,702) (130,117) (9,958) Policy charges...................................... (59,230) (76,559) (79,463) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (462,792) (33,893) (312,771) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (641,485) (198,390) (347,816) ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (344,331) 17,551 (487,493) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,327,124 1,309,573 1,797,066 ------------------- ------------------- -------------------- End of year......................................... $ 982,793 $ 1,327,124 $ 1,309,573 =================== =================== ==================== MSF BLACKROCK BOND INCOME SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 418 $ 305 $ 513 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 322 310 49 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (848) 270 286 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. (108) 885 848 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ -- -- -- Net transfers (including fixed account)............. -- 1,083 -- Policy charges...................................... (2,210) (3,796) (1,815) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (220) -- (175) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (2,430) (2,713) (1,990) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (2,538) (1,828) (1,142) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 11,889 13,717 14,859 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 9,351 $ 11,889 $ 13,717 ==================== =================== =================== MSF BLACKROCK CAPITAL APPRECIATION SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 1,404 $ 395 $ 204 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 31,970 5,636 5,458 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 15,385 15,237 (20,463) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 48,759 21,268 (14,801) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 3,971 3,955 4,017 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 2,802 -- 14 Policy charges...................................... (4,556) (5,574) (5,609) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (31,894) (11,180) (6,740) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (29,677) (12,799) (8,318) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 19,082 8,469 (23,119) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 157,461 148,992 172,111 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 176,543 $ 157,461 $ 148,992 ==================== =================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 50
N-657th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 57th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 51
N-658th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 58th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ (8,822) $ (17,476) $ (17,436) Net realized gains (losses)......................... -- -- -- Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. -- -- -- ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. (8,822) (17,476) (17,436) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 174,198 251,428 215,709 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 246,032 1,258,451 (65,032) Policy charges...................................... (163,238) (257,856) (275,172) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (1,760,205) (981,370) (910,433) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (1,503,213) 270,653 (1,034,928) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (1,512,035) 253,177 (1,052,364) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 2,884,270 2,631,093 3,683,457 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,372,235 $ 2,884,270 $ 2,631,093 ================= ================= ================= MSF DAVIS MSF FRONTIER VENTURE VALUE MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 (a) ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 23,366 $ 9,156 $ 19,965 $ (783) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 270,682 43,829 62,202 3,538 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 426,985 277,376 (216,138) 48,657 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 721,033 330,361 (133,971) 51,412 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 93,080 108,735 131,909 5,385 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (201,272) (224,324) (307,206) 253,847 Policy charges...................................... (128,233) (163,413) (181,569) (6,097) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (674,213) (179,927) (781,462) (23,741) ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (910,638) (458,929) (1,138,328) 229,394 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (189,605) (128,568) (1,272,299) 280,806 NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 2,705,585 2,834,153 4,106,452 -- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- End of year......................................... $ 2,515,980 $ 2,705,585 $ 2,834,153 $ 280,806 ================= ================= ================== ================= MSF JENNISON GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ (1,188) $ (7,181) $ (2,846) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 80,637 174,717 24,074 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 573,524 (72,196) (21,181) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 652,973 95,340 47 ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 92,951 62,223 48,387 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (132,487) 1,152,858 79,159 Policy charges...................................... (105,538) (102,235) (53,667) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (165,439) (157,069) (151,814) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (310,513) 955,777 (77,935) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 342,460 1,051,117 (77,888) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 2,005,351 954,234 1,032,122 ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- End of year......................................... $ 2,347,811 $ 2,005,351 $ 954,234 ================= ================== ================= (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 52
N-659th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 59th
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 53
N-660th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 60th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF MET/ARTISAN MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 5,008 $ 3,863 $ 3,625 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 34,175 (19,295) (38,362) Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 239,251 101,754 84,351 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 278,434 86,322 49,614 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 39,156 45,687 32,727 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (46,177) 413 (36,813) Policy charges...................................... (59,820) (67,751) (70,468) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (95,757) (31,034) (51,303) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (162,598) (52,685) (125,857) ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 115,836 33,637 (76,243) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 824,712 791,075 867,318 ----------------- ----------------- ----------------- End of year......................................... $ 940,548 $ 824,712 $ 791,075 ================= ================= ================= MSF MSF NEUBERGER METLIFE STOCK INDEX BERMAN GENESIS SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------- ----------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 (a) ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 22,240 $ 18,867 $ 15,228 $ (2,233) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 210,924 34,105 16,272 8,016 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 236,918 164,621 (11,145) 209,163 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 470,082 217,593 20,355 214,946 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 59,203 114,531 57,322 33,070 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (299,114) 101,065 77,249 814,699 Policy charges...................................... (92,050) (98,013) (92,330) (29,967) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (95,806) (28,702) (20,318) (22,966) ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (427,767) 88,881 21,923 794,836 ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 42,315 306,474 42,278 1,009,782 NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 1,751,267 1,444,793 1,402,515 -- ----------------- ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- End of year......................................... $ 1,793,582 $ 1,751,267 $ 1,444,793 $ 1,009,782 ================= ================= ================== ================= MSF T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ (427) $ 121 $ 60 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 7,111 1,293 885 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 115,168 22,589 (2,365) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 121,852 24,003 (1,420) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 20,791 731 855 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 225,428 (1,847) (596) Policy charges...................................... (14,586) (2,633) (2,443) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (2,102) (8) (1,284) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ 229,531 (3,757) (3,468) ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 351,383 20,246 (4,888) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 147,562 127,316 132,204 ----------------- ------------------ ----------------- End of year......................................... $ 498,945 $ 147,562 $ 127,316 ================= ================== ================= (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 54
N-661st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 61st
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 55
N-662nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 62nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS -- (CONCLUDED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 58 $ (3) $ (4) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 1,064 1,483 737 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 5,274 568 (447) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 6,396 2,048 286 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ -- -- -- Net transfers (including fixed account)............. -- 98 -- Policy charges...................................... (421) (463) (302) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (44) -- (2,612) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (465) (365) (2,914) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 5,931 1,683 (2,628) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 14,535 12,852 15,480 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 20,466 $ 14,535 $ 12,852 =================== ==================== =================== MSF WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT U.S. GOVERNMENT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 1,634 $ 1,574 $ 885 Net realized gains (losses)......................... 336 170 5,082 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. (2,897) 1,103 (619) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. (927) 2,847 5,348 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 8,186 8,198 8,186 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. (7,067) 1,469 1,340 Policy charges...................................... (9,163) (10,699) (10,849) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... (17,053) (735) (118,369) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (25,097) (1,767) (119,692) -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. (26,024) 1,080 (114,344) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 102,286 101,206 215,550 -------------------- ------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 76,262 $ 102,286 $ 101,206 ==================== =================== =================== PUTNAM VT MULTI-CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS: FROM OPERATIONS: Net investment income (loss)........................ $ 83 $ 12 $ (7) Net realized gains (losses)......................... 254 170 137 Change in unrealized gains (losses) on investments.. 5,141 2,021 (870) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations................................. 5,478 2,203 (740) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- POLICY TRANSACTIONS: Premium payments received from policy owners........ 606 485 485 Net transfers (including fixed account)............. 25 (89) (220) Policy charges...................................... (853) (928) (700) Transfers for policy benefits and terminations...... -- -- (11) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from policy transactions........................ (222) (532) (446) ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- Net increase (decrease) in net assets............. 5,256 1,671 (1,186) NET ASSETS: Beginning of year................................... 15,135 13,464 14,650 ------------------- -------------------- ------------------- End of year......................................... $ 20,391 $ 15,135 $ 13,464 =================== ==================== =================== (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 56
N-663rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 63rd
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements. 57
N-664th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 64th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. ORGANIZATION MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One (the "Separate Account"), a separate account of MetLife Investors Insurance Company (the "Company"), was established by the Company's Board of Directors on October 23, 1991 to support operations of the Company with respect to certain variable life insurance policies (the "Policies"). The Company is a direct wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., a Delaware corporation. The Separate Account is registered as a unit investment trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended, and exists in accordance with the regulations of the Missouri Department of Insurance. In the second quarter of 2013, MetLife, Inc. announced its plans to merge into MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut ("MICC"), as the surviving entity, two United States ("U.S.")-based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware (the "Mergers"). The companies to be merged into MICC consist of the Company and MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("Exeter"), a reinsurance company that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products. Exeter, formerly a Cayman Islands company, was re-domesticated to Delaware in October 2013. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. The Separate Account is divided into Sub-Accounts, each of which is treated as an individual accounting entity for financial reporting purposes. Each Sub-Account invests in shares of the corresponding fund or portfolio (with the same name) of registered investment management companies (the "Trusts"), which are presented below: [Enlarge/Download Table] AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST")* Insurance Funds) ("Invesco V.I.") Metropolitan Series Fund ("MSF")* Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust Putnam Variable Trust ("Putnam VT") ("FTVIPT") *See Note 5 for a discussion of additional information on related party transactions. The assets of each of the Sub-Accounts of the Separate Account are registered in the name of the Company. Under applicable insurance law, the assets and liabilities of the Separate Account are clearly identified and distinguished from the Company's other assets and liabilities. The portion of the Separate Account's assets applicable to the Policies is not chargeable with liabilities arising out of any other business the Company may conduct. 2. LIST OF SUB-ACCOUNTS A. Premium payments, less any applicable charges, applied to the Separate Account are invested in one or more Sub-Accounts in accordance with the selection made by the policy owner. The following Sub-Accounts had net assets as of December 31, 2013: [Enlarge/Download Table] FTVIPT Templeton Foreign Securities Sub-Account MIST MetLife Balanced Strategy Sub-Account Invesco V.I. International Growth Sub-Account MIST MetLife Defensive Strategy Sub-Account MIST Clarion Global Real Estate Sub-Account MIST MetLife Growth Strategy Sub-Account MIST ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Sub-Account MIST MetLife Moderate Strategy Sub-Account MIST Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Sub-Account MIST MFS Emerging Markets Equity Sub-Account MIST Harris Oakmark International Sub-Account MIST MFS Research International Sub-Account MIST Invesco Comstock Sub-Account MIST Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Sub-Account MIST Invesco Mid Cap Value Sub-Account MIST PIMCO Inflation Protected Bond Sub-Account MIST Invesco Small Cap Growth Sub-Account MIST PIMCO Total Return Sub-Account MIST Loomis Sayles Global Markets Sub-Account MIST Pioneer Fund Sub-Account MIST Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Sub-Account MIST T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Sub-Account MIST MetLife Aggressive Strategy Sub-Account MIST T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Sub-Account 58
N-665th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 65th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 2. LIST OF SUB-ACCOUNTS -- (CONCLUDED) [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST Third Avenue Small Cap Value Sub-Account MSF MetLife Stock Index Sub-Account MSF BlackRock Bond Income Sub-Account MSF Neuberger Berman Genesis Sub-Account (a) MSF BlackRock Capital Appreciation Sub-Account MSF T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Sub-Account MSF BlackRock Money Market Sub-Account MSF T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Sub-Account MSF Davis Venture Value Sub-Account MSF Western Asset Management U.S. Government MSF Frontier Mid Cap Growth Sub-Account (a) Sub-Account MSF Jennison Growth Sub-Account Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Sub-Account MSF Met/Artisan Mid Cap Value Sub-Account (a) This Sub-Account began operations during the year ended December 31, 2013. B. The following Sub-Accounts had no net assets as of December 31, 2013: MSF Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Sub-Account 3. PORTFOLIO CHANGES The following Sub-Accounts ceased operations during the year ended December 31, 2013: MIST MLA Mid Cap Sub-Account MIST RCM Technology Sub-Account MIST Turner Mid Cap Growth Sub-Account The operations of the Sub-Accounts were affected by the following changes that occurred during the year ended December 31, 2013: NAME CHANGES: [Enlarge/Download Table] Former Portfolio New Portfolio (MIST) Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth (MIST) ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio Portfolio (MIST) Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio (MIST) Invesco Mid Cap Value Portfolio (MIST) Van Kampen Comstock Portfolio (MIST) Invesco Comstock Portfolio (MSF) BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (MSF) BlackRock Capital Appreciation Portfolio MERGERS: [Enlarge/Download Table] Former Portfolio New Portfolio (MIST) MLA Mid Cap Portfolio (MSF) Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio (MIST) RCM Technology Portfolio (MSF) T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (MIST) Turner Mid Cap Growth Portfolio (MSF) Frontier Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES BASIS OF ACCOUNTING The financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") applicable for variable life separate accounts registered as unit investment trusts. 59
N-666th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 66th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONTINUED) SECURITY TRANSACTIONS Security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Realized gains and losses on the sales of investments are computed on the basis of the average cost of the investment sold. Income from dividends and realized gain distributions are recorded on the ex-distribution date. SECURITY VALUATION A Sub-Account's investment in shares of a fund or portfolio of the Trusts is valued at fair value based on the closing net asset value ("NAV") or price per share as determined by the Trusts as of the end of the year. All changes in fair value are recorded as changes in unrealized gains (losses) on investments in the statements of operations of the applicable Sub-Accounts. The Separate Account defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The Separate Account prioritizes the inputs to fair valuation techniques and allows for the use of unobservable inputs to the extent that observable inputs are not available. The Separate Account has categorized its assets based on the priority of the inputs to the respective valuation technique. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). An asset's classification within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of significant input to its valuation. The input levels are as follows: Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets that the Separate Account has the ability to access. Level 2 Observable inputs other than quoted prices in Level 1 that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs may include quoted prices for the identical instrument on an inactive market or prices for similar instruments. Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the fair value of the assets, representing the Separate Account's own assumptions about the assumptions a market participant would use in valuing the asset, and based on the best information available. Each Sub-Account invests in shares of open-end mutual funds which calculate a daily NAV based on the fair value of the underlying securities in their portfolios. As a result, and as required by law, shares of open-end mutual funds are purchased and redeemed at their quoted daily NAV as reported by the Trusts at the close of each business day. On that basis, the inputs used to value all shares held by the Separate Account, which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis, are classified as Level 2. There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, and no activity in Level 3 during the year. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES The operations of the Separate Account form a part of the total operations of the Company and are not taxed separately. The Company is taxed as a life insurance company under the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code ("IRC"). Under the current provisions of the IRC, the Company does not expect to incur federal income taxes on the earnings of the Separate Account to the extent the earnings are credited under the Policies. Accordingly, no charge is currently being made to the Separate Account for federal income taxes. The Company will periodically review the status of this policy in the event of changes in the tax law. A charge may be made in future years for any federal income taxes that would be attributable to the Policies. 60
N-667th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 67th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES -- (CONCLUDED) PREMIUM PAYMENTS The Company deducts a sales charge for certain policies and a state premium tax charge from premiums before amounts are allocated to the Separate Account. In the case of certain Policies, the Company also deducts a federal income tax charge before amounts are allocated to the Separate Account. This federal income tax charge is imposed in connection with certain Policies to recover a portion of the federal income tax adjustment attributable to policy acquisition expenses. Net premiums are reported as premium payments received from policy owners on the statements of changes in net assets of the applicable Sub-Accounts and are credited as accumulation units. NET TRANSFERS Funds transferred by the policy owner into or out of Sub-Accounts within the Separate Account or into or out of the fixed account, which is part of the Company's general account, are recorded on a net basis as net transfers in the statements of changes in net assets of the applicable Sub-Accounts. USE OF ESTIMATES The preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported herein. Actual results could differ from these estimates. 5. EXPENSES AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The following annual Separate Account charge paid to the Company is an asset-based charge assessed through a daily reduction in unit values, which is recorded as an expense in the accompanying statements of operations of the applicable Sub-Accounts: Mortality and Expense Risk -- The mortality risk assumed by the Company is the risk that those insured may die sooner than anticipated and therefore, the Company will pay an aggregate amount of death benefits greater than anticipated. The expense risk assumed is the risk that expenses incurred in issuing and administering the Policies will exceed the amounts realized from the administrative charges assessed against the Policies. The table below represents the range of effective annual rates for the charge for the year ended December 31, 2013: [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Mortality and Expense Risk 0.00% - 0.55% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The above referenced charge may not necessarily correspond to the costs associated with providing the services or benefits indicated by the designation of the charge or associated with a particular policy. 61
N-668th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 68th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. EXPENSES AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS -- (CONCLUDED) For some Policies, a Mortality and Expense Risk charge ranging from 0.50% to 0.90% is assessed on a monthly basis through the redemption of units. Other policy charges that are assessed through the redemption of units generally include: cost of insurance ("COI") charges, administrative charges, a policy fee, and charges for benefits provided by rider, if any. The COI charge is the primary charge under the policy for the death benefit provided by the Company which may vary by policy based on underwriting criteria. A transfer fee of $25 or 2% of the amount transferred may be deducted after twelve transfers are made in a policy year. Administrative charges range from $.03 to $1.01 for every $1,000 of policy face amount and are assessed monthly for the first 10 policy years. Certain policies impose a monthly tax expense charge at a 0.40% annual rate for the first 10 policy years and a monthly administrative charge at a 0.40% annual rate for the life of the policy. Policy fees range from $6 to $30 and are assessed monthly or annually depending on the policy and the policy year. In addition, the Policies impose a surrender charge if the policy is partially or fully surrendered within the specified surrender charge period that ranges from 0% to 45% of the policy's target premium. Most policies offer optional benefits that can be added to the policy by rider. The charge for riders that provide life insurance benefits can range from $.01 to $83.33 per $1,000 of coverage and the charge for riders providing benefits in the event of disability can range from $1.30 to $28.50 per $100 of the benefit provided. These charges are paid to the Company and are recorded as policy charges in the accompanying statements of changes in net assets of the applicable Sub-Accounts for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. MetLife Advisers, LLC, which acts in the capacity of investment adviser to the portfolios of the MIST and MSF Trusts, is an affiliate of the Company. 62
N-669th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 69th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. STATEMENTS OF INVESTMENTS [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------- -------------------------------------------------------------------- COST OF PROCEEDS SHARES COST ($) PURCHASES ($) FROM SALES ($) --------- --------- --------------------------------- --------------------------------- 2013 2013 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 --------- --------- --------- ------- --------- --------- --------- ---------- FTVIPT Templeton Foreign Securities Subaccount........ 7,674 125,354 6,160 4,342 2,793 2,575 2,657 13,626 Invesco VI International Growth Fund Subaccount.............. 1,526 32,142 4,235 1,284 768 644 581 8,877 MIST Clarion Global Real Estate Subaccount................... 29,714 324,958 56,372 77,387 39,639 56,303 86,830 86,940 MIST ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Subaccount............ 27,694 240,682 106,256 51,143 103,195 323,826 102,171 201,122 MIST Goldman Sachs Mid Cap Value Subaccount............. 34,152 426,698 50,240 29,960 28,444 150,101 92,073 130,366 MIST Harris Oakmark International Subaccount..... 97,372 1,407,342 512,598 211,160 238,798 847,551 321,057 649,407 MIST Invesco Comstock Subaccount................... 46,065 483,453 107,178 74,731 91,842 121,025 70,372 41,881 MIST Invesco Mid Cap Value Subaccount................... 17,520 293,930 10,928 3,639 14,998 34,786 11,297 66,732 MIST Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio Subaccount......... 41,468 607,177 204,389 211,668 93,809 151,472 189,965 125,953 MIST Loomis Sayles Global Markets Subaccount........... 34,884 414,207 31,526 121,844 266,152 14,579 14,071 70,366 MIST Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Subaccount......... 127,376 1,570,389 286,754 244,003 265,183 191,405 739,274 444,567 MIST MetLife Aggressive Strategy Subaccount.......... 39,854 387,114 27,546 21,369 34,882 454,968 61,276 507,426 MIST MetLife Balanced Strategy Subaccount.......... 253,201 2,559,765 420,523 431,021 842,438 143,588 234,520 1,059,667 MIST MetLife Defensive Strategy Subaccount.......... 800 9,068 9,208 6,657 9,307 72,949 1,696 1,712 MIST MetLife Growth Strategy Subaccount.......... 240,166 2,557,473 165,319 306,385 150,067 236,786 451,507 186,870 MIST MetLife Moderate Strategy Subaccount.......... 115,149 1,206,416 121,521 120,566 83,673 98,886 58,555 80,644 MIST MFS Emerging Markets Equity Subaccount.... 36,641 360,969 142,968 20,869 169,624 63,416 308,781 161,735 MIST MFS Research International Subaccount..... 108,111 1,165,940 125,865 131,532 139,467 436,360 479,317 1,185,874 MIST Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Subaccount.... 14,149 128,729 8,077 5,327 19,601 11,205 19,755 43,801 MIST PIMCO Inflation Protected Bond Subaccount.... 99,296 1,075,444 786,772 344,843 681,703 1,287,770 466,010 561,893 MIST PIMCO Total Return Subaccount............ 255,098 3,065,944 1,048,547 977,974 1,023,719 1,085,002 1,184,575 995,199 MIST Pioneer Fund Subaccount... 26,277 271,616 17,609 6,370 18,783 35,045 26,214 55,486 MIST T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Sub-Account............ 189,595 4,623,080 1,106,284 365,432 305,490 1,554,788 821,612 1,364,685 MIST T. Rowe Price Mid Cap Growth Subaccount............ 132,898 1,171,350 431,862 478,253 330,158 650,545 490,903 505,848 MIST Third Avenue Small Cap Value Subaccount............. 46,714 725,259 343,071 45,572 167,038 976,272 251,295 503,952 MSF BlackRock Bond Income Subaccount................... 87 9,337 713 2,053 861 2,469 4,363 2,335 MSF BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Subaccount........ 4,665 105,897 57,553 4,276 7,354 85,804 16,680 15,465 (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. 63
N-670th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 70th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. STATEMENTS OF INVESTMENTS -- (CONCLUDED) [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31, FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ COST OF PROCEEDS SHARES COST ($) PURCHASES ($) FROM SALES ($) ------- --------- ----------------------------------- ----------------------------------- 2013 2013 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------- --------- ------------ --------- -------- ------------ --------- ---------- MSF BlackRock Money Market Subaccount.................... 13,781 1,378,092 1,492,065 2,507,242 432,116 2,998,252 2,254,065 1,484,514 MSF Davis Venture Value Subaccount.................... 58,554 1,822,980 487,051 186,547 168,612 1,332,542 636,312 1,287,067 MSF Frontier Mid Cap Growth Subaccount.................... 7,611 232,203 280,489(a) -- -- 51,824(a) -- -- MSF Jennison Growth Subaccount.................... 147,592 1,782,931 406,767 1,746,016 203,988 709,962 622,778 284,773 MSF Met/Artisan Mid Cap Value Subaccount.................... 3,502 741,062 164,597 118,282 68,372 322,148 167,071 190,626 MSF MetLife Stock Index Subaccount.................... 42,124 1,352,149 637,228 460,726 184,170 1,018,691 342,031 138,726 MSF Neuberger Berman Genesis Sub-Account................... 55,669 800,679 896,265(a) -- -- 103,603(a) -- -- MSF T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Subaccount............. 20,354 335,945 258,105 703 789 29,105 4,340 4,184 MSF T.Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Subaccount............. 862 11,471 963 1,493 23 457 508 2,936 MSF Western Asset Management U.S. Government Subaccount.... 6,353 76,695 16,499 10,635 15,714 39,946 10,820 131,092 Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Subaccount.................... 657 12,341 663 631 604 852 1,151 1,054 (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. 64
N-671st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 71st
This page is intentionally left blank.
N-672nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 72nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. SCHEDULES OF UNITS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011: [Enlarge/Download Table] FTVIPT TEMPLETON INVESCO V.I. FOREIGN SECURITIES INTERNATIONAL GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- Units beginning of year............ 5,720 5,806 6,620 2,967 2,961 3,598 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 168 33 28 251 52 2 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (89) (119) (842) (47) (46) (639) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ ------------- Units end of year.................. 5,799 5,720 5,806 3,171 2,967 2,961 ============= ============= ============= ============= ============ ============= MIST CLARION GLOBAL MIST CLEARBRIDGE REAL ESTATE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ Units beginning of year............ 18,675 19,610 23,260 33,803 36,581 44,597 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 2,214 4,397 1,796 22,936 6,041 8,895 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (3,215) (5,332) (5,446) (35,555) (8,819) (16,911) ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------- ------------ Units end of year.................. 17,674 18,675 19,610 21,184 33,803 36,581 ============= ============= ============= ============= ============= ============ [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST GOLDMAN SACHS MIST HARRIS OAKMARK MID CAP VALUE INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 30,953 34,731 40,616 76,754 82,740 102,155 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 17,302 1,584 1,651 47,456 10,616 12,277 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (23,447) (5,362) (7,536) (61,535) (16,602) (31,692) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 24,808 30,953 34,731 62,675 76,754 82,740 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ MIST INVESCO COMSTOCK MIST INVESCO MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT -------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ Units beginning of year............ 5,043 4,087 3,663 10,271 10,591 12,376 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 18,960 1,674 791 221 61 466 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (2,775) (718) (367) (935) (381) (2,251) ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ Units end of year.................. 21,228 5,043 4,087 9,557 10,271 10,591 =========== ============ =========== ============ =========== ============ [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST INVESCO MIST LOOMIS SAYLES SMALL CAP GROWTH GLOBAL MARKETS SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 32,976 34,422 36,164 27,897 21,110 6,929 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 14,796 10,581 6,536 1,847 7,600 19,036 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (15,463) (12,027) (8,278) (1,410) (813) (4,855) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 32,309 32,976 34,422 28,334 27,897 21,110 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ MIST LORD ABBETT MIST METLIFE BOND DEBENTURE AGGRESSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 66,633 96,842 111,921 5,990 6,318 9,966 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 20,587 7,468 7,224 38,290 131 265 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (26,981) (37,677) (22,303) (23,599) (459) (3,913) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 60,239 66,633 96,842 20,681 5,990 6,318 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST METLIFE MIST METLIFE BALANCED STRATEGY DEFENSIVE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 24,597 17,003 19,102 503 485 435 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 43,623 9,498 6,428 32 28 60 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (5,667) (1,904) (8,527) (475) (10) (10) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 62,553 24,597 17,003 60 503 485 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ MIST METLIFE MIST METLIFE GROWTH STRATEGY MODERATE STRATEGY SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 30,414 21,386 21,914 9,242 8,711 8,809 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 14,573 12,729 882 36,668 954 475 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (3,614) (3,701) (1,410) (6,102) (423) (573) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 41,373 30,414 21,386 39,808 9,242 8,711 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. 66
N-673rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 73rd
67
N-674th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 74th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. SCHEDULES OF UNITS -- (CONTINUED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011: [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST MFS MIST MFS EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 25,387 48,591 48,949 68,319 86,503 140,572 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 11,631 1,667 13,450 25,004 10,381 5,500 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (5,540) (24,871) (13,808) (36,992) (28,565) (59,569) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 31,478 25,387 48,591 56,331 68,319 86,503 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ MIST MORGAN STANLEY MIST PIMCO MID CAP GROWTH INFLATION PROTECTED BOND SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 7,298 7,917 9,205 93,790 109,605 108,563 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 248 262 562 66,606 10,571 35,865 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (420) (881) (1,850) (100,261) (26,386) (34,823) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 7,126 7,298 7,917 60,135 93,790 109,605 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST PIMCO MIST TOTAL RETURN PIONEER FUND SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 170,142 189,371 197,880 3,091 3,298 3,631 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 96,067 52,431 47,328 22 4 154 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (111,919) (71,660) (55,837) (237) (211) (487) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 154,290 170,142 189,371 2,876 3,091 3,298 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ MIST T. ROWE PRICE MIST T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE MID CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- Units beginning of year............ 263,580 301,520 378,052 89,207 96,423 109,038 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 67,636 22,131 22,110 46,253 23,072 19,573 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (123,472) (60,071) (98,642) (55,043) (30,288) (32,188) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- Units end of year.................. 207,744 263,580 301,520 80,417 89,207 96,423 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ =========== [Enlarge/Download Table] MIST THIRD AVENUE MSF BLACKROCK SMALL CAP VALUE BOND INCOME SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT --------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- Units beginning of year............ 52,850 61,163 76,212 143 176 203 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 29,385 2,977 6,549 -- 22 3 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (49,900) (11,290) (21,598) (30) (55) (30) ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- Units end of year.................. 32,335 52,850 61,163 113 143 176 ============ =========== ============ ============ ============ =========== MSF BLACKROCK MSF BLACKROCK CAPITAL APPRECIATION MONEY MARKET SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 8,214 9,003 9,665 219,012 208,523 289,854 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 6,273 108 316 95,596 189,852 34,398 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (6,929) (897) (978) (249,188) (179,363) (115,729) ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 7,558 8,214 9,003 65,420 219,012 208,523 ============ ============ ============ =========== ============ ============ [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF FRONTIER MSF DAVIS VENTURE MID CAP VALUE GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------- ------------ 2013 2012 2011 2013 (A) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 167,128 205,966 284,822 -- Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 39,071 9,781 9,666 26,369 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (121,303) (48,619) (88,522) (12,349) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 84,896 167,128 205,966 14,020 ============= ============ ============ ============ MSF JENNISON MSF MET/ARTISAN GROWTH MID CAP VALUE SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 103,565 55,767 60,297 52,276 58,672 68,298 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 69,447 84,875 11,623 11,932 7,421 4,613 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (75,595) (37,077) (16,153) (32,062) (13,817) (14,239) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 97,417 103,565 55,767 32,146 52,276 58,672 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. 68
N-675th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 75th
69
N-676th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 76th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. SCHEDULES OF UNITS -- (CONCLUDED) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011: [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF NEUBERGER MSF METLIFE BERMAN STOCK INDEX GENESIS SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ----------------------------------------- ------------ 2013 2012 2011 2013 (A) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 97,344 114,857 112,922 -- Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 33,909 23,060 12,305 60,869 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (83,089) (40,573) (10,370) (16,445) ------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 48,164 97,344 114,857 44,424 ============= ============ ============ ============ MSF T. ROWE PRICE MSF T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH SMALL CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units beginning of year............ 7,346 7,536 7,735 546 561 688 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 13,871 35 215 -- 6 1 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (2,008) (225) (414) (14) (21) (128) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Units end of year.................. 19,209 7,346 7,536 532 546 561 ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ ============ [Enlarge/Download Table] MSF WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT PUTNAM VT U.S. GOVERNMENT MULTI-CAP GROWTH SUB-ACCOUNT SUB-ACCOUNT ---------------------------------------- --------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ Units beginning of year............ 457 465 1,040 879 911 982 Units issued and transferred from other funding options...... 356 39 54 38 46 1,011 Units redeemed and transferred to other funding options........... (235) (47) (629) (49) (78) (1,082) ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ ----------- ------------ Units end of year.................. 578 457 465 868 879 911 ============ ============ ============ ============ =========== ============ (a) For the period April 29, 2013 to December 31, 2013. 70
N-677th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 77th
71
N-678th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 78th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS The Company sells a number of variable life products which have unique combinations of features and fees, some of which directly affect the unit values of the Sub-Accounts. Differences in the fee structures result in a variety of unit values, expense ratios, and total returns. The following table is a summary of unit values and units outstanding for the Policies, net investment income ratios, and expense ratios, excluding expenses for the underlying fund or portfolio, for the respective stated periods in the five years ended December 31, 2013: [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31 ------------------------------------------- UNIT VALUE LOWEST TO NET UNITS HIGHEST ($) ASSETS ($) ----------- ---------------- ------------ FTVIPT Templeton Foreign Securities 2013 5,799 20.86 - 154.39 134,753 Sub-Account 2012 5,720 15.37 - 125.56 108,569 2011 5,806 13.03 - 106.32 92,913 2010 6,620 14.63 - 119.25 116,626 2009 7,580 13.54 - 14.66 109,928 Invesco V.I. International Growth 2013 3,171 16.73 - 44.27 53,891 Sub-Account 2012 2,967 14.06 - 37.29 42,370 2011 2,961 12.17 - 32.41 36,569 2010 3,598 12.30 - 34.91 47,490 2009 3,723 10.96 - 11.56 43,008 MIST Clarion Global Real Estate 2013 17,674 18.72 - 18.94 330,964 Sub-Account 2012 18,675 18.14 - 18.30 338,836 2011 19,610 14.44 - 14.55 283,265 2010 23,260 15.33 - 15.43 356,641 2009 23,025 13.26 305,225 MIST ClearBridge Aggressive 2013 21,184 15.39 - 20.53 372,425 Growth Sub-Account 2012 33,803 10.57 - 14.15 450,353 2011 36,581 8.94 - 11.98 424,732 2010 44,597 8.67 - 11.63 506,425 2009 48,591 9.43 458,027 MIST Goldman Sachs Mid Cap 2013 24,808 24.28 - 24.58 606,498 Value Sub-Account 2012 30,953 18.37 568,479 2011 34,731 15.59 541,432 2010 40,616 16.69 678,241 2009 42,888 13.48 578,140 MIST Harris Oakmark International 2013 62,675 29.32 - 30.33 1,862,655 Sub-Account 2012 76,754 22.47 - 23.13 1,772,605 2011 82,740 17.96 1,486,107 2010 102,155 20.96 2,144,852 2009 109,693 18.10 1,984,877 MIST Invesco Comstock Sub-Account 2013 21,228 17.33 - 171.39 671,585 2012 5,043 12.81 - 127.06 515,450 2011 4,087 107.58 439,690 2010 3,663 109.45 400,870 2009 3,891 95.60 371,973 MIST Invesco Mid Cap Value 2013 9,557 41.69 - 43.00 398,908 Sub-Account 2012 10,271 25.77 - 33.00 328,233 2011 10,591 22.54 - 28.82 294,396 2010 12,376 23.47 - 29.99 356,212 2009 15,886 18.76 - 22.85 360,427 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 -------------------------------------------------- INVESTMENT(1) EXPENSE RATIO(2) TOTAL RETURN(3) INCOME LOWEST TO LOWEST TO RATIO (%) HIGHEST (%) HIGHEST (%) ------------- ---------------- ----------------- FTVIPT Templeton Foreign Securities 2013 2.55 0.00 - 0.25 22.97 - 23.27 Sub-Account 2012 3.20 0.00 - 0.55 17.94 - 18.60 2011 1.93 0.00 - 0.55 (10.93) - (10.45) 2010 2.11 0.00 - 0.55 8.08 - 9.63 2009 4.08 0.55 36.59 - 37.34 Invesco V.I. International Growth 2013 1.26 0.00 - 0.25 18.72 - 19.01 Sub-Account 2012 1.49 0.00 - 0.25 15.04 - 15.53 2011 1.66 0.00 - 0.45 (7.16) - (6.74) 2010 2.39 0.00 - 0.55 12.61 - 12.85 2009 1.58 0.55 34.50 - 35.25 MIST Clarion Global Real Estate 2013 6.83 0.25 - 0.55 3.19 - 3.50 Sub-Account 2012 2.12 0.25 - 0.55 25.60 - 25.76 2011 4.18 0.45 - 0.55 (5.79) - (5.70) 2010 7.98 0.45 - 0.55 11.83 - 15.65 2009 3.71 0.55 34.37 MIST ClearBridge Aggressive 2013 0.43 0.25 - 0.55 45.10 - 45.54 Growth Sub-Account 2012 0.20 0.25 - 0.55 18.16 - 18.31 2011 0.10 0.45 - 0.55 2.98 - 3.08 2010 0.07 0.45 - 0.55 14.05 - 23.37 2009 0.14 0.55 32.72 MIST Goldman Sachs Mid Cap 2013 1.19 0.25 - 0.55 32.22 - 32.62 Value Sub-Account 2012 0.87 0.55 17.81 2011 0.65 0.55 (6.65) 2010 1.22 0.55 23.88 2009 1.64 0.55 31.94 MIST Harris Oakmark International 2013 2.74 0.15 - 0.55 30.08 - 30.61 Sub-Account 2012 1.84 0.25 - 0.55 28.76 - 28.93 2011 0.03 0.55 (14.46) 2010 2.06 0.55 16.03 2009 8.35 0.55 54.61 MIST Invesco Comstock Sub-Account 2013 1.29 0.25 - 0.55 34.89 - 35.30 2012 1.57 0.25 - 0.55 18.10 - 18.26 2011 1.24 0.55 (1.71) 2010 1.67 0.55 14.49 2009 2.66 0.55 26.20 MIST Invesco Mid Cap Value 2013 0.92 0.00 - 0.25 30.30 - 30.63 Sub-Account 2012 0.67 0.00 - 0.55 14.36 - 15.00 2011 0.77 0.00 - 0.55 (3.99) - (3.46) 2010 0.85 0.00 - 0.55 11.36 - 25.84 2009 2.92 0.55 26.17 - 26.87 72
N-679th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 79th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS -- (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31 ----------------------------------------- UNIT VALUE LOWEST TO NET UNITS HIGHEST ($) ASSETS ($) ----------- --------------- ----------- MIST Invesco Small Cap Growth 2013 32,309 24.78 - 29.90 851,279 Sub-Account 2012 32,976 17.73 - 20.61 598,422 2011 34,422 15.04 - 17.46 517,851 2010 36,164 15.25 551,631 2009 40,018 12.13 485,309 MIST Loomis Sayles Global Markets 2013 28,334 18.36 - 18.55 520,434 Sub-Account 2012 27,897 15.74 438,966 2011 21,110 13.50 284,909 2010 6,929 13.74 95,216 2009 6,781 11.29 76,547 MIST Lord Abbett Bond Debenture 2013 60,239 24.05 - 36.85 1,723,794 Sub-Account 2012 66,633 22.36 - 32.46 1,611,273 2011 96,842 19.86 - 22.64 2,004,485 2010 111,921 19.05 - 21.59 2,208,923 2009 111,155 16.93 - 19.08 1,954,950 MIST MetLife Aggressive Strategy 2013 20,681 17.75 - 175.46 536,385 Sub-Account 2012 5,990 135.96 814,421 2011 6,318 116.80 737,946 2010 9,966 124.37 1,239,472 2009 2,775 106.95 296,818 MIST MetLife Balanced Strategy 2013 62,553 17.13 - 169.36 3,339,690 Sub-Account 2012 24,597 14.34 - 142.18 2,583,652 2011 17,003 125.15 2,127,849 2010 19,102 127.76 2,440,526 2009 15,551 112.84 1,754,842 MIST MetLife Defensive Strategy 2013 60 157.89 9,546 Sub-Account 2012 503 145.23 73,028 2011 485 131.33 63,636 2010 435 129.48 56,362 2009 386 117.02 45,169 MIST MetLife Growth Strategy 2013 41,373 17.77 - 175.65 3,393,497 Sub-Account 2012 30,414 14.11 - 139.88 2,798,566 2011 21,386 121.22 2,592,354 2010 21,914 126.49 2,771,903 2009 26,093 109.87 2,866,765 MIST MetLife Moderate Strategy 2013 39,808 16.72 - 165.34 1,473,862 Sub-Account 2012 9,242 14.65 - 145.29 1,302,910 2011 8,711 129.63 1,129,123 2010 8,809 130.12 1,146,247 2009 9,488 116.13 1,101,910 MIST MFS Emerging Markets Equity 2013 31,478 12.05 - 12.17 379,949 Sub-Account 2012 25,387 12.73 - 12.82 323,193 2011 48,591 10.75 - 10.81 522,182 2010 48,949 13.25 - 13.31 648,372 2009 33,572 10.74 360,567 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 --------------------------------------------------- INVESTMENT(1) EXPENSE RATIO(2) TOTAL RETURN(3) INCOME LOWEST TO LOWEST TO RATIO (%) HIGHEST (%) HIGHEST (%) -------------- ---------------- ----------------- MIST Invesco Small Cap Growth 2013 0.42 0.15 - 0.55 39.77 - 40.32 Sub-Account 2012 -- 0.25 - 0.55 17.86 - 18.01 2011 -- 0.45 - 0.55 (1.39) - (1.29) 2010 -- 0.55 25.79 2009 -- 0.55 33.47 MIST Loomis Sayles Global Markets 2013 2.55 0.25 - 0.55 16.70 - 17.05 Sub-Account 2012 2.12 0.55 16.59 2011 2.52 0.55 (1.79) 2010 3.46 0.55 21.72 2009 2.24 0.55 40.23 MIST Lord Abbett Bond Debenture 2013 6.68 0.00 - 0.55 7.58 - 8.17 Sub-Account 2012 7.04 0.00 - 0.55 12.57 - 13.19 2011 6.17 0.00 - 0.55 4.25 - 4.82 2010 6.45 0.00 - 0.55 12.56 - 13.18 2009 7.78 0.55 36.37 - 37.12 MIST MetLife Aggressive Strategy 2013 1.22 0.25 - 0.55 29.06 - 29.44 Sub-Account 2012 0.85 0.55 16.40 2011 1.21 0.55 (6.08) 2010 0.96 0.55 16.28 2009 -- 0.55 32.23 MIST MetLife Balanced Strategy 2013 2.06 0.25 - 0.55 19.12 - 19.48 Sub-Account 2012 2.30 0.25 - 0.55 13.61 - 13.75 2011 1.88 0.55 (2.05) 2010 2.10 0.55 13.22 2009 -- 0.55 28.00 MIST MetLife Defensive Strategy 2013 7.61 0.55 8.72 Sub-Account 2012 3.04 0.55 10.58 2011 2.55 0.55 1.43 2010 3.49 0.55 10.64 2009 4.08 0.55 22.56 MIST MetLife Growth Strategy 2013 1.73 0.25 - 0.55 25.57 - 25.95 Sub-Account 2012 1.80 0.25 - 0.55 15.40 - 15.55 2011 1.72 0.55 (4.17) 2010 1.85 0.55 15.13 2009 -- 0.55 29.76 MIST MetLife Moderate Strategy 2013 2.57 0.25 - 0.55 13.80 - 14.15 Sub-Account 2012 2.78 0.25 - 0.55 12.08 - 12.22 2011 2.01 0.55 (0.38) 2010 2.84 0.55 12.05 2009 3.72 0.55 25.66 MIST MFS Emerging Markets Equity 2013 1.26 0.25 - 0.55 (5.32) - (5.04) Sub-Account 2012 0.83 0.25 - 0.55 18.45 - 18.60 2011 1.56 0.45 - 0.55 (18.88) - (18.79) 2010 1.03 0.45 - 0.55 19.03 - 23.32 2009 1.18 0.55 68.23 73
N-680th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 80th
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS -- (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31 ------------------------------------------ UNIT VALUE LOWEST TO NET UNITS HIGHEST ($) ASSETS ($) ----------- --------------- ------------ MIST MFS Research International 2013 56,331 20.19 - 28.80 1,298,316 Sub-Account 2012 68,319 16.92 - 24.08 1,412,862 2011 86,503 14.53 - 20.59 1,554,624 2010 140,572 16.30 - 22.99 2,827,554 2009 132,368 17.97 - 20.59 2,404,090 MIST Morgan Stanley Mid Cap 2013 7,126 25.33 - 32.95 230,586 Growth Sub-Account 2012 7,298 13.00 - 23.65 169,509 2011 7,917 11.93 - 21.59 168,072 2010 9,205 12.85 - 23.13 209,605 2009 12,190 9.76 - 17.47 205,218 MIST PIMCO Inflation Protected 2013 60,135 16.35 - 17.06 987,947 Bond Sub-Account 2012 93,790 18.06 - 18.24 1,694,813 2011 109,605 16.61 1,820,776 2010 108,563 14.98 1,626,591 2009 96,808 13.95 1,350,368 MIST PIMCO Total Return 2013 154,290 18.62 - 21.48 3,027,966 Sub-Account 2012 170,142 19.05 - 21.86 3,325,699 2011 189,371 17.49 - 19.95 3,339,529 2010 197,880 17.00 - 19.29 3,390,666 2009 253,284 15.77 - 17.80 4,036,073 MIST Pioneer Fund Sub-Account 2013 2,876 170.81 491,287 (Commenced 5/4/2009) 2012 3,091 128.35 396,726 2011 3,298 116.06 382,723 2010 3,631 121.59 441,447 2009 4,515 104.62 472,344 MIST T. Rowe Price Large Cap 2013 207,744 20.90 - 99.03 6,104,336 Value Sub-Account 2012 263,580 15.68 - 69.03 5,013,414 2011 301,520 13.33 - 58.62 4,727,402 2010 378,052 13.93 - 61.19 6,016,069 2009 432,079 11.93 - 15.75 5,870,197 MIST T. Rowe Price Mid Cap 2013 80,417 17.98 - 23.43 1,633,247 Growth Sub-Account 2012 89,207 13.16 - 17.20 1,460,144 2011 96,423 15.18 1,463,658 2010 109,038 15.48 1,687,854 2009 134,262 12.15 1,631,694 MIST Third Avenue Small Cap 2013 32,335 27.86 - 33.27 982,793 Value Sub-Account 2012 52,850 21.03 - 25.18 1,327,124 2011 61,163 21.41 1,309,573 2010 76,212 23.58 1,797,066 2009 78,740 19.73 1,553,885 MSF BlackRock Bond Income 2013 113 82.50 9,351 Sub-Account 2012 143 80.91 - 83.34 11,889 2011 176 75.65 - 77.82 13,717 2010 203 71.38 - 73.36 14,859 2009 245 66.25 16,226 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 -------------------------------------------------- INVESTMENT(1) EXPENSE RATIO(2) TOTAL RETURN(3) INCOME LOWEST TO LOWEST TO RATIO (%) HIGHEST (%) HIGHEST (%) ------------- ---------------- ----------------- MIST MFS Research International 2013 2.85 0.00 - 0.55 18.94 - 19.58 Sub-Account 2012 2.13 0.00 - 0.55 16.37 - 16.97 2011 2.12 0.00 - 0.55 (10.89) - (10.44) 2010 1.97 0.00 - 0.55 11.09 - 14.01 2009 3.62 0.55 31.27 - 31.93 MIST Morgan Stanley Mid Cap 2013 0.79 0.00 - 0.25 38.96 - 39.30 Growth Sub-Account 2012 -- 0.00 - 0.55 8.95 - 9.55 2011 0.71 0.00 - 0.55 (7.17) - (6.67) 2010 0.17 0.00 - 0.55 20.18 - 32.41 2009 0.02 0.55 56.97 - 57.82 MIST PIMCO Inflation Protected 2013 2.58 0.15 - 0.55 (9.48) - (9.12) Bond Sub-Account 2012 3.24 0.25 - 0.55 8.72 - 8.87 2011 1.90 0.55 10.87 2010 2.54 0.55 7.41 2009 4.01 0.55 17.71 MIST PIMCO Total Return 2013 4.60 0.00 - 0.55 (2.26) - (1.72) Sub-Account 2012 3.39 0.00 - 0.55 8.95 - 9.56 2011 2.79 0.00 - 0.55 2.86 - 3.42 2010 3.90 0.00 - 0.55 4.47 - 8.41 2009 7.22 0.55 17.74 - 18.40 MIST Pioneer Fund Sub-Account 2013 3.20 0.00 33.08 (Commenced 5/4/2009) 2012 1.52 0.00 10.59 2011 1.26 0.00 (4.55) 2010 0.95 0.00 16.22 2009 -- 0.00 27.25 MIST T. Rowe Price Large Cap 2013 1.73 0.00 - 0.55 33.35 - 34.09 Value Sub-Account 2012 1.69 0.00 - 0.55 17.62 - 18.27 2011 0.88 0.00 - 0.55 (4.29) - (3.77) 2010 1.27 0.00 - 0.55 5.04 - 17.33 2009 2.68 0.55 18.02 - 18.67 MIST T. Rowe Price Mid Cap 2013 0.41 0.15 - 0.55 36.21 - 36.75 Growth Sub-Account 2012 -- 0.25 - 0.55 13.30 - 13.45 2011 -- 0.55 (1.93) 2010 -- 0.55 27.37 2009 -- 0.55 45.04 MIST Third Avenue Small Cap 2013 1.27 0.15 - 0.55 32.08 - 32.61 Value Sub-Account 2012 -- 0.25 - 0.55 17.62 - 17.78 2011 1.29 0.55 (9.20) 2010 1.39 0.55 19.49 2009 1.52 0.55 26.12 MSF BlackRock Bond Income 2013 4.15 0.25 (1.01) Sub-Account 2012 2.80 0.25 - 0.55 6.95 - 7.09 2011 4.03 0.45 - 0.55 5.98 - 6.09 2010 4.08 0.45 - 0.55 4.65 - 7.74 2009 7.30 0.55 8.87 74
N-681st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 81st
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS -- (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31 ------------------------------------------ UNIT VALUE LOWEST TO NET UNITS HIGHEST ($) ASSETS ($) ----------- --------------- ------------ MSF BlackRock Capital Appreciation 2013 7,558 9.70 - 53.00 176,543 Sub-Account 2012 8,214 17.30 - 39.59 157,461 (Commenced 5/4/2009) 2011 9,003 6.39 - 34.76 148,992 2010 9,665 7.06 - 38.35 172,111 2009 17,111 5.92 - 13.86 212,300 MSF BlackRock Money Market 2013 65,420 11.88 - 31.72 1,372,235 Sub-Account 2012 219,012 11.88 - 31.80 2,884,270 2011 208,523 11.88 - 31.94 2,631,093 2010 289,854 11.88 - 32.08 3,683,457 2009 401,008 11.88 - 12.76 5,115,550 MSF Davis Venture Value 2013 84,896 20.54 - 60.56 2,515,980 Sub-Account 2012 167,128 15.44 - 42.97 2,705,585 2011 205,966 13.76 2,834,153 2010 284,822 14.42 4,106,452 2009 297,989 12.94 3,857,140 MSF Frontier Mid Cap Growth 2013 14,020 19.89 - 20.13 280,806 Sub-Account (Commenced 4/29/2013) MSF Jennison Growth Sub-Account 2013 97,417 21.56 - 26.85 2,347,811 2012 103,565 15.77 - 19.70 2,005,351 2011 55,767 17.11 954,234 2010 60,297 17.12 1,032,122 2009 54,667 15.42 842,916 MSF Met/Artisan Mid Cap Value 2013 32,146 20.41 - 64.13 940,548 Sub-Account 2012 52,276 15.00 - 44.25 824,712 2011 58,672 13.48 791,075 2010 68,298 12.69 867,318 2009 101,146 11.10 1,122,661 MSF MetLife Stock Index 2013 48,164 19.01 - 80.67 1,793,582 Sub-Account 2012 97,344 14.48 - 61.26 1,751,267 2011 114,857 12.58 1,444,793 2010 112,922 12.42 1,402,515 2009 122,177 10.88 1,328,859 MSF Neuberger Berman Genesis 2013 44,424 21.42 - 24.70 1,009,782 Sub-Account (Commenced 4/29/2013) MSF T. Rowe Price Large Cap 2013 19,209 10.93 - 28.13 498,945 Growth Sub-Account 2012 7,346 18.70 - 20.21 147,562 2011 7,536 15.80 - 16.99 127,316 2010 7,735 16.07 - 17.18 132,204 2009 7,897 13.81 - 14.68 115,279 MSF T. Rowe Price Small Cap 2013 532 35.92 - 38.66 20,466 Growth Sub-Account 2012 546 24.52 - 26.75 14,535 2011 561 21.54 - 23.02 12,852 2010 688 20.97 - 22.62 15,480 2009 5,054 15.63 - 16.77 84,689 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 ------------------------------------------------ INVESTMENT(1) EXPENSE RATIO(2) TOTAL RETURN(3) INCOME LOWEST TO LOWEST TO RATIO (%) HIGHEST (%) HIGHEST (%) ------------- ---------------- --------------- MSF BlackRock Capital Appreciation 2013 0.87 0.00 - 0.55 33.48 - 34.22 Sub-Account 2012 0.31 0.00 - 0.25 13.89 - 14.37 (Commenced 5/4/2009) 2011 0.19 0.00 - 0.55 (9.44) - (8.95) 2010 0.21 0.00 - 0.55 12.43 - 19.81 2009 -- 0.55 30.28 - 30.78 MSF BlackRock Money Market 2013 -- 0.00 - 0.55 (0.55) - 0.00 Sub-Account 2012 -- 0.00 - 0.55 (0.55) - 0.00 2011 -- 0.00 - 0.55 (0.54) - 0.00 2010 0.01 0.00 - 0.55 (0.54) - 0.01 2009 0.41 0.55 (0.13) - 0.42 MSF Davis Venture Value 2013 1.42 0.15 - 0.55 32.97 - 33.50 Sub-Account 2012 0.87 0.25 - 0.55 12.24 - 12.38 2011 1.17 0.55 (4.56) 2010 1.02 0.55 11.39 2009 1.61 0.55 31.26 MSF Frontier Mid Cap Growth 2013 -- 0.25 - 0.55 20.89 - 21.14 Sub-Account (Commenced 4/29/2013) MSF Jennison Growth Sub-Account 2013 0.42 0.15 - 0.55 36.25 - 36.80 2012 0.14 0.25 - 0.55 (3.25) - 15.15 2011 0.27 0.55 (0.04) 2010 0.59 0.55 11.01 2009 0.20 0.55 39.22 MSF Met/Artisan Mid Cap Value 2013 1.02 0.15 - 0.55 36.10 - 36.65 Sub-Account 2012 1.01 0.25 - 0.55 11.25 - 11.39 2011 0.97 0.55 6.17 2010 0.81 0.55 14.42 2009 1.14 0.55 40.78 MSF MetLife Stock Index 2013 1.70 0.25 - 0.55 31.29 - 31.69 Sub-Account 2012 1.71 0.25 - 0.55 15.12 - 15.47 2011 1.61 0.55 1.28 2010 1.81 0.55 14.20 2009 2.97 0.55 25.55 MSF Neuberger Berman Genesis 2013 -- 0.00 - 0.55 25.77 - 26.99 Sub-Account (Commenced 4/29/2013) MSF T. Rowe Price Large Cap 2013 0.15 0.00 - 0.55 27.59 - 39.16 Growth Sub-Account 2012 0.12 0.00 - 0.55 18.32 - 18.97 2011 0.09 0.00 - 0.55 (1.66) - (1.11) 2010 0.27 0.00 - 0.55 9.76 - 17.05 2009 0.57 0.55 42.66 - 43.44 MSF T. Rowe Price Small Cap 2013 0.34 0.00 - 0.25 44.19 - 44.55 Growth Sub-Account 2012 -- 0.00 - 0.55 15.53 - 16.18 2011 -- 0.00 - 0.45 1.31 - 1.77 2010 -- 0.00 - 0.55 17.05 - 34.89 2009 0.35 0.55 38.21 - 38.97 75
N-682nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 82nd
METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE OF METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONCLUDED) 8. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS -- (CONCLUDED) [Enlarge/Download Table] AS OF DECEMBER 31 FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31 ---------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- UNIT VALUE INVESTMENT(1) EXPENSE RATIO(2) TOTAL RETURN(3) LOWEST TO NET INCOME LOWEST TO LOWEST TO UNITS HIGHEST ($) ASSETS ($) RATIO (%) HIGHEST (%) HIGHEST (%) ----------- -------------- ----------- ------------- ---------------- ---------------- MSF Western Asset Management 2013 578 22.55 - 220.73 76,262 2.43 0.25 - 0.55 (1.28) - (0.99) U.S. Government 2012 457 223.60 102,286 2.08 0.55 2.80 Sub-Account 2011 465 217.51 101,206 1.35 0.55 4.93 2010 1,040 207.29 215,550 1.78 0.55 5.23 2009 467 196.99 92,024 4.23 0.55 3.76 Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth 2013 868 23.50 20,391 0.72 0.25 36.40 Sub-Account 2012 879 7.93 - 17.23 15,135 0.50 0.25 - 0.55 16.44 - 16.59 (Commenced 9/27/2010) 2011 911 6.81 - 14.78 13,464 0.39 0.45 - 0.55 (5.41) - (5.30) 2010 982 7.20 - 15.60 14,650 -- 0.45 - 0.55 15.95 - 15.98 1 These amounts represent the dividends, excluding distributions of capital gains, received by the Sub-Account from the underlying fund or portfolio, net of management fees assessed by the fund manager, divided by the average net assets. These ratios exclude those expenses, such as mortality and expense risk charges, that are assessed against policy owner accounts either through reductions in the unit values or the redemption of units. The investment income ratio is calculated for each period indicated or from the effective date through the end of the reporting period. The recognition of investment income by the Sub-Account is affected by the timing of the declaration of dividends by the underlying fund or portfolio in which the Sub-Account invests. 2 These amounts represent annualized policy expenses of each of the applicable Sub-Accounts, consisting primarily of mortality and expense risk charges, for each period indicated. The ratios include only those expenses that result in a direct reduction to unit values. Charges made directly to policy owner accounts through the redemption of units and expenses of the underlying fund or portfolio have been excluded. 3 These amounts represent the total return for the period indicated, including changes in the value of the underlying fund or portfolio, and expenses assessed through the reduction of unit values. These ratios do not include any expenses assessed through the redemption of units. The total return is calculated for each period indicated or from the effective date through the end of the reporting period. The total return is presented as a range of minimum to maximum returns, based on the minimum and maximum returns within each product grouping of the applicable Sub-Account. 76
N-683rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 83rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Financial Statements In the second quarter of 2013, MetLife, Inc. announced its plans to merge three U.S.-based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company (the "Mergers"). The companies to be merged are MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company ("MLI-USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, and MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MLIIC"), each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("Exeter"), a reinsurance company that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving company. Exeter, formerly a Cayman Islands company, was re-domesticated to Delaware in October 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, following receipt of New York State Department of Financial Services approval, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut withdrew its license to issue insurance policies and annuity contracts in New York. Also, effective January 1, 2014, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut reinsured with an affiliate all existing New York insurance policies and annuity contracts that include a separate account feature. Following the Mergers and subject to certain regulatory approvals, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut will likely enter into transactions to transfer to one or more affiliates certain business that is currently reinsured by Exeter. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements and accompanying notes present the impact of the Mergers as a transaction among entities under common control which is more fully described in the notes to the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. Transactions among entities under common control are prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP"). The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements include historical audited amounts as of December 31, 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, for MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries, including MLI-USA (collectively "MICC"), MLIIC and Exeter. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements give effect to the Mergers as if they had occurred (i) on December 31, 2013 for purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet and (ii) on January 1, 2011 for purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The historical financial information has been adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the Mergers, factually supportable, and are expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. It is likely that the actual adjustments reflected in the final accounting, that will consider additional available information, will differ from the pro forma adjustments and it is possible the differences may be material. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the accompanying notes. In addition, the unaudited proforma condensed combined financial statements were derived from and should be read in conjunction with the audited historical consolidated financial statements of MICC included in MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as revised by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2014, as well as the audited historical balance sheets of MLIIC as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 together with the notes thereto and balance sheets of Exeter as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 together with the notes thereto, as restated on October 27, 2014 and as revised on November 7, 2014, are included as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively, to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A ("Amendment No. 2") with which this financial information is filed as Exhibit 99.3. 1
N-684th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 84th
The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for informational purposes only and are not intended to reflect the results of operations or the financial position of the combined company that would have resulted had the Mergers been effective as of and during the periods presented or the results that may be obtained by the combined company in the future. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements as of and for the periods presented do not reflect future events that are not directly attributable to the Mergers and that may occur after the Mergers, including, but not limited to, expense efficiencies or revenue enhancements arising from the Mergers or management actions. Future results may vary significantly from the results reflected in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. 2
N-685th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 85th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Balance Sheet December 31, 2013 (In millions, except per share data) [Enlarge/Download Table] Historical ----------------------------- MetLife Exeter Investors Reassurance Insurance Company Reinsurance Other Pro Forma MICC Company Ltd. Adjustments Adjustments Notes Combined -------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------- Assets Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value............................ $ 45,252 $ 2,250 $ 1,321 $ (695) $ -- 3(c) $ 48,128 Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value............... 418 45 -- -- -- 463 Mortgage loans, net; at estimated fair value................................. 7,718 286 -- -- -- 8,004 Policy loans............................ 1,219 27 -- -- -- 1,246 Real estate and real estate joint ventures.............................. 754 -- -- -- -- 754 Other limited partnership interests..... 2,130 32 -- -- -- 2,162 Short-term investments, principally at estimated fair value.................. 2,107 75 2,781 (7) -- 3(c) 4,956 Derivative assets....................... -- -- 2,376 -- (2,376) 4(a) -- Funds withheld at interest.............. -- -- 2,694 -- (2,694) 4(a) -- Other invested assets, principally at 3(a)-(c), estimated fair value.................. 2,555 68 -- (2,768) 4,570 4(a), 5(a) 4,425 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- Total investments..................... 62,153 2,783 9,172 (3,470) (500) 70,138 Cash and cash equivalents, principally at estimated fair value................. 746 24 630 (604) -- 3(a), (c) 796 Accrued investment income................ 542 26 94 (29) (2) 3(c), 5(a) 631 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables............................. 20,609 1,829 646 (3,170) -- 3(a)-(c) 19,914 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired.............. 4,730 291 160 707 -- 3(b), (c) 5,888 Current income tax recoverable........... 192 9 197 -- -- 398 Deferred income tax recoverable.......... -- -- 1,529 -- (1,529) 4(b) -- Goodwill................................. 493 -- -- -- 33 4(c) 526 Other assets............................. 794 110 -- 34 (33) 3(b), 4(c) 905 Separate account assets.................. 97,780 12,033 -- -- -- 109,813 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- Total assets.......................... $188,039 $17,105 $12,428 $(6,532) $(2,031) $209,009 ======== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Liabilities Future policy benefits................... 3(b), (c), $ 27,991 $ 501 $ 2,747 $(1,455) $ 12 4(d) $ 29,796 Policyholder account balances............ 33,453 2,748 2,489 (1,262) -- 3(c) 37,428 Other policy-related balances............ 3(b), (c), 3,164 102 2,170 (2,973) 4 4(d) 2,467 Policyholder dividends payable........... -- -- 16 -- (16) 4(d) -- Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions............................ 6,451 266 -- -- 197 4(e) 6,914 Long-term debt........................... 2,251 -- 575 -- (500) 5(a) 2,326 Deferred income tax liability............ 1,385 192 -- 272 (1,529) 3(b), 4(b) 320 Derivative liabilities................... -- -- 2,648 -- (2,648) 4(f) -- 3(a)-(c), 4(e), 4(f), Other liabilities........................ 6,776 94 553 (1,560) 2,449 5(a) 8,312 Separate account liabilities............. 97,780 12,033 -- -- -- 109,813 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- Total liabilities..................... 179,251 15,936 11,198 (6,978) (2,031) 197,376 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- Stockholders' Equity Preferred stock.......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- Common stock, par value $2.50 per share.. 86 6 -- -- -- 92 Additional paid-in capital............... 6,737 636 4,126 -- -- 11,499 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit).. 1,076 504 (2,965) 506 -- 3(b) (879) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).................................. 889 23 69 (60) -- 3(c) 921 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- Total stockholders' equity............ 8,788 1,169 1,230 446 -- 11,633 -------- ------- ------- ------- ------- -------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity............................... $188,039 $17,105 $12,428 $(6,532) $(2,031) $209,009 ======== ======= ======= ======= ======= ======== See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. 3
N-686th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 86th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations For the Year End December 31, 2013 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Historical ----------------------------- MetLife Exeter Investors Reassurance Insurance Company Reinsurance Other Pro Forma MICC Company Ltd. Adjustments Adjustments Notes Combined ------- --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------- --------- Revenues Premiums............................ $ 606 $ 29 $ 59 $ (5) $ -- 3(b) $ 689 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees................ 2,336 202 587 (177) -- 3(b), (c) 2,948 Net investment income............... 2,852 114 35 (16) (2) 3(c), 5(a) 2,983 Fees on ceded reinsurance and other.............................. -- 90 -- -- (90) 4(g) -- Other revenues...................... 592 -- 2 (74) 90 3(b), (c), 4(g) 610 Net investment gains (losses): Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities..... (9) -- -- -- -- (9) Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to other comprehensive income (loss)...... (11) -- -- -- -- (11) Other net investment gains (losses)......................... 102 1 (57) 59 (45) 3(c), 5(b) 60 ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- ------ Total net investment gains (losses)....................... 82 1 (57) 59 (45) 40 Net derivative gains (losses)..... (1,052) (442) 1,935 375 -- 3(c) 816 ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- ------ Total revenues.................. 5,416 (6) 2,561 162 (47) 8,086 ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- ------ Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims.... 1,707 48 1,380 (44) 27 3(b), (c), 4(h) 3,118 Interest credited to policyholder account balances................... 1,037 113 17 (17) -- 3(c) 1,150 Policyholder dividends.............. -- -- 27 -- (27) 4(h) -- Goodwill impairment................. 66 -- -- -- -- 66 Other expenses...................... 1,659 (11) 101 215 (2) 3(b)-(d), 5(a) 1,962 ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- ------ Total expenses.................. 4,469 150 1,525 154 (2) 6,296 ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- ------ Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income tax......................... 947 (156) 1,036 8 (45) 1,790 Provision for income tax expense (benefit).......................... 227 (67) 364 3 (16) 3(e), 5(c) 511 ------- ----- ------ ----- ---- ------ Income from continuing operations, net of income tax.................. $ 720 $ (89) $ 672 $ 5 $(29) $1,279 ======= ===== ====== ===== ==== ====== See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. 4
N-687th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 87th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations For the Year End December 31, 2012 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Historical ---------------------------- MetLife Exeter Investors Reassurance Insurance Company Reinsurance Other Pro Forma MICC Company Ltd. Adjustments Adjustments Notes Combined ------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- Revenues Premiums.......................... $1,261 $ 11 $ 950 $ (888) $ -- 3(b),(c) $1,334 Universal life and investment- type product policy fees........ 2,261 198 548 (183) -- 3(b),(c) 2,824 Net investment income............. 2,952 113 21 (2) (26) 3(c), 5(a) 3,058 Fees on ceded reinsurance and other........................... -- 93 -- -- (93) 4(g) -- Other revenues.................... 511 -- 23 (24) 93 3(c), 4(g) 603 Net investment gains (losses): Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities............ (52) (2) -- -- -- (54) Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to other comprehensive income (loss)......................... 3 -- -- -- -- 3 Other net investment gains (losses)....................... 201 (2) 42 (37) -- 3(c) 204 ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------ Total net investment gains (losses)..................... 152 (4) 42 (37) -- 153 Net derivative gains (losses)....................... 1,003 329 (3,677) 1,432 -- 3(c) (913) ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------ Total revenues................. 8,140 740 (2,093) 298 (26) 7,059 ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------ Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims.......................... 2,389 100 1,812 (1,001) 30 3(b),(c), 4(h) 3,330 Interest credited to policyholder account balances................ 1,147 118 17 (17) -- 3(c) 1,265 Policyholder dividends............ -- -- 30 -- (30) 4(h) -- Goodwill impairment............... 394 -- -- -- -- 394 Other expenses.................... 2,720 229 206 (709) (26) 3(b)-(d), 5(a) 2,420 ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------ Total expenses................. 6,650 447 2,065 (1,727) (26) 7,409 ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------ Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income tax.................. 1,490 293 (4,158) 2,025 -- (350) Provision for income tax expense (benefit)............... 372 94 (1,455) 709 -- 3(e), 5(c) (280) ------ ---- ------- ------- ---- ------ Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax............................. $1,118 $199 $(2,703) $ 1,316 $ -- $ (70) ====== ==== ======= ======= ==== ====== See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. 5
N-688th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 88th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations For the Year End December 31, 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Historical ---------------------------- MetLife Exeter Investors Reassurance Insurance Company Reinsurance Other Pro Forma MICC Company Ltd. Adjustments Adjustments Notes Combined ------ --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- -------------- --------- Revenues Premiums........................... $1,828 $ 7 $ 72 $ (9) $ -- 3(b) $1,898 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.............. 1,956 204 433 (136) -- 3(b),(c) 2,457 Net investment income.............. 3,074 114 17 3 (9) 3(c), 5(a) 3,199 Fees on ceded reinsurance and other............................ -- 104 -- -- (104) 4(g) -- Other revenues..................... 508 -- 44 (55) 104 3(b),(c), 4(g) 601 Net investment gains (losses): Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities...................... (42) -- -- -- -- (42) Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to other comprehensive income (loss).......................... (5) -- -- -- -- (5) Other net investment gains (losses)........................ 82 (5) (1) -- -- 76 ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ Total net investment gains (losses)...................... 35 (5) (1) -- -- 29 Net derivative gains (losses)..... 1,096 326 230 (787) -- 3(c) 865 ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ Total revenues.................. 8,497 750 795 (984) (9) 9,049 ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims... 2,660 59 309 (88) 31 3(b),(c), 4(h) 2,971 Interest credited to policyholder account balances................. 1,189 127 16 (16) -- 3(c) 1,316 Policyholder dividends............. -- -- 31 -- (31) 4(h) -- Other expenses..................... 2,981 259 170 (101) (9) 3(b)-(d), 5(a) 3,300 ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ Total expenses.................. 6,830 445 526 (205) (9) 7,587 ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income tax....................... 1,667 305 269 (779) -- 1,462 Provision for income tax expense (benefit)........................ 493 90 94 (272) -- 3(e), 5(c) 405 ------ ---- ---- ----- ----- ------ Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.... $1,174 $215 $175 $(507) $ -- $1,057 ====== ==== ==== ===== ===== ====== See accompanying notes to unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. 6
N-689th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 89th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. Description of Transaction In the second quarter of 2013, MetLife, Inc. announced its plans to merge three U.S.-based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company (the "Mergers"). The companies to be merged are MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company ("MLI-USA"), a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, and MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MLIIC"), each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("Exeter"), a reinsurance company that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving company. Exeter, formerly a Cayman Islands company, was re-domesticated to Delaware in October 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, following receipt of New York State Department of Financial Services approval, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut withdrew its license to issue insurance policies and annuity contracts in New York. Also, effective January 1, 2014, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut reinsured with an affiliate all existing New York insurance policies and annuity contracts that include a separate account feature. Following the Mergers and subject to certain regulatory approvals, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut will likely enter into transactions to transfer to one or more affiliates certain business that is currently reinsured by Exeter. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. 2. Basis of Presentation The Mergers represent a transaction among entities under common control. Transactions among entities under common control are accounted for as if the transaction occurred at the beginning of the earliest date presented and prior years are retrospectively adjusted to furnish comparative information similar to the pooling method. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements include historical amounts derived from the audited financial statements as of December 31, 2013 and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, for MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries, including MLI-USA (collectively "MICC"), MLIIC and Exeter. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements give effect to the Mergers as if they had occurred (i) on December 31, 2013 for purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined balance sheet and (ii) on January 1, 2011 for purposes of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements were prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") and presented in accordance with the requirements of Article 11 of Regulation S-X published by the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission. In accordance with Article 11 of Regulation S-X, discontinued operations have been excluded from the presentation of the unaudited pro forma condensed combined statements of operations. The historical financial information has been adjusted in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements to give effect to pro forma events that are directly attributable to the Mergers, factually supportable, and are expected to have a continuing impact on the combined results. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements exclude the effects of adjustments that rely on highly judgmental estimates including how historical management practices and operating decisions may or may not have changed as a result of the Mergers. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements are presented for informational purposes only and are not intended to reflect the results of operations or the financial position of the combined company that 7
N-690th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 90th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) would have resulted had the Mergers been effective during the periods presented or the results that may be obtained by the combined company in the future. These unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited historical consolidated financial statements of MICC included in MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013, as revised by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on October 27, 2014, as well as the audited historical balance sheets of MLIIC as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 together with the notes thereto and balance sheets of Exeter as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 together with the notes thereto, as restated on October 27, 2014 and as revised on November 7, 2014, are included as Exhibits 99.1 and 99.2, respectively, to the Current Report on Form 8-K/A ("Amendment No. 2") with which this financial information is filed as Exhibit 99.3. 3. Reinsurance Adjustments In connection with the Mergers, adjustments have been included for new and planned reinsurance agreements, for the recapture of certain reinsurance agreements and to eliminate non-recurring bank fees. The total of the reinsurance adjustments at December 31, 2013 resulted in changes to total assets of ($6,532) million, total liabilities of ($6,978) million, and total stockholders' equity of $446 million and for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 resulted in changes to total revenues of $162 million, $298 million and ($984) million, respectively, and to total expenses of $154 million, ($1,727) million, and ($205) million, respectively. (a)Adjustment to increase total assets and total liabilities by $97 million to record a new reinsurance agreement. Effective January 1, 2014, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut reinsured with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, an affiliate, all existing New York insurance policies and annuity contracts that include a separate account feature. The new reinsurance agreement was entered into in connection with MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut withdrawing its license to issue insurance policies and annuity contracts in New York. (b)Adjustment to eliminate reinsurance transactions among the merging companies. The adjustments at December 31, 2013 include: changes of ($4,045) million to total assets, ($4,551) million to total liabilities and $506 million to retained earnings. The adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include: reductions to total revenue of $73 million, $0 and $12 million, respectively, and changes to other expenses of $208 million, ($690) million and ($61) million, respectively. (c)Adjustment to reflect planned reinsurance transactions to transfer to one or more affiliates certain business that is currently reinsured by Exeter. The adjustments at December 31, 2013 include: reductions of $2,584 million to total assets, $2,524 million to total liabilities and $60 million to accumulated other comprehensive income (loss). The adjustments for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include: changes to total revenue of $235 million, $298 million and ($972) million, respectively, and reductions to other expenses of $37 million, $1,018 million and $119 million, respectively. (d)Adjustment to eliminate from other expenses non-recurring credit facility usage fees for letters of credit, which were held to collateralize assumed liabilities and which were canceled when Exeter re-domesticated to Delaware of $17 million, $19 million and $25 million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (e)Adjustment for the income tax impact for all reinsurance adjustments at the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. 8
N-691st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 91st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. Reclassification Adjustments Reclassification adjustments, included in other adjustments, are reflected herein to conform the presentation of Exeter's and MLIIC's financial statements to the presentation of MICC's financial statements. (a)Adjustment to reclassify derivative assets of $2,376 million and funds withheld at interest of $2,694 million to other invested assets. (b)Adjustment to net deferred income tax recoverable of $1,529 million with deferred income tax liability. (c)Adjustment to reclassify goodwill of $33 million from other assets to goodwill. (d)Adjustment to reclassify policyholder dividends payable of $12 million and $4 million to future policy benefits and other policy-related balances, respectively. (e)Adjustment to reclassify cash collateral on deposit of $197 million from other liabilities to payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions. (f)Adjustment to reclassify derivative liabilities of $2,648 million to other liabilities. (g)Adjustment to reclassify fees on ceded reinsurance and other of $90 million, $93 million and $104 million to other revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (h)Adjustment to reclassify policyholder dividends of $27 million, $30 million and $31 million to policyholder benefits and claims for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 5. Other Adjustments The following other pro forma adjustments have been recorded in the unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements. (a)Adjustments to eliminate related party debt transactions among the merging entities. The adjustments at December 31, 2013 include: reductions of $2 million to accrued investment income and other liabilities and reductions of $500 million to other invested assets and long-term debt. The adjustments for the year ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 include: reductions of $2 million, $26 million and $9 million, respectively, to net investment income and other expenses. (b)Adjustment to eliminate related party investment gains for the year ended December 31, 2013. The non-recurring gains were recorded in connection with establishing a custodial account when MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut withdrew its license to issue insurance policies and annuity contracts in New York. (c)Adjustment for the income tax impact for all other adjustments at the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. 6. Forward Looking Statements These unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements may be deemed to be forward looking statements within the meaning of the safe harbor provisions of the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward looking statements are identified by words such as "anticipate," "estimate," "expect," "project," "intend," "plan," "believe" and other words and terms of similar meaning, or are tied to future periods, in connection with a discussion of future operating or financial performance. Such statements may include, but are not limited to statements about the benefits of the Mergers, including future financial and operating results, the combined company's plans, objectives, expectations and intentions and other statements that are not historical facts. These forward looking statements are based largely on management's expectations and are subject to a number of risks and uncertainties. Actual results could differ materially from these forward looking statements. 9
N-692nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 92nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) NOTES TO THE UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. Subsequent Event On February 14, 2014, a subsidiary of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut entered into a definitive agreement to sell its wholly-owned subsidiary, MetLife Assurance Limited ("MAL"). Beginning in the first quarter of 2014, MICC will account for and report MAL as discontinued operations. These unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial statements exclude the impact of the MAL disposition as the transaction does not meet the significant subsidiary conditions of Article 11 of Regulation S-X and is not directly attributable to the Mergers. The transaction is expected to close in the second quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals and satisfaction of other closing conditions. 10
N-693rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 93rd
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes and Schedules [Enlarge/Download Table] Page ---- Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm............................................ 2 Financial Statements at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011: Consolidated Balance Sheets....................................................................... 3 Consolidated Statements of Operations............................................................. 4 Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)............................................ 5 Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity................................................... 6 Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows............................................................. 7 Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements.................................................... 9 Note 1 -- Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies...... 9 Note 2 -- Segment Information................................................................. 29 Note 3 -- Dispositions........................................................................ 35 Note 4 -- Insurance........................................................................... 36 Note 5 -- Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy- Related Intangibles......................................................................... 42 Note 6 -- Reinsurance......................................................................... 46 Note 7 -- Investments......................................................................... 53 Note 8 -- Derivatives......................................................................... 76 Note 9 -- Fair Value.......................................................................... 88 Note 10 -- Goodwill........................................................................... 114 Note 11 -- Debt............................................................................... 116 Note 12 -- Equity............................................................................. 117 Note 13 -- Other Expenses..................................................................... 122 Note 14 -- Income Tax......................................................................... 123 Note 15 -- Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees.......................................... 126 Note 16 -- Related Party Transactions......................................................... 130 Note 17 -- Subsequent Events.................................................................. 130 Financial Statement Schedules at December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011: Schedule I -- Consolidated Summary of Investments -- Other Than Investments in Related Parties.... 132 Schedule II -- Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only).............................. 133 Schedule III -- Consolidated Supplementary Insurance Information.................................. 137 Schedule IV -- Consolidated Reinsurance........................................................... 139 1
N-694th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 94th
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut: We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholders' equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013. Our audits also included the financial statement schedules listed in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements, Notes and Schedules. These consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion. In our opinion, such consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and subsidiaries as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also, in our opinion, such financial statement schedules, when considered in relation to the basic consolidated financial statements taken as a whole, present fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP New York, New York March 28, 2014 (October 27, 2014 as to Note 17) 2
N-695th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 95th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Consolidated Balance Sheets December 31, 2013 and 2012 (In millions, except share and per share data) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 ----------- ----------- Assets Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $43,477 and $46,005, respectively)................................................... $ 45,252 $ 50,968 Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (cost: $397 and $311, respectively)........................................................................ 418 317 Mortgage loans (net of valuation allowances of $34 and $35, respectively; includes $1,598 and $2,666, respectively, at estimated fair value, relating to variable interest entities)................................................................... 7,718 9,157 Policy loans........................................................................... 1,219 1,216 Real estate and real estate joint ventures............................................. 754 708 Other limited partnership interests.................................................... 2,130 1,848 Short-term investments, principally at estimated fair value............................ 2,107 2,576 Other invested assets, principally at estimated fair value............................. 2,555 2,970 ----------- ----------- Total investments.................................................................... 62,153 69,760 Cash and cash equivalents, principally at estimated fair value.......................... 746 895 Accrued investment income (includes $9 and $13, respectively, relating to variable interest entities).................................................................... 542 575 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables............................................. 20,609 21,927 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired........................ 4,730 3,746 Current income tax recoverable.......................................................... 192 135 Goodwill................................................................................ 493 559 Other assets............................................................................ 794 826 Separate account assets................................................................. 97,780 86,114 ----------- ----------- Total assets......................................................................... $ 188,039 $ 184,537 =========== =========== Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Liabilities Future policy benefits.................................................................. $ 27,991 $ 27,583 Policyholder account balances........................................................... 33,453 36,976 Other policy-related balances........................................................... 3,164 3,138 Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions.................. 6,451 8,399 Long-term debt (includes $1,461 and $2,559, respectively, at estimated fair value, relating to variable interest entities)............................................... 2,251 3,350 Deferred income tax liability........................................................... 1,385 1,870 Other liabilities (includes $7 and $13, respectively, relating to variable interest entities)............................................................................. 6,776 6,547 Separate account liabilities............................................................ 97,780 86,114 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities.................................................................... 179,251 173,977 ----------- ----------- Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (Note 15) Stockholders' Equity Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 34,595,317 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012........................... 86 86 Additional paid-in capital.............................................................. 6,737 6,718 Retained earnings....................................................................... 1,076 1,356 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)........................................... 889 2,400 ----------- ----------- Total stockholders' equity........................................................... 8,788 10,560 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity........................................... $ 188,039 $ 184,537 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 3
N-696th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 96th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Consolidated Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 --------- --------- --------- Revenues Premiums............................................................. $ 606 $ 1,261 $ 1,828 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees............... 2,336 2,261 1,956 Net investment income................................................ 2,852 2,952 3,074 Other revenues....................................................... 592 511 508 Net investment gains (losses): Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities....... (9) (52) (42) Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities transferred to other comprehensive income (loss).................. (11) 3 (5) Other net investment gains (losses)................................. 102 201 82 --------- --------- --------- Total net investment gains (losses)............................... 82 152 35 Net derivative gains (losses)....................................... (1,052) 1,003 1,096 --------- --------- --------- Total revenues.................................................. 5,416 8,140 8,497 --------- --------- --------- Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims..................................... 1,707 2,389 2,660 Interest credited to policyholder account balances................... 1,037 1,147 1,189 Goodwill impairment.................................................. 66 394 -- Other expenses....................................................... 1,659 2,720 2,981 --------- --------- --------- Total expenses.................................................. 4,469 6,650 6,830 --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income tax................................................................ 947 1,490 1,667 Provision for income tax expense (benefit)........................... 227 372 493 --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.......... 720 1,118 1,174 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax........ -- 8 -- --------- --------- --------- Net income (loss).................................................... $ 720 $ 1,126 $ 1,174 ========= ========= ========= See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 4
N-697th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 97th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ----------- --------- --------- Net income (loss).................................................... $ 720 $ 1,126 $ 1,174 Other comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized investment gains (losses), net of related offsets........ (2,094) 850 2,074 Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives............................ (204) 4 347 Foreign currency translation adjustments............................ 28 88 (16) ----------- --------- --------- Other comprehensive income (loss), before income tax................. (2,270) 942 2,405 Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)...................................................... 759 (313) (851) ----------- --------- --------- Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax................. (1,511) 629 1,554 ----------- --------- --------- Comprehensive income (loss).......................................... $ (791) $ 1,755 $ 2,728 =========== ========= ========= See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 5
N-698th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 98th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) --------------------------------------------- Net Foreign Additional Unrealized Other-Than- Currency Total Common Paid-in Retained Investment Temporary Translation Stockholders' Stock Capital Earnings Gains (Losses) Impairments Adjustments Equity ------ ---------- ----------- -------------- ----------- ----------- ------------- Balance at December 31, 2010 (1).................. $ 86 $ 6,719 $ 424 $ 393 $ (51) $ (125) $ 7,446 Dividend paid to MetLife.... (517) (517) Capital contribution........ 1 1 Return of capital (Note 12). (47) (47) Net income (loss)........... 1,174 1,174 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax. 1,591 (23) (14) 1,554 ------ --------- ----------- ----------- ---------- --------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2011 86 6,673 1,081 1,984 (74) (139) 9,611 Dividend of subsidiary (Note 3).................. (347) (347) Dividend paid to MetLife.... (504) (504) Capital contribution........ 45 45 Net income (loss)........... 1,126 1,126 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax (2)................... 503 36 90 629 ------ --------- ----------- ----------- ---------- --------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2012 86 6,718 1,356 2,487 (38) (49) 10,560 Dividend paid to MetLife.... (1,000) (1,000) Capital contribution........ 19 19 Net income (loss)........... 720 720 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax. (1,549) 12 26 (1,511) ------ --------- ----------- ----------- ---------- --------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2013 $ 86 $ 6,737 $ 1,076 $ 938 $ (26) $ (23) $ 8,788 ====== ========= =========== =========== ========== ========= =========== -------- (1)Includes amounts related to prior period adjustments to Retained Earnings of ($33) million. See Note 1. (2)Includes amounts related to dividend of subsidiary. See Notes 3 and 12. See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 6
N-699th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 99th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from operating activities Net income (loss)...................................................................... $ 720 $ 1,126 $ 1,174 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization expenses............................................... 33 31 37 Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts associated with investments, net. (167) (168) (152) (Gains) losses on investments and derivatives and from sales of businesses, net...... 1,108 (1,043) (1,160) (Income) loss from equity method investments, net of dividends or distributions...... (78) (42) (23) Interest credited to policyholder account balances................................... 1,037 1,147 1,189 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees............................... (2,336) (2,261) (1,956) Goodwill impairment.................................................................. 66 394 -- Change in fair value option securities............................................... -- (602) (1,483) Change in accrued investment income.................................................. 77 66 51 Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables................................ (1,355) (1,197) (1,202) Change in deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, net...... (553) 182 (207) Change in income tax................................................................. 213 630 537 Change in other assets............................................................... 1,836 1,499 1,386 Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances.................. 1,144 1,863 1,958 Change in other liabilities.......................................................... 847 804 406 Other, net........................................................................... 141 53 67 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities.................................... 2,733 2,482 622 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from investing activities Sales, maturities and repayments of: Fixed maturity securities........................................................... 18,718 14,394 17,348 Equity securities................................................................... 67 50 168 Mortgage loans...................................................................... 2,292 1,447 993 Real estate and real estate joint ventures.......................................... 104 72 26 Other limited partnership interests................................................. 153 223 256 Purchases of: Fixed maturity securities........................................................... (15,841) (15,706) (17,127) Equity securities................................................................... (133) (58) (27) Mortgage loans...................................................................... (882) (807) (1,357) Real estate and real estate joint ventures.......................................... (201) (225) (72) Other limited partnership interests................................................. (363) (341) (378) Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives............................ 111 414 397 Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives................................ (720) (335) (478) Dividend of subsidiary............................................................... -- (53) -- Issuances of loans to affiliates..................................................... (500) -- (430) Net change in policy loans........................................................... (3) (13) (13) Net change in short-term investments................................................. 471 (155) (1,347) Net change in other invested assets.................................................. (47) (54) (12) Other, net........................................................................... 3 -- 1 ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.................................... $ 3,229 $ (1,147) $ (2,052) ----------- ----------- ----------- See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 7
N-6100th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 100th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows -- (Continued) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash flows from financing activities Policyholder account balances: Deposits............................................................................... $ 13,770 $ 14,785 $ 20,496 Withdrawals............................................................................ (15,899) (15,493) (19,404) Net change in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions.... (1,948) 320 (24) Long-term debt repaid................................................................... (1,009) (482) (385) Financing element on certain derivative instruments..................................... (29) 180 129 Return of capital....................................................................... -- -- (47) Dividends on common stock............................................................... (1,000) (504) (517) ----------- ----------- ----------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities....................................... (6,115) (1,194) 248 ----------- ----------- ----------- Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances. 4 9 (1) ----------- ----------- ----------- Change in cash and cash equivalents....................................................... (149) 150 (1,183) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year.............................................. 895 745 1,928 ----------- ----------- ----------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year.................................................... $ 746 $ 895 $ 745 =========== =========== =========== Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information Net cash paid (received) for: Interest............................................................................... $ 194 $ 232 $ 406 =========== =========== =========== Income tax............................................................................. $ (1) $ (226) $ (47) =========== =========== =========== Non-cash transactions: Disposal of subsidiary: (1) Assets disposed........................................................................ $ -- $ 4,857 $ -- Liabilities disposed................................................................... -- (4,567) -- ----------- ----------- ----------- Net assets disposed.................................................................... -- 290 -- Cash disposed.......................................................................... -- (53) -- Dividend of interests in subsidiary.................................................... -- (237) -- ----------- ----------- ----------- (Gain) loss on dividend of interests in subsidiary..................................... $ -- $ -- $ -- =========== =========== =========== Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc.................................................. $ 19 $ 45 $ -- =========== =========== =========== Real estate and real estate joint ventures acquired in satisfaction of debt............. $ -- $ 50 $ 5 =========== =========== =========== -------- (1)See Note 3. See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial statements. 8
N-6101st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 101st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Business "MICC" or the "Company" refers to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, a Connecticut corporation incorporated in 1863, and its subsidiaries, including MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company ("MLI-USA"). MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. ("MetLife"). The Company offers individual annuities, individual life insurance, and institutional protection and asset accumulation products. The Company is organized into two segments: Retail and Corporate Benefit Funding. In the second quarter of 2013, MetLife announced its plans to merge three U.S.-based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company (the "Mergers"). The companies to be merged are MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MLI-USA and MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MLIIC"), each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("Exeter"), a reinsurance company that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving entity. Exeter, formerly a Cayman Islands company, was re-domesticated to Delaware in October 2013. Effective January 1, 2014, following receipt of New York State Department of Financial Services ("Department of Financial Services") approval, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut withdrew its license to issue insurance policies and annuity contracts in New York. Also effective January 1, 2014, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut reinsured with Metropolitan Life Insurance Company ("MLIC"), an affiliate, all existing New York insurance policies and annuity contracts that include a separate account feature. As a result of the reinsurance agreements, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut recorded a reinsurance recoverable, included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables, of $545 million and a funds withheld liability, included in other liabilities, of $97 million, and transferred cash and investments of $448 million to MLIC. On December 31, 2013, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut deposited investments with an estimated fair market value of $6.3 billion into a custodial account, which became restricted to secure MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's remaining New York policyholder liabilities not covered by such reinsurance on January 1, 2014. In anticipation of establishing the custodial account with qualifying investments, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut transferred investments with an estimated fair value of $739 million and cash of $12 million to MLIC and received from MLIC qualifying investments with an estimated fair value of $751 million in the fourth quarter of 2013. See Note 7. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. Basis of Presentation The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. In applying these policies and estimates, management makes subjective and complex judgments that frequently require assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services industries; others are specific to the Company's business and operations. Actual results could differ from estimates. 9
N-6102nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 102nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Consolidation The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries, as well as partnerships and joint ventures in which the Company has control, and variable interest entities ("VIEs") for which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Since the Company is a member of a controlled group of affiliated companies, its results may not be indicative of those of a stand-alone entity. Discontinued Operations The results of operations of a component of the Company that has either been disposed of or is classified as held-for-sale are reported in discontinued operations if certain criteria are met. In order to qualify for a discontinued operation, the operations and cash flows of the component have been or will be eliminated from the ongoing operations of the Company, and the Company will not have any significant continuing involvement in the operations of the component after the disposal transaction. Separate Accounts Separate accounts are established in conformity with insurance laws and are generally not chargeable with liabilities that arise from any other business of the Company. Separate account assets are subject to general account claims only to the extent the value of such assets exceeds the separate account liabilities. The Company reports separately, as assets and liabilities, investments held in separate accounts and liabilities of the separate accounts if: . such separate accounts are legally recognized; . assets supporting the contract liabilities are legally insulated from the Company's general account liabilities; . investments are directed by the contractholder; and . all investment performance, net of contract fees and assessments, is passed through to the contractholder. The Company reports separate account assets at their fair value, which is based on the estimated fair values of the underlying assets comprising the individual separate account portfolios. Investment performance (including investment income, net investment gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses)) and the corresponding amounts credited to contractholders of such separate accounts are offset within the same line in the statements of operations. Separate accounts credited with a contractual investment return are combined on a line-by-line basis with the Company's general account assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the accounting for these investments is consistent with the methodologies described herein for similar financial instruments held within the general account. Unit-linked separate account investments that are directed by contractholders but do not meet one or more of the other above criteria are included in fair value option ("FVO") securities. See Note 3. 10
N-6103rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 103rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The Company's revenues reflect fees charged to the separate accounts, including mortality charges, risk charges, policy administration fees, investment management fees and surrender charges. Such fees are included in universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the statements of operations. Reclassifications Certain amounts in the prior years' consolidated financial statements and related footnotes thereto have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation as discussed throughout the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Adjustments to Prior Periods During the fourth quarter of 2013, the Company determined to adjust certain prior period results to correct the following: . Certain prior years' acquisition costs related to variable annuity sales were incorrectly allocated to an affiliate. Such costs, net of deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC"), were $57 million, $66 million, and $52 million for 2012, 2011 and 2010, respectively. . A DAC recoverability write-off of $111 million associated with term life and universal life secondary guarantees business sold in 2012 was not recorded as of December 31, 2012. . The fair value of a bifurcated embedded derivative associated with a reinsurance agreement was overstated by $23 million for 2011. . Policyholder benefits and claims and other expenses were overstated in 2012 by $6 million and $23 million, respectively, due to an adjustment in the modeling of dynamic lapses in certain variable annuity products. . Tax valuation allowances were understated by $22 million for 2012. . A non-cash transaction relating to a pension closeout sale was incorrectly recorded as an increase of $312 million in net cash provided by operating activities with an offsetting impact on net cash used in investing activities for 2011. Management evaluated the materiality of these adjustments quantitatively and qualitatively and concluded that they were not material to any prior periods' annual or quarterly financial statements, however, unadjusted amounts as of December 31, 2012 would have had a significant effect on the results of operations for 2013 if they were recorded in 2013. Accordingly, the Company has revised its previously reported financial statements for prior annual periods for the items listed above, including the related tax impacts, as detailed below. The effects of the adjustments were immaterial to quarterly financial information reported in each of the interim condensed consolidated financial statements in 2012 and 2013, since the most significant adjustments occurred in the fourth quarter of 2012. As a result, such previously reported quarterly financial information has not been adjusted, and we do not plan to amend prior quarterly filings. 11
N-6104th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 104th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The impact of the adjustments is shown in the tables below: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2012 ------------------- As Previously As Consolidated Balance Sheets Reported Adjusted -------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Assets Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables...................... $ 22,143 $ 21,927 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired. $ 3,793 $ 3,746 Other assets..................................................... $ 822 $ 826 Total assets..................................................... $184,796 $184,537 Liabilities Future policy benefits........................................... $ 27,585 $ 27,583 Deferred income tax liability.................................... $ 1,938 $ 1,870 Total liabilities................................................ $174,047 $173,977 Stockholders' Equity Retained earnings................................................ $ 1,545 $ 1,356 Total stockholders' equity....................................... $ 10,749 $ 10,560 Total liabilities and stockholders' equity....................... $184,796 $184,537 [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------- 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- As As Previously As Previously As Consolidated Statements of Operations Reported Adjusted Reported Adjusted --------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Revenues Net derivative gains (losses)..................................... $ 980 $1,003 $1,119 $1,096 Total revenues.................................................... $8,117 $8,140 $8,520 $8,497 Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims.................................. $2,395 $2,389 $2,660 N/A Other expenses.................................................... $2,575 $2,720 $2,915 $2,981 Total expenses.................................................... $6,511 $6,650 $6,764 $6,830 Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income tax................................................................ $1,606 $1,490 $1,756 $1,667 Provision for income tax expense (benefit)........................... $ 391 $ 372 $ 523 $ 493 Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.......... $1,215 $1,118 $1,233 $1,174 Net income (loss).................................................... $1,223 $1,126 $1,233 $1,174 [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------- 2012 2011 ------------------- ------------------- As As Previously As Previously As Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) Reported Adjusted Reported Adjusted ------------------------------------------------------ ---------- -------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Net income (loss)......................... $1,223 $1,126 $1,233 $1,174 Comprehensive income (loss)............... $1,852 $1,755 $2,787 $2,728 12
N-6105th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 105th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) [Download Table] As Previously As Consolidated Statements of Stockholders' Equity Reported Adjusted ----------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Retained Earnings Balance at December 31, 2010........... $ 457 $ 424 Net income (loss)..................... $ 1,233 $ 1,174 Balance at December 31, 2011........... $ 1,173 $ 1,081 Net income (loss)..................... $ 1,223 $ 1,126 Balance at December 31, 2012........... $ 1,545 $ 1,356 Total Stockholders' Equity Balance at December 31, 2010........... $ 7,479 $ 7,446 Balance at December 31, 2011........... $ 9,703 $ 9,611 Balance at December 31, 2012........... $10,749 $10,560 [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, - --------------------------------------- 2012 2011 ------------------ ------------------- As As Previously As Previously As Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows Reported Adjusted Reported Adjusted ------------------------------------------------------------------- ---------- -------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Cash flows from operating activities Net income (loss)................................................ $ 1,223 $ 1,126 $ 1,233 $ 1,174 (Gains) losses on investments and derivatives and from sales of businesses, net................................................ $(1,020) $(1,043) $ (1,183) $ (1,160) Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables............ $(1,229) $(1,197) $ (1,288) $ (1,202) Change in deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, net......................................... $ 69 $ 182 $ (187) $ (207) Change in income tax............................................. $ 649 $ 630 $ 567 $ 537 Change in other assets........................................... $ 1,503 $ 1,499 N/A N/A Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances....................................................... $ 1,865 $ 1,863 $ 2,307 $ 1,958 Other, net....................................................... N/A N/A $ 30 $ 67 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities.............. N/A N/A $ 934 $ 622 Cash flows from investing activities Purchases of fixed maturity securities........................... N/A N/A $(17,439) $(17,127) Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities.............. N/A N/A $ (2,364) $ (2,052) 13
N-6106th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 106th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The following are the Company's significant accounting policies with references to notes providing additional information on such policies and critical accounting estimates relating to such policies. [Enlarge/Download Table] -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Accounting Policy Note -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Insurance 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles 5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reinsurance 6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investments 7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derivatives 8 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Value 9 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Goodwill 10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Income Tax 14 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Litigation Contingencies 15 Insurance Future Policy Benefit Liabilities and Policyholder Account Balances The Company establishes liabilities for amounts payable under insurance policies. Generally, amounts are payable over an extended period of time and related liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be paid reduced by the present value of future expected premiums. Such liabilities are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with GAAP and applicable actuarial standards. Principal assumptions used in the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits are mortality, morbidity, policy lapse, renewal, retirement, disability incidence, disability terminations, investment returns, inflation, expenses and other contingent events as appropriate to the respective product type. These assumptions are established at the time the policy is issued and are intended to estimate the experience for the period the policy benefits are payable. Utilizing these assumptions, liabilities are established on a block of business basis. For long duration insurance contracts, assumptions such as mortality, morbidity and interest rates are "locked in" upon the issuance of new business. However, significant adverse changes in experience on such contracts may require the establishment of premium deficiency reserves. Such reserves are determined based on the then current assumptions and do not include a provision for adverse deviation. Liabilities for universal and variable life secondary guarantees are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits payable when the account balance is projected to be zero and recognizing those benefits ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used in estimating the secondary guarantee liabilities are consistent with those used for amortizing DAC and are thus subject to the same variability and risk as further discussed herein. The assumptions of investment performance and volatility for variable products are consistent with historical experience of appropriate underlying equity indices, such as the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P") 500 Index. The benefits used in calculating the liabilities are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios. 14
N-6107th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 107th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The Company regularly reviews its estimates of liabilities for future policy benefits and compares them with its actual experience. Differences result in changes to the liability balances with related charges or credits to benefit expenses in the period in which the changes occur. Policyholder account balances ("PABs") relate to contract or contract features where the Company has no significant insurance risk. The Company issues directly and assumes through reinsurance, certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits that provide the policyholder a minimum return based on their initial deposit (i.e., the benefit base) less withdrawals. These guarantees are accounted for as insurance liabilities or as embedded derivatives depending on how and when the benefit is paid. Specifically, a guarantee is accounted for as an embedded derivative if a guarantee is paid without requiring (i) the occurrence of specific insurable event, or (ii) the policyholder to annuitize. Alternatively, a guarantee is accounted for as an insurance liability if the guarantee is paid only upon either (i) the occurrence of a specific insurable event, or (ii) annuitization. In certain cases, a guarantee may have elements of both an insurance liability and an embedded derivative and in such cases the guarantee is split and accounted for under both models. Guarantees accounted for as insurance liabilities in future policy benefits include guaranteed minimum death benefits ("GMDBs"), the portion of guaranteed minimum income benefits ("GMIBs") that require annuitization, and the life-contingent portion of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits ("GMWBs"). Guarantees accounted for as embedded derivatives in PABs include the non life-contingent portion of GMWBs, guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits ("GMABs") and the portion of GMIBs that do not require annuitization. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent "excess" fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Other Policy-Related Balances Other policy-related balances include policy and contract claims, unearned revenue liabilities, premiums received in advance and policyholder dividends due and unpaid. The liability for policy and contract claims generally relates to incurred but not reported death, disability, and long-term care ("LTC") claims, as well as claims which have been reported but not yet settled. The liability for these claims is based on the Company's estimated ultimate cost of settling all claims. The Company derives estimates for the development of incurred but not reported claims principally from analyses of historical patterns of claims by business line. The methods used to determine these estimates are continually reviewed. Adjustments resulting from this continuous review process and differences between estimates and payments for claims are recognized in policyholder benefits and claims expense in the period in which the estimates are changed or payments are made. The unearned revenue liability relates to universal life-type and investment-type products and represents policy charges for services to be provided in future periods. The charges are deferred as unearned revenue and amortized using the product's estimated gross profits, similar to DAC as discussed further herein. Such amortization is recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. 15
N-6108th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 108th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The Company accounts for the prepayment of premiums on its individual life, group life and health contracts as premiums received in advance and applies the cash received to premiums when due. Recognition of Insurance Revenues and Deposits Premiums related to traditional life and annuity policies with life contingencies are recognized as revenues when due from policyholders. Policyholder benefits and expenses are provided to recognize profits over the estimated lives of the insurance policies. When premiums are due over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided, any excess profit is deferred and recognized into earnings in a constant relationship to insurance in-force or, for annuities, the amount of expected future policy benefit payments. Premiums related to non-medical health and disability contracts are recognized on a pro rata basis over the applicable contract term. Deposits related to universal life-type and investment-type products are credited to PABs. Revenues from such contracts consist of fees for mortality, policy administration and surrender charges and are recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the period in which services are provided. Amounts that are charged to earnings include interest credited and benefit claims incurred in excess of related PABs. Premiums, policy fees, policyholder benefits and expenses are presented net of reinsurance. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles The Company incurs significant costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance business. Costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts are capitalized as DAC. Such costs include: . incremental direct costs of contract acquisition, such as commissions; . the portion of an employee's total compensation and benefits related to time spent selling, underwriting or processing the issuance of new and renewal insurance business only with respect to actual policies acquired or renewed; . other essential direct costs that would not have been incurred had a policy not been acquired or renewed; and . in limited circumstances, the costs of direct-response advertising, the primary purpose of which is to elicit sales to customers who could be shown to have responded specifically to the advertising and that results in probable future benefits. All other acquisition-related costs, including those related to general advertising and solicitation, market research, agent training, product development, unsuccessful sales and underwriting efforts, as well as all indirect costs, are expensed as incurred. Value of business acquired ("VOBA") is an intangible asset resulting from a business combination that represents the excess of book value over the estimated fair value of acquired insurance, annuity, and investment-type contracts in-force at the acquisition date. The estimated fair value of the acquired liabilities is 16
N-6109th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 109th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) based on projections, by each block of business, of future policy and contract charges, premiums, mortality and morbidity, separate account performance, surrenders, operating expenses, investment returns, nonperformance risk adjustment and other factors. Actual experience on the purchased business may vary from these projections. DAC and VOBA are amortized as follows: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Products: In proportion to the following over estimated lives of the contracts: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Nonparticipating and Historic actual and expected future non-dividend-paying traditional gross premiums. contracts (primarily term insurance) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Participating, dividend-paying Actual and expected future gross traditional contracts margins. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Fixed and variable universal life Actual and expected future gross contracts profits. . Fixed and variable deferred annuity contracts ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- See Note 5 for additional information on DAC and VOBA amortization. The recovery of DAC and VOBA is dependent upon the future profitability of the related business. DAC and VOBA are aggregated in the financial statements for reporting purposes. The Company generally has two different types of sales inducements which are included in other assets: (i) the policyholder receives a bonus whereby the policyholder's initial account balance is increased by an amount equal to a specified percentage of the customer's deposit; and (ii) the policyholder receives a higher interest rate using a dollar cost averaging method than would have been received based on the normal general account interest rate credited. The Company defers sales inducements and amortizes them over the life of the policy using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. The amortization of sales inducements is included in policyholder benefits and claims. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential recoverability issue exists, the Company reviews deferred sales inducements to determine the recoverability of the asset. Value of distribution agreements acquired ("VODA") is reported in other assets and represents the present value of expected future profits associated with the expected future business derived from the distribution agreements acquired as part of a business combination. Value of customer relationships acquired ("VOCRA") is also reported in other assets and represents the present value of the expected future profits associated with the expected future business acquired through existing customers of the acquired company or business. The VODA and VOCRA associated with past business combinations are amortized over useful lives ranging from 10 to 30 years and such amortization is included in other expenses. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a possible impairment exists, the Company reviews VODA and VOCRA to determine whether the asset is impaired. Reinsurance For each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge the Company's obligations as the primary insurer. The Company reviews all contractual features, including those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the reinsurer is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims. 17
N-6110th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 110th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) For reinsurance of existing in-force blocks of long-duration contracts that transfer significant insurance risk, the difference, if any, between the amounts paid (received), and the liabilities ceded (assumed) related to the underlying contracts is considered the net cost of reinsurance at the inception of the reinsurance agreement. The net cost of reinsurance is recorded as an adjustment to DAC when there is a gain at inception on the ceding entity and to other liabilities when there is a loss at inception. The net cost of reinsurance is recognized as a component of other expenses when there is a gain at inception and as policyholder benefits and claims when there is a loss and is subsequently amortized on a basis consistent with the methodology used for amortizing DAC related to the underlying reinsured contracts. Subsequent amounts paid (received) on the reinsurance of in-force blocks, as well as amounts paid (received) related to new business, are recorded as ceded (assumed) premiums and ceded (assumed) premiums, reinsurance and other receivables (future policy benefits) are established. Amounts currently recoverable under reinsurance agreements are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and amounts currently payable are included in other liabilities. Assets and liabilities relating to reinsurance agreements with the same reinsurer may be recorded net on the balance sheet, if a right of offset exists within the reinsurance agreement. In the event that reinsurers do not meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, reinsurance recoverable balances could become uncollectible. In such instances, reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance. The funds withheld liability represents amounts withheld by the Company in accordance with the terms of the reinsurance agreements. The Company withholds the funds rather than transferring the underlying investments and, as a result, records funds withheld liability within other liabilities. The Company recognizes interest on funds withheld, included in other expenses, at rates defined by the terms of the agreement which may be contractually specified or directly related to the investment portfolio. Premiums, fees and policyholder benefits and claims include amounts assumed under reinsurance agreements and are net of reinsurance ceded. Amounts received from reinsurers for policy administration are reported in other revenues. With respect to GMIBs, a portion of the directly written GMIBs are accounted for as insurance liabilities, but the associated reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company determines that a reinsurance agreement does not expose the reinsurer to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk, the Company records the agreement using the deposit method of accounting. Deposits received are included in other liabilities and deposits made are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. As amounts are paid or received, consistent with the underlying contracts, the deposit assets or liabilities are adjusted. Interest on such deposits is recorded as other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate. Periodically, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the expected payments or recoveries and adjusts the deposit asset or liability through other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate. 18
N-6111th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 111th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Investments Net Investment Income and Net Investment Gains (Losses) Income on investments is reported within net investment income, unless otherwise stated herein. Gains and losses on sales of investments, impairment losses and changes in valuation allowances are reported within net investment gains (losses), unless otherwise stated herein. Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities The majority of the Company's fixed maturity and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale ("AFS") and are reported at their estimated fair value. Unrealized investment gains and losses on these securities are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"), net of policyholder-related amounts and deferred income taxes. All security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Investment gains and losses on sales are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income on fixed maturity securities is recognized when earned using an effective yield method giving effect to amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Prepayment fees are recognized when earned. Dividends on equity securities are recognized when declared. The Company periodically evaluates fixed maturity and equity securities for impairment. The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on management's case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in estimated fair value, as well as an analysis of the gross unrealized losses by severity and/or age as described in Note 7 "-- Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities." For fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position, an other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") is recognized in earnings when it is anticipated that the amortized cost will not be recovered. When either: (i) the Company has the intent to sell the security; or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the security's amortized cost and estimated fair value. If neither of these conditions exist, the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected is recognized as an OTTI in earnings ("credit loss"). If the estimated fair value is less than the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected, this portion of OTTI related to other-than-credit factors ("noncredit loss") is recorded in OCI. With respect to equity securities, the Company considers in its OTTI analysis its intent and ability to hold a particular equity security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of its estimated fair value to an amount equal to or greater than cost. If a sale decision is made for an equity security and recovery to an amount at least equal to cost prior to the sale is not expected, the security will be deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired in the period that the sale decision was made and an OTTI loss will be recorded in earnings. The OTTI loss recognized is the entire difference between the security's cost and its estimated fair value. 19
N-6112th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 112th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Mortgage Loans The Company disaggregates its mortgage loan investments into two portfolio segments: commercial and agricultural. The accounting policies that are applicable to all portfolio segments are presented below and the accounting policies related to each of the portfolio segments are included in Note 7. Mortgage loans are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, deferred fees or expenses, and are net of valuation allowances. Interest income and prepayment fees are recognized when earned. Interest income is recognized using an effective yield method giving effect to amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Also included in mortgage loans are commercial mortgage loans held by consolidated securitization entities ("CSEs") for which the FVO was elected. These mortgage loans are stated at estimated fair value. Changes in estimated fair value are recognized in net investment gains (losses) for commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs. Policy Loans Policy loans are stated at unpaid principal balances. Interest income on such loans is recorded as earned using the contractual interest rate. Generally, accrued interest is capitalized on the policy's anniversary date. Valuation allowances are not established for policy loans, as they are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policies. Any unpaid principal or interest on the loan is deducted from the cash surrender value or the death benefit prior to settlement of the insurance policy. Real Estate Real estate held-for-investment is stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the asset (typically 20 to 55 years). Rental income associated with such real estate is recognized on a straight-line basis over the term of the respective leases. The Company periodically reviews its real estate held-for-investment for impairment and tests for recoverability whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying value may not be recoverable and exceeds its estimated fair value. Properties whose carrying values are greater than their undiscounted cash flows are written down to their estimated fair value, which is generally computed using the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at a rate commensurate with the underlying risks. Real estate for which the Company commits to a plan to sell within one year and actively markets in its current condition for a reasonable price in comparison to its estimated fair value is classified as held for sale. Real estate held-for-sale is stated at the lower of depreciated cost or estimated fair value less expected disposition costs and is not depreciated. Real Estate Joint Ventures and Other Limited Partnership Interests The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in equity securities when it has significant influence or at least 20% interest and for investments in real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests ("investees") when it has more than a minor ownership interest or more than a minor influence over the investee's operations, but does not have a controlling financial interest. The Company 20
N-6113th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 113th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) generally recognizes its share of the investee's earnings on a three-month lag in instances where the investee's financial information is not sufficiently timely or when the investee's reporting period differs from the Company's reporting period. The Company uses the cost method of accounting for investments in which it has virtually no influence over the investee's operations. The Company recognizes distributions on cost method investments as earned or received. Because of the nature and structure of these cost method investments, they do not meet the characteristics of an equity security in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The Company routinely evaluates its equity method and cost method investments for impairment. For equity method investees, the Company considers financial and other information provided by the investee, other known information and inherent risks in the underlying investments, as well as future capital commitments, in determining whether an impairment has occurred. The Company considers its cost method investments for impairment when the carrying value of such investments exceeds the net asset value ("NAV"). The Company takes into consideration the severity and duration of this excess when determining whether the cost method investment is impaired. Short-term Investments Short-term investments include securities and other investments with remaining maturities of one year or less, but greater than three months, at the time of purchase and are stated at estimated fair value or amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. Short-term investments also include investments in affiliated money market pools. Other Invested Assets Other invested assets consist principally of the following: . Freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values are described in "-- Derivatives" below. . Loans to affiliates are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount. . Tax credit and renewable energy partnerships derive a significant source of investment return in the form of income tax credits or other tax incentives. Where tax credits are guaranteed by a creditworthy third party, the investment is accounted for under the effective yield method. Otherwise, the investment is accounted for under the equity method. . Leveraged leases are recorded net of non-recourse debt. Income on leveraged leases is recognized by applying the leveraged lease's estimated rate of return to the net investment in the lease. The Company regularly reviews residual values for impairment. . Investments in joint ventures that engage in insurance underwriting activities are accounted for under the equity method. Securities Lending Program Securities lending transactions, whereby blocks of securities are loaned to third parties, primarily brokerage firms and commercial banks, are treated as financing arrangements and the associated liability is recorded at the amount of cash received. The Company obtains collateral at the inception of the loan, usually cash, in an amount 21
N-6114th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 114th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) generally equal to 102% of the estimated fair value of the securities loaned, and maintains it at a level greater than or equal to 100% for the duration of the loan. The Company is liable to return to the counterparties the cash collateral received. Security collateral on deposit from counterparties in connection with the securities lending transactions may not be sold or repledged, unless the counterparty is in default, and is not reflected in the financial statements. The Company monitors the estimated fair value of the securities loaned on a daily basis and additional collateral is obtained as necessary. Income and expenses associated with securities lending transactions are reported as investment income and investment expense, respectively, within net investment income. Derivatives Freestanding Derivatives Freestanding derivatives are carried in the Company's balance sheets either as assets within other invested assets or as liabilities within other liabilities at estimated fair value. The Company does not offset the fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement. Accruals on derivatives are generally recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities. However, accruals that are not scheduled to settle within one year are included with the derivatives carrying value in other invested assets or other liabilities. If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are reported in net derivative gains (losses) except as follows: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Statement of Operations Presentation: Derivative: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Policyholder benefits and claims . Economic hedges of variable annuity guarantees included in future policy benefits ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Net investment income . Economic hedges of equity method investments in joint ventures ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hedge Accounting To qualify for hedge accounting, at the inception of the hedging relationship, the Company formally documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction, as well as its designation of the hedge. Hedge designation and financial statement presentation of changes in estimated fair value of the hedging derivatives are as follows: . Fair value hedge (a hedge of the estimated fair value of a recognized asset or liability) -- in net derivative gains (losses), consistent with the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the designated risk being hedged. . Cash flow hedge (a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability) -- effectiveness in OCI (deferred gains or losses on the derivative are reclassified into the statement of operations when the Company's earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item); ineffectiveness in net derivative gains (losses). 22
N-6115th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 115th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The changes in estimated fair values of the hedging derivatives are exclusive of any accruals that are separately reported in the statement of operations within interest income or interest expense to match the location of the hedged item. In its hedge documentation, the Company sets forth how the hedging instrument is expected to hedge the designated risks related to the hedged item and sets forth the method that will be used to retrospectively and prospectively assess the hedging instrument's effectiveness and the method that will be used to measure ineffectiveness. A derivative designated as a hedging instrument must be assessed as being highly effective in offsetting the designated risk of the hedged item. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed at inception and at least quarterly throughout the life of the designated hedging relationship. Assessments of hedge effectiveness and measurements of ineffectiveness are also subject to interpretation and estimation and different interpretations or estimates may have a material effect on the amount reported in net income. The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item, the derivative continues to be carried in the balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in net derivative gains (losses). The carrying value of the hedged recognized asset or liability under a fair value hedge is no longer adjusted for changes in its estimated fair value due to the hedged risk, and the cumulative adjustment to its carrying value is amortized into income over the remaining life of the hedged item. Provided the hedged forecasted transaction is still probable of occurrence, the changes in estimated fair value of derivatives recorded in OCI related to discontinued cash flow hedges are released into the statements of operations when the Company's earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transactions will occur on the anticipated date or within two months of that date, the derivative continues to be carried in the balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized currently in net derivative gains (losses). Deferred gains and losses of a derivative recorded in OCI pursuant to the discontinued cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable are recognized immediately in net derivative gains (losses). In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative is carried at its estimated fair value in the balance sheets, with changes in its estimated fair value recognized in the current period as net derivative gains (losses). Embedded Derivatives The Company sells variable annuities and issues certain insurance products and investment contracts and is a party to certain reinsurance agreements that have embedded derivatives. The Company assesses each identified embedded derivative to determine whether it is required to be bifurcated. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a freestanding derivative if: . the combined instrument is not accounted for in its entirety at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings; 23
N-6116th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 116th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) . the terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and . a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would qualify as a derivative instrument. Such embedded derivatives are carried in the balance sheets at estimated fair value with the host contract and changes in their estimated fair value are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company is unable to properly identify and measure an embedded derivative for separation from its host contract, the entire contract is carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income. Additionally, the Company may elect to carry an entire contract on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income if that contract contains an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent "excess" fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Fair Value Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In most cases, the exit price and the transaction (or entry) price will be the same at initial recognition. Subsequent to initial recognition, fair values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. When such quoted prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities, or other observable inputs. If these inputs are not available, or observable inputs are not determinable, unobservable inputs and/or adjustments to observable inputs requiring management judgment are used to determine the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities. Goodwill Goodwill represents the future economic benefits arising from net assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and recognized. Goodwill is calculated as the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of such net assets acquired, is not amortized, and is tested for impairment based on a fair value approach at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances indicate that there may be justification for conducting an interim test. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment testing during the third quarter of each year based upon data as of the close of the second quarter. Goodwill associated with a business acquisition is not tested for impairment during the year the business is acquired unless there is a significant identified impairment event. The impairment test is performed at the reporting unit level, which is the operating segment or a business one level below the operating segment, if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at that level. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, if the carrying value of a reporting unit 24
N-6117th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 117th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) exceeds its estimated fair value, there may be an indication of impairment. In such instances, the implied fair value of the goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be determined in a business combination. The excess of the carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill would be recognized as an impairment and recorded as a charge against net income. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates potential triggering events that may affect the estimated fair value of the Company's reporting units to assess whether any goodwill impairment exists. Deteriorating or adverse market conditions for certain reporting units may have a significant impact on the estimated fair value of these reporting units and could result in future impairments of goodwill. Employee Benefit Plans Pension, postretirement and postemployment benefits are provided to associates under plans sponsored and administered by MLIC, an affiliate of the Company. The Company's obligation and expense related to these benefits is limited to the amount of associated expense allocated from MLIC. Income Tax MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and all of its includable subsidiaries join with MetLife and its includable subsidiaries in filing a consolidated U.S. life and non-life federal income tax return in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the "Code"). Current taxes (and the benefits of tax attributes such as losses) are allocated to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries under the consolidated tax return regulations and a tax sharing agreement. Under the consolidated tax return regulations, MetLife has elected the "percentage method" (and 100 percent under such method) of reimbursing companies for tax attributes such as losses. As a result, 100 percent of tax attributes such as losses are reimbursed by MetLife to the extent that consolidated federal income tax of the consolidated federal tax return group is reduced in a year by tax attributes such as losses. Profitable subsidiaries pay MetLife each year the federal income tax which such profitable subsidiary would have paid that year based upon that year's taxable income. If MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut or its includable subsidiaries has current or prior deductions and credits (including but not limited to losses) which reduce the consolidated tax liability of the consolidated federal tax return group, the deductions and credits are characterized as realized (or realizable) by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its includable subsidiaries when those tax attributes are realized (or realizable) by the consolidated federal tax return group, even if MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut or its includable subsidiaries would not have realized the attributes on a stand-alone basis under a "wait and see" method. The Company's accounting for income taxes represents management's best estimate of various events and transactions. Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities are measured at the balance sheet date using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years the temporary differences are expected to reverse. 25
N-6118th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 118th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction. Valuation allowances are established when management determines, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Factors in management's determination include the performance of the business and its ability to generate capital gains. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following: . future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; . future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; . taxable income in prior carryback years; and . tax planning strategies. The Company may be required to change its provision for income taxes in certain circumstances. Examples of such circumstances include when estimates used in determining valuation allowances on deferred tax assets significantly change or when receipt of new information indicates the need for adjustment in valuation allowances. Additionally, future events, such as changes in tax laws, tax regulations, or interpretations of such laws or regulations, could have an impact on the provision for income tax and the effective tax rate. Any such changes could significantly affect the amounts reported in the financial statements in the year these changes occur. The Company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit can be recorded in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits due to tax uncertainties that do not meet the threshold are included within other liabilities and are charged to earnings in the period that such determination is made. The Company classifies interest recognized as interest expense and penalties recognized as a component of income tax. Litigation Contingencies The Company is a party to a number of legal actions and is involved in a number of regulatory investigations. Given the inherent unpredictability of these matters, it is difficult to estimate the impact on the Company's financial position. Liabilities are established when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs are recognized as incurred. On a quarterly and annual basis, the Company reviews relevant information with respect to liabilities for litigation, regulatory investigations and litigation-related contingencies to be reflected in the Company's financial statements. Other Accounting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid securities and other investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. 26
N-6119th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 119th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Property, Equipment, Leasehold Improvements and Computer Software Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, which are included in other assets, are stated at cost, less accumulated depreciation and amortization. Depreciation is determined using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, as appropriate. Estimated lives generally range from five to 10 years for leasehold improvements, and from three to seven years for all other property and equipment. The net book value of the property, equipment and leasehold improvements was insignificant at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Computer software, which is included in other assets, is stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. Purchased software costs, as well as certain internal and external costs incurred to develop internal-use computer software during the application development stage, are capitalized. Such costs are amortized generally over a four-year period using the straight-line method. The cost basis of computer software was $200 million and $185 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized software was $97 million and $92 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Related amortization expense was $5 million, $10 million and $17 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Other Revenues Other revenues include, in addition to items described elsewhere herein, advisory fees, broker-dealer commissions and fees and administrative service fees. Such fees and commissions are recognized in the period in which services are performed. Foreign Currency Assets, liabilities and operations of foreign affiliates and subsidiaries are recorded based on the functional currency of each entity. The determination of the functional currency is made based on the appropriate economic and management indicators. The local currencies of foreign operations are the functional currencies. Assets and liabilities of foreign affiliates and subsidiaries are translated from the functional currency to U.S. dollars at the exchange rates in effect at each year-end and income and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. The resulting translation adjustments are charged or credited directly to OCI, net of applicable taxes. Gains and losses from foreign currency transactions, including the effect of re-measurement of monetary assets and liabilities to the appropriate functional currency, are reported as part of net investment gains (losses) in the period in which they occur. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements Effective July 17, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding derivatives that permits the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes, in addition to the United States Treasury and London Interbank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"). Also, this new guidance removes the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption, but may impact the selection of benchmark interest rates for hedging relationships in the future. 27
N-6120th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 120th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income that requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated OCI ("AOCI") by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The adoption was prospectively applied and resulted in additional disclosures in Note 12. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding balance sheet offsetting disclosures which requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements for derivatives, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions, to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effects of those arrangements on its financial position. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The adoption was retrospectively applied and resulted in additional disclosures related to derivatives in Note 8. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for DAC, which was retrospectively applied. The guidance specifies that only costs related directly to successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts can be capitalized as DAC; all other acquisition-related costs must be expensed as incurred. As a result, certain sales manager compensation and administrative costs previously capitalized by the Company will no longer be deferred. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income, which was retrospectively applied, that provides companies with the option to present the total of comprehensive income, components of net income, and the components of OCI either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements in annual financial statements. The standard eliminates the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The Company adopted the two-statement approach for annual financial statements. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance on goodwill impairment testing that simplifies how an entity tests goodwill for impairment. This new guidance allows an entity to first assess qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than its carrying value as a basis for determining whether it needs to perform the quantitative two-step goodwill impairment test. Only if an entity determines, based on qualitative assessment, that it is more likely than not that a reporting unit's fair value is less than its carrying value will it be required to calculate the fair value of the reporting unit. The qualitative assessment is optional and the Company is permitted to bypass it for any reporting unit in any period and begin its impairment analysis with the quantitative calculation. The Company is permitted to perform the qualitative assessment in any subsequent period. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding fair value measurements that establishes common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Some of the 28
N-6121st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 121st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) amendments clarify the Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") intent on the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements other than the expanded disclosures in Note 9. Future Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements In March 2013, the FASB issued new guidance regarding foreign currency (Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-05, Foreign Currency Matters (Topic 830): Parent's Accounting for the Cumulative Translation Adjustment upon Derecognition of Certain Subsidiaries or Groups of Assets within a Foreign Entity or of an Investment in a Foreign Entity), effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments require an entity that ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30, Foreign Currency Matters -- Translation of Financial Statements, to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, the partial sale guidance in section 830-30-40, Derecognition, still applies. As such, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such an equity method investment. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance regarding liabilities (ASU 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date), effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 and interim periods within those years. The amendments require an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. In addition, the amendments require an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation, as well as other information about the obligation. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements. 2. Segment Information The Company is organized into two segments: Retail and Corporate Benefit Funding. In addition, the Company reports certain of its results of operations in Corporate & Other. Retail The Retail segment offers a broad range of protection products and a variety of annuities primarily to individuals, and is organized into two businesses: Annuities and Life & Other. Annuities includes a variety of variable, fixed and indexed annuities which provide for both asset accumulation and asset distribution needs. Life & Other insurance products and services include variable life, universal life, term life and whole life products, as well as individual disability income products. Additionally, through broker-dealer affiliates, the Company offers a full range of mutual funds and other securities products. 29
N-6122nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 122nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Segment Information (continued) Corporate Benefit Funding The Corporate Benefit Funding segment offers a broad range of annuity and investment products, including guaranteed interest products and other stable value products, income annuities, and separate account contracts for the investment management of defined benefit and defined contribution plan assets. This segment also includes structured settlements and certain products to fund company-, bank- or trust-owned life insurance used to finance non-qualified benefit programs for executives. Corporate & Other Corporate & Other contains the excess capital not allocated to the segments, various start-up businesses, including direct and digital marketing products, run-off businesses, the Company's ancillary international operations, interest expense related to the majority of the Company's outstanding debt, as well as expenses associated with certain legal proceedings and income tax audit issues. Corporate & Other also includes the elimination of intersegment amounts. Financial Measures and Segment Accounting Policies Operating earnings is the measure of segment profit or loss the Company uses to evaluate segment performance and allocate resources. Consistent with GAAP guidance for segment reporting, operating earnings is the Company's measure of segment performance and is reported below. Operating earnings should not be viewed as a substitute for income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax. The Company believes the presentation of operating earnings as the Company measures it for management purposes enhances the understanding of its performance by highlighting the results of operations and the underlying profitability drivers of the business. Operating earnings is defined as operating revenues less operating expenses, both net of income tax. Operating revenues excludes net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses). Operating expenses excludes goodwill impairments. The following additional adjustments are made to GAAP revenues, in the line items indicated, in calculating operating revenues: . Universal life and investment-type product policy fees excludes the amortization of unearned revenue related to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses) and certain variable annuity GMIB fees ("GMIB Fees"); and . Net investment income: (i) includes amounts for scheduled periodic settlement payments and amortization of premium on derivatives that are hedges of investments or that are used to replicate certain investments, but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment, (ii) includes income from discontinued real estate operations, (iii) excludes post-tax operating earnings adjustments relating to insurance joint ventures accounted for under the equity method, (iv) excludes certain amounts related to contractholder-directed unit-linked investments, and (v) excludes certain amounts related to securitization entities that are VIEs consolidated under GAAP. 30
N-6123rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 123rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Segment Information (continued) The following additional adjustments are made to GAAP expenses, in the line items indicated, in calculating operating expenses: . Policyholder benefits and claims excludes: (i) amounts associated with periodic crediting rate adjustments based on the total return of a contractually referenced pool of assets, (ii) benefits and hedging costs related to GMIBs ("GMIB Costs"), and (iii) market value adjustments associated with surrenders or terminations of contracts ("Market Value Adjustments"); . Interest credited to policyholder account balances includes adjustments for scheduled periodic settlement payments and amortization of premium on derivatives that are hedges of PABs but do not qualify for hedge accounting treatment and excludes amounts related to net investment income earned on contractholder-directed unit-linked investments; . Amortization of DAC and VOBA excludes amounts related to: (i) net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses), (ii) GMIB Fees and GMIB Costs, and (iii) Market Value Adjustments; . Interest expense on debt excludes certain amounts related to securitization entities that are VIEs consolidated under GAAP; and . Other expenses excludes costs related to: (i) implementation of new insurance regulatory requirements, and (ii) acquisition and integration costs. Set forth in the tables below is certain financial information with respect to the Company's segments, as well as Corporate & Other, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and at December 31, 2013 and 2012. The segment accounting policies are the same as those used to prepare the Company's consolidated financial statements, except for operating earnings adjustments as defined above. In addition, segment accounting policies include the method of capital allocation described below. Economic capital is an internally developed risk capital model, the purpose of which is to measure the risk in the business and to provide a basis upon which capital is deployed. The economic capital model accounts for the unique and specific nature of the risks inherent in MetLife's and the Company's business. MetLife's economic capital model aligns segment allocated equity with emerging standards and consistent risk principles. The model applies statistics-based risk evaluation principles to the material risks to which the Company is exposed. These consistent risk principles include calibrating required economic capital shock factors to a specific confidence level and time horizon and applying an industry standard method for the inclusion of diversification benefits among risk types. Segment net investment income is credited or charged based on the level of allocated equity; however, changes in allocated equity do not impact the Company's consolidated net investment income, operating earnings or income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax. Net investment income is based upon the actual results of each segment's specifically identifiable investment portfolios adjusted for allocated equity. Other costs are allocated to each of the segments based upon: (i) a review of the nature of such costs; (ii) time studies analyzing the amount of employee compensation costs incurred by each segment; and (iii) cost estimates included in the Company's product pricing. 31
N-6124th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 124th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Segment Information (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Operating Earnings ------------------------------------- Corporate Benefit Corporate Total Year Ended December 31, 2013 Retail Funding & Other Total Adjustments Consolidated -------------------------------------------------------- -------- --------- --------- -------- ----------- ------------ (In millions) Revenues Premiums................................................ $ 387 $ 184 $ 35 $ 606 $ -- $ 606 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.. 2,155 35 -- 2,190 146 2,336 Net investment income................................... 1,614 1,162 112 2,888 (36) 2,852 Other revenues.......................................... 587 5 -- 592 -- 592 Net investment gains (losses)........................... -- -- -- -- 82 82 Net derivative gains (losses)........................... -- -- -- -- (1,052) (1,052) -------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ---------- Total revenues........................................ 4,743 1,386 147 6,276 (860) 5,416 -------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ---------- Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims........................ 737 749 14 1,500 207 1,707 Interest credited to policyholder account balances...... 906 136 -- 1,042 (5) 1,037 Goodwill impairment..................................... -- -- -- -- 66 66 Capitalization of DAC................................... (475) (2) (27) (504) -- (504) Amortization of DAC and VOBA............................ 552 5 1 558 (508) 50 Interest expense on debt................................ -- -- 68 68 122 190 Other expenses.......................................... 1,816 36 71 1,923 -- 1,923 -------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ---------- Total expenses........................................ 3,536 924 127 4,587 (118) 4,469 -------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ---------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit).............. 395 162 (86) 471 (244) 227 -------- ------- ------- -------- ---------- ---------- Operating earnings...................................... $ 812 $ 300 $ 106 1,218 ======== ======= ======= Adjustments to:......................................... Total revenues........................................ (860) Total expenses........................................ 118 Provision for income tax (expense) benefit............ 244 -------- Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.................................................... $ 720 $ 720 ======== ========== [Download Table] Corporate Benefit Corporate & At December 31, 2013 Retail Funding Other Total ----------------------------- ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- (In millions) Total assets................. $ 146,515 $ 30,822 $ 10,702 $ 188,039 Separate account assets...... $ 95,692 $ 2,088 $ -- $ 97,780 Separate account liabilities. $ 95,692 $ 2,088 $ -- $ 97,780 32
N-6125th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 125th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Segment Information (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Operating Earnings --------------------------------------- Corporate Benefit Corporate & Total Year Ended December 31, 2012 Retail Funding Other Total Adjustments Consolidated -------------------------------------------------------- -------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------------ (In millions) Revenues Premiums................................................ $ 498 $ 629 $ 134 $ 1,261 $ -- $ 1,261 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.. 2,081 29 14 2,124 137 2,261 Net investment income................................... 1,525 1,167 185 2,877 75 2,952 Other revenues.......................................... 505 6 -- 511 -- 511 Net investment gains (losses)........................... -- -- -- -- 152 152 Net derivative gains (losses)........................... -- -- -- -- 1,003 1,003 -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- Total revenues........................................ 4,609 1,831 333 6,773 1,367 8,140 -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims........................ 738 1,161 128 2,027 362 2,389 Interest credited to policyholder account balances...... 943 162 -- 1,105 42 1,147 Goodwill impairment..................................... -- -- -- -- 394 394 Capitalization of DAC................................... (848) (5) (33) (886) -- (886) Amortization of DAC and VOBA............................ 666 10 2 678 357 1,035 Interest expense on debt................................ -- -- 68 68 163 231 Other expenses.......................................... 2,229 39 66 2,334 6 2,340 -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- Total expenses........................................ 3,728 1,367 231 5,326 1,324 6,650 -------- -------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit).............. 332 162 (30) 464 (92) 372 -------- -------- -------- -------- ----------- Operating earnings...................................... $ 549 $ 302 $ 132 983 ======== ======== ======== Adjustments to: Total revenues........................................ 1,367 Total expenses........................................ (1,324) Provision for income tax (expense) benefit............ 92 -------- Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.................................................... $ 1,118 $ 1,118 ======== =========== [Download Table] Corporate Benefit Corporate At December 31, 2012 Retail Funding & Other Total ----------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------- (In millions) Total assets................. $ 136,074 $33,140 $ 15,323 $ 184,537 Separate account assets...... $ 84,106 $ 2,008 $ -- $ 86,114 Separate account liabilities. $ 84,106 $ 2,008 $ -- $ 86,114 33
N-6126th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 126th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Segment Information (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Operating Earnings ----------------------------------------- Corporate Benefit Corporate Total Year Ended December 31, 2011 Retail Funding & Other Total Adjustments Consolidated -------------------------------------------------------- ---------- --------- --------- ---------- ----------- ------------ (In millions) Revenues Premiums................................................ $ 710 $ 1,071 $ 47 $ 1,828 $ -- $ 1,828 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.. 1,764 34 36 1,834 122 1,956 Net investment income................................... 1,423 1,175 181 2,779 295 3,074 Other revenues.......................................... 502 5 1 508 -- 508 Net investment gains (losses)........................... -- -- -- -- 35 35 Net derivative gains (losses)........................... -- -- -- -- 1,096 1,096 ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Total revenues........................................ 4,399 2,285 265 6,949 1,548 8,497 ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims........................ 896 1,598 46 2,540 120 2,660 Interest credited to policyholder account balances...... 988 180 -- 1,168 21 1,189 Goodwill impairment..................................... -- -- -- -- -- -- Capitalization of DAC................................... (1,301) (7) (57) (1,365) -- (1,365) Amortization of DAC and VOBA............................ 791 4 6 801 358 1,159 Interest expense on debt................................ -- -- 67 67 322 389 Other expenses.......................................... 2,568 42 163 2,773 25 2,798 ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Total expenses........................................ 3,942 1,817 225 5,984 846 6,830 ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- ----------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit).............. 161 164 (70) 255 238 493 ---------- -------- -------- ---------- ----------- Operating earnings...................................... $ 296 $ 304 $ 110 710 ========== ======== ======== Adjustments to: Total revenues........................................ 1,548 Total expenses........................................ (846) Provision for income tax (expense) benefit............ (238) ---------- Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.................................................... $ 1,174 $ 1,174 ========== =========== The following table presents total premiums, universal life and investment-type product policy fees and other revenues by major product groups of the Company's segments, as well as Corporate & Other: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Life insurance (1)............ $ 3,528 $ 4,026 $ 4,285 Accident and health insurance. 6 7 7 -------- -------- -------- Total........................ $ 3,534 $ 4,033 $ 4,292 ======== ======== ======== -------- (1) Includes annuities and corporate benefit funding products. Revenues derived from any customer did not exceed 10% of consolidated premiums, universal life and investment-type product policy fees and other revenues for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. 34
N-6127th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 127th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Segment Information (continued) The following table presents total premiums, universal life and investment-type product policy fees and other revenues associated with the Company's U.S. and foreign operations: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) U.S............. $ 3,442 $ 3,329 $ 3,222 Foreign: United Kingdom. 92 556 986 Other (1)...... -- 148 84 -------- -------- -------- Total........ $ 3,534 $ 4,033 $ 4,292 ======== ======== ======== -------- (1)See Note 3 for information on the disposition of a subsidiary. 3. Dispositions Disposition In June 2012, the Company distributed all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of its wholly-owned subsidiary, MetLife Europe Limited ("MetLife Europe") to its stockholders as an in-kind dividend. The net book value of MetLife Europe at the time of the dividend was $290 million which was recorded as a dividend of retained earnings of $347 million and an increase to OCI of $57 million, net of income tax. As of the date of dividend, the Company no longer consolidates the assets, liabilities and operations of MetLife Europe. The net income of MetLife Europe was not material to the Company for the periods prior to the dividend. The results of MetLife Europe were reported in Corporate & Other. See Note 2 for a discussion of Corporate & Other. Discontinued Operations The following table summarizes the amounts that have been reflected as discontinued operations in the consolidated statements of operations. Income (loss) from discontinued operations includes real estate classified as held-for-sale or sold. [Enlarge/Download Table] Year Ended December 31, 2012 ---------------------------- (In millions) Total revenues................................................ $ 12 Total expenses................................................ -- --------------------- Income (loss) before provision for income tax................. 12 Provision for income tax expense (benefit).................... 4 --------------------- Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax. $ 8 ===================== There was no income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax, for both of the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2011. 35
N-6128th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 128th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance Insurance Liabilities Insurance liabilities, including affiliated insurance liabilities on reinsurance assumed and ceded, are comprised of future policy benefits, PABs and other policy-related balances. Information regarding insurance liabilities by segment, as well as Corporate & Other, was as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, ------------------- 2013 2012 --------- --------- (In millions) Retail.................... $ 35,844 $ 37,642 Corporate Benefit Funding. 22,222 23,766 Corporate & Other......... 6,542 6,289 --------- --------- Total.................... $ 64,608 $ 67,697 ========= ========= See Note 6 for discussion of affiliated reinsurance liabilities included in the table above. Future policy benefits are measured as follows: Product Type: Measurement Assumptions: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Participating life Aggregate of net level premium reserves for death and endowment policy benefits (calculated based upon the non-forfeiture interest rate of 4%, and mortality rates guaranteed in calculating the cash surrender values described in such contracts). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nonparticipating life Aggregate of the present value of expected future benefit payments and related expenses less the present value of expected future net premiums. Assumptions as to mortality and persistency are based upon the Company's experience when the basis of the liability is established. Interest rate assumptions for the aggregate future policy benefit liabilities range from 2% to 7%. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Individual and group traditional Present value of expected future fixed annuities after annuitization payments. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 4% to 8%. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Non-medical health insurance The net level premium method and assumptions as to future morbidity, withdrawals and interest, which provide a margin for adverse deviation. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 4% to 7%. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Disabled lives Present value of benefits method and experience assumptions as to claim terminations, expenses and interest. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 3% to 7%. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Participating business represented 3% and 2% of the Company's life insurance in-force at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Participating policies represented 32%, 24% and 10% of gross life insurance premiums for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. PABs are equal to: (i) policy account values, which consist of an accumulation of gross premium payments; (ii) credited interest, ranging from 1% to 8%, less expenses, mortality charges and withdrawals; and (iii) fair value adjustments relating to business combinations. 36
N-6129th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 129th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance (continued) Guarantees The Company issues variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits. The non-life contingent portion of GMWBs and the portion of certain GMIBs that does not require annuitization are accounted for as embedded derivatives in PABs and are further discussed in Note 8. Guarantees accounted for as insurance liabilities include: [Enlarge/Download Table] Guarantee: Measurement Assumptions: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GMDBs . A return of purchase payment upon Present value of expected death benefits in death even if the account value is excess of the projected account balance reduced to zero. recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on the present value of total expected assessments. . An enhanced death benefit may be Assumptions are consistent with those used available for an additional fee. for amortizing DAC, and are thus subject to the same variability and risk. Investment performance and volatility assumptions are consistent with the historical experience of the appropriate underlying equity index, such as the S&P 500 Index. Benefit assumptions are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GMIBs . After a specified period of time Present value of expected income benefits in determined at the time of issuance excess of the projected account balance at of the variable annuity contract, any future date of annuitization and a minimum accumulation of purchase recognizing the excess ratably over the payments, even if the account accumulation period based on present value value is reduced to zero, that can of total expected assessments. be annuitized to receive a monthly income stream that is not less than a specified amount. . Certain contracts also provide for Assumptions are consistent with those used a guaranteed lump sum return of for estimating GMDB liabilities. purchase premium in lieu of the annuitization benefit. Calculation incorporates an assumption for the percentage of the potential annuitizations that may be elected by the contractholder. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GMWBs. . A return of purchase payment via Expected value of the life contingent partial withdrawals, even if the payments and expected assessments using account value is reduced to zero, assumptions consistent with those used for provided that cumulative estimating the GMDB liabilities. withdrawals in a contract year do not exceed a certain limit. . Certain contracts include guaranteed withdrawals that are life contingent. 37
N-6130th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 130th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance (continued) Information regarding the liabilities for guarantees (excluding base policy liabilities and embedded derivatives) relating to annuity and universal and variable life contracts was as follows: [Download Table] Universal and Variable Life Annuity Contracts Contracts ----------------- ------------- Secondary GMDBs GMIBs Guarantees Total -------- -------- ------------- --------- (In millions) Direct Balance at January 1, 2011... $ 79 $ 281 $ 896 $ 1,256 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 84 128 140 352 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (25) -- -- (25) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2011. 138 409 1,036 1,583 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 108 402 332 842 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (29) -- -- (29) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2012. 217 811 1,368 2,396 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 155 127 415 697 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (17) -- -- (17) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2013. $ 355 $ 938 $ 1,783 $ 3,076 ======== ======== ========= ========= Ceded Balance at January 1, 2011... $ 76 $ 97 $ 657 $ 830 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 59 42 110 211 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (21) -- -- (21) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2011. 114 139 767 1,020 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 56 129 267 452 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (25) -- -- (25) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2012. 145 268 1,034 1,447 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 85 31 334 450 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (15) -- -- (15) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2013. $ 215 $ 299 $ 1,368 $ 1,882 ======== ======== ========= ========= Net Balance at January 1, 2011... $ 3 $ 184 $ 239 $ 426 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 25 86 30 141 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (4) -- -- (4) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2011. 24 270 269 563 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 52 273 65 390 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (4) -- -- (4) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2012. 72 543 334 949 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 70 96 81 247 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (2) -- -- (2) -------- -------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31, 2013. $ 140 $ 639 $ 415 $ 1,194 ======== ======== ========= ========= 38
N-6131st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 131st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance (continued) Account balances of contracts with insurance guarantees were invested in separate account asset classes as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, ------------------- 2013 2012 --------- --------- (In millions) Fund Groupings: Equity.......... $ 46,559 $ 39,113 Balanced........ 41,894 37,528 Bond............ 4,270 4,678 Money Market.... 789 879 --------- --------- Total.......... $ 93,512 $ 82,198 ========= ========= Based on the type of guarantee, the Company defines net amount at risk ("NAR") as listed below. Variable Annuity Guarantees In the Event of Death Defined as the death benefit less the total contract account value, as of the balance sheet date. It represents the amount of the claim that the Company would incur if death claims were filed on all contracts on the balance sheet date and includes any additional contractual claims associated with riders purchased to assist with covering income taxes payable upon death. At Annuitization Defined as the amount (if any) that would be required to be added to the total contract account value to purchase a lifetime income stream, based on current annuity rates, equal to the minimum amount provided under the guaranteed benefit. This amount represents the Company's potential economic exposure to such guarantees in the event all contractholders were to annuitize on the balance sheet date, even though the contracts contain terms that allow annuitization of the guaranteed amount only after the 10th anniversary of the contract, which not all contractholders have achieved. Universal and Variable Life Contracts Defined as the guarantee amount less the account value, as of the balance sheet date. It represents the amount of the claim that the Company would incur if death claims were filed on all contracts on the balance sheet date. The amounts in the table below include direct business, but exclude offsets from hedging or reinsurance, if any. See Note 6 for a discussion of certain living and death benefit guarantees which have been reinsured. Therefore, the NARs presented below reflect the economic exposures of living and death benefit guarantees associated with variable annuities, but not necessarily their impact on the Company. 39
N-6132nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 132nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance (continued) Information regarding the types of guarantees relating to annuity contracts and universal and variable life contracts was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- In the At In the At Event of Death Annuitization Event of Death Annuitization -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- (In millions) Annuity Contracts (1) Variable Annuity Guarantees Total contract account value............ $ 100,420 $ 57,041 $ 89,671 $ 51,411 Separate account value.................. $ 95,637 $ 55,805 $ 84,106 $ 49,778 Net amount at risk...................... $ 2,230 $ 562 $ 3,117 $ 2,316 Average attained age of contractholders. 64 years 64 years 63 years 63 years [Download Table] December 31, ----------------------- 2013 2012 ----------- ----------- Secondary Guarantees ----------------------- (In millions) Universal and Variable Life Contracts (1) Account value (general and separate account). $ 6,360 $ 5,812 Net amount at risk........................... $ 91,264 $ 86,468 Average attained age of policyholders........ 58 years 58 years -------- (1)The Company's annuity and life contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract. Therefore, the amounts listed above may not be mutually exclusive. Obligations Under Funding Agreements The Company issues fixed and floating rate funding agreements, which are denominated in either U.S. dollars or foreign currencies, to certain special purpose entities ("SPEs") that have issued either debt securities or commercial paper for which payment of interest and principal is secured by such funding agreements. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Company issued $10.9 billion, $10.3 billion and $12.5 billion, respectively, and repaid $11.7 billion, $9.6 billion and $13.4 billion, respectively, of such funding agreements. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, liabilities for funding agreements outstanding, which are included in PABs, were $5.3 billion and $6.1 billion, respectively. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MLI-USA, are members of regional banks in the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") system ("FHLBanks"). Holdings of common stock of FHLBanks, included in equity securities, were as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) FHLB of Boston..... $ 64 $ 67 FHLB of Pittsburgh. $ 20 $ 11 40
N-6133rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 133rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance (continued) The Company has also entered into funding agreements with FHLBanks and the Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation, a federally chartered instrumentality of the U.S. ("Farmer Mac"). The liability for such funding agreements is included in PABs. Information related to such funding agreements was as follows at: [Download Table] Liability Collateral ------------------- --------------------- December 31, ----------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2013 2012 --------- --------- ---------- ---------- (In millions) FHLB of Boston (1)..... $ 450 $ 450 $ 808 (2) $ 537 (2) Farmer Mac (3)......... $ 200 $ 200 $ 230 $ 230 FHLB of Pittsburgh (1). $ 200 $ -- $ 602 (2) $ 595 (2) -------- (1)Represents funding agreements issued to the applicable FHLBank in exchange for cash and for which such FHLBank has been granted a lien on certain assets, some of which are in the custody of such FHLBank, including residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"), to collateralize obligations under advances evidenced by funding agreements. The Company is permitted to withdraw any portion of the collateral in the custody of such FHLBank as long as there is no event of default and the remaining qualified collateral is sufficient to satisfy the collateral maintenance level. Upon any event of default by the Company, such FHLBank's recovery on the collateral is limited to the amount of the Company's liability to such FHLBank. (2)Advances are collateralized by mortgage-backed securities. The amount of collateral presented is at estimated fair value. (3)Represents funding agreements issued to certain SPEs that have issued debt securities for which payment of interest and principal is secured by such funding agreements, and such debt securities are also guaranteed as to payment of interest and principal by Farmer Mac. The obligations under these funding agreements are secured by a pledge of certain eligible agricultural real estate mortgage loans and may, under certain circumstances, be secured by other qualified collateral. The amount of collateral presented is at carrying value. 41
N-6134th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 134th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Insurance (continued) Liabilities for Unpaid Claims and Claim Expenses Information regarding the liabilities for unpaid claims and claim expenses relating to group accident and non-medical health policies and contracts, which are reported in future policy benefits and other policy-related balances, was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,........... $ 1,216 $ 1,079 $ 978 Less: Reinsurance recoverables. 1,124 980 878 -------- -------- -------- Net balance at January 1,....... 92 99 100 -------- -------- -------- Incurred related to: Current year................... 5 5 5 Prior years (1)................ 4 (2) 4 -------- -------- -------- Total incurred............... 9 3 9 -------- -------- -------- Paid related to: Current year................... -- -- -- Prior years.................... (11) (10) (10) -------- -------- -------- Total paid................... (11) (10) (10) -------- -------- -------- Net balance at December 31,..... 90 92 99 Add: Reinsurance recoverables.. 1,235 1,124 980 -------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31,......... $ 1,325 $ 1,216 $ 1,079 ======== ======== ======== -------- (1)During 2013, 2012 and 2011, claims and claim adjustment expenses associated with prior years changed due to differences between the actual benefits paid and expected benefits owed during those periods. Separate Accounts Separate account assets and liabilities primarily include pass-through separate accounts totaling $97.6 billion and $85.9 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for which the policyholder assumes all investment risk. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were no investment gains (losses) on transfers of assets from the general account to the separate accounts. 5. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles See Note 1 for a description of capitalized acquisition costs. 42
N-6135th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 135th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5.Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) Nonparticipating and Non-Dividend-Paying Traditional Contracts The Company amortizes DAC and VOBA related to these contracts (primarily term insurance) over the appropriate premium paying period in proportion to the historic actual and expected future gross premiums that were set at contract issue. The expected premiums are based upon the premium requirement of each policy and assumptions for mortality, persistency and investment returns at policy issuance, or policy acquisition (as it relates to VOBA), include provisions for adverse deviation, and are consistent with the assumptions used to calculate future policyholder benefit liabilities. These assumptions are not revised after policy issuance or acquisition unless the DAC or VOBA balance is deemed to be unrecoverable from future expected profits. Absent a premium deficiency, variability in amortization after policy issuance or acquisition is caused only by variability in premium volumes. Participating, Dividend-Paying Traditional Contracts The Company amortizes DAC related to these contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross margins. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception or acquisition of the contracts. The future gross margins are dependent principally on investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, mortality, persistency, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses, persistency and other factor changes, as well as policyholder dividend scales are reasonably likely to impact significantly the rate of DAC amortization. Each reporting period, the Company updates the estimated gross margins with the actual gross margins for that period. When the actual gross margins change from previously estimated gross margins, the cumulative DAC amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. When actual gross margins exceed those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross margins are below the previously estimated gross margins. Each reporting period, the Company also updates the actual amount of business in-force, which impacts expected future gross margins. When expected future gross margins are below those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross margins are above the previously estimated expected future gross margins. Each period, the Company also reviews the estimated gross margins for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC balances. Fixed and Variable Universal Life Contracts and Fixed and Variable Deferred Annuity Contracts The Company amortizes DAC and VOBA related to these contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross profits. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception or acquisition of the contracts. The amount of future gross profits is dependent principally upon returns in excess of the amounts credited to policyholders, mortality, persistency, interest crediting rates, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties, the effect of any hedges used and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses and persistency are reasonably likely to impact significantly the rate of DAC and VOBA amortization. Each reporting period, the Company updates the estimated gross profits with the actual gross profits for that period. When the actual gross profits change from previously estimated gross profits, the 43
N-6136th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 136th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5.Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) cumulative DAC and VOBA amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. When actual gross profits exceed those previously estimated, the DAC and VOBA amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross profits are below the previously estimated gross profits. Each reporting period, the Company also updates the actual amount of business remaining in-force, which impacts expected future gross profits. When expected future gross profits are below those previously estimated, the DAC and VOBA amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross profits are above the previously estimated expected future gross profits. Each period, the Company also reviews the estimated gross profits for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC and VOBA balances. Factors Impacting Amortization Separate account rates of return on variable universal life contracts and variable deferred annuity contracts affect in-force account balances on such contracts each reporting period, which can result in significant fluctuations in amortization of DAC and VOBA. Returns that are higher than the Company's long-term expectation produce higher account balances, which increases the Company's future fee expectations and decreases future benefit payment expectations on minimum death and living benefit guarantees, resulting in higher expected future gross profits. The opposite result occurs when returns are lower than the Company's long-term expectation. The Company's practice to determine the impact of gross profits resulting from returns on separate accounts assumes that long-term appreciation in equity markets is not changed by short-term market fluctuations, but is only changed when sustained interim deviations are expected. The Company monitors these events and only changes the assumption when its long-term expectation changes. The Company also periodically reviews other long-term assumptions underlying the projections of estimated gross margins and profits. These assumptions primarily relate to investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, interest crediting rates, mortality, persistency and expenses to administer business. Management annually updates assumptions used in the calculation of estimated gross margins and profits which may have significantly changed. If the update of assumptions causes expected future gross margins and profits to increase, DAC and VOBA amortization will decrease, resulting in a current period increase to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the assumption update causes expected future gross margins and profits to decrease. Periodically, the Company modifies product benefits, features, rights or coverages that occur by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by election or coverage within a contract. If such modification, referred to as an internal replacement, substantially changes the contract, the associated DAC or VOBA is written off immediately through income and any new deferrable costs associated with the replacement contract are deferred. If the modification does not substantially change the contract, the DAC or VOBA amortization on the original contract will continue and any acquisition costs associated with the related modification are expensed. Amortization of DAC and VOBA is attributed to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses), and to other expenses for the amount of gross margins or profits originating from transactions other than investment gains and losses. Unrealized investment gains and losses represent the amount of DAC and VOBA that would have been amortized if such gains and losses had been recognized. 44
N-6137th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 137th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5.Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) Information regarding DAC and VOBA was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) DAC Balance at January 1,............................................ $ 3,079 $ 3,215 $ 2,718 Capitalizations.................................................. 504 886 1,365 Amortization related to: Net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses). 484 (331) (339) Other expenses.................................................. (404) (513) (477) -------- -------- -------- Total amortization............................................ 80 (844) (816) -------- -------- -------- Unrealized investment gains (losses)............................. 80 (19) (49) Disposition and other (1), (2)................................... 138 (159) (3) -------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31,.......................................... 3,881 3,079 3,215 -------- -------- -------- VOBA Balance at January 1,............................................ 667 1,006 1,686 Amortization related to: Net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses). 5 -- (29) Other expenses.................................................. (135) (191) (314) -------- -------- -------- Total amortization............................................ (130) (191) (343) -------- -------- -------- Unrealized investment gains (losses)............................. 312 (148) (337) -------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31,.......................................... 849 667 1,006 -------- -------- -------- Total DAC and VOBA Balance at December 31,.......................................... $ 4,730 $ 3,746 $ 4,221 ======== ======== ======== -------- (1)The year ended December 31, 2013 includes $138 million that was reclassified to DAC from premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. The amounts reclassified relate to an affiliated reinsurance agreement accounted for using the deposit method of accounting and represent the DAC amortization on the expense allowances ceded on the agreement from inception. These amounts were previously included in the calculated value of the deposit receivable on this agreement and recorded within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. (2)See Note 3 for information on the disposition of a subsidiary. 45
N-6138th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 138th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5.Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) Information regarding total DAC and VOBA by segment, as well as Corporate & Other, was as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, ----------------- 2013 2012 -------- -------- (In millions) Retail.................... $ 4,698 $ 3,738 Corporate Benefit Funding. 6 8 Corporate & Other......... 26 -- -------- -------- Total.................... $ 4,730 $ 3,746 ======== ======== Information regarding other policy-related intangibles was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ----------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------- ------- ------- (In millions) Deferred Sales Inducements Balance at January 1,...... $ 509 $ 535 $ 537 Capitalization............. 6 21 79 Amortization............... (32) (47) (81) ------- ------- ------- Balance at December 31,.... $ 483 $ 509 $ 535 ======= ======= ======= VODA and VOCRA Balance at January 1,...... $ 175 $ 190 $ 203 Amortization............... (16) (15) (13) ------- ------- ------- Balance at December 31,.... $ 159 $ 175 $ 190 ======= ======= ======= Accumulated amortization... $ 81 $ 65 $ 50 ======= ======= ======= The estimated future amortization expense to be reported in other expenses for the next five years is as follows: [Download Table] VOBA VODA and VOCRA -------------- -------------- (In millions) 2014.......................... $ 176 $ 17 2015.......................... $ 141 $ 17 2016.......................... $ 114 $ 15 2017.......................... $ 94 $ 14 2018.......................... $ 78 $ 13 6. Reinsurance The Company enters into reinsurance agreements primarily as a purchaser of reinsurance for its various insurance products and also as a provider of reinsurance for some insurance products issued by affiliated and unaffiliated companies. The Company participates in reinsurance activities in order to limit losses, minimize exposure to significant risks and provide additional capacity for future growth. 46
N-6139th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 139th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) Accounting for reinsurance requires extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business and the potential impact of counterparty credit risks. The Company periodically reviews actual and anticipated experience compared to the aforementioned assumptions used to establish assets and liabilities relating to ceded and assumed reinsurance and evaluates the financial strength of counterparties to its reinsurance agreements using criteria similar to that evaluated in the security impairment process discussed in Note 7. Retail The Company's Retail Annuities business reinsures 100% of the living and death benefit guarantees issued in connection with most of its variable annuities issued since 2006 to an affiliated reinsurer and certain portions of the living and death benefit guarantees issued in connection with its variable annuities issued prior to 2006 to affiliated and unaffiliated reinsurers. Under these reinsurance agreements, the Company pays a reinsurance premium generally based on fees associated with the guarantees collected from policyholders, and receives reimbursement for benefits paid or accrued in excess of account values, subject to certain limitations. The Company also reinsures 90% of its fixed annuities to an affiliated reinsurer. The value of the embedded derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer. For its Retail Life & Other insurance products, the Company has historically reinsured the mortality risk primarily on an excess of retention basis or on a quota share basis. The Company currently reinsures 100% of the mortality risk in excess of $100,000 per life for most new policies and reinsures up to 100% of the mortality risk for certain other policies. In addition to reinsuring mortality risk as described above, the Company reinsures other risks, as well as specific coverages. Placement of reinsurance is done primarily on an automatic basis and also on a facultative basis for risks with specified characteristics. The Company also reinsures the risk associated with secondary death benefit guarantees on certain universal life insurance policies to affiliates. The Company evaluates its reinsurance programs routinely and may increase or decrease its retention at any time. Corporate Benefit Funding The Company's Corporate Benefit Funding segment has periodically engaged in reinsurance activities, on an opportunistic basis. The impact of these activities on the financial results of this segment has not been significant and there were no additional transactions during the periods presented. Corporate & Other The Company also reinsures, through 100% quota share reinsurance agreements, certain run-off LTC and workers' compensation business written by the Company. Catastrophe Coverage The Company has exposure to catastrophes, which could contribute to significant fluctuations in the Company's results of operations. The Company uses excess of retention and quota share reinsurance agreements to provide greater diversification of risk and minimize exposure to larger risks. 47
N-6140th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 140th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) Reinsurance Recoverables The Company reinsures its business through a diversified group of well-capitalized reinsurers. The Company analyzes recent trends in arbitration and litigation outcomes in disputes, if any, with its reinsurers. The Company monitors ratings and evaluates the financial strength of its reinsurers by analyzing their financial statements. In addition, the reinsurance recoverable balance due from each reinsurer is evaluated as part of the overall monitoring process. Recoverability of reinsurance recoverable balances is evaluated based on these analyses. The Company generally secures large reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. These reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance, which at December 31, 2013 and 2012, were not significant. The Company has secured certain reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. The Company had $2.0 billion and $2.2 billion of unsecured unaffiliated reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. At December 31, 2013, the Company had $7.5 billion of net unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverables. Of this total, $6.7 billion, or 89%, were with the Company's five largest unaffiliated ceded reinsurers, including $1.2 billion of net unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverables which were unsecured. At December 31, 2012, the Company had $7.2 billion of net unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverables. Of this total, $6.5 billion, or 90%, were with the Company's five largest unaffiliated ceded reinsurers, including $1.4 billion of net unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverables which were unsecured. 48
N-6141st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 141st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) The amounts in the consolidated statements of operations include the impact of reinsurance. Information regarding the significant effects of reinsurance was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Premiums Direct premiums............................................... $ 1,561 $ 2,063 $ 2,429 Reinsurance assumed........................................... 10 11 7 Reinsurance ceded............................................. (965) (813) (608) -------- -------- -------- Net premiums................................................ $ 606 $ 1,261 $ 1,828 ======== ======== ======== Universal life and investment-type product policy fees Direct universal life and investment-type product policy fees. $ 3,248 $ 2,972 $ 2,572 Reinsurance assumed........................................... 84 87 92 Reinsurance ceded............................................. (996) (798) (708) -------- -------- -------- Net universal life and investment-type product policy fees.. $ 2,336 $ 2,261 $ 1,956 ======== ======== ======== Other revenues Direct other revenues......................................... $ 259 $ 231 $ 209 Reinsurance assumed........................................... -- -- -- Reinsurance ceded............................................. 333 280 299 -------- -------- -------- Net other revenues.......................................... $ 592 $ 511 $ 508 ======== ======== ======== Policyholder benefits and claims Direct policyholder benefits and claims....................... $ 3,732 $ 4,139 $ 4,277 Reinsurance assumed........................................... 15 23 20 Reinsurance ceded............................................. (2,040) (1,773) (1,637) -------- -------- -------- Net policyholder benefits and claims........................ $ 1,707 $ 2,389 $ 2,660 ======== ======== ======== Interest credited to policyholder account balances Direct interest credited to policyholder account balances..... $ 1,089 $ 1,185 $ 1,206 Reinsurance assumed........................................... 73 71 68 Reinsurance ceded............................................. (125) (109) (85) -------- -------- -------- Net interest credited to policyholder account balances...... $ 1,037 $ 1,147 $ 1,189 ======== ======== ======== Other expenses Direct other expenses......................................... $ 1,568 $ 2,562 $ 2,781 Reinsurance assumed........................................... 28 33 48 Reinsurance ceded............................................. 63 125 152 -------- -------- -------- Net other expenses.......................................... $ 1,659 $ 2,720 $ 2,981 ======== ======== ======== 49
N-6142nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 142nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) The amounts in the consolidated balance sheets include the impact of reinsurance. Information regarding the significant effects of reinsurance was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Total Total Balance Balance Direct Assumed Ceded Sheet Direct Assumed Ceded Sheet ---------- -------- --------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- --------- (In millions) Assets Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables........... $ 221 $ 28 $ 20,360 $ 20,609 $ 396 $ 35 $ 21,496 $ 21,927 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired.................... 5,191 123 (584) 4,730 4,264 121 (639) 3,746 ---------- -------- --------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- --------- Total assets............... $ 5,412 $ 151 $ 19,776 $ 25,339 $ 4,660 $ 156 $ 20,857 $ 25,673 ========== ======== ========= ========= ========== ======== ========= ========= Liabilities Other policy-related balances.................... $ 712 $ 1,641 $ 811 $ 3,164 $ 691 $ 1,592 $ 855 $ 3,138 Other liabilities............ 1,257 10 5,509 6,776 1,396 11 5,140 6,547 ---------- -------- --------- --------- ---------- -------- --------- --------- Total liabilities.......... $ 1,969 $ 1,651 $ 6,320 $ 9,940 $ 2,087 $ 1,603 $ 5,995 $ 9,685 ========== ======== ========= ========= ========== ======== ========= ========= Reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. The deposit assets on reinsurance were $4.6 billion and $4.7 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no deposit liabilities on reinsurance at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. 50
N-6143rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 143rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) Related Party Reinsurance Transactions The Company has reinsurance agreements with certain MetLife subsidiaries, including MLIC, MetLife Reinsurance Company of South Carolina, Exeter, General American Life Insurance Company, MLIIC, MetLife Reinsurance Company of Vermont and MetLife Reinsurance Company of Delaware ("MRD"), all of which are related parties. Information regarding the significant effects of affiliated reinsurance included in the consolidated statements of operations was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------- ------- ------- (In millions) Premiums Reinsurance assumed.......................................... $ 10 $ 11 $ 7 Reinsurance ceded............................................ (638) (478) (286) ------- ------- ------- Net premiums............................................... $ (628) $ (467) $ (279) ======= ======= ======= Universal life and investment-type product policy fees Reinsurance assumed.......................................... $ 84 $ 87 $ 92 Reinsurance ceded............................................ (585) (444) (400) ------- ------- ------- Net universal life and investment-type product policy fees. $ (501) $ (357) $ (308) ======= ======= ======= Other revenues Reinsurance assumed.......................................... $ -- $ -- $ -- Reinsurance ceded............................................ 332 280 299 ------- ------- ------- Net other revenues......................................... $ 332 $ 280 $ 299 ======= ======= ======= Policyholder benefits and claims Reinsurance assumed.......................................... $ 13 $ 21 $ 18 Reinsurance ceded............................................ (800) (780) (484) ------- ------- ------- Net policyholder benefits and claims....................... $ (787) $ (759) $ (466) ======= ======= ======= Interest credited to policyholder account balances Reinsurance assumed.......................................... $ 73 $ 71 $ 68 Reinsurance ceded............................................ (125) (109) (84) ------- ------- ------- Net interest credited to policyholder account balances..... $ (52) $ (38) $ (16) ======= ======= ======= Other expenses Reinsurance assumed.......................................... $ 28 $ 33 $ 48 Reinsurance ceded............................................ 92 157 204 ------- ------- ------- Net other expenses......................................... $ 120 $ 190 $ 252 ======= ======= ======= 51
N-6144th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 144th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) Information regarding the significant effects of affiliated reinsurance included in the consolidated balance sheets was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, -------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------------ ------------------ Assumed Ceded Assumed Ceded -------- --------- -------- --------- (In millions) Assets Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables............. $ 28 $ 12,710 $ 35 $ 14,171 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired.............................................. 122 (579) 121 (642) -------- --------- -------- --------- Total assets........................................... $ 150 $ 12,131 $ 156 $ 13,529 ======== ========= ======== ========= Liabilities Other policy-related balances........................... $ 1,640 $ 811 $ 1,592 $ 855 Other liabilities....................................... 9 5,260 10 4,894 -------- --------- -------- --------- Total liabilities...................................... $ 1,649 $ 6,071 $ 1,602 $ 5,749 ======== ========= ======== ========= Effective October 1, 2012, MLI-USA entered into a reinsurance agreement to cede two blocks of business to MRD, on a 90% coinsurance with funds withheld basis. The agreement covers certain term and certain universal life policies issued in 2012 by MLI-USA and was amended in 2013 to include certain term and universal life policies issued by MLI-USA through December 31, 2013. The agreement transfers risk to MRD and, therefore, is accounted for as reinsurance. As a result of the agreement, affiliated reinsurance recoverables, included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables, were $917 million and $407 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. MLI-USA also recorded a funds withheld liability and other reinsurance payables, included in other liabilities, which were $798 million and $438 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Certain contractual features of this agreement qualify as embedded derivatives, which are separately accounted for at fair value on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The embedded derivative related to the funds withheld associated with this reinsurance agreement is included within other liabilities and was ($14) million and $6 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company's consolidated statements of operations reflected a loss for this agreement of $50 million and $37 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which included net derivative gains (losses) of $20 million and ($6) million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, related to the embedded derivative. The Company ceded risks to affiliates related to guaranteed minimum benefit guarantees written directly by the Company. These ceded reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives and changes in their fair value are also included within net derivative gains (losses). The embedded derivatives associated with the cessions are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and were assets of $912 million and $3.6 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net derivative gains (losses) associated with the embedded derivatives were ($3.0) billion, $524 million, and $1.6 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. MLI-USA ceded two blocks of business to an affiliate on a 90% coinsurance with funds withheld basis. Certain contractual features of this agreement qualify as embedded derivatives, which are separately accounted for at estimated fair value on the Company's consolidated balance sheets. The embedded derivative related to the 52
N-6145th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 145th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Reinsurance (continued) funds withheld associated with this reinsurance agreement is included within other liabilities and increased the funds withheld balance by $48 million and $546 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net derivative gains (losses) associated with the embedded derivatives were $498 million, ($107) million and ($434) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has secured certain reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts, funds withheld accounts and irrevocable letters of credit. The Company had $5.9 billion and $6.1 billion of unsecured affiliated reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Affiliated reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. The deposit assets on affiliated reinsurance were $4.4 billion and $4.6 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no deposit liabilities on affiliated reinsurance at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. 7. Investments See Note 9 for information about the fair value hierarchy for investments and the related valuation methodologies. Investment Risks and Uncertainties Investments are exposed to the following primary sources of risk: credit, interest rate, liquidity, market valuation, currency and real estate risk. The financial statement risks, stemming from such investment risks, are those associated with the determination of estimated fair values, the diminished ability to sell certain investments in times of strained market conditions, the recognition of impairments, the recognition of income on certain investments and the potential consolidation of VIEs. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs relating to these financial statement risks may have a material effect on the amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements. The determination of valuation allowances and impairments is highly subjective and is based upon periodic evaluations and assessments of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. The recognition of income on certain investments (e.g. structured securities, including mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities ("ABS") and certain structured investment transactions) is dependent upon certain factors such as prepayments and defaults, and changes in such factors could result in changes in amounts to be earned. 53
N-6146th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 146th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS by Sector The following table presents the fixed maturity and equity securities AFS by sector. Redeemable preferred stock is reported within U.S. corporate and foreign corporate fixed maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock is reported within equity securities. Included within fixed maturity securities are structured securities including RMBS, ABS and commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"). [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 --------------------------------------------- --------------------------------------------- Gross Unrealized Gross Unrealized Cost or ------------------------- Estimated Cost or ------------------------- Estimated Amortized Temporary OTTI Fair Amortized Temporary OTTI Fair Cost Gains Losses Losses Value Cost Gains Losses Losses Value --------- -------- --------- ------ --------- --------- -------- --------- ------ --------- (In millions) Fixed maturity securities U.S. corporate.................. $ 15,779 $ 1,130 $ 207 $ -- $ 16,702 $ 16,914 $ 2,063 $ 82 $ -- $ 18,895 Foreign corporate............... 8,111 485 79 -- 8,517 8,618 853 26 -- 9,445 U.S. Treasury and agency........ 8,188 334 228 -- 8,294 7,678 1,186 -- -- 8,864 RMBS............................ 4,587 201 59 41 4,688 5,492 360 50 64 5,738 State and political subdivision. 2,147 139 62 -- 2,224 2,002 354 27 -- 2,329 ABS............................. 2,081 32 12 -- 2,101 2,204 67 18 -- 2,253 CMBS............................ 1,546 62 4 -- 1,604 2,221 141 6 -- 2,356 Foreign government.............. 1,038 103 19 -- 1,122 876 214 2 -- 1,088 --------- -------- --------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----- --------- Total fixed maturity securities.................... $ 43,477 $ 2,486 $ 670 $ 41 $ 45,252 $ 46,005 $ 5,238 $ 211 $ 64 $ 50,968 ========= ======== ========= ===== ========= ========= ======== ========= ===== ========= Equity securities Non-redeemable preferred stock.......................... $ 236 $ 9 $ 28 $ -- $ 217 $ 151 $ 11 $ 22 $ -- $ 140 Common stock.................... 161 40 -- -- 201 160 18 1 -- 177 --------- -------- --------- ----- --------- --------- -------- --------- ----- --------- Total equity securities........ $ 397 $ 49 $ 28 $ -- $ 418 $ 311 $ 29 $ 23 $ -- $ 317 ========= ======== ========= ===== ========= ========= ======== ========= ===== ========= The Company held non-income producing fixed maturity securities with an estimated fair value of $30 million and $22 million with unrealized gains (losses) of $6 million and $3 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Methodology for Amortization of Premium and Accretion of Discount on Structured Securities Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on structured securities considers the estimated timing and amount of prepayments of the underlying loans. Actual prepayment experience is periodically reviewed and effective yields are recalculated when differences arise between the originally anticipated and the actual prepayments received and currently anticipated. Prepayment assumptions for single class and multi-class mortgage-backed and ABS are estimated using inputs obtained from third-party specialists and based on management's knowledge of the current market. For credit-sensitive mortgage-backed and ABS and certain prepayment-sensitive securities, the effective yield is recalculated on a prospective basis. For all other mortgage-backed and ABS, the effective yield is recalculated on a retrospective basis. 54
N-6147th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 147th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity date, were as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------------- ------------------- Estimated Estimated Amortized Fair Amortized Fair Cost Value Cost Value --------- --------- --------- --------- (In millions) Due in one year or less.................... $ 2,934 $ 2,966 $ 4,831 $ 4,875 Due after one year through five years...... 8,895 9,301 8,646 9,192 Due after five years through ten years..... 7,433 7,970 7,967 8,960 Due after ten years........................ 16,001 16,622 14,644 17,594 --------- --------- --------- --------- Subtotal................................ 35,263 36,859 36,088 40,621 Structured securities (RMBS, ABS and CMBS). 8,214 8,393 9,917 10,347 --------- --------- --------- --------- Total fixed maturity securities..... $ 43,477 $ 45,252 $ 46,005 $ 50,968 ========= ========= ========= ========= Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to the exercise of call or prepayment options. Fixed maturity securities not due at a single maturity date have been presented in the year of final contractual maturity. RMBS, ABS and CMBS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity. 55
N-6148th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 148th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Continuous Gross Unrealized Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS by Sector The following table presents the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity and equity securities AFS in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by sector and by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Equal to or Greater Equal to or Greater Less than 12 Months than 12 Months Less than 12 Months than 12 Months -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Estimated Gross Estimated Gross Estimated Gross Estimated Gross Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In millions, except number of securities) Fixed maturity securities U.S. corporate................... $ 2,526 $ 141 $ 470 $ 66 $ 784 $ 16 $ 621 $ 66 Foreign corporate................ 1,520 70 135 9 494 8 203 18 U.S. Treasury and agency......... 3,825 228 -- -- 200 -- -- -- RMBS............................. 996 35 457 65 62 6 781 108 State and political subdivision.. 630 44 64 18 44 2 55 25 ABS.............................. 680 5 104 7 208 1 266 17 CMBS............................. 143 4 7 -- 59 1 101 5 Foreign government............... 264 19 1 -- 116 2 -- -- --------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ Total fixed maturity securities.................... $ 10,584 $ 546 $ 1,238 $ 165 $ 1,967 $ 36 $ 2,027 $ 239 ========= ======= ======== ====== ======== ====== ======== ====== Equity securities Non-redeemable preferred stock........................... $ 105 $ 21 $ 33 $ 7 $ -- $ -- $ 50 $ 22 Common stock..................... 3 -- 7 -- 10 1 7 -- --------- ------- -------- ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ Total equity securities........ $ 108 $ 21 $ 40 $ 7 $ 10 $ 1 $ 57 $ 22 ========= ======= ======== ====== ======== ====== ======== ====== Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position........ 1,081 297 327 420 ========= ======== ======== ======== Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities Evaluation and Measurement Methodologies Management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in management's evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below cost or amortized cost; (ii) the potential for impairments when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; (iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector; (iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations; (v) the potential for impairments where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic loss or has exhausted 56
N-6149th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 149th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) natural resources; (vi) with respect to fixed maturity securities, whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost recovers; (vii) with respect to structured securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; and (viii) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies. The methodology and significant inputs used to determine the amount of credit loss on fixed maturity securities are as follows: . The Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate is generally the effective interest rate of the security prior to impairment. . When determining collectability and the period over which value is expected to recover, the Company applies considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process which incorporates information regarding the specific security, fundamentals of the industry and geographic area in which the security issuer operates, and overall macroeconomic conditions. Projected future cash flows are estimated using assumptions derived from management's best estimates of likely scenario-based outcomes after giving consideration to a variety of variables that include, but are not limited to: payment terms of the security; the likelihood that the issuer can service the interest and principal payments; the quality and amount of any credit enhancements; the security's position within the capital structure of the issuer; possible corporate restructurings or asset sales by the issuer; and changes to the rating of the security or the issuer by rating agencies. . Additional considerations are made when assessing the unique features that apply to certain structured securities including, but not limited to: the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying loans or assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security. . When determining the amount of the credit loss for U.S. and foreign corporate securities, foreign government securities and state and political subdivision securities, the estimated fair value is considered the recovery value when available information does not indicate that another value is more appropriate. When information is identified that indicates a recovery value other than estimated fair value, management considers in the determination of recovery value the same considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process as described above, as well as any private and public sector programs to restructure such securities. With respect to securities that have attributes of debt and equity (perpetual hybrid securities), consideration is given in the OTTI analysis as to whether there has been any deterioration in the credit of the issuer and the likelihood of recovery in value of the securities that are in a severe and extended unrealized loss position. Consideration is also given as to whether any perpetual hybrid securities, with an unrealized loss, regardless of credit rating, have deferred any dividend payments. When an OTTI loss has occurred, the OTTI loss is the entire difference between the perpetual hybrid security's cost and its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings. 57
N-6150th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 150th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) The cost or amortized cost of fixed maturity and equity securities is adjusted for OTTI in the period in which the determination is made. The Company does not change the revised cost basis for subsequent recoveries in value. In periods subsequent to the recognition of OTTI on a fixed maturity security, the Company accounts for the impaired security as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. Accordingly, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis is accreted over the remaining term of the fixed maturity security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows. Current Period Evaluation Based on the Company's current evaluation of its AFS securities in an unrealized loss position in accordance with its impairment policy, and the Company's current intentions and assessments (as applicable to the type of security) about holding, selling and any requirements to sell these securities, the Company has concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013. Future OTTI will depend primarily on economic fundamentals, issuer performance (including changes in the present value of future cash flows expected to be collected), and changes in credit ratings, collateral valuation, interest rates and credit spreads. If economic fundamentals deteriorate or if there are adverse changes in the above factors, OTTI may be incurred in upcoming periods. Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities increased $436 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $275 million to $711 million. The increase in gross unrealized losses for the year ended December 31, 2013, was primarily attributable to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by narrowing credit spreads. At December 31, 2013, $61 million of the total $711 million of gross unrealized losses were from 18 fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater. Investment Grade Fixed Maturity Securities Of the $61 million of gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater, $41 million, or 67%, are related to gross unrealized losses on 13 investment grade fixed maturity securities. Unrealized losses on investment grade fixed maturity securities are principally related to widening credit spreads, and with respect to fixed-rate fixed maturity securities, rising interest rates since purchase. Below Investment Grade Fixed Maturity Securities Of the $61 million of gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater, $20 million, or 33%, are related to gross unrealized losses on five below investment grade fixed maturity securities. Unrealized losses on below investment grade fixed maturity securities are principally related to non-agency RMBS (primarily alternative residential mortgage loans) and are the result of significantly wider credit spreads resulting from higher risk premiums since purchase, largely due to economic and market uncertainties including concerns over unemployment levels and valuations of residential real estate supporting non-agency RMBS. Management evaluates non-agency RMBS 58
N-6151st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 151st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) based on actual and projected cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security. Equity Securities Gross unrealized losses on equity securities increased $5 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $23 million to $28 million. Of the $28 million, $5 million were from two equity securities with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more of cost for 12 months or greater, all of which were financial services industry investment grade non-redeemable preferred stock, of which 40% were rated A or better. Mortgage Loans Mortgage Loans by Portfolio Segment Mortgage loans are summarized as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, -------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 --------------------- ---------------------- Carrying % of Carrying % of Value Total Value Total ------------- ------- ------------- -------- (In millions) (In millions) Mortgage loans: Commercial.................................... $ 4,869 63.1% $ 5,266 57.5% Agricultural.................................. 1,285 16.6 1,260 13.8 -------- ------- -------- -------- Subtotal (1)................................ 6,154 79.7 6,526 71.3 Valuation allowances.......................... (34) (0.4) (35) (0.4) -------- ------- -------- -------- Subtotal mortgage loans, net................ 6,120 79.3 6,491 70.9 Commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs -- FVO. 1,598 20.7 2,666 29.1 -------- ------- -------- -------- Total mortgage loans, net................. $ 7,718 100.0% $ 9,157 100.0% ======== ======= ======== ======== -------- (1)Purchases of mortgage loans were $10 million and $27 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See "-- Variable Interest Entities" for discussion of CSEs. See "-- Related Party Investment Transactions" for discussion of related party mortgage loans. 59
N-6152nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 152nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Mortgage Loans and Valuation Allowance by Portfolio Segment The carrying value prior to valuation allowance ("recorded investment") in mortgage loans, by portfolio segment, by method of evaluation of credit loss, and the related valuation allowances, by type of credit loss, were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------------------------- ------------------------------- Commercial Agricultural Total Commercial Agricultural Total ---------- ------------ ------- ---------- ------------ ------- (In millions) Mortgage loans: Evaluated individually for credit losses.. $ 72 $ 4 $ 76 $ 76 $ -- $ 76 Evaluated collectively for credit losses.. 4,797 1,281 6,078 5,190 1,260 6,450 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total mortgage loans.................... 4,869 1,285 6,154 5,266 1,260 6,526 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Valuation allowances: Specific credit losses.................... 7 -- 7 11 -- 11 Non-specifically identified credit losses. 23 4 27 21 3 24 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Total valuation allowances.............. 30 4 34 32 3 35 ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- ------- Mortgage loans, net of valuation allowance........................... $ 4,839 $ 1,281 $ 6,120 $ 5,234 $ 1,257 $ 6,491 ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= ======= Valuation Allowance Rollforward by Portfolio Segment The changes in the valuation allowance, by portfolio segment, were as follows: [Download Table] Commercial Agricultural Total ---------- ------------ ------- (In millions) Balance at January 1, 2011..... $ 84 $ 3 $ 87 Provision (release)............ (26) -- (26) Charge-offs, net of recoveries. -- -- -- ------- ------ ------- Balance at December 31, 2011... 58 3 61 Provision (release)............ (26) -- (26) Charge-offs, net of recoveries. -- -- -- ------- ------ ------- Balance at December 31, 2012... 32 3 35 Provision (release)............ (2) 1 (1) Charge-offs, net of recoveries. -- -- -- ------- ------ ------- Balance at December 31, 2013... $ 30 $ 4 $ 34 ======= ====== ======= Valuation Allowance Methodology Mortgage loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that, based upon current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are established using the same methodology for both portfolio segments as the excess carrying 60
N-6153rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 153rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) value of a loan over either (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate, (ii) the estimated fair value of the loan's underlying collateral if the loan is in the process of foreclosure or otherwise collateral dependent, or (iii) the loan's observable market price. A common evaluation framework is used for establishing non-specific valuation allowances for both loan portfolio segments; however, a separate non-specific valuation allowance is calculated and maintained for each loan portfolio segment that is based on inputs unique to each loan portfolio segment. Non-specific valuation allowances are established for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company expects to incur a credit loss. These evaluations are based upon several loan portfolio segment-specific factors, including the Company's experience for loan losses, defaults and loss severity, and loss expectations for loans with similar risk characteristics. These evaluations are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. Commercial and Agricultural Mortgage Loan Portfolio Segments The Company typically uses several years of historical experience in establishing non-specific valuation allowances which captures multiple economic cycles. For evaluations of commercial mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include the impact of a rapid change to the economy, which may not be reflected in the loan portfolio, and recent loss and recovery trend experience as compared to historical loss and recovery experience. For evaluations of agricultural mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include increased stress in certain sectors, which may be evidenced by higher delinquency rates, or a change in the number of higher risk loans. On a quarterly basis, management incorporates the impact of these current market events and conditions on historical experience in determining the non-specific valuation allowance established for commercial and agricultural mortgage loans. All commercial mortgage loans are reviewed on an ongoing basis which may include an analysis of the property financial statements and rent roll, lease rollover analysis, property inspections, market analysis, estimated valuations of the underlying collateral, loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, and tenant creditworthiness. All agricultural mortgage loans are monitored on an ongoing basis. The monitoring process focuses on higher risk loans, which include those that are classified as restructured, delinquent or in foreclosure, as well as loans with higher loan-to-value ratios and lower debt service coverage ratios. The monitoring process for agricultural mortgage loans is generally similar to the commercial mortgage loan monitoring process, with a focus on higher risk loans, including reviews on a geographic and property-type basis. Higher risk loans are reviewed individually on an ongoing basis for potential credit loss and specific valuation allowances are established using the methodology described above. Quarterly, the remaining loans are reviewed on a pool basis by aggregating groups of loans that have similar risk characteristics for potential credit loss, and non-specific valuation allowances are established as described above using inputs that are unique to each segment of the loan portfolio. For commercial mortgage loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the debt service coverage ratio, which compares a property's net operating income to amounts needed to service the principal and interest due under the loan. Generally, the lower the debt service coverage ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The Company also reviews the loan-to-value ratio of its commercial mortgage loan portfolio. Loan-to-value ratios compare the unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. Generally, the higher the loan-to-value ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio, as well as the values utilized in calculating these ratios, are updated annually, on a rolling basis, with a portion of the loan portfolio updated each quarter. 61
N-6154th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 154th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) For agricultural mortgage loans, the Company's primary credit quality indicator is the loan-to-value ratio. The values utilized in calculating this ratio are developed in connection with the ongoing review of the agricultural mortgage loan portfolio and are routinely updated. Credit Quality of Commercial Mortgage Loans The credit quality of commercial mortgage loans, were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] Recorded Investment ---------------------------------------------- Debt Service Coverage Ratios ------------------------------ % of Estimated % of > 1.20x 1.00x - 1.20x < 1.00x Total Total Fair Value Total -------- ------------- ------- -------- ------ ------------- ------ (In millions) (In millions) December 31, 2013: Loan-to-value ratios: Less than 65%......... $ 3,754 $ 125 $ 107 $ 3,986 81.9% $ 4,224 82.8% 65% to 75%............ 700 -- 27 727 14.9 736 14.4 76% to 80%............ 80 13 -- 93 1.9 93 1.8 Greater than 80%...... 37 26 -- 63 1.3 53 1.0 -------- ------ ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ Total................ $ 4,571 $ 164 $ 134 $ 4,869 100.0% $ 5,106 100.0% ======== ====== ====== ======== ====== ======== ====== December 31, 2012: Loan-to-value ratios: Less than 65%......... $ 3,888 $ 106 $ 89 $ 4,083 77.5% $ 4,459 78.5% 65% to 75%............ 626 32 27 685 13.0 711 12.5 76% to 80%............ 343 8 57 408 7.8 428 7.6 Greater than 80%...... 39 28 23 90 1.7 81 1.4 -------- ------ ------ -------- ------ -------- ------ Total................ $ 4,896 $ 174 $ 196 $ 5,266 100.0% $ 5,679 100.0% ======== ====== ====== ======== ====== ======== ====== Credit Quality of Agricultural Mortgage Loans The credit quality of agricultural mortgage loans, were as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------------- ---------------------- Recorded % of Recorded % of Investment Total Investment Total ------------- -------- ------------- -------- (In millions) (In millions) Loan-to-value ratios: Less than 65%......... $ 1,215 94.6% $ 1,184 94.0% 65% to 75%............ 70 5.4 76 6.0 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total................ $ 1,285 100.0% $ 1,260 100.0% ======== ======== ======== ======== The estimated fair value of agricultural mortgage loans was $1.3 billion at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. 62
N-6155th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 155th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Past Due and Interest Accrual Status of Mortgage Loans The Company has a high quality, well performing, mortgage loan portfolio, with 99% of all mortgage loans classified as performing at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company defines delinquency consistent with industry practice, when mortgage loans are past due as follows: commercial mortgage loans -- 60 days and agricultural mortgage loans -- 90 days. The Company had no agricultural mortgage loans past due and one commercial mortgage loan in non-accrual status with a recorded investment of $22 million at December 31, 2013. The Company had no mortgage loans past due and no loans in nonaccrual status at December 31, 2012. Impaired Mortgage Loans Impaired mortgage loans, including those modified in a troubled debt restructuring, by portfolio segment, were as follows at and for the years ended: [Enlarge/Download Table] Loans without Loans with a Valuation Allowance a Valuation Allowance All Impaired Loans ---------------------------------------- -------------------- -------------------------------------- Unpaid Unpaid Unpaid Average Principal Recorded Valuation Carrying Principal Recorded Principal Carrying Recorded Interest Balance Investment Allowances Value Balance Investment Balance Value Investment Income --------- ---------- ---------- -------- --------- ---------- --------- -------- ---------- -------- (In millions) December 31, 2013: Commercial....... $ 22 $ 22 $ 7 $ 15 $ 52 $ 50 $ 74 $ 65 $ 73 $ 3 Agricultural (1). 4 4 -- 4 -- -- 4 4 2 -- ------ -------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------- ----- Total.......... $ 26 $ 26 $ 7 $ 19 $ 52 $ 50 $ 78 $ 69 $ 75 $ 3 ====== ======== ======== ======= ======= ======= ====== ====== ======= ===== December 31, 2012: Commercial....... $ 76 $ 76 $ 11 $ 65 $ -- $ -- $ 76 $ 65 $ 67 $ 2 Agricultural..... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- ------ -------- -------- ------- ------- ------- ------ ------ ------- ----- Total.......... $ 76 $ 76 $ 11 $ 65 $ -- $ -- $ 76 $ 65 $ 67 $ 2 ====== ======== ======== ======= ======= ======= ====== ====== ======= ===== -------- (1)Valuation allowance on agricultural mortgage loans was less than $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. Unpaid principal balance is generally prior to any charge-offs. Interest income recognized is primarily cash basis income. The average recorded investment for commercial and agricultural mortgage loans was $29 million and $4 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011; and interest income recognized for commercial and agricultural mortgage loans was $2 million and $0, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Mortgage Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring For a small portion of the mortgage loan portfolio, classified as troubled debt restructurings, concessions are granted related to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties. Generally, the types of concessions include: reduction of the contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than current market interest rates, and/or a reduction of accrued interest. The amount, timing and extent of the concession granted is considered in determining any impairment or changes in the specific valuation allowance recorded 63
N-6156th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 156th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) with the restructuring. Through the continuous monitoring process, a specific valuation allowance may have been recorded prior to the quarter when the mortgage loan is modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the carrying value (after specific valuation allowance) before and after modification through a troubled debt restructuring may not change significantly, or may increase if the expected recovery is higher than the pre-modification recovery assessment. The Company had one agricultural mortgage loan modified in a troubled debt restructuring with a pre-modification and post-modification carrying value of $4 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. There were no agricultural mortgage loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the year ended December 31, 2012. There were no commercial mortgage loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company had one commercial mortgage loan modified during the year ended December 31, 2012 in a troubled debt restructuring which had a carrying value after specific valuation allowance of $53 million pre-modification and $48 million post-modification. There were no mortgage loans during the previous 12 months modified in a troubled debt restructuring with a subsequent payment default at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Payment default is determined in the same manner as delinquency status as described above. Other Invested Assets Other invested assets is comprised primarily of freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values (see Note 8), loans to affiliates (see "-- Related Party Investment Transactions), tax credit and renewable energy partnerships and leveraged leases. Leveraged Leases Investment in leveraged leases consisted of the following at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ------------------- 2013 2012 --------- --------- (In millions) Rental receivables, net............................................. $ 92 $ 92 Estimated residual values........................................... 14 14 --------- --------- Subtotal......................................................... 106 106 Unearned income..................................................... (35) (37) --------- --------- Investment in leveraged leases, net of non-recourse debt..... $ 71 $ 69 ========= ========= Rental receivables are generally due in periodic installments. The payment periods range from two to 19 years. For rental receivables, the primary credit quality indicator is whether the rental receivable is performing or nonperforming, which is assessed monthly. The Company generally defines nonperforming rental receivables as those that are 90 days or more past due. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, all rental receivables were performing. The deferred income tax liability related to leveraged leases was $63 million and $53 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 64
N-6157th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 157th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) The components of income from investment in leveraged leases, excluding net investment gains (losses), were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Income from investment in leveraged leases...................... $ 2 $ 5 $ 8 Less: Income tax expense on leveraged leases.................... 1 2 3 -------- -------- -------- Investment income after income tax from investment in leveraged leases........................................................ $ 1 $ 3 $ 5 ======== ======== ======== Cash Equivalents The carrying value of cash equivalents, which includes securities and other investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, was $469 million and $654 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses) The components of net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in AOCI, were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- ---------- (In millions) Fixed maturity securities.............................................. $ 1,819 $ 5,019 $ 3,690 Fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses in AOCI........... (41) (64) (125) -------- -------- ---------- Total fixed maturity securities....................................... 1,778 4,955 3,565 Equity securities...................................................... 15 12 (41) Derivatives............................................................ 39 243 239 Short-term investments................................................. 1 (2) (2) Other.................................................................. (71) (17) (5) -------- -------- ---------- Subtotal.............................................................. 1,762 5,191 3,756 -------- -------- ---------- Amounts allocated from: Insurance liability loss recognition.................................. -- (739) (325) DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI................................................................ (1) 4 9 DAC and VOBA.......................................................... (274) (671) (509) -------- -------- ---------- Subtotal............................................................ (275) (1,406) (825) Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI................................................... 16 22 42 Deferred income tax benefit (expense).................................. (591) (1,358) (1,063) -------- -------- ---------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses)............................... $ 912 $ 2,449 $ 1,910 ======== ======== ========== 65
N-6158th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 158th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) The changes in fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses included in AOCI were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------- -------------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,....................................... $ (64) $ (125) Noncredit OTTI losses and subsequent changes recognized (1). 11 (3) Securities sold with previous noncredit OTTI loss........... 21 35 Subsequent changes in estimated fair value.................. (9) 29 ------------- -------------- Balance at December 31,..................................... $ (41) $ (64) ============= ============== -------- (1)Noncredit OTTI losses and subsequent changes recognized, net of DAC, were $7 million and $5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ---------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,.............................................. $ 2,449 $ 1,910 $ 342 Fixed maturity securities on which noncredit OTTI losses have been recognized....................................................... 23 61 (39) Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the year............... (3,452) 1,374 3,138 Unrealized investment gains (losses) relating to: Insurance liability gain (loss) recognition....................... 739 (414) (292) DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI............................................................ (5) (5) 4 DAC and VOBA...................................................... 397 (162) (390) Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI....................................... (6) (20) 12 Deferred income tax benefit (expense)............................. 767 (295) (865) ---------- ---------- -------- Balance at December 31,............................................ $ 912 $ 2,449 $ 1,910 ========== ========== ======== Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)................. $ (1,537) $ 539 $ 1,568 ========== ========== ======== Concentrations of Credit Risk There were no investments in any counterparty that were greater than 10% of the Company's stockholders' equity, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. 66
N-6159th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 159th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Securities Lending Elements of the securities lending program are presented below at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Securities on loan: (1) Amortized cost........................................ $ 5,931 $ 6,154 Estimated fair value.................................. $ 5,984 $ 7,339 Cash collateral on deposit from counterparties (2)..... $ 6,140 $ 7,502 Security collateral on deposit from counterparties (3). $ -- $ 51 Reinvestment portfolio -- estimated fair value......... $ 6,145 $ 7,533 -------- (1)Included within fixed maturity securities, short-term investments, cash and cash equivalents and equity securities. (2)Included within payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions. (3)Security collateral on deposit from counterparties may not be sold or repledged, unless the counterparty is in default, and is not reflected in the consolidated financial statements. Invested Assets on Deposit and Pledged as Collateral Invested assets on deposit and pledged as collateral are presented below at estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments and fixed maturity securities and at carrying value for mortgage loans at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Invested assets on deposit (regulatory deposits) (1)........ $ 56 $ 58 Invested assets pledged as collateral (2)................... 1,901 1,569 ---------- ---------- Total invested assets on deposit and pledged as collateral. $ 1,957 $ 1,627 ========== ========== -------- (1)See Note 1 for information about invested assets that became restricted under the MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut plan to withdraw its New York license on January 1, 2014. (2)The Company has pledged invested assets in connection with various agreements and transactions, including funding agreements (see Note 4) and derivative transactions (see Note 8). See "-- Securities Lending" for securities on loan. Purchased Credit Impaired Investments Investments acquired with evidence of credit quality deterioration since origination and for which it is probable at the acquisition date that the Company will be unable to collect all contractually required payments 67
N-6160th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 160th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) are classified as purchased credit impaired ("PCI") investments. For each investment, the excess of the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date over its acquisition date fair value is referred to as the accretable yield and is recognized as net investment income on an effective yield basis. If subsequently, based on current information and events, it is probable that there is a significant increase in cash flows previously expected to be collected or if actual cash flows are significantly greater than cash flows previously expected to be collected, the accretable yield is adjusted prospectively. The excess of the contractually required payments (including interest) as of the acquisition date over the cash flows expected to be collected as of the acquisition date is referred to as the nonaccretable difference, and this amount is not expected to be realized as net investment income. Decreases in cash flows expected to be collected can result in OTTI. The Company's PCI fixed maturity securities were as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Outstanding principal and interest balance (1). $ 648 $ 560 Carrying value (2)............................. $ 498 $ 459 -------- (1)Represents the contractually required payments, which is the sum of contractual principal, whether or not currently due, and accrued interest. (2)Estimated fair value plus accrued interest. The following table presents information about PCI fixed maturity securities acquired during the periods indicated: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Contractually required payments (including interest). $ 238 $ 172 Cash flows expected to be collected (1).............. $ 183 $ 88 Fair value of investments acquired................... $ 128 $ 55 -------- (1)Represents undiscounted principal and interest cash flow expectations, at the date of acquisition. The following table presents activity for the accretable yield on PCI fixed maturity securities for: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Accretable yield, January 1,........................ $ 309 $ 320 Investments purchased............................... 55 33 Accretion recognized in earnings.................... (24) (18) Disposals........................................... (8) (4) Reclassification (to) from nonaccretable difference. (24) (22) ---------- ---------- Accretable yield, December 31,...................... $ 308 $ 309 ========== ========== 68
N-6161st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 161st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Collectively Significant Equity Method Investments The Company holds investments in real estate joint ventures, real estate funds and other limited partnership interests consisting of leveraged buy-out funds, hedge funds, private equity funds, joint ventures and other funds. The portion of these investments accounted for under the equity method had a carrying value of $2.6 billion at December 31, 2013. The Company's maximum exposure to loss related to these equity method investments is limited to the carrying value of these investments plus unfunded commitments of $862 million at December 31, 2013. Except for certain real estate joint ventures, the Company's investments in real estate funds and other limited partnership interests are generally of a passive nature in that the Company does not participate in the management of the entities. As described in Note 1, the Company generally records its share of earnings in its equity method investments using a three-month lag methodology and within net investment income. Aggregate net investment income from these equity method investments exceeded 10% of the Company's consolidated pre-tax income (loss) from continuing operations. This aggregated summarized financial data does not represent the Company's proportionate share of the assets, liabilities, or earnings of such entities. The aggregated summarized financial data presented below reflects the latest available financial information and is as of, and for, the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Aggregate total assets of these entities totaled $217.3 billion and $178.3 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Aggregate total liabilities of these entities totaled $16.3 billion and $12.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) of these entities totaled $20.9 billion, $13.1 billion and $7.1 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Aggregate net income (loss) from the underlying entities in which the Company invests is primarily comprised of investment income, including recurring investment income and realized and unrealized investment gains (losses). Variable Interest Entities The Company has invested in certain structured transactions that are VIEs. In certain instances, the Company holds both the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity, as well as an economic interest in the entity and, as such, is deemed to be the primary beneficiary or consolidator of the entity. The determination of the VIE's primary beneficiary requires an evaluation of the contractual and implied rights and obligations associated with each party's relationship with or involvement in the entity, an estimate of the entity's expected losses and expected residual returns and the allocation of such estimates to each party involved in the entity. The Company generally uses a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary. However, for VIEs that are investment companies or apply measurement principles consistent with those utilized by investment companies, the primary beneficiary is based on a risks and rewards model and is defined as the entity that will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of a VIE's expected residual returns if no single entity absorbs a majority of expected losses, or both. The Company reassesses its involvement with VIEs on a quarterly basis. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs in the determination of the primary beneficiary could have a material effect on the amounts presented within the consolidated financial statements. 69
N-6162nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 162nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Consolidated VIEs The following table presents the total assets and total liabilities relating to VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and which are consolidated at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Creditors or beneficial interest holders of VIEs where the Company is the primary beneficiary have no recourse to the general credit of the Company, as the Company's obligation to the VIEs is limited to the amount of its committed investment. [Download Table] December 31, ----------------- 2013 2012 -------- -------- (In millions) CSEs: (1) Assets: Mortgage loans (commercial mortgage loans). $ 1,598 $ 2,666 Accrued investment income.................. 9 13 -------- -------- Total assets............................. $ 1,607 $ 2,679 ======== ======== Liabilities: Long-term debt............................. $ 1,461 $ 2,559 Other liabilities.......................... 7 13 -------- -------- Total liabilities........................ $ 1,468 $ 2,572 ======== ======== -------- (1)The Company consolidates entities that are structured as CMBS. The assets of these entities can only be used to settle their respective liabilities, and under no circumstances is the Company liable for any principal or interest shortfalls should any arise. The Company's exposure was limited to that of its remaining investment in these entities of $120 million and $92 million at estimated fair value at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The long-term debt bears interest primarily at fixed rates ranging from 2.25% to 5.57%, payable primarily on a monthly basis. Interest expense related to these obligations, included in other expenses, was $122 million, $163 million and $322 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 70
N-6163rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 163rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Unconsolidated VIEs The carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs in which the Company holds a significant variable interest but is not the primary beneficiary and which have not been consolidated were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 --------------------- --------------------- Maximum Maximum Carrying Exposure Carrying Exposure Amount to Loss (1) Amount to Loss (1) --------- ----------- --------- ----------- (In millions) Fixed maturity securities AFS: Structured securities (RMBS, ABS and CMBS) (2). $ 8,393 $ 8,393 $ 10,347 $ 10,347 U.S. and foreign corporate..................... 468 468 651 651 Other limited partnership interests............. 1,651 2,077 1,408 1,930 Real estate joint ventures...................... 41 45 71 74 Other invested assets........................... 9 44 -- -- --------- --------- --------- --------- Total.......................................... $ 10,562 $ 11,027 $ 12,477 $ 13,002 ========= ========= ========= ========= -------- (1)The maximum exposure to loss relating to fixed maturity securities AFS is equal to their carrying amounts or the carrying amounts of retained interests. The maximum exposure to loss relating to other limited partnership interests and real estate joint ventures is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded commitments of the Company. For its investments in other invested assets, the Company's return is in the form of income tax credits. For such investments, the maximum exposure to loss is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded commitment. Such a maximum loss would be expected to occur only upon bankruptcy of the issuer or investee. (2)For these variable interests, the Company's involvement is limited to that of a passive investor. As described in Note 15, the Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. Excluding these commitments, the Company did not provide financial or other support to investees designated as VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. 71
N-6164th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 164th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Net Investment Income The components of net investment income were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------ ------ (In millions) Investment income: Fixed maturity securities.............................................. $2,102 $2,143 $2,147 Equity securities...................................................... 12 9 10 Mortgage loans......................................................... 344 357 347 Policy loans........................................................... 55 59 63 Real estate and real estate joint ventures............................. 56 83 24 Other limited partnership interests.................................... 266 167 176 Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments...................... 4 5 5 International joint ventures........................................... (5) (2) (5) Other.................................................................. -- (2) 4 ------ ------ ------ Subtotal............................................................. 2,834 2,819 2,771 Less: Investment expenses.............................................. 114 101 100 ------ ------ ------ Subtotal, net........................................................ 2,720 2,718 2,671 ------ ------ ------ FVO securities--FVO contractholder-directed unit-linked investments (1). -- 62 71 FVO CSEs--interest income--commercial mortgage loans................... 132 172 332 ------ ------ ------ Subtotal............................................................. 132 234 403 ------ ------ ------ Net investment income.............................................. $2,852 $2,952 $3,074 ====== ====== ====== -------- (1)There were no changes in estimated fair value subsequent to purchase for securities still held as of the end of the respective years included in net investment income for both the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Changes in estimated fair value subsequent to purchase for securities included in net investment income were ($11) million for the year ended December 31, 2011. See "-- Variable Interest Entities" for discussion of CSEs. See "-- Related Party Investment Transactions" for discussion of affiliated net investment income and investment expenses. 72
N-6165th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 165th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Net Investment Gains (Losses) Components of Net Investment Gains (Losses) The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------- ------ (In millions) Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities: Total OTTI losses recognized -- by sector and industry: U.S. and foreign corporate securities -- by industry: Transportation........................................................ $ (3) $ (16) $ -- Finance............................................................... (3) (7) (9) Utility............................................................... -- (3) -- Communications........................................................ -- (2) (11) Industrial............................................................ -- (1) (2) ------ ------- ------ Total U.S. and foreign corporate securities......................... (6) (29) (22) RMBS.................................................................... (14) (20) (17) ABS..................................................................... -- -- (5) CMBS.................................................................... -- -- (3) ------ ------- ------ OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in earnings........... (20) (49) (47) Fixed maturity securities -- net gains (losses) on sales and disposals.... 58 145 81 ------ ------- ------ Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities.................. 38 96 34 ------ ------- ------ Total gains (losses) on equity securities: Total OTTI losses recognized -- by sector: Non-redeemable preferred stock.......................................... (3) -- (6) Common stock............................................................ (2) (9) (2) ------ ------- ------ OTTI losses on equity securities recognized in earnings................... (5) (9) (8) Equity securities -- net gains (losses) on sales and disposals............ 10 5 (13) ------ ------- ------ Total gains (losses) on equity securities.......................... 5 (4) (21) ------ ------- ------ Mortgage loans............................................................ 5 27 26 Real estate and real estate joint ventures................................ 2 (3) (1) Other limited partnership interests....................................... (6) (2) (5) Other investment portfolio gains (losses)................................. 8 4 (9) ------ ------- ------ Subtotal -- investment portfolio gains (losses).................... 52 118 24 ------ ------- ------ FVO CSEs: Commercial mortgage loans................................................. (56) 7 (84) Long-term debt -- related to commercial mortgage loans.................... 88 27 93 Non-investment portfolio gains (losses).................................... (2) -- 2 ------ ------- ------ Subtotal FVO CSEs and non-investment portfolio gains (losses)...... 30 34 11 ------ ------- ------ Total net investment gains (losses).............................. $ 82 $ 152 $ 35 ====== ======= ====== See "-- Variable Interest Entities" for discussion of CSEs. 73
N-6166th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 166th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) See "-- Related Party Investment Transactions" for discussion of affiliated net investment gains (losses) related to transfers of invested assets to affiliates. Gains (losses) from foreign currency transactions included within net investment gains (losses) was less than $1 million, $2 million and ($7) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Sales or Disposals and Impairments of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity and equity securities and the components of fixed maturity and equity securities net investment gains (losses) are as shown in the table below. Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis. [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 -------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ -------- ------- -------- Fixed Maturity Securities Equity Securities Total ------------------------- --------------------- ------------------------- (In millions) Proceeds.................... $ 11,051 $ 6,690 $ 11,634 $ 75 $ 39 $ 190 $ 11,126 $ 6,729 $ 11,824 ======== ======= ======== ======= ====== ====== ======== ======= ======== Gross investment gains...... $ 189 $ 186 $ 182 $ 19 $ 9 $ 9 $ 208 $ 195 $ 191 -------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ -------- ------- -------- Gross investment losses..... (131) (41) (101) (9) (4) (22) (140) (45) (123) -------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ -------- ------- -------- Total OTTI losses: Credit-related............ (17) (42) (38) -- -- -- (17) (42) (38) Other (1)................. (3) (7) (9) (5) (9) (8) (8) (16) (17) -------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ -------- ------- -------- Total OTTI losses........ (20) (49) (47) (5) (9) (8) (25) (58) (55) -------- ------- -------- ------- ------ ------ -------- ------- -------- Net investment gains (losses)............... $ 38 $ 96 $ 34 $ 5 $ (4) $ (21) $ 43 $ 92 $ 13 ======== ======= ======== ======= ====== ====== ======== ======= ======== -------- (1)Other OTTI losses recognized in earnings include impairments on (i) equity securities, (ii) perpetual hybrid securities classified within fixed maturity securities where the primary reason for the impairment was the severity and/or the duration of an unrealized loss position and (iii) fixed maturity securities where there is an intent to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the decline in estimated fair value. 74
N-6167th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 167th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) Credit Loss Rollforward The table below presents a rollforward of the cumulative credit loss component of OTTI loss recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities still held for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, --------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------- ------------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,........................................... $ 59 $ 55 Additions: Initial impairments -- credit loss OTTI recognized on securities not previously impaired........................... 1 6 Additional impairments -- credit loss OTTI recognized on securities previously impaired............................... 12 15 Reductions: Sales (maturities, pay downs or prepayments) during the period of securities previously impaired as credit loss OTTI........ (15) (17) ------------- ------------- Balance at December 31,......................................... $ 57 $ 59 ============= ============= Related Party Investment Transactions The Company transfers invested assets, primarily consisting of fixed maturity securities, to and from affiliates. Invested assets transferred to and from affiliates were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 -------- ------- ------- (In millions) Estimated fair value of invested assets transferred to affiliates... $ 874 $ -- $ -- Amortized cost of invested assets transferred to affiliates......... $ 827 $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses) recognized on transfers............... $ 47 $ -- $ -- Estimated fair value of invested assets transferred from affiliates. $ 834 $ -- $ 33 Included within the transfers to affiliates in 2013 and transfers from affiliates in 2013 was $739 million and $751 million, respectively, related to the establishment of a custodial account to secure certain policyholder liabilities. See Note 1. The Company has affiliated loans outstanding to wholly-owned real estate subsidiaries of an affiliate, MLIC, which are included in mortgage loans, with a carrying value of $364 million and $306 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Two loans issued in 2013 totaling $60 million bear interest at one-month LIBOR + 4.50% with quarterly interest only payments of less than $1 million through January 2017, when the principal balance is due. A loan with a carrying value of $110 million, at both December 31, 2013 and 2012, bears interest at one-month LIBOR + 1.95% with quarterly interest only payments of $1 million through January 2015, when the principal balance is due. A loan with a carrying value of $134 million and $136 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, bears interest at 7.26% due in quarterly principal and interest payments of $3 million through January 2020, when the principal balance is due. A loan with a carrying value of $60 million, at both December 31, 2013 and 2012, bears interest at 7.01% with quarterly interest only payments of $1 million through January 2020, when the principal balance is due. These affiliated loans are secured by interests in the real estate 75
N-6168th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 168th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Investments (continued) subsidiaries, which own operating real estate with a fair value in excess of the loans. Net investment income from these affiliated loans was $16 million, $17 million and $14 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has affiliated loans outstanding, which are included in other invested assets, totaling $430 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2011, the loans were outstanding with Exeter, an affiliate. During 2012, MetLife assumed this affiliated debt from Exeter. The loans of $305 million, issued by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and $125 million, issued by MLI-USA, are due on July 15, 2021 and December 16, 2021, respectively, and bear interest, payable semi-annually, at 5.64% and 5.86%, respectively. Net investment income from these affiliated loans was $25 million, $25 million and $8 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In July 2013, the Company committed to lend up to $1.8 billion to Exeter, an affiliate, pursuant to a note purchase agreement. Pursuant to the agreement, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut committed to purchase up to $1.3 billion of notes and MLI-USA committed to purchase up to $438 million of notes through December 31, 2014. The notes will be due not later than three years after issuance. The repayment of any notes issued pursuant to this agreement is guaranteed by MetLife. In October 2013, pursuant to this agreement, the Company issued loans to Exeter which are included in other invested assets, totaling $500 million at December 31, 2013. The loans of $375 million, issued by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, and $125 million, issued by MLI-USA, are both due October 15, 2015, and bear interest, payable semi-annually, at 2.47%. Net investment income from this loan was $3 million at December 31, 2013. The remaining total commitment to lend is $1.2 billion with $925 million committed by MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and $313 million committed by MLI-USA at December 31, 2013. The Company receives investment administrative services from an affiliate. The related investment administrative service charges were $68 million for both years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and $67 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company also had additional affiliated net investment income of $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 and less than $1 million for both of the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. 8. Derivatives Accounting for Derivatives See Note 1 for a description of the Company's accounting policies for derivatives and Note 9 for information about the fair value hierarchy for derivatives. Derivative Strategies The Company is exposed to various risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate, credit and equity market. The Company uses a variety of strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivatives. Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit spreads and/or other financial indices. Derivatives may be exchange-traded or contracted in the 76
N-6169th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 169th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) over-the-counter ("OTC") market. Certain of the Company's OTC derivatives are cleared and settled through central clearing counterparties ("OTC-cleared"), while others are bilateral contracts between two counterparties ("OTC-bilateral"). The types of derivatives the Company uses include swaps, forwards, futures and option contracts. To a lesser extent, the Company uses credit default swaps to synthetically replicate investment risks and returns which are not readily available in the cash market. Interest Rate Derivatives The Company uses a variety of interest rate derivatives to reduce its exposure to changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps, caps, floors, futures and forwards. Interest rate swaps are used by the Company primarily to reduce market risks from changes in interest rates and to alter interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (duration mismatches). In an interest rate swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts as calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps in fair value, cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships. The Company purchases interest rate caps and floors primarily to protect its floating rate liabilities against rises in interest rates above a specified level, and against interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities, as well as to protect its minimum rate guarantee liabilities against declines in interest rates below a specified level, respectively. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased caps and floors by entering into offsetting written caps and floors. The Company utilizes interest rate caps and floors in non-qualifying hedging relationships. In exchange-traded interest rate (Treasury and swap) futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of interest rate securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded interest rate (Treasury and swap) futures are used primarily to hedge mismatches between the duration of assets in a portfolio and the duration of liabilities supported by those assets, to hedge against changes in value of securities the Company owns or anticipates acquiring and to hedge against changes in interest rates on anticipated liability issuances by replicating Treasury or swap curve performance. The Company utilizes exchange-traded interest rate futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships. Inflation swaps are used as an economic hedge to reduce inflation risk generated from inflation-indexed liabilities. Inflation swaps are included in interest rate swaps. The Company utilizes inflation swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships. The Company enters into interest rate forwards to buy and sell securities. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at a specified future date. The Company utilizes interest rate forwards in cash flow hedging relationships. 77
N-6170th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 170th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Derivatives The Company uses foreign currency swaps to reduce the risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates associated with its assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. In a foreign currency swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and another at a fixed exchange rate, generally set at inception, calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. The notional amount of each currency is exchanged at the inception and termination of the currency swap by each party. The Company utilizes foreign currency swaps in fair value, cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships. To a lesser extent, the Company uses foreign currency forwards in non-qualifying hedging relationships. Credit Derivatives The Company enters into purchased credit default swaps to hedge against credit-related changes in the value of its investments. In a credit default swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to pay, at specified intervals, a premium to hedge credit risk. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the delivery of par quantities of the referenced investment equal to the specified swap notional in exchange for the payment of cash amounts by the counterparty equal to the par value of the investment surrendered. Credit events vary by type of issuer but typically include bankruptcy, failure to pay debt obligations, repudiation, moratorium, or involuntary restructuring. In each case, payout on a credit default swap is triggered only after the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA") deems that a credit event has occurred. The Company utilizes credit default swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships. The Company enters into written credit default swaps to synthetically create credit investments that are either more expensive to acquire or otherwise unavailable in the cash markets. These transactions are a combination of a derivative and one or more cash instruments, such as U.S. Treasury securities, agency securities or other fixed maturity securities. These credit default swaps are not designated as hedging instruments. To a lesser extent, the Company uses credit forwards to lock in the price to be paid for forward purchases of certain securities. The Company utilizes credit forwards in cash flow hedging relationships. Equity Derivatives The Company uses a variety of equity derivatives to reduce its exposure to equity market risk, including equity index options, variance swaps and exchange-traded equity futures. Equity index options are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. To hedge against adverse changes in equity indices, the Company enters into contracts to sell the equity index within a limited time at a contracted price. The contracts will be net settled in cash based on differentials in the indices at the time of exercise and the strike price. In certain instances, the Company may enter into a combination of transactions to hedge adverse changes in equity indices within a pre-determined range through the purchase and sale of options. The Company utilizes equity index options in non-qualifying hedging relationships. Equity variance swaps are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. In an equity variance swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange amounts in the future, based on changes in equity volatility over a defined period. The Company utilizes equity variance swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships. 78
N-6171st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 171st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) In exchange-traded equity futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of equity securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded equity futures are used primarily to hedge liabilities embedded in certain variable annuity products offered by the Company. The Company utilizes exchange-traded equity futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships. To a lesser extent, the Company also uses total rate of return swaps ("TRRs") to hedge its equity market guarantees in certain of its insurance products. The Company utilizes TRRs in non-qualifying hedging relationships. Primary Risks Managed by Derivatives The following table presents the gross notional amount, estimated fair value and primary underlying risk exposure of the Company's derivatives, excluding embedded derivatives, held at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------------------------ ------------------------------ Estimated Fair Value Estimated Fair Value -------------------- -------------------- Notional Notional Primary Underlying Risk Exposure Amount Assets Liabilities Amount Assets Liabilities -------------------------------- --------- -------- ----------- --------- -------- ----------- (In millions) Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Fair value hedges: Interest rate swaps..... Interest rate.................... $ 436 $ 5 $ 10 $ 538 $ 28 $ 9 Foreign currency swaps.. Foreign currency exchange rate... 122 -- 13 122 -- 14 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Subtotal.............................................. 558 5 23 660 28 23 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Cash flow hedges: Interest rate swaps..... Interest rate.................... 537 6 32 658 99 -- Interest rate forwards.. Interest rate.................... 245 3 4 410 81 -- Foreign currency swaps.. Foreign currency exchange rate... 544 25 35 524 16 14 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Subtotal.............................................. 1,326 34 71 1,592 196 14 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Total qualifying hedges............................. 1,884 39 94 2,252 224 37 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Derivatives Not Designated or Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments Interest rate swaps....... Interest rate.................... 22,262 881 441 16,869 1,254 513 Interest rate floors...... Interest rate.................... 17,604 103 99 15,136 318 274 Interest rate caps........ Interest rate.................... 9,651 36 -- 9,031 11 -- Interest rate futures..... Interest rate.................... 1,443 -- 3 2,771 -- 7 Foreign currency swaps.... Foreign currency exchange rate... 882 52 41 811 60 35 Foreign currency forwards. Foreign currency exchange rate... 56 -- 1 139 -- 4 Credit default swaps -- purchased....... Credit........................... 157 -- 1 162 -- 2 Credit default swaps -- written......... Credit........................... 2,243 38 -- 2,456 23 1 Equity futures............ Equity market.................... 778 -- 3 1,075 -- 27 Equity options............ Equity market.................... 3,597 305 42 2,845 469 1 Variance swaps............ Equity market.................... 2,270 6 94 2,346 11 62 TRRs...................... Equity market.................... 462 -- 22 300 -- 7 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Total non-designated or non-qualifying derivatives.... 61,405 1,421 747 53,941 2,146 933 --------- -------- -------- --------- -------- --------- Total............................................... $ 63,289 $ 1,460 $ 841 $ 56,193 $ 2,370 $ 970 ========= ======== ======== ========= ======== ========= 79
N-6172nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 172nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) Based on notional amounts, a substantial portion of the Company's derivatives was not designated or did not qualify as part of a hedging relationship at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company's use of derivatives includes (i) derivatives that serve as macro hedges of the Company's exposure to various risks and that generally do not qualify for hedge accounting due to the criteria required under the portfolio hedging rules; (ii) derivatives that economically hedge insurance liabilities that contain mortality or morbidity risk and that generally do not qualify for hedge accounting because the lack of these risks in the derivatives cannot support an expectation of a highly effective hedging relationship; (iii) derivatives that economically hedge embedded derivatives that do not qualify for hedge accounting because the changes in estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives are already recorded in net income; and (iv) written credit default swaps that are used to synthetically create credit investments and that do not qualify for hedge accounting because they do not involve a hedging relationship. For these non-qualified derivatives, changes in market factors can lead to the recognition of fair value changes in the consolidated statement of operations without an offsetting gain or loss recognized in earnings for the item being hedged. Net Derivative Gains (Losses) The components of net derivative gains (losses) were as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, --------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Derivatives and hedging gains (losses) (1). $ (958) $ (289) $ 846 Embedded derivatives....................... (94) 1,292 250 ------------- ---------- -------- Total net derivative gains (losses)....... $ (1,052) $ 1,003 $ 1,096 ============= ========== ======== -------- (1)Includes foreign currency transaction gains (losses) on hedged items in cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships, which are not presented elsewhere in this note. The following table presents earned income on derivatives: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, --------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 --------- -------- -------- (In millions) Qualifying hedges: Net investment income.............................. $ 2 $ 2 $ 2 Interest credited to policyholder account balances. 2 18 41 Non-qualifying hedges: Net derivative gains (losses)...................... 79 127 83 Policyholder benefits and claims................... (17) (6) -- --------- -------- -------- Total............................................ $ 66 $ 141 $ 126 ========= ======== ======== 80
N-6173rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 173rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) Non-Qualifying Derivatives and Derivatives for Purposes Other Than Hedging The following table presents the amount and location of gains (losses) recognized in income for derivatives that were not designated or qualifying as hedging instruments: [Download Table] Net Policyholder Net Derivative Investment Benefits and Gains (Losses) Income (1) Claims (2) -------------- ---------- ------------ (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Interest rate derivatives.................. $ (558) $ -- $ (26) Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. (24) -- -- Credit derivatives -- purchased............ -- -- -- Credit derivatives -- written.............. 27 -- -- Equity derivatives......................... (486) (7) (90) ------------ --------- ---------- Total.................................... $ (1,041) $ (7) $ (116) ============ ========= ========== Year Ended December 31, 2012: Interest rate derivatives.................. $ (5) $ -- $ -- Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. (4) -- -- Credit derivatives -- purchased............ (11) -- -- Credit derivatives -- written.............. 41 -- -- Equity derivatives......................... (413) (4) (51) ------------ --------- ---------- Total.................................... $ (392) $ (4) $ (51) ============ ========= ========== Year Ended December 31, 2011: Interest rate derivatives.................. $ 701 $ -- $ -- Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. 27 -- -- Credit derivatives -- purchased............ 13 -- -- Credit derivatives -- written.............. (13) -- -- Equity derivatives......................... 45 (7) (4) ------------ --------- ---------- Total.................................... $ 773 $ (7) $ (4) ============ ========= ========== -------- (1)Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of equity method investments in joint ventures. (2)Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of variable annuity guarantees included in future policy benefits. Fair Value Hedges The Company designates and accounts for the following as fair value hedges when they have met the requirements of fair value hedging: (i) interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate assets and liabilities to floating rate assets and liabilities; and (ii) foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency fair value exposure of foreign currency denominated liabilities. 81
N-6174th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 174th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) The Company recognizes gains and losses on derivatives and the related hedged items in fair value hedges within net derivative gains (losses). The following table presents the amount of such net derivative gains (losses): [Enlarge/Download Table] Net Derivative Net Derivative Ineffectiveness Gains (Losses) Gains (Losses) Recognized in Derivatives in Fair Value Hedged Items in Fair Value Recognized Recognized for Net Derivative Hedging Relationships Hedging Relationships for Derivatives Hedged Items Gains (Losses) ------------------------- ----------------------------- --------------- -------------- --------------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Interest rate swaps: Fixed maturity securities.... $ 7 $ (9) $ (2) Policyholder liabilities (1). (30) 28 (2) Foreign currency swaps: Foreign-denominated PABs (2). 2 (2) -- -------------- -------------- -------------- Total............................................... $ (21) $ 17 $ (4) ============== ============== ============== Year Ended December 31, 2012: Interest rate swaps: Fixed maturity securities.... $ (3) $ 1 $ (2) Policyholder liabilities (1). (10) 8 (2) Foreign currency swaps: Foreign-denominated PABs (2). (29) 20 (9) -------------- -------------- -------------- Total............................................... $ (42) $ 29 $ (13) ============== ============== ============== Year Ended December 31, 2011: Interest rate swaps: Fixed maturity securities.... $ (7) $ 5 $ (2) Policyholder liabilities (1). 36 (38) (2) Foreign currency swaps: Foreign-denominated PABs (2). (52) 30 (22) -------------- -------------- -------------- Total............................................... $ (23) $ (3) $ (26) ============== ============== ============== -------- (1)Fixed rate liabilities reported in PABs or future policy benefits. (2)Fixed rate or floating rate liabilities. All components of each derivative's gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Cash Flow Hedges The Company designates and accounts for the following as cash flow hedges when they have met the requirements of cash flow hedging: (i) interest rate swaps to convert floating rate assets and liabilities to fixed rate assets and liabilities; (ii) foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated assets and liabilities; (iii) interest rate forwards and credit forwards to lock in the price to be paid for forward purchases of investments; and (iv) interest rate swaps and interest rate forwards to hedge the forecasted purchases of fixed-rate investments. In certain instances, the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring. Because certain of the forecasted transactions also were not probable of occurring within two months of the anticipated date, the Company reclassified certain amounts from AOCI into net derivative gains (losses). These amounts were $0 for both years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 and $1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the maximum length of time over which the Company was hedging its exposure to variability in future cash flows for forecasted transactions did not exceed six years and seven years, respectively. 82
N-6175th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 175th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance in AOCI associated with cash flow hedges was $39 million and $243 million, respectively. The following table presents the effects of derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships on the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of stockholders' equity: [Enlarge/Download Table] Amount and Location Amount and Location Amount of Gains of Gains (Losses) of Gains (Losses) Derivatives in Cash Flow (Losses) Deferred in Reclassified from Recognized in Income Hedging Relationships AOCI on Derivatives AOCI into Income (Loss) (Loss) on Derivatives ------------------------ -------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------- (Effective Portion) (Effective Portion) (Ineffective Portion) - -------------------- ----------------------------- ----------------------- Net Derivative Net Investment Net Derivative Gains (Losses) Income Gains (Losses) -------------- -------------- ----------------------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Interest rate swaps...... $ (120) $ -- $ -- $ -- Interest rate forwards... (57) 9 1 -- Foreign currency swaps... (15) -- -- 1 Credit forwards.......... (1) -- 1 -- -------------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------------- Total.................. $ (193) $ 9 $ 2 $ 1 ==================== ============== ============== ======================= Year Ended December 31, 2012: Interest rate swaps...... $ 21 $ -- $ -- $ 1 Interest rate forwards... 1 1 1 -- Foreign currency swaps... (15) 1 -- (1) Credit forwards.......... -- -- -- -- -------------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------------- Total.................. $ 7 $ 2 $ 1 $ -- ==================== ============== ============== ======================= Year Ended December 31, 2011: Interest rate swaps...... $ 132 $ 1 $ -- $ -- Interest rate forwards... 208 9 -- 1 Foreign currency swaps... 17 (2) -- -- Credit forwards.......... -- 1 -- -- -------------------- -------------- -------------- ----------------------- Total.................. $ 357 $ 9 $ -- $ 1 ==================== ============== ============== ======================= All components of each derivative's gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. At December 31, 2013, $1 million of deferred net gains (losses) on derivatives in AOCI was expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months. Credit Derivatives In connection with synthetically created credit investment transactions, the Company writes credit default swaps for which it receives a premium to insure credit risk. Such credit derivatives are included within the non-qualifying derivatives and derivatives for purposes other than hedging table. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the Company paying the counterparty the specified swap notional amount in exchange for the delivery of par quantities of the referenced credit obligation. The Company's maximum amount at risk, assuming the value of all referenced credit obligations is zero, was $2.2 billion and $2.5 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company can terminate these contracts at any time through cash settlement with the counterparty at an amount equal to the then current fair value of the credit default swaps. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company would have received $38 million and $22 million, respectively, to terminate all of these contracts. 83
N-6176th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 176th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) The following table presents the estimated fair value, maximum amount of future payments and weighted average years to maturity of written credit default swaps at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Estimated Maximum Estimated Maximum Fair Value Amount of Future Weighted Fair Value Amount of Future Weighted Rating Agency Designation of of Credit Payments under Average of Credit Payments under Average Referenced Default Credit Default Years to Default Credit Default Years to Credit Obligations (1) Swaps Swaps (2) Maturity (3) Swaps Swaps (2) Maturity (3) ---------------------------- ---------- ---------------- ------------ ---------- ---------------- ------------ (In millions) (In millions) Aaa/Aa/A Single name credit default swaps (corporate).......... $ 3 $ 115 2.7 $ 3 $ 167 3.2 Credit default swaps referencing indices........ 6 650 1.1 10 650 2.1 ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- Subtotal.................... 9 765 1.3 13 817 2.3 ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- Baa Single name credit default swaps (corporate).......... 8 446 3.0 4 479 3.8 Credit default swaps referencing indices........ 18 996 4.9 5 1,124 4.8 ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- Subtotal.................... 26 1,442 4.3 9 1,603 4.5 ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- B Single name credit default swaps (corporate).......... -- -- -- -- -- -- Credit default swaps referencing indices........ 3 36 5.0 -- 36 5.0 ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- Subtotal.................... 3 36 5.0 -- 36 5.0 ---------- ---------------- ---------- ---------------- Total..................... $ 38 $ 2,243 3.3 $ 22 $ 2,456 3.8 ========== ================ ========== ================ -------- (1)The rating agency designations are based on availability and the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's"), S&P and Fitch Ratings. If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used. (2)Assumes the value of the referenced credit obligations is zero. (3)The weighted average years to maturity of the credit default swaps is calculated based on weighted average notional amounts. Credit Risk on Freestanding Derivatives The Company may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivatives. Generally, the current credit exposure of the Company's derivatives is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivatives at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of master netting or similar agreements and any collateral received pursuant to such agreements. 84
N-6177th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 177th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) The Company manages its credit risk related to derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties and establishing and monitoring exposure limits. The Company's OTC-bilateral derivative transactions are generally governed by ISDA Master Agreements which provide for legally enforceable set-off and close-out netting of exposures to specific counterparties in the event of early termination of a transaction, which includes, but is not limited to, events of default and bankruptcy. In the event of an early termination, the Company is permitted to set off receivables from the counterparty against payables to the same counterparty arising out of all included transactions. Substantially all of the Company's ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex provisions which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral in connection with its OTC-bilateral derivatives. The Company's OTC-cleared derivatives are effected through central clearing counterparties and its exchange-traded derivatives are effected through regulated exchanges. Such positions are marked to market and margined on a daily basis, and the Company has minimal exposure to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to such derivatives. See Note 9 for a description of the impact of credit risk on the valuation of derivatives. The estimated fair value of the Company's net derivative assets and net derivative liabilities after the application of master netting agreements and collateral was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement or a Similar -------------------- -------------------- Arrangement Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities ---------------------------------------------------------------- -------- ----------- -------- ----------- (In millions) Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: OTC-bilateral (1).............................................. $ 1,450 $ 851 $ 2,436 $ 982 OTC-cleared (1)................................................ 50 9 -- -- Exchange-traded................................................ -- 6 -- 34 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total gross estimated fair value of derivatives (1).......... 1,500 866 2,436 1,016 Amounts offset in the consolidated balance sheets............... -- -- -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- Estimated fair value of derivatives presented in the consolidated balance sheets (1)............................... 1,500 866 2,436 1,016 Gross amounts not offset in the consolidated balance sheets: Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: (2) OTC-bilateral.................................................. (670) (670) (838) (838) OTC-cleared.................................................... (8) (8) -- -- Exchange-traded................................................ -- -- -- -- Cash collateral: (3) OTC-bilateral.................................................. (216) -- (897) -- OTC-cleared.................................................... (40) (1) -- -- Exchange-traded................................................ -- (5) -- (34) Securities collateral: (4) OTC-bilateral.................................................. (554) (160) (689) (121) OTC-cleared.................................................... -- -- -- -- Exchange-traded................................................ -- (1) -- -- -------- -------- -------- -------- Net amount after application of master netting agreements and collateral.................................................... $ 12 $ 21 $ 12 $ 23 ======== ======== ======== ======== 85
N-6178th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 178th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) -------- (1)At December 31, 2013 and 2012, derivative assets include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $40 million and $66 million, respectively, and derivative liabilities include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $25 million and $46 million, respectively. (2)Estimated fair value of derivatives is limited to the amount that is subject to set-off and includes income or expense accruals. (3)Cash collateral received is included in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, or in fixed maturity securities, and the obligation to return it is included in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions in the consolidated balance sheets. The receivable for the return of cash collateral provided by the Company is inclusive of initial margin on exchange-traded and OTC-cleared derivatives and is included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets. The amount of cash collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess cash collateral of $21 million and $0, respectively, and provided excess cash collateral of $19 million and $53 million, respectively, which is not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. (4)Securities collateral received by the Company is held in separate custodial accounts and is not recorded on the consolidated balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the Company is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral, but at December 31, 2013 none of the collateral had been sold or repledged. Securities collateral pledged by the Company is reported in fixed maturity securities in the consolidated balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the counterparties are permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral. The amount of securities collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements and cash collateral. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess securities collateral with an estimated fair value of $34 million and $0, respectively, for its OTC-bilateral derivatives, which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company provided excess securities collateral with an estimated fair value of $1 million and $0, respectively, for its OTC-bilateral derivatives, $29 million and $0, respectively, for its OTC-cleared derivatives and $46 million and $0, respectively, for its exchange-traded derivatives, which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. The Company's collateral arrangements for its OTC-bilateral derivatives generally require the counterparty in a net liability position, after considering the effect of netting agreements, to pledge collateral when the fair value of that counterparty's derivatives reaches a pre-determined threshold. Certain of these arrangements also include financial strength-contingent provisions that provide for a reduction of these thresholds (on a sliding scale that converges toward zero) in the event of downgrades in the financial strength ratings of the Company and/or the credit ratings of the counterparty. In addition, certain of the Company's netting agreements for derivatives contain provisions that require both the Company and the counterparty to maintain a specific investment grade financial strength or credit rating from each of Moody's and S&P. If a party's financial strength or credit ratings were to fall below that specific investment grade financial strength or credit rating, that party would be in violation of these provisions, and the other party to the derivatives could terminate the transactions and demand immediate settlement and payment based on such party's reasonable valuation of the derivatives. 86
N-6179th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 179th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company's OTC-bilateral derivatives that are in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements, together with the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the collateral pledged. The table also presents the incremental collateral that the Company would be required to provide if there was a one notch downgrade in the Company's financial strength rating at the reporting date or if the Company's financial strength rating sustained a downgrade to a level that triggered full overnight collateralization or termination of the derivative position at the reporting date. OTC-bilateral derivatives that are not subject to collateral agreements are excluded from this table. [Enlarge/Download Table] Estimated Fair Value of Collateral Provided: Fair Value of Incremental Collateral Provided Upon: -------------------- --------------------------------------------------- Downgrade in the Company's Financial Strength One Notch Rating to a Level that Estimated Downgrade in Triggers Full Overnight Fair Value of the Company's Collateralization or Derivatives in Net Fixed Maturity Financial Strength Termination of the Liability Position (1) Securities Rating Derivative Position ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------ ---------------------------- (In millions) December 31, 2013 $ 181 $ 161 $ -- $ 2 December 31, 2012 $ 143 $ 121 $ 2 $ 28 -------- (1)After taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements. Embedded Derivatives The Company issues certain products or purchases certain investments that contain embedded derivatives that are required to be separated from their host contracts and accounted for as freestanding derivatives. These host contracts principally include: variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; affiliated ceded reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; affiliated assumed reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs and certain GMIBs; funds withheld on ceded reinsurance; and certain debt and equity securities. The following table presents the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the Company's embedded derivatives that have been separated from their host contracts at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ------------------- Balance Sheet Location 2013 2012 -------------------------- ---------- -------- (In millions) Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts: Ceded guaranteed minimum benefits... Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables......... $ 912 $ 3,551 Options embedded in debt or equity securities......................... Investments............... (30) (14) ---------- -------- Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts....... $ 882 $ 3,537 ========== ======== Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts: Direct guaranteed minimum benefits.. PABs...................... $ (1,232) $ 705 Assumed guaranteed minimum benefits. PABs...................... (13) 4 Funds withheld on ceded reinsurance. Other liabilities......... 34 552 ---------- -------- Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts... $ (1,211) $ 1,261 ========== ======== 87
N-6180th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 180th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Derivatives (continued) The following table presents changes in estimated fair value related to embedded derivatives: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------- ----------- ----------- (In millions) Net derivative gains (losses) (1) (2). $ (94) $ 1,292 $ 250 -------- (1)The valuation of direct and assumed guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses), in connection with this adjustment, were ($156) million, ($235) million and $354 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, the valuation of ceded guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses) in connection with this adjustment, were $76 million, $124 million and ($476) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (2)See Note 6 for discussion of affiliated net derivative gains (losses) included in the table above. 9. Fair Value When developing estimated fair values, the Company considers three broad valuation techniques: (i) the market approach, (ii) the income approach, and (iii) the cost approach. The Company determines the most appropriate valuation technique to use, given what is being measured and the availability of sufficient inputs, giving priority to observable inputs. The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value into a three-level hierarchy, based on the significant input with the lowest level in its valuation. The input levels are as follows: Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company defines active markets based on average trading volume for equity securities. The size of the bid/ask spread is used as an indicator of market activity for fixed maturity securities. Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities other than quoted prices in Level 1, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other significant inputs that are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the determination of estimated fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. The Company's ability to sell securities, or the price ultimately realized for these securities, depends upon the demand and liquidity in the market and increases the use of judgment in determining the estimated fair value of certain securities. Considerable judgment is often required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value, and the use of different assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. 88
N-6181st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 181st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Recurring Fair Value Measurements The assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, including those items for which the Company has elected the FVO, are presented below. [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 ---------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ------------------------------ Total Estimated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value -------- ---------- ---------- --------------- (In millions) Assets Fixed maturity securities: U.S. corporate............................................. $ -- $ 15,454 $ 1,248 $ 16,702 Foreign corporate.......................................... -- 7,783 734 8,517 U.S. Treasury and agency................................... 4,365 3,929 -- 8,294 RMBS....................................................... -- 4,266 422 4,688 State and political subdivision............................ -- 2,224 -- 2,224 ABS........................................................ -- 1,682 419 2,101 CMBS....................................................... -- 1,532 72 1,604 Foreign government......................................... -- 1,122 -- 1,122 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total fixed maturity securities........................... 4,365 37,992 2,895 45,252 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Equity securities: Non-redeemable preferred stock............................. -- 136 81 217 Common stock............................................... 86 84 31 201 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total equity securities................................... 86 220 112 418 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Short-term investments (1)................................... 391 1,671 -- 2,062 Mortgage loans held by CSEs -- FVO........................... -- 1,598 -- 1,598 Other invested assets: FVO securities............................................. -- 9 -- 9 Derivative assets: (2) Interest rate............................................. -- 1,011 23 1,034 Foreign currency exchange rate............................ -- 77 -- 77 Credit.................................................... -- 32 6 38 Equity market............................................. -- 305 6 311 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total derivative assets................................. -- 1,425 35 1,460 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total other invested assets............................ -- 1,434 35 1,469 Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (3)..... -- -- 912 912 Separate account assets (4).................................. 259 97,368 153 97,780 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total assets........................................... $ 5,101 $ 140,283 $ 4,107 $ 149,491 ======== ========== ========== ============ Liabilities Derivative liabilities: (2) Interest rate.............................................. $ 3 $ 574 $ 12 $ 589 Foreign currency exchange rate............................. -- 90 -- 90 Credit..................................................... -- 1 -- 1 Equity market.............................................. 3 64 94 161 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total derivative liabilities.............................. 6 729 106 841 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (3). -- -- (1,211) (1,211) Long-term debt of CSEs....................................... -- 1,461 -- 1,461 -------- ---------- ---------- ------------ Total liabilities...................................... $ 6 $ 2,190 $ (1,105) $ 1,091 ======== ========== ========== ============ 89
N-6182nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 182nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2012 -------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ---------------------------- Total Estimated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value -------- ---------- -------- --------------- (In millions) Assets Fixed maturity securities: U.S. corporate............................................. $ -- $ 17,461 $ 1,434 $ 18,895 Foreign corporate.......................................... -- 8,577 868 9,445 U.S. Treasury and agency................................... 5,082 3,782 -- 8,864 RMBS....................................................... -- 5,460 278 5,738 State and political subdivision............................ -- 2,304 25 2,329 ABS........................................................ -- 1,910 343 2,253 CMBS....................................................... -- 2,231 125 2,356 Foreign government......................................... -- 1,085 3 1,088 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total fixed maturity securities.......................... 5,082 42,810 3,076 50,968 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Equity securities: Non-redeemable preferred stock............................. -- 47 93 140 Common stock............................................... 70 81 26 177 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total equity securities.................................. 70 128 119 317 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Short-term investments (1)................................... 1,233 1,285 13 2,531 Mortgage loans held by CSEs -- FVO........................... -- 2,666 -- 2,666 Other invested assets: FVO securities............................................. -- 9 -- 9 Derivative assets: (2) Interest rate............................................ -- 1,643 148 1,791 Foreign currency exchange rate........................... -- 76 -- 76 Credit................................................... -- 13 10 23 Equity market............................................ -- 469 11 480 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total derivative assets................................. -- 2,201 169 2,370 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total other invested assets........................... -- 2,210 169 2,379 Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (3)..... -- -- 3,551 3,551 Separate account assets (4).................................. 201 85,772 141 86,114 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total assets.......................................... $ 6,586 $ 134,871 $ 7,069 $ 148,526 ======== ========== ======== =========== Liabilities Derivative liabilities: (2) Interest rate.............................................. $ 7 $ 767 $ 29 $ 803 Foreign currency exchange rate............................. -- 67 -- 67 Credit..................................................... -- 3 -- 3 Equity market.............................................. 27 8 62 97 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total derivative liabilities............................. 34 845 91 970 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (3). -- -- 1,261 1,261 Long-term debt of CSEs....................................... -- 2,559 -- 2,559 -------- ---------- -------- ----------- Total liabilities..................................... $ 34 $ 3,404 $ 1,352 $ 4,790 ======== ========== ======== =========== -------- 90
N-6183rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 183rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) (1)Short-term investments as presented in the tables above differ from the amounts presented in the consolidated balance sheets because certain short-term investments are not measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis. (2)Derivative assets are presented within other invested assets in the consolidated balance sheets and derivative liabilities are presented within other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. The amounts are presented gross in the tables above to reflect the presentation in the consolidated balance sheets, but are presented net for purposes of the rollforward in the Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) tables. (3)Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts are presented primarily within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets. Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts are presented primarily within PABs and other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, equity securities also included embedded derivatives of ($30) million and ($14) million, respectively. (4)Investment performance related to separate account assets is fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to contractholders whose liability is reflected within separate account liabilities. Separate account liabilities are set equal to the estimated fair value of separate account assets. The following describes the valuation methodologies used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. The description includes the valuation techniques and key inputs for each category of assets or liabilities that are classified within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Investments Valuation Controls and Procedures On behalf of the Company and MetLife, Inc.'s Chief Investment Officer and Chief Financial Officer, a pricing and valuation committee that is independent of the trading and investing functions and comprised of senior management, provides oversight of control systems and valuation policies for securities, mortgage loans and derivatives. On a quarterly basis, this committee reviews and approves new transaction types and markets, ensures that observable market prices and market-based parameters are used for valuation, wherever possible, and determines that judgmental valuation adjustments, when applied, are based upon established policies and are applied consistently over time. This committee also provides oversight of the selection of independent third party pricing providers and the controls and procedures to evaluate third party pricing. Periodically, the Chief Accounting Officer reports to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's Audit Committee regarding compliance with fair value accounting standards. The Company reviews its valuation methodologies on an ongoing basis and revises those methodologies when necessary based on changing market conditions. Assurance is gained on the overall reasonableness and consistent application of input assumptions, valuation methodologies and compliance with fair value accounting standards through controls designed to ensure valuations represent an exit price. Several controls are utilized, including certain monthly controls, which include, but are not limited to, analysis of portfolio returns to corresponding benchmark returns, comparing a sample of executed prices of securities sold to the 91
N-6184th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 184th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) fair value estimates, comparing fair value estimates to management's knowledge of the current market, reviewing the bid/ask spreads to assess activity, comparing prices from multiple independent pricing services and ongoing due diligence to confirm that independent pricing services use market-based parameters. The process includes a determination of the observability of inputs used in estimated fair values received from independent pricing services or brokers by assessing whether these inputs can be corroborated by observable market data. The Company ensures that prices received from independent brokers, also referred to herein as "consensus pricing," represent a reasonable estimate of fair value by considering such pricing relative to the Company's knowledge of the current market dynamics and current pricing for similar financial instruments. While independent non-binding broker quotations are utilized, they are not used for a significant portion of the portfolio. For example, fixed maturity securities priced using independent non-binding broker quotations represent less than 1% of the total estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities and 11% of the total estimated fair value of Level 3 fixed maturity securities. The Company also applies a formal process to challenge any prices received from independent pricing services that are not considered representative of estimated fair value. If prices received from independent pricing services are not considered reflective of market activity or representative of estimated fair value, independent non-binding broker quotations are obtained, or an internally developed valuation is prepared. Internally developed valuations of current estimated fair value, which reflect internal estimates of liquidity and nonperformance risks, compared with pricing received from the independent pricing services, did not produce material differences in the estimated fair values for the majority of the portfolio; accordingly, overrides were not material. This is, in part, because internal estimates of liquidity and nonperformance risks are generally based on available market evidence and estimates used by other market participants. In the absence of such market-based evidence, management's best estimate is used. Securities, Short-term Investments and Long-term Debt of CSEs When available, the estimated fair value of these financial instruments is based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. Generally, these are the most liquid of the Company's securities holdings and valuation of these securities does not involve management's judgment. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, giving priority to observable inputs. The significant inputs to the market standard valuation methodologies for certain types of securities with reasonable levels of price transparency are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. When observable inputs are not available, the market standard valuation methodologies rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. These unobservable inputs can be based in large part on management's judgment or estimation and cannot be supported by reference to market activity. Even though these inputs are unobservable, management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such securities and are considered appropriate given the circumstances. The estimated fair value of long-term debt of CSEs is determined on a basis consistent with the methodologies described herein for securities. 92
N-6185th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 185th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: This level includes securities priced principally by independent pricing services using observable inputs. Short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 2 fixed maturity securities and equity securities. U.S. corporate and foreign corporate securities These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques that use standard market observable inputs such as benchmark yields, spreads off benchmark yields, new issuances, issuer rating, duration, and trades of identical or comparable securities. Privately-placed securities are valued using matrix pricing methodologies using standard market observable inputs, and inputs derived from, or corroborated by, market observable data including market yield curve, duration, call provisions, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer, and in certain cases, delta spread adjustments to reflect specific credit-related issues. U.S. Treasury and agency securities These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs such as a benchmark U.S. Treasury yield curve, the spread off the U.S. Treasury yield curve for the identical security and comparable securities that are actively traded. Structured securities comprised of RMBS, ABS and CMBS These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques using standard market inputs, including spreads for actively traded securities, spreads off benchmark yields, expected prepayment speeds and volumes, current and forecasted loss severity, rating, weighted average coupon, weighted average maturity, average delinquency rates, geographic region, debt-service coverage ratios and issuance-specific information, including, but not limited to: collateral type, payment terms of the underlying assets, payment priority within the tranche, structure of the security, deal performance and vintage of loans. State and political subdivision and foreign government securities These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs including a benchmark U.S. Treasury yield or other yields, issuer ratings, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads and reported trades of similar securities, including those within the same sub-sector or with a similar maturity or credit rating. Common and non-redeemable preferred stock These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based principally on observable inputs, including quoted prices in markets that are not considered active. 93
N-6186th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 186th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: In general, securities classified within Level 3 use many of the same valuation techniques and inputs as described previously for Level 2. However, if key inputs are unobservable, or if the investments are less liquid and there is very limited trading activity, the investments are generally classified as Level 3. The use of independent non-binding broker quotations to value investments generally indicates there is a lack of liquidity or a lack of transparency in the process to develop the valuation estimates, generally causing these investments to be classified in Level 3. Short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 3 securities described below; accordingly, the valuation techniques and significant market standard observable inputs used in their valuation are also similar to those described below. U.S. corporate and foreign corporate securities These securities, including financial services industry hybrid securities classified within fixed maturity securities, are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques that utilize unobservable inputs or inputs that cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including illiquidity premium, delta spread adjustments to reflect specific credit-related issues, credit spreads; and inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain valuations are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. Structured securities comprised of RMBS, ABS and CMBS These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques that utilize inputs that are unobservable or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including credit spreads. Below investment grade securities and sub-prime RMBS included in this level are valued based on inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain of these valuations are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. State and political subdivision and foreign government securities These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on independent non-binding broker quotations and inputs, including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain valuations are based on matrix pricing that utilize inputs that are unobservable or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including credit spreads. Common and non-redeemable preferred stock These securities, including privately-held securities and financial services industry hybrid securities classified within equity securities, are principally valued using the market and income approaches. 94
N-6187th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 187th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques using inputs such as comparable credit rating and issuance structure. Certain of these securities are valued based on inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2 and independent non-binding broker quotations. Mortgage Loans Held by CSEs -- FVO The Company consolidates certain securitization entities that hold commercial mortgage loans. Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: These investments are principally valued using the market approach. The principal market for these investments is the securitization market. The Company uses the quoted securitization market price of the obligations of the CSEs to determine the estimated fair value of these commercial loan portfolios. These market prices are determined principally by independent pricing services using observable inputs. Separate Account Assets Separate account assets are carried at estimated fair value and reported as a summarized total on the consolidated balance sheets. The estimated fair value of separate account assets is based on the estimated fair value of the underlying assets. Separate account assets include: mutual funds, fixed maturity securities, equity securities, derivatives, other limited partnership interests, short-term investments and cash and cash equivalents. Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: These assets are comprised of investments that are similar in nature to the instruments described under "-- Securities, Short-term Investments and Long-term Debt of CSEs." Also included are certain mutual funds without readily determinable fair values, as prices are not published publicly. Valuation of the mutual funds is based upon quoted prices or reported NAV provided by the fund managers. Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: These assets are comprised of investments that are similar in nature to the instruments described under "-- Securities, Short-term Investments and Long-term Debt of CSEs." Also included are other limited partnership interests, which are valued giving consideration to the value of the underlying holdings of the partnerships and by applying a premium or discount, if appropriate, for factors such as liquidity, bid/ask spreads, the performance record of the fund manager or other relevant variables that may impact the exit value of the particular partnership interest. Derivatives The estimated fair value of derivatives is determined through the use of quoted market prices for exchange-traded derivatives, or through the use of pricing models for OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives. The determination of estimated fair value, when quoted market values are not available, is based on market standard 95
N-6188th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 188th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) valuation methodologies and inputs that management believes are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments. Derivative valuations can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices, credit spreads, default risk, nonperformance risk, volatility, liquidity and changes in estimates and assumptions used in the pricing models. The valuation controls and procedures for derivatives are described in "-- Investments." The significant inputs to the pricing models for most OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant inputs that are observable generally include: interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rate curves, credit curves and volatility. However, certain OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives may rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant inputs that are unobservable generally include references to emerging market currencies and inputs that are outside the observable portion of the interest rate curve, credit curve, volatility or other relevant market measure. These unobservable inputs may involve significant management judgment or estimation. Even though unobservable, these inputs are based on assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances and management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments. Most inputs for OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives are mid-market inputs but, in certain cases, liquidity adjustments are made when they are deemed more representative of exit value. Market liquidity, as well as the use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs, may have a material effect on the estimated fair values of the Company's derivatives and could materially affect net income. The credit risk of both the counterparty and the Company are considered in determining the estimated fair value for all OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives, and any potential credit adjustment is based on the net exposure by counterparty after taking into account the effects of netting agreements and collateral arrangements. The Company values its OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives using standard swap curves which may include a spread to the risk free rate, depending upon specific collateral arrangements. This credit spread is appropriate for those parties that execute trades at pricing levels consistent with similar collateral arrangements. As the Company and its significant derivative counterparties generally execute trades at such pricing levels and hold sufficient collateral, additional credit risk adjustments are not currently required in the valuation process. The Company's ability to consistently execute at such pricing levels is in part due to the netting agreements and collateral arrangements that are in place with all of its significant derivative counterparties. An evaluation of the requirement to make additional credit risk adjustments is performed by the Company each reporting period. Freestanding Derivatives Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: This level includes all types of derivatives utilized by the Company with the exception of exchange-traded derivatives included within Level 1 and those derivatives with unobservable inputs as described in Level 3. These derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. 96
N-6189th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 189th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Interest rate Non-option-based. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve and basis curves. Option-based. Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, basis curves and interest rate volatility. Foreign currency exchange rate Non-option-based. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, basis curves, currency spot rates and cross currency basis curves. Credit Non-option-based. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, credit curves and recovery rates. Equity market Non-option-based. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, spot equity index levels and dividend yield curves. Option-based. Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, spot equity index levels, dividend yield curves and equity volatility. Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: These derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. Valuations of non-option-based derivatives utilize present value techniques, whereas valuations of option-based derivatives utilize option pricing models. These valuation methodologies generally use the same inputs as described in the corresponding sections above for Level 2 measurements of derivatives. However, these derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Interest rate Non-option-based. Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and basis curves. Credit Non-option-based. Significant unobservable inputs may include credit spreads, repurchase rates and the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and credit curves. Certain of these derivatives are valued based on independent non-binding broker quotations. 97
N-6190th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 190th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Equity market Non-option-based. Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of dividend yield curves and equity volatility. Embedded Derivatives Embedded derivatives principally include certain direct, assumed and ceded variable annuity guarantees and embedded derivatives related to funds withheld on ceded reinsurance. Embedded derivatives are recorded at estimated fair value with changes in estimated fair value reported in net income. The Company issues certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits. GMWBs, GMABs and GMIBs contain embedded derivatives, which are measured at estimated fair value separately from the host variable annuity contract, with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). These embedded derivatives are classified within PABs in the consolidated balance sheets. The fair value of these embedded derivatives, estimated as the present value of projected future benefits minus the present value of projected future fees using actuarial and capital market assumptions including expectations concerning policyholder behavior, is calculated by the Company's actuarial department. The calculation is based on in-force business, and is performed using standard actuarial valuation software which projects future cash flows from the embedded derivative over multiple risk neutral stochastic scenarios using observable risk free rates. Capital market assumptions, such as risk free rates and implied volatilities, are based on market prices for publicly traded instruments to the extent that prices for such instruments are observable. Implied volatilities beyond the observable period are extrapolated based on observable implied volatilities and historical volatilities. Actuarial assumptions, including mortality, lapse, withdrawal and utilization, are unobservable and are reviewed at least annually based on actuarial studies of historical experience. The valuation of these guarantee liabilities includes nonperformance risk adjustments and adjustments for a risk margin related to non-capital market inputs. The nonperformance adjustment is determined by taking into consideration publicly available information relating to spreads in the secondary market for MetLife's debt, including related credit default swaps. These observable spreads are then adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the priority of these liabilities and the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance subsidiaries compared to MetLife. Risk margins are established to capture the non-capital market risks of the instrument which represent the additional compensation a market participant would require to assume the risks related to the uncertainties of such actuarial assumptions as annuitization, premium persistency, partial withdrawal and surrenders. The establishment of risk margins requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions of the amount and cost of capital needed to cover the guarantees. These guarantees may be more costly than expected in volatile or declining equity markets. Market conditions including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, equity indices, market volatility and foreign currency exchange rates; changes in nonperformance risk; and variations in actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, mortality and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs, may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the guarantees that could materially affect net income. 98
N-6191st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 191st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) The Company assumed, from an affiliated insurance company, the risk associated with certain GMIBs. These embedded derivatives are included in other policy-related balances in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The value of the embedded derivatives on these assumed risks is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company. The Company ceded, to an affiliated reinsurance company, the risk associated with certain of the GMIBs, GMABs and GMWBs described above that are also accounted for as embedded derivatives. In addition to ceding risks associated with guarantees that are accounted for as embedded derivatives, the Company also cedes, to the same affiliated reinsurance company, certain directly written GMIBs that are accounted for as insurance (i.e., not as embedded derivatives), but where the reinsurance agreement contains an embedded derivative. These embedded derivatives are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The value of the embedded derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer. The estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives within funds withheld related to certain ceded reinsurance is determined based on the change in estimated fair value of the underlying assets held by the Company in a reference portfolio backing the funds withheld liability. The estimated fair value of the underlying assets is determined as previously described in "-- Investments -- Securities, Short-term Investments and Long-term Debt of CSEs." The estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives is included, along with their funds withheld hosts, in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value recorded in net derivative gains (losses). Changes in the credit spreads on the underlying assets, interest rates and market volatility may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives that could materially affect net income. Embedded Derivatives Within Asset and Liability Host Contracts Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: Direct and assumed guaranteed minimum benefits These embedded derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. Valuations are based on option pricing techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include swap yield curve, currency exchange rates and implied volatilities. These embedded derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant unobservable inputs generally include: the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and implied volatilities, actuarial assumptions for policyholder behavior and mortality and the potential variability in policyholder behavior and mortality, nonperformance risk and cost of capital for purposes of calculating the risk margin. Reinsurance ceded on certain guaranteed minimum benefits These embedded derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. The valuation techniques and significant market standard unobservable inputs used in their valuation are similar to those described above in "-- Direct and Assumed Guaranteed Minimum Benefits" and also include counterparty credit spreads. 99
N-6192nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 192nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Transfers between Levels Overall, transfers between levels occur when there are changes in the observability of inputs and market activity. Transfers into or out of any level are assumed to occur at the beginning of the period. Transfers between Levels 1 and 2: For assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value and still held at December 31, 2013 and 2012, transfers between Levels 1 and 2 were not significant. Transfers into or out of Level 3: Assets and liabilities are transferred into Level 3 when a significant input cannot be corroborated with market observable data. This occurs when market activity decreases significantly and underlying inputs cannot be observed, current prices are not available, and/or when there are significant variances in quoted prices, thereby affecting transparency. Assets and liabilities are transferred out of Level 3 when circumstances change such that a significant input can be corroborated with market observable data. This may be due to a significant increase in market activity, a specific event, or one or more significant input(s) becoming observable. Transfers into Level 3 for fixed maturity securities were due primarily to a lack of trading activity, decreased liquidity and credit ratings downgrades (e.g., from investment grade to below investment grade) which have resulted in decreased transparency of valuations and an increased use of independent non-binding broker quotations and unobservable inputs, such as illiquidity premiums, delta spread adjustments or credit spreads. Transfers out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities resulted primarily from increased transparency of both new issuances that, subsequent to issuance and establishment of trading activity, became priced by independent pricing services and existing issuances that, over time, the Company was able to obtain pricing from, or corroborate pricing received from, independent pricing services with observable inputs (such as observable spreads used in pricing securities) or increases in market activity and upgraded credit ratings. 100
N-6193rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 193rd
Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) The following table presents certain quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, and the sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in those inputs, for the more significant asset and liability classes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 --------------------------- Valuation Significant Weighted Techniques Unobservable Inputs Range Average (1) ------------------------ --------------------------- --------------- ----------- Fixed maturity securities: (3) U.S. corporate and Delta spread (10) - 240 51 foreign corporate............ Matrix pricing adjustments (4) Illiquidity premium (4) 30 - 30 30 Credit spreads (4) (112) - 538 208 Offered quotes (5) 99 - 100 100 .. Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 33 - 103 87 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RMBS.......................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) (96) - 2,406 295 discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 10 - 100 95 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 78 - 100 95 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMBS.......................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) 341 - 1,879 746 discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 97 - 104 101 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 101 - 101 101 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABS........................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) 30 - 875 319 discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) -- - 104 101 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 58 - 106 98 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derivatives: Interest rate................. Present value Swap yield (7) 248 - 450 techniques ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Credit........................ Present value Credit spreads (8) 98 - 100 techniques Consensus pricing Offered quotes (9) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equity market................. Present value Volatility (10) 17% - 28% techniques ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded derivatives: Direct and ceded Option pricing Mortality rates: 0% - 0.10% guaranteed minimum techniques Ages 0 - 40 benefits..................... Ages 41 - 60 0.04% - 0.65% Ages 61 - 115 0.26% - 100% Lapse rates: Durations 1 - 10 0.50% - 100% Durations 11 - 20 3% - 100% Durations 21 - 116 3% - 100% Utilization rates 20% - 50% Withdrawal rates 0.07% - 10% Long-term equity 17.40% - 25% volatilities Nonperformance 0.03% - 0.44% risk spread ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2012 --------------------------- Valuation Significant Weighted Techniques Unobservable Inputs Range Average (1) ------------------------ --------------------------- --------------- ----------- Fixed maturity securities: (3) U.S. corporate and Delta spread 9 - 500 105 foreign corporate............ Matrix pricing adjustments (4) Illiquidity premium (4) 30 - 30 30 Credit spreads (4) (157) - 876 282 Offered quotes (5) 100 - 100 100 .. Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 35 - 555 96 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RMBS.......................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) 40 - 2,367 436 discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 100 - 100 100 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMBS.......................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) 10 - 9,164 413 discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 100 - 104 102 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABS........................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) -- - 900 152 discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 97 - 102 100 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 50 - 111 100 ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derivatives: Interest rate................. Present value Swap yield (7) 221 - 353 techniques ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Credit........................ Present value Credit spreads (8) 100 - 100 techniques Consensus pricing Offered quotes (9) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equity market................. Present value Volatility (10) 18% - 26% techniques ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded derivatives: Direct and ceded Option pricing Mortality rates: 0% - 0.10% guaranteed minimum techniques Ages 0 - 40 benefits..................... Ages 41 - 60 0.05% - 0.64% Ages 61 - 115 0.32% - 100% Lapse rates: Durations 1 - 10 0.50% - 100% Durations 11 - 20 3% - 100% Durations 21 - 116 3% - 100% Utilization rates 20% - 50% Withdrawal rates 0.07% - 10% Long-term equity 17.40% - 25% volatilities Nonperformance 0.10% - 0.67% risk spread ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Enlarge/Download Table] Impact of Increase in Input on Valuation Significant Estimated Techniques Unobservable Inputs Fair Value (2) ------------------------ --------------------------- -------------- Fixed maturity securities: (3) U.S. corporate and Delta spread Decrease foreign corporate............ Matrix pricing adjustments (4) Illiquidity premium (4) Decrease Credit spreads (4) Decrease Offered quotes (5) Increase .. Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) Increase -------------------------------------------------------------------------- RMBS.......................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) Decrease (6) discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) Increase (6) Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) Increase (6) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMBS.......................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) Decrease (6) discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) Increase (6) Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) Increase (6) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABS........................... Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) Decrease (6) discounted cash flow Market pricing Quoted prices (5) Increase (6) Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) Increase (6) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derivatives: Interest rate................. Present value Swap yield (7) Increase (11) techniques -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Credit........................ Present value Credit spreads (8) Decrease (8) techniques Consensus pricing Offered quotes (9) -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equity market................. Present value Volatility (10) Increase (11) techniques -------------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded derivatives: Direct and ceded Option pricing Mortality rates: Decrease (12) guaranteed minimum techniques Ages 0 - 40 benefits..................... Ages 41 - 60 Decrease (12) Ages 61 - 115 Decrease (12) Lapse rates: Durations 1 - 10 Decrease (13) Durations 11 - 20 Decrease (13) Durations 21 - 116 Decrease (13) Utilization rates Increase (14) Withdrawal rates (15) Long-term equity Increase (16) volatilities Nonperformance Decrease (17) risk spread -------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- (1)The weighted average for fixed maturity securities is determined based on the estimated fair value of the securities. 101
N-6194th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 194th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) (2)The impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact on the estimated fair value. For embedded derivatives, changes to direct guaranteed minimum benefits are based on liability positions and changes to ceded guaranteed minimum benefits are based on asset positions. (3)Significant increases (decreases) in expected default rates in isolation would result in substantially lower (higher) valuations. (4)Range and weighted average are presented in basis points. (5)Range and weighted average are presented in accordance with the market convention for fixed maturity securities of dollars per hundred dollars of par. (6)Changes in the assumptions used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumptions used for prepayment rates. (7)Ranges represent the rates across different yield curves and are presented in basis points. The swap yield curve is utilized among different types of derivatives to project cash flows, as well as to discount future cash flows to present value. Since this valuation methodology uses a range of inputs across a yield curve to value the derivative, presenting a range is more representative of the unobservable input used in the valuation. (8)Represents the risk quoted in basis points of a credit default event on the underlying instrument. The range being provided is a single quoted spread in the valuation model. Credit derivatives with significant unobservable inputs are primarily comprised of written credit default swaps. (9)At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, independent non-binding broker quotations were used in the determination of less than 1% of the total net derivative estimated fair value. (10)Ranges represent the underlying equity volatility quoted in percentage points. Since this valuation methodology uses a range of inputs across multiple volatility surfaces to value the derivative, presenting a range is more representative of the unobservable input used in the valuation. (11)Changes are based on long U.S. dollar net asset positions and will be inversely impacted for short U.S. dollar net asset positions. (12)Mortality rates vary by age and by demographic characteristics such as gender. Mortality rate assumptions are based on company experience. A mortality improvement assumption is also applied. For any given contract, mortality rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (13)Base lapse rates are adjusted at the contract level based on a comparison of the actuarially calculated guaranteed values and the current policyholder account value, as well as other factors, such as the applicability of any surrender charges. A dynamic lapse function reduces the base lapse rate when the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value as in the money contracts are less likely to lapse. Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. For any given contract, lapse rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (14)The utilization rate assumption estimates the percentage of contract holders with a GMIB or lifetime withdrawal benefit who will elect to utilize the benefit upon becoming eligible. The rates may vary by the type of guarantee, the amount by which the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value, the 102
N-6195th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 195th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) contract's withdrawal history and by the age of the policyholder. For any given contract, utilization rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (15)The withdrawal rate represents the percentage of account balance that any given policyholder will elect to withdraw from the contract each year. The withdrawal rate assumption varies by age and duration of the contract, and also by other factors such as benefit type. For any given contract, withdrawal rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. For GMWBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in an increase (decrease) in the estimated fair value of the guarantees. For GMABs and GMIBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in a decrease (increase) in the estimated fair value. (16)Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. For any given contract, long-term equity volatility rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (17)Nonperformance risk spread varies by duration and by currency. For any given contract, multiple nonperformance risk spreads will apply, depending on the duration of the cash flow being discounted for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. The following is a summary of the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 that are not included in the preceding table. Generally, all other classes of securities classified within Level 3, including those within separate account assets and embedded derivatives within funds withheld related to certain ceded reinsurance, use the same valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs as previously described for Level 3 securities. This includes matrix pricing and discounted cash flow methodologies, inputs such as quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2, as well as independent non-binding broker quotations. The sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in the significant unobservable inputs for these other assets and liabilities is similar in nature to that described in the preceding table. The valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement for the more significant assets measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis and determined using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) are summarized in "-- Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements." 103
N-6196th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 196th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) The following tables summarize the change of all assets and (liabilities) measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed Maturity Securities: --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State and U.S. Foreign U.S. Treasury Political Foreign Corporate Corporate and Agency RMBS Subdivision ABS CMBS Government --------- --------- ------------- -------- ----------- ------ ------- ----------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Balance at January 1,.................... $ 1,434 $ 868 $ -- $ 278 $ 25 $ 343 $ 125 $ 3 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income................. 7 -- -- 1 -- 1 1 -- Net investment gains (losses)......... -- (7) -- (1) -- 2 -- -- Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- OCI.................................... (39) (5) -- 13 -- (5) 3 -- Purchases (3)............................ 150 53 -- 170 -- 184 37 -- Sales (3)................................ (243) (129) -- (49) (2) (53) (71) (3) Issuances (3)............................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3).......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers into Level 3 (4)............... 218 30 -- 14 -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............. (279) (76) -- (4) (23) (53) (23) -- -------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------ ------- ----------- Balance at December 31,.................. $ 1,248 $ 734 $ -- $ 422 $ -- $ 419 $ 72 $ -- ======== ======== =========== ======== ========= ====== ======= =========== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ 7 $ -- $ -- $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ -- $ (3) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- 104
N-6197th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 197th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equity Securities: Net Derivatives: (6) ------------------- ----------------------- Non- redeemable Net Separate Preferred Common Short-term Interest Equity Embedded Account Stock Stock Investments Rate Credit Market Derivatives (7) Assets (8) ---------- -------- ----------- -------- ------ ------- --------------- ---------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Balance at January 1,.................... $ 93 $ 26 $ 13 $ 119 $ 10 $ (51) $ 2,290 $ 141 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income................. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)......... -- 8 -- -- -- -- -- 6 Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- (16) (4) (40) 108 -- OCI.................................... 12 7 -- (58) -- -- -- -- Purchases (3)............................ 3 2 -- -- -- -- -- 9 Sales (3)................................ (27) (12) (13) -- -- -- -- (6) Issuances (3)............................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3).......................... -- -- -- (19) -- 3 (59) -- Transfers into Level 3 (4)............... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 3 Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............. -- -- -- (15) -- -- -- -- ---------- -------- ---------- ------- ------ ------- ------------- -------- Balance at December 31,.................. $ 81 $ 31 $ -- $ 11 $ 6 $ (88) $ 2,123 $ 153 ========== ======== ========== ======= ====== ======= ============= ======== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ (3) $ (2) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (8) $ (4) $ (36) $ (83) $ -- 105
N-6198th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 198th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed Maturity Securities: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- U.S. State and U.S. Foreign Treasury Political Foreign Corporate Corporate and Agency RMBS Subdivision ABS CMBS Government --------- --------- ----------- -------- ----------- ------ ------- ----------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2012: Balance at January 1,.................... $ 1,432 $ 580 $ -- $ 239 $ 23 $ 220 $ 147 $ 2 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income................. 7 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)......... -- (24) -- (4) -- -- (1) -- Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- OCI.................................... 66 44 -- 39 2 8 6 1 Purchases (3)............................ 227 269 -- 61 -- 148 22 -- Sales (3)................................ (183) (56) -- (63) -- (15) (71) -- Issuances (3)............................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3).......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers into Level 3 (4)............... 76 68 -- 6 -- -- 39 -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............. (191) (13) -- -- -- (18) (17) -- -------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------ ------- ----------- Balance at December 31,.................. $ 1,434 $ 868 $ -- $ 278 $ 25 $ 343 $ 125 $ 3 ======== ======== =========== ======== ========= ====== ======= =========== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ 7 $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ -- $ (16) $ -- $ (2) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- 106
N-6199th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 199th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equity Securities: Net Derivatives: (6) ------------------- ------------------------ Non- redeemable Separate Preferred Common Short-term Interest Equity Net Embedded Account Stock Stock Investments Rate Credit Market Derivatives (7) Assets (8) ---------- -------- ----------- -------- ------ -------- --------------- ---------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2012: Balance at January 1,.............. $ 76 $ 21 $ 10 $ 174 $ (1) $ 43 $ 1,009 $ 130 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income........... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)... -- (2) -- -- -- -- -- 16 Net derivative gains (losses)... -- -- -- 1 10 (91) 1,296 -- OCI............................... 20 9 -- 1 -- -- -- -- Purchases (3)...................... -- -- 13 -- -- -- -- 1 Sales (3).......................... (3) (2) (10) -- -- -- -- (5) Issuances (3)...................... -- -- -- (10) -- -- -- -- Settlements (3).................... -- -- -- (47) -- (3) (15) -- Transfers into Level 3 (4)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 1 Transfers out of Level 3 (4)....... -- -- -- -- 1 -- -- (2) ---------- -------- ---------- ------ ----- -------- ------------- -------- Balance at December 31,............ $ 93 $ 26 $ 13 $ 119 $ 10 $ (51) $ 2,290 $ 141 ========== ======== ========== ====== ===== ======== ============= ======== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income............. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses)..... $ -- $ (4) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses)..... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 3 $ 11 $ (88) $ 1,305 $ -- 107
N-6200th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 200th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed Maturity Securities: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- State and U.S. Foreign U.S. Treasury Political Foreign Corporate Corporate and Agency RMBS Subdivision ABS CMBS Government --------- --------- ------------- -------- ----------- ------ ------ ----------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2011: Balance at January 1,.................... $ 1,510 $ 880 $ 34 $ 282 $ 32 $ 321 $ 130 $ 14 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income................. 6 1 -- 1 -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)......... 32 (20) -- (5) -- (6) -- -- Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- OCI.................................... 80 22 -- (9) (8) 8 19 -- Purchases (3)............................ 76 282 -- 16 -- 166 17 -- Sales (3)................................ (175) (515) -- (34) (1) (46) (19) (12) Issuances (3)............................ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3).......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers into Level 3 (4)............... 40 3 -- 1 -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............. (137) (73) (34) (13) -- (223) -- -- -------- -------- ----------- -------- -------- ------ ------ ----------- Balance at December 31,.................. $ 1,432 $ 580 $ -- $ 239 $ 23 $ 220 $ 147 $ 2 ======== ======== =========== ======== ======== ====== ====== =========== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ 6 $ 1 $ -- $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ -- $ (9) $ -- $ (5) $ -- $ (2) $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- 108
N-6201st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 201st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Equity Securities: Net Derivatives: (6) ------------------ ----------------------- Non- redeemable Separate Preferred Common Short-term Interest Equity Net Embedded Account Stock Stock Investments Rate Credit Market Derivatives (7) Assets (8) ---------- ------- ----------- -------- ------- ------ --------------- ---------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2011: Balance at January 1,.................... $ 214 $ 22 $ 173 $ (61) $ 11 $ 12 $ 677 $ 133 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income................. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)......... (24) 2 (1) -- -- -- -- (7) Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- 50 (10) 32 254 -- OCI.................................... 1 (6) -- 199 -- -- -- -- Purchases (3)............................ -- 9 10 -- -- 3 -- 5 Sales (3)................................ (115) (6) (172) -- -- -- -- (1) Issuances (3)............................ -- -- -- -- (1) (4) -- -- Settlements (3).......................... -- -- -- (13) (1) -- 78 -- Transfers into Level 3 (4)............... -- -- -- (1) -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- --------- ------- ---------- ------ ------- ----- ------------ -------- Balance at December 31,.................. $ 76 $ 21 $ 10 $ 174 $ (1) $ 43 $ 1,009 $ 130 ========= ======= ========== ====== ======= ===== ============ ======== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ (3) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 39 $ (10) $ 33 $ 256 $ -- -------- (1)Amortization of premium/accretion of discount is included within net investment income. Impairments charged to net income (loss) on securities are included in net investment gains (losses). Lapses associated with net embedded derivatives are included in net derivative gains (losses). (2)Interest and dividend accruals, as well as cash interest coupons and dividends received, are excluded from the rollforward. (3)Items purchased/issued and then sold/settled in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. Fees attributed to embedded derivatives are included in settlements. (4)Gains and losses, in net income (loss) and OCI, are calculated assuming transfers into and/or out of Level 3 occurred at the beginning of the period. Items transferred into and then out of Level 3 in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. (5)Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) relate to assets and liabilities still held at the end of the respective periods. (6)Freestanding derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward. (7)Embedded derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward. (8)Investment performance related to separate account assets is fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to contractholders within separate account liabilities. Therefore, such changes in estimated fair value are not recorded in net income. For the purpose of this disclosure, these changes are presented within net investment gains (losses). 109
N-6202nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 202nd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Fair Value Option The following table presents information for certain assets and liabilities of CSEs, which are accounted for under the FVO. These assets and liabilities were initially measured at fair value. [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ----------------- 2013 2012 -------- -------- (In millions) Assets: (1) Unpaid principal balance.................................................. $ 1,528 $ 2,539 Difference between estimated fair value and unpaid principal balance...... 70 127 -------- -------- Carrying value at estimated fair value................................... $ 1,598 $ 2,666 ======== ======== Liabilities: (1) Contractual principal balance............................................. $ 1,436 $ 2,444 Difference between estimated fair value and contractual principal balance. 25 115 -------- -------- Carrying value at estimated fair value................................... $ 1,461 $ 2,559 ======== ======== -------- (1)These assets and liabilities are comprised of commercial mortgage loans and long-term debt. Changes in estimated fair value on these assets and liabilities and gains or losses on sales of these assets are recognized in net investment gains (losses). Interest income on commercial mortgage loans held by CSEs -- FVO is recognized in net investment income. Interest expense from long-term debt of CSEs -- FVO is recognized in other expenses. Nonrecurring Fair Value Measurements The following table presents information for assets measured at estimated fair value on a nonrecurring basis during the periods and still held at the reporting dates; that is, they are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis but are subject to fair value adjustments only in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of impairment). The estimated fair values for these assets were determined using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3). [Enlarge/Download Table] At December 31, Years Ended December 31, -------------------------------- -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------ ------- -------- --------- ------- Carrying Value After Measurement Gains (Losses) -------------------------------- -------------------------- (In millions) Mortgage loans, net (1)................. $ 36 $ 65 $ 8 $ (4) $ 4 $ 8 Other limited partnership interests (2). $ 5 $ 6 $ 5 $ (6) $ (3) $ (2) Real estate joint ventures (3).......... $ 1 $ 2 $ -- $ (1) $ (3) $ -- Goodwill (4)............................ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ (66) $ (394) $ -- -------- (1)Estimated fair values for impaired mortgage loans are based on independent broker quotations or valuation models using unobservable inputs or, if the loans are in foreclosure or are otherwise determined to be collateral dependent, are based on the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral or the present value of the expected future cash flows. 110
N-6203rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 203rd
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) (2)For these cost method investments, estimated fair value is determined from information provided in the financial statements of the underlying entities including NAV data. These investments include private equity and debt funds that typically invest primarily in various strategies including domestic and international leveraged buyout funds; power, energy, timber and infrastructure development funds; venture capital funds; and below investment grade debt and mezzanine debt funds. Distributions will be generated from investment gains, from operating income from the underlying investments of the funds and from liquidation of the underlying assets of the funds. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the funds will be liquidated over the next two to 10 years. Unfunded commitments for these investments at both December 31, 2013 and 2012 were not significant. (3)For these cost method investments, estimated fair value is determined from information provided in the financial statements of the underlying entities including NAV data. These investments include several real estate funds that typically invest primarily in commercial real estate. Distributions will be generated from investment gains, from operating income from the underlying investments of the funds and from liquidation of the underlying assets of the funds. It is estimated that the underlying assets of the funds will be liquidated over the next one to 10 years. Unfunded commitments for these investments at both December 31, 2013 and 2012 were not significant. (4)As discussed in Note 10, in 2013, the Company recorded an impairment of goodwill associated with the Retail Life & Other reporting unit. In addition, in 2012, the Company recorded an impairment of goodwill associated with the Retail Annuities reporting unit. These impairments have been categorized as Level 3 due to the significant unobservable inputs used in the determination of the estimated fair value. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Carried at Other Than Fair Value The following tables provide fair value information for financial instruments that are carried on the balance sheet at amounts other than fair value. These tables exclude the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accrued investment income, payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions and those short-term investments that are not securities, such as time deposits, and therefore are not included in the three level hierarchy table disclosed in the "-- Recurring Fair Value Measurements" section. The estimated fair value of the excluded financial instruments, which are primarily classified in Level 2 and, to a lesser extent, in Level 1, approximates carrying value as they are short-term in nature such that the Company believes there is minimal risk of material changes in interest rates or credit quality. All remaining balance sheet amounts excluded from the table below are not considered financial instruments subject to this disclosure. 111
N-6204th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 204th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) The carrying values and estimated fair values for such financial instruments, and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, are summarized as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 -------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ------------------------------------ Carrying Total Estimated Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value --------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------- (In millions) Assets Mortgage loans...................... $ 6,120 $ -- $ -- $ 6,427 $ 6,427 Policy loans........................ $ 1,219 $ -- $ 872 $ 407 $ 1,279 Real estate joint ventures.......... $ 55 $ -- $ -- $ 98 $ 98 Other limited partnership interests. $ 78 $ -- $ -- $ 89 $ 89 Other invested assets............... $ 931 $ -- $ 995 $ -- $ 995 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables........................ $ 5,928 $ -- $ 24 $ 6,282 $ 6,306 Liabilities PABs................................ $ 20,875 $ -- $ -- $ 21,987 $ 21,987 Long-term debt...................... $ 790 $ -- $ 1,009 $ -- $ 1,009 Other liabilities................... $ 258 $ -- $ 96 $ 162 $ 258 Separate account liabilities........ $ 1,448 $ -- $ 1,448 $ -- $ 1,448 December 31, 2012 -------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ------------------------------------ Carrying Total Estimated Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value --------- ----------- ----------- ------------ --------------- (In millions) Assets Mortgage loans...................... $ 6,491 $ -- $ -- $ 7,009 $ 7,009 Policy loans........................ $ 1,216 $ -- $ 861 $ 450 $ 1,311 Real estate joint ventures.......... $ 59 $ -- $ -- $ 101 $ 101 Other limited partnership interests. $ 94 $ -- $ -- $ 103 $ 103 Other invested assets............... $ 432 $ -- $ 548 $ -- $ 548 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables........................ $ 6,015 $ -- $ 86 $ 6,914 $ 7,000 Liabilities PABs................................ $ 22,613 $ -- $ -- $ 24,520 $ 24,520 Long-term debt...................... $ 791 $ -- $ 1,076 $ -- $ 1,076 Other liabilities................... $ 237 $ -- $ 81 $ 156 $ 237 Separate account liabilities........ $ 1,296 $ -- $ 1,296 $ -- $ 1,296 The methods, assumptions and significant valuation techniques and inputs used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are summarized as follows: Mortgage Loans For mortgage loans, estimated fair value is primarily determined by estimating expected future cash flows and discounting them using current interest rates for similar mortgage loans with similar credit risk, or is determined from pricing for similar loans. 112
N-6205th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 205th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) Policy Loans Policy loans with fixed interest rates are classified within Level 3. The estimated fair values for these loans are determined using a discounted cash flow model applied to groups of similar policy loans determined by the nature of the underlying insurance liabilities. Cash flow estimates are developed by applying a weighted-average interest rate to the outstanding principal balance of the respective group of policy loans and an estimated average maturity determined through experience studies of the past performance of policyholder repayment behavior for similar loans. These cash flows are discounted using current risk-free interest rates with no adjustment for borrower credit risk as these loans are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policy. Policy loans with variable interest rates are classified within Level 2 and the estimated fair value approximates carrying value due to the absence of borrower credit risk and the short time period between interest rate resets, which presents minimal risk of a material change in estimated fair value due to changes in market interest rates. Real Estate Joint Ventures and Other Limited Partnership Interests The estimated fair values of these cost method investments are generally based on the Company's share of the NAV as provided in the financial statements of the investees. In certain circumstances, management may adjust the NAV by a premium or discount when it has sufficient evidence to support applying such adjustments. Other Invested Assets These other invested assets are principally comprised of loans to affiliates. The estimated fair value of loans to affiliates is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using market interest rates currently available for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities. Premiums, Reinsurance and Other Receivables Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables are principally comprised of certain amounts recoverable under reinsurance agreements, amounts on deposit with financial institutions to facilitate daily settlements related to certain derivatives and amounts receivable for securities sold but not yet settled. Amounts recoverable under ceded reinsurance agreements, which the Company has determined do not transfer significant risk such that they are accounted for using the deposit method of accounting, have been classified as Level 3. The valuation is based on discounted cash flow methodologies using significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value is determined using interest rates determined to reflect the appropriate credit standing of the assuming counterparty. The amounts on deposit for derivative settlements, classified within Level 2, essentially represent the equivalent of demand deposit balances and amounts due for securities sold are generally received over short periods such that the estimated fair value approximates carrying value. PABs These PABs include investment contracts. Embedded derivatives on investment contracts and certain variable annuity guarantees accounted for as embedded derivatives are excluded from this caption in the preceding tables as they are separately presented in "-- Recurring Fair Value Measurements." 113
N-6206th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 206th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 9. Fair Value (continued) The investment contracts primarily include certain funding agreements, fixed deferred annuities, modified guaranteed annuities, fixed term payout annuities and total control accounts. The valuation of these investment contracts is based on discounted cash flow methodologies using significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value is determined using current market risk-free interest rates adding a spread to reflect the nonperformance risk in the liability. Long-term Debt The estimated fair value of long-term debt is principally determined using market standard valuation methodologies. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active or using matrix pricing that use standard market observable inputs such as quoted prices in markets that are not active and observable yields and spreads in the market. Instruments valued using discounted cash flow methodologies use standard market observable inputs including market yield curve, duration, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues. Other Liabilities Other liabilities consist primarily of interest payable, amounts due for securities purchased but not yet settled and funds withheld amounts payable, which are contractually withheld by the Company in accordance with the terms of the reinsurance agreements. The Company evaluates the specific terms, facts and circumstances of each instrument to determine the appropriate estimated fair values, which are not materially different from the carrying values. Separate Account Liabilities Separate account liabilities represent those balances due to policyholders under contracts that are classified as investment contracts. Separate account liabilities classified as investment contracts primarily represent variable annuities with no significant mortality risk to the Company such that the death benefit is equal to the account balance and certain contracts that provide for benefit funding. Since separate account liabilities are fully funded by cash flows from the separate account assets which are recognized at estimated fair value as described in the section "-- Recurring Fair Value Measurements," the value of those assets approximates the estimated fair value of the related separate account liabilities. The valuation techniques and inputs for separate account liabilities are similar to those described for separate account assets. 10. Goodwill Goodwill is the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be justification for conducting an interim test. Step 1 of the goodwill impairment process requires a comparison of the fair value of a reporting unit to its carrying value. 114
N-6207th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 207th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 10. Goodwill (continued) In performing the Company's goodwill impairment tests, the estimated fair values of the reporting units are first determined using a market multiple valuation approach. When further corroboration is required, the Company uses a discounted cash flow valuation approach. For reporting units which are particularly sensitive to market assumptions, the Company may use additional valuation methodologies to estimate the reporting units' fair values. The market multiple valuation approach utilizes market multiples of companies with similar businesses and the projected operating earnings of the reporting unit. The discounted cash flow valuation approach requires judgments about revenues, operating earnings projections, capital market assumptions and discount rates. The key inputs, judgments and assumptions necessary in determining estimated fair value of the reporting units include projected operating earnings, current book value, the level of economic capital required to support the mix of business, long-term growth rates, comparative market multiples, the account value of in-force business, projections of new and renewal business, as well as margins on such business, the level of interest rates, credit spreads, equity market levels, and the discount rate that the Company believes is appropriate for the respective reporting unit. The valuation methodologies utilized are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management's reasonable expectation regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. Declines in the estimated fair value of the Company's reporting units could result in goodwill impairments in future periods which could materially adversely affect the Company's results of operations or financial position. During the 2013 annual goodwill impairment tests, the market multiple and discounted cash flow valuation techniques indicated that the fair value of the Retail Life & Other reporting unit was below its carrying value. Due to these results, an actuarial appraisal, which estimates the net worth of the reporting unit, the value of existing business and the value of new business, was also performed. This appraisal also resulted in a fair value of the Retail Life & Other reporting unit that was less than the carrying value, indicating a potential for goodwill impairment. An increase in required reserves on universal life products with secondary guarantees, together with modifications to financial reinsurance treaty terms, was reflected in the fair value estimate. In addition, decreased future sales assumptions reflected in the valuation were driven by the discontinuance of certain sales of universal life products with secondary guarantees by the Company. Accordingly, the Company performed Step 2 of the goodwill impairment process, which compares the implied fair value of goodwill with the carrying value of that goodwill in the reporting unit to calculate the amount of goodwill impairment. The Company determined that all of the recorded goodwill associated with the Retail Life & Other reporting unit was not recoverable and recorded a non-cash charge of $66 million ($57 million, net of income tax) for the impairment of the entire goodwill balance in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2013. The full amount was impaired at MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. In addition, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test of its Corporate Benefit Funding reporting unit using a market multiple valuation approach and concluded that the fair value of such reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value and, therefore, goodwill was not impaired. 115
N-6208th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 208th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 10. Goodwill (continued) Information regarding goodwill by segment, as well as Corporate & Other, was as follows: [Download Table] Corporate Benefit Corporate Retail Funding & Other (1) Total -------- --------- ----------- -------- (In millions) Balance at January 1, 2012 Goodwill..................... $ 241 $ 307 $ 405 $ 953 Accumulated impairment....... -- -- -- -- -------- ------ -------- -------- Total goodwill, net......... $ 241 $ 307 $ 405 $ 953 Impairments (2).............. (218) -- (176) (394) Balance at December 31, 2012 Goodwill..................... $ 241 $ 307 $ 405 $ 953 Accumulated impairment....... (218) -- (176) (394) -------- ------ -------- -------- Total goodwill, net......... $ 23 $ 307 $ 229 $ 559 Impairments (23) -- (43) (66) Balance at December 31, 2013. Goodwill..................... $ 241 $ 307 $ 405 $ 953 Accumulated impairment....... (241) -- (219) (460) -------- ------ -------- -------- Total goodwill, net......... $ -- $ 307 $ 186 $ 493 ======== ====== ======== ======== -------- (1)For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, the $229 million of net goodwill in Corporate & Other at December 31, 2012, which resulted from goodwill acquired as part of the 2005 Travelers acquisition, was allocated to business units of the Retail and Corporate Benefit Funding segments in the amounts of $43 million and $186 million, respectively. As reflected in the table, the $43 million related to the Retail segment was impaired for the year ended December 31, 2013. (2)In connection with its annual goodwill impairment testing, the Company determined that all of the recorded goodwill associated with the Retail Annuities reporting unit was not recoverable and recorded a non-cash charge of $394 million ($147 million, net of income tax) for the impairment of the entire goodwill balance in the consolidated statements of operations for the year ended December 31, 2012. Of this amount, $327 million ($80 million, net of income tax) was impaired at MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. 11. Debt Long-term debt outstanding was as follows: [Download Table] December 31, Interest ----------------- Rate Maturity 2013 2012 -------- -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Surplus notes -- affiliated........ 8.60% 2038 $ 750 $ 750 Long-term debt -- unaffiliated (1). 7.03% 2030 40 41 -------- -------- Total long-term debt (2).......... $ 790 $ 791 ======== ======== -------- (1)Principal and interest is paid quarterly. 116
N-6209th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 209th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 11. Debt (continued) (2)Excludes $1.5 billion and $2.6 billion of long-term debt relating to CSEs at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Note 7. The aggregate maturities of long-term debt at December 31, 2013 are $1 million in each of 2014, 2015, 2016, and 2017, $2 million in 2018 and $784 million thereafter. Interest expense related to the Company's indebtedness included in other expenses was $68 million, $68 million and $67 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Payments of interest and principal on the surplus notes, which are subordinate to all other obligations at the operating company level, may be made only with the prior approval of the insurance department of the state of domicile. 12. Equity Return of Capital During the year ended December 31, 2011, Sino-US MetLife Insurance Company Limited ("Sino"), an insurance underwriting joint venture of the Company accounted for under the equity method, merged with United MetLife Insurance Company Limited ("United"), another insurance underwriting joint venture of an affiliate of the Company. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's ownership interest in the merged entity, Sino-US United MetLife Insurance Company Limited ("Sino-United") was determined based on its contributed capital and share of undistributed earnings of Sino compared to the contributed capital and undistributed earnings of all other investees of Sino and United. Since both of the joint ventures were under common ownership both prior to and subsequent to the merger, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's investment in Sino-United is based on the carrying value of its investment in Sino. Pursuant to the merger, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut entered into an agreement to pay the affiliate an amount based on the relative fair values of their respective investments in Sino-United. Accordingly, upon completion of the estimation of fair value, $47 million, representing a return of capital, was paid during the year ended December 31, 2011. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's investment in Sino-United is accounted for under the equity method and is included in other invested assets. Common Stock The Company has 40,000,000 authorized shares of common stock, 34,595,317 shares of which were outstanding at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Of such outstanding shares, 30,000,000 shares are owned directly by MetLife and the remaining shares are owned by MetLife Investors Group, Inc. Statutory Equity and Income Each U.S. insurance company's state of domicile imposes risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements that were developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC"). Regulatory compliance is determined by a ratio of a company's total adjusted capital, calculated in the manner prescribed by the NAIC ("TAC") to its authorized control level RBC, calculated in the manner prescribed by the NAIC ("ACL RBC"). Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are classified within certain levels, each of which requires 117
N-6210th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 210th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 12. Equity (continued) specified corrective action. The minimum level of TAC before corrective action commences is twice ACL RBC. The RBC ratio for MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its U.S. insurance subsidiary, MLI-USA, were in excess of 400% for all periods presented. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its insurance subsidiaries prepare statutory-basis financial statements in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance department of the state of domicile or applicable foreign jurisdiction. The NAIC has adopted the Codification of Statutory Accounting Principles ("Statutory Codification"). Statutory Codification is intended to standardize regulatory accounting and reporting to state insurance departments. However, statutory accounting principles continue to be established by individual state laws and permitted practices. Modifications by the various state insurance departments may impact the effect of Statutory Codification on the statutory capital and surplus of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MLI-USA. Statutory accounting principles differ from GAAP primarily by charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing future policy benefit liabilities using different actuarial assumptions, reporting surplus notes as surplus instead of debt, reporting of reinsurance agreements and valuing securities on a different basis. In addition, certain assets are not admitted under statutory accounting principles and are charged directly to surplus. The most significant assets not admitted by the Company are net deferred income tax assets resulting from temporary differences between statutory accounting principles basis and tax basis not expected to reverse and become recoverable within three years. Statutory net income (loss) of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, a Connecticut domiciled insurer, was $790 million, $848 million and $46 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus was $4.8 billion and $5.3 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. All such amounts are derived from the statutory-basis financial statements as filed with the Connecticut Insurance Department. Statutory net income (loss) of MLI-USA, a Delaware domiciled insurer, was $209 million, $84 million and $178 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus was $1.9 billion and $1.7 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. All such amounts are derived from the statutory-basis financial statements as filed with the Delaware Department of Insurance. As of December 31, 2013, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's sole foreign insurance subsidiary, MetLife Assurance Limited ("MAL") was regulated by authorities in the United Kingdom and was subject to minimum capital and solvency requirements before corrective action commences. The required capital and surplus was $165 million and the actual regulatory capital and surplus was $573 million as of the date of the most recent capital adequacy calculation for the jurisdiction. MAL exceeded these minimum capital and solvency requirements for all other periods presented. See Note 17 for additional information on MAL. Dividend Restrictions Under Connecticut State Insurance Law, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay stockholder dividends to its stockholders as long as the amount of such dividends, when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months, does not exceed the greater 118
N-6211th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 211th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 12. Equity (continued) of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut will be permitted to pay a dividend in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of its declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Connecticut Commissioner of Insurance (the "Connecticut Commissioner") and the Connecticut Commissioner either approves the distribution of the dividend or does not disapprove the payment within 30 days after notice. In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (defined as "unassigned funds (surplus)" reduced by 25% of unrealized appreciation in value or revaluation of assets or unrealized profits on investments) as of the last filed annual statutory statement requires insurance regulatory approval. Under Connecticut State Insurance Law, the Connecticut Commissioner has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its stockholders. During the year ended December 31, 2013, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut paid a dividend to its stockholders in the amount of $1.0 billion. During the year ended December 31, 2012, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut paid total dividends of $706 million. During June 2012, the Company distributed all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of MetLife Europe to its stockholders as an in-kind extraordinary dividend of $202 million, as calculated on a statutory basis. Regulatory approval for this extraordinary dividend was obtained due to the timing of payment. During December 2012, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut paid a dividend to its stockholders in the amount of $504 million, which represented its ordinary dividend capacity at year-end 2012. Due to the June 2012 in -kind dividend, a portion of this was extraordinary and regulatory approval was obtained. During the years ended December 31, 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut paid a dividend of $517 million. Based on amounts at December 31, 2013, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut could pay a stockholder dividend in 2014 of $1.0 billion without prior approval of the Connecticut Commissioner. Under Delaware State Insurance Law, MLI-USA is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay a stockholder dividend to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut as long as the amount of the dividend when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months does not exceed the greater of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its net statutory gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year (excluding realized capital gains). MLI-USA will be permitted to pay a dividend to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of the declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Delaware Commissioner of Insurance (the "Delaware Commissioner") and the Delaware Commissioner either approves the distribution of the dividend or does not disapprove the distribution within 30 days of its filing. In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (defined as "unassigned funds (surplus)") as of the immediately preceding calendar year requires insurance regulatory approval. Under Delaware State Insurance Law, the Delaware Commissioner has broad discretion in determining whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its stockholders. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, MLI-USA did not pay dividends to MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. Because MLI-USA's statutory unassigned funds were negative at December 31, 2013, MLI-USA cannot pay any dividends in 2014 without prior regulatory approval. 119
N-6212th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 212th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 12. Equity (continued) Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Information regarding changes in the balances of each component of AOCI, net of income tax, was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Unrealized Foreign Investment Gains Unrealized Currency (Losses), Net of Gains (Losses) Translation Related Offsets (1) on Derivatives Adjustments Total ------------------- -------------- ----------- ---------- (In millions) Balance at December 31, 2010................... $ 412 $ (70) $ (125) $ 217 OCI before reclassifications................... 2,118 356 (16) 2,458 Income tax expense (benefit)................... (747) (125) 2 (870) -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax......................................... 1,783 161 (139) 1,805 Amounts reclassified from AOCI................. (44) (9) -- (53) Income tax expense (benefit)................... 16 3 -- 19 -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax......................................... (28) (6) -- (34) -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2011................... 1,755 155 (139) 1,771 OCI before reclassifications................... 945 7 88 1,040 Income tax expense (benefit)................... (350) (1) 2 (349) -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax......................................... 2,350 161 (49) 2,462 Amounts reclassified from AOCI................. (95) (3) -- (98) Income tax expense (benefit)................... 35 1 -- 36 -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax......................................... (60) (2) -- (62) -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2012................... 2,290 159 (49) 2,400 OCI before reclassifications................... (2,039) (193) 28 (2,204) Income tax expense (benefit)................... 671 68 (2) 737 -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax......................................... 922 34 (23) 933 Amounts reclassified from AOCI................. (55) (11) -- (66) Income tax expense (benefit)................... 18 4 -- 22 -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax......................................... (37) (7) -- (44) -------------- ----------- ---------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2013................... $ 885 $ 27 $ (23) $ 889 ============== =========== ========== ========== -------- (1)See Note 7 for information on offsets to investments related to insurance liabilities and DAC and VOBA. 120
N-6213th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 213th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 12. Equity (continued) Information regarding amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI, was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Statement of Operations and AOCI Components Amounts Reclassified from AOCI Comprehensive Income (Loss) Location -------------------------------------------- ----------------------------- ------------------------------------ Years Ended December 31, ----------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 --------- --------- --------- (In millions) Net unrealized investment gains (losses): Net unrealized investment gains (losses).................................... $ 48 $ 98 $ 14 Other net investment gains (losses) Net unrealized investment gains (losses).................................... 16 6 25 Net investment income Net unrealized investment gains (losses).................................... 2 (12) 10 Net derivative gains (losses) OTTI......................................... (11) 3 (5) OTTI on fixed maturity securities --------- --------- --------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses), before income tax............... 55 95 44 Income tax (expense) benefit............... (18) (35) (16) --------- --------- --------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of income tax............... $ 37 $ 60 $ 28 ========= ========= ========= Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives - cash flow hedges: Interest rate swaps.......................... -- -- 1 Net derivative gains (losses) Interest rate forwards....................... 9 1 9 Net derivative gains (losses) Interest rate forwards....................... 1 1 -- Net investment income Foreign currency swaps....................... -- 1 (2) Net derivative gains (losses) Credit forwards.............................. -- -- 1 Net derivative gains (losses) Credit forwards.............................. 1 -- -- Net investment income --------- --------- --------- Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, before income tax......................... 11 3 9 Income tax (expense) benefit............... (4) (1) (3) --------- --------- --------- Gains (losses) on cash flow hedges, net of income tax............................. $ 7 $ 2 $ 6 ========= ========= ========= Total reclassifications, net of income tax..... $ 44 $ 62 $ 34 ========= ========= ========= 121
N-6214th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 214th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 13. Other Expenses Information on other expenses was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- ---------- (In millions) Compensation..................................... $ 352 $ 402 $ 357 Commissions...................................... 639 939 1,418 Volume-related costs............................. 138 159 196 Affiliated interest costs on ceded reinsurance... 212 271 271 Capitalization of DAC............................ (504) (886) (1,365) Amortization of DAC and VOBA..................... 50 1,035 1,159 Interest expense on debt and debt issuance costs. 190 231 389 Premium taxes, licenses and fees................. 57 63 75 Professional services............................ 41 25 50 Rent and related expenses........................ 31 37 29 Other............................................ 453 444 402 -------- -------- ---------- Total other expenses............................ $ 1,659 $ 2,720 $ 2,981 ======== ======== ========== Capitalization of DAC and Amortization of DAC and VOBA See Note 5 for additional information on DAC and VOBA including impacts of capitalization and amortization. Interest Expense on Debt and Debt Issuance Costs Interest expense on debt and debt issuance costs includes interest expense on debt (see Note 11) and interest expense related to CSEs (see Note 7). Affiliated Expenses Commissions, capitalization of DAC and amortization of DAC include the impact of affiliated reinsurance transactions. See Notes 6, 11 and 16 for discussion of affiliated expenses included in the table above. 122
N-6215th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 215th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 14. Income Tax The provision for income tax from continuing operations was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------ -------- -------- (In millions) Current: Federal................................................... $ (41) $ (235) $ (157) Foreign................................................... 8 (10) (5) ------ -------- -------- Subtotal................................................ (33) (245) (162) ------ -------- -------- Deferred: Federal................................................... 242 598 613 Foreign................................................... 18 19 42 ------ -------- -------- Subtotal................................................ 260 617 655 ------ -------- -------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit)............ $ 227 $ 372 $ 493 ====== ======== ======== The Company's income (loss) from continuing operations before income tax expense (benefit) from domestic and foreign operations were as follows: Years Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------ -------- -------- (In millions) Income (loss) from continuing operations: Domestic.................................................. $ 869 $ 1,492 $ 1,545 Foreign................................................... 78 (2) 122 ------ -------- -------- Total................................................... $ 947 $ 1,490 $ 1,667 ====== ======== ======== The reconciliation of the income tax provision at the U.S. statutory rate to the provision for income tax as reported for continuing operations was as follows: Years Ended December 31, --------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------ -------- -------- (In millions) Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate....................... $ 331 $ 522 $ 583 Tax effect of: Dividend received deduction............................... (81) (70) (69) Tax-exempt income......................................... -- (1) (2) Prior year tax............................................ (4) 3 (9) Tax credits............................................... (10) (8) (11) Foreign tax rate differential............................. (2) 13 (1) Change in valuation allowance............................. -- 22 (2) Goodwill impairment....................................... 13 (109) -- Sale of subsidiary........................................ (24) -- -- Other, net................................................ 4 -- 4 ------ -------- -------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit).............. $ 227 $ 372 $ 493 ====== ======== ======== 123
N-6216th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 216th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 14. Income Tax (continued) Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ----------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------- ------------------ (In millions) Deferred income tax assets: Policyholder liabilities and receivables.................. $ 1,282 $ 883 Net operating loss carryforwards.......................... 22 32 Employee benefits......................................... -- 3 Tax credit carryforwards.................................. 125 92 Other..................................................... 7 35 ---------------- ------------------ Total gross deferred income tax assets.................. 1,436 1,045 Less: Valuation allowance................................. -- 25 ---------------- ------------------ Total net deferred income tax assets.................... 1,436 1,020 ---------------- ------------------ Deferred income tax liabilities: Investments, including derivatives........................ 651 258 Net unrealized investment gains........................... 575 1,336 DAC and VOBA.............................................. 1,543 1,281 Other..................................................... 52 15 ---------------- ------------------ Total deferred income tax liabilities................... 2,821 2,890 ---------------- ------------------ Net deferred income tax asset (liability)............. $ (1,385) $ (1,870) ================ ================== The following table sets forth the domestic net operating carryforwards for tax purposes at December 31, 2013: Net Operating Loss Carryforwards ----------------------------------------------------- Amount Expiration ---------------- ------------------ (In millions) Domestic................................................... $ 64 Beginning in 2028 Tax credit carryforwards of $125 million at December 31, 2013 will expire beginning in 2015. Pursuant to Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") rules, the Company was excluded from MetLife's life/non-life consolidated federal tax return for the five years subsequent to MetLife's July 2005 acquisition of the Company. In 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries joined the consolidated return and became a party to the MetLife tax sharing agreement. Prior to 2011, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut filed a consolidated tax return with its includable subsidiaries. Non-includable subsidiaries filed either separate individual corporate tax returns or separate consolidated tax returns. The Company participates in a tax sharing agreement with MetLife, as described in Note 1. Pursuant to this tax sharing agreement, the amounts due from affiliates included $194 million, $135 million, and $151 million at December 31, 2013, 2012, and 2011, respectively. 124
N-6217th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 217th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 14. Income Tax (continued) The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. federal government and various state and local jurisdictions, as well as foreign jurisdictions. The Company is under continuous examination by the IRS and other tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the Company has significant business operations. The income tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations in major taxing jurisdictions for years prior to 2005. In 2012, the Company and the IRS completed and settled substantially all the issues identified in the audit years of 2005 and 2006. The issues not settled are under review at the IRS Appeals Division. The Company's liability for unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the next 12 months. A reasonable estimate of the increase or decrease cannot be made at this time. However, the Company continues to believe that the ultimate resolution of the pending issues will not result in a material change to its consolidated financial statements, although the resolution of income tax matters could impact the Company's effective tax rate for a particular future period. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, --------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------- --------- --------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,.................................................... $ (1) $ 29 $ 38 Additions for tax positions of prior years............................... 25 46 -- Reductions for tax positions of prior years.............................. (1) (76) (3) Additions for tax positions of current year.............................. 1 9 2 Reductions for tax positions of current year............................. (1) (9) (8) ------- --------- --------- Balance at December 31,.................................................. $23 $ (1) $ 29 ======= ========= ========= Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized would impact the effective rate................................................................... $ 23 $ (1) $ (3) ======= ========= ========= The Company classifies interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, included within other expenses, while penalties are included in income tax expense. Interest was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------ ------- (In millions) Interest recognized in the consolidated statements of operations. $ 1 $ (9) $ -- December 31, ---------------- 2013 2012 ------ ------- (In millions) Interest included in other liabilities in the consolidated balance sheets $ 1 $ -- The Company had no penalties for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. 125
N-6218th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 218th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 14. Income Tax (continued) The U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS have indicated that they intend to address through regulations the methodology to be followed in determining the dividends received deduction ("DRD"), related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The DRD reduces the amount of dividend income subject to tax and is a significant component of the difference between the actual tax expense and expected amount determined using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other interested parties will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing and substance of any such regulations are unknown at this time. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $92 million and $70 million, respectively, related to the separate account DRD. The 2013 benefit included a benefit of $11 million related to a true-up of the 2012 tax return. The 2012 benefit included an expense of less than $1 million related to a true-up of the 2011 tax return. 15. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees Contingencies Litigation The Company is a defendant in a number of litigation matters. In some of the matters, large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Modern pleading practice in the U.S. permits considerable variation in the assertion of monetary damages or other relief. Jurisdictions may permit claimants not to specify the monetary damages sought or may permit claimants to state only that the amount sought is sufficient to invoke the jurisdiction of the trial court. In addition, jurisdictions may permit plaintiffs to allege monetary damages in amounts well exceeding reasonably possible verdicts in the jurisdiction for similar matters. This variability in pleadings, together with the actual experience of the Company in litigating or resolving through settlement numerous claims over an extended period of time, demonstrates to management that the monetary relief which may be specified in a lawsuit or claim bears little relevance to its merits or disposition value. Due to the vagaries of litigation, the outcome of a litigation matter and the amount or range of potential loss at particular points in time may normally be difficult to ascertain. Uncertainties can include how fact finders will evaluate documentary evidence and the credibility and effectiveness of witness testimony, and how trial and appellate courts will apply the law in the context of the pleadings or evidence presented, whether by motion practice, or at trial or on appeal. Disposition valuations are also subject to the uncertainty of how opposing parties and their counsel will themselves view the relevant evidence and applicable law. The Company establishes liabilities for litigation and regulatory loss contingencies when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Liabilities have been established for some of the matters below. It is possible that some of the matters could require the Company to pay damages or make other expenditures or establish accruals in amounts that could not be estimated at December 31, 2013. 126
N-6219th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 219th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 15. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (continued) Matters as to Which an Estimate Can Be Made For some of the matters discussed below, the Company is able to estimate a reasonably possible range of loss. For such matters where a loss is believed to be reasonably possible, but not probable, no accrual has been made. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate range of reasonably possible losses in excess of amounts accrued for these matters was not material for the Company. Matters as to Which an Estimate Cannot Be Made For other matters disclosed below, the Company is not currently able to estimate the reasonably possible loss or range of loss. The Company is often unable to estimate the possible loss or range of loss until developments in such matters have provided sufficient information to support an assessment of the range of possible loss, such as quantification of a damage demand from plaintiffs, discovery from other parties and investigation of factual allegations, rulings by the court on motions or appeals, analysis by experts, and the progress of settlement negotiations. On a quarterly and annual basis, the Company reviews relevant information with respect to litigation contingencies and updates its accruals, disclosures and estimates of reasonably possible losses or ranges of loss based on such reviews. Unclaimed Property Inquiries In April 2012, MetLife, for itself and on behalf of entities including MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, reached agreements with representatives of the U.S. jurisdictions that were conducting audits of MetLife and certain of its affiliates for compliance with unclaimed property laws, and with state insurance regulators directly involved in a multistate targeted market conduct examination relating to claim-payment practices and compliance with unclaimed property laws. On December 28, 2012, the West Virginia Treasurer filed an action (West Virginia ex rel. John D. Perdue v. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, Circuit Court of Putnam County) alleging that the Company violated the West Virginia Uniform Unclaimed Property Act, seeking to compel compliance with the Act, and seeking payment of unclaimed property, interest, and penalties. On November 14, 2012, the Treasurer filed a substantially identical suit against MLI-USA. On December 30, 2013, the court granted defendants' motions to dismiss all of the West Virginia Treasurer's actions. The Treasurer has filed a notice to appeal the dismissal order. At least one other jurisdiction is pursuing a similar market conduct examination. It is possible that other jurisdictions may pursue similar examinations, audits, or lawsuits and that such actions may result in additional payments to beneficiaries, additional escheatment of funds deemed abandoned under state laws, administrative penalties, interest, and/or further changes to the Company's procedures. The Company is not currently able to estimate these additional possible costs. Sales Practices Claims Over the past several years, the Company has faced claims and regulatory inquires and investigations, alleging improper marketing or sales of individual life insurance policies, annuities, mutual funds or other products. The Company continues to vigorously defend against the claims in these matters. The Company believes adequate provision has been made in its consolidated financial statements for all probable and reasonably estimable losses for sales practices matters. 127
N-6220th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 220th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 15. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (continued) Summary Various litigation, claims and assessments against the Company, in addition to those discussed previously and those otherwise provided for in the Company's consolidated financial statements, have arisen in the course of the Company's business, including, but not limited to, in connection with its activities as an insurer, employer, investor, investment advisor and taxpayer. Further, state insurance regulatory authorities and other federal and state authorities regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning the Company's compliance with applicable insurance and other laws and regulations. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of all pending investigations and legal proceedings. In some of the matters referred to previously, large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Although, in light of these considerations it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain cases could have a material effect upon the Company's financial position, based on information currently known by the Company's management, in its opinion, the outcomes of such pending investigations and legal proceedings are not likely to have such an effect. However, given the large and/or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material effect on the Company's consolidated net income or cash flows in particular quarterly or annual periods. Insolvency Assessments Most of the jurisdictions in which the Company is admitted to transact business require insurers doing business within the jurisdiction to participate in guaranty associations, which are organized to pay contractual benefits owed pursuant to insurance policies issued by impaired, insolvent or failed insurers. These associations levy assessments, up to prescribed limits, on all member insurers in a particular state on the basis of the proportionate share of the premiums written by member insurers in the lines of business in which the impaired, insolvent or failed insurer engaged. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. Assets and liabilities held for insolvency assessments were as follows: [Download Table] December 31, --------------- 2013 2012 ------- ------- (In millions) Other Assets: Premium tax offset for future undiscounted assessments....... $ 10 $ 19 Premium tax offsets currently available for paid assessments. 10 2 ------- ------- $ 20 $ 21 ======= ======= Other Liabilities: Insolvency assessments....................................... $ 14 $ 37 ======= ======= On September 1, 2011, the Department of Financial Services filed a liquidation plan for Executive Life Insurance Company of New York ("ELNY"), which had been under rehabilitation by the Liquidation Bureau since 1991. The plan involves the satisfaction of insurers' financial obligations under a number of state life and health insurance guaranty associations and also provides additional industry support for certain ELNY policyholders. 128
N-6221st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 221st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements -- (Continued) 15. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (continued) Commitments Commitments to Fund Partnership Investments The Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. The amounts of these unfunded commitments were $956 million and $1.0 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company anticipates that these amounts will be invested in partnerships over the next five years. Mortgage Loan Commitments The Company commits to lend funds under mortgage loan commitments. The amounts of these mortgage loan commitments were $147 million and $181 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Commitments to Fund Bank Credit Facilities and Private Corporate Bond Investments The Company commits to lend funds under bank credit facilities and private corporate bond investments. The amounts of these unfunded commitments were $57 million and $144 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Other Commitments The Company has entered into collateral arrangements with affiliates, which require the transfer of collateral in connection with secured demand notes. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had agreed to fund up to $61 million and $86 million, respectively, of cash upon the request by these affiliates and had transferred collateral consisting of various securities with a fair market value of $74 million and $106 million, respectively, to custody accounts to secure the demand notes. Each of these affiliates is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral. See Note 7 "-- Related Party Investment Transactions" for additional other commitments. Guarantees In the normal course of its business, the Company has provided certain indemnities, guarantees and commitments to third parties such that it may be required to make payments now or in the future. In the context of acquisition, disposition, investment and other transactions, the Company has provided indemnities and guarantees, including those related to tax, environmental and other specific liabilities and other indemnities and guarantees that are triggered by, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by the Company. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company provides indemnifications to counterparties in contracts with triggers similar to the foregoing, as well as for certain other liabilities, such as third-party lawsuits. These obligations are often subject to time limitations that vary in duration, including contractual limitations and those that arise by operation of law, such as applicable statutes of limitation. The maximum potential obligation under the indemnities and guarantees is subject to a contractual limitation, ranging from $36 million to $233 million, with a cumulative maximum of $269 million, in the case of MetLife International Insurance Company, Ltd. ("MLII"), a former affiliate, discussed below. In other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable. Since certain of these obligations are not subject to limitations, the 129
N-6222nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 222nd
15. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (continued) Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount that could become due under these guarantees in the future. Management believes that it is unlikely the Company will have to make any material payments under these indemnities, guarantees, or commitments. The Company has provided a guarantee on behalf of MLII that is triggered if MLII cannot pay claims because of insolvency, liquidation or rehabilitation. Life insurance coverage in-force, representing the maximum potential obligation under this guarantee, was $233 million and $235 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company does not hold any collateral related to this guarantee, but has a recorded liability of $1 million that was based on the total account value of the guaranteed policies plus the amounts retained per policy at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The remainder of the risk was ceded to external reinsurers. In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors and officers as provided in its charters and by-laws. Also, the Company indemnifies its agents for liabilities incurred as a result of their representation of the Company's interests. Since these indemnities are generally not subject to limitation with respect to duration or amount, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount that could become due under these indemnities in the future. 16. Related Party Transactions Service Agreements The Company has entered into various agreements with affiliates for services necessary to conduct its activities. Typical services provided under these agreements include management, policy administrative functions, personnel, investment advice and distribution services. For certain agreements, charges are based on various performance measures or activity-based costing. The bases for such charges are modified and adjusted by management when necessary or appropriate to reflect fairly and equitably the actual incidence of cost incurred by the Company and/or affiliate. Expenses incurred with affiliates related to these agreements, recorded in other expenses, were $1.6 billion, $1.7 billion and $1.9 billion for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenues received from affiliates related to these agreements, recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees, were $209 million, $179 million and $145 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenues received from affiliates related to these agreements, recorded in other revenues, were $186 million, $166 million and $136 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company had net payables to affiliates, related to the items discussed above, of $210 million and $109 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Notes 6, 7 and 11 for additional information on related party transactions. 17. Subsequent Events Equity In August 2014, in anticipation of the Mergers, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut redeemed and retired the 4,595,317 shares of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut's common stock owned by MetLife Investors Group, LLC for $1.4 billion; all of the outstanding shares of common stock of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut are now directly held by MetLife, Inc. MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut does not expect to pay a dividend in 2014. 130
N-6223rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 223rd
17. Subsequent Events (continued) In August 2014, following the common stock redemption, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut received a capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. of $231 million. Disposition In May 2014, the Company completed the sale of its wholly-owned subsidiary, MAL, for $702 million ((Pounds)418 million) in net cash consideration. As a result of the sale, a loss of $608 million ($436 million, net of income tax) was recorded, which includes a reduction to goodwill of $112 million ($94 million, net of income tax). The loss on the sale was increased by net income from MAL of $77 million through the date of sale. Following the adoption of new guidance effective January 1, 2014, MAL's results of operations have been included in continuing operations in subsequent quarterly filings. They were historically included in the Corporate Benefit Funding segment. 131
N-6224th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 224th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule I Consolidated Summary of Investments -- Other Than Investments in Related Parties December 31, 2013 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Amount at Cost or Estimated Fair Which Shown on Types of Investments Amortized Cost (1) Value Balance Sheet -------------------- ------------------ -------------- -------------- Fixed maturity securities: Bonds: U.S. Treasury and agency securities........ $ 8,188 $ 8,294 $ 8,294 Public utilities........................... 3,966 4,275 4,275 State and political subdivision securities. 2,147 2,224 2,224 Foreign government securities.............. 1,038 1,122 1,122 All other corporate bonds.................. 19,512 20,478 20,478 --------------- ----------- ------------- Total bonds.............................. 34,851 36,393 36,393 Mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities.. 8,214 8,393 8,393 Redeemable preferred stock................... 412 466 466 --------------- ----------- ------------- Total fixed maturity securities........ 43,477 45,252 45,252 --------------- ----------- ------------- Equity securities: Common stock: Industrial, miscellaneous and all other...... 161 201 201 Non-redeemable preferred stock............... 236 217 217 --------------- ----------- ------------- Total equity securities.................. 397 418 418 --------------- ----------- ------------- Mortgage loans, net.................... 7,718 7,718 Policy loans.................................. 1,219 1,219 Real estate and real estate joint ventures.... 754 754 Other limited partnership interests........... 2,130 2,130 Short-term investments........................ 2,107 2,107 Other invested assets......................... 2,555 2,555 --------------- ------------- Total investments..................... $ 60,357 $ 62,153 =============== ============= -------- (1)Cost or amortized cost for fixed maturity securities and mortgage loans represents original cost reduced by repayments, valuation allowances and impairments from other-than-temporary declines in estimated fair value that are charged to earnings and adjusted for amortization of premiums or discounts; for equity securities, cost represents original cost reduced by impairments from other-than-temporary declines in estimated fair value; for real estate, cost represents original cost reduced by impairments and adjusted for valuation allowances and depreciation; for real estate joint ventures and other limited partnership interests cost represents original cost reduced for other-than-temporary impairments or original cost adjusted for equity in earnings and distributions. 132
N-6225th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 225th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule II Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only) December 31, 2013 and 2012 (In millions, except share and per share data) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 - --------- Condensed Balance Sheets Assets Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $28,548 and $32,018, respectively)............................................................................................... $ 29,690 Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (cost: $284 and $273, respectively)............ 319 Mortgage loans (net of valuation allowances of $19 and $22, respectively).................................... 4,224 Policy loans................................................................................................. 1,068 Real estate and real estate joint ventures................................................................... 419 Other limited partnership interests.......................................................................... 1,318 Short-term investments, principally at estimated fair value.................................................. 1,512 Investment in subsidiaries................................................................................... 6,099 Loans to subsidiaries........................................................................................ 680 Other invested assets, principally at estimated fair value................................................... 1,139 --------- Total investments........................................................................................... 46,468 Cash and cash equivalents, principally at estimated fair value................................................. 417 Accrued investment income...................................................................................... 287 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.................................................................... 7,195 Receivables from subsidiaries.................................................................................. 858 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired............................................... 1,011 Current income tax recoverable................................................................................. 88 Goodwill....................................................................................................... 493 Other assets................................................................................................... 132 Separate account assets........................................................................................ 16,036 --------- Total assets................................................................................................ $ 72,985 ========= Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Liabilities Future policy benefits......................................................................................... $ 19,099 Policyholder account balances.................................................................................. 22,387 Other policy-related balances.................................................................................. 246 Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions......................................... 4,811 Long-term debt -- affiliated................................................................................... 750 Current income tax payable..................................................................................... -- Deferred income tax liability.................................................................................. 16 Other liabilities.............................................................................................. 852 Separate account liabilities................................................................................... 16,036 --------- Total liabilities........................................................................................... 64,197 --------- Stockholders' Equity Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 34,595,317 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012..................................................................... 86 Additional paid-in capital..................................................................................... 6,737 Retained earnings.............................................................................................. 1,076 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).................................................................. 889 --------- Total stockholders' equity.................................................................................. 8,788 --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................................................................. $ 72,985 ========= [Enlarge/Download Table] 2012 - --------- Condensed Balance Sheets Assets Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $28,548 and $32,018, respectively)............................................................................................... $ 35,152 Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (cost: $284 and $273, respectively)............ 277 Mortgage loans (net of valuation allowances of $19 and $22, respectively).................................... 4,703 Policy loans................................................................................................. 1,086 Real estate and real estate joint ventures................................................................... 371 Other limited partnership interests.......................................................................... 1,181 Short-term investments, principally at estimated fair value.................................................. 1,833 Investment in subsidiaries................................................................................... 6,641 Loans to subsidiaries........................................................................................ 305 Other invested assets, principally at estimated fair value................................................... 1,682 --------- Total investments........................................................................................... 53,231 Cash and cash equivalents, principally at estimated fair value................................................. 553 Accrued investment income...................................................................................... 316 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.................................................................... 7,003 Receivables from subsidiaries.................................................................................. 833 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired............................................... 789 Current income tax recoverable................................................................................. -- Goodwill....................................................................................................... 558 Other assets................................................................................................... 140 Separate account assets........................................................................................ 15,238 --------- Total assets................................................................................................ $ 78,661 ========= Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity Liabilities Future policy benefits......................................................................................... $ 19,632 Policyholder account balances.................................................................................. 24,039 Other policy-related balances.................................................................................. 872 Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions......................................... 6,477 Long-term debt -- affiliated................................................................................... 750 Current income tax payable..................................................................................... 3 Deferred income tax liability.................................................................................. 266 Other liabilities.............................................................................................. 824 Separate account liabilities................................................................................... 15,238 --------- Total liabilities........................................................................................... 68,101 --------- Stockholders' Equity Common stock, par value $2.50 per share; 40,000,000 shares authorized; 34,595,317 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013 and 2012..................................................................... 86 Additional paid-in capital..................................................................................... 6,718 Retained earnings.............................................................................................. 1,356 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss).................................................................. 2,400 --------- Total stockholders' equity.................................................................................. 10,560 --------- Total liabilities and stockholders' equity.................................................................. $ 78,661 ========= See accompanying notes to the condensed financial information. 133
N-6226th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 226th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule II Condensed Financial Information -- (Continued) (Parent Company Only) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 --------- --------- --------- Condensed Statements of Operations Revenues Premiums............................................................. $ 181 $ 144 $ 148 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees............... 645 662 632 Net investment income................................................ 1,797 1,854 1,943 Equity in earnings of subsidiaries................................... 287 773 574 Other revenues....................................................... 147 151 154 Net investment gains (losses)........................................ 54 20 14 Net derivative gains (losses)........................................ (105) (140) 241 --------- --------- --------- Total revenues...................................................... 3,006 3,464 3,706 --------- --------- --------- Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims..................................... 916 797 755 Interest credited to policyholder account balances................... 618 666 710 Goodwill impairment.................................................. 66 327 -- Other expenses....................................................... 499 576 772 --------- --------- --------- Total expenses...................................................... 2,099 2,366 2,237 --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) from continuing operations before provision for income tax................................................................ 907 1,098 1,469 Provision for income tax expense (benefit)........................... 187 (20) 295 --------- --------- --------- Income (loss) from continuing operations, net of income tax.......... 720 1,118 1,174 Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of income tax........ -- 8 -- --------- --------- --------- Net income (loss).................................................... $ 720 $ 1,126 $ 1,174 ========= ========= ========= Comprehensive income (loss).......................................... $ (791) $ 1,755 $ 2,728 ========= ========= ========= See accompanying notes to the condensed financial information. 134
N-6227th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 227th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule II Condensed Financial Information -- (Continued) (Parent Company Only) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ---------- --------- Condensed Statements of Cash Flows Cash flows from operating activities Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities...................... $ 957 $ 1,184 $ 886 Cash flows from investing activities Sales, maturities, and repayments of: Fixed maturity securities.............................................. 14,647 10,714 13,921 Equity securities...................................................... 56 46 163 Mortgage loans......................................................... 1,154 845 552 Real estate and real estate joint ventures............................. 58 47 12 Other limited partnership interests.................................... 102 154 159 Purchases of: Fixed maturity securities.............................................. (11,000) (10,729) (11,658) Equity securities...................................................... (51) (27) (22) Mortgage loans......................................................... (648) (428) (946) Real estate and real estate joint ventures............................. (129) (77) (83) Other limited partnership interests.................................... (192) (179) (214) Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives................ 73 362 375 Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives.................... (644) (322) (453) Dividends from subsidiaries.............................................. 25 -- -- Returns of capital from subsidiaries..................................... 52 84 49 Capital contributions to subsidiaries.................................... (3) (166) (422) Issuances of loans to affiliates......................................... (375) -- (305) Net change in policy loans............................................... 18 15 26 Net change in short-term investments..................................... 321 (251) (487) Net change in other invested assets...................................... (39) (50) (16) ------------ ---------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities........................ 3,425 38 651 ------------ ---------- --------- Cash flows from financing activities Policyholder account balances: Deposits............................................................... 12,156 11,577 14,151 Withdrawals............................................................ (13,987) (12,298) (15,754) Net change in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions............................................................ (1,666) 102 (482) Financing element on certain derivative instruments...................... (21) 75 127 Return of capital........................................................ -- -- (47) Dividends on common stock................................................ (1,000) (504) (517) ------------ ---------- --------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities........................ (4,518) (1,048) (2,522) ------------ ---------- --------- Change in cash and cash equivalents........................................ (136) 174 (985) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year............................... 553 379 1,364 ------------ ---------- --------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year..................................... $ 417 $ 553 $ 379 ============ ========== ========= Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Net cash paid (received) for: Interest............................................................... $ 64 $ 64 $ 64 ============ ========== ========= Income tax............................................................. $ 120 $ (194) $ (66) ============ ========== ========= Non-cash transactions: Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc................................. $ 19 $ 45 $ -- ============ ========== ========= Returns of capital from subsidiaries................................... $ -- $ 202 $ -- ============ ========== ========= Capital contributions to subsidiaries.................................. $ 16 $ 31 $ -- ============ ========== ========= See accompanying notes to the condensed financial information. 135
N-6228th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 228th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule II Notes to the Condensed Financial Information (Parent Company Only) 1. Basis of Presentation The condensed financial information of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (the "Parent Company") should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and its subsidiaries and the notes thereto. These condensed unconsolidated financial statements reflect the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the Parent Company. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method of accounting. The preparation of these condensed unconsolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to adopt accounting policies and make certain estimates and assumptions. The most important of these estimates and assumptions relate to the fair value measurements, the accounting for goodwill and identifiable intangible assets and the provision for potential losses that may arise from litigation and regulatory proceedings and tax audits, which may affect the amounts reported in the condensed unconsolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from these estimates. 2. Support Agreement The Parent Company has entered into a net worth maintenance agreement with its indirect subsidiary, MetLife Assurance Limited ("MAL"), a United Kingdom company. Under the agreement, the Parent Company agreed, without limitation as to amount, to cause MAL to have capital and surplus equal to the greater of (a) (Pounds)50 million, (b) such amount that will be sufficient to provide solvency cover equal to 175% of MAL's capital resources requirement as defined by applicable law and regulation as required by the Financial Services Authority of the United Kingdom (the "FSA") or any successor body, or (c) such amount that will be sufficient to provide solvency cover equal to 125% of MAL's individual capital guidance as defined by applicable law and regulation as required by the FSA or any successor body. As described in Note 17 of the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements, a subsidiary of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut reached an agreement to sell MAL to a third party. Upon the close of such sale, the Parent Company's obligations under this net worth maintenance agreement will terminate. 136
N-6229th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 229th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule III Consolidated Supplementary Insurance Information December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Future Policy Benefits DAC and Other Policyholder and Policy-Related Account Unearned Unearned Segment VOBA Balances Balances Premiums (1), (2) Revenue (1) -------------------------- -------- ---------------------- ------------ ----------------- ----------- 2013 Retail.................... $ 4,698 $ 10,345 $ 25,499 $ 9 $ 156 Corporate Benefit Funding. 6 14,270 7,952 -- 2 Corporate & Other......... 26 6,540 2 4 -- -------- ---------------- --------- ------------- -------- Total.................... $ 4,730 $ 31,155 $ 33,453 $ 13 $ 158 ======== ================ ========= ============= ======== 2012 Retail.................... $ 3,738 $ 9,355 $ 28,287 $ 9 $ 158 Corporate Benefit Funding. 8 15,078 8,688 -- 2 Corporate & Other......... -- 6,288 1 4 -- -------- ---------------- --------- ------------- -------- Total.................... $ 3,746 $ 30,721 $ 36,976 $ 13 $ 160 ======== ================ ========= ============= ======== 2011 Retail.................... $ 4,080 $ 7,915 $ 30,001 $ 7 $ 184 Corporate Benefit Funding. 13 14,042 8,375 -- 2 Corporate & Other......... 128 6,515 3,699 5 72 -------- ---------------- --------- ------------- -------- Total.................... $ 4,221 $ 28,472 $ 42,075 $ 12 $ 258 ======== ================ ========= ============= ======== -------- (1)Amounts are included within the future policy benefits and other policy-related balances column. (2)Includes premiums received in advance. 137
N-6230th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 230th
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule III Consolidated Supplementary Insurance Information -- (Continued) December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Policyholder Benefits and Premium Claims and Amortization of Revenue Net Interest Credited DAC and VOBA Other and Policy Investment to Policyholder Charged to Operating Segment Charges Income Account Balances Other Expenses Expenses (1) -------------------------- ---------- ---------- ----------------- --------------- ------------ 2013 Retail.................... $ 2,688 $ 1,515 $ 1,875 $ 44 $ 1,341 Corporate Benefit Funding. 219 1,108 855 5 34 Corporate & Other......... 35 229 14 1 234 -------- -------- ------------ ----------- --------- Total.................... $ 2,942 $ 2,852 $ 2,744 $ 50 $ 1,609 ======== ======== ============ =========== ========= 2012 Retail.................... $ 2,716 $ 1,434 $ 2,031 $ 1,023 $ 1,381 Corporate Benefit Funding. 658 1,111 1,318 10 36 Corporate & Other......... 148 407 187 2 268 -------- -------- ------------ ----------- --------- Total.................... $ 3,522 $ 2,952 $ 3,536 $ 1,035 $ 1,685 ======== ======== ============ =========== ========= 2011 Retail.................... $ 2,596 $ 1,360 $ 1,984 $ 1,149 $ 1,268 Corporate Benefit Funding. 1,105 1,142 1,763 4 36 Corporate & Other......... 83 572 102 6 518 -------- -------- ------------ ----------- --------- Total.................... $ 3,784 $ 3,074 $ 3,849 $ 1,159 $ 1,822 ======== ======== ============ =========== ========= -------- (1)Includes other expenses, excluding amortization of deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC") and value of business acquired ("VOBA") charged to other expenses. 138
N-6231st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 231st
MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Schedule IV Consolidated Reinsurance December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] % Amount Gross Amount Ceded Assumed Net Amount Assumed to Net ------------ ---------- -------- ---------- -------------- 2013 Life insurance in-force....... $ 466,650 $ 424,836 $ 7,273 $ 49,087 14.8% ========== ========== ======== ========= Insurance premium Life insurance................ $ 1,327 $ 737 $ 10 $ 600 1.7% Accident and health insurance. 234 228 -- 6 -- ---------- ---------- -------- --------- Total insurance premium...... $ 1,561 $ 965 $ 10 $ 606 1.7% ========== ========== ======== ========= 2012 Life insurance in-force....... $ 428,803 $ 391,045 $ 7,750 $ 45,508 17.0% ========== ========== ======== ========= Insurance premium Life insurance................ $ 1,815 $ 572 $ 11 $ 1,254 0.9% Accident and health insurance. 248 241 -- 7 -- ---------- ---------- -------- --------- Total insurance premium...... $ 2,063 $ 813 $ 11 $ 1,261 0.9% ========== ========== ======== ========= 2011 Life insurance in-force....... $ 378,153 $ 340,477 $ 8,085 $ 45,761 17.7% ========== ========== ======== ========= Insurance premium Life insurance................ $ 2,180 $ 366 $ 7 $ 1,821 0.4% Accident and health insurance. 249 242 -- 7 -- ---------- ---------- -------- --------- Total insurance premium...... $ 2,429 $ 608 $ 7 $ 1,828 0.4% ========== ========== ======== ========= For the year ended December 31, 2013, reinsurance ceded and assumed included affiliated transactions for life insurance in-force of $269.9 billion and $7.3 billion, respectively, and life insurance premiums of $638 million and $ 10 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2012, reinsurance ceded and assumed included affiliated transactions for life insurance in-force of $237.2 billion and $7.8 billion, respectively, and life insurance premiums of $478 million and $11 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2011, reinsurance ceded and assumed included affiliated transactions for life insurance in-force of $195.2 billion and $8.1 billion, respectively, and life insurance premiums of $286 million and $ 7 million, respectively. 139
N-6232nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 232nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company Financial Statements As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 and for the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 and Independent Auditors' Report
N-6233rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 233rd
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of MetLife Investors Insurance Company: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of MetLife Investors Insurance Company (a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) (the "Company"), which comprise the balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements. Management's Responsibility for the Financial Statements Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. Auditors' Responsibility Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. Opinion In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MetLife Investors Insurance Company as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013 in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Other Matter Results of the Company may not be indicative of those of a stand-alone entity, as the Company is a member of a controlled group of affiliated companies. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Certified Public Accountants Tampa, Florida March 31, 2014 1
N-6234th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 234th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Balance Sheets December 31, 2013 and 2012 (In millions, except share and per share data) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 ----------- ----------- Assets Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $2,200 and $2,178, respectively).......................................... $ 2,250 $ 2,320 Equity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (cost: $46 and $48, respectively)................................................................... 45 45 Mortgage loans (net of valuation allowances of $1 and $2, respectively)........... 286 284 Policy loans...................................................................... 27 27 Other limited partnership interests............................................... 32 23 Short-term investments, at estimated fair value................................... 75 139 Other invested assets............................................................. 68 93 ----------- ----------- Total investments............................................................... 2,783 2,931 Cash and cash equivalents.......................................................... 24 27 Accrued investment income.......................................................... 26 28 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables........................................ 1,829 2,485 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired................... 291 148 Current income tax recoverable..................................................... 9 9 Other assets....................................................................... 110 115 Separate account assets............................................................ 12,033 11,072 ----------- ----------- Total assets.................................................................... $ 17,105 $ 16,815 =========== =========== Liabilities and Stockholder's Equity Liabilities Future policy benefits............................................................. $ 501 $ 482 Policyholder account balances...................................................... 2,748 3,077 Other policy-related balances...................................................... 102 102 Payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions............. 266 238 Deferred income tax liability...................................................... 192 326 Other liabilities.................................................................. 94 78 Separate account liabilities....................................................... 12,033 11,072 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities............................................................... 15,936 15,375 ----------- ----------- Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (Note 11) Stockholder's Equity Common stock, par value $2 per share; 5,000,000 shares authorized; 2,899,446 shares issued and outstanding......................................... 6 6 Additional paid-in capital........................................................ 636 636 Retained earnings................................................................. 504 722 Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)..................................... 23 76 ----------- ----------- Total stockholder's equity...................................................... 1,169 1,440 ----------- ----------- Total liabilities and stockholder's equity...................................... $ 17,105 $ 16,815 =========== =========== See accompanying notes to the financial statements. 2
N-6235th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 235th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Statements of Operations For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ---------- -------- -------- Revenues Premiums......................................................... $ 29 $ 11 $ 7 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees........... 202 198 204 Net investment income............................................ 114 113 114 Fees on ceded reinsurance and other.............................. 90 93 104 Net investment gains (losses): Other-than-temporary impairments on fixed maturity securities.. -- (2) -- Other net investment gains (losses)............................ 1 (2) (5) ---------- -------- -------- Total net investment gains (losses)........................... 1 (4) (5) Net derivative gains (losses).................................. (442) 329 326 ---------- -------- -------- Total revenues.............................................. (6) 740 750 ---------- -------- -------- Expenses Policyholder benefits and claims................................. 48 100 59 Interest credited to policyholder account balances............... 113 118 127 Other expenses................................................... (11) 229 259 ---------- -------- -------- Total expenses.............................................. 150 447 445 ---------- -------- -------- Income (loss) before provision for income tax.................... (156) 293 305 Provision for income tax expense (benefit)....................... (67) 94 90 ---------- -------- -------- Net income (loss)................................................ $ (89) $ 199 $ 215 ========== ======== ======== See accompanying notes to the financial statements. 3
N-6236th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 236th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss) For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ---------- -------- -------- Net income (loss).................................................... $ (89) $ 199 $ 215 Other comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized investment gains (losses), net of related offsets........ (80) 64 23 Unrealized gains (losses) on derivatives............................ (2) (1) -- ---------- -------- -------- Other comprehensive income (loss), before income tax................. (82) 63 23 Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)...................................................... 29 (22) (8) ---------- -------- -------- Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax................. (53) 41 15 ---------- -------- -------- Comprehensive income (loss).......................................... $ (142) $ 240 $ 230 ========== ======== ======== See accompanying notes to the financial statements. 4
N-6237th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 237th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Statements of Stockholder's Equity For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) ---------------------- Net Unrealized Additional Investment Other-Than- Total Common Paid-in Retained Gains Temporary Stockholder's Stock Capital Earnings (Losses) Impairments Equity ------ ---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance at December 31, 2010.......................... $6 $636 $ 326 $ 24 $(4) $ 988 Net income (loss)..................................... 215 215 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax.. 16 (1) 15 ------ ---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance at December 31, 2011.......................... 6 636 541 40 (5) 1,218 Dividend on common stock.............................. (18) (18) Net income (loss)..................................... 199 199 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax.. 39 2 41 ------ ---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance at December 31, 2012.......................... 6 636 722 79 (3) 1,440 Dividend on common stock.............................. (129) (129) Net income (loss)..................................... (89) (89) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax.. (54) 1 (53) ------ ---------- -------- ---------- ----------- ------------- Balance at December 31, 2013.......................... $6 $636 $ 504 $ 25 $(2) $1,169 ====== ========== ======== ========== =========== ============= See accompanying notes to the financial statements. 5
N-6238th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 238th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Statements of Cash Flows For the Years Ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 (In millions) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ---------- ------------ ---------- Cash flows from operating activities Net income (loss)................................. $ (89) $ 199 $ 215 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Depreciation and amortization expenses........... 2 2 2 Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts associated with investments, net..... 3 (3) (5) (Gains) losses on investments and derivatives, net............................................ 437 (321) (329) (Income) loss from equity method investments, net of dividends or distributions.............. (4) (1) -- Interest credited to policyholder account balances....................................... 113 118 127 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.................................... (202) (198) (204) Change in accrued investment income.............. 2 1 (4) Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.................................... 71 74 (6) Change in deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired, net................ (135) 130 139 Change in income tax............................. (105) 68 91 Change in other assets........................... 194 193 200 Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances........................ 19 94 34 Change in other liabilities...................... 10 (12) 14 ---------- ------------ ---------- Net cash provided by operating activities......... 316 344 274 ---------- ------------ ---------- Cash flows from investing activities Sales, maturities and repayments of: Fixed maturity securities........................ 794 909 696 Equity securities................................ 2 6 5 Mortgage loans................................... 47 13 3 Other limited partnership interests.............. 1 1 4 Purchases of: Fixed maturity securities........................ (808) (958) (840) Equity securities................................ -- (13) (13) Mortgage loans................................... (49) (72) (98) Other limited partnership interests.............. (5) (15) (2) Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives...................................... 1 5 1 Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives...................................... (12) (1) -- Issuances of loans to affiliates.................. -- -- (45) Net change in policy loans........................ (1) (1) 1 Net change in short-term investments.............. 64 (70) (12) ---------- ------------ ---------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities....................................... 34 (196) (300) ---------- ------------ ---------- Cash flows from financing activities Policyholder account balances: Deposits......................................... 632 1,077 725 Withdrawals...................................... (882) (1,155) (732) Net change in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions......... 28 (87) 46 Dividend on common stock.......................... (129) (18) -- Other, net........................................ (2) 18 -- ---------- ------------ ---------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities....................................... (353) (165) 39 ---------- ------------ ---------- Change in cash and cash equivalents............... (3) (17) 13 Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year...... 27 44 31 ---------- ------------ ---------- Cash and cash equivalents, end of year............ $ 24 $ 27 $ 44 ========== ============ ========== Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: Net cash paid (received) for: Income tax....................................... $ 34 $ 27 $ (1) ========== ============ ========== See accompanying notes to the financial statements. 6
N-6239th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 239th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies Business MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MLIIC"), a Missouri domiciled life insurance company (the "Company") is a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. ("MetLife"). The Company markets, administers and insures a broad range of term life, universal life and variable and fixed annuity products to individuals. The Company is licensed to conduct business in 49 states and the District of Columbia. Most of the policies issued present no significant mortality or longevity risk to the Company, but rather represent investment deposits by the policyholders. In the second quarter of 2013, MetLife, Inc. announced its plans to merge three U.S.-based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company (the "Mergers"). The companies to be merged consist of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut ("MICC"), MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company ("MLI-USA") and MLIIC, each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. ("Exeter"), a reinsurance company that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products. MICC, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving entity. Exeter, formerly a Cayman Islands company, was re-domesticated to Delaware in October 2013. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. Basis of Presentation The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. In applying these policies and estimates, management makes subjective and complex judgments that frequently require assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services industries; others are specific to the Company's business and operations. Actual results could differ from estimates. Since the Company is a member of a controlled group of affiliated companies, its results may not be indicative of those of a stand-alone entity. Separate Accounts Separate accounts are established in conformity with insurance laws and are generally not chargeable with liabilities that arise from any other business of the Company. Separate account assets are subject to general account claims only to the extent the value of such assets exceeds the separate account liabilities. The Company reports separately, as assets and liabilities, investments held in separate accounts and liabilities of the separate accounts if: . such separate accounts are legally recognized; . assets supporting the contract liabilities are legally insulated from the Company's general account liabilities; . investments are directed by the contractholder; and 7
N-6240th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 240th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) . all investment performance, net of contract fees and assessments, is passed through to the contractholder. The Company reports separate account assets at their fair value, which is based on the estimated fair values of the underlying assets comprising the individual separate account portfolios. Investment performance (including investment income, net investment gains (losses) and changes in unrealized gains (losses)) and the corresponding amounts credited to contractholders of such separate accounts are offset within the same line in the statements of operations. The Company's revenues reflect fees charged to the separate accounts, including mortality charges, risk charges, policy administration fees, investment management fees and surrender charges. Such fees are included in universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the statements of operations. Reclassifications Certain amounts in the prior years' financial statements and related footnotes thereto have been reclassified to conform with the current year presentation as discussed throughout the Notes to the Financial Statements. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The following are the Company's significant accounting policies with references to notes providing additional information on such policies and critical accounting estimates relating to such policies. [Enlarge/Download Table] Accounting Policy Note -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Insurance 2 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles 3 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Reinsurance 4 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Investments 5 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Derivatives 6 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Value 7 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Income Tax 10 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Litigation Contingencies 11 Insurance Future Policy Benefit Liabilities and Policyholder Account Balances The Company establishes liabilities for amounts payable under insurance policies. Generally, amounts are payable over an extended period of time and related liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be paid reduced by the present value of future expected premiums. Such liabilities are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with GAAP and applicable actuarial 8
N-6241st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 241st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) standards. Principal assumptions used in the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits are mortality, policy lapse, renewal, investment returns, inflation, expenses and other contingent events as appropriate to the respective product type. These assumptions are established at the time the policy is issued and are intended to estimate the experience for the period the policy benefits are payable. Utilizing these assumptions, liabilities are established on a block of business basis. For long duration insurance contracts, assumptions such as mortality and interest rates are "locked in" upon the issuance of new business. However, significant adverse changes in experience on such contracts may require the establishment of premium deficiency reserves. Such reserves are determined based on the then current assumptions and do not include a provision for adverse deviation. The Company regularly reviews its estimates of liabilities for future policy benefits and compares them with its actual experience. Differences result in changes to the liability balances with related charges or credits to benefit expenses in the period in which the changes occur. Policyholder account balances ("PABs") relate to contract or contract features where the Company has no significant insurance risk. The Company issues certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits that provide the policyholder a minimum return based on their initial deposit (i.e., the benefit base) less withdrawals. These guarantees are accounted for as insurance liabilities or as embedded derivatives depending on how and when the benefit is paid. Specifically, a guarantee is accounted for as an embedded derivative if a guarantee is paid without requiring (i) the occurrence of specific insurable event, or (ii) the policyholder to annuitize. Alternatively, a guarantee is accounted for as an insurance liability if the guarantee is paid only upon either (i) the occurrence of a specific insurable event, or (ii) annuitization. In certain cases, a guarantee may have elements of both an insurance liability and an embedded derivative and in such cases the guarantee is split and accounted for under both models. Guarantees accounted for as insurance liabilities in future policy benefits include guaranteed minimum death benefits ("GMDBs"), the portion of guaranteed minimum income benefits ("GMIBs") that require annuitization, and the life-contingent portion of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits ("GMWBs"). Guarantees accounted for as embedded derivatives in PABs include the non life-contingent portion of GMWBs, guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits ("GMABs") and the portion of GMIBs that do not require annuitization. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent "excess" fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Other Policy-Related Balances Other policy-related balances include policy and contract claims and unearned revenue liabilities. The liability for policy and contract claims generally relates to incurred but not reported death claims, as well as claims which have been reported but not yet settled. The liability for these claims is based on the Company's estimated ultimate cost of settling all claims. The Company derives estimates for the development 9
N-6242nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 242nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) of incurred but not reported claims principally from analyses of historical patterns of claims by business line. The methods used to determine these estimates are continually reviewed. Adjustments resulting from this continuous review process and differences between estimates and payments for claims are recognized in policyholder benefits and claims expense in the period in which the estimates are changed or payments are made. The unearned revenue liability relates to universal life-type and investment-type products and represents policy charges for services to be provided in future periods. The charges are deferred as unearned revenue and amortized using the product's estimated gross profits, similar to deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC") as discussed further herein. Such amortization is recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Recognition of Insurance Revenues and Deposits Premiums related to traditional life and annuity policies with life contingencies are recognized as revenues when due from policyholders. Policyholder benefits and expenses are provided to recognize profits over the estimated lives of the insurance policies. When premiums are due over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided, any excess profit is deferred and recognized into earnings in a constant relationship to insurance in-force or, for annuities, the amount of expected future policy benefit payments. Deposits related to universal life-type and investment-type products are credited to PABs. Revenues from such contracts consist of fees for mortality, policy administration and surrender charges and are recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees in the period in which services are provided. Amounts that are charged to earnings include interest credited and benefit claims incurred in excess of related PABs. Premiums, policy fees, policyholder benefits and expenses are presented net of reinsurance. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles The Company incurs significant costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal insurance business. Costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition or renewal of insurance contracts are capitalized as DAC. Such costs include: . incremental direct costs of contract acquisition, such as commissions; . the portion of an employee's total compensation and benefits related to time spent selling, underwriting or processing the issuance of new and renewal insurance business only with respect to actual policies acquired or renewed; and . other essential direct costs that would not have been incurred had a policy not been acquired or renewed. All other acquisition-related costs, including those related to general advertising and solicitation, market research, agent training, product development, unsuccessful sales and underwriting efforts, as well as all indirect costs, are expensed as incurred. 10
N-6243rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 243rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Value of business acquired ("VOBA") is an intangible asset resulting from a business combination that represents the excess of book value over the estimated fair value of acquired insurance, annuity, and investment-type contracts in-force at the acquisition date. The estimated fair value of the acquired liabilities is based on projections, by each block of business, of future policy and contract charges, premiums, mortality, separate account performance, surrenders, operating expenses, investment returns, nonperformance risk adjustment and other factors. Actual experience on the purchased business may vary from these projections. DAC and VOBA are amortized as follows: Products: In proportion to the following over estimated lives of the contracts: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Fixed and variable universal life Actual and expected future gross contracts profits. . Fixed and variable deferred annuity contracts See Note 3 for additional information on DAC and VOBA amortization. The recovery of DAC and VOBA is dependent upon the future profitability of the related business. DAC and VOBA are aggregated in the financial statements for reporting purposes. The Company generally has two different types of sales inducements which are included in other assets: (i) the policyholder receives a bonus whereby the policyholder's initial account balance is increased by an amount equal to a specified percentage of the customer's deposit; and (ii) the policyholder receives a higher interest rate using a dollar cost averaging method than would have been received based on the normal general account interest rate credited. The Company defers sales inducements and amortizes them over the life of the policy using the same methodology and assumptions used to amortize DAC. The amortization of sales inducements is included in policyholder benefits and claims. Each year, or more frequently if circumstances indicate a potential recoverability issue exists, the Company reviews deferred sales inducements to determine the recoverability of the asset. Reinsurance For each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge the Company's obligations as the primary insurer. The Company reviews all contractual features, including those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the reinsurer is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims. For reinsurance of existing in-force blocks of long-duration contracts that transfer significant insurance risk, the difference, if any, between the amounts paid, and the liabilities ceded related to the underlying contracts is considered the net cost of reinsurance at the inception of the reinsurance agreement. The net cost of reinsurance is recorded as an adjustment to DAC when there is a gain at inception on the ceding entity and to other liabilities when there is a loss at inception. The net cost of reinsurance is recognized as a component of other expenses when there is a gain at inception and as policyholder benefits and claims when there is a loss and is subsequently amortized on a basis consistent with the methodology used for amortizing the DAC related to the 11
N-6244th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 244th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) underlying reinsured contracts. Subsequent amounts paid on the reinsurance of in-force blocks, as well as amounts paid related to new business, are recorded as ceded premiums and ceded premiums, reinsurance and other receivables are established. Amounts currently recoverable under reinsurance agreements are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and amounts currently payable are included in other liabilities. Assets and liabilities relating to reinsurance agreements with the same reinsurer may be recorded net on the balance sheet, if a right of offset exists within the reinsurance agreement. In the event that reinsurers do not meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, reinsurance recoverable balances could become uncollectible. In such instances, reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance. Premiums, fees and policyholder benefits and claims are net of reinsurance ceded. Amounts received from reinsurers for policy administration are reported in fees on ceded reinsurance and other. With respect to GMIBs, a portion of the directly written GMIBs are accounted for as insurance liabilities, but the associated reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives. These embedded derivatives are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company determines that a reinsurance agreement does not expose the reinsurer to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk, the Company records the agreement using the deposit method of accounting. Deposits received are included in other liabilities and deposits made are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. As amounts are paid or received, consistent with the underlying contracts, the deposit assets or liabilities are adjusted. Interest on such deposits is recorded as fees on ceded reinsurance and other or other expenses, as appropriate. Periodically, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the expected payments or recoveries and adjusts the deposit asset or liability through fees on ceded reinsurance and other or other expenses, as appropriate. Investments Net Investment Income and Net Investment Gains (Losses) Income on investments is reported within net investment income, unless otherwise stated herein. Gains and losses on sales of investments, impairment losses and changes in valuation allowances are reported within net investment gains (losses). Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities The Company's fixed maturity and equity securities are classified as available-for-sale ("AFS") and are reported at their estimated fair value. Unrealized investment gains and losses on these securities are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"), net of policyholder-related amounts and deferred income taxes. All security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Investment gains and losses on sales are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income on fixed maturity securities is recognized when earned using an effective yield method giving effect to amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Prepayment fees are recognized when earned. Dividends on equity securities are recognized when declared. 12
N-6245th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 245th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The Company periodically evaluates fixed maturity and equity securities for impairment. The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on management's case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in estimated fair value, as well as an analysis of the gross unrealized losses by severity and/or age as described in Note 5 "-- Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities." For fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position, an other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") is recognized in earnings when it is anticipated that the amortized cost will not be recovered. When either: (i) the Company has the intent to sell the security; or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the security's amortized cost and estimated fair value. If neither of these conditions exist, the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected is recognized as an OTTI in earnings ("credit loss"). If the estimated fair value is less than the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected, this portion of OTTI related to other-than-credit factors is recorded in OCI. With respect to equity securities, the Company considers in its OTTI analysis its intent and ability to hold a particular equity security for a period of time sufficient to allow for the recovery of its estimated fair value to an amount equal to or greater than cost. If a sale decision is made for an equity security and recovery to an amount at least equal to cost prior to the sale is not expected, the security will be deemed to be other-than-temporarily impaired in the period that the sale decision was made and an OTTI loss will be recorded in earnings. The OTTI loss recognized is the entire difference between the security's cost and its estimated fair value. Mortgage Loans The Company disaggregates its mortgage loan investments into two portfolio segments: commercial and agricultural. The accounting policies that are applicable to all portfolio segments are presented below and the accounting policies related to each of the portfolio segments are included in Note 5. Mortgage loans are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount, deferred fees or expenses, and are net of valuation allowances. Interest income and prepayment fees are recognized when earned. Interest income is recognized using an effective yield method giving effect to amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Policy Loans Policy loans are stated at unpaid principal balances. Interest income on such loans is recorded as earned using the contractual interest rate. Generally, accrued interest is capitalized on the policy's anniversary date. Valuation allowances are not established for policy loans, as they are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policies. Any unpaid principal or interest on the loan is deducted from the cash surrender value or the death benefit prior to settlement of the insurance policy. Other Limited Partnership Interests The Company uses the equity method of accounting for investments in equity securities when it has significant influence or at least 20% interest and other limited partnership interests ("investees") when it has 13
N-6246th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 246th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) more than a minor ownership interest or more than a minor influence over the investee's operations, but does not have a controlling financial interest. The Company generally recognizes its share of the investee's earnings on a three-month lag in instances where the investee's financial information is not sufficiently timely or when the investee's reporting period differs from the Company's reporting period. The Company uses the cost method of accounting for investments in which it has virtually no influence over the investee's operations. The Company recognizes distributions on cost method investments as earned or received. Because of the nature and structure of these cost method investments, they do not meet the characteristics of an equity security in accordance with applicable accounting standards. The Company routinely evaluates its equity method and cost method investments for impairment. For equity method investees, the Company considers financial and other information provided by the investee, other known information and inherent risks in the underlying investments, as well as future capital commitments, in determining whether an impairment has occurred. The Company considers its cost method investments for impairment when the carrying value of such investments exceeds the net asset value ("NAV"). The Company takes into consideration the severity and duration of this excess when determining whether the cost method investment is impaired. Short-term Investments Short-term investments include securities and other investments with remaining maturities of one year or less, but greater than three months, at the time of purchase and are stated at estimated fair value or amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. Other Invested Assets Other invested assets consist principally of the following: . Loans to affiliates are stated at unpaid principal balance, adjusted for any unamortized premium or discount. . Freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values are described in "--Derivatives" below. Securities Lending Program Securities lending transactions, whereby blocks of securities are loaned to third parties, primarily brokerage firms and commercial banks, are treated as financing arrangements and the associated liability is recorded at the amount of cash received. The Company obtains collateral at the inception of the loan, usually cash, in an amount generally equal to 102% of the estimated fair value of the securities loaned, and maintains it at a level greater than or equal to 100% for the duration of the loan. The Company is liable to return to the counterparties the cash collateral received. Security collateral on deposit from counterparties in connection with the securities lending transactions may not be sold or repledged, unless the counterparty is in default, and is not reflected in the financial statements. The Company monitors the estimated fair value of the securities loaned on a daily basis and additional collateral is obtained as necessary. Income and expenses associated with securities lending transactions are reported as investment income and investment expense, respectively, within net investment income. 14
N-6247th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 247th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Derivatives Freestanding Derivatives Freestanding derivatives are carried in the Company's balance sheets either as assets within other invested assets or as liabilities within other liabilities at estimated fair value. The Company does not offset the fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty under the same master netting agreement. Accruals on derivatives are generally recorded in accrued investment income or within other liabilities. However, accruals that are not scheduled to settle within one year are included with the derivatives carrying value in other invested assets or other liabilities. If a derivative is not designated as an accounting hedge or its use in managing risk does not qualify for hedge accounting, changes in the estimated fair value of the derivative are reported in net derivative gains (losses). Hedge Accounting To qualify for hedge accounting, at the inception of the hedging relationship, the Company formally documents its risk management objective and strategy for undertaking the hedging transaction, as well as its designation of the hedge. Hedge designation and financial statement presentation of changes in estimated fair value of the hedging derivatives are as follows: . Fair value hedge (a hedge of the estimated fair value of a recognized asset or liability)--in net derivative gains (losses), consistent with the change in fair value of the hedged item attributable to the designated risk being hedged. . Cash flow hedge (a hedge of a forecasted transaction or of the variability of cash flows to be received or paid related to a recognized asset or liability)--effectiveness in OCI (deferred gains or losses on the derivative are reclassified into the statement of operations when the Company's earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item); ineffectiveness in net derivative gains (losses). The changes in estimated fair values of the hedging derivatives are exclusive of any accruals that are separately reported in the statement of operations within interest income or interest expense to match the location of the hedged item. In its hedge documentation, the Company sets forth how the hedging instrument is expected to hedge the designated risks related to the hedged item and sets forth the method that will be used to retrospectively and prospectively assess the hedging instrument's effectiveness and the method that will be used to measure ineffectiveness. A derivative designated as a hedging instrument must be assessed as being highly effective in offsetting the designated risk of the hedged item. Hedge effectiveness is formally assessed at inception and at least quarterly throughout the life of the designated hedging relationship. Assessments of hedge effectiveness and measurements of ineffectiveness are also subject to interpretation and estimation and different interpretations or estimates may have a material effect on the amount reported in net income. 15
N-6248th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 248th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The Company discontinues hedge accounting prospectively when: (i) it is determined that the derivative is no longer highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (ii) the derivative expires, is sold, terminated, or exercised; (iii) it is no longer probable that the hedged forecasted transaction will occur; or (iv) the derivative is de-designated as a hedging instrument. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is determined that the derivative is not highly effective in offsetting changes in the estimated fair value or cash flows of a hedged item, the derivative continues to be carried in the balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in net derivative gains (losses). The carrying value of the hedged recognized asset or liability under a fair value hedge is no longer adjusted for changes in its estimated fair value due to the hedged risk, and the cumulative adjustment to its carrying value is amortized into income over the remaining life of the hedged item. Provided the hedged forecasted transaction is still probable of occurrence, the changes in estimated fair value of derivatives recorded in OCI related to discontinued cash flow hedges are released into the statements of operations when the Company's earnings are affected by the variability in cash flows of the hedged item. When hedge accounting is discontinued because it is no longer probable that the forecasted transactions will occur on the anticipated date or within two months of that date, the derivative continues to be carried in the balance sheets at its estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized currently in net derivative gains (losses). Deferred gains and losses of a derivative recorded in OCI pursuant to the discontinued cash flow hedge of a forecasted transaction that is no longer probable are recognized immediately in net derivative gains (losses). In all other situations in which hedge accounting is discontinued, the derivative is carried at its estimated fair value in the balance sheets, with changes in its estimated fair value recognized in the current period as net derivative gains (losses). Embedded Derivatives The Company sells variable annuities and issues certain insurance products and investment contracts and is a party to certain reinsurance agreements that have embedded derivatives. The Company assesses each identified embedded derivative to determine whether it is required to be bifurcated. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a freestanding derivative if: . the combined instrument is not accounted for in its entirety at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings; . the terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and . a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would qualify as a derivative instrument. Such embedded derivatives are carried in the balance sheets at estimated fair value with the host contract and changes in their estimated fair value are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company is unable to properly identify and measure an embedded derivative for separation from its host contract, the entire contract is carried on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income. Additionally, the 16
N-6249th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 249th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Company may elect to carry an entire contract on the balance sheet at estimated fair value, with changes in estimated fair value recognized in the current period in net investment gains (losses) or net investment income if that contract contains an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent "excess" fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Fair Value Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In most cases, the exit price and the transaction (or entry) price will be the same at initial recognition. Subsequent to initial recognition, fair values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. When such quoted prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities, or other observable inputs. If these inputs are not available, or observable inputs are not determinable, unobservable inputs and/or adjustments to observable inputs requiring management judgment are used to determine the estimated fair value of assets and liabilities. Goodwill Goodwill, which is included in other assets, is the excess of cost over the estimated fair value of net assets acquired which represents the future economic benefits arising from such net assets acquired that could not be individually identified. Goodwill is not amortized but is tested for impairment at least annually or more frequently if events or circumstances, such as adverse changes in the business climate, indicate that there may be justification for conducting an interim test. The Company performs its annual goodwill impairment testing during the third quarter of each year based upon data as of the close of the second quarter. Goodwill associated with a business acquisition is not tested for impairment during the year the business is acquired unless there is a significant identified impairment event. Impairment testing is performed using the fair value approach, which requires the use of estimates and judgment, at the "reporting unit" level. A reporting unit is the operating segment or a business one level below the operating segment, if discrete financial information is prepared and regularly reviewed by management at that level. Management has concluded that the Company has one reporting unit. For purposes of goodwill impairment testing, if the carrying value of a reporting unit exceeds its estimated fair value, there may be an indication of impairment. In such instances, the implied fair value of the goodwill is determined in the same manner as the amount of goodwill that would be determined in a business combination. The excess of the carrying value of goodwill over the implied fair value of goodwill would be recognized as an impairment and recorded as a charge against net income. In performing the Company's goodwill impairment test, the estimated fair value of the reporting unit is determined using a market multiple approach. When further corroboration is required, the Company uses a discounted cash flow approach. The Company may use additional valuation methodologies when appropriate. 17
N-6250th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 250th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) The key inputs, judgments and assumptions necessary in determining estimated fair value of the reporting unit include projected operating earnings, current book value, the level of economic capital required to support the mix of business, long-term growth rates, comparative market multiples, the account value of in-force business, projections of new and renewal business, as well as margins on such business, the level of interest rates, credit spreads, equity market levels, and the discount rate that the Company believes is appropriate for the reporting unit. The Company applies significant judgment when determining the estimated fair value of its reporting unit. The valuation methodologies utilized are subject to key judgments and assumptions that are sensitive to change. Estimates of fair value are inherently uncertain and represent only management's reasonable expectation regarding future developments. These estimates and the judgments and assumptions upon which the estimates are based will, in all likelihood, differ in some respects from actual future results. Declines in the estimated fair value of the Company's reporting unit could result in goodwill impairments in future periods which could adversely affect the Company's results of operations or financial position. In 2013, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test using the market multiple valuation approach. The analysis results indicated that the fair value of the reporting unit was in excess of its carrying value and, therefore, goodwill was not impaired. On an ongoing basis, the Company evaluates potential triggering events that may affect the estimated fair value of the Company's reporting unit to assess whether any goodwill impairment exists. Deteriorating or adverse market conditions may have an impact on the estimated fair value and could result in future impairments of goodwill. The Company has no accumulated goodwill impairment as of December 31, 2013. Goodwill was $33 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Income Tax The Company joined with MetLife and its includable subsidiaries in filing a consolidated U.S. life and non-life federal income tax return in accordance with the provisions of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. Current taxes (and the benefits of tax attributes such as losses) are allocated to the Company under the consolidated tax return regulations and a tax sharing agreement. Under the consolidated tax return regulations, MetLife has elected the "percentage method" (and 100 percent under such method) of reimbursing companies for tax attributes such as losses. As a result, 100 percent of tax attributes such as losses are reimbursed by MetLife to the extent that consolidated federal income tax of the consolidated federal tax return group is reduced in a year by tax attributes such as losses. Profitable subsidiaries pay to MetLife each year the federal income tax which such profitable subsidiary would have paid that year based upon that year's taxable income. If the Company has current or prior deductions and credits (including but not limited to losses) which reduce the consolidated tax liability of the consolidated federal tax return group, the deductions and credits are characterized as realized (or realizable) by the Company when those tax attributes are realized (or realizable) by the consolidated federal tax return group, even if the Company would not have realized the attributes on a stand-alone basis under a "wait and see" method. The Company's accounting for income taxes represents management's best estimate of various events and transactions. 18
N-6251st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 251st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Deferred tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax bases of assets and liabilities are measured at the balance sheet date using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The realization of deferred tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction. Valuation allowances are established when management determines, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Factors in management's determination include the performance of the business and its ability to generate capital gains. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following: . future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; . future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; . taxable income in prior carryback years; and . tax planning strategies. The Company may be required to change its provision for income taxes in certain circumstances. Examples of such circumstances include when estimates used in determining valuation allowances on deferred tax assets significantly change or when receipt of new information indicates the need for adjustment in valuation allowances. Additionally, future events, such as changes in tax laws, tax regulations, or interpretations of such laws or regulations, could have an impact on the provision for income tax and the effective tax rate. Any such changes could significantly affect the amounts reported in the financial statements in the year these changes occur. The Company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit can be recorded in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits due to tax uncertainties that do not meet the threshold are included within other liabilities and are charged to earnings in the period that such determination is made. The Company classifies interest recognized as interest expense and penalties recognized as a component of income tax. Litigation Contingencies The Company is a party to a number of legal actions and is involved in a number of regulatory investigations. Given the inherent unpredictability of these matters, it is difficult to estimate the impact on the Company's financial position. Liabilities are established when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. Legal costs are recognized as incurred. On an annual basis, the Company reviews relevant information with respect to liabilities for litigation, regulatory investigations and litigation-related contingencies to be reflected in the Company's financial statements. 19
N-6252nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 252nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) Other Accounting Policies Cash and Cash Equivalents The Company considers all highly liquid securities and other investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. Computer Software Computer software, which is included in other assets, is stated at cost, less accumulated amortization. Purchased software costs, as well as certain internal and external costs incurred to develop internal-use computer software during the application development stage, are capitalized. Such costs are amortized generally over a four-year period using the straight-line method. The cost basis of computer software was $15 million and $14 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Accumulated amortization of capitalized software was $8 million and $6 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Related amortization expense was $2 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. Fees on Ceded Reinsurance and Other Fees on ceded reinsurance and other primarily include, in addition to items described elsewhere herein, fee income on financial reinsurance agreements. Such fees are recognized in the period in which services are performed. Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements Effective July 17, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding derivatives that permits the Fed Funds Effective Swap Rate (or Overnight Index Swap Rate) to be used as a U.S. benchmark interest rate for hedge accounting purposes, in addition to the United States Treasury and London Interbank Offered Rate. Also, this new guidance removes the restriction on using different benchmark rates for similar hedges. The new guidance did not have a material impact on the financial statements upon adoption, but may impact the selection of benchmark interest rates for hedging relationships in the future. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income that requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of accumulated OCI ("AOCI") by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The adoption was prospectively applied and resulted in additional disclosures in Note 8. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding balance sheet offsetting disclosures which requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements for derivatives, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities 20
N-6253rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 253rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 1. Business, Basis of Presentation and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies (continued) borrowing and lending transactions, to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effects of those arrangements on its financial position. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The adoption was retrospectively applied and resulted in additional disclosures related to derivatives in Note 6. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for DAC, which was retrospectively applied. The guidance specifies that only costs related directly to successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts can be capitalized as DAC; all other acquisition-related costs must be expensed as incurred. As a result, certain sales manager compensation and administrative costs previously capitalized by the Company will no longer be deferred. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income, which was retrospectively applied, that provides companies with the option to present the total of comprehensive income, components of net income, and the components of OCI either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements in annual financial statements. The standard eliminates the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholder's equity. The Company adopted the two-statement approach for annual financial statements. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding fair value measurements that establishes common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Some of the amendments clarify the Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") intent on the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements other than the expanded disclosures in Note 7. Future Adoption of New Accounting Pronouncements In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance regarding liabilities (Accounting Standards Update 2013-04, Liabilities (Topic 405): Obligations Resulting from Joint and Several Liability Arrangements for Which the Total Amount of the Obligation Is Fixed at the Reporting Date), effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 and interim periods within those years. The amendments require an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. In addition, the amendments require an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation, as well as other information about the obligation. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements. 21
N-6254th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 254th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Insurance Insurance Liabilities Future policy benefits are measured as follows: Product Type: Measurement Assumptions: ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Nonparticipating life Aggregate of the present value of expected future benefit payments and related expenses less the present value of expected future net premiums. Assumptions as to mortality and persistency are based upon the Company's experience when the basis of the liability is established. Interest rate assumptions for the aggregate future policy benefit liabilities are 5%. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- Traditional fixed annuities after Present value of expected future annuitization payments. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 3% to 8%. ------------------------------------------------------------------------- PABs are equal to: (i) policy account values, which consist of an accumulation of gross premium payments; and (ii) credited interest, ranging from 1% to 8%, less expenses, mortality charges and withdrawals. 22
N-6255th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 255th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Insurance (continued) Guarantees The Company issues variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits. The non-life contingent portion of GMWBs and the portion of certain GMIBs that does not require annuitization are accounted for as embedded derivatives in PABs and are further discussed in Note 6. Guarantees accounted for as insurance liabilities include: Guarantee: Measurement Assumptions: ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GMDBs . A return of purchase payment . Present value of expected upon death even if the death benefits in excess of account value is reduced to the projected account zero. balance recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on the present value of total expected assessments. . An enhanced death benefit . Assumptions are consistent may be available for an with those used for additional fee. amortizing DAC, and are thus subject to the same variability and risk. . Investment performance and volatility assumptions are consistent with the historical experience of the appropriate underlying equity index, such as the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P") 500 Index. . Benefit assumptions are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GMIBs . After a specified period of . Present value of expected time determined at the time income benefits in excess of of issuance of the variable the projected account annuity contract, a minimum balance at any future date accumulation of purchase of annuitization and payments, even if the recognizing the excess account value is reduced to ratably over the zero, that can be annuitized accumulation period based on to receive a monthly income present value of total stream that is not less than expected assessments. a specified amount. . Certain contracts also . Assumptions are consistent provide for a guaranteed with those used for lump sum return of purchase estimating GMDB liabilities. premium in lieu of the annuitization benefit. . Calculation incorporates an assumption for the percentage of the potential annuitizations that may be elected by the contractholder. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ GMWBs . A return of purchase payment . Expected value of the life via partial withdrawals, contingent payments and even if the account value is expected assessments using reduced to zero, provided assumptions consistent with that cumulative withdrawals those used for estimating in a contract year do not the GMDB liabilities. exceed a certain limit. . Certain contracts include guaranteed withdrawals that are life contingent. 23
N-6256th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 256th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Insurance (continued) Information regarding the liabilities for guarantees (excluding base policy liabilities and embedded derivatives) relating to annuity contracts was as follows: [Download Table] Annuity Contracts ---------------- GMDBs GMIBs Total ------- -------- -------- (In millions) Direct Balance at January 1, 2011...... $ 32 $ 88 $ 120 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... 17 31 48 Paid guaranteed benefits........ (7) -- (7) ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2011.... 42 119 161 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... 10 98 108 Paid guaranteed benefits........ (9) -- (9) ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2012.... 43 217 260 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... 11 1 12 Paid guaranteed benefits........ (5) -- (5) ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2013.... $ 49 $ 218 $ 267 ======= ======== ======== Ceded Balance at January 1, 2011...... $ 32 $ 30 $ 62 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... 17 11 28 Paid guaranteed benefits........ (7) -- (7) ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2011.... 42 41 83 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... 10 34 44 Paid guaranteed benefits........ (9) -- (9) ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2012.... 43 75 118 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... 11 1 12 Paid guaranteed benefits........ (5) -- (5) ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2013.... $ 49 $ 76 $ 125 ======= ======== ======== Net Balance at January 1, 2011...... $ -- $ 58 $ 58 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... -- 20 20 Paid guaranteed benefits........ -- -- -- ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2011.... -- 78 78 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... -- 64 64 Paid guaranteed benefits........ -- -- -- ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2012.... -- 142 142 Incurred guaranteed benefits.... -- -- -- Paid guaranteed benefits........ -- -- -- ------- -------- -------- Balance at December 31, 2013.... $ -- $ 142 $ 142 ======= ======== ======== 24
N-6257th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 257th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Insurance (continued) Account balances of contracts with insurance guarantees were invested in separate account asset classes as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, ------------------- 2013 2012 --------- --------- (In millions) Fund Groupings: Balanced........ $ 7,255 $ 6,507 Equity.......... 4,086 3,816 Bond............ 551 588 Money Market.... 98 118 --------- --------- Total.......... $ 11,990 $ 11,029 ========= ========= Based on the type of guarantee, the Company defines net amount at risk as listed below. These amounts include direct business, but exclude offsets from hedging or reinsurance, if any. Variable Annuity Guarantees In the Event of Death Defined as the death benefit less the total contract account value, as of the balance sheet date. It represents the amount of the claim that the Company would incur if death claims were filed on all contracts on the balance sheet date and includes any additional contractual claims associated with riders purchased to assist with covering income taxes payable upon death. At Annuitization Defined as the amount (if any) that would be required to be added to the total contract account value to purchase a lifetime income stream, based on current annuity rates, equal to the minimum amount provided under the guaranteed benefit. This amount represents the Company's potential economic exposure to such guarantees in the event all contractholders were to annuitize on the balance sheet date, even though the contracts contain terms that allow annuitization of the guaranteed amount only after the 10th anniversary of the contract, which not all contractholders have achieved. Information regarding the types of guarantees relating to annuity contracts was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------------------- ---------------------------- In the At In the At Event of Death Annuitization Event of Death Annuitization -------------- ------------- -------------- ------------- (In millions) Annuity Contracts (1) Variable Annuity Guarantees Total contract account value.............. $ 13,348 $ 8,712 $ 12,309 $ 7,963 Separate account value.................... $ 12,841 $ 8,470 $ 11,797 $ 7,715 Net amount at risk........................ $ 327 $ 116 $ 594 $ 554 Average attained age of contractholders... 67 years 66 years 66 years 65 years -------- (1)The Company's annuity contracts with guarantees may offer more than one type of guarantee in each contract. Therefore, the amounts listed above may not be mutually exclusive. 25
N-6258th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 258th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 2. Insurance (continued) Obligations Under Funding Agreements MLIIC is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank ("FHLB") of Des Moines. Holdings of the FHLB of Des Moines common stock, included in equity securities, were as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, ------------- 2013 2012 ----- ----- (In millions) FHLB of Des Moines.... $ 26 $ 28 The Company has also entered into funding agreements with the FHLB of Des Moines. The liability for such funding agreements is included in PABs. Information related to such funding agreements was as follows at: [Download Table] Liability Collateral ------------- --------------------- December 31, ----------------------------------- 2013 2012 2013 2012 ------ ------ ---------- ---------- (In millions) FHLB of Des Moines (1)... $ 405 $ 405 $ 477 (2) $ 604 (2) -------- (1)Represents funding agreements issued to the FHLB of Des Moines in exchange for cash and for which the FHLB of Des Moines has been granted a lien on certain assets, some of which are in the custody of the FHLB of Des Moines, including residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"), to collateralize obligations under advances evidenced by funding agreements. The Company is permitted to withdraw any portion of the collateral in the custody of the FHLB of Des Moines as long as there is no event of default and the remaining qualified collateral is sufficient to satisfy the collateral maintenance level. Upon any event of default by the Company, the FHLB of Des Moines' recovery on the collateral is limited to the amount of the Company's liability to the FHLB of Des Moines. (2)Advances are collateralized by mortgage-backed securities. The amount of collateral presented is at estimated fair value. Separate Accounts Separate account assets and liabilities consist of pass-through separate accounts totaling $12.0 billion and $11.1 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, for which the policyholder assumes all investment risk. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were no investment gains (losses) on transfers of assets from the general account to the separate accounts. 3. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles See Note 1 for a description of capitalized acquisition costs. 26
N-6259th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 259th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 3. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) Fixed and Variable Universal Life Contracts and Fixed and Variable Deferred Annuity Contracts The Company amortizes DAC and VOBA related to these contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross profits. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception or acquisition of the contracts. The amount of future gross profits is dependent principally upon returns in excess of the amounts credited to policyholders, mortality, persistency, interest crediting rates, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties, the effect of any hedges used and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses and persistency are reasonably likely to impact significantly the rate of DAC and VOBA amortization. Each reporting period, the Company updates the estimated gross profits with the actual gross profits for that period. When the actual gross profits change from previously estimated gross profits, the cumulative DAC and VOBA amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to current operations. When actual gross profits exceed those previously estimated, the DAC and VOBA amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross profits are below the previously estimated gross profits. Each reporting period, the Company also updates the actual amount of business remaining in-force, which impacts expected future gross profits. When expected future gross profits are below those previously estimated, the DAC and VOBA amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross profits are above the previously estimated expected future gross profits. Each period, the Company also reviews the estimated gross profits for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC and VOBA balances. Factors Impacting Amortization Separate account rates of return on variable universal life contracts and variable deferred annuity contracts affect in-force account balances on such contracts each reporting period, which can result in significant fluctuations in amortization of DAC and VOBA. Returns that are higher than the Company's long-term expectation produce higher account balances, which increases the Company's future fee expectations and decreases future benefit payment expectations on minimum death and living benefit guarantees, resulting in higher expected future gross profits. The opposite result occurs when returns are lower than the Company's long-term expectation. The Company's practice to determine the impact of gross profits resulting from returns on separate accounts assumes that long-term appreciation in equity markets is not changed by short-term market fluctuations, but is only changed when sustained interim deviations are expected. The Company monitors these events and only changes the assumption when its long-term expectation changes. The Company also periodically reviews other long-term assumptions underlying the projections of estimated gross profits. These assumptions primarily relate to investment returns, interest crediting rates, mortality, persistency and expenses to administer business. Management annually updates assumptions used in the calculation of estimated gross profits which may have significantly changed. If the update of assumptions causes expected future gross profits to increase, DAC and VOBA amortization will decrease, resulting in a current period increase to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the assumption update causes expected future gross profits to decrease. Periodically, the Company modifies product benefits, features, rights or coverages that occur by the exchange of a contract for a new contract, or by amendment, endorsement, or rider to a contract, or by election or coverage 27
N-6260th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 260th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 3. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) within a contract. If such modification, referred to as an internal replacement, substantially changes the contract, the associated DAC or VOBA is written off immediately through income and any new deferrable costs associated with the replacement contract are deferred. If the modification does not substantially change the contract, the DAC or VOBA amortization on the original contract will continue and any acquisition costs associated with the related modification are expensed. Amortization of DAC and VOBA is attributed to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses), and to other expenses for the amount of gross profits originating from transactions other than investment gains and losses. Unrealized investment gains and losses represent the amount of DAC and VOBA that would have been amortized if such gains and losses had been recognized. Information regarding DAC and VOBA was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------ ------ (In millions) DAC Balance at January 1,............................................... $ 97 $ 220 $ 352 Capitalizations..................................................... 6 19 34 Amortization related to: Net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses)... 122 (96) (84) Other expenses.................................................... (27) (38) (76) ------ ------ ------ Total amortization............................................... 95 (134) (160) ------ ------ ------ Unrealized investment gains (losses)................................ 8 (8) (6) Other (1)........................................................... 38 -- -- ------ ------ ------ Balance at December 31,............................................. 244 97 220 ------ ------ ------ VOBA Balance at January 1,............................................... 51 66 79 Total amortization related to other expenses...................... (6) (14) (12) Unrealized investment gains (losses)................................ 2 (1) (1) ------ ------ ------ Balance at December 31,............................................. 47 51 66 ------ ------ ------ Total DAC and VOBA Balance at December 31,............................................. $ 291 $ 148 $ 286 ====== ====== ====== -------- (1)The year ended December 31, 2013 includes $38 million that was reclassified to DAC from premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. The amounts reclassified relate to an affiliated reinsurance agreement accounted for using the deposit method of accounting and represent the DAC amortization on the expense allowances ceded on the agreement from inception. These amounts were previously included in the calculated value of the deposit receivable on this agreement and recorded within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. 28
N-6261st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 261st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 3. Deferred Policy Acquisition Costs, Value of Business Acquired and Other Policy-Related Intangibles (continued) Information regarding other policy-related intangibles was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ----- ----- ----- (In millions) Deferred Sales Inducements Balance at January 1,...... $ 65 $ 71 $ 84 Capitalization............. -- 1 3 Amortization............... (2) (7) (16) ----- ----- ----- Balance at December 31,.... $ 63 $ 65 $ 71 ===== ===== ===== The estimated future amortization expense to be reported in other expenses for the next five years is as follows: [Download Table] VOBA ------------- (In millions) 2014.......................... $ 12 2015.......................... $ 10 2016.......................... $ 9 2017.......................... $ 6 2018.......................... $ 6 4. Reinsurance The Company enters into reinsurance agreements primarily as a purchaser of reinsurance for its various insurance products. The Company participates in reinsurance activities in order to limit losses and minimize exposure to significant risks. Accounting for reinsurance requires extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business and the potential impact of counterparty credit risks. The Company periodically reviews actual and anticipated experience compared to the aforementioned assumptions used to establish assets and liabilities relating to ceded reinsurance and evaluates the financial strength of counterparties to its reinsurance agreements using criteria similar to that evaluated in the security impairment process discussed in Note 5. For its individual life insurance products, the Company has historically reinsured the mortality risk primarily on an excess of retention basis or on a quota share basis. In addition to reinsuring mortality risk as described above, the Company reinsures other risks, as well as specific coverages. Placement of reinsurance is done primarily on an automatic basis and also on a facultative basis for risks with specified characteristics. The Company currently reinsures 100% of the living and death benefit guarantees issued in connection with its variable annuities to affiliated reinsurers. Under these reinsurance agreements, the Company pays a reinsurance premium generally based on fees associated with the guarantees collected from policyholders, and receives reimbursement for benefits paid or accrued in excess of account values, subject to certain limitations. The Company also reinsures 90% of its fixed annuities to an affiliated reinsurer. The value of the embedded 29
N-6262nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 262nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Reinsurance (continued) derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer. The Company has exposure to catastrophes which could contribute to significant fluctuations in the Company's results of operations. The Company uses excess of retention and quota share reinsurance agreements to provide greater diversification of risk and minimize exposure to larger risks. The Company reinsures its remaining business through a diversified group of well-capitalized reinsurers. The Company analyzes recent trends in arbitration and litigation outcomes in disputes, if any, with its reinsurers. The Company monitors ratings and evaluates the financial strength of its reinsurers by analyzing their financial statements. In addition, the reinsurance recoverable balance due from each reinsurer is evaluated as part of the overall monitoring process. Recoverability of reinsurance recoverable balances is evaluated based on these analyses. These reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance, which at December 31, 2013 and 2012, were not significant. The Company had $6 million and $8 million of unsecured unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Of these totals, 100% were with the Company's five largest unaffiliated ceded reinsurers at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The amounts in the statements of operations include the impact of reinsurance. Information regarding the significant effects of reinsurance was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ----------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------- ------- ------- (In millions) Premiums Direct premiums................................................ $ 30 $ 12 $ 8 Reinsurance ceded.............................................. (1) (1) (1) ------- ------- ------- Net premiums.................................................. $ 29 $ 11 $ 7 ======= ======= ======= Universal life and investment-type product policy fees Direct universal life and investment-type product policy fees.. $ 244 $ 237 $ 240 Reinsurance ceded.............................................. (42) (39) (36) ------- ------- ------- Net universal life and investment-type product policy fees.... $ 202 $ 198 $ 204 ======= ======= ======= Fees on ceded reinsurance and other Direct fees on ceded reinsurance and other..................... $ 25 $ 25 $ 26 Reinsurance ceded.............................................. 65 68 78 ------- ------- ------- Net fees on ceded reinsurance and other....................... $ 90 $ 93 $ 104 ======= ======= ======= Policyholder benefits and claims Direct policyholder benefits and claims........................ $ 61 $ 144 $ 92 Reinsurance ceded.............................................. (13) (44) (33) ------- ------- ------- Net policyholder benefits and claims.......................... $ 48 $ 100 $ 59 ======= ======= ======= 30
N-6263rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 263rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Reinsurance (continued) The amounts in the balance sheets include the impact of reinsurance. Information regarding the significant effects of reinsurance was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------------------ ------------------------ Total Total Balance Balance Direct Ceded Sheet Direct Ceded Sheet ------ -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- (In millions) Assets Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables......................... $ 26 $ 1,803 $ 1,829 $ 26 $ 2,459 $ 2,485 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired.......... 311 (20) 291 207 (59) 148 ------ -------- -------- ------ -------- -------- Total assets......................... $ 337 $ 1,783 $ 2,120 $ 233 $ 2,400 $ 2,633 ====== ======== ======== ====== ======== ======== Reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. Deposit assets and deposit liabilities, if any, are the result of affiliated reinsurance transactions. See " Related Party Reinsurance Transactions." Related Party Reinsurance Transactions The Company has reinsurance agreements with certain MetLife subsidiaries, including Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, General American Life Insurance Company, Exeter and MICC, all of which are related parties. Information regarding the significant effects of affiliated reinsurance included in the statements of operations was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ----------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------- ------- ------- (In millions) Premiums Reinsurance ceded...................................... $ -- $ (1) $ -- Universal life and investment-type product policy fees Reinsurance ceded...................................... $ (41) $ (39) $ (35) Fees on ceded reinsurance and other Reinsurance ceded...................................... $ 65 $ 68 $ 78 Policyholder benefits and claims Reinsurance ceded...................................... $ (13) $ (44) $ (31) 31
N-6264th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 264th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 4. Reinsurance (continued) Information regarding the significant effects of ceded affiliated reinsurance included in the balance sheets was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ----------------- 2013 2012 -------- -------- (In millions) Assets Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables......................... $ 1,798 $ 2,451 Deferred policy acquisition costs and value of business acquired.... (20) (59) -------- -------- Total assets...................................................... $ 1,778 $ 2,392 ======== ======== The Company ceded risks to affiliates related to guaranteed minimum benefit guarantees written directly by the Company. These ceded reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives and changes in their fair value are included within net derivative gains (losses). The embedded derivatives associated with the cessions are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and were assets of $376 million and $959 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Net derivative gains (losses) associated with the embedded derivatives were ($639) million, $190 million and $380 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company has secured certain reinsurance recoverable balances with various forms of collateral, including secured trusts and irrevocable letters of credit. The Company had $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion of unsecured affiliated reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Affiliated reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. The deposit assets on affiliated reinsurance were $1.3 billion and $1.4 billion at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. There were no deposit liabilities on affiliated reinsurance at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. 5. Investments See Note 7 for information about the fair value hierarchy for investments and the related valuation methodologies. Investment Risks and Uncertainties Investments are exposed to the following primary sources of risk: credit, interest rate, liquidity, market valuation, currency and real estate risk. The financial statement risks, stemming from such investment risks, are those associated with the determination of estimated fair values, the diminished ability to sell certain investments in times of strained market conditions, the recognition of impairments, the recognition of income on certain investments and the potential consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIEs"). The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs relating to these financial statement risks may have a material effect on the amounts presented within the financial statements. The determination of valuation allowances and impairments is highly subjective and is based upon periodic evaluations and assessments of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. 32
N-6265th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 265th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) The recognition of income on certain investments (e.g. structured securities, including mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities ("ABS") and certain structured investment transactions) is dependent upon certain factors such as prepayments and defaults, and changes in such factors could result in changes in amounts to be earned. Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS by Sector The following table presents the fixed maturity and equity securities AFS by sector. Redeemable preferred stock is reported within U.S. corporate fixed maturity securities and non-redeemable preferred stock is reported within equity securities. Included within fixed maturity securities are structured securities including RMBS, commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS") and ABS. [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ Gross Unrealized Gross Unrealized Cost or ---------------------- Estimated Cost or ---------------------- Estimated Amortized Temporary OTTI Fair Amortized Temporary OTTI Fair Cost Gains Losses Losses Value Cost Gains Losses Losses Value --------- ----- --------- ------ --------- --------- ----- --------- ------ --------- (In millions) Fixed maturity securities U.S. corporate..................... $ 825 $ 55 $ 8 $ -- $ 872 $ 913 $ 87 $ 1 $ -- $ 999 U.S. Treasury and agency........... 469 2 14 -- 457 391 6 -- -- 397 RMBS............................... 312 12 7 5 312 286 21 4 6 297 CMBS............................... 293 8 4 -- 297 302 17 -- -- 319 Foreign corporate.................. 223 9 3 -- 229 209 14 1 -- 222 ABS................................ 51 2 -- -- 53 51 4 1 -- 54 State and political subdivision.... 17 2 -- -- 19 17 3 -- -- 20 Foreign government................. 10 1 -- -- 11 9 3 -- -- 12 ------- ---- ---- ---- ------- ------- ----- ---- ---- ------- Total fixed maturity securities... $ 2,200 $ 91 $ 36 $ 5 $ 2,250 $ 2,178 $ 155 $ 7 $ 6 $ 2,320 ======= ==== ==== ==== ======= ======= ===== ==== ==== ======= Equity securities Common stock....................... $ 26 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 26 $ 28 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 28 Non-redeemable preferred stock..... 20 -- 1 -- 19 20 -- 3 -- 17 ------- ---- ---- ---- ------- ------- ----- ---- ---- ------- Total equity securities........... $ 46 $ -- $ 1 $ -- $ 45 $ 48 $ -- $ 3 $ -- $ 45 ======= ==== ==== ==== ======= ======= ===== ==== ==== ======= The Company held non-income producing fixed maturity securities with an estimated fair value of less than $1 million with unrealized gains (losses) of less than $1 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Methodology for Amortization of Premium and Accretion of Discount on Structured Securities Amortization of premium and accretion of discount on structured securities considers the estimated timing and amount of prepayments of the underlying loans. Actual prepayment experience is periodically reviewed and effective yields are recalculated when differences arise between the originally anticipated and the actual prepayments received and currently anticipated. Prepayment assumptions for single class and multi-class mortgage-backed and ABS are estimated using inputs obtained from third-party specialists and based on management's knowledge of the current market. For credit-sensitive mortgage-backed and ABS and certain prepayment-sensitive securities, the effective yield is recalculated on a prospective basis. For all other mortgage-backed and ABS, the effective yield is recalculated on a retrospective basis. 33
N-6266th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 266th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Maturities of Fixed Maturity Securities The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity date, were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ----------------------------------------- 2013 2012 -------------------- -------------------- Amortized Estimated Amortized Estimated Cost Fair Value Cost Fair Value --------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In millions) Due in one year or less...................... $ 240 $ 242 $ 306 $ 308 Due after one year through five years........ 487 512 446 476 Due after five years through ten years....... 566 595 588 657 Due after ten years.......................... 251 239 199 209 -------- -------- -------- -------- Subtotal................................... 1,544 1,588 1,539 1,650 Structured securities (RMBS, CMBS and ABS)... 656 662 639 670 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total fixed maturity securities............ $ 2,200 $ 2,250 $ 2,178 $ 2,320 ======== ======== ======== ======== Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to the exercise of call or prepayment options. Fixed maturity securities not due at a single maturity date have been presented in the year of final contractual maturity. RMBS, CMBS and ABS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity. 34
N-6267th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 267th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Continuous Gross Unrealized Losses for Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities AFS by Sector The following table presents the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity and equity securities AFS in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by sector and by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 ----------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------- Equal to or Greater Equal to or Greater Less than 12 Months than 12 Months Less than 12 Months than 12 Months -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- -------------------- Estimated Gross Estimated Gross Estimated Gross Estimated Gross Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Fair Unrealized Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses Value Losses --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- --------- ---------- (In millions, except number of securities) Fixed maturity securities U.S. corporate................... $ 84 $ 7 $ 13 $ 1 $ 20 $ 1 $ 9 $ -- U.S. Treasury and agency......... 169 14 -- -- 60 -- -- -- RMBS............................. 84 4 34 8 -- -- 49 10 CMBS............................. 73 4 -- -- 4 -- 15 -- Foreign corporate................ 27 2 7 1 2 -- 7 1 ABS.............................. 7 -- 5 -- -- -- 5 1 Foreign government............... 1 -- 1 -- 1 -- -- -- ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- Total fixed maturity securities.. $ 445 $ 31 $ 60 $ 10 $ 87 $ 1 $ 85 $ 12 ====== ===== ===== ===== ===== ==== ===== ===== Equity securities Non-redeemable preferred stock........................... $ -- $ -- $ 18 $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ 17 $ 3 ------ ----- ----- ----- ----- ---- ----- ----- Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position........ 87 18 18 22 ====== ===== ===== ===== Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities Evaluation and Measurement Methodologies Management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in management's evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below cost or amortized cost; (ii) the potential for impairments when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; (iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector; (iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations; (v) the potential for impairments where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic loss or has exhausted natural resources; (vi) with respect to fixed maturity securities, whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost recovers; (vii) with respect to structured securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; and (viii) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies. 35
N-6268th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 268th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) The methodology and significant inputs used to determine the amount of credit loss on fixed maturity securities are as follows: . The Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate is generally the effective interest rate of the security prior to impairment. . When determining collectability and the period over which value is expected to recover, the Company applies considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process which incorporates information regarding the specific security, fundamentals of the industry and geographic area in which the security issuer operates, and overall macroeconomic conditions. Projected future cash flows are estimated using assumptions derived from management's best estimates of likely scenario-based outcomes after giving consideration to a variety of variables that include, but are not limited to: payment terms of the security; the likelihood that the issuer can service the interest and principal payments; the quality and amount of any credit enhancements; the security's position within the capital structure of the issuer; possible corporate restructurings or asset sales by the issuer; and changes to the rating of the security or the issuer by rating agencies. . Additional considerations are made when assessing the unique features that apply to certain structured securities including, but not limited to: the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying loans or assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security. . When determining the amount of the credit loss for U.S. and foreign corporate securities, state and political subdivision securities and foreign government securities, the estimated fair value is considered the recovery value when available information does not indicate that another value is more appropriate. When information is identified that indicates a recovery value other than estimated fair value, management considers in the determination of recovery value the same considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process as described above, as well as any private and public sector programs to restructure such securities. With respect to securities that have attributes of debt and equity (perpetual hybrid securities), consideration is given in the OTTI analysis as to whether there has been any deterioration in the credit of the issuer and the likelihood of recovery in value of the securities that are in a severe and extended unrealized loss position. Consideration is also given as to whether any perpetual hybrid securities, with an unrealized loss, regardless of credit rating, have deferred any dividend payments. When an OTTI loss has occurred, the OTTI loss is the entire difference between the perpetual hybrid security's cost and its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings. The cost or amortized cost of fixed maturity and equity securities is adjusted for OTTI in the period in which the determination is made. The Company does not change the revised cost basis for subsequent recoveries in value. 36
N-6269th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 269th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) In periods subsequent to the recognition of OTTI on a fixed maturity security, the Company accounts for the impaired security as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. Accordingly, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis is accreted over the remaining term of the fixed maturity security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows. Current Period Evaluation Based on the Company's current evaluation of its AFS securities in an unrealized loss position in accordance with its impairment policy, and the Company's current intentions and assessments (as applicable to the type of security) about holding, selling and any requirements to sell these securities, the Company has concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013. Future OTTI will depend primarily on economic fundamentals, issuer performance (including changes in the present value of future cash flows expected to be collected), and changes in credit ratings, collateral valuation, interest rates and credit spreads. If economic fundamentals deteriorate or if there are adverse changes in the above factors, OTTI may be incurred in upcoming periods. Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities increased $28 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $13 million to $41 million. The increase in gross unrealized losses for the year ended December 31, 2013, was primarily attributable to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by narrowing credit spreads. At December 31, 2013, $5 million of the total $41 million of gross unrealized losses were from one below investment grade fixed maturity security with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater. Unrealized losses on the below investment grade fixed maturity security are related to non-agency RMBS (alternative residential mortgage loans) and are the result of significantly wider credit spreads resulting from higher risk premiums since purchase, largely due to economic and market uncertainties including concerns over unemployment levels and valuations of residential real estate supporting non-agency RMBS. Management evaluates non-agency RMBS based on actual and projected cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security. Equity Securities Gross unrealized losses on equity securities decreased $2 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $3 million to $1 million. None of the $1 million of gross unrealized losses were from equity securities with gross unrealized losses of 20% or more of cost for 12 months or greater. 37
N-6270th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 270th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Mortgage Loans Mortgage Loans by Portfolio Segment Mortgage loans are summarized as follows at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ----------------------- -------------------- Carrying Carrying % of Value % of Total Value Total ------------- ---------- ------------- ------ (In millions) (In millions) Mortgage loans: Commercial.................... $ 246 86.0 % $ 238 83.8 % Agricultural.................. 41 14.3 48 16.9 ------ ------ ------ ------ Subtotal (1)................. 287 100.3 286 100.7 Valuation allowances.......... (1) (0.3) (2) (0.7) ------ ------ ------ ------ Total mortgage loans, net.... $ 286 100.0 % $ 284 100.0 % ====== ====== ====== ====== -------- (1)The Company did not purchase any mortgage loans during the year ended December 31, 2013. In 2012, the Company purchased $48 million of mortgage loans, of which $38 million were purchased at estimated fair value from an affiliate, MetLife Bank, National Association. Mortgage Loans and Valuation Allowance by Portfolio Segment All commercial and agricultural mortgage loans held at both December 31, 2013 and 2012 were evaluated collectively for credit losses. The valuation allowances maintained at both December 31, 2013 and 2012 were primarily for the commercial mortgage loan portfolio segment and were for non-specifically identified credit losses. The valuation allowance for agricultural mortgage loans was less than $1 million at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Valuation Allowance Rollforward by Portfolio Segment The changes in the valuation allowance, by portfolio segment, were as follows: [Download Table] Commercial Agricultural Total ---------- ------------ ------ (In millions) Balance at January 1, 2011...... $ 1 $ -- $ 1 Provision (release)............. 1 -- 1 ------ ------- ------ Balance at December 31, 2011.... 2 -- 2 Provision (release)............. -- -- -- ------ ------- ------ Balance at December 31, 2012.... 2 -- 2 Provision (release)............. (1) -- (1) ------ ------- ------ Balance at December 31, 2013.... $ 1 $ -- $ 1 ====== ======= ====== 38
N-6271st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 271st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Valuation Allowance Methodology Mortgage loans are considered to be impaired when it is probable that, based upon current information and events, the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due under the loan agreement. Specific valuation allowances are established using the same methodology for both portfolio segments as the excess carrying value of a loan over either (i) the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan's original effective interest rate, (ii) the estimated fair value of the loan's underlying collateral if the loan is in the process of foreclosure or otherwise collateral dependent, or (iii) the loan's observable market price. A common evaluation framework is used for establishing non-specific valuation allowances for both loan portfolio segments; however, a separate non-specific valuation allowance is calculated and maintained for each loan portfolio segment that is based on inputs unique to each loan portfolio segment. Non-specific valuation allowances are established for pools of loans with similar risk characteristics where a property-specific or market-specific risk has not been identified, but for which the Company expects to incur a credit loss. These evaluations are based upon several loan portfolio segment-specific factors, including the Company's experience for loan losses, defaults and loss severity, and loss expectations for loans with similar risk characteristics. These evaluations are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. Commercial and Agricultural Mortgage Loan Portfolio Segments The Company typically uses several years of historical experience in establishing non-specific valuation allowances which captures multiple economic cycles. For evaluations of commercial mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include the impact of a rapid change to the economy, which may not be reflected in the loan portfolio, and recent loss and recovery trend experience as compared to historical loss and recovery experience. For evaluations of agricultural mortgage loans, in addition to historical experience, management considers factors that include increased stress in certain sectors, which may be evidenced by higher delinquency rates, or a change in the number of higher risk loans. On a quarterly basis, management incorporates the impact of these current market events and conditions on historical experience in determining the non-specific valuation allowance established for commercial and agricultural mortgage loans. All commercial mortgage loans are reviewed on an ongoing basis which may include an analysis of the property financial statements and rent roll, lease rollover analysis, property inspections, market analysis, estimated valuations of the underlying collateral, loan-to-value ratios, debt service coverage ratios, and tenant creditworthiness. All agricultural mortgage loans are monitored on an ongoing basis. The monitoring process focuses on higher risk loans, which include those that are classified as restructured, delinquent or in foreclosure, as well as loans with higher loan-to-value ratios and lower debt service coverage ratios. The monitoring process for agricultural mortgage loans is generally similar to the commercial mortgage loan monitoring process, with a focus on higher risk loans, including reviews on a geographic and property-type basis. Higher risk loans are reviewed individually on an ongoing basis for potential credit loss and specific valuation allowances are established using the methodology described above. Quarterly, the remaining loans are reviewed on a pool basis by aggregating groups of loans that have similar risk characteristics for potential credit loss, and non-specific valuation allowances are established as described above using inputs that are unique to each segment of the loan portfolio. 39
N-6272nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 272nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) For commercial mortgage loans, the primary credit quality indicator is the debt service coverage ratio, which compares a property's net operating income to amounts needed to service the principal and interest due under the loan. Generally, the lower the debt service coverage ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The Company also reviews the loan-to-value ratio of its commercial mortgage loan portfolio. Loan-to-value ratios compare the unpaid principal balance of the loan to the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral. Generally, the higher the loan-to-value ratio, the higher the risk of experiencing a credit loss. The debt service coverage ratio and loan-to-value ratio, as well as the values utilized in calculating these ratios, are updated annually, on a rolling basis, with a portion of the loan portfolio updated each quarter. For agricultural mortgage loans, the Company's primary credit quality indicator is the loan-to-value ratio. The values utilized in calculating this ratio are developed in connection with the ongoing review of the agricultural mortgage loan portfolio and are routinely updated. Credit Quality of Commercial Mortgage Loans The credit quality of commercial mortgage loans, were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Recorded Investment ------------------------------------------- Debt Service Coverage Ratios ----------------------------- % of Estimated % of > 1.20x 1.00x - 1.20x < 1.00x Total Total Fair Value Total ------- ------------- ------- ------ ------ ------------- ------ (In millions) (In millions) December 31, 2013: Loan-to-value ratios: Less than 65%......... $ 193 $ 9 $ 15 $ 217 88.2 % $ 228 88.4 % 65% to 75%............ 19 -- 10 29 11.8 30 11.6 ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ Total................ $ 212 $ 9 $ 25 $ 246 100.0 % $ 258 100.0 % ====== ===== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== December 31, 2012: Loan-to-value ratios: Less than 65%......... $ 194 $ 10 $ 9 $ 213 89.5 % $ 231 90.2 % 65% to 75%............ 15 -- 10 25 10.5 25 9.8 ------ ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ ------ Total................ $ 209 $ 10 $ 19 $ 238 100.0 % $ 256 100.0 % ====== ===== ===== ====== ====== ====== ====== Credit Quality of Agricultural Mortgage Loans All of the agricultural mortgage loans held at both December 31, 2013 and 2012 had loan-to-value ratios of less than 65%. Past Due, Interest Accrual Status and Impaired Mortgage Loans The Company has a high quality, well performing, mortgage loan portfolio, with all mortgage loans classified as performing at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company defines delinquency consistent with industry practice, when mortgage loans are past due as follows: commercial mortgage loans -- 60 days and agricultural mortgage loans -- 90 days. The Company had no impaired mortgage loans, no mortgage loans past due and no mortgage loans in non-accrual status at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company did not recognize interest income on impaired mortgage loans during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. 40
N-6273rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 273rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Mortgage Loans Modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring The Company may grant concessions related to borrowers experiencing financial difficulties which are classified as troubled debt restructurings. Generally, the types of concessions include: reduction of the contractual interest rate, extension of the maturity date at an interest rate lower than current market interest rates, and/or a reduction of accrued interest. The amount, timing and extent of the concession granted is considered in determining any impairment or changes in the specific valuation allowance recorded with the restructuring. Through the continuous monitoring process, a specific valuation allowance may have been recorded prior to the quarter when the mortgage loan is modified in a troubled debt restructuring. Accordingly, the carrying value (after specific valuation allowance) before and after modification through a troubled debt restructuring may not change significantly, or may increase if the expected recovery is higher than the pre-modification recovery assessment. There were no mortgage loans modified in a troubled debt restructuring during the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. Other Invested Assets Other invested assets is comprised of loans to affiliates (see " -- Related Party Investment Transactions") and freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values (see Note 6). Cash Equivalents The carrying value of cash equivalents, which includes securities and other investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, was $17 million and $23 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. 41
N-6274th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 274th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Net Unrealized Investment Gains (Losses) The components of net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in AOCI, were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ----- ------ ----- (In millions) Fixed maturity securities......................................................... $ 55 $ 148 $ 88 Fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses in AOCI...................... (5) (6) (10) ----- ------ ----- Total fixed maturity securities.................................................. 50 142 78 Equity securities................................................................. (1) (3) (5) Derivatives....................................................................... (1) 1 2 Short-term investments............................................................ (1) (1) (1) ----- ------ ----- Subtotal......................................................................... 47 139 74 ----- ------ ----- Amounts allocated from: Insurance liability loss recognition............................................. -- -- (7) DAC and VOBA related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI................. 1 1 1 DAC and VOBA..................................................................... (14) (24) (15) ----- ------ ----- Subtotal....................................................................... (13) (23) (21) Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI......................................................................... 2 2 4 Deferred income tax benefit (expense)............................................. (13) (42) (22) ----- ------ ----- Net unrealized investment gains (losses).......................................... $ 23 $ 76 $ 35 ===== ====== ===== The changes in fixed maturity securities with noncredit OTTI losses included in AOCI were as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,............................... $ (6) $ (10) Securities sold with previous noncredit OTTI loss... 1 3 Subsequent changes in estimated fair value.......... -- 1 ---------- ---------- Balance at December 31,............................. $ (5) $ (6) ========== ========== 42
N-6275th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 275th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------- ------- ----- (In millions) Balance at January 1,........................................................... $ 76 $ 35 $ 20 Fixed maturity securities on which noncredit OTTI losses have been recognized... 1 4 (2) Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the year............................ (93) 61 39 Unrealized investment gains (losses) relating to: Insurance liability gain (loss) recognition................................... -- 7 (7) DAC and VOBA.................................................................. 10 (9) (7) Deferred income tax benefit (expense) related to noncredit OTTI losses recognized in AOCI........................................................... -- (2) 1 Deferred income tax benefit (expense)......................................... 29 (20) (9) ------- ------- ----- Balance at December 31,......................................................... $ 23 $ 76 $ 35 ======= ======= ===== Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses).............................. $ (53) $ 41 $ 15 ======= ======= ===== Concentrations of Credit Risk There were no investments in any counterparty that were greater than 10% of the Company's stockholder's equity, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. Securities Lending Elements of the securities lending program are presented below at: [Download Table] December 31, ------------- 2013 2012 ------ ------ (In millions) Securities on loan: (1) Amortized cost....................................... $ 249 $ 185 Estimated fair value................................. $ 241 $ 191 Cash collateral on deposit from counterparties (2)..... $ 249 $ 196 Reinvestment portfolio -- estimated fair value......... $ 247 $ 196 ------------- (1)Included within fixed maturity securities and short-term investments. (2)Included within payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions. 43
N-6276th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 276th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Invested Assets on Deposit and Pledged as Collateral Invested assets on deposit and pledged as collateral are presented below at estimated fair value for fixed maturity securities at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------- 2013 2012 ------- ------- (In millions) Invested assets on deposit (regulatory deposits)............ $ 7 $ 4 Invested assets pledged as collateral (1)................... 505 620 ------- ------- Total invested assets on deposit and pledged as collateral. $ 512 $ 624 ======= ======= -------- (1)The Company has pledged invested assets in connection with various agreements and transactions, including funding agreements (see Note 2) and derivative transactions (see Note 6). See "-- Securities Lending" for securities on loan. Variable Interest Entities The Company has invested in certain structured transactions that are VIEs. In certain instances, the Company may hold both the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity, as well as an economic interest in the entity and, as such, it would be deemed the primary beneficiary or consolidator of the entity. The determination of the VIE's primary beneficiary requires an evaluation of the contractual and implied rights and obligations associated with each party's relationship with or involvement in the entity, an estimate of the entity's expected losses and expected residual returns and the allocation of such estimates to each party involved in the entity. The Company generally uses a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary. However, for VIEs that are investment companies or apply measurement principles consistent with those utilized by investment companies, the primary beneficiary is based on a risks and rewards model and is defined as the entity that will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of a VIE's expected residual returns if no single entity absorbs a majority of expected losses, or both. The Company reassesses its involvement with VIEs on a quarterly basis. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs in the determination of the primary beneficiary could have a material effect on the amounts presented within the financial statements. Consolidated VIEs There were no VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and which are consolidated at December 31, 2013 and 2012. 44
N-6277th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 277th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Unconsolidated VIEs The carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs in which the Company holds a significant variable interest but is not the primary beneficiary and which have not been consolidated were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ----------------------------------------- 2013 2012 -------------------- -------------------- Maximum Maximum Carrying Exposure Carrying Exposure Amount to Loss (1) Amount to Loss (1) -------- ----------- -------- ----------- (In millions) Fixed maturity securities AFS: Structured securities (RMBS, CMBS, and ABS) (2)...... $ 662 $ 662 $ 670 $ 670 U.S. and foreign corporate........................... 21 21 23 23 Other limited partnership interests.................... 19 20 14 15 Equity securities AFS: Non-redeemable preferred stock....................... 18 18 17 17 ------ ------ ------ ------ Total................................................ $ 720 $ 721 $ 724 $ 725 ====== ====== ====== ====== -------- (1)The maximum exposure to loss relating to fixed maturity and equity securities AFS is equal to their carrying amounts or the carrying amounts of retained interests. The maximum exposure to loss relating to other limited partnership interests is equal to the carrying amounts plus any unfunded commitments of the Company. Such a maximum loss would be expected to occur only upon bankruptcy of the issuer or investee. (2)For these variable interests, the Company's involvement is limited to that of a passive investor. As described in Note 11, the Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. Excluding these commitments, the Company did not provide financial or other support to investees designated as VIEs during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. 45
N-6278th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 278th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Net Investment Income The components of net investment income were as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------ ------ (In millions) Investment income: Fixed maturity securities.......................... $ 94 $ 98 $ 104 Equity securities.................................. 1 1 2 Mortgage loans..................................... 16 15 10 Policy loans....................................... 2 2 2 Other limited partnership interests................ 4 1 -- Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments.. 1 -- -- ------ ------ ------ Subtotal.......................................... 118 117 118 Less: Investment expenses.......................... 4 4 4 ------ ------ ------ Net investment income......................... $ 114 $ 113 $ 114 ====== ====== ====== See "-- Related Party Investment Transactions" for discussion of affiliated net investment income and investment expenses. Net Investment Gains (Losses) Components of Net Investment Gains (Losses) The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ----- ------ ------ (In millions) Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities: Total OTTI losses recognized -- by industry: U.S. and foreign corporate securities -- by industry: Finance................................................................ $ -- $ (1) $ -- Utility................................................................ -- (1) -- ----- ------ ------ Total U.S. and foreign corporate securities.......................... -- (2) -- ----- ------ ------ OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities recognized in earnings........... -- (2) -- Fixed maturity securities -- net gains (losses) on sales and disposals.... 1 (2) (5) ----- ------ ------ Total gains (losses) on fixed maturity securities........................ 1 (4) (5) ----- ------ ------ Total net investment gains (losses).................................. $ 1 $ (4) $ (5) ===== ====== ====== 46
N-6279th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 279th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) Sales or Disposals and Impairments of Fixed Maturity and Equity Securities Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity and equity securities and the components of fixed maturity and equity securities net investment gains (losses) are as shown in the table below. Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis. [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ Fixed Maturity Securities Equity Securities Total ------------------------- ----------------- -------------------- (In millions) Proceeds............................ $ 417 $ 576 $ 318 $ -- $ 1 $ 5 $ 417 $ 577 $ 323 ====== ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== ====== ====== ====== Gross investment gains.............. $ 3 $ 2 $ 3 $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 3 $ 2 $ 3 ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ Gross investment losses............. (2) (4) (8) -- -- -- (2) (4) (8) ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ Total OTTI losses: Credit-related.................... -- (1) -- -- -- -- -- (1) -- Other (1)......................... -- (1) -- -- -- -- -- (1) -- ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ Total OTTI losses................ -- (2) -- -- -- -- -- (2) -- ------ ------ ------ ----- ----- ----- ------ ------ ------ Net investment gains (losses)... $ 1 $ (4) $ (5) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 1 $ (4) $ (5) ====== ====== ====== ===== ===== ===== ====== ====== ====== -------- (1)Other OTTI losses recognized in earnings include impairments on fixed maturity securities where there is an intent to sell or it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery of the decline in estimated fair value. Credit Loss Rollforward The table below presents a rollforward of the cumulative credit loss component of OTTI loss recognized in earnings on fixed maturity securities still held for which a portion of the OTTI loss was recognized in OCI: [Enlarge/Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,........................................... $ 2 $ 3 Reductions: Sales (maturities, pay downs or prepayments) during the period of securities previously impaired as credit loss OTTI........ -- (1) ---------- ---------- Balance at December 31,......................................... $ 2 $ 2 ========== ========== Related Party Investment Transactions The Company has an affiliated loan outstanding, which is included in other invested assets, totaling $45 million at both years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. At December 31, 2011, the loan was outstanding with Exeter, an affiliate. During 2012, MetLife assumed this affiliated debt from Exeter. The loan is due on July 15, 2021, and bears interest, payable semi-annually, at 5.64%. Net investment income from this loan was $3 million, $3 million and $1 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 47
N-6280th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 280th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 5. Investments (continued) The Company receives investment administrative services from an affiliate. The related investment administrative service charges were $3 million for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. 6. Derivatives Accounting for Derivatives See Note 1 for a description of the Company's accounting policies for derivatives and Note 7 for information about the fair value hierarchy for derivatives. Derivative Strategies The Company is exposed to various risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate, credit and equity. The Company uses a variety of strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivatives. Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit spreads and/or other financial indices. Derivatives may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter ("OTC") market. Certain of the Company's OTC derivatives are cleared and settled through central clearing counterparties ("OTC-cleared"), while others are bilateral contracts between two counterparties ("OTC-bilateral"). The types of derivatives the Company uses include swaps, futures and option contracts. To a lesser extent, the Company uses credit default swaps to synthetically replicate investment risks and returns which are not readily available in the cash market. Interest Rate Derivatives The Company uses a variety of interest rate derivatives to reduce its exposure to changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps and floors. Interest rate swaps are used by the Company primarily to reduce market risks from changes in interest rates and to alter interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (duration mismatches). In an interest rate swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts as calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount. The Company utilizes interest rate swaps in fair value and non-qualifying hedging relationships. The Company purchases interest rate floors primarily to protect its minimum rate guarantee liabilities against declines in interest rates below a specified level. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased floors by entering into offsetting written floors. The Company utilizes interest rate floors in non-qualifying hedging relationships. To a lesser extent, the Company uses interest rate futures in non-qualifying hedging relationships. Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Derivatives The Company uses foreign currency swaps to reduce the risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates associated with its assets denominated in foreign currencies. In a foreign currency swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between one currency and 48
N-6281st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 281st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) another at a fixed exchange rate, generally set at inception, calculated by reference to an agreed upon notional amount. The notional amount of each currency is exchanged at the inception and termination of the currency swap by each party. The Company utilizes foreign currency swaps in cash flow and non-qualifying hedging relationships. Credit Derivatives The Company enters into purchased credit default swaps to hedge against credit-related changes in the value of its investments. In a credit default swap transaction, the Company agrees with another party to pay, at specified intervals, a premium to hedge credit risk. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the delivery of par quantities of the referenced investment equal to the specified swap notional in exchange for the payment of cash amounts by the counterparty equal to the par value of the investment surrendered. Credit events vary by type of issuer but typically include bankruptcy, failure to pay debt obligations, repudiation, moratorium, or involuntary restructuring. In each case, payout on a credit default swap is triggered only after the Credit Derivatives Determinations Committee of the International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. ("ISDA") deems that a credit event has occurred. The Company utilizes credit default swaps in non-qualifying hedging relationships. The Company enters into written credit default swaps to synthetically create credit investments that are either more expensive to acquire or otherwise unavailable in the cash markets. These transactions are a combination of a derivative and one or more cash instruments, such as U.S. Treasury securities, agency securities or other fixed maturity securities. These credit default swaps are not designated as hedging instruments. Primary Risks Managed by Derivatives The following table presents the gross notional amount, estimated fair value and primary underlying risk exposure of the Company's derivatives, excluding embedded derivatives, held at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, ----------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ----------------------------- ----------------------------- Estimated Fair Value Estimated Fair Value -------------------- -------------------- Notional Notional Primary Underlying Risk Exposure Amount Assets Liabilities Amount Assets Liabilities -------------------------------- -------- ------ ----------- -------- ------ ----------- (In millions) Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments Fair value hedges: Interest rate swaps............... Interest rate.................... $ 10 $ -- $ -- $ 12 $ -- $ -- Cash flow hedges: Foreign currency swaps............ Foreign currency exchange rate... 30 2 3 27 2 1 -------- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- Total qualifying hedges...................................... 40 2 3 39 2 1 -------- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- Derivatives Not Designated or Not Qualifying as Hedging Instruments Interest rate swaps................ Interest rate.................... 741 12 22 741 9 6 Interest rate floors............... Interest rate.................... 2,040 9 4 2,040 36 17 Foreign currency swaps............. Foreign currency exchange rate... 37 -- 5 23 -- 1 Credit default swaps--purchased.... Credit........................... 8 -- -- 9 -- -- Credit default swaps--written...... Credit........................... 20 -- -- 22 -- -- -------- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- Total non-designated or non-qualifying derivatives............. 2,846 21 31 2,835 45 24 -------- ----- ----- -------- ----- ----- Total........................................................ $ 2,886 $ 23 $ 34 $ 2,874 $ 47 $ 25 ======== ===== ===== ======== ===== ===== 49
N-6282nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 282nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) Based on notional amounts, a substantial portion of the Company's derivatives was not designated or did not qualify as part of a hedging relationship at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. The Company's use of derivatives includes (i) derivatives that serve as macro hedges of the Company's exposure to various risks and that generally do not qualify for hedge accounting due to the criteria required under the portfolio hedging rules; (ii) derivatives that economically hedge insurance liabilities that contain mortality or morbidity risk and that generally do not qualify for hedge accounting because the lack of these risks in the derivatives cannot support an expectation of a highly effective hedging relationship; and (iii) written credit default swaps that are used to synthetically create credit investments and that do not qualify for hedge accounting because they do not involve a hedging relationship. For these non-qualified derivatives, changes in market factors can lead to the recognition of fair value changes in the statement of operations without an offsetting gain or loss recognized in earnings for the item being hedged. Net Derivative Gains (Losses) The components of net derivative gains (losses) were as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- ------ ------ (In millions) Derivatives and hedging gains (losses).. $ (27) $ 26 $ 36 Embedded derivatives.................... (415) 303 290 -------- ------ ------ Total net derivative gains (losses)... $ (442) $ 329 $ 326 ======== ====== ====== The amount the Company recognized in net investment income from settlement payments related to qualifying hedges for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, was not significant. The Company recognized $26 million, $25 million and $14 million of net derivative gains (losses) from settlement payments related to non-qualifying hedges for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 50
N-6283rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 283rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) Non-Qualifying Derivatives and Derivatives for Purposes Other Than Hedging The following table presents the amount and location of gains (losses) recognized in income for derivatives that were not designated or qualifying as hedging instruments: [Download Table] Net Derivative Gains (Losses) -------------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Interest rate derivatives..................... $ (50) Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives.... (4) Credit derivatives -- purchased............... -- Credit derivatives -- written................. -- ------- Total........................................ $ (54) ======= Year Ended December 31, 2012: Interest rate derivatives..................... $ 2 Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives.... (1) Credit derivatives -- purchased............... -- Credit derivatives -- written................. -- ------- Total........................................ $ 1 ======= Year Ended December 31, 2011: Interest rate derivatives..................... $ 22 Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives.... -- Credit derivatives -- purchased............... -- Credit derivatives -- written................. 1 ------- Total........................................ $ 23 ======= Fair Value Hedges The Company designates and accounts for interest rate swaps to convert fixed rate assets to floating rate assets as fair value hedges when they have met the requirements of fair value hedging. The amounts recognized in net derivative gains (losses) representing the ineffective portion of all fair value hedges for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011 were not significant. Changes in the fair value of the derivatives and the hedged items recognized in net derivative gains (losses) were not significant for each of the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. All components of each derivative's gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Cash Flow Hedges The Company designates and accounts for foreign currency swaps to hedge the foreign currency cash flow exposure of foreign currency denominated assets as cash flow hedges when they have met the requirements of cash flow hedging. 51
N-6284th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 284th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) In certain instances, the Company discontinued cash flow hedge accounting because the forecasted transactions were no longer probable of occurring. When such forecasted transactions are not probable of occurring within two months of the anticipated date, the Company reclassifies certain amounts from AOCI into net derivative gains (losses). For the year ended December 31, 2013 the amounts reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) related to such discontinued cash flow hedges were not significant. For both the years ended 2012 and 2011, there were no amounts reclassified into net derivative gains (losses) related to such discontinued cash flow hedges. There were no hedged forecasted transactions, other than the receipt or payment of variable interest payments, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the balance in AOCI associated with foreign currency swaps designated and qualifying as cash flow hedges was ($1) million and $1 million, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there was ($2) million, ($1) million and $1 million of gains (losses) deferred in AOCI related to foreign currency swaps, respectively. For both the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the amounts reclassified to net derivative gains (losses) related to foreign currency swaps were not significant. For the year ended December 31, 2011, there were no amounts reclassified to net derivative gains (losses) related to foreign currency swaps. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, there were no amounts reclassified to net investment income related to foreign currency swaps. For both the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the amounts recognized in net derivative gains (losses) which represented the ineffective portion of all cash flow hedges were not significant. For the year ended December 31, 2011, the Company did not recognize any net derivative gains (losses) which represented the ineffective portion of all cash flow hedges. At December 31, 2013, ($1) million of deferred net gains (losses) on derivatives in AOCI was expected to be reclassified to earnings within the next 12 months. All components of each derivative's gain or loss were included in the assessment of hedge effectiveness. Credit Derivatives In connection with synthetically created credit investment transactions, the Company writes credit default swaps for which it receives a premium to insure credit risk. Such credit derivatives are included within the non-qualifying derivatives and derivatives for purposes other than hedging table. If a credit event occurs, as defined by the contract, the contract may be cash settled or it may be settled gross by the Company paying the counterparty the specified swap notional amount in exchange for the delivery of par quantities of the referenced credit obligation. The Company's maximum amount at risk, assuming the value of all referenced credit obligations is zero, was $20 million and $22 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company can terminate these contracts at any time through cash settlement with the counterparty at an amount equal to the then current fair value of the credit default swaps. At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the amounts the Company would have received to terminate all of these contracts was not significant. 52
N-6285th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 285th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) The following table presents the estimated fair value, maximum amount of future payments and weighted average years to maturity of written credit default swaps at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 ---------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------- Estimated Maximum Estimated Maximum Fair Value Amount of Future Weighted Fair Value Amount of Future Weighted Rating Agency Designation of of Credit Payments under Average of Credit Payments under Average Referenced Default Credit Default Years to Default Credit Default Years to Credit Obligations (1) Swaps Swaps (2) Maturity (3) Swaps Swaps (2) Maturity (3) ---------------------------- ---------- ---------------- ------------ ---------- ---------------- ------------ (In millions) (In millions) Aaa/Aa/A Single name credit default swaps (corporate).......... $ -- $ -- -- $ -- $ 2 1.0 Baa Credit default swaps referencing indices........ -- 20 5.0 -- 20 4.5 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total....................... $ -- $ 20 5.0 $ -- $ 22 4.2 ======== ======== ======== ======== -------- (1)The rating agency designations are based on availability and the midpoint of the applicable ratings among Moody's Investors Service ("Moody's"), S&P and Fitch Ratings. If no rating is available from a rating agency, then an internally developed rating is used. (2)Assumes the value of the referenced credit obligations is zero. (3)The weighted average years to maturity of the credit default swaps is calculated based on weighted average notional amounts. Credit Risk on Freestanding Derivatives The Company may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivatives. Generally, the current credit exposure of the Company's derivatives is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivatives at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of master netting or similar agreements and any collateral received pursuant to such agreements. The Company manages its credit risk related to derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties and establishing and monitoring exposure limits. The Company's OTC-bilateral derivative transactions are generally governed by ISDA Master Agreements which provide for legally enforceable set-off and close-out netting of exposures to specific counterparties in the event of early termination of a transaction, which includes, but is not limited to, events of default and bankruptcy. In the event of an early termination, the Company is permitted to set off receivables from the counterparty against payables to the same counterparty arising out of all included transactions. Substantially all of the Company's ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex provisions which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral in connection with its OTC-bilateral derivatives. 53
N-6286th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 286th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) The Company's OTC-cleared derivatives are effected through central clearing counterparties and its exchange-traded derivatives are effected through regulated exchanges. Such positions are marked to market and margined on a daily basis, and the Company has minimal exposure to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to such derivatives. See Note 7 for a description of the impact of credit risk on the valuation of derivatives. The estimated fair value of the Company's net derivative assets and net derivative liabilities after the application of master netting agreements and collateral was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 December 31, 2012 Derivatives Subject to a Master Netting Arrangement or a Similar ------------------ ------------------ Arrangement Assets Liabilities Assets Liabilities ---------------------------------------------------------------- ------ ----------- ------ ----------- (In millions) Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: OTC-bilateral (1)....................................................... $ 25 $ 32 $ 53 $ 27 OTC-cleared (1)......................................................... -- -- -- -- Exchange-traded......................................................... -- -- -- -- ----- ----- ------ ----- Total gross estimated fair value of derivatives (1).................... 25 32 53 27 Amounts offset in the balance sheets...................................... -- -- -- -- ----- ----- ------ ----- Estimated fair value of derivatives presented in the balance sheets (1)... 25 32 53 27 Gross amounts not offset in the balance sheets: Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: (2) OTC-bilateral........................................................... (5) (5) (10) (10) OTC-cleared............................................................. -- -- -- -- Exchange-traded......................................................... -- -- -- -- Cash collateral: (3) OTC-bilateral........................................................... (17) -- (42) -- OTC-cleared............................................................. -- -- -- -- Exchange-traded......................................................... -- -- -- -- Securities collateral: (4) OTC-bilateral........................................................... (2) (26) (1) (16) OTC-cleared............................................................. -- -- -- -- Exchange-traded......................................................... -- -- -- -- ----- ----- ------ ----- Net amount after application of master netting agreements and collateral.. $ 1 $ 1 $ -- $ 1 ===== ===== ====== ===== -------- (1)At December 31, 2013 and 2012, derivative assets include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $2 million and $6 million, respectively, and derivative liabilities include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of ($2) million and $2 million, respectively. (2)Estimated fair value of derivatives is limited to the amount that is subject to set-off and includes income or expense accruals. 54
N-6287th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 287th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) (3)Cash collateral received is included in cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, or in fixed maturity securities, and the obligation to return it is included in payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions in the balance sheets. The receivable for the return of cash collateral provided by the Company is inclusive of initial margin on exchange traded and OTC-cleared derivatives and is included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the balance sheets. The amount of cash collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements. At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had not received or paid any excess cash collateral. (4)Securities collateral received by the Company is held in separate custodial accounts and is not recorded on the balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the Company is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral, but at December 31, 2013 none of the collateral had been sold or repledged. Securities collateral pledged by the Company is reported in fixed maturity securities in the balance sheets. Subject to certain constraints, the counterparties are permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral. The amount of securities collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements and cash collateral. At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess securities collateral with an estimated fair value of $1 million for its OTC-bilateral derivatives, which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had provided no excess securities collateral for its OTC-bilateral derivatives, and had provided $1 million and $0, respectively, for its OTC- cleared derivatives, which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. At both December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company did not pledge any securities collateral for its exchange-traded derivatives. The Company's collateral arrangements for its OTC-bilateral derivatives generally require the counterparty in a net liability position, after considering the effect of netting agreements, to pledge collateral when the fair value of that counterparty's derivatives reaches a pre-determined threshold. Certain of these arrangements also include financial strength-contingent provisions that provide for a reduction of these thresholds (on a sliding scale that converges toward zero) in the event of downgrades in the financial strength ratings of the Company and/or the credit ratings of the counterparty. In addition, certain of the Company's netting agreements for derivatives contain provisions that require both the Company and the counterparty to maintain a specific investment grade financial strength or credit rating from each of Moody's and S&P. If a party's financial strength or credit ratings were to fall below that specific investment grade financial strength or credit rating, that party would be in violation of these provisions, and the other party to the derivatives could terminate the transactions and demand immediate settlement and payment based on such party's reasonable valuation of the derivatives. The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company's OTC-bilateral derivatives that are in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements, together with the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the collateral pledged. The table also presents the incremental collateral that the Company would be required to provide if there was a one notch downgrade in the Company's financial strength rating at the reporting date or if the Company's financial strength rating sustained a downgrade to a level that 55
N-6288th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 288th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) triggered full overnight collateralization or termination of the derivative position at the reporting date. OTC-bilateral derivatives that are not subject to collateral agreements are excluded from this table. [Enlarge/Download Table] Estimated Fair Value of Fair Value of Incremental Collateral Collateral Provided: Provided Upon: ----------------------- ------------------------------------------- Downgrade in the Company's Financial Strength Rating to a Level that Triggers Estimated One Notch Full Overnight Fair Value of Downgrade in Collateralization or Derivatives in the Company's Termination Net Liability Fixed Maturity Financial Strength of the Derivative Position (1) Securities Rating Position -------------- ----------------------- ------------------ ------------------------ (In millions) December 31, 2013... $ 27 $ 26 $ -- $ 1 December 31, 2012... $ 17 $ 16 $ -- $ 2 -------- (1)After taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements. Embedded Derivatives The Company issues certain products or purchases certain investments that contain embedded derivatives that are required to be separated from their host contracts and accounted for as freestanding derivatives. These host contracts principally include: variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; and affiliated ceded reinsurance of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs. The following table presents the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the Company's embedded derivatives that have been separated from their host contracts at: [Download Table] December 31, --------------- Balance Sheet Location 2013 2012 -------------------------- -------- ------ (In millions) Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts: Ceded guaranteed minimum benefits... Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables......... $ 376 $ 959 Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts: Direct guaranteed minimum benefits.. PABs...................... $ (131) $ 56 The following table presents changes in estimated fair value related to embedded derivatives: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ---------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- ------ ------ (In millions) Net derivative gains (losses) (1), (2).. $ (415) $ 303 $ 290 -------- (1)The valuation of direct guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses) in connection with this adjustment were ($6) million, ($26) million and $29 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, 56
N-6289th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 289th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 6. Derivatives (continued) the valuation of ceded guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses) in connection with this adjustment were $42 million, $28 million and ($62) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. (2)See Note 4 for discussion of affiliated net derivative gains (losses) included in the table above. 7. Fair Value When developing estimated fair values, the Company considers three broad valuation techniques: (i) the market approach, (ii) the income approach, and (iii) the cost approach. The Company determines the most appropriate valuation technique to use, given what is being measured and the availability of sufficient inputs, giving priority to observable inputs. The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value into a three-level hierarchy, based on the significant input with the lowest level in its valuation. The input levels are as follows: Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The Company defines active markets based on average trading volume for equity securities. The size of the bid/ask spread is used as an indicator of market activity for fixed maturity securities. Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities other than quoted prices in Level 1, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other significant inputs that are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the determination of estimated fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. The Company's ability to sell securities, or the price ultimately realized for these securities, depends upon the demand and liquidity in the market and increases the use of judgment in determining the estimated fair value of certain securities. Considerable judgment is often required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value, and the use of different assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. 57
N-6290th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 290th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) Recurring Fair Value Measurements The assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy are presented below. [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 ----------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ------------------------- Total Estimated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value ------- --------- ------- --------------- (In millions) Assets Fixed maturity securities: U.S. corporate............................................... $ -- $ 859 $ 13 $ 872 U.S. Treasury and agency..................................... 408 49 -- 457 RMBS......................................................... -- 285 27 312 CMBS......................................................... -- 297 -- 297 Foreign corporate............................................ -- 185 44 229 ABS.......................................................... -- 46 7 53 State and political subdivision.............................. -- 19 -- 19 Foreign government........................................... -- 11 -- 11 ------ --------- ------ --------- Total fixed maturity securities............................ 408 1,751 91 2,250 ------ --------- ------ --------- Equity securities: Common stock................................................. -- 26 -- 26 Non-redeemable preferred stock............................... -- -- 19 19 ------ --------- ------ --------- Total equity securities.................................... -- 26 19 45 ------ --------- ------ --------- Short-term investments........................................ 14 61 -- 75 Derivative assets: (1) Interest rate.............................................. -- 21 -- 21 Foreign currency exchange rate............................. -- 2 -- 2 ------ --------- ------ --------- Total derivative assets................................... -- 23 -- 23 ------ --------- ------ --------- Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (2)...... -- -- 376 376 Separate account assets (3)................................... -- 12,033 -- 12,033 ------ --------- ------ --------- Total assets.............................................. $ 422 $ 13,894 $ 486 $ 14,802 ====== ========= ====== ========= Liabilities Derivative liabilities: (1) Interest rate................................................ $ -- $ 26 $ -- $ 26 Foreign currency exchange rate............................... -- 8 -- 8 ------ --------- ------ --------- Total derivative liabilities............................... -- 34 -- 34 ------ --------- ------ --------- Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (2).. -- -- (131) (131) ------ --------- ------ --------- Total liabilities.......................................... $ -- $ 34 $(131) $ (97) ====== ========= ====== ========= 58
N-6291st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 291st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2012 ----------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ------------------------------- Total Estimated Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value -------- ----------- ---------- --------------- (In millions) Assets Fixed maturity securities: U.S. corporate............................................... $ -- $ 944 $ 55 $ 999 U.S. Treasury and agency..................................... 382 15 -- 397 RMBS......................................................... -- 283 14 297 CMBS......................................................... -- 305 14 319 Foreign corporate............................................ -- 180 42 222 ABS.......................................................... -- 54 -- 54 State and political subdivision.............................. -- 20 -- 20 Foreign government........................................... -- 12 -- 12 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total fixed maturity securities............................ 382 1,813 125 2,320 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Equity securities: Common stock................................................. -- 28 -- 28 Non-redeemable preferred stock............................... -- -- 17 17 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total equity securities.................................... -- 28 17 45 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Short-term investments........................................ 116 23 -- 139 Derivative assets: (1) Interest rate.............................................. -- 45 -- 45 Foreign currency exchange rate............................. -- 2 -- 2 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total derivative assets................................... -- 47 -- 47 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (2)...... -- -- 959 959 Separate account assets (3)................................... -- 11,072 -- 11,072 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total assets.............................................. $ 498 $ 12,983 $ 1,101 $ 14,582 ======== =========== ========== =========== Liabilities Derivative liabilities: (1) Interest rate................................................ $ -- $ 23 $ -- $ 23 Foreign currency exchange rate............................... -- 2 -- 2 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total derivative liabilities.............................. -- 25 -- 25 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (2).. -- -- 56 56 -------- ----------- ---------- ----------- Total liabilities......................................... $ -- $ 25 $ 56 $ 81 ======== =========== ========== =========== -------- (1)Derivative assets are presented within other invested assets in the balance sheets and derivative liabilities are presented within other liabilities in the balance sheets. The amounts are presented gross in the tables above to reflect the presentation in the balance sheets, but are presented net for purposes of the rollforward in the Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) tables. (2)Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts are presented within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the balance sheets. Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts are presented within PABs in the balance sheets. (3)Investment performance related to separate account assets is fully offset by corresponding amounts credited to contractholders whose liability is reflected within separate account liabilities. Separate account liabilities are set equal to the estimated fair value of separate account assets. 59
N-6292nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 292nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) The following describes the valuation methodologies used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. The description includes the valuation techniques and key inputs for each category of assets or liabilities that are classified within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. Investments Valuation Controls and Procedures On behalf of the Company and MetLife, Inc.'s Chief Investment Officer and Chief Financial Officer, a pricing and valuation committee that is independent of the trading and investing functions and comprised of senior management, provides oversight of control systems and valuation policies for securities, mortgage loans and derivatives. On a quarterly basis, this committee reviews and approves new transaction types and markets, ensures that observable market prices and market-based parameters are used for valuation, wherever possible, and determines that judgmental valuation adjustments, when applied, are based upon established policies and are applied consistently over time. This committee also provides oversight of the selection of independent third party pricing providers and the controls and procedures to evaluate third party pricing. Periodically, the Chief Accounting Officer reports to the Audit Committee of MetLife, Inc.'s Board of Directors regarding compliance with fair value accounting standards. The Company reviews its valuation methodologies on an ongoing basis and revises those methodologies when necessary based on changing market conditions. Assurance is gained on the overall reasonableness and consistent application of input assumptions, valuation methodologies and compliance with fair value accounting standards through controls designed to ensure valuations represent an exit price. Several controls are utilized, including certain monthly controls, which include, but are not limited to, analysis of portfolio returns to corresponding benchmark returns, comparing a sample of executed prices of securities sold to the fair value estimates, comparing fair value estimates to management's knowledge of the current market, reviewing the bid/ask spreads to assess activity, comparing prices from multiple independent pricing services and ongoing due diligence to confirm that independent pricing services use market-based parameters. The process includes a determination of the observability of inputs used in estimated fair values received from independent pricing services or brokers by assessing whether these inputs can be corroborated by observable market data. The Company ensures that prices received from independent brokers, also referred to herein as "consensus pricing," represent a reasonable estimate of fair value by considering such pricing relative to the Company's knowledge of the current market dynamics and current pricing for similar financial instruments. While independent non-binding broker quotations are utilized, they are not used for a significant portion of the portfolio. For example, fixed maturity securities priced using independent non-binding broker quotations represent less than 1% of the total estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities and 2% of the total estimated fair value of Level 3 fixed maturity securities. The Company also applies a formal process to challenge any prices received from independent pricing services that are not considered representative of estimated fair value. If prices received from independent pricing services are not considered reflective of market activity or representative of estimated fair value, independent non-binding broker quotations are obtained, or an internally developed valuation is prepared. Internally developed valuations of current estimated fair value, which reflect internal estimates of liquidity and nonperformance risks, compared with pricing received from the independent pricing services, did not produce material differences in the estimated fair values for the majority of the portfolio; accordingly, overrides were 60
N-6293rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 293rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) not material. This is, in part, because internal estimates of liquidity and nonperformance risks are generally based on available market evidence and estimates used by other market participants. In the absence of such market-based evidence, management's best estimate is used. Securities and Short-term Investments When available, the estimated fair value of these financial instruments is based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. Generally, these are the most liquid of the Company's securities holdings and valuation of these securities does not involve management's judgment. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, giving priority to observable inputs. The significant inputs to the market standard valuation methodologies for certain types of securities with reasonable levels of price transparency are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. When observable inputs are not available, the market standard valuation methodologies rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. These unobservable inputs can be based in large part on management's judgment or estimation and cannot be supported by reference to market activity. Even though these inputs are unobservable, management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such securities and are considered appropriate given the circumstances. Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: This level includes securities priced principally by independent pricing services using observable inputs. Short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 2 fixed maturity securities and equity securities. U.S. corporate and foreign corporate securities These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques that use standard market observable inputs such as benchmark yields, spreads off benchmark yields, new issuances, issuer rating, duration, and trades of identical or comparable securities. Privately-placed securities are valued using matrix pricing methodologies using standard market observable inputs, and inputs derived from, or corroborated by, market observable data including market yield curve, duration, call provisions, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer, and in certain cases, delta spread adjustments to reflect specific credit-related issues. U.S. Treasury and agency securities These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs such as a benchmark U.S. Treasury yield curve, the spread off the U.S. Treasury yield curve for the identical security and comparable securities that are actively traded. 61
N-6294th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 294th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) Structured securities comprised of RMBS, CMBS and ABS These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques using standard market inputs, including spreads for actively traded securities, spreads off benchmark yields, expected prepayment speeds and volumes, current and forecasted loss severity, rating, weighted average coupon, weighted average maturity, average delinquency rates, geographic region, debt-service coverage ratios and issuance-specific information, including, but not limited to: collateral type, payment terms of the underlying assets, payment priority within the tranche, structure of the security, deal performance and vintage of loans. State and political subdivision and foreign government securities These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs, including a benchmark U.S. Treasury yield or other yields, issuer ratings, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads and reported trades of similar securities, including those within the same sub-sector or with a similar maturity or credit rating. Common stock These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based principally on observable inputs, including quoted prices in markets that are not considered active. Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: In general, securities classified within Level 3 use many of the same valuation techniques and inputs as described previously for Level 2. However, if key inputs are unobservable, or if the investments are less liquid and there is very limited trading activity, the investments are generally classified as Level 3. The use of independent non-binding broker quotations to value investments generally indicates there is a lack of liquidity or a lack of transparency in the process to develop the valuation estimates, generally causing these investments to be classified in Level 3. U.S. corporate and foreign corporate securities These securities, including financial services industry hybrid securities classified within fixed maturity securities, are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques that utilize unobservable inputs or inputs that cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including illiquidity premium, delta spread adjustments to reflect specific credit-related issues, credit spreads; and inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain valuations are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. Structured securities comprised of RMBS, CMBS and ABS These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques that utilize 62
N-6295th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 295th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) inputs that are unobservable or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including credit spreads. Below investment grade securities and sub-prime RMBS included in this level are valued based on inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain of these valuations are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. Non-redeemable preferred stock These securities, including financial services industry hybrid securities classified within equity securities, are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques using inputs such as comparable credit rating and issuance structure. Certain of these securities are valued based on inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2 and independent non-binding broker quotations. Separate Account Assets Separate account assets are carried at estimated fair value and reported as a summarized total on the balance sheets. The estimated fair value of separate account assets is based on the estimated fair value of the underlying assets. Separate account assets within the Company's separate accounts consist of mutual funds. Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: These assets are comprised of certain mutual funds without readily determinable fair values, as prices are not published publicly. Valuation of the mutual funds is based upon quoted prices or reported NAV provided by the fund managers. Derivatives The estimated fair value of derivatives is determined through the use of quoted market prices for exchange-traded derivatives or through the use of pricing models for OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives. The determination of estimated fair value, when quoted market values are not available, is based on market standard valuation methodologies and inputs that management believes are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments. Derivative valuations can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices, credit spreads, default risk, nonperformance risk, volatility, liquidity and changes in estimates and assumptions used in the pricing models. The valuation controls and procedures for derivatives are described in "-- Investments." The significant inputs to the pricing models for most OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant inputs that are observable generally include: interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rate curves, credit curves and volatility. However, certain OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives may rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant inputs that are unobservable generally include references to emerging market currencies and inputs that are outside the observable portion of 63
N-6296th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 296th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) the interest rate curve, credit curve, volatility or other relevant market measure. These unobservable inputs may involve significant management judgment or estimation. Even though unobservable, these inputs are based on assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances and management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments. Most inputs for OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives are mid-market inputs but, in certain cases, liquidity adjustments are made when they are deemed more representative of exit value. Market liquidity, as well as the use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs, may have a material effect on the estimated fair values of the Company's derivatives and could materially affect net income. The credit risk of both the counterparty and the Company are considered in determining the estimated fair value for all OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives, and any potential credit adjustment is based on the net exposure by counterparty after taking into account the effects of netting agreements and collateral arrangements. The Company values its OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives using standard swap curves which may include a spread to the risk free rate, depending upon specific collateral arrangements. This credit spread is appropriate for those parties that execute trades at pricing levels consistent with similar collateral arrangements. As the Company and its significant derivative counterparties generally execute trades at such pricing levels and hold sufficient collateral, additional credit risk adjustments are not currently required in the valuation process. The Company's ability to consistently execute at such pricing levels is in part due to the netting agreements and collateral arrangements that are in place with all of its significant derivative counterparties. An evaluation of the requirement to make additional credit risk adjustments is performed by the Company each reporting period. Freestanding Derivatives Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: This level includes all types of derivatives utilized by the Company with the exception of exchange traded derivatives included within Level 1 and those derivatives with unobservable inputs as described in Level 3. These derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. Interest rate Non-option-based. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve and basis curves. Option-based. Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, basis curves and interest rate volatility. Foreign currency exchange rate Non-option-based. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, basis curves, currency spot rates and cross currency basis curves. Embedded Derivatives Embedded derivatives principally include certain direct variable annuity guarantees and certain affiliated ceded reinsurance agreements related to such variable annuity guarantees. Embedded derivatives are recorded at estimated fair value with changes in estimated fair value reported in net income. 64
N-6297th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 297th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) The Company issues certain variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits. GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs contain embedded derivatives, which are measured at estimated fair value separately from the host variable annuity contract, with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). These embedded derivatives are classified within PABs in the balance sheets. The fair value of these embedded derivatives, estimated as the present value of projected future benefits minus the present value of projected future fees using actuarial and capital market assumptions including expectations concerning policyholder behavior, is calculated by the Company's actuarial department. The calculation is based on in-force business, and is performed using standard actuarial valuation software which projects future cash flows from the embedded derivative over multiple risk neutral stochastic scenarios using observable risk free rates. Capital market assumptions, such as risk free rates and implied volatilities, are based on market prices for publicly traded instruments to the extent that prices for such instruments are observable. Implied volatilities beyond the observable period are extrapolated based on observable implied volatilities and historical volatilities. Actuarial assumptions, including mortality, lapse, withdrawal and utilization, are unobservable and are reviewed at least annually based on actuarial studies of historical experience. The valuation of these guarantee liabilities includes nonperformance risk adjustments and adjustments for a risk margin related to non-capital market inputs. The nonperformance adjustment is determined by taking into consideration publicly available information relating to spreads in the secondary market for MetLife's debt, including related credit default swaps. These observable spreads are then adjusted, as necessary, to reflect the priority of these liabilities and the claims paying ability of the issuing insurance subsidiaries compared to MetLife. Risk margins are established to capture the non-capital market risks of the instrument which represent the additional compensation a market participant would require to assume the risks related to the uncertainties of such actuarial assumptions as annuitization, premium persistency, partial withdrawal and surrenders. The establishment of risk margins requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions of the amount and cost of capital needed to cover the guarantees. These guarantees may be more costly than expected in volatile or declining equity markets. Market conditions including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, equity indices, market volatility and foreign currency exchange rates; changes in nonperformance risk; and variations in actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, mortality and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs, may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the guarantees that could materially affect net income. The Company ceded, to an affiliated reinsurance company, the risk associated with certain of the GMIBs, GMABs and GMWBs described above that are also accounted for as embedded derivatives. In addition to ceding risks associated with guarantees that are accounted for as embedded derivatives, the Company also cedes, to the same affiliated reinsurance company, certain directly written GMIBs that are accounted for as insurance (i.e., not as embedded derivatives), but where the reinsurance agreement contains an embedded derivative. These embedded derivatives are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). The value of the embedded derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously for the guarantees directly written by the Company with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer. 65
N-6298th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 298th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) Embedded Derivatives Within Asset and Liability Host Contracts Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: Direct guaranteed minimum benefits These embedded derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. Valuations are based on option pricing techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include swap yield curve, currency exchange rates and implied volatilities. These embedded derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant unobservable inputs generally include: the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and implied volatilities, actuarial assumptions for policyholder behavior and mortality and the potential variability in policyholder behavior and mortality, nonperformance risk and cost of capital for purposes of calculating the risk margin. Reinsurance ceded on certain guaranteed minimum benefits These embedded derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. The valuation techniques and significant market standard unobservable inputs used in their valuation are similar to those described above in "-- Direct Guaranteed Minimum Benefits" and also include counterparty credit spreads. Transfers between Levels Overall, transfers between levels occur when there are changes in the observability of inputs and market activity. Transfers into or out of any level are assumed to occur at the beginning of the period. Transfers between Levels 1 and 2: There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 for assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value and still held at December 31, 2013 and 2012. Transfers into or out of Level 3: Assets and liabilities are transferred into Level 3 when a significant input cannot be corroborated with market observable data. This occurs when market activity decreases significantly and underlying inputs cannot be observed, current prices are not available, and/or when there are significant variances in quoted prices, thereby affecting transparency. Assets and liabilities are transferred out of Level 3 when circumstances change such that a significant input can be corroborated with market observable data. This may be due to a significant increase in market activity, a specific event, or one or more significant input(s) becoming observable. Transfers into Level 3 for fixed maturity securities were due primarily to a lack of trading activity, decreased liquidity and credit ratings downgrades (e.g., from investment grade to below investment grade) which have resulted in decreased transparency of valuations and an increased use of independent non-binding broker quotations and unobservable inputs, such as illiquidity premiums, delta spread adjustments, or credit spreads. 66
N-6299th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 299th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) Transfers out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities resulted primarily from increased transparency of both new issuances that, subsequent to issuance and establishment of trading activity, became priced by independent pricing services and existing issuances that, over time, the Company was able to obtain pricing from, or corroborate pricing received from, independent pricing services with observable inputs (such as observable spreads used in pricing securities) or increases in market activity and upgraded credit ratings. Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) The following table presents certain quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, and the sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in those inputs, for the more significant asset and liability classes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 --------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- Valuation Significant Weighted Techniques Unobservable Inputs Range Average (1) --------------------- -------------------------- ------------- ----------- Fixed maturity securities: (3) U.S. corporate and Matrix pricing Delta spread foreign corporate... adjustments (4) (10) - 30 6 Illiquidity premium (4) 30 - 30 30 Credit spreads (4) Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RMBS Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) discounted cash flow 97 - 574 411 Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 100 - 100 100 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMBS Market pricing Quoted prices (5) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABS Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 99 - 99 99 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 99 - 99 99 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded derivatives: Direct and ceded Option pricing Mortality rates: guaranteed techniques minimum benefits............ Ages 0 - 40 0% - 0.10% Ages 41 - 60 0.04% - 0.65% Ages 61 - 115 0.26% - 100% Lapse rates: Durations 1 - 10 0.50% - 100% Durations 11 -20 3% - 100% Durations 21 -116 3% - 100% Utilization rates 20% - 50% Withdrawal rates 0.07% - 10% Long-term equity volatilities 17.40% - 25% Nonperformance risk spread 0.03% - 0.44% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2012 Impact of --------------------- -------------------------- -------------------------- Increase in Input Valuation Significant Weighted on Estimated Techniques Unobservable Inputs Range Average (1) Fair Value (2) --------------------- -------------------------- ------------- ----------- ----------------- Fixed maturity securities: (3) U.S. corporate and Matrix pricing Delta spread foreign corporate... adjustments (4) 50 - 100 57 Decrease Illiquidity premium (4) 30 - 30 30 Decrease Credit spreads (4) 23 - 421 129 Decrease Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 100 - 102 101 Increase ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- RMBS Matrix pricing and Credit spreads (4) discounted cash flow 161 - 657 541 Decrease (6) Market pricing Quoted prices (5) Increase (6) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CMBS Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 100 - 100 100 Increase (6) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ABS Market pricing Quoted prices (5) Increase (6) Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) Increase (6) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Embedded derivatives: Direct and ceded Option pricing Mortality rates: guaranteed techniques minimum benefits............ Ages 0 - 40 0% - 0.10% Decrease (7) Ages 41 - 60 0.05% - 0.64% Decrease (7) Ages 61 - 115 0.32% - 100% Decrease (7) Lapse rates: Durations 1 - 10 0.50% - 100% Decrease (8) Durations 11 -20 3% - 100% Decrease (8) Durations 21 -116 3% - 100% Decrease (8) Utilization rates 20% - 50% Increase (9) Withdrawal rates 0.07% - 10% (10) Long-term equity volatilities 17.40% - 25% Increase (11) Nonperformance risk spread 0.10% - 0.67% Decrease (12) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- (1)The weighted average for fixed maturity securities is determined based on the estimated fair value of the securities. (2)The impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact on the estimated fair value. For embedded derivatives, changes to direct guaranteed minimum benefits are based on liability positions and changes to ceded guaranteed minimum benefits are based on asset positions. 67
N-6300th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 300th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) (3)Significant increases (decreases) in expected default rates in isolation would result in substantially lower (higher) valuations. (4)Range and weighted average are presented in basis points. (5)Range and weighted average are presented in accordance with the market convention for fixed maturity securities of dollars per hundred dollars of par. (6)Changes in the assumptions used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumptions used for prepayment rates. (7)Mortality rates vary by age and by demographic characteristics such as gender. Mortality rate assumptions are based on company experience. A mortality improvement assumption is also applied. For any given contract, mortality rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (8)Base lapse rates are adjusted at the contract level based on a comparison of the actuarially calculated guaranteed values and the current policyholder account value, as well as other factors, such as the applicability of any surrender charges. A dynamic lapse function reduces the base lapse rate when the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value as in the money contracts are less likely to lapse. Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. For any given contract, lapse rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (9)The utilization rate assumption estimates the percentage of contract holders with a GMIB or lifetime withdrawal benefit who will elect to utilize the benefit upon becoming eligible. The rates may vary by the type of guarantee, the amount by which the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value, the contract's withdrawal history and by the age of the policyholder. For any given contract, utilization rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (10)The withdrawal rate represents the percentage of account balance that any given policyholder will elect to withdraw from the contract each year. The withdrawal rate assumption varies by age and duration of the contract, and also by other factors such as benefit type. For any given contract, withdrawal rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. For GMWBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in an increase (decrease) in the estimated fair value of the guarantees. For GMABs and GMIBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in a decrease (increase) in the estimated fair value. (11)Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. For any given contract, long-term equity volatility rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (12)Nonperformance risk spread varies by duration and by currency. For any given contract, multiple nonperformance risk spreads will apply, depending on the duration of the cash flow being discounted for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. 68
N-6301st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 301st
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) The following is a summary of the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 that are not included in the preceding table. Generally, all other classes of securities classified within Level 3 use the same valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs as previously described for Level 3 securities. This includes matrix pricing and discounted cash flow methodologies, inputs such as quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2, as well as independent non-binding broker quotations. The sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in the significant unobservable inputs for these other assets and liabilities is similar in nature to that described in the preceding table. The following tables summarize the change of all assets and (liabilities) measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed Maturity Securities: Equity Securities: ------------------------------------- ----------------- Non- redeemable Net U.S. Foreign Common Preferred Short-term Embedded Corporate RMBS CMBS Corporate ABS Stock Stock Investments Derivatives (6) --------- ----- ----- --------- ----- ------ ---------- ----------- --------------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2013: Balance at January 1,................... $ 55 $ 14 $ 14 $ 42 $ -- $ -- $ 17 $ -- $ 903 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2)............ Net investment income................. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- (415) OCI.................................... -- -- -- 2 -- -- 2 -- -- Purchases (3)........................... 4 13 -- 10 7 -- -- -- -- Sales (3)............................... (10) -- -- (9) -- -- -- -- -- Issuances (3)........................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3)......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 19 Transfers into Level 3 (4).............. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............ (36) -- (14) (1) -- -- -- -- -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ Balance at December 31,................. $ 13 $ 27 $ -- $ 44 $ 7 $ -- $ 19 $ -- $ 507 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ====== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $(402) 69
N-6302nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 302nd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed Maturity Securities: Equity Securities: ------------------------------------- ----------------- Non- redeemable Net U.S. Foreign Common Preferred Short-term Embedded Corporate RMBS CMBS Corporate ABS Stock Stock Investments Derivatives (6) --------- ----- ----- --------- ----- ------ ---------- ----------- --------------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2012: Balance at January 1,................... $ 16 $ 11 $ -- $ 6 $ 6 $ 19 $ 15 $ -- $ 580 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2)............ Net investment income................. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net derivative gains (losses)......... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 303 OCI.................................... 2 3 -- -- -- -- 2 -- -- Purchases (3)........................... 31 -- 14 36 -- -- -- -- -- Sales (3)............................... (2) -- -- -- (6) -- -- -- -- Issuances (3)........................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3)......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 20 Transfers into Level 3 (4).............. 11 -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)............ (3) -- -- -- -- (19) -- -- -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ Balance at December 31,................. $ 55 $ 14 $ 14 $ 42 $ -- $ -- $ 17 $ -- $ 903 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ====== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.................. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).......... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 309 [Enlarge/Download Table] Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Fixed Maturity Securities: Equity Securities: ------------------------------------- ----------------- Non- redeemable Net U.S. Foreign Common Preferred Short-term Embedded Corporate RMBS CMBS Corporate ABS Stock Stock Investments Derivatives (6) --------- ----- ----- --------- ----- ------ ---------- ----------- --------------- (In millions) Year Ended December 31, 2011: Balance at January 1,................. $ 22 $ 11 $ -- $ 25 $ 19 $ 10 $ 15 $ 9 $ 269 Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2).......... Net investment income............... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net investment gains (losses)....... -- -- -- (3) -- -- -- -- -- Net derivative gains (losses)....... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 290 OCI.................................. 1 -- -- 2 1 -- -- -- -- Purchases (3)......................... 2 -- -- 6 5 9 -- -- -- Sales (3)............................. (2) -- -- (17) (9) -- -- (9) -- Issuances (3)......................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Settlements (3)....................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- 21 Transfers into Level 3 (4)............ -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4).......... (7) -- -- (7) (10) -- -- -- -- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ----- ------ Balance at December 31,............... $ 16 $ 11 $ -- $ 6 $ 6 $ 19 $ 15 $ -- $ 580 ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ===== ====== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income................ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses)........ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses)........ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 293 -------- (1)Amortization of premium/discount is included within net investment income. Impairments charged to net income (loss) on securities are included in net investment gains (losses). Lapses associated with net embedded derivatives are included in net derivative gains (losses). 70
N-6303rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 303rd
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) (2)Interest and dividend accruals, as well as cash interest coupons and dividends received, are excluded from the rollforward. (3)Items purchased/issued and then sold/settled in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. Fees attributed to embedded derivatives are included in settlements. (4)Gains and losses, in net income (loss) and OCI, are calculated assuming transfers into and/or out of Level 3 occurred at the beginning of the period. Items transferred into and then out of Level 3 in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. (5)Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) relate to assets and liabilities still held at the end of the respective periods. (6)Embedded derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward. Fair Value of Financial Instruments Carried at Other Than Fair Value The following tables provide fair value information for financial instruments that are carried on the balance sheet at amounts other than fair value. These tables exclude the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accrued investment income and payables for collateral under securities loaned and other transactions. The estimated fair value of the excluded financial instruments, which are primarily classified in Level 2 and, to a lesser extent, in Level 1, approximates carrying value as they are short-term in nature such that the Company believes there is minimal risk of material changes in interest rates or credit quality. All remaining balance sheet amounts excluded from the table below are not considered financial instruments subject to this disclosure. The carrying values and estimated fair values for such financial instruments, and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, are summarized as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2013 ------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy - ----------------------------------- Carrying Total Estimated Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------- (In millions) Assets Mortgage loans.................. $ 286 $ -- $ -- $ 303 $ 303 Policy loans.................... $ 27 $ -- $ 3 $ 39 $ 42 Other limited partnership interests...................... $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ 1 $ 1 Other invested assets........... $ 45 $ -- $ 50 $ -- $ 50 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.................... $ 1,258 $ -- $ -- $ 1,359 $ 1,359 Other assets.................... $ 5 $ -- $ 5 $ -- $ 5 Liabilities PABs............................ $ 2,293 $ -- $ -- $ 2,501 $ 2,501 Other liabilities............... $ 1 $ -- $ 1 $ -- $ 1 71
N-6304th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 304th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) [Enlarge/Download Table] December 31, 2012 ------------------------------------------------------------- Fair Value Hierarchy ----------------------------------- Carrying Total Estimated Value Level 1 Level 2 Level 3 Fair Value --------- ----------- ----------- ----------- --------------- (In millions) Assets Mortgage loans.................. $ 284 $ -- $ -- $ 307 $ 307 Policy loans.................... $ 27 $ -- $ 2 $ 46 $ 48 Other limited partnership interests...................... $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ 2 $ 2 Other invested assets........... $ 45 $ -- $ 57 $ -- $ 57 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.................... $ 1,364 $ -- $ -- $ 1,527 $ 1,527 Other assets.................... $ 6 $ -- $ 6 $ -- $ 6 Liabilities PABs............................ $ 2,431 $ -- $ -- $ 2,788 $ 2,788 Other liabilities............... $ 3 $ -- $ 3 $ -- $ 3 The methods, assumptions and significant valuation techniques and inputs used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are summarized as follows: Mortgage Loans For mortgage loans, estimated fair value is primarily determined by estimating expected future cash flows and discounting them using current interest rates for similar mortgage loans with similar credit risk, or is determined from pricing for similar loans. Policy Loans Policy loans with fixed interest rates are classified within Level 3. The estimated fair values for these loans are determined using a discounted cash flow model applied to groups of similar policy loans determined by the nature of the underlying insurance liabilities. Cash flow estimates are developed by applying a weighted-average interest rate to the outstanding principal balance of the respective group of policy loans and an estimated average maturity determined through experience studies of the past performance of policyholder repayment behavior for similar loans. These cash flows are discounted using current risk-free interest rates with no adjustment for borrower credit risk as these loans are fully collateralized by the cash surrender value of the underlying insurance policy. Policy loans with variable interest rates are classified within Level 2 and the estimated fair value approximates carrying value due to the absence of borrower credit risk and the short time period between interest rate resets, which presents minimal risk of a material change in estimated fair value due to changes in market interest rates. Other Limited Partnership Interests The estimated fair values of these cost method investments are generally based on the Company's share of the NAV as provided in the financial statements of the investees. In certain circumstances, management may adjust the NAV by a premium or discount when it has sufficient evidence to support applying such adjustments. 72
N-6305th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 305th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 7. Fair Value (continued) Other Invested Assets These other invested assets are principally comprised of loans to affiliates. The estimated fair value of loans to affiliates is determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using market interest rates currently available for instruments with similar terms and remaining maturities. Premiums, Reinsurance and Other Receivables Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables are principally comprised of certain amounts recoverable under reinsurance agreements. Amounts recoverable under ceded reinsurance agreements, which the Company has determined do not transfer significant risk such that they are accounted for using the deposit method of accounting, have been classified as Level 3. The valuation is based on discounted cash flow methodologies using significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value is determined using interest rates determined to reflect the appropriate credit standing of the assuming counterparty. Other Assets Other assets are comprised of a receivable for the reimbursable portion of the estimated future guaranty liability that pertains to pre-acquisition business. With the exception of the receivable, other assets are not considered financial instruments subject to disclosure. Accordingly, the amount represents the receivable from an unaffiliated institution for which the estimated fair value was determined by discounting the expected future cash flows using a discount rate that reflects the credit standing of the unaffiliated institution. PABs These PABs include investment contracts. Embedded derivatives on investment contracts and certain variable annuity guarantees accounted for as embedded derivatives are excluded from this caption in the preceding tables as they are separately presented in "-- Recurring Fair Value Measurements." The investment contracts primarily include fixed deferred annuities and fixed term payout annuities. The valuation of these investment contracts is based on discounted cash flow methodologies using significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value is determined using current market risk-free interest rates adding a spread to reflect the nonperformance risk in the liability. Other Liabilities Other liabilities consist of derivative payables and amounts due for securities purchased but not yet settled. The Company evaluates the specific terms, facts and circumstances of each instrument to determine the appropriate estimated fair values, which are not materially different from the carrying values. 73
N-6306th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 306th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Equity Statutory Equity and Income Each U.S. insurance company's state of domicile imposes risk-based capital ("RBC") requirements that were developed by the National Association of Insurance Commissioners ("NAIC"). Regulatory compliance is determined by a ratio of a company's total adjusted capital, calculated in the manner prescribed by the NAIC ("TAC") to its authorized control level RBC, calculated in the manner prescribed by the NAIC ("ACL RBC"). Companies below specific trigger points or ratios are classified within certain levels, each of which requires specified corrective action. The minimum level of TAC before corrective action commences is twice ACL RBC ("Company Action RBC"). The RBC ratio for the Company was in excess of 1,400% for all periods presented. The Company prepares statutory-basis financial statements in accordance with statutory accounting practices prescribed or permitted by the insurance department of its state of domicile. The NAIC has adopted the Codification of Statutory Accounting Principles ("Statutory Codification"). Statutory Codification is intended to standardize regulatory accounting and reporting to state insurance departments. However, statutory accounting principles continue to be established by individual state laws and permitted practices. Modifications by state insurance departments may impact the effect of Statutory Codification on the statutory capital and surplus of the Company. Statutory accounting principles differ from GAAP primarily by charging policy acquisition costs to expense as incurred, establishing future policy benefit liabilities using different actuarial assumptions, reporting of reinsurance agreements and valuing securities on a different basis. In addition, certain assets are not admitted under statutory accounting principles and are charged directly to surplus. The most significant assets not admitted by the Company are net deferred income tax assets resulting from temporary differences between statutory accounting principles basis and tax basis not expected to reverse and become recoverable within three years. Statutory net income (loss) of the Company, a Missouri domiciled insurer, was $111 million, $132 million and $94 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Statutory capital and surplus was $666 million and $704 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. All such amounts are derived from the statutory-basis financial statements as filed with the Missouri State Department of Insurance. Dividend Restrictions Under Missouri State Insurance Law, MLIIC is permitted, without prior insurance regulatory clearance, to pay a stockholder dividend to MetLife as long as the amount of the dividend when aggregated with all other dividends in the preceding 12 months does not exceed the greater of: (i) 10% of its surplus to policyholders as of the end of the immediately preceding calendar year; or (ii) its statutory net gain from operations for the immediately preceding calendar year (excluding net realized capital gains). MLIIC will be permitted to pay a dividend to MetLife in excess of the greater of such two amounts only if it files notice of the declaration of such a dividend and the amount thereof with the Missouri Director of Insurance (the "Missouri Director") and the Missouri Director either approves the distribution of the dividend or does not disapprove the distribution within 30 days of its filing. In addition, any dividend that exceeds earned surplus (defined by the Company as "unassigned funds (surplus)") as of the last filed annual statutory statement requires insurance regulatory approval. Under Missouri State Insurance Law, the Missouri Director has broad discretion in determining 74
N-6307th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 307th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Equity (continued) whether the financial condition of a stock life insurance company would support the payment of such dividends to its stockholders. During the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, MLIIC paid a dividend to MetLife of $129 million and $18 million, respectively. During the year ended December 31, 2011, MLIIC did not pay a dividend to MetLife. Based on amounts at December 31, 2013, MLIIC could pay a stockholder dividend in 2014 of $99 million without prior regulatory approval of the Missouri Director. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Information regarding changes in the balances of each component of AOCI, net of income tax, was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Unrealized Investment Gains Unrealized (Losses), Net of Gains (Losses) Related Offsets (1) on Derivatives Total ------------------- -------------- ------- (In millions) Balance at December 31, 2010....................... $ 19 $ 1 $ 20 OCI before reclassifications....................... 19 -- 19 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (7) -- (7) ------- ------- ------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax... 31 1 32 Amounts reclassified from AOCI..................... 4 -- 4 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (1) -- (1) ------- ------- ------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax. 3 -- 3 ------- ------- ------- Balance at December 31, 2011....................... 34 1 35 OCI before reclassifications....................... 61 (1) 60 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (21) -- (21) ------- ------- ------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax... 74 -- 74 Amounts reclassified from AOCI..................... 3 -- 3 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (1) -- (1) ------- ------- ------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax. 2 -- 2 ------- ------- ------- Balance at December 31, 2012....................... 76 -- 76 OCI before reclassifications....................... (78) (2) (80) Income tax expense (benefit)....................... 27 1 28 ------- ------- ------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax... 25 (1) 24 Amounts reclassified from AOCI..................... (2) -- (2) Income tax expense (benefit)....................... 1 -- 1 ------- ------- ------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax. (1) -- (1) ------- ------- ------- Balance at December 31, 2013....................... $ 24 $ (1) $ 23 ======= ======= ======= -------- (1)See Note 5 for information on offsets to investments related to insurance liabilities and DAC and VOBA. 75
N-6308th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 308th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 8. Equity (continued) Information regarding amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI, was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Statement of Operations and AOCI Components Amounts Reclassified from AOCI Comprehensive Income (Loss) Location ---------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------ ------------------------------------ Years Ended December 31, ------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (In millions) Net unrealized investment gains (losses): Net unrealized investment gains (losses)............ $ 1 $ (5) $ (5) Other net investment gains (losses) Net unrealized investment gains (losses)............ 1 2 1 Net investment income -------- -------- -------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses), before income tax........................................ 2 (3) (4) Income tax (expense) benefit....................... (1) 1 1 -------- -------- -------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses), net of income tax........................................ $ 1 $ (2) $ (3) ======== ======== ======== Total reclassifications, net of income tax............ $ 1 $ (2) $ (3) ======== ======== ======== 9. Other Expenses Information on other expenses was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ----- ----- ----- (In millions) Compensation..................... $ 5 $ 9 $ 10 Commissions...................... 50 57 68 Volume-related costs............. -- 3 7 Capitalization of DAC............ (6) (19) (34) Amortization of DAC and VOBA..... (89) 148 172 Premium taxes, licenses and fees. 3 1 6 Other............................ 26 30 30 ----- ----- ----- Total other expenses........... $(11) $ 229 $ 259 ===== ===== ===== Capitalization and Amortization of DAC and VOBA See Note 3 for additional information on DAC and VOBA including impacts of capitalization and amortization. Affiliated Expenses See Note 12 for discussion of affiliated expenses included in the table above. 76
N-6309th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 309th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 10. Income Tax The provision for income tax was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------- ----- ----- (In millions) Current: Federal...................................... $ 38 $ 8 $ 24 Deferred: Federal...................................... (105) 86 66 ------- ----- ----- Provision for income tax expense (benefit). $ (67) $ 94 $ 90 ======= ===== ===== The reconciliation of the income tax provision at the U.S. statutory rate to the provision for income tax as reported was as follows: [Download Table] Years Ended December 31, ------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------- ----- ----- (In millions) Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate....... $ (55) $ 103 $ 107 Tax effect of: Dividend received deduction............... (12) (11) (13) Prior year tax............................ (2) 3 (2) Tax credits............................... (1) (1) (2) Other, net................................ 3 -- -- ------- ----- ----- Provision for income tax expense (benefit). $ (67) $ 94 $ 90 ======= ===== ===== Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at: [Download Table] December 31, ----------------- 2013 2012 -------- -------- (In millions) Deferred income tax assets: Investments, including derivatives.............. $ 9 $ -- Tax credit carryforwards........................ 5 -- Other, net...................................... 2 -------- -------- Total deferred income tax assets.............. 16 -- Deferred income tax liabilities: Policyholder liabilities and receivables........ 110 234 DAC and VOBA.................................... 86 33 Net unrealized investment gains................. 11 40 Investments, including derivatives.............. -- 18 Other........................................... 1 1 -------- -------- Total deferred income tax liabilities......... 208 326 -------- -------- Net deferred income tax asset (liability)... $ (192) $ (326) ======== ======== 77
N-6310th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 310th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 10. Income Tax (continued) Tax credit carryforwards of $5 million at December 31, 2013 will expire beginning in 2021. The Company participates in a tax sharing agreement with MetLife, as described in Note 1. Pursuant to this tax sharing agreement, the amounts due from affiliates include $18 million and $8 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The amounts due to affiliates include $8 million at December 31, 2011. The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. federal government and various state and local jurisdictions. The Company is under continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service ("IRS") and other tax authorities in jurisdictions in which the Company has significant business operations. The income tax years under examination vary by jurisdiction. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state or local income tax examinations in major taxing jurisdictions for years prior to 2006. The IRS audit cycle for the year 2006, which began in April 2010, is expected to conclude in 2014. It is not expected that there will be a material change in the Company's liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the next 12 months. A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] Year Ended December 31, 2013 ----------------- (In millions) Balance at January 1,......................................................... $ -- Additions for tax positions of prior years.................................... 3 -------- Balance at December 31,....................................................... $ 3 ======== Unrecognized tax benefits that, if recognized would impact the effective rate. $ 3 ======== There were no unrecognized tax benefits at December 31, 2012 and 2011. The Company classifies interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense, included within other expenses, while penalties are included in income tax expense. Interest was as follows: [Download Table] Year Ended December 31, 2013 ----------------- (In millions) Interest recognized in the statements of operations.......... $ 1 December 31, 2013 ----------------- (In millions) Interest included in other liabilities in the balance sheets. $ 1 78
N-6311th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 311th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 10. Income Tax (continued) There was no interest recognized in the statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. There was no interest included in other liabilities in the balance sheets at December 31, 2012. The Company had no penalties for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. The U.S. Treasury Department and the IRS have indicated that they intend to address through regulations the methodology to be followed in determining the dividends received deduction ("DRD"), related to variable life insurance and annuity contracts. The DRD reduces the amount of dividend income subject to tax and is a significant component of the difference between the actual tax expense and expected amount determined using the federal statutory tax rate of 35%. Any regulations that the IRS ultimately proposes for issuance in this area will be subject to public notice and comment, at which time insurance companies and other interested parties will have the opportunity to raise legal and practical questions about the content, scope and application of such regulations. As a result, the ultimate timing and substance of any such regulations are unknown at this time. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized an income tax benefit of $14 million and $8 million, respectively, related to the separate account DRD. The 2013 benefit included a benefit of $2 million related to a true-up of the 2012 tax return. The 2012 benefit included an expense of $3 million related to a true-up of the 2011 tax return. 11. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees Contingencies Litigation Unclaimed Property Inquiries In April 2012, MetLife, for itself and on behalf of entities including the Company, reached agreements with representatives of the U.S. jurisdictions that were conducting audits of MetLife and certain of its affiliates for compliance with unclaimed property laws, and with state insurance regulators directly involved in a multistate targeted market conduct examination relating to claim-payment practices and compliance with unclaimed property laws. At least one other jurisdiction is pursuing a market conduct examination. It is possible that other jurisdictions may pursue similar examinations or audits and that such actions may result in additional payments to beneficiaries, additional escheatment of funds deemed abandoned under state laws, administrative penalties, interest, and/or further changes to the Company's procedures. The Company is not currently able to estimate these additional possible costs. Sales Practices Claims Over the past several years, the Company has faced claims and regulatory inquiries and investigations, alleging improper marketing or sales of individual life insurance policies, annuities, mutual funds or other products. The Company continues to vigorously defend against the claims in these matters. The Company believes adequate provision has been made in its financial statements for all probable and reasonably estimable losses for sales practices matters. 79
N-6312th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 312th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 11. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (continued) Summary Various litigation, claims and assessments against the Company, have arisen in the course of the Company's business, including, but not limited to, in connection with its activities as an insurer, employer, investor, investment advisor, and taxpayer. Further, state insurance regulatory authorities and other federal and state authorities regularly make inquiries and conduct investigations concerning the Company's compliance with applicable insurance and other laws and regulations. It is not possible to predict the ultimate outcome of all pending investigations and legal proceedings. In some of the matters, very large and/or indeterminate amounts, including punitive and treble damages, are sought. Although in light of these considerations it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain cases could have a material effect upon the Company's financial position, based on information currently known by the Company's management, in its opinion, the outcomes of such pending investigations and legal proceedings are not likely to have such an effect. However, given the large and/or indeterminate amounts sought in certain of these matters and the inherent unpredictability of litigation, it is possible that an adverse outcome in certain matters could, from time to time, have a material effect on the Company's net income or cash flows in particular annual periods. Insolvency Assessments Most of the jurisdictions in which the Company is admitted to transact business require insurers doing business within the jurisdiction to participate in guaranty associations, which are organized to pay contractual benefits owed pursuant to insurance policies issued by impaired, insolvent or failed insurers. These associations levy assessments, up to prescribed limits, on all member insurers in a particular state on the basis of the proportionate share of the premiums written by member insurers in the lines of business in which the impaired, insolvent or failed insurer engaged. Some states permit member insurers to recover assessments paid through full or partial premium tax offsets. Assets and liabilities held for insolvency assessments were as follows: [Download Table] December 31, --------------- 2013 2012 ------- ------- (In millions) Other Assets: Premium tax offset for future undiscounted assessments. $ 1 $ 1 Receivable for reimbursement of paid assessments (1)... 5 6 ------- ------- $ 6 $ 7 ======= ======= Other Liabilities: Insolvency assessments................................. $ 6 $ 8 ======= ======= -------- (1)The Company holds a receivable from the seller of a prior acquisition in accordance with the purchase agreement. 80
N-6313th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 313th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 11. Contingencies, Commitments and Guarantees (continued) Commitments Commitments to Fund Partnership Investments The Company makes commitments to fund partnership investments in the normal course of business. The amounts of these unfunded commitments were $7 million and $9 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company anticipates that these amounts will be invested in partnerships over the next five years. Mortgage Loan Commitments The Company commits to lend funds under mortgage loan commitments. The amounts of these mortgage loan commitments were $6 million and $1 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Commitments to Fund Private Corporate Bond Investments The Company commits to lend funds under private corporate bond investments. The amounts of these unfunded commitments were $14 million and $13 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. Guarantees In the normal course of its business, the Company has provided certain indemnities, guarantees and commitments to third parties such that it may be required to make payments now or in the future. In the context of acquisition, disposition, investment and other transactions, the Company has provided indemnities and guarantees, including those related to tax, environmental and other specific liabilities, and other indemnities and guarantees that are triggered by, among other things, breaches of representations, warranties or covenants provided by the Company. In addition, in the normal course of business, the Company provides indemnifications to counterparties in contracts with triggers similar to the foregoing, as well as for certain other liabilities, such as third-party lawsuits. These obligations are often subject to time limitations that vary in duration, including contractual limitations and those that arise by operation of law, such as applicable statutes of limitation. In some cases, the maximum potential obligation under the indemnities and guarantees is subject to a contractual limitation, while in other cases such limitations are not specified or applicable. Since certain of these obligations are not subject to limitations, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount that could become due under these guarantees in the future. Management believes that it is unlikely the Company will have to make any material payments under these indemnities, guarantees, or commitments. In addition, the Company indemnifies its directors and officers as provided in its charters and by-laws. Also, the Company indemnifies its agents for liabilities incurred as a result of their representation of the Company's interests. Since these indemnities are generally not subject to limitation with respect to duration or amount, the Company does not believe that it is possible to determine the maximum potential amount that could become due under these indemnities in the future. The Company had no liability for indemnities, guarantees and commitments at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. 81
N-6314th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 314th
MetLife Investors Insurance Company (A Wholly-Owned Subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) Notes to the Financial Statements -- (Continued) 12. Related Party Transactions Service Agreements The Company has entered into various agreements with affiliates for services necessary to conduct its activities. Typical services provided under these agreements include management, policy administrative functions, personnel, investment advice and distribution services. For certain agreements, charges are based on various performance measures or activity-based costing. The bases for such charges are modified and adjusted by management when necessary or appropriate to reflect fairly and equitably the actual incidence of cost incurred by the Company and/or affiliate. Expenses incurred with affiliates related to these agreements, recorded in other expenses, were $78 million, $53 million and $76 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenues received from affiliates related to these agreements, recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees, were $38 million, $34 million and $32 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Revenues received from affiliates related to these agreements, recorded in fees on ceded reinsurance and other, were $25 million, $24 million and $26 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The Company had net receivables from affiliates, related to the items discussed above, of $4 million and $2 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. See Notes 4 and 5 for additional information on related party transactions. 13. Subsequent Event The Company has evaluated events subsequent to December 31, 2013, through March 31, 2014, which is the date these financial statements were available to be issued, and has determined there are no material subsequent events requiring adjustment to or disclosure in the financial statements. 82
N-6315th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 315th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 AND FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 (AS RESTATED) AND INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT
N-6316th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 316th
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS' REPORT To the Board of Directors and Stockholder of Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd.: We have audited the accompanying financial statements of Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. (a wholly-owned subsidiary of MetLife, Inc.) (the "Company"), which comprise the balance sheets as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the related statements of operations, comprehensive income (loss), stockholder's equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, and the related notes to the financial statements. MANAGEMENT'S RESPONSIBILITY FOR THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error. AUDITORS' RESPONSIBILITY Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with auditing standards generally accepted in the United States of America. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement. An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor's judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the Company's preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion. OPINION In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. as of December 31, 2013 and 2012, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2013, in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. EMPHASIS OF MATTER As discussed in Note 1 to the financial statements, the accompanying financial statements have been restated to correct misstatements on the 2013, 2012 and 2011 statements of cash flows. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter. OTHER MATTERS In our report dated April 2, 2014 on the previously issued 2012 financial statements filed with the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority ("CIMA"), we expressed an opinion that the Company's 2012 balance sheet did not fairly present insurance liabilities and, accordingly, did not conform to the presentation required under accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. That presentation was based on practices prescribed or permitted by CIMA. As noted in Note 1, in these general purpose financial statements, the Company has changed its presentation of insurance liabilities to conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Accordingly, our present opinion on the 2012 financial statements, as presented herein, is different from that expressed in our previous report. In addition, results of the Company may not be indicative of those of a stand-alone entity, as the Company is a member of a controlled group of affiliated companies. /s/ DELOITTE & TOUCHE LLP Certified Public Accountants Princeton, New Jersey April 2, 2014 (October 27, 2014 as to Note 1 related to the restatements and November 7, 2014 as to Note 14) F-1
N-6317th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 317th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. BALANCE SHEETS DECEMBER 31, 2013 AND 2012 (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT SHARE AND PER SHARE DATA) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 --------------- ASSETS Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $1,311,922 and $1,719,913, respectively)..................................................................... $ 1,321,081 Short-term investments, at estimated fair value.................................................... 2,781,282 Derivative assets.................................................................................. 2,375,499 Funds withheld at interest......................................................................... 2,694,267 --------------- Total investments................................................................................. 9,172,129 Cash and cash equivalents............................................................................ 629,616 Accrued investment income............................................................................ 94,238 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.......................................................... 645,814 Deferred policy acquisition costs.................................................................... 159,820 Current income tax recoverable....................................................................... 196,592 Deferred income tax recoverable...................................................................... 1,529,464 --------------- Total assets...................................................................................... $ 12,427,673 =============== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY LIABILITIES Future policy benefits............................................................................... $ 2,747,421 Policyholder account balances........................................................................ 2,488,945 Other policy-related balances........................................................................ 2,170,145 Policyholder dividends payable....................................................................... 16,256 Debt -- affiliated................................................................................... 575,118 Derivative liabilities............................................................................... 2,648,454 Other liabilities.................................................................................... 551,170 --------------- Total liabilities................................................................................. 11,197,509 --------------- CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (NOTE 12) STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 250,000 shares authorized, 200,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013; par value $1.00 per share; 200,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012; $2,000,000 aggregate liquidation preference at December 31, 2013 and 2012.......................................................................... 2 Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 13,875,000 shares authorized, 13,466,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013; par value $1.00 per share; 14,125,000 shares authorized, 13,466,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012....................................... 135 Additional paid-in capital........................................................................... 4,125,653 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit).............................................................. (2,964,638) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)........................................................ 69,012 --------------- Total stockholder's equity........................................................................ 1,230,164 --------------- Total liabilities and stockholder's equity........................................................ $ 12,427,673 =============== [Enlarge/Download Table] 2012 --------------- ASSETS Investments: Fixed maturity securities available-for-sale, at estimated fair value (amortized cost: $1,311,922 and $1,719,913, respectively)..................................................................... $ 1,785,619 Short-term investments, at estimated fair value.................................................... 4,307,652 Derivative assets.................................................................................. 4,652,428 Funds withheld at interest......................................................................... 2,436,815 --------------- Total investments................................................................................. 13,182,514 Cash and cash equivalents............................................................................ 905,519 Accrued investment income............................................................................ 93,501 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.......................................................... 775,433 Deferred policy acquisition costs.................................................................... 136,661 Current income tax recoverable....................................................................... 261,720 Deferred income tax recoverable...................................................................... 2,267,071 --------------- Total assets...................................................................................... $ 17,622,419 =============== LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY LIABILITIES Future policy benefits............................................................................... $ 2,735,580 Policyholder account balances........................................................................ 8,831,285 Other policy-related balances........................................................................ 1,896,818 Policyholder dividends payable....................................................................... 17,438 Debt -- affiliated................................................................................... 75,118 Derivative liabilities............................................................................... 1,665,997 Other liabilities.................................................................................... 1,726,141 --------------- Total liabilities................................................................................. 16,948,377 --------------- CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS (NOTE 12) STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY Preferred stock, par value $.01 per share; 250,000 shares authorized, 200,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013; par value $1.00 per share; 200,000 shares authorized, issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012; $2,000,000 aggregate liquidation preference at December 31, 2013 and 2012.......................................................................... 200 Common stock, par value $.01 per share; 13,875,000 shares authorized, 13,466,000 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2013; par value $1.00 per share; 14,125,000 shares authorized, 13,466,000 shares issued and outstanding at December 31, 2012....................................... 13,466 Additional paid-in capital........................................................................... 4,085,299 Retained earnings (accumulated deficit).............................................................. (3,504,200) Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)........................................................ 79,277 --------------- Total stockholder's equity........................................................................ 674,042 --------------- Total liabilities and stockholder's equity........................................................ $ 17,622,419 =============== SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-2
N-6318th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 318th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ------------- --------------- ----------- REVENUES Premiums............................................... $ 59,372 $ 949,827 $ 71,518 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees. 586,571 548,425 432,722 Net investment income.................................. 35,423 20,695 17,238 Net investment gains (losses).......................... (56,581) 41,793 (1,086) Net derivative gains (losses).......................... 1,935,248 (3,676,589) 230,434 Other revenues......................................... 1,395 22,916 43,740 ------------- --------------- ----------- Total revenues...................................... 2,561,428 (2,092,933) 794,566 ------------- --------------- ----------- EXPENSES Policyholder benefits and claims....................... 1,379,886 1,811,746 309,339 Interest credited to policyholder account balances..... 17,399 16,598 15,831 Policyholder dividends................................. 26,675 30,279 30,722 Other expenses......................................... 101,207 206,841 169,883 ------------- --------------- ----------- Total expenses...................................... 1,525,167 2,065,464 525,775 ------------- --------------- ----------- Income (loss) before provision for income tax.......... 1,036,261 (4,158,397) 268,791 Provision for income tax expense (benefit)............. 364,215 (1,455,499) 94,077 ------------- --------------- ----------- Net income (loss)...................................... $ 672,046 $ (2,702,898) $ 174,714 ============= =============== =========== SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-3
N-6319th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 319th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ---------------- ------------ Net income (loss)....................................... $ 672,046 $ (2,702,898) $ 174,714 Other comprehensive income (loss): Unrealized investment gains (losses), net of related offsets.............................................. (56,634) 25,017 35,549 Foreign currency translation adjustments............... 26,548 13,028 (15,751) ------------ ---------------- ------------ Other comprehensive income (loss), before income tax... (30,086) 38,045 19,798 Income tax (expense) benefit related to items of other comprehensive income (loss).......................... 19,821 (8,756) (12,442) ------------ ---------------- ------------ Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax... (10,265) 29,289 7,356 ------------ ---------------- ------------ Comprehensive income (loss)............................. $ 661,781 $ (2,673,609) $ 182,070 ============ ================ ============ SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-4
N-6320th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 320th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] RETAINED ADDITIONAL EARNINGS PREFERRED COMMON PAID-IN (ACCUMULATED STOCK STOCK CAPITAL DEFICIT) ---------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Balance at December 31, 2010............................... $ -- $ 13,466 $ 548,218 $ (976,016) Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. (Note 9)........... 703,860 Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss).......................................... 174,714 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax....... -------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Balance at December 31, 2011............................... -- 13,466 1,252,078 (801,302) -------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. (Note 9)........... 833,421 Non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock issuance -- newly issued shares (Note 9).................................... 200 1,999,800 Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss).......................................... (2,702,898) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax....... -------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Balance at December 31, 2012............................... 200 13,466 4,085,299 (3,504,200) -------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. (Note 9)........... 26,825 Change in preferred and common stock par value (Note 9).................................................. (198) (13,331) 13,529 Dividends on perpetual preferred stock..................... (132,484) Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss).......................................... 672,046 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax....... -------- ---------- ------------ -------------- Balance at December 31, 2013............................... $ 2 $ 135 $ 4,125,653 $ (2,964,638) ======== ========== ============ ============== [Enlarge/Download Table] ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) ----------------------------- NET FOREIGN UNREALIZED CURRENCY INVESTMENT TRANSLATION TOTAL GAINS (LOSSES) ADJUSTMENTS STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY --------------- ------------- --------------------- Balance at December 31, 2010............................... $ 3,341 $ 39,291 $ (371,700) Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. (Note 9)........... 703,860 Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss).......................................... 174,714 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax....... 23,107 (15,751) 7,356 ------------ ------------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 2011............................... 26,448 23,540 514,230 ------------ ------------- ------------ Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. (Note 9)........... 833,421 Non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock issuance -- newly issued shares (Note 9).................................... 2,000,000 Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss).......................................... (2,702,898) Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax....... 16,261 13,028 29,289 ------------ ------------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 2012............................... 42,709 36,568 674,042 ------------ ------------- ------------ Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc. (Note 9)........... 26,825 Change in preferred and common stock par value (Note 9).................................................. -- Dividends on perpetual preferred stock..................... (132,484) Comprehensive income (loss): Net income (loss).......................................... 672,046 Other comprehensive income (loss), net of income tax....... (36,813) 26,548 (10,265) ------------ ------------- ------------ Balance at December 31, 2013............................... $ 5,896 $ 63,116 $ 1,230,164 ============ ============= ============ SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-5
N-6321st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 321st
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013, 2012 AND 2011 (IN THOUSANDS) [Enlarge/Download Table] 2013 2012 -------------- -------------- AS RESTATED AS RESTATED SEE NOTE 1 SEE NOTE 1 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (loss)......................................................................... $ 672,046 $ (2,702,898) Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts associated with investments, net.... 20,823 5,956 (Gains) losses on investments, net...................................................... 56,581 (41,793) (Gains) losses on derivatives, net...................................................... (204,378) 4,802,934 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.................................. 11,088 (556) Change in accrued investment income..................................................... 28 (77,901) Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables................................... 112,292 155,762 Change in deferred policy acquisition costs, net........................................ (23,159) 41,444 Change in income tax recoverable (payable).............................................. 670,461 (1,675,874) Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances..................... 272,897 530,400 Change in other liabilities............................................................. 101,876 (96,015) Other, net.............................................................................. 31,681 24,977 -------------- -------------- Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities....................................... 1,722,236 966,436 -------------- -------------- CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Sales, maturities and repayments of: Fixed maturity securities............................................................... 813,413 1,310,619 Equity securities....................................................................... 128 7,212 Purchases of fixed maturity securities.................................................... (415,825) (1,486,466) Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives................................. 146,845 415,944 Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives..................................... (2,882,508) (1,790,917) Net change in short-term investments...................................................... 1,525,163 1,497,830 Net change in funds withheld at interest.................................................. (336,545) (146,444) Other, net................................................................................ 272,335 24,279 -------------- -------------- Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities....................................... (876,994) (167,943) -------------- -------------- CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Policyholder account balances: Deposits................................................................................ -- 212 Withdrawals............................................................................. -- (10,330) Change in payables for derivative collateral.............................................. (1,276,847) (1,627,743) Long-term debt issuances -- affiliated.................................................... 500,000 -- Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc.................................................... -- 800,000 Dividend on preferred stock............................................................... (132,484) -- Other, net................................................................................ (166,050) (122,628) -------------- -------------- Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities....................................... (1,075,381) (960,489) -------------- -------------- Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances. (45,764) (23,555) -------------- -------------- Change in cash and cash equivalents....................................................... (275,903) (185,551) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year.............................................. 905,519 1,091,070 -------------- -------------- CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR.................................................... $ 629,616 $ 905,519 ============== ============== SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Net cash paid for: Interest................................................................................ $ 5,107 $ 134,691 ============== ============== Income tax.............................................................................. $ 304,518 $ 222,025 ============== ============== Non-cash transactions: Purchase of fixed maturity securities associated with business transfer................. $ -- $ 760,628 ============== ============== Purchase of short-term investments associated with business transfer.................... $ -- $ 72,453 ============== ============== Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc.................................................. $ 26,825 $ 33,421 ============== ============== Issuance of non-cumulative perpetual preferred shares................................... $ -- $ 2,000,000 ============== ============== Assignment of senior notes to MetLife, Inc.............................................. $ -- $ (2,000,000) ============== ============== [Enlarge/Download Table] 2011 ------------ AS RESTATED SEE NOTE 1 CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Net income (loss)......................................................................... $ 174,714 Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts associated with investments, net.... (62) (Gains) losses on investments, net...................................................... 1,086 (Gains) losses on derivatives, net...................................................... 469,752 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees.................................. (3,781) Change in accrued investment income..................................................... (6,706) Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables................................... 358,863 Change in deferred policy acquisition costs, net........................................ 28,571 Change in income tax recoverable (payable).............................................. (19,555) Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances..................... 256,552 Change in other liabilities............................................................. (355,242) Other, net.............................................................................. 29,195 ------------ Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities....................................... 933,387 ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Sales, maturities and repayments of: Fixed maturity securities............................................................... 604,979 Equity securities....................................................................... 2,880 Purchases of fixed maturity securities.................................................... (754,191) Cash received in connection with freestanding derivatives................................. 876,691 Cash paid in connection with freestanding derivatives..................................... (2,032,925) Net change in short-term investments...................................................... (4,538,307) Net change in funds withheld at interest.................................................. (98,811) Other, net................................................................................ 158,928 ------------ Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities....................................... (5,780,756) ------------ CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES Policyholder account balances: Deposits................................................................................ 416 Withdrawals............................................................................. (2,644) Change in payables for derivative collateral.............................................. 2,563,812 Long-term debt issuances -- affiliated.................................................... 1,000,000 Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc.................................................... 673,000 Dividend on preferred stock............................................................... -- Other, net................................................................................ 80,761 ------------ Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities....................................... 4,315,345 ------------ Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances. 7,065 ------------ Change in cash and cash equivalents....................................................... (524,959) Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year.............................................. 1,616,029 ------------ CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF YEAR.................................................... $ 1,091,070 ============ SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION: Net cash paid for: Interest................................................................................ $ 69,232 ============ Income tax.............................................................................. $ 115,497 ============ Non-cash transactions: Purchase of fixed maturity securities associated with business transfer................. $ -- ============ Purchase of short-term investments associated with business transfer.................... $ -- ============ Capital contribution from MetLife, Inc.................................................. $ 30,860 ============ Issuance of non-cumulative perpetual preferred shares................................... $ -- ============ Assignment of senior notes to MetLife, Inc.............................................. $ -- ============ SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS. F-6
N-6322nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 322nd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES BUSINESS Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. (the "Company" or "Exeter") is a wholly-owned stock life insurance subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. (the "Holding Company"). In 2011, the Company was redomesticated to the Cayman Islands. The Company was licensed as an Unrestricted Class B Insurer under the Insurance Law of the Cayman Islands (the "Law"). Effective October 1, 2013, the Company redomesticated to the state of Delaware ("Delaware"). The Company is licensed as a Delaware pure captive insurance company under the Delaware Captive Insurance Law ("Delaware Law"). The Company engages in traditional and financial reinsurance of life insurance and annuity policies, primarily with affiliates. In the second quarter of 2013, the Holding Company announced its plans to merge three U.S.-based life insurance companies and an offshore reinsurance subsidiary to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company (the "Mergers"). The companies to be merged consist of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut ("MICC"), MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company ("MLI-USA") and MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MLIIC"), each a U.S. insurance company that issues variable annuity products in addition to other products, and Exeter. MICC, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving entity. The Mergers are expected to occur in the fourth quarter of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. BASIS OF PRESENTATION The Company has previously prepared, and filed, financial statements that comply with the filing requirements of the Cayman Islands Monetary Authority ("CIMA"). The financial statements as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012 presented insurance liabilities in the balance sheet in accordance with practices prescribed or permitted by CIMA, which presentation differs from the presentation requirements under generally accepted accounting principles. The presentation of insurance liabilities in these financial statements has been revised to present such amounts in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America ("GAAP") requires management to adopt accounting policies and make estimates and assumptions that affect amounts reported in the financial statements. In applying these policies and estimates, management makes subjective and complex judgments that frequently require assumptions about matters that are inherently uncertain. Many of these policies, estimates and related judgments are common in the insurance and financial services industries; others are specific to the Company's business and operations. Actual results could differ from estimates. Since the Company is a member of a controlled group of affiliated companies, its results may not be indicative of those of a stand-alone entity. F-7
N-6323rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 323rd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) RESTATEMENTS The Company identified the following errors relating to the 2013, 2012 and 2011 statements of cash flows: . Net cash provided by operating activities was overstated and net cash used in investing activities was understated in 2012, as a result of errors relating to the non-cash component of the consideration received for the transfer of business to the Company from an affiliate. . The effects of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents were incorrectly reported in 2013, 2012 and 2011, resulting in offsetting impacts on net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in investing activities. . Certain transactions relating to fees on embedded derivatives were incorrectly reported in the cash flow statement in 2013, 2012 and 2011 including: (a) cash transactions incorrectly reported in (gains) losses on derivatives, net, resulting in impacts to both net cash provided by operating activities and net cash used in investing activities: and (b) non-cash transactions incorrectly reported in cash flows from investing activities in other, net, resulting in impacts to net cash used in investing activities. . Non-cash transactions relating to funds withheld at interest were incorrectly reported in net cash used in investing activities in 2013, 2012 and 2011. The combined errors resulted in an overstatement/(understatement) of (i) net cash provided by operating activities of $93,333 thousand, $991,168 thousand and ($76,861) thousand in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively; (ii) net cash used in investing activities of ($139,097) thousand, ($1,014,723) thousand and $83,926 thousand in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively; and (iii) the effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents of $45,764 thousand, $23,555 thousand and ($7,065) thousand in 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. The impact of the 2013, 2012 and 2011 restatements is shown in the tables below: [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013 ---------------------------------------- AS PREVIOUSLY CORRECTION OF REPORTED ERRORS AS ADJUSTED ------------- ------------- ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: (Gains) losses on derivatives, net............................. $(1,095,691) $ 891,313 $ (204,378) Change in accrued investment income............................ $ (737) $ 765 $ 28 Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables.......... $ 130,149 $ (17,857) $ 112,292 Change in income tax recoverable (payable)..................... $ 822,557 $(152,096) $ 670,461 Change in other assets......................................... $ 26,549 $ (26,549) $ -- Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances..................................................... $ 979,232 $(706,335) $ 272,897 Change in other liabilities.................................... $ 101,875 $ 1 $ 101,876 Other, net..................................................... $ 114,256 $ (82,575) $ 31,681 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities............. $ 1,815,569 $ (93,333) $ 1,722,236 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Sales, maturities and repayments of: Fixed maturity securities.................................... $ 803,256 $ 10,157 $ 813,413 Net change in short-term investments........................... $ 1,528,444 $ (3,281) $ 1,525,163 Net change in funds withheld at interest....................... $ (257,452) $ (79,093) $ (336,545) Other, net..................................................... $ 61,021 $ 211,314 $ 272,335 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities............. $(1,016,091) $ 139,097 $ (876,994) Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances..................................... $ -- $ (45,764) $ (45,764) F-8
N-6324th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 324th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012 ---------------------------------------- AS PREVIOUSLY CORRECTION OF REPORTED ERRORS AS ADJUSTED ------------- ------------- ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: (Gains) losses on derivatives, net......................... $ 4,156,565 $ 646,369 $ 4,802,934 Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables...... $ 149,271 $ 6,491 $ 155,762 Change in income tax recoverable (payable)................. $(1,617,392) $ (58,482) $(1,675,874) Change in other assets..................................... $ 13,027 $ (13,027) $ -- Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances................................................. $ 1,932,786 $(1,402,386) $ 530,400 Change in other liabilities................................ $ (31,859) $ (64,156) $ (96,015) Other, net................................................. $ 130,954 $ (105,977) $ 24,977 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities......... $ 1,957,604 $ (991,168) $ 966,436 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Purchases of fixed maturity securities..................... $(2,264,346) $ 777,880 $(1,486,466) Net change in short-term investments....................... $ 1,423,762 $ 74,068 $ 1,497,830 Net change in funds withheld at interest................... $ (218,801) $ 72,357 $ (146,444) Other, net................................................. $ (66,139) $ 90,418 $ 24,279 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities......... $(1,182,666) $ 1,014,723 $ (167,943) Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances............................. $ -- $ (23,555) $ (23,555) [Enlarge/Download Table] FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011 ---------------------------------------- AS PREVIOUSLY CORRECTION OF REPORTED ERRORS AS ADJUSTED ------------- ------------- ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: (Gains) losses on derivatives, net................................ $ (153,956) $ 623,708 $ 469,752 Change in accrued investment income............................... $ (8,031) $ 1,325 $ (6,706) Change in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables............. $ 349,645 $ 9,218 $ 358,863 Change in income tax recoverable (payable)........................ $ (50,030) $ 30,475 $ (19,555) Change in other assets............................................ $ (15,750) $ 15,750 $ -- Change in insurance-related liabilities and policy-related balances........................................................ $ 757,824 $(501,272) $ 256,552 Change in other liabilities....................................... $ (354,977) $ (265) $ (355,242) Other, net........................................................ $ 131,273 $(102,078) $ 29,195 Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities................ $ 856,526 $ 76,861 $ 933,387 CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES Net change in funds withheld at interest........................... $ (91,382) $ (7,429) $ (98,811) Other, net........................................................ $ 235,425 $ (76,497) $ 158,928 Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities................ $(5,696,830) $ (83,926) (5,780,756) Effect of change in foreign currency exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents balances........................................ $ -- $ 7,065 $ 7,065 F-9
N-6325th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 325th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES The following are the Company's significant accounting policies with references to notes providing additional information on such policies and critical accounting estimates relating to such policies. [Download Table] -------------------------------------- ACCOUNTING POLICY NOTE -------------------------------------- Deferred Policy Acquistion Costs 2 -------------------------------------- Reserves 3 -------------------------------------- Reinsurance 4 -------------------------------------- Investments 5 -------------------------------------- Derivatives 6 -------------------------------------- Fair Value 7 -------------------------------------- Income Tax 11 -------------------------------------- Litigation Contingencies 12 -------------------------------------- FUTURE POLICYHOLDER BENEFITS, POLICYHOLDER ACCOUNT BALANCES AND OTHER POLICY-RELATED BALANCES The Company establishes liabilities for insurance policies assumed by the Company. Generally, amounts are payable over an extended period of time and related liabilities are calculated as the present value of future expected benefits to be paid reduced by the present value of future expected premiums. Such liabilities are established based on methods and underlying assumptions in accordance with GAAP and applicable actuarial standards. Principal assumptions used in the establishment of liabilities for future policy benefits are mortality, morbidity, policy lapse, renewal, retirement, investment returns, inflation, expenses and other contingent events as appropriate to the respective product type. For long duration insurance contracts, assumptions such as mortality and interest rates are "locked in" upon the issuance of new business. However, significant adverse changes in experience on such contracts may require the establishment of premium deficiency reserves. Such reserves are determined based on the then current assumptions and do not include a provision for adverse deviation. Liabilities for assumed universal secondary guarantees are determined by estimating the expected value of death benefits payable when the account balance is projected to be zero and recognizing those benefits ratably over the accumulation period based on total expected assessments. The assumptions used in estimating the secondary liabilities are consistent with those used for amortizing deferred policy acquisition costs ("DAC"), and are thus subject to the same variability and risk as further discussed herein. The assumptions of investment performance and volatility for variable products are consistent with historical experience of appropriate underlying equity indices, such as the Standard & Poor's Ratings Services ("S&P") 500 Index. The benefits used in calculating the liabilities assumed are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios. The assumed unearned revenue liability included in other policy-related balances relates to universal life-type products and represents policy charges for services to be provided in future periods. The charges are deferred as unearned revenue and amortized using the product's estimated gross profits, similar to DAC as discussed further herein. Such amortization is recorded in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. The Company regularly reviews its estimates of liabilities for future policy benefits and compares them with its actual experience. Differences result in changes to the liability balances with related charges or credits to benefit expenses in the period in which the changes occur. F-10
N-6326th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 326th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) The Company assumed and ceded guaranteed minimum benefits associated with certain variable annuity product risks that provide the policyholder a minimum return based on their initial deposit (i.e., the benefit base) less withdrawals. These guarantees are accounted for as insurance liabilities or as embedded derivatives depending on how and when the benefit is paid. Specifically, a guarantee is accounted for as an embedded derivative if a guarantee is paid without requiring (i) the occurrence of specific insurable event, or (ii) the policyholder to annuitize. Alternatively, a guarantee is accounted for as an insurance liability if the guarantee is paid only upon either (i) the occurrence of a specific insurable event, or (ii) annuitization. In certain cases, a guarantee may have elements of both an insurance liability and an embedded derivative and in such cases the guarantee is split and accounted for under both models. Guarantees assumed are accounted for as insurance liabilities in future policy benefits include guaranteed minimum death benefits ("GMDB"), the portion of guaranteed minimum income benefits ("GMIB") that require annuitization, and the life-contingent portion of guaranteed minimum withdrawal benefits ("GMWB"). Guarantees assumed are accounted for as embedded derivatives in policyholder account balances include the non life-contingent portion of GMWB, guaranteed minimum accumulation benefits ("GMAB") and the portion of GMIB that do not require annuitization. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent "excess" fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. Other policy-related balances include policy and contract claims and policyholder dividends due and unpaid. The liability for policy and contract claims generally relates to incurred but not reported death claims, as well as claims which have been reported but not yet settled. DIVIDEND LIABILITY The terminal dividend liability for assumed participating traditional life insurance policies is equal to the liability for dividends paid to policyholders upon termination and after satisfying minimum period in-force requirements. RECOGNITION OF INSURANCE REVENUE AND RELATED BENEFITS Premiums related to assumed traditional life and variable annuity business are recognized as revenues when due. Policyholder benefits and expenses are provided against such revenues to recognize profits over the estimated lives of the policies. When premiums are due over a significantly shorter period than the period over which benefits are provided, any excess profit is deferred and recognized into operations in a constant relationship to the business assumed. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS The Company reimburses the direct writer of the reinsured agreements for significant costs in connection with acquiring new and renewal reinsurance business. Costs that are related directly to the successful acquisition or renewal of reinsurance agreements are capitalized as DAC. Such costs primarily include: . incremental direct costs of contract acquisition, such as commissions; F-11
N-6327th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 327th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) . other essential direct costs that would not have been incurred had a policy not been acquired or renewed. All other acquisition-related costs, as well as all indirect costs, are expensed as incurred. DAC is amortized as follows: Products reinsured: In proportion to the following over estimated lives of the reinsurance agreements: ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Participating, dividend-paying Actual and expected future gross traditional contracts margins. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- . Variable universal life contracts Actual and expected future gross . Variable deferred annuity contracts profits. See Note 2 for additional information on DAC amortization. The recovery of DAC is dependent upon the future profitability of the related business. REINSURANCE AGREEMENTS For each of its reinsurance agreements, the Company determines whether the agreement provides indemnification against loss or liability relating to insurance risk in accordance with applicable accounting standards. Cessions under reinsurance agreements do not discharge the Company's obligations as a reinsurer. The Company reviews all contractual features, particularly those that may limit the amount of insurance risk to which the Company is subject or features that delay the timely reimbursement of claims. For reinsurance of existing in-force blocks of long-duration contracts that transfer significant insurance risk, the difference, if any, between the amounts paid (received), and the liabilities ceded (assumed) related to the underlying contracts is considered the net cost of reinsurance at the inception of the reinsurance agreement. The net cost of reinsurance is recorded as an adjustment to DAC when there is a gain at inception on the ceding entity and to other liabilities when there is a loss at inception. The net cost of reinsurance is recognized as a component of other expenses when there is a gain at inception and as policyholder benefits and claims when there is a loss and is subsequently amortized on a basis consistent with the methodology used for amortizing DAC related to the underlying reinsured contracts. Subsequent amounts paid (received) on the reinsurance of in-force blocks, as well as amounts paid (received) related to new business, are recorded as ceded (assumed) premiums and ceded (assumed) future policy benefit liabilities are established. Amounts currently recoverable under reinsurance agreements are included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables and amounts currently payable are included in other liabilities and other policy-related balances. Assets and liabilities relating to reinsurance agreements with the same reinsurer may be recorded net on the balance sheet, if a right of offset exists within the reinsurance agreement. In the event that reinsurers do not meet their obligations to the Company under the terms of the reinsurance agreements, reinsurance recoverable balances could become uncollectible. In such instances, reinsurance recoverable balances are stated net of allowances for uncollectible reinsurance. F-12
N-6328th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 328th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Premiums, fees and policyholder benefits and claims include amounts assumed under reinsurance agreements and are net of reinsurance ceded. Amounts received from reinsurers for policy administration are reported in other revenues. Certain assumed GMWB, GMAB and GMIB are accounted for as embedded derivatives with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses). If the Company determines that a reinsurance agreement does not expose the reinsurer to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk, the Company records the agreement using the deposit method of accounting. Deposits received are included in other liabilities and deposits made are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. As amounts are paid or received, consistent with the underlying contracts, the deposit assets or liabilities are adjusted. Interest on such deposits is recorded as other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate. Periodically, the Company evaluates the adequacy of the expected payments or recoveries and adjusts the deposit asset or liability through other revenues or other expenses, as appropriate. INVESTMENTS NET INVESTMENT INCOME Income on investments is reported within net investment income, unless otherwise stated herein. FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES The Company's fixed maturity securities are classified as available-for-sale ("AFS") and are reported at their estimated fair value. Unrealized investment gains and losses on these securities are recorded as a separate component of other comprehensive income (loss) ("OCI"), net of policyholder-related amounts and deferred income taxes. All security transactions are recorded on a trade date basis. Investment gains and losses on sales are determined on a specific identification basis. Interest income on fixed maturity securities is recognized when earned using an effective yield method giving effect to amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts. Prepayment fees are recognized when earned. The Company periodically evaluates fixed maturity securities for impairment. The assessment of whether impairments have occurred is based on management's case-by-case evaluation of the underlying reasons for the decline in estimated fair value and an analysis of the gross unrealized losses by severity and/or age. The analysis of gross unrealized losses is described further in Note 5 "--Evaluation of AFS Securities for OTTI and Evaluating Temporarily Impaired AFS Securities." For fixed maturity securities in an unrealized loss position, an other-than-temporary impairment ("OTTI") is recognized in earnings when it is anticipated that the amortized cost will not be recovered. When either: (i) the Company has the intent to sell the security; or (ii) it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security before recovery, the OTTI recognized in earnings is the entire difference between the security's amortized cost and estimated fair value. If neither of these conditions exist, the difference between the amortized cost of the security and the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected is recognized as an OTTI in earnings ("credit loss"). If the estimated fair value is less than the present value of projected future cash flows expected to be collected, this portion of OTTI related to other-than-credit factors ("noncredit loss") is recorded in OCI. Adjustments are not made for subsequent recoveries in value. F-13
N-6329th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 329th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS Short-term investments include securities and other investments with remaining maturities of one year or less, but greater than three months, at the time of purchase and are stated at the estimated fair value or amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. DERIVATIVE ASSETS Derivative assets consist principally of freestanding derivatives with positive estimated fair values and are described in " -- Derivatives" below. FUNDS WITHHELD AT INTEREST Funds withheld at interest represent amounts contractually withheld by ceding companies in accordance with reinsurance agreements. The Company records a funds withheld asset rather than the underlying investments. The Company recognizes interest on funds withheld at rates defined by the terms of the agreement which may be contractually specified or directly related to the underlying investments. DERIVATIVES FREESTANDING DERIVATIVES Freestanding derivatives are carried in the Company's balance sheets either as assets within derivative assets or as liabilities within derivative liabilities at estimated fair value. The Company does not offset the fair value amounts recognized for derivatives executed with the same counterparty absent a master netting agreement. Accruals on derivatives are generally recorded in accrued investment income or within derivative liabilities. However, accruals that are not scheduled to settle within one year are included with the derivatives carrying value in derivative assets or derivative liabilities. The Company's derivatives are not designated as qualifying for hedge accounting. Changes in the estimated fair value of derivatives are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses) except for those in policyholder benefits and claims for economic hedges of variable annuity guarantees included in future policy benefits in the balance sheets. The fluctuations in estimated fair value of derivatives can result in significant volatility in net income. EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES The Company assumes variable annuity guarantees, modified coinsurance contracts and equity indexed deferred annuities that contain embedded derivatives. Additionally, the Company has retroceded certain of these variable annuity guarantees to unaffiliated reinsurance counterparties that also contain embedded derivatives. The Company assesses each identified embedded derivative to determine whether it is required to be bifurcated. The embedded derivative is bifurcated from the host contract and accounted for as a freestanding derivative if: . the combined instrument is not accounted for in its entirety at fair value with changes in fair value recorded in earnings; F-14
N-6330th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 330th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) . the terms of the embedded derivative are not clearly and closely related to the economic characteristics of the host contract; and . a separate instrument with the same terms as the embedded derivative would qualify as a derivative instrument. Such embedded derivatives are carried in the balance sheets at estimated fair value with the host contract and changes in their estimated fair value are generally reported in net derivative gains (losses) for assumed reinsurance or in policyholder benefits and claims for ceded reinsurance. At inception, the Company attributes to the embedded derivative a portion of the projected future guarantee fees to be collected from the policyholder equal to the present value of projected future guaranteed benefits. Any additional fees represent "excess" fees and are reported in universal life and investment-type product policy fees. FAIR VALUE Certain assets and liabilities are measured at estimated fair value in the Company's balance sheets. In addition, the notes to these financial statements include further disclosures of estimated fair values. The Company defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. In most cases, the exit price and the transaction (or entry) price will be the same at initial recognition. Subsequent to initial recognition, fair values are based on unadjusted quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. When such quoted prices are not available, fair values are based on quoted prices in markets that are not active, quoted prices for similar but not identical assets or liabilities, or other observable inputs. If these inputs are not available, or observable inputs are not determinative, unobservable inputs and/or adjustments to observable inputs requiring management judgment are used to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities. INCOME TAX The Company joins with the Holding Company and its includable life insurance and non-life insurance subsidiaries in filing a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return in accordance with the provision of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the "Code"). Current taxes (and the benefits of tax attributes such as losses) are allocated to the Holding Company under the consolidated tax return regulations and a tax sharing agreement. Under the consolidated tax return regulations, the Holding Company has elected the "percentage method' (and 100 percent under such method) of reimbursing companies for tax attributes such as losses. As a result, one hundred percent of tax attributes such as losses are reimbursed by the Holding Company to the extent that consolidated federal income tax of the consolidated federal tax return group is reduced in a year by tax attributes such as losses. Profitable subsidiaries pay to the Holding company each year the federal income tax which such profitable subsidiary would have paid that year based upon that year's taxable income. The Holding Company has current or prior deductions and credits (including by not limited to losses) which reduce the consolidated tax liability of the consolidated federal tax return group, the deductions and credits are characterized as realized (or realizable) by the Holding Company when those tax attributes are realized (or realizable) by the consolidated federal tax return group, even if the Holding Company would not have realized the attributes on a stand-alone basis under a "wait and see" method. F-15
N-6331st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 331st
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) Deferred income tax assets and liabilities resulting from temporary differences between the financial reporting and tax basis of assets and liabilities are measured at the balance sheet date using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years the temporary differences are expected to reverse. The realization of deferred income tax assets depends upon the existence of sufficient taxable income within the carryback or carryforward periods under the tax law in the applicable tax jurisdiction. Valuation allowances are established when management determines, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that deferred income tax assets will not be realized. Factors in management's determination include the performance of the business and its ability to generate capital gains. Significant judgment is required in determining whether valuation allowances should be established, as well as the amount of such allowances. When making such determination, consideration is given to, among other things, the following: . future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards; . future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences; . taxable income in prior carryback years; and . tax planning strategies. The Company may be required to change its provision for income taxes in certain circumstances. Examples of such circumstances include when estimates used in determining valuation allowances on deferred tax assets significantly change or when receipt of new information indicates the need for adjustment in valuation allowances. Additionally, future events, such as changes in tax laws, tax regulations, or interpretations of such laws or regulations, could have an impact on the provision for income tax and the effective tax rate. Any such changes could significantly affect the amounts reported in the financial statements in the year these changes occur. The Company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination by the appropriate taxing authorities before any part of the benefit can be recorded in the financial statements. A tax position is measured at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits due to tax uncertainties that do not meet the threshold are included in other liabilities and are charged to earnings in the period that such determination is made. The Company classifies interest recognized as other expense and penalties recognized as a component of income tax expense. OTHER ACCOUNTING POLICIES CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS The Company considers all highly liquid securities and other investments purchased with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the date of purchase to be cash equivalents. Cash equivalents are stated at amortized cost, which approximates estimated fair value. OTHER REVENUES Other revenues consist of funds withheld investment credit fees associated with financial reinsurance. F-16
N-6332nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 332nd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) POLICYHOLDER DIVIDENDS Pursuant to the terms of certain reinsurance agreements, the Company participates in the policyholder dividend scale of the ceding company. Policyholder dividends are approved annually by the ceding company's board of directors. The aggregate amount of policyholder dividends is related to actual interest, mortality, morbidity and expense experience for the year, as well as the judgment of the ceding company's management as to the appropriate level of statutory surplus to be retained by the ceding company. FOREIGN CURRENCY Balance sheet accounts for reinsurance agreements that are settled in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each year end and income and expense accounts are translated at the average exchange rates during the year. Translation adjustments are charged or credited directly to foreign currency translation adjustments, included in accumulated other comprehensive income or loss, net of applicable taxes. Intercompany receivables (payables) that are held in foreign currencies are translated at the exchange rate in effect at each year end and translation adjustments are charged directly to net investment gains (losses) in the period in which they occur. ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income that requires an entity to provide information about the amounts reclassified out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") by component. In addition, an entity is required to present, either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the notes, significant amounts reclassified out of AOCI by the respective line items of net income but only if the amount reclassified is required under GAAP to be reclassified to net income in its entirety in the same reporting period. For other amounts that are not required under GAAP to be reclassified in their entirety to net income, an entity is required to cross-reference to other disclosures required under GAAP that provide additional detail about those amounts. The adoption was prospectively applied and resulted in additional disclosures in Note 9. Effective January 1, 2013, the Company adopted new guidance regarding balance sheet offsetting disclosures which requires an entity to disclose information about offsetting and related arrangements for derivatives, including bifurcated embedded derivatives, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, and securities borrowing and lending transactions, to enable users of its financial statements to understand the effects of those arrangements on its financial position. Entities are required to disclose both gross information and net information about both instruments and transactions eligible for offset in the statement of financial position and instruments and transactions subject to an agreement similar to a master netting arrangement. The adoption was retrospectively applied and resulted in additional disclosures related to derivatives in Note 6. On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding accounting for DAC, which was retrospectively applied. The guidance specifies that only costs related directly to successful acquisition of new or renewal contracts can be capitalized as DAC; all other acquisition-related costs must be expensed as incurred. Under the new guidance, advertising costs may only be included in DAC if the capitalization criteria in the direct-response advertising guidance in Subtopic 340-20, OTHER ASSETS AND DEFERRED COSTS--CAPITALIZED ADVERTISING COSTS, are met. As a result, certain direct marketing, sales manager compensation and administrative costs previously capitalized by the Company will no longer be deferred. F-17
N-6333rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 333rd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 1. BUSINESS, BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (CONTINUED) On January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding comprehensive income, which was retrospectively applied, that provides companies with the option to present the total of comprehensive income, components of net income, and the components of OCI either in a single continuous statement of comprehensive income or in two separate but consecutive statements in annual financial statements. The standard eliminates the option to present components of OCI as part of the statement of changes in stockholders' equity. The Company adopted the two-statement approach for annual financial statements. Effective January 1, 2012, the Company adopted new guidance regarding fair value measurements that establishes common requirements for measuring fair value and for disclosing information about fair value measurements in accordance with GAAP and International Financial Reporting Standards. Some of the amendments clarify the Financial Accounting Standards Board's ("FASB") intent on the application of existing fair value measurement requirements. Other amendments change a particular principle or requirement for measuring fair value or for disclosing information about fair value measurements. The adoption did not have a material impact on the Company's financial statements other than the expanded disclosures in Note 7. FUTURE ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS In March 2013, the FASB issued new guidance regarding foreign currency (Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") 2013-05, FOREIGN CURRENCY MATTERS (TOPIC 830): PARENT'S ACCOUNTING FOR THE CUMULATIVE TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT UPON DERECOGNITION OF CERTAIN SUBSIDIARIES OR GROUPS OF ASSETS WITHIN A FOREIGN ENTITY OR OF AN INVESTMENT IN A FOREIGN ENTITY), effective prospectively for fiscal years and interim reporting periods within those years beginning after December 15, 2013. The amendments require an entity that ceases to have a controlling financial interest in a subsidiary or group of assets within a foreign entity to apply the guidance in Subtopic 830-30, FOREIGN CURRENCY MATTERS -- TRANSLATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS, to release any related cumulative translation adjustment into net income. Accordingly, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income only if the sale or transfer results in the complete or substantially complete liquidation of the foreign entity in which the subsidiary or group of assets had resided. For an equity method investment that is a foreign entity, the partial sale guidance in section 830-30-40, DERECOGNITION, still applies. As such, a pro rata portion of the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net income upon a partial sale of such an equity method investment. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements. In February 2013, the FASB issued new guidance regarding liabilities (ASU 2013-04, LIABILITIES (TOPIC 405): OBLIGATIONS RESULTING FROM JOINT AND SEVERAL LIABILITY ARRANGEMENTS FOR WHICH THE TOTAL AMOUNT OF THE OBLIGATION IS FIXED AT THE REPORTING DATE), effective retrospectively for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2013 and interim periods within those years. The amendments require an entity to measure obligations resulting from joint and several liability arrangements for which the total amount of the obligation within the scope of the guidance is fixed at the reporting date, as the sum of the amount the reporting entity agreed to pay on the basis of its arrangement among its co-obligors and any additional amount the reporting entity expects to pay on behalf of its co-obligors. In addition, the amendments require an entity to disclose the nature and amount of the obligation, as well as other information about the obligation. The Company does not expect the adoption of this new guidance to have a material impact on its financial statements. F-18
N-6334th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 334th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 2. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS See Note 1 for a description of capitalized acquisition costs. PARTICIPATING AND DIVIDEND-PAYING TRADITIONAL CONTRACTS The Company amortizes DAC related to these contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross margins. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception or acquisition of the contracts. The future gross margins are dependent principally on investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, mortality, persistency, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties, and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses, persistency, and other factor changes and policyholder dividend scales are reasonably likely to significantly impact the rate of DAC amortization. On a quarterly basis, the Company updates the estimated gross margins with the actual gross margins for that period. When the actual gross margins change from previously estimated gross margins, the cumulative DAC amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by a cumulative charge or credit to earnings. When actual gross margins exceed those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross margins are below the previously estimated gross margins. On a quarterly basis, the Company also updates the actual amount of business in-force, which impacts expected future gross margins. When expected future gross margins are below those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross margins are above the previously estimated expected future gross margins. Total DAC amortization during a particular period may increase or decrease depending upon the relative size of the amortization change resulting from the adjustment to DAC for the update of actual gross margins and the re-estimation of expected future gross margins. On a quarterly basis, the Company also reviews the estimated gross margins for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC balances. VARIABLE UNIVERSAL LIFE CONTRACTS, VARIABLE DEFERRED ANNUITY CONTRACTS AND EQUITY INDEXED DEFERRED ANNUITY CONTRACTS The Company amortizes DAC related to these contracts over the estimated lives of the contracts in proportion to actual and expected future gross profits. The amortization includes interest based on rates in effect at inception of the contracts. The amount of expected future gross profits is dependent principally upon investment returns in excess of the amounts credited to policyholders, mortality, persistency, interest crediting rates, expenses to administer the business, creditworthiness of reinsurance counterparties, and certain economic variables, such as inflation. Of these factors, the Company anticipates that investment returns, expenses, and persistency are reasonably likely to impact significantly the rate of DAC amortization. On a quarterly basis, the Company updates the estimated gross profits with the actual gross profits for that period. When the actual gross profits change from previously estimated gross profits, the cumulative DAC amortization is re-estimated and adjusted by the cumulated charge or credit to current operations. When actual gross profits exceed those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the actual gross profits are below the previously estimated gross profits. On a quarterly basis, the Company also updates the actual amount of business remaining in-force, which impact expected future gross profits. When expected future gross profits are below those previously estimated, the DAC amortization will increase, resulting in a current period charge to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the expected future gross profits are above the previously estimated expected future gross profits. Each period, the Company also reviews the estimated gross profits for each block of business to determine the recoverability of DAC balances. F-19
N-6335th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 335th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 2. DEFERRED POLICY ACQUISITION COSTS (CONTINUED) FACTORS IMPACTING AMORTIZATION The Company also periodically reviews other long-term assumptions underlying the projections of estimated gross margins and profits. These include investment returns, policyholder dividend scales, interest crediting rates, mortality, persistency and expenses to administer business. Management annually updates assumptions used in the calculation of estimated gross margins and profits which may have significantly changed. If the update of assumptions causes expected future gross margins and profits to increase, DAC amortization will decrease, resulting in a current period increase to earnings. The opposite result occurs when the assumption update causes expected future gross margins and profits to decrease. Amortization of DAC is attributed to net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses), and to other expenses for the amount of gross margins or profits originating from transactions other than investment gains and losses. Unrealized investment gains and losses represent the amount of DAC that would have been amortized if such gains and losses had been recognized. Information regarding DAC was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Balance at January 1,...................................... $ 136,661 $ 178,105 $ 206,677 Capitalizations............................................ 2,013 1,760 2,955 Amortization related to: Net investment gains (losses) and net derivative gains (losses).............................................. 23,559 (28,204) (21,453) Other expenses.......................................... (2,413) (15,000) (10,074) ---------- ---------- ---------- Total amortization.................................. 21,146 (43,204) (31,527) ---------- ---------- ---------- Balance at December 31,.................................... $ 159,820 $ 136,661 $ 178,105 ========== ========== ========== 3. RESERVES REINSURANCE LIABILITIES Future policy benefits are measured as follows: Product Type Measurement Assumptions: --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumed Participating Life Aggregate of (i) net level premium reserves for death and endowment policy benefits (calculated based upon the non-forfeiture interest rate ranging from 4% to 6% and mortality rates guaranteed in calculating the cash surrender values described in such contracts); and (ii) the liability for terminal dividends. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- Assumed traditional fixed annuities Present value of expected future after annuitization payments. Interest rate assumptions used in establishing such liabilities range from 1% to 7% for domestic business and 2% to 5% for international business. F-20
N-6336th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 336th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 3. RESERVES (CONTINUED) GUARANTEES The Company reinsures variable annuity products with guaranteed minimum benefits. The non-life contingent portion of GMWB, GMAB and the portion of certain GMIB that does not require annuitization are accounted for as embedded derivatives in policyholder account balances and other policy-related balances which are further discussed in Note 6. Guarantees accounted for as reinsurance liabilities include: [Enlarge/Download Table] Guarantee: Measurement Assumptions: ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GMDBs . A return of purchase payment upon Present value of expected death benefits in death even if the account value is excess of the projected account balance reduced to zero. recognizing the excess ratably over the accumulation period based on the present value of total expected assessments. . An enhanced death benefit may be Assumptions are consistent with those used available for an additional fee. for amortizing DAC, and are thus subject to the same variability and risk. Investment performance and volatility assumptions are consistent with the historical experience of the appropriate underlying equity index, such as the S&P 500 Index. Benefit assumptions are based on the average benefits payable over a range of scenarios. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GMIBs . After a specified period of time Present value of expected income benefits in determined at the time of issuance excess of the projected account balance at of the variable annuity contract, any future date of annuitization and a minimum accumulation of purchase recognizing the excess ratably over the payments, even if the account accumulation period based on the present value is reduced to zero, that can value of total expected assessments. be annuitized to receive a monthly Assumptions are consistent with those used income stream that is not less for estimating GMDBs liabilities. than a specified amount. Calculation incorporates an assumption for . Certain contracts also provide for the percentage of the potential annuitizations a guaranteed lump sum return of that may be elected by the contractholder. purchase premium in lieu of the annuitization benefit. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- GMWBs. . A return of purchase payment via Expected value of the life contingent partial withdrawals, even if the payments and expected assessments using account value is reduced to zero, assumptions consistent with those used for provided that cumulative estimating the GMDBs liabilities. withdrawals in a contract year do not exceed a certain limit. . Certain contracts include guaranteed withdrawals that are life contingent. F-21
N-6337th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 337th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 3. RESERVES (CONTINUED) Information regarding the liabilities for guarantees (excluding embedded derivatives) relating to annuity and universal and variable life contracts was as follows: [Download Table] UNIVERSAL AND VARIABLE LIFE ANNUITY CONTRACTS CONTRACTS - ------------------ ------------- SECONDARY GMDBS GMIBS GUARANTEES TOTAL - -------- -------- ------------- ---------- ASSUMED Balance at January 1, 2011... $204,783 $172,260 $41,159 $ 418,202 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 197,432 72,496 (1,514) 268,414 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (74,439) -- -- (74,439) -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2011. 327,776 244,756 39,645 612,177 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 169,545 230,988 10,288 410,821 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (79,815) -- -- (79,815) -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2012. 417,506 475,744 49,933 943,183 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 125,884 52,561 7,018 185,463 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (59,132) -- -- (59,132) -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2013. $484,258 $528,305 $56,951 $1,069,514 ======== ======== ======= ========== CEDED Balance at January 1, 2011... $ 8,210 $ -- $ -- $ 8,210 Incurred guaranteed benefits. (32) -- -- (32) Paid guaranteed benefits..... -- -- -- -- -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2011. 8,178 -- -- 8,178 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 2,920 -- -- 2,920 Paid guaranteed benefits..... -- -- -- -- -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2012. 11,098 -- -- 11,098 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 3,704 -- -- 3,704 Paid guaranteed benefits..... -- -- -- -- -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2013. $ 14,802 $ -- $ -- $ 14,802 ======== ======== ======= ========== NET Balance at January 1, 2011... $196,573 $172,260 $41,159 $ 409,992 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 197,464 72,496 (1,514) 268,446 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (74,439) -- -- (74,439) -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2011. 319,598 244,756 39,645 603,999 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 166,625 230,988 10,288 407,901 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (79,815) -- -- (79,815) -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2012. 406,408 475,744 49,933 932,085 Incurred guaranteed benefits. 122,180 52,561 7,018 181,759 Paid guaranteed benefits..... (59,132) -- -- (59,132) -------- -------- ------- ---------- Balance at December 31, 2013. $469,456 $528,305 $56,951 $1,054,712 ======== ======== ======= ========== F-22
N-6338th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 338th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. REINSURANCE The Company assumes insurance risk from affiliated and unaffiliated insurance companies. The Company also cedes certain assumed insurance risks to unaffiliated reinsurers. Accounting for reinsurance requires extensive use of assumptions and estimates, particularly related to the future performance of the underlying business and the potential impact of counterparty credit risks. The Company periodically reviews actual and anticipated experience compared to the aforementioned assumptions used to establish assets and liabilities relating to ceded and assumed reinsurance and evaluates the financial strength of counterparties to its reinsurance agreements using criteria similar to that evaluated in the security impairment process discussed previously. Premiums and policyholder benefits and claims in the statements of operations consist of amounts assumed, partially offset by amounts ceded under reinsurance agreements. The Company assumes risks from an unaffiliated company related to guaranteed minimum benefit guarantees written directly by the unaffiliated company. These assumed reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives and changes in their fair value are also included within net derivative gains (losses). The embedded derivatives associated with the cessions are included within policyholder's account balance and were liabilities of $1,262.3 million and $2,581.9 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, net derivative gains (losses) included $1,126.5 million, ($394.9) million and $80.6 million, respectively, in changes in fair value of such embedded derivatives. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had $99.2 million and $287.2 million, respectively, of unsecured unaffiliated ceded reinsurance recoverable balances. Certain unaffiliated reinsurance agreements that do not expose the Company to a reasonable possibility of a significant loss from insurance risk are recorded using the deposit method of accounting. The deposit assets on ceded unaffiliated reinsurance were $3.5 million and $28.9 million, at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The deposit liabilities on assumed unaffiliated reinsurance were $545 thousand and $335 thousand at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. RELATED PARTY REINSURANCE TRANSACTIONS The Company has reinsurance agreements with certain of the Holding Company's subsidiaries, including Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, First MetLife Investors Insurance Company, MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company, MetLife Investors Insurance Company, MetLife Europe Limited ("MEL"), New England Life Insurance Company and Alico Life International Limited, all of which are related parties. F-23
N-6339th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 339th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. REINSURANCE (CONTINUED) Information regarding the significant effects of affiliated reinsurance included in the statements of operations was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ -------------- (IN THOUSANDS) REVENUES Premiums............................................... $ 23,922 $ 909,170 $ 29,894 Universal life and investment-type product policy fees. 450,583 398,509 283,097 Net derivative gain (loss)............................. 5,678,708 (723,305) (2,818,107) Other revenues......................................... 1,396 22,917 43,740 ------------ ------------ -------------- Total revenues........................................ $ 6,154,609 $ 607,291 $ (2,461,376) ============ ============ ============== EXPENSES Policyholder benefits and claims....................... $ 255,205 $ 1,273,113 $ 234,143 Interest credited to policyholder account balances..... 17,399 16,598 15,831 Policyholder dividends................................. 12,295 14,256 14,013 Other expenses......................................... 82,569 16,845 26,466 ------------ ------------ -------------- Total expenses........................................ $ 367,468 $ 1,320,812 $ 290,453 ============ ============ ============== Information regarding the significant effects of affiliated reinsurance included in the balance sheets was as follows at: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------ ------------- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS Funds withheld at interest.................. $ 2,045,389 $ 1,796,083 Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. 243,080 160,658 Deferred policy acquisition costs........... 80,831 76,892 ------------ ------------- Total assets............................... $ 2,369,300 $ 2,033,633 ============ ============= LIABILITIES Future policy benefits...................... $ 2,062,320 $ 2,043,905 Other policy-related balances............... 3,561,663 8,130,768 Policyholder dividends payable.............. 16,256 17,438 Other liabilities........................... 250,807 161,603 ------------ ------------- Total liabilities.......................... $ 5,891,046 $ 10,353,714 ============ ============= In September 2012, the Company entered into a reinsurance agreement to assume 100% quota share of certain blocks of indemnity reinsurance from MEL. This agreement covers a portion of liabilities under defined portfolios of living time annuities contracts issued on or after the effective date. This agreement transfers risk to the Company, and therefore, is accounted for as reinsurance. As a result of the agreement, the Company recorded future policy benefits, presented within future policy benefits, of $649.3 million and $792.3 million, other reinsurance liabilities of $16.9 million and $10.7 million, and other reinsurance payables, included in other F-24
N-6340th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 340th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 4. REINSURANCE (CONTINUED) liabilities, were $43.7 million and $61.1 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company's statement of operations reflects a loss for this agreement of $8.6 million and $3.5 million, which includes premiums of $1 thousand and $881.2 million and policyholder benefits of $8.6 million and $884.7 million for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company assumes risks from affiliates related to guaranteed minimum benefit guarantees written directly by the affiliates. These assumed reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives and changes in their fair value are also included within net derivative gains (losses). The embedded derivatives associated with the cessions are included within policyholder account balances and were liabilities of $1,226.6 million and $6,249.3 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, net derivative gains (losses) included $5,729.1 million, ($729.3) million and ($2,818.1) million, respectively, in changes in fair value of such embedded derivatives. The Company had no ceded affiliated reinsurance recoverable balances at December 31, 2013 and 2012. 5. INVESTMENTS See Note 7 for information about the fair value hierarchy for investments and the related valuation methodologies. INVESTMENT RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES Investments are exposed to the following primary sources of risk: credit, interest rate, liquidity, market valuation and currency. The financial statement risks, stemming from such investment risks, are those associated with the determination of estimated fair values, the diminished ability to sell certain investments in times of strained market conditions, the recognition of impairments, the recognition of income on certain investments and the potential consolidation of variable interest entities ("VIEs"). The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs relating to these financial statement risks may have a material effect on the amounts presented within the financial statements. The determination of valuation allowances and impairments is highly subjective and is based upon periodic evaluations and assessments of known and inherent risks associated with the respective asset class. Such evaluations and assessments are revised as conditions change and new information becomes available. The recognition of income on certain investments (e.g., structured securities, including mortgage-backed securities, asset-backed securities ("ABS") and certain structured investment transactions) is dependent upon certain factors such as prepayments and defaults, and changes in such factors could result in changes in amounts to be earned. F-25
N-6341st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 341st
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES AFS FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES AFS BY SECTOR The following table presents the fixed maturity securities AFS by sector. Included within fixed maturity securities are structured securities including commercial mortgage-backed securities ("CMBS"), ABS and residential mortgage-backed securities ("RMBS"). [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 DECEMBER 31, 2012 ------------------------------------------------- ------------------------------------------------- GROSS UNREALIZED GROSS UNREALIZED COST OR ------------------------- ESTIMATED COST OR ------------------------- ESTIMATED AMORTIZED TEMPORARY OTTI FAIR AMORTIZED TEMPORARY OTTI FAIR COST GAINS LOSSES LOSSES VALUE COST GAINS LOSSES LOSSES VALUE ----------- -------- --------- ------ ----------- ----------- -------- --------- ------ ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) (IN THOUSANDS) FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES: Foreign corporate..... $ 535,332 $ 5,294 $ 7,203 $ -- $ 533,423 $ 621,950 $ 11,286 $ 1,814 $ -- $ 631,422 U.S. corporate........ 255,510 10,478 2,366 -- 263,622 302,993 19,714 241 -- 322,466 CMBS.................. 135,781 1,724 4,941 -- 132,564 82,307 4,019 -- -- 86,326 State and political subdivision.......... 114,310 6,862 916 -- 120,256 115,352 20,220 5 -- 135,567 U.S. Treasury and agency............... 101,947 1,225 3,924 -- 99,248 290,766 2,765 2 -- 293,529 ABS................... 79,461 1,323 264 -- 80,520 195,178 2,707 9 -- 197,876 RMBS.................. 61,322 2,261 794 -- 62,789 76,727 5,179 -- -- 81,906 Foreign government.... 28,259 400 -- -- 28,659 34,640 1,887 -- -- 36,527 ----------- -------- -------- ---- ----------- ----------- -------- ------- ---- ----------- Total fixed maturity securities.......... $ 1,311,922 $ 29,567 $ 20,408 $ -- $ 1,321,081 $ 1,719,913 $ 67,777 $ 2,071 $ -- $ 1,785,619 =========== ======== ======== ==== =========== =========== ======== ======= ==== =========== The Company held no non-income producing fixed maturity securities at December 31, 2013 and 2012. METHODOLOGY FOR AMORTIZATION OF PREMIUM AND ACCRETION OF DISCOUNT ON STRUCTURED SECURITIES Amortization of premium or accretion of discount on structured securities considers the estimated timing and amount of prepayments of the underlying loans. Actual prepayment experience is periodically reviewed and effective yields are recalculated when differences arise between the originally anticipated and the actual prepayments received and currently anticipated. Prepayment assumptions for single class and multi-class mortgage-backed and ABS are estimated using inputs obtained from third-party specialists and based on management's knowledge of the current market. For credit-sensitive mortgage-backed and ABS and certain prepayment-sensitive securities, the effective yield is recalculated on a prospective basis. For all other mortgage-backed and ABS, the effective yield is recalculated on a retrospective basis. F-26
N-6342nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 342nd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) MATURITIES OF FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES The amortized cost and estimated fair value of fixed maturity securities, by contractual maturity date, were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------- 2013 2012 --------------------- --------------------- ESTIMATED ESTIMATED AMORTIZED FAIR AMORTIZED FAIR COST VALUE COST VALUE ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Due in one year or less.................... $ 246,228 $ 246,780 $ 273,190 $ 273,472 Due after one year through five years...... 280,090 283,376 520,894 524,882 Due after five years through ten years..... 308,324 311,927 364,081 386,994 Due after ten years........................ 200,716 203,125 207,536 234,163 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Subtotal.................................. 1,035,358 1,045,208 1,365,701 1,419,511 Structured securities (CMBS, ABS and RMBS). 276,564 275,873 354,212 366,108 ---------- ---------- ---------- ---------- Total fixed maturity securities........... $1,311,922 $1,321,081 $1,719,913 $1,785,619 ========== ========== ========== ========== Actual maturities may differ from contractual maturities due to the exercise of call or prepayment options. Fixed maturity securities not due at a single maturity date have been presented in the year of final contractual maturity. CMBS, ABS and RMBS are shown separately, as they are not due at a single maturity. CONTINUOUS GROSS UNREALIZED LOSSES FOR FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES AFS BY SECTOR The following table presents the estimated fair value and gross unrealized losses of fixed maturity securities AFS in an unrealized loss position, aggregated by sector and by length of time that the securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position. The unrealized loss amounts include the noncredit component of OTTI loss. [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 DECEMBER 31, 2012 ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ EQUAL TO OR GREATER EQUAL TO OR GREATER LESS THAN 12 MONTHS THAN 12 MONTHS LESS THAN 12 MONTHS THAN 12 MONTHS --------------------- -------------------- --------------------- -------------------- ESTIMATED GROSS ESTIMATED GROSS ESTIMATED GROSS ESTIMATED GROSS FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED FAIR UNREALIZED VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES VALUE LOSSES ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- ---------- ---------- --------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS, EXCEPT NUMBER OF SECURITIES) FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES: Foreign corporate............. $ 214,876 $ 7,203 $ -- $ -- $ 288,797 $ 1,814 $ -- $ -- U.S. corporate................ 50,458 1,771 4,378 595 54,064 241 -- -- CMBS.......................... 62,872 4,941 -- -- -- -- -- -- State and political subdivision.................. 14,936 916 -- -- 775 5 -- -- U.S. Treasury and agency...... 28,434 3,924 -- -- 2,522 2 -- -- ABS........................... 18,907 264 -- -- 72,441 9 -- -- RMBS.......................... 17,541 794 -- -- -- -- -- -- ---------- --------- -------- ---- ---------- -------- ----- ----- Total fixed maturity securities................. $ 408,024 $ 19,813 $ 4,378 $595 $ 418,599 $ 2,071 $ -- $ -- ========== ========= ======== ==== ========== ======== ===== ===== Total number of securities in an unrealized loss position..................... 79 2 67 -- ========== ======== ========== ===== F-27
N-6343rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 343rd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) EVALUATION OF AFS SECURITIES FOR OTTI AND EVALUATING TEMPORARILY IMPAIRED AFS SECURITIES EVALUATION AND MEASUREMENT METHODOLOGIES Management considers a wide range of factors about the security issuer and uses its best judgment in evaluating the cause of the decline in the estimated fair value of the security and in assessing the prospects for near-term recovery. Inherent in management's evaluation of the security are assumptions and estimates about the operations of the issuer and its future earnings potential. Considerations used in the impairment evaluation process include, but are not limited to: (i) the length of time and the extent to which the estimated fair value has been below amortized cost; (ii) the potential for impairments when the issuer is experiencing significant financial difficulties; (iii) the potential for impairments in an entire industry sector or sub-sector; (iv) the potential for impairments in certain economically depressed geographic locations; (v) the potential for impairments of securities where the issuer, series of issuers or industry has suffered a catastrophic loss or has exhausted natural resources; (vi) whether the Company has the intent to sell or will more likely than not be required to sell a particular security before the decline in estimated fair value below amortized cost recovers; (vii) with respect to structured securities, changes in forecasted cash flows after considering the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds, current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security; and (viii) other subjective factors, including concentrations and information obtained from regulators and rating agencies. The methodology and significant inputs used to determine the amount of credit loss on fixed maturity securities are as follows: . The Company calculates the recovery value by performing a discounted cash flow analysis based on the present value of future cash flows. The discount rate is generally the effective interest rate of the security prior to impairment. . When determining collectability and the period over which value is expected to recover, the Company applies considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process which incorporates information regarding the specific security, fundamentals of the industry and geographic area in which the security issuer operates, and overall macroeconomic conditions. Projected future cash flows are estimated using assumptions derived from management's best estimates of likely scenario-based outcomes after giving consideration to a variety of variables that include, but are not limited to: payment terms of the security; the likelihood that the issuer can service the interest and principal payments; the quality and amount of any credit enhancements; the security's position within the capital structure of the issuer; possible corporate restructurings or asset sales by the issuer; and changes to the rating of the security or the issuer by rating agencies. . Additional considerations are made when assessing the unique features that apply to certain structured securities including, but not limited to: the quality of underlying collateral, expected prepayment speeds; current and forecasted loss severity, consideration of the payment terms of the underlying loans or assets backing a particular security, and the payment priority within the tranche structure of the security. . When determining the amount of the credit loss for U.S. and foreign corporate securities and state and political subdivision securities, the estimated fair value is considered the recovery value when available F-28
N-6344th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 344th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) information does not indicate that another value is more appropriate. When information is identified that indicates a recovery value other than estimated fair value, management considers in the determination of recovery value the same considerations utilized in its overall impairment evaluation process as described above, as well as private and public sector programs to restructure such securities. With respect to securities that have attributes of debt and equity (perpetual hybrid securities), consideration is given in the OTTI analysis as to whether there has been any deterioration in the credit of the issuer and the likelihood of recovery in value of the securities that are in a severe and extended unrealized loss position. Consideration is also given as to whether any perpetual hybrid securities, with an unrealized loss, regardless of credit rating, have deferred any dividend payments. When an OTTI loss has occurred, the OTTI loss is the entire difference between the perpetual hybrid security's cost and its estimated fair value with a corresponding charge to earnings. The amortized cost of fixed maturity securities is adjusted for OTTI in the period in which the determination is made. The Company does not change the revised cost basis for subsequent recoveries in value. In periods subsequent to the recognition of OTTI on a fixed maturity security, the Company accounts for the impaired security as if it had been purchased on the measurement date of the impairment. Accordingly, the discount (or reduced premium) based on the new cost basis is accreted over the remaining term of the fixed maturity security in a prospective manner based on the amount and timing of estimated future cash flows. CURRENT PERIOD EVALUATION Based on the Company's current evaluation of its AFS securities in an unrealized loss position in accordance with its impairment policy, and the Company's current intentions and assessments (as applicable to the type of security) about holding, selling and any requirements to sell these securities, the Company has concluded that these securities are not other-than-temporarily impaired at December 31, 2013. Future OTTI will depend primarily on economic fundamentals, issuer performance (including changes in the present value of future cash flows expected to be collected) and changes in credit ratings, collateral valuation, interest rates and credit spreads. If economic fundamentals deteriorate or if there are adverse changes in the above factors, OTTI may be incurred in upcoming periods. Gross unrealized losses on fixed maturity securities increased $18.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2013 from $2.1 million to $20.4 million. The increase in gross unrealized losses for the year ended December 31, 2013, was primarily attributable to an increase in interest rates, partially offset by narrowing credit spreads. At December 31, 2013, there were no fixed maturity securities with an unrealized loss position of 20% or more of amortized cost for six months or greater. FUNDS WITHHELD AT INTEREST Funds withheld at interest represent amounts contractually withheld by ceding companies in accordance with reinsurance agreements. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, such amounts consisted of balances withheld in connection with reinsurance agreements with affiliates of the Holding Company, as presented in Note 4, and an unaffiliated company. F-29
N-6345th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 345th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) CASH EQUIVALENTS The carrying value of cash equivalents, which includes securities and other investments with an original or remaining maturity of three months or less at the time of purchase, was $40.8 million and $410.6 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. NET UNREALIZED INVESTMENT GAINS (LOSSES) The components of net unrealized investment gains (losses), included in AOCI, were as follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ---------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ---------- ----------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Fixed maturity securities................. $ 9,072 $ 65,706 $ 41,752 Equity securities......................... -- -- (1,063) Deferred income tax benefit (expense)..... (3,176) (22,997) (14,241) ---------- ----------- ----------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses). $ 5,896 $ 42,709 $ 26,448 ========== =========== =========== The changes in net unrealized investment gains (losses) were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, --------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ----------- --------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Balance, January 1,.................................. $ 42,709 $ 26,448 $ 3,341 Unrealized investment gains (losses) during the year. (56,634) 25,017 35,549 Deferred income tax benefit (expense)................ 19,821 (8,756) (12,442) ----------- --------- ----------- Balance, December 31,................................ $ 5,896 $ 42,709 $ 26,448 =========== ========= =========== Change in net unrealized investment gains (losses)... $ (36,813) $ 16,261 $ 23,107 =========== ========= =========== CONCENTRATIONS OF CREDIT RISK There were no investments in any counterparty that were greater than 10% of the Company's stockholder's equity, other than the U.S. government and its agencies, at both December 31, 2013 and 2012. INVESTED ASSETS HELD IN TRUST AND PLEDGED AS COLLATERAL Invested assets held in trust and pledged as collateral are presented below at estimated fair value for cash and cash equivalents, short-term investments, and fixed maturity securities at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Invested assets held in trust (1).............................. $2,754,170 $4,697,418 Invested assets pledged as collateral (2)...................... 1,024,682 289,145 ---------- ---------- Total invested assets held in trust and pledged as collateral. $3,778,852 $4,986,563 ========== ========== -------- (1)The Company has held in trust certain investments, primarily fixed maturity securities, in connection with certain reinsurance transactions. F-30
N-6346th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 346th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) (2)Certain of the Company's invested assets are pledged as collateral for various derivative transactions as described in Note 6. VARIABLE INTEREST ENTITIES The Company has invested in certain structured transactions that are VIEs. In certain instances, the Company may hold both the power to direct the most significant activities of the entity, as well as an economic interest in the entity and, as such, it would be deemed to be the primary beneficiary or consolidator of the entity. The determination of the VIE's primary beneficiary requires an evaluation of the contractual and implied rights and obligations associated with each party's relationship with or involvement in the entity, an estimate of the entity's expected losses and expected residual returns and the allocation of such estimates to each party involved in the entity. The Company generally uses a qualitative approach to determine whether it is the primary beneficiary. However, for VIEs that are investment companies or apply measurement principles consistent with those utilized by investment companies, the primary beneficiary is based on a risks and rewards model and is defined as the entity that will absorb a majority of a VIE's expected losses, receive a majority of a VIE's expected residual returns if no single entity absorbs a majority of expected losses, or both. The Company reassesses its involvement with VIEs on a quarterly basis. The use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs in the determination of the primary beneficiary could have a material effect on the amounts presented within the financial statements. CONSOLIDATED VIES There were no VIEs for which the Company has concluded that it is the primary beneficiary and which are consolidated at December 31, 2013 and 2012. UNCONSOLIDATED VIES The carrying amount and maximum exposure to loss relating to VIEs in which the Company holds a significant variable interest but is not the primary beneficiary and which have not been consolidated were as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------------- 2013 2012 -------------------- -------------------- MAXIMUM MAXIMUM CARRYING EXPOSURE CARRYING EXPOSURE VALUE TO LOSS (1) VALUE TO LOSS (1) -------- ----------- -------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Fixed maturity securities AFS: Structured securities (ABS, CMBS and RMBS) (2). $275,873 $275,873 $366,108 $366,108 Foreign corporate.............................. 5,186 5,186 5,525 5,525 -------- -------- -------- -------- Total........................................ $281,059 $281,059 $371,633 $371,633 ======== ======== ======== ======== -------- (1)The maximum exposure to loss relating to fixed maturity securities is equal to their carrying amounts or the carrying amounts of retained interests. (2)For these variable interests, the Company's involvement is limited to that of a passive investor. F-31
N-6347th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 347th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) NET INVESTMENT INCOME The components of net investment income were as follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 -------- -------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Investment Income: Fixed maturity securities......................... $ 41,202 $ 29,831 $ 23,825 Equity securities................................. -- 94 619 Cash, cash equivalents and short-term investments. 3,247 6,415 3,314 Other............................................. (3,155) (4,792) (4,622) -------- -------- -------- Subtotal........................................ 41,294 31,548 23,136 -------- -------- -------- Less: Investment expenses......................... 5,871 10,853 5,898 -------- -------- -------- Net investment income........................... $ 35,423 $ 20,695 $ 17,238 ======== ======== ======== See "-- Related Party Investment Transactions" for discussion of affiliated net investment income and expenses included in the table above. NET INVESTMENT GAINS (LOSSES) COMPONENTS OF NET INVESTMENT GAINS (LOSSES) The components of net investment gains (losses) were as follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 --------- ------- -------- (IN THOUSANDS) Fixed maturity securities................. $ 2,066 $ 711 $ 4,717 Equity securities......................... -- 3,675 (292) Other investment portfolio gains (losses). (58,647) 37,407 (5,511) --------- ------- -------- Total net investment gains (losses)...... $(56,581) $41,793 $(1,086) ========= ======= ======== Gains (losses) from foreign currency transactions included within net investment gains (losses) were ($59.2) million, $37.3 million and ($5.9) million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. F-32
N-6348th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 348th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 5. INVESTMENTS (CONTINUED) SALES OR DISPOSALS OF FIXED MATURITY AND EQUITY SECURITIES Proceeds from sales or disposals of fixed maturity and equity securities and the components of fixed maturity and equity securities net investment gains (losses) are as shown in the table below. Investment gains and losses on sales of securities are determined on a specific identification basis. [Enlarge/Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 2013 2012 2011 ---------- --------- ---------- ----- -------- -------- ---------- --------- ---------- FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES EQUITY SECURITIES TOTAL ------------------------------- ----------------------- ------------------------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Proceeds................ $ 251,239 $ 34,432 $ 421,298 $ -- $ 7,212 $ 2,880 $ 251,239 $ 41,644 $ 424,178 ========== ========= ========== ===== ======== ======== ========== ========= ========== Gross investment gains.................. $ 2,721 $ 755 $ 5,178 $ -- $ 3,675 $ -- $ 2,721 $ 4,430 $ 5,178 Gross investment losses................. (655) (44) (461) -- -- (292) (655) (44) (753) ---------- --------- ---------- ----- -------- -------- ---------- --------- ---------- Net investment gains (losses)............. $ 2,066 $ 711 $ 4,717 $ -- $ 3,675 $ (292) $ 2,066 $ 4,386 $ 4,425 ========== ========= ========== ===== ======== ======== ========== ========= ========== There were no OTTI losses on fixed maturity securities or equity securities during the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011. RELATED PARTY INVESTMENT TRANSACTIONS In the normal course of business, the Company transfers invested assets, primarily consisting of fixed maturity securities, to and from affiliates. There were no invested assets transferred to affiliates for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012. There were no invested assets transferred from affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2013. The estimated fair value of invested assets transferred from affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2012 was $857.4 million. There were no invested assets transferred from affiliates for the year ended December 31, 2011. The Company receives investment administrative services from an affiliate. The related investment administrative service charges were $4.6 million, $7.2 million and $4.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. 6. DERIVATIVES ACCOUNTING FOR DERIVATIVES See Note 1 for a description of the Company's accounting policies for derivatives and Note 7 for information about the fair value hierarchy for derivatives. DERIVATIVE STRATEGIES The Company is exposed to various risks relating to its ongoing business operations, including interest rate, foreign currency exchange rate and equity market. The Company uses a variety of strategies to manage these risks, including the use of derivatives. F-33
N-6349th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 349th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) Derivatives are financial instruments whose values are derived from interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, credit spreads and/or other financial indices. Derivatives may be exchange-traded or contracted in the over-the-counter ("OTC") market. Certain of the Company's OTC derivatives may be cleared and settled through central clearing counterparties ("OTC-cleared"), while others are bilateral contracts between two counterparties ("OTC-bilateral"). The types of derivatives the Company uses include swaps, forwards, futures and option contracts. The Company also purchases certain securities and engages in certain reinsurance agreements that have embedded derivatives. The Company utilizes all derivatives in non-qualifying hedging relationships. INTEREST RATE DERIVATIVES The Company uses a variety of interest rate derivatives to reduce its exposure to changes in interest rates, including interest rate swaps, futures and options. Interest rate swaps are used by the Company primarily to reduce market risks from changes in interest rates and to alter interest rate exposure arising from mismatches between assets and liabilities (duration mismatches). In an interest rate swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between fixed rate and floating rate interest amounts as calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount. In exchange-traded interest rate Treasury futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of interest rate securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded interest rate Treasury futures are used primarily to hedge mismatches between the duration of assets in a portfolio and the duration of liabilities supported by those assets, to hedge against changes in value of securities the Company owns or anticipates acquiring and to hedge against changes in interest rates on anticipated liability issuances by replicating Treasury or swap curve performance. Swaptions are used by the Company to hedge interest rate risk associated with the Company's long-term liabilities and invested assets. A swaption is an option to enter into a swap with a forward starting effective date. In certain instances, the Company locks in the economic impact of existing purchased swaptions by entering into offsetting written swaptions. The Company pays a premium for purchased swaptions and receives a premium for written swaptions. Swaptions are included in interest rate options. FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE DERIVATIVES The Company uses foreign currency forwards to reduce the risk from fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates associated with its assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies. In a foreign currency forward transaction, the Company agrees with another party to deliver a specified amount of an identified currency at a specified future date. The price is agreed upon at the time of the contract and payment for such a contract is made at the specified future date. To a lesser extent, the Company uses exchange-traded currency futures to hedge currency mismatches between assets and liabilities. F-34
N-6350th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 350th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) EQUITY DERIVATIVES The Company uses a variety of equity derivatives to reduce its exposure to equity market risk, including equity index options, variance swaps, exchange-traded equity futures and total rate of return swaps ("TRRs"). Equity index options are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products assumed by the Company. To hedge against adverse changes in equity indices, the Company enters into contracts to sell the equity index within a limited time at a contracted price. The contracts will be net settled in cash based on differentials in the indices at the time of exercise and the strike price. Certain of these contracts may also contain settlement provisions linked to interest rates. In certain instances, the Company may enter into a combination of transactions to hedge adverse changes in equity indices within a pre-determined range through the purchase and sale of options. Equity variance swaps are used by the Company primarily to hedge minimum guarantees embedded in certain variable annuity products reinsured by the Company. In an equity variance swap, the Company agrees with another party to exchange amounts in the future, based on changes in equity volatility over a defined period. In exchange-traded equity futures transactions, the Company agrees to purchase or sell a specified number of contracts, the value of which is determined by the different classes of equity securities, and to post variation margin on a daily basis in an amount equal to the difference in the daily market values of those contracts. The Company enters into exchange-traded futures with regulated futures commission merchants that are members of the exchange. Exchange-traded equity futures are used primarily to hedge liabilities embedded in certain variable annuity products reinsured by the Company. TRRs are swaps whereby the Company agrees with another party to exchange, at specified intervals, the difference between the economic risk and reward of an asset or a market index and the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate ("LIBOR"), calculated by reference to an agreed notional amount. No cash is exchanged at the outset of the contract. Cash is paid and received over the life of the contract based on the terms of the swap. The Company uses TRRs to hedge its equity market guarantees in certain of its reinsured products. TRRs can be used as hedges or to synthetically create investments. F-35
N-6351st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 351st
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) PRIMARY RISKS MANAGED BY DERIVATIVES The following table presents the gross notional amount, estimated fair value and primary underlying risk exposure of the Company's derivatives, excluding embedded derivatives, held at: [Download Table] DERIVATIVES NOT DESIGNATED OR NOT QUALIFYING AS HEDGING PRIMARY UNDERLYING RISK INSTRUMENTS EXPOSURE --------------------- ------------------------------- Interest rate swaps........ Interest rate.................. Interest rate futures...... Interest rate.................. Interest rate options...... Interest rate.................. Foreign currency forwards.. Foreign currency exchange rate. Currency futures........... Foreign currency exchange rate. Equity futures............. Equity market.................. Equity options............. Equity market.................. Variance swaps............. Equity market.................. Total rate of return swaps. Equity market.................. Total non-designated or non-qualifying derivatives....... [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 DECEMBER 31, 2012 ----------------------------------- ---------------------------------- ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE ---------------------- ---------------------- PRIMARY UNDERLYING RISK NOTIONAL NOTIONAL EXPOSURE AMOUNT ASSETS LIABILITIES AMOUNT ASSETS LIABILITIES ------------------------------- ------------ ---------- ----------- ----------- ---------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Interest rate.................. $ 23,221,522 $1,040,377 $ 562,851 $22,298,852 $1,867,230 $ 611,572 Interest rate.................. 4,462,013 9,047 6,547 6,437,033 598 20,980 Interest rate.................. 17,690,095 131,341 235,516 11,440,095 302,989 58,486 Foreign currency exchange rate. 2,324,152 728 171,078 2,281,296 1,051 177,496 Foreign currency exchange rate. 364,550 1,169 1,022 518,160 3,864 -- Equity market.................. 4,327,600 1,284 39,600 5,898,717 14,146 105,452 Equity market.................. 31,414,484 1,024,034 1,005,551 18,897,916 2,346,326 355,433 Equity market.................. 18,917,116 167,519 469,330 17,177,849 111,788 241,073 Equity market.................. 3,339,982 -- 156,959 2,791,568 4,436 95,505 ------------ ---------- ---------- ----------- ---------- ---------- $106,061,514 $2,375,499 $2,648,454 $87,741,486 $4,652,428 $1,665,997 ============ ========== ========== =========== ========== ========== NET DERIVATIVE GAINS (LOSSES) The components of net derivative gains (losses) were as follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 -------------- -------------- ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) Derivatives and hedging gains (losses). $ (4,841,296) $ (2,586,885) $ 2,941,895 Embedded derivatives................... 6,776,544 (1,089,704) (2,711,461) -------------- -------------- ------------ Total net derivatives gains (losses).. $ 1,935,248 $ (3,676,589) $ 230,434 ============== ============== ============ The following table presents earned income on derivatives for the: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------------ ------------ ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Net derivative gains (losses).... $ (262,379) $ 20,202 $ 141,929 Policyholder benefits and claims. (274,848) (113,899) 16,833 ------------ ------------ ---------- Total........................... $ (537,227) $ (93,697) $ 158,762 ============ ============ ========== F-36
N-6352nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 352nd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) NON-QUALIFYING DERIVATIVES The following table presents the amount and location of gains (losses) recognized in income for derivatives that were not designated or qualifying as hedging instruments: [Download Table] NET POLICYHOLDER DERIVATIVE BENEFITS AND GAINS (LOSSES) CLAIMS (1) -------------- ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013: Interest rate derivatives.................. $ (925,139) $ (1,364) Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. (514,563) -- Equity derivatives......................... (3,139,215) (635,931) -------------- ------------ Total.................................... $ (4,578,917) $ (637,295) ============== ============ FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012: Interest rate derivatives.................. $ (204,299) $ -- Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. (284,745) -- Equity derivatives......................... (2,118,043) (367,490) -------------- ------------ Total.................................... $ (2,607,087) $ (367,490) ============== ============ FOR THE YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011: Interest rate derivatives.................. $ 1,527,402 $ -- Foreign currency exchange rate derivatives. 143,177 -- Equity derivatives......................... 1,129,387 (82,696) -------------- ------------ Total.................................... $ 2,799,966 $ (82,696) ============== ============ -------- (1)Changes in estimated fair value related to economic hedges of reinsured variable annuity guarantees. CREDIT RISK ON FREESTANDING DERIVATIVES The Company may be exposed to credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to derivatives. Generally, the current credit exposure of the Company's derivatives is limited to the net positive estimated fair value of derivatives at the reporting date after taking into consideration the existence of master netting or similar agreements and any collateral received pursuant to such agreements. The Company manages its credit risk related to derivatives by entering into transactions with creditworthy counterparties and establishing and monitoring exposure limits. The Company's OTC-bilateral derivative transactions are generally governed by International Swaps and Derivatives Association ("ISDA") Master Agreements which provide for legally enforceable set-off and close-out netting of exposures to specific counterparties in the event of early termination of a transaction, which includes, but is not limited to, events of default and bankruptcy. In the event of an early termination, the Company is permitted to set-off receivables from the counterparty against payables to the same counterparty arising out of all included transactions. Substantially all of the Company's ISDA Master Agreements also include Credit Support Annex provisions which require both the pledging and accepting of collateral in connection with its OTC-bilateral derivatives. See Note 7 for a description of the impact of credit risk on the valuation of derivatives. F-37
N-6353rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 353rd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) The estimated fair value of the Company's net derivative assets and net derivative liabilities after the application of master netting agreements and collateral was as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 DECEMBER 31, 2012 ------------------------- ------------------------- DERIVATIVES SUBJECT TO A MASTER NETTING ARRANGEMENT OR A SIMILAR ARRANGEMENT ASSETS LIABILITIES ASSETS LIABILITIES -------------------------------------------------------- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: OTC-bilateral.......................................... $ 2,430,173 $ 2,593,152 $ 4,708,762 $ 1,534,233 Exchange-traded........................................ 11,500 47,169 18,608 126,432 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total gross estimated fair value of derivatives (1).................................... 2,441,673 2,640,321 4,727,370 1,660,665 Amounts offset in the balance sheets.................... -- -- -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Estimated fair value of derivatives presented in the balance sheets (1).................................... 2,441,673 2,640,321 4,727,370 1,660,665 Gross amounts not offset in the balance sheets: Gross estimated fair value of derivatives: (2) OTC-bilateral.......................................... (1,869,869) (1,869,869) (1,518,669) (1,518,669) Exchange-traded........................................ (5,368) (5,368) (18,608) (18,608) Cash collateral (3) OTC-bilateral.......................................... (163,210) -- (1,473,376) -- Exchange-traded........................................ -- (39,008) -- (107,824) Securities collateral (4) OTC-bilateral.......................................... (377,561) (646,079) (1,716,717) (13,667) Exchange-traded........................................ -- (2,793) -- -- ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net amount after application of master netting agreements and collateral............................. $ 25,665 $ 77,204 $ -- $ 1,897 ============ ============ ============ ============ -------- (1)At December 31, 2013 and 2012, derivative assets include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $66,175 thousand and $74,942 thousand, respectively, and derivative liabilities include income or expense accruals reported in accrued investment income or in other liabilities of $8,133 thousand and $5,332 thousand, respectively. (2)Estimated fair value of derivatives is limited to the amount that is subject to set-off and includes income or expense accruals. (3)Cash collateral received is included in cash and cash equivalents and the obligation to return it is included in other liabilities in the balance sheet. The receivable for the return of cash collateral provided by the Company is inclusive of initial margin on exchange-traded derivatives and is included in premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the balance sheet. The amount of cash collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess cash collateral of $33,319 thousand and $0, respectively, and provided excess cash collateral of $185,299 thousand and $167,655 thousand, respectively, which is not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. F-38
N-6354th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 354th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) (4)Securities collateral received by the Company is held in separate custodial accounts and is not recorded on the balance sheet. Subject to certain constraints, the Company is permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral, but at December 31, 2013 none of the collateral had been sold or repledged. Securities collateral pledged by the Company is reported in fixed maturity securities in the balance sheet. Subject to certain constraints, the counterparties are permitted by contract to sell or repledge this collateral. The amount of securities collateral offset in the table above is limited to the net estimated fair value of derivatives after application of netting agreements and cash collateral. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company received excess securities collateral of $96,746 thousand and $59,320 thousand, respectively, for its OTC-bilateral derivatives which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. At December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company provided excess securities collateral of $0 and $0, respectively, for its OTC-bilateral derivatives and $36,182 thousand and $39,989 thousand, respectively, for its exchange-traded derivatives, which are not included in the table above due to the foregoing limitation. The following table presents the estimated fair value of the Company's OTC-bilateral derivatives that are in a net liability position after considering the effect of netting agreements, together with the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the collateral pledged. The table also presents the incremental collateral that the Company would be required to provide if there was a one notch downgrade in the Company's credit rating at the reporting date or if the Company's credit rating sustained a downgrade to a level that triggered full overnight collateralization or termination of the derivative position at the reporting date. OTC-bilateral derivatives that are not subject to collateral agreements are excluded from this table. [Enlarge/Download Table] ESTIMATED FAIR VALUE OF FAIR VALUE OF INCREMENTAL COLLATERAL COLLATERAL PROVIDED: PROVIDED UPON: ----------------------- ---------------------------------------- DOWNGRADE IN THE HOLDING COMPANY'S CREDIT RATING ESTIMATED ONE NOTCH TO A LEVEL THAT TRIGGERS FAIR VALUE OF DOWNGRADE IN FULL OVERNIGHT DERIVATIVES IN THE HOLDING COLLATERALIZATION OR NET LIABILITY FIXED MATURITY COMPANY'S TERMINATION POSITION (1) SECURITIES CREDIT RATING OF THE DERIVATIVE POSITION -------------- ----------------------- ------------- -------------------------- (IN THOUSANDS) December 31, 2013. $ 723,283 $ 646,079 $ 20,912 $ 21,353 December 31, 2012. $ 15,564 $ 13,667 $ -- $ -- -------- (1)After taking into consideration the existence of netting agreements. EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES The Company assumes variable annuities, modified coinsurance contracts, equity indexed deferred annuities and purchases certain investments that contain embedded derivatives that are required to be separated from their host contracts and accounted for as freestanding derivatives. These host contracts principally include: assumed variable annuities with guaranteed minimum benefits, including GMWBs, GMABs and certain GMIBs; ceded reinsurance agreements of guaranteed minimum benefits related to GMABs and certain GMIBs; assumed modified coinsurance contracts; assumed reinsurance on equity indexed deferred annuities; and options embedded in debt and equity securities. F-39
N-6355th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 355th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 6. DERIVATIVES (CONTINUED) The following table presents the estimated fair value and balance sheet location of the Company's embedded derivatives that have been separated from their host contracts at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ------------------------- BALANCE SHEET LOCATION 2013 2012 -------------------------- ------------ ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts: Ceded guaranteed minimum benefits... Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables......... $ 122,515 $ 257,690 Assumed modified coinsurance Funds withheld at contracts.......................... interest.................. 24,035 72,357 ------------ ------------ Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts....... $ 146,550 $ 330,047 ============ ============ Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts: Assumed guaranteed minimum benefits. Other policy-related balances.................. $ 2,488,944 $ 8,831,285 ------------ ------------ Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts... $ 2,488,944 $ 8,831,285 ============ ============ The following table presents changes in estimated fair value related to embedded derivatives: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------------ -------------- -------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Net derivative gains (losses) (1). $ 6,776,544 $ (1,089,704) $ (2,711,461) Policyholder benefits and claims.. $ (139,134) $ 72,507 $ 70,390 -------- (1)The valuation of reinsured guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses), in connection with this adjustment, were ($996.3) million, ($1,603.0) million and $1,956.9 million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. In addition, the valuation of ceded guaranteed minimum benefits includes a nonperformance risk adjustment. The amounts included in net derivative gains (losses), in connection with this adjustment, were $19.4 million, $2.9 million and ($23.1) million, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. F-40
N-6356th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 356th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE When developing estimated fair values, the Company considers three broad valuation techniques: (i) the market approach, (ii) the income approach, and (iii) the cost approach. The Company determines the most appropriate valuation technique to use, given what is being measured and the availability of sufficient inputs, giving priority to observable inputs. The Company categorizes its assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value into a three-level hierarchy, based on the significant input with the lowest level in its valuation. The input levels are as follows: Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. The size of the bid/ask spread is used as an indicator of market activity for fixed maturity securities. Level 2 Quoted prices in markets that are not active or inputs that are observable either directly or indirectly. These inputs can include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities other than quoted prices in Level 1, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other significant inputs that are observable or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are significant to the determination of estimated fair value of the assets or liabilities. Unobservable inputs reflect the reporting entity's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability. Financial markets are susceptible to severe events evidenced by rapid depreciation in asset values accompanied by a reduction in asset liquidity. The Company's ability to sell securities, or the price ultimately realized for these securities, depends upon the demand and liquidity in the market and increases the use of judgment in determining the estimated fair value of certain securities. Considerable judgment is often required in interpreting market data to develop estimates of fair value, and the use of different assumptions or valuation methodologies may have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts. F-41
N-6357th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 357th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) RECURRING FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS The assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy are presented below. [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 ------------------------------------------------------ FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY -------------------------------------- TOTAL ESTIMATED LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUE ------------ ------------ ------------ --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS: Fixed maturity securities: Foreign corporate............................. $ -- $ 533,423 $ -- $ 533,423 U.S. corporate................................ -- 253,705 9,917 263,622 CMBS.......................................... -- 75,017 57,547 132,564 State and political subdivision............... -- 120,256 -- 120,256 U.S. Treasury and agency...................... 99,248 -- -- 99,248 ABS........................................... -- 80,520 -- 80,520 RMBS.......................................... -- 62,789 -- 62,789 Foreign government............................ -- 28,659 -- 28,659 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total fixed maturity securities............. 99,248 1,154,369 67,464 1,321,081 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Short-term investments (1)..................... 2,630,762 101,270 -- 2,732,032 Derivative assets: (2) Interest rate contracts....................... 9,046 1,171,719 -- 1,180,765 Foreign currency contracts.................... 1,169 728 -- 1,897 Equity market contracts....................... 1,284 917,797 273,756 1,192,837 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total derivative assets..................... 11,499 2,090,244 273,756 2,375,499 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (3)................................ -- -- 146,550 146,550 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total assets................................ $ 2,741,509 $ 3,345,883 $ 487,770 $ 6,575,162 ============ ============ ============ ============ LIABILITIES: Derivative liabilities: (2) Interest rate contracts....................... $ 6,547 $ 798,367 $ -- $ 804,914 Foreign currency contracts.................... 1,022 171,078 -- 172,100 Equity market contracts....................... 39,601 1,136,875 494,964 1,671,440 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total derivative liabilities................ 47,170 2,106,320 494,964 2,648,454 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (3)................................ -- -- 2,488,944 2,488,944 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------ Total liabilities........................... $ 47,170 $ 2,106,320 $ 2,983,908 $ 5,137,398 ============ ============ ============ ============ F-42
N-6358th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 358th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2012 ------------------------------------------------------ FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY -------------------------------------- TOTAL ESTIMATED LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUE ------------ ------------ ------------ --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS: Fixed maturity securities: Foreign corporate......................... $ -- $ 628,708 $ 2,714 $ 631,422 U.S. corporate............................ -- 307,001 15,465 322,466 CMBS...................................... -- 44,603 41,723 86,326 State and political subdivision........... -- 135,567 -- 135,567 U.S. Treasury and agency.................. 285,259 8,270 -- 293,529 ABS....................................... -- 193,876 4,000 197,876 RMBS...................................... -- 81,906 -- 81,906 Foreign government........................ -- 36,527 -- 36,527 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Total fixed maturity securities......... 285,259 1,436,458 63,902 1,785,619 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Short-term investments (1)................. 3,824,840 425,354 4,996 4,255,190 Derivative assets: (2) Interest rate contracts................... 598 2,170,219 -- 2,170,817 Foreign currency contracts................ 3,864 1,051 -- 4,915 Equity market contracts................... 14,146 2,000,970 461,580 2,476,696 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Total derivative assets................. 18,608 4,172,240 461,580 4,652,428 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts (3)............................ -- -- 330,047 330,047 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Total assets............................ $ 4,128,707 $ 6,034,052 $ 860,525 $ 11,023,284 ============ ============ ============ ============= LIABILITIES: Derivative liabilities: (2) Interest rate contracts................... $ 20,980 $ 670,059 $ -- $ 691,039 Foreign currency contracts................ -- 177,496 -- 177,496 Equity market contracts................... 105,452 416,032 275,979 797,463 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Total derivative liabilities............ 126,432 1,263,587 275,979 1,665,998 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts (3)....................... -- -- 8,831,285 8,831,285 ------------ ------------ ------------ ------------- Total liabilities....................... $ 126,432 $ 1,263,587 $ 9,107,264 $ 10,497,283 ============ ============ ============ ============= -------- (1)Short-term investments as presented in the tables above differ from the amounts presented in the balance sheets because certain short-term investments are not measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis. (2)Derivative amounts are presented gross in the tables above to reflect the presentation in the balance sheets, but are presented net for purposes of the rollforward in the Fair Value Measurements Using Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) tables. F-43
N-6359th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 359th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) (3)Net embedded derivatives within asset host contracts are presented within funds withheld at interest and premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the balance sheets. Net embedded derivatives within liability host contracts are presented within other policy-related balances in the balance sheets. The following describes the valuation methodologies used to measure assets and liabilities at fair value. The description includes the valuation techniques and key inputs for each category of assets or liabilities that are classified within Level 2 and Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. INVESTMENTS VALUATION CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES On behalf of the Company and the Holding Company's Chief Investment Officer and Chief Financial Officer, a pricing and valuation committee that is independent of the trading and investing functions and comprised of senior management provides oversight of control systems and valuation policies for securities and derivatives. On a quarterly basis, this committee reviews and approves new transaction types and markets, ensures that observable market prices and market-based parameters are used for valuation, wherever possible, and determines that judgmental valuation adjustments, when applied, are based upon established policies and are applied consistently over time. This committee also provides oversight of the selection of independent third party pricing providers and the controls and procedures to evaluate third party pricing. Periodically, the Chief Accounting Officer reports to the Audit Committee of the Holding Company's Board of Directors regarding compliance with fair value accounting standards. The Company reviews its valuation methodologies on an ongoing basis and revises those methodologies when necessary based on changing market conditions. Assurance is gained on the overall reasonableness and consistent application of input assumptions, valuation methodologies and compliance with fair value accounting standards through controls designed to ensure valuations represent an exit price. Several controls are utilized, including certain monthly controls, which include, but are not limited to, analysis of portfolio returns to corresponding benchmark returns, comparing a sample of executed prices of securities sold to the fair value estimates, comparing fair value estimates to management's knowledge of the current market, reviewing the bid/ask spreads to assess activity, comparing prices from multiple independent pricing services and ongoing due diligence to confirm that independent pricing services use market-based parameters. The process includes a determination of the observability of inputs used in estimated fair values received from independent pricing services or brokers by assessing whether these inputs can be corroborated by observable market data. The Company ensures that prices received from independent brokers, also referred to herein as "consensus pricing," represent a reasonable estimate of fair value by considering such pricing relative to the Company's knowledge of the current market dynamics and current pricing for similar financial instruments. The Company also applies a formal process to challenge any prices received from independent pricing services that are not considered representative of estimated fair value. If prices received from independent pricing services are not considered reflective of market activity or representative of estimated fair value, independent non-binding broker quotations are obtained, or an internally developed valuation is prepared. Internally developed valuations of current estimated fair value, which reflect internal estimates of liquidity and nonperformance risks, compared with pricing received from the independent pricing services, did not produce material differences in the estimated fair values for the majority of the portfolio; accordingly, overrides were not material. This is, in part, because internal estimates of liquidity and nonperformance risks are generally F-44
N-6360th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 360th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) based on available market evidence and estimates used by other market participants. In the absence of such market-based evidence, management's best estimate is used. SECURITIES AND SHORT-TERM INVESTMENTS When available, the estimated fair value of these investments is based on quoted prices in active markets that are readily and regularly obtainable. Generally, these are the most liquid of the Company's securities holdings and valuation of these securities does not involve management's judgment. When quoted prices in active markets are not available, the determination of estimated fair value is based on market standard valuation methodologies, giving priority to observable inputs. The significant inputs to the market standard valuation methodologies for certain types of securities with reasonable levels of price transparency are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. When observable inputs are not available, the market standard valuation methodologies rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. These unobservable inputs can be based in large part on management's judgment or estimation and cannot be supported by reference to market activity. Even though these inputs are unobservable, management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such securities and are considered appropriate given the circumstances. Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: This level includes fixed maturity securities priced principally by independent pricing services using observable inputs. Short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 2 fixed maturity securities. U.S. CORPORATE AND FOREIGN CORPORATE SECURITIES These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active, or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques that use standard market observable inputs such as benchmark yields, spreads off benchmark yields, new issuances, issuer rating, duration, and trades of identical or comparable securities. Privately placed securities are valued using matrix pricing methodologies using standard market observable inputs, and inputs derived from, or corroborated by, market observable data including market yield curve, duration, call provisions, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues that incorporate the credit quality and industry sector of the issuer and in certain cases, delta spread adjustments to reflect specific credit related issues. STRUCTURED SECURITIES COMPRISED OF ABS, CMBS AND RMBS These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques using standard market inputs including spreads for actively traded securities, spreads off benchmark yields, expected prepayment speeds and volumes, current and forecasted loss severity, rating, weighted average coupon, F-45
N-6361st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 361st
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) weighted average maturity, average delinquency rates, geographic region, debt-service coverage ratios and issuance-specific information including, but not limited to: collateral type, payment terms of the underlying assets, payment priority within the tranche, structure of the security, deal performance and vintage of loans. STATE AND POLITICAL SUBDIVISION AND FOREIGN GOVERNMENT SECURITIES These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs including a benchmark U.S. Treasury yield or other yields, issuer ratings, broker-dealer quotes, issuer spreads and reported trades of similar securities, including those within the same sub-sector or with a similar maturity or credit rating. U.S. TREASURY AND AGENCY SECURITIES These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active or using matrix pricing or other similar techniques using standard market observable inputs such as a benchmark U.S. Treasury yield curve, the spread off the U.S. Treasury yield curve for the identical security and comparable securities that are actively traded. Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: In general, securities classified within Level 3 use many of the same valuation techniques and inputs as described previously for in the Level 2. However, if key inputs are unobservable, or if the investments are less liquid and there is very limited trading activity, the investments are generally classified as Level 3. The use of independent non-binding broker quotations to value investments generally indicates there is a lack of liquidity or a lack of transparency in the process to develop the valuation estimates, generally causing these investments to be classified in Level 3. Short-term investments within this level are of a similar nature and class to the Level 3 securities described below; accordingly, the valuation techniques and significant market standard observable inputs used in their valuation are also similar to those described below. U.S. CORPORATE AND FOREIGN CORPORATE SECURITIES These securities are principally valued using the market approach. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing or other similar techniques that utilize unobservable inputs or inputs that cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data, including illiquidity premium, delta spread adjustments to reflect specific credit-related issues, credit spreads and inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain valuations are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. STRUCTURED SECURITIES COMPRISED OF ABS AND CMBS These securities are principally valued using the market and income approaches. Valuations are based primarily on matrix pricing, discounted cash flow methodologies or other similar techniques that utilize inputs that are unobservable or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data including credit spreads. Below investment grade securities and sub-prime RMBS included in this level F-46
N-6362nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 362nd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) are valued based on inputs including quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2. Certain of these valuations are based on independent non-binding broker quotations. DERIVATIVES The estimated fair value of derivatives is determined through the use of quoted market prices for exchange-traded derivatives, or through the use of pricing models for OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives. The determination of estimated fair value, when quoted market values are not available, is based on market standard valuation methodologies and inputs that management believes are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments. Derivative valuations can be affected by changes in interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, financial indices, credit spreads, default risk, nonperformance risk, volatility, liquidity and changes in estimates and assumptions used in the pricing models. The valuation controls and procedures for derivatives are described in "-- Investments." The significant inputs to the pricing models for most OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives are inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant inputs that are observable generally include: interest rates, foreign currency exchange rates, interest rate curves, credit curves and volatility. However, certain OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives may rely on inputs that are significant to the estimated fair value that are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant inputs that are unobservable generally include references to emerging market currencies and inputs that are outside the observable portion of the interest rate curve, credit curve, volatility or other relevant market measure. These unobservable inputs may involve significant management judgment or estimation. Even though unobservable, these inputs are based on assumptions deemed appropriate given the circumstances and management believes they are consistent with what other market participants would use when pricing such instruments. Most inputs for OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives are mid-market inputs but, in certain cases, liquidity adjustments are made when they are deemed more representative of exit value. Market liquidity, as well as the use of different methodologies, assumptions and inputs, may have a material effect on the estimated fair values of the Company's derivatives and could materially affect net income. The credit risk of both the counterparty and the Company are considered in determining the estimated fair value for all OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives, and any potential credit adjustment is based on the net exposure by counterparty after taking into account the effects of netting agreements and collateral arrangements. The Company values its OTC-bilateral and OTC-cleared derivatives using standard swap curves which may include a spread to the risk free rate, depending upon specific collateral arrangements. This credit spread is appropriate for those parties that execute trades at pricing levels consistent with similar collateral arrangements. As the Company and its significant derivative counterparties generally execute trades at such pricing levels and hold sufficient collateral, additional credit risk adjustments are not currently required in the valuation process. The Company's ability to consistently execute at such pricing levels is in part due to the netting agreements and collateral arrangements that are in place with all of its significant derivative counterparties. An evaluation of the requirement to make additional credit risk adjustments is performed by the Company each reporting period. F-47
N-6363rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 363rd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) FREESTANDING DERIVATIVES Level 2 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: This level includes all types of derivatives utilized by the Company with the exception of exchange-traded derivatives included within Level 1 and those derivatives with unobservable inputs as described in Level 3. These derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. INTEREST RATE NON-OPTION-BASED. -- Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve and basis curves. OPTION-BASED. -- Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, basis curves and interest rate volatility. FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE RATE NON-OPTION-BASED. -- Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, basis curves, currency spot rates and cross currency basis curves. EQUITY MARKET NON-OPTION-BASED. -- Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, spot equity index levels and dividend yield curves. OPTION-BASED. -- Valuations are based on option pricing models, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve, spot equity index levels, dividend yield curves and equity volatility. Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: These derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. Valuations of non-option-based derivatives utilize present value techniques, whereas valuations of option-based derivatives utilize option pricing models. These valuation methodologies generally use the same inputs as described in the corresponding sections above for Level 2 measurements of derivatives. However, these derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. EQUITY MARKET NON-OPTION-BASED. -- Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of dividend yield curves and equity volatility. OPTION-BASED. -- Significant unobservable inputs may include the extrapolation beyond observable limits of dividend yield curves, equity volatility and unobservable correlation between model inputs. F-48
N-6364th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 364th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES Embedded derivatives principally include certain assumed and ceded variable annuity guarantees and equity indexed crediting rates within certain funding agreements. Embedded derivatives are recorded at estimated fair value with changes in estimated fair value reported in net income. The fair value of these embedded derivatives, estimated as the present value of projected future benefits minus the present value of projected future fees using actuarial and capital market assumptions including expectations concerning policyholder behavior, is calculated by the Company's actuarial department. The calculation is based on in-force business, and is performed using standard actuarial valuation software which projects future cash flows from the embedded derivative over multiple risk neutral stochastic scenarios using observable risk free rates. Capital market assumptions, such as risk free rates and implied volatilities, are based on market prices for publicly traded instruments to the extent that prices for such instruments are observable. Implied volatilities beyond the observable period are extrapolated based on observable implied volatilities and historical volatilities. Actuarial assumptions, including mortality, lapse, withdrawal and utilization, are unobservable and are reviewed at least annually based on actuarial studies of historical experience. The valuation of these guarantee liabilities includes nonperformance risk adjustments and adjustments for a risk margin related to non-capital market inputs. The nonperformance adjustment is determined by taking into consideration publicly available information relating to spreads in the secondary market for the Holding Company's debt, including related credit default swaps. Risk margins are established to capture the non-capital market risks of the instrument which represent the additional compensation a market participant would require to assume the risks related to the uncertainties of such actuarial assumptions as annuitization, premium persistency, partial withdrawal and surrenders. The establishment of risk margins requires the use of significant management judgment, including assumptions of the amount and cost of capital needed to cover the guarantees. These guarantees may be more costly than expected in volatile or declining equity markets. Market conditions including, but not limited to, changes in interest rates, equity indices, market volatility and foreign currency exchange rates; changes in nonperformance risk; and variations in actuarial assumptions regarding policyholder behavior, mortality and risk margins related to non-capital market inputs, may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of the guarantees that could materially affect net income. The Company ceded the risk associated with certain of the GMIBs previously described. These reinsurance agreements contain embedded derivatives which are included within premiums, reinsurance and other receivables in the balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value reported in net derivative gains (losses) or policyholder benefits and claims depending on the statement of operations classification of the direct risk. The value of the embedded derivatives on the ceded risk is determined using a methodology consistent with that described previously with the exception of the input for nonperformance risk that reflects the credit of the reinsurer. F-49
N-6365th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 365th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) The estimated fair value of the embedded derivatives within funds withheld related to certain assumed reinsurance is determined based on the change in estimated fair value of the underlying assets held by the Company in a reference portfolio backing the funds withheld liability. The estimated fair value of the underlying assets is determined as previously described in "-- Investments -- Securities and Short-term Investments." The estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives is included, along with their funds withheld hosts, in derivative liabilities and funds withheld at interest in the balance sheets with changes in estimated fair value recorded in net derivative gains (losses). Changes in the credit spreads on the underlying assets, interest rates and market volatility may result in significant fluctuations in the estimated fair value of these embedded derivatives that could materially affect net income. EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES WITHIN ASSET AND LIABILITY HOST CONTRACTS Level 3 Valuation Techniques and Key Inputs: ASSUMED GUARANTEED MINIMUM BENEFITS These embedded derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. Valuations are based on option pricing techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include swap yield curve, currency exchange rates and implied volatilities. These embedded derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant unobservable inputs generally include: the extrapolation beyond observable limits of the swap yield curve and implied volatilities, actuarial assumptions for policyholder behavior and mortality and the potential variability in policyholder behavior and mortality, nonperformance risk and cost of capital for purposes of calculating the risk margin. REINSURANCE CEDED ON CERTAIN GUARANTEED MINIMUM BENEFITS These embedded derivatives are principally valued using the income approach. The valuation techniques and significant market standard unobservable inputs used in their valuation are similar to those described above in " -- Assumed Guaranteed Minimum Benefits" and also include counterparty credit spreads. EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES WITHIN FUNDS WITHHELD RELATED TO CERTAIN ASSUMED REINSURANCE These embedded derivatives are principally valued using an income approach. Valuations are based on present value techniques, which utilize significant inputs that may include the swap yield curve and the fair value of assets within the reference portfolio. These embedded derivatives result in Level 3 classification because one or more of the significant inputs are not observable in the market or cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. Significant unobservable inputs generally include: the fair value of certain assets within the reference portfolio which are not observable in the market and cannot be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data. TRANSFERS BETWEEN LEVELS Overall, transfers between levels occur when there are changes in the observability of inputs and market activity. Transfers into or out of any level are assumed to occur at the beginning of the period. F-50
N-6366th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 366th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) TRANSFERS BETWEEN LEVELS 1 AND 2: There were no transfers between Levels 1 and 2 for assets and liabilities measured at estimated fair value and still held at December 31, 2013 and 2012. TRANSFERS INTO OR OUT OF LEVEL 3: Assets and liabilities are transferred into Level 3 when a significant input cannot be corroborated with market observable data. This occurs when market activity decreases significantly and underlying inputs cannot be observed, current prices are not available, and/or when there are significant variances in quoted prices, thereby affecting transparency. Assets and liabilities are transferred out of Level 3 when circumstances change such that a significant input can be corroborated with market observable data. This may be due to a significant increase in market activity, a specific event, or one or more significant input(s) becoming observable. Transfers into Level 3 for fixed maturity securities were due primarily to a lack of trading activity, decreased liquidity and credit ratings downgrades (e.g., from investment grade to below investment grade) which have resulted in decreased transparency of valuations and an increased use of independent non-binding broker quotations and unobservable inputs, such as illiquidity premiums, delta spread adjustments, or credit spreads. Transfers out of Level 3 for fixed maturity securities resulted primarily from increased transparency of both new issuances that, subsequent to issuance and establishment of trading activity, became priced by independent pricing services and existing issuances that, over time, the Company was able to obtain pricing from, or corroborate pricing received from, independent pricing services with observable inputs (such as observable spreads used in pricing securities) or increases in market activity and upgraded credit ratings. F-51
N-6367th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 367th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) ASSETS AND LIABILITIES MEASURED AT FAIR VALUE USING SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) The following table presents certain quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement, and the sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in those inputs, for the more significant asset and liability classes measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 -------------------------- SIGNIFICANT WEIGHTED VALUATION TECHNIQUES UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS RANGE AVERAGE (1) -------------------------------- -------------------------- ------------- ----------- FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES: (3) U.S. corporate and foreign corporate... Matrix pricing Credit spreads (4) 95 - 95 95 Illiquidity premium (4) 30 - 30 30 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CMBS................. Matrix pricing and discounted Credit spreads (4) cash flow 215 - 215 215 Market pricing Quoted prices (5) 104 - 104 104 Consensus pricing Offered quotes (5) 90 - 92 91 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DERIVATIVES: Equity market........ Present value techniques Volatility (7) 13% - 28% or option pricing models Correlation (9) 60% - 60% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ EMBEDDED DERIVATIVES: Assumed and ceded Option pricing techniques Mortality rates: 0% - 0.10% guaranteed minimum Ages 0 - 40 benefits............ Ages 41 - 60 0.04% - 0.65% Ages 61 - 115 0.26% - 100% Lapse rates: Durations 1 -10 0.50% - 100% Durations 11 -20 3% - 100% Durations 21 -116 3% - 100% Utilization rates 20% - 50% Withdrawal rates 0.07% - 10% Long-term equity 17.40% - 25% volatilities Nonperformance 0.03% - 0.44% risk spread ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ [Download Table] IMPACT OF DECEMBER 31, 2012 INCREASE IN -------------------------- INPUT ON WEIGHTED ESTIMATED VALUATION TECHNIQUES RANGE AVERAGE (1) FAIR VALUE (2) -------------------------------- ------------- ----------- -------------- Matrix pricing 103 - 499 168 Decrease 30 - 30 30 Decrease ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Matrix pricing and discounted cash flow Decrease (6) Market pricing 104 - 104 104 Increase (6) Consensus pricing Increase (6) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Present value techniques 13% - 32% Increase (8) or option pricing models 65% - 65% ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Option pricing techniques 0% - 0.14% Decrease (10) 0.05% - 0.75% Decrease (10) 0.26% - 100% Decrease (10) 0.50% - 100% Decrease (11) 3% - 100% Decrease (11) 2.5% - 100% Decrease (11) 20% - 50% Increase (12) 0.07% - 20% (13) 15.18% - 40% Increase (14) 0.10% - 1.72% Decrease (15) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- (1)The weighted average for fixed maturity securities is determined based on the estimated fair value of the securities. (2)The impact of a decrease in input would have the opposite impact on the estimated fair value. For embedded derivatives, changes to assumed guaranteed minimum benefits are based on liability positions and changes to ceded guaranteed minimum benefits are based on asset positions. (3)Significant increases (decreases) in expected default rates in isolation would result in substantially lower (higher) valuations. (4)Range and weighted average are presented in basis points. (5)Range and weighted average are presented in accordance with the market convention for fixed maturity securities of dollars per hundred dollars of par. (6)Changes in the assumptions used for the probability of default is accompanied by a directionally similar change in the assumption used for the loss severity and a directionally opposite change in the assumptions used for prepayment rates. (7)Ranges represent the underlying equity volatility quoted in percentage points. Since this valuation methodology uses a range of inputs across multiple volatility surfaces to value the derivative, presenting a range is more representative of the unobservable input used in the valuation. (8)Changes are based on long U.S. dollar net asset positions and will be inversely impacted for short U.S. dollar net asset positions. F-52
N-6368th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 368th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) (9)Ranges represent the different correlation factors utilized as components within the valuation methodology. Presenting a range of correlation factors is more representative of the unobservable input used in the valuation. Increases (decreases) in correlation in isolation will increase (decrease) the significance of the change in valuations. (10)Mortality rates vary by age and by demographic characteristics such as gender. Mortality rate assumptions are based on company experience. A mortality improvement assumption is also applied. For any given contract, mortality rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (11)Base lapse rates are adjusted at the contract level based on a comparison of the actuarially calculated guaranteed values and the current policyholder account value, as well as other factors, such as the applicability of any surrender charges. A dynamic lapse function reduces the base lapse rate when the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value as in the money contracts are less likely to lapse. Lapse rates are also generally assumed to be lower in periods when a surrender charge applies. For any given contract, lapse rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (12)The utilization rate assumption estimates the percentage of contract holders with a GMIB or lifetime withdrawal benefit who will elect to utilize the benefit upon becoming eligible. The rates may vary by the type of guarantee, the amount by which the guaranteed amount is greater than the account value, the contract's withdrawal history and by the age of the policyholder. For any given contract, utilization rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (13)The withdrawal rate represents the percentage of account balance that any given policyholder will elect to withdraw from the contract each year. The withdrawal rate assumption varies by age and duration of the contract, and also by other factors such as benefit type. For any given contract, withdrawal rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. For GMWBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in an increase (decrease) in the estimated fair value of the guarantees. For GMABs and GMIBs, any increase (decrease) in withdrawal rates results in a decrease (increase) in the estimated fair value. (14)Long-term equity volatilities represent equity volatility beyond the period for which observable equity volatilities are available. For any given contract, long-term equity volatility rates vary throughout the period over which cash flows are projected for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. (15)Nonperformance risk spread varies by duration and by currency. For any given contract, multiple nonperformance risk spreads will apply, depending on the duration of the cash flow being discounted for purposes of valuing the embedded derivative. The following is a summary of the valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of assets and liabilities classified within Level 3 that are not included in the preceding table. Generally, all other classes of securities classified within Level 3, including those within embedded derivatives within funds withheld related to certain assumed reinsurance, use the same valuation techniques and significant unobservable inputs as previously described for Level 3 fixed maturity securities. This includes matrix pricing and discounted cash flow methodologies, inputs such as quoted prices for identical or similar securities that are less liquid and based on lower levels of trading activity than securities classified in Level 2, as well as independent non-binding broker quotations. The sensitivity of the estimated fair value to changes in the significant unobservable inputs for these other assets and liabilities is similar in nature to that described in the preceding table. F-53
N-6369th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 369th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) The following tables summarize the change of all assets and (liabilities) measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3): [Enlarge/Download Table] FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES: -------------------------------------- FOREIGN U.S. SHORT-TERM EQUITY NET EMBEDDED CORPORATE CORPORATE CMBS ABS INVESTMENTS MARKET DERIVATIVES (6) --------- --------- --------- -------- ----------- ---------- --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013: Balance, January 1,........................... $ 2,714 $ 15,465 $ 41,723 $ 4,000 $ 4,996 $ 185,601 $(8,501,238) Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2)................. Net investment income...................... 11 (63) (242) -- 4 -- -- Net investment gains (losses).............. -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net derivative gains (losses).............. -- -- -- -- -- (425,674) 6,789,870 Policyholder benefits and claims........... -- -- -- -- -- 18,720 (139,134) OCI......................................... (25) (652) (1,828) -- -- 252 291,536 Purchases (3)................................. -- -- 17,894 -- -- 7,149 -- Sales (3)..................................... (2,700) (8,680) -- -- (5,000) -- -- Settlements (3)............................... -- -- -- -- -- (7,256) (783,428) Transfers into Level 3 (4).................... -- 3,847 -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4).................. -- -- -- (4,000) -- -- -- -------- --------- --------- -------- -------- ---------- ------------ Balance, December 31,......................... $ -- $ 9,917 $ 57,547 $ -- $ -- $(221,208) $(2,342,394) ======== ========= ========= ======== ======== ========== ============ Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income....................... $ -- $ 4 $ (242) $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses)............... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses)............... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $(414,667) $ 6,743,952 Policyholder benefits and claims............ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 18,720 $ (134,839) F-54
N-6370th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 370th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES: EQUITY SECURITIES: -------------------------------------- ------------------ FOREIGN U.S. NON-REDEEMABLE SHORT-TERM EQUITY NET EMBEDDED CORPORATE CORPORATE CMBS ABS PREFERRED STOCK INVESTMENTS MARKET DERIVATIVES (6) --------- --------- --------- -------- ------------------ ----------- ---------- --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2012: Balance, January 1,............. $ 2,533 $ 15,114 $ 41,724 $ -- $ -- $ 39,967 $ 844,062 $(7,033,096) Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income........ 12 (16) (164) -- -- 35 -- -- Net investment gains (losses).................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Net derivative gains (losses).................... -- -- -- -- -- -- (507,571) (1,085,812) Policyholder benefits and claims...................... -- -- -- -- -- -- 28,895 72,507 OCI........................... 169 (4) 163 -- -- -- (2,565) 259,765 Purchases (3)................... -- 6,501 -- 4,000 -- 4,994 19,056 -- Sales (3)....................... -- (701) -- -- -- (40,000) (43,500) -- Settlements (3)................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (152,776) (714,602) Transfers into Level 3 (4).................... -- -- -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4).................... -- (5,429) -- -- -- -- -- -- -------- --------- --------- -------- --------- --------- ---------- ------------ Balance, December 31,........... $ 2,714 $ 15,465 $ 41,723 $ 4,000 $ -- $ 4,996 $ 185,601 $(8,501,238) ======== ========= ========= ======== ========= ========= ========== ============ Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income......... $ 11 $ 9 $ (163) $ -- $ -- $ 2 $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses)..................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses)..................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $(498,377) $(1,139,890) Policyholder benefits and claims....................... $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 28,895 $ 75,146 F-55
N-6371st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 371st
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) [Enlarge/Download Table] FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS USING SIGNIFICANT UNOBSERVABLE INPUTS (LEVEL 3) ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FIXED MATURITY SECURITIES: EQUITY SECURITIES: ---------------------------------- ------------------ FOREIGN U.S. NON-REDEEMABLE SHORT-TERM EQUITY NET EMBEDDED CORPORATE CORPORATE CMBS ABS PREFERRED STOCK INVESTMENTS MARKET DERIVATIVES (6) --------- --------- ------- ----- ------------------ ----------- -------- --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2011: Balance, January 1,.............. $2,673 $10,430 $ -- $ -- $ 2,835 $ 49,980 $124,720 $(3,660,494) Total realized/unrealized gains (losses) included in: Net income (loss): (1), (2) Net investment income......... 10 4 (104) -- -- 19 -- -- Net investment gains (losses)..................... -- 1 -- -- (292) -- -- -- Net derivative gains (losses)..................... -- -- -- -- -- -- 563,864 (2,710,927) Policyholder benefits and claims....................... -- -- -- -- -- -- 7,131 70,390 OCI............................ (150) (511) 104 -- 337 -- 409 (120,058) Purchases (3).................... -- -- 41,724 -- -- 39,951 225,211 -- Sales (3)........................ -- (1,974) -- -- (2,880) (49,983) -- -- Settlements (3).................. -- -- -- -- -- -- (2,563) (612,007) Transfers into Level 3 (4)....... -- 7,164 -- -- -- -- -- -- Transfers out of Level 3 (4)..... -- -- -- -- -- -- (74,710) -- ------ ------- ------- ----- ------------ --------- -------- ----------- Balance, December 31,............ $2,533 $15,114 $41,724 $ -- $ -- $ 39,967 $844,062 $(7,033,096) ====== ======= ======= ===== ============ ========= ======== =========== Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss): (5) Net investment income.......... $ 10 $ 4 $ (104) $ -- $ -- $ 15 $ -- $ -- Net investment gains (losses).. $ -- $ 1 $ -- $ -- $ (292) $ -- $ -- $ -- Net derivative gains (losses).. $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $566,325 $ 2,735,936 Policyholder benefits and claims........................ $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ -- $ 7,131 $ 108,678 -------- (1)Amortization of premium/accretion of discount is included within net investment income. Impairments charged to net income (loss) on securities are included in net investment gains (losses). Lapses associated with net embedded derivatives are included in net derivative gains (losses). (2)Interest and dividend accruals, as well as cash interest coupons and dividends received, are excluded from the rollforward. (3)The amount reported within purchases, sales, issuances and settlements is the purchase or issuance price and the sales or settlement proceeds based upon the actual date purchased or issued and sold or settled, respectively. Items purchased/issued and sold/settled in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. Fees attributed to embedded derivatives are included in settlements. (4)Gains and losses, in net income (loss) and other comprehensive income (loss), are calculated assuming transfers into and/or out of Level 3 occurred at the beginning of the period. Items transferred into and then out of Level 3 in the same period are excluded from the rollforward. (5)Changes in unrealized gains (losses) included in net income (loss) relate to assets and liabilities still held at the end of the respective periods. (6)Embedded derivative assets and liabilities are presented net for purposes of the rollforward. F-56
N-6372nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 372nd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS CARRIED AT OTHER THAN FAIR VALUE The following tables provide fair value information for financial instruments that are carried on the balance sheet at amounts other than fair value. These tables exclude the following financial instruments: cash and cash equivalents, accrued investment income, the obligation to return cash collateral received (included in other liabilities on the balance sheets) and short-term investments that are not securities, such as time deposits, and therefore are not included in the three level hierarchy table disclosed in the "-- Recurring Fair Value Measurements" section. The estimated fair value of the excluded financial instruments, which are primarily classified in Level 2 and, to a lesser extent, in Level 1, approximates carrying value as they are short-term in nature such that the Company believes there is minimal risk of material changes in interest rates or credit quality. All remaining balance sheet amounts excluded from the table below are not considered financial instruments subject to this disclosure. The carrying values and estimated fair values for such financial instruments, and their corresponding placement in the fair value hierarchy, are summarized as follows at: [Enlarge/Download Table] DECEMBER 31, 2013 --------------------------------------------------------- FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY CARRYING ----------------------------- TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUE ---------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. $ 228,140 $ -- $ 224,672 $ (161,249) $ 63,423 LIABILITIES Debt -- affiliated.......................... $ 575,118 $ -- $ 592,278 $ -- $ 592,278 Other liabilities........................... $ 3,836 $ -- $ 3,836 $ -- $ 3,836 DECEMBER 31, 2012 --------------------------------------------------------- FAIR VALUE HIERARCHY CARRYING ----------------------------- TOTAL ESTIMATED VALUE LEVEL 1 LEVEL 2 LEVEL 3 FAIR VALUE ---------- ------- ---------- ---------- --------------- (IN THOUSANDS) ASSETS Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables. $ 304,411 $ -- $ 275,479 $ 174,126 $ 449,605 LIABILITIES Debt -- affiliated.......................... $ 75,118 $ -- $ 82,174 $ -- $ 82,174 Other liabilities........................... $ 72 $ -- $ 72 $ -- $ 72 The methods, assumptions and significant valuation techniques and inputs used to estimate the fair value of financial instruments are summarized as follows: PREMIUMS, REINSURANCE AND OTHER RECEIVABLES Premiums, reinsurance and other receivables are principally comprised of certain amounts recoverable under reinsurance agreements and amounts on deposit with financial institutions to facilitate daily settlements related to certain derivatives. F-57
N-6373rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 373rd
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 7. FAIR VALUE (CONTINUED) Premiums receivable and those amounts recoverable under reinsurance agreements determined to transfer significant risk are not financial instruments subject to disclosure and thus have been excluded from the amounts presented. Amounts recoverable under ceded reinsurance agreements, which the Company has determined do not transfer significant risk such that they are accounted for using the deposit method of accounting, have been classified as Level 3. The valuation is based on discounted cash flow methodologies using significant unobservable inputs. The estimated fair value is determined using interest rates determined to reflect the appropriate credit standing of the assuming counterparty. The amounts on deposit for derivative settlements, classified within Level 2, essentially represent the equivalent of demand deposit balances and amounts due for securities sold are generally received over short periods such that the estimated fair value approximates carrying value. DEBT -- AFFILIATED The estimated fair value of debt is principally determined using market standard valuation methodologies. Valuations are based primarily on quoted prices in markets that are not active or using matrix pricing that use standard market observable inputs such as quoted prices in markets that are not active and observable yields and spreads in the market. Instruments valued using discounted cash flow methodologies use standard market observable inputs including market yield curve, duration, observable prices and spreads for similar publicly traded or privately traded issues. OTHER LIABILITIES Other liabilities consist primarily of interest payable. The Company evaluates the specific terms, facts and circumstances of each instrument to determine the appropriate estimated fair values, which are not materially different from the carrying values. 8. DEBT -- AFFILIATED The table below presents information for the Company's long-term and short-term debt-affiliated outstanding at: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, -------------------- INTEREST RATE MATURITY 2013 2012 ------------- -------- ---------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) -------------------- SHORT-TERM AND LONG-TERM DEBT Surplus note................. 6.798% 2014 $ 75,118 $ 75,118 Senior notes................. 2.470% 2015 500,000 -- ---------- --------- Total debt-affiliated...... $ 575,118 $ 75,118 ========== ========= On October 15, 2013, the Company issued $500.0 million of guaranteed senior notes, Series A, to various affiliates, maturing in 2015 with an interest rate of 2.47%. On September 27, 2012, the Holding Company assumed $750.0 million of the Company's senior notes with interest rates of 6.440% and 5.330%, payable to an affiliate. In exchange for the assumption of senior notes, the F-58
N-6374th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 374th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 8. DEBT -- AFFILIATED (CONTINUED) Company issued to the Holding Company 75,000 shares of Series A 7.69% non-cumulative perpetual preferred shares with a par value of $1 per share and a liquidity preference of $10,000 per share. The dividend is payable semi-annually. (See Note 9 for additional information on preferred stock). On December 19, 2012, the Holding Company assumed $1,250.0 million of the Company's senior notes with interest rates of 7.440%, 5.640% and 5.860%, payable to various affiliates. In exchange for the assumption of senior notes, the Company issued to the Holding Company 125,000 shares of Series A 7.75% non-cumulative perpetual preferred shares with a par value of $1 per share and a liquidity preference of $10,000 per share. The dividend is payable semi-annually. (See Note 9 for additional information on preferred stock). On July 15, 2011, the Company issued a $500.0 million guaranteed senior note, Series A, to various affiliates, maturing in 2021 with an interest rate of 5.64%. On December 16, 2011, the Company issued a $500.0 million guaranteed senior note, Series B, to various affiliates, maturing in 2021 with an interest rate of 5.86%. Interest expense related to the Company's indebtedness, included in other expenses, was $7.7 million, $112.6 million and $83.3 million for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. LETTERS OF CREDIT The Company had access to certain letter of credit agreements totaling $5,450.0 million in letter of credit capacity from various banks, either directly with the bank or indirectly through letters of credit available to the Holding Company for the benefit of the Company and certain other affiliates of the Holding Company. At December 31, 2013, the Company had $802.0 million in outstanding letters of credit. The letters of credit were used to collateralize assumed liabilities. Letters of credit outstanding as of December 31, 2013 were as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] USED BY USED BY REMAINING BORROWER(S) EXPIRATION CAPACITY THE COMPANY AFFILIATES UNUSED ----------------------------- ------------------ ------------ ----------- ---------- ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) Exeter....................... December 2027 (1) $ 650,000 $ 600,000 $ -- $ 50,000 Holding Company and MetLife Funding, Inc............... September 2017 (1) 1,000,000 -- 59,000 941,000 Holding Company and MetLife Funding, Inc............... August 2016 3,000,000 2,000 130,789 2,867,211 Exeter, Holding Company & Missouri Reinsurance, Inc.. June 2016 500,000 -- 490,000 10,000 Holding Company.............. August 2014 300,000 200,000 100,000 -- ------------ ---------- ---------- ------------ Total....................... $ 5,450,000 $ 802,000 $ 779,789 $ 3,868,211 ============ ========== ========== ============ -------- (1)The Holding Company is a guarantor under this agreement. 9. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY Effective October 1, 2013 in conjunction with the Company's redomestication to Delaware the stockholder's equity was restructured. F-59
N-6375th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 375th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 9. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (CONTINUED) Information regarding the restructure was as follows at: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- COMMON STOCK Shares authorized................ 13,875,000 14,125,000 Shares issued.................... 13,466,000 13,466,000 Shares outstanding............... 13,466,000 13,466,000 Par value per share.............. $0.01 $1.00 DECEMBER 31, --------------------- 2013 2012 ---------- ---------- PREFERRED STOCK Shares authorized................ 250,000 200,000 Shares issued.................... 200,000 200,000 Shares outstanding............... 200,000 200,000 Par value per share.............. $0.01 $1.00 Liquidation preference per share. $10,000 $10,000 PREFERRED STOCK On September 27, 2012, the Company issued to the Holding Company 75,000 shares of 7.69% Series A non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock in exchange for the assumption of $750.0 million of the Company's senior notes. See Note 8. On December 19, 2012, the Company issued to the Holding Company 125,000 shares of 7.75% Series A non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock in exchange for the assumption of $1,250.0 million of the Company's senior notes. See Note 8. EQUITY Under Delaware Law, the Company is required to maintain minimum capital of $250 thousand. The Company was in compliance with this requirement at December 31, 2013. Under the Law, the Company was required to maintain net worth of $240 thousand. The Company was in compliance with this requirement at September 30, 2013 (prior to redomestication to Delaware) and December 31, 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company received no capital contributions from the Holding Company. The Company received capital contributions of $800.0 million and $673.0 million in cash from the Holding Company during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. During the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, the Holding Company paid and contributed, on the Company's behalf, $26.8 million, $33.4 million and $30.9 million, respectively, in the form of letter of credit fees. F-60
N-6376th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 376th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 9. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (CONTINUED) DIVIDEND RESTRICTIONS Under the strategic business plan of the company approved by the Delaware Insurance commissioner (the "Commissioner"), the company may not declare or pay dividend in any form to its parent without the approval of the Commissioner and in no event shall the Commissioner grant such approval if the dividend would result in the insolvency or impairment of the Company. The company paid non-cumulative perpetual preferred stock dividend to the Holding company of $132.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. The Company did not pay a dividend to the Holding Company during the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) Information regarding changes in the balances of each component of AOCI, net of income tax, was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] UNREALIZED FOREIGN INVESTMENT GAINS CURRENCY (LOSSES), NET OF TRANSLATION RELATED OFFSETS ADJUSTMENT TOTAL ---------------- ----------- ----------- (IN THOUSANDS) Balance at December 31, 2010....................... $ 3,341 $ 39,291 $ 42,632 OCI before reclassifications....................... 39,974 (15,751) 24,223 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (13,991) -- (13,991) ----------- ----------- ----------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax... 29,324 23,540 52,864 Amounts reclassified from AOCI..................... (4,425) -- (4,425) Income tax expense (benefit)....................... 1,549 -- 1,549 ----------- ----------- ----------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax. (2,876) -- (2,876) ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2011....................... 26,448 23,540 49,988 OCI before reclassifications....................... 29,412 13,028 42,440 Income tax expense (benefit)....................... (10,294) -- (10,294) ----------- ----------- ----------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax... 45,566 36,568 82,134 Amounts reclassified from AOCI..................... (4,395) -- (4,395) Income tax expense (benefit)....................... 1,538 -- 1,538 ----------- ----------- ----------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax. (2,857) -- (2,857) ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2012....................... 42,709 36,568 79,277 OCI before reclassifications....................... (54,557) 26,548 (28,009) Income tax expense (benefit)....................... 19,094 -- 19,094 ----------- ----------- ----------- OCI before reclassifications, net of income tax... 7,246 63,116 70,362 Amounts reclassified from AOCI..................... (2,077) -- (2,077) Income tax expense (benefit)....................... 727 -- 727 ----------- ----------- ----------- Amounts reclassified from AOCI, net of income tax. (1,350) -- (1,350) ----------- ----------- ----------- Balance at December 31, 2013....................... $ 5,896 $ 63,116 $ 69,012 =========== =========== =========== F-61
N-6377th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 377th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 9. STOCKHOLDER'S EQUITY (CONTINUED) Information regarding amounts reclassified out of each component of AOCI, was as follows: [Enlarge/Download Table] STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS AND AOCI COMPONENTS AMOUNTS RECLASSIFIED FROM AOCI COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) LOCATION ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------------ ------------------------------------ YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ------------ -------------- -------------- (IN THOUSANDS) Net unrealized investment gains (losses): Net unrealized investment gains (losses)............................... $ 2,066 $ 4,387 $ 4,426 Other net investment gains (losses) Net unrealized investment gains (losses)............................... 11 8 (1) Net investment income ------------ -------------- -------------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses), before income tax........... 2,077 4,395 4,425 Income tax (expense) benefit........... (727) (1,538) (1,549) ------------ -------------- -------------- Net unrealized investment gains (losses), net income tax.............. $ 1,350 $ 2,857 $ 2,876 ============ ============== ============== Total reclassification, net of income tax. $ 1,350 $ 2,857 $ 2,876 ============ ============== ============== 10. OTHER EXPENSES Information on other expenses was as follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, -------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ---------- ---------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Commissions...................................... $ 11,775 $ 11,116 $ 9,155 Volume-related costs............................. 26,816 33,524 30,929 Affiliated costs of reinsurance.................. 72,517 297 12,073 Capitalization of DAC............................ (2,013) (1,760) (2,955) Amortization of DAC.............................. (21,146) 43,204 31,527 Interest expense on debt and debt issuance costs. 7,714 112,646 83,296 Premium taxes, licenses & fees................... 25 9 34 Professional services............................ 468 858 84 Other............................................ 5,051 6,947 5,740 ---------- ---------- ---------- Total other expenses........................... $ 101,207 $ 206,841 $ 169,883 ========== ========== ========== CAPITALIZATION AND AMORTIZATION OF DAC See Note 2 for additional information on DAC including impacts of capitalization and amortization. AFFILIATED EXPENSES Commissions, volume-related costs and capitalization and amortization of DAC include the impact of affiliated reinsurance transactions. See Notes 4 and 8 for a discussion of affiliated expenses included in the table above. INTEREST EXPENSE ON DEBT See Note 8 for attribution of interest expense by debt issuance. F-62
N-6378th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 378th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 11. INCOME TAX The provision for income tax was as follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ------------------------------------ 2013 2012 2011 ---------- -------------- ---------- (IN THOUSANDS) Current: Federal................................... $(267,685) $ (363,174) $ 273,521 Foreign................................... 50 50 -- ---------- -------------- ---------- (267,635) (363,124) 273,521 Deferred: Federal................................... 631,850 (1,092,375) (179,444) ---------- -------------- ---------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit). $ 364,215 $ (1,455,499) $ 94,077 ========== ============== ========== The reconciliation of the income tax provision at the U.S. statutory rate to the provision for income tax as reported was follows: [Download Table] YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, ----------------------------------- 2013 2012 2011 ---------- -------------- --------- (IN THOUSANDS) Tax provision at U.S. statutory rate....... $ 362,691 $ (1,455,439) $ 94,077 Tax effect of: Other...................................... 1,464 -- -- Tax exempt investment income............... -- (60) -- Prior year tax............................. 60 -- -- ---------- -------------- --------- Provision for income tax expense (benefit). $ 364,215 $ (1,455,499) $ 94,077 ========== ============== ========= Deferred income tax represents the tax effect of the differences between the book and tax basis of assets and liabilities. Net deferred income tax assets and liabilities consisted of the following at: [Download Table] DECEMBER 31, ------------------------- 2013 2012 ------------ ------------ (IN THOUSANDS) Deferred income tax assets: Benefit, reinsurance and other reserves.. $ 726,167 $ 2,752,083 Investments, including derivatives....... 821,544 -- Net operating loss....................... 67,235 -- Tax credits.............................. 113 -- Other.................................... -- 753 ------------ ------------ 1,615,059 2,752,836 ------------ ------------ Deferred income tax liabilities: Net unrealized investment gains.......... 3,176 22,997 DAC...................................... 35,280 33,288 Investments, including derivatives....... -- 429,480 Other.................................... 47,139 -- ------------ ------------ 85,595 485,765 ------------ ------------ Net deferred income tax asset (liability). $ 1,529,464 $ 2,267,071 ============ ============ F-63
N-6379th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 379th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 11. INCOME TAX (CONTINUED) Domestic net operating carryforwards of $192,099 thousand at December 31, 2013 will expire beginning in 2028. Tax credit carryforwards of $113 thousand at December 31, 2013 will expire beginning in 2022. The lack of a valuation allowance reflects management's assessment, based on available information, that it is more likely than not that the deferred income tax asset will be realizable. In 2013, management believes that it is more likely than not that the results of future operations will generate sufficient taxable income to realize gross deferred tax assets. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded a valuation allowance against its gross deferred tax assets. The Company has determined that a valuation allowance against its deferred tax assets is not appropriate as of the year ended December 31, 2012. Prior to October 1, 2013, the Company was registered as an exempted company pursuant to the Companies Law of the Cayman Islands. No local income, profits or capital gains taxes are levied in the Cayman Islands at the current time. As a result, no provision for such taxes is recorded by the Company. Prior to the re-domestication, the Company made an election to be treated as an U.S. Domestic entity under Internal Revenue Code Section ("Sec.") 953(d). The election under Sec. 953(d) is valid through December 31, 2013. The Company joins with the Holding Company and its includable life insurance and non-life insurance subsidiaries in filing a consolidated U.S. federal income tax return in accordance with the provision of the Code. Pursuant to this tax sharing agreement, the amount due from the Holding Company was $196.6 million and $261.7 million at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. federal government and is under continuous examination by the Internal Revenue Service. The Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal income tax examinations for years prior to 2003, with the exception of the period October 31, 2000 through December 31, 2000. The IRS audit cycle for the years 2003 through 2006, which began in April 2010, is expected to conclude in 2014. It is not expected to have a material impact on the financial statements. As of December 31, 2013, the Company had no liability for unrecognized tax benefits. 12. CONTINGENCIES AND COMMITMENTS There is no pending or threatened litigation, claim or assessment against the Company that would constitute a material loss contingency. Various litigation, claims or assessments against the Company may arise in the ordinary course of the Company's business. Liabilities for litigations, claims or assessments are established when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount of the loss can be reasonably estimated. The Company regularly reviews relevant information with respect to liabilities for litigation, regulatory investigations and litigation-related contingencies to be reflected in the Company's financial statements. Based on information currently known by the Company's management, in its opinion, there are no current legal proceedings, likely to have such an effect. However, it is possible that an adverse outcome in a litigation matter, should such a litigation matter arise in the future, could have a material effect on the Company's net income or cash flows. F-64
N-6380th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 380th
EXETER REASSURANCE COMPANY, LTD. NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS -- (CONTINUED) 13. OTHER RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS The Company had net payables to affiliates of $593 thousand and $877 thousand at December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. These payables exclude affiliated reinsurance balances discussed in Note 4 and affiliated debt balances discussed in Note 8. See Note 5 for additional related party transactions. 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS In anticipation of the Mergers, certain risks formerly reinsured by Exeter were re-directed to affiliates through various forms of transactions. For certain risks that were re-directed in October 2014 and November 2014, the agreement terms included that the initial settlement amounts were to be based upon the reinsurance balances at September 30, 2014. The estimated impacts of these transactions to Exeter were a decrease in cash and invested assets of $2.6 billion, a decrease in future policy benefits of $500 million, a decrease in policyholder account balances of $1.2 billion and a decrease in other policy-related balances of $800 million. Also as a result of these transactions, Exeter recorded an estimated net loss of $100 million during the fourth quarter of 2014. These estimated amounts will be adjusted to actual settlement amounts by January 2015, in accordance with the applicable reinsurance recapture agreements' terms. The Company expects to enter into another affiliated reinsurance transaction on or around November 10, 2014. The estimated impacts, based upon the account balances at September 30, 2014, are a decrease in cash and invested assets of $400 million, a decrease in future policy benefits of $500 million, offset by an increase in other policy-related balances of $100 million. It is likely that the final settlement amounts of these reinsurance transactions, that will consider additional available information, will differ from the estimated amounts and it is possible the differences may be material. F-65
N-6381st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 381st
METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE SUPPLEMENT DATED APRIL 28, 2014 TO PROSPECTUSES DATED MAY 1, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 9, 2009 (CUSTOM-SELECT FLEX VUL) This will supplement the prospectuses dated May 1, 2001 (as supplemented) and November 9, 2009 (as supplemented) for variable life insurance policies issued by Metlife Investors Variable Life Account One. The following information is provided with respect to the investment options available under the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy (the "Policy") issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company. The corresponding sections of the prospectus are supplemented or modified as follows: EXPENSES .. DEDUCTIONS FROM THE INVESTMENT FUNDS MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE We are waiving an amount of the Mortality and Expense Risk Charge equal to the Investment Fund expenses that are in excess of 0.58% for cash value allocated to the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio. ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (as a percentage of average daily net assets) The following table describes the annual operating expenses for each Investment Fund for the year ended December 31, 2013, before and after any applicable contractual fee waivers and expense reimbursements: [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE (12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING INVESTMENT FUND FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) -- SERIES I Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund 0.71% -- 0.31% 0.01% 1.03% 0.01% 1.02% FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST -- CLASS 1 Templeton Foreign VIP Fund 0.64% -- 0.14% -- 0.78% -- 0.78% MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST -- CLASS A Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.05% -- 0.65% -- 0.65% ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio 0.59% -- 0.02% -- 0.61% 0.00% 0.61% Invesco Mid Cap Value Portfolio 0.65% -- 0.05% 0.08% 0.78% 0.02% 0.76% Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.85% -- 0.02% -- 0.87% 0.02% 0.85% Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio 0.51% -- 0.03% -- 0.54% -- 0.54% MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.87% -- 0.15% -- 1.02% 0.01% 1.01% MFS(R) Research International Portfolio 0.68% -- 0.07% -- 0.75% 0.06% 0.69% Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 0.64% -- 0.05% -- 0.69% 0.01% 0.68% PIMCO Total Return Portfolio 0.48% -- 0.03% -- 0.51% -- 0.51% T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio 0.57% -- 0.02% -- 0.59% -- 0.59% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1
N-6382nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 382nd
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE (12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING INVESTMENT FUND FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND -- CLASS A BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio 0.33% -- 0.02% -- 0.35% 0.00% 0.35% BlackRock Money Market Portfolio 0.33% -- 0.02% -- 0.35% 0.02% 0.33% Jennison Growth Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.02% -- 0.62% 0.07% 0.55% Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio 0.80% -- 0.03% -- 0.83% 0.01% 0.82% T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.03% -- 0.63% 0.01% 0.62% T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.48% -- 0.04% -- 0.52% -- 0.52% Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.06% -- 0.66% 0.04% 0.62% PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST -- CLASS IA Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund 0.56% -- 0.16% -- 0.72% -- 0.72% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information shown in the table above was provided by the Investment Funds and we have not independently verified that information. Net Total Annual Operating Expenses shown in the table reflect any current fee waiver or expense reimbursement arrangement that will remain in effect for a period of at least one year from the date of the Investment Fund's 2014 prospectus. "0.00%" in the Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement column indicates that there is such an arrangement in effect for the Investment Fund, but that the expenses of the Investment Fund are below the level that would trigger the waiver or reimbursement. Fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements with a duration of less than one year, or arrangements that may be terminated without the consent of the Investment Fund's board of directors or trustees, are not shown. INVESTMENT FUNDS The Policy offers the Investment Funds which are listed below. Appendix A contains a summary of investment objectives and subadvisers, if any, for each Investment Fund. Additional Investment Funds may be available in the future. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESE FUNDS CAREFULLY. YOU CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES BY CALLING US AT 1-800-343-8496. YOU CAN ALSO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS (INCLUDING A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) BY ACCESSING THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES I SHARES) AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust currently consists of multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: Templeton Foreign VIP Fund (formerly Templeton Foreign Securities Fund) MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A) Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio Invesco Mid Cap Value Portfolio (formerly Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio) Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 2
N-6383rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 383rd
MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio PIMCO Total Return Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND (CLASS A) Metropolitan Series Fund is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio Jennison Growth Portfolio Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA) Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Class IA portfolio is available under the policy: Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund OTHER INFORMATION METLIFE INVESTORS The principal executive offices of MetLife Investors Insurance Company have changed from 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1900, Irvine, CA 92614 to 11225 North Community House Road, Charlotte, NC 28277. In 2013, MetLife, Inc. announced its plans to merge MetLife Investors, MetLife Investors USA Insurance Company (MetLife Investors USA), MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut (MetLife of Connecticut), and Exeter Reassurance Company, Ltd. (Exeter Reassurance), to create one larger U.S.-based and U.S.-regulated life insurance company. MetLife Investors USA and MetLife of Connecticut, like MetLife Investors, are U.S. insurance companies that issue variable insurance products in addition to other products. Exeter Reassurance is a direct subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. that mainly reinsures guarantees associated with variable annuity products issued by U.S. insurance companies that are direct or indirect subsidiaries of MetLife, Inc. MetLife of Connecticut, which is expected to be renamed and domiciled in Delaware, will be the surviving entity. These mergers are expected to occur towards the end of 2014, subject to regulatory approvals. DISTRIBUTION The principal business address of MetLife Investors Distribution Company ("Distributor") had changed from 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1900, Irvine, CA 92614 to 1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036. The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") provides background information about broker-dealers and their registered representatives through FINRA BrokerCheck. You may contact the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline at 1-800-289-9999, or log on to www.finra.org. An investor brochure that includes information describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available through the Hotline or on-line. FEDERAL TAX STATUS NOTE: The following description is based upon our understanding of current Federal income tax law applicable to life insurance in general. We cannot predict the probability that any changes in such laws will be made. Purchasers are cautioned to seek competent tax advice regarding the possibility of such changes. Section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), defines the term "life insurance contract" for purposes of the Code. We believe that Single Life Policies issued on a standard underwriting basis should qualify as "life insurance contracts" under Section 7702. There is more uncertainty as to Single Life Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Survivor Policies. We do not guarantee the tax status of the Policies. Purchasers bear the complete risk that the Policies may not be treated as a "life insurance contract" under Federal income tax laws. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisers. It should be further understood that the following discussion is not exhaustive and that special rules not described in this prospectus may be applicable in certain situations. In general, however, the insurance proceeds payable on the death of the Insured will never be less than the minimum amount required for the Policy to be treated as life insurance under section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date the Policy was issued. INTRODUCTION. The discussion contained herein addressing Federal income tax considerations relating to the Policy is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice. It does not purport to be complete or to address every situation. 3
N-6384th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 384th
Each person concerned should consult a competent tax adviser. No attempt is made to consider any applicable state, local or foreign or other tax laws. Moreover, the discussion herein is based upon our understanding of current federal income tax laws as they are currently interpreted. No representation is made regarding the likelihood of continuation of those current federal income tax laws or of the current interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: The tax information contained herein is not intended to (and cannot) be used by anyone to avoid IRS penalties. It is intended to support the sale of the Policy. The Policy Owner should seek tax advice based on the Policy Owner's particular circumstances from an independent tax adviser. We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Code. For federal income tax purposes, the Separate Account is not a separate entity but is part of our operations. DIVERSIFICATION. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying assets of variable life insurance policies. The Code provides that a variable life insurance policy will not be treated as life insurance for any period (and any subsequent period) for which the investments are not adequately diversified under IRS rules. Disqualification of the Policy as a life insurance contract would result in imposition of federal income tax to the Owner with respect to earnings allocable to the Policy prior to the receipt of payments under the Policy. We intend that each Investment Fund underlying the Policies will be managed by the managers in such a manner as to comply with these diversification requirements. If Investment Fund shares are sold directly to tax-qualified retirement plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, or to non-qualified plans, there may be adverse consequences under the diversification rules. INVESTOR CONTROL. In some circumstances, owners of variable contracts who retain excessive control over the investment of the underlying separate account assets may be treated as the owners of those assets. Although published guidance in this area does not address certain aspects of the Policies, we believe that the Owner of a Policy should not be treated as the owner of the Separate Account assets. We reserve the right to modify the Policies to bring them into conformity with applicable standards should such modification be necessary to prevent Owners of the Policies from being treated as the owners of the underlying Separate Account assets. TAX TREATMENT OF THE POLICY. The Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance contained in Section 7702 of the Code. Although some interim guidance has been provided and some proposed and final regulations have been issued, a comprehensive set of final regulations has not been adopted. Section 7702 of the Code requires that the amount of mortality and other expense charges be reasonable. In establishing these charges, we have relied on interim IRS guidance. Currently, there is even less guidance as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Last Survivor Policies. Moreover, if you elect the Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, the continued tax qualification of the Policy after a distribution is made under the rider is unclear. We may take appropriate steps to bring the Policy into compliance with applicable requirements and we reserve the right to restrict Policy transactions in order to do so. We note that the law relating to Section 7702 compliance is complex and unclear in many respects. There is a risk, therefore, that the Internal Revenue Service will not concur with some of our interpretations of Section 7702 that were made in determining such compliance. In the event the Policy is determined not to comply, it would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment usually accorded life insurance policies. You should consult your own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of purchasing the Policy. The following discussion assumes that the Policy will satisfy Section 7702. POLICY PROCEEDS. The tax treatment accorded to loan proceeds and/or surrender payments from the policies will depend on whether the Policy is considered to be a MEC. (See "Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.") Otherwise, we believe that the Policy should receive the same Federal income tax treatment as any other type of life insurance. As such, the death benefit thereunder is generally excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary to the extent provided in Section 101(a) of the Code. Also, in general, you are not deemed to be in constructive receipt of the Cash Surrender Value, including increments thereon, under a Policy until there is a distribution of such amounts. In the case of employer-owned life insurance as defined in Section 101(j), the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income is limited to premiums paid unless the Policy falls within certain specified exceptions and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied before the Policy is issued. Certain specified exceptions are based on the status of an employee as highly compensated, a director or recently employed. There are also exceptions for Policy 4
N-6385th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 385th
proceeds paid to an employee's heirs. These exceptions only apply if proper notice is given to the insured employee and consent is received from the insured employee before the issuance of the Policy. These rules apply to Policies issued August 18, 2006 and later and also apply to policies issued before August 18, 2006 after a material increase in the death benefit or other material change. An IRS reporting requirement applies to employer-owned life insurance subject to these rules. Because these rules are complex and will affect the tax treatment of death benefits, it is advisable to consult tax counsel. The death benefit will also be taxable in the case of a transfer-for-value unless certain exceptions apply. Federal, state and local estate, inheritance and other tax consequences of ownership, or receipt of Policy proceeds, depend on the circumstances of each owner or Beneficiary. A tax advisor should be consulted on these circumstances. TAX TREATMENT OF LOANS AND SURRENDERS. Section 7702A of the Code sets forth the rules for determining when a life insurance Policy will be deemed to be a Modified Endowment Contract or a MEC. A MEC is a contract which is entered into or materially changed on or after June 21, 1988 and fails to meet the 7-pay test. A Policy fails to meet the 7-pay test when the cumulative amount paid under the Policy at any time during the first 7 Policy years, or 7 years after a material change, exceeds the sum of the net level premiums which would have been paid on or before such time if the Policy provided for paid-up future benefits after the payment of seven (7) level annual premiums. A material change would include any increase in the future benefits or addition of qualified additional benefits provided under a Policy unless the increase is attributable to: (1) the payment of premiums necessary to fund the lowest death benefit and qualified additional benefits payable in the first seven Policy years; or (2) the crediting of interest or other earnings with respect to such premiums. Certain changes in a Policy after it is issued could also cause it to fail to satisfy the 7-pay test and therefore to be classified as a MEC. Making additional payments, reducing the Policy's death benefit, reducing the Policy's benefits through a partial withdrawal, a change in death benefit option, and termination of benefits under a rider are examples of changes that could result in your Policy becoming classified as a MEC. Reducing the death benefit below the lowest death benefit provided by the Policy during the first seven years will probably cause the Policy to be classified as a MEC if such a reduction occurs during the first seven Policy years in the case of a Single Life Policy or at any time in the case of a Joint and Last Survivor Policy. Even if these events do not result in a Policy becoming classified as a MEC, they could reduce the amount that may be paid in the future without causing the Policy to be classified as a MEC. You should consult a tax adviser to determine whether a Policy transaction will cause your Policy to be classified as a MEC. Furthermore, any Policy received in exchange for a Policy classified as a MEC will be treated as a MEC regardless of whether it meets the 7-pay test. However, an exchange under Section 1035 of the Code of a life insurance Policy entered into before June 21, 1988 for the Policy will not cause the Policy to be treated as a MEC if no additional premiums are paid. Due to the flexible premium nature of the Policy, the determination of whether it qualifies for treatment as a MEC depends on the individual circumstances of each Policy. If the Policy is classified as a MEC, then any distribution (including a loan taken from or secured by the Policy) is taxable to the extent of income in the Policy. Distributions are deemed to be on a last-in, first-out basis, which means the taxable income is distributed first. Distributions, including those resulting from surrender or lapse of the Policy, may also be subject to an additional 10% federal income tax penalty applied to the income portion of such distribution. The penalty shall not apply, however, to any distributions: (1) made on or after the date on which the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) which is attributable to the taxpayer becoming disabled (within the meaning of Section 72(m)(7) of the Code); or (3) which is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made not less frequently than annually for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such taxpayer and his beneficiary. The exception to the additional 10% federal income tax penalty does not apply to a taxpayer which is a non-natural person, such as a corporation. If a Policy becomes a MEC, distributions that occur during the Policy year will be taxed as distributions from a MEC. In addition, distributions from a Policy within two years before it becomes a MEC will be taxed in this manner. This means that a distribution made from a Policy that is not a MEC could later become taxable as a distribution from a MEC. If a Policy is not classified as a MEC, then any distribution shall generally be treated first as a recovery of the investment 5
N-6386th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 386th
in the Policy which would not be received as taxable income. Distributions will be taxable once your investment in the Policy is reduced to zero. However, if a distribution is the result of a reduction in benefits under the Policy within the first fifteen years after the Policy is issued in order to comply with Section 7702, such distribution will, under rules set forth in Section 7702, be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of income in the Policy. Your investment in the Policy is generally your aggregate premiums. When a distribution is taken from the Policy, your investment in the Policy is reduced by the amount of the distribution that is tax-free. Loans from a Policy which is not classified as a MEC, will generally be treated as Indebtedness of the Owner and not a distribution. However, there is uncertainty as to loans from such a Policy after the 10th Policy year and you should consult a tax adviser as to the treatment of such loans. If your Policy is surrendered, cancelled, lapses, or is exchanged while any Policy loan is outstanding, the amount of the Policy loan plus accrued interest will be deemed to be distributed to you and could be partly or wholly taxable, depending on your particular circumstances. Cash distributed to you from the Policy in these circumstances may be insufficient to pay the tax attributable to any Policy loan. Interest payable on a loan under a Policy is generally not deductible. Policyowners should seek competent tax advice on the tax consequences of taking loans, distributions, exchanging or surrendering any Policy. MULTIPLE POLICIES. The Code further provides that multiple MECs that are issued within a calendar year period to the same owner by one company or its affiliates are treated as one MEC for purposes of determining the taxable portion of any loans or distributions. Such treatment may result in adverse tax consequences including more rapid taxation of the loans or distributed amounts from such combination of policies. You should consult a tax adviser prior to purchasing more than one MEC in any calendar year period. CONTINUATION OF POLICY BEYOND AGE 100. The tax consequences of continuing the Policy beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy) are unclear. You should consult a tax adviser if you intend to keep the Policy in force beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy). TAX TREATMENT OF POLICY SPLIT. The Split Policy Option Rider and the Divorce Split Rider permit a Policy to be split into two individual Policies. In general exercising either the Policy Split Rider or the Divorce Split Rider will be treated as a taxable transaction. It is not clear whether the individual Policies that result will be classified as Modified Endowment Contracts. A tax adviser should be consulted before exercising either rider. ACCELERATION OF DEATH BENEFIT RIDER. Payments received under the Acceleration of Death Benefit Rider should be excludable from the gross income of the beneficiary except in certain business contexts. However, you should consult a qualified tax adviser about the consequences of adding this rider to a Policy or requesting payment under this rider. TAX TREATMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS. An assignment of a Policy or the change of ownership of a Policy may be a taxable event. You should therefore consult a competent tax adviser should you wish to assign or change the owner of your Policy. QUALIFIED PLANS. The Policies may be used in conjunction with certain Qualified Plans. Because the rules governing such use are complex and the amount of life insurance provided in connection with such plans may be limited, you should not do so until you have consulted a competent Qualified Plans consultant. INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING. All distributions or the portion thereof which is includible in gross income of the Policy owner are subject to Federal income tax withholding. However, in most cases you may elect not to have taxes withheld. You may be required to pay penalties under the estimated tax rules, if withholding and estimated tax payments are insufficient. LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASES BY NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Policy Owners that are not U.S. citizens or residents will generally be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax on taxable distributions from life insurance policies at a 30% rate, unless a lower treaty rate applies. In addition, Policy Owners may be subject to state and/or municipal taxes and taxes that may be imposed by the Policy Owner's country of citizenship or residence. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult with a qualified tax adviser regarding taxation with respect to a purchase of the Policy. 6
N-6387th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 387th
BUSINESS USES OF POLICY. Businesses can use the Policies in various arrangements, including nonqualified deferred compensation or salary continuance plans, split dollar insurance plans, executive bonus plans, tax exempt and nonexempt welfare benefit plans, retiree medical benefit plans and others. The tax consequences of such plans may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances. If you are purchasing the Policy for any arrangement the value of which depends in part on its tax consequences, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. In the case of a business-owned Policy, the provisions of Section 101(j) of the Code may limit the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income unless a specified exception applies and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied, as discussed above. In recent years, moreover, Congress has adopted new rules relating to life insurance owned by businesses. Any business contemplating the purchase of a new Policy or a change in an existing Policy should consult a tax adviser. NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNERS AND BUSINESS BENEFICIARIES OF POLICIES. Ownership of the Policy by a corporation, trust or other non-natural person could jeopardize some (or all) of such entity's interest deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 264, even where such entity's indebtedness is in no way connected to the Policy. In addition, under Section 264(f)(5), if a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the Policy, the Policy could be treated as held by the business for purposes of the Section 264(f) entity-holder rules. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult with a qualified tax adviser before any non-natural person is made an Owner or holder of the Policy, or before a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is made a beneficiary of the Policy. SPLIT-DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS. The IRS and the Treasury Department have recently issued guidance that substantially affects split-dollar arrangements. You should consult a qualified tax adviser before entering into or paying additional premiums with respect to such arrangements. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on July 30, 2002, prohibits, with limited exceptions, publicly-traded companies, including non-U.S. companies that have securities listed on U.S. exchanges, from extending directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, many types of personal loans to their directors or executive officers. It is possible that this prohibition may be interpreted to apply to split-dollar life insurance arrangements for directors and executive officers of such companies, since such arrangements can arguably be viewed as involving a loan from the employer for at least some purposes. Any affected business contemplating the payments of a premium on an existing Policy or the purchase of a new Policy in connection with a split-dollar life insurance arrangement should consult legal counsel. Split dollar plans that provide deferred compensation may be subject to recently enacted rules governing deferred compensation arrangements. Failure to adhere to these rules will result in adverse tax consequences. A tax adviser should be consulted with respect to such plans. ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES. The transfer of the Policy or the designation of a beneficiary may have Federal, state, and/or local transfer and inheritance tax consequences, including the imposition of gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer taxes. When the insured dies, the death proceeds will generally be includable in the Policy Owner's estate for purposes of the Federal estate tax if the Policy Owner was the insured, retained incidents of ownership at death, or made a gift transfer of the Policy within 3 years of death. If the Policy Owner was not the insured, the fair market value of the Policy would be included in the Policy Owner's estate upon the Policy Owner's death. The Policy would not be includable in the insured's estate if the insured neither retained incidents of ownership at death nor had given up ownership within three years before death. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code may impose a "generation-skipping transfer tax" when all or part of a life insurance policy is transferred to, or a death benefit is paid to, an individual two or more generations younger than the Policy Owner. Regulations issued under the Internal Revenue Code may require us to deduct the tax from your Policy, or from any applicable payment, and pay it directly to the IRS. Qualified tax advisers should be consulted concerning the estate and gift tax consequences of Policy ownership and distributions under Federal, state and local law. The individual situation of each Policy Owner or beneficiary will determine the extent, if any, to which Federal, state, and local transfer and inheritance taxes may be imposed and how ownership or receipt of Policy proceeds will be treated for purposes of Federal, state and local estate, inheritance, generation-skipping and other taxes. 7
N-6388th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 388th
In general, current rules provide for a $5 million estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax exemption (as adjusted for inflation) and a top tax rate of 40 percent. The complexity of the tax law, along with uncertainty as to how it might be modified in coming years, underscores the importance of seeking guidance from a qualified adviser to help ensure that your estate plan adequately addresses your needs and those of your beneficiaries under all possible scenarios. TAX CREDITS AND DEDUCTIONS. The Company may be entitled to certain tax benefits related to the assets of the Separate Account. These tax benefits, which may include foreign tax credits and corporate dividends received deductions, are not passed back to the Separate Account or to Policy Owners since the Company is the owner of the assets from which the tax benefits are derived. CORPORATE ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. There may also be an indirect tax on the income in the Policy or the proceeds of the Policy under the Federal corporate alternative minimum tax if the Owner is subject to that tax. POSSIBLE TAX LAW CHANGES. Although the likelihood of legislative changes is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Policy could change by legislation or otherwise. Consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Policy. THE COMPANY'S INCOME TAXES. Under current Federal income tax law we are not taxed on the Separate Account's operations. Thus, currently we do not deduct a charge from the Separate Account for company Federal income taxes. (We do deduct a charge for Federal taxes from premiums.) We reserve the right to charge the Separate Account for any future Federal income taxes we may incur. Under current laws we may incur state and local taxes (in addition to premium taxes). These taxes are not now significant and we are not currently charging for them. If they increase, we may deduct charges for such taxes. 8
N-6389th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 389th
APPENDIX A PARTICIPATING INVESTMENT FUNDS INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Below is a listing of the investment advisers and subadvisers, if any, and the investment objectives of each Investment Fund available under the policy. The fund prospectuses contain more complete information, including a description of the investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL BE ACHIEVED. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES 1 SHARES): AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: TEMPLETON FOREIGN VIP FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: CBRE Clarion Securities LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks total return through investment in real estate securities, emphasizing both capital appreciation and current income. CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ClearBridge Investments, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. INVESCO MID CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Advisers, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high total return by investing in equity securities of mid-sized companies. INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Advisers, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a high total return. MFS(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MFS(R) RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. PIMCO TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks maximum total return, consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. 9
N-6390th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 390th
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in common stocks believed to be undervalued. Income is a secondary objective. METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND (CLASS A): Metropolitan Series Fund is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BLACKROCK BOND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a competitive total return primarily from investing in fixed-income securities. BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. JENNISON GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Jennison Associates LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. NEUBERGER BERMAN GENESIS PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Neuberger Berman Management LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high total return, consisting principally of capital appreciation. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long term growth of capital. T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC BOND OPPORTUNITIES PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Western Asset Management Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks to maximize total return consistent with preservation of capital. PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following portfolio is available under the policy: PUTNAM VT MULTI-CAP GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation. DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS. The following investment option is no longer available for allocations of premiums or transfers of cash value (excluding rebalancing and dollar cost averaging programs in existence at the time of closing): Metropolitan Series Fund: BlackRock Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) (formerly BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A)) (added and closed effective May 1, 2009). Effective as of April 28, 2003, General American Money Market Fund was merged into the State Street Research Money Market Portfolio of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. and the following investment portfolios of the Met Investors Series Trust were merged: J.P. Morgan Enhanced Index Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio; J.P. Morgan International Equity Portfolio merged into the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio; and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Portfolio. Effective as of May 1, 2004, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Premier Equity Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST"); (b) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: AllianceBernstein Premier Growth Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Janus Aggressive Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (c) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust (Class 1): Franklin Small Cap Fund was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. ("MSF"); and Mutual Shares Securities Fund was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (d) Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust ("GSVIT"): GSVIT Growth and Income Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and GSVIT International Equity Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; 10
N-6391st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 391st
(e) Liberty Variable Investments: the Newport Tiger Fund, Variable Series (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (f) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust (Initial Class): MFS(R) Research Series (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; MFS(R) Emerging Growth Series was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and the MFS(R) Strategic Income Series was replaced with the Salomon Brothers Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; (g) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (Initial Class): Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the State Street Research Bond Income Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and (h) Putnam Variable Trust (Class IA): Putnam VT New Value Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and the Putnam VT International New Opportunities Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST. Effective as of November 22, 2004, the J.P. Morgan Quality Bond Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the J.P. Morgan Select Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was closed. Effective as of May 1, 2005, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: the AllianceBernstein Real Estate Investment Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Neuberger Berman Real Estate Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (b) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust: the MFS(R) High Income Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust, the MFS(R) Investors Trust Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the MFS New Discovery Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust; (c) Putnam Variable Trust: the Putnam VT International Equity Fund (Class IA) was replaced with the MFS Research International Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (d) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds: the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA (Class A) (closed May 1, 2004) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; and (b) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Small Cap Growth VIP (Class A) was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the Met/Putnam Capital Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Lazard Mid-Cap Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 28, 2008, the Templeton Developing Markets Securities Fund (Class 1) of the Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust was replaced with the MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of May 4, 2009, the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of May 3, 2010, the Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of September 27, 2010, the Putnam VT Vista Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust merged into the Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2012, the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the Jennison Growth Portfolio of the Metropolitan Series Fund. Effective as of April 29, 2013, the MLA Mid Cap Portfolio (Class A) (which was formerly the Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio (Class A)) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund. 11
N-6392nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 392nd
METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE SUPPLEMENT DATED APRIL 29, 2013 TO PROSPECTUSES DATED MAY 1, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 9, 2009 (CUSTOM-SELECT FLEX VUL) This will supplement the prospectuses dated May 1, 2001 (as supplemented) and November 9, 2009 (as supplemented) for variable life insurance policies issued by Metlife Investors Variable Life Account One. The following information is provided with respect to the investment options available under the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy (the "Policy") issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company. The corresponding sections of the prospectus are supplemented or modified as follows: EXPENSES .. DEDUCTIONS FROM THE INVESTMENT FUNDS MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE We are waiving an amount of the Mortality and Expense Risk Charge equal to the Investment Fund expenses that are in excess of 0.58% for cash value allocated to the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio. ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (as a percentage of average daily net assets) The following table describes the annual operating expenses for each Investment Fund for the year ended December 31, 2012, before and after any applicable contractual fee waivers and expense reimbursements: [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE (12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING INVESTMENT FUND FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) -- SERIES I Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund 0.71% -- 0.30% -- 1.01% -- 1.01% FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST -- CLASS 1 Templeton Foreign Securities Fund 0.64% -- 0.15% -- 0.79% -- 0.79% MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST -- CLASS A Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.06% -- 0.66% -- 0.66% ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio 0.61% -- 0.03% -- 0.64% -- 0.64% Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.85% -- 0.02% -- 0.87% 0.01% 0.86% Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio 0.51% -- 0.03% -- 0.54% -- 0.54% Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio 0.65% -- 0.04% 0.06% 0.75% 0.00% 0.75% MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.91% -- 0.16% -- 1.07% 0.02% 1.05% MFS(R) Research International Portfolio 0.68% -- 0.07% -- 0.75% 0.05% 0.70% Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 0.65% -- 0.07% -- 0.72% 0.01% 0.71% PIMCO Total Return Portfolio 0.48% -- 0.03% -- 0.51% -- 0.51% T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio 0.57% -- 0.02% -- 0.59% -- 0.59% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1
N-6393rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 393rd
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE (12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING INVESTMENT FUND FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND -- CLASS A BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio 0.32% -- 0.04% -- 0.36% 0.00% 0.36% BlackRock Money Market Portfolio 0.33% -- 0.02% -- 0.35% 0.01% 0.34% Jennison Growth Portfolio 0.61% -- 0.03% -- 0.64% 0.07% 0.57% Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio 0.82% -- 0.04% -- 0.86% 0.01% 0.85% T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.04% -- 0.64% 0.01% 0.63% T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.49% -- 0.06% -- 0.55% -- 0.55% Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.05% -- 0.65% 0.04% 0.61% PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST -- CLASS IA Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund 0.57% -- 0.15% -- 0.72% -- 0.72% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- The information shown in the table above was provided by the Investment Funds and we have not independently verified that information. Net Total Annual Operating Expenses shown in the table reflect any current fee waiver or expense reimbursement arrangement that will remain in effect for a period of at least one year from the date of the Investment Fund's 2013 prospectus. "0.00%" in the Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement column indicates that there is such an arrangement in effect for the Investment Fund, but that the expenses of the Investment Fund are below the level that would trigger the waiver or reimbursement. Fee waiver and expense reimbursement arrangements with a duration of less than one year, or arrangements that may be terminated without the consent of the Investment Fund's board of directors or trustees, are not shown. INVESTMENT FUNDS The Policy offers the Investment Funds which are listed below. Appendix A contains a summary of investment objectives and subadvisers, if any, for each Investment Fund. Additional Investment Funds may be available in the future. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESE FUNDS CAREFULLY. YOU CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES BY CALLING US AT 1-800-638-9294. YOU CAN ALSO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS (INCLUDING A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) BY ACCESSING THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES I SHARES) AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust currently consists of multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: Templeton Foreign Securities Fund MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A) Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 2
N-6394th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 394th
PIMCO Total Return Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND (CLASS A) Metropolitan Series Fund is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio Jennison Growth Portfolio Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA) Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Class IA portfolio is available under the policy: Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund TRANSFERS The following replaces the Transfers section: At your request, we will transfer amounts in your Policy from any Investment Fund to another Investment Fund, or to and from the General Account (subject to restrictions). The minimum amount that can be transferred is the lesser of the minimum transfer amount (currently $500), or the total value in an Investment Fund or the General Account. You can make twelve transfers or partial withdrawals in a Policy year without charge. Restrictions apply; refer to the "Restrictions on Transfers" section below. We currently charge a transfer fee of $25 for additional transfers in a Policy year. You cannot make a transfer out of our General Account in the first Policy year. The maximum amount you can transfer from the General Account in any Policy year after the first is the greater of: (a) 25% of a Policy's Cash Surrender Value in the General Account at the beginning of the Policy year; or (b) the previous Policy year's General Account maximum withdrawal amount not to exceed the total Cash Surrender Value of the Policy. Transfers resulting from Policy loans will not be counted for purposes of the limitations on the amount or frequency of transfers allowed in each Policy year. MARKET TIMING The following replaces the Market Timing section: RESTRICTIONS ON TRANSFERS RESTRICTIONS ON FREQUENT TRANSFERS. Frequent requests from Policy Owners to transfer cash value may dilute the value of an Investment Fund's shares if the frequent trading involves an attempt to take advantage of pricing inefficiencies created by a lag between a change in the value of the securities held by the Investment Fund and the reflection of that change in the Investment Fund's share price ("arbitrage trading"). Frequent transfers involving arbitrage trading may adversely affect the long-term performance of the Investment Funds, which may in turn adversely affect Policy Owners and other persons who may have an interest in the Policies (e.g., beneficiaries). We have policies and procedures that attempt to detect and deter frequent transfers in situations where we determine there is a potential for arbitrage trading. Currently, we believe that such situations may be presented in the international, small-cap, and high-yield Investment Funds (i.e., the Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund, Templeton Foreign Securities Fund, Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio, Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio, Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio, MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio, MFS(R) Research International Portfolio, Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio, T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio, Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio) and we monitor transfer activity in those Investment Funds (the "Monitored Portfolios"). We employ various means to monitor transfer activity, such as examining the frequency and size of transfers into and out of the Monitored Portfolios within given periods of time. For example, we currently monitor transfer activity to determine if, for each category of international, small-cap, and high-yield Investment Funds, in a 12-month period there were, (1) six or more transfers involving the given category; (2) cumulative gross transfers involving the given category that exceed the current cash value; and (3) two or more "round-trips" involving any Portfolio in the given category. A round-trip generally is defined as a transfer in followed by a transfer out within the next seven calendar days or a transfer out followed by a transfer in within the next seven calendar days, in either case subject to certain other criteria. WE DO NOT BELIEVE THAT OTHER INVESTMENT FUNDS PRESENT A SIGNIFICANT OPPORTUNITY TO ENGAGE IN ARBITRAGE TRADING AND THEREFORE DO 3
N-6395th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 395th
NOT MONITOR TRANSFER ACTIVITY IN THOSE INVESTMENT FUNDS. We may change the Monitored Portfolios at any time without notice in our sole discretion. Our policies and procedures may result in transfer restrictions being applied to deter frequent transfers. Currently, when we detect transfer activity in the Monitored Portfolios that exceeds our current transfer limits, we require future transfer requests to or from any Monitored Portfolios under that Policy to be submitted either (i) in writing with an original signature or (ii) by telephone prior to 10:00 a.m. A first occurrence will result in the imposition of this restriction for a six-month period; a second occurrence will result in the permanent imposition of the restriction. Transfers made under a dollar cost averaging or rebalancing program are not treated as transfers when we monitor the frequency of transfers. The detection and deterrence of harmful transfer activity involves judgments that are inherently subjective, such as the decision to monitor only those Investment Funds that we believe are susceptible to arbitrage trading or the determination of the transfer limits. Our ability to detect and/or restrict such transfer activity may be limited by operational and technological systems, as well as our ability to predict strategies employed by Policy Owners to avoid such detection. Our ability to restrict such transfer activity also may be limited by provisions of the Policy. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we will prevent all transfer activity that may adversely affect Policy Owners and other persons with interests in the Policies. We do not accommodate frequent transfers in any Investment Fund and there are no arrangements in place to permit any Policy Owner to engage in frequent transfers; we apply our policies and procedures without exception, waiver, or special arrangement. The Investment Funds may have adopted their own policies and procedures with respect to frequent transfers in their respective shares, and we reserve the right to enforce these policies and procedures. For example, Investment Funds may assess a redemption fee (which we reserve the right to collect) on shares held for a relatively short period. The prospectuses for the Investment Funds describe any such policies and procedures, which may be more or less restrictive than the policies and procedures we have adopted. Although we may not have the contractual authority or the operational capacity to apply the frequent transfer policies and procedures of the Investment Funds, we have entered into a written agreement, as required by SEC regulation, with each Investment Fund or its principal underwriter that obligates us to provide to the Investment Fund promptly upon request certain information about the trading activity of individual Policy Owners, and to execute instructions from the Investment Fund to restrict or prohibit further purchases or transfers by specific Policy Owners who violate the frequent transfer policies established by the Investment Fund. In addition, Policy Owners and other persons with interests in the Policies should be aware that the purchase and redemption orders received by the Investment Funds generally are "omnibus" orders from intermediaries, such as retirement plans or separate accounts funding variable insurance products. The omnibus orders reflect the aggregation and netting of multiple orders from individual owners of variable insurance products and/or individual retirement plan participants. The omnibus nature of these orders may limit the Investment Funds in their ability to apply their frequent transfer policies and procedures. In addition, the other insurance companies and/or retirement plans may have different policies and procedures or may not have any such policies and procedures because of contractual limitations. For these reasons, we cannot guarantee that the Investment Funds (and thus Policy Owners) will not be harmed by transfer activity relating to other insurance companies and/or retirement plans that may invest in the Investment Funds. If an Investment Fund believes that an omnibus order reflects one or more transfer requests from Policy Owners engaged in frequent trading, the Investment Fund may reject the entire omnibus order. In accordance with applicable law, we reserve the right to modify or terminate the transfer privilege at any time. We also reserve the right to defer or restrict the transfer privilege at any time that we are unable to purchase or redeem shares of any of the Investment Funds, including any refusal or restriction on purchases or redemptions of their shares as a result of their own policies and procedures on frequent transfers (even if an entire omnibus order is rejected due to the frequent transfers of a single Policy Owner). You should read the Investment Fund prospectuses for more details. RESTRICTIONS ON LARGE TRANSFERS. Large transfers may increase brokerage and administrative costs of the underlying Investment Funds and may disrupt portfolio management strategy, requiring an Investment Fund to maintain a high cash position and possibly resulting in lost investment opportunities and forced liquidations. We do not monitor for large transfers to or from Investment Funds except where the portfolio manager of a particular 4
N-6396th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 396th
underlying Investment Fund has brought large transfer activity to our attention for investigation on a case-by-case basis. For example, some portfolio managers have asked us to monitor for "block transfers" where transfer requests have been submitted on behalf of multiple Policy Owners by a third party such as an investment adviser. When we detect such large trades, we may impose restrictions similar to those described above where future transfer requests from that third party must be submitted either (i) in writing with an original signature or (ii) by telephone prior to 10:00 a.m. A first occurrence will result in the imposition of this restriction for a six-month period; a second occurrence will result in the permanent imposition of the restriction. OTHER INFORMATION DISTRIBUTOR The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") provides background information about broker-dealers and their registered representatives through FINRA BrokerCheck. You may contact the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline at 1-800-289-9999, or log on to www.finra.org. An investor brochure that includes information describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available through the Hotline or on-line. OWNERSHIP The following is added to the Beneficiary section: Every state has unclaimed property laws which generally declare life insurance policies to be abandoned after a period of inactivity of three to five years from the date any death benefit is due and payable. For example, if the payment of a death benefit has been triggered, and after a thorough search, we are still unable to locate the beneficiary of the death benefit, the death benefit will be paid to the abandoned property division or unclaimed property office of the state in which the beneficiary or the policy owner last resided, as shown on our books and records. ("Escheatment" is the formal, legal name for this process.) However, the state is obligated to pay the death benefit (without interest) if your beneficiary steps forward to claim it with the proper documentation. To prevent your Policy's death benefit from being paid to the state's abandoned or unclaimed property office, it is important that you update your beneficiary designation--including complete names and complete address--if and as they change. You should contact our Service Office at 1-800-638-5000 in order to make a change to your beneficiary designation. FEDERAL TAX STATUS NOTE: The following description is based upon our understanding of current Federal income tax law applicable to life insurance in general. We cannot predict the probability that any changes in such laws will be made. Purchasers are cautioned to seek competent tax advice regarding the possibility of such changes. Section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), defines the term "life insurance contract" for purposes of the Code. We believe that Single Life Policies issued on a standard underwriting basis should qualify as "life insurance contracts" under Section 7702. There is more uncertainty as to Single Life Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Survivor Policies. We do not guarantee the tax status of the Policies. Purchasers bear the complete risk that the Policies may not be treated as a "life insurance contract" under Federal income tax laws. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisers. It should be further understood that the following discussion is not exhaustive and that special rules not described in this prospectus may be applicable in certain situations. In general, however, the insurance proceeds payable on the death of the Insured will never be less than the minimum amount required for the Policy to be treated as life insurance under section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date the Policy was issued. INTRODUCTION. The discussion contained herein addressing Federal income tax considerations relating to the Policy is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice. It does not purport to be complete or to address every situation. Each person concerned should consult a competent tax adviser. No attempt is made to consider any applicable state, local or foreign or other tax laws. Moreover, the discussion herein is based upon our understanding of current federal income tax laws as they are currently interpreted. No representation is made regarding the likelihood of continuation of those current federal income tax laws or of the current interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: The tax information contained herein is not intended to (and cannot) be used by anyone to avoid IRS penalties. It is intended to support the sale of the Policy. The Policy Owner should seek tax advice based on the Policy Owner's particular circumstances from an independent tax adviser. We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Code. For federal income tax purposes, the Separate Account is not a separate entity from us and its operations form a part of us. 5
N-6397th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 397th
DIVERSIFICATION. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying assets of variable life insurance policies. The Code provides that a variable life insurance policy will not be treated as life insurance for any period (and any subsequent period) for which the investments are not adequately diversified under IRS rules. Disqualification of the Policy as a life insurance contract would result in imposition of federal income tax to the Owner with respect to earnings allocable to the Policy prior to the receipt of payments under the Policy. We intend that each Investment Fund underlying the Policies will be managed by the managers in such a manner as to comply with these diversification requirements. If Investment Fund shares are sold directly to tax-qualified retirement plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, or to non-qualified plans, there may be adverse consequences under the diversification rules. INVESTOR CONTROL. In some circumstances, owners of variable contracts who retain excessive control over the investment of the underlying separate account assets may be treated as the owners of those assets. Although published guidance in this area does not address certain aspects of the Policies, we believe that the Owner of a Policy should not be treated as the owner of the Separate Account assets. We reserve the right to modify the Policies to bring them into conformity with applicable standards should such modification be necessary to prevent Owners of the Policies from being treated as the owners of the underlying Separate Account assets. TAX TREATMENT OF THE POLICY. The Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance contained in Section 7702 of the Code. Although some interim guidance has been provided and some proposed and final regulations have been issued, a comprehensive set of final regulations has not been adopted. Section 7702 of the Code requires that the amount of mortality and other expense charges be reasonable. In establishing these charges, we have relied on interim IRS guidance. Currently, there is even less guidance as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Last Survivor Policies. Moreover, if you elect the Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, the continued tax qualification of the Policy after a distribution is made under the rider is unclear. We note that the law relating to Section 7702 compliance is complex and unclear in many respects. There is a risk, therefore, that the Internal Revenue Service will not concur with some of our interpretations of Section 7702 that were made in determining such compliance. In the event the Policy is determined not to comply, it would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment usually accorded life insurance policies. You should consult your own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of purchasing the Policy. The following discussion assumes that the Policy will satisfy Section 7702. POLICY PROCEEDS. The tax treatment accorded to loan proceeds and/or surrender payments from the policies will depend on whether the Policy is considered to be a MEC. (See "Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.") Otherwise, we believe that the Policy should receive the same Federal income tax treatment as any other type of life insurance. As such, the death benefit thereunder is generally excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary to the extent provided in Section 101(a) of the Code. Also, you are not deemed to be in constructive receipt of the Cash Surrender Value, including increments thereon, under a Policy until there is a distribution of such amounts. In the case of employer-owned life insurance as defined in Section 101(j), the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income is limited to premiums paid unless the Policy falls within certain specified exceptions and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied before the Policy is issued. Certain specified exceptions are based on the status of an employee as highly compensated or recently employed. There are also exceptions for Policy proceeds paid to an employee's heirs. These exceptions only apply if proper notice is given to the insured employee and consent is received from the insured employee before the issuance of the Policy. These rules apply to Policies issued August 18, 2006 and later and also apply to policies issued before August 18, 2006 after a material increase in the death benefit or other material change. An IRS reporting requirement applies to employer-owned life insurance subject to these rules. Because these rules are complex and will affect the tax treatment of death benefits, it is advisable to consult tax counsel. The death benefit will also be taxable in the case of a transfer-for-value unless certain exceptions apply. Federal, state and local estate, inheritance and other tax consequences of ownership, or receipt of Policy proceeds, depend on the circumstances of each owner or Beneficiary. TAX TREATMENT OF LOANS AND SURRENDERS. Section 7702A of the Code sets forth the rules for determining when a life insurance Policy will be deemed to be a MEC. A MEC is a contract which is entered into or materially changed on or after June 21, 1988 and fails to 6
N-6398th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 398th
meet the 7-pay test. A Policy fails to meet the 7-pay test when the cumulative amount paid under the Policy at any time during the first 7 Policy years exceeds the sum of the net level premiums which would have been paid on or before such time if the Policy provided for paid-up future benefits after the payment of seven (7) level annual premiums. A material change would include any increase in the future benefits or addition of qualified additional benefits provided under a Policy unless the increase is attributable to: (1) the payment of premiums necessary to fund the lowest death benefit and qualified additional benefits payable in the first seven Policy years; or (2) the crediting of interest or other earnings with respect to such premiums. Certain changes in a Policy after it is issued could also cause it to fail to satisfy the 7-pay test and therefore to be classified as a MEC. Making additional payments, reducing the Policy's death benefit, reducing the Policy's benefits through a partial withdrawal, a change in death benefit option, and termination of benefits under a rider are examples of changes that could result in your Policy becoming classified as a MEC. Reducing the death benefit below the lowest death benefit provided by the Policy during the first seven years will probably cause the Policy to be classified as a MEC if such a reduction occurs during the first seven Policy years in the case of a Single Life Policy or at any time in the case of a Joint and Last Survivor Policy. Even if these events do not result in a Policy becoming classified as a MEC, they could reduce the amount that may be paid in the future without causing the Policy to be classified as a MEC. You should consult a tax adviser to determine whether a Policy transaction will cause your Policy to be classified as a MEC. Furthermore, any Policy received in exchange for a Policy classified as a MEC will be treated as a MEC regardless of whether it meets the 7-pay test. However, an exchange under Section 1035 of the Code of a life insurance Policy entered into before June 21, 1988 for the Policy will not cause the Policy to be treated as a MEC if no additional premiums are paid. Due to the flexible premium nature of the Policy, the determination of whether it qualifies for treatment as a MEC depends on the individual circumstances of each Policy. If the Policy is classified as a MEC, then any distribution (including the proceeds of any loan) is taxable to the extent of income in the Policy. Distributions are deemed to be on a last-in, first-out basis, which means the taxable income is distributed first. Distributions, including those resulting from surrender or lapse of the Policy, may also be subject to an additional 10% federal income tax penalty applied to the income portion of such distribution. The penalty shall not apply, however, to any distributions: (1) made on or after the date on which the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) which is attributable to the taxpayer becoming disabled (within the meaning of Section 72(m)(7) of the Code); or (3) which is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made not less frequently than annually for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such taxpayer and his beneficiary. The exception to the additional 10% federal income tax penalty does not apply to a taxpayer which is a non-natural person, such as a corporation. If a Policy becomes a MEC, distributions that occur during the Policy year will be taxed as distributions from a MEC. In addition, distributions from a Policy within two years before it becomes a MEC will be taxed in this manner. This means that a distribution made from a Policy that is not a MEC could later become taxable as a distribution from a MEC. If a Policy is not classified as a MEC, then any surrenders shall be treated first as a recovery of the investment in the Policy which would not be received as taxable income. However, if a distribution is the result of a reduction in benefits under the Policy within the first fifteen years after the Policy is issued in order to comply with Section 7702, such distribution will, under rules set forth in Section 7702, be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of income in the Policy. Loans from a Policy which is not classified as a MEC, will generally be treated as Indebtedness of the Owner and not a distribution. However, there is uncertainty as to loans from such a Policy after the 10th Policy year and you should consult a tax adviser as to the treatment of such loans. If your Policy is surrendered, cancelled, lapses, or is exchanged while any Policy loan is outstanding, the amount of the Policy loan plus accrued interest will be deemed to be distributed to you and could be partly or wholly taxable, depending on your particular circumstances. Cash distributed to you from the Policy in these circumstances may be insufficient to pay the tax attributable to any Policy loan. Interest payable on a loan under a Policy is generally not deductible. 7
N-6399th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 399th
Policyowners should seek competent tax advice on the tax consequences of taking loans, distributions, exchanging or surrendering any Policy. MULTIPLE POLICIES. The Code further provides that multiple MECs that are issued within a calendar year period to the same owner by one company or its affiliates are treated as one MEC for purposes of determining the taxable portion of any loans or distributions. Such treatment may result in adverse tax consequences including more rapid taxation of the loans or distributed amounts from such combination of policies. You should consult a tax adviser prior to purchasing more than one MEC in any calendar year period. CONTINUATION OF POLICY BEYOND AGE 100. The tax consequences of continuing the Policy beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy) are unclear. You should consult a tax adviser if you intend to keep the Policy in force beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy). TAX TREATMENT OF POLICY SPLIT. The Split Policy Option Rider and the Divorce Split Rider permit a Policy to be split into two individual Policies. In general exercising either the Policy Split Rider or the Divorce Split Rider will be treated as a taxable transaction. It is not clear whether the individual Policies that result will be classified as Modified Endowment Contracts. A tax adviser should be consulted before exercising either rider. TAX TREATMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS. An assignment of a Policy or the change of ownership of a Policy may be a taxable event. You should therefore consult a competent tax adviser should you wish to assign or change the owner of your Policy. QUALIFIED PLANS. The Policies may be used in conjunction with certain Qualified Plans. Because the rules governing such use are complex and the amount of life insurance provided in connection with such plans may be limited, you should not do so until you have consulted a competent Qualified Plans consultant. INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING. All distributions or the portion thereof which is includible in gross income of the Policy owner are subject to Federal income tax withholding. However, in most cases you may elect not to have taxes withheld. You may be required to pay penalties under the estimated tax rules, if withholding and estimated tax payments are insufficient. LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASES BY NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Policy Owners that are not U.S. citizens or residents will generally be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax on taxable distributions from life insurance policies at a 30% rate, unless a lower treaty rate applies. In addition, Policy Owners may be subject to state and/or municipal taxes and taxes that may be imposed by the Policy Owner's country of citizenship or residence. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult with a qualified tax adviser regarding taxation with respect to a purchase of the Policy. BUSINESS USES OF POLICY. Businesses can use the Policies in various arrangements, including nonqualified deferred compensation or salary continuance plans, split dollar insurance plans, executive bonus plans, tax exempt and nonexempt welfare benefit plans, retiree medical benefit plans and others. The tax consequences of such plans may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances. If you are purchasing the Policy for any arrangement the value of which depends in part on its tax consequences, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. In the case of a business-owned Policy, the provisions of Section 101(j) of the Code may limit the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income unless a specified exception applies and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied, as discussed above. In recent years, moreover, Congress has adopted new rules relating to life insurance owned by businesses. Any business contemplating the purchase of a new Policy or a change in an existing Policy should consult a tax adviser. NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNERS AND BUSINESS BENEFICIARIES OF POLICIES. Ownership of the Policy by a corporation, trust or other non-natural person could jeopardize some (or all) of such entity's interest deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 264, even where such entity's indebtedness is in no way connected to the Policy. In addition, under Section 264(f)(5), if a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the Policy, the Policy could be treated as held by the business for purposes of the Section 264(f) entity-holder rules. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult with a qualified tax adviser before any non-natural person is made an Owner or holder of the Policy, or before a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is made a beneficiary of the Policy. SPLIT-DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS. The IRS and the Treasury Department have recently issued guidance that substantially affects split-dollar arrangements. You should 8
N-6400th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 400th
consult a qualified tax adviser before entering into or paying additional premiums with respect to such arrangements. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on July 30, 2002, prohibits, with limited exceptions, publicly-traded companies, including non-U.S. companies that have securities listed on U.S. exchanges, from extending directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, many types of personal loans to their directors or executive officers. It is possible that this prohibition may be interpreted to apply to split-dollar life insurance arrangements for directors and executive officers of such companies, since such arrangements can arguably be viewed as involving a loan from the employer for at least some purposes. Any affected business contemplating the payments of a premium on an existing Policy or the purchase of a new Policy in connection with a split-dollar life insurance arrangement should consult legal counsel. Split dollar plans that provide deferred compensation may be subject to recently enacted rules governing deferred compensation arrangements. Failure to adhere to these rules will result in adverse tax consequences. A tax adviser should be consulted with respect to such plans. ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES. The transfer of the Policy or the designation of a beneficiary may have Federal, state, and/or local transfer and inheritance tax consequences, including the imposition of gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer taxes. When the insured dies, the death proceeds will generally be includable in the Policy Owner's estate for purposes of the Federal estate tax if the Policy Owner was the insured, retained incidents of ownership at death, or made a gift transfer of the Policy within 3 years of death. If the Policy Owner was not the insured, the fair market value of the Policy would be included in the Policy Owner's estate upon the Policy Owner's death. The Policy would not be includable in the insured's estate if the insured neither retained incidents of ownership at death nor had given up ownership within three years before death. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code may impose a "generation-skipping transfer tax" when all or part of a life insurance policy is transferred to, or a death benefit is paid to, an individual two or more generations younger than the Policy Owner. Regulations issued under the Internal Revenue Code may require us to deduct the tax from your Policy, or from any applicable payment, and pay it directly to the IRS. Qualified tax advisers should be consulted concerning the estate and gift tax consequences of Policy ownership and distributions under Federal, state and local law. The individual situation of each Policy Owner or beneficiary will determine the extent, if any, to which Federal, state, and local transfer and inheritance taxes may be imposed and how ownership or receipt of Policy proceeds will be treated for purposes of Federal, state and local estate, inheritance, generation-skipping and other taxes. In general, current rules provide for a $5 million estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer tax exemption (as adjusted for inflation) and a top tax rate of 40 percent. The complexity of the tax law, along with uncertainty as to how it might be modified in coming years, underscores the importance of seeking guidance from a qualified adviser to help ensure that your estate plan adequately addresses your needs and those of your beneficiaries under all possible scenarios. TAX CREDITS AND DEDUCTIONS The Company may be entitled to certain tax benefits related to the assets of the Separate Account. These tax benefits, which may include foreign tax credits and corporate dividends received deductions, are not passed back to the Separate Account or to Policy Owners since the Company is the owner of the assets from which the tax benefits are derived. ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. There may also be an indirect tax on the income in the Policy or the proceeds of the Policy under the Federal corporate alternative minimum tax if the Owner is subject to that tax. POSSIBLE TAX LAW CHANGES. Although the likelihood of legislative changes is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Policy could change by legislation or otherwise. Consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Policy. THE COMPANY'S INCOME TAXES. Under current Federal income tax law we are not taxed on the Separate Account's operations. Thus, currently we do not deduct a charge from the Separate Account for company Federal income taxes. (We do deduct a charge for Federal taxes from premiums.) We reserve the right to charge the Separate Account for any future Federal income taxes we may incur. Under current laws we may incur state and local taxes (in addition to premium taxes). These taxes are not now significant and we are not currently charging for them. If they increase, we may deduct charges for such taxes. 9
N-6401st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 401st
APPENDIX A PARTICIPATING INVESTMENT FUNDS INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Below is a listing of the investment advisers and subadvisers, if any, and the investment objectives of each Investment Fund available under the policy. The fund prospectuses contain more complete information, including a description of the investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL BE ACHIEVED. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES 1 SHARES): AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: CBRE Clarion Securities LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks total return through investment in real estate securities, emphasizing both capital appreciation and current income. CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO (FORMERLY LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO) SUBADVISER: ClearBridge Investments, LLC (formerly ClearBridge Advisors, LLC) INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Advisers, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a high total return. LORD ABBETT MID CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation through investments, primarily in equity securities, which are believed to be undervalued in the marketplace. MFS(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MFS(R) RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. 10
N-6402nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 402nd
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. PIMCO TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks maximum total return, consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in common stocks believed to be undervalued. Income is a secondary objective. METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND (CLASS A): Metropolitan Series Fund is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BLACKROCK BOND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a competitive total return primarily from investing in fixed-income securities. BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. JENNISON GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Jennison Associates LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. NEUBERGER BERMAN GENESIS PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Neuberger Berman Management LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high total return, consisting principally of capital appreciation. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long term growth of capital and, secondarily, dividend income. T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC BOND OPPORTUNITIES PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Western Asset Management Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks to maximize total return consistent with preservation of capital. PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following portfolio is available under the policy: PUTNAM VT MULTI-CAP GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation. DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS. The following investment option is no longer available for allocations of premiums or transfers of cash value (excluding rebalancing and dollar cost averaging programs in existence at the time of closing): Metropolitan Series Fund: BlackRock Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) (formerly BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A)) (added and closed effective May 1, 2009). Effective as of April 28, 2003, General American Money Market Fund was merged into the State Street Research Money Market Portfolio of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. and the following investment portfolios of the Met Investors Series Trust were merged: J.P. Morgan Enhanced Index Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio; J.P. Morgan International Equity Portfolio merged into the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio; and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Portfolio. 11
N-6403rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 403rd
Effective as of May 1, 2004, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Premier Equity Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST"); (b) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: AllianceBernstein Premier Growth Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Janus Aggressive Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (c) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust (Class 1): Franklin Small Cap Fund was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. ("MSF"); and Mutual Shares Securities Fund was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (d) Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust ("GSVIT"): GSVIT Growth and Income Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and GSVIT International Equity Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (e) Liberty Variable Investments: the Newport Tiger Fund, Variable Series (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (f) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust (Initial Class): MFS(R) Research Series (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; MFS(R) Emerging Growth Series was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and the MFS(R) Strategic Income Series was replaced with the Salomon Brothers Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; (g) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (Initial Class): Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the State Street Research Bond Income Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and (h) Putnam Variable Trust (Class IA): Putnam VT New Value Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and the Putnam VT International New Opportunities Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST. Effective as of November 22, 2004, the J.P. Morgan Quality Bond Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the J.P. Morgan Select Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was closed. Effective as of May 1, 2005, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: the AllianceBernstein Real Estate Investment Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Neuberger Berman Real Estate Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (b) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust: the MFS(R) High Income Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust, the MFS(R) Investors Trust Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the MFS New Discovery Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust; (c) Putnam Variable Trust: the Putnam VT International Equity Fund (Class IA) was replaced with the MFS Research International Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (d) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds: the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA (Class A) (closed May 1, 2004) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; and (b) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Small Cap Growth VIP (Class A) was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the Met/Putnam Capital Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Lazard Mid-Cap Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 28, 2008, the Templeton Developing Markets Securities Fund (Class 1) of the Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust was replaced with the MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of May 4, 2009, the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series 12
N-6404th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 404th
Trust merged into the BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of May 3, 2010, the Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of September 27, 2010, the Putnam VT Vista Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust merged into the Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2012, the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the Jennison Growth Portfolio of the Metropolitan Series Fund. Effective as of April 29, 2013, the MLA Mid Cap Portfolio (Class A) (which was formerly the Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio (Class A)) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Neuberger Berman Genesis Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund. 13
N-6405th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 405th
METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE SUPPLEMENT DATED APRIL 30, 2012 TO PROSPECTUSES DATED MAY 1, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 9, 2009 (CUSTOM-SELECT FLEX VUL) This will supplement the prospectuses dated May 1, 2001 (as supplemented) and November 9, 2009 (as supplemented) for variable life insurance policies issued by Metlife Investors Variable Life Account One. The following information is provided with respect to the investment options available effective on and after April 30, 2012, under the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy (the "Policy") issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company. The corresponding sections of the prospectus are supplemented or modified as follows: EXPENSES .. DEDUCTIONS FROM THE INVESTMENT FUNDS MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE We are waiving an amount of the Mortality and Expense Risk Charge equal to the Investment Fund expenses that are in excess of 0.58% for cash value allocated to the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio. ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (as a percentage of average daily net assets) The following table describes the annual operating expenses for each Investment Fund for the year ended December 31, 2011, before and after any applicable contractual fee waivers and expense reimbursements: [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTUAL DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE(12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) -- SERIES I Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund 0.71% -- 0.32% -- 1.03% -- 1.03% FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST -- CLASS 1 Templeton Foreign Securities Fund 0.64% -- 0.15% 0.01% 0.80% 0.00% 0.80% MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST -- CLASS A Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio 0.61% -- 0.06% -- 0.67% -- 0.67% Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.85% -- 0.03% -- 0.88% 0.02% 0.86% Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio 0.69% -- 0.06% -- 0.75% -- 0.75% Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio 0.62% -- 0.03% -- 0.65% -- 0.65% Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio 0.50% -- 0.04% -- 0.54% -- 0.54% Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio 0.67% -- 0.06% -- 0.73% 0.02% 0.71% MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.92% -- 0.17% -- 1.09% -- 1.09% MFS(R) Research International Portfolio 0.68% -- 0.09% -- 0.77% 0.06% 0.71% Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 0.65% -- 0.07% -- 0.72% 0.01% 0.71% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1
N-6406th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 406th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTUAL DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE(12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PIMCO Total Return Portfolio 0.48% -- 0.03% -- 0.51% -- 0.51% T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio 0.57% -- 0.02% -- 0.59% -- 0.59% METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND -- CLASS A BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio 0.34% -- 0.03% -- 0.37% 0.01% 0.36% BlackRock Money Market Portfolio 0.33% -- 0.02% -- 0.35% 0.01% 0.34% Jennison Growth Portfolio 0.62% -- 0.02% -- 0.64% 0.07% 0.57% T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.04% -- 0.64% 0.01% 0.63% T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.49% -- 0.06% -- 0.55% -- 0.55% Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio 0.61% -- 0.06% -- 0.67% 0.04% 0.63% PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST -- CLASS IA Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund 0.56% -- 0.16% -- 0.72% -- 0.72% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ The Net Total Annual Operating Expenses shown in the table reflect contractual arrangements currently in effect under which the investment advisers of certain Investment Funds have agreed to waive fees and/or pay expenses of the Investment Funds until at least April 30, 2013. In the table, "0.00%" in the Contractual Fee Waiver and/or Expense Reimbursement column indicates that there is a contractual arrangement in effect for that Investment Fund, but the expenses of the Investment Fund are below the level that would trigger the waiver or reimbursement. The Net Total Annual Operating Expenses shown do not reflect voluntary waiver or expense reimbursement arrangements or arrangements that terminate prior to April 30, 2013. The Investment Funds provided the information on their expenses, and we have not independently verified the information. INVESTMENT FUNDS The Policy offers the Investment Funds which are listed below. Appendix A contains a summary of investment objectives and subadvisers, if any, for each Investment Fund. Additional Investment Funds may be available in the future. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESE FUNDS CAREFULLY. YOU CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES BY CALLING US AT 1-800-638-9294. YOU CAN ALSO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS (INCLUDING A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) BY ACCESSING THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES I SHARES) AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust currently consists of multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: Templeton Foreign Securities Fund MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A) Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 2
N-6407th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 407th
MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio PIMCO Total Return Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND (CLASS A) Metropolitan Series Fund is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio Jennison Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA) Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Class IA portfolio is available under the policy: Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund MARKET TIMING The following paragraphs in this section have been modified: The Investment Funds may have adopted their own policies and procedures with respect to market timing transactions in their respective shares, and we reserve the right to enforce these policies and procedures. For example, the Investment Funds may assess a redemption fee (which we reserve the right to collect) on shares held for a relatively short period. The prospectuses for the Investment Funds describe any such policies and procedures, which may be more or less restrictive than the policies and procedures we have adopted. Although we may not have the contractual authority or the operational capacity to apply the market timing policies and procedures of the Investment Funds, we have entered into a written agreement, as required by SEC regulation, with each Investment Fund or its principal underwriter that obligates us to provide to the Investment Fund promptly upon request certain information about the trading activity of individual owners, and to execute instructions from the Investment Fund to restrict or prohibit further purchases or transfers by specific owners who violate the frequent trading policies established by the Investment Fund. In addition, owners and other persons with interests in the Policies should be aware that the purchase and redemption orders received by the Investment Funds generally are "omnibus" orders from intermediaries such as retirement plans or separate accounts funding variable insurance contracts. The omnibus orders reflect the aggregation and netting of multiple orders from individual owners of variable insurance contracts and/or individual retirement plan participants. The omnibus nature of these orders may limit the Investment Funds in their ability to apply their market timing policies and procedures. In addition, the other insurance companies and/or retirement plans may have different policies and procedures or may not have any such policies and procedures because of contractual limitations. For these reasons, we cannot guarantee that the Investment Funds (and thus owners) will not be harmed by transfer activity relating to other insurance companies and/or retirement plans that may invest in the Investment Funds. If an Investment Fund believes that an omnibus order reflects one or more transfer requests from owners engaged in disruptive trading activity, the Investment Fund may reject the entire omnibus order. In accordance with applicable law, we reserve the right to modify or terminate the transfer privilege at any time. We also reserve the right to defer or restrict the transfer privilege at any time that we are unable to purchase or redeem shares of any of the Investment Funds, including any refusal or restriction on purchases or redemptions of their shares as a result of their own policies and procedures on market timing and disruptive trading activities (even if an entire omnibus order is rejected due to the market timing or disruptive trading activity of a single owner). You should read the Investment Fund prospectuses for more details. OTHER INFORMATION DISTRIBUTOR The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") provides background information about broker-dealers and their registered representatives through FINRA BrokerCheck. You may contact the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline at 1-800-289-9999, or log on to www.finra.org. An investor brochure that includes information describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available through the Hotline or on-line. 3
N-6408th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 408th
FEDERAL TAX STATUS NOTE: The following description is based upon our understanding of current Federal income tax law applicable to life insurance in general. We cannot predict the probability that any changes in such laws will be made. Purchasers are cautioned to seek competent tax advice regarding the possibility of such changes. Section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), defines the term "life insurance contract" for purposes of the Code. We believe that Single Life Policies issued on a standard underwriting basis should qualify as "life insurance contracts" under Section 7702. There is more uncertainty as to Single Life Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Survivor Policies. We do not guarantee the tax status of the Policies. Purchasers bear the complete risk that the Policies may not be treated as a "life insurance contract" under Federal income tax laws. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisers. It should be further understood that the following discussion is not exhaustive and that special rules not described in this prospectus may be applicable in certain situations. In general, however, the insurance proceeds payable on the death of the Insured will never be less than the minimum amount required for the Policy to be treated as life insurance under section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date the Policy was issued. INTRODUCTION. The discussion contained herein addressing Federal income tax considerations relating to the Policy is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice. It does not purport to be complete or to address every situation. Each person concerned should consult a competent tax adviser. No attempt is made to consider any applicable state, local or foreign or other tax laws. Moreover, the discussion herein is based upon our understanding of current federal income tax laws as they are currently interpreted. No representation is made regarding the likelihood of continuation of those current federal income tax laws or of the current interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: The tax information contained herein is not intended to (and cannot) be used by anyone to avoid IRS penalties. It is intended to support the sale of the Policy. The Policy Owner should seek tax advice based on the Policy Owner's particular circumstances from an independent tax adviser. We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Code. For federal income tax purposes, the Separate Account is not a separate entity from us and its operations form a part of us. DIVERSIFICATION. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying assets of variable life insurance policies. The Code provides that a variable life insurance policy will not be treated as life insurance for any period (and any subsequent period) for which the investments are not adequately diversified under IRS rules. Disqualification of the Policy as a life insurance contract would result in imposition of federal income tax to the Owner with respect to earnings allocable to the Policy prior to the receipt of payments under the Policy. We intend that each Investment Fund underlying the Policies will be managed by the managers in such a manner as to comply with these diversification requirements. If Investment Fund shares are sold directly to tax-qualified retirement plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, or to non-qualified plans, there may be adverse consequences under the diversification rules. INVESTOR CONTROL. In some circumstances, owners of variable contracts who retain excessive control over the investment of the underlying separate account assets may be treated as the owners of those assets. Although published guidance in this area does not address certain aspects of the Policies, we believe that the Owner of a Policy should not be treated as the owner of the Separate Account assets. We reserve the right to modify the Policies to bring them into conformity with applicable standards should such modification be necessary to prevent Owners of the Policies from being treated as the owners of the underlying Separate Account assets. TAX TREATMENT OF THE POLICY. The Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance contained in Section 7702 of the Code. Although some interim guidance has been provided and some proposed and final regulations have been issued, a comprehensive set of final regulations has not been adopted. Section 7702 of the Code requires that the amount of mortality and other expense charges be reasonable. In establishing these charges, we have relied on interim IRS guidance. Currently, there is even less guidance as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Last Survivor Policies. Moreover, if you elect the Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, the continued tax qualification of the Policy after a distribution is made under the rider is unclear. We note that the law relating to Section 7702 compliance is complex and unclear in many respects. There is a risk, therefore, that the Internal Revenue Service will not concur 4
N-6409th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 409th
with some of our interpretations of Section 7702 that were made in determining such compliance. In the event the Policy is determined not to comply, it would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment usually accorded life insurance policies. You should consult your own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of purchasing the Policy. The following discussion assumes that the Policy will satisfy Section 7702. POLICY PROCEEDS. The tax treatment accorded to loan proceeds and/or surrender payments from the policies will depend on whether the Policy is considered to be a MEC. (See "Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.") Otherwise, we believe that the Policy should receive the same Federal income tax treatment as any other type of life insurance. As such, the death benefit thereunder is generally excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary to the extent provided in Section 101(a) of the Code. Also, you are not deemed to be in constructive receipt of the Cash Surrender Value, including increments thereon, under a Policy until there is a distribution of such amounts. In the case of employer-owned life insurance as defined in Section 101(j), the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income is limited to premiums paid unless the Policy falls within certain specified exceptions and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied before the Policy is issued. Certain specified exceptions are based on the status of an employee as highly compensated or recently employed. There are also exceptions for Policy proceeds paid to an employee's heirs. These exceptions only apply if proper notice is given to the insured employee and consent is received from the insured employee before the issuance of the Policy. These rules apply to Policies issued August 18, 2006 and later and also apply to policies issued before August 18, 2006 after a material increase in the death benefit or other material change. An IRS reporting requirement applies to employer-owned life insurance subject to these rules. Because these rules are complex and will affect the tax treatment of death benefits, it is advisable to consult tax counsel. The death benefit will also be taxable in the case of a transfer-for-value unless certain exceptions apply. Federal, state and local estate, inheritance and other tax consequences of ownership, or receipt of Policy proceeds, depend on the circumstances of each owner or Beneficiary. TAX TREATMENT OF LOANS AND SURRENDERS. Section 7702A of the Code sets forth the rules for determining when a life insurance Policy will be deemed to be a MEC. A MEC is a contract which is entered into or materially changed on or after June 21, 1988 and fails to meet the 7-pay test. A Policy fails to meet the 7-pay test when the cumulative amount paid under the Policy at any time during the first 7 Policy years exceeds the sum of the net level premiums which would have been paid on or before such time if the Policy provided for paid-up future benefits after the payment of seven (7) level annual premiums. A material change would include any increase in the future benefits or addition of qualified additional benefits provided under a Policy unless the increase is attributable to: (1) the payment of premiums necessary to fund the lowest death benefit and qualified additional benefits payable in the first seven Policy years; or (2) the crediting of interest or other earnings with respect to such premiums. Certain changes in a Policy after it is issued could also cause it to fail to satisfy the 7-pay test and therefore to be classified as a MEC. Making additional payments, reducing the Policy's death benefit, reducing the Policy's benefits through a partial withdrawal, a change in death benefit option, and termination of benefits under a rider are examples of changes that could result in your Policy becoming classified as a MEC. Reducing the death benefit below the lowest death benefit provided by the Policy during the first seven years will probably cause the Policy to be classified as a MEC if such a reduction occurs during the first seven Policy years in the case of a Single Life Policy or at any time in the case of a Joint and Last Survivor Policy. Even if these events do not result in a Policy becoming classified as a MEC, they could reduce the amount that may be paid in the future without causing the Policy to be classified as a MEC. You should consult a tax adviser to determine whether a Policy transaction will cause your Policy to be classified as a MEC. Furthermore, any Policy received in exchange for a Policy classified as a MEC will be treated as a MEC regardless of whether it meets the 7-pay test. However, an exchange under Section 1035 of the Code of a life insurance Policy entered into before June 21, 1988 for the Policy will not cause the Policy to be treated as a MEC if no additional premiums are paid. Due to the flexible premium nature of the Policy, the determination of whether it qualifies for treatment as a MEC depends on the individual circumstances of each Policy. If the Policy is classified as a MEC, then any distribution (including the proceeds of any loan) is taxable to the extent 5
N-6410th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 410th
of income in the Policy. Distributions are deemed to be on a last-in, first-out basis, which means the taxable income is distributed first. Distributions, including those resulting from surrender or lapse of the Policy, may also be subject to an additional 10% federal income tax penalty applied to the income portion of such distribution. The penalty shall not apply, however, to any distributions: (1) made on or after the date on which the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) which is attributable to the taxpayer becoming disabled (within the meaning of Section 72(m)(7) of the Code); or (3) which is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made not less frequently than annually for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such taxpayer and his beneficiary. The exception to the additional 10% federal income tax penalty does not apply to a taxpayer which is a non-natural person, such as a corporation. If a Policy becomes a MEC, distributions that occur during the Policy year will be taxed as distributions from a MEC. In addition, distributions from a Policy within two years before it becomes a MEC will be taxed in this manner. This means that a distribution made from a Policy that is not a MEC could later become taxable as a distribution from a MEC. If a Policy is not classified as a MEC, then any surrenders shall be treated first as a recovery of the investment in the Policy which would not be received as taxable income. However, if a distribution is the result of a reduction in benefits under the Policy within the first fifteen years after the Policy is issued in order to comply with Section 7702, such distribution will, under rules set forth in Section 7702, be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of income in the Policy. Loans from a Policy which is not classified as a MEC, will generally be treated as Indebtedness of the Owner and not a distribution. However, there is uncertainty as to loans from such a Policy after the 10th Policy year and you should consult a tax adviser as to the treatment of such loans. If your Policy is surrendered, cancelled, lapses, or is exchanged while any Policy loan is outstanding, the amount of the Policy loan plus accrued interest will be deemed to be distributed to you and could be partly or wholly taxable, depending on your particular circumstances. Cash distributed to you from the Policy in these circumstances may be insufficient to pay the tax attributable to any Policy loan. Interest payable on a loan under a Policy is generally not deductible. Policyowners should seek competent tax advice on the tax consequences of taking loans, distributions, exchanging or surrendering any Policy. MULTIPLE POLICIES. The Code further provides that multiple MECs that are issued within a calendar year period to the same owner by one company or its affiliates are treated as one MEC for purposes of determining the taxable portion of any loans or distributions. Such treatment may result in adverse tax consequences including more rapid taxation of the loans or distributed amounts from such combination of policies. You should consult a tax adviser prior to purchasing more than one MEC in any calendar year period. CONTINUATION OF POLICY BEYOND AGE 100. The tax consequences of continuing the Policy beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy) are unclear. You should consult a tax adviser if you intend to keep the Policy in force beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy). TAX TREATMENT OF POLICY SPLIT. The Split Policy Option Rider and the Divorce Split Rider permit a Policy to be split into two individual Policies. In general exercising either the Policy Split Rider or the Divorce Split Rider will be treated as a taxable transaction. It is not clear whether the individual Policies that result will be classified as Modified Endowment Contracts. A tax adviser should be consulted before exercising either rider. TAX TREATMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS. An assignment of a Policy or the change of ownership of a Policy may be a taxable event. You should therefore consult a competent tax adviser should you wish to assign or change the owner of your Policy. QUALIFIED PLANS. The Policies may be used in conjunction with certain Qualified Plans. Because the rules governing such use are complex and the amount of life insurance provided in connection with such plans may be limited, you should not do so until you have consulted a competent Qualified Plans consultant. INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING. All distributions or the portion thereof which is includible in gross income of the Policy owner are subject to Federal income tax withholding. However, in most cases you may elect not to have taxes withheld. You may be required to pay penalties under the estimated tax rules, if withholding and estimated tax payments are insufficient. 6
N-6411th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 411th
LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASES BY NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Policy Owners that are not U.S. citizens or residents will generally be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax on taxable distributions from life insurance policies at a 30% rate, unless a lower treaty rate applies. In addition, Policy Owners may be subject to state and/or municipal taxes and taxes that may be imposed by the Policy Owner's country of citizenship or residence. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult with a qualified tax adviser regarding taxation with respect to a purchase of the Policy. BUSINESS USES OF POLICY. Businesses can use the Policies in various arrangements, including nonqualified deferred compensation or salary continuance plans, split dollar insurance plans, executive bonus plans, tax exempt and nonexempt welfare benefit plans, retiree medical benefit plans and others. The tax consequences of such plans may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances. If you are purchasing the Policy for any arrangement the value of which depends in part on its tax consequences, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. In the case of a business-owned Policy, the provisions of Section 101(j) of the Code may limit the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income unless a specified exception applies and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied, as discussed above. In recent years, moreover, Congress has adopted new rules relating to life insurance owned by businesses. Any business contemplating the purchase of a new Policy or a change in an existing Policy should consult a tax adviser. NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNERS AND BUSINESS BENEFICIARIES OF POLICIES. Ownership of the Policy by a corporation, trust or other non-natural person could jeopardize some (or all) of such entity's interest deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 264, even where such entity's indebtedness is in no way connected to the Policy. In addition, under Section 264(f)(5), if a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the Policy, the Policy could be treated as held by the business for purposes of the Section 264(f) entity-holder rules. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult with a qualified tax adviser before any non-natural person is made an Owner or holder of the Policy, or before a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is made a beneficiary of the Policy. SPLIT-DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS. The IRS and the Treasury Department have recently issued guidance that substantially affects split-dollar arrangements. You should consult a qualified tax adviser before entering into or paying additional premiums with respect to such arrangements. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on July 30, 2002, prohibits, with limited exceptions, publicly-traded companies, including non-U.S. companies that have securities listed on U.S. exchanges, from extending directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, many types of personal loans to their directors or executive officers. It is possible that this prohibition may be interpreted to apply to split-dollar life insurance arrangements for directors and executive officers of such companies, since such arrangements can arguably be viewed as involving a loan from the employer for at least some purposes. Any affected business contemplating the payments of a premium on an existing Policy or the purchase of a new Policy in connection with a split-dollar life insurance arrangement should consult legal counsel. Split dollar plans that provide deferred compensation may be subject to recently enacted rules governing deferred compensation arrangements. Failure to adhere to these rules will result in adverse tax consequences. A tax adviser should be consulted with respect to such plans. ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES. The transfer of the Policy or the designation of a beneficiary may have Federal, state, and/or local transfer and inheritance tax consequences, including the imposition of gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer taxes. When the insured dies, the death proceeds will generally be includable in the Policy Owner's estate for purposes of the Federal estate tax if the Policy Owner was the insured, retained incidents of ownership at death, or made a gift transfer of the Policy within 3 years of death. If the Policy Owner was not the insured, the fair market value of the Policy would be included in the Policy Owner's estate upon the Policy Owner's death. The Policy would not be includable in the insured's estate if the insured neither retained incidents of ownership at death nor had given up ownership within three years before death. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code may impose a "generation-skipping transfer tax" when all or part of a life insurance policy is transferred to, or a death benefit is paid to, an individual two or more generations younger than the Policy Owner. Regulations issued under the Internal Revenue Code may require us to deduct the tax from your Policy, or from any applicable payment, and pay it directly to the IRS. 7
N-6412th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 412th
Qualified tax advisers should be consulted concerning the estate and gift tax consequences of Policy ownership and distributions under Federal, state and local law. The individual situation of each Policy Owner or beneficiary will determine the extent, if any, to which Federal, state, and local transfer and inheritance taxes may be imposed and how ownership or receipt of Policy proceeds will be treated for purposes of Federal, state and local estate, inheritance, generation-skipping and other taxes. Under previous law, the estate tax applicable exclusion gradually rose to $3.5 million per person in 2009 and was repealed in 2010 with a modified carryover basis for heirs. The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the "2010 Act") has reinstated the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes through the end of 2012 with lower top rates and larger exemptions. The 2010 Act raises the applicable exclusion amount to $5,000,000. The top tax rate is set at 35%. A special irrevocable election was provided for estates of decedents who died in 2010. These estates may generally choose between the reinstated estate tax and the carryover basis rules which were in effect in 2010. It is not known if Congress will make the temporary changes of the 2010 Act permanent, enact permanent repeal of the estate and the generation-skipping transfer taxes or otherwise modify the estate tax or generation-skipping transfer tax rules for years after 2012. Absent Congressional action, the law governing estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes will revert on January 1, 2013 to the law that was in place on June 7, 2001. The complexity of the tax law, along with uncertainty as to how it might be modified in coming years, underscores the importance of seeking guidance from a qualified adviser to help ensure that your estate plan adequately addresses your needs and those of your beneficiaries under all possible scenarios. TAX CREDITS AND DEDUCTIONS The Company may be entitled to certain tax benefits related to the assets of the Separate Account. These tax benefits, which may include foreign tax credits and corporate dividends received deductions, are not passed back to the Separate Account or to Policy Owners since the Company is the owner of the assets from which the tax benefits are derived. ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. There may also be an indirect tax on the income in the Policy or the proceeds of the Policy under the Federal corporate alternative minimum tax if the Owner is subject to that tax. POSSIBLE TAX LAW CHANGES. Although the likelihood of legislative changes is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Policy could change by legislation or otherwise. Consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Policy. THE COMPANY'S INCOME TAXES. Under current Federal income tax law we are not taxed on the Separate Account's operations. Thus, currently we do not deduct a charge from the Separate Account for company Federal income taxes. (We do deduct a charge for Federal taxes from premiums.) We reserve the right to charge the Separate Account for any future Federal income taxes we may incur. Under current laws we may incur state and local taxes (in addition to premium taxes). These taxes are not now significant and we are not currently charging for them. If they increase, we may deduct charges for such taxes. 8
N-6413th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 413th
APPENDIX A PARTICIPATING INVESTMENT FUNDS INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Below is a listing of the investment advisers and subadvisers, if any, and the investment objectives of each Investment Fund available under the policy. The fund prospectuses contain more complete information, including a description of the investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL BE ACHIEVED. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES 1 SHARES): AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: CBRE Clarion Securities LLC (formerly ING Clarion Real Estate Securities LLC) INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks total return through investment in real estate securities, emphasizing both capital appreciation and current income. INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Advisers, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LAZARD MID CAP PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lazard Asset Management LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ClearBridge Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a high total return. LORD ABBETT MID CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation through investments, primarily in equity securities, which are believed to be undervalued in the marketplace. MFS(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MFS(R) RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. 9
N-6414th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 414th
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. PIMCO TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks maximum total return, consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc./1/ INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in common stocks believed to be undervalued. Income is a secondary objective. METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND (CLASS A): Metropolitan Series Fund is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BLACKROCK BOND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a competitive total return primarily from investing in fixed-income securities. BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. JENNISON GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Jennison Associates LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long term growth of capital and, secondarily, dividend income. T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC BOND OPPORTUNITIES PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Western Asset Management Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks to maximize total return consistent with preservation of capital. PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following portfolio is available under the policy: PUTNAM VT MULTI-CAP GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation. DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS. The following investment options are no longer available for allocations of premiums or transfers of cash value (excluding rebalancing and dollar cost averaging programs in existence at the time of closing): (a) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Government & Agency Securities VIP (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002); and (b) Metropolitan Series Fund: BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) (added and closed effective May 1, 2009). Effective as of April 28, 2003, General American Money Market Fund was merged into the State Street Research Money Market Portfolio of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. and the following investment portfolios of the Met Investors Series Trust were merged: J.P. Morgan Enhanced Index Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio; J.P. Morgan International Equity Portfolio merged into the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio; and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Portfolio. Effective as of May 1, 2004, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Premier Equity Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST"); (b) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: AllianceBernstein Premier Growth Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Janus Aggressive Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (c) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust (Class 1): Franklin Small Cap Fund was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap 10
N-6415th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 415th
Growth Portfolio (Class A) of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. ("MSF"); and Mutual Shares Securities Fund was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (d) Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust ("GSVIT"): GSVIT Growth and Income Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and GSVIT International Equity Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (e) Liberty Variable Investments: the Newport Tiger Fund, Variable Series (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (f) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust (Initial Class): MFS(R) Research Series (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; MFS(R) Emerging Growth Series was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and the MFS(R) Strategic Income Series was replaced with the Salomon Brothers Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; (g) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (Initial Class): Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the State Street Research Bond Income Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and (h) Putnam Variable Trust (Class IA): Putnam VT New Value Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and the Putnam VT International New Opportunities Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST. Effective as of November 22, 2004, the J.P. Morgan Quality Bond Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the J.P. Morgan Select Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was closed. Effective as of May 1, 2005, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: the AllianceBernstein Real Estate Investment Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Neuberger Berman Real Estate Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (b) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust: the MFS(R) High Income Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust, the MFS(R) Investors Trust Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the MFS New Discovery Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust; (c) Putnam Variable Trust: the Putnam VT International Equity Fund (Class IA) was replaced with the MFS Research International Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (d) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds: the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA (Class A) (closed May 1, 2004) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; and (b) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Small Cap Growth VIP (Class A) was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the Met/Putnam Capital Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Lazard Mid-Cap Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 28, 2008, the Templeton Developing Markets Securities Fund (Class 1) of the Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust was replaced with the MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of May 4, 2009, the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of May 3, 2010, the Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of September 27, 2010, the Putnam VT Vista Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust merged into the Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust. 11
N-6416th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 416th
Effective as of April 30, 2012, the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the Jennison Growth Portfolio of the Metropolitan Series Fund. 12
N-6417th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 417th
METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE SUPPLEMENT DATED MAY 1, 2011 TO PROSPECTUSES DATED MAY 1, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 9, 2009 (CUSTOM-SELECT FLEX VUL) This will supplement the prospectuses dated May 1, 2001 (as supplemented) and November 9, 2009 (as supplemented) for variable life insurance policies issued by Metlife Investors Variable Life Account One. The following information is provided with respect to the investment options available effective on and after May 1, 2011, under the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy (the "Policy") issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company. The corresponding sections of the prospectus are supplemented or modified as follows: EXPENSES .. DEDUCTIONS FROM THE INVESTMENT FUNDS MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE We are waiving an amount of the Mortality and Expense Risk Charge equal to the Investment Fund expenses that are in excess of 0.58% for cash value allocated to the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio. ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (as a percentage of average daily net assets) The following table describes the annual operating expenses for each Investment Fund for the year ended December 31, 2010, before and after any applicable contractual fee waivers and expense reimbursements: [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTUAL DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE(12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS)--SERIES I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund 0.71% -- 0.33% -- 1.04% -- 1.04% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST-- CLASS 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Templeton Foreign Securities Fund 0.65% -- 0.14% 0.01% 0.80% 0.01% 0.79%/1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST-- CLASS A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio 0.62% -- 0.07% -- 0.69% -- 0.69% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.85% -- 0.04% -- 0.89% 0.02% 0.87%/2/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio 0.69% -- 0.04% -- 0.73% -- 0.73% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio 0.64% -- 0.04% -- 0.68% -- 0.68% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio 0.50% -- 0.03% -- 0.53% -- 0.53% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio 0.68% -- 0.07% -- 0.75% -- 0.75% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.94% -- 0.18% -- 1.12% -- 1.12% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MFS(R) Research International Portfolio 0.69% -- 0.09% -- 0.78% 0.03% 0.75%/3/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 0.66% -- 0.14% -- 0.80% 0.02% 0.78%/4/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 1
N-6418th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 418th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTUAL DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE(12B-1) OTHER FEES AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.06% -- 0.66% -- 0.66% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PIMCO Total Return Portfolio 0.48% -- 0.03% -- 0.51% -- 0.51% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio 0.57% -- 0.02% -- 0.59% -- 0.59%/5/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC.-- CLASS A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio 0.37% -- 0.03% -- 0.40% 0.03% 0.37%/6/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ BlackRock Money Market Portfolio 0.32% -- 0.02% -- 0.34% 0.01% 0.33%/7/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.04% -- 0.64% -- 0.64% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.50% -- 0.07% -- 0.57% -- 0.57% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio 0.62% -- 0.05% -- 0.67% 0.04% 0.63%/8/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST--CLASS IA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund 0.56% -- 0.19% -- 0.75% -- 0.75% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ -------- /1/The Fund's manager and administrator have agreed in advance to reduce their fees as a result of the Fund's investment in a Franklin Templeton money fund ("Sweep Money Fund"). This reduction will continue until at least April 30, 2012. /2/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012, to reduce the Management Fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.83% of the Portfolio's average daily net assets from $250 million to $500 million. This arrangement may be modified or discontinued prior to April 30, 2012 only with the approval of the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio. /3/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012, to reduce the Management Fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.55% of the Portfolio's average daily net assets exceeding $1.5 billion. This arrangement may be modified or discontinued prior to April 30, 2012 only with the approval of the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio. /4/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012, to reduce the Management Fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.65% of the first $500 million of the Portfolio's average daily net assets plus 0.625% of such assets over $500 million. This arrangement may be modified or discontinued prior to April 30, 2012 only with the approval of the Board of Trustees of the Portfolio. /5/ The Management Fee has been restated to reflect an amended advisory agreement, as if the fee had been in effect during the previous fiscal year. /6/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012, to reduce the Management Fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.37% for the first $1 billion of the Portfolio's average daily net assets, 0.325% for the next $2.4 billion and 0.25% on amounts over $3.4 billion. This arrangement may be modified or discontinued prior to April 30, 2012 only with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Portfolio. /7/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012, to reduce the Management Fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.325% for the first $1 billion of the Portfolio's average daily net assets. This arrangement may be modified or discontinued prior to April 30, 2012 only with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Portfolio. /8/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2011 through April 30, 2012, to reduce the Management Fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.595% for the first $500 million of the Portfolio's average daily net assets. This arrangement may be modified or discontinued prior to April 30, 2012 only with the approval of the Board of Directors of the Portfolio. INVESTMENT FUNDS The Policy offers the investment funds which are listed below. Appendix A contains a summary of investment objectives and subadvisers, if any, for each investment fund. Additional investment funds may be available in the future. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESE FUNDS CAREFULLY. YOU CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES BY CALLING US AT 1-800-638-9294. YOU CAN ALSO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS (INCLUDING A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) BY ACCESSING THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES I SHARES) AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust currently consists of multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: Templeton Foreign Securities Fund MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A) Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment 2
N-6419th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 419th
portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio PIMCO Total Return Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Value Portfolio (formerly Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio) METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A) Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA) Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Class IA portfolio is available under the policy: Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund OTHER INFORMATION DISTRIBUTOR The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") provides background information about broker-dealers and their registered representatives through FINRA BrokerCheck. You may contact the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline at 1-800-289-9999, or log on to www.finra.org. An investor brochure that includes information describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available through the Hotline or on-line. FEDERAL TAX STATUS NOTE: The following description is based upon our understanding of current Federal income tax law applicable to life insurance in general. We cannot predict the probability that any changes in such laws will be made. Purchasers are cautioned to seek competent tax advice regarding the possibility of such changes. Section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), defines the term "life insurance contract" for purposes of the Code. We believe that Single Life Policies issued on a standard underwriting basis should qualify as "life insurance contracts" under Section 7702. There is more uncertainty as to Single Life Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Survivor Policies. We do not guarantee the tax status of the Policies. Purchasers bear the complete risk that the Policies may not be treated as a "life insurance contract" under Federal income tax laws. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisers. It should be further understood that the following discussion is not exhaustive and that special rules not described in this prospectus may be applicable in certain situations. In general, however, the insurance proceeds payable on the death of the Insured will never be less than the minimum amount required for the Policy to be treated as life insurance under section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date the Policy was issued. INTRODUCTION. The discussion contained herein is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice. It does not purport to be complete or to address every situation. Each person concerned should consult a competent tax adviser. No attempt is made to consider any applicable state or other tax laws. Moreover, the discussion herein is based upon our understanding of current federal income tax laws as they are currently interpreted. No representation is made regarding the likelihood of continuation of those current federal income tax laws or of the current interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: The tax information contained herein is not intended to (and cannot) be used by anyone to avoid IRS penalties. It is intended to support the sale of the Policy. The Policy Owner should seek tax advice based on the Policy Owner's particular circumstances from an independent tax adviser. We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Code. For federal income tax purposes, the Separate Account is not a separate entity from us and its operations form a part of us. 3
N-6420th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 420th
DIVERSIFICATION. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying assets of variable life insurance policies. The Code provides that a variable life insurance policy will not be treated as life insurance for any period (and any subsequent period) for which the investments are not, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the United States Treasury Department ("Treasury Department"), adequately diversified. Disqualification of the Policy as a life insurance contract would result in imposition of federal income tax to the Owner with respect to earnings allocable to the Policy prior to the receipt of payments under the Policy. We intend that each Investment Fund underlying the Policies will be managed by the managers in such a manner as to comply with these diversification requirements. If Investment Fund shares are sold directly to tax-qualified retirement plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, or to non-qualified plans, there may be adverse consequences under the diversification rules. INVESTOR CONTROL. In some circumstances, owners of variable contracts who retain excessive control over the investment of the underlying separate account assets may be treated as the owners of those assets. Although published guidance in this area does not address certain aspects of the Policies, we believe that the Owner of a Policy should not be treated as the owner of the Separate Account assets. We reserve the right to modify the Policies to bring them into conformity with applicable standards should such modification be necessary to prevent Owners of the Policies from being treated as the owners of the underlying Separate Account assets. TAX TREATMENT OF THE POLICY. The Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance contained in Section 7702 of the Code. Although some interim guidance has been provided and proposed regulations have been issued, final regulations have not been adopted. Section 7702 of the Code requires that the amount of mortality and other expense charges be reasonable. In establishing these charges, we have relied on interim IRS guidance. Currently, there is even less guidance as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Last Survivor Policies. Moreover, if you elect the Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, the continued tax qualification of the Policy after a distribution is made under the rider is unclear. While we have attempted to comply with Section 7702, the law in this area is very complex and unclear. There is a risk, therefore, that the Internal Revenue Service will not concur with our interpretations of Section 7702 that were made in determining such compliance. In the event the Policy is determined not to so comply, it would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment usually accorded life insurance policies. You should consult your own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of purchasing the Policy. The following discussion assumes that the Policy will satisfy Section 7702. POLICY PROCEEDS. The tax treatment accorded to loan proceeds and/or surrender payments from the policies will depend on whether the Policy is considered to be a MEC. (See "Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.") Otherwise, we believe that the Policy should receive the same Federal income tax treatment as any other type of life insurance. As such, the death benefit thereunder is generally excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary to the extent provided in Section 101(a) of the Code. Also, you are not deemed to be in constructive receipt of the Cash Surrender Value, including increments thereon, under a Policy until there is a distribution of such amounts. In the case of employer-owned life insurance as defined in Section 101(j), the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income is limited to premiums paid unless the Policy falls within certain specified exceptions and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied before the Policy is issued. Certain specified exceptions are based on the status of an employee as highly compensated or recently employed. There are also exceptions for Policy proceeds paid to an employee's heirs. These exceptions only apply if proper notice is given to the insured employee and consent is received from the insured employee before the issuance of the Policy. These rules apply to Policies issued August 18, 2006 and later and also apply to policies issued before August 18, 2006 after a material increase in the death benefit or other material change. An IRS reporting requirement applies to employer-owned life insurance subject to these rules. Because these rules are complex and will affect the tax treatment of death benefits, it is advisable to consult tax counsel. The death benefit will also be taxable in the case of a transfer-for-value unless certain exceptions apply. Federal, state and local estate, inheritance and other tax consequences of ownership, or receipt of Policy proceeds, depend on the circumstances of each owner or Beneficiary. TAX TREATMENT OF LOANS AND SURRENDERS. Section 7702A of the Code sets forth the rules for determining when a life insurance Policy will be deemed to 4
N-6421st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 421st
be a MEC. A MEC is a contract which is entered into or materially changed on or after June 21, 1988 and fails to meet the 7-pay test. A Policy fails to meet the 7-pay test when the cumulative amount paid under the Policy at any time during the first 7 Policy years exceeds the sum of the net level premiums which would have been paid on or before such time if the Policy provided for paid-up future benefits after the payment of seven (7) level annual premiums. A material change would include any increase in the future benefits or addition of qualified additional benefits provided under a Policy unless the increase is attributable to: (1) the payment of premiums necessary to fund the lowest death benefit and qualified additional benefits payable in the first seven Policy years; or (2) the crediting of interest or other earnings with respect to such premiums. Certain changes in a Policy after it is issued could also cause it to fail to satisfy the 7-pay test and therefore to be classified as a MEC. Making additional payments, reducing the Policy's death benefit, reducing the Policy's benefits through a partial withdrawal, a change in death benefit option, and termination of benefits under a rider are examples of changes that could result in your Policy becoming classified as a MEC. Reducing the death benefit below the lowest death benefit provided by the Policy during the first seven years will probably cause the Policy to be classified as a MEC if such a reduction occurs during the first seven Policy years in the case of a Single Life Policy or at any time in the case of a Joint and Last Survivor Policy. Even if these events do not result in a Policy becoming classified as a MEC, they could reduce the amount that may be paid in the future without causing the Policy to be classified as a MEC. You should consult a tax adviser to determine whether a Policy transaction will cause your Policy to be classified as a MEC. Furthermore, any Policy received in exchange for a Policy classified as a MEC will be treated as a MEC regardless of whether it meets the 7-pay test. However, an exchange under Section 1035 of the Code of a life insurance Policy entered into before June 21, 1988 for the Policy will not cause the Policy to be treated as a MEC if no additional premiums are paid. Due to the flexible premium nature of the Policy, the determination of whether it qualifies for treatment as a MEC depends on the individual circumstances of each Policy. If the Policy is classified as a MEC, then any distribution (including the proceeds of any loan) is taxable to the extent of income in the Policy. Distributions are deemed to be on a last-in, first-out basis, which means the taxable income is distributed first. Distributions, including those resulting from surrender or lapse of the Policy, may also be subject to an additional 10% federal income tax penalty applied to the income portion of such distribution. The penalty shall not apply, however, to any distributions: (1) made on or after the date on which the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) which is attributable to the taxpayer becoming disabled (within the meaning of Section 72(m)(7) of the Code); or (3) which is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made not less frequently than annually for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such taxpayer and his beneficiary. If a Policy becomes a MEC, distributions that occur during the Policy year will be taxed as distributions from a MEC. In addition, distributions from a Policy within two years before it becomes a MEC will be taxed in this manner. This means that a distribution made from a Policy that is not a MEC could later become taxable as a distribution from a MEC. If a Policy is not classified as a MEC, then any surrenders shall be treated first as a recovery of the investment in the Policy which would not be received as taxable income. However, if a distribution is the result of a reduction in benefits under the Policy within the first fifteen years after the Policy is issued in order to comply with Section 7702, such distribution will, under rules set forth in Section 7702, be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of income in the Policy. Loans from a Policy which is not classified as a MEC, will generally be treated as Indebtedness of the Owner and not a distribution. However, there is uncertainty as to loans from such a Policy after the 10th Policy year and you should consult a tax adviser as to the treatment of such loans. If your Policy is surrendered, cancelled, lapses, or is exchanged while any Policy loan is outstanding, the amount of the Policy loan plus accrued interest will be deemed to be distributed to you and could be partly or wholly taxable, depending on your particular circumstances. Cash distributed to you from the Policy in these circumstances may be insufficient to pay the tax attributable to any Policy loan. Interest payable on a loan under a Policy is generally not deductible. 5
N-6422nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 422nd
Policyowners should seek competent tax advice on the tax consequences of taking loans, distributions, exchanging or surrendering any Policy. MULTIPLE POLICIES. The Code further provides that multiple MECs that are issued within a calendar year period to the same owner by one company or its affiliates are treated as one MEC for purposes of determining the taxable portion of any loans or distributions. Such treatment may result in adverse tax consequences including more rapid taxation of the loans or distributed amounts from such combination of policies. You should consult a tax adviser prior to purchasing more than one MEC in any calendar year period. CONTINUATION OF POLICY BEYOND AGE 100. The tax consequences of continuing the Policy beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy) are unclear. You should consult a tax adviser if you intend to keep the Policy in force beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy). TAX TREATMENT OF POLICY SPLIT. The Split Policy Option Rider and the Divorce Split Rider permit a Policy to be split into two individual Policies. In general exercising either the Policy Split Rider or the Divorce Split Rider will be treated as a taxable transaction. It is not clear whether the individual Policies that result will be classified as Modified Endowment Contracts. A tax adviser should be consulted before exercising either rider. TAX TREATMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS. An assignment of a Policy or the change of ownership of a Policy may be a taxable event. You should therefore consult a competent tax adviser should you wish to assign or change the owner of your Policy. QUALIFIED PLANS. The Policies may be used in conjunction with certain Qualified Plans. Because the rules governing such use are complex and the amount of life insurance provided in connection with such plans may be limited, you should not do so until you have consulted a competent Qualified Plans consultant. INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING. All distributions or the portion thereof which is includible in gross income of the Policy owner are subject to Federal income tax withholding. However, in most cases you may elect not to have taxes withheld. You may be required to pay penalties under the estimated tax rules, if withholding and estimated tax payments are insufficient. LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASES BY NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Policy Owners that are not U.S. citizens or residents will generally be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax on taxable distributions from life insurance policies at a 30% rate, unless a lower treaty rate applies. In addition, Policy Owners may be subject to state and/or municipal taxes and taxes that may be imposed by the Policy Owner's country of citizenship or residence. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult with a qualified tax adviser regarding taxation with respect to a purchase of the Policy. BUSINESS USES OF POLICY. Businesses can use the Policies in various arrangements, including nonqualified deferred compensation or salary continuance plans, split dollar insurance plans, executive bonus plans, tax exempt and nonexempt welfare benefit plans, retiree medical benefit plans and others. The tax consequences of such plans may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances. If you are purchasing the Policy for any arrangement the value of which depends in part on its tax consequences, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. In the case of a business-owned Policy, the provisions of Section 101(j) of the Code may limit the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income unless a specified exception applies and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied, as discussed above. In recent years, moreover, Congress has adopted new rules relating to life insurance owned by businesses. Any business contemplating the purchase of a new Policy or a change in an existing Policy should consult a tax adviser. NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNERS AND BUSINESS BENEFICIARIES OF POLICIES. Ownership of the Policy by a corporation, trust or other non-natural person could jeopardize some (or all) of such entity's interest deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 264, even where such entity's indebtedness is in no way connected to the Policy. In addition, under Section 264(f)(5), if a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the Policy, the Policy could be treated as held by the business for purposes of the Section 264(f) entity-holder rules. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult with a qualified tax adviser before any non-natural person is made an Owner or holder of the Policy, or before a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is made a beneficiary of the Policy. SPLIT-DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS. The IRS and the Treasury Department have recently issued guidance that substantially affects split-dollar arrangements. You should 6
N-6423rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 423rd
consult a qualified tax adviser before entering into or paying additional premiums with respect to such arrangements. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on July 30, 2002, prohibits, with limited exceptions, publicly-traded companies, including non-U.S. companies that have securities listed on U.S. exchanges, from extending directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, many types of personal loans to their directors or executive officers. It is possible that this prohibition may be interpreted to apply to split-dollar life insurance arrangements for directors and executive officers of such companies, since such arrangements can arguably be viewed as involving a loan from the employer for at least some purposes. Any affected business contemplating the payments of a premium on an existing Policy or the purchase of a new Policy in connection with a split-dollar life insurance arrangement should consult legal counsel. Split dollar plans that provide deferred compensation may be subject to recently enacted rules governing deferred compensation arrangements. Failure to adhere to these rules will result in adverse tax consequences. A tax adviser should be consulted with respect to such plans. ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES. The transfer of the Policy or the designation of a beneficiary may have Federal, state, and/or local transfer and inheritance tax consequences, including the imposition of gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer taxes. When the insured dies, the death proceeds will generally be includable in the Policy Owner's estate for purposes of the Federal estate tax if the Policy Owner was the insured. If the Policy Owner was not the insured, the fair market value of the Policy would be included in the Policy Owner's estate upon the Policy Owner's death. The Policy would not be includable in the insured's estate if the insured neither retained incidents of ownership at death nor had given up ownership within three years before death. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code may impose a "generation-skipping transfer tax" when all or part of a life insurance policy is transferred to, or a death benefit is paid to, an individual two or more generations younger than the Policy Owner. Regulations issued under the Internal Revenue Code may require us to deduct the tax from your Policy, or from any applicable payment, and pay it directly to the IRS. Qualified tax advisers should be consulted concerning the estate and gift tax consequences of Policy ownership and distributions under Federal, state and local law. The individual situation of each Policy Owner or beneficiary will determine the extent, if any, to which Federal, state, and local transfer and inheritance taxes may be imposed and how ownership or receipt of Policy proceeds will be treated for purposes of Federal, state and local estate, inheritance, generation-skipping and other taxes. Under previous law, the estate tax applicable exclusion gradually rose to $3.5 million per person in 2009 and was repealed in 2010 with a modified carryover basis for heirs. The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 (the "2010 Act") has reinstated the estate and generation-skipping transfer taxes through the end of 2012 with lower top rates and larger exemptions. The 2010 Act raises the applicable exclusion amount to $5,000,000. The top tax rate is set at 35%. A special irrevocable election was provided for estates of decedents who died in 2010. These estates may generally choose between the reinstated estate tax and the carryover basis rules which were in effect in 2010. It is not known if Congress will make the temporary changes of the 2010 Act permanent, enact permanent repeal of the estate and the generation-skipping transfer taxes or otherwise modify the estate tax or generation-skipping transfer tax rules for years after 2012. The complexity of the tax law, along with uncertainty as to how it might be modified in coming years, underscores the importance of seeking guidance from a qualified adviser to help ensure that your estate plan adequately addresses your needs and those of your beneficiaries under all possible scenarios. TAX CREDITS AND DEDUCTIONS The Company may be entitled to certain tax benefits related to the assets of the Separate Account. These tax benefits, which may include foreign tax credits and corporate dividends received deductions, are not passed back to the Separate Account or to Policy Owners since the Company is the owner of the assets from which the tax benefits are derived. ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. There may also be an indirect tax on the income in the Policy or the proceeds of the Policy under the Federal corporate alternative minimum tax if the Owner is subject to that tax. 7
N-6424th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 424th
POSSIBLE TAX LAW CHANGES. Although the likelihood of legislative changes is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Policy could change by legislation or otherwise. Consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Policy. THE COMPANY'S INCOME TAXES. Under current Federal income tax law we are not taxed on the Separate Account's operations. Thus, currently we do not deduct a charge from the Separate Account for company Federal income taxes. (We do deduct a charge for Federal taxes from premiums.) We reserve the right to charge the Separate Account for any future Federal income taxes we may incur. Under current laws we may incur state and local taxes (in addition to premium taxes). These taxes are not now significant and we are not currently charging for them. If they increase, we may deduct charges for such taxes. 8
N-6425th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 425th
APPENDIX A PARTICIPATING INVESTMENT FUNDS INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Below is a listing of the investment advisers and subadvisers, if any, and the investment objectives of each investment fund available under the policy. The fund prospectuses contain more complete information, including a description of the investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL BE ACHIEVED. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES 1 SHARES): AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ING Clarion Real Estate Securities LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks total return through investment in real estate securities, emphasizing both capital appreciation and current income. INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Advisers, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LAZARD MID CAP PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lazard Asset Management LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ClearBridge Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a high total return. LORD ABBETT MID CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation through investments, primarily in equity securities, which are believed to be undervalued in the marketplace. MFS(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MFS(R) RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. 9
N-6426th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 426th
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. OPPENHEIMER CAPITAL APPRECIATION PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: OppenheimerFunds, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. PIMCO TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks maximum total return, consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc./1/ INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation by investing in common stocks believed to be undervalued. Income is a secondary objective. METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A): Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BLACKROCK BOND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a competitive total return primarily from investing in fixed-income securities. BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long term growth of capital and, secondarily, dividend income. T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC BOND OPPORTUNITIES PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Western Asset Management Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks to maximize total return consistent with preservation of capital. PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following portfolio is available under the policy: PUTNAM VT MULTI-CAP GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital appreciation. DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS. The following investment options are no longer available for allocations of premiums or transfers of cash value (excluding rebalancing and dollar cost averaging programs in existence at the time of closing): (a) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Government & Agency Securities VIP (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002); and (b) Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc.: BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) (added and closed effective May 1, 2009). Effective as of April 28, 2003, General American Money Market Fund was merged into the State Street Research Money Market Portfolio of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. and the following investment portfolios of the Met Investors Series Trust were merged: J.P. Morgan Enhanced Index Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio; J.P. Morgan International Equity Portfolio merged into the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio; and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Portfolio. Effective as of May 1, 2004, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Premier Equity Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income /1/ Prior to May 1, 2011, Lord Abbett & Co. LLC was the subadviser to the Portfolio. 10
N-6427th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 427th
Portfolio (Class A) of Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST"); (b) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: AllianceBernstein Premier Growth Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Janus Aggressive Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (c) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust (Class 1): Franklin Small Cap Fund was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. ("MSF"); and Mutual Shares Securities Fund was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (d) Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust ("GSVIT"): GSVIT Growth and Income Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and GSVIT International Equity Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (e) Liberty Variable Investments: the Newport Tiger Fund, Variable Series (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (f) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust (Initial Class): MFS(R) Research Series (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; MFS(R) Emerging Growth Series was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and the MFS(R) Strategic Income Series was replaced with the Salomon Brothers Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; (g) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (Initial Class): Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the State Street Research Bond Income Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and (h) Putnam Variable Trust (Class IA): Putnam VT New Value Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and the Putnam VT International New Opportunities Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST. Effective as of November 22, 2004, the J.P. Morgan Quality Bond Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the J.P. Morgan Select Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was closed. Effective as of May 1, 2005, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: the AllianceBernstein Real Estate Investment Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Neuberger Berman Real Estate Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (b) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust: the MFS(R) High Income Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust, the MFS(R) Investors Trust Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the MFS New Discovery Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust; (c) Putnam Variable Trust: the Putnam VT International Equity Fund (Class IA) was replaced with the MFS Research International Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (d) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds: the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA (Class A) (closed May 1, 2004) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; and (b) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Small Cap Growth VIP (Class A) was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the Met/Putnam Capital Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Lazard Mid-Cap Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 28, 2008, the Templeton Developing Markets Securities Fund (Class 1) of the Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust was replaced with the MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of May 4, 2009, the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. 11
N-6428th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 428th
Effective as of May 3, 2010, the Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of September 27, 2010, the Putnam VT Vista Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust merged into the Putnam VT Multi-Cap Growth Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust. 12
N-6429th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 429th
METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE SUPPLEMENT DATED MAY 1, 2010 TO PROSPECTUSES DATED MAY 1, 2001 AND NOVEMBER 9, 2009 (CUSTOM-SELECT FLEX VUL) This will supplement the prospectuses dated May 1, 2001 (as supplemented) and November 9, 2009 (as supplemented) for variable life insurance policies issued by Metlife Investors Variable Life Account One. The following information is provided with respect to the investment options available effective on and after May 1, 2010, under the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy (the "Policy") issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company. The corresponding sections of the prospectus are supplemented or modified as follows: EXPENSES .. DEDUCTIONS FROM THE INVESTMENT FUNDS MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE We are waiving an amount of the Mortality and Expense Risk Charge equal to the Investment Fund expenses that are in excess of 0.58% for cash value allocated to the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio. ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (as a percentage of average daily net assets) The following table describes the annual operating expenses for each Investment Fund for the year ended December 31, 2009, before and after any applicable contractual fee waivers and expense reimbursements: [Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ CONTRACTUAL DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE (12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES* EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS)--SERIES I ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund 0.71% -- 0.33% 0.02% 1.06% -- 1.06% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST-- CLASS 1 ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Templeton Foreign Securities Fund 0.64% -- 0.15% 0.02% 0.81% 0.01% 0.80%/1/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST-- CLASS A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio 0.64% -- 0.09% -- 0.73% -- 0.73% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.86% -- 0.04% -- 0.90% -- 0.90% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio 0.70% -- 0.04% -- 0.74% -- 0.74% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio 0.64% -- 0.03% -- 0.67% -- 0.67% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio 0.51% -- 0.04% -- 0.55% -- 0.55% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio 0.53% -- 0.03% -- 0.56% -- 0.56% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio 0.68% -- 0.08% -- 0.76% -- 0.76% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.99% -- 0.18% -- 1.17% -- 1.17% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUPP-510 VUL 1
N-6430th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 430th
[Enlarge/Download Table] ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- CONTRACTUAL DISTRIBUTION ACQUIRED TOTAL FEE WAIVER NET TOTAL AND/OR FUND FEES ANNUAL AND/OR ANNUAL MANAGEMENT SERVICE (12B-1) OTHER AND OPERATING EXPENSE OPERATING FEE FEES EXPENSES EXPENSES* EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENT EXPENSES** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- MFS(R) Research International Portfolio 0.71% -- 0.10% -- 0.81% -- 0.81% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 0.70% -- 0.20% -- 0.90% -- 0.90% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.07% -- 0.67% -- 0.67% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PIMCO Total Return Portfolio 0.48% -- 0.04% -- 0.52% -- 0.52% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC.-- CLASS A ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio 0.38% -- 0.05% -- 0.43% 0.03% 0.40%/2/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- BlackRock Money Market Portfolio 0.32% -- 0.02% -- 0.34% 0.01% 0.33%/3/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio 0.60% -- 0.07% -- 0.67% -- 0.67% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.51% -- 0.11% -- 0.62% -- 0.62% ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio 0.62% -- 0.07% -- 0.69% 0.04% 0.65%/4/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST--CLASS IA ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Putnam VT Vista Fund 0.59% -- 0.20% 0.01% 0.80% -- 0.80%/5/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- -------- * Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are fees and expenses incurred indirectly by a portfolio as a result of investing in shares of one or more underlying portfolios. ** Net Total Annual Operating Expenses do not reflect: (1) voluntary waivers of fees or expenses; (2) contractual waivers that are in effect for less than one year from the date of this Prospectus; or (3) expense reductions resulting from custodial fee credits or directed brokerage arrangements. /1/ The manager and administrator have agreed in advance to reduce their fees as a result of the Fund's investment in a Franklin Templeton money market fund ("Sweep Money Fund"). This reduction is required by the Trust's board of trustees and an exemptive order by the Securities and Exchange Commission; this arrangement will continue as long as the exemptive order is relied upon. /2/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2010 through April 30, 2011, to reduce the management fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.37% for the first $1 billion of the Portfolio's average daily net assets, 0.325% for amounts over $1 billion but less than $3.4 billion and 0.25% on amounts over $3.4 billion. /3/ MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2010 through April 30, 2011, to reduce the management fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.325% for the first $1 billion of the Portfolio's average daily net assets. Other Expenses do not reflect fees of 0.03% paid in connection with the U.S. Treasury Temporary Guarantee Program for Money Market Funds. /4/ MetLife Advisers, LLC, has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2010 through April 30, 2011, to reduce the management fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.595% for the first $500 million of the Portfolio's average daily net assets. /5/ Total Annual Operating Expenses reflect projected expenses under a new management contract effective January 1, 2010, changes in the Fund's investor servicing contract and a new expense arrangement, which gives effect to changes in the allocation of certain expenses among the Putnam funds. INVESTMENT FUNDS The Policy offers the investment funds which are listed below. Appendix A contains a summary of investment objectives and subadvisers, if any, for each investment fund. Additional investment funds may be available in the future. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESE FUNDS CAREFULLY. YOU CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES BY CALLING US AT 1-800-638-9294. YOU CAN ALSO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS (INCLUDING A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) BY ACCESSING THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES I SHARES) AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund (formerly AIM V.I. International Growth Fund) FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust currently consists of multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: Templeton Foreign Securities Fund MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A) Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers 2
N-6431st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 431st
to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio (formerly Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio) Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio Legg Mason ClearBridge Aggressive Growth Portfolio (formerly Legg Mason Partners Aggressive Growth Portfolio) Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Morgan Stanley Mid Cap Growth Portfolio (formerly Van Kampen Mid Cap Growth Portfolio) Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio PIMCO Total Return Portfolio METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A) Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA) Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Class IA portfolio is available under the policy: Putnam VT Vista Fund MARKET TIMING The following paragraph is modified: We have policies and procedures that attempt to detect and deter frequent transfers in situations where we determine there is a potential for arbitrage trading. Currently, we believe that such situations may be presented in the international, small-cap, and high-yield investment portfolios (i.e., the Invesco V.I. International Growth Fund, Templeton Foreign Securities Fund, Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio, Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio, MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio, MFS(R) Research International Portfolio, Invesco Small Cap Growth Portfolio, Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio and T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio) (the "Monitored Portfolios") and we monitor transfer activity in those Investment Funds. We employ various means to monitor transfer activity, such as examining the frequency and size of transfers into and out of the Monitored Portfolios within given periods of time. For example, we currently monitor transfer activity to determine if, for each category of international, small-cap, and high-yield investment fund, in a 12-month period there were, (1) six or more transfers involving the given category; (2) cumulative gross transfers involving the given category that exceed the current Cash Value; and (3) two or more "round-trips" involving any Monitored Portfolio in the given category. A round-trip generally is defined as a transfer in followed by a transfer out within the next seven calendar days or a transfer out followed by a transfer in within the next seven calendar days, in either case subject to certain other criteria. OTHER INFORMATION METLIFE INVESTORS The paragraph relating to the Insurance Marketplace Standards Association appearing in this subsection is deleted. DISTRIBUTOR The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority ("FINRA") provides background information about broker-dealers and their registered representatives through FINRA BrokerCheck. You may contact the FINRA BrokerCheck Hotline at 1-800-289-9999, or log on to www.finra.org. An investor brochure that includes information describing FINRA BrokerCheck is available through the Hotline or on-line. FEDERAL TAX STATUS NOTE: The following description is based upon our understanding of current Federal income tax law applicable to life insurance in general. We cannot predict the probability that any changes in such laws will be made. Purchasers are cautioned to seek competent tax advice regarding the possibility of such changes. Section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), defines the term "life insurance contract" for purposes of 3
N-6432nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 432nd
the Code. We believe that Single Life Policies issued on a standard underwriting basis should qualify as "life insurance contracts" under Section 7702. There is more uncertainty as to Single Life Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Survivor Policies. We do not guarantee the tax status of the Policies. Purchasers bear the complete risk that the Policies may not be treated as a "life insurance contract" under Federal income tax laws. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisers. It should be further understood that the following discussion is not exhaustive and that special rules not described in this prospectus may be applicable in certain situations. In general, however, the insurance proceeds payable on the death of the Insured will never be less than the minimum amount required for the Policy to be treated as life insurance under section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date the Policy was issued. INTRODUCTION. The discussion contained herein is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice. It does not purport to be complete or to address every situation. Each person concerned should consult a competent tax adviser. No attempt is made to consider any applicable state or other tax laws. Moreover, the discussion herein is based upon our understanding of current federal income tax laws as they are currently interpreted. No representation is made regarding the likelihood of continuation of those current federal income tax laws or of the current interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: The tax information contained herein is not intended to (and cannot) be used by anyone to avoid IRS penalties. It is intended to support the sale of the Policy. The Policy Owner should seek tax advice based on the Policy Owner's particular circumstances from an independent tax adviser. We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Code. For federal income tax purposes, the Separate Account is not a separate entity from us and its operations form a part of us. DIVERSIFICATION. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying assets of variable life insurance policies. The Code provides that a variable life insurance policy will not be treated as life insurance for any period (and any subsequent period) for which the investments are not, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the United States Treasury Department ("Treasury Department"), adequately diversified. Disqualification of the Policy as a life insurance contract would result in imposition of federal income tax to the Owner with respect to earnings allocable to the Policy prior to the receipt of payments under the Policy. We intend that each Investment Fund underlying the Policies will be managed by the managers in such a manner as to comply with these diversification requirements. If Investment Fund shares are sold directly to tax-qualified retirement plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, or to non-qualified plans, there may be adverse consequences under the diversification rules. INVESTOR CONTROL. In some circumstances, owners of variable contracts who retain excessive control over the investment of the underlying separate account assets may be treated as the owners of those assets. Although published guidance in this area does not address certain aspects of the Policies, we believe that the Owner of a Policy should not be treated as the owner of the Separate Account assets. We reserve the right to modify the Policies to bring them into conformity with applicable standards should such modification be necessary to prevent Owners of the Policies from being treated as the owners of the underlying Separate Account assets. TAX TREATMENT OF THE POLICY. The Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance contained in Section 7702 of the Code. Although some interim guidance has been provided and proposed regulations have been issued, final regulations have not been adopted. Section 7702 of the Code requires that the amount of mortality and other expense charges be reasonable. In establishing these charges, we have relied on interim IRS guidance. Currently, there is even less guidance as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis and Joint and Last Survivor Policies. Moreover, if you elect the Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, the continued tax qualification of the Policy after a distribution is made under the rider is unclear. While we have attempted to comply with Section 7702, the law in this area is very complex and unclear. There is a risk, therefore, that the Internal Revenue Service will not concur with our interpretations of Section 7702 that were made in determining such compliance. In the event the Policy is determined not to so comply, it would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment usually accorded life insurance policies. You should consult your own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of purchasing the Policy. The following discussion assumes that the Policy will satisfy Section 7702. POLICY PROCEEDS. The tax treatment accorded to loan proceeds and/or surrender payments from the policies will 4
N-6433rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 433rd
depend on whether the Policy is considered to be a MEC. (See "Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.") Otherwise, we believe that the Policy should receive the same Federal income tax treatment as any other type of life insurance. As such, the death benefit thereunder is generally excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary to the extent provided in Section 101(a) of the Code. Also, you are not deemed to be in constructive receipt of the Cash Surrender Value, including increments thereon, under a Policy until there is a distribution of such amounts. In the case of employer-owned life insurance as defined in Section 101(j), the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income is limited to premiums paid unless the Policy falls within certain specified exceptions and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied before the Policy is issued. Certain specified exceptions are based on the status of an employee as highly compensated or recently employed. There are also exceptions for Policy proceeds paid to an employee's heirs. These exceptions only apply if proper notice is given to the insured employee and consent is received from the insured employee before the issuance of the Policy. These rules apply to Policies issued August 18, 2006 and later and also apply to policies issued before August 18, 2006 after a material increase in the death benefit or other material change. An IRS reporting requirement applies to employer-owned life insurance subject to these rules. Because these rules are complex and will affect the tax treatment of death benefits, it is advisable to consult tax counsel. The death benefit will also be taxable in the case of a transfer-for-value unless certain exceptions apply. Federal, state and local estate, inheritance and other tax consequences of ownership, or receipt of Policy proceeds, depend on the circumstances of each owner or Beneficiary. TAX TREATMENT OF LOANS AND SURRENDERS. Section 7702A of the Code sets forth the rules for determining when a life insurance Policy will be deemed to be a MEC. A MEC is a contract which is entered into or materially changed on or after June 21, 1988 and fails to meet the 7-pay test. A Policy fails to meet the 7-pay test when the cumulative amount paid under the Policy at any time during the first 7 Policy years exceeds the sum of the net level premiums which would have been paid on or before such time if the Policy provided for paid-up future benefits after the payment of seven (7) level annual premiums. A material change would include any increase in the future benefits or addition of qualified additional benefits provided under a Policy unless the increase is attributable to: (1) the payment of premiums necessary to fund the lowest death benefit and qualified additional benefits payable in the first seven Policy years; or (2) the crediting of interest or other earnings with respect to such premiums. Certain changes in a Policy after it is issued could also cause it to fail to satisfy the 7-pay test and therefore to be classified as a MEC. Making additional payments, reducing the Policy's death benefit, reducing the Policy's benefits through a partial withdrawal, a change in death benefit option, and termination of benefits under a rider are examples of changes that could result in your Policy becoming classified as a MEC. Reducing the death benefit below the lowest death benefit provided by the Policy during the first seven years will probably cause the Policy to be classified as a MEC if such a reduction occurs during the first seven Policy years in the case of a Single Life Policy or at any time in the case of a Joint and Last Survivor Policy. Even if these events do not result in a Policy becoming classified as a MEC, they could reduce the amount that may be paid in the future without causing the Policy to be classified as a MEC. You should consult a tax adviser to determine whether a Policy transaction will cause your Policy to be classified as a MEC. Furthermore, any Policy received in exchange for a Policy classified as a MEC will be treated as a MEC regardless of whether it meets the 7-pay test. However, an exchange under Section 1035 of the Code of a life insurance Policy entered into before June 21, 1988 for the Policy will not cause the Policy to be treated as a MEC if no additional premiums are paid. Due to the flexible premium nature of the Policy, the determination of whether it qualifies for treatment as a MEC depends on the individual circumstances of each Policy. If the Policy is classified as a MEC, then any distribution (including the proceeds of any loan) is taxable to the extent of income in the Policy. Distributions are deemed to be on a last-in, first-out basis, which means the taxable income is distributed first. Distributions, including those resulting from surrender or lapse of the Policy, may also be subject to an additional 10% federal income tax penalty applied to the income portion of such distribution. The penalty shall not apply, however, to any distributions: (1) made on or after the date on which the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) which is attributable to the taxpayer becoming disabled (within the meaning of Section 72(m)(7) of the Code); or 5
N-6434th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 434th
(3) which is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made not less frequently than annually for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such taxpayer and his beneficiary. If a Policy becomes a MEC, distributions that occur during the Policy year will be taxed as distributions from a MEC. In addition, distributions from a Policy within two years before it becomes a MEC will be taxed in this manner. This means that a distribution made from a Policy that is not a MEC could later become taxable as a distribution from a MEC. If a Policy is not classified as a MEC, then any surrenders shall be treated first as a recovery of the investment in the Policy which would not be received as taxable income. However, if a distribution is the result of a reduction in benefits under the Policy within the first fifteen years after the Policy is issued in order to comply with Section 7702, such distribution will, under rules set forth in Section 7702, be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of income in the Policy. Loans from a Policy which is not classified as a MEC, will generally be treated as Indebtedness of the Owner and not a distribution. However, there is uncertainty as to loans from such a Policy after the 10th Policy year and you should consult a tax adviser as to the treatment of such loans. If your Policy is surrendered, cancelled, lapses, or is exchanged while any Policy loan is outstanding, the amount of the Policy loan plus accrued interest will be deemed to be distributed to you and could be partly or wholly taxable, depending on your particular circumstances. Cash distributed to you from the Policy in these circumstances may be insufficient to pay the tax attributable to any Policy loan. Interest payable on a loan under a Policy is generally not deductible. Policyowners should seek competent tax advice on the tax consequences of taking loans, distributions, exchanging or surrendering any Policy. MULTIPLE POLICIES. The Code further provides that multiple MECs that are issued within a calendar year period to the same owner by one company or its affiliates are treated as one MEC for purposes of determining the taxable portion of any loans or distributions. Such treatment may result in adverse tax consequences including more rapid taxation of the loans or distributed amounts from such combination of policies. You should consult a tax adviser prior to purchasing more than one MEC in any calendar year period. CONTINUATION OF POLICY BEYOND AGE 100. The tax consequences of continuing the Policy beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy) are unclear. You should consult a tax adviser if you intend to keep the Policy in force beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy). TAX TREATMENT OF POLICY SPLIT. The Split Policy Option Rider and the Divorce Split Rider permit a Policy to be split into two individual Policies. In general exercising either the Policy Split Rider or the Divorce Split Rider will be treated as a taxable transaction. It is not clear whether the individual Policies that result will be classified as Modified Endowment Contracts. A tax adviser should be consulted before exercising either rider. TAX TREATMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS. An assignment of a Policy or the change of ownership of a Policy may be a taxable event. You should therefore consult a competent tax adviser should you wish to assign or change the owner of your Policy. QUALIFIED PLANS. The Policies may be used in conjunction with certain Qualified Plans. Because the rules governing such use are complex and the amount of life insurance provided in connection with such plans may be limited, you should not do so until you have consulted a competent Qualified Plans consultant. INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING. All distributions or the portion thereof which is includible in gross income of the Policy owner are subject to Federal income tax withholding. However, in most cases you may elect not to have taxes withheld. You may be required to pay penalties under the estimated tax rules, if withholding and estimated tax payments are insufficient. LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASES BY NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Policy Owners that are not U.S. citizens or residents will generally be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax on taxable distributions from life insurance policies at a 30% rate, unless a lower treaty rate applies. In addition, Policy Owners may be subject to state and/or municipal taxes and taxes that may be imposed by the Policy Owner's country of citizenship or residence. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult with a qualified tax adviser regarding taxation with respect to a purchase of the Policy. 6
N-6435th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 435th
BUSINESS USES OF POLICY. Businesses can use the Policies in various arrangements, including nonqualified deferred compensation or salary continuance plans, split dollar insurance plans, executive bonus plans, tax exempt and nonexempt welfare benefit plans, retiree medical benefit plans and others. The tax consequences of such plans may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances. If you are purchasing the Policy for any arrangement the value of which depends in part on its tax consequences, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. In the case of a business-owned Policy, the provisions of Section 101(j) of the Code may limit the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income unless a specified exception applies and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied, as discussed above. In recent years, moreover, Congress has adopted new rules relating to life insurance owned by businesses. Any business contemplating the purchase of a new Policy or a change in an existing Policy should consult a tax adviser. NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNERS AND BUSINESS BENEFICIARIES OF POLICIES. Ownership of the Policy by a corporation, trust or other non-natural person could jeopardize some (or all) of such entity's interest deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 264, even where such entity's indebtedness is in no way connected to the Policy. In addition, under Section 264(f)(5), if a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the Policy, the Policy could be treated as held by the business for purposes of the Section 264(f) entity-holder rules. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult with a qualified tax adviser before any non-natural person is made an Owner or holder of the Policy, or before a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is made a beneficiary of the Policy. SPLIT-DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS. The IRS and the Treasury Department have recently issued guidance that substantially affects split-dollar arrangements. You should consult a qualified tax adviser before entering into or paying additional premiums with respect to such arrangements. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on July 30, 2002, prohibits, with limited exceptions, publicly-traded companies, including non-U.S. companies that have securities listed on U.S. exchanges, from extending directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, many types of personal loans to their directors or executive officers. It is possible that this prohibition may be interpreted to apply to split-dollar life insurance arrangements for directors and executive officers of such companies, since such arrangements can arguably be viewed as involving a loan from the employer for at least some purposes. Any affected business contemplating the payments of a premium on an existing Policy or the purchase of a new Policy in connection with a split-dollar life insurance arrangement should consult legal counsel. Split dollar plans that provide deferred compensation may be subject to recently enacted rules governing deferred compensation arrangements. Failure to adhere to these rules will result in adverse tax consequences. A tax adviser should be consulted with respect to such plans. ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES. The transfer of the Policy or the designation of a beneficiary may have Federal, state, and/or local transfer and inheritance tax consequences, including the imposition of gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer taxes. When the insured dies, the death proceeds will generally be includable in the Policy Owner's estate for purposes of the Federal estate tax if the Policy Owner was the insured. If the Policy Owner was not the insured, the fair market value of the Policy would be included in the Policy Owner's estate upon the Policy Owner's death. The Policy would not be includable in the insured's estate if the insured neither retained incidents of ownership at death nor had given up ownership within three years before death. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code may impose a "generation-skipping transfer tax" when all or part of a life insurance policy is transferred to, or a death benefit is paid to, an individual two or more generations younger than the Policy Owner. Regulations issued under the Internal Revenue Code may require us to deduct the tax from your Policy, or from any applicable payment, and pay it directly to the IRS. Qualified tax advisers should be consulted concerning the estate and gift tax consequences of Policy ownership and distributions under Federal, state and local law. The individual situation of each Policy Owner or beneficiary will determine the extent, if any, to which Federal, state, and local transfer and inheritance taxes may be imposed and how ownership or receipt of Policy proceeds will be treated for purposes of Federal, state and local estate, inheritance, generation-skipping and other taxes. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("EGTRRA") repeals the Federal estate tax and replaces it with a carryover basis income tax regime 7
N-6436th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 436th
effective for estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2009. EGTRRA also repeals the generation-skipping transfer tax, but not the gift tax, for transfers made after December 31, 2009. EGTRRA contains a sunset provision, which essentially returns the Federal estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes to their pre-EGTRRA form, beginning in 2011. During the period prior to 2010, EGTRRA provides for periodic decreases in the maximum estate tax rate coupled with periodic increases in the estate tax exemption. For 2007-2009, the maximum estate tax rate is 45%. The estate tax exemption is $2,000,000 for 2006-2008 and $3,500,000 in 2009. In general, the estate tax has been repealed for estates of decedents dying in 2010, but is scheduled to be reinstated in 2011 with an exemption of $1 million and a maximum rate of 55%. The generation-skipping transfer (GST) tax has also been repealed for 2010, and is scheduled to return in 2011, with an exemption of $1 million, plus inflation-indexed increases. During the repeal of the estate tax in 2010, the basis of assets received from a decedent generally will carry over from the decedent, rather than being stepped-up to date-of-death value. It is not known if Congress will enact permanent repeal of the estate and GST tax or will reinstate the estate tax or GST tax for 2010, and, if so, whether the reinstatement will be made retroactive to January 1, 2010. Please consult your tax adviser. The complexity of the tax law, along with uncertainty as to how it might be modified in 2010 and in coming years, underscores the importance of seeking guidance from a qualified adviser to help ensure that your estate plan adequately addresses your needs and those of your beneficiaries under all possible scenarios. TAX CREDITS AND DEDUCTIONS The Company may be entitled to certain tax benefits related to the assets of the Separate Account. These tax benefits, which may include foreign tax credits and corporate dividends received deductions, are not passed back to the Separate Account or to Policy Owners since the Company is the owner of the assets from which the tax benefits are derived. ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. There may also be an indirect tax on the income in the Policy or the proceeds of the Policy under the Federal corporate alternative minimum tax if the Owner is subject to that tax. POSSIBLE TAX LAW CHANGES. Although the likelihood of legislative changes is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Policy could change by legislation or otherwise. Consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Policy. THE COMPANY'S INCOME TAXES. Under current Federal income tax law we are not taxed on the Separate Account's operations. Thus, currently we do not deduct a charge from the Separate Account for company Federal income taxes. (We do deduct a charge for Federal taxes from premiums.) We reserve the right to charge the Separate Account for any future Federal income taxes we may incur. Under current laws we may incur state and local taxes (in addition to premium taxes). These taxes are not now significant and we are not currently charging for them. If they increase, we may deduct charges for such taxes. 8
N-6437th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 437th
APPENDIX A PARTICIPATING INVESTMENT FUNDS INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Below is a listing of the investment advisers and subadvisers, if any, and the investment objectives of each investment fund available under the policy. The fund prospectuses contain more complete information, including a description of the investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL BE ACHIEVED. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (INVESCO VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS) (SERIES 1 SHARES): AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Advisers, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: INVESCO V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ING Clarion Real Estate Securities LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks total return through investment in real estate securities, emphasizing both capital appreciation and current income. INVESCO SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Advisers, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LAZARD MID CAP PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lazard Asset Management LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LEGG MASON CLEARBRIDGE AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ClearBridge Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a high total return. LORD ABBETT GROWTH AND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital and income without excessive fluctuation in market value. LORD ABBETT MID CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation through investments primarily in equity securities which are believed to be undervalued in the marketplace. MFS(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. 9
N-6438th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 438th
MFS(R) RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MORGAN STANLEY MID CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Morgan Stanley Investment Management Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. OPPENHEIMER CAPITAL APPRECIATION PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: OppenheimerFunds, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. PIMCO TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks maximum total return, consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management. METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A): Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BLACKROCK BOND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a competitive total return primarily from investing in fixed-income securities. BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long term growth of capital and, secondarily, dividend income. T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC BOND OPPORTUNITIES PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Western Asset Management Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks to maximize total return consistent with preservation of capital. PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following portfolio is available under the policy: PUTNAM VT VISTA FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS. The following investment options are no longer available for allocations of premiums or transfers of cash value (excluding rebalancing and dollar cost averaging programs in existence at the time of closing): (a) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Government & Agency Securities VIP (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002); and (b) Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc.: BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) (added and closed effective May 1, 2009). Effective as of April 28, 2003, General American Money Market Fund was merged into the State Street Research Money Market Portfolio of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. and the following investment portfolios of the Met Investors Series Trust were merged: J.P. Morgan Enhanced Index Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio; J.P. Morgan International Equity Portfolio merged into the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio; and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Portfolio. Effective as of May 1, 2004, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Premier Equity Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST"); (b) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: AllianceBernstein Premier Growth Portfolio (Class A) was 10
N-6439th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 439th
replaced with the Janus Aggressive Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (c) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust (Class 1): Franklin Small Cap Fund was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. ("MSF"); and Mutual Shares Securities Fund was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (d) Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust ("GSVIT"): GSVIT Growth and Income Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and GSVIT International Equity Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (e) Liberty Variable Investments: the Newport Tiger Fund, Variable Series (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (f) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust (Initial Class): MFS(R) Research Series (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; MFS(R) Emerging Growth Series was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and the MFS(R) Strategic Income Series was replaced with the Salomon Brothers Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; (g) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (Initial Class): Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the State Street Research Bond Income Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and (h) Putnam Variable Trust (Class IA): Putnam VT New Value Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and the Putnam VT International New Opportunities Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST. Effective as of November 22, 2004, the J.P. Morgan Quality Bond Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the J.P. Morgan Select Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was closed. Effective as of May 1, 2005, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: the AllianceBernstein Real Estate Investment Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Neuberger Berman Real Estate Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (b) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust: the MFS(R) High Income Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust, the MFS(R) Investors Trust Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the MFS New Discovery Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust; (c) Putnam Variable Trust: the Putnam VT International Equity Fund (Class IA) was replaced with the MFS Research International Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (d) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds: the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA (Class A) (closed May 1, 2004) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; and (b) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Small Cap Growth VIP (Class A) was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the Met/Putnam Capital Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Lazard Mid-Cap Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 28, 2008, the Templeton Developing Markets Securities Fund (Class 1) of the Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust was replaced with the MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of May 4, 2009, the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. 11
N-6440th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 440th
Effective as of May 3, 2010, the Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund (Class IA) of the Putnam Variable Trust was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. 12
N-6441st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 441st
CUSTOM SELECT FLEXIBLE PREMIUM VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY ISSUED BY METLIFE INVESTORS INSURANCE COMPANY METLIFE INVESTORS VARIABLE LIFE ACCOUNT ONE NOVEMBER 9, 2009 This prospectus describes the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy offered by MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MetLife Investors", "we" or "us"). The prospectus describes all material features and benefits of the Policy. The language in the prospectus determines your rights under the federal securities laws. We have designed the Policy for use in estate and retirement planning and other insurance needs of individuals. The Policy provides for maximum flexibility by allowing you to vary your premium payments and to change the level of death benefits payable. You, the Policyowner, have a number of investment choices in the Policy. These investment choices include a General Account as well as the Investment Funds listed below which are offered through our Separate Account (you can invest in up to 15 of the Investment Funds and the General Account at any one time). When you purchase a Policy, you bear the complete investment risk. This means that the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy may increase and decrease depending upon the investment performance of the Investment Fund(s) you select. The duration of the Policy and, under some circumstances, the death benefit will increase and decrease depending upon investment performance. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (SERIES I SHARES): AIM V.I. International Growth Fund FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Templeton Foreign Securities Fund MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio Legg Mason Partners Aggressive Growth Portfolio Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio PIMCO Total Return Portfolio Van Kampen Mid Cap Growth Portfolio METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A): BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund Putnam VT Vista Fund Please read this prospectus before investing and keep it on file for future reference. It contains important information about the Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy. The Securities and Exchange Commission (the "Commission" or the "SEC") maintains a web site (http://www.sec.gov) that contains information regarding registrants that file electronically with the Commission. The Policy: .. is not a bank deposit. .. is not federally insured. .. is not endorsed by any bank or government agency. The Policy is subject to investment risk. You may be subject to loss of principal. The Policies described in this prospectus were originally issued under MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five. Effective November 9, 2009, we combined MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five with and into MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One. (See "The Separate Account"). WE ARE NOT OFFERING THE POLICIES DESCRIBED IN THIS PROSPECTUS TO NEW PURCHASERS. WE DO CONTINUE TO ACCEPT PREMIUM PAYMENTS FROM EXISTING OWNERS. THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION HAS NOT APPROVED OR DISAPPROVED THE POLICY OR DETERMINED THAT THIS PROSPECTUS IS ACCURATE OR COMPLETE. ANY REPRESENTATION THAT IT HAS IS A CRIMINAL OFFENSE. 1
N-6442nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 442nd
[Download Table] TABLE OF CONTENTS PAGE [Download Table] SPECIAL TERMS................................... 3 SUMMARY......................................... 4 The Variable Life Insurance Policy........... 4 Purchases.................................... 4 Investment Choices........................... 4 Expenses..................................... 4 Death Benefit................................ 7 Taxes........................................ 7 Access to Your Money......................... 7 Other Information............................ 8 Inquiries.................................... 8 PART I.......................................... 9 1. THE VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY........... 9 2. PURCHASES.................................... 9 Application for a Policy..................... 9 Premiums..................................... 9 Unscheduled Premiums......................... 9 Lapse and Grace Period....................... 9 Reinstatement................................ 10 Allocation of Premium........................ 10 Accumulation Account Value of Your Policy.... 10 Method of Determining Accumulation Account Value of an Investment Fund................. 10 Net Investment Factor........................ 11 Our Right to Reject or Return a Premium Payment..................................... 11 3. INVESTMENT FUNDS............................. 12 Substitution and Limitations on Further Investments................................. 13 Transfers.................................... 13 Dollar Cost Averaging........................ 15 Portfolio Rebalancing........................ 15 Approved Asset Allocation Programs........... 16 4. EXPENSES..................................... 16 Tax Charges.................................. 17 Sales Charge................................. 17 Selection and Issue Expense Charge........... 17 Monthly Policy Charge........................ 17 Monthly Cost of Insurance Charge............. 17 Charges for Additional Benefit Riders........ 18 Mortality and Expense Risk Charge............ 18 Surrender Charge............................. 18 Transaction Charges.......................... 19 Investment Fund Expenses..................... 19 5. DEATH BENEFIT................................ 19 Change of Death Benefit...................... 20 Change in Face Amount........................ 20 6. TAXES........................................ 20 Life Insurance in General.................... 21 Taking Money Out of Your Policy.............. 21 Diversification.............................. 21 [Download Table] PAGE [Download Table] 7. ACCESS TO YOUR MONEY................................. 21 Policy Loans......................................... 21 Loan Interest Charged................................ 22 Security............................................. 22 Repaying Policy Debt................................. 22 Partial Withdrawals.................................. 22 Pro-Rata Surrender................................... 23 Full Surrenders...................................... 23 8. OTHER INFORMATION.................................... 24 MetLife Investors.................................... 24 Distribution......................................... 25 The Separate Account................................. 25 The General Account.................................. 25 Suspension of Payments or Transfers.................. 25 Ownership............................................ 26 Adjustment of Charges................................ 26 PART II................................................. 26 Executive Officers and Directors..................... 26 Voting............................................... 27 Disregard of Voting Instructions..................... 28 Our Right to Contest................................. 28 Additional Benefits.................................. 28 Federal Tax Status................................... 29 Introduction....................................... 29 Diversification.................................... 29 Tax Treatment of the Policy........................ 30 Policy Proceeds.................................... 30 Employer-Owned Life Insurance...................... Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.............. 30 Multiple Policies.................................. 31 Tax Treatment of Assignments....................... 32 Qualified Plans.................................... 32 Income Tax Withholding............................. 32 Life Insurance Purchases by Nonresident Aliens and Foreign Corporations.......................... 32 Business Uses of Policy............................ 32 Non-Individual Owners and Business Beneficiaries of Policies......................... 32 Split-Dollar Arrangements.......................... 32 Estate, Gift and Generation-Skipping Transfer Taxes............................................. 33 Foreign Tax Credits................................ Alternative Minimum Tax............................ 33 Possible Tax Law Changes........................... 33 The Company's Income Taxes......................... 33 Reports to Owners.................................... 33 Legal Proceedings.................................... 33 Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm........ 34 Financial Statements................................. 35 APPENDIX A.............................................. A-1 Participating Investment Funds....................... A-1 2
N-6443rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 443rd
SPECIAL TERMS We have tried to make this prospectus as readable and understandable for you as possible. However, by the very nature of the Policy certain technical words or terms are unavoidable. We have identified some of these terms and provided you with a definition. ACCUMULATION ACCOUNT VALUE -- The total of the amounts credited to the Owner in the Separate Account, the General Account and the Loan Account. ATTAINED AGE -- The Issue Age of the Insured plus the number of completed Policy years. BENEFICIARY -- The person(s) named in the application or by later designation to receive Policy proceeds in the event of the Insured's death. A Beneficiary may be changed as set forth in the Policy and this prospectus. CASH SURRENDER VALUE -- The Accumulation Account Value of a Policy on the date of surrender, less any Indebtedness, less any unpaid selection and issue expense charge due for the remainder of the first Policy year, less any unpaid monthly Policy charge due for the remainder of the first Policy year, and less any surrender charge. FACE AMOUNT -- The minimum death benefit under the Policy so long as the Policy remains in force before the Insured's Attained Age 100. GENERAL ACCOUNT -- Our assets other than those allocated to the Separate Account or any other separate account. INDEBTEDNESS -- The sum of all unpaid Policy loans and accrued interest on loans. INSURED -- The person whose life is insured under the Policy. INVESTMENT FUNDS -- Investments within the Separate Account which we make available under the Policy. INVESTMENT START DATE -- The date the initial premium is applied to the General Account and/or the Investment Funds. This date is the later of the Issue Date or the date the initial premium is received at our Service Office. ISSUE AGE -- The age of the Insured at his or her nearest birthday as of the Issue Date. ISSUE DATE -- The date as of which insurance coverage begins under a Policy. It is also the date from which Policy anniversaries, Policy years, and Policy months are measured. It is the Effective Date of coverage under the Policy. LOAN ACCOUNT -- The account of MetLife Investors to which amounts securing Policy Loans are allocated. The Loan Account is part of MetLife Investors' General Account. LOAN SUBACCOUNT -- A Loan Subaccount has been established for the General Account and for each Investment Fund. Any Accumulation Account Value transferred to the Loan Account will be allocated to the appropriate Loan Subaccount to reflect the origin of the Accumulation Account Value. At any point in time, the Loan Account will equal the sum of all the Loan Subaccounts. MONTHLY ANNIVERSARY -- The same date in each succeeding month as the Issue Date except that whenever the Monthly Anniversary falls on a date other than a Valuation Date, the Monthly Anniversary will be deemed the next Valuation Date. If any Monthly Anniversary would be the 29th, 30th, or 31st day of a month that does not have that number of days, then the Monthly Anniversary will be the last day of that month. NET PREMIUM -- The premium paid, less the premium tax charge, less the Federal tax charge, less the sales charge. OWNER -- The owner of a Policy, as designated in the application or as subsequently changed. POLICY -- The flexible premium variable life insurance Policy offered by us and described in this prospectus. PRO-RATA SURRENDER -- A requested reduction of both the Face Amount and the Accumulation Account Value by a given percentage. SEPARATE ACCOUNT -- MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One, a separate investment account established by MetLife Investors to receive and invest the Net Premiums paid under the Policy, and certain other variable life policies, and allocated by you to provide variable benefits. SERVICE OFFICE -- MetLife Investors Insurance Company, P.O. Box 358, Warwick, RI 02887-0358. TARGET PREMIUM -- A premium calculated when a Policy is issued, based on the Insured's age, sex (except in unisex policies) and risk class. The Target Premium is used to calculate the first year's premium expense charge, the surrender charge, and agent compensation under the Policy. 3
N-6444th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 444th
VALUATION DATE -- Each day that the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) is open for trading and MetLife Investors is open for business. MetLife Investors is open for business every day that the NYSE is open for trading. VALUATION PERIOD -- The period between two successive Valuation Dates, commencing at the close of the NYSE (usually 4:00 p.m. Eastern Standard Time) on a Valuation Date and ending with the close of the NYSE on the next succeeding Valuation Date. THE PROSPECTUS IS DIVIDED INTO THREE SECTIONS: THE SUMMARY, PART I AND PART II. THE SECTIONS IN THE SUMMARY CORRESPOND TO SECTIONS IN PART I OF THIS PROSPECTUS WHICH DISCUSS THE TOPICS IN MORE DETAIL. PART II CONTAINS EVEN MORE DETAILED INFORMATION. SUMMARY 1. THE VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY The variable life insurance Policy is a contract between you, the Owner, and us, an insurance company. The Policy provides for the payment of a death benefit to your selected Beneficiary upon the death of the person Insured. This death benefit is distributed free from Federal income taxes. The Policy can be used as part of your estate planning or used to save for retirement. The Insured is the person you choose to have insured under the Policy. You, the Owner, can be the Insured, but you do not have to be. The Policy described in this prospectus is a flexible premium variable life insurance Policy. The Policy is "flexible" because: .. the frequency and amount of premium payments can vary; .. you can choose between death benefit options; and .. you can change the amount of insurance coverage. The Policy is "variable" because the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy, when allocated to the Investment Funds, may increase or decrease depending upon the investment results of the selected Investment Funds. The duration of your Policy may vary and, under certain circumstances, so may your death benefit. So long as the Insured is alive, you can surrender the Policy for all or part of its Cash Surrender Value. You may also obtain a Policy loan, using the Policy as security. We will pay a death benefit when the Insured dies. We make available a number of riders to meet a variety of your estate planning needs. The minimum Face Amount of insurance that we offer is $50,000. 2. PURCHASES We no longer offer the Policy to new purchasers. We do continue to accept premium payments from existing Owners. You purchase the Policy by completing the proper forms. Your registered representative can help you. In some circumstances, we may contact you for additional information regarding the Insured. We may require the Insured to provide us with medical records, a physician's statement or a complete paramedical examination. The minimum initial premium we accept is computed for you based on the Face Amount you request. The Policy is designed for the payment of subsequent premiums. You can establish planned annual premiums. The minimum subsequent premium that we accept is $10. 3. INVESTMENT CHOICES You can put your money in our General Account or in any or all of the Investment Funds. However, you can only put your money in up to 15 of the Investment Funds and the General Account at any one time. A brief description of the Investment Funds is contained in Appendix A and a detailed description of the Investment Funds, their investment policies, restrictions, risks, and charges is contained in the prospectuses for each Investment Fund. You should read the Fund prospectuses carefully. 4. EXPENSES We make certain deductions from your premiums, your Accumulation Account Value and from the Investment Funds. These deductions are made for taxes, mortality and expense risks, administrative expenses, sales charges, the cost of providing life insurance protection and for the cost associated with the management and investment operations of the Investment Funds. These deductions are summarized as follows: .. DEDUCTIONS FROM EACH PREMIUM PAYMENT. TAX CHARGES. We currently deduct 1.3% of each premium payment to pay the Federal Tax Charge. We also deduct a Premium Tax Charge currently equal to 2.35% to pay the state and local premium taxes. 4
N-6445th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 445th
SALES CHARGE. The Sales Charge, which is also referred to as the percent of premium charge, is determined as follows: (1)in the first Policy year, 15% of the amount you pay up to the Target Premium, and 5% of the amount you pay over the Target Premium; (2)in the 2nd through 10th Policy years, 5% of the actual premium you pay; and (3)in the 11th Policy year and later, 2% of the actual premium you pay. .. MONTHLY DEDUCTIONS FROM YOUR ACCUMULATION ACCOUNT VALUE. SELECTION AND ISSUE EXPENSE CHARGE. During the first 10 Policy years, we assess a charge of up to 1% per $1000 of Face Amount. This charge varies by Issue Age, risk class and sex (except in unisex policies) of the Insured. MONTHLY POLICY CHARGE. This charge is equal to $25 per month for the first policy year, and $6 per policy month thereafter. This amount is deducted from the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the Investment Start Date and each Monthly Anniversary date. MONTHLY COST OF INSURANCE. This amount is deducted monthly from your Accumulation Account Value on the Investment Start Date and each Monthly Anniversary date. The amount of the deduction varies with the age, sex (except in unisex policies), risk class of the Insured, duration and the amount of death benefit at risk. CHARGES FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFIT RIDERS. On each Monthly Anniversary date, the amount of the charge, if any, for additional benefit riders is determined in accordance with the rider and is shown on the specifications page of your Policy. .. DEDUCTIONS FROM THE INVESTMENT FUNDS. MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE. This risk charge is guaranteed not to exceed, on an annual basis, 0.55% of the average value of each of your Investment Funds and is deducted each Valuation Date. The current risk charge depends on the number of years your Policy has been in force and is as follows: [Download Table] Years Daily Charge Factor Annual Equivalent ----- ------------------- ----------------- 1-10 .0015027% 0.55% 11-20 .0012301% 0.45% 21+ .0009572% 0.35% This deduction is guaranteed not to increase while the Policy is in force. We will not increase the mortality and expense risk charge to .55% in years 11 and beyond. 5
N-6446th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 446th
ANNUAL OPERATING EXPENSES (as a percentage of average daily net assets) The following table describes the annual operating expenses for each Investment Fund for the year ended December 31, 2008: [Enlarge/Download Table] ACQUIRED FEE WAIVERS NET FUND FEES TOTAL AND TOTAL MANAGEMENT OTHER 12B-1 AND ANNUAL EXPENSE ANNUAL FEES EXPENSES FEES EXPENSES* EXPENSES REIMBURSEMENTS EXPENSES** ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE INSURANCE FUNDS (SERIES I SHARES) AIM V.I. International Growth Fund 0.71% 0.35% -- 0.02% 1.08% -- 1.08%(1) FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Templeton Foreign Securities Fund 0.64% 0.15% -- 0.02% 0.81% -- 0.81%(2) MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST -- CLASS A Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio 0.63% 0.06% -- -- 0.69% -- 0.69% Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio 0.69% 0.05% -- -- 0.74% -- 0.74%(3) Legg Mason Partners Aggressive Growth Portfolio 0.63% 0.02% -- -- 0.65% -- 0.65% Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio 0.50% 0.03% -- -- 0.53% -- 0.53% Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio 0.50% 0.03% -- -- 0.53% -- 0.53% Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio 0.68% 0.07% -- -- 0.75% -- 0.75%(4) Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.86% 0.03% -- -- 0.89% -- 0.89% MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio 0.98% 0.13% -- -- 1.11% -- 1.11% MFS(R) Research International Portfolio 0.70% 0.07% -- -- 0.77% -- 0.77% Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio 0.59% 0.03% -- -- 0.62% -- 0.62% PIMCO Total Return Portfolio 0.48% 0.04% -- -- 0.52% -- 0.52% Van Kampen Mid Cap Growth Portfolio 0.70% 0.19% -- -- 0.89% -- 0.89%(5) METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. -- CLASS A BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio 0.38% 0.05% -- -- 0.43% -- 0.43%(6) BlackRock Money Market Portfolio 0.32% 0.02% -- -- 0.34% -- 0.34%(7) T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio 0.60% 0.07% -- -- 0.67% -- 0.67% T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio 0.51% 0.08% -- -- 0.59% -- 0.59% Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio 0.60% 0.05% -- -- 0.65% -- 0.65% PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST -- CLASS IA Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund 0.53% 0.07% -- -- 0.60% -- 0.60%(8) Putnam VT Vista Fund 0.65% 0.15% -- 0.01% 0.81% -- 0.81% -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- * Acquired Fund Fees and Expenses are fees and expenses incurred indirectly by a portfolio as a result of investing in shares of one or more underlying portfolios. ** Net Total Annual Operating Expenses do not reflect: (1) voluntary waivers of fees or expenses; (2) contractual waivers that are in effect for less than one year from the date of this Prospectus; or (3) expense reductions resulting from custodial fee credits or directed brokerage arrangements. (1) The Fund's advisor has contractually agreed, through at least April 30, 2010, to waive the advisory fee payable by the Fund in an amount equal to 100% of the net advisory fees Invesco Aim receives from affiliated money market funds on investments by the Fund of uninvested cash (excluding investments of cash allocated from securities lending) in such affiliated money market funds. The Fee Waiver reflects this agreement. (2) The manager has agreed in advance to reduce its fee from assets invested by the Fund in a Franklin Templeton money market fund (the Sweep Money Fund which is the "acquired fund" in this case) to the extent of the Fund's fees and expenses of the acquired fund. This reduction is required by the Trust's board of trustees and an exemptive order by the Securities and Exchange Commission; this arrangement will continue as long as the exemptive order is relied upon. (3) Other Expenses include 0.02% of deferred expense reimbursement from a prior period. (4) Other Expenses include 0.03% of deferred expense reimbursement from a prior period. (5) Other Expenses include 0.08% of deferred expense reimbursement from a prior period. (6) MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010, to reduce the management fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.325% for the Portfolio's average daily net assets in excess of $1 billion but less than $2 billion. (7) MetLife Advisers, LLC has contractually agreed, for the period May 1, 2009 through April 30, 2010, to reduce the management fee for each Class of the Portfolio to the annual rate of 0.345% for the first $500 million of the Portfolio's average daily net assets and 0.335% for the next $500 million. Other Expenses include Treasury Guarantee Program expenses of 0.012% incurred for the period September 19, 2008 through December 31, 2008. (8) Other Expenses include estimated expenses attributable to the fund's investments in other investment companies that the fund bears indirectly. 6
N-6447th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 447th
.. DEDUCTIONS FOR SURRENDERS, PARTIAL WITHDRAWALS AND TRANSFERS. SURRENDER CHARGE. A Surrender Charge may be deducted in the event you make a full or partial withdrawal of your Policy. If you surrender your Policy or let it lapse during the first ten Policy years, we will keep part of the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy to help us recover the costs of selling and issuing the Policy. The Surrender Charge is 45% of the Target Premium if you surrender the Policy or let it lapse during the first five Policy years. Afterwards, the amount of the Surrender Charge goes down each month. After the 10th Policy year there is no charge. A Surrender Charge will apply to any decrease in Face Amount. There is a table in your Policy that shows the amount of the Target Premium and the percentage of the Surrender Charge for each month. If you make a partial withdrawal from your Policy, we will charge a pro-rated portion of the Surrender Charge. There may also be a Partial Withdrawal Fee charged. PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL FEE AND TRANSFER FEE. The first 12 requested transfers or partial withdrawals in a Policy year are free. For each partial withdrawal or transfer in excess of 12 in a Policy year, there is a fee assessed which is currently equal to $25. 5. DEATH BENEFIT The amount of the death benefit depends on: .. the Face Amount of your Policy; .. the death benefit option in effect at the time of the Insured's death; and .. under some circumstances the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy. There are three death benefit options: Option A, Option B and Option C. If death benefit Option A is in effect, the death benefit is the greater of your total Face Amount in effect or the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the date of the Insured's death multiplied by the applicable factor. Under this option, the amount of the death benefit is fixed, except when we use the factor to determine the benefit percentage. If death benefit Option B is in effect, the death benefit is the greater of your total Face Amount in effect plus the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy, or the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy multiplied by the applicable factor. Under this option, the amount of the death benefit is variable (but will never be less than the Face Amount). If death benefit Option C is in effect, the death benefit is the greater of your total Face Amount in effect or the Accumulation Account Value multiplied by an Attained Age factor. So long as the Policy remains in force, prior to the Insured's Attained Age 100, the minimum death benefit will be at least the current Face Amount. Under certain circumstances you can change death benefit options. You can also change the Face Amount under certain circumstances. At the time of application for a Policy, you designate a Beneficiary who is the person or persons who will receive the death proceeds. You can change your Beneficiary unless you have designated an irrevocable Beneficiary. The Beneficiary does not have to be a natural person. 6. TAXES Your Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance in the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, the death proceeds paid under the Policy should be excludable from the gross income of your Beneficiary. However, estate taxes may apply. Any earnings in your Policy are not taxed until you take them out. The tax treatment of the loan proceeds and surrender proceeds will depend on whether the Policy is considered a Modified Endowment Contract (MEC). Proceeds taken out of a MEC are considered to come from earnings first and are includible in taxable income. If you are younger than 59 1/2 when you take money out of a MEC, you may also be subject to a 10% Federal tax penalty on the earnings withdrawn. 7. ACCESS TO YOUR MONEY You can terminate your Policy at any time during the lifetime of the Insured and we will pay you the Cash Surrender Value of your Policy. At any time during the 7
N-6448th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 448th
Insured's lifetime and before the Policy has terminated, you may withdraw a part of your Accumulation Account Value subject to the requirements of the Policy. When you terminate your Policy or make a partial withdrawal, a surrender charge and partial withdrawal fee may be assessed. You can also borrow against the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy. 8. OTHER INFORMATION FREE LOOK. You can cancel the Policy within 20 days after you receive it or the 45th day after you sign your application, whichever period ends later. We will refund all premiums paid. If you are 60 years or older on the Issue Date, you can cancel your Policy within 30 days after you receive it in which case we will refund your Policy's Account Value plus fees and charges (i.e., premium tax charge, Federal tax charge, selection and issue expense charge, cost of insurance, monthly Policy charge, percent of premium charge and mortality and expense risk charge) deducted from the Account Value as of the day we receive your returned Policy. Upon completion of the underwriting process, we will allocate your initial Net Premium to the Money Market until the reallocation date, which occurs upon the expiration of the free look period. After that, we will invest your Policy's Accumulation Account Value and any subsequent premiums as you requested. WHO SHOULD PURCHASE THE POLICY? The Policy is designed for individuals and businesses that have a need for death protection but who also desire to potentially increase the values in their policies through investment in the Investment Funds. The Policy offers the following to individuals: .. create or conserve one's estate; .. supplement retirement income; and .. access to funds through loans and surrenders. If you currently own a variable life insurance policy on the life of the Insured, you should consider whether the purchase of the Policy is appropriate. Also, you should carefully consider whether the Policy should be used to replace an existing Policy on the life of the Insured. ADDITIONAL FEATURES. The following additional features are offered: .. you can arrange to have a regular amount of money automatically transferred from the BlackRock Money Market Portfolio to selected Investment Funds each month, theoretically giving you a lower average cost per unit over time than a single one time purchase. We call this feature Dollar Cost Averaging. .. you can arrange to automatically readjust your Accumulation Account Value between Investment Funds periodically to keep the allocation you select. We call this feature Portfolio Rebalancing. .. we also offer a number of additional riders that are common to life insurance policies. Consult your registered representative regarding the availability of these features and riders. 9. INQUIRIES If you need more information about purchasing a Policy, or if you need Policyowner service (such as changes in Policy information, inquiry into Policy values, or to make a loan), please contact us at our Service Office: MetLife Life Administration - Equity Products P.O. Box 358 Warwick, RI 02887-0358 (800) 638-9294 8
N-6449th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 449th
PART I 1. THE VARIABLE LIFE INSURANCE POLICY The variable life insurance Policy is a contract between you, the Owner, and us, an insurance company. This kind of Policy is most commonly used for retirement planning and/or estate planning. The Policy provides for life insurance coverage on the Insured. It has an Accumulation Account Value, a death benefit, surrender rights, loan privileges and other characteristics associated with traditional and universal life insurance. However, since the Policy is a variable life insurance policy, the value of your Policy will increase or decrease depending upon the investment experience of the Investment Funds you choose. The duration or amount of the death benefit may also vary based on the investment performance of the underlying Investment Funds. To the extent you select any of the Investment Funds, you bear the investment risk. If your Accumulation Account Value less any loans, loan interest accrued, unpaid selection and issue charge due for the remainder of the first Policy year and, if surrender charges and any Partial Withdrawal Fee are insufficient to pay the monthly deductions, the Policy may terminate. Because the Policy is like traditional and universal life insurance, it provides a death benefit which is paid to your named Beneficiary. When the Insured dies, the death proceeds are paid to your Beneficiary which should be excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary. The tax-free death proceeds make this an excellent way to accumulate money you do not think you will use in your lifetime. It is also a tax-efficient way to provide for those you leave behind. If you need access to your money, you can borrow from the Policy, make a total surrender or a partial withdrawal. 2. PURCHASES APPLICATION FOR A POLICY We no longer offer the Policy to new purchasers. We do continue to accept premium payment from existing Owners. In order to purchase a Policy, you must submit an application to us that requests information about the proposed Insured. In some cases, we will ask for additional information. We may request that the proposed Insured provide us with medical records, a physician's statement or possibly require other medical tests. PREMIUMS Before coverage begins under a Policy, the application and the premium must be in good order as determined by our administrative rules. You may receive a copy of a Policy before that time for examination but there will be no coverage. Each premium after the initial premium must be at least $10. The Policy is not designed for professional market timing organizations, other entities, or persons using programmed, large, or frequent transfers. You can establish a schedule of planned premiums. We will send you billing notices for these premium payments. A failure to pay such a premium payment will not itself cause the Policy to lapse. If you send premium payments or transaction requests to an address other than the one we have designated for receipt of such payments or requests, we may return the premium payment to you, or there may be a delay applying the payment or transaction to your Policy. UNSCHEDULED PREMIUMS You can make additional unscheduled premium payments at any time while the Policy is in force. However, in order to preserve the favorable tax status of the Policy, we may limit the amount of the premiums and may return any premiums that exceed the limits stated under the Internal Revenue Code. If MetLife Investors receives a premium payment which would cause the death benefit to increase by an amount that exceeds the Net Premium portion of the payment, then MetLife Investors reserves the right to: (1)refuse that premium payment; or (2)require additional evidence of insurability before it accepts the premium. LAPSE AND GRACE PERIOD During the first 5 Policy years, your Policy will not lapse if the Cash Surrender Value of your Policy is insufficient to pay for the monthly deductions when: .. the sum of all premiums paid on the Policy (reduced by any partial withdrawals and any outstanding loan balance) is at least equal to the sum of the No Lapse Monthly Premiums for the elapsed months since the Issue Date. The No Lapse Monthly Premium amount is found on the specifications page of your Policy. This amount may be modified if you change your Face Amount, make a change 9
N-6450th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 450th
in the premium class of the Insured within 5 years of the Issue Date, or if there is an addition or deletion of a rider. Lapse will occur if: .. the Cash Surrender Value is not sufficient to cover the monthly deduction (except for reasons stated above); .. the sum of all the premiums you paid into the Policy (reduced by any partial withdrawal or any outstanding loan balance) is less than the No Lapse Monthly Premium; and .. a grace period expires without a sufficient premium payment. When a Policy is about to terminate, the Policy provides a grace period in order for you to make a premium payment or a loan repayment to keep your Policy in force. The grace period, which is 62 days, begins on the Monthly Anniversary on which the Cash Surrender Value is insufficient to meet the next monthly deduction. We will notify you by mail of the amount of additional premium that must be paid to keep the Policy from terminating. If we do not receive the required amount within the grace period, the Policy will lapse and terminate without Accumulation Account Value. If the Insured dies during the grace period, any overdue monthly deductions will be deducted from the death benefit otherwise payable. REINSTATEMENT If your Policy terminated at the end of a grace period, you can request that we reinstate it (restore your insurance coverage) anytime within 5 years after its termination. To reinstate your Policy you must: .. submit a written request for reinstatement; .. submit proof satisfactory to us that the Insured is still insurable at the risk class that applies for the latest Face Amount portion then in effect; .. pay a Net Premium large enough to cover the monthly deductions that were due at the time of lapse and 2 times the monthly deduction due at the time of reinstatement; and .. pay an amount large enough to cover any loan interest due and unpaid at the time of lapse. The reinstatement date is the date on or following the day we approve the application for reinstatement. The Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the reinstatement date is equal to: .. the amount of any Policy loan reinstated; .. increased by the Net Premiums paid at reinstatement, any Policy loan paid at the time of reinstatement, and the amount of any surrender charge paid at the time of lapse. The Policy may not be reinstated if it has been surrendered or if the Insured dies before the reinstatement date. There will be a full monthly deduction for the Policy month which includes the reinstatement date. ALLOCATION OF PREMIUM When we receive a premium from you, we deduct: .. a Tax Charge for premium taxes and Federal taxes; and .. a Sales Charge. The premium less these charges is referred to as the Net Premium. Your Net Premium is allocated to the General Account or one or more of the Investment Funds, as selected by you. When we issue you a Policy, we automatically allocate your initial premium to the money market Investment Fund. Once the free look period expires, the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy is allocated to the General Account and/or the Investment Funds in accordance with your selections requested in the application. For any chosen allocation, the percentages must be in whole numbers. This allocation is not subject to the transfer fee provision. However, we reserve the right to limit the number of selections that you may invest in at any one time. ACCUMULATION ACCOUNT VALUE OF YOUR POLICY The Accumulation Account Value equals the sum of the amounts in the General Account, the Investment Funds you have selected, and the Loan Account. METHOD OF DETERMINING ACCUMULATION ACCOUNT VALUE OF AN INVESTMENT FUND The value of your Policy will go up or down depending upon the investment performance of the Investment Fund(s) you choose and the charges and deductions made against your Policy. The Accumulation Account Value of the Investment Funds is determined for each Valuation Period. When we apply your initial premium to an Investment Fund, the Accumulation Account Value equals the Net Premium allocated to the Investment Fund, minus the monthly deduction(s) due from the Issue Date through the 10
N-6451st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 451st
Investment Start Date. Thereafter, on each Valuation Date, the Accumulation Account Value in an Investment Fund will equal: (1) The Accumulation Account Value in the Investment Fund on the preceding Valuation Date, multiplied by the Investment Fund's Net Investment Factor (defined below) for the current Valuation Period; plus (2) Any Net Premium payments received during the current Valuation Period which are allocated to the Investment Fund; plus (3) Any loan repayments allocated to the Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period; plus (4) Any amounts transferred to the Investment Fund from the General Account or from another Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period; plus (5) That portion of the interest credited on outstanding loans which is allocated to the Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period; minus (6) Any amounts transferred from the Investment Fund to the General Account, Loan Account, or to another Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period (including any transfer charges); minus (7) Any partial withdrawals from the Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period; minus (8) Any withdrawal due to a Pro-Rata Surrender from the Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period; minus (9) Any withdrawal or surrender charges incurred during the current Valuation Period attributed to the Investment Fund in connection with a partial withdrawal or Pro-Rata Surrender; minus (10)If a Monthly Anniversary occurs during the current Valuation Period, the portion of the monthly deduction allocated to the Investment Fund during the current Valuation Period to cover the Policy month which starts during that Valuation Period. NET INVESTMENT FACTOR The Net Investment Factor measures the investment performance of an Investment Fund during a Valuation Period. The Net Investment Factor for each Investment Fund for a Valuation Period is calculated as follows: (1)The value of the assets at the end of the preceding Valuation Period; plus (2)The investment income and capital gains, realized or unrealized, credited to the assets in the Valuation Period for which the Net Investment Factor is being determined; minus (3)The capital losses, realized or unrealized, charged against those assets during the Valuation Period; minus (4)Any amount charged against each Investment Fund for taxes, including any tax or other economic burden resulting from the application of the tax laws determined by us to be properly attributable to the Investment Funds, or any amount set aside during the Valuation Period as a reserve for taxes attributable to the operation or maintenance of each Investment Fund; minus (5)The mortality and expense risk charge equal to a percentage of the average net assets for each day in the Valuation Period. This charge, for mortality and expense risks, is determined by the length of time the Policy has been in force. It will not exceed the amounts shown in the following table: [Download Table] Policy Percentage of Effective Years Avg. Net Assets Annual Rate ------ --------------- ----------- 1-10 0.0015027 0.55% 11-20 0.0012301 0.45% 21+ 0.0009572 0.35% divided by (6)The value of the assets at the end of the preceding Valuation Period. OUR RIGHT TO REJECT OR RETURN A PREMIUM PAYMENT In order to receive the tax treatment for life insurance under the Internal Revenue Code (Code), a Policy must initially qualify and continue to qualify as life insurance under the Code. To maintain this qualification, we have reserved the right under the Policy to return any premiums paid which we have determined will cause the Policy to fail as life insurance. We also have the right to make changes in the Policy or to make a distribution to the extent we determine this is necessary to continue to qualify the Policy as life insurance. Such distributions may have current income tax consequences to you. If subsequent premiums would cause your Policy to become a Modified Endowment Contract (MEC), we will notify you and give you an opportunity to receive a refund of the excess premium to prevent your policy from being treated 11
N-6452nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 452nd
as a MEC. (See "Federal Tax Status" for further discussion of the Policy's qualification as a life insurance contract under the Code and the consequences of being a MEC.) If mandated under other applicable federal or state law, we also may be required to return a premium payment. 3. INVESTMENT FUNDS The Policy offers the Investment Funds which are listed below. Appendix A contains a summary of investment objectives and subadvisers, if any, for each Investment Fund. Additional Investment Funds may be available in the future. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESE FUNDS CAREFULLY. YOU CAN OBTAIN COPIES OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES BY CALLING OR WRITING TO US AT METLIFE INVESTORS, P.O. BOX 358, WARWICK, RI 02887-0358, 1-800-638-9294. YOU CAN ALSO OBTAIN INFORMATION ABOUT THE FUNDS (INCLUDING A COPY OF THE STATEMENT OF ADDITIONAL INFORMATION) BY ACCESSING THE SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION'S WEBSITE AT HTTP://WWW.SEC.GOV. CERTAIN PAYMENTS WE RECEIVE WITH REGARD TO THE INVESTMENT FUNDS. An investment adviser (other than our affiliate, MetLife Advisers, LLC) or subadviser of an Investment Fund or its affiliates may compensate us and/or certain affiliates for administrative or other services relating to the Investment Funds. The amount of the compensation is not deducted from Investment Fund assets and does not decrease the Investment Fund's investment return. The amount of the compensation is based on a percentage of assets of the Investment Funds attributable to the policies and certain other variable insurance products that we and our affiliates issue. These percentages differ and some advisers or subadvisers (or other affiliates) may pay us more than others. These percentages currently range up to 0.50%. Additionally, an investment adviser or subadviser of an investment fund or its affiliates may provide us with wholesaling services that assist in the distribution of the policies and may pay us and/or certain affiliates amounts to participate in sales meetings. These amounts may be significant and may provide the adviser or subadviser (or other affiliate) with increased access to persons involved in the distribution of the policies. We and certain of our affiliated insurance companies are joint owners of our affiliated investment adviser, MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is formed as a "limited liability company." Our ownership interests entitle us to profit distributions if the adviser makes a profit with respect to the advisory fees it receives from an Investment Fund. We may benefit accordingly from assets allocated to the Investment Funds to the extent they result in profits to the adviser. See "Expenses -- Annual Operating Expenses" for information on the management fee paid by the Investment Funds and the Statement of Additional Information for the Investment Funds for information on the management fees paid by the advisers to the subadvisers. HOW WE SELECT THE INVESTMENT FUNDS. We select the Investment Funds offered through the Policy based on several criteria, including asset class coverage, the strength of the adviser's or sub-adviser's reputation and tenure, brand recognition, performance, and the capability and qualification of each investment firm. Another factor we consider during the selection process is whether the Investment Fund's adviser or sub-adviser is one of our affiliates or whether the Investment Fund, its adviser, its sub-adviser(s), or an affiliate will compensate us or our affiliates for providing certain administrative and other services, as described above. In some cases, we have included Investment Funds based on recommendations made by selling firms through which the contract is sold. We review the Investment Funds periodically and may remove an Investment Fund or limit its availability to new purchase payments and/or transfers of cash value if we determine that the Investment Fund no longer meets one or more of the selection criteria, and/or if the Investment Fund has not attracted significant allocations from policy owners. We do not provide investment advice and do not recommend or endorse any particular Investment Fund. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (SERIES I SHARES) AIM Variable Insurance Funds is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: AIM V.I. International Growth Fund FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust currently consists of multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: Templeton Foreign Securities Fund 12
N-6453rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 453rd
MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A) Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio Lazard Mid Cap Portfolio Legg Mason Partners Aggressive Growth Portfolio Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio Lord Abbett Mid Cap Value Portfolio Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio MFS(R) Research International Portfolio Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio PIMCO Total Return Portfolio Van Kampen Mid Cap Growth Portfolio METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A) Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual investment portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BlackRock Bond Income Portfolio BlackRock Money Market Portfolio T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA) Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Class IA portfolios are available under the policy: Putnam VT Growth and Income Fund Putnam VT Vista Fund Shares of the Investment Funds may be offered in connection with certain variable annuity contracts and variable life insurance policies of various life insurance companies which may or may not be affiliated with us. Certain Investment Funds may also be sold directly to qualified plans. The Funds believe that offering their shares in this manner will not be disadvantageous to you. We may enter into certain arrangements under which we are reimbursed by the Investment Funds' advisers, distributors and/or affiliates for the administrative services which we provide to the Funds. SUBSTITUTION AND LIMITATIONS ON FURTHER INVESTMENTS We may substitute one or more of the Investment Funds you have selected with another Investment Fund. We will not do this without the prior approval of the SEC. We may also limit further investment in an Investment Fund. We will give you notice of our intention to do this. TRANSFERS At your request, we will transfer amounts in your Policy from any Investment Fund to another Investment Fund, or to and from the General Account (subject to restrictions). The minimum amount that can be transferred is the lesser of the minimum transfer amount (currently $500), or the total value in an Investment Fund or the General Account. You can make twelve transfers or partial withdrawals in a Policy year without charge. Restrictions apply: refer to the "Market Timing" section below. We currently charge a transfer fee of $25 for additional transfers in a Policy year. You cannot make a transfer out of our General Account in the first Policy year. The maximum amount you can transfer from the General Account in any Policy year after the 1st is the greater of: (a)25% of a Policy's Cash Surrender Value in the General Account at the beginning of the Policy year; or (b)the previous Policy year's General Account maximum withdrawal amount not to exceed the total Cash Surrender Value of the Policy. We are not currently imposing the above restrictions, but we reserve the right to do so. Transfers resulting from Policy loans will not be counted for purposes of the limitations on the amount or frequency of transfers allowed in each Policy year. MARKET TIMING Frequent requests from policy owners to transfer cash value may dilute the value of an investment fund's shares if the frequent trading involves an attempt to take advantage of pricing inefficiencies created by a lag between a change 13
N-6454th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 454th
in the value of the securities held by the investment fund and the reflection of that change in the investment fund's share price ("arbitrage trading"). Regardless of the existence of pricing inefficiencies, frequent transfers may also increase brokerage and administrative costs of the underlying investment funds and may disrupt portfolio management strategy, requiring an investment fund to maintain a high cash position and possibly resulting in lost investment opportunities and forced liquidations ("disruptive trading"). Accordingly, arbitrage trading and disruptive trading activities (referred to collectively as "market timing") may adversely affect the long-term performance of the investment funds, which may in turn adversely affect policy owners and other persons who may have an interest in the policies (e.g., beneficiaries). We have policies and procedures that attempt to detect and deter frequent transfers in situations where we determine there is a potential for arbitrage trading. Currently, we believe that such situations may be presented in the international, small-cap, and high-yield investment portfolios (i.e., the AIM V.I. International Growth Fund, Templeton Foreign Securities Fund, Clarion Global Real Estate Portfolio, Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio, MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio, MFS(R) Research International Portfolio, Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio, Western Asset Management Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio and T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio) (the "Monitored Portfolios") and we monitor transfer activity in those Investment Funds. We employ various means to monitor transfer activity, such as examining the frequency and size of transfers into and out of the Monitored Portfolios within given periods of time. For example, we currently monitor transfer activity to determine if, for each category of international, small-cap, and high-yield investment fund, in a 12-month period there were, (1) six or more transfers involving the given category; (2) cumulative gross transfers involving the given category that exceed the current Cash Value; and (3) two or more "round-trips" involving any Monitored Portfolio in the given category. A round-trip generally is defined as a transfer in followed by a transfer out within the next seven calendar days or a transfer out followed by a transfer in within the next seven calendar days, in either case subject to certain other criteria. We do not believe that other investment funds present a significant opportunity to engage in arbitrage trading and therefore do not monitor transfer activity in those investment funds. We may change the Monitored Portfolios at any time without notice in our sole discretion. In addition to monitoring transfer activity in certain investment funds, we rely on the underlying investment funds to bring any potential disruptive trading activity they identify to our attention for investigation on a case-by-case basis. We will also investigate other harmful transfer activity that we identify from time to time. We may revise these policies and procedures in our sole discretion at any time without prior notice. Our policies and procedures may result in transfer restrictions being applied to deter market timing. Currently, when we detect transfer activity in the Monitored Portfolios that exceeds our current transfer limits, or other transfer activity that we believe may be harmful to other owners or other persons who have an interest in the Policies, we require all future transfer requests to or from any Monitored Portfolios or other identified funds under that policy to be submitted either (i) in writing with an original signature or (ii) by telephone prior to 10:00 a.m. Transfers made under the dollar cost averaging or rebalancing program are not treated as transfers when we evaluate trading patterns for market timing. The detection and deterrence of harmful transfer activity involves judgments that are inherently subjective, such as the decision to monitor only those investment funds that we believe are susceptible to arbitrage trading or the determination of transfer limits. Our ability to detect and/or restrict such transfer activity may be limited by operational and technological systems, as well as our ability to predict strategies employed by Policy Owners to avoid such detection. Our ability to restrict such transfer activity may also be limited by provisions of the policy. Accordingly, there is no assurance that we will prevent all transfer activity that may adversely affect Policy Owners and other persons with interests in the policies. We do not accommodate market timing in any Investment Funds and there are no arrangements in place to permit any policy owner to engage in market timing. We apply our policies and procedures without exception, waiver or special arrangement. The Investment Funds may have adopted their own policies and procedures with respect to frequent purchases and redemptions of their respective shares, and we reserve the right to enforce these policies and procedures. For example, investment funds may assess a redemption fee (which we reserve the right to collect) on shares held for a relatively short period. The prospectuses for the investment funds 14
N-6455th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 455th
describe any such policies and procedures, which may be more or less restrictive than the policies and procedures we have adopted. Although we may not have the contractual authority or the operational capacity to apply the frequent trading policies and procedures of the investment funds, we have entered into a written agreement, as required by SEC regulation, with each investment fund or its principal underwriter that obligates us to provide to the investment fund promptly upon request certain information about the trading activity of individual Policy Owners, and to execute instructions from the investment fund to restrict or prohibit further purchases or transfers by specific Policy Owners who violate the frequent trading policies established by the investment fund. In addition, Policy Owners and other persons with interests in the Policies should be aware that the purchase and redemption orders received by the investment funds generally are "omnibus" orders from intermediaries such as retirement plans and separate accounts funding variable insurance products. The omnibus orders reflect the aggregation and netting of multiple orders from individual owners of variable insurance products and/or individual retirement plan participants. The omnibus nature of these orders may limit the investment funds in their ability to apply their frequent trading policies and procedures. In addition, the other insurance companies and/or retirement plans may have different policies and procedures or may not have any such policies and procedures because of contractual limitations. For these reasons, we cannot guarantee that the Investment Funds (and thus Policy Owners) will not be harmed by transfer activity relating to the other insurance companies and/or retirement plans that may invest in the investment funds. If an investment fund believes that an omnibus order reflects one or more transfer requests from Policy Owners engaged in disruptive trading activity, the investment fund may reject the entire omnibus order. In accordance with applicable law, we reserve the right to modify or terminate the transfer privilege at any time. We also reserve the right to defer or restrict the transfer privilege at any time that we are unable to purchase or redeem shares of any of the investment funds, including any refusal or restriction on purchases or redemptions of their shares as a result of their own policies and procedures on market timing activities (even if an entire omnibus order is rejected due to the market timing activity of a single policy owner). You should read the Investment Fund prospectuses for more details. DOLLAR COST AVERAGING Dollar cost averaging is a program which enables you to allocate specified dollar amounts from the BlackRock Money Market Portfolio to other Investment Funds on a monthly basis. By allocating amounts on a monthly basis, you may be less susceptible to the impact of market fluctuations. The minimum transfer amount is $100. The minimum amount that can be allocated to an Investment Fund is 5% of the amount transferred. You can elect to participate in this program at any time by properly completing the dollar cost averaging election form. Dollar cost averaging will terminate when any of the following occurs: 1) the value of the BlackRock Money Market Portfolio is completely depleted; or 2) you request termination in writing. There is no current charge for dollar cost averaging but we reserve the right to charge for this program in the future. Transfers made under dollar cost averaging do not count against the total of 12 transfers allowed without charge in a Policy year. Dollar cost averaging cannot be used simultaneously with the portfolio rebalancing program. PORTFOLIO REBALANCING Over time, the funds in the General Account and the Investment Funds will accumulate at different rates as a result of different investment returns. You may direct us to automatically restore the balance of the Accumulation Account Value in the General Account and in the Investment Funds to the percentages determined in advance. There are two methods of rebalancing available -- periodic and variance. PERIODIC REBALANCING. Under this option you elect a frequency (monthly, quarterly, semiannually or annually), measured from the Policy anniversary. On each date elected, we will rebalance the Investment Funds and/or General Account to reallocate the Accumulation Account Value according to the investment percentages you elected. VARIANCE REBALANCING. Under this option you elect a specific allocation percentage for the General Account and each Investment Fund. For each such account, the allocation percentage (if not zero) must be a whole percentage and must not be less than five percent. You also elect a maximum variance percentage (5%, 10%, 15%, or 20% only), and can exclude specific Investment Funds and/ or the General Account from being rebalanced. On each 15
N-6456th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 456th
Monthly Anniversary we will review the current balances to determine whether any Investment Fund balance is outside of the variance range (either above or below) as a percentage of the specified allocation percentage. If any Investment Fund is outside of the variance range, we will generate transfers to rebalance all of the specified Investment Funds and/or the General Account back to the predetermined percentages. Transfers resulting from portfolio rebalancing will not be counted against the total number of transfers allowed in a Policy year before a charge is applied. You may elect either method of portfolio rebalancing by specifying it on the Policy application, or may elect it later for an in force Policy, or may cancel it, by submitting a change form acceptable to us. We reserve the right to suspend portfolio rebalancing at any time on any class of policies on a nondiscriminatory basis, or to charge an administrative fee for election changes in excess of a specified number in a Policy year in accordance with our administrative rules. Portfolio rebalancing cannot be used simultaneously with the dollar cost averaging program. APPROVED ASSET ALLOCATION PROGRAMS We recognize the value to certain Owners of having available, on a continuous basis, advice for the allocation of their money among the Investment Funds available under the Policy. Certain providers of these types of services have agreed to provide such services to Owners in accordance with our administrative rules regarding such programs. We have made no independent investigation of these programs. We have only established that these programs are compatible with our administrative systems and rules. Even though we permit the use of approved asset allocation programs, the Policy was not designed for professional market timing organizations. Repeated patterns of frequent transfers are disruptive to the operations of the Investment Funds, and should we become aware of such disruptive practices, we may modify the transfer privilege either on an individual or class basis. If you participate in an approved asset allocation program, the transfers made under the program are not taken into account in determining any transaction charges. 4. EXPENSES We make certain charges and deductions under the Policy. These charges and deductions compensate us for: (1) services and benefits we provide; (2) costs and expenses we incur; and (3) risks we assume. Services and benefits we provide: .. the death benefit, cash, and loan benefits under the Policy .. investment options, including premium allocations .. administration of elective options .. the distribution of reports to Policy Owners Costs and expenses we incur: .. costs associated with processing and underwriting applications, and with issuing and administering the Policy (including any riders) .. overhead and other expenses for providing services and benefits .. sales and marketing expenses .. other costs of doing business, such as collecting premiums, maintaining records, processing claims, effecting transactions, and paying federal, state, and local premium and other taxes and fees Risks we assume: .. that the cost of insurance charges we may deduct are insufficient to meet our actual claims because the insureds die sooner than we estimate .. that the cost of providing the services and benefits under the Policies exceed the charges we deduct The amount of a charge may not necessarily correspond to the costs of the services or benefits that are implied by the name of the charge or that are associated with the particular Policy. For example, the sales charge and the surrender charge may not fully cover all of our sales and distribution expenses, and we may use proceeds from other charges, including the mortality and expense risk charge and the cost of insurance charge, to help cover those expenses. We can profit from certain Policy charges, including the cost of insurance charge. There are charges and other expenses associated with the Policy that reduce the return on your investment in the Policy. The charges and expenses are: 16
N-6457th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 457th
TAX CHARGES There are charges for Federal taxes, and state and local premium taxes which are deducted from each premium payment. The Federal tax charge is currently 1.3% of each premium. The premium tax charge is currently 2.35% of premium payments. If the tax rates change, we may change the amount of the deduction to cover the new rate. SALES CHARGE A sales charge will be deducted from each premium payment to partially compensate us for expenses incurred in distributing the Policy and any additional benefits provided by riders. We currently intend to deduct a sales charge determined according to the following schedule: [Download Table] Policy Year 1: 15% of premium up to Target Premium; 5% of premium above Target Premium Policy Years 2-10: 5% of all premium paid Policy Years 11+: 2% of all premium paid The expenses covered by the sales charge include agent sales commissions, the cost of printing prospectuses and sales literature, and any advertising costs. Where policies are issued to Insureds with higher mortality risks or to Insureds who have selected additional insurance benefits, a portion of the amount deducted for the sales charge is used to pay distribution expenses and other costs associated with these additional coverages. To the extent that sales expenses are not recovered from the sales charge and the surrender charge, those expenses may be recovered from other sources, including the mortality and expense risk charge described below. SELECTION AND ISSUE EXPENSE CHARGE During the first ten Policy years, we generally assess a monthly selection and issue expense charge to cover the costs associated with the underwriting and issue of the Policy. The monthly charge per $1,000 of Face Amount ranges from approximately 4 cents to one dollar, and varies by Issue Age, risk class, and (except on unisex Policies) sex of the Insured. MONTHLY POLICY CHARGE We deduct a monthly Policy charge on the Investment Start Date and each Monthly Anniversary date. The charge is equal to $25 per Policy month for the first Policy year. Thereafter, it is $6 per Policy month guaranteed not to increase while the Policy is in force. The charge reimburses us for expenses incurred in the administration of the Policies. Such expenses include: confirmations, annual reports and account statements, maintenance of Policy records, maintenance of Separate Account records, administrative personnel costs, mailing costs, data processing costs, legal fees, accounting fees, filing fees, the costs of other services necessary for policyowner servicing and all accounting, valuation, regulatory and updating requirements. MONTHLY COST OF INSURANCE CHARGE This charge compensates us for the insurance coverage we provide in the month following the charge. The monthly cost of insurance charge for each Policy month equals the total of the insurance risk charges for the Policy month for each Face Amount portion then in effect. The monthly cost of insurance charge is deducted on each Monthly Anniversary for the following Policy month. The monthly cost of insurance charge is determined in a manner that reflects the anticipated mortality of the Insured and the fact that the death benefit is not payable until the death of the Insured. Because the monthly cost of insurance charge depends upon a number of variables, the charge will vary for each Policy month. We will determine the cost of insurance charge by multiplying the applicable cost of insurance rate or rates by the net amount at risk (defined below) for each Policy month. The monthly cost of insurance rates are determined at the beginning of each Policy year. The rates will be based on the Attained Age, duration, rate class, and (except for unisex policies) sex of the Insured at issue. The monthly cost of insurance rates generally increase as the Insured's Attained Age increases. The rate class of an Insured also will affect the cost of insurance rate. For the initial Face Amount, we will use the rate class on the Issue Date. If the death benefit equals a percentage of Accumulation Account Value, an increase in Accumulation Account Value will cause an automatic increase in the death benefit. The rate class for such increase will be the same as that used for the initial Face Amount. We currently place the Insured into a preferred rate class, a standard rate class, or into rate classes involving a higher mortality risk. Actual monthly cost of insurance rates may change, and the actual monthly cost of insurance charge will be determined by us based on our expectations as to future mortality experience. However, the actual monthly cost of 17
N-6458th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 458th
insurance rates will not be greater than the guaranteed cost of insurance rates set forth in the Policy. For Policies which are not in a substandard risk class, the guaranteed cost of insurance rates are equal to 100% of the rates set forth in the male/female smoker/non-smoker 1980 CSO Mortality Tables (1980 CSO Tables NA and SA and 1980 CSO Tables NG and SG for sex distinct policies and policies issued in qualified pension plans). All Policies are based on the Attained Age of the Insured. Higher rates apply if the Insured is determined to be in a substandard risk class. In two otherwise identical policies, an Insured in the preferred rate class will have a lower cost of insurance than an Insured in a rate class involving higher mortality risk. Each rate class is also divided into two categories: smokers and nonsmokers. Non-smoker Insureds will generally incur a lower cost of insurance than similarly situated Insureds who smoke. (Insureds under Attained Age 20 are automatically assigned to the non-smoker rate class.) The net amount at risk for a Policy month is: (1)the death benefit at the beginning of the Policy month divided by 1.0032737 (which reduces the net amount at risk, solely for purposes of computing the cost of insurance, by taking into account assumed monthly earnings at an annual rate of 4%); less (2)the Accumulation Account Value at the beginning of the Policy month. In calculating the monthly cost of insurance charges, the cost of insurance rate for a Face Amount is applied to the net amount at risk for that Face Amount. CHARGES FOR ADDITIONAL BENEFIT RIDERS The amount of the charge, if any, each Policy month for additional benefit riders is determined in accordance with the rider and is shown on the specifications page of your Policy. MORTALITY AND EXPENSE RISK CHARGE We will deduct a daily charge from the Investment Funds. The amount of the deduction is determined as a percentage of the average net assets of each Investment Fund. The current daily deduction percentages, and the equivalent effective annual rates, are: [Download Table] Daily Policy Charge Annual Years Factor Equivalent ------ -------- ---------- 1-10 .0015027% 0.55% 11-20 .0012301% 0.45% 21+ .0009572% 0.35% This deduction is guaranteed not to increase while the Policy is in force. This risk charge compensates us for assuming the mortality and expense risks under the Policy. The mortality risk assumed by us is that the Insureds, as a group, may not live as long as expected. The expense risk assumed by us is that actual expenses may be greater than those assumed. We expect to profit from this charge. SURRENDER CHARGE For up to 10 years after the Issue Date, we will impose a contingent deferred sales charge, also referred to as a surrender charge, when the following occur: .. upon surrender or lapse of the Policy; .. upon a partial withdrawal; .. upon a Pro-Rata Surrender; or .. upon a decrease in Face Amount. The amount of the charge assessed will depend upon a number of factors, including the type of event (a full surrender, lapse, or partial withdrawal), the amount of any premium payments made under the Policy prior to the event, and the number of Policy years having elapsed since the Policy was issued. The surrender charge compensates us for expenses relating to the distribution of the Policy, including agents' commissions, advertising, and the printing of the prospectus and sales literature. The surrender charge percentage is shown in the following table. [Download Table] If surrender or lapse The percentage of occurs in the last the annual Target month of Policy year: Premium payable is: --------------------- ------------------- 1 through 5 45% 6 40% 7 30% 8 20% 9 10% 10 and later 0% The Target Premium (on which we base the surrender charge) is shown in your Policy. As shown above, the maximum surrender charge is 45% of the annual Target Premium payable. In addition, the percentages are reduced equally for each Policy month during the years shown. For example, during the seventh year, the percentage is reduced equally each month from 40% at the end of the sixth year to 30% at the end of the seventh year. This table may be modified if required by law or regulation of the governing jurisdiction. 18
N-6459th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 459th
The amount of the surrender charge deducted upon a partial withdrawal or Pro-Rata Surrender will equal a fraction of the charge that would be deducted if the Policy were surrendered at that time. The fraction will be determined by dividing the amount of the withdrawal by the Accumulation Account Value before the withdrawal and multiplying the result by the surrender charge. Immediately after a withdrawal, the Policy's remaining surrender charge will equal the amount of the surrender charge immediately before the withdrawal less the amount deducted in connection with the withdrawal. A surrender charge will apply when there is a decrease in Face Amount for up to 10 years from the Policy's Issue Date. A partial withdrawal may cause a decrease in Face Amount and therefore, we may deduct a surrender charge. If the Face Amount is decreased by some fraction of any previous increases in Face Amount and/or the Face Amount at issue, the surrender charge deducted will be the previously defined surrender charge multiplied by the fraction. TRANSACTION CHARGES There is no transaction charge for the first twelve partial withdrawals or requested transfers in a Policy year. We will impose a charge of $25 for each partial withdrawal or requested transfer in excess of twelve in a Policy year. We may revoke or modify the privilege of transferring amounts to or from the General Account at any time. Partial withdrawals and Pro-Rata Surrenders will result in the imposition of the applicable surrender charge. INVESTMENT FUND EXPENSES The expenses of the Investment Funds are shown in the Summary. The value of the net assets of the Investment Funds will reflect the investment advisory fee and other expenses incurred by the underlying investment companies. The Investment Fund expenses are collected from the underlying Investment Fund, and are not direct charges against the Separate Account assets or reductions from the Policy's Accumulation Account Value. Expenses of the Funds are not fixed or specified under the terms of the Policy, and actual expenses may vary. These underlying Investment Fund expenses are taken into consideration in computing each Investment Fund's net asset value, which is used to calculate the unit values in the Separate Account. The management fees and other expenses are more fully described in the prospectus of each individual Investment Fund. The information relating to the Investment Fund expenses was provided by the Investment Fund and was not independently verified by us. Except as otherwise specifically noted, the management fees and other expenses are not currently subject to fee waivers or expense reimbursements. 5. DEATH BENEFIT The amount of the death benefit depends on the total Face Amount, the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the date of death and the death benefit option (Option A, Option B, or Option C) in effect at that time. The actual amount we will pay the Beneficiary will be reduced by any Indebtedness. The initial Face Amount and the death benefit option in effect on the Issue Date are shown on the specifications page of your Policy. OPTION A. The amount of the death benefit under Option A is the greater of: .. the Face Amount; or .. the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the date of death multiplied by the applicable multiple percentage shown in the "Applicable Percentage of Accumulation Account Value Table For Insureds Less than Age 100" shown below. OPTION B. The amount of the death benefit under Option B is the greater of: .. the Face Amount plus the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the date of death; or .. the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the date of death multiplied by the applicable multiple percentage shown in the "Applicable Percentage of Accumulation Account Value Table For Insureds Less than Age 100" shown below. Applicable Percentage of Accumulation Account Value Table For Insureds Less Than Age 100 [Download Table] Insured Policy Accumulation Account Person's Age Value Multiple Percentage ------------ --------------------------- 40 or under 250% 45 215% 50 185% 55 150% 60 130% 65 120% 70 115% 78 to 90 105% 95 to 99 101% 19
N-6460th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 460th
For ages that are not shown on this table the applicable percentage multiples will decrease by a ratable portion for each full year. OPTION C. The amount of the death benefit under Option C is the greater of: .. the Face Amount; or .. the Accumulation Account Value of your Policy on the date of the Insured's death multiplied by the applicable factor from the Table of Attained Age Factors shown in your Policy. If your Policy is in force after the Insured's Attained Age is 100, then the Death Benefit will be 101% of the Policy's Accumulation Account Value. CHANGE OF DEATH BENEFIT If the Policy was issued with either death benefit Option A or death benefit Option B, the death benefit option may be changed. A Policy issued under death benefit Option C may not be changed for the entire lifetime of the Policy. Similarly, a Policy issued under either death benefit Option A or B may not change to death benefit Option C for the lifetime of the Policy. A request for change must be made to us in writing. The Effective Date of such a change will be the Monthly Anniversary on or following the date we receive the change request. A death benefit Option A Policy may be changed to have death benefit Option B. The Face Amount will be decreased to equal the death benefit less the Accumulation Account Value on the Effective Date of the change. Satisfactory evidence of insurability must be submitted to us in connection with a request for a change from death benefit Option A to death benefit Option B. A change may not be made if it would result in a Face Amount of less than the minimum Face Amount. A death benefit Option B Policy may be changed to have death benefit Option A. The Face Amount will be increased to equal the death benefit on the Effective Date of the change. A change in death benefit option may have Federal income tax consequences. CHANGE IN FACE AMOUNT Subject to certain limitations set forth below, you may decrease or increase the Face Amount of a Policy once each Policy year after the first Policy year. A written request is required for a change in the Face Amount. A change in Face Amount may affect the cost of insurance rate and the net amount at risk, both of which affect your cost of insurance charge. A reduction in the Face Amount of a Policy may have Federal income tax consequences. Any decrease in the Face Amount will become effective on the Monthly Anniversary on or following receipt of the written request by us. The amount of the requested change must be at least $5,000 ($2,000 for Policies issued in qualified pension plans) and the Face Amount remaining in force after any requested decrease may not be less than the minimum Face Amount. If you decrease the Face Amount and the Policy does not comply with the maximum premium limitations required by Federal tax law, the decrease may be limited or the Accumulation Account Value may be returned to you (at your election), to the extent necessary to meet these requirements. If you want to increase the Face Amount, you must submit proof that the Insured is insurable by our standards on the date the requested increase is submitted and the Insured must have an Attained Age not greater than age 80 on the Policy anniversary that the increase will become effective. PAYMENT OF PROCEEDS Unless otherwise requested, the Policy's death proceeds may be paid to your beneficiary through an account called the Total Control Account. The Total Control Account is an interest-bearing account through which the beneficiary has complete access to the proceeds, with unlimited check writing privileges. We credit interest to the account at a rate that will not be less than a minimum guaranteed rate. You may also elect to have any Policy surrender proceeds paid into a Total Control Account established for you. Assets backing the Total Control Accounts are maintained in our general account and are subject to the claims of our creditors. We will bear the investment experience of such assets; however, regardless of the investment experience of such assets, the interest credited to the Total Control Account will never fall below the applicable guaranteed minimum rate. Because we bear the investment experience of the assets backing the Total Control Accounts, we may receive a profit from these assets. The Total Control Account is not insured by the FDIC or any other governmental agency. 6. TAXES NOTE: WE HAVE PREPARED THE FOLLOWING INFORMATION ON FEDERAL INCOME TAXES AS A GENERAL DISCUSSION OF THE SUBJECT. 20
N-6461st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 461st
IT IS NOT INTENDED AS TAX ADVICE TO ANYONE. YOU SHOULD CONSULT YOUR OWN TAX ADVISER ABOUT YOUR OWN CIRCUMSTANCES. WE HAVE INCLUDED AN ADDITIONAL DISCUSSION REGARDING TAXES IN PART II. LIFE INSURANCE IN GENERAL Life insurance, such as this Policy, is a means of providing for death protection and setting aside money for future needs. Congress recognized the importance of such planning and provided special rules in the Internal Revenue Code for life insurance. Simply stated, these rules provide that you will not be taxed on the earnings on the money held in your life insurance Policy until you take the money out. Beneficiaries generally are not taxed when they receive the death proceeds upon the death of the Insured. However, estate taxes may apply. TAKING MONEY OUT OF YOUR POLICY You, as the Owner, will not be taxed on increases in the value of your Policy until a distribution occurs either as a surrender or as a loan. If your Policy is a MEC, any loans or surrenders from the Policy will be treated as first coming from earnings and then from your investment in the Policy. Consequently, these earnings are included in taxable income. The Internal Revenue Code (Code) also provides that any amount received from a MEC which is included in income may be subject to a 10% penalty. The penalty will not apply if the income received is: (1) paid on or after the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) paid if the taxpayer becomes totally disabled (as that term is defined in the Code); or (3) in a series of substantially equal payments made annually (or more frequently) for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer. If your Policy is not a MEC, any surrender proceeds will be treated as first a recovery of the investment in the Policy and to that extent will not be included in taxable income. Furthermore, any loan will be treated as Indebtedness under the Policy and not as a taxable distribution. See "Federal Tax Status" in Part II for more details. DIVERSIFICATION The Code provides that the underlying investments for a variable life insurance Policy must satisfy certain diversification requirements in order to be treated as a life insurance contract. We believe that the Investment Funds are being managed so as to comply with such requirements. Under current Federal tax law, it is unclear as to the circumstances under which you, because of the degree of control you exercise over the underlying investments, and not us would be considered the owner of the shares of the Investment Funds. If you are considered the owner of the investments, it will result in the loss of the favorable tax treatment for the Policy. It is unknown to what extent owners are permitted to select Investment Funds, to make transfers among the Investment Funds or the number and type of Investment Funds owners may select from. If guidance from the Internal Revenue Service is provided which is considered a new position, the guidance would generally be applied prospectively. However, if such guidance is considered not to be a new position, it may be applied retroactively. This would mean that you, as the owner of the Policy, could be treated as the owner of the Investment Funds. Due to the uncertainty in this area, we reserve the right to modify the Policy in an attempt to maintain favorable tax treatment. 7. ACCESS TO YOUR MONEY POLICY LOANS We will loan money to you at the loan interest rate we establish. You should contact our Service Office or your registered representative for information on loan procedures. We will make the loan as of the date when we receive a loan request. You may borrow an amount up to the loan value of the Policy. The loan value is: .. the Accumulation Account Value of the Policy on the date the loan request is received; less .. interest to the next loan interest due date; less .. anticipated monthly deductions to the next loan interest due date; less .. any existing loan; less .. any surrender charge; plus .. interest expected to be earned on the loan balance to the next loan interest due date. Policy loan interest is payable on each Policy anniversary. The minimum amount that you can borrow is $500. The loan may be completely or partially repaid at any time while the Insured is living. When a Policy loan is made, we will deduct Accumulation Account Value from your Policy equal to the amount of the loan, plus interest due and place 21
N-6462nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 462nd
it in the Loan Subaccount as security for the loan. This Accumulation Account Value amount is expected to earn interest at a rate ("the earnings rate") which is lower than the rate charged on the Policy loan ("the borrowing rate"). The Accumulation Account Value that we use as security will accrue interest daily at an annual earnings rate of 4%. Unless the Owner requests a different allocation, the Accumulation Account Value amount used as security for the loan will be transferred from the Investment Funds and the General Account on a pro-rata basis to the Loan Account. This will reduce the Policy's Accumulation Account Value in the General Account and the Investment Fund(s). These transactions will not be considered transfers for purposes of the limitations on transfers between Investment Funds or to or from the General Account. A Policy loan, whether or not repaid, will have a permanent effect on the death benefits and Policy values because the values transferred to the Loan Account will not share in the investment results of the Investment Funds while the loan is outstanding. If the Loan Account earnings rate is less than the investment performance of the selected Investment Funds and/or the General Account, the values and benefits under the Policy will be reduced as a result of the loan. In addition, if the Indebtedness exceeds the Accumulation Account Value minus the surrender charge on any Monthly Anniversary, the Policy will lapse, subject to a grace period. (See "Purchases -- Lapse and Grace Period".) A lapse of the Policy with a loan outstanding may have Federal income tax consequences. (See "Federal Tax Status".) Interest credited to the Accumulation Account Value held in the Loan Subaccount as security for the loan will be allocated on Policy anniversaries to the General Account and the Investment Funds. The interest credited will also be transferred: (1) when a new loan is made; (2) when a loan is partially or fully repaid; and (3) when an amount is needed to meet a monthly deduction. Policy loans may have Federal income tax consequences. (See "Federal Tax Status".) LOAN INTEREST CHARGED The borrowing rate we charge for Policy loan interest will be based on the following schedule: [Download Table] For Loans Annual Outstanding During Interest Rate ------------------ ------------- Policy Years 1-10 4.50% Policy Years 11-20 4.25% Policy Years 21+ 4.15% We will inform you of the current borrowing rate when a Policy loan is requested. Policy loan interest is due and payable annually on each Policy anniversary. If you do not pay the interest when it is due, the unpaid loan interest will be added to the outstanding Indebtedness as of the due date and you will be charged interest at the same rate as the rest of the Indebtedness. SECURITY The Policy will be the only security for the loan. REPAYING POLICY DEBT You may repay the loan at any time prior to the death of the Insured and as long as the Policy is in force. Any Indebtedness outstanding will be deducted before any benefit proceeds are paid or applied under a payment option. Repayments will be allocated to the General Account and the Investment Funds based on how the Accumulation Account Value used for security was allocated. Unpaid loans and loan interest will be deducted from any settlement of your Policy. Any payments received from you will be applied as premiums, unless you clearly request in writing that it be used as repayment of Indebtedness. PARTIAL WITHDRAWALS After the first Policy year, you may make partial withdrawals from the Policy's Cash Surrender Value. You should contact our Service Office or your registered representative for information on partial withdrawal procedures. Each Policy year you are allowed 12 free partial withdrawals. For each partial withdrawal after 12, we may impose a $25 fee. We will process your partial withdrawal as of the date when we receive a request. A partial withdrawal may be subject to a surrender charge and have Federal income tax consequences. The minimum amount of a partial withdrawal request, net of any applicable fees and surrender charges, is the lesser of: (1)$500 from an Investment Fund or the General Account; or (2)the Policy's Accumulation Account Value in an Investment Fund. Partial withdrawals made during a Policy year are subject to the following limitations. The maximum amount that may be withdrawn from an Investment Fund is the Policy's Accumulation Account Value net of any applicable surrender charges and fees in that Investment Fund. The 22
N-6463rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 463rd
total partial withdrawals and transfers from the General Account over the Policy year may not exceed a maximum amount equal to the greater of the following: (1)25% of the Cash Surrender Value in the General Account at the beginning of the Policy year, multiplied by the withdrawal percentage limit shown in the Policy; or (2)the previous Policy year's maximum amount. You may allocate the amount withdrawn plus any applicable surrender charges and fees, subject to the above conditions, among the Investment Funds and the General Account. If no allocation is specified, then the partial withdrawal will be allocated among the Investment Funds and the General Account in the same proportion that the Policy's Accumulation Account Value in each Investment Fund and the General Account bears to the total Accumulation Account Value of the Policy, less the Accumulation Account Value in the Loan Account, on the date the request was received. If the limitations on withdrawals from the General Account will not permit this pro-rata allocation, you will be requested to provide an alternate allocation. No amount may be withdrawn that would result in there being insufficient Accumulation Account Value to meet any surrender charge and applicable fees that would be payable immediately following the withdrawal upon the surrender of the remaining Accumulation Account Value. The death benefit will be affected by a partial withdrawal, unless death benefit Option A or Option C is in effect and the withdrawal is made under the terms of an anniversary partial withdrawal rider. If death benefit Option A or death benefit Option C is in effect and the death benefit equals the Face Amount, then a partial withdrawal will decrease the Face Amount by an amount equal to the partial withdrawal plus the applicable surrender charge resulting from that partial withdrawal. If the death benefit is based on a percentage of the Accumulation Account Value, then a partial withdrawal will decrease the Face Amount by an amount by which the partial withdrawal plus the applicable surrender charge and fees exceeds the difference between the death benefit and the Face Amount. If death benefit Option B is in effect, the Face Amount will not change. The Face Amount remaining in force after a partial withdrawal may not be less than the minimum Face Amount. Any request for a partial withdrawal that would reduce the Face Amount below this amount will not be implemented. Partial withdrawals may affect the way in which the cost of insurance charge is calculated and the amount of pure insurance protection afforded under a Policy. We may change the minimum amount required for a partial withdrawal or the number of times partial withdrawals may be made. PRO-RATA SURRENDER After the first Policy year, you can make a Pro-Rata Surrender of the Policy. The Pro-Rata Surrender will reduce the Face Amount and the Accumulation Account Value by a percentage chosen by you. This percentage must be any whole number. A Pro-Rata Surrender may have Federal income tax consequences. The percentage will be applied to the Face Amount and the Accumulation Account Value on the Monthly Anniversary on or following our receipt of the request. You may allocate the amount of decrease in Accumulation Account Value plus any applicable surrender charge and fees among the Investment Funds and the General Account. If no allocation is specified, then the decrease in Accumulation Account Value and any applicable surrender charge and fees will be allocated among the Investment Funds and the General Account in the same proportion that the Policy's Accumulation Account Value in each Investment Fund and the General Account bears to the total Accumulation Account Value of the Policy, less the Accumulation Account Value in the Loan Account, on the date the request for Pro-Rata Surrender is received. A Pro-Rata Surrender cannot be processed if it will reduce the Face Amount below the minimum Face Amount of the Policy. No Pro-Rata Surrender will be processed for more Cash Surrender Value than is available on the date of the Pro-Rata Surrender. A cash payment will be made to you for the amount of Accumulation Account Value reduction less any applicable surrender charges and fees. Pro-Rata Surrenders may affect the way in which the cost of insurance charge is calculated and the amount of the pure insurance protection afforded under the Policy. FULL SURRENDERS To effect a full surrender, either the Policy must be returned to us along with the request, or the request must be accompanied by a completed affidavit of loss, which is available from us. Upon surrender, we will pay the Cash Surrender Value to you in a single sum. We will determine the Cash Surrender Value as of the date that we receive your 23
N-6464th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 464th
written request at our Service Office. If the request is received on a Monthly Anniversary, the monthly deduction otherwise deductible will be included in the amount paid. Coverage under a Policy will terminate as of the date of surrender. The Insured must be living at the time of a surrender. A surrender may have Federal income tax consequences. 8. OTHER INFORMATION METLIFE INVESTORS MetLife Investors Insurance Company (MetLife Investors) was incorporated on August 17, 1981, as Assurance Life Company, a Missouri corporation, and changed its name to Xerox Financial Services Life Insurance Company in 1985. On June 1, 1995, a wholly-owned subsidiary of General American Life Insurance Company (General American Life) purchased Xerox Financial Services Life Insurance Company, which on that date changed its name to Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company. On January 6, 2000, Metropolitan Life Insurance Company acquired GenAmerica Financial Corporation, the ultimate parent company of General American Life. Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company changed its name to MetLife Investors Insurance Company on January 30, 2001. On December 31, 2002, MetLife Investors became an indirect subsidiary of MetLife, Inc., the holding company of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company and a listed company on the New York Stock Exchange. On October 1, 2004, MetLife Investors became a direct subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. MetLife, Inc., through its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading provider of insurance and other financial services to individual and institutional customers. Before November 9, 2006, all Policies were issued by MetLife Investors Insurance Company of California ("MetLife Investors California"), a subsidiary of MetLife Investors Insurance Company ("MetLife Investors") which in turn is a direct subsidiary of MetLife, Inc. On November 9, 2006, the operations of MetLife Investors and MetLife Investors of California were combined through a merger, with MetLife Investors as the surviving company after the merger. Upon consummation of the merger, MetLife Investors California's separate corporate existence ceased by operation of law, and MetLife Investors assumed legal ownership of all of the assets of MetLife Investors California, including the Separate Account and its assets. As a result of the merger, MetLife Investors also has become responsible for all of MetLife Investors California's liabilities and obligations, including those created under the Policies initially issued by MetLife Investors California and outstanding on the date of the merger. Such policies have thereby become variable policies funded by a Separate Account of MetLife Investors, and each Owner thereof has become a policyholder of MetLife Investors. For Policies issued on or before December 31, 2002, General American Life Insurance Company ("General American"), the former parent of MetLife Investors, agreed to ensure that MetLife Investors will have sufficient funds to meet its obligations under the Policies. In the event an Owner or Beneficiary of such a Policy presents a legitimate claim for payment, General American will pay such claim directly to the Owner or Beneficiary if MetLife Investors is unable to make such payment. This guarantee is enforceable against General American directly without any requirement that the Policy Owner or Beneficiary first file a claim against MetLife Investors. The guarantee agreement is binding on General American, its successors or assigns and shall terminate only if the guarantee is assigned to an organization having a financial rating from certain specified rating agencies equal to or better than General American's rating. With respect to the guarantee, General American is relying on the exemption provided by Rule 12h-7 under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Act") to not file reports under the Act. On December 31, 2002, MetLife, Inc. entered into a net worth maintenance agreement with MetLife Investors. Under the agreement, MetLife, Inc. agreed, without limitation as to the amount, to cause MetLife Investors to have certain minimum capital and surplus levels and liquidity necessary to enable it to meet its current obligations on a timely basis. At December 31, 2008, the capital and surplus of MetLife Investors was in excess of these minimum capital and surplus levels. MetLife, Inc. and MetLife Investors entered into the agreement in part to enhance and maintain the financial strength of MetLife Investors as set forth in the agreement. Creditors of MetLife Investors (including its Policy Owners) have certain rights under the agreement to enforce the provisions of the agreement through certain state insurance regulators. However, the agreement provides, among other things, that it does not provide any creditor of MetLife Investors with recourse to or against any of the assets of MetLife, Inc. MetLife, Inc. has the right to terminate the agreement upon thirty days written notice to MetLife Investors. MetLife, Inc. has agreed not to terminate the agreement unless one of certain designated events occur, including if the Company attains a financial strength rating from Moody's Investors Service, Inc., 24
N-6465th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 465th
without giving weight to the support of the agreement, that is the same as or better than its rating of such rating agency with such support. In addition, General American entered into a contingent reinsurance agreement with MetLife Investors. Under this agreement, in the event that MetLife Investors' statutory capital and surplus fall below certain levels, General American Life would assume as assumption reinsurance, subject to regulatory approvals and required consents, all of MetLife Investors' life insurance and annuity contracts. At December 31, 2008, the capital and surplus of MetLife Investors was in excess of these minimum capital and surplus levels. We are licensed to do business in the District of Columbia and all states except Maine, New Hampshire, New York and Vermont. DISTRIBUTION MetLife Investors Distribution Company, 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1900, Irvine, California 92614, acts as the distributor of the Policies. MetLife Investors Distribution Company is our affiliate. Commissions will be paid to broker-dealers who sell the Policies. Currently, broker-dealers will be paid first-year commissions equal up to 90% of Target Premium and 4.0% of excess premiums paid in Policy year 1. In renewal years, the commissions will equal up to 5.0% of premiums paid in Policy years 2-10 and 2.0% in Policy years 11 and beyond. In addition, broker-dealers will receive annually, asset-based compensation equal up to .25% of Accumulation Account Value for all Policy years beginning the 13th month. Sometimes, MetLife Investors enters into an agreement with the broker-dealer to pay the broker-dealer persistency bonuses in addition to the standard commission. THE SEPARATE ACCOUNT We established a separate account, MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One (the "Separate Account"), to hold the assets that underlie the Policies. The Board of Directors of MetLife Investors adopted a resolution to establish the Separate Account under Missouri insurance law on October 23, 1991. The Separate Account is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission as a unit investment trust under the Investment Company Act of 1940. The Separate Account is divided into subaccounts. Effective November 9, 2009, we combined MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five (the "Former Separate Account") with and into the Separate Account (the "Combination"). In connection with the Combination, we transferred the assets of the Former Separate Account to the Separate Account and the Separate Account assumed the liabilities and contractual obligations of the Former Separate Account. The Combination does not affect Policy Owners in any way. There are no changes in our obligations or your rights and benefits under the Policy. Your Cash Value is not affected by the Combination and no charges have been or will be imposed in connection therewith. The Investment Funds available under your Policy have not changed. Your Cash Value is allocated to the same Investment Funds (with the same unit values) as it was before the Combination. The Combination does not result in any federal income tax consequences to you. After the Combination, the financial statements will report assets on a combined basis. The financial statements will also combine any sub-accounts that invest in the same Investment Funds and illustrate unit values as a range. The assets of the Separate Account are held in our name on behalf of the Separate Account and legally belong to us. However, those assets that underlie the Policies, are not chargeable with liabilities arising out of any other business we may conduct. All the income, gains and losses (realized or unrealized) resulting from those assets are credited to or against the Policies and not against any other policies we may issue. THE GENERAL ACCOUNT We own the assets in our General Account, and we use these assets to support our insurance and annuity obligations other than those funded by our separate investment accounts. These assets are subject to our general liabilities from business operations. Subject to applicable law, we have sole discretion over investment of the General Account's assets. While your Policy provides for limitations on allocations to the General Account, our current practice is not to limit allocations to the General Account. We have not registered the General Account or any interests therein with the Securities and Exchange Commission, and the staff of the Securities and Exchange Commission has not reviewed the disclosure in this prospectus relating to the General Account. SUSPENSION OF PAYMENTS OR TRANSFERS We may be required to suspend or postpone any payments or transfers for any period when: 1) the New York Stock Exchange is closed (other than customary weekend and holiday closings); 25
N-6466th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 466th
2) trading on the New York Stock Exchange is restricted; 3) an emergency exists, as determined by the SEC, as a result of which disposal of shares of the Investment Funds is not reasonably practicable or we cannot reasonably value the shares of the Investment Funds; 4) during any other period when the Securities and Exchange Commission, by order, so permits for the protection of owners. We may defer the portion of any transfer, amount payable or surrender, or Policy Loan from the General Account for not more than 6 months. OWNERSHIP OWNER. The Insured is the Owner of the Policy unless another person or entity is shown as the Owner in the application. The Owner is entitled to all rights provided by the Policy. If there is more than one Owner at a given time, all owners must exercise the rights of ownership by joint action. If the Owner dies, and the Owner is not the Insured, the Owner's interest in the Policy becomes the property of his or her estate unless otherwise provided. Unless otherwise provided, the Policy is jointly owned by all Owners named in the Policy or by the survivors of those joint Owners. Unless otherwise stated in the Policy, the final Owner is the estate of the last joint Owner to die. BENEFICIARY. The Beneficiary is the person(s) or entity you name to receive any death proceeds. The Beneficiary is named at the time the Policy is issued unless changed at a later date. You can name a contingent Beneficiary prior to the death of the Insured. Unless an irrevocable Beneficiary has been named, you can change the Beneficiary at any time before the Insured dies. If there is an irrevocable Beneficiary, all Policy changes except premium allocations and transfers require the consent of the Beneficiary. Primary and contingent Beneficiaries are as named in the application, unless you make a change. To change a Beneficiary, you must submit a written request to us. We may require the Policy to record the change. The request will take effect when signed, subject to any action we may take before receiving it. One or more irrevocable Beneficiaries may be named. If a Beneficiary is a minor, we will make payment to the guardian of his or her estate. We may require proof of age of any Beneficiary. Proceeds payable to a Beneficiary will be free from the claims of creditors, to the extent allowed by law. ASSIGNMENT. You can assign the Policy. A copy of any assignment must be filed with our Service Office. We are not responsible for the validity of any assignment. If you assign the Policy, your rights and those of any revocably- named person will be subject to the assignment. An assignment will not affect any payments we may make or actions we may take before such assignment has been recorded at our Service Office. This may be a taxable event. You should consult a tax adviser if you wish to assign the Policy. ADJUSTMENT OF CHARGES For certain individuals and certain corporate or other groups or sponsored arrangements purchasing one or more policies, we may waive or adjust the amount of the sales charge, contingent deferred sales charge, monthly administrative charge, or other charges where the expenses associated with the sale of the Policy or policies or the underwriting or other administrative costs associated with the Policy or policies warrant an adjustment. Sales, underwriting, or other administrative expenses may be reduced for reasons such as expected economies resulting from a corporate purchase or a group or sponsored arrangement, from the amount of the initial premium payment or payments, or from the amount of projected premium payments. We will determine in our discretion if, and in what amount, an adjustment is appropriate. We may modify the criteria for qualification for adjustment of charges as experience is gained, subject to the limitation that such adjustments will not be unfairly discriminatory against the interests of any owner. PARTII EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS Our directors and executive officers and their principal occupations for the past five years are as follows: [Download Table] NAME AND PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS TITLES AND POSITIONS ---------------- -------------------- Michael K. Chairman of the Board, President Farrell**** and Chief Executive Officer of MetLife Investors and MetLife Investors USA since 2002 and Executive Vice President of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company since 2005. Senior Vice President of Metropolitan Life 2002-2005. Susan A. Director, MetLife Investors and Buffum**** MetLife Investors USA since 2001. FA, Managing Director of MetLife Investors since 1994. 26
N-6467th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 467th
[Download Table] NAME AND PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS TITLES AND POSITIONS ---------------- -------------------- Elizabeth M. Director and Executive Vice Forget* President of MetLife Investors since 2003, President of Met Investors Series Trust since 2000 and Senior Vice President of Metropolitan Life since 2007. Vice President of Metropolitan Life 2002-2007. George Director of MetLife Investors and Foulke****** MetLife Investors USA since 2003 and Vice President of Metropolitan Life since 1998. Jay S. Kaduson**** Director and Vice President since 2007 and Director, Life Distribution of Metropolitan Life since 2006. Senior Counsel 2005- 2006 and Counsel 2004-2005 of Metropolitan Life. Bennett D. Director since 2009 and Vice Kleinberg***** President since 2005 of MetLife Investors and MetLife Investors USA and Vice President and Senior Actuary of Metropolitan Life since 2005 when MetLife merged with Travelers Insurance Company. Vice President of Travelers Insurance Company 2003-2005. Richard C. Director of MetLife Investors since Pearson** 2001, Director of MetLife Investors USA since 1994, Vice President, Associate General Counsel and Secretary of MetLife Investors and MetLife Investors USA since 2007. Associate General Counsel of Metropolitan Life since 2003 and Executive Vice President, General Counsel and Secretary of MetLife Investors 2001-2007. Paul A. Director of MetLife Investors and Sylvester**** MetLife Investors USA since 2006 and Senior Vice President of Metropolitan Life since 2008. Jeffrey A. Tupper** Director since 2003 and Assistant Vice President since 2001 of MetLife Investors and MetLife Investors USA. [Download Table] NAME AND PRINCIPAL BUSINESS ADDRESS TITLES AND POSITIONS ---------------- -------------------- Kevin J. Senior Vice President of MetLife Paulson******* Investors and MetLife Investors USA since 2003 and Vice President of Metropolitan Life since 2003. Eric T. Steigerwalt* Treasurer of MetLife Investors and MetLife Investors USA since 2007 and Senior Vice President and Treasurer of Metropolitan Life since 2007. Senior Vice President of Metropolitan Life 2000-2007. James J. Reilly*** Vice President- Finance of MetLife Investors since 2008 and Vice President and Actuary of Metropolitan Life Insurance Company since 2005. * The principal business address is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 1095 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036. ** The principal address is MetLife Investors Insurance Company, 5 Park Plaza, Suite 1900, Irvine, CA 92614 *** The principal business address is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 501 Boylston Street, Boston, MA 02116. **** The principal business address is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 10 Park Avenue, Morristown, NJ 07962. ***** The principal business address is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 1300 Hall Boulevard, Bloomfield, CT 06002. ****** The principal business address is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 334 Madison Avenue, P.O. Box 533, Convent Station, NJ 07961. ******* The principal business address is Metropolitan Life Insurance Company, 4700 Westown Parkway, Suite 200, West Des Moines, IA 50266 VOTING In accordance with our view of present applicable law, we will vote the shares of the Investment Funds at special meetings of shareholders in accordance with instructions received from Owners having a voting interest. We will vote shares for which we have not received instructions in the same proportion as we vote shares for which we have received instructions. We will vote shares we own in the same proportion as we vote shares for which we have received instructions. The effect of this proportional voting is that a small number of Policy Owners may control the outcome of a vote. The Funds do not hold regular meetings of shareholders. 27
N-6468th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 468th
If the Investment Company Act of 1940 or any regulation thereunder should be amended or if the present interpretation thereof should change, and as a result we determine that we are permitted to vote the shares of the Funds in our own right, we may elect to do so. The voting interests of the Owner in the Funds will be determined as follows: Owners may cast one vote for each $100 of Accumulation Account Value of a Policy which is allocated to an Investment Fund on the record date. Fractional votes are counted. The number of shares which a person has a right to vote will be determined as of the date to be chosen by us not more than sixty (60) days prior to the meeting of the Fund. Voting instructions will be solicited by written communication at least fourteen (14) days prior to such meeting. Each Owner having such a voting interest will receive periodic reports relating to the Investment Funds in which he or she has an interest, proxy material and a form with which to give such voting instructions. DISREGARD OF VOTING INSTRUCTIONS We may, when required to do so by state insurance authorities, vote shares of the Funds without regard to instructions from Owners if such instructions would require the shares to be voted to cause an Investment Fund to make, or refrain from making, investments which would result in changes in the sub-classification or investment objectives of the Investment Fund. We may also disapprove changes in the investment policy initiated by Owners or trustees/directors of the Funds, if such disapproval is reasonable and is based on a good faith determination by us that the change would violate state or Federal law or the change would not be consistent with the investment objectives of the Investment Funds or which varies from the general quality and nature of investments and investment techniques used by other funds with similar investment objectives underlying other variable contracts offered by us or of an affiliated company. In the event we disregard voting instructions, a summary of this action and the reasons for such action will be included in the next annual report to owners. OUR RIGHT TO CONTEST We cannot contest the validity of the Policy except in the case of fraud after it has been in effect during the Insured's lifetime for two years. If the Policy is reinstated, the two-year period is measured from the date of reinstatement. In addition, if the Insured commits suicide in the two-year period, or such period as specified in state law, the benefit payable will be limited to premiums paid less Indebtedness and less any surrenders. We also have the right to adjust any benefits under the Policy if the answers in the application regarding the use of tobacco are not correct. ADDITIONAL BENEFITS Subject to certain requirements, one or more of the following additional insurance benefits may be added to a Policy by rider. Consult your registered representative regarding the availability of these riders. The cost of any additional riders will be determined in accordance with the rider and shown on the specifications page of your Policy. (See "Expenses -- Charge for Additional Benefit Riders".) Certain restrictions may apply and are described in the applicable rider. ACCELERATED BENEFIT RIDER -- This rider provides a benefit to the Owner if the Insured becomes terminally ill and is not expected to live more than twelve months. The Owner may receive 25%, 50% or 75% (but no more than $250,000) of the eligible proceeds in a lump sum. "Eligible proceeds" means the death benefit that would have been payable had the Insured died on the date the rider is exercised. The receipt of an accelerated death benefit amount may adversely affect the recipient's eligibility for Medicaid or other government benefits or entitlements. ANNIVERSARY PARTIAL WITHDRAWAL RIDER -- This rider allows the Owner to withdraw up to 15% of the Policy's Cash Surrender Value on any Policy Anniversary without reducing the Face Amount. A contingent deferred sales charge will still apply. GUARANTEED SURVIVOR PURCHASE OPTION (GSPO-PLUS) -- This rider grants the Policy Owner or the Insured's Beneficiary the option to purchase, upon the death of the Insured, on the 10th anniversary of the rider, and on the rider anniversary nearest the Designated Life's 65th birthday, a specified amount of additional insurance coverage on the Designated Life (or Lives) without furnishing evidence of insurability. LIFETIME COVERAGE RIDER -- This rider provides the continuation of the Policy's Face Amount beyond age 100, provided the Policy remains in force to age 100 with a positive Cash Surrender Value. If the Policy is in force after the Insured's Attained Age 100, the death benefit will be the greater of the Face Amount or 101% of the Accumulation Account Value. 28
N-6469th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 469th
SECONDARY GUARANTEE RIDER -- This rider guarantees that if, during the secondary guarantee period, the sum of all premiums paid on the Policy, reduced by any partial withdrawals and any outstanding loan balance, is greater than or equal to the sum of the secondary guarantee premiums required since the Issue Date, the Policy will not lapse as a result of an Accumulation Account Value less any loans, loan interest due, and any surrender charge being insufficient to pay the monthly deduction. The secondary guarantee period is the lesser of twenty Policy years, or the number of Policy years until the Insured reaches Attained Age 70. For Policies issued after Attained Age 60, the secondary guarantee period is ten Policy years. SUPPLEMENTAL COVERAGE TERM RIDER -- This rider provides level term insurance on the life of the Insured under the base policy. It can be added only at issue. It cannot be increased or added to an existing Policy. WAIVER OF MONTHLY DEDUCTION RIDER -- This rider provides for the waiver of the monthly deductions while the Insured is totally disabled, subject to certain limitations described in the rider. The Insured must have become disabled after age 5 and before age 65. WAIVER OF SPECIFIED PREMIUM RIDER -- This rider provides for crediting the Policy's Accumulation Account Value with a specified monthly premium while the Insured is totally disabled. The monthly premium selected at issue is not guaranteed to keep the Policy in force. The Insured must have become disabled after age 5 and before age 65. FEDERAL TAX STATUS NOTE: The following description is based upon our understanding of current Federal income tax law applicable to life insurance in general. We cannot predict the probability that any changes in such laws will be made. Purchasers are cautioned to seek competent tax advice regarding the possibility of such changes. Section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended ("Code"), defines the term "life insurance contract" for purposes of the Code. We believe that Policies issued on a standard underwriting basis should qualify as "life insurance contracts" under Section 7702. There is more uncertainty as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis. We do not guarantee the tax status of the Policies. Purchasers bear the complete risk that the Policies may not be treated as a "life insurance contract" under Federal income tax laws. Purchasers should consult their own tax advisers. It should be further understood that the following discussion is not exhaustive and that special rules not described in this prospectus may be applicable in certain situations. In general, however, the insurance proceeds payable on the death of the Insured will never be less than the minimum amount required for the Policy to be treated as life insurance under section 7702 of the Internal Revenue Code, as in effect on the date the Policy was issued. INTRODUCTION. The discussion contained herein is general in nature and is not intended as tax advice. It does not purport to be complete or to address every situation. Each person concerned should consult a competent tax adviser. No attempt is made to consider any applicable state or other tax laws. Moreover, the discussion herein is based upon our understanding of current federal income tax laws as they are currently interpreted. No representation is made regarding the likelihood of continuation of those current federal income tax laws or of the current interpretations by the Internal Revenue Service. IRS CIRCULAR 230 NOTICE: The tax information contained herein is not intended to (and cannot) be used by anyone to avoid IRS penalties. It is intended to support the sale of the Policy. The Policy Owner should seek tax advice based on the Policy Owner's particular circumstances from an independent tax adviser. We are taxed as a life insurance company under the Code. For federal income tax purposes, the Separate Account is not a separate entity from us and its operations form a part of us. DIVERSIFICATION. Section 817(h) of the Code imposes certain diversification standards on the underlying assets of variable life insurance policies. The Code provides that a variable life insurance policy will not be treated as life insurance for any period (and any subsequent period) for which the investments are not, in accordance with regulations prescribed by the United States Treasury Department ("Treasury Department"), adequately diversified. Disqualification of the Policy as a life insurance contract would result in imposition of federal income tax to the Owner with respect to earnings allocable to the Policy prior to the receipt of payments under the Policy. We intend that each Investment Fund underlying the Policies will be managed by the managers in such a manner as to comply with these diversification requirements. If Investment Fund shares are sold directly to tax-qualified retirement plans that later lose their tax-qualified status, or to non-qualified plans, the separate accounts investing in 29
N-6470th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 470th
the Investment Funds may fail the diversification requirements of section 817(h) of the Internal Revenue Code, which could have adverse tax consequences, including losing the benefit of tax deferral. INVESTOR CONTROL. In some circumstances, owners of variable contracts who retain excessive control over the investment of the underlying separate account assets may be treated as the owners of those assets. Although published guidance in this area does not address certain aspects of the Policies, we believe that the Owner of a Policy should not be treated as the owner of the Separate Account assets. We reserve the right to modify the Policies to bring them into conformity with applicable standards should such modification be necessary to prevent Owners of the Policies from being treated as the owners of the underlying Separate Account assets. TAX TREATMENT OF THE POLICY. The Policy has been designed to comply with the definition of life insurance contained in Section 7702 of the Code. Although some interim guidance has been provided and proposed regulations have been issued, final regulations have not been adopted. Section 7702 of the Code requires that the amount of mortality and other expense charges be reasonable. In establishing these charges, we have relied on interim IRS guidance. Currently, there is even less guidance as to Policies issued on a substandard risk basis. Moreover, if you elect the Accelerated Death Benefit Rider, the continued tax qualification of the Policy after a distribution is made under the rider is unclear. While we have attempted to comply with Section 7702, the law in this area is very complex and unclear. There is a risk, therefore, that the Internal Revenue Service will not concur with our interpretations of Section 7702 that were made in determining such compliance. In the event the Policy is determined not to so comply, it would not qualify for the favorable tax treatment usually accorded life insurance policies. You should consult your own tax advisers with respect to the tax consequences of purchasing the Policy. The following discussion assumes that the Policy will satisfy Section 7702. POLICY PROCEEDS. The tax treatment accorded to loan proceeds and/or surrender payments from the policies will depend on whether the Policy is considered to be a MEC. (See "Tax Treatment of Loans and Surrenders.") Otherwise, we believe that the Policy should receive the same Federal income tax treatment as any other type of life insurance. As such, the death benefit thereunder is generally excludable from the gross income of the Beneficiary to the extent provided in Section 101(a) of the Code. Also, you are not deemed to be in constructive receipt of the Cash Surrender Value, including increments thereon, under a Policy until there is a distribution of such amounts. In the case of employer-owned life insurance as defined in Section 101(j), the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income is limited to premiums paid unless the Policy falls within certain specified exceptions and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied before the Policy is issued. Certain specified exceptions are based on the status of an employee as highly compensated or recently employed. There are also exceptions for Policy proceeds paid to an employee's heirs. These exceptions only apply if proper notice is given to the insured employee and consent is received from the insured employee before the issuance of the Policy. These rules apply to Policies issued August 18, 2006 and later and also apply to policies issued before August 18, 2006 after a material increase in the death benefit or other material change. An IRS reporting requirement applies to employer-owned life insurance subject to these rules. Because these rules are complex and will affect the tax treatment of death benefits, it is advisable to consult tax counsel. The death benefit will also be taxable in the case of a transfer-for-value unless certain exceptions apply. Federal, state and local estate, inheritance and other tax consequences of ownership, or receipt of Policy proceeds, depend on the circumstances of each owner or Beneficiary. TAX TREATMENT OF LOANS AND SURRENDERS. Section 7702A of the Code sets forth the rules for determining when a life insurance Policy will be deemed to be a MEC. A MEC is a contract which is entered into or materially changed on or after June 21, 1988 and fails to meet the 7-pay test. A Policy fails to meet the 7-pay test when the cumulative amount paid under the Policy at any time during the first 7 Policy years exceeds the sum of the net level premiums which would have been paid on or before such time if the Policy provided for paid-up future benefits after the payment of seven (7) level annual premiums. A material change would include any increase in the future benefits or addition of qualified additional benefits provided under a Policy unless the increase is attributable to: (1) the payment of premiums necessary to fund the lowest death benefit and qualified additional benefits payable in the first seven Policy years; or (2) the crediting of interest or other earnings with respect to such premiums. 30
N-6471st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 471st
Certain changes in a Policy after it is issued could also cause it to fail to satisfy the 7-pay test and therefore to be classified as a MEC. Making additional payments, reducing the Policy's death benefit, reducing the Policy's benefits through a partial withdrawal, a change in death benefit option, and termination of benefits under a rider are examples of changes that could result in your Policy becoming classified as a MEC. Reducing the death benefit below the lowest death benefit provided by the Policy during the first seven years will probably cause the Policy to be classified as a MEC if such a reduction occurs during the first seven Policy years in the case of a Single Life Policy or at any time in the case of a Joint and Last Survivor Policy. Even if these events do not result in a Policy becoming classified as a MEC, they could reduce the amount that may be paid in the future without causing the Policy to be classified as a MEC. You should consult a tax adviser to determine whether a Policy transaction will cause your Policy to be classified as a MEC. Furthermore, any Policy received in exchange for a Policy classified as a MEC will be treated as a MEC regardless of whether it meets the 7-pay test. However, an exchange under Section 1035 of the Code of a life insurance Policy entered into before June 21, 1988 for the Policy will not cause the Policy to be treated as a MEC if no additional premiums are paid. Due to the flexible premium nature of the Policy, the determination of whether it qualifies for treatment as a MEC depends on the individual circumstances of each Policy. If the Policy is classified as a MEC, then any distribution (including the proceeds of any loan) is taxable to the extent of income in the Policy. Distributions are deemed to be on a last-in, first-out basis, which means the taxable income is distributed first. Distributions, including those resulting from surrender or lapse of the Policy, may also be subject to an additional 10% federal income tax penalty applied to the income portion of such distribution. The penalty shall not apply, however, to any distributions: (1) made on or after the date on which the taxpayer reaches age 59 1/2; (2) which is attributable to the taxpayer becoming disabled (within the meaning of Section 72(m)(7) of the Code); or (3) which is part of a series of substantially equal periodic payments made not less frequently than annually for the life (or life expectancy) of the taxpayer or the joint lives (or joint life expectancies) of such taxpayer and his beneficiary. If a Policy becomes a MEC, distributions that occur during the Policy year will be taxed as distributions from a MEC. In addition, distributions from a Policy within two years before it becomes a MEC will be taxed in this manner. This means that a distribution made from a Policy that is not a MEC could later become taxable as a distribution from a MEC. If a Policy is not classified as a MEC, then any surrenders shall be treated first as a recovery of the investment in the Policy which would not be received as taxable income. However, if a distribution is the result of a reduction in benefits under the Policy within the first fifteen years after the Policy is issued in order to comply with Section 7702, such distribution will, under rules set forth in Section 7702, be taxed as ordinary income to the extent of income in the Policy. Loans from a Policy which is not classified as a MEC, will generally be treated as Indebtedness of the Owner and not a distribution. However, there is uncertainty as to loans from such a Policy after the 10th Policy year and you should consult a tax adviser as to the treatment of such loans. If your Policy is surrendered, cancelled, lapses, or is exchanged while any Policy loan is outstanding, the amount of the Policy loan plus accrued interest will be deemed to be distributed to you and could be partly or wholly taxable, depending on your particular circumstances. Cash distributed to you from the Policy in these circumstances may be insufficient to pay the tax attributable to any Policy loan. Interest payable on a loan under a Policy is generally not deductible. Policyowners should seek competent tax advice on the tax consequences of taking loans, distributions, exchanging or surrendering any Policy. MULTIPLE POLICIES. The Code further provides that multiple MECs that are issued within a calendar year period to the same owner by one company or its affiliates are treated as one MEC for purposes of determining the taxable portion of any loans or distributions. Such treatment may result in adverse tax consequences including more rapid taxation of the loans or distributed amounts from such combination of policies. You should consult a tax adviser prior to purchasing more than one MEC in any calendar year period. CONTINUATION OF POLICY BEYOND AGE 100. The tax consequences of continuing the Policy beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday 31
N-6472nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 472nd
with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy) are unclear. You should consult a tax adviser if you intend to keep the Policy in force beyond the Insured's 100th birthday (or the younger Insured's 100th birthday with respect to the Joint and Last Survivor Policy). TAX TREATMENT OF ASSIGNMENTS. An assignment of a Policy or the change of ownership of a Policy may be a taxable event. You should therefore consult a competent tax adviser should you wish to assign or change the owner of your Policy. QUALIFIED PLANS. The Policies may be used in conjunction with certain Qualified Plans. Because the rules governing such use are complex and the amount of life insurance provided in connection with such plans may be limited, you should not do so until you have consulted a competent Qualified Plans consultant. INCOME TAX WITHHOLDING. All distributions or the portion thereof which is includible in gross income of the Policy owner are subject to Federal income tax withholding. However, in most cases you may elect not to have taxes withheld. You may be required to pay penalties under the estimated tax rules, if withholding and estimated tax payments are insufficient. LIFE INSURANCE PURCHASES BY NONRESIDENT ALIENS AND FOREIGN CORPORATIONS. Policy Owners that are not U.S. citizens or residents will generally be subject to U.S. Federal withholding tax on taxable distributions from life insurance policies at a 30% rate, unless a lower treaty rate applies. In addition, Policy Owners may be subject to state and/or municipal taxes and taxes that may be imposed by the Policy Owner's country of citizenship or residence. Prospective purchasers are advised to consult with a qualified tax adviser regarding taxation with respect to a purchase of the Policy. BUSINESS USES OF POLICY. Businesses can use the Policies in various arrangements, including nonqualified deferred compensation or salary continuance plans, split dollar insurance plans, executive bonus plans, tax exempt and nonexempt welfare benefit plans, retiree medical benefit plans and others. The tax consequences of such plans may vary depending on the particular facts and circumstances. If you are purchasing the Policy for any arrangement the value of which depends in part on its tax consequences, you should consult a qualified tax adviser. In the case of a business-owned Policy, the provisions of Section 101(j) of the Code may limit the amount of the death benefit excludable from gross income unless a specified exception applies and a notice and consent requirement is satisfied, as discussed above. In recent years, moreover, Congress has adopted new rules relating to life insurance owned by businesses. Any business contemplating the purchase of a new Policy or a change in an existing Policy should consult a tax adviser. NON-INDIVIDUAL OWNERS AND BUSINESS BENEFICIARIES OF POLICIES. Ownership of the Policy by a corporation, trust or other non-natural person could jeopardize some (or all) of such entity's interest deduction under Internal Revenue Code Section 264, even where such entity's indebtedness is in no way connected to the Policy. In addition, under Section 264(f)(5), if a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is directly or indirectly a beneficiary of the Policy, the Policy could be treated as held by the business for purposes of the Section 264(f) entity-holder rules. Therefore, it would be advisable to consult with a qualified tax adviser before any non-natural person is made an Owner or holder of the Policy, or before a business (other than a sole proprietorship) is made a beneficiary of the Policy. SPLIT-DOLLAR ARRANGEMENTS. The IRS and the Treasury Department have recently issued guidance that substantially affects split-dollar arrangements. You should consult a qualified tax adviser before entering into or paying additional premiums with respect to such arrangements. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (the "Act"), which was signed into law on July 30, 2002, prohibits, with limited exceptions, publicly-traded companies, including non-U.S. companies that have securities listed on U.S. exchanges, from extending directly or indirectly or through a subsidiary, many types of personal loans to their directors or executive officers. It is possible that this prohibition may be interpreted to apply to split-dollar life insurance arrangements for directors and executive officers of such companies, since such arrangements can arguably be viewed as involving a loan from the employer for at least some purposes. Any affected business contemplating the payments of a premium on an existing Policy or the purchase of a new Policy in connection with a split-dollar life insurance arrangement should consult legal counsel. Split dollar plans that provide deferred compensation may be subject to recently enacted rules governing deferred compensation arrangements. Failure to adhere to these rules will result in adverse tax consequences. A tax adviser should be consulted with respect to such plans. 32
N-6473rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 473rd
ESTATE, GIFT AND GENERATION-SKIPPING TRANSFER TAXES. The transfer of the Policy or the designation of a beneficiary may have Federal, state, and/or local transfer and inheritance tax consequences, including the imposition of gift, estate, and generation-skipping transfer taxes. When the insured dies, the death proceeds will generally be includable in the Policy Owner's estate for purposes of the Federal estate tax if the Policy Owner was the insured. If the Policy Owner was not the insured, the fair market value of the Policy would be included in the Policy Owner's estate upon the Policy Owner's death. The Policy would not be includable in the insured's estate if the insured neither retained incidents of ownership at death nor had given up ownership within three years before death. Moreover, under certain circumstances, the Internal Revenue Code may impose a "generation-skipping transfer tax" when all or part of a life insurance policy is transferred to, or a death benefit is paid to, an individual two or more generations younger than the Policy Owner. Regulations issued under the Internal Revenue Code may require us to deduct the tax from your Policy, or from any applicable payment, and pay it directly to the IRS. Qualified tax advisers should be consulted concerning the estate and gift tax consequences of Policy ownership and distributions under Federal, state and local law. The individual situation of each Policy Owner or beneficiary will determine the extent, if any, to which Federal, state, and local transfer and inheritance taxes may be imposed and how ownership or receipt of Policy proceeds will be treated for purposes of Federal, state and local estate, inheritance, generation-skipping and other taxes. The Economic Growth and Tax Relief Reconciliation Act of 2001 ("EGTRRA") repeals the Federal estate tax and replaces it with a carryover basis income tax regime effective for estates of decedents dying after December 31, 2009. EGTRRA also repeals the generation-skipping transfer tax, but not the gift tax, for transfers made after December 31, 2009. EGTRRA contains a sunset provision, which essentially returns the Federal estate, gift and generation-skipping transfer taxes to their pre-EGTRRA form, beginning in 2011. Congress may or may not enact permanent repeal between now and then. During the period prior to 2010, EGTRRA provides for periodic decreases in the maximum estate tax rate coupled with periodic increases in the estate tax exemption. For 2007-2009, the maximum estate tax rate is 45%. The estate tax exemption is $2,000,000 for 2006-2008 and $3,500,000 in 2009. The complexity of the new tax law, along with uncertainty as to how it might be modified in coming years, underscores the importance of seeking guidance from a qualified adviser to help ensure that your estate plan adequately addresses your needs and those of your beneficiaries under all possible scenarios. TAX CREDITS AND DEDUCTIONS The Company may be entitled to certain tax benefits related to the assets of the Separate Account. These tax benefits, which may include foreign tax credits and corporate dividends received deductions, are not passed back to the Separate Account or to Policy Owners since the Company is the owner of the assets from which the tax benefits are derived. ALTERNATIVE MINIMUM TAX. There may also be an indirect tax on the income in the Policy or the proceeds of the Policy under the Federal corporate alternative minimum tax if the Owner is subject to that tax. POSSIBLE TAX LAW CHANGES. Although the likelihood of legislative changes is uncertain, there is always the possibility that the tax treatment of the Policy could change by legislation or otherwise. Consult a tax adviser with respect to legislative developments and their effect on the Policy. THE COMPANY'S INCOME TAXES. Under current Federal income tax law we are not taxed on the Separate Account's operations. Thus, currently we do not deduct a charge from the Separate Account for company Federal income taxes. (We do deduct a charge for Federal taxes from premiums.) We reserve the right to charge the Separate Account for any future Federal income taxes we may incur. Under current laws we may incur state and local taxes (in addition to premium taxes). These taxes are not now significant and we are not currently charging for them. If they increase, we may deduct charges for such taxes. REPORTS TO OWNERS Each year a report will be sent to you which shows the current Policy values, premiums paid and deductions made since the last report, and any outstanding loans. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS In the ordinary course of business, MetLife Investors, similar to other life insurance companies, is involved in lawsuits (including class action lawsuits), arbitrations and other legal proceedings. Also, from time to time, state and federal regulators or other officials conduct formal and 33
N-6474th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 474th
informal examinations or undertake other actions dealing with various aspects of the financial services and insurance industries. In some legal proceedings involving insurers, substantial damages have been sought and/or material settlement payments have been made. It is not possible to predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of any pending legal proceeding or regulatory action. However, MetLife Investors does not believe any such action or proceeding will have a material adverse effect upon the Separate Account or upon the ability of MetLife Investors Distribution Company to perform its contract with the Separate Account or of MetLife Investors to meet its obligations under the contracts. INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM [2008 Financial Statements Omitted] The financial statements of each of the Sub-Accounts of MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One and MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five included in this Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports appearing herein, and are included in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The principal address of Deloitte & Touche LLP is 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1200, Tampa, Florida 33602-5827. The financial statements of MetLife Investors Insurance Company (the "Company") included in this Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the fact that the Company changed its method of accounting for certain assets and liabilities to a fair value measurement approach as required by accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2008, and changed its method of accounting for income taxes as required by accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2007), and are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The principal address of Deloitte & Touche LLP is 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1200, Tampa, Florida 33602-5827. The consolidated financial statements of General American Life Insurance Company and subsidiaries (the "Guarantor") included in this Prospectus have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report appearing herein (which report expresses an unqualified opinion and includes an explanatory paragraph referring to the fact that the Guarantor changed its method of accounting for certain assets and liabilities to a fair value measurement approach as required by accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2008, and changed its method of accounting for deferred acquisition costs and for income taxes as required by accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2007), and are included in reliance upon the report of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. The principal address of Deloitte & Touche LLP is 201 East Kennedy Boulevard, Suite 1200, Tampa, Florida 33602-5827. The consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules included in MetLife, Inc. and subsidiaries' ("MetLife's") Current Report on Form 8-K dated June 12, 2009, incorporated by reference in this Prospectus and the effectiveness of MetLife's internal control over financial reporting for the year ended December 31, 2008 included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K incorporated by reference herein, have been audited by Deloitte & Touche LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their reports (which (1) express an unqualified opinion on the consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules and include an explanatory paragraph regarding changes in MetLife's method of accounting for certain assets and liabilities to a fair value measurement approach as required by accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2008, and its method of accounting for deferred acquisition costs and for income taxes as required by accounting guidance adopted on January 1, 2007, and (2) express an unqualified opinion on MetLife's effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting), which are incorporated herein by reference. Such consolidated financial statements and financial statement schedules have been so incorporated in reliance upon the reports of such firm given upon their authority as experts in accounting and auditing. ADDITIONAL INFORMATION As noted in the THE COMPANY section of this Prospectus, MetLife, Inc. has entered into a net worth maintenance agreement with the Company. As permitted by Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") rules, we are incorporating into this Prospectus the following documents which have been filed with the SEC, which means these documents are legally part of the Prospectus: (i) The consolidated financial statements and financial schedules from MetLife and subsidiaries' Annual Report on 34
N-6475th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 475th
Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008, filed on March 2, 2009 (File No. 001-15787), can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.; (ii) the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements (including notes thereto) included in MetLife's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2009, filed on May 7, 2009 (File No. 001-15787), can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.; (iii) the unaudited interim condensed consolidated financial statements (including notes thereto) included in MetLife's Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended June 30, 2009, filed on August 4, 2009 (File No. 001-15787), can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov.; (iv) MetLife's Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on June 12, 2009 (File No. 001-15787), can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. (v) MetLife's Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the SEC on October 29, 2009 (File No. 001-15787), can be viewed on the SEC website at www.sec.gov. You should only consider MetLife, Inc.'s financial statements (including notes and financial statement schedules thereto) and other financial information that we have incorporated by reference as noted above as bearing on the ability of MetLife, Inc. to meet its obligations under the net worth maintenance agreement. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS [2008 Financial Statements are Omitted] Financial Statements of the Separate Accounts, the Company and General American Life are provided herein. 35
N-6476th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 476th
APPENDIX A PARTICIPATING INVESTMENT FUNDS INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES Below is a listing of the investment advisers and subadvisers, if any, and the investment objectives of each Investment Fund available under the policy. The Investment Funds' prospectuses contain more complete information, including a description of the investment objectives, policies, restrictions and risks. THERE CAN BE NO ASSURANCE THAT THE INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES WILL BE ACHIEVED. AIM VARIABLE INSURANCE FUNDS (SERIES 1 SHARES): AIM Variable Insurance Funds is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Invesco Aim Advisors, Inc. is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following Series I portfolio is available under the policy: AIM V.I. INTERNATIONAL GROWTH FUND SUBADVISERS: Invesco Asset Management Deutschland GmbH; Invesco Asset Management Limited; Invesco Asset Management (Japan) Limited; Invesco Australia Limited; Invesco Global Asset Management (N.A.), Inc.; Invesco Hong Kong Limited; Invesco Institutional (N.A.), Inc.; Invesco Senior Secured Management, Inc.; Invesco Trimark Investment Management Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. FRANKLIN TEMPLETON VARIABLE INSURANCE PRODUCTS TRUST (CLASS 1): Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Templeton Investment Counsel, LLC is the investment adviser for the following Class 1 portfolio available under the policy: TEMPLETON FOREIGN SECURITIES FUND SUBADVISER: Franklin Templeton Investment Management Limited INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. MET INVESTORS SERIES TRUST (CLASS A): Met Investors Series Trust is managed by MetLife Advisers, LLC, which is an affiliate of MetLife Investors. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. Met Investors Series Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: CLARION GLOBAL REAL ESTATE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ING Clarion Real Estate Securities, L.P. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks total return through investment in real estate securities, emphasizing both capital appreciation and current income. LAZARD MID CAP PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lazard Asset Management LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. LEGG MASON PARTNERS AGGRESSIVE GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: ClearBridge Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. LORD ABBETT BOND DEBENTURE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks high current income and the opportunity for capital appreciation to produce a high total return. LORD ABBETT GROWTH AND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital and income without excessive fluctuation in market value. LORD ABBETT MID CAP VALUE PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Lord, Abbett & Co. LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation through investments primarily in equity securities which are believed to be undervalued in the marketplace. MET/AIM SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Invesco Aim Capital Management, Inc. A-1
N-6477th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 477th
INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term growth of capital. MFS(R) EMERGING MARKETS EQUITY PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. MFS(R) RESEARCH INTERNATIONAL PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Massachusetts Financial Services Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. OPPENHEIMER CAPITAL APPRECIATION PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: OppenheimerFunds, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. PIMCO TOTAL RETURN PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Pacific Investment Management Company LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks maximum total return, consistent with the preservation of capital and prudent investment management. VAN KAMPEN MID CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Morgan Stanley Investment Management, Inc. (d/b/a Van Kampen) INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. METROPOLITAN SERIES FUND, INC. (CLASS A): Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC is the investment adviser to the portfolios. MetLife Advisers, LLC has engaged subadvisers to provide investment advice for the individual portfolios. The following Class A portfolios are available under the policy: BLACKROCK BOND INCOME PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a competitive total return primarily from investing in fixed-income securities. BLACKROCK MONEY MARKET PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: BlackRock Advisors, LLC INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks a high level of current income consistent with preservation of capital. T. ROWE PRICE LARGE CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long term growth of capital and, secondarily, dividend income. T. ROWE PRICE SMALL CAP GROWTH PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: T. Rowe Price Associates, Inc. INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks long-term capital growth. WESTERN ASSET MANAGEMENT STRATEGIC BOND OPPORTUNITIES PORTFOLIO SUBADVISER: Western Asset Management Company INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks to maximize total return consistent with preservation of capital. PUTNAM VARIABLE TRUST (CLASS IA): Putnam Variable Trust is a mutual fund with multiple portfolios. Putnam Investment Management, LLC is the investment adviser to each portfolio. The following portfolios are available under the policy: PUTNAM VT GROWTH AND INCOME FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital growth and current income. PUTNAM VT VISTA FUND INVESTMENT OBJECTIVE: Seeks capital appreciation. DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS. The following investment options are no longer available for allocations of premiums or transfers of cash value (excluding rebalancing and dollar cost averaging programs in existence at the time of closing): (a) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Government & Agency Securities VIP (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002); and (b) Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc.: BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) (added and closed effective May 1, 2009). Effective as of April 28, 2003, General American Money Market Fund was merged into the State Street Research Money Market Portfolio of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. and the following investment portfolios of the Met Investors Series Trust were merged: J.P. Morgan Enhanced Index Portfolio merged into the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio; J.P. Morgan International Equity Portfolio merged into the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio; and Lord Abbett Developing Growth Portfolio A-2
N-6478th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 478th
merged into the Lord Abbett Growth Opportunities Portfolio. Effective as of May 1, 2004, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Premier Equity Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of Met Investors Series Trust ("MIST"); (b) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: AllianceBernstein Premier Growth Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Janus Aggressive Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (c) Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust (Class 1): Franklin Small Cap Fund was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. ("MSF"); and Mutual Shares Securities Fund was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (d) Goldman Sachs Variable Insurance Trust ("GSVIT"): GSVIT Growth and Income Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and GSVIT International Equity Fund (closed effective March 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (e) Liberty Variable Investments: the Newport Tiger Fund, Variable Series (Class A) (closed effective May 1, 2002) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; (f) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust (Initial Class): MFS(R) Research Series (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; MFS(R) Emerging Growth Series was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and the MFS(R) Strategic Income Series was replaced with the Salomon Brothers Strategic Bond Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; (g) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds (Initial Class): Oppenheimer Strategic Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Main Street Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer High Income Fund/VA was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of MIST; Oppenheimer Bond Fund/VA was replaced with the State Street Research Bond Income Portfolio (Class A) of MSF; and (h) Putnam Variable Trust (Class IA): Putnam VT New Value Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Growth and Income Fund (Class A) of MIST; and the Putnam VT International New Opportunities Fund (closed effective May 1, 2003) was replaced with the MFS(R) Research International Portfolio (Class A) of MIST. Effective as of November 22, 2004, the J.P. Morgan Quality Bond Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the PIMCO Total Return Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the J.P. Morgan Select Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was closed. Effective as of May 1, 2005, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AllianceBernstein Variable Products Series Fund, Inc.: the AllianceBernstein Real Estate Investment Portfolio (Class A) was replaced with the Neuberger Berman Real Estate Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (b) MFS(R) Variable Insurance Trust: the MFS(R) High Income Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Lord Abbett Bond Debenture Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust, the MFS(R) Investors Trust Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust and the MFS New Discovery Series (Initial Class) was replaced with the Met/AIM Small Cap Growth Portfolio of the Met Investors Series Trust; (c) Putnam Variable Trust: the Putnam VT International Equity Fund (Class IA) was replaced with the MFS Research International Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; (d) Oppenheimer Variable Account Funds: the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Fund/VA (Class A) (closed May 1, 2004) was replaced with the Oppenheimer Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the following investment portfolios were replaced: (a) AIM Variable Insurance Funds: AIM V.I. Capital Appreciation Fund (Series I) was replaced with the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust; and (b) DWS Variable Series II: DWS Small Cap Growth VIP (Class A) was replaced with the T. Rowe Price Small Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. Effective as of April 30, 2007, the Met/Putnam Capital Opportunities Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust was merged into the Lazard Mid-Cap Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. Effective as of April 28, 2008, the Templeton Developing Markets Securities Fund (Class 1) of the Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust was replaced with the MFS(R) Emerging Markets Equity Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust. A-3
N-6479th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 479th
Effective as of May 4, 2009, the Met/AIM Capital Appreciation Portfolio (Class A) of the Met Investors Series Trust merged into the BlackRock Legacy Large Cap Growth Portfolio (Class A) of the Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc. YOU SHOULD READ THE PROSPECTUSES FOR THESES DISCONTINUED INVESTMENT PORTFOLIOS FOR MORE INFORMATION ON FEES, CHARGES, INVESTMENT OBJECTIVES AND RISKS. A COPY OF THE FUND PROSPECTUSES HAS PREVIOUSLY BEEN PROVIDED TO YOU. A-4
N-6480th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 480th
Part II UNDERTAKING TO FILE REPORTS Subject to the terms and conditions of Section 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the undersigned Registrant hereby undertakes to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission such supplementary and periodic information, documents, and reports as may be prescribed by any rule or regulation of the Commission heretofore or hereafter duly adopted pursuant to authority conferred in that section. RULE 484 UNDERTAKING As described in their respective governing documents, MetLife, Inc. (the ultimate parent of the Depositor and MetLife Investors Distribution Company, the Registrant's underwriter (the "Underwriter")) and the Depositor, each of which is incorporated in the state of Delaware, shall indemnify any person who is made or is threatened to be made a party to any civil or criminal suit, or any administrative or investigative proceeding, by reason of that person's service as a director, officer, or agent of the respective company, under certain circumstances, against liabilities and expenses incurred by such person (except, with respect to the Depositor, as described below regarding MetLife Employees). As described in its governing documents, the Underwriter, which is incorporated in the state of Missouri, may indemnify, under certain circumstances, any person who is made a party to any civil or criminal suit, or made a subject of any administrative or investigative proceeding by reason of the fact that he is or was a director, officer, or agent of the Underwriter. The Underwriter also has such other and further powers of indemnification as are not inconsistent with the laws of Missouri. MetLife, Inc. also has adopted a policy to indemnify employees ("MetLife Employees") of MetLife, Inc. or its affiliates ("MetLife"), including any MetLife Employees serving as directors or officers of the Depositor or the Underwriter. Under the policy, MetLife, Inc. will, under certain circumstances, indemnify MetLife Employees for losses and expenses incurred in connection with legal actions threatened or brought against them as a result of their service to MetLife. The policy excludes MetLife directors and others who are not MetLife Employees, whose rights to indemnification, if any, are as described in the charter, bylaws or other arrangement of the relevant company. MetLife, Inc. also maintains a Directors and Officers Liability and Corporate Reimbursement Insurance Policy under which the Registrant, the Depositor and the Underwriter, as well as certain other subsidiaries of MetLife, are covered. MetLife, Inc. also has secured a Financial Institutions Bond. Insofar as indemnification for liability arising under the Securities Act of 1933 may be permitted to directors, officers and controlling persons of the Company pursuant to the foregoing provisions, or otherwise, the Company has been advised that in the opinion of the Securities and Exchange Commission such indemnification is against public policy as expressed in the Act and is, therefore, unenforceable. In the event that a claim for indemnification against such liabilities (other than the payment by the Company of expenses incurred or paid by a director, officer or controlling person of the Company in the successful defense of any action, suit or proceeding) is asserted by such director, officer or controlling person in connection with the securities being registered, the Company will, unless in the opinion of its counsel the matter has been settled by controlling precedent, submit to a court of appropriate jurisdiction the question whether such indemnification by it is against public policy as expressed in the Act and will be governed by the final adjudication of such issue. 1
N-6481st Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 481st
REPRESENTATIONS MetLife Insurance Company USA hereby represents that the fees and charges deducted under the flexible premium variable life insurance policies described in this registration statement, in the aggregate, are reasonable in relation to the services rendered, the expenses expected to be incurred, and the risks assumed by MetLife Insurance Company USA. CONTENTS OF REGISTRATION STATEMENT This Registration Statement comprises the following papers and documents: The facing sheet. A reconciliation and tie-in of the information shown in the prospectus with the items of Form N-8B-2. The prospectus consisting of ___ pages. The undertaking to file reports. The undertaking pursuant to Rule 484(b) under the Securities Act of 1933. Representations. The signatures. Written consents of the following persons: Opinion and Consent of Counsel (see Exhibit 2(i)below) D. Kent Holbrook, F.S.A., M.A.A.A. (see Exhibit 2(ii) below) Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (see Exhibit 4 below) The following exhibits: 1.A. (1) (a) Resolution of the Board of Directors of MetLife Investors Insurance Company authorizing establishment of the Separate Account. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1. A. 1 of the Registrant's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-17963) filed December 16, 1996.) (b) Resolutions of the Board of Directors of MetLife Investors Insurance Company (including Agreement and Plan of Merger attached as Exhibit A to the resolutions)(adopted August 13, 2014) (Filed herewith.) (c) Resolutions of the Board of Directors of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut authorizing acceptance of the Separate Account (adopted September 17, 2014) (Filed herewith.) (3) (a)(i) Distribution and Principal Underwriting Agreement between MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MetLife Investors Distribution Company (effective November 24, 2009) (Incorporated herein by reference 2
N-6482nd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 482nd
to Exhibit (c) 7 to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to MetLife of CT Fund UL III for Variable Life Insurance's Registration Statement on Form N-6 (File No. 333-71349) filed April 9, 2009.) (ii) Amendment to the Distribution and Principal Underwriting Agreement between MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MetLife Investors Distribution Company (dated August 18, 2014)(Filed herewith.) (b) Enterprise Selling Agreement between MetLife Investors Distribution Company and broker-dealers dated September 2012. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit (d) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 23 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-101778) filed April 3, 2013.) (c) Schedule of Commissions (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.A.3(c) to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-83183) filed October 22, 1999.) (5) (a) Flexible Premium Variable Life Insurance Policy (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.A.5 to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-83183) filed July 19, 1999.) (b) Riders for the Policy: Accelerated Benefit Rider Anniversary Partial Withdrawal Rider Guaranteed Survivor Plus Purchase Option Rider Lifetime Coverage Rider Preliminary Term Life Insurance Rider Secondary Guarantee Rider Supplemental Coverage Rider Waiver of Monthly Deduction Rider Waiver of Specified Premium Rider (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 1.A.5(a)-(i) to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-83183) filed July 19, 1999.) (c) Name Change Endorsement (effective February 5, 2001.) (Cova Financial Services Life Insurance Company changed its name to MetLife Investors Insurance Company) (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.A.5(j) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-83183) filed April 26, 2001.) (d) Merger Endorsement (effective November 9, 2006) (MetLife Investors Insurance Company of California merged into MetLife Investors Insurance Company)(Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 1.A.5(j) to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-138574) filed November 9, 2006.) (e) Merger Endorsement (effective November 14, 2014) (MetLife Investors Insurance Company merged into MetLife Insurance Company USA) (Filed herewith.) (6) (a) Copy of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and Certificate of Amendment (effective November 14, 2014) (Filed herewith.) (b) Copy of the By-Laws of the Company. (Filed herewith.) (9) (a)(i) Participation Agreement among Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc., MetLife Advisers, LLC, MetLife Investors Distribution Company and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut effective August 31, 2007. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(e) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 11 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Nine for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-65926) filed October 31, 2007.) (ii) Amendment dated April 30, 2010 to the Participation Agreement dated August 31, 2007 by and among Metropolitan Series Fund, Inc., MetLife Advisers, LLC, MetLife Investors Distribution Company and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(b)(iii) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-152189) filed April 4, 2012.) 3
N-6483rd Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 483rd
(b)(i) Participation Agreement among Met Investors Series Trust, Met Investors Advisory, LLC, MetLife Investors Distribution Company, The Travelers Insurance Company and The Travelers Life and Annuity Company effective November 1, 2005. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(c) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 14 to Travelers Fund ABD for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 033-65343) filed April 6, 2006.) (ii) First Amendment dated May 1, 2009 to the Participation Agreement dated November 1, 2005 by and among Met Investors Series Trust, MetLife Advisers, LLC, MetLife Investors Distribution Company and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(a)(i) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-152189) filed April 4, 2012.) (iii) Amendment dated April 30, 2010 to the Participation Agreement dated November 1, 2005 by and among Met Investors Series Trust, MetLife Advisers, LLC, MetLife Investors Distribution Company and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(a)(ii) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-152189) filed April 4, 2012.) (iv) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with Met Investors Series Trust (Filed herewith.) (c)(i) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement among Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust, Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., The Travelers Insurance Company, The Travelers Life and Annuity Company and Travelers Distribution LLC dated May 1, 2004 and amendments. (Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to MetLife of CT Fund UL III for Variable Life Insurance's Registration Statement on Form N-6 (File No. 333-71349) filed April 9, 2009.) (ii) Amendment No. 5 dated October 5, 2010 to the Amended and Restated Participation Agreement dated May 1, 2004 among Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust, Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MetLife Investors Distribution Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(d)(i) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 3 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-152189) filed April 5, 2011.) (iii) Participation Agreement Addendum effective May 1, 2011 among Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust, Franklin /Templeton Distributors, Inc., MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MetLife 4
N-6484th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 484th
Investors Distribution Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(d)(ii) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-152189) filed April 4, 2012.) (iv) Amendment dated January 15, 2013 to the Participation Agreement Among Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust, Franklin/Templeton Distributors, Inc., MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MetLife Investors Distribution Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(i)(iii) to Post- Effective Amendment No. 23 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-101778) filed April 3, 2013.) (v) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust. (Filed herewith.) (d)(i) Participation Agreement among AIM Variable Insurance Funds, AIM Distributors, Inc., The Travelers Insurance Company, The Travelers Life and Annuity Company and Travelers Distribution LLC dated October 1, 2000 and amendments. (Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the MetLife of CT Fund UL III for Variable Life Insurance's Registration Statement on Form N-6 (File No. 333-71349) filed April 9, 2009.) (ii) Amendment dated April 30, 2010 to the Participation Agreement dated October 1, 2000 by and among AIM Variable Insurance Funds, AIM Distributors, Inc., MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut and MetLife Investors Distribution Company. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(c)(i) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-101778) filed April 5, 2011.) (iii) Amendment dated April 30, 2010 to the Participation Agreement dated October 1, 2000 between AIM Variable Insurance Funds (Invesco Variable Insurance Funds) ("AVIF"), Invesco Distributors, Inc. and MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut. (Incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit 8(c)(ii) to Post-Effective Amendment No. 21 to MetLife of CT Separate Account Eleven for Variable Annuities' Registration Statement on Form N-4 (File No. 333-101778) filed April 5, 2011.) (iv) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with AIM Variable Insurance Funds. (Filed herewith.) (e)(i) Amended and Restated Participation Agreement among Putnam Variable Trust, Putnam Retail Management, L.P., The Travelers Insurance Company and The Travelers Life and Annuity Company dated June 1, 2001 and amendments. (Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 15 to the MetLife of CT Fund UL III for Variable Life Insurance's Registration Statement on Form N-6 (File No. 333-71349) filed April 9, 2009.) (ii) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with Putnam Variable Trust. (Filed herewith.) (10) Application Forms. (Incorporated herein by reference to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-83183) filed July 19, 1999.) 2. (i) Opinion and Consent of Nancy H. Badeer, Esq. as to the legality of the securities being registered. (Filed herewith.) (ii) Actuarial Opinion and Consent of D. Kent Holbrook, FSA, MAAA. (Incorporated herein by reference to Post-Effective Amendment No. 4 to MetLife Investors Variable Life Account Five's Registration Statement on Form S-6 (File No. 333-83183) filed April 26, 2001.) 3. Powers of Attorney. (Filed herewith.) 4. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Filed herewith.) 5
N-6485th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 485th
SIGNATURES Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, the registrant, MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One, has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, and its seal to be hereunto affixed and attested, all in the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 14th day of November, 2014. MetLife Investors Variable Life Account One (Registrant) By: MetLife Insurance Company USA (Depositor) By: /s/ Karen A. Johnson -------------------------------- Karen A. Johnson Vice President Attest: /s/ Michele H. Abate ----------------------------- Michele H. Abate 1
N-6486th Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 486th
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, MetLife Insurance Company USA has duly caused this Registration Statement to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, and its seal to be hereunto affixed and attested, all in the City of Boston, and the Commonwealth of Massachusetts, on the 14th day of November, 2014. MetLife Insurance Company USA (Seal) Attest: /s/ Michele H. Abate By: /s/ Karen A. Johnson -------------------------- ------------------------------ Michele H. Abate Karen A. Johnson Vice President Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, this Registration Statement has been signed by the following persons, in the capacities indicated, on November 14, 2014. * Chairman of the Board, President and ---------------------------------- Chief Executive Officer and a Director Eric T. Steigerwalt * Director and Senior Vice President ---------------------------------- Elizabeth M. Forget * Director and Senior Vice President ---------------------------------- Gene L. Lunman * Senior Vice President and ---------------------------------- Chief Financial Officer Anant Bhalla * Executive Vice President and ---------------------------------- Chief Accounting Officer Peter M. Carlson By: /s/ Michele H. Abate ------------------------------ Michele H. Abate, Esq Attorney-in-fact * Executed by Michele H. Abate, Esquire on behalf of those indicated pursuant to powers of attorney filed herewith. 2
N-6Last Page of 487TOC1stPreviousNextBottomJust 487th
EXHIBIT LIST 1.A. 1(b) Resolutions of the Board of Directors of MetLife Investors Insurance Company (including Agreement and Plan of Merger attached as Exhibit A to the resolutions.) 1(c) Resolutions of the Board of Directors of MetLife Insurance Company of Connecticut authorizing acceptance of the Separate Account 3(a)(ii) Amendment to the Distribution and Principal Underwriting Agreement 5(e) Merger Endorsement (effective November 14, 2014) 6(a) Copy of the Certificate of Incorporation of the Company and Certificate of Amendment (b) Copy of the By-Laws of the Company 9(b)(iv) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with Met Investors Series Trust 9(c)(v) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with Franklin Templeton Variable Insurance Products Trust 9(d)(iv) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with AIM Variable Insurance Funds 9(e)(ii) Amendment to the Participation Agreement with Putnam Variable Trust 2. (i) Opinion and Consent of Nancy H. Badeer, Esq. as to the legality of the securities being registered 3. Powers of Attorney 4. Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm (Deloitte & Touche LLP) 1

Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

Referenced-On Page
This ‘N-6’ Filing    Date First  Last      Other Filings
12/16/21168
7/15/21168279
10/15/15168
12/31/14168
Filed as of:11/17/1423N-6
Filed on:11/14/141487N-6
11/10/14380
11/7/1483316
10/27/1483316
9/30/14380
9/17/14481
8/18/14482
8/13/14481
4/28/14381
4/2/14316
3/31/14233314
3/28/1494
3/27/145
2/14/1492
1/1/1483223
12/31/13538124F-2NT,  N-30D,  NSAR-U
12/30/13219
12/15/13121333
10/15/13373
10/1/13322379
9/30/13375
7/17/13119252
4/30/13406
4/29/1316404
4/3/13482484
1/15/13484
1/1/13120412
12/31/121639224F-2NT,  N-30D,  NSAR-U
12/28/12219
12/19/12374375
11/14/12219
10/1/12144
9/27/12373375
4/30/12391418497
4/4/12482484
1/1/12120333
12/31/111640524F-2NT,  N-30D,  NSAR-U
12/16/11374
9/1/11220
7/15/11374
5/1/11417483
4/30/11430
4/5/11483484
1/1/1183337
12/31/109841724F-2NT,  N-30D,  NSAR-U
10/5/10483
9/27/10391428
5/3/10391440
5/1/10429430
4/30/10446484497
1/1/10430436
12/31/0942947324F-2NT,  N-30D,  NSAR-U
11/24/09481
11/9/09381465
10/29/09475
8/4/09475
6/30/09475N-30D
6/12/09474475
5/7/09475
5/4/09391479
5/1/09390483
4/9/09482484
3/31/09475
3/2/09475
12/31/0844647524F-2NT,  N-30D,  NSAR-U
9/19/08446
4/28/08391478485BPOS
1/1/08474
10/31/07482
8/31/07482
4/30/07391478485BPOS,  497
1/1/07474
11/9/06464482497J
8/18/06385470
4/6/06483
11/1/05483
5/1/05391478485BPOS
11/22/04391478
10/1/04464
5/1/04390483
5/1/03391478
4/28/03390477
1/1/033
12/31/02346424F-2NT,  NSAR-U
7/30/02387472
5/1/02391478485BPOS
3/1/02390478
6/7/01412
6/1/01484
5/1/01381429
4/26/01482484485BPOS
2/5/01482
1/30/01464
12/31/0037924F-2NT,  NSAR-U
10/31/00379
10/1/00484
1/6/00464
10/22/99482S-6/A
7/19/99482484S-6
12/16/96481N-8A,  N-8B-2,  S-6EL24
6/1/95464
 List all Filings
Top
Filing Submission 0001193125-14-413577   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Wed., Apr. 24, 11:51:53.4am ET