SEC Info  
    Home      Search      My Interests      Help      Sign In      Please Sign In

MPM Holdings Inc. – IPO: ‘424B1’ on 7/2/15

On:  Thursday, 7/2/15, at 4:55pm ET   ·   Accession #:  1193125-15-244399   ·   File #:  333-201338

Find Words in Filings emoji
 
  in    Show  and   Hints

  As Of                Filer                Filing    For·On·As Docs:Size              Issuer               Agent

 7/02/15  MPM Holdings Inc.                 424B1                  1:3.5M                                   RR Donnelley/FA

Initial Public Offering (IPO):  Prospectus   —   Rule 424(b)(1)
Filing Table of Contents

Document/Exhibit                   Description                      Pages   Size 

 1: 424B1       Final Prospectus                                    HTML   2.46M 


Document Table of Contents

Page (sequential) | (alphabetic) Top
 
11st Page   -   Filing Submission
"Table of Contents
"P Resentation of F Inancial I Nformation
"M Arket and I Ndustry D Ata and F Orecasts
"T Rademarks
"P Rospectus S Ummary
"Risk Factors
"C Autionary S Tatements C Oncerning F Orward L Ooking S Tatements
"U Se of P Roceeds
"M Arket P Rices and D Ividend P Olicy
"O Ffering P Rice
"C Apitalization
"U Naudited P Ro F Orma C Ondensed F Inancial I Nformation
"S Elected H Istorical C Onsolidated F Inancial D Ata
"M Anagement ' S D Iscussion and A Nalysis of F Inancial C Ondition and R Esults of O Perations
"B Usiness
"M Anagement
"P Rincipal and S Elling S Tockholders
"C Ertain R Elationships and R Elated P Arty T Ransactions
"D Escription of I Ndebtedness
"D Escription of C Apital S Tock
"P Lan of D Istribution
"C Ertain U.S. F Ederal I Ncome T Ax C Onsiderations for Non -U.S. H Olders
"L Egal M Atters
"E Xperts
"W Here Y Ou C An F Ind A Dditional I Nformation
"I Ndex to F Inancial S Tatements
"Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
"Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013
"Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
"Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014
"Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor)
"Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor)
"Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor)
"Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2015
"Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

This is an HTML Document rendered as filed.  [ Alternative Formats ]



  Final Prospectus  
Table of Contents

Filed Pursuant to Rule 424(b)(1)
Registration No. 333-201338

PROSPECTUS

39,305,467 Shares

 

LOGO

MPM Holdings Inc.

Common Stock

 

 

This prospectus relates to the offer and resale of up to an aggregate of 39,305,466 shares of common stock of MPM Holdings Inc. by the selling stockholders identified in this prospectus. We are not selling any shares under this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares being offered by the selling stockholders.

The selling stockholders may offer shares of our common stock from time to time, if and to the extent as they may determine, through public or private transactions or through other means described under “Plan of Distribution” at the current fixed price per share of $20.33 for our common stock until such shares are quoted on the OTCBB, OTCQX or OTCQB or listed on an exchange and thereafter at prevailing market prices or at privately negotiated prices. The selling stockholders may sell shares through agents they select or through underwriters and dealers they select. The selling stockholders also may sell shares directly to investors. If the selling stockholders use agents, underwriters or dealers to sell the shares, we will name such agents, underwriters or dealers and describe any applicable commissions or discounts in a supplement to this prospectus if required.

Our common stock is not listed on any national securities exchange and no public market currently exists for our common stock.

 

 

Investing in our common stock involves risks. See “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 of this prospectus for a discussion of certain risks that you should consider before buying shares of our common stock.

Neither the Securities and Exchange Commission nor any state securities commission has approved or disapproved of these securities or determined if this prospectus is truthful or complete. Any representation to the contrary is a criminal offense.

 

 

Prospectus dated July 2, 2015.


Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION      ii   
MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS      ii   
TRADEMARKS      ii   
PROSPECTUS SUMMARY      1   
RISK FACTORS      12   
CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS      33   
USE OF PROCEEDS      35   
MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND POLICY      36   
OFFERING PRICE      36   
CAPITALIZATION      37   
UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED FINANCIAL INFORMATION      38   
SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA      42   
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS      45   
BUSINESS      72   
MANAGEMENT      83   
PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS      110   
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS      116   
DESCRIPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS      122   
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK      127   
PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION      130   
CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS FOR NON-U.S. HOLDERS      132   
LEGAL MATTERS      137   
EXPERTS      137   
WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION      137   
INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS      F-1   

You should rely only on the information contained in this prospectus or to which we have referred you. We have not authorized any other person to provide you with different information. If anyone provides you with different or inconsistent information, you should not rely on it. We are not making an offer to sell these securities in any jurisdiction where the offer or sale is not permitted. You should assume that the information appearing in this prospectus is accurate only as of the date on the front cover of this prospectus. Our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects may have changed since that date.

For investors outside the United States: We have not done anything that would permit this offering or possession or distribution of this prospectus in any jurisdiction where action for that purpose is required, other than in the United States. You are required to inform yourselves about and to observe any restrictions relating to this offering and the distribution of this prospectus outside of the United States.

 

i


Table of Contents

PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Prior to October 24, 2014, the date we emerged from bankruptcy (the “Emergence Date”), MPM Holdings Inc. (“MPM Holdings”) had not conducted any business operations. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted or suggested by context, all financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes, as of and prior to the Emergence Date, as contained in this prospectus, reflect the actual historical consolidated results of operations and financial condition of Momentive Performance Materials Inc. (“MPM”) for the periods presented and do not give effect to the Plan of Reorganization (as defined below) or any of the transactions contemplated thereby or the adoption of “fresh-start” accounting. Thus, such financial information may not be representative of our performance or financial condition after the Emergence Date. Except with respect to such historical financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes or as otherwise noted or suggested by the context, all other information contained in this prospectus relates to MPM Holdings and its subsidiaries following the Emergence Date. When we use the terms “MPM Holdings,” “we,” the “Company,” “us,” “our” or similar words in this prospectus, unless the context otherwise requires, we are referring to MPM Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries following emergence from the Bankruptcy Cases (as defined below).

MARKET AND INDUSTRY DATA AND FORECASTS

This prospectus includes estimates of market share and industry data and forecasts that we obtained from industry publications and surveys and/or internal company sources. Industry publications and surveys and forecasts generally state that the information contained therein has been obtained from sources believed to be reliable, but there can be no assurance as to the accuracy or completeness of included information. We have not independently verified any of the data from third-party sources, nor have we ascertained the underlying economic assumptions relied upon therein. Similarly, while we believe our internal estimates with respect to our industry are reliable, our estimates have not been verified by any independent sources. While we are not aware of any misstatements regarding any industry data presented in this prospectus, our estimates, in particular as they relate to market share and our general expectations, involve risks and uncertainties and are subject to change based on various factors, including those discussed under the section entitled “Risk Factors.” Unless otherwise noted, all information regarding our market share is based on the latest market data currently available to us, and all market share data is based on net sales in the applicable market.

TRADEMARKS

We have proprietary rights to or are exclusively licensed to use a number of registered and unregistered trademarks that we believe are important to our business, including, without limitation, Momentive. We attempt to obtain registration of our key trademarks whenever possible or practicable and pursue any infringement of those trademarks. Solely for convenience, the trademarks, service marks and tradenames referred to in this prospectus are without the “®” and “TM” symbols, but such references are not intended to indicate, in any way, that we will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, our rights or the rights of the applicable licensors to these trademarks, service marks and tradenames.

 

ii


Table of Contents

PROSPECTUS SUMMARY

This summary highlights the more detailed information contained elsewhere in this prospectus. This summary may not contain all the information that may be important to you. You should carefully read the entire prospectus before making an investment decision, especially the information presented under the heading “Risk Factors.” In this prospectus, except as otherwise indicated herein, or as the context may otherwise require, all references to “MPM Holdings” refers to MPM Holdings Inc., “MPM” refers to Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and the “Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer, prior to the Emergence, to MPM and its subsidiaries and, after the Emergence, to MPM Holdings and its subsidiaries.

Our Company

We believe we are one of the world’s largest producers of silicones and silicone derivatives and a global leader in the development and manufacture of products derived from quartz and specialty ceramics. Silicones are a multi-functional family of materials used in a wide variety of products, and serve as a critical ingredient in many construction, transportation, healthcare, personal care, electronic, consumer and agricultural uses. Silicones are generally used as an additive to a wide variety of end products in order to provide or enhance certain of their attributes, such as resistance (heat, ultraviolet light and chemical), lubrication, adhesion or viscosity. Some of the most well-known end-use product applications include bath and shower caulk, pressure-sensitive adhesive labels, foam products, cosmetics and tires. Due to the versatility and high-performance characteristics of silicones, they are increasingly being used as a substitute for other materials. Our Quartz division manufactures quartz, specialty ceramics and crystal products for use in a number of high-technology industries, which typically require products made to precise specifications. The cost of our products typically represents a small percentage of the overall cost of our customers’ products.

We believe that our scale and global reach provide significant efficiencies in our fixed and variable cost structure and that our breadth of related products provides significant operational, technological and commercial advantages. Manufacturing capacity at our internal sites and our joint venture in China is sufficient to produce the substantial majority of one of our key intermediates, siloxane, which facilitates a low-cost operating structure and security of supply.

As of March 31, 2015, we had 24 production sites strategically located around the world, which allows us to produce the substantial majority of our key products locally in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Through this network of production facilities, we serve more than 4,500 customers between our Silicones and Quartz businesses in over 100 countries worldwide. Our customers include leading companies in their respective industries, such as Procter & Gamble, Avery, Continental Tire, Saint Gobain, Unilever, BASF, SABIC, The Home Depot and Lowe’s.

We believe we have created a value-added, technical service-oriented business model that enables us to target and participate in high-margin and high-growth specialty markets. These specialty markets account for the majority of our revenues and continue to be a growing part of our business.

Net sales and Segment EBITDA, as defined elsewhere within this Prospectus Summary, for the three months ended March 31, 2015 were $579 million and $53 million, respectively, and for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 were $465 million and $46 million, respectively, and for the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, were $2,011 million and $192 million, respectively. Net (loss) income was $(26) million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and was $(60) million and $1,685 million for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, respectively. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to Net (Loss) Income” for a reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to net income.

 

 

1


Table of Contents

Our Strengths

Our company has the following competitive strengths:

Leading Global Silicones Producer. We believe we are one of the world’s largest producers of silicones and silicone derivatives, with leading positions in various product lines and geographic areas. We believe our scale, global reach and breadth of product offerings provide us with significant advantages over many of our competitors by allowing us to serve global customers with precise specifications, particularly those expanding production in developing nations.

Attractive Industry Growth Profile. The broad molecular characteristics of silicones continually lead to new uses and applications, which have led to worldwide industry growth in excess of GDP over the past 20 years. Drivers of growth include end-market growth and increased market penetration, with silicones increasingly being used as a value-added substitute for traditional materials or as a functional additive, which yields new properties for our customers’ products. For instance, silicones act as the conditioning ingredient in “2-in-1” shampoo.

Broad-Based Diversification.

Industry Diversification. Our Silicones business has a diversified revenue base across a variety of end-markets, reducing our vulnerability to industry trends. Furthermore, our products are often used in niche applications that represent a small portion of our customers’ material costs. Our leading end-markets are building and construction, which consists of industrial and infrastructure construction and repair, urethane foam additives, and a number of other specialty products.

Customer Diversification. We have a diverse customer base of more than 4,500 customers between our Silicones and Quartz businesses and are well balanced across multiple geographies. In 2014, our top 20 customers accounted for less than 22% of our total net sales, and no single customer accounted for more than 3% of our net sales. We have maintained long-standing relationships with many of our customers.

Geographic Diversification. We have a global sales presence, with approximately 37%, 30% and 32% of our 2014 revenues generated in the Americas, Europe and Asia, respectively.

Global Infrastructure. We are a global company with significant manufacturing capacity in each of the Americas, Europe and Asia. We have 24 production facilities located around the world, R&D centers on three continents and sales to customers in over 100 countries. The Silicones business has three siloxane production facilities located in Waterford, New York, Ohta, Japan and Leverkusen, Germany, as well as a siloxane manufacturing joint venture in Jiande, China, and two silanes production facilities in Sistersville, West Virginia and Termoli, Italy. The Quartz production sites are located in Ohio, Geesthacht, Germany, Kozuki, Japan and Wuxi, China.

We use our global platform to deliver products to companies efficiently on a worldwide basis. Many of our customers are expanding internationally to serve developing areas in Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, India and Russia. Maintaining close proximity to our international customers allows us to serve them more quickly and efficiently and thus build strong relationships.

Attractive Intermediate Position. We produce siloxane, the key intermediate required to manufacture silicones, in the United States, Germany and Japan, and source siloxane from a joint venture in China. This manufacturing capacity is sufficient to meet the substantial majority of our current requirements for siloxane. We also source a portion of our requirements through long-term and/or supply agreements. We believe this combination of siloxane supply, along with our ability to purchase siloxane from other suppliers when pricing is advantageous, reduces our overall cost structure and strengthens our overall competitiveness.

 

 

2


Table of Contents

Leading Fused Quartz and Specialty Ceramics Producer. We believe we are a global leader in the fused quartz and ceramics product markets in which we compete. In particular, we believe we are the largest manufacturer of quartz products for the semiconductor end-market and the second largest manufacturer of quartz products for fiber optics. Our leadership position and profitability are driven by several factors, including strong customer relationships and the precise quality and purity specifications of our products. Additionally, we believe we are a leader in several ceramic materials end-markets, including cosmetic additives.

Conservative Capital Structure with Stable Free Cash Flow Profile. With a long-dated debt maturity profile and no significant debt maturities due until 2021, we believe we have a conservative capital structure. We also have a modest fixed annual interest expense, as adjusted for the impact of restructuring our capital structure. We believe our stable free cash flow profile will support our long-term growth programs.

Strategy

We believe that we have opportunities for growth through the following long-term strategies:

Expand Our Global Reach in Faster Growing Regions. We intend to continue to grow by expanding our sales presence and application support around the world. Specifically, we are focused on growing our business in the high growth regions of Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, Latin America, India and the Middle East, where the usage of our products is increasing. For example, we recently commissioned new liquid silicone rubber and release coating production capabilities at our Rayong, Thailand site to serve the growing Asian Pacific market.

Develop and Market New Products. We will continue our efforts to expand our product offerings through research and development initiatives and research partnership formations with third parties. Through these innovation initiatives we expect to create new generations of products and services which will continue to drive revenue and earnings growth over the long term. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we invested $76 million, $70 million and $69 million, respectively, in research and development. In recent years we have completed such initiatives as upgrading technology facilities at our Tarrytown, NY site, implementing a full scale pilot line for our coatings business in Leverkusen, Germany, expanding our technology center in Seoul, Korea, and opening a new research and development facility in Bangalore, India, all of which further complement our network of innovation centers strategically located near our global customers.

Increase Shift to High-Margin Specialty Products. We continue to proactively manage our product portfolio with a focus on specialty, high-margin applications. As a result of this capital allocation strategy and anticipated end market growth underlying these specialty segments, we believe high-margin specialty materials will continue to be a larger part of our broader portfolio. For instance, we are investing in our NXT* Silane manufacturing network to double our NXT* production capability. NXT* is an innovative product used in the production of tires, and can offer tire manufacturers the ability to reduce rolling resistance without loss of wet traction, as well as deliver benefits in the tire manufacturing process.

Continue Portfolio Optimization and Pursue Targeted Add-On Acquisitions and Joint Ventures. As a large manufacturer of performance materials, with leadership in the production of silicone, silicone derivatives, quartz and specialty ceramics, we have an advantage in pursuing add-on acquisitions and joint ventures in areas that allow us to build upon our core strengths, expand our product, technology and geographic portfolio, and better serve our customers. We believe we may have the opportunity to consummate acquisitions at relatively attractive valuations due to the scalability of our existing global operations and deal-related synergies.

Implement Strategic Cost Reduction Initiatives. In 2012, we approved certain restructuring actions in connection with the realignment of our businesses globally. During 2014, we realized approximately $3 million in cost savings as a result of these restructuring initiatives, bringing our total realized savings under these initiatives to $34 million, and substantially completing such programs. We continue to evaluate other actions that could lead to further savings.

 

 

3


Table of Contents

Leverage Cost Savings from the Shared Services Agreement. The Shared Services Agreement with Hexion Inc. (formerly known as Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc., “Hexion”) has resulted in significant synergies for us, including shared services and logistics optimization, best-of-source contractual terms, procurement savings, regional site rationalization and administrative and overhead savings. As of March 31, 2015, we have realized cumulative cost savings of $65 million as a result of the Shared Services Agreement. The Shared Services Agreement remains in place between us and Hexion following completion of our balance sheet restructuring, and both companies will continue to benefit from the optimized cost structure and services that it provides.

Risks Associated with our Business

Investing in our common stock involves a number of risks, including:

 

   

Our substantial debt could adversely affect our operations and prevent us from satisfying our obligations under our debt obligations, and may have an adverse effect on our stock price. As of March 31, 2015, we had $1,205 million of consolidated outstanding indebtedness, and, based on our consolidated indebtedness, our annualized cash interest expense would be approximately $58 million based on interest rates at March 31, 2015;

 

   

If global economic conditions weaken or deteriorate, it will negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition;

 

   

We may be unable to achieve the cost savings or synergies that we expect to achieve from our strategic initiatives, which would adversely affect our profitability and financial condition; and

 

   

Fluctuations in direct or indirect raw material costs could have an adverse impact on our business.

For a discussion of the significant risks associated with our business, our industry and investing in our common stock, you should read the section entitled “Risk Factors.”

Emergence from Chapter 11 Proceedings

MPM Holdings was formed to serve as the parent holding company for certain subsidiaries of Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. (“Old MPM Holdings”) after completion of proceedings under Chapter 11 of Title 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. Old MPM Holdings and certain of its domestics subsidiaries were debtors (the “Debtors”) in jointly administered bankruptcy cases in the United States Bankruptcy Court in the Southern District of New York (the “Court”) (the “Bankruptcy Cases”). Other subsidiaries of Old MPM Holdings were not involved in the Bankruptcy Cases. On September 11, 2014, the Bankruptcy Court confirmed our Joint Chapter 11 Plan of Reorganization for Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and its Affiliated Debtors (the Plan of Reorganization) and the Debtors emerged from bankruptcy on October 24, 2014 (the “Emergence Date”).

On the Emergence Date, the Plan of Reorganization became effective and the Debtors emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings (the “Emergence”). On or following the Emergence Date, and pursuant to the terms of the Plan of Reorganization, the following occurred:

 

   

payment in full in cash to general unsecured creditors (including trade creditors) and holders of claims arising from the $75 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Cash Flow Facility”) and the $300 million senior secured debtor-in-possession term loan facility (the “DIP Term Loan Facility”);

 

   

conversion of our then-existing asset-based revolving facility into an exit $270 million asset-based revolving facility (the “ABL Facility”);

 

   

issuance of new 3.88% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “First Lien Notes”) and new 4.69% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “Second Lien Notes”) to holders of the

 

 

4


Table of Contents
 

8.875% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (the “Old First Lien Notes”) and 10% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (the “Old Secured Notes”), respectively, and the cancellation of the Old First Lien Notes and the Old Secured Notes;

 

   

conversion of the 9.00% Second-Priority Springing Lien Notes due 2021 and 9.50% Second-Priority Springing Lien Notes due 2021 (collectively, “Old Second Lien Notes”) into the new equity of the post-Emergence Date Company (resulting in the issuance of 11,791,126 shares of common stock), subject to dilution by the management incentive plan and common stock issued in the Rights Offerings (as defined below);

 

   

issuance of 36,197,874 shares of the post-Emergence Date Company common stock (including shares issued in connection with the backstop commitment of the Rights Offerings (the “Backstop Commitment”)) resulting from the exercise of subscription rights issued to holders of the Old Second Lien Notes in $600 million rights offerings (the “Rights Offerings”) and the “commitment premium” paid in shares to the backstop parties in respect of their backstop commitment;

 

   

exchange of all shares of post-Emergence Date MPM common stock for common stock of MPM Holdings and the contribution by MPM Holdings of all shares of the post-Emergence Date MPM common stock to its wholly-owned subsidiary, MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc., a result of which MPM became a wholly owned subsidiary of MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc.;

 

   

cancellation of the equity of the pre-Emergence Date Company;

 

   

cancellation of the 11.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the “Subordinated Notes”);

 

   

a recovery to the holders of Old MPM Holdings’ 11% Senior Discount Notes due June 4, 2017 (“PIK Notes”) of $9 million, which represents the amount of the cash available at Old MPM Holdings as of the Emergence Date, after taking into account administrative expenses; and

 

   

appointment of a new chief executive officer, chief financial officer and general counsel.

 

 

5


Table of Contents

Organizational Structure

The chart below is a summary of the organizational structure of the Company and illustrates the long-term debt outstanding as of the date of this prospectus.

 

LOGO

 

(1) Guarantor under the ABL Facility.
(2) MPM and the guarantors also provide guarantees under (or are borrowers under) the ABL Facility. As of and for the three months ended March 31, 2015, MPM (excluding its subsidiaries) and the guarantors collectively represented 41% of our total assets and 34% of our net sales, after intercompany eliminations.
(3) Total estimated availability of $270 million, subject to borrowing base availability, of which approximately $203 million would have been available as of March 31, 2015, after giving effect to no outstanding borrowings and $67 million of outstanding letters of credit. The ABL Facility covenants include a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that will only apply if our availability is less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27 million.

 

 

6


Table of Contents
(4) Two indirect non-U.S. subsidiaries hold interests in Momentive Performance Materials (Nantong) Co., Ltd. (“MPM Nantong”), which, as of March 31, 2015, had approximately $32 million of debt outstanding payable within one year. Two loans are denominated in Chinese renminbi and collateralized by certain assets of MPM Nantong. The weighted average interest rate on these loans as of March 31, 2015 was 6.1%, and $11 million was outstanding as of March 31, 2015. The loans are non-recourse to us and the guarantors and MPM Nantong is an unrestricted subsidiary under MPM’s indentures. MPM Nantong also has two working capital loan facilities providing for revolving secured loans of up to $24 million (subject to exchange rates), $21 million of which was outstanding as of March 31, 2015. These revolving loans, which are denominated in U.S. dollars and Chinese renminbi, must be paid down and renewed annually. The interest rates on these loans as of March 31, 2015 ranged from 2.9% to 6.0%. In addition, MPM Nantong entered into another working capital loan agreement with JiangSu Bank of China providing for revolving unsecured loans up to $15 million (subject to exchange rates), none of which was outstanding as of March 31, 2015. This revolving loan is denominated in Chinese renminbi. The interest rate on this loan as of March 31, 2015 was 6.0%.
(5) Certain of our non-U.S. subsidiaries provide guarantees under the ABL Facility but do not guarantee the First Lien Notes or the Second Lien Notes.
(6) An indirect subsidiary owns Momentive Performance Materials (India) Private Limited, which, as of March 31, 2015, had approximately $2 million in long-term debt outstanding.

Additional Information

MPM Holdings was incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware on September 2, 2014. Our principal executive offices are located at 260 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188, and our telephone number is (518) 233-3370. The address of our Internet site is www.momentive.com. This Internet address is provided for informational purposes only and is not intended to function as a hyperlink. Accordingly, no information contained in this Internet address is included or incorporated by reference herein.

 

 

7


Table of Contents

The Offering

The following summary highlights all material information contained elsewhere in this prospectus but does not contain all the information that you should consider before investing in our common stock. We urge you to read this entire prospectus, including the “Risk Factors” section and the consolidated financial statements and related notes.

 

Issuer

MPM Holdings Inc.

 

Common stock offered by the selling stockholders

Up to 39,305,467 shares of common stock.

 

Common stock outstanding as of April 30, 2015

48,028,594 shares of common stock.

 

Use of proceeds

We will not receive any of the proceeds from the sale of shares offered by the selling stockholders.

 

Dividend policy

We have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We do not intend to declare or pay any cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future.

 

No current market

Our common stock is not listed on any national securities exchange.

 

Risk factors

You should carefully consider all of the information set forth in this prospectus and, in particular, the information under “Risk Factors” beginning on page 12 of this prospectus, prior to purchasing shares of our common stock offered hereby.

Unless we specifically state otherwise, all share information in this prospectus is based on 48,028,594 shares outstanding as of April 30, 2015.

 

 

8


Table of Contents

SUMMARY HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents the Company’s summary historical financial information as of and for the periods presented. Prior to the Emergence Date, MPM Holdings had not conducted any business operations. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted or suggested by context, all financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes, as of and prior to the Emergence Date, as contained in this prospectus, reflect the actual historical consolidated results of operations and financial condition of MPM for the periods presented and do not give effect to the Plan of Reorganization or any of the transactions contemplated thereby or the adoption of “fresh-start” accounting.

The summary historical financial information as of December 31, 2014 (successor) and 2013 (predecessor) and for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. The financial data as of December 31, 2012 has been derived from the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto. The summary historical financial information as of March 31, 2015 (successor) and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor) has been derived from, and should be read in conjunction with, the Company’s unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal recurring accruals considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included.

The results of operations for interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the operating results that may be expected for the entire year or any future period.

 

 

9


Table of Contents
    Three Months
Ended March  31,
    Successor      Predecessor  

(dollars in millions, except per share
data)

 

  Successor     Predecessor     Period  from
October 25, 2014
through
December 31,

2014
     Period  from
January 1, 2014
through
October 24,

2014
    As of and for the Year
Ended

December 31,
 
  2015     2014          2013     2012  

Statements of Operations

                

Net sales

    $579        $605      $ 465       $ 2,011      $ 2,398      $ 2,357  

Costs and expenses:

                

Cost of sales

    479          402          
 

 

 

     

 

 

        

Gross profit

    100          63          

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

        434            
1,439
  
    1,732       1,705  

Selling, general and administrative expense

    74        79        80         434        373       392  

Depreciation and amortization expense

        41             147        171       187  

Research and development expense

    18        20        13         63        70       69  

Restructuring and other costs

    4        4        5         20        21       43  

Other operating income, net

    (7)        —          (1      —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

    11        27        (34      (92     31       (39

Interest expense, net

    19        76        15         162        394       277  

Other non-operating expense (income), net

    4        —          8         —          —          (11

Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt

    —          —          —           —          —          57  

Reorganization items, net

    5        —          3         (1,972     —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income tax and earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (17)        (49)        (60      1,718        (363     (362

Income tax expense

    10        8       
—  
  
     36        104       8  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (27)        (57)        (60      1,682        (467     (370

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes

    1        1        —           3        3       5  
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

    $(26)        $(56)      $ (60    $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) earnings per share—basic and diluted

    $(0.54)        $(560,000)      $ (1.25    $ 16,850,000      $ (4,640,000 )   $ (3,650,000 )

Balance Sheet Data (at period end):

                

Cash and cash equivalents

    $190        $ 228         $ 94     $ 110  

Adjusted working capital(1)

    593          611           192        290  

Total assets

    2,817          2,884           2,694       2,904  

Adjusted total long-term debt(2)

    1,169          1,163           3,083       3,081  

Total net debt(3)

    1,015          973           3,163       3,006  

Total liabilities

    2,117          2,115           4,174       4,052  

Total equity (deficit)

    700          769           (1,480     (1,148

Cash Flow provided by (used in):

                

Operating activities

  $    (3   $ (68   $ (3    $ (207   $ (150   $ (95

Investing activities

    (28)        (27     (17      (18     (88     (102

Financing activities

    (2)        118        (1      390        220       111  

Other Financial Data:

                

Capital expenditures(4)

    27        27        24         62        91        98  

Adjusted EBITDA(5)

    222          221          

Segment EBITDA(6)

    53        55        46         192        238       214  

 

 

10


Table of Contents

 

(1) Working capital is defined as current assets net of current liabilities. In order to make period to period comparisons more meaningful, solely for the purposes of the summary historical financial information and not in the audited and unaudited financial statements, certain current and long-term liabilities were reclassified for the working capital calculation as of December 31, 2013. Specifically, as of December 31, 2013, Debt payable within one year of $3,076 million has been reclassified as long-term debt. The presentation is a non-GAAP measure.

The following table reconciles adjusted working capital to working capital:

 

      As of
December 31,
2013
 

Adjusted working capital

   $ 192   

Long-term debt classified as current due to event of default

     (3,076
  

 

 

 

Working capital

   $ (2,884
  

 

 

 

 

(2) In order to make period to period comparisons more meaningful, solely for the purposes of the summary historical financial information and not in the audited and unaudited financial statements, certain current and long-term liabilities were reclassified as of December 31, 2013. Specifically, as of December 31, 2013, Debt payable within one year of $3,076 million has been reclassified as long-term debt. The presentation is a non-GAAP measure.

The following table reconciles adjusted total long-term debt to total long-term debt:

 

      As of
December 31,
2013
 

Adjusted total long-term debt

   $ 3,083   

Long-term debt classified as current due to event of default

     (3,076
  

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

   $ 7   
  

 

 

 

 

(3) Total net debt is defined as long-term debt plus short-term debt, less cash and cash equivalents.

 

(4) Capital expenditures are presented on an accrual basis.

 

(5) Adjusted EBITDA is defined in the instruments that govern our indebtedness. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations—Covenants under our Debt Instruments” for a discussion of Adjusted EBITDA and a reconciliation of net income to Adjusted EBITDA.

 

(6) We have provided Segment EBITDA in this prospectus because it is the primary performance measure used by our senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the board of directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among businesses. Segment EBITDA is also the profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals. Segment EBITDA is the aggregate of the Segment EBITDA for our Silicones business and the Segment EBITDA for our Quartz business, less Other, which is primarily general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the businesses. Segment EBITDA is not a presentation made in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) and our use of the term Segment EBITDA may vary from that of others in our industry. Segment EBITDA should not be considered as an alternative to net income, operating income or any other performance measures derived in accordance with GAAP. Segment EBITDA has important limitations as an analytical tool, including with respect to measuring our operating performance, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. For example, Segment EBITDA excludes certain restructuring and other costs; excludes certain income tax expense that may represent a future obligation to us; does not reflect any charges for the assets being depreciated and amortized that may have to be replaced in the future; does not reflect the interest expense on our indebtedness; and does not include certain non-cash and certain other income and expenses. Non-cash charges primarily represent stock-based compensation expense, unrealized derivative and foreign exchange gains and losses and asset disposal gains and losses. Restructuring and other costs primarily include expenses from MPM’s restructuring and cost optimization programs and management fees paid to its owner.

See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to net (loss) income.

 

 

11


Table of Contents

RISK FACTORS

You should carefully consider the risk factors set forth below, as well as the other information contained in this prospectus. The risks described below are not the only risks facing us. Any of the following risks could materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition or operating results. In such a case, you may lose all or a part of your original investment.

Risks Related to Our Business

If global economic conditions weaken or deteriorate, it will negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Global economic and financial market conditions, including severe market disruptions and the potential for a significant and prolonged global economic downturn, have impacted or could continue to impact our business operations in a number of ways including, but not limited to, the following:

 

   

reduced demand in key customer segments, such as automotive, building, construction and electronics, compared to prior years;

 

   

payment delays by customers and reduced demand for our products caused by customer insolvencies and/or the inability of customers to obtain adequate financing to maintain operations. This situation could cause customers to terminate existing purchase orders and reduce the volume of products they purchase from us and further impact our customers’ ability to pay our receivables, requiring us to assume additional credit risk related to these receivables or limit our ability to collect receivables from that customer;

 

   

insolvency of suppliers or the failure of suppliers to meet their commitments resulting in product delays;

 

   

more onerous credit and commercial terms from our suppliers such as shortening the required payment period for outstanding accounts receivable or reducing or eliminating the amount of trade credit available to us; and

 

   

potential delays in accessing our ABL Facility or obtaining new credit facilities on terms we deem commercially reasonable or at all, and the potential inability of one or more of the financial institutions included in our ABL Facility to fulfill their funding obligations. Should a bank in our ABL Facility be unable to fund a future draw request, we could find it difficult to replace that bank in the facility.

Global economic conditions may weaken or deteriorate. In such event, we may become subject to the negative effects described above and our liquidity, as well as our ability to maintain compliance with the financial maintenance covenants, if in effect, in the ABL Facility could be significantly affected. See “Risks Related to Our Indebtedness—We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our consolidated debt service payments.” As a result, it may cause us to defer needed capital expenditures, reduce research and development or other spending, defer costs to achieve productivity and synergy programs, sell assets or incur additional borrowings which may not be available or may only be available on terms significantly less advantageous than our current credit terms and could result in a wide-ranging and prolonged impact on general business conditions, thereby negatively impacting our business, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, if the global economic environment deteriorates or remains slow for an extended period of time, the fair value of our reporting units could be more adversely affected than we estimated in our analysis of reporting unit fair values at the Effective Date of October 24, 2014. This could result in goodwill or other asset impairments, which could negatively impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

12


Table of Contents

Fluctuations in direct or indirect raw material costs could have an adverse impact on our business.

The prices of our direct and indirect raw materials have been, and we expect them to continue to be, volatile. If the cost of direct or indirect raw materials increases significantly and we are unable to offset the increased costs with higher selling prices, our profitability will decline. Increases in prices for our products could also hurt our ability to remain both competitive and profitable in the markets in which we compete.

Although some of our materials contracts include competitive price clauses that allow us to buy outside the contract if market pricing falls below contract pricing, and certain contracts have minimum-maximum monthly volume commitments that allow us to take advantage of spot pricing, we may be unable to purchase raw materials at market prices. In addition, some of our customer contracts have fixed prices for a certain term, and as a result, we may not be able to pass on raw material price increases to our customers immediately, if at all. Due to differences in timing of the pricing trigger points between our sales and purchase contracts, there is often a “lead-lag” impact that can negatively impact our margins in the short term in periods of rising raw material prices and positively impact them in the short term in periods of falling raw material prices. Future raw material prices may be impacted by new laws or regulations, suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers, changes in our supplier manufacturing processes as some of our products are byproducts of these processes, interruptions in production by suppliers, natural disasters, volatility in the price of crude oil and related petrochemical products and changes in exchange rates.

An inadequate supply of direct or indirect raw materials and intermediate products could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Our manufacturing operations require adequate supplies of raw materials and intermediate products on a timely basis. The loss of a key source or a delay in shipments could have a material adverse effect on our business. Raw material availability may be subject to curtailment or change due to, among other things:

 

   

new or existing laws or regulations;

 

   

suppliers’ allocations to other purchasers;

 

   

interruptions in production by suppliers; and

 

   

natural disasters.

Many of our raw materials and intermediate products are available in the quantities we require from a limited number of suppliers.

For example, our silicones business is highly dependent upon access to silicon metal, a key raw material, and siloxane, an intermediate product that is derived from silicon metal. While silicon is itself abundant, silicon metal is produced through a manufacturing process and, in certain geographic areas, is currently available through a limited number of suppliers. In North America, there are only two significant silicon metal suppliers. In 2009 and 2010, two of our competitors acquired silicon metal manufacturing assets in North America and Europe, respectively, becoming vertically integrated in silicon metal for a portion of their supply requirements and reducing the manufacturing base of certain independent silicon metal producers. In addition, silicon metal producers face a number of regulations that affect the supply or price of silicon metal in some or all of the jurisdictions in which we operate. For example, significant anti-dumping duties of up to 139.5% imposed by the U.S. Department of Commerce and the International Trade Commission against producers of silicon metal in China and Russia effectively block the sale by all or most producers in these jurisdictions to U.S. purchasers, which restricts the supply of silicon metal and results in increased prices. We currently purchase silicon metal under multi-year, one-year or short-term contracts and in the spot market. We typically purchase silicon metal under contracts in the United States and Europe and in the spot market in Asia Pacific.

Our silicones business also relies heavily on siloxane as an intermediate product. Our manufacturing capacity at our internal sites and our joint venture in China is sufficient to meet the substantial majority of our current siloxane requirements. We also source a portion of our requirements from ASM under an existing

 

13


Table of Contents

purchase and sale agreement. In addition, from time to time we enter into supply agreements with other third parties to take advantage of favorable pricing and minimize our cost. There are also a limited number of third-party siloxane providers, and the supply of siloxane may be limited from time to time. In addition, regulation of siloxane producers can also affect the supply of siloxane. For example, in January 2006, the Ministry of Commerce of the People’s Republic of China issued a final determination of an anti-dumping investigation that imposed anti-dumping duties on all siloxane manufacturers, including us, ranging from 13% to 22%. These duties were terminated in January 2011. In late May 2009, China’s Ministry of Commerce also concluded an anti-dumping investigation of siloxane manufacturers in Thailand and South Korea, which resulted in an imposition of a 5.4% duty against our supplier, ASM, in Thailand, a 21.8% duty against other Thailand companies and a 25.1% duty against Korean companies.

Our quartz production relies heavily on naturally occurring quartz sand, which is currently available from a limited number of suppliers. A significant amount of the market for this sand is controlled by Unimin. In April 2015, we entered into a long term purchase agreement with Unimin, which is retroactive to January 1, 2013 and expires on December 31, 2016.

Should any of our key suppliers fail to deliver these or other raw materials or intermediate products to us or no longer supply us, we may be unable to purchase these materials in necessary quantities, which could adversely affect our volumes, or may not be able to purchase them at prices that would allow us to remain competitive. During the past several years, certain of our suppliers have experienced force majeure events rendering them unable to deliver all, or a portion of, the contracted-for raw materials. On these occasions, we were forced to purchase replacement raw materials in the open market at significantly higher costs or place our customers on an allocation of our products. In addition, we cannot predict whether new regulations or restrictions may be imposed in the future on silicon metal, siloxane or other key materials, which may result in reduced supply or further increases in prices. We cannot assure investors that we will be able to renew our current materials contracts or enter into replacement contracts on commercially acceptable terms, or at all. Fluctuations in the price of these or other raw materials or intermediate products, the loss of a key source of supply or any delay in the supply could result in a material adverse effect on our business.

Our production facilities are subject to significant operating hazards which could cause environmental contamination, personal injury and loss of life, and severe damage to, or destruction of property and equipment.

Our production facilities are subject to hazards associated with the manufacturing, handling, storage and transportation of chemical materials and products, including human exposure to hazardous substances, pipeline and equipment leaks and ruptures, explosions, fires, inclement weather and natural disasters, mechanical failures, unscheduled downtime, transportation interruptions, remedial complications, chemical spills, discharges or releases of toxic or hazardous substances or gases, storage tank leaks and other environmental risks. Additionally, a number of our operations are adjacent to operations of independent entities that engage in hazardous and potentially dangerous activities. Our operations or adjacent operations could result in personal injury or loss of life, severe damage to or destruction of property or equipment, environmental damage, or a loss of the use of all or a portion of one of our key manufacturing facilities. Such events at our facilities or adjacent third-party facilities, could have a material adverse effect on us.

We may incur losses beyond the limits or coverage of our insurance policies for liabilities that are associated with these hazards. In addition, various kinds of insurance for companies in the chemical industry have not been available on commercially acceptable terms, or, in some cases, have been unavailable altogether. In the future, we may not be able to obtain coverage at current levels, and our premiums may increase significantly on coverage that we maintain.

Environmental obligations and liabilities could have a substantial negative impact on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

Our operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and are subject to extensive and complex U.S. federal, state, local and non-U.S. supra-national,

 

14


Table of Contents

national, provincial, and local environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These environmental laws and regulations include those that govern the discharge of pollutants into the air and water, the generation, use, storage, transportation, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes, the cleanup of contaminated sites, occupational health and safety and those requiring permits, licenses, or other government approvals for specified operations or activities. Our products are also subject to a variety of international, national, regional, state, and provincial requirements and restrictions applicable to the manufacture, import, export or subsequent use of such products. In addition, we are required to maintain, and may be required to obtain in the future, environmental, health and safety permits, licenses, or government approvals to continue current operations at most of our manufacturing and research facilities throughout the world.

Compliance with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and maintenance of permits, can be costly and complex, and we have incurred and will continue to incur costs, including capital expenditures and costs associated with the issuance and maintenance of letters of credit, to comply with these requirements. In 2014, we incurred capital expenditures of $24 million to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to make other environmental improvements. If we are unable to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, or maintain our permits, we could incur substantial costs, including fines and civil or criminal sanctions, third party property damage or personal injury claims or costs associated with upgrades to our facilities or changes in our manufacturing processes in order to achieve and maintain compliance, and may also be required to halt permitted activities or operations until any necessary permits can be obtained or complied with. In addition, future developments or increasingly stringent regulations could require us to make additional unforeseen environmental expenditures, which could have a material adverse effect on our business.

Actual and alleged environmental violations have been identified at our facility in Waterford, New York. We are cooperating with the New York State Department of Environmental Conservation (the “NYSDEC”) and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (the “USEPA”) and the U.S. Department of Justice in their respective investigations of that facility’s compliance with certain applicable environmental requirements, including certain requirements governing the operation of the facility’s hazardous waste incinerators. Although we currently believe that the costs and potential penalties associated with these investigations will not have a material adverse impact on our business, these investigations may result in administrative, civil or criminal enforcement by the State of New York and/or the United States and resolution of such enforcement actions will likely require payment of a monetary penalty and/or the imposition of other civil or criminal sanctions.

Environmental, health and safety requirements change frequently and have tended to become more stringent over time. We cannot predict what environmental, health and safety laws and regulations or permit requirements will be enacted or amended in the future, how existing or future laws or regulations will be interpreted or enforced or the impact of such laws, regulations or permits on future production expenditures, supply chain or sales. Our costs of compliance with current and future environmental, health and safety requirements could be material. Such future requirements include legislation designed to reduce emissions of carbon dioxide and other substances associated with climate change (“greenhouse gases”). The European Union has enacted greenhouse gas emissions legislation, and continues to expand the scope of such legislation. The USEPA has promulgated regulations applicable to projects involving greenhouse gas emissions above a certain threshold, and the United States and certain states within the United States have enacted, or are considering, limitations on greenhouse gas emissions. These requirements to limit greenhouse gas emissions could significantly increase our energy costs, and may also require us to incur material capital costs to modify our manufacturing facilities.

In addition, we are subject to liability associated with hazardous substances in soil, groundwater and elsewhere at a number of sites. These include sites that we formerly owned or operated and sites where hazardous wastes and other substances from our current and former facilities and operations have been sent, treated, stored or disposed of, as well as sites that we currently own or operate. Depending upon the circumstances, our liability may be strict, joint and several, meaning that we may be held responsible for more than our proportionate share, or even all, of the liability involved regardless of our fault or whether we are aware of the conditions giving rise to the liability. Environmental conditions at these sites can lead to environmental cleanup liability and claims

 

15


Table of Contents

against us for personal injury or wrongful death, property damages and natural resource damages, as well as to claims and obligations for the investigation and cleanup of environmental conditions. The extent of any of these liabilities is difficult to predict, but in the aggregate such liabilities could be material.

We have been notified that we are or may be responsible for environmental remediation at certain sites in the United States. As the result of former, current or future operations, there may be additional environmental remediation or restoration liabilities or claims of personal injury by employees or members of the public due to exposure or alleged exposure to hazardous materials in connection with our operations, properties or products. Sites sold by us in past years may have significant site closure or remediation costs and our share, if any, may be unknown to us at this time. These environmental liabilities or obligations, or any that may arise or become known to us in the future, could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

In addition, in the normal course of our business, we are required to provide financial assurances for contingent future costs associated with certain hazardous waste management and remedial activities. Pursuant to financial assurance requirements set forth in state hazardous waste permit regulations applicable to our manufacturing facilities in Waterford, NY and Sistersville, WV, we have provided letters of credit in the following amounts: $25 million for closure and post-closure care for the Waterford and the Sistersville facilities; and $10 million (annual aggregate) for accidental occurrences at the Waterford and Sistersville facilities. We are currently in discussions with the NYSDEC regarding the renewal of our Waterford facility’s hazardous waste permit. We have recently been advised by the NYDEC that the draft renewal permit will require $26 million in financial assurances for our Waterford facility, an increase to the amount currently being provided of approximately $8 million. We believe that the draft permit will also require a re-evaluation of the financial assurance amount within the next three years. One or more of our facilities may also in the future be subject to additional financial assurance requirements imposed by governmental authorities, including the USEPA. In this regard, the USEPA has identified chemical manufacturing as an industry for which it plans to develop, as necessary, proposed regulations identifying appropriate financial assurance requirements pursuant to §108(b) of CERCLA. Any increase in financial assurances required for our facilities in connection with environmental, health and safety laws or regulations or the maintenance of permits would likely increase our costs and could also materially impact our financial position. For example, to the extent we issue letters of credit under our ABL Facility to satisfy any financial assurance requirements, we would incur fees for the issuance and maintenance of these letters of credit and the amount of borrowings that would otherwise be available to us under such facility would be reduced.

Future chemical regulatory actions may decrease our profitability.

Several governmental entities have enacted, are considering or may consider in the future, regulations that may impact our ability to sell certain chemical products in certain geographic areas. In December 2006, the European Union enacted a regulation known as REACH. This regulation requires manufacturers, importers and consumers of certain chemicals manufactured in, or imported into, the European Union to register such chemicals and evaluate their potential impacts on human health and the environment. The implementing agency is currently in the process of determining if any chemicals should be further tested, regulated, restricted or banned from use in the European Union. Other countries have implemented, or are considering implementation of, similar chemical regulatory programs. When fully implemented, REACH and other similar regulatory programs may result in significant adverse market impacts on the affected chemical products. If we fail to comply with REACH or other similar laws and regulations, we may be subject to penalties or other enforcement actions, including fines, injunctions, recalls or seizures, which would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

Similarly, the Canadian government is implementing an initiative to review certain chemical products for potential environmental and human health and safety impacts. The list of products being reviewed includes several chemicals sold by us. We are part of an industry organization that is working with the Canadian

 

16


Table of Contents

government to develop relevant data and information. Upon review of such data and information, the Canadian government may enact regulations that would limit our ability to sell the affected chemicals in Canada. As part of this initiative, based upon modeled potential impacts on the aquatic environment, the Canadian government has listed as environmentally toxic octamethylcyclotetrasiloxane, or D4, a chemical substance that we manufacture. The Canadian government has issued regulations to minimize the discharge of D4 from industrial facilities into the aquatic environment. We cannot at this time estimate the effect of these regulations on us or our financial condition, cash flows and profitability, but it could be material. The European Union is also reviewing D4, as well as decamethylcyclopentasiloxane, or D5, another chemical substance we manufacture, and may, pursuant to REACH, regulate the manufacture, import and/or use of these two chemical substances in the European Union. The USEPA has also stated that they are reviewing the potential environmental risks posed by these two substances to determine whether regulatory measures are warranted, and we and other silicones industry members have entered into a consent order with the USEPA to conduct certain studies to obtain relevant data. Finally, the Norwegian Climate and Pollution Agency has published a November 2011 study that identifies D4 and D5 as potential candidates for listing as persistent organic pollutants pursuant to the Stockholm Convention on Persistent Organic Pollutants (the “Stockholm Convention”), an international treaty aimed at eliminating or minimizing the release of organic chemicals that are toxic, resistant to degradation in the environment, and transported and deposited far from the point of release. Regulation of our products containing such substances by the European Union, Canada, the United States, parties to the Stockholm Convention and/or other jurisdictions would likely reduce our sales within the jurisdiction and possibly in other geographic areas as well. These reductions in sales could be material depending upon the extent of any such additional regulations.

We participate with other companies in trade associations and regularly contribute to the research and study of the safety and environmental impact of our products and raw materials, including siloxanes. These programs are part of a program to review the environmental impacts, safety and efficacy of our products. In addition, government and academic institutions periodically conduct research on potential environmental and health concerns posed by various chemical substances, including substances we manufacture and sell. These research results are periodically reviewed by state, national and international regulatory agencies and potential customers. Such research could result in future regulations restricting the manufacture or use of our products, liability for adverse environmental or health effects linked to our products, and/or de-selection of our products for specific applications. These restrictions, liability, and product de-selection could have a material adverse effect on our business, our financial condition and/or liquidity.

Scientists periodically conduct studies on the potential human health and environmental impacts of chemicals, including products we manufacture and sell. Also, nongovernmental advocacy organizations and individuals periodically issue public statements alleging human health and environmental impacts of chemicals, including products we manufacture and sell. Based upon such studies or public statements, our customers may elect to discontinue the purchase and use of our products, even in the absence of any government regulation. Such actions could significantly decrease the demand for our products and, accordingly, have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, cash flows and profitability.

We are subject to certain risks related to litigation filed by or against us, and adverse results may harm our business.

We cannot predict with certainty the cost of defense, of prosecution or of the ultimate outcome of litigation and other proceedings filed by or against us, including penalties or other civil or criminal sanctions, or remedies or damage awards, and adverse results in any litigation and other proceedings may materially harm our business. Litigation and other proceedings may include, but are not limited to, actions relating to intellectual property, international trade, commercial arrangements, product liability, environmental, health and safety, joint venture agreements, labor and employment or other harms resulting from the actions of individuals or entities outside of our control. In the case of intellectual property litigation and proceedings, adverse outcomes could include the cancellation, invalidation or other loss of material intellectual property rights used in our business and injunctions prohibiting our use of business processes or technology that are subject to third-party patents or other third-party

 

17


Table of Contents

intellectual property rights. Litigation based on environmental matters or exposure to hazardous substances in the workplace or based upon the use of our products could result in significant liability for us, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability.

We remain subject to litigation relating to the Chapter 11 proceedings.

In connection with the Bankruptcy Cases, three appeals were filed relating to the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization. Specifically, on September 15, 2014, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) as trustee for the Subordinated Notes filed its appeal (the “U.S. Bank Appeal”) before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) seeking a reversal of the Court’s determination that the Debtors’ Plan of Reorganization properly denied recovery to holders of the Subordinated Notes on the basis that those debt securities are contractually subordinated to the Old Second Lien Notes. In addition, on September 16, 2014, BOKF, NA, as trustee for the Old First Lien Notes (“First Lien Indenture Trustee”) and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee for the Old Secured Notes (“Wilmington Trust” and, together with U.S. Bank and First Lien Indenture Trustee, the “Appellants”) filed their joint appeal (together with the U.S. Bank Appeal, the “Appeals”) before the District Court seeking reversal of the Bankruptcy Court’s determinations that (i) the Debtors were not required to compensate holders of the Old First Lien Notes and Old Secured Notes for any prepayment premiums and (ii) the interest rates on First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes provided to holders of the Old First Lien Notes and Old Secured Notes under the Plan of Reorganization was proper and in accordance with United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Court Rulings”). On November 11, 2014, the Debtors also filed a motion to dismiss the Appeals (the “Motion to Dismiss”) with the District Court asserting, inter alia, that granting the relief requested by the Appellants would be inequitable under the legal doctrine of equitable mootness. On May 5, 2015, the District Court dismissed the Appeals (the “District Court Decision”) and affirmed the Bankruptcy Court Rulings. Because the Appeals were decided on their merits, the District Court also terminated the Motion to Dismiss as moot. All the Appellants appealed the District Court Decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of any such appeals. An adverse outcome could negatively affect our business, results of operations and financial condition by reducing our liquidity and/or increasing our interest costs.

Because we manufacture and use materials that are known to be hazardous, we are subject to, or affected by, certain product and manufacturing regulations, for which compliance can be costly and time consuming. In addition, we may be subject to personal injury or product liability claims as a result of human exposure to such hazardous materials.

We produce hazardous chemicals that require care in handling and use that are subject to regulation by many U.S. and non-U.S. national, supra-national, state and local governmental authorities. In some circumstances, these authorities must review and, in some cases approve, our products and/or manufacturing processes and facilities before we may manufacture and sell some of these chemicals. To be able to manufacture and sell certain new chemical products, we may be required, among other things, to demonstrate to the relevant authority that the product does not pose an unreasonable risk during its intended uses and/or that we are capable of manufacturing the product in compliance with current regulations. The process of seeking any necessary approvals can be costly, time consuming and subject to unanticipated and significant delays. Approvals may not be granted to us on a timely basis, or at all. Any delay in obtaining, or any failure to obtain or maintain, these approvals would adversely affect our ability to introduce new products and to generate revenue from those products. New laws and regulations may be introduced in the future that could result in additional compliance costs, bans on product sales or use, seizures, confiscation, recall or monetary fines, any of which could prevent or inhibit the development, distribution or sale of our products and could increase our customers’ efforts to find less hazardous substitutes for our products. We are subject to ongoing reviews of our products and manufacturing processes.

Products we have made or used could be the focus of legal claims based upon allegations of harm to human health. While we cannot predict the outcome of suits and claims, we believe that we maintain adequate reserves,

 

18


Table of Contents

in accordance with our policy, to address litigation and are adequately insured to cover foreseeable future claims. However, an unfavorable outcome in these litigation matters could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability and cause our reputation to decline.

We are subject to claims from our customers and their employees, environmental action groups and neighbors living near our production facilities.

We produce and use hazardous chemicals that require appropriate procedures and care to be used in handling them or in using them to manufacture other products. As a result of the hazardous nature of some of the products we produce and use, we may face claims relating to incidents that involve our customers’ improper handling, storage and use of our products. Additionally, we may face lawsuits alleging personal injury or property damage by neighbors living near our production facilities. These lawsuits could result in substantial damage awards against us, which in turn could encourage additional lawsuits and could cause us to incur significant legal fees to defend such lawsuits, either of which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and/or profitability. In addition, the activities of environmental action groups could result in litigation or damage to our reputation.

As a global business, we are subject to numerous risks associated with our international operations that could have a material adverse effect on our business.

We have significant manufacturing and other operations outside the United States. Some of these operations are in jurisdictions with unstable political or economic conditions. There are numerous inherent risks in international operations, including, but not limited to:

 

   

exchange controls and currency restrictions;

 

   

currency fluctuations and devaluations;

 

   

tariffs and trade barriers;

 

   

export duties and quotas;

 

   

changes in local economic conditions;

 

   

changes in laws and regulations;

 

   

exposure to possible expropriation or other government actions;

 

   

hostility from local populations;

 

   

diminished ability to legally enforce our contractual rights in non-U.S. countries;

 

   

restrictions on our ability to repatriate dividends from our subsidiaries;

 

   

unsettled political conditions and possible terrorist attacks against U.S. interests; and

 

   

natural disasters or other catastrophic events.

Our international operations expose us to different local political and business risks and challenges. For example, we face potential difficulties in staffing and managing local operations, and we have to design local solutions to manage credit risks of local customers and distributors. In addition, some of our operations are located in regions that may be politically unstable, having particular exposure to riots, civil commotion or civil unrests, acts of war (declared or undeclared) or armed hostilities or other national or international calamity. In some of these regions, our status as a U.S. company also exposes us to increased risk of sabotage, terrorist attacks, interference by civil or military authorities or to greater impact from the national and global military, diplomatic and financial response to any future attacks or other threats.

Some of our operations are located in regions with particular exposure to natural disasters such as storms, floods, fires and earthquakes. It would be difficult or impossible for us to relocate these operations and, as a result, any of the aforementioned occurrences could materially adversely affect our business.

 

19


Table of Contents

In addition, intellectual property rights may be more difficult to enforce in non-U.S. or non-Western Europe countries.

Our overall success as a global business depends, in part, upon our ability to succeed under different economic, social and political conditions. We may fail to develop and implement policies and strategies that are effective in each location where we do business, and failure to do so could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our business is subject to foreign currency risk.

In 2014, approximately 68% of our net sales originated outside the United States. In our consolidated financial statements, we translate our local currency financial results into U.S. dollars based on average exchange rates prevailing during a reporting period or the exchange rate at the end of that period. During times of a strengthening U.S. dollar, at a constant level of business, our reported international revenues and earnings would be reduced because the local currency would translate into fewer U.S. dollars.

In addition to currency translation risks, we incur a currency transaction risk whenever one of our operating subsidiaries enters into a purchase or a sales transaction or indebtedness transaction using a different currency from the currency in which it records revenues. Given the volatility of exchange rates, we may not manage our currency transaction and/or translation risks effectively, and volatility in currency exchange rates may materially adversely affect our financial condition or results of operations, including our tax obligations. Since most of our indebtedness is denominated in U.S. dollars, a strengthening of the U.S. dollar could make it more difficult for us to repay our indebtedness.

We have entered and expect to continue to enter into various hedging and other programs in an effort to protect against adverse changes in the non-U.S. exchange markets and attempt to minimize potential material adverse effects. These hedging and other programs may be unsuccessful in protecting against these risks. Our results of operations could be materially adversely affected if the U.S. dollar strengthens against non-U.S. currencies and our protective strategies are not successful. Likewise, a strengthening U.S. dollar provides opportunities to source raw materials more cheaply from foreign countries.

The European debt crisis and related European financial restructuring efforts have contributed to instability in global credit markets and may cause the value of the Euro to further deteriorate. If global economic and market conditions, or economic conditions in Europe, the United States or other key markets remain uncertain or deteriorate further, the value of the Euro and the global credit markets may weaken. While we do not transact a significant amount of business in Greece, Italy or Spain, the general financial instability in those countries could have a contagion effect on the region and contribute to the general instability and uncertainty in the European Union. If this were to occur, it could adversely affect our European customers and suppliers and in turn have a materially adverse effect on our international business and results of operations.

Fluctuations in energy costs could have an adverse impact on our profitability and negatively affect our financial condition.

Oil and natural gas prices have fluctuated greatly over the past several years and we anticipate that they will continue to do so. Natural gas and electricity are essential to our manufacturing processes, which are energy-intensive. Our energy costs represented approximately 7% of our total cost of sales for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012.

Our operating expenses will increase if our energy prices increase. Increased energy prices may also result in greater raw materials costs. If we cannot pass these costs through to our customers, our profitability may decline. In addition, increased energy costs may also negatively affect our customers and the demand for our products.

 

20


Table of Contents

If our energy prices decrease, we expect benefits in the short-run with decreased operating expenses and increased operating income, but may face increased pricing pressure from competitors that are similarly impacted by energy prices and could see reduced demand for certain of our products that are sold to participants in the energy sector. As a result, profitability may decrease over an extended period of time of lower energy prices. Moreover, any future increases in energy prices after a period of lower energy prices may have an adverse impact on our profitability for the reasons described above.

We face increased competition from other companies and from substitute products, which could force us to lower our prices, which would adversely affect our profitability and financial condition.

The markets that we operate in are highly competitive, and this competition could harm our results of operations, cash flows and financial condition. Our competitors include major international producers as well as smaller regional competitors. We may be forced to lower our selling price based on our competitors’ pricing decisions, which would reduce our profitability. This has been further magnified by the impact of the recent global economic downturn, as companies have focused more on price to retain business and market share. In addition, we face competition from a number of products that are potential substitutes for our products. Growth in substitute products could adversely affect our market share, net sales and profit margins.

There is also a trend in our industries toward relocating manufacturing facilities to lower cost regions, such as Asia, which may permit some of our competitors to lower their costs and improve their competitive position. Furthermore, there has been an increase in new competitors based in these regions.

Some of our competitors are larger, have greater financial resources, have a lower cost structure, and/or have less debt than we do. As a result, those competitors may be better able to withstand a change in conditions within our industry and in the economy as a whole. If we do not compete successfully, our operating margins, financial condition, cash flows and profitability could be adversely affected. Furthermore, if we do not have adequate capital to invest in technology, including expenditures for research and development, our technology could be rendered uneconomical or obsolete, negatively affecting our ability to remain competitive.

We have achieved significant cost savings as a result of the Shared Services Agreement with Hexion. If the Shared Services Agreement is terminated or further amended, if we have material disputes with Hexion regarding its implementation or if we are unable to implement new initiatives under the amended agreement, it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations, and financial condition.

In October 2010, we entered into the Shared Services Agreement with Hexion. Under this agreement, we provide to Hexion, and Hexion provides to us, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, technology development, legal and procurement services. We have realized significant cost savings under the Shared Services Agreement, including savings related to shared services and logistics optimization, best-of-source contractual terms, procurement savings, regional site rationalization, administrative and overhead savings. The Shared Services Agreement is subject to termination by Hexion (or us), without cause, on not less than thirty days prior written notice, and expires in October 2015 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter, absent contrary notice from either party). In conjunction with the consummation of the Plan of Reorganization and our emergence from Chapter 11, on October 24, 2014, the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Shared Services Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations. If the Shared Services Agreement is terminated, or if the parties to the amended agreement have material disagreements with its implementation it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations and financial condition, as we would need to replace the services no longer being provided by Hexion, and would lose a portion of the benefits being generated under the agreement at the time.

 

21


Table of Contents

We expect additional cost savings from our other strategic initiatives, and if we are unable to achieve these cost savings, or sustain our current cost structure, it could have a material adverse effect on our business operations, results of operations and financial condition.

We have not yet realized all of the cost savings and synergies we expect to achieve from our other strategic initiatives. A variety of risks could cause us not to realize the expected cost savings and synergies, including but not limited to, higher than expected severance costs related to staff reductions; higher than expected retention costs for employees that will be retained; higher than expected stand-alone overhead expenses; delays in the anticipated timing of activities related to our cost-saving plan; and other unexpected costs associated with operating our business.

If we are unable to achieve these cost savings or synergies it could adversely affect our profitability and financial condition. In addition, while we have been successful in reducing costs and generating savings, factors may arise that may not allow us to sustain our current cost structure. As market and economic conditions change, we may also make changes to our operating cost structure.

Our success depends in part on our ability to protect our intellectual property rights, and our inability to enforce these rights could have a material adverse effect on our competitive position.

We rely on the patent, trademark, copyright and trade-secret laws of the United States and the countries where we do business to protect our intellectual property rights. We may be unable to prevent third parties from using our intellectual property without our authorization. The unauthorized use of our intellectual property could reduce any competitive advantage we have developed, reduce our market share or otherwise harm our business. In the event of unauthorized use of our intellectual property, litigation to protect or enforce our rights could be costly, and we may not prevail.

Many of our technologies are not covered by any patent or patent application, and our issued and pending U.S. and non-U.S. patents may not provide us with any competitive advantage and could be challenged by third parties. Our inability to secure issuance of our pending patent applications may limit our ability to protect the intellectual property rights these pending patent applications were intended to cover. Our competitors may attempt to design around our patents to avoid liability for infringement and, if successful, our competitors could adversely affect our market share. Furthermore, the expiration of our patents may lead to increased competition.

Our pending trademark applications may not be approved by the responsible governmental authorities and, even if these trademark applications are granted, third parties may seek to oppose or otherwise challenge these trademark applications. A failure to obtain trademark registrations in the United States and in other countries could limit our ability to protect our products and their associated trademarks and impede our marketing efforts in those jurisdictions.

In addition, effective patent, trademark, copyright and trade secret protection may be unavailable or limited in some foreign countries. In some countries we do not apply for patent, trademark or copyright protection. We also rely on unpatented proprietary manufacturing expertise, continuing technological innovation and other trade secrets to develop and maintain our competitive position. While we generally enter into confidentiality agreements with our employees and third parties to protect our intellectual property, these confidentiality agreements are limited in duration and could be breached, and may not provide meaningful protection of our trade secrets or proprietary manufacturing expertise. Adequate remedies may not be available if there is an unauthorized use or disclosure of our trade secrets and manufacturing expertise. In addition, others may obtain knowledge about our trade secrets through independent development or by legal means. The failure to protect our processes, apparatuses, technology, trade secrets and proprietary manufacturing expertise, methods and compounds could have a material adverse effect on our business by jeopardizing critical intellectual property.

Where a product formulation or process is kept as a trade secret, third parties may independently develop or invent and patent products or processes identical to our trade-secret products or processes. This could have an

 

22


Table of Contents

adverse impact on our ability to make and sell products or use such processes and could potentially result in costly litigation in which we might not prevail.

We could face intellectual property infringement claims that could result in significant legal costs and damages and impede our ability to produce key products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our production processes and products are specialized; however, we could face intellectual property infringement claims from our competitors or others alleging that our processes or products infringe on their proprietary technology. If we were subject to an infringement suit, we may be required to change our processes or products, or stop using certain technologies or producing the infringing product entirely. Even if we ultimately prevail in an infringement suit, the existence of the suit could cause our customers to seek other products that are not subject to infringement suits. Any infringement suit could result in significant legal costs and damages and impede our ability to produce key products, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements with our works councils and labor unions as they expire from time to time, if disputes with our works councils or unions arise, or if our unionized or represented employees were to engage in a strike or other work stoppage, our business and operating results could be materially adversely affected.

As of December 31, 2014, approximately 45% of our employees were unionized or represented by works councils that were covered by collective bargaining agreements. In addition, some of our employees reside in countries in which employment laws provide greater bargaining or other employee rights than the laws of the United States. These rights may require us to expend more time and money altering or amending employees’ terms of employment or making staff reductions. For example, most of our employees in Europe are represented by works councils, which generally must approve changes in conditions of employment, including restructuring initiatives and changes in salaries and benefits. A significant dispute could divert our management’s attention and otherwise hinder our ability to conduct our business or to achieve planned cost savings.

We may be unable to timely extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements as they expire. For example, a majority of our manufacturing personnel at our Sistersville, West Virginia site, and our Waterford, New York and Willoughby, Ohio sites are covered by collective bargaining agreements that expire in the summer of 2017 and the summer of 2016, respectively. We also may be subject to strikes or work stoppages by, or disputes with, our labor unions in connection with these collective bargaining agreements or otherwise. In January 2011, the union at our Waterford, New York facility representing approximately 780 employees went on strike for two days in response to grievances. In addition, in January and November 2009, this union filed a variety of unfair labor practice charges against us with the National Labor Relations Board (the “NLRB”) arising from our implementation of a new wage rate schedule, a new job classification structure and a new overtime procedure at our Waterford, New York facility. In January 2010, the NLRB filed a complaint against us relating to a portion of these charges, and in July 2010 we reached a settlement with respect to these claims and the complaint was withdrawn. If we fail to extend or renegotiate our collective bargaining agreements, if additional disputes with our works councils or unions arise or if our unionized or represented workers engage in a further strike or other work stoppage, we could incur higher labor costs or experience a significant disruption of operations, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial position and results of operations.

Our pension plans are unfunded or under-funded and our required cash contributions could be higher than we expect, each of which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

We sponsor various pension and similar benefit plans worldwide.

 

23


Table of Contents

Our U.S. and non-U.S. defined benefit pension plans were under-funded in the aggregate by $107 million and $158 million, respectively, as of December 31, 2014. We are legally required to make contributions to our pension plans in the future, and those contributions could be material.

Our future funding obligations for our employee benefit plans depend upon the levels of benefits provided for by the plans, the future performance of assets set aside for these plans, the rates of interest used to determine funding levels, the impact of potential business dispositions, actuarial data and experience, and any changes in government laws and regulations. In addition, certain of our funded employee benefit plans hold a significant amount of equity securities. If the market values of these securities decline, our pension expense and funding requirements would increase and, as a result, could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If the performance of assets in the funded plans does not meet our expectations, our cash contributions for these plans could be higher than we expect, which could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and liquidity.

Natural or other disasters have, and could in the future disrupt our business and result in loss of revenue or higher expenses.

Any serious disruption at any of our facilities or our suppliers’ facilities due to hurricane, fire, earthquake, flood, terrorist attack or any other natural or man-made disaster could impair our ability to use our facilities and have a material adverse impact on our revenues and increase our costs and expenses. If there is a natural disaster or other serious disruption at any of our facilities or our suppliers’ facilities, it could impair our ability to adequately supply our customers and negatively impact our operating results.

For example, our manufacturing facility in Ohta, Japan and the manufacturing facilities of certain of our suppliers were impacted by the effects of the earthquake and tsunami in Japan on March 11, 2011 and related events. Our Ohta facility is one of three facilities globally where we internally produce siloxane, a key intermediate required in our manufacturing process of silicones. We also produce a variety of finished silicone products at this plant, including highly specialized silicone products. We are currently able to shift only certain amounts of production to our other facilities throughout the world over the short term. Our Ohta plant, which is approximately 230 kilometers away from the nuclear power plant at Fukushima, Japan that incurred significant damage as a result of the earthquake, is our closest facility to the area affected by the earthquake and tsunami. We also have manufacturing and research facilities in Kozuki and Kobe, Japan that produce quartz products, and administration offices in Tokyo, Nagoya and Fukuoka, Japan, none of which were significantly impacted by the earthquake. In addition, our manufacturing facilities, primarily those located in the Asia Pacific region, purchase certain raw materials from suppliers throughout Japan. Normal plant operations at our Ohta facility were restored in early May 2011 but uncertainty in Japan continues primarily with respect to the country’s energy infrastructure. To the extent further events or actions in Japan occur that impact its energy supply, including, but not limited to, rolling blackouts, restrictions on power usage, radiation exposure from nuclear power plants or the imposition of evacuation zones around such plants, it could materially and adversely affect our operations, operating results and financial condition.

In addition, many of our current and potential customers are concentrated in specific geographic areas. A disaster in one of these regions could have a material adverse impact on our operations, operating results and financial condition. Our business interruption insurance may not be sufficient to cover all of our losses from a disaster, in which case our unreimbursed losses could be substantial.

Acquisitions and joint ventures that we pursue may present unforeseen integration obstacles and costs, increase our leverage and negatively impact our performance. Divestitures that we pursue also may present unforeseen obstacles and costs.

We have made acquisitions of related businesses, and entered into joint ventures in the past and we may do so in the future. Acquisitions may require us to assume or incur additional debt financing, resulting in additional

 

24


Table of Contents

leverage and complex debt structures. If such acquisitions are consummated, the risk factors we describe above and below, and for our business generally, may be intensified.

Our ability to implement our growth strategy is limited by covenants in our ABL Facility, indentures and other indebtedness, our financial resources, including available cash and borrowing capacity, and our ability to integrate or identify appropriate acquisition and joint venture candidates.

The expense incurred in consummating acquisitions of related businesses, or our failure to integrate such businesses successfully into our existing businesses, could result in our incurring unanticipated expenses and losses. Furthermore, we may not be able to realize any anticipated benefits from acquisitions or joint ventures. The process of integrating acquired operations into our existing operations may result in unforeseen operating difficulties and may require significant financial resources that would otherwise be available for the ongoing development or expansion of existing operations.

In addition we may pursue divestitures of certain of our businesses as one element of our portfolio optimization strategy. Divestitures may require us to separate integrated assets and personnel from our retained businesses and devote our resources to transitioning assets and services to purchasers, resulting in disruptions to our ongoing business and distraction of management.

Security breaches and other disruptions to our information technology infrastructure could interfere with our operations, and could compromise our information and the information of our customers and suppliers, exposing us to liability which would cause our business and reputation to suffer.

In the ordinary course of business, we rely upon information technology networks and systems, some of which are managed by third parties, to process, transmit and store electronic information, and to manage or support a variety of business processes and activities, including supply chain, manufacturing, distribution, invoicing, and collection of payments from customers. We use information technology systems to record, process and summarize financial information and results of operations for internal reporting purposes and to comply with regulatory financial reporting, legal and tax requirements. Additionally, we collect and store sensitive data, including intellectual property, proprietary business information, the propriety business information of our customers and suppliers, as well as personally identifiable information of our customers and employees, in data centers and on information technology networks. The secure operation of these information technology networks, and the processing and maintenance of this information is critical to our business operations and strategy. Despite security measures and business continuity plans, our information technology networks and infrastructure may be vulnerable to damage, disruptions or shutdowns due to attacks by hackers or breaches due to employee error or malfeasance, or other disruptions during the process of upgrading or replacing computer software or hardware, power outages, computer viruses, telecommunication or utility failures or natural disasters or other catastrophic events. The occurrence of any of these events could compromise our networks and the information stored there could be accessed, publicly disclosed, lost or stolen. Any such access, disclosure or other loss of information could result in legal claims or proceedings, liability or regulatory penalties under laws protecting the privacy of personal information, disrupt operations, and damage our reputation, which could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Limitations on our use of certain product-identifying information, including the GE name and monogram, could adversely affect our business and profitability.

Prior to December 2006, substantially all of our products and services were marketed using the GE brand name and monogram, and we believe the association with GE provided our products and services with preferred status among our customers and employees due to GE’s globally recognized brands and perceived high quality. We and GE are parties to a trademark license agreement, which was entered into in December 2006 and amended in May 2013, that grants us a limited right to, among other things, use the GE mark and monogram on our sealant, adhesive and certain other products. These rights extend for a term of five years through December 3,

 

25


Table of Contents

2018, with options that allow us to renew the license through 2023, subject to certain terms and conditions, including the payment of royalties. We also have the right to use numerous product specifications that contain the letters “GE” for the life of the respective products. While we continue to use the GE mark and monogram on these products and continue to use these product specifications, we are not able to use the GE mark and monogram on other products, use GE as part of our name or advertise ourselves as a GE company. While we have not yet experienced any significant loss of business as a result of our limited use of the GE mark and monogram, our business could be disadvantaged in the future by the loss of association with the GE name on our sealant, adhesive and certain other products.

Our actual financial results may vary significantly from the projections that were filed with the Bankruptcy Court.

In connection with our disclosure statement relating to the Plan of Reorganization (the “Disclosure Statement”), and the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization, we prepared projected financial information to demonstrate to the Bankruptcy Court the feasibility of the Plan of Reorganization and our ability to continue operations upon our emergence from the Bankruptcy Cases. This projected financial information was prepared by, and is the responsibility of, management. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP neither examined, compiled nor performed any procedures with respect to the projected financial information and, accordingly, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP does not express an opinion or any other form of assurance with respect thereto. Those projections were prepared solely for the purpose of the Bankruptcy Cases and have not been, and will not be, updated on an ongoing basis. At the time they were prepared, the projections reflected numerous assumptions concerning our anticipated future performance and with respect to prevailing and anticipated market and economic conditions that were and remain beyond our control and that may not materialize. Projections are inherently subject to substantial and numerous uncertainties and to a wide variety of significant business, economic and competitive risks and the assumptions underlying the projections and/or valuation estimates may prove to be wrong in material respects. Actual results may vary significantly from those contemplated by the projections that were prepared in connection with the Disclosure Statement and the hearing to consider confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization.

Our financial condition or results of operations will not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements.

Since October 24, 2014, we have been operating under a new capital structure. In addition, as required by fresh-start accounting, at October 24, 2014 our assets and liabilities were recorded at fair value, which are significantly different than amounts in our historical financial statements. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations from and after the Effective Date will not be comparable to the financial condition or results of operations reflected in our historical financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

Risks Related to Our Indebtedness

We may be unable to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to meet our consolidated debt service payments.

We have substantial consolidated indebtedness. As of March 31, 2015, we had $1,205 million of consolidated outstanding indebtedness. Our projected annualized cash interest expense is approximately $58 million based on our consolidated indebtedness and letters of credit outstanding and interest rates at March 31, 2015 without giving effect to any subsequent borrowings under the ABL Facility, substantially all of which represents cash interest expense on fixed-rate obligations.

Our ability to generate sufficient cash flows from operations to make scheduled debt service payments depends on a range of economic, competitive and business factors, many of which are outside of our control.

 

26


Table of Contents

Continued or increased weakness in economic conditions and our performance beyond our expectations would exacerbate these risks. Our business may generate insufficient cash flows from operations to meet our debt service and other obligations, and currently anticipated cost savings, working capital reductions and operating improvements may not be realized on schedule, or at all. To the extent our cash flow from operations is insufficient to fund our debt service obligations, aside from our current liquidity, we would be dependent on outside capital to meet the funding of our debt service obligations and to fund capital expenditures and other obligations. We were previously forced to take actions to restructure and refinance our indebtedness and there can be no assurance we will be able to meet our scheduled debt service obligations in the future.

If we are unable to meet our expenses and debt service obligations, we may need to refinance all or a portion of our indebtedness on or before maturity, sell assets or issue additional equity securities. We may be unable to refinance any of our indebtedness, sell assets or issue equity securities on commercially reasonable terms, or at all, which could cause us to default on our obligations and result in the acceleration of our debt obligations. Our inability to generate sufficient cash flows to satisfy our outstanding debt obligations, or to refinance our obligations on commercially reasonable terms, would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Availability under the ABL Facility is subject to a borrowing base based on a specified percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and, in certain foreign jurisdictions, machinery and equipment. As of March 31, 2015, the borrowing base (including various reserves) was determined to be approximately $270 million, and we had $67 million of drawn letters of credit and no revolver borrowings under the ABL Facility. The borrowing base (including various reserves) is updated on a monthly basis, so the actual borrowing base could be lower in the future. To the extent the borrowing base is lower than we expect, that could significantly impair our liquidity.

Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital to fund our operations and limit our ability to react to changes in the economy or our industry.

Our substantial consolidated indebtedness and other commitments and obligations could have other important consequences, including but not limited to the following:

 

   

it may limit our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our operations or business;

 

   

we are more highly leveraged than many of our competitors, which may place us at a competitive disadvantage;

 

   

it may make us more vulnerable to downturns in our business or the economy;

 

   

a substantial portion of our cash flows from operations will be dedicated to the repayment of our indebtedness and will not be available for other purposes;

 

   

it may restrict us from making strategic acquisitions, introducing new technologies, or exploiting business opportunities;

 

   

it may make it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations with respect to our existing indebtedness;

 

   

it may adversely affect terms under which suppliers provide material and services to us; and

 

   

it may limit our ability to borrow additional funds or dispose of assets.

There would be a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition if we were unable to service our indebtedness or obtain additional financing, as needed.

Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able to incur significant additional indebtedness. This could intensify the risks described above and below.

We may be able to incur substantial additional indebtedness in the future. Although the terms governing our indebtedness contain restrictions on our ability to incur additional indebtedness, these restrictions are subject to

 

27


Table of Contents

numerous qualifications and exceptions, and the indebtedness we may incur in compliance with these restrictions could be substantial. Increasing our indebtedness could intensify the risks described above and below.

The terms governing our outstanding debt, including restrictive covenants, may adversely affect our operations.

The terms governing our outstanding debt contain, and any future indebtedness we incur would likely contain, numerous restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on our ability to, among other things:

 

   

incur or guarantee additional debt;

 

   

pay dividends and make other distributions to our stockholders;

 

   

create or incur certain liens;

 

   

make certain loans, acquisitions, capital expenditures or investments;

 

   

engage in sales of assets and subsidiary stock;

 

   

enter into sale/leaseback transactions;

 

   

enter into transactions with affiliates; and

 

   

transfer all or substantially all of our assets or enter into merger or consolidation transactions.

As a result of these covenants, we are limited in the manner in which we conduct our business, and we may be unable to engage in favorable business activities or finance future operations or capital needs.

If the availability under the ABL Facility falls below certain thresholds, we will be subject to a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio. If we are unable to maintain compliance with such ratio or other covenants in the ABL Facility, an event of default could result.

The credit agreement governing the ABL Facility requires us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 at any time when the availability is less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27 million. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the agreement governing the ABL Facility is generally defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured on a last twelve months, or LTM, basis.

A breach of our fixed charge coverage ratio, if in effect, could, if not waived, result in an event of default under our ABL Facility. Pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility, our direct parent company will have the right, but not the obligation, to cure such default through the purchase of additional equity in up to three of any four consecutive quarters. If a breach of a fixed charge coverage ratio covenant is not cured or waived, or if any other event of default under the ABL Facility occurs, the lenders under such credit facility:

 

   

would not be required to lend any additional amounts to us;

 

   

could elect to declare all borrowings outstanding under such ABL Facility, together with accrued and unpaid interest and fees, due and payable and could demand cash collateral for all letters of credit issued thereunder;

 

   

could apply all of our available cash that is subject to the cash sweep mechanism of the ABL Facility to repay these borrowings; and/or

 

   

could prevent us from making payments on our notes;

any or all of which could result in an event of default under our notes.

 

28


Table of Contents

The ABL Facility also provides for “springing control” over the cash in our deposit accounts constituting collateral for the ABL Facility, and such cash management arrangements include a cash sweep at any time that availability under the ABL Facility is less than the greater of (1) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (2) $27 million. Such cash sweep, if in effect, will cause all our available cash to be applied to outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility. If we satisfy the conditions to borrowing under the ABL Facility while any such cash sweep is in effect, we may be able to make additional borrowings under the ABL Facility to satisfy our working capital and other operational needs. If we do not satisfy the conditions to borrowing, we will not be permitted to make additional borrowings under the ABL Facility, and we will not have sufficient cash to satisfy our working capital and other operational needs. The availability threshold for triggering a cash sweep is the same availability threshold for triggering the fixed charge coverage ratio covenant under the ABL Facility.

The terms governing our indebtedness limit our ability to sell assets and also restrict the use of proceeds from that sale. We may be unable to sell assets quickly enough or for sufficient amounts to enable us to meet our obligations. Furthermore, a substantial portion of our assets is, and may continue to be, intangible assets. Therefore, it may be difficult for us to pay our consolidated debt obligations in the event of an acceleration of any of our consolidated indebtedness.

If the indebtedness under the ABL Facility or our existing notes were to be accelerated after an event of default, our respective assets may be insufficient to repay such indebtedness in full and our lenders could foreclose on the assets pledged under the applicable facility, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Repayment of our debt, including required principal and interest payments, depends on cash flows generated by our subsidiaries, which may be subject to limitations beyond our control.

Our subsidiaries own a significant portion of our consolidated assets and conduct a significant portion of our consolidated operations. Repayment of our indebtedness depends, to a significant extent, on the generation of cash flows and the ability of our subsidiaries to make cash available to us by dividend, debt repayment or otherwise. Our subsidiaries may not be able to, or may not be permitted to, make distributions to enable us to make payments on our indebtedness. Each subsidiary is a distinct legal entity and, under certain circumstances, legal and contractual restrictions may limit our ability to obtain cash from subsidiaries. While there are limitations on the ability of our subsidiaries to incur consensual restrictions on their ability to pay dividends or make intercompany payments, these limitations are subject to certain qualifications and exceptions. In the event that we are unable to receive distributions from our subsidiaries, we may be unable to make required principal and interest payments on our indebtedness.

A downgrade in our debt ratings could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings or trade credit.

Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service (“Moody’s”) maintain credit ratings on us and certain of our debt. Our ratings by Moody’s were downgraded in 2013, and again downgraded by S&P and Moody’s in 2014 prior to us filing a voluntary petition for reorganization (the “Bankruptcy Filing”) under Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code. The ratings assigned to our debt issued in connection with the Emergence are currently below investment grade. Any decision by these ratings agencies to downgrade such ratings or to put them on negative watch in the future could restrict our access to, and negatively impact the terms of, current or future financings and trade credit extended by our suppliers of raw materials or other vendors.

 

29


Table of Contents

Risks Related to the Company’s Common Stock

There is no public market for our common stock.

There are substantial risks in investing in our common stock given the general illiquid nature of such securities. There is no public trading market for our securities. Holders of our securities may find it difficult or impossible to find a qualified purchaser for such securities at any price. Because of this, it is hard to determine exactly the value of our common stock.

Our stock price may be volatile or may decline regardless of our operating performance, and you may not be able to resell your shares at or above the offering price.

The price for our common stock may be volatile and may fluctuate significantly in response to a number of factors, most of which we cannot control, including, among others:

 

   

changes in economic trends or the continuation of current economic conditions;

 

   

industry cycles and trends;

 

   

changes in government and environmental regulation;

 

   

adverse resolution of new or pending litigation against us;

 

   

changes in laws or regulations governing our business and operations;

 

   

the sustainability of an active trading market for our common stock; and

 

   

future sales of our common stock by our stockholders.

These and other factors may lower the price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance. In the event of a drop in the price of our common stock, you could lose a substantial part or all of your investment in our common stock.

In addition, the stock markets have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have affected and continue to affect the market prices of equity securities of many companies. In the past, stockholders have instituted securities class action litigation following periods of market volatility. If we were to become involved in securities litigation, we could incur substantial costs and our resources and the attention of management could be diverted from our business.

Future sales of our common stock, or the perception that these sales may occur, may depress the price of our common stock.

Additional sales of a substantial number of our shares of common stock, or the perception that such sales may occur, could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock and could materially impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional shares. As of April 30, 2015, we had 48,028,594 shares of common stock issued and outstanding. Of these shares, approximately 6,360,219 shares are freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), except for any shares acquired by our directors, executive officers or other affiliates (as that term is defined in the Securities Act) and approximately 41,668,381 shares are restricted securities or control securities under the Securities Act. Restricted securities and control securities may not be sold in the public market unless the sale is registered under the Securities Act or an exemption from registration is available. The shares that constitute restricted securities and control securities are being registered pursuant to the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part and may be sold under this prospectus. As of the date of this prospectus, the selling stockholders beneficially own approximately 90.7% of our common stock. The sale of all or a portion of the shares by the selling stockholders or our other stockholders, or the perception that these sales may occur, could cause the price of our common stock to decrease significantly.

 

30


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the Company’s Registration Rights Agreement, the selling stockholders have certain demand and piggyback rights that may require us to file additional registration statements registering their common stock or to include sales of such common stock in registration statements that we may file for ourselves or other stockholders. Any shares of common stock sold under these registration statements or this prospectus will be freely tradable. In the event such registration rights are exercised and a large number of shares of common stock is sold, such sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock. These sales also could impede our ability to raise future capital. Additionally, we will bear all expenses in connection with this registration and any such registrations, except that the selling stockholders may be responsible for their pro rata shares of underwriters’ discounts and commissions, stock transfer taxes and certain legal expenses.

As a holding company, our only material assets will be our equity interests in our operating subsidiaries, and our principal source of revenue and cash flow will be distributions from such subsidiaries, which may be limited by law and/or contract in making such distributions.

As a holding company, our principal source of revenue and cash flow will be distributions from our subsidiaries. Therefore, our ability to carry out our business plan, to fund and conduct our business, service our debt and pay dividends (if any) in the future will depend on the ability of our subsidiaries to generate sufficient net income and cash flows to make upstream cash distributions to us. Our subsidiaries are separate legal entities, and although they may be wholly owned or controlled by us, they have no obligation to make any funds available to us, whether in the form of loans, dividends or otherwise. The ability of our subsidiaries to distribute cash to us may also be subject to, among other things, future restrictions that are contained in our subsidiaries’ agreements (as entered into from time to time), availability of sufficient funds in such subsidiaries and applicable laws and regulatory restrictions. Claims of creditors of our subsidiaries generally will have priority as to the assets of such subsidiaries over our claims and claims of our creditors and stockholders. To the extent the ability of our subsidiaries to distribute dividends or other payments to us could be limited in any way, this could materially limit our ability to fund and conduct our business, service our debt and pay dividends (if any).

Apollo is our largest stockholder and has significant influence over us, and its interests may conflict with or differ from your interests as a stockholder.

As of March 31, 2015, Apollo and its affiliates beneficially own approximately 39.8% of our common stock. In connection with the Emergence, Apollo designated four of our eleven directors. As a result of that representation, Apollo has the ability to exert significant influence over us.

The interests of Apollo could conflict with or differ from the interests of our other stockholders. For example, the concentration of ownership held by Apollo could delay, defer, cause or prevent a change of control of us or impede a merger, takeover or other business combination that you as a stockholder may otherwise view favorably. Apollo is in the business of making or advising on investments in companies and holds, and may from time to time in the future acquire, interests in or provide advice to businesses that directly or indirectly compete with certain portions of our business or are suppliers or customers of ours. Apollo may also pursue acquisitions that may be complementary to our business, and, as a result, those acquisition opportunities may not be available to us.

Our Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (Certificate of Incorporation) provides that we expressly renounce any interest or expectancy in any business opportunity, transaction or other matter in which Apollo, the Ad Hoc Group (as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation) or any of their respective affiliates (with respect to Apollo, the “Apollo Group”) participates or desires or seeks to participate in, even if the opportunity is one that we would reasonably be deemed to have pursued if given the opportunity to do so.

Provisions in our organizational documents may delay or prevent our acquisition by a third party.

Our Certificate of Incorporation and our amended and restated bylaws (Bylaws) contain several provisions that may make it more difficult or expensive for a third party to acquire control of us without the

 

31


Table of Contents

approval of our board of directors. These provisions also may delay, prevent or deter a merger, acquisition, tender offer, proxy contest or other transaction that might otherwise result in our stockholders receiving a premium over the market price for their common stock. These provisions include, among others:

 

   

provisions relating to the appointment of directors for a period of time following the Emergence;

 

   

provisions requiring stockholders to hold at least 33% of our outstanding common stock in the aggregate to request special meetings;

 

   

provisions that provide that the doctrine of “corporate opportunity” will not apply with respect to Apollo, the Ad Hoc Group (as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation) and their respective affiliates with respect to the Company; and

 

   

provisions that require a non-interim Chief Executive Officer to review any business combination transaction.

These provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws could discourage potential takeover attempts and reduce the price that investors might be willing to pay for our common stock in the future, which could reduce the market price of our common stock. For more information, see “Description of Capital Stock.”

 

32


Table of Contents

CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS CONCERNING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This prospectus contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the federal securities laws, which involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify forward-looking statements because they contain words such as “believe,” “project,” “might,” “expect,” “may,” “will,” “should,” “seek,” “approximately,” “intend,” “plan,” “estimate,” or “anticipate” or similar expressions that concern our strategy, plans or intentions. All statements we make in this prospectus relating to our estimated and projected revenue, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates, financial results, and prospects are forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to risks and uncertainties that may change at any time, and, therefore, our actual results may differ materially from those we expect. We derive many of our forward-looking statements from our operating budgets and forecasts, which we base upon many detailed assumptions. While we believe that our assumptions are reasonable, we caution that it is very difficult to predict the impact of known factors, and it is impossible for us to anticipate all factors that could affect our actual results.

We disclose important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this prospectus, including, without limitation, in conjunction with the forward-looking statements included in this prospectus. Some of the factors that we believe could affect our revenue, margins, costs, expenditures, cash flows, growth rates, financial results, business, condition and prospects include:

 

   

global economic conditions;

 

   

raw material costs and supply availability;

 

   

environmental hazards and regulations and related compliance and litigation costs;

 

   

litigation costs;

 

   

manufacturing regulations and related compliance and litigation costs;

 

   

risks associated with international operations;

 

   

foreign currency fluctuations;

 

   

rising energy costs;

 

   

increased competition;

 

   

the success of the implementation of the Shared Services Agreement;

 

   

the success of our strategic initiatives;

 

   

our holding company structure;

 

   

intellectual property protection and litigation;

 

   

relations and costs associated with our workforce;

 

   

our pension liabilities;

 

   

disruptions to our information technology infrastructure;

 

   

natural disasters, acts of war, terrorism and other acts beyond our control;

 

   

the impact of our substantial indebtedness;

 

   

our incurring additional debt;

 

   

acquisitions, divestitures and joint ventures that we may pursue;

 

   

restrictive covenants related to our indebtedness; and

 

   

other factors presented under the heading “Risk Factors.”

 

33


Table of Contents

We caution you that the foregoing list of important factors may not contain all of the material factors that are important to you. There may be other factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from the results referred to in the forward-looking statements. In addition, in light of these risks and uncertainties, the matters referred to in the forward-looking statements contained in this prospectus may not in fact occur. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statement as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as otherwise required by law.

 

34


Table of Contents

USE OF PROCEEDS

We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of shares of common stock that may be sold from time to time pursuant to this prospectus. The selling stockholders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock offered from time to time under this prospectus. We have agreed to pay certain expenses of the selling stockholders incurred in connection with the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus, but will not pay any underwriters’ discounts or commissions.

 

35


Table of Contents

MARKET PRICES AND DIVIDEND POLICY

Our common stock has no established public trading market.

Holders. As of April 30, 2015, there were 187 stockholders of record of our common stock, one of which was Cede & Co., a nominee for The Depository Trust Company. All of our common stock held by brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions as nominees for beneficial owners are considered to be held of record by Cede & Co., who is considered to be one stockholder of record. A substantially greater number of holders of our common stock are “street name” or beneficial holders, whose shares of common stock are held of record by banks, brokers and other financial institutions. Because such shares of common stock are held on behalf of stockholders, and not by the stockholders directly, and because a stockholder can have multiple positions with different brokerage firms, banks and other financial institutions, we are unable to determine the total number of stockholders we have.

Dividends and Dividend Policy. We have not paid any dividends since our incorporation in 2014. For the foreseeable future, we intend to retain any earnings to finance our business and we do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock. Any future determination to pay dividends will be at the discretion of our board of directors in accordance with applicable law and will be dependent upon then-existing conditions, including our financial condition and results of operations, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects and other factors that our board of directors considers relevant.

OFFERING PRICE

All the common stock being offered hereby will be offered or sold from time to time directly by the selling stockholders or alternatively through underwriters, broker dealers or agents. The shares of common stock may be sold in one or more transactions at the current fixed price per share of $20.33 for our common stock until such shares are quoted on the OTCBB, OTCQX or OTCQB or listed on an exchange, if ever, and thereafter at prevailing market prices at the time of sale or privately negotiated prices.

 

36


Table of Contents

CAPITALIZATION

The following table sets forth the Company’s cash and cash equivalents and capitalization as of March 31, 2015. We have agreed to pay certain expenses of the selling stockholders incurred in connection with the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus, but will not pay any underwriters’ discounts or commissions. The selling stockholders will receive all of the proceeds from the sale of the shares of common stock offered from time to time under this prospectus. We will not receive any proceeds from the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus.

You should read the information set forth below in conjunction with the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto and the section entitled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere herein.

 

     As of March 31, 2015  
(dollars in millions)       

Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $4)(1)

   $ 190   
  

 

 

 

Debt outstanding:

  

ABL Facility(2)

   $ —     

3.88% First Lien Notes due 2021 (includes $136 of unamortized debt discount)

     964   

4.69% Second Lien Notes due 2022 (includes $47 of unamortized debt discount)

     205   

China bank loans at 5.0%

     32   

Other at 6.6%

     4   
  

 

 

 

Total debt

     1,205   
  

 

 

 

Total equity

     700   
  

 

 

 

Total capitalization

   $ 1,905   
  

 

 

 

 

(1) Cash and cash equivalents consist of bank deposits, money market and other financial instruments with an initial maturity of three months or less.
(2) The ABL Facility has total maximum borrowing availability of $270 million, subject to a borrowing base. See “Description of Indebtedness—ABL Facility.”

 

37


Table of Contents

UNAUDITED PRO FORMA CONDENSED COMBINED FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The following sets forth unaudited pro forma condensed financial information of the Company prepared in accordance with Article XI of Regulation S-X. You should read this information in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors,” “Capitalization,” “Selected Historical Financial Data” and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information is based on, and has been derived from, the Company’s historical audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined statement of operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 gives pro forma effect to the following events as if they occurred on January 1, 2014:

 

   

the consummation of the Plan of Reorganization;

 

   

the adoption of fresh start accounting; and

 

   

accounting policy changes that management elected to adopt in conjunction with fresh start reporting.

Pro forma adjustments for the Plan of Reorganization for the year ended December 31, 2014 were made to reflect 1) the estimated effect of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Plan of Reorganization, including the issuance of the new debt and 2) the removal of Reorganization items, net which were directly attributable to the Company’s Chapter 11 proceedings and not expected to have a continuing effect on the results of operations.

Pro forma adjustments for fresh start accounting for the year ended December 31, 2014 were made to reflect the depreciation and amortization adjustments and the nonrecurring impact of the write-up of inventory related to the fair value adjustments that were made to allocate the reorganization value to the individual assets based on their estimated fair values.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, pro forma adjustments for the Plan of Reorganization would result in the removal of $5 million of Reorganization items, net from the Company’s historical unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations. There would be no income tax impact related to the pro forma adjustments as these adjustments relate to activity in jurisdictions that are in a valuation allowance.

The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information includes unaudited pro forma adjustments that are factually supportable and directly attributable to the respective transactions. In addition, the unaudited pro forma adjustments are expected to have a continuing impact on the Company’s results. The unaudited pro forma condensed combined financial information has been prepared by management for illustrative purposes only and does not purport to represent what the results of operations or financial condition would have been had the respective transactions actually occurred on the dates indicated, nor do they purport to project the results of operations or financial condition for any future period or as of any future date.

Historical basic and diluted loss per share for the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 is calculated based on weighted average common shares outstanding of MPM, and based upon the weighted average common shares outstanding of the Company for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014. Pro forma basic and diluted loss per share is calculated based on weighted average common shares outstanding of the Company.

 

38


Table of Contents

MPM Holdings Inc.

Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations

For the Year Ended December 31, 2014

 

    Actual     Adjustments        
    Successor     Predecessor                          
(In millions, except share data)   Period from
October 25,
2014

through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October 24,
2014
    Reorganization(1)     Accounting
Policy Changes(2)
    Fresh Start(3)     Pro Forma  

Net sales

  $ 465      $ 2,011      $ —        $ —        $ —        $ 2,476   

Cost of sales

    402          —          1,634 (a)      (38 )(a)      1,998   
 

 

 

     

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Gross profit

    63          —          (1,634     38        478   

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

      1,439        —          (1,439 )(a)      —          —     

Selling, general and administrative expense

    80        434        —          (125 )(a)(b)(c)      (10 )(b)      379   

Depreciation and amortization expense

      147        —          (147 )(a)      —          —     

Research and development expense

    13        63        —          —          —          76   

Restructuring and other costs

    5        20        —          —          —          25   

Other operating income, net

    (1     —          —          —          —          (1
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

    (34     (92     —          77        48        (1

Interest expense, net

    15        162        (98 )(a)      —          —          79   

Other non-operating expense, net

    8        —          —          99 (c)      —          107   

Reorganization items, net

    3        (1,972     1,969 (b)      —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (60     1,718        (1,871     (22     48        (187

Income tax expense (benefit)

    —          36        —   (c)      —   (d)      —   (c)      36   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (60     1,682        (1,871     (22     48        (223

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes

    —          3        —          —          —          3   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

  $ (60   $ 1,685      $ (1,871   $ (22   $ 48      $ (220
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted

    47,989,000        100              47,989,000   

(Loss) income per share—basic and diluted

  $ (1.25   $ 16,850,000            $ (4.58

See Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations

 

39


Table of Contents

Notes to Unaudited Pro Forma Condensed Combined Statement of Operations

(dollars in millions)

 

(1) Reflects the following adjustments to record the pro forma effects of the consummation of the Plan of Reorganization:

 

  (a) Reflects the change in net interest expense related to the new debt and the settlement of existing debt as part of the Plan of Reorganization:

 

     Year Ended
December 31,
2014
 

Newly issued debt:

  

3.88% First Lien Notes due 2021

   $ 42   

4.69% Second Lien Notes due 2022

     12   

Existing debt:

  

China bank loans

     3   

Amortization of debt discount

     22   
  

 

 

 

Total

     79   

Historical interest expense

     (177
  

 

 

 

Net pro forma change in interest

   $ (98
  

 

 

 

 

  (b) Reflects an adjustment to remove Reorganization items, net of $1,969 included in the unaudited Condensed Combined Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2014, which were directly attributable to the Company’s Chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings.

 

  (c) There is no income tax impact of the pro forma adjustments to reorganization expenses as these adjustments relate to activity in jurisdictions that are in a valuation allowance.

 

(2)   (a) As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, management elected to change its accounting policy related to its income statement presentation of costs of goods sold. As a result, the Depreciation and amortization expense caption has been eliminated and the related expense has been allocated to Cost of goods sold and Selling general and administrative expense. The Company also re-evaluated its accounting policy with respect to which overhead costs were production-related, as well as the extent to which certain functional costs supported production-related activities. As a result, the Company reclassified certain costs from Selling general and administrative expense to Cost of goods sold.

 

  (b) As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, management elected to change its accounting policy related to the recognition of actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs resulting from plan amendments for defined benefit plans. Specifically, such actuarial gains and losses and prior service costs previously recognized as a component of accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) in the historical balance sheet will be recognized directly as a component of earnings under the new policy. As a result, adjustments herein reflects a loss of $22 previously recognized as a component of other comprehensive income during the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014.

 

  (c) As a result of the application of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, management elected to change its accounting policy related to its income statement classification of unrealized foreign currency gains and losses on intercompany arrangements. As a result, these amounts have been reclassified from Selling, general and administrative expense to Other non-operating expense, net.

 

  (d) There is no income tax impact of the pro forma adjustments to accounting policy changes as these adjustments relate to activity in jurisdictions that are in a valuation allowance.

 

40


Table of Contents
(3) Reflects the following adjustments to record the pro forma effects of fresh start accounting adjustments related to the Reorganization:

 

  (a) Reflects a net decrease in depreciation expense resulting from the estimated fair value adjustments to certain property and equipment and adjustments to the estimated useful lives of the assets.

 

                 Depreciation  
     Useful Life
(in years)
   Estimated Fair
Value
     Year Ended
December 31,
2014
 

Depreciable tangible property

   1-40    $ 1,171       $ 62   

Historical depreciation

           (85
        

 

 

 

Net pro forma change in depreciation

         $ (23
        

 

 

 

The adjustment for the year ended December 31, 2014 also reflects an adjustment to eliminate the $15 non-recurring write-up of inventory resulting from the estimated fair value adjustment made to inventory.

 

  (b) Reflects a net decrease in depreciation expense resulting from the estimated fair value adjustments to certain property and equipment and adjustments to the estimated useful lives of the assets. Also reflects a net decrease in amortization expense resulting from the estimated fair value adjustments made to certain amortizable intangible assets.

 

                 Depreciation/
Amortization
 
     Useful Life
(in years)
   Estimated Fair
Value
     Year Ended
December 31,
2014
 

Depreciable tangible property

   1-40    $ 1,171       $ 21   

Amortizable intangible assets

   6-13      424         31   
     

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total long-lived assets

      $ 1,595         52   
     

 

 

    

Historical depreciation & amortization

           (62
        

 

 

 

Net pro forma change in depreciation & amortization

         $ (10
        

 

 

 

 

  (c) There is no income tax impact of the pro forma adjustments to fresh start accounting adjustments as these adjustments relate to activity in jurisdictions that are in a valuation allowance.

 

41


Table of Contents

SELECTED HISTORICAL CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL DATA

The following table presents the Company’s summary historical financial information as of and for the periods presented. Prior to the Emergence Date, MPM Holdings had not conducted any business operations. Accordingly, unless otherwise noted or suggested by context, all financial information and data and accompanying financial statements and corresponding notes, as of and prior to the Emergence Date, as contained in this prospectus, reflect the actual historical consolidated results of operations and financial condition of MPM for the periods presented and do not give effect to the Plan of Reorganization or any of the transactions contemplated thereby or the adoption of “fresh-start” accounting.

As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, as well as the effects of the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization, the consolidated financial statements on and after October 24, 2014 are not comparable with the consolidated financial statements prior to that date. Refer to Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements included elsewhere herein.

The selected historical consolidated financial data as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 and for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the fiscal years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus.

The financial data as of December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 and for the fiscal years ended December 31, 2011 and 2010 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto.

The selected historical consolidated financial data as of March 31, 2015 (successor) and for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor) have been derived from the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, included elsewhere in this prospectus, and include all adjustments that management considers necessary for a fair presentation of our financial position and results of operations as of the dates and for the periods indicated. Results for the three months ended March 31, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the entire year.

 

42


Table of Contents

You should read the following selected historical financial data in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations,” “Risk Factors” and our consolidated financial statements and related notes and other financial information included elsewhere in this prospectus.

 

                Successor     Predecessor  
    Three Months
Ended March 31,
    Period from
October 25, 2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1, 2014
through
October 24,
2014
       
    Successor     Predecessor          As of and for the
Year Ended December 31,
 
(dollars in millions, except per share
data)
  2015     2014         2013     2012     2011     2010  

Statements of Operations Data:

                 

Net sales

    $579        $605      $ 465      $ 2,011      $ 2,398      $ 2,357      $ 2,637      $ 2,588   

Costs and expenses:

                 

Cost of sales

    479          402             
 

 

 

     

 

 

           

Gross profit

    100          63             

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

        434          1,439        1,732        1,705        1,798        1,645   

Selling, general and administrative expense

    74        79        80        434        373        392        389        388   

Depreciation and amortization expense

        41          147        171        187        197        197   

Research and development expense

    18        20        13        63        70        69        78        73   

Restructuring and other costs

    4        4        5        20        21        43        33        23   

Other operating income, net

    (7)        —          (1     —          —          —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

    11        27        (34     (92     31        (39     142        262   

Interest expense, net

    19        76        15        162        394        277        256        249   

Other non-operating expense (income), net

    4        —          8        —          —          (11     —          —     

Loss (gain) on extinguishment and exchange of debt

    —          —          —          —          —          57        (7     78   

Reorganization items, net

    5        —          3        (1,972     —          —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes and earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities

    (17)        (49)        (60     1,718        (363     (362     (107     (65

Income tax expense (benefit)

    10        8        —          36        104        8        27        (2
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities

    (27)        (57)        (60     1,682        (467     (370     (134     (63

Earnings (losses) from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes

    1        1        —          3        3        5        (6     —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

    (26)        (56)        (60     1,685        (464     (365     (140     (63

Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest

    —          —          —          —          —          —          (1     (1
       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income attributable to MPM Holdings Inc.

    $(26)        $(56)      $ (60   $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365   $ (141   $ (64
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) earnings per share, basic and diluted

    $(0.54)        $(560,000)      $ (1.25   $ 16,850,000      $ (4,640,000   $ (3,650,000   $ (1,410,000   $ (640,000

Dividends declared per common share

        $ —        $ —        $ 4,600      $ 3,185      $ 7,500      $ 12,500   

Balance Sheet Data (at period end):

                 

Cash and cash equivalents

  $ 190        $ 228        $ 94      $ 110      $ 199      $ 250   

Adjusted working capital(1)

    593          611          192        290        378        493   

Total assets

    2,817          2,884          2,694        2,904        3,161        3,288   

Adjusted total long-term debt(2)

    1,169          1,163          3,083        3,081        2,895        2,952   

Total net debt(3)

    2,117          973          3,163        3,006        2,735        2,729   

Total liabilities

    700          2,115          4,174        4,052        3,901        3,896   

Total deficit

    1,015          769          (1,480     (1,148     (736     (604

Cash Flow provided by (used in):

                 

Operating activities

  $ (3     $(68)      $ (3   $ (207   $ (150   $ (95   $ 106      $ 253   

Investing activities

    (28     (27)        (17     (18     (88     (102     (120     (95

Financing activities

    (2     118        (1     390        220        111        (41     (112

Other Financial Data:

                 

Capital expenditures(4)

  $ 27        $27      $ 24      $ 62      $ 91      $ 98      $ 116      $ 95   

 

43


Table of Contents

 

(1) Working capital is defined as current assets net of current liabilities. In order to make period to period comparisons more meaningful, solely for the purposes of the summary historical financial information and not in the audited and unaudited financial statements, certain current and long-term liabilities were reclassified for the working capital calculation as of December 31, 2013. Specifically, as of December 31, 2013, Debt payable within one year $3,076 million has been reclassified as long-term debt. The presentation is a non-GAAP measure. The following table reconciles adjusted working capital to working capital:

 

(in millions)    As of
December 31, 2013
 

Adjusted working capital

   $ 192   

Long-term debt classified as current due to event of default

     (3,076
  

 

 

 

Working capital

   $ (2,884
  

 

 

 

 

(2) In order to make period to period comparisons more meaningful, solely for the purposes of the summary historical financial information and not in the audited and unaudited financial statements, certain current and long-term liabilities were reclassified as of December 31, 2013. Specifically, as of December 31, 2013, Debt payable within one year of $3,076 million has been reclassified as long-term debt. The presentation is a non-GAAP measure. The following table reconciles adjusted total long-term debt to total long-term debt:

 

(in millions)    As of
December 31,
2013
 

Adjusted total long-term debt

   $ 3,083   

Long-term debt classified as current due to event of default

     (3,076
  

 

 

 

Total long-term debt

   $ 7   
  

 

 

 

 

(3) Total net debt is defined as long-term debt plus short-term debt less cash and cash equivalents.
(4) Capital expenditures are presented on an accrual basis.

 

44


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL

CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

You should read the following discussion and analysis of our results of operations and financial condition for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014; the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 with the corresponding financial statements and related notes included elsewhere herein. The following discussion and analysis contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs, and which involve numerous risks and uncertainties, including, but not limited to, the risks and uncertainties described in “Risk Factors.” Actual results may differ materially from those contained in any forward-looking statements. See “Forward-Looking and Cautionary Statements.”

Overview and Outlook

MPM Holdings, a Delaware corporation, is one of the world’s largest producers of silicones, silicone derivatives and organofunctional silanes and a global leader in the development and manufacture of products derived from quartz and specialty ceramics. Silicones are a multi-functional family of materials used in a wide variety of products and serve as a critical ingredient in many construction, transportation, healthcare, personal care, electronic, consumer and agricultural uses. Silicones and silanes are generally used as an additive to a wide variety of end products in order to provide or enhance certain of their attributes, such as resistance (heat, ultraviolet light and chemical), lubrication, adhesion or viscosity. Some of the most well-known end-use product applications include bath and shower caulk, pressure-sensitive adhesive labels, polyurethane foam products, cosmetics and tires. Due to the versatility and high-performance characteristics of silicones and silanes, they are increasingly being used as a substitute for other materials. Our Quartz business manufactures quartz, specialty ceramics and crystal products for use in a number of high-technology industries, which typically require products made to precise specifications. The cost of our products typically represents a small percentage of the overall cost of our customers’ products.

We serve more than 4,500 customers between our Silicones and Quartz businesses in over 100 countries. Our customers include leading companies in their respective industries, such as Procter & Gamble, Avery, Continental Tire, Saint Gobain, Unilever, BASF, SABIC, The Home Depot and Lowe’s.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy and Emergence

On April 13, 2014, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Court. The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re MPM Silicones, LLC, et al., Case No. 14-22503. During the bankruptcy proceedings, we continued to operate our business as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Court until our emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”).

On September 11, 2014, the Court confirmed the Plan of Reorganization, and on the Effective Date the Plan of Reorganization became effective and we emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings. Upon emergence, we reduced our total aggregate debt obligations from approximately $3.2 billion at December 31, 2013 to approximately $1.2 billion at December 31, 2014, and reduced our annual cash interest payments from nearly $300 million to approximately $58 million. As of December 31, 2014, we had $2,884 million of total assets, $2,115 million of total liabilities, and $769 million of total equity.

Reportable Segments

Our business segments are based on the products that we offer and the markets that we serve. At March 31, 2015, we had two reportable segments: Silicones and Quartz.

 

45


Table of Contents

The Company’s organizational structure continues to evolve. We are also continuing to refine our business and operating structure to better align our services to our customers and improve our cost position, while continuing to invest in global growth opportunities.

First Quarter of 2015 Overview

 

   

Net Sales—Net sales decreased $26 million in the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the first quarter of 2014. The decrease was primarily driven by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations which were primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen, partially offset by favorable price and mix fluctuations driven by growth in NXT* Silanes and liquid silicone rubber sales.

 

   

Segment EBITDA—Segment EBITDA decreased $2 million in the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the first quarter of 2014, due primarily to net unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations and an increase in processing costs to improve plant reliability and support new investments and growth. These were partially offset by a one-time settlement gain and deflation in certain of our raw material inputs.

 

   

Recently completed growth initiatives include:

 

   

The expansion of our Rayong, Thailand facility serving liquid silicone rubber customers throughout Asia in the automotive, aerospace, energy, healthcare and consumer products industries, as well as adding new site capacity to produce silicone-based release coatings used in a variety of adhesive applications.

 

   

Future growth initiatives include:

 

   

The expansion of our capability to manufacture NXT* Silane, which is an innovative product used in the production of tires, and can offer tire manufacturers the ability to reduce rolling resistance without loss of wet traction, as well as deliver benefits in the tire manufacturing process. This expansion will double our current NXT* Silane manufacturing capacity and is expected to be completed in 2016.

2014 Overview

 

   

We successfully undertook steps to restructure our balance sheet and capital structure, and on October 24, 2014, we emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy with an appropriately adjusted balance sheet and capital structure and significantly reduced debt service obligations.

 

   

Net SalesNet sales in 2014 were $2.48 billion, an increase of 3% compared with $2.4 billion in 2013. The increase was primarily driven by an increase in silicones volumes.

 

   

Segment EBITDASegment EBITDA in 2014 was $238 million, even with 2013. Segment EBITDA performance for the year largely reflects gains in our silicones portfolio that were offset by demand cyclicality for semiconductor related quartz products and an increase in corporate expenses.

 

   

Recently completed initiatives include:

 

   

The expansion of our Rayong, Thailand facility serving liquid silicone rubber customers throughout Asia in the automotive, aerospace, energy, healthcare and consumer products industries, as well as adding new site capacity to produce silicone-based release coatings used in a variety of adhesive applications.

 

   

Future growth initiatives include:

 

   

The expansion of our capability to manufacture NXT* Silane, which is an innovative product used in the production of tires, and can offer tire manufacturers the ability to reduce rolling resistance without loss of wet traction, as well as deliver benefits in the tire manufacturing process. This expansion will double our current NXT* Silane manufacturing capacity and is expected to be completed in 2016.

 

46


Table of Contents

Short-term Outlook

Our business is impacted by general economic and industrial conditions, including general industrial production, automotive builds, housing starts, construction activity, consumer spending and semiconductor capital equipment investment. Our business has both geographic and end market diversity which often reduces the impact of any one of these factors on our overall performance.

During the remainder of 2015, we expect continued growth in demand in our specialty silicones businesses, particularly as we continue our investment in developing new products to support future growth. However, we expect continued softness in semiconductor capital equipment and specialty solar demand and further delay in recovery in these markets to adversely affect volumes in our Quartz business in 2015. Overall, we expect slight increases in volumes in 2015 as compared to 2014 due to expected growth within the construction, consumer and transportation markets. In addition, as we have emerged from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, we expect the related one-time negative impacts on our business to subside in 2015. We expect the increase in liquidity and lower debt service requirements resulting from our successful restructuring efforts to increase our future operational and financial flexibility. As a result, we are well positioned to leverage our leadership positions, optimize our portfolio and drive new growth programs.

We are continuing to invest in growth opportunities in our higher-growth product lines and geographical regions, and will leverage the combination of our proprietary technologies, strategic investments in key assets and leading presence in high-growth end markets to benefit as the global economy recovers and for long-term success. We are also focused on gaining productivity efficiencies to reduce material costs and improve margins through investments in reliable and stable operations. We continue to evaluate additional actions, as well as productivity measures, that could lead to further savings. Such actions could result in more significant restructuring, exit and disposal costs and asset impairments in the future.

While we expect the recent decline in crude oil prices to positively impact earnings in our silicones business due to the corresponding decline in raw material prices, greater than 70% of our raw material inputs are not petroleum-based, and their prices do not fluctuate with the price of crude oil.

Shared Services Agreement

In October 2010, we entered into a shared services agreement with Hexion (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary under a common parent) (the “Shared Services Agreement”), pursuant to which we provide to Hexion, and Hexion provides to us, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, technology development, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement is subject to termination by either us or Hexion, without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2015 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the costs of such services are allocated between us and Hexion and requires that the Steering Committee formed under the agreement meet no less than annually to evaluate and determine an equitable allocation percentage. The allocation percentage are reviewed by the Steering Committee pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement.

The Shared Services Agreement has resulted in significant synergies for us, including shared services and logistics optimization, best-of-source contractual terms, procurement savings, regional site rationalization and administrative and overhead savings. As of March 31, 2015, we have realized a total of approximately $65 million of cost savings in connection with the Shared Services Agreement on a run-rate basis, and expect the savings from these synergies to continue. Despite the Bankruptcy Filing, the Shared Services Agreement has continued in effect along with the majority of the savings from these synergies. In conjunction with our emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, on October 24, 2014 the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance

 

47


Table of Contents

period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations.

Matters Impacting Comparability of Results

As a result of the application of fresh-start accounting, at October 24, 2014, our assets and liabilities were recorded at their estimated fair values which, in some cases, are significantly different than amounts included in our financial statements prior to the Effective Date. Accordingly, our financial condition and results of operations on and after the Effective Date are not comparable to our financial condition and results of operations prior to the Effective Date. For purposes of facilitating a discussion of the results of operations, the data provided herein has been calculated by adding the relevant results for the period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 to the relevant results for the period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014.

During the application of fresh start accounting, we re-evaluated our accounting policy with respect to which overhead costs were production-related, as well as the extent to which functional costs supported production-related activities. As a result, certain costs were recorded in cost of sales rather than selling, general and administrative expense in the successor period.

Raw Materials

In 2014, we purchased approximately $1.0 billion of raw materials. The largest raw material used in our Silicones business is silicon metal. The cost of silicon metal comprised approximately 22% of our total raw material costs in our Silicones’ manufacturing processes in 2014. The market price of silicon metal rose through 2010 and peaked in early 2011. Market prices declined steadily through 2011 and leveled out at the end of 2012. We saw favorable market prices in 2013 due to the extended economic slowdown, but in 2014, the Brazilian drought as well as increased consumption into the aluminum market led to increased prices which slightly decreased margins. We expect 2015 to be relatively stable. The largest raw material used in our Quartz business is a specific type of sand, which is currently available from a limited number of suppliers. Because Unimin controls a significant amount of the quartz sand market, it exercises significant control over quartz sand prices, which have been steadily increasing. In April 2015, we entered into a long term purchase agreement with Unimin, which is effective as of December 1, 2013 and expires on December 31, 2016.

We expect long-term raw material cost fluctuations to continue because of price movements of key feedstocks. To help mitigate the fluctuations in raw material pricing, we have purchase and sale contracts and commercial arrangements with many of our vendors and customers that contain periodic price adjustment mechanisms. Due to differences in the timing of pricing mechanism trigger points between our sales and purchase contracts, there is often a “lead-lag” impact. In many cases this “lead-lag” impact can negatively impact our margins in the short term in periods of rising raw material prices and positively impact them in the short term in periods of falling raw material prices.

Other Comprehensive Loss

Our other comprehensive loss is significantly impacted by foreign currency translation. The impact of foreign currency translation is driven by the translation of assets and liabilities of our foreign subsidiaries which are denominated in functional currencies other than the U.S. dollar. The primary assets and liabilities driving the adjustments are cash and cash equivalents; accounts receivable; inventory; property, plant and equipment; goodwill and other intangible assets; accounts payable and pension and other postretirement benefit obligations. The primary currencies in which these assets and liabilities are denominated are the euro and Japanese yen. Prior to October 24, 2014, other comprehensive loss included the impact of defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit adjustments. Upon the application of fresh start accounting, beginning on and after October 24, 2014,

 

48


Table of Contents

actuarial gains and losses resulting from pension and postretirement liability remeasurements are recognized immediately in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, compared to our prior policy of deferring such gains and losses in accumulated other comprehensive income and amortizing them over future periods. The impact of defined benefit pension and postretirement benefit adjustments prior to October 24, 2014 were primarily driven by unrecognized actuarial gains and losses related to our defined benefit and other postretirement benefit plans, as well as the subsequent amortization of gains and losses from accumulated other comprehensive income in periods following the initial recording of such items. These actuarial gains and losses were determined using various assumptions, the most significant of which were (i) the weighted average rate used for discounting the liability, (ii) the weighted average expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, (iii) the weighted average rate of future salary increases and (iv) the anticipated mortality rate tables.

 

49


Table of Contents

Results of Operations

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    Three Months
Ended March  31,
    Successor          Predecessor  
   

 

Successor

   

 

Predecessor

    Period from
October 25, 2014
through
December 31,
2014
         Period from
January 1, 2014
through
October 24,
2014
    Year Ended December 31,  

(In millions)

  2015     2014               2013             2012      

Net sales

  $ 579      $ 605      $ 465          $ 2,011      $ 2,398      $ 2,357   

Cost of sales

    479          402             
 

 

 

     

 

 

           

Gross profit

    100          63             

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

        434              1,439        1,732        1,705   

Selling, general and administrative expense

    74        79        80            434        373        392   

Depreciation and amortization expense

        41              147        171        187   

Research and development expense

    18        20        13            63        70        69   

Restructuring and other costs

    4        4        5            20        21        43   

Other operating income, net

    (7     —          (1         —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating income (loss)

    11        27        (34         (92     31        (39

Operating income (loss) as a percentage of net sales

    2     4     (7 )%          (5 )%      1 %      (2 )% 

Interest expense, net

    19        76        15            162        394        277   

Other non-operating expense (income), net

    4        —          8            —          —          (11

Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt

    —          —          —              —          —          57   

Reorganization items, net

    5        —          3            (1,972     —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-operating expense (income)

    28        76        26            (1,810     394        323   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (17     (49     (60         1,718        (363     (362

Income tax expense

    10        8        —              36        104        8   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (27     (57     (60         1,682        (467     (370

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes

    1        1        —              3        3        5   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

  $ (26   $ (56   $ (60       $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income

    (43     (14   $ (28       $ (202   $ 22      $ (48
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

50


Table of Contents

Net Sales

Net sales in the first quarter of 2015 decreased $26 million, or 4%, compared to the first quarter of 2014. These decrease was primarily due to unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $37 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen in the first quarter of 2015 as compared to first quarter of 2014. This was partially offset by price and mix shift, which positively impacted net sales by $11 million. Sales volumes were flat as compared to the first quarter of 2014. Price and mix were positively impacted by higher sales of specialty grade products, specifically NXT* Silanes and liquid silicone rubber.

In 2014, net sales increased by $78 million, or 3%, compared to 2013. Volume increases and price and mix shift positively impacted net sales by $94 million. Sales volumes were positively impacted by improved demand for our silicones products in the construction and automotive markets as a result of successful growth initiatives and economic improvement, primarily in Europe, and were partially offset by decreased demand in the specialty solar market, which negatively impacted our Quartz business. Price and mix were positively impacted by higher sales of specialty grade products, specifically silanes, coatings and elastomers. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $16 million, which were primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen in 2014 as compared to 2013.

In 2013, net sales increased by $41 million, or 2%, compared to 2012. Volume increases positively impacted net sales by $95 million, and were partially offset by unfavorable foreign exchange rate fluctuations of $36 million and a decrease in price and mix shift of $18 million. The volume increases were primarily driven by improved demand for our silicones products in construction, automotive and personal care applications as a result of successful growth initiatives and economic improvement primarily in the North American market.

Operating Income (Loss)

In the first quarter of 2015, operating income decreased $16 million compared to the first quarter of 2014. Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization of $27 million in the successor period due to the change in presentation of depreciation and amortization, as described in Note 1 to the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements) increased by $18 million compared to the first quarter of 2014. Cost of sales was negatively impacted by increases in processing costs of $9 million during the first quarter of 2015, partially offset by raw material cost deflation of $5 million. Cost of sales was positively impacted by favorable exchange rate fluctuations driven by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen. In conjunction with the application of fresh start accounting, we re-evaluated our accounting policy with respect to which overhead costs were production-related, as well as the extent to which functional costs supported production-related activities. As a result, certain costs were recorded in cost of sales rather than in selling, general and administrative expense in the Successor period. Selling, general and administrative expense (excluding depreciation and amortization of $10 million due to the presentation change discussed above) decreased by $15 million compared to the first quarter of 2014. Selling, general and administrative expense in the first quarter of 2014 included foreign currency gains of approximately $22 million related to certain intercompany arrangements for which we were unable to assert permanent reinvestment during the Predecessor period due to the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern under our prior capital structure. Additionally, in 2015 certain costs which previously had been recorded in selling, general and administrative expense are being recorded in cost of sales, as discussed above. Selling, general and administrative expense also benefited from favorable exchange rate fluctuations in the first quarter of 2015, as discussed above. Depreciation and amortization expense in the first quarter of 2015 was $37 million compared to $41 million in the first quarter of 2014. Research and development expense for the first quarter of 2015 decreased by $2 million compared to the first quarter of 2014 primarily related to timing of new projects. Restructuring and other costs for the first quarter of 2015 were flat compared to the first quarter of 2014. These costs were primarily related to one-time expenses for services costs. Other operating income included a settlement gain of $6 million related to the resolution of a customer dispute in the first quarter of 2015.

 

51


Table of Contents

In 2014, operating income decreased $157 million, from income of $31 million to a loss of $126 million, compared to 2013. Cost of sales (excluding depreciation and amortization of $14 million in the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 due to the change in presentation of depreciation and amortization, as described in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein) increased by $95 million compared to 2013. The increase was primarily due to an increase in volumes and price and mix shift, which were primarily driven by the increase in net sales discussed above. Cost of sales was also negatively impacted by price inflation in certain key raw materials during 2014 which we were unable to absorb. These increases were partially offset by productivity improvements and favorable exchange rate fluctuations driven by the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen. Selling, general and administrative expense (excluding depreciation and amortization of $8 million due to the presentation change discussed above) increased by $133 million compared to 2013. The increase was driven by unrealized foreign currency losses of approximately $94 million related to certain intercompany arrangements for which we were unable to assert permanent reinvestment during the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 due to the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern under our prior capital structure. The increase was also driven by unrealized losses of $15 million in 2014 related to the remeasurement of our pension liabilities which, subsequent to the Effective Date due to a change in accounting policy, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Depreciation and amortization expense in 2014 was $169 million (including $22 million of depreciation and amortization expense included in cost of sales and selling, general and administrative expense, as discussed above) compared to $171 million in 2013. Research and development expense in 2014 increased $6 million compared to 2013, primarily related to timing of new projects. Restructuring and other costs increased by $4 million, which was primarily related to one-time charges for services and certain costs associated with restructuring our capital structure prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, and was partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement.

In 2013, operating income increased $70 million, from a loss of $39 million to income of $31 million, compared to 2012. The increase was partially due to the $41 million increase in net sales discussed above. Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization increased by $27 million, which was primarily due to the increase in volumes discussed above, and was partially offset by deflation in raw materials and processing costs of $40 million, as well as a positive impact from exchange rate fluctuations of $29 million. Selling, general and administrative and depreciation and amortization expense decreased by $35 million due to lower depreciation and amortization expense of $16 million and lower compensation and benefit expense as a result of reduced headcount from our restructuring programs, which was partially offset by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $10 million. Research and development expense remained relatively flat compared to 2012. Restructuring and other costs decreased by $22 million primarily due to the wind-down of 2012 restructuring activities, which consisted of severance charges associated with workforce reductions and other one-time expenses for services and integration.

Non-Operating Expense (Income)

In the first quarter of 2015, total non-operating expense decreased by $49 million compared to the first quarter of 2014. The decrease was driven by a decrease in interest expense of $57 million, which was primarily due to a reduction in total debt outstanding as a result of restructuring our capital structure in conjunction with the implementation of the Plan. The decrease was partially offset by an increase in other non-operating expense of $4 million in the first quarter of 2015, which primarily consisted of realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses, and reorganization items of $5 million, which primarily consisted of professional fees and rating fees for the new first and second lien notes issued on the Emergence Date.

In 2014, total non-operating expense decreased by $2,178 million, from an expense of $394 million to income of $1,784 million, compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily driven by reorganization items, net of $1,969 million in 2014 (see Note 4 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for more information). The overall decrease was also driven by a decrease in interest expense of $217 million, which was primarily due to ceasing interest accruals on the Debtor’s unsecured debt beginning in April 2014 as a result of

 

52


Table of Contents

the Bankruptcy Filing, as well as a reduction in total debt outstanding as a result of restructuring our capital structure in conjunction with the implementation of the Plan of Reorganization. These decreases were partially offset by other non-operating expense of $8 million in 2014, which primarily consisted of realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses.

In 2013, total non-operating expense increased by $71 million compared to 2012, primarily due to an increase in interest expense of $117 million, which was driven by higher average outstanding debt balances and interest rates as a result of the refinancing transactions in April, May and October of 2012, as well as the write off of $81 million in unamortized deferred debt issuance costs and $2 million in unamortized debt discount due to the reclassification of outstanding debt to current in the fourth quarter of 2013 as a result of the substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern under our prior capital structure, which would represent a covenant violation and would make the debt callable. These increases were partially offset by a $57 million loss on extinguishment of debt related to the debt refinancing transactions in 2012, which did not recur in 2013. Other non-operating income, net, decreased by $11 million as a result of a one-time gain recognized in 2012 from the sale of a building lease option to a third party as well as a one-time royalty payment received from our siloxane joint venture in China, neither of which recurred in 2013.

Income Tax Expense

The effective tax rate was (59)% and (17)% for the first quarter of 2015 and 2014, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the amount and distribution of income and loss among the various jurisdictions in which we operate. Economic pressure and volatility within certain foreign jurisdictions, including Germany and Japan, were largely responsible for the change in distribution of income between 2014 and 2015. The effective tax rates were also impacted by operating losses generated in jurisdictions where no tax benefit was recognized due to the maintenance of a full valuation allowance.

For the first quarter of 2015, income taxes included unfavorable discrete tax adjustments of $3 million pertaining to a change in the tax law in Japan and the resolution of certain tax matters in non-U.S. jurisdictions. For the first quarter of 2014, income taxes included unfavorable discrete tax adjustments of $8 million pertaining to related party transaction costs, unrealized gains on intercompany transactions and the resolution of certain tax matters in U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions.

We are recognizing the earnings of non-U.S. operations currently in our U.S. consolidated income tax return as of March 31, 2015, and are expecting that all earnings, with the exception of Germany and Japan, will be repatriated to the United States. We have accrued the incremental tax expense expected to be incurred upon the repatriation of these earnings.

In 2014, income tax expense decreased by $68 million compared to 2013. The effective income tax rate was 2% for 2014 compared to (29)% for 2013. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the amount and distribution of income and loss among the various jurisdictions in which we operate. The effective tax rate was also impacted by the tax impact of the reorganization and fresh start accounting net of the movement in valuation allowance, as well as the change in our permanent reinvestment assertion. The valuation allowance, which relates principally to U.S. and certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, was established and maintained based on our assessment that a portion of the deferred tax assets will likely not be realized.

In 2013, income tax expense increased by $96 million compared to 2012. The effective income tax rate was (29)% for 2013 compared to (2)% for 2012. The change in the effective tax rate in 2013 was primarily due to our inability to continue our permanent reinvestment assertion related to certain intercompany arrangements, the maintenance of a full valuation allowance against a substantial amount of our net deferred tax assets and the establishment of valuation allowances in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions. In addition, the foreign rate differential increased by $15 million due to changes in estimates of our uncertain tax positions and also by the geographic mix of earnings across several jurisdictions, which were offset against changes in valuation allowances described above.

 

53


Table of Contents

For both 2013 and 2012, losses incurred in foreign jurisdictions with statutory tax rates less than 35% (primarily Germany) comprised the largest portion of the foreign rate differential. Economic pressure and volatility within certain foreign jurisdictions, including Germany, Japan, and Switzerland were largely responsible for the change in foreign rate differential from 2012 to 2013. Due in part to this economic volatility and the impact of certain business changes made as a result of our ability to continue as a going concern, the historically significant effective tax rate drivers discussed above may not be indicative of our future tax rate. The valuation allowance, which related principally to U.S. and certain non-U.S. deferred tax assets, was established and maintained based on our assessment that a portion of the deferred tax assets would likely not be realized. In 2013, a new valuation allowance of $20 million was established in certain non-U.S. jurisdictions which had not been previously subject to a valuation allowance, but which then required a valuation allowance based on our assessment that the net deferred tax assets would likely not be realized. These new valuation allowances were in addition to changes in valuation allowances for jurisdictions in which valuation allowances had been established in prior years.

We are recognizing the earnings of non-U.S. operations currently in our U.S. consolidated income tax return as of December 31, 2014 and are expecting that, with the exception of Germany and Japan, all excess cash will be repatriated to the United States. We have accrued the incremental tax expense expected to be incurred upon the repatriation of these earnings. In addition, we have certain intercompany arrangements that, if settled, may trigger taxable gains or losses based on foreign currency exchange rates in place at the time of settlement. In 2012, we were able to assert permanent reinvestment with respect to certain intercompany arrangements, and therefore did not accrue any additional tax related to the foreign currency exchange gains and losses. In the fourth quarter of 2013, as a result of the conditions related to our ability to continue as a going concern described above, we were no longer able to assert permanent reinvestment with respect to certain intercompany arrangements previously considered indefinite, and recorded deferred taxes on the foreign currency translation impact. This change in assertion resulted in a tax expense of $87 million in the period in which the change occurred. Beginning on the Effective Date, as a result of our emergence from bankruptcy and our ability to continue as a going concern, we are able to assert permanent reinvestment with respect to these intercompany arrangements. As a result, we have reversed the deferred taxes on the foreign currency impact previously recorded. This change in assertion resulted in a tax benefit of $5 million in the period in which the change occurred.

Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

In the first quarter of 2015, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $43 million, primarily due to the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen.

In the first quarter of 2014, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $15 million, primarily due to the impact of the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the Japanese yen as it relates to certain intercompany arrangements. For the first quarter of 2014, pension and postretirement benefit adjustments positively impacted other comprehensive income by $1 million, primarily due to minor gains recognized related to certain postretirement benefit plans.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $2 million, primarily due to the impact of the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen. For the year ended December 31, 2014, pension and postretirement benefit adjustments negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $70 million, primarily due to net unrecognized actuarial losses driven by a decrease in the discount rate at October 24, 2014, partially offset by favorable asset experience. In connection with the application of fresh start accounting, on October 24, 2014, total accumulated unrecognized net gains of $162 million were eliminated from accumulated other comprehensive income (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for more information).

 

54


Table of Contents

For the year ended December 31, 2013, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $6 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Japanese yen, partially offset by the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2013, a tax benefit of $54 million was recognized in other comprehensive income related to a change in assertion with respect to certain intercompany arrangements, which were previously considered indefinite. For the year ended December 31, 2013, pension and postretirement benefit adjustments positively impacted other comprehensive income by $28 million, primarily due to unrecognized actuarial gains driven by an increase in the discount rate at December 31, 2013, favorable asset experience and the amortization of unrecognized actuarial losses recorded in prior periods.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, foreign currency translation negatively impacted other comprehensive income by $29 million, primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the Japanese yen, partially offset by the weakening of the U.S. dollar against the euro. For the year ended December 31, 2012, pension and postretirement benefit adjustments negatively impacted other comprehensive loss by $19 million, primarily due to unrecognized actuarial losses driven by a decrease in the discount rate at December 31, 2012 and unfavorable asset experience. These decreases were partially offset by the positive impact of a curtailment gain recognized on domestic pension benefit plans.

Results of Operations by Segment

Following are net sales and Segment EBITDA by reportable segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) adjusted for certain non-cash items and certain other income and expenses. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by our senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the Board of Directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. Segment EBITDA is also the profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals. Segment EBITDA should not be considered a substitute for net income (loss) or other results reported in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Segment EBITDA may not be comparable to similarly titled measures reported by other companies.

In 2015, we redefined our internal reporting structure and now allocate additional administrative functional costs to the operating segments. The current presentation of Segment EBITDA includes a Corporate component rather than the Other component previously disclosed. Corporate is primarily corporate, general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the segments, such as certain shared service and administrative functions. Segment EBITDA for all periods presented was retrospectively revised to conform with the current presentation.

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,     Successor          Predecessor  
    

 

Successor

         

 

Predecessor

    Period from
October 25,
2014
 through

December 31,
2014
         Period from
January 1,
2014
 through

October 24,
2014
    Year Ended
December  31,
 
(in millions)    2015           2014              2013     2012  

Net Sales(1):

                     

Silicones

     $532             $557      $ 431          $ 1,866      $ 2,197      $ 2,136   

Quartz

     47             48        34            145        201        221   
  

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     $579             $605      $ 465          $ 2,011      $ 2,398      $ 2,357   
  

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Segment EBITDA:

                     

Silicones

     $52             $58      $ 44          $ 213      $ 241      $ 205   

Quartz

     11             7        6            17        35        43   

Corporate

     (10          (10     (4         (38     (38     (34
  

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 53             $55      $ 46          $ 192      $ 238      $ 214   
  

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Inter-segment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.

 

55


Table of Contents

Three Months Ended March 31, 2015 vs. Three Months Ended March 31, 2014 Segment Results

Following is an analysis of the percentage change in sales by business from the three months ended March 31, 2014 to the three months ended March 31, 2015:

 

     Volume     Price/
Mix
    Currency
Translation
    Total  

Silicones

     —           (6 )%      (4 )% 

Quartz

     4     —       (6 )%      (2 )% 

Silicones

Net sales in the first quarter of 2015 decreased $25 million, or 4%, compared to the first quarter of 2014. The decrease was primarily due to unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $34 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen in the first quarter of 2015 as compared to first quarter of 2014. This was partially offset by price and mix shift, which positively impacted net sales by $11 million. Sales volumes were flat as compared to the first quarter of 2014. Price and mix were positively impacted by higher sales of specialty grade products, specifically NXT* Silanes and liquid silicone rubber.

Segment EBITDA in the first quarter of 2015 decreased by $6 million to $52 million compared to the first quarter of 2014. The decrease was primarily due to net unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations, as discussed above, as well as an increase in processing costs related to improvement of plant reliability and to support new investments and growth. These decreases were partially offset by raw material cost deflation.

Quartz

Net sales in the first quarter of 2015 decreased $1 million, or 2%, compared to the first quarter of 2014. Unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $3 million due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro and Japanese yen in the first quarter of 2015 as compared to first quarter of 2014 offset positive volume increases driven by recovering demand in the semiconductor market.

Segment EBITDA in the first quarter of 2015 increased by $4 million to $11 million compared to the first quarter of 2014. The increase was primarily due to a settlement gain of $6 million related to the resolution of a customer dispute in the first quarter of 2015, which was partially offset by increased processing costs.

Corporate

Corporate charges were flat in the first quarter of 2015 as compared to the first quarter of 2014.

2014 vs. 2013 Segment Results

Following is an analysis of the percentage change in sales by segment from 2013 to 2014:

 

       Volume     Price/
Mix
     Currency
Translation
     Total  

Silicones

       3     3      (1)      5

Quartz

       (11 )%      —        —        (11 )% 

Silicones

Net sales in 2014 increased $100 million, or 5%, compared to 2013. Volume increases and price and mix shift positively impacted net sales by $61 million and $55 million, respectively. Sales volumes were positively impacted by improved demand for our silicones products in the construction and automotive markets as a result

 

56


Table of Contents

of successful growth initiatives and economic improvement, primarily in Europe. Price and mix were positively impacted by higher sales of specialty grade products, specifically silanes, coatings and elastomers. These increases were partially offset by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $16 million, which were primarily due to the strengthening of the U.S. dollar against the euro in 2014 as compared to 2013.

Segment EBITDA in 2014 increased by $16 million to $257 million compared to 2013. The increase was due to the increase in net sales discussed above, and was partially offset by raw material inflation, disruptions in plant operations and incremental transportation costs due to adverse weather conditions in early 2014, as well as the negative impact on our business resulting from the Chapter 11 proceedings.

Quartz

Net sales in 2014 decreased $22 million, or 11%, compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in volumes, which were primarily due to decreased demand in the specialty solar market. Price and mix and exchange rate fluctuations were flat compared to 2013.

Segment EBITDA in 2014 decreased by $12 million to $23 million compared to 2013. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in net sales discussed above, as well as decreased productivity in processing costs, and was partially offset by cost control and other operational efficiencies.

Corporate

Corporate charges increased by $4 million to $42 million compared to 2013, primarily due to higher compensation costs and costs to support initiatives in our information technology, human resources and environmental, health and safety functions.

2013 vs. 2012 Segment Results

Following is an analysis of the percentage change in sales by segment from 2012 to 2013:

 

       Volume     Price/
Mix
    Currency
Translation
    Total  

Silicones

       5     (1 )%      (1 )%      3

Quartz

       (8 )%      —       (1 )%      (9 )% 

Silicones

Net sales in 2013 increased $61 million, or 3%, compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to an increase in volume of $112 million, partially offset by unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $33 million and a decrease in price and mix shift of $18 million. The volume increases were driven by the execution of growth initiatives primarily in the North American and Pacific markets, which contributed to increased demand for our products, primarily in construction, automotive and oil and gas applications.

Segment EBITDA in 2013 increased by $36 million to $241 million compared to 2012. The increase was primarily due to the increase in sales discussed above, as well as the impact of cost control and productivity initiatives.

Quartz

Net sales in 2013 decreased $20 million, or 9%, compared to 2012. The decrease was primarily due to lower volumes of $17 million reflecting a downturn in demand for semiconductor and solar related products, as well as unfavorable exchange rate fluctuations of $3 million.

 

57


Table of Contents

Segment EBITDA in 2013 decreased by $8 million to $35 million compared to 2012. The decrease was primarily due to the decrease in sales discussed above as well as challenges in the solar and lighting markets.

Corporate

Corporate charges increased by $4 million to $38 million compared to 2012, primarily due to increased expenses that were not assessed to the operating segments.

Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to Net (Loss) Income:

 

    

  Three Months Ended March 31,  

    Successor          Predecessor  
    

 

Successor

        

 

Predecessor

    Period from
October 25,
2014
 through
December 31,
2014
         Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October 24,
2014
    Year Ended December 31,  
(in millions)    2015       2014               2013             2012      

Segment EBITDA:

                    

Silicones

   $ 52          $ 58      $ 44          $ 213      $ 241      $ 205   

Quartz

     11            7        6            17        35        43   

Corporate

     (10         (10     (4         (38     (38     (34
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 53          $ 55      $ 46          $ 192      $ 238      $ 214   
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation:

                    

Items not included in Segment EBITDA:

                    

Non-cash charges and other income and expense

   $ (4       $ 18      $ (46       $ (114   $ (12   $ (7

Unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits

     —              —          (15         —          —          —     

Restructuring and other costs

     (4         (4     (5         (20     (21     (43

Reorganization items, net

     (5         —          (3         1,972        —          —     
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     (13         14        (69         1,838        (33     (50

Interest expense, net

     (19         (76     (15         (162     (394     (277

Income tax expense

     (10         (8     —              (36     (104     (8

Depreciation and amortization

     (37         (41     (22         (147     (171     (187

Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt

     —              —          —              —          —          (57
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $ (26       $ (56   $ (60       $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365
  

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Items Not Included in Segment EBITDA

Not included in Segment EBITDA are certain non-cash and other income and expenses. For the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, non-cash charges primarily included net unrealized foreign exchange transaction gains related to certain intercompany arrangements. Restructuring and other costs primarily included expenses from our restructuring and cost optimization programs. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with restructuring our capital structure incurred prior to the

 

58


Table of Contents

Bankruptcy Filing, which were partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement. Reorganization items, net represented incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, reorganization items, net included professional fees and rating fees for the new debt issued on the Emergence date. For the year ended December 31, 2014, these charges primarily represented net realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses, expenses from retention programs and losses on the disposal of certain assets. For the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, these amounts primarily represented net unrealized derivative and foreign exchange losses, stock-based compensation and gains and losses from the disposal of certain assets.

Unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits represented non-cash actuarial losses recognized upon the remeasurement of our pension and postretirement benefit obligations, which after the Effective Date, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and were driven by a decrease in discount rates, other demographic assumptions and asset performance. Restructuring and other costs primarily included expenses from our restructuring and cost optimization programs. For the year ended December 31, 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with restructuring our capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, and were partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement. Reorganization items, net represented incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, and included certain professional fees, the $30 million commitment premium received by the commitment parties party to the Backstop Commitment Agreement (the “BCA Commitment Premium”) and financing fees related to our debtor-in-possession credit facilities (the “DIP Facilities”), as well as the impact of the Reorganization Adjustments and the Fresh Start Adjustments (see Note 3 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein).

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Our primary sources of liquidity are cash on hand, cash flow from operations and funds available under the ABL Facility. Our primary continuing liquidity needs are to finance our working capital, debt service and capital expenditures.

At March 31, 2015, we had $1,205 million of outstanding indebtedness. In addition, at March 31, 2015, we had $389 million in liquidity, consisting of the following:

 

   

$186 million of unrestricted cash and cash equivalents (of which $162 million is maintained in foreign jurisdictions); and

 

   

$203 million of availability under the ABL Facility ($270 million borrowing base, less $67 million of outstanding letters of credit and subject to a fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that will only apply if our availability is less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27 million).

A summary of the components of our net working capital (defined as accounts receivable and inventories less accounts payable) at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows:

 

     March 31,
2015
    % of LTM
Net Sales
    December 31,
2014
    % of LTM
Net Sales
 

Accounts receivable

   $ 339        14   $ 324        13

Inventories

     420        17     402        16

Accounts payable

     (219     (9 )%      (223     (9 )% 
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net working capital

   $ 540        22   $ 503        20
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The increase in net working capital of $37 million from December 31, 2014 was due to an increase in accounts receivable due to customer mix and timing of collections, a buildup of inventories to meet forecasted volume and demand, and a decrease in accounts payable due to residual payments under the Plan, offset by improved payment terms following our Chapter 11 Emergence. To minimize the impact of net working capital on

 

59


Table of Contents

cash flows, we continue to review inventory safety stock levels where possible. We also continue to focus on receivable collections by offering incentives to customers to encourage early payment, or accelerating receipts through the sale of receivables at a discount.

We periodically borrow from the ABL Facility to support our short-term liquidity requirements, particularly when net working capital requirements increase in response to seasonality of our volumes in the summer months. During the first quarter of 2015, we had no borrowings under the ABL Facility. As of March 31, 2015, we had no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility.

Debt Repurchases and Other Transactions

From time to time, depending upon market, pricing and other conditions, as well as on our cash balances and liquidity, we or our affiliates may seek to acquire (and have acquired) notes or other indebtedness of the Company through open market purchases, privately negotiated transactions, tender offers, redemption or otherwise, upon such terms and at such prices as we or our affiliates may determine (or as may be provided for in the indentures governing the notes), for cash or other consideration. In addition, we have considered and will continue to evaluate potential transactions to reduce net debt, such as debt for debt exchanges and other transactions. There can be no assurance as to which, if any, of these alternatives or combinations thereof we or our affiliates may choose to pursue in the future as the pursuit of any alternative will depend upon numerous factors such as market conditions, our financial performance and the limitations applicable to such transactions under our financing documents.

Sources and Uses of Cash

Following are highlights from our Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows:

 

    Three Months Ended March 31,     Successor          Predecessor  
    Successor          Predecessor     Period from
October 25,
2014
 through

December 31, 2014
         Period from
January 1,
2014
 through

October 24, 2014
    Year Ended December 31,  
(in millions)   2015          2014                  2013             2012      

Sources (uses) of cash:

                   

Operating activities

  $ (3       $ (68   $ (3       $ (207   $ (150   $ (95

Investing activities

    (28         (27     (17         (18     (88     (102

Financing activities

    (2         118        (1         390        220        111   

Effect of exchange rates on cash flow

    (4         (1     (4         (6     (3     (3
 

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

  $ (37       $ 22      $ (25       $ 159      $ (21   $ (89
 

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

       

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating Activities

In the first three months of 2015, operations used $3 million of cash. Net loss of $26 million included $52 million of non-cash expense items, of which $37 million was for depreciation and amortization, $7 million was for unrealized foreign currency losses, and $4 million for deferred income tax expense. Net working capital used $46 million of cash, primarily due to increases in inventory of $34 million and accounts receivable of $26 million as discussed above. These items were partially offset by increases in other liabilities of $23 million and accounts payable of $14 million driven by improved payment terms following our Chapter 11 Emergence and the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest on our new debt.

 

60


Table of Contents

In the first three months of 2014, operations used $68 million of cash. Net loss of $56 million included $24 million of non-cash expense items, of which $41 million was for depreciation and amortization, and $6 million for deferred income taxes. These items were partially offset by $23 million of unrealized foreign currency gains. Net working capital used $52 million of cash, driven by increases in inventory of $22 million and accounts receivable of $30 million. Changes in other assets and liabilities and due to/from affiliates provided $16 million, and were driven by the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, taxes and restructuring expenses.

In 2014, operations used $210 million of cash. Net income of $1,625 million included $1,755 million of net non-cash income items, of which $2,078 million was for non-cash reorganization items, which were partially offset by other various non-cash expenses. These other non-cash expenses included $169 million for depreciation and amortization, a $19 million reclassification of DIP Facility financing fees to “Financing Activities”, a $15 million non-cash charge for unrealized losses related to the remeasurement of our pension liabilities, $101 million of unrealized foreign currency losses, $10 million of deferred tax expense and $4 million for the amortization of debt discount. Net working capital used $80 million of cash, as opposed to $47 million of cash used in the year ended December 31, 2013. This change was primarily driven by increases in sales volumes and the related impact on accounts receivable and inventory, as well as a decrease in accounts payable of $14 million. Changes in other assets and liabilities, due to/from affiliates and income taxes payable remained flat. These changes are driven by the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, pension plan contributions and taxes.

In 2013, operations used $150 million of cash. Net loss of $464 million included $364 million of non-cash expense items, of which $171 million was for depreciation and amortization, $81 million was for the write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs, $86 million was for deferred tax expense, $10 million was for the amortization of debt discount and issuance costs and $12 million was for unrealized foreign currency losses. Net working capital used $47 million of cash, as compared to $7 million of cash used in the year ended December 31, 2012. This change was primarily driven by the increase in sales volume and impact on accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable. Changes in other assets and liabilities, due to/from affiliates and income taxes payable used cash of $3 million, and are driven by the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, taxes, pension plan contributions and restructuring expenses.

In 2012, operations used $95 million of cash. Net loss of $365 million included $250 million of non-cash expense items, of which $187 million was for depreciation and amortization, $18 million was for the amortization of debt discount and deferred issuance costs, $57 million was for loss on extinguishment of debt and $1 million was for unrealized foreign currency losses. These items were partially offset by a $10 million deferred tax benefit. Net working capital used $7 million of cash, as compared to $4 million of cash generated in the year ended December 31, 2011. This change was driven by the decrease in sales and raw material costs and resulting impacts on accounts receivable, inventory and accounts payable. This impact was largely offset by the impacts of lower days of sales, inventory and payables outstanding. Changes in other assets and liabilities, due to/from affiliates and income taxes payable provided cash of $27 million due to the timing of when items were expensed versus paid, which primarily included interest expense, taxes and restructuring expenses.

Investing Activities

In the first three months of 2015, investing activities used $28 million. We spent $27 million for ongoing capital expenditures related to growth, environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects (of which $19 million represented current year asset additions, with the remainder spent on asset additions made in prior periods).

In the first three months of 2014, investing activities used $27 million, all of which was spent for ongoing capital expenditures related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects (of which $19 million represented current year asset additions, with the remainder spent on asset additions made in prior periods).

 

61


Table of Contents

In 2014, investing activities used $35 million of cash. We spent $96 million for ongoing capital expenditures (including capitalized interest) related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects (of which $87 million represented current year asset additions, with the remainder spent on asset additions made in prior periods). We also spent $2 million on the acquisition of intangible assets. These expenditures were partially offset by the consolidation of Superholdco Finance Corp. (“Finco”), which provided a $50 million increase in cash, as well as $12 million in proceeds received from the sale of a subsidiary to Hexion.

In 2013, investing activities used $88 million of cash. We spent $81 million for ongoing capital expenditures (including capitalized interest) related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects. We also spent $3 million on the acquisition of intangible assets, and an increase in restricted cash used $5 million. These expenditures were partially offset by proceeds of $1 million from the sale of certain assets.

In 2012, investing activities used $102 million of cash. We spent $107 million for ongoing capital expenditures related to environmental, health and safety compliance and maintenance projects. We also spent $2 million on the acquisition of intangible assets. These expenditures were partially offset by proceeds of $7 million from the sale of assets.

Financing Activities

In the first three months of 2015, financing activities used $2 million, which related to net short-term debt repayments.

In the first three months of 2014, financing activities provided $118 million. Net short-term debt borrowings were $4 million, and net long-term debt borrowings were $105 million, which primarily consisted of net borrowings under our Old ABL Facility and our Old Cash Flow Facility. We also received cash of $9 million related to a loan from Old MPM Holdings.

In 2014, financing activities provided $389 million of cash. Proceeds from the Rights Offerings provided cash of $600 million. Net long-term debt repayments were $135 million, which primarily consisted of net repayments under the Old ABL Facility and a $75 million revolving credit facility (the “Cash Flow Facility”), and net short-term debt repayments were $7 million. Additionally, the repayment of an affiliated loan in conjunction with various transactions with Finco used cash of $50 million. We also paid $19 million in financing fees related to our DIP Facilities.

In 2013, financing activities provided $220 million of cash. Net long-term debt borrowings were $132 million, which consisted primarily of net borrowings under the Old ABL Facility of $135 million. Net short-term debt repayments were $2 million. We also paid $12 million in financing fees related to our Old ABL Facility, and received proceeds from a capital contribution of $102 million from our parent.

In 2012, financing activities provided $111 million of cash. Net long-term debt borrowings were $192 million, which consisted primarily of proceeds of $250 million from the issuance of 10% Senior Secured Notes due October 2020 and $175 million of incremental term loans due May 2015, partially offset by the repayment of $240 million of term loans maturing May 2015 and $178 million of term loans maturing December 2013, all as part of our refinancing transactions in 2012. These increases were partially offset by $51 million of original issue discounts and tender premiums and $33 million for the payment of debt issuance costs related to these refinancing transactions.

At March 31, 2015, there were $67 million in outstanding letters of credit and no outstanding borrowings under our $270 million ABL Facility, leaving unused borrowing capacity of $203 million.

 

62


Table of Contents

The credit agreement governing the ABL Facility contains various restrictive covenants that prohibit us and/or restrict our ability to prepay indebtedness, including our First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes (collectively, the “notes”). In addition, the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility and the indentures governing our notes, among other things, restrict our ability to incur indebtedness or liens, make investments or declare or pay any dividends. However, all of these restrictions are subject to exceptions.

There are certain restrictions on the ability of certain of our subsidiaries to transfer funds to the parent of such subsidiaries in the form of cash dividends, loans or otherwise, which primarily arise as a result of certain foreign government regulations or as a result of restrictions within certain subsidiaries’ financing agreements that limit such transfers to the amounts of available earnings and profits or otherwise limit the amount of dividends that can be distributed. In either case, we have alternative methods to obtain cash from these subsidiaries in the form of intercompany loans and/or returns of capital in such instances where payment of dividends is limited to the extent of earnings and profits.

We have recorded deferred taxes on the earnings of our foreign subsidiaries, as they are not considered to be permanently reinvested as those foreign earnings are needed for operations in the United States.

Covenants under the ABL Facility and the Notes

The instruments that govern our indebtedness contain, among other provisions, restrictive covenants (and incurrence tests in certain cases) regarding indebtedness, dividends and distributions, mergers and acquisitions, asset sales, affiliate transactions, capital expenditures and, under certain circumstances, the maintenance of a fixed charge coverage ratio, as further described below. Payment of borrowings under the ABL Facility and our notes may be accelerated if there is an event of default as determined under the governing debt instrument. Events of default under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility include the failure to pay principal and interest when due, a material breach of a representation or warranty, events of bankruptcy, a change of control and most covenant defaults. Events of default under the indentures governing our notes include the failure to pay principal and interest, a failure to comply with covenants, subject to a 30-day grace period in certain instances, and certain events of bankruptcy.

The ABL Facility does not have any financial maintenance covenant other than a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that would only apply if our availability under the ABL Facility at any time was less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27 million. The fixed charge coverage ratio is generally defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured on a last twelve months, or LTM, basis and calculated as of the last day of the applicable fiscal quarter.

In addition to the financial maintenance covenant described above, we are also subject to certain incurrence tests under the indentures governing our notes that restrict our ability to take certain actions if we are unable to meet specified ratios. For instance, the indentures governing our notes contain an incurrence test that restricts our ability to incur indebtedness or make investments, among other actions, if we do not maintain an Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio (measured on a LTM basis) of at least 2.0 to 1.0. The Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio under the indentures is generally defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA to (b) net interest expense excluding the amortization or write-off of deferred financing costs, each measured on a LTM basis. The restrictions on our ability to incur indebtedness or make investments under the indentures that apply as a result, however, are subject to exceptions, including exceptions that permit indebtedness under the ABL Facility.

At March 31, 2015, we were in compliance with all covenants under the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility and under the indentures governing the notes.

 

63


Table of Contents

Adjusted EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash and certain non-recurring items and other adjustments calculated on a pro-forma basis, including the expected future cost savings from business optimization or other programs and the expected future impact of acquisitions, in each case as determined under the governing debt instrument. As we are highly leveraged, we believe that including the supplemental adjustments that are made to calculate Adjusted EBITDA provides additional information to investors about our ability to comply with our financial covenants and to obtain additional debt in the future. Adjusted EBITDA is not a defined term under U.S. GAAP. Adjusted EBITDA is not a measure of financial condition, liquidity or profitability, and should not be considered as an alternative to net income (loss) determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP or operating cash flows determined in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Additionally, EBITDA is not intended to be a measure of free cash flow for management’s discretionary use, as it does not take into account certain items such as interest and principal payments on our indebtedness, depreciation and amortization expense (because we use capital assets, depreciation and amortization expense is a necessary element of our costs and ability to generate revenue), working capital needs, tax payments (because the payment of taxes is part of our operations, it is a necessary element of our costs and ability to operate), non-recurring expenses and capital expenditures. Fixed Charges under the indentures should not be considered as an alternative to interest expense.

The following table reconciles Net income to EBITDA and Adjusted EBITDA, and calculates the ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges as calculated under our indentures for the period presented:

 

(in millions)    March 31, 2015
LTM Period
    Year Ended
December 31, 2014
 

Net income

   $ 1,655      $ 1,625   

Interest expense, net

     120        177   

Income tax expense

     39        36   

Depreciation and amortization

     166        169   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

EBITDA

     1,980        2,007   

Adjustments to EBITDA:

    

Restructuring and other costs(a)

     25        25   

Reorganization items, net(b)

     (1,964     (1,969

Unrealized loss on pension and postretirement benefits(c)

     15        15   

Non-cash charges and other income and expense(d)

     188        162   

Exclusion of Unrestricted Subsidiary results(e)

     (22     (19
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Adjusted EBITDA

   $ 222      $ 221   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Pro forma fixed charges(f)

   $ 58      $ 58   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ratio of Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges(g)

     3.83        3.81   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(a) Relates primarily to one-time payments for services and integration expenses, as well as costs related to restructuring our capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing.
(b) Represents incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, including certain professional fees, the BCA Commitment Premium and financing fees related to the DIP Facilities. Also includes the impact of the Reorganization Adjustments and the Fresh Start Adjustments.
(c) Represents non-cash actuarial losses resulting from pension and postretirement liability remeasurements.
(d) Non-cash charges and other income and expense includes the effects of unrealized foreign exchange transaction losses related to certain intercompany arrangements, stock-based compensation expense, unrealized derivative gains and losses and asset disposals.
(e) Reflects the exclusion of the EBITDA of our subsidiaries that are designated as Unrestricted Subsidiaries under the ABL Facility.
(f) Reflects pro forma interest expense based on outstanding indebtedness and interest rates at March 31, 2015 and at December 31, 2014.
(g) Our ability to incur additional indebtedness, among other actions, is restricted under the indentures governing our notes, unless the Company has an Adjusted EBITDA to Fixed Charges ratio of 2.0 to 1.0. As of March 31, 2015, we were able to satisfy this test and incur additional indebtedness under these indentures.

 

64


Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations

The following table presents our contractual cash obligations at December 31, 2014. Our contractual cash obligations consist of legal commitments at December 31, 2014 that require us to make fixed or determinable cash payments, regardless of the contractual requirements of the specific vendor to provide us with future goods or services. This table does not include information about most of our recurring purchases of materials used in our production; our raw material purchase contracts do not meet this definition since they generally do not require fixed or minimum quantities. Contracts with cancellation clauses are not included, unless a cancellation would result in a major disruption to our business. These contractual obligations are grouped in the same manner as they are classified in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows in order to provide a better understanding of the nature of the obligations.

 

(in millions)    Payments Due By Year  

Contractual Obligations

   2015      2016      2017      2018      2019      2020 and
beyond
     Total  

Operating activities:

                    

Purchase obligations(1)

   $ 137       $ 122       $ 121       $ 121       $ 106       $ 738       $ 1,345   

Interest on fixed rate debt obligations

     57         56         56         56         56         106         387   

Operating lease obligations

     17         14         10         7         6         21         75   

Funding of pension and other postretirement obligations(2)

     23         16         19         21         21         —           100   

Financing activities:

                    

Long-term debt, including current maturities(3)

     38         —           —           —           —           1,350         1,388   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 272       $ 208       $ 206       $ 205       $ 189       $ 2,215       $ 3,295   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Purchase obligations are comprised of the fixed or minimum amounts of goods and/or services under long-term contracts and assumes that certain contracts are terminated in accordance with their terms after giving the requisite notice which is generally two to three years for most of these contracts; however, under certain circumstances, some of these minimum commitment term periods could be further reduced which would significantly decrease these contractual obligations.
(2) Pension and other postretirement contributions have been included in the above table for the next five years. These amounts include estimated benefit payments to be made for unfunded foreign defined benefit pension plans as well as estimated contributions to our funded defined benefit plans. The assumptions used by our actuaries in calculating these projections includes a weighted average annual return on pension assets of approximately 6% for the years 2015 – 2019 and the continuation of current law and plan provisions. These estimated payments may vary based on the actual return on our plan assets or changes in current law or plan provisions. See Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements contained elsewhere herein for more information on our pension and postretirement obligations.
(3) Long-term debt amounts above represent gross repayments, and are exclusive of any unamortized debt discounts.

The table above excludes payments for income taxes and environmental obligations since, at this time, we cannot determine either the timing or the amounts of all payments beyond 2015. At December 31, 2014, we recorded unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $56 million. We estimate that we will pay approximately $17 million in 2015 for local, state and international income taxes. We expect non-capital environmental expenditures for 2015 through 2019 totaling $2 million. See Notes 13 and 14 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein for more information on these obligations.

Critical Accounting Estimates

In preparing our financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, we have to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the amounts of reported assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses, as well as the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in the

 

65


Table of Contents

financial statements and accompanying notes. Some of these accounting policies require the application of significant judgment by management to select the appropriate assumptions to determine these estimates. By their nature, these judgments are subject to an inherent degree of uncertainty; therefore, actual results may differ significantly from estimated results. We base these judgments on our historical experience, advice from experienced consultants, forecasts and other available information, as appropriate. Our significant accounting policies are more fully described in Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

Income Taxes

Income taxes are accounted for under the asset and liability method. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment dates. Deferred tax assets are subject to valuation allowances based upon management’s estimates of realizability.

At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we had valuation allowances of $309 million and $972 million respectively, against our deferred income tax assets. At December 31, 2014, we had a $106 million valuation allowance against a portion of our net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, as well as a valuation allowance of $203 million against a portion of our net foreign deferred income tax assets, primarily in Germany. At December 31, 2013, we had a $790 million valuation allowance against all of our net U.S. federal and state deferred tax assets, as well as a valuation allowance of $182 million against a portion of our net foreign deferred income tax assets, primarily in Germany. The valuation allowances require an assessment of both negative and positive evidence, such as operating results during the most recent three-year period. This evidence is given more weight than our expectations of future profitability, which are inherently uncertain.

The Company considered all available evidence, both positive and negative, in assessing the need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets. The Company evaluated four possible sources of taxable income when assessing the realization of deferred tax assets:

 

   

Taxable income in prior carryback years;

 

   

Future reversal of existing taxable temporary differences;

 

   

Tax planning strategies; and

 

   

Future taxable income exclusive of reversing temporary differences and carryforwards.

The accounting guidance for uncertainty in income taxes is recognized in the financial statements. The guidance prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of tax positions taken or expected to be taken in its tax return. We also apply the guidance relating to de-recognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.

The calculation of our income tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex domestic and foreign income tax regulations. Unrecognized tax benefits are generated when there are differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements. Tax benefits are recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. Tax benefits are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely to be realized upon settlement. To the extent we prevail in matters for which liabilities have been established, or are required to pay amounts in excess of our liabilities, our effective income tax rate in a given period could be materially impacted. An unfavorable income tax settlement would require the use of cash and result in an increase in our effective income tax rate in the year it is resolved. A favorable income

 

66


Table of Contents

tax settlement would be recognized as a reduction in the effective income tax rate in the year of resolution. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, we recorded unrecognized tax benefits and related interest and penalties of $56 million and $54 million, respectively.

Pensions

The amounts that we recognize in our financial statements for pension benefit obligations are determined by actuarial valuations. Inherent in these valuations are certain assumptions, the more significant of which are:

 

   

The weighted average rate used for discounting the liability;

 

   

The weighted average expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets;

 

   

The method used to determine market-related value of pension plan assets;

 

   

The weighted average rate of future salary increases; and

 

   

The anticipated mortality rate tables.

The discount rate reflects the rate at which pensions could be effectively settled. When selecting a discount rate, our actuaries provide us with a cash flow model that uses the yields of high-grade corporate bonds with maturities consistent with our anticipated cash flow projections.

The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is determined based on the various plans’ current and projected asset mix. To determine the expected overall long-term rate of return on assets, we take into account the rates on long-term debt investments that are held in the portfolio, as well as expected trends in the equity markets, for plans including equity securities.

The rate of increase in future compensation levels is determined based on salary and wage trends in the chemical and other similar industries, as well as our specific compensation targets.

The mortality tables that are used represent the best estimated mortality projections for each particular country and reflect projected mortality improvements.

We believe the current assumptions used to estimate plan obligations and pension expense are appropriate in the current economic environment. However, as economic conditions change, we may change some of our assumptions, which could have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

The following table presents the sensitivity of our projected pension benefit obligation (“PBO”), accumulated benefit obligation (“ABO”), equity (“Equity”) and 2015 pension expense to the following changes in key assumptions:

 

(in millions)    Increase / (Decrease) at
December 31, 2014
    Increase  /
(Decrease)
 
    
   PBO     ABO     Equity     2015 Expense  

Assumption:

        

Increase in discount rate of 0.5%

   $ (37   $ (34   $ 36      $ (1

Decrease in discount rate of 0.5%

     42        39        (41     2   

Increase in estimated return on assets of 1.0%

     N/A        N/A        N/A        (1

Decrease in estimated return on assets of 1.0%

     N/A        N/A        N/A        1   

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets

As events warrant, we evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets, other than goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangibles, by assessing whether the carrying value can be recovered over their remaining useful

 

67


Table of Contents

lives through the expected future undiscounted operating cash flows of the underlying asset groups. Impairment indicators include, but are not limited to, a significant decrease in the market price of a long-lived asset; a significant adverse change in the manner in which the asset is being used or in its physical condition; a significant adverse change in legal factors or the business climate that could affect the value of a long-lived asset; an accumulation of costs significantly in excess of the amount originally expected for the acquisition or construction of a long-lived asset; current period operating or cash flow losses combined with a history of operating or cash flow losses associated with the use of the asset; or a current expectation that it is more likely than not that a long-lived asset will be sold or otherwise disposed of significantly before the end of its previously estimated useful life. As a result, future decisions to change our manufacturing process, exit certain businesses, reduce excess capacity, temporarily idle facilities and close facilities could result in material impairment charges. Long-lived assets are grouped together at the lowest level for which identifiable cash flows are largely independent of cash flows of other groups of long-lived assets. Any impairment loss that may be required is determined by comparing the carrying value of the assets to their estimated fair value. We do not have any indefinite-lived intangibles, other than goodwill.

We perform an annual assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of any events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets. If, after assessing all events and circumstances, we determine it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets, we use a probability weighted market and income approach to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. Our market approach is a comparable analysis technique commonly used in the investment banking and private equity industries based on the EBITDA multiple technique. Under this technique, estimated fair value is the result of a market based EBITDA multiple that is applied to an appropriate historical EBITDA amount, adjusted for the additional fair value that would be assigned by a market participant obtaining control over the reporting unit. Our income approach is a discounted cash flow model. The discounted cash flow model requires management to project revenues, operating expenses, working capital investment, capital spending and cash flows over a multiyear period, as well as determine the weighted average cost of capital to be used as a discount rate. Applying this discount rate to the multiyear projections provides an estimate of fair value for the reporting unit. The discounted cash flow model does not include cash flows related to interest payments and debt service, as the related debt has not been pushed down to the reporting unit level. Our reporting units include silicones and quartz. Our reporting units are one level below our operating segments for which discrete financial information is available and reviewed by segment management.

At both October 1, 2014 and 2013, the estimated fair value of each of our reporting units was deemed to be substantially in excess of the carrying amount of assets (including goodwill) and liabilities assigned to each unit.

Fresh Start Accounting

The application of fresh start accounting requires that the assets and liabilities of the successor entity be recorded at the date of the emergence at their respective fair values. Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Accordingly, we may be required to value assets at fair value measures that do not reflect our intended use of those assets. The fair value of in-process research and development, identifiable intangible assets and certain tangible assets requires the use of significant estimates and assumptions, including, but not limited to, estimating future cash flows and developing appropriate discount rates. Accordingly, for significant items, we typically obtain assistance from third party valuation specialists. Fair value measurements can be highly subjective and the reasonable application may result in a range of alternative estimates using the same facts and circumstances. Any excess of the enterprise value over the estimated fair values of the net assets is recorded as goodwill. As a result, we adjusted the carrying value of goodwill to $224 million which represents the reorganizational value of assets in excess of amounts allocated to identified tangible and intangible assets.

 

68


Table of Contents

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance and most industry-specific guidance applicable to revenue recognition. According to the new guidance, an entity will apply a principles-based five step model to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The tentative revised effective date for ASU 2014-09 is for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, and early adoption will be permitted. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in ASU 2014-09. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2014-09 on our financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-01: Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”). ASU 2015-01 eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and removes the requirement to present extraordinary items separately on the income statement, net of tax. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. The requirements of ASU 2015-01 are not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-02: Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”). ASU 2015-02 amends the existing consolidation guidance related to (i) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (ii) the evaluation of fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as variable interest, (iii) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, and (iv) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 simplifies the existing guidance by reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, reducing the extent to which related party arrangements cause an entity to be considered a primary beneficiary, and placing more emphasis on the risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. The requirements of ASU 2015-02 are not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-03: Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, and also requires that the amortization of such costs be reported as interest expense. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period, and early adoption is permitted. We are currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2015-03 on our financial statements.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

We are exposed to market risks arising from our normal business activities. These market risks principally involve the possibility of changes in interest rates, currency exchange rates or commodity prices that would adversely affect the value of our financial assets and liabilities or future cash flows and earnings. Market risk is the potential loss arising from adverse changes in market rates and prices.

Foreign Exchange Risk

Our international operations accounted for approximately 68% of our net sales in 2014, 2013 and 2012. As a result, we have significant exposure to foreign exchange risk related to transactions that can potentially be

 

69


Table of Contents

denominated in many foreign currencies. These transactions include foreign currency denominated imports and exports of raw materials and finished goods (both intercompany and third party) and loan repayments. The functional currency of our operating subsidiaries is generally the related local currency.

We aim to reduce foreign currency cash flow exposure due to exchange rate fluctuations by hedging foreign currency transactions when economically feasible. Our use of forward and option contracts is designed to protect our cash flows against unfavorable movements in exchange rates, to the extent of the amount under contract. We do not attempt to hedge foreign currency exposure in a manner that would entirely eliminate the effect of changes in foreign currency exchange rates on net income and cash flow. We do not speculate in foreign currency, nor do we hedge the foreign currency translation of our international businesses to the U.S. dollar for purposes of consolidating our financial results or other foreign currency net asset or liability positions. The counter-parties to our hedge contracts are financial institutions with investment-grade credit ratings.

Our foreign exchange risk is also mitigated because we operate in many foreign countries, which reduces the concentration of risk in any one currency. In addition, certain of our foreign operations have limited imports and exports, which reduces the potential impact of foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations.

Interest Rate Risk

As of December 31, 2014, less than 1%, of our borrowings, were at variable interest rates and expose us to interest rate risk. If we make additional borrowings at variable interest rates in the future, we will be subject to the variations in interest rates in respect of our variable rate debt. Assuming the amount of our variable rate debt remains the same, an increase of 1% in the interest rates on our variable rate debt would increase our 2015 estimated debt service requirements by less than $1 million. While we may enter into agreements intending to limit our exposure to higher interest rates, any such agreements may not offer complete protection from this risk. See “Risk Factors” elsewhere herein for additional discussion about interest rate risk.

Following is a summary of our outstanding debt as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 (see Note 10 to the Consolidated Financial Statements elsewhere herein for additional information on our debt). The fair value of our publicly held debt is based on the price at which the bonds are traded or quoted at December 31, 2014 and 2013. All other debt fair values are based on other similar financial instruments, or based upon interest rates that are currently available to us for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities.

 

     2014      2013  

(dollars in millions)

Year

   Debt
Maturities
     Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
    Fair Value      Debt
Maturities
     Weighted
Average
Interest
Rate
    Fair Value  

2014

           $ 39         9.1   $ 39   

2015

   $ 38         4.1   $ 38         7         9.1     7   

2016

     —           —       —           382         8.9     260   

2017

     —           —       —           —           8.8     —     

2018

     —           —       —           135         8.9     135   

2019

     —           —       —           —           —       —     

2020 and beyond

     1,350         4.0     1,128         2,694         9.1     2,588   
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

 
   $ 1,388         $ 1,166       $ 3,257         $ 3,029   
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

 

 

 

70


Table of Contents

Commodity Risk

We are exposed to price risks on raw material purchases. We pursue ways to diversify and minimize material costs through strategic raw material purchases, and through commercial and contractual pricing agreements and customer price adjustments. For our commodity raw materials, we have purchase contracts that have periodic price adjustment provisions. We rely on key suppliers for most of our raw materials. The loss of a key source of supply or a delay in shipments could have an adverse effect on our business. Should any of our suppliers fail to deliver or should any key supply contracts be canceled, we would be forced to purchase raw materials in the open market, and no assurances can be given that we would be able to make these purchases or make them at prices that would allow us to remain competitive. Also, we will consider hedging strategies that minimize risk or reduce volatility when available.

 

71


Table of Contents

BUSINESS

Overview

MPM Holdings, a Delaware corporation, is one of the world’s largest producers of silicones and silicone derivatives and a global leader in the development and manufacture of products derived from quartz and specialty ceramics.

As a result of our reorganization and emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”) (described below), MPM’s direct parent became MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc., a holding company and wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, the ultimate parent entity of MPM. Prior to its reorganization, MPM, through a series of intermediate holding companies, was controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (together with Apollo Global Management, LLC and subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Products and Markets

Our products are used in thousands of applications and are sold into diverse markets, such as industrial, building and construction, transportation, agriculture, electronics, healthcare, personal care, semiconductor and fiber optics. The diversity of our products limits our dependence on any one market or end-use. We have a history of product innovation and success in introducing new products to new markets, as evidenced by more than 3,500 patents, the majority of which relate to the development of new products and manufacturing processes.

As of March 31, 2015, we had 24 production sites strategically located around the world, which allows us to produce the substantial majority of our key products locally in the Americas, Europe and Asia. Through this network of production facilities, we serve more than 4,500 customers between our Silicones and Quartz businesses in over 100 countries worldwide. We use our global platform to deliver products to companies efficiently on a worldwide basis. Many of our customers are expanding internationally to serve developing areas in Asia, Eastern Europe, Latin America, India and Russia. Maintaining close proximity to our international customers allows us to serve them more quickly and efficiently and thus build strong relationships. Our customers include leading companies in their respective industries, such as Procter & Gamble, Avery, Continental Tire, Saint Gobain, Unilever, BASF, SABIC, The Home Depot and Lowe’s.

We believe that our scale and global reach provide significant efficiencies in our fixed and variable cost structure and that our breadth of related products provides significant operational, technological and commercial advantages. Manufacturing capacity at our internal sites and our joint venture in China is sufficient to produce the majority of one of our key intermediates, siloxane, which facilitates a cost effective operating structure and security of supply.

We believe we have created a value-added, technical service-oriented business model that enables us to target and participate in high-margin and high-growth specialty markets. These specialty markets account for the majority of our revenues and continue to be a growing part of our business.

Growth and Strategy

We believe that we have opportunities for growth through the following long-term strategies:

Expand Our Global Reach in Faster Growing Regions. We intend to continue to grow by expanding our sales presence and application support around the world. Specifically, we are focused on growing our business in the high growth regions of Asia-Pacific, Eastern Europe, Latin America, India and the Middle East, where the usage of our products is increasing. For example, we recently commissioned new liquid silicone rubber and release coating production capabilities at our Rayong, Thailand site to serve the growing Asian Pacific market.

 

72


Table of Contents

Develop and Market New Products. We will continue our efforts to expand our product offerings through research and development initiatives and research partnership formations with third parties. Through these innovation initiatives we expect to create new generations of products and services which will continue to drive revenue and earnings growth over the long term. In 2014, 2013 and 2012, we invested $76 million, $70 million and $69 million, respectively, in research and development. In recent years we have completed such initiatives as upgrading technology facilities at our Tarrytown, NY site, implementing a full scale pilot line for our coatings business in Leverkusen, Germany, expanding our technology center in Seoul, Korea, and opening a new research and development facility in Bangalore, India, all of which further complement our network of innovation centers strategically located near our global customers.

Increase Shift to High-Margin Specialty Products. We continue to proactively manage our product portfolio with a focus on specialty, high-margin applications. As a result of this capital allocation strategy and anticipated end market growth underlying these specialty segments, we believe high-margin specialty materials will continue to be a larger part of our broader portfolio. For instance, we are investing in our NXT* Silane manufacturing network to double our NXT* production capability. NXT* is an innovative product used in the production of tires, and can offer tire manufacturers the ability to reduce rolling resistance without loss of wet traction, as well as deliver benefits in the tire manufacturing process.

Continue Portfolio Optimization and Pursue Targeted Add-On Acquisitions and Joint Ventures. As a large manufacturer of performance materials, with leadership in the production of silicone, silicone derivatives, quartz and specialty ceramics, we have an advantage in pursuing add-on acquisitions and joint ventures in areas that allow us to build upon our core strengths, expand our product, technology and geographic portfolio, and better serve our customers. We believe we may have the opportunity to consummate acquisitions at relatively attractive valuations due to the scalability of our existing global operations and deal-related synergies.

Implement Strategic Cost Reduction Initiatives. In 2012, we approved certain restructuring actions in connection with the realignment of our businesses globally. During 2014, we realized approximately $3 million in cost savings as a result of these restructuring initiatives, bringing our total realized savings under these initiatives to $34 million, and substantially completing such programs. We continue to evaluate other actions that could lead to further savings.

Leverage Cost Savings from the Shared Services Agreement. The Shared Services Agreement with Hexion Inc. (formerly known as Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc., “Hexion”) has resulted in significant synergies for us, including shared services and logistics optimization, best-of-source contractual terms, procurement savings, regional site rationalization and administrative and overhead savings. As of March 31, 2015, we have realized cumulative cost savings of $65 million as a result of the Shared Services Agreement The Shared Services Agreement remains in place between us and Hexion following completion of our balance sheet restructuring, and both companies will continue to benefit from the optimized cost structure and services that it provides.

Industry and Competitors

We compete with a variety of companies, including large global chemical companies and small specialty chemical companies, in each of our product lines. The principal factors of competition in our industry include product quality, customer service and breadth of product offerings, product innovation, manufacturing efficiency, distribution and price. We believe that no single company competes with us across all of our existing product lines.

Our Businesses

The following paragraphs discuss our reportable segments, their corresponding major product lines and the primary end-use applications of our key products as of December 31, 2014.

 

73


Table of Contents

Silicones

2014 Net Sales: $2,297 million

We believe we are one of the world’s largest producers of silicones, silicone derivatives and organofunctional silanes, with leading positions in various product lines and geographic areas. We manufacture a wide range of high-performing elastomers, engineered materials and fluids. Silicones are generally used as an additive to a wide variety of end products in order to provide or enhance certain of their attributes, such as resistance (heat, ultraviolet light and chemical), lubrication, adhesion or viscosity. Silicones are used in product formulations primarily due to two distinguishing factors: (i) their high degree of inertness (resistance to heat, electricity and chemical reactions); and (ii) the ability during manufacturing to greatly modify their viscosity, enabling production of end-products with significant variation in levels of lubricity or adhesion. Silicones are developed using various finishing processes to generate a wide variety of different performance characteristics and are typically used in applications where traditional materials cannot perform under required conditions. Entirely new applications for silicones continue to emerge as a result of their versatility and broad range of both physical and chemical properties. We have a broad range of specialty silicones technologies, with highly advanced research, applications development and technical service capabilities.

Products

Our silicones product portfolio consists primarily of those set forth below.

 

   

Fluids. Fluids products are polydimethylsiloxane polymers, co-polymers, elastomers and gel networks, high-performance antifoams and emulsions. Silicone fluids exhibit low surface tension, excellent gloss, excellent sensory, softening and conditioning properties, good thermal stability and excellent viscosity over a wide temperature range, which permits usage in a number of applications. Fluids are used primarily in the personal care, home care and auto care, textiles, oil and gas, agriculture and industrial end-markets and are sold under the Magnasoft, Sagtex, Formasil, Silwet, Silsoft, Silshine, Tospearl and Velvesil brands.

 

   

Silanes and Resins. Silane and resin products are primarily used as components in a variety of specialty applications where improved performance is desired. Resins are used as binders in the production of formulated products such as adhesives, laminates, paints and coatings, and sealants and caulks. Their use is generally focused on situations where required performance characteristics, such as paintability, high-temperature or harsh environmental resistance, are beyond the scope of traditional materials. Our Tospearl resins are also used as light diffusion aids in LCD/LED screens, lighting and as slip agents in plastic packaging materials and paints & coatings. Silanes are used as high-performance coupling agents, adhesion promoters or as reactive intermediates. Silane and resin products are sold into a diverse range of end-markets, including aerospace, construction, coatings and inks, paint, adhesives, electronics, motor vehicles, sealants, rubber and plastics. We sell silane and specialty resins brands including: Silblock, A-Link, Wetlink, Silquest, NXT, Pearlene, SPUR, Tospearl and CoatOSil.

 

   

Intermediates. Intermediate products are a broad set of siloxane, silane, and by-product materials produced in chemical operation and primarily used as inputs for other product portfolios.

 

   

Elastomers. Silicone elastomers are blends of silicone polymers and various fillers and include solid and liquid elastomers. Favorable performance characteristics include a broad temperature range, excellent resistance to weathering, low toxicity, good electrical insulation properties and acoustical damping qualities. Silicone elastomers are used in the production of a variety of products, including gaskets, seals, hoses and tubing, as well as numerous consumer items. Elastomers products are used primarily in the healthcare, consumer products, energy and automotive end-markets and are sold under the Tufel, Ultra Tufel, Silplus, LSR/LIM, Silopren, and Addisil brand names.

 

   

Specialty Coatings. Specialty Coatings products are fully formulated solutions designed to enhance performance and drive productivity in various applications. Performance attributes include high-temperature resistance, abrasion resistance, pressure sensitive adhesion or release and weatherability.

 

74


Table of Contents
 

Specialty Coatings products are sold into a diverse range of end-markets, including construction, tape and label, adhesives, electronics and automotive. Specialty Coatings brands include SilForce, Silgrip, Silblock, Baysilone, and Anchorsil.

 

   

Room Temperature Vulcanizers. Room Temperature Vulcanization (“RTV”) products consist of highly engineered gels, adhesives, encapsulants and sealants. Different types of chemistries are employed based on the application to cure the material at room temperature, with heat or by UV light. Custom fillers and additives are used to enhance performance in areas such as electrical and thermal conductivity, cure speed, adhesion to plastics and metals, optical clarity and resistance to heat. RTV products are used primarily in micro- and macro-electronics assembly, consumer electronics, automotive, aerospace, consumer goods and industrial sealing applications. RTV products include the TSE, SilCool, InvisiSil and SnapSil brand names.

 

   

Urethane Additives. Urethane Additive’s product portfolio includes silicone surfactants used essentially for stabilizing polyurethane foam and a diverse line of tertiary amines to provide blow, gel and balanced catalysis in polyurethane foam reaction. Polyurethane applications include furniture, bedding, auto interior, appliances, construction, carpet backing, footwear and PU leather. Urethane additive products are sold under the Niax and Geolite brands.

 

   

Consumer and Construction Sealants. Consumer sealants are used by homeowners, builders and contractors for a variety of projects throughout the home including increasing energy efficiency, reducing damaging effects of moisture and protecting the home from pollen, pollution and pests. Construction sealants are used in structural glazing, weather-sealing, and insulated glass applications in new and remedial large-scale commercial building projects. We have a trademark license agreement with GE Monogram Licensing International which gives us an exclusive right to use the GE brand for these products through 2018, with a five-year renewal option through 2023. Our consumer and construction sealant products are also sold under various private labels for a number of hardware and paint retailers.

End-Markets and Applications

The physical properties of silicones, such as weather-ability, longevity and tolerance to a wide temperature range, make them versatile products with broad commercial applications. In the building and construction industry, silicone sealants and caulks are used to seal expansion and control joints in pre-cast exterior concrete panels and metal curtain walls, as well as in siding, window and door perimeters. In the transportation industry, silicones are used in a variety of original equipment manufacturer and aftermarket applications. In the electronics industry, silicones’ tolerance to high temperatures give them a considerable advantage relative to other, traditional materials in a variety of computer and electronic manufacturing applications. In the personal care industry, silicones are used in consumer goods such as hair care and shaving products, antiperspirants and deodorants, cosmetics and shower and bath products. In the healthcare industry, silicones are used in medical equipment, as well as in surgeries and other general medical procedures. We believe that such a broad range of commercial uses not only helps to maintain a steady demand for our products in industries that are less vulnerable to economic cycles, but also allows for continuous innovation leading into new applications for our products in high-growth industries.

Raw Materials

 

   

Silicon Metal. Silicon metal is an inorganic material that is not derived from petrochemicals. Major silicon metal suppliers include FerroAtlantica, Elkem, Globe Specialty Metals, Rima, Simcoa and other smaller vendors located around the world. We currently purchase silicon metal under short-term, one-year or multi-year contracts and in the spot market. We typically purchase silicon metal under contracts in the United States and Europe and in the spot market in Asia Pacific.

 

   

Siloxane. Siloxane is a key intermediate required to produce silicone polymers. We are one of two producers in the silicones market with global siloxane production capacity. We produce siloxane for

 

75


Table of Contents
 

our internal use in Waterford, New York; Leverkusen, Germany and Ohta, Japan and source siloxane from our joint venture in Jiande, China. This manufacturing capacity is sufficient to meet our current siloxane requirements. We also source siloxane under a purchase and sale agreement with Asia Silicones Monomer Limited (“ASM”). In addition, from time to time, we enter into supply agreements with other third parties to take advantage of favorable pricing and minimize our costs.

 

   

Methanol. Methanol is a key raw material for the production of methyl chloride, which is used to produce chlorosilanes. Major methanol suppliers include Methanex, MHTL and Mitsubishi Gas Chemicals. We typically enter into quarterly or annual contracts for methanol.

Quartz

2014 Net Sales: $179 million

We believe that our Quartz business is a global leader in the development and manufacturing of fused quartz and ceramic materials. Fused quartz, a man-made glass manufactured principally from quartz sand, is used in processes requiring extreme temperature, high purity and other specific characteristics. Fused quartz and ceramic materials are used in a wide range of industries, including semiconductor, lamp tubing, manufacturing, packaging, cosmetics and fiber optics. We believe that our Quartz business is a leading global producer of quartz tubing, ingots and crucibles and high-performance, non-oxide ceramic powders, coatings and solids.

Products

Our Quartz business’ products are used as a superior substitute for glass. On a microscopic level, normal glass is filled with impurities, bubbles and other flaws. For this reason, applications that require transparency and a high level of purity or stress-resistance (such as process equipment for semiconductor manufacturing or lamp lenses for high intensity video projectors) require the use of quartz. A significant driver of our Quartz volumes derives from semiconductor chip manufacturers adding to or adjusting their manufacturing lines for newly developed products. The manufacture of quartz products for use in the production of semiconductors generated approximately 48% of our Quartz business’ revenue for the year ended December 31, 2014 compared to 45% and 41% in 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Raw Materials

Naturally occurring quartz sand is the key raw material for many of the products manufactured by our Quartz business, which is currently available from a limited number of suppliers. The Unimin Corporation (“Unimin”), a major producer of natural quartz sand, controls a significant portion of the market for this sand. As a result, Unimin exercises significant control over quartz sand prices, which have been steadily increasing. In recent years, these increases have averaged approximately 3-5% per year. In April 2015, we entered into a long term purchase agreement with Unimin, which is effective as of December 1, 2013 and expires on December 31, 2016.

Raw Material Purchases

Overall, in 2014, we purchased approximately $1.0 billion of raw materials. Many of the raw materials we use to manufacture our products are available from more than once source, and are readily available in the open market. As discussed above, we have long-term purchase agreements for certain raw materials to ensure the availability of adequate supply.

Marketing, Customers and Seasonality

We market an extensive product line to meet a wide variety of customer needs. We focus on customers who are, or have the potential to be, leaders in their industries and have growth objectives that support our own growth objectives. In addition, we focus on customers who value our service-oriented business model. This

 

76


Table of Contents

approach includes high-quality, reliable products backed by local sales support and technical expertise. An important component of our strategy is to utilize our broad product capabilities to win high-end specialty business from our customers. These customers value these capabilities and, as a result, we are able to become a supplier of choice, given our relationship and ability to develop solutions to meet their precise needs.

In 2014, our largest customer accounted for less than 3% of our net sales, and our top twenty customers accounted for approximately 22% of our net sales. Neither our overall Company nor any of our businesses depends on any single customer or a particular group of customers; therefore, the loss of any single customer would not have a material adverse effect on any of our businesses or the Company as a whole.

We do not experience significant seasonality of demand, although sales have historically been slightly higher during the second and fourth quarters due to increased industrial activity. Seasonality trends, however, have been skewed in recent years primarily due to volatile global economic conditions.

Research and Development

Research and development expenses include wages and benefits for research personnel including engineers and chemists; payments to consultants and outside testing services, costs of supplies and chemicals used in in-house laboratories and costs of research and development facilities. Our research and development efforts focus on the development of new applications for our existing products and technological advances that we hope will lead to new products. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we spent $76 million, $70 million and $69 million, respectively, on research and development.

Intellectual Property

We own, license or have rights to over 3,500 patents, approximately 100 trademarks, various patent and trademark applications and technology licenses around the world. These patents will expire between 2015 and 2032. Our rights under such patents and licenses are a significant strategic asset in the conduct of our business. Patents, patent applications, trademarks and trademark applications relating to our Velvesil, Silwet, Silsoft, SPUR+ and NXT* brands, technologies and products are considered material to our business. See “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence” for a description of our licensing arrangements with GE.

Industry Regulatory Matters

Domestic and international laws regulate the production and marketing of chemical substances. Although almost every country has its own legal procedure for registration and import, laws and regulations in the European Union, the United States, and China are the most significant to our business. These laws typically prohibit the import or manufacture of chemical substances unless the substances are registered or are on the country’s chemical inventory list, such as the European inventory of existing commercial chemical substances and the U.S. Toxic Substances Control Act inventory. Chemicals that are on one or more of these lists can usually be registered and imported without requiring additional testing in countries that do not have such lists, although additional administrative hurdles may exist. Under such laws, countries may also require toxicity testing to be conducted on chemicals in order to register them or may place restrictions on the import, manufacture and/or use of a chemical.

The European Commission enacted a regulatory system in 2006, known as Registration, Evaluation, Authorization and Restriction of Chemical substances (“REACH”), which requires manufacturers, importers and consumers of certain chemicals to register these chemicals and evaluate their potential impact on human health and the environment. As REACH matures, significant market restrictions could be imposed on the current and future uses of chemical products that we use as raw materials or that we sell as finished products in the European Union. Other countries may also enact similar regulations.

 

77


Table of Contents

In the European Union and other jurisdictions committed to compliance with the Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, there is an increasing likelihood that our manufacturing sites will be affected in some way over the next few years by taxation of greenhouse gas, or GHG emissions. In addition, although the United States is not a signatory to the Kyoto Protocol, several states, including California and New York, are implementing their own GHG regulatory programs, and the enactment of federal climate change legislation in the United States is a possibility for the future. While only a small number of our sites are currently affected by existing GHG regulations, and none have experienced or anticipate significant cost increases as a result, it is likely that GHG emission restrictions will increase over time. Potential consequences of such restrictions include increases in energy costs above the level of general inflation, as well as direct compliance costs. Currently, however, it is not possible to estimate the likely financial impact of potential future regulation on any of our sites.

Environmental Regulations

Our policy is to strive to operate our plants in a manner that protects the environment and the health and safety of our employees, customers and communities. We have implemented company-wide environmental, health and safety policies and practices managed by our Environmental, Health and Safety, or EH&S department, and overseen by the EH&S Committee of our Board of Directors. Our EH&S department has the responsibility to ensure that our operations worldwide comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. This responsibility is executed via training, communication of EH&S policies, formulation of relevant policies and standards, EH&S audits and incident response planning and implementation. Our EH&S policies and practices include management systems and procedures relating to environmental emissions, waste generation, process safety management, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances, worker health and safety requirements, emergency planning and response and product stewardship.

Our operations involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials and are subject to extensive environmental regulation at the federal, state and international level. Our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal or modification. Violations of environmental laws or permits may result in restrictions being imposed on operating activities, substantial fines, penalties, damages or other costs. In addition, statutes such as the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, or CERCLA, and comparable state and foreign laws impose strict, joint and several liability for investigating and remediating the consequences of spills and other releases of hazardous materials, substances and wastes at current and former facilities and at third-party disposal sites. Other laws permit individuals to seek recovery of damages for alleged personal injury or property damage due to exposure to hazardous substances and conditions at or from our facilities or to hazardous substances otherwise owned, sold or controlled by us. Therefore, notwithstanding our commitment to environmental management, environmental health and safety, we may incur liabilities in the future, and these liabilities may result in a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

Although our environmental policies and practices are designed to ensure compliance with international, federal and state laws and environmental regulations, future developments and increasingly stringent regulation could require us to make additional unforeseen environmental expenditures.

We expect to incur future costs for capital improvements and general compliance under environmental laws, including costs to acquire, maintain and repair pollution control equipment. In 2014, we incurred capital expenditures of $24 million on an aggregate basis to comply with environmental laws and regulations and to make other environmental improvements. We estimate that our capital expenditures in 2015 for environmental controls at our facilities will be approximately $26 million. This estimate is based on current regulations and other requirements, but it is possible that a material amount of capital expenditures, in addition to those we currently anticipate, could be necessary if these regulations or other requirements or other facts change.

 

78


Table of Contents

Employees

As of December 31, 2014, we had approximately 4,600 employees. Approximately 45% of our employees are members of a labor union or are represented by workers’ councils that have collective bargaining agreements. We believe that we have good relations with our union and non-union employees.

In July 2013, the labor union representing the Willoughby, Ohio, and Waterford, New York facilities ratified a new three-year collective bargaining agreement. In July 2014, the labor union representing the Sistersville, West Virginia facility ratified a new three-year collective bargaining agreement, extending the agreement until July 2017.

Chapter 11 Bankruptcy Filing and Emergence

On April 13, 2014, the Debtors filed voluntary petitions for reorganization under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code in the Court. The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re MPM Silicones, LLC, et al., Case No. 14-22503. We continued to operate our businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Court until our emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings.

On September 11, 2014, the Court confirmed the Plan of Reorganization, and on the Effective Date the Plan of Reorganization became effective and we emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings. Upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date, we adopted fresh-start accounting which resulted in the creation of a new entity (such entity, the “Successor Company”) for financial reporting purposes. Accordingly, the consolidated financial statements on or after October 24, 2014 are not comparable with the consolidated financial statements prior to that date (such entity, the “Predecessor Company”).

Properties

Our headquarters is located in Waterford, New York. Our major manufacturing facilities are primarily located in North America, Europe and Asia. As of March 31, 2015, we operated 10 domestic production and manufacturing facilities in 6 states and 14 foreign production and manufacturing facilities, primarily in China, Germany, Italy and Japan.

 

79


Table of Contents

We believe our production and manufacturing facilities are well maintained and effectively utilized and are adequate to operate our business. Following are our production and manufacturing facilities, executive offices and technology research centers as of March 31, 2015:

 

Location

   Real Property
Interest
   Business in Which
Property is Used

Americas:

     

Waterford, NY

   Owned    Silicones

Tarrytown, NY(1)

   Leased    Silicones

Sistersville, WV

   Owned    Silicones

Chino, CA

   Leased    Silicones

Garrett, IN

   Leased    Silicones

New Smyrna Beach, FL

   Owned    Silicones

Itatiba, Brazil

   Owned    Silicones

Strongsville, OH

   Owned    Quartz

Willoughby, OH

   Owned    Quartz

Richmond Heights, OH

   Owned    Quartz

Newark, OH

   Owned    Quartz

Europe:

     

Leverkusen, Germany

   Leased    Silicones

Bergen op Zoom, Netherlands

   Leased    Silicones

Lostock, United Kingdom

   Leased    Silicones

Termoli, Italy

   Owned    Silicones

Antwerp, Belgium

   Leased    Silicones

Geesthacht, Germany

   Owned    Quartz

Asia Pacific:

     

Nantong, China

   Leased    Silicones

Ohta, Japan

   Owned    Silicones

Rayong, Thailand

   Leased    Silicones

Bangalore, India(1)

   Leased    Silicones

Chennai, India

   Owned    Silicones

Seoul, South Korea

   Leased    Silicones

Shanghai, China(1)

   Leased    Silicones

Kobe, Japan(1)(2)

   Leased    Quartz

Kozuki, Japan

   Owned    Quartz

Wuxi, China

   Leased    Quartz

 

(1) Technology research center.
(2) Manufacturing facility and technology research center.

Legal Proceedings

Various claims, lawsuits and administrative proceedings are pending or threatened against us and/or our subsidiaries, arising from the ordinary course of business with respect to commercial, product liability, employee, environmental and toxic exposure matters. Historically, we have not faced any litigation matters or series of litigation matters that have had a material adverse impact on our business. In addition, we do not believe that there is any pending or threatened litigation, either individually or in the aggregate, that is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business. We have a number of lawsuits pending against us alleging personal injury due to exposure to hazardous materials, many of which are multi-defendant lawsuits on behalf of large groups of plaintiffs. We believe we are indemnified by GE for any liability arising from any such lawsuits existing prior to MPM’s creation on December 3, 2006, through the acquisition of certain assets, liabilities and subsidiaries of GE that comprised GE Advanced Materials, an operating unit within the Industrial Segment of GE, by MPM and Old MPM Holdings (the “GE Advanced Materials Acquisition”). We cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any litigation or the potential for future litigation and any such matters, if they occur, could materially adversely affect our business and operations.

 

80


Table of Contents

Appeals Relating to the Confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization in the Bankruptcy Cases

In connection with the Bankruptcy Cases, three appeals were filed relating to the confirmation of the Plan of Reorganization. Specifically, on September 15, 2014, U.S. Bank National Association (“U.S. Bank”) as trustee for the Subordinated Notes filed its appeal (the “U.S. Bank Appeal”) before the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York (the “District Court”) seeking a reversal of the Court’s determination that the Debtors’ Plan of Reorganization properly denied recovery to holders of the Subordinated Notes on the basis that those debt securities are contractually subordinated to the Old Second Lien Notes. In addition, on September 16, 2014, BOKF, NA, as trustee for the Old First Lien Notes (“First Lien Indenture Trustee”) and Wilmington Trust, National Association, as trustee for the Old Secured Notes (“Wilmington Trust” and, together with U.S. Bank and First Lien Indenture Trustee, the “Appellants”) filed their joint appeal (together with the U.S. Bank Appeal, the “Appeals”) before the District Court seeking reversal of the Bankruptcy Court’s determinations that (i) the Debtors were not required to compensate holders of the Old First Lien Notes and Old Secured Notes for any prepayment premiums and (ii) the interest rates on First Lien Notes and Second Lien Notes provided to holders of the Old First Lien Notes and Old Secured Notes under the Plan of Reorganization was proper and in accordance with United States Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Court Rulings”). On November 11, 2014, the Debtors also filed a motion to dismiss the Appeals (the “Motion to Dismiss”) with the District Court asserting, inter alia, that granting the relief requested by the Appellants would be inequitable under the legal doctrine of equitable mootness. On May 5, 2015, the District Court dismissed the Appeals (the “District Court Decision”) and affirmed the Bankruptcy Court Rulings. Because the Appeals were decided on their merits, the District Court also terminated the Motion to Dismiss as moot. All the Appellants appealed the District Court Decision to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit. We cannot predict with certainty the ultimate outcome of any such appeals.

Italian Tax Claim

On June 17, 2014, an Italian tax court of appeals (the “Italian Court of Appeals”) decided against the Company related to its 2003 income tax position resulting from the acquisition by General Electric Company (“GE”) of an Italian company in the same year. GE subsequently sold this Italian subsidiary to the Company as part of the acquisition of GE Advanced Materials in 2006 (the “GE Advanced Materials Acquisition”). Having considered the use of debt financing and other characteristics of the acquisition by GE, the Italian Court of Appeals determined that the goodwill amortization and interest expense related to the acquisition by GE were not deductible for tax purposes. Prior to this decision, the Company had received favorable rulings by lower level Italian trial courts in a series of similar cases regarding the same matter.

On August 7, 2014, the Italian Court of Appeals affirmed the prior decisions of the Italian tax trial courts in the Company’s favor regarding the deductions made in the years 2004 through 2007. On December 29, 2014, the Company filed an appeal before the Italian Supreme Court with respect to the lower courts adverse decision related to the 2003 tax year. On January 10, 2015, the Company received notice of appeal of the favorable decision it received with respect to the years 2004 to 2007. The Company believes it has a considerable likelihood of obtaining favorable outcomes for all years contested. As of December 31, 2014, the total potential assessment, including penalties and interest, is €46 million, or approximately $56 million, of which €30 million, or approximately $36 million, relates to the period of ownership subsequent to the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition.

The Company continues to believe its tax filing position is appropriate and that it is more likely than not this position will prevail upon appeal to the Italian Supreme Court. As a result, the Company has not recorded any income tax liability related to this matter as of December 31, 2014. Additionally, in conjunction with the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition, the Company and GE entered into an agreement providing for the indemnification by GE for tax matters related to the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this agreement on its potential exposure.

Environmental Matters

Our operations are subject to extensive environmental regulation at the federal, state and international level and our production facilities require operating permits that are subject to renewal or modification. Our operations

 

81


Table of Contents

also involve the use, handling, processing, storage, transportation and disposal of hazardous materials, and we may be exposed to the risk of claims for environmental remediation or restoration.

We have adopted and implemented health, safety and environmental policies, which include systems and procedures governing environmental emissions, waste generation, process safety management, handling, storage and disposal of hazardous substances, worker health and safety requirements, emergency planning and response, and product stewardship. In order to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, and maintenance of permits, we have incurred and will continue to incur costs, including capital expenditures for projects related to environmental improvements. In addition, pursuant to applicable hazardous waste regulations, we are required to provide financial assurances for contingent future costs associated with certain hazardous waste management and remedial activities. We have obtained $35 million in letters of credit for financial assurance required under applicable hazardous waste regulations, including $25 million for closure and post-closure care for the Waterford, NY and Sisterville, WV facilities, and $10 million (annual aggregate) for accidental occurrences at those facilities. We are currently in discussions with the NYSDEC regarding the renewal of our Waterford facility’s hazardous waste permit. We have recently been advised by the NYDEC that the draft renewal permit will require $26 million in financial assurances for our Waterford facility, an increase to the amount currently being provided of approximately $8 million. We believe that the draft permit will also require a re-evaluation of the financial assurance amount within the next three years. One or more of our U.S. facilities may also in the future be subject to additional financial assurance requirements imposed by governmental authorities, including the USEPA. In this regard, the USEPA has identified chemical manufacturing as an industry for which it plans to develop, as necessary, proposed regulations identifying appropriate financial assurance requirements pursuant to §108(b) of CERCLA.

We are currently conducting investigations and/or cleanup of known or potential contamination at several of our facilities, and have been named as a potentially responsible party at several third party Superfund sites. In connection with the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition, GE has agreed to indemnify us for liabilities associated with contamination at former properties and for liabilities associated with third-party waste disposal sites. GE has also agreed that if we suffer any losses that are the subject of an indemnification obligation under a third party contract with respect to which GE is an indemnitee, GE will pursue such indemnification on our behalf and provide us with any benefits received.

While we do not anticipate material costs in excess of current reserves and/or available indemnification relating to known or potential environmental contamination, the discovery of additional contamination, or the imposition of more stringent cleanup requirements, could require us to make significant expenditures in excess of such reserves and/or indemnification.

We have been named as a defendant in a series of multi-defendant lawsuits based on our alleged involvement in the supply of allegedly hazardous materials. The plaintiffs seek damages for alleged personal injury resulting from exposure to various chemicals. These claims have not resulted in material judgments or settlements historically and we do not anticipate that these claims present any material risk to our business in the future. In addition, we have been indemnified by GE for any liability arising from any such claims existing prior to the consummation of the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. However, we cannot predict with certainty the outcome of any such claims or the involvement we might have in such matters in the future.

In 2008, we became aware and disclosed to the NYSDEC that, in certain instances, our Waterford, New York, facility may have failed to comply with the State and federal regulatory requirements governing the treatment of hazardous waste. During 2008, the NYSDEC initiated an investigation into these disclosures and issued a notice of violation alleging certain noncompliances. Subsequently, in the second quarter 2009, the USEPA and the U.S. Department of Justice sought, through search warrant and subpoena, additional information related to the alleged noncompliances. We are cooperating fully with the State and federal authorities. State and federal authorities have the statutory authority to seek civil and criminal sanctions, including but not limited to monetary penalties, for any noncompliances identified.

 

82


Table of Contents

MANAGEMENT

Executive Officers and Directors

Set forth below are the names, ages and current positions of our executive officers and directors as of May 31, 2015.

 

Name

  

Age

  

Title

John G. Boss

   56    Chief Executive Officer and President and Director

Erick R. Asmussen

   48    Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

Craig R. Branchfield

   49    Vice President—Environmental Health & Safety

Stephen J. Psutka

  

52

   Interim General Counsel and Secretary

Susan Walden

   57    Vice President—Human Resources

Mahesh Balakrishnan

  

31

   Director

Bradley J. Bell

   62    Director and Chairman of the Board

John D. Dionne

  

51

   Director

Robert Kalsow-Ramos

   29    Director

Scott M. Kleinman

   42    Director

Julian Markby

   63    Director

Daniel C. Murphy

  

40

   Director

Jason G. New

  

46

   Director

David B. Sambur

   35    Director

Marvin O. Schlanger

   67    Director

John G. Boss was appointed Interim Chief Executive Officer and President and a director of the Company and MPM on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. On December 15, 2014, he was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President. He joined the Company as Executive Vice President and President of the Silicones and Quartz Division in March 2014. Mr. Boss was the former President of Honeywell Safety Products at Honeywell International from February 2012 to March 2014. He served in various leadership positions with Honeywell International since 2003, including Vice President and General Manager of Specialty Products from 2008 through 2012 and Vice President and General Manager of Specialty Chemicals from 2005 through 2008. Before joining Honeywell International, Mr. Boss was Vice President and General Manager of the Specialty and Fine Chemicals business of Great Lakes Chemical Corporation from 2000 through 2003, and Vice President and Business Director at Ashland Corporation (formerly International Specialty Products) from 1996 through 2000. Mr. Boss’ position as President and Chief Executive Officer, his extensive management experience and skills in business leadership qualify him to serve as a director of the Company

Erick R. Asmussen was appointed as Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Company effective May 26, 2015. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Asmussen, served as Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of GrafTech International, Ltd. from September 2013 to May 2015. Mr. Asmussen joined GrafTech in 1999 as the Tax Director. He has also served as GrafTech’s Worldwide Controller and Tax Director from December 1999 to August 2002, Treasurer and Director of Finance from September 2002 to April 2005 and Vice President of Strategy, Planning and Corporate Development from May 2005 to August 2013. Prior to GrafTech, Mr. Asmussen worked in various financial positions with Corning Incorporated, AT&T Corporation and Arthur Anderson LLP.

Craig R. Branchfield was appointed Vice President—Environmental, Health and Safety of the Company November 25, 2014 and holds the same position for MPM. Prior to joining the Company, he served as Global Director of Health, Safety, Environment and Security for Eastman Chemical Company from July 2012 to November 2014. From August 1998 to July 2012 Mr. Branchfield held various positions with Solutia Inc., including Plant Manager from July 2008 to January 2010, Business Director—Rubber Chemicals Business from January 2010 to July 2010, and Vice President Environmental, Safety and Health from July 2010 to July 2012.

Stephen J. Psutka was appointed as Interim General Counsel for the Company and MPM and a director of MPM on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. Effective May 8, 2015, he also was appointed

 

83


Table of Contents

as Secretary of the Company and MPM. Mr. Psutka has been with MPM since its formation on December 4, 2006, initially serving as its General Counsel, Americas. He assumed the role of Associate General Counsel, Silicones and Quartz Division in February of 2011, serving in such capacity until his appointment as Interim General Counsel. Prior to the formation of MPM, Mr. Psutka served as the Americas Counsel, Silicones for GE Advanced Materials, a division of General Electric Company, from 2005 to December 2006. Mr. Psutka joined GE in 1996, serving in various business and transactions counsel roles for its GE Plastics division, after beginning his career in private practice as a corporate and business transactions lawyer.

Susan Walden was elected Vice President—Human Resources of the Company on November 25, 2014 and holds the same position for MPM. Ms. Walden joined MPM in July 2007 as Director, Global Human Resources, serving in that position until December 2011 when she was promoted to Global Human Resources Vice President. She was elected an officer of MPM on December 15, 2014.

Mahesh Balakrishnan was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. Mr. Balakrishnan is a Managing Director in Oaktree’s Opportunities Funds. He joined Oaktree in 2007 and has been focused on investing in the Chemicals, Energy, Financial Institutions, Real Estate and Shipping sectors. Mr. Balakrishnan has worked with a number of Oaktree’s portfolio companies and currently serves on the boards of STORE Capital Corp. and Excel Maritime Carriers. He has been active on a number of creditors’ committees during restructuring of investments, including Eagle Bulk Shipping, Excel Maritime Carriers, Lehman Brothers and LyondellBasell. Prior to Oaktree, Mr. Balakrishnan spent two years in the Financial Sponsors & Leveraged Finance group at UBS Investment Bank. Mr. Balakrishnan serves as a director of MPM Holdings at the discretion of certain investment funds managed by Oaktree Capital Management, which funds hold a substantial equity interest in MPM Holdings.

Bradley J. Bell was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization and as Chairman of the Board on December 15, 2014. Mr. Bell also has served on the Board of Directors of IDEX Corporation since 2001, chairing the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee since 2010 and serving on the Compensation Committee since 2011. Since 2003, he has been a member of the Board of Directors of Compass Minerals Corporation, where he has been the Compensation Committee Chair since 2010 and a member of the Audit Committee since 2014, and was a member the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee from 2009 to 2014. Mr. Bell was Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer at Nalco Holding Co. (formerly known as Nalco Chemical Co.) from November 2003 to September 2010. He also served as a Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Rohm & Haas Co. from 1997 to May 2003. In light of Mr. Bell’s extensive finance and business experience and over 20 years’ experience of serving on Boards of Directors of publicly traded companies, we believe it is appropriate for Mr. Bell to serve as a director of the Company.

John D. Dionne was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. He is a Senior Advisor of the Blackstone Group and a Field Fellow with the Harvard Business School. He was most recently a Senior Managing Director at Blackstone and Global Head of its Private Equity Investor Relations and Business Development Groups. He also served as a member of Blackstone’s Private Equity Investment and Valuation Committees. Mr. Dionne originally joined Blackstone in 2004 as the Founder and Chief Investment Officer of the Blackstone Distressed Securities Fund, the firm’s initial entry into the single-manager hedge fund practice, with peak assets under management of $2 billion. During this period, he also served on the Investment Committees of Blackstone’s GSO and Kalix investment businesses. Before joining Blackstone, Mr. Dionne was for several years a Partner and Portfolio Manager for Bennett Restructuring Funds, specializing in investing in financially troubled companies. He is a Chartered Financial Analyst and Certified Public Accountant (inactive). Mr. Dionne has served on the Board of Directors of Pelmorex Media Inc. since September 2013, and on the Board of Directors and the Audit Committee of Cengage Learning since April 2014. Mr. Dionne’s extensive finance and business experience qualifies him to serve as a director of the Company.

Robert Kalsow-Ramos was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. Mr. Kalsow-Ramos is a Principal in Apollo Global Management’s Private Equity Group, where he has worked since 2010. Prior to joining Apollo, Mr. Kalsow-Ramos was a member of the Transportation

 

84


Table of Contents

Investment Banking Group at Morgan Stanley from 2008 to 2010. He also serves on the Board of Directors of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation and Hexion Holdings LLC, both of which are affiliated with Apollo. Mr. Kalsow-Ramos’ position with Apollo and his extensive finance and business experience, which gives him insights into strategic and financial matters, qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Scott M. Kleinman was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. He served as a director of MPM from October 1, 2010 to October 24, 2014. Mr. Kleinman is the Lead Partner for Private Equity at Apollo, where he has worked since February 1996. Prior to that time, Mr. Kleinman was employed by Smith Barney Inc. in its Investment Banking division. Mr. Kleinman is also a director of the following companies affiliated with Apollo: Hexion Holdings LLC, Verso Corporation and Verso Paper Holdings, LLC. Within the past five years, Mr. Kleinman was also a director of Noranda Aluminum Holding Corporation, Realogy Holdings Corp. Hexion Inc., LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and Taminco Corporation. During 2014 he also served as Chair of the Audit and Compensation Committee of MPM’s Board of Directors. In light of our ownership structure and Mr. Kleinman’s position with Apollo and his extensive finance and business experience, we believe it is appropriate for Mr. Kleinman to serve as a director of the Company.

Julian Markby was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. He served as a director of MPM from April 2013 to October 2014. Mr. Markby has been an independent financial consultant and corporate director since 2005. Mr. Markby has been a member of the Board and the Audit Committee of Thiele Kaolin Company from April 2011 to present, serving as the Audit Committee Chair since May 1, 2013. He has also been Chairman of the Board of SP Fiber Holdings, Inc. since December 2013 and has been a director and member of the Audit and Compensation Committees since September 2012. In addition, he has been a member of the Board and the Audit and Compensation committees of Altegrity, Inc. since November 2014 and a director of NewPage Corporation from January 2011 to December 2012. During 2014, he also served on the Audit and Conflicts Committees of MPM’s Board of Directors. Previously, Mr. Markby was an investment banker for over 25 years, most recently at Wasserstein Perella and Dresdner Kleinwort Wasserstein for over 8 years. Mr. Markby’s extensive finance and business experience qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Daniel C. Murphy was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. He serves as Portfolio Manager and Head of Fixed Income for Pentwater Capital Management, LP since August 2013 and previously from February 2008 to February 2011. Previously, he was an analyst for Anchorage Advisors, LLC. Prior to that, Mr. Murphy served as a Director of Credit Portfolio Management for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and an Associate in Leverage Finance for CIBC World Markets Corp. He also served as a Director of Six Flags Entertainment Corp. and a member of the Audit Committee from April 2010 to May 2011. Mr. Murphy serves as a director of the Company at the discretion of certain investment funds managed by Pentwater Capital Management, which holds a substantial equity ownership interest in the Company.

Jason G. New was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. He is a Senior Managing Director of The Blackstone Group and Head of Special Situation Investing for GSO Capital Partners. Mr. New focuses on managing GSO’s public investment portfolio with a specific emphasis on stressed and distressed companies and on sourcing direct special situation investment opportunities. Mr. New is a member of the GSO Investment Committee. Before joining GSO Capital in 2005, Mr. New was a senior member of Credit Suisse’s distressed finance group. Mr. New joined Credit Suisse in 2000 when it acquired Donaldson, Lufkin & Jenrette (“DLJ”), where he was a member of DLJ’s restructuring group. Prior to joining DLJ in 1999, he was an associate with the law firm Sidley Austin LLP where he practiced law in the firm’s corporate reorganization group. He has been a Director of Eastman Kodak Company since September 2013 and he served as Director of Cheniere Energy, Inc. Mr. New serves as a director of the Company at the discretion of GSO Capital Partners, which holds a substantial equity ownership interest in the Company.

David B. Sambur was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. He served as a director of MPM from October 1, 2010 to October 24, 2014. He is a Partner at Apollo, where he

 

85


Table of Contents

has worked since 2004. He was a member of the Leveraged Finance Group of Salomon Smith Barney Inc. from 2002 to 2004. He is also a director of Hexion Holdings Inc., Verso Corporation, Caesars Entertainment Corporation and Caesars Acquisition Company, all companies affiliated with Apollo. Within the past five years, Mr. Sambur was a member of the Verso Paper Holdings LLC Board of Managers and Hexion Inc. Boards of Directors. During 2014, he also served on the Audit and Compensation Committees of MPM’s Board of Directors. In light of our ownership structure and Mr. Sambur’s position with Apollo, and his extensive financial and business experience, we believe it is appropriate for Mr. Sambur to serve as a director of the Company.

Marvin O. Schlanger was appointed as a Director on October 24, 2014 pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization. Since October 1998, Mr. Schlanger has been a principal in the firm of Cherry Hill Chemical Investments, LLC, which provides management services and capital to the chemical and allied industries. Prior to October 1998, he held various positions with ARCO Chemical Company, serving as President and Chief Executive Officer from May 1998 to July 1998 and as Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer from 1994 to May 1998. He served as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Resolution Performance Products LLC and RPP Capital Corporation from November 2000 and Chairman of Resolution Specialty Materials Company from August 2004 until the formation of Hexion Inc. in May 2005. Mr. Schlanger is also a director and the Chairman of the Board of CEVA Group Plc, and a director of UGI Corporation, UGI Utilities Inc., Amerigas Partners, LLP and Hexion Holdings LLC. Mr. Schlanger was formerly Chairman of the Supervisory Board of LyondellBasell Industries N.V. and Chairman of Covalence Specialty Materials Corp. Mr. Schlanger’s extensive finance and business experience qualifies him to serve on our Board of Directors.

Committees of the Board of Directors

Audit Committee

Our audit committee consists of Messrs. New, Markby and Kalsow-Ramos, with Mr. Markby serving as its chairman. Each of Messrs. New, Markby and Kalsow-Ramos qualifies as an audit committee financial expert as defined in Item 407(d) of Regulation S-K. Mr. Markby meets the independence and the experience requirements of the federal securities laws.

The principal duties and responsibilities of our audit committee are as follows:

 

   

to monitor our accounting, internal control and external reporting policies and practices;

 

   

to oversee the integrity of our financial statements;

 

   

to oversee the independence, qualifications and performance of the independent auditor (including appointment, termination and compensation of the independent auditor);

 

   

to oversee the performance of our internal audit function; and

 

   

to oversee our compliance with legal, ethical and regulatory matters as well as our standards of business.

The audit committee has the authority to retain counsel and advisors to fulfill its responsibilities and duties.

Compensation Committee

Our compensation committee consists of Messrs. Balakrishnan, Sambur and Bell, with Mr. Bell serving as its chairman.

The principal duties and responsibilities of our compensation committee are as follows:

 

   

to provide oversight on the design and implementation of the compensation policies, strategies, plans and programs for our key employees and outside directors and disclosure relating to these matters;

 

   

to review and make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the compensation of our chief executive officer and other executive officers;

 

86


Table of Contents
   

to evaluate the performance of the chief executive officer;

 

   

to approve or and make recommendations to the Board of Directors with respect to the employment agreements, separation packages and severance benefits of executive officers;

 

   

to monitor and make recommendations with respect to management succession planning; and

 

   

to provide oversight on the regulatory compliance with respect compensation matters.

Nominating and Governance Committee

Our nominating and governance committee consists of Messrs. Murphy, Bell and Kleinman, with Mr. Bell serving as its chairman.

The principal duties and responsibilities of the nominating committee are as follows:

 

   

to oversee the selection of members of the Board of Directors;

 

   

to develop and recommend to the Board of Directors corporate governance guidelines;

 

   

to oversee the evaluation of the Board of Directors, management and each Board committee.

 

   

to establish criteria for board and committee membership and recommend to the Board of Directors proposed nominees for election to the Board of Directors and for membership on committees of the Board of Directors; and

 

   

to oversee and review the policy and process for stockholder communication to the Board of Directors.

Environmental, Health and Safety Committee

Our environmental, health and safety committee consists of Messrs. Balakrishnan, Dionne and Schlanger, with Mr. Schlanger serving as its chairman.

The principal duties and responsibilities of the environmental, health and safety committee are as follows:

 

   

to oversee the environmental, health and safety compliance programs and initiatives;

 

   

to oversee compliance with environmental, health and safety indemnifications;

 

   

to monitor our environmental, health and safety performance statistics;

 

   

to recommend the general budget for environmental, health and safety capital spending; and

 

   

to oversee environmental, health and safety audit program.

Other Committees

Our Bylaws provide that our Board of Directors may establish one or more additional committees. In addition to MPM Holdings’ four standing committees, in connection with the Emergence, the Board of Directors created a special committee (the “Special Committee”) to assist in identifying and hiring a permanent Chief Executive Officer, a permanent Chief Financial Officer and a permanent General Counsel. The Special Committee consists of Messrs. Balakrishnan, Bell and Sambur, with Mr. Bell serving as its chairman.

Code of Ethics

We have adopted a Code of Conduct that applies to our directors, officers and employees. These standards are designed to deter wrongdoing and to promote the honest and ethical conduct of all employees. The Code of Conduct is posted on our website: www.momentive.com under “Investor Relations—Momentive Performance Materials Inc.” Any substantive amendment to, or waiver from, any provision of the Code of Conduct with respect to any senior executive or financial officer will be posted on this website.

 

87


Table of Contents

COMPENSATION DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS

Overview

In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, the terms “our,” “we” or the “Company” refer to Momentive Performance Materials Inc.

In 2010, we entered into the Shared Services Agreement with Hexion. Under this agreement, Hexion provides to us, and we provide to Hexion, a range of services on a shared basis including the services of certain executives and employees. In 2014, the fully burdened costs of the shared executives and other employees were allocated 57% to Hexion and 43% to us. However, if 100% of any cost is demonstrably attributable to or for the benefit of either Hexion or us, the entire amount of such cost is allocated to the company realizing such benefit. Fully burdened costs for shared employees include salary, bonus, cash grants under annual and long-term incentive compensation plans, costs under health care, life insurance, pension, retirement, deferred compensation and severance plans and associated overhead. The costs are calculated in accordance with accounting policies and procedures approved, from time to time, by the parties.

As a result of the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”), the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, exclude the services of the existing Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”), Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”) and General Counsel. In addition, the Board of Directors of the Company’s new ultimate parent company, MPM Holdings, assumed responsibility for determining the compensation and benefits of our executive officers. Most of the executive compensation decisions made during 2014 for our Named Executive Officers (“NEOs”) were made by the Compensation Committee of the Company’s former ultimate parent company, Hexion Holdings, (the “Committee”). For those NEOs who did not report directly to the CEO for the entire year, executive compensation decisions may have been made by one of the CEO’s direct reports. In all cases, the compensation objectives and strategy used to determine compensation for 2014 were established by the Committee. However, due to the fact that the Company operated under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code from April 13, 2014 through October 24, 2014, the Committee’s ability to implement certain compensation programs for its executives was restrained during much of the year.

 

88


Table of Contents

As a result of the reorganization of the Company and the governance changes described above, there are nine NEOs for 2014. In this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, we describe the Committee’s process of determining the compensation and benefits provided to our NEOs. The table below identifies the employer (which is the entity at which benefits are provided) for each of our 2014 NEOs. Messrs. Morrison, Carter and Johns provided services to the Company under the SSA until the Effective Date, at which time they ceased being executive officers of the Company, and Messrs. Boss, Berger and Psutka, respectively, were appointed as their successors. Mr. Boss was hired in March 2014 as President of the Silicones & Quartz Division and served in that capacity until October 24, 2014 when he was named Interim Chief Executive Officer, becoming permanent CEO on December 15, 2014. Ms. Walden was elected Vice President—Human Resources of the Company, and designated an executive officer effective December 15, 2014. Ms. Sonnett resigned as an executive officer December 15, 2014.

 

Named Executive Officer

  

Title

    

Employer

John G. Boss

   President & Chief Executive Officer (as of December 15, 2014)      MPM

Brian D. Berger

   Interim Chief Financial Officer (as of October 24, 2014)      MPM

Susan Walden

   Vice President—Human Resources (as of December 15, 2014)      MPM

Nathan E. Fisher

   Executive Vice President—Procurement      Hexion

Stephen J. Psutka

   Interim General Counsel (as of October 24, 2014)      MPM

Craig O. Morrison

   Former President & Chief Executive Officer (through October 23, 2014)      Hexion

William H. Carter

   Former Executive Vice President & Chief Financial Officer (through October 23, 2014)      Hexion

Judith Sonnett

   Former Executive Vice President—Human Resources
(through December 15, 2014)
     Hexion

Douglas A. Johns

   Executive Vice President, Secretary & Former General Counsel (through October 23, 2014)      MPM

Oversight of the Executive Compensation Program

The Committee sets the principles and strategies that guide the design of our executive compensation program. The Committee annually evaluates the performance and compensation levels of the NEOs. This annual compensation review process includes an evaluation of key objectives and measurable contributions to ensure that incentives are not only aligned with the Company’s strategic goals, but also enable us to attract and retain a highly qualified and effective management team. Based on this evaluation, the Committee approves each executive officer’s compensation level, including base salary, annual incentive opportunities and long-term incentive opportunities.

Use of Compensation Data

In order to obtain a general understanding of compensation practices when setting total compensation levels for our NEOs, the Committee considers broad-based competitive market data on total compensation packages provided to executive officers with similar responsibilities at comparable companies. Such companies include those within the chemical industry, as well as those with similar revenues and operational complexity outside the chemical industry. As warranted, the Committee will use data obtained from third-party executive compensation salary surveys when determining appropriate total compensation levels for our NEOs.

Executive Summary

Executive Compensation Objectives and Strategy

Our executive compensation program has been designed to set compensation and benefits at a level that is reasonable, internally fair and externally competitive. Specifically, the Committee has been guided by the following objectives:

 

   

Pay for Performance. We emphasize pay for performance based on achievement of company operational and financial objectives and the realization of personal goals. We believe that a significant

 

89


Table of Contents
 

portion of each executive’s total compensation should be variable and contingent upon the achievement of specific and measurable financial and operational performance goals.

 

   

Align Incentives with Shareholders. Our executive compensation program is designed to focus our NEOs on our key strategic, financial and operational goals that will translate into long-term value creation for our shareholders.

 

   

Balance Critical Short-Term Objectives and Long-term Strategy. We believe that the compensation packages we provide to our NEOs should include a mix of short-term, cash-based incentive awards that encourage the achievement of annual goals, and long-term cash and equity elements that reward long-term value creation for the business.

 

   

Attract, Retain and Motivate Top Talent. We design our executive compensation program to be externally competitive in order to attract, retain and motivate the most talented executive officers who will drive company objectives.

 

   

Pay for Individual Achievement. We believe that each executive officer’s total compensation should correlate to the scope of his or her responsibilities and relative contributions to the Company’s performance.

2014 Executive Compensation Highlights

For much of 2014, the Company operated under the provisions of the U.S. Bankruptcy Court in New York. This status substantially restrained certain executive compensation programs we might otherwise have provided to our insiders, including our NEOs.

 

   

In February 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors established a project incentive in light of our pending balance sheet restructuring. Along with other key executives of the Company, Messrs. Berger and Psutka and Ms. Walden received awards pursuant to this program to encourage their retention during the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.

 

   

We adopted an annual cash incentive plan for 2014 (the “2014 ICP”), which was designed to reward participants, including our NEOs for achieving specific financial and environmental health and safety goals. The Committee established a guaranteed 30% minimum payout under the 2014 ICP for all participants, other than the Company’s insiders, to focus employees on business performance and encourage retention during the Chapter 11 bankruptcy process.

 

   

We implemented our annual merit increases to base salary in July for salaried employees except where business circumstances required us to deliver such increases earlier in the year. Mr. Boss did not receive a merit increase because he was a new hire in 2014. The Committee determined that measured increases to our NEOs’ base salaries were merited in light of their achievement of specific company, division, and other goals.

 

   

During 2014, prior to the Effective Date, Apollo, as the Company’s controlling shareholder, and its representatives on the Committee, continued to be actively involved in making recommendations regarding the structure of our executive compensation program and the amounts payable to our NEOs. The Company is not currently required to hold a shareholder advisory “say-on-pay” vote.

Evaluating Company and Individual Performance

In determining 2014 compensation, the Committee, the CEO or one of his direct reports considered the following accomplishments of our NEOs in 2013:

 

   

Mr. Boss, our President and Chief Executive Officer: Mr. Boss was hired in March 2014 pursuant to an employment letter that governs his compensation and other terms of employment. From March 2014 until October 24, 2014, he served as President of the Silicones & Quartz Division. He was then named

 

90


Table of Contents
 

Interim Chief Executive Officer, and became permanent CEO on December 15, 2014. The terms of his employment letter reflect the inherent challenges facing a business leader who joins a company facing imminent restructuring.

 

   

Mr. Berger, our Interim Chief Financial Officer: Mr. Berger was recognized for his efforts in helping drive year-over-year sales growth and operations productivity in the Silicones & Quartz Division, as well as his significant efforts in providing leadership to the business during a period of significant instability, including acting as interim President of the Silicones & Quartz Division for a portion of the year.

 

   

Ms. Walden, our Vice President—Human Resources: Ms. Walden was recognized for the leadership she provided in successfully concluding the contract negotiations with the Silicones & Quartz Division’s largest union, driving a strategic talent review process throughout the organization, supporting education and development efforts including global skills training, competency development and global leadership development, and staffing key leadership roles in selected functions in the organization.

 

   

Mr. Fisher, our Executive Vice President—Procurement: The Committee recognized his efforts in producing significant cost productivity and his effective vendor management during difficult business conditions. Additionally, Mr. Fisher was recognized for his accomplishments related to analysis and management of raw materials.

 

   

Mr. Psutka, our Interim General Counsel: Mr. Psutka was recognized for his role in supporting the business in all material commercial transactions during the year, providing management on major projects and litigation for the business, and his leadership on compliance programs and of the Company’s Compliance Review Board.

 

   

Mr. Morrison, our former President and Chief Executive Officer: The Committee considered Mr. Morrison’s outstanding and enduring leadership of the business during challenging global business conditions, his focus and drive for growth, and his impact on substantial process improvements and cost reductions in the operation of the shared services organization.

 

   

Mr. Carter, our former Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer: The Committee considered his exceptional expert knowledge base and leadership related to strategic matters across both the business and his global function. He effectively managed a wide range of change initiatives successfully, including cash management as well as the building of robust systems that enable his organization to complete multiple competing objectives in timely and effective manner. Finally, he led the extensive planning effort required to prepare for the Company’s balance sheet restructuring.

 

   

Ms. Sonnett, our former Executive Vice President—Human Resources: The Committee recognized her leadership in implementing core components of the global total rewards strategy, including a global compensation framework, harmonized U.S. medical and pension plans and an integrated employee performance management process.

 

   

Mr. Johns, our Executive Vice President and Secretary and former General Counsel: The Committee recognized his significant role in the planning of the Company’s balance sheet restructuring, the leadership he provides in the management of major litigation risk areas, and his leadership role with the Global Compliance Review Board.

 

91


Table of Contents

Components of Our Executive Compensation Program

The principal components of our executive compensation program during 2014 were as follows:

 

Type

  

Components

Annual Cash Compensation

   Base Salary
   Annual Incentive Awards
   Discretionary Awards

Long-term Incentives

   Equity Awards
   Long-term Cash Awards

Benefits

   Health, Welfare and Retirement Benefits

Other

   Change-in-control and Severance Benefits

The following section describes each of these components in further detail.

1. Annual Cash Compensation

Base Salaries

The annual base salaries of our NEOs are designed to be commensurate with professional status, accomplishments, scope of responsibility, overall impact on the organization, and size and complexity of the business or functional operations managed. The annual base salaries of our NEOs are also intended to be externally competitive with the market.

The Committee, the CEO or one of his direct reports, as applicable (the “Compensation Decision Maker”), reviews the NEOs’ base salary levels (i) annually, in conjunction with the annual performance review conducted globally for non-bargained salaried employees, and (ii) in conjunction with new hires, promotions or significant changes in job responsibilities. In approving increases to base salaries, the Compensation Decision Maker considers various factors, such as job performance, total target compensation, impact on value creation and the externally competitive marketplace. Typically, annual performance reviews are conducted in the second quarter of the calendar year and determine whether any increases to base salaries are merited based on the prior year’s performance. Base salary increases for most of our NEOs are not implemented until July.

In July 2014, certain of our NEOs received a merit increase in base salary in recognition of accomplishments in 2013 (described above under “Evaluating Company and Individual Performance”). Mr. Boss did not receive a merit increase since he was hired in March of 2014. The base salaries and percentage increase for 2014 for each NEO is shown in the table below:

 

Name

   2013 Base Salary      2014 Base Salary      2014 Increase  

Mr. Boss

     N/A       $ 585,000         N/A   

Mr. Berger

     255,000         266,475         4.50

Ms. Walden

     232,875         243,354         4.50

Mr. Fisher

     340,704         356,036         4.50

Mr. Psutka

     244,530         254,311         4.00

Mr. Morrison

     1,102,500         1,102,500        

Mr. Carter

     767,510         786,698         2.50

Ms. Sonnett

     434,720         454,282         4.50

Mr. Johns

     475,904         497,320         4.50

Annual Incentive Awards

Our annual incentive compensation plan is a short-term performance incentive designed to reward participants for delivering increased value to the organization against specific financial and other critical business objectives. Annual incentive compensation awards are targeted at a level that, when combined with base salaries

 

92


Table of Contents

and other components of our total rewards program, is intended to yield total annual compensation that is competitive in the external marketplace, while performance above the target is intended to yield total annual compensation above the market median.

The performance targets for the applicable components of the annual incentive compensation plan are identical for executives and other eligible, salaried employees. We strive to set annual incentive award targets that are achievable only through strong performance, believing this motivates our executives and other participants to deliver ongoing value creation, while allowing the Company to attract and retain highly talented senior executives. Performance measures may be based on a number of factors, such as our prior-year performance; current market trends; anticipated synergies; integration efforts around acquired assets or businesses; potential pricing actions; raw material projections; the realization of planned productivity initiatives; expansion plans; new product development; environmental, health and safety, and other strategic factors that could potentially impact operations.

The 2014 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan

In early 2014, the Committee approved the 2014 annual incentive compensation plan for employees of the Company, Hexion and their respective subsidiaries, which we refer to as the “2014 ICP.” Under the 2014 ICP, our NEOs and other eligible participants had the opportunity to earn annual cash incentive compensation based upon the achievement of certain performance targets.

The performance targets under the 2014 ICP for our NEOs with corporate roles (Messrs. Boss Morrison, Carter, Fisher, Psutka and Johns and Ms. Sonnett) were based 100% upon the results of our then ultimate parent, Hexion Holdings, rather than on the results of the Company or Hexion alone. This design recognized the fact that, during 2014, certain of our NEOs and other Company employees had responsibilities for, or provide services to, both the Company and Hexion under the Shared Services Agreement.

The performance targets under the 2014 ICP for our NEOs solely with operating company responsibilities (Mr. Berger and Ms. Walden) were based 90% upon the Company’s results. We believe that our operating officers’ incentive compensation must have a strong tie to the Company’s performance where they have the greatest impact and closest line of sight. The performance goals were established based on the following measures:

 

Performance Goal

  

Description

  

2014 Target

Segment

EBITDA

  

Segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization, adjusted to exclude certain noncash, certain other income and expenses and discontinued operations) was used as the primary profitability measure for determining the level of financial performance for management and executive annual incentive compensation purposes.

 

Segment EBITDA of Hexion Holdings in 2014 (“Momentive Segment EBITDA”) corresponds to the sum of “MPM Segment EBITDA” and “Hexion Segment EBITDA” less certain Hexion Holdings expenses. MPM Segment EBITDA and Hexion Segment EBITDA are defined

   The Momentive Segment EBITDA target for 2014 was set based upon factors impacting Hexion Holdings’ operating subsidiaries, including, but not limited to, competitive business dynamics in the markets, raw material trends, anticipated business unit growth, anticipated cost synergies and business unit budget projections. For the 2014 ICP, the targeted Momentive Segment EBITDA was $712 million.

 

93


Table of Contents

Performance Goal

  

Description

  

2014 Target

  

herein and in Hexion’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014 (the “Hexion 2014 Annual Report”), respectively. See Item 7 of Part II of this Annual Report for a reconciliation of MPM Segment EBITDA to Net Income (loss); see Item 7 of Part II of the 2014 Hexion Annual Report for a reconciliation of Hexion Segment EBITDA to Net loss.

 

  

Cash Flow

  

Cash flow encompasses Segment EBITDA, net trading capital improvement and/or usage, capital spending and interest paid along with other smaller operating cash flow items such as income taxes paid and pension contributions. The purpose of this component is to increase focus on cost control and cost reduction actions to preserve an adequate amount of liquidity to fund operations and capital expenditures, service debt and ultimately sustain the business through difficult economic cycles.

 

   The cash flow targets were established as a result of budget projections. For the 2014 ICP, the targeted cash flow for Hexion Holdings was a net usage of cash equal to $400 million.

Environmental Health

& Safety (“EH&S”)

   As a chemical manufacturer, our operations involve the use of hazardous materials, and are subject to extensive environmental regulation. As a result, EH&S is a core value and a critical focus for all employees.    For the 2014 ICP, we established severe incident factor (“SIF”) and total environmental incidents goals as our EH&S targets, and set goals for Hexion Holdings and the Company’s divisions. SIF’s are incidents that have the potential to cause a severe incident or fatality. The 2014 goal for Hexion Holdings represents approximately a 10% improvement from prior year actual statistics. There is no payout unless the 2014 goal is achieved. The 2014 goal for total environmental incidents is intended to continue to drive focus and improvement in our ongoing commitment to the communities in which we operate. The 2014 goal for Hexion Holdings represents an approximate 10% improvement from the end of the prior year.

Each of the 2014 performance goals was measured independently such that a payout of one element was not dependent upon the achievement of the others. This was intended to keep employees focused on driving continuous improvement in EH&S and cash flow, in addition to EBITDA.

Awards under the 2014 ICP were calculated as follows: Each participant was designated a target award under the 2014 ICP based on a percentage of his or her base salary, which varies per participant based on the scope of the participant’s responsibilities and externally competitive benchmarks. For 2014, the target bonus percentage for our NEOs remained consistent with the prior year. Payout of the target award is based on the

 

94


Table of Contents

achievement of the performance goals described above, subject to a sliding scale and the relative weightings of the performance goals noted in the table below. Depending upon alignment, (i) achievement of Segment EBITDA ranging from 93% of target to 96% of target would be necessary in order for a participant to earn the minimum 30% of the allocated target award for the EBITDA component, and (ii) achievement of approximately 110% of the Segment EBITDA target would be necessary in order for a participant to earn the maximum 200% of his or her target award for the Segment EBITDA goal. These achievement and payout metrics for the EBITDA component are somewhat different from prior years reflecting the market and economic conditions faced by our portfolio of businesses. For example, in 2013, the minimum Segment EBITDA needed to earn a minimum 30% payout was 88% of target whereas 93% of target is required to earn the same payout under the 2014 ICP. For 2014, the Committee determined that tightening the range of performance that justifies the minimum payout was effective in accomplishing the purpose of the plan. The payment range for achieving the performance goals for EH&S was 100% (target) and 200% (maximum) of the allocated target award for the safety component and 50% (threshold), 100% (target) and 200% (maximum) of the allocated target award for the environmental component. The payment range for achieving the performance goals for Cash Flow was 50% (minimum), 100% (target) and 200% (maximum) of the allocated target award for the Cash Flow component.

The following table summarizes the target awards, performance measures, weightings, achievements and payouts for the 2014 ICP awards granted to our NEOs. The 2014 ICP awards are reflected in the “Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation” column of the Summary Compensation Table shown elsewhere in “—Compensation Discussion and Analysis.”

 

Name

  Incentive
Target

(% of
Base Salary)
    Target
Award ($)
   

Performance Criteria /

Weighting  %

  Performance
Achieved
(%)
    Actual
2014
ICP
Payout
($)
 

J. Boss

    80     468,000      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     77,642   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     46,332   
      EH&S Goals / 10%     131     61,425   
      Momentive Cash Flow / 15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     37,580   

B. Berger

    35     93,266      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 10%     55     5,157   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 50%     —       —     
      EH&S Goals / 10%     100     9,327   
      Division Cash Flow / 30%     57     15,893   

S. Walden

    40     97,342      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 10%     55     5,383   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 50%     —       —     
      EH&S Goal / 10%     100     9,734   
      Division Cash Flow / 30%     57     16,587   

N. Fisher

    60     249,225      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     41,346   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     24,673   
      EH&S Goal / 10%     131     32,711   
      Momentive Cash Flow / 15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     20,013   

S. Psutka

    35     89,009      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     14,767   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     8,812   
      EH&S Goal / 10%     131     11,682   
      Momentive Cash Flow / 15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     7,147   

C. Morrison

    100     1,102,500      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     182,904   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     109,148   
      EH&S Goal / 10%     131     144,703   
      Momentive Cash Flow / 15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     88,531   

 

95


Table of Contents

Name

  Incentive
Target

(% of
Base Salary)
    Target
Award
($)
   

Performance Criteria /

Weighting  %

  Performance
Achieved
(%)
    Actual
2014
ICP
Payout
($)
 

W. Carter

    80     629,358      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     104,412   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     62,307   
      EH&S Goal /  10%     131     82,602   
      Momentive Cash Flow /  15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     50,537   

J. Sonnett

    70     317,998      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     52,756   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     31,482   
      EH&S Goal / 10%     131     41,737   
      Momentive Cash Flow / 15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     25,535   

D. Johns

    70     348,124      Momentive Segment EBITDA / 30%     55     57,755   
      Division Segment EBITDA / 30%     33     34,464   
      EH&S Goal / 10%     131     45,691   
      Momentive Cash Flow / 15%     —       —     
      Division Cash Flow / 15%     54     27,954   

Discretionary Awards

The CEO periodically uses discretionary awards to reward exemplary efforts. Often, such efforts are required by atypical business conditions or are related to special projects impacting long-term business results. Discretionary awards are also used for retention purposes or in connection with a new hiring or promotion. Any discretionary award to an executive officer must be approved by the Committee.

In 2014, the Committee approved the use of discretionary awards, if needed, to ensure a minimum 30% ICP payout to all 2014 ICP participants employed by Hexion, including Messrs. Morrison, Carter, Fisher and Ms. Sonnett. A similar action was approved by the bankruptcy court for employees of the Company, other than the executive staff. This action was taken to encourage retention during the turbulence created by the MPM bankruptcy and other challenging business conditions.

Also in 2014, in recognition of the additional work that would be required by key individuals to navigate the Company through a successful and speedy restructuring, an incentive program was implemented for certain associates directly involved in the restructuring process, including three of our NEOs. Cash awards were granted under this program to Mr. Berger ($127,500), Ms. Walden ($116,438), and Mr. Psutka ($85,586). The awards are designed to be paid in installments beginning in March 2014 and ending six months following emergence from bankruptcy, in April 2015.

In early 2015, following the determination of the 2014 ICP payouts, the MPM Holdings Compensation Committee (the “MPM Committee”) made awards in the amount of $40,000 each to Messrs. Berger and Psutka and Ms. Walden and $90,582 to Mr. Boss in recognition of their contributions to 2014 business results in a challenging business environment. The amount for Messrs. Berger and Psutka and Ms. Walden was determined by considering the percentage of their target annual incentive earned under the 2014 ICP, and granting an additional discretionary amount such that the combined amount of such items as a percentage of each NEO’s target incentive was consistent with such NEO’s contribution to the Company’s success in 2014. The amount for Mr. Boss was determined by applying the average total payout percentage for the senior leadership team to Mr. Boss’ target award opportunity.

 

96


Table of Contents

2. Long-term Incentive Awards

Equity Awards

The Committee believes that equity awards play an important role in creating incentives to maximize Company performance, motivating and rewarding long-term value creation, and further aligning the interests of our executive officers with those of our shareholders. Historically, our NEOs, as well as other members of the leadership team and other eligible employees, have participated in equity plans sponsored by Hexion Holdings, Hexion LLC or Old MPM Holdings. Awards under these plans were factored into the executive compensation program established by the Committee.

Our long-term strategy included the use of periodic grants, rather than ongoing annual grants of equity. The Committee believed that periodic grants provided an incentive toward a long-term projected value. Our equity awards contain time, performance and service vesting requirements. Awards that are conditioned on time and service vesting requirements function as a retention incentive, while awards that are conditioned on performance and service vesting requirements are linked to the attainment of specific long-term objectives.

The type of equity awards Hexion has historically used are (i) options to purchase common units and (ii) restricted deferred units. Prior to the October 2010 combination transaction between the Company and Hexion, Messrs. Morrison, Carter and Fisher received awards under a 2004 Stock Incentive Plan (the “Hexion 2004 Stock Plan”) and a 2004 Deferred Compensation Plan (the “Hexion 2004 DC Plan”) and Ms. Sonnett received an award under the 2007 Long-term Incentive Plan (the “Hexion 2007 Long-term Plan”), which plans are administered by Hexion Holdings or Hexion. At the time of the combination of the Company and Hexion, all outstanding equity awards that covered common units of Hexion LLC and shares of Old MPM Holdings were converted to cover units of Hexion Holdings. In February 2011, the Committee approved and granted awards under a new long-term equity incentive plan for key leaders and directors of the Company and Hexion (the “2011 Equity Plan”). Nether the Company nor MPM Holdings has any liability under any of the above mentioned plans.

The type of equity awards we have historically used are (i) options to purchase common units and (ii) restricted deferred units. Prior to October 2010, the Company’s former parent, Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. (“Old MPM Holdings”) sponsored a plan for the benefit of the Company’s executives under which awards denominated in securities of Old MPM Holdings were granted to certain of our NEOs who were employed by the Company at that time (the “MPM 2007 Plan”). Mr. Johns received awards under the MPM 2007 Plan. In the October 2010 combination transaction between the Company and Hexion, all equity awards granted prior to that date by Old MPM Holdings were converted into awards covering equity securities of the Company’s new ultimate parent, Hexion Holdings. From October 2010 through 2013, Hexion Holdings granted awards of restricted deferred units (“RDUs”) and unit options denominated in securities of Hexion Holdings to our NEOs under the 2011 Equity Plan (together with the MPM 2007 Plan, the “Equity Plans”). Neither the Company nor MPM Holdings has any liability for these prior awards under the Equity Plans. There were no equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2014 under the Equity Plans.

On October 24, 2014 when the Company emerged from bankruptcy, it was no longer a subsidiary of either Old MPM Holdings or Hexion Holdings. Thus, under the terms of the Equity Plans unvested RDUs and unit options held by the Company’s employees, including those held by Messrs. Berger, Psutka, Johns, and Ms. Walden terminated immediately. Their vested unit options became exercisable for 90 days and subsequently expired unexercised on January 22, 2015. Any RDUs that had vested prior to October 24, 2014 were unaffected by this event.

With respect to outstanding equity holdings of our NEOs who are employed by Hexion, they are reported in the Hexion Inc. Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.

MPM Holdings is implementing a new equity plan in 2015 (the “MPMH Equity Plan”) pursuant to which various equity awards (including options, restricted stock units and restricted stock) may be granted to persons or

 

97


Table of Contents

entities who provide services to MPM Holdings or its affiliates and who are in a position to contribute to the long-term success of MPM Holdings or its affiliates. The purposes of the MPMH Equity Plan are (i) to enable MPM Holdings to align the interests of those persons with the interests of our shareholders, and (ii) to aid in attracting, retaining and motivating persons of outstanding ability.

Cash Awards

From time to time, the Committee approved long-term cash awards or plans for our key employees, including our NEOs. These awards were designed to pay over extended performance periods, subject to the achievement of specified, measurable performance goals, and were further conditioned upon continued employment. As such, these awards are useful in providing a defined value for achievement of our financial targets, as well as leadership stability. In addition, long-term cash awards help complement equity awards which are not yet liquid.

Retaining key talent during difficult business cycles has been a critical focus for the Company in recent years. In 2012, key associates, including our NEOs, received awards under a long-term cash plan (the “2012 LTIP”). Awards granted under the 2012 LTIP were determined using a multiplier of the participant’s base salary. Payment of 50% of the total award was based upon continued service through April 2015 and payment of 50% of the total award was subject to the achievement of specific financial performance goals as well as continued service conditions.

It became apparent to the Committee in 2014 that the performance goals under the 2012 LTIP would likely never be achieved due to the Company’s bankruptcy. Therefore, to ensure the continued retention of key talent during a critical period of challenging business conditions, the Committee granted new long-term cash awards to key leaders of Hexion in November 2014, including Messrs. Morrison and Carter, under the Momentive Performance Materials Holdings LLC Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (the “2014 LTIP”). Awards under the 2014 LTIP are subject to time and service requirements. Acceptance of this award was conditioned upon the participant’s forfeiture of the performance grants under the 2012 LTIP.

The awards granted to our NEOs under the 2014 LTIP are based on a percentage of base salary as well as consideration of individual circumstances. The Committee considered the scope and complexity of each NEO’s role, the competitiveness of the executive’s total compensation package and the importance of the executive’s role in the context of the market and economic challenges and turbulent business conditions faced by the Company. Based on all of these factors, the Committee ultimately determined an award value for each NEO. Since Mr. Johns was an employee of MPM, he was not granted an award under the 2014 LTIP. The following table provides each NEO’s award value under the 2014 LTIP. Neither the Company nor MPM Holdings has any liability for the awards to be paid to Messrs. Morrison and Carter. The awards payable to Ms. Sonnett and Mr. Fisher may be allocated under the Shared Services Agreement.

 

     2014 LTIP Award Payout Schedule  

Name

   Payable in 2015      Payable in 2016      Payable in 2017  

Mr. Morrison

   $ 2,150,000       $ 3,803,750       $ 1,653,750   

Mr. Carter

     403,221         1,515,555         —     

Ms. Sonnett

     333,333         876,733         1,876,733   

Mr. Fisher

     —           596,232         596,232   

In March 2015, the MPM Holdings Board of Directors approved a form of modification to awards under the 2012 LTIP which can be used to encourage the retention of certain of our key employees. Recipients may include certain of our named executive officers, although no determinations of the recipients were made at the time the form of modification was approved. Under such modification with a participating key employee, 50% of such participant’s target award that was originally payable upon the achievement of EBITDA goals of Hexion Holdings would, in lieu of such terms, be payable upon the achievement of the EBITDA and free cash flow goals

 

98


Table of Contents

of MPM Holdings for the 2015 fiscal year, subject to continued employment. The remaining 50% of target awards would be payable in April 2015, subject to continued employment, consistent with the terms of the 2012 LTIP.

3. Benefits

The Company provides a comprehensive group of benefits to eligible employees, including our NEOs. These include health and welfare benefits as well as retirement benefits. Our benefit programs are designed to provide market competitive benefits for employees and their covered dependents.

Each of our NEOs participates in qualified defined benefit and defined contribution retirement plans on substantially the same terms as other participating employees. In addition, because individuals are subject to U.S. tax limitations on contributions to qualified retirement plans, in January 2012, MPM adopted a defined contribution Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “MPM SERP”), a non-qualified plan, to provide these employees, including our NEOs, with an incremental benefit on eligible earnings above the U.S. tax limits for qualified plans. Our NEOs are eligible to participate in the non-qualified plans on the same basis as our other highly compensated salaried employees.

Our savings plan, a defined contribution plan (the “MPM 401(k) Plan”), covers our U.S. employees. This plan allows eligible exempt employees to make pre-tax contributions from 1% to 15% of eligible earnings for employees who meet the definition of highly-compensated employees and 30% for all other employees up to the federal limits for qualified plans. Those employees whose pension service is frozen are eligible to receive matching contributions from the Company equal to 100% on contributions of up to 5% of eligible earnings. All other employees are eligible to receive matching contributions from the Company of 50% of contributions of up to either 7% or 8%, depending on the date of hire. In addition, the Company makes an annual retirement contribution ranging from 3% to 7% of eligible compensation, depending on years of benefit service, to eligible employees actively employed on the last day of the year. An additional company matching contribution may be made if we achieve specified annual financial goals established at the beginning of each plan year.

Messrs. Morrison, Carter, Fisher and Ms. Sonnett participate in Hexion’s defined contribution plan (the “Hexion 401(k) Plan”), which provides substantially the same benefits as those the Company provides to its U.S. salaried exempt employees. In 2014, Hexion amended its savings plan to add an employer match true-up feature effective for 2014 contributions to ensure that eligible participants receive the full matching contribution to which they are entitled.

There were no significant changes to the Company’s benefit plans in 2014 that would impact our NEOs. These plans are described in the Narrative to the Pension Benefits Table and Narrative to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table below.

4. Other

Change-in-Control and Severance Benefits

Our NEOs are generally entitled to change-in-control and severance protections. We believe that appropriate change-in-control and severance protections accomplish two objectives. First, they create an environment where key executives are able to take actions in the best interest of the Company without incurring undue personal risk. Second, they foster management stability during periods of potential uncertainty. We are also cognizant that excessive pay in the way of change-in-control and severance protection would not be in the best interest of the Company because such pay may encourage undue risk-taking. In an attempt to balance the delicate equation, the Committee has determined to provide these benefits very selectively. The change-in-control and severance benefits payable to our NEOs are discussed in the Narrative to the Summary Compensation Table and in the discussion on Potential Payments Upon Termination of Employment, below.

 

99


Table of Contents

Summary Compensation Table—Fiscal 2014

The following table provides information about the compensation for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 for our current and former Chief Executive Officers, our current Interim and former Chief Financial Officers, our three next most highly compensated executive officers as of December 31, 2014 and two former executive officers who would have been among the next three most highly compensated had they been executive officers at the year end. We collectively refer to these nine individuals as our NEOs. The compensation for those NEOs who provide services to us and Hexion on a shared basis is shown regardless of the source of compensation or the cost allocations of any compensation amounts under the Shared Services Agreement.

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE—FISCAL 2014

 

Name and

Principal Position (a)

  Year
(b)
    Salary
($) (c)
    Bonus
($) (d)
    Stock
Awards
($) (e)
    Options
Awards
($) (f)
    Non-Equity
Incentive Plan
Compensation ($)
(g) (1)
    Change in
Pension
Value and
Nonqualified
Deferred
Compensation
Earnings ($)
(h) (2)
    All
Other
Compen-

sation
($) (i) (3)
    Total ($)
(j)
 

John G. Boss

    2014        427,500        590,582        —          —          222,979        —          491,481        1,732,542   

President and Chief

Executive Officer

                 

Brian D. Berger

    2014        260,517        174,150        —          —          30,377        —          21,495        486,539   

Interim Chief Financial Officer

                 

Susan Walden

    2014        237,913        116,849        —          —          31,704        47,556        14,889        448,911   

Vice President—

Human Resources

                 

Nathan E. Fisher

    2014        348,075        —          —          —          118,743        30,967        28,857        526,642   

Executive Vice President—

Procurement

    2013        333,900        —          253,334        110,208        20,442        —          41,347        759,231   
    2012        321,058        —          —          —          43,685        16,975        26,273        407,991   

Stephen J. Psutka

    2014        249,232        96,487        —          —          42,408        66,745        21,252        476,124   

Interim General Counsel

                 

Craig O. Morrison

    2014        1,102,500        —          —          —          525,286        147,243        71,421        1,846,450   

Former President and

Chief Executive Officer

    2013        1,075,240        —          805,245        350,304        110,250        —          98,677        2,439,716   
    2012        1,024,039        —          —          72,364        280,035        69,981        56,563        1,502,982   

William H. Carter

    2014        776,735        —          —          —          299,858        207,209        95,126        1,378,928   

Former Executive Vice President

and Chief Financial Officer

    2013        754,034        —          740,036        321,937        61,401        —          76,576        1,953,984   
    2012        726,747        —          —          57,890        158,218        92,415        39,410        1,074,680   

Judith S. Sonnett

    2014        444,125        —          —          —          151,510        78,021        36,784        710,440   

Former Executive Vice President—

Human Resources

    2013        425,000        —          379,916        165,274        30,430        —          59,062        1,059,682   
    2012        407,692        —          —          720        66,568        31,800        31,712        538,492   

Douglas A. Johns

    2014        486,200        —          —          —          165,864        256,617        41,578        950,259   

Executive Vice President and

Former General Counsel

    2013        466,400        —          271,908        118,287        33,313        —          46,466        936,374   
    2012        445,661        —          —          —          73,225        195,968        25,664        740,518   

 

(1) The amounts shown in column (g) for 2014 reflect the amounts earned under the 2014 ICP, our annual incentive compensation plan, based on performance achieved for 2014. The material terms of the 2014 ICP are described in the Compensation Discussion & Analysis above. The 2014 ICP awards will be paid in April 2015.
(2) The amounts shown in column (h) reflect the actuarial increase in the present value of benefits under the MPM U.S. Pension Plan and the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan for Ms. Walden and Messrs. Psutka and Johns, and under the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and the Hexion Supplemental Plan for Messrs. Morrison, Carter and Fisher and Ms. Sonnett. See the Pension Benefits Table below for additional information regarding our pension calculations, including the assumptions used for these calculations. There were no above-market earnings on nonqualified deferred compensation plans for our NEOs for 2014.
(3)

The amounts shown in column (i) for 2014 include: for Mr. Boss: $19,675 of company contributions paid or accrued to the 401(k) Plan, tax gross-ups of $151,937 and perquisites in the amount of $311,494, including $235,000 related to a payment for relocation expenses that exceeded the Company’s standard reimbursement policy and tax payments made by the Company on his behalf in the amount of $76,494; for Mr. Berger: $20,800 of company contributions paid or accrued to the 401(k) Plan; for Ms. Walden: $14,889 of company contributions paid or accrued to the 401(k) Plan; for Mr. Fisher: $23,400 of company contributions paid or accrued to the Hexion 401(k) Plan; for Mr. Psutka: $21,252 of company contributions paid or accrued to the 401(k) Plan; for Mr. Morrison: $23,400 of company contributions paid or accrued to the Hexion 401(k) Plan and an accrued future contribution of $47,638 to the Hexion SERP; for Mr. Carter: $26,000 of company contributions paid or accrued to the Hexion 401(k) Plan and an accrued future contribution of $28,907

 

100


Table of Contents
  to the Hexion SERP and the transfer of a Company-held country club membership valued at $40,000; for Ms. Sonnett: $26,000 of company contributions paid or accrued to the Hexion 401(k) Plan and an accrued future contribution of $10,728 to the Hexion SERP; and for Mr. Johns: $28,600 of company contributions paid or accrued to the 401(k) Plan and an accrued future company contribution of $12,976 to the MPM SERP.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards—Fiscal 2014

The following table presents information about grants of awards during the year ended December 31, 2014 under the 2014 ICP and Hexion’s 2014 LTIP.

 

Name (a)

   Estimated Future Payouts Under
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Awards
 
   Threshold
($)

(c)
     Target
($)
(d)
     Maximum
($)
(e)
 

John G. Boss

        

2014 ICP

     11,700         468,000         936,000   

Brian D. Berger

        

2014 ICP

     2,332         93,266         186,533   

Susan Walden

        

2014 ICP

     2,434         97,342         194,684   

Nathan E. Fisher

        

2014 ICP

     6,231         249,225         498,450   

2014 LTIP

     1,192,464         1,192,464         1,192,464   

Stephen J. Psutka

        

2014 ICP

     2,225         89,009         178,018   

Craig O. Morrison

        

2014 ICP

     27,563         1,102,500         2,205,000   

2014 LTIP

     7,607,500         7,607,500         7,607,500   

William H. Carter

        

2014 ICP

     15,734         629,358         1,258,717   

2014 LTIP

     1,918,776         1,918,776         1,918,776   

Judith A. Sonnett

        

2014 ICP

     7,950         317,998         635,995   

2014 LTIP

     3,086,799         3,086,799         3,086,799   

Douglas A. Johns

        

2014 ICP

     8,703         348,124         696,248   

Narrative to Summary Compensation Table and Grants of Plan-Based Awards Table

Employment Agreements

The Company or Hexion has employment agreements or employment letters with certain of our NEOs, which provide for their terms of compensation and benefits, severance, and certain restrictive covenants. Further details regarding the severance and restrictive covenant provisions are described below under “Potential Payments upon a Termination or Change in Control.”

Mr. Boss has an employment letter which provides that his base salary for his first full year of employment will be $585,000 and he will participate in the 2014 ICP with a target incentive award of 80% of his annualized base salary. Standard relocation and health and welfare benefits are provided in addition to four weeks vacation annually. The agreement provides him with a guaranteed sign-on bonus of $1.3 million to be paid over a two-year period beginning July 2014 and ending April 2015. So long as Mr. Boss has not voluntarily resigned or been terminated for cause, he is also entitled to full payment of his sign-on bonus. This sign-on bonus compensated Mr. Boss for the estimated value of the long-term incentive awards he forfeited with his prior employer. He is also guaranteed severance equal to 18 months of base salary in the event he is terminated

 

101


Table of Contents

without cause. Additional benefits related to executive outplacement and COBRA benefit continuation would also be included. In addition, in the event Mr. Boss is not granted an equity award with a target value of $8 million, he has the right under his agreement to terminate his employment for “good reason” and receive any unpaid amount of his sign-on bonus, the full amount of his severance and would not be required to repay any relocation benefits received.

2014 Annual Incentive Compensation Plan (2014 ICP)

Information on the 2014 ICP targets, performance components, weightings, and payouts for each of our NEOs can be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this prospectus.

2014 Long-Term Cash Incentive Plan (2014 LTIP)

Information on the 2014 LTIP targets and other details for each of our NEOs can be found in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this prospectus.

Outstanding Equity Awards 2014 Fiscal Year-End

Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table—Fiscal 2014

As discussed under “Long-Term Incentive Awards—Equity Awards” in the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this prospectus, there were no equity awards granted to our NEOs in 2014 and no awards have been granted to our NEOs by the Company or MPM Holdings. Thus, the “Outstanding Equity Awards—2014 Fiscal Year-End” and “Option Exercises and Stock Vested Table—Fiscal 2014” tables have been omitted from this prospectus.

 

102


Table of Contents

Pension Benefits—Fiscal 2014

The following table presents information regarding the benefits payable to each of our NEOs at, following or in connection with their retirement under the qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans of MPM and Hexion as of December 31, 2014. The table does not provide information regarding the defined contribution plans of MPM or Hexion. The amounts shown in the table for each participant represents the present value of the annuitized benefit and does not represent the actual cash balance of a participant’s account. Because the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and the Hexion Supplemental Plan were frozen prior to the previous integration of MPM and Hexion and the benefits under such plans arise solely from services provided to Hexion, the costs of such plans are not allocated in any manner to MPM under the Shared Services Agreement.

PENSION BENEFITS TABLE—FISCAL 2014

 

Name (a)

  

Plan Name (b)

   Number
of Years
Credited
Service
(#) (c)

(1)
     Present
Value of
Accumulated
Benefit ($)
(d) (2)
     Payments
During
Last
Fiscal
Year ($)
(e)
 

John G. Boss(3)

   N/A      —           —           —     

Brian D. Berger(3)

   N/A      —           —           —     

Susan Walden

   MPM U.S. Pension Plan      5.15         146,975         —     
   MPM Supplementary Pension Plan      4.48         37,369         —     

Nathan E. Fisher

   Hexion U.S. Pension Plan      6.33         97,633         —     
   Hexion Supplemental Plan      5.84         29,322         —     

Stephen J. Psutka

   MPM U.S. Pension Plan      5.59         156,993         —     
   MPM Supplementary Pension Plan      4.92         107,042         —     

Craig O. Morrison

   Hexion U.S. Pension Plan      7.27         129,352         —     
   Hexion Supplemental Plan      6.78         520,727         —     

William H. Carter

   Hexion U.S. Pension Plan      14.25         249,977         —     
   Hexion Supplemental Plan      13.76         680,828         —     

Judith A. Sonnett

   Hexion U.S. Pension Plan      10.67         184,418         —     
   Hexion Supplemental Plan      10.17         108,821         —     

Douglas A. Johns

   MPM U.S. Pension Plan      5.59         223,715         —     
   MPM Supplementary Pension Plan      4.92         1,030,451         —     

 

(1) The number of years of credit service set forth in column (c) reflects benefit service years which are used to determine benefit accrual under the applicable plan, and do not necessarily reflect the NEO’s years of vested service.
(2) The accumulated benefit for the MPM U.S. Pension Plan is based on service and earnings (base salary and bonus, as described below) that are considered for the period from January 29, 2007 to August 31, 2012. The present value of accumulated benefits under the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan has been calculated assuming (i) the NEO will remain in service with us until the age at which retirement could occur without any reduction in benefits under the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan (which may be age 60, 62 or 65, depending on date of hire and years of service) and (ii) that the benefit is payable under the available forms of annuity consistent with the assumptions as described in Note 15 to our Consolidated Financial Statements. As described in such note, the discount rate is 4.15% for the MPM U.S. Pension Plan and 4.10% for the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan. The post-retirement mortality assumption is based on the RP2014 base table with generational projection using scale MP2014.
(3) These NEOs are not participants in the MPM U.S. Pension Plan or the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan because they were hired after the plans were frozen for participation.

 

103


Table of Contents

Narrative to Pension Benefits Table

MPM U.S. Pension Plan and MPM Supplementary Pension Plan

Benefits for U.S. salaried exempt associates under the MPM U.S. Pension Plan were frozen as of August 31, 2012. Benefits under the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan were frozen as of December 31, 2011. Although affected participants will continue to earn vesting credits under the plans, no additional benefit service will be credited following the dates of the freeze.

The MPM U.S. Pension Plan provides benefits based primarily on a formula that takes into account the participant’s highest 60-month average compensation earned during the final 120 months of service times years of credited benefit service. Eligible compensation under this formula includes base salary and one-half of the eligible annual incentive payments, subject to the IRS-prescribed limit applicable to tax-qualified plans.

U.S. associates who are classified as exempt associates, including the participating NEO, are generally eligible to retire under the MPM U.S. Pension Plan with unreduced benefits at age 65 (or at age 62 with 25 years of vesting service if hired before January 1, 2005).

The MPM Supplementary Pension Plan is an unfunded non-qualified pension plan that provides benefits in excess of IRS-prescribed limits for the qualified pension plans. Participants are generally not eligible for benefits under the MPM Supplementary Pension Plan if they leave the Company prior to reaching age 60, except in the event that the Company terminates the participant’s employment without cause following five or more years of service. The normal retirement age as defined in this Plan is 65; however, for participants hired before 2005, early unreduced retirement is permitted at age 60, and benefits must commence the January 1 following the later of termination of employment and attainment of age 60. Participants hired after 2004 can retire with an unreduced benefit following attainment of 25 years of service. These supplemental benefits are paid in the form of an annuity with joint and survivor benefits for married participants.

For a discussion of the assumptions applied in calculating the present value of benefits reported in the table above for participating NEOs, please see Note 15 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere herein.

Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and Hexion Supplemental Plan

The benefits associated with the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and Hexion Supplemental Plan were frozen June 30, 2009 and January 1, 2009, respectively. Although participants will continue to receive interest credits under the plans, no additional benefit credits will be provided. Prior to the freeze, the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan provided benefit credits equal to 3% of earnings to the extent that this credit does not exceed the Social Security wage base for the year plus 6% of eligible earnings in excess of the social security wage base to covered U.S. associates subject to the IRS-prescribed limit applicable to tax-qualified plans.

The Hexion Supplemental Plan provided non-qualified pension benefits in excess of allowable limits for the qualified pension plans. The benefit formula mirrored the qualified Hexion U.S. Pension Plan but applied only to eligible compensation above the federal limits for qualified plans. The accrued benefits are unfunded and are paid from our general assets upon the participant’s termination of employment with the Company.

Under both the Hexion U.S. Pension Plan and Hexion Supplemental Plan, eligible earnings included annual incentive awards that were paid currently, but excluded any long term incentive awards. Historically, the accrued benefits earned interest credits based on one year Treasury bill rates until the participant begins to receive benefit payments. Effective January 1, 2012, the plans were amended to provide a minimum interest crediting rate of 300 basis points. The interest rate determined under the plan for fiscal 2014 was 3.0%. Participants vest after the completion of three years of service.

The net present value of the Hexion pension benefits was determined based on a discount rate of 3.65% and the RPM-2007 mortality table with the projection scale.

 

104


Table of Contents

Nonqualified Deferred Compensation—Fiscal 2014

The following table presents information with respect to each defined contribution or other plan that provides for the deferral of compensation on a basis that is not tax-qualified. Because the benefits under the Hexion Supplemental Plan and the Hexion SERP arise solely from services provided to Hexion, the costs of such plans are not allocated in any manner to MPM under the Shared Services Agreement.

NONQUALIFIED DEFERRED COMPENSATION TABLE—FISCAL 2014

 

Name (a)

   Executive
Contributions
in Last FY

($)
(b)
     Registrant
Contributions
in Last FY

($)
(c)
     Aggregate
Earnings (Loss)
in Last

FY
($)
(d)
     Aggregate
Withdrawals/
Distributions
($)

(e)
     Aggregate
Balance at
Last FYE
($)

(f)
 

John G. Boss

              

MPM SERP

     —           —           —           —           —     

Brian D. Berger

              

MPM SERP

     —           271         2         —           273   

Susan Walden

              

MPM SERP

     —           —           —           —           —     

Nathan E. Fisher2

              

Hexion Supplemental Plan

     —           —           300         —           25,666   

Hexion SERP1

     —           6,129         265         —           25,318   

Stephen J. Psutka

              

MPM SERP

     —           295         2         —           297   

Craig O. Morrison2

              

Hexion Supplemental Plan

     —           —           10,692         —           914,804   

Hexion SERP1

     —           55,014         2,199         —           212,283   

William H. Carter2

              

Hexion Supplemental Plan

     —           —           20,481         —           1,752,380   

Hexion SERP1

     —           32,863         1,267         —           122,878   

Judith A. Sonnett2

              

Hexion Supplemental Plan

     —           —           958         —           81,951   

Hexion SERP1

     —           11,828         487         —           46,863   

Douglas A. Johns2

              

MPM SERP

     —           14,231         211         —           24,317   

 

(1) The amount shown in column (c) for the MPM SERP and the Hexion SERP are included in the All Other Compensation column of the Summary Compensation Table for 2013. These amounts were earned in 2013 and credited to the accounts by the Company and Hexion, respectively, in 2014.
(2) Nonqualified Deferred Compensation awards held by these NEOs that are denominated in equity securities of Hexion Holdings, for which neither the Company nor MPM Holdings has any liability, are not shown in this table. Such awards held by the NEOs employed by Hexion are reported in the Hexion Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

Narrative to the Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table

MPM SERP

MPM adopted the Momentive Performance Materials SERP (“MPM SERP”) in 2012 to provide certain of its executives and other highly compensated employees, including Messrs. Boss, Berger, Psutka, Johns and Ms. Walden, an annual contribution of 5% of eligible earnings above the maximum limitations set by the IRS for contributions to a qualified pension plan. The MPM SERP is an unfunded non-qualified plan. Account credits are

 

105


Table of Contents

made to the plan during the second quarter of each year. Interest credits are provided in the participant’s SERP accounts at an interest rate determined by MPM, which has been defined as the rate equivalent to the fixed income fund of the Hexion 401(k) Plan. This deferred compensation is paid six months following termination of employment.

Hexion Supplemental Plan

Effective January 1, 2009, the benefits associated with this plan were frozen. This plan provided supplemental retirement benefits in the form of voluntary employee deferral opportunities and employer match on compensation earned above the IRS limit on qualified plans. The Hexion Supplemental Plan benefits are unfunded and paid from Hexion’s general assets upon the employee’s termination of employment. Interest credits are made to the participants’ accounts at an interest rate determined by Hexion, which has been defined as the rate equivalent to the fixed income fund of the Hexion 401(k) Plan.

Hexion SERP

Hexion adopted the Hexion SERP in 2011 to provide certain of its executives and other highly compensated employees, including Messrs. Morrison, Carter, Fisher and Ms. Sonnett, an annual contribution of 5% of eligible earnings above the maximum limitations set by the IRS for contributions to a qualified pension plan. The Hexion SERP is an unfunded non-qualified plan. Account credits are made to the plan during the second quarter of each year. Interest credits are provided in the participant’s SERP accounts at an interest rate determined by Hexion, which has been defined as the rate equivalent to the fixed income fund of the Hexion 401(k) Plan. This deferred compensation is paid six months following termination of employment.

Potential Payments Upon Termination or Change in Control

Termination Payments

As described above, the Company or Hexion has employment agreements or employment letters with certain of our NEOs that provide for severance under certain circumstances as well as restrictive covenants. Hexion has employment agreements with Messrs. Morrison and Carter which provide that if the executive’s employment is terminated by Hexion without cause or the executive resigns for good reason (as defined in their employment agreements), Hexion will provide them with continued base salary through their severance period (18 months in the case of Mr. Morrison and 24 months in the case of Mr. Carter) and a lump sum payment equal to the estimated cost for the executive to continue COBRA coverage for 18 months. In addition, any accrued but unpaid compensation through the termination dated (such as accrued but unpaid base salary, earned but unpaid bonus, and accrued and unused vacation) will be paid in a lump sum payment at the time of termination. The employment agreements also contain the following restrictive covenants:

 

   

a confidentiality agreement;

 

   

an agreement not to compete with Hexion for (i) 18 months following termination of employment, in the case of Mr. Morrison, and (ii) two years following termination of employment, in the case of Mr. Carter; and

 

   

a non-solicitation agreement for an additional year beyond their severance periods.

The Company has an employment agreement with Mr. Boss which provides him with 18 month of base salary in the event he is terminated without cause. Additional benefits related to executive outplacement and COBRA benefit continuation would also be included. So long as Mr. Boss has not voluntarily resigned or been terminated for cause, he is also entitled to full payment of his sign-on bonus, $800,000 of which is due to be paid to him in April 2015. In addition, in the event Mr. Boss is not granted an equity award with a target value of $8 million, he has the right under his agreement to terminate his employment for “good reason” and receive any unpaid amount of his sign-on bonus, the full amount of his severance and would not be required to repay any relocation benefits received.

 

106


Table of Contents

Under Mr. Johns’ terms of employment, he would receive 18 months of severance if his employment is terminated from the Company without cause. Mr. Johns has an agreement not to compete with the Company and not to solicit Company associates for one year following termination for any reason, as well as a confidentiality agreement.

Under applicable corporate severance guidelines based on the executive’s position and length of service, Mses. Walden and Sonnett and Messrs. Berger, Fisher, Psutka, Morrison, Carter and Johns are entitled to cash severance payments in the event their employment is terminated without cause. Severance payments under such guidelines are conditioned on the executive’s compliance with non-competition and non-solicitation covenants.

The following table describes payments our NEOs would have received had the individual’s employment been terminated without cause, or in the case of Messrs. Morrison and Carter, by the executive for good reason, as of December 31, 2014.

 

Name

   Cash Severance
($) (1)
     Estimated Value
of Non-Cash
Benefits ($) (2)
     2014 ICP
($) (3)
     2007 Long-
Term Plan
($) (4)
     Hexion 2004
DC Plan

($) (5)
     MPM 2007
Plan

($) (6)
 

John G. Boss

     1,677,500         14,867         222,979         —           —           —     

Brian D. Berger

     184,483         13,767         30,377         —           —           —     

Susan Walden

     168,476         8,199         31,704         —           —           —     

Nathan E. Fisher

     356,036         14,538         118,743         —           11,638         —     

Stephen J. Psutka

     176,062         13,438         42,408         —           —           —     

Craig O. Morrison

     1,653,750         32,238         525,286         —           74,775         —     

William H. Carter

     1,573,396         24,856         299,858         —           59,820         —     

Judith Sonnett

     454,282         14,867         151,510         1,860         —           —     

Douglas A. Johns

     745,980         31,249         165,864         —           —           250,000   

 

(1) This column reflects cash severance payments due under the NEO’s employment agreement or under applicable Hexion or MPM severance guidelines, as described above, based on salary as of December 31, 2014.
(2) This column reflects the estimated value of health care benefits and outplacement services for the NEOs. The values are based upon the cost of such benefit at December 31, 2014.
(3) This column reflects the amount earned by each executive under the 2014 ICP, which would be paid if he or she was employed by Hexion or MPM on December 31, 2014, but incurred a termination of employment by Hexion or MPM, as applicable, without cause prior to payment. The incentive payment is forfeited if the executive resigns or incurs a termination of employment for cause prior to payment.
(4) This column reflects the value of the common units that would be distributed under the 2007 Long-Term Plan upon termination of employment without cause.
(5) This column reflects the value of the common units or cash that would be distributed under the Hexion 2004 DC Plan, using the year-end unit value as determined by the Hexion Holdings’ Board of Managers, and the value of vested options granted under the Hexion 2004 Stock Plan, which, if exercised, would be distributed upon termination of employment for any reason.
(6) This column reflects the cost of Mr. Johns’ initial investment in Hexion Holdings. Under the terms of the Old MPM Holdings Securityholders’ Agreement, he may exercise a put right and require Hexion Holdings to purchase his units at his original cost, in the event he is terminated by the Company without Cause, or leaves for Good Reason, as defined in the Securityholders’ Agreement.

In addition to these benefits, our NEOs would also generally be entitled to receive the benefits set forth above in the Pension Benefits Table and Nonqualified Deferred Compensation Table following a termination of employment for any reason, and would also be entitled to payment for accrued but unused vacation days, if any.

 

107


Table of Contents

Change-in-Control Payments

As noted above in the Narrative to the Outstanding Equity Awards Table, our NEOs will also be entitled to accelerate vesting of their outstanding unvested equity awards under the 2011 Equity Plan, MPM 2007 Plan and Hexion 2007 Long-Term Plan in connection with certain corporate transactions or change-in-control transactions. There was no value in any of the options held by our NEOs at December 31, 2014 because the option exercise prices all exceeded the year-end unit value as determined by the Hexion Holdings’ Board of Managers for management equity purposes.

In the event of a Complete Change in Control, as defined in the 2011 Equity Plan, prior to April 1, 2015, the service component of the awards under the 2012 LTIP would be deemed satisfied and 50% of the target awards to our NEOs under that plan would vest and become payable. In such event, Mses. Walden and Sonnett and Messrs. Fisher, Psutka, Morrison, Carter, Berger and Johns would be entitled to payments of $112,500, $624,000, $491,400, $117,000, $2,625,000, $1,112,334, $125,000 and $686,400, respectively.

Director Compensation—Fiscal 2014

The following table presents information regarding the compensation earned or paid during 2014 to our directors who are not also NEOs and who served on our Board of Directors, the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings through October 24, 2014, or the Board of Directors of MPM Holdings from October 24 through December 31, 2104.

 

Name (a)

   Fees Earned or
Paid in Cash ($)
(b)
     Total ($) (h)  

Mahesh Balakrishnan(2)

     14,640         14,640   

Bradley Bell(2)

     15,102         15,102   

John D. Dionne(2)

     14,294         14,294   

Robert Kaslow-Ramos(2)

     14,525         14,525   

William H. Joyce(3)

     74,250         74,250   

Scott M. Kleinman(4)

     100,544         100,544   

Julian Markby

     167,006         167,006   

Daniel C. Murphy(2)

     14,294         14,294   

Jason G. New(2)

     14,525         14,525   

Jonathan Rich(3)

     74,250         74,250   

David B. Sambur(4)

     101,659         101,659   

Marvin O. Schlanger(4)

     90,775         90,775   

Robert V. Seminara(1)(3)

     69,250         69,250   

Lee C. Stewart(1)

     152,250         152,250   

Jordan C. Zaken(1)

     —           —     

 

(1) Messrs. Zaken, Seminara and Stewart resigned their directorships in February, October and October 2014, respectively.
(2) The amount shown represents the fees earned by these directors for service on the MPM Holdings Board from October 24, 2014 through December 31, 2014.
(3) The amount shown represents the fees earned by these directors for service on the Hexion Holdings Board from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, 43% of which was funded by the Company.
(4) The amount shown for these directors represents fees earned for serving on the MPM Holdings Board from October 24 through December 31, 2014 which were paid by the Company, and fees earned for serving on the Hexion Holdings Board from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 which were funded 43% by the Company.

 

108


Table of Contents

Narrative to the Director Compensation Table

Each director who was a member of our Board of Directors or the Board of Managers of Hexion Holdings in 2014, who was not an employee or officer of the Company, received an annual retainer of $75,000 payable quarterly in advance. In addition, in 2014, each such director received $2,000 for each meeting of the Board or a committee of the Board that he attended in person and $1,000 for attending teleconference meetings or for participating in regularly scheduled in-person meetings via teleconference. Directors who received compensation for serving on the Hexion Holdings Board of Managers did not receive additional compensation for serving on the Company’s Board of Directors. The fees paid to the Hexion Holdings directors for their services from January through October 24, 2014 were funded 43% by the Company and 57% by Hexion. The fees paid to Messrs. Markby and Stewart were paid 100% by the Company.

Following the Emergence Date and the appointment of a new Board of Directors, a new director compensation policy was adopted for MPM Holdings directors. Under this policy, directors receive an annual retainer of $75,000 payable quarterly in arrears and the following annual retainers for their services on Board Committees:

 

Committee

   Member Retainer      Chairperson Retainer  

Audit

   $ 10,000       $ 15,000   

Compensation

     7,500         12,500   

Environmental, Health & Safety

     5,000         10,000   

Nominating & Governance

     5,000         10,000   

Retainer amounts payable with respect to any partial quarter of service are pro-rated to reflect the number of days served by the director during such quarter. Directors are also entitled to participate in equity-related programs that may be approved by the Compensation Committee from time to time. There were no such programs in place for directors during 2014 and none of our directors holds stock or option awards in securities of the Company or MPM Holdings.

Compensation Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation

Messrs. Sambur and Balakrishnan, who are members of the Compensation Committee and whose names appear in “—Executive Officers and Directors” above, are employed by Apollo Management, L.P. and Oaktree Capital Management, two of MPM Holdings’ shareholders. Neither of these directors is or has been an executive officer of the Company. None of our executive officers served as a director or a member of a compensation committee (or other committee serving an equivalent function) of any other entity, the executive officers of which served as a director or member of our Compensation Committee during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014.

 

109


Table of Contents

PRINCIPAL AND SELLING STOCKHOLDERS

The following table sets forth as of April 30, 2015 information regarding the beneficial ownership of our common stock and shows the number of shares of common stock and percentage owned by:

 

   

each member of our Board of Directors and each of our named executive officers;

 

   

all of the executive officers and members of the Board of Directors as a group;

 

   

each person known to beneficially own more than 5% of our common stock, each of whom is a selling stockholder; and

 

   

all other selling stockholders.

As of April 30, 2015, we had 48,028,594 shares of common stock outstanding. The amounts and percentages of common stock beneficially owned are reported on the basis of regulations of the SEC governing the determination of beneficial ownership of securities. Under the rules of the SEC, a person is deemed to be a “beneficial owner” of a security if that person has or shares “voting power,” which includes the power to vote or to direct the voting of such security, or “investment power,” which includes the power to dispose of or to direct the disposition of such security. A person is also deemed to be a beneficial owner of any securities of which that person has a right to acquire beneficial ownership within 60 days. Under these rules, more than one person may be deemed a beneficial owner of the same securities and a person may be deemed a beneficial owner of securities as to which he has no economic interest. Except as otherwise indicated in the footnotes below, each of the beneficial owners has, to our knowledge, sole voting and investment power with respect to the indicated common stock and has not pledged any such stock as security.

 

Name of Beneficial Owner(1)

   Number of Shares
of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
     Percent
of Class
    Shares of Common
Stock That May Be
Offered for  Resale(2)
 

Directors and Named Executive Officers:

       

Mahesh Balakrishnan(3)

     —           —          —     

Bradley J. Bell

     12,500         *        —     

John G. Boss

     —           —          —     

John D. Dionne

     24,594         *        —     

Robert Kalsow-Ramos(4)

     —           —          —     

Scott M. Kleinman(4)

     —           —          —     

Julian Markby

     2,500         *        —     

Daniel C. Murphy

     —           —          —     

Jason G. New

     —           —          —     

David B. Sambur(4)

     —           —          —     

Marvin Schlanger

     —           —          —     

Douglas A. Johns

     —           —          —     

Brian D. Berger

     —           —          —     

William H. Carter

     —           —          —     

Nathan E. Fisher

     —           —          —     

Craig Morrison

     —           —          —     

Stephen J. Psutka

     —           —          —     

Judith Sonnett

     —           —          —     

Susan Walden

     —           —          —     

Named Executive Officers and Directors as a group

     39,594         *        —     

5% Selling Stockholders:

       

Euro VI (BC) Sà.r.l(5)

     19,084,996         39.74     19,084,996   

OCM Opps MTIV Holdings, LLC(6)

     6,551,657         13.64     6,551,657   

Pentwater Capital Management(7)

     3,440,525         7.16     3,440,525   

GSO Capital Partners(8)

     3,279,600         6.83     3,279,600   

Carlson Capital(9)

     2,402,716         5.00     1,397,225   

 

110


Table of Contents

Name of Beneficial Owner(1)

   Number of Shares
of Common Stock
Beneficially Owned
     Percent
of Class
    Shares of Common
Stock That May Be
Offered for  Resale(2)
 

Other Selling Stockholders:

       

Third Avenue Funds(10)

     2,310,988         4.81     1,416,798   

Ares Management(11)

     1,981,349         4.13     1,208,157   

Aristeia Capital(12)

     1,812,612        
3.77

    1,375,506   

D.E. Shaw Galvanic Portfolios, L.L.C(13)

     1,008,592         2.10     506,750   

Fortress Credit Advisors(14)

     632,957         1.32     632,957   

Napier Park Global Capital(15)

     605,551         1.26     327,392   

Nexpoint Credit Strategies Fund(16)

     456,875         0.95     83,904   

 

* Less than 1%.
(1) Unless otherwise noted, the address for each person listed in this table is c/o Momentive Performance Materials Inc., 260 Hudson River Road, Waterford, NY 12188.

 

(2) The shares of our common stock that may be offered for resale by the selling stockholders pursuant to this prospectus were acquired by the selling stockholders in connection with the Emergence pursuant to the Plan of Reorganization in transactions that were exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code. See “Summary—Emergence from Chapter 11 Proceedings” for additional information regarding the Emergence and how the selling stockholders acquired shares of our common stock. We have been advised that none of the selling stockholders is a broker-dealer and that each selling stockholder that is an affiliate of a broker-dealer acquired its shares of common stock in the ordinary course of its business and, at the time of acquisition, had no agreements or understandings, directly or indirectly, with any person to distribute the shares.

 

(3)

The address for Mr. Balakrishnan is 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

 

(4) The address of each of Messrs. Kalsow-Ramos, Kleinman and Sambur is c/o Apollo Management, L.P., 9 West 57th Street, New York, New York 10019.

 

(5) AIF VI Euro Holdings, L.P. (“AIF VI Euro”) is the sole shareholder of Euro VI (BC). Apollo Advisors VI (EH), L.P. (“Advisors VI (EH)”) is the general partner of AIF VI Euro, and Apollo Advisors VI (EH-GP), Ltd. (“Advisors VI (EH-GP)”) is the general partner of Advisors VI (EH). Apollo Principal Holdings III, L.P. (“Principal III”) is the sole shareholder of Advisors VI (EH-GP). Apollo Principal Holdings III GP, Ltd. (“Principal III GP”) is the general partner of Principal III. Apollo Management VI, L.P. (“Management VI”) is the manager of AIF VI Euro, and AIF VI Management, LLC (“AIF VI LLC”) is the general partner of Management VI. Apollo Management, L.P. (“Apollo Management”) is the sole member and manager of AIF VI LLC, and Apollo Management GP, LLC (“Management GP”) is the general partner of Apollo Management. Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (“Management Holdings”) is the sole member and manager of Management GP. Apollo Management Holdings GP, LLC (“Management Holdings GP”) is the general partner of Management Holdings. Leon Black, Joshua Harris and Marc Rowan are the managers, as well as executive officers, of Management Holdings GP, and the directors of Principal III GP, and as such may be deemed to have voting and dispositive control of the shares of common stock held of record by Euro VI (BC). The address of Euro VI BC is 7, Val Ste Croix, L-1371 Luxembourg. The address of AIF VI Euro, Advisors VI (EH), Advisors VI (EH-GP), Principal III and Principal III GP is c/o Intertrust Corporate Services (Cayman) Limited, 190 Elgin Street, George Town, KY1-9005 Grand Cayman, Cayman Islands. The address of each of Management VI, AIF VI LLC, Apollo Management, Management GP, Management Holdings and Management Holdings GP, and Messrs. Black, Harris and Rowan, is 9 West 57th Street, 43rd Floor, New York, New York 10019.

 

(6)

The manager of OCM Opps MTIV Holdings, LLC (“Opps MTIV”) is Oaktree Fund GP, LLC (“GP LLC”). The managing member of GP LLC is Oaktree Fund GP I, L.P. (“GP I”). The general partner of GP I is Oaktree Capital I, L.P. (“Capital I”). The general partner of Capital I is OCM Holdings I , LLC (“Holdings I”). The managing member of Holdings I is Oaktree Holdings, LLC (“Holdings”). The managing member of Holdings is Oaktree Capital Group, LLC (“OCG”). The duly elected manager of OCG is Oaktree Capital Group Holdings GP, LLC. The members of Oaktree Capital Group Holdings GP, LLC are

 

111


Table of Contents
  Howard Marks, Bruce Karsh, Jay Wintrob, John Frank, Sheldon Stone, Larry Keele, Stephen Kaplan and David Kirchheimer. Each of the managing members, managers, general partners, and members described above disclaims beneficial ownership of any shares of common stock beneficially or of record owned by Opps MTIV, except to the extent of any pecuniary interest therein. Mr. Balakrishnan, an employee of Oaktree Capital Management, L. P., an affiliate of Opps MTIV, has been a Director of the Company since October 24, 2014. The business address for each of the persons and entities named in this footnote is 333 South Grand Avenue, 28th Floor, Los Angeles, CA 90071.

 

(7) Includes (i) 115,210 shares held of record by Pentwater Capital Management LP as investment advisor to Pentwater Event Driven Cayman Fund Limited, (ii) 495,719 shares held of record by Oceana Master Fund Ltd., (iii) 608,466 shares held of record by Pentwater Capital Management LP acting as investment manager for and on behalf of Pentwater Event Equity Reflection Fund, a sub-fund of an Irish open ended umbrella type investment company incorporated with variable capital and with segregated liability between sub-funds, called AAI Pentwater Fund Plc, (iv) 501,359 shares held of record by Pentwater Capital Management LP as investment advisor to LMA SPC for and on behalf of MAP98 Segregated Portfolio, (v) 23,539 shares held of record by Pentwater Equity Opportunities Master Fund Ltd, (vi) 1,625,707 shares held of record by PWCM Master Fund Ltd, (vii) 10,011 shares held of record by Pentwater Merger Arbitrage Master Fund Ltd and (viii) 60,514 shares held of record by Pentwater Credit Opportunities Master Fund Ltd. Matthew C. Halbower, CIO and CEO of Pentwater Capital Management LP, exercises voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by the entities named in this footnote. Daniel C. Murphy, Portfolio Manager and Head of Fixed Income for Pentwater Capital Management, LP, has been a Director of the Company since October 24, 2014. The business address for each person and entity named in this footnote 7 is 614 Davis St., Evanston, IL 60201.

 

(8) Includes (i) 13,940 shares held of record by FS Global Credit Opportunities Fund (“FS Fund”), (ii) 771,065 shares held of record by GSO Special Situations Fund LP (“Special Situations Fund”), (iii) 49,444 shares held of record by GSO Special Situations Master Fund LP (“Special Situations Master Fund”), (iv) 865,590 shares held of record by GSO Special Situations Overseas Master Fund Ltd (“Special Situations Overseas Master Fund”), (v) 98,023 shares held of record by Steamboat Credit Opportunities Master Fund LP (“Steamboat Fund”), (vi) 120,767 shares held of record by GSO Aiguille des Grands Montets Fund I LP (“Grands Montets Fund I”), (vii) 73,922 shares held of record by each of GSO Aiguille des Grands Montets Fund II LP (“Grands Montets Fund II”) and GSO Aiguille des Grands Montets Fund III LP (“Grands Montets Fund III”), (viii) 97,090 shares held of record by GSO Cactus Credit Opportunities Fund LP (“Cactus Fund”), (ix) 134,155 shares held of record by GSO Churchill Partners LP (“Churchill Partners”), (x) 88,758 shares held of record by GSO Coastline Credit Partners LP (“Coastline Credit Partners”), (xi) 457,082 shares held of record by GSO Credit-A Partners LP (“Credit-A Partners”), and (xii) 435,842 shares held of record by GSO Palmetto Opportunistic Investment Partners LP (“Palmetto Partners”).

 

     FS Global Advisor, LLC (“FS Advisor”) serves as the investment adviser of FS Fund. The investment committee of FS Advisor makes investment decisions on behalf of FS Advisor and has the power to vote or to direct the vote of, and to dispose or to direct the disposition of, the shares of the Company held by FS Fund. The members of the investment committee of FS Advisor are Michael C. Forman, Gerald F. Stahlecker, Zachary Klehr and Robert Hoffman. None of FS Advisor or any member of FS Advisor’s investment committee owns any shares of the Company directly, and FS Advisor and each member of FS Advisor’s investment committee disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares of the Company held by FS Fund, except, in the case of the members of FS Advisor’s investment committee, to the extent of their pecuniary interest therein. The business address of FS Fund, FS Advisor and each member of FS Advisor’s investment committee is 201 Rouse Boulevard, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19112.

 

    

GSO Capital Partners LP (“GSO Capital Partners”) is the non-discretionary investment subadviser to FS Advisor. GSO Capital Partners votes at the direction of FS Advisor. GSO Capital Partners is the investment adviser to Special Situations Fund, Special Situations Master Fund, Special Situations Overseas Master Fund, Steamboat Fund, Grands Montets Fund I, Grands Montets Fund II, Grands Montets Fund III, Cactus Fund, Churchill Partners, Coastline Credit Partners, Credit-A Partners and Palmetto Partners. GSO Advisor Holdings LLC (“GSO Advisor”) is the general partner of GSO Capital Partners. Blackstone Holdings I L.P.

 

112


Table of Contents
  (“Blackstone I”) is the sole member of GSO Advisor. Blackstone Holdings I/II GP Inc. (“Blackstone I/II GP”) is the general partner of Blackstone I. The Blackstone Group L.P. (“Blackstone Group”) is the controlling shareholder of Blackstone I/II GP. Blackstone Group Management L.L.C. (“Blackstone Group Management”) is the general partner of Blackstone Group. Blackstone Group Management is controlled by Stephen A. Schwarzman, one of its founders. Each of Bennett J. Goodman, J. Albert Smith III and Douglas I. Ostrover is an executive of GSO Capital Partners and may be deemed to have shared voting power and/or investment power with respect to the shares held by funds managed or advised by GSO Capital Partners. Each of such persons disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares directly held by such funds (other than such funds to the extent of their direct holdings).

 

    

Jason New, Senior Managing Director of Blackstone Group (an affiliate of GSO Capital Partners), has been a Director of the Company since October 24, 2014. Mr. New disclaims any beneficial ownership of the shares of our common stock held by the foregoing entities. In the ordinary course of business, GSO Capital Partners and its affiliates, including Blackstone Group manage, advise or sub-advise certain funds whose portfolio companies may have relationships with the Company. The business address for each of the persons and entities named in this footnote 8, unless otherwise stated, is 345 Park Avenue, 31st Floor, New York, NY 10154.

 

(9) Includes (i) 2,294,199 shares held of record by Double Black Diamond Offshore Ltd. (“Double Black Diamond”), of which 1,333,695 shares may be offered for sale, and (ii) 108,517 shares held of record by Black Diamond Offshore Ltd. (“Black Diamond”), of which 63,530 shares may be offered for sale. The investment advisor of each of Black Diamond and Double Black Diamond is Carlson Capital, L.P., and the general partner of Carlson Capital, L.P. is Asgard Investment Corp. II. The sole stockholder of Asgard Investment Corp. II. is Asgard Investment Corp., and Clint D. Carlson is its controlling person. The business address of each person and entity named in this footnote 9 is 2100 McKinney Ave, Suite 1800, Dallas, TX 75201.

 

(10)

Includes (i) 2,178,290 shares held of record by Third Avenue Trust, on behalf of Third Avenue Focused Credit Fund, of which 1,310,842 shares may be offered for sale, (ii) 43,564 shares held of record by Third Avenue Management LLC, on behalf of Manulife Global Focused Balanced Fund, of which 26,217 shares may be offered for sale, (iii) 18,150 shares held of record by Third Avenue Capital Plc c/o Third Avenue High Yield Credit Fund, of which 10,922 shares may be offered for sale, (iv) 5,443 shares held of record by Third Avenue Value Income Fund, L.P., of which 3,276 shares may be offered for sale, and (v) 65,541 shares held of record by JURA LIMITED, all of which may be offered for sale. The investment manager or investment sub-adviser, as the case may be, of each of the funds is Third Avenue Management LLC. Thomas Lapointe exercises voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by the entities named in this footnote 10. The business address for each of the persons and entities, except for JURA LIMITED, named in this footnote 10 is 622 Third Avenue, 32nd Floor, New York, NY 10017. The business address of JURA LIMITED is 12 Par-La-Ville Rd, Hamilton HM 08 Bermuda.

 

(11) Includes (i) 36,304 shares held of record by Anthem, Inc. (“Anthem”), of which 21,847 shares may be offered for sale, (ii) 45,380 shares held of record by PPF Nominee 1 B.V. (“PPF Nominee”), of which 27,309 shares may be offered for sale, (iii) 18,150 shares held of record by Ontario Public Service Employees Union Pension Plan Trust Fund (“Ontario Fund”), of which 10,922 shares may be offered for sale, (iv) 99,837 shares held of record by Ares Senior Loan Trust (“Loan Trust”), of which 60,080 shares may be offered for sale, (v) 108,914 shares held of record by ASIP (Holdco) IV S.à.r.l. (“ASIP IV”), of which 65,542 shares may be offered for sale, (vi) 54,455 shares held of record by Ares Multi-Strategy Credit Fund V (H), L.P. (“Multi-Strategy Fund”), of which 32,770 shares may be offered for sale, (vii) 245,057 shares held of record by Transatlantic Reinsurance Company (“Transatlantic”), of which 147,470 shares may be offered for sale, (viii) 117,990 shares held of record by RSUI Indemnity Company (“RSUI”), of which 71,004 shares may be offered for sale, (ix) 555,464 shares held of record by Ares Special Situations Fund III, L.P. (“Special Situations Fund”), of which 334,265 shares may be offered for sale, and (x) 699,798 shares held of record by Ares SSF Riopelle, L.P. (“SSF Riopelle”), of which 436,948 shares may be offered for sale.

 

113


Table of Contents
    

The manager of Anthem is Ares WLP Management L.P., the general partner of which is Ares WLP Management GP LLC. The portfolio manager of PPF Nominee is Ares Management Limited. The investment counsel of Ontario Fund is AELIS X Management, L.P., the general partner of which is AELIS X Management GP, LLC. The investment adviser of Loan Trust is Ares Senior Loan Trust Management, L.P., the general partner of which is Ares Senior Loan Trust Management, LLC. The investment manager of ASIP IV is ASIP Operating Manager IV LLC. The manager of Multi-Strategy Fund is Ares MSCF V (H) Management LLC, the manager of which is Ares Capital Management III LLC. The portfolio manager of Transatlantic and RSUI is Ares ASIP VII Management, L.P., the general partner of which is Ares ASIP VII GP, LLC. The manager of Special Situations Fund is ASSF Operating Manager III, LLC. The manager of SSF Riopelle is ASSF Riopelle Management, LLC. John Eanes, Portfolio Manager, exercises voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by Anthem, PPF Nominee, Ontario Fund and Loan Trust. Seth J. Brufsky, Portfolio Manager, exercises voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by ASIP IV, Multi-Strategy Fund, Transatlantic and RSUI. Jeff Moore, Portfolio Manager, and Darryl Schall, Portfolio Manager, exercise voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by Special Situations Fund and SSF Riopelle. The business address of each person and entity named in this footnote 11 is 2000 Avenue of the Stars, 12th floor, Los Angeles, CA 90067.

 

(12) Includes (i) 1,631,654 shares held of record by Aristeia Horizons LP (“Horizons”), of which 1,194,548 shares may be offered for sale, (ii) 52,607 shares held of record by Compass TSMA LP (“TSMA”), all of which may be offered for sale, (iii) 41,595 shares held of record by Compass ESMA LP (“ESMA”), all of which may be offered for sale, and (iv) 86,756 shares held of record by Windermere Ireland Fund PLC (“Ireland Fund”), all of which may be offered for sale.

 

    

Aristeia Capital, L.L.C. and Aristeia Advisors, L.P. (collectively, “Aristeia”) may be deemed the beneficial owners of the securities in their capacity as the investment manager and/or general partner, as the case may be, of Horizons, Ireland Fund, ESMA and TSMA (each a “Aristeia Fund” and collectively, the “Aristeia Funds”). As investment manager and/or general partner of each Aristeia Fund, Aristeia has voting and investment control with respect to the securities held by each Aristeia Fund. Aristeia is owned by Kevin C. Toner, Robert H. Lynch, Jr., Anthony M. Frascella and William R. Techar. Each of Aristeia and such individuals disclaims beneficial ownership of the securities referenced herein except to the extent of its or his direct or indirect economic interest in the Aristeia Funds. The business address for each of the persons and entities named in this footnote 12 is c/o Aristeia Capital LLC, 136 Madison Avenue, 3rd floor, New York, NY 10016.

 

(13) The investment adviser of D. E. Shaw Galvanic Portfolios, LLC (“Portfolios”) is D. E. Shaw Adviser II, L.L.C. (“Adviser”) and the manager is D. E. Shaw Manager II, L.L.C. (“Manager”). The managing member of Adviser is D. E. Shaw & Co., L.P. (“DESCO LP”) and the managing member of Manager is D. E. Shaw & Co., L.L.C. (“DESCO LLC”). DESCO LP and DESCO LLC may be deemed to have the shared power to exercise voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by Portfolios. Anne Dinning, Julius Gaudio, Maximilian Stone, and Eric Wepsic, or their designees, exercise voting and investment control over such shares on DESCO LP and DESCO LLC’s behalf. D. E. Shaw & Co., Inc. (“DESCO Inc.”), as general partner of DESCO LP, and D. E. Shaw & Co. II, Inc. (“DESCO II Inc.”), as managing member of DESCO LLC, may be deemed to have the shared power to exercise voting and investment control with respect to the shares. Each of DESCO LP, DESCO LLC, DESCO Inc., or DESCO II Inc. disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares. By virtue of David E. Shaw’s position as President and sole shareholder of DESCO Inc. and as President and sole shareholder of DESCO II Inc., he may be deemed to have the shared power to exercise voting and investment control with respect to the shares. David E. Shaw disclaims beneficial ownership of the shares held by Portfolios. The business address of each person and entity named in this footnote 13 is 1166 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10036.

 

(14)

Includes (i) 431,096 shares held of record by Drawbridge DSO Securities LLC (“Drawbridge DSO”), (ii) 168,598 shares held of record by Drawbridge OSO Securities LLC, (iii) 28,482 shares held of record by Worden Master Fund LP, and (iv) 4,781 shares held of record by Worden Master Fund II LP, in each case all of which may be offered for sale. The general partner of Worden Master Fund LP and Worden Master

 

114


Table of Contents
  Fund II LP is Fortress Special Opportunities I GP LLC. Such entities are managed within the Credit Funds business of Fortress Investment Group. The Co-Chief Investment Officers of the Credit Funds business are Peter L. Briger, Jr. and Constantine M. Dakolias, who exercise voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by the entities named in this footnote. The business address for Drawbridge DSO and the investment manager of each other entity listed in this footnote 14 is c/o Fortress Investment Group, 1345 Avenue of the Americas, New York, NY 10105.

 

(15)

Includes (i) 196,895 shares held of record by Napier Park Distressed Debt Opportunity Master Fund, Ltd., of which 120,044 shares may be offered for sale, (ii) 235,108 shares held of record by DStar Ltd., of which 130,957 shares may be offered for sale, and (iii) 173,548 shares held of record by Napier Park Select Master Fund, LP., of which 76,391 shares may be offered for sale. Napier Park Global Capital (US) LP (“Napier Park”) acts as the investment manager or investment advisor, as the case may be, to all of the entities listed above in this footnote 15. Napier Park exercises voting and investment control with respect to the shares held by the entities through its Distressed Debt Investment Team, where James Duplessie exercises voting and investment control with respect to such shares on behalf of the team. The business address of each person and entity named in this footnote 15 is c/o Napier Park Global Capital, 280 Park Avenue, 3rd Floor, New York, NY 10017.

 

(16) The investment adviser of Nexpoint Credit Strategies Fund (“Nexpoint”) is Nexpoint Advisors, L.P. James Dondero exercises voting and/or investment control with respect to the shares held by Nexpoint. The business address of each person and entity named in this footnote 16 is 300 Crescent Court Suite 700, Dallas, TX 75201.

Relationships with Selling Stockholders

None of the selling stockholders, other than Apollo, has had any material relationships with the Company within the past three years other than representation on the Company’s board of directors as described in the table above. See “Certain Relationships and Related Party Transactions.”

 

115


Table of Contents

CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

We have entered into various agreements with GE and Apollo and their affiliates on terms which management has concluded are fair to us. Agreements with GE and its affiliates were entered into primarily in connection with the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. Agreements with Apollo and its affiliates were entered into primarily in connection with the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition and the prior combination with Hexion.

Apollo Management Agreement

We were subject to a management consulting and advisory services agreement with Apollo and its affiliates for the provision of management and advisory services for an initial term of up to twelve years. We also agreed to indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors, officers, and representatives for potential losses relating to the services contemplated under these agreements. Terms of the agreement provided for annual fees of $4 million plus out of pocket expenses, payable in one lump sum annually, and provided for a lump-sum settlement equal to the net present value of the remaining annual management fees payable under the remaining term of the agreement in connection with a sale or initial public offering by us. This annual management fee was waived for 2013 and 2014. We paid annual fees of $4 million in each of 2012 and 2011 and also reimbursed Apollo for expenses totaling less than $1 million, including certain third-party consulting fees, in each of 2012 and 2011. In connection with our emergence from Chapter 11, the management agreement was terminated pursuant to the court order confirming the Plan of Reorganization, effective as of Petition Date.

Registration Rights Agreement

On October 24, 2014, in connection with the Emergence, we entered into a registration rights agreement with certain of our stockholders (the “Registration Rights Agreement), which provides our stockholders party thereto certain registration rights.

Under the Registration Rights Agreement, we are required to file a shelf registration statement (on Form S-3 if permitted) and use our reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective for the benefit of all stockholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement. Any individual holder or holders of our outstanding common stock party thereto can demand an unlimited number of “shelf takedowns,” which may be conducted in underwritten offerings so long as the total offering size is reasonably expected to exceed $50 million. The registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part was filed to satisfy our obligation under the Registration Rights Agreement.

Each holder or holders party to the Registration Rights Agreement who own at least 10% of our outstanding common stock, or held at least 10% of our common stock as of the date of the Registration Rights Agreement and could reasonably be considered our affiliate, have Form S-1 demand registration rights, which may be conducted in an underwritten offering, as long as the total offering price is reasonably expected to be at least $50 million, and which may not exceed two in any six month period or eight in total, subject to certain exceptions and to customary cutback provisions. In addition, a holder of at least 10% of our common stock has unlimited Form S-3 demand registration rights, which may be conducted in underwritten offerings, as long as the total offering price is reasonably expected to be at least $50 million, subject to customary cutback provisions.

Each stockholder party to the Registration Rights Agreement has unlimited piggyback registration rights with respect to underwritten offerings, subject to certain exceptions and limitations.

The foregoing registration rights are subject to certain cutback provisions and customary suspension/blackout provisions. We have agreed to pay all registration expenses under the Registration Rights Agreement. We are paying the registration expenses for the registration statement of which this prospectus forms a part. In connection with the registrations described above, we have agreed to indemnify the stockholders against certain liabilities.

 

116


Table of Contents

The Registration Rights Agreement also contains certain holdback agreements that apply to each stockholder party to the Registration Rights Agreement. Generally, without our prior consent and subject to limited exceptions, the stockholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement have agreed to, if requested, enter into an agreement not to publicly sell or distribute our equity securities beginning ten days prior to the pricing of our initial public offering for the 180-day period following the closing date of our initial public offering and, if participating in a future shelf takedown or other underwritten public offering, beginning ten days prior to the pricing of that offering and for the 90-day period following the closing date of such offering.

Transactions with Hexion

Shared Services Agreement

On October 1, 2010, we entered into a shared services agreement with Hexion (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary under a common parent) (the “Shared Services Agreement”). Under this agreement, we provide to Hexion, and Hexion provides to us, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, technology development, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement is subject to termination by either us or Hexion, without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2015 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the costs of such services are allocated between Hexion and us.

Pursuant to this agreement, during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $25 million of net costs for shared services and Hexion incurred approximately $31 million and $33 million, respectively, of net costs for shared services. For the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $99 million, $92 million and $148 million, respectively, of net costs for shared services and during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Hexion incurred approximately $131 million, $121 million and $155 million, respectively, of net costs for shared services. Included in the net costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, were net billings from Hexion to the Company of $17 million and $9 million, respectively, and during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were net billings from Hexion to the Company of $49 million, $31 million and $22 million, respectively, to bring the percentage of total net incurred costs for shared services under the Shared Services Agreement to the applicable allocation percentage, as well as to reflect costs allocated 100% to one party.

The allocation percentages are reviewed by the Steering Committee pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement. The Company had accounts receivable of $0 as of March 31, 2015 and 2014 and as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and accounts payable to Hexion of $6 million, $9 million and $4 million at March 31, 2015, December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company realized approximately $1 million, $9 million and $31 million, respectively, in cost savings as a result of the Shared Services Agreement.

On March 17, 2011, we amended the Shared Services Agreement with Hexion to reflect the terms of the Master Confidentiality and Joint Development Agreement (the “JDA”) by and between Hexion and us entered into on the same date.

The Shared Services Agreement incorporates by reference the terms of the JDA and provides that in the event of a conflict between such agreements, the terms of the JDA shall control. The JDA, which is effective as of October 1, 2010, sets forth the terms and conditions for (i) the disclosure, receipt and use of each party’s confidential information; (ii) any research and development (“R&D”) collaborations agreed to be pursued by Hexion and us; (iii) the ownership of products, technology and intellectual property (“IP”) resulting from such collaborations; (iv) licenses under each party’s respective IP; and (v) strategies for commercialization of products and/or technology developed under the agreement.

 

117


Table of Contents

Pursuant to the JDA, each party has sole ownership rights for any R&D work product and related IP developed under the agreement (“Technology”) for their respective product categories and/or technology fields (as defined in the JDA). For Technology that relates to product categories and/or technology fields of both Hexion and us (“Hybrid Technology”), a steering committee made up of three representatives of each party shall determine which party shall be granted ownership rights, subject to certain exceptions. In the event that the steering committee is unable to reach a decision, the Hybrid Technology shall be jointly owned by the parties. In addition, under the terms of the JDA, each party grants to the other party a non-exclusive royalty-bearing (subject to certain exceptions) license for the Technology or the Hybrid Technology. The royalty shall be determined by the respective representatives of the parties through the steering committee in arm’s-length good faith negotiations. The parties also grant royalty-free licenses to each other with respect to their IP for R&D, including for initiatives outside the scope of the JDA. The JDA has a term of 20 years, subject to early termination pursuant to its terms for cause or for a change of control.

In conjunction with the consummation of the Plan of Reorganization, the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations.

Purchases and Sales of Products and Services with Hexion

We also sell products to, and purchases products from, Hexion pursuant to a Master Buy/Sell Agreement dated as of September 6, 2012 (the “Master Buy/Sell Agreement”). Prices under the agreement are determined by a formula based upon certain third party sales of the applicable product, or in the event that no qualifying third party sales have taken place, based upon the average contribution margin generated by certain third party sales of products in the same or a similar industry. The standard terms and conditions of the seller in the applicable jurisdiction apply to transactions under the Master Buy/Sell Agreement. The Master Buy/Sell Agreement has an initial term of 3 years and may be terminated for convenience by either party thereunder upon 30 days’ prior notice. A subsidiary of ours also acted as a non-exclusive distributor in India for certain subsidiaries of Hexion pursuant to Distribution Agreements dated as of September 6, 2012 (the “Distribution Agreements”). Prices under the Distribution Agreements were determined by a formula based on the weighted average sales price of the applicable product less a margin. The Distribution Agreements had initial terms of three years and were terminated by mutual agreement on March 9, 2015. Pursuant to these agreements and other purchase orders, during both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company sold $2 million of products to Hexion and purchased less than $1 million. The Company sold $8 million, $9 million and $3 million of products to Hexion during 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and purchased less than $1 million of products from Hexion in each year.

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had less than $1 million and $2 million, respectively, of accounts receivable from Hexion and less than $1 million of accounts payable to Hexion and as of December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, we had $2 million of accounts receivable from Hexion, $1 million and less than $1 million, respectively, of accounts receivable from, and less than $1 million, in each year, of accounts payable to Hexion related to these agreements.

Other Transactions with Hexion

In March 2014, we entered into a ground lease with a Brazilian subsidiary of Hexion to lease a portion of our manufacturing site in Itatiba, Brazil, where the subsidiary of Hexion will construct and operate an epoxy production facility. In conjunction with the ground lease, we also entered into a site services agreement whereby it provides to the subsidiary of Hexion various services such as environmental, health and safety, security, maintenance and accounting, amongst others, to support the operation of this new facility. We received less than $1 million from Hexion under this agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and during the year ended December 31, 2014. No amounts were transacted under these agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

 

118


Table of Contents

In April 2014, we sold 100% of its interest in our Canadian subsidiary to a subsidiary of Hexion for a purchase price of $12 million. As a part of the transaction we also entered into a non-exclusive distribution agreement with a subsidiary of Hexion, whereby the subsidiary of Hexion will act as a distributor of certain of our products in Canada. The agreement has a term of 10 years, and is cancelable by either party with 180 days’ notice. We compensate the subsidiary of Hexion for acting as distributor at a rate of 2% of the net selling price of the related products sold. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company sold approximately $7 million of products to Hexion under this distribution agreement, and paid less than $1 to Hexion as compensation for acting as distributor of the products. During 2014, we sold approximately $29 million of products to Hexion under this distribution agreement, and paid less than $1 million to Hexion as compensation for acting as distributor of the products. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had $3 million and $2 million, respectively, of accounts receivable from Hexion related to the distribution agreement and as of December 31, 2014, we had $2 million of accounts receivable from Hexion related to this distribution agreement.

Purchases and Sales of Products and Services with Affiliates other than Hexion

The Company sells products to various affiliates other than Hexion. These sales were less than $1 million and $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $11 million, $9 million and $16 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. We had accounts receivable from these affiliates of less than $1 million and $1 million at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and $1 million, $1 million and $5 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

The Company also purchases products and services from various affiliates other than Hexion. These purchases were $1 million and $3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively, and $13 million, $19 million and $17 million for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company had accounts payable to these affiliates of less than $1 million as of March 31, 2015 and less than $1 million, $2 million and less than $1 million at December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Transactions with GE and its Affiliates

ASM Off-Take Agreement

Through May 17, 2013, we were a party to an (i) off-take agreement (the “Old Off-Take Agreement”) with Asia Silicones Monomer Limited (“ASM”), which was 50% owned by GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte Ltd. up until such date, and (ii) a long-term supply agreement with GE and GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte. Ltd. (the “Old GE Supply Agreement”), which was entered into at the closing of the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. Under the Old Off-Take Agreement, ASM was obligated to provide siloxane and certain related products to us through 2014 (or until certain ASM financing obligations were satisfied). Under the Old GE Supply Agreement, GE and GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte. Ltd. agreed to ensure us a minimum annual supply of siloxane and certain related products from ASM or an alternative source in certain circumstances through December 2026. Under the Old Off-Take Agreement, we purchased approximately $35 million, $92 million and $109 million of siloxane and certain related products from ASM for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively. Subsequent to May 17, 2013, the Company continues to purchase siloxane and certain related products from ASM under a new agreement whereby ASM is not a considered a related party.

At the closing of the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition, GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte. Ltd. also assigned its interest as licensor under a certain Technology License Agreement with ASM to us, which assumed all of the obligations of GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte. Ltd. under such agreement. Pursuant to the Technology License Agreement, which was to terminate in 2039, we received royalties from ASM of approximately $2 million in each of 2012 and 2011 and less than $1 million in 2013.

On May 17, 2013, we entered into a new purchase and sale agreement (the “PSA”) with ASM in connection with the sale (the “GE ASM Sale”) by GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte Ltd., an affiliate of the General Electric Company (“GE”) of its equity interests in ASM. As a result of the GE ASM Sale, ASM is no longer an affiliate

 

119


Table of Contents

of us. The new PSA provides us with a long-term supply of siloxane through 2026 and the option to extend such agreement through 2036. The PSA replaced and superseded the Old Off-Take Agreement and the Old GE Supply Agreement. In connection with the foregoing transactions, Old MPM Holdings received a one-time payment of approximately $102 million from GE, which amount was subsequently contributed to MPM.

Trademark License Agreement

On May 17, 2013, we entered into an amendment to the Trademark License Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2006, by and between GE Monogram Licensing International and us, to, among other things, revise the royalty payable to GE Monogram Licensing International and provide for an option to extend such agreement for an additional five-year period through 2023. In connection with the amendment, Old MPM Holdings recorded a gain and related intangible asset of $7 million. The intangible asset was subsequently contributed to MPM. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, on October 24, 2014, the intangible asset related to the agreement was written-off.

Intellectual Property Cross License Agreement

We and GE are parties to an intellectual property cross-licensing agreement to ensure that the MPM Group owns or has the right to use all intellectual property necessary to conduct its business as was conducted at the time of the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. The agreement provides for four different categories of ownership and licensing terms (including the scope, duration and exclusivity of the license) based on the use of the intellectual property by the MPM Group or by GE prior to closing of the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. All licenses of intellectual property by GE to the MPM Group or by the MPM Group to GE are perpetual and royalty-free.

Revolving Credit Facility

In April 2013, we entered into a $75 million revolving credit facility with an affiliate of GE (the “Cash Flow Facility”). Prior to entry into the Cash Flow Facility, an affiliate of GE was one of the lenders under our old revolving credit facility, representing approximately $160 million of the lenders’ $300 million revolving credit facility commitment. In connection with the Emergence, the Company repaid in full all outstanding amounts under the Cash Flow Facility. Upon making these payments, the Company’s obligations under the Cash Flow Facility were satisfied in full and the Cash Flow Facility was immediately terminated.

Participation of Apollo Global Securities in Refinancing Transactions

In 2012, Apollo Global Securities, LLC (“AGS”), an affiliate of Apollo, acted as one of the initial purchasers and received less than $1 million and approximately $1 million in connection with the sales of the Old Secured Notes and the Old First Lien Notes, respectively. AGS also received less than $1 million in connection with arranging the issuance of the Old Secured Notes and approximately $1 million in connection with arranging the issuance of the Old First Lien Notes and the commitments for the Old ABL Facility.

Other Transactions and Arrangements

Prior to June 30, 2014, Hexion Holdings (MPM’s ultimate parent prior to October 24, 2014) purchased insurance policies which also covered us and Hexion. Amounts were billed to us annually based on its relative share of the insurance premiums and amortized over the term of the policy. There were no billings to us for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Hexion Holdings billed MPM $9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013. We had accounts payable to Hexion Holdings of approximately $3 million under these arrangements at December 31, 2013.

In April 2014, we entered into an accounts receivable purchase and sale agreement with Superholdco Finance Corp. (“Finco”) a newly formed subsidiary of Hexion Holdings. The agreement contains customary

 

120


Table of Contents

terms and conditions associated with such arrangements. On April 7, 2014, under this agreement, we sold approximately $51 million of accounts receivable to Finco, and received 95% of the proceeds in cash, with the remaining 5% to be received in cash when the sold receivables were fully collected by Finco. The agreement also appointed the Company to act as the servicer of the receivables on behalf of Finco.

In March 2014, we entered into an Employee Services Agreement with Hexion Holdings, Hexion and Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Employee Corporation (“Employee Corp”), a subsidiary of Hexion Holdings (the “Services Agreement”). The Services Agreement provided for the executive services of Mr. John G. Boss, an employee of Employee Corp., to be made available to us and set forth the terms with respect to payment for the cost of such services. Mr. Boss was elected Executive Vice President and President Silicones and Quartz Division effective March 31, 2014. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, we agreed to pay 100% of Mr. Boss’ costs of employment which are comprised of “covered costs” including an annual base salary of $585,000, a sign-on bonus of $1.3 million payable between 2014 and 2015, annual incentive compensation, relocation costs, severance and benefits and other standard reasonable business expenses.

In December 2014, Mr. Boss was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, In connection with the appointment, MPM Holdings assumed from Hexion Holdings the terms of the accepted offer of employment with Mr. Boss. We paid less than $1 million under this agreement during the year ended December 31, 2014.

In April 2015, we issued 39,594 shares of our common stock to certain of our directors, Messrs. Bradley J. Bell, John D. Dionne and Julian Markby, for aggregate proceeds of $0.8 million.

Review, Approval or Ratification of Transactions with Related Persons

Our Audit Committee Charter requires that the Audit Committee review and approve all transactions between related persons required to be reported under the provisions of Item 404 of Regulation S-K under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act.

The types of transactions that are covered by the policy include all transactions required to be so reported, including financial and other transactions, arrangements or relationships in which we or any of its subsidiaries is a participant and in which a related person has a direct or indirect material interest, where the amount involved exceeds $120,000. There were no transactions required to be reported under the provisions of Item 404 of Regulation S-K since the beginning of the last year where the above procedures did not require review, approval or ratification or where such procedures were not followed.

Related persons include directors and director nominees, executive officers, stockholders beneficially owning more than 5% of our voting stock, and immediate family members of any of the previously described persons. A related person could also be an entity in which a director, executive officer or 5% stockholder is an employee, general partner or 5% stockholder.

Our Certificate of Incorporation also requires that any transaction between the Company and any stockholder or affiliate thereof be approved by a majority of the directors who are not appointed by and are not otherwise affiliated with the related party, subject to certain exceptions including for transactions that involve payments or value equal to or less than $1,750,000.

Director Independence

We have no securities listed for trading on a national securities exchange or in an automated inter-dealer quotation system of a national securities association, which has requirements that a majority of our Board of Directors be independent. For purposes of complying with the disclosure requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission, we have adopted the definition of independence used by the New York Stock Exchange. Under the New York Stock Exchange’s definition of independence, Messrs. Bell, Dionne and Markby are independent.

 

121


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF INDEBTEDNESS

The Company has the following secured indebtedness outstanding:

 

   

the ABL Facility;

 

   

the First Lien Notes; and

 

   

the Second Lien Notes.

Each of the foregoing are secured by separate collateral agreements with substantially identical terms and covering substantially identical collateral except with respect to foreign collateral, which is only pledged in favor of the lenders under the ABL Facility.

ABL Facility

Upon emergence from the Chapter 11 proceedings, the debtor-in-possession and exit senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility converted into an exit senior secured asset-based revolving credit facility (the “ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility provides borrowing availability equal to the lesser of (a) $270 million and (b) the borrowing base described below. The commitments under the ABL Facility consist of a $200 million last-in, first-out tranche (the “Tranche A Commitments”) and a $70 million first-in, last-out tranche (the “Tranche B Commitments”). The ABL Facility has a five-year term.

In addition, we may request one or more incremental revolving commitments under the ABL Facility in an aggregate principal amount up to the greater of (a) $80 million and (b) the excess of the borrowing base over the amount of the then-effective commitments under the ABL Facility at the time of such increase (to the extent we can identify lenders willing to make such an increase available to us).

The borrowing base for the Tranche A Commitments is, at any time of determination, an amount (net of reserves) equal to the sum of:

 

   

85% of the amount of eligible accounts receivable (including trade receivables), plus

 

   

the lesser of (i) 70% of the amount of eligible inventory and (ii) 85% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory.

The borrowing base for the Tranche B Commitments is, at any time of determination, an amount (net of reserves) equal to the sum of:

 

   

5% of the amount of eligible accounts receivable (including trade receivables), plus

 

   

the lesser of (i) 5% of the amount of eligible inventory and (ii) 5% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible inventory, plus

 

   

in the case of the borrowing base for our German subsidiaries and our Canadian subsidiary, the lesser of (i) 80% of the net orderly liquidation value of eligible machinery and equipment located in Canada, the United Kingdom, Germany and the Netherlands and (ii) $50 million.

The ABL Facility includes borrowing capacity available for letters of credit and for borrowings on same-day notice, referred to as swingline loans.

We may voluntarily repay outstanding loans under the ABL Facility at any time without premium or penalty, other than customary “breakage” costs with respect to eurocurrency loans.

The borrowings under the ABL Facility bear interest at a rate equal to an applicable margin (subject to adjustment based on average availability) plus, as determined at our option, either (a) a base rate (the “ABR

 

122


Table of Contents

Rate”) determined by reference to the highest of (1) the U.S. federal funds rate plus 0.50%, (2) the prime rate of the administrative agent or one of its affiliates, and (3) the adjusted LIBOR rate for a one-month interest period plus 1.0%, and (b) a eurocurrency rate (“LIBOR”) determined by reference to the costs of funds for eurocurrency deposits in dollars in the London interbank market for the interest period relevant to such borrowing adjusted for certain additional costs, with Canadian-equivalent options in the case of borrowings by our Canadian subsidiary.

The initial applicable margin for LIBOR rate borrowings under the ABL Facility was 2.00% for Tranche A Commitments and 2.75% for Tranche B Commitments. The initial applicable margin for ABR Rate borrowings under the ABL Facility was 1.00% for Tranche A Commitments and 1.75% for Tranche B Commitments. The foregoing applicable margins are adjusted depending on the availability under the ABL Facility. Following and during the continuance of an event of default, overdue amounts owing under our ABL Facility will bear interest at a rate per annum equal to the rate otherwise applicable thereto plus an additional 2.0%.

In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the ABL Facility, are required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders in respect of the unutilized commitments thereunder at an initial rate equal to 0.375% per annum, which could be adjusted to 0.25% per annum depending on the usage. We also pay a customary letter of credit fee, including a fronting fee of 0.125% per annum of the stated amount of each outstanding letter of credit, and customary agency fees.

Our ABL Facility contains customary covenants that, among other things, restrict, subject to certain exceptions, our ability, and the ability of our subsidiaries, to incur indebtedness, sell assets, make investments, engage in acquisitions, mergers or consolidations and make dividends or other restricted payments. Our ABL Facility also contains certain customary affirmative covenants and events of default. The negative covenants in the ABL Facility include, among other things, limitations (none of which are absolute) on our ability to:

 

   

sell assets;

 

   

incur additional indebtedness;

 

   

repay other indebtedness;

 

   

pay dividends and distributions or repurchase our capital stock;

 

   

create liens on assets;

 

   

make investments, loans, guarantees or advances;

 

   

make certain acquisitions;

 

   

engage in mergers or consolidations;

 

   

enter into sale leaseback transactions;

 

   

engage in certain transactions with affiliates;

 

   

amend certain material agreements governing our indebtedness;

 

   

amend our organizational documents; and

 

   

change the business conducted by us and our subsidiaries.

In addition, the ABL Facility requires us to maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio at any time when the average availability is less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of (i) the borrowing base at such time and (ii) the aggregate amount of ABL Facility commitments at such time, and (b) $27 million. In that event (the “Availability Triggering Event”), we must satisfy a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0. For purposes of determining compliance with the fixed charge coverage ratio maintenance covenant for any applicable fiscal quarter, we may exercise an equity cure by issuing certain permitted securities for cash or otherwise receive cash contributions that will, upon the receipt of such cash by us, be included in the calculation of EBITDA. We expect that, on a pro forma basis giving effect to the Emergence, the fixed charge coverage ratio will not be in effect.

 

123


Table of Contents

The events of default under our ABL Facility include, without limitation, nonpayment, misrepresentations, breach of covenants, insolvency, bankruptcy, certain judgments, change of control (as defined in our ABL Facility) and cross-defaults.

All obligations under the ABL Facility are unconditionally guaranteed by MPM’s parent, MPM, and, subject to certain exceptions, each of MPM’s existing and future direct and indirect U.S. subsidiaries, which we refer to collectively as “U.S. Guarantors.” In addition, all obligations of MPM GmbH, MPM Quartz and MPM Canada under the ABL Facility are guaranteed by MPM USA, the U.S. Guarantors, and certain other direct and indirect foreign subsidiaries of the Company, which we collectively refer to as the “Foreign Guarantors.” The obligations of MPM USA under the ABL Facility and any hedging arrangements and cash management services and the guarantees in respect of those obligations are secured by substantially all of the assets and stock (but in the case of non-U.S. subsidiaries, limited to 65% of the voting equity of such subsidiaries) owned by MPM USA and the U.S. Guarantors, other than the intercompany note issued to the Company by Japan Acquisition Co. and subject to certain other exceptions. The obligations of MPM GmbH, MPM Quartz and MPM Canada under the ABL Facility and any hedging arrangements and cash management services and the guarantees in respect of those obligations are secured by substantially all of the assets and stock owned by MPM USA and the U.S. Guarantors and by the receivables, inventory and other current assets, and the equipment and machinery (and proceeds thereof) of MPM GmbH, MPM Quartz, MPM Canada and certain of the Foreign Guarantors, subject to certain exceptions. Such security interest will consist, (1) with respect to the assets of MPM USA and the U.S. Guarantors constituting collateral, of a first-priority security interest with respect to the ABL priority collateral (with the First Lien Notes (as defined below) secured by second-priority security interests therein) and a second-priority security interest with respect to the non-ABL priority collateral (with the First Lien Notes (as defined below) secured by first-priority security interests therein) and (2) of a first-priority lien with respect to the assets of MPM GmbH, MPM Quartz, MPM Canada and the Foreign Guarantors constituting collateral.

First Lien Notes

General

The 3.88% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “First Lien Notes”) consist of $1,100 million original aggregate principal amount.

Rankings

The First Lien Notes rank equally in right of payment to all of MPM’s existing and future senior indebtedness and rank senior in right of payment to all of MPM’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The First Lien Notes rank effectively junior in priority to MPM’s obligations under the ABL Facility to the extent of the value of the ABL Priority Collateral (which generally includes most of the Registrant’s and its domestic subsidiaries’ inventory and accounts receivable and related assets); equal with holders of other obligations secured pari passu with the First Lien Notes including other first priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral); effectively senior to any junior priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral) including the Second Lien Notes and MPM’s obligations under the ABL Facility to the extent of the value of the collateral that is not ABL Priority Collateral; and effectively senior to any senior unsecured obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral).

Optional Redemption

The First Lien Notes may be redeemed at the applicable redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Mandatory Redemption

The Company is not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the First Lien Notes.

 

124


Table of Contents

Change in Control

In the event of a Change in Control (as defined in the applicable indenture), a holder has the right to require MPM to buy such holder’s First Lien Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Covenants

Under the terms of the indenture governing the First Lien Notes, MPM is subject to covenants that, among other things, limit MPM’s ability and the ability of certain of MPM’s subsidiaries to (i) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; (ii) grant liens on assets; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions to MPM’s stockholders; (iv) repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; (v) make investments or acquisitions; (vi) incur restrictions on the ability of MPM’s subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make other payments to us; (vii) enter into transactions with MPM’s affiliates; (viii) merge or consolidate with other companies or transfer all or substantially all of MPM’s assets; and (ix) transfer or sell assets.

Events of Default

The First Lien Notes specify events of default including failure to pay principal and interest on the First Lien Notes, subject to a 30-day grace period, a failure to comply with covenants, subject to a 60-day grace period in certain instances, and certain bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization events with respect to us.

Second Lien Notes

General

The 4.69% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “Second Lien Notes”) consist of $250 million original aggregate principal amount.

Rankings

The Second Lien Notes rank equally in right of payment to all of MPM’s existing and future senior indebtedness and rank senior in right of payment to all of MPM’s existing and future subordinated indebtedness. The Second Lien Notes rank junior in priority as to collateral with respect to the First Lien Notes and the ABL Facility and holders of certain other obligations secured pari passu with other first-priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral) and senior in priority as to collateral with respect to all of MPM’s existing and future obligations secured by a junior lien on the collateral.

Optional Redemption

The Second Lien Notes may be redeemed at the applicable redemption price, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

Mandatory Redemption

The Company is not required to make mandatory redemption or sinking fund payments with respect to the Second Lien Notes.

Change of Control

In the event of a Change in Control (as defined below), a holder has the right to require MPM to buy such holder’s Second Lien Notes at 100% of their principal amount, plus accrued and unpaid interest.

 

125


Table of Contents

A “Change of Control” shall be deemed to have occurred: upon MPM becoming aware of the acquisition by any person or group, other than any of the permitted holders, by way of merger, consolidation or other business combination or purchase of beneficial ownership of more than 50% of the total voting power of the voting stock of MPM; or upon the sale, lease or transfer of substantially all of the assets of MPM and its subsidiaries, taken as a whole, to any person other than any of the permitted holders.

Covenants

Under the terms of the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes, MPM is subject to covenants that, among other things, restrict its ability to create liens on its assets, incur debt, incur debt at its subsidiaries, pay dividends, issue disqualified and preferred stock or enter into sale leaseback transactions.

Events of Default

The Second Lien Notes specify events of default including failure to pay principal and interest on the Second Lien Notes, a failure to comply with covenants, subject to a 30-day grace period in certain instances, and certain bankruptcy, insolvency or reorganization events with respect to us.

 

126


Table of Contents

DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STOCK

Capital Stock

Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation (the Certificate of Incorporation) has an authorized capital stock consisting of 70,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.01 per share. As of April 30, 2015, we had 48,028,594 shares of common stock outstanding. Summarized below are material provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and amended and restated bylaws, as well as relevant sections of the Delaware General Corporation Law (the “DGCL”). The following summary is qualified in its entirety by the provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and amended and restated bylaws (the Bylaws), copies of which have been filed as exhibits to the registration statement of which this prospectus is a part, and by the applicable provisions of the DGCL.

Common stock

The holders of our common stock are entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of stockholders, including the election of directors. Holders of the common stock do not have cumulative voting rights, which means that the holders of a majority of the outstanding common stock voting for the election of directors can elect all directors then being elected. The holders of our common stock are entitled to receive dividends when, as, and if declared by our board of directors out of legally available funds. Upon our liquidation or dissolution, the holders of common stock will be entitled to share ratably in those of our assets that are legally available for distribution to stockholders after payment of liabilities.

The holders of our common stock that beneficially own more than 2.5% of the outstanding shares of common stock have pre-emptive rights (“Preemptive Rightsholders”) until the earlier of the listing of the common stock on a national securities exchange (a “Listing”) or the consummation of the first public offering and sale of common stock (an “IPO”). Preemptive Rightsholders have the right to elect to purchase their pro rata portion of the number of shares of common stock to be issued by the Company in a proposed transaction at the same price and on the same terms and conditions as in such transaction, subject to certain exceptions including common stock issued pursuant to (i) equity-based compensation or incentive plans approved by the Board, (ii) stock splits, payments of dividends or other similar transactions approved by the Board, (iii) consideration in any business combination, consolidation, merger or acquisition transaction or joint venture, (iv) as a bona fide equity kicker in connection with incurring indebtedness, subject to certain exceptions, and (v) to the Company or a direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

Corporate Opportunity

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that the doctrine of “corporate opportunity” will not apply with respect to Apollo, the Ad Hoc Group (as defined in the Certificate of Incorporation) and their respective affiliates in a manner that would prohibit them from investing in, or having a relationship with, a competing businesses or pursuing business opportunities that are ones that the Company might reasonably be deemed to have pursued.

Certain Certificate of Incorporation, Bylaw and Statutory Provisions

The provisions of our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws and of the DGCL summarized below may have an anti-takeover effect and may delay, deter or prevent a tender offer or takeover attempt that you might consider in your best interest, including an attempt that might result in your receipt of a premium over the market price for your shares.

Directors’ Liability; Indemnification of Directors and Officers

Section 145 of the DGCL authorizes a court to award, or a corporation’s board of directors to grant, indemnity to directors and officers in terms sufficiently broad to permit such indemnification under certain circumstances for liabilities, including reimbursements for expenses incurred arising under the Securities Act.

 

127


Table of Contents

Our Certificate of Incorporation limits the liability of our officers and directors to the maximum extent permitted by Delaware law. Delaware law provides that directors will not be personally liable for monetary damages for breach of their fiduciary duties as directors, except liability for:

 

   

any breach of the duty of loyalty to the corporation or its stockholders;

 

   

acts or omissions not in good faith or which involve intentional misconduct or knowing violations of law;

 

   

unlawful payments of dividends or unlawful stock repurchases or redemptions; or

 

   

any transaction from which the director derived an improper personal benefit.

The effect of this provision is to eliminate our rights, and our stockholders’ rights, to recover monetary damages against a director for breach of a fiduciary duty of care as a director. This provision does not limit or eliminate our rights or those of any stockholder to seek non-monetary relief such as an injunction or rescission in the event of a breach of a director’s duty of care. The provisions will not alter the liability of directors under federal securities laws. Our Certificate of Incorporation also requires us to advance expenses, including attorneys’ fees, to our directors and officers in connection with legal proceedings, subject to very limited exceptions.

Any amendment to or repeal of these provisions will not adversely affect any right or protection of our directors in respect of any act or failure to act that occurred prior to any amendment to or repeal of such provisions or the adoption of an inconsistent provision. If the DGCL is amended to provide further limitation on the personal liability of directors of corporations, then the personal liability of our directors will be further limited to the greatest extent permitted by the DGCL. In addition, we intend to enter into separate indemnification arrangements with each of our directors. We also maintain director and officer liability insurance.

Special Meetings of Stockholders

Our Bylaws provide that special meetings of stockholders may be called only by the chairperson of our board of directors, the president or secretary of the Company, or at the request of holders of at least 33% of our outstanding common stock. Except as described above, stockholders will not be permitted to call a special meeting of stockholders, to require that the chairman call such a special meeting, or to require that the president or secretary request the calling of a special meeting of stockholders. These provisions, taken together, will prevent stockholders from forcing consideration by the stockholders of stockholder proposals over the opposition of the board, except at an annual meeting or under the circumstances described above.

Stockholder Action

Our Bylaws provide that prior to a Listing or an IPO, stockholders may take action by written consent if the consent is signed by holders of our outstanding shares having the number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote thereon were present. Following the earlier of a Listing or an IPO, stockholders may take action by written consent only if the written consent is signed by all holders of outstanding stock of the Company.

Directors

Our board of directors currently has eleven members. Each of our directors will serve an initial term of the earlier to occur of (i) October 24, 2016 and (ii) the date of a Listing or an IPO (the “First Election”). Prior to the First Election, no the size of the board of directors will consist of no less than nine members and no more than eleven members, and no director may be removed, with or without cause, without the affirmative vote of the holders of ninety percent (90%) of the then outstanding shares of common stock. After the First Election, the number of directors may be changed by a resolution of a majority of the board of directors. Our board of directors may elect a director to fill a vacancy, including vacancies created by the expansion of the board of directors, upon the affirmative vote of a majority of the remaining directors then in office.

 

128


Table of Contents

Our Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws provide that directors will be elected by a plurality of the votes, but do not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Business Combinations

Interested Stockholders

In general, section 203 of the DGCL prevents an interested stockholder (which is defined generally as a person owning 15% or more of the corporation’s outstanding voting stock) of a Delaware corporation from engaging in a business combination (as defined therein) for three years following the date that person became an interested stockholder unless various conditions are satisfied. We have elected to opt out of the provisions of section 203. Accordingly, we will not be subject to the anti-takeover effects of section 203.

Chief Executive Officer Review

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that the Company will not be party to a business combination transaction until such time as a Chief Executive Officer that has been appointed other than on an interim or temporary basis (as determined by a majority of the directors who were not appointed by and are not otherwise affiliated with Apollo or the Ad Hoc Group) has reviewed the proposed terms and conditions of such transaction.

Forum for Adjudication of Disputes

Our Certificate of Incorporation provides that unless the Company consents in writing to the selection of an alternative forum, the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware will be the sole and exclusive forum for any derivative action or proceeding brought on behalf of the Company, any action asserting breach of a fiduciary duty owed by any director, officer or other employee of the Company, any action asserting a claim arising pursuant to the DGCL or any action asserting a claim governed by the internal affairs doctrine. Although we have included a choice of forum provision in our Bylaws, it is possible that a court could rule that such provision is inapplicable or unenforceable. In addition, this provision would not affect the ability of our stockholders to seek remedies under the federal securities laws.

Amendment of the Certificate of Incorporation and Bylaws

Our Certificate of Incorporation may be amended in accordance with the provisions of the DGCL, which requires a majority of the outstanding stock of our common stock to vote in favor of an amendment, except that (i) the provisions relating to preemptive rights, the number of term of directors and the chief executive officer may not be altered, amended or repealed until the earlier of the occurrence of a Listing and an IPO and (ii) the provisions relating to affiliate transactions may not be altered, amended or repealed without the affirmative vote of the holders of all the then outstanding shares of common stock (other than in connection with a Listing or an IPO) and the approval of both a majority of directors not affiliated with Apollo and the holders of a majority of the then outstanding shares of common stock, disregarding for purposes of such calculation any shares of common stock beneficially owned by Apollo or any of its affiliates.

In addition, the board of directors is permitted to alter our Bylaws without obtaining stockholder approval. Stockholders may only alter our Bylaws with the affirmative vote of at least a majority of the then outstanding shares of common stock.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

The transfer agent and registrar for our common stock is Wells Fargo Bank, National Association.

National Securities Exchange Listing

Our common stock is not listed on any national securities exchange and there can be no assurance that our common stock will achieve a listing on a national securities exchange.

 

129


Table of Contents

PLAN OF DISTRIBUTION

We are registering common stock covered by this prospectus to permit the selling stockholders to conduct public secondary trading of these shares from time to time after the date of this prospectus. We will not receive any of the proceeds of the sale of the common stock offered by this prospectus. The aggregate proceeds to the selling stockholders from the sale of the common stock will be the purchase price of the common stock less any discounts and commissions. We have agreed to pay certain expenses of the selling stockholders incurred in connection with the sale of common stock from time to time pursuant to this prospectus, but will not pay any underwriters’ discounts or commissions.

Each selling stockholder reserves the right to accept and, together with its agents, to reject, any proposed purchases of common stock to be made directly or through agents. If any pledgee, donee, transferee or other successor to the selling stockholders named in this prospectus wishes to sell under this prospectus, we will file a prospectus supplement identifying such successors as selling stockholders.

The shares of common stock offered by this prospectus may be sold from time to time to purchasers:

 

   

directly by the selling stockholders and their successors, which includes their donees, pledgees or transferees or their successors-in-interest; or

 

   

through underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, who may receive compensation in the form of discounts, commissions or agent’s commissions from the selling stockholders or the purchasers of the common stock. These discounts, concessions, or commissions may be in excess of those customary in the types of transaction involved.

These sales may be effected in one or more transactions:

 

   

on any national securities exchange or quotation service on which our common stock may be listed or quoted at the time of sale;

 

   

in the over-the-counter market;

 

   

in transactions otherwise than in the over-the-counter market;

 

   

through the writing of options (including the issuance by the selling stockholders of derivative securities), whether the options or such other derivative securities are listed on an options exchange or otherwise;

 

   

through the settlement of short sales; or

 

   

through any combination of the foregoing.

These transactions may include block transactions or crosses. Crosses are transactions in which the same broker acts as an agent on both sides of the trade. In connection with the sales of our common stock, the selling stockholders may enter into hedging transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions that, in turn, may:

 

   

engage in short sales of the common stock in the course of hedging their positions;

 

   

sell the common stock short and deliver the common stock to close out short positions;

 

   

loan or pledge the common stock to broker-dealers or other financial institutions that in turn may sell the common stock;

 

   

enter into option or other transactions with broker-dealers or other financial institutions that require the delivery to the broker-dealer or other financial institution of the common stock, which the broker-dealer or other financial institution may resell; or

 

   

enter into transactions in which a broker-dealer makes purchases as a principal for resale for its own account or through other types of transactions.

 

130


Table of Contents

A short sale of common stock by a broker-dealer, financial institution or selling stockholder would involve the sale of such common stock that is not owned, and therefore must be borrowed, in order to make delivery of the security in connection with such sale. In connection with a short sale of common stock, a broker-dealer, financial institution or selling stockholder may purchase shares on the open market to cover positions created by short sales. In determining the source of the common stock to close out such short positions, the broker-dealer, financial institution or selling stockholders may consider, among other things, the price of shares available for purchase in the open market.

At the time a particular offering of the shares is made, a prospectus supplement, if required, will be distributed, which will set forth the names of the selling stockholders, the aggregate amount of shares being offered and the terms of the offering, including, to the extent required, (1) the name or names of any underwriters, broker-dealers or agents, (2) any discounts, commissions and other terms constituting compensation from the selling stockholders and (3) any discounts, commissions or concessions allowed or reallowed to be paid to broker-dealers.

Pursuant to a requirement by FINRA, the maximum commission or discount to be received by any FINRA member or independent broker-dealer may not be greater than 8% of the gross proceeds received by the selling stockholders for the sale of any common stock being offered by this prospectus.

There can be no assurance that any selling stockholder will sell any or all of the common stock under this prospectus. Further, we cannot assure you that any such selling stockholder will not transfer, devise or gift the common stock by other means not described in this prospectus. In addition, any common stock covered by this prospectus that qualifies for sale under Rule 144 or Rule 144A of the Securities Act may be sold under Rule 144 or Rule 144A rather than under this prospectus. The Common Stock Covered by this Prospectus may also be sold to non-U.S. persons outside the U.S. in accordance with Regulation S under the Securities Act rather than under this Prospectus. The common stock may be sold in some states only through registered or licensed brokers or dealers. In addition, in some states the common stock may not be sold unless it has been registered or qualified for sale or an exemption from registration or qualification is available and complied with.

The selling stockholders and any other person participating in the sale of the common stock will be subject to the Exchange Act. The Exchange Act rules include, without limitation, Regulation M, which may limit the timing of purchases and sales of any of the common stock by the selling stockholders and any other person. In addition, Regulation M may restrict the ability of any person engaged in the distribution of the common stock to engage in market-making activities with respect to the particular common stock being distributed. This may affect the marketability of the common stock and the ability of any person or entity to engage in market-making activities with respect to the common stock.

In the Registration Rights Agreement, we have agreed to indemnify or provide contribution to the selling stockholders against certain liabilities, including certain liabilities under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act. In addition, we have agreed to pay substantially all of the expenses incidental to the registration of the common stock, including the payment of federal securities law and state “blue sky” registration fees excluding underwriting discounts and commissions relating to the sale of common stock.

 

131


Table of Contents

CERTAIN U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

The following is a discussion of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common stock by beneficial owners of our common stock that acquire common stock pursuant to this offering and that hold such shares as capital assets (generally, for investment). This discussion is not a complete analysis or listing of all of the possible tax consequences of such transactions and does not address all tax considerations that might be relevant to particular stockholders in light of their personal circumstances or to persons that are subject to special tax rules. In addition, this description of the material U.S. federal income tax consequences does not address the tax treatment of special classes of stockholders, such as:

 

   

financial institutions

 

   

regulated investment companies

 

   

real estate investment trusts

 

   

tax-exempt entities

 

   

insurance companies

 

   

persons holding the shares as part of a hedging, integrated or conversion transaction, constructive sale or “straddle,”

 

   

persons who acquired common stock through the exercise or cancellation of employee stock options or otherwise as compensation for their services

 

   

U.S. expatriates

 

   

persons subject to the alternative minimum tax

 

   

dealers or traders in securities or currencies

 

   

holders whose functional currency is not the U.S. dollar.

This summary does not address estate and gift tax consequences (except to the extent specifically provided herein) or tax consequences under any state, local or foreign laws.

For purposes of this section, you are a “U.S. Holder” if you are: (1) an individual citizen of the United States or a resident alien of the United States; (2) a corporation (or other entity treated as a corporation for U.S. federal income tax purposes) created or organized under the laws of the United States or any state thereof or the District of Columbia; (3) an estate the income of which is subject to U.S. federal income taxation regardless of its source; or (4) a trust (A) if a court within the United States is able to exercise primary supervision over its administration and one or more U.S. persons have authority to control all substantial decisions of the trust or (B) that has a valid election in effect under applicable Treasury regulations to be treated as a U.S. person.

If you are an individual, you may be treated as a resident alien of the United States, as opposed to a non-resident alien, for U.S. federal income tax purposes if you are present in the United States for at least 31 days in a calendar year and for an aggregate of at least 183 days during a three-year period ending in such calendar year. For purposes of this calculation, you would count all of the days that you were present in the then-current year, one-third of the days that you were present in the immediately preceding year and one-sixth of the days that you were present in the second preceding year. Resident aliens are subject to United States federal income tax as if they were U.S. citizens, and thus would constitute “U.S. Holders” for purposes of the discussion below. If you are a citizen or tax resident of a country with which the United States has a tax treaty, other rules may apply in determining whether you are a resident alien.

The term “Non-U.S. Holder” means any beneficial owner of common stock that is neither a U.S. Holder nor a partnership (including for this purpose any entity that is treated as a partnership for U.S. federal income tax purposes).

 

132


Table of Contents

If a partnership or other pass-through entity is a beneficial owner of common stock, the tax treatment of a partner or other owner will generally depend upon the status of the partner (or other owner) and the activities of the entity. If you are a partner (or other owner) of a pass-through entity that acquires common stock, you should consult your tax advisor regarding the tax consequences of acquiring, owning and disposing of common stock.

The following discussion is based upon the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), U.S. judicial decisions, administrative pronouncements and existing and proposed Treasury regulations, all as in effect as of the date hereof. All of the preceding authorities are subject to change, possibly with retroactive effect, so as to result in U.S. federal income tax consequences different from those discussed below. We have not requested, and will not request, a ruling from the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (the “IRS”) with respect to any of the U.S. federal income tax consequences described below, and as a result there can be no assurance that the IRS will not disagree with or challenge any of the conclusions we have reached and describe herein.

The following discussion is for general information only and is not intended to be, nor should it be construed to be, legal or tax advice to any holder or prospective holder of common stock and no opinion or representation with respect to the U.S. federal income tax consequences to any such holder or prospective holder is made. Prospective purchasers are urged to consult their tax advisors as to the particular consequences to them under U.S. federal, state and local, and applicable foreign tax laws of the acquisition, ownership and disposition of common stock.

U.S. Holders

The rules discussed in the following paragraphs will apply to your acquisition, ownership and disposition of common stock if you are a U.S. Holder, as defined above.

Distributions

Distributions of cash or property that we pay in respect of our common stock will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles) and will be includible in gross income by you when actually or constructively received in accordance with your regular method of accounting for U.S. federal income tax purposes. Any such dividend will generally be eligible for the dividends received deduction if you are a corporate U.S. Holder that meets the holding period and other requirements for the dividends received deduction. If you are a non-corporate U.S. Holder, dividends received may be eligible for U.S. federal income taxation at the long-term capital gains rates generally applicable to individuals, provided that the applicable holding period and other requirements are met. If the amount of a distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess first will be treated as a tax-free return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our common stock, and thereafter will be treated as capital gain.

Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Stock

You generally will recognize gain or loss upon the taxable sale, exchange or other disposition of common stock in an amount equal to the difference between (i) the amount realized upon the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition and (ii) your adjusted tax basis in the common stock. Generally, such gain or loss will be capital gain or loss and will be long-term capital gain or loss if, on the date of the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition, you have held the common stock for more than one year. Long-term capital gains will be taxed at a maximum rate of 20%. The deductibility of capital losses is subject to limitations under the Code.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding

In general, information reporting will apply to dividends paid to you in respect of common stock and the proceeds received by you from the sale, exchange or other disposition of common stock within the United States

 

133


Table of Contents

unless you are a corporation or other exempt recipient. A backup withholding tax may apply to such payments if you fail to provide a taxpayer identification number or certification of exempt status, or you fail to report in full dividend and interest income.

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules will be allowed as a refund or credit against your U.S. federal income tax liability, provided that you furnish the required information to the IRS.

Non-U.S. Holders

Distributions

Distributions of cash or property that we pay in respect of common stock will constitute dividends for U.S. federal income tax purposes to the extent paid from our current or accumulated earnings and profits (as determined under U.S. federal income tax principles). Except as described below under —Non-U.S. Holders—U.S. Trade or Business Income,” you generally will be subject to U.S. federal withholding tax at a 30% rate, or at a reduced rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty, on any dividends received in respect of our common stock. If the amount of the distribution exceeds our current and accumulated earnings and profits, such excess first will be treated as a return of capital to the extent of your tax basis in our common stock, and thereafter will be treated as capital gain. However, except to the extent that we elect (or the paying agent or other intermediary through which you hold your common stock elects) otherwise, we (or the intermediary) must generally withhold on the entire distribution, in which case you would be entitled to a refund from the IRS for the withholding tax on the portion of the distribution that exceeded our current and accumulated earnings and profits. In order to obtain a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an applicable income tax treaty, you will be required to provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or successor form) certifying your entitlement to benefits under the treaty. If you are eligible for a reduced rate of U.S. federal withholding tax under an income tax treaty, you may obtain a refund or credit of any excess amounts withheld by filing an appropriate claim for a refund with the IRS. You are urged to consult your own tax advisor regarding your possible entitlement to benefits under an income tax treaty.

Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Stock

You generally will not be subject to U.S. federal income or withholding tax in respect of any gain on a sale, exchange or other disposition of common stock unless:

 

   

the gain is U.S. trade or business income, in which case, such gain will be taxed as described in “U.S. Trade or Business Income,” below.

 

   

you are an individual who is present in the United States for 183 or more days in the taxable year of the disposition and certain other conditions are met, in which case you will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at a rate of 30% (or a reduced rate under an applicable tax treaty) on the amount by which certain capital gains allocable to U.S. sources exceed certain capital losses allocable to U.S. sources; or

 

   

we are or have been a “U.S. real property holding corporation” (a “USRPHC”) under section 897 of the Code at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the disposition and your holding period for the common stock, in which case, subject to the exception set forth in the second sentence of the next paragraph, such gain will be subject to U.S. federal income tax in the same manner as U.S. trade or business income.

In general, a corporation is a USRPHC if the fair market value of its “U.S. real property interests” equals or exceeds 50% of the sum of the fair market value of its worldwide real property interests and its other assets used or held for use in a trade or business. In the event that we are determined to be a USRPHC, gain will not be subject to tax as U.S. trade or business income if your holdings (direct and indirect) at all times during the applicable period constituted 5% or less of our common stock, provided that our common stock were regularly

 

134


Table of Contents

traded on an established securities market during such period. We believe that were are not currently, and we do not anticipate becoming in the future, a “U.S. real property holding corporation” for U.S. federal income tax purposes.

U.S. Trade or Business Income

For purposes of this discussion, dividend income and gain on the sale, exchange or other taxable disposition of our common stock will be considered to be “U.S. trade or business income” if (A) such income or gain is (i) effectively connected with your conduct of a trade or business within the United States and (ii) if you are eligible for the benefits of an income tax treaty with the United States, attributable to a permanent establishment (or, if you are an individual, a fixed base) that you maintain in the United States or (B) we are or have been a USRPHC at any time during the shorter of the five-year period ending on the date of the disposition of your interest and your holding period for the common stock (subject to the exception set forth above in the second paragraph of “Sale, Exchange or Other Taxable Disposition of Common Stock”. Generally, U.S. trade or business income is not subject to U.S. federal withholding tax (provided that you comply with applicable certification and disclosure requirements, including providing a properly executed IRS Form W-ECI (or successor form)); instead, you are subject to U.S. federal income tax on a net basis at regular U.S. federal income tax rates (in the same manner as a U.S. person) on your U.S. trade or business income. If you are a corporation, any U.S. trade or business income that you receive may also be subject to a “branch profits tax” at a 30% rate, or at a lower rate prescribed by an applicable income tax treaty.

U.S. Federal Estate Tax

If you are an individual Non-U.S. Holder who is treated as the owner of or has made certain lifetime transfers of an interest in our common stock, you will be required to include the value thereof in your gross estate for U.S. federal estate tax purposes, and may be subject to U.S. federal estate tax unless an applicable estate tax treaty provides otherwise.

Information Reporting and Backup Withholding Tax

We must annually report to the IRS and to each Non-U.S. Holder any dividend income that is subject to U.S. federal withholding tax, or that is exempt from such withholding pursuant to an income tax treaty. Copies of these information returns may also be made available under the provisions of a specific treaty or agreement to the tax authorities of the country in which a Non-U.S. Holder resides. Under certain circumstances, the Code imposes a backup withholding obligation on certain reportable payments. Dividends paid to you will generally be exempt from backup withholding if you provide a properly executed IRS Form W-8BEN or W-8BEN-E (or successor form) or otherwise establish an exemption and we do not have actual knowledge or reason to know that you are a U.S. person or that the conditions of such other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied.

The payment of the proceeds from the disposition of common stock to or through the U.S. office of any broker (U.S. or non-U.S.) will be subject to information reporting and possible backup withholding unless you certify as to your non-U.S. status under penalties of perjury or otherwise establish an exemption and the broker does not have actual knowledge or reason to know that you are a U.S. person or that the conditions of any other exemption are not, in fact, satisfied. The payment of proceeds from the disposition of our common stock to or through a non-U.S. office of a non-U.S. broker will not be subject to information reporting or backup withholding unless the non-U.S. broker has certain types of relationships with the United States (a “U.S. related financial intermediary”). In the case of the payment of proceeds from the disposition of our common stock to or through a non-U.S. office of a broker that is either a U.S. person or a U.S. related financial intermediary, the Treasury regulations require information reporting (but not backup withholding) on the payment unless the broker has documentary evidence in its files that the owner is a Non-U.S. Holder and the broker has no knowledge to the contrary. You are urged to consult your tax advisor on the application of information reporting and backup withholding in light of your particular circumstances.

 

135


Table of Contents

Backup withholding is not an additional tax. Any amounts withheld under the backup withholding rules from a payment to you will be refunded or credited against your U.S. federal income tax liability, if any, provided that the required information is furnished to the IRS.

Additional Withholding Requirements Under FATCA

Sections 1471 through 1474 of the Code, commonly referred to as FATCA, and applicable Treasury Regulations impose withholding at a rate of 30% on payments of dividends on, and gross proceeds from the sale or redemption of, our common stock paid to “foreign financial institutions” (which is broadly defined for this purpose and in general includes investment vehicles) and certain other non-U.S. entities unless various U.S. information reporting and due diligence requirements (generally relating to ownership by U.S. persons of certain interests in or accounts with those entities) have been satisfied, or an exemption applies. An intergovernmental agreement between the United States and an applicable foreign country may modify these requirements. If FATCA withholding is imposed, a beneficial owner of our common stock that is not a foreign financial institution generally will be entitled to a refund of any amounts withheld in excess of otherwise applicable withholding tax by filing a U.S. federal income tax return (which may entail significant administrative burden). A beneficial owner that is a foreign financial institution but not a “participating foreign financial institution” (as defined under FATCA) will be able to obtain a refund only to the extent an applicable income tax treaty with the United States entitles such beneficial owner to an exemption from, or reduced rate of, tax on the payment that was subject to withholding under FATCA. These withholding requirements apply to any payments of dividends on our common stock, as well as to payments of gross proceeds from a disposition of our common stock made on or after January 1, 2017. Non-U.S. Holders should consult their tax advisers regarding the effects of FATCA on their investment in our common stock and their potential ability to obtain a refund of any FATCA withholding.

 

136


Table of Contents

LEGAL MATTERS

The validity of the shares of common stock being offered hereby will be passed upon for us by Paul, Weiss, Rifkind, Wharton & Garrison LLP, New York, New York.

EXPERTS

The financial statements as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 (Successor), and as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 (Predecessor), included in this Prospectus have been so included in reliance on the reports (which each contain an emphasis of a matter related to the emergence from bankruptcy and adoption of fresh start accounting) of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, given on the authority of said firm as experts in auditing and accounting.

WHERE YOU CAN FIND ADDITIONAL INFORMATION

We have filed with the SEC a registration statement under the Securities Act referred with respect to the shares of our common stock offered by this prospectus. This prospectus, filed as part of the registration statement, does not contain all of the information set forth in the registration statement or the exhibits and schedules thereto as permitted by the rules and regulations of the SEC. For further information about us and our common stock, you should refer to the registration statement. This prospectus summarizes provisions that we consider material of certain contracts and other documents to which we refer you. Because the summaries may not contain all of the information that you may find important, you should review the full text of those documents.

The registration statement, including its exhibits and schedules, may be inspected and copied at the public reference facilities maintained by the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549. You may obtain information on the operation of the public reference room by calling 1-202-551-8909. Copies of such materials are also available by mail from the Public Reference Branch of the SEC at 100 F Street, N.E., Room 1580, Washington, D.C. 20549 at prescribed rates. In addition, the SEC maintains a website at http://www.sec.gov from which interested persons can electronically access the registration statement, including the exhibits and schedules to the registration statement.

We have not authorized anyone to give you any information or to make any representations about us or the transactions we discuss in this prospectus other than those contained in this prospectus. If you are given any information or representations about these matters that is not discussed in this prospectus, you must not rely on that information. This prospectus is not an offer to sell or a solicitation of an offer to buy securities anywhere or to anyone where or to whom we are not permitted to offer or sell securities under applicable law.

 

137


Table of Contents

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

      Page
Number
 

Consolidated Financial Statements of MPM Holdings Inc.

  

Reports of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

     F-2   

Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013

     F-4   

Consolidated Statements of Operations; successor period from October 25, 2014 through December  31, 2014; predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

     F-5   

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive (Loss) Income; successor period from October  25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

     F-6   

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows; successor period from October 25, 2014 through December  31, 2014; predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

     F-7   

Consolidated Statements of Equity (Deficit); successor period from October  25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012

     F-8   

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

     F-9   

Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) of MPM Holdings Inc.

  

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014

     F-59   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor)

     F-60   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor)

     F-61   

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2015 (successor) and 2014 (predecessor)

     F-62   

Condensed Consolidated Statement of Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2015

     F-63   

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

     F-64   

 

F-1


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholders of MPM Holdings Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive (loss) income, of equity (deficit) and of cash flows for the period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MPM Holdings Inc. and its subsidiaries (Successor) at December 31, 2014 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the appendix appearing under Item 16(b)as of December 31, 2014 and for the period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audit. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York confirmed the Company’s Plan on June 23, 2014. Confirmation of the Plan resulted in the discharge of certain claims against the Company that arose before April 13, 2014 and substantially alters the rights and interests of equity security holders as provided for in the Plan. The Plan was substantially consummated on October 24, 2014 and the Company emerged from bankruptcy. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, the Company adopted fresh start accounting as of October 24, 2014.

/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Columbus, Ohio

April 14, 2015, except for the change in the composition of reportable segments disclosed in Note 16, as to which the date is June 17, 2015.


Table of Contents

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors and Shareholder of Momentive Performance Materials Inc.:

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2013 and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive (loss) income, of equity (deficit) and of cash flows for the period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and its subsidiaries (Predecessor) at December 31, 2013 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the period January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. In addition, in our opinion, the financial statement schedules listed in the appendix appearing under Item 16(b) as of December 31, 2013 and for the period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein when read in conjunction with the related consolidated financial statements. These financial statements and financial statement schedules are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and financial statement schedules based on our audits. We conducted our audits of these statements in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

As discussed in Note 2 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company filed a petition on April 13, 2014 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York for reorganization under the provisions of Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy code. The Plan was substantially consummated on October 24, 2014 and the Company emerged from bankruptcy. In connection with its emergence from bankruptcy, the Company adopted fresh start accounting.

/s/PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

Columbus, Ohio

March 30, 2015, except for the earnings per common share data included in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, as to which the date is April 14, 2015, and for the change in the composition of reportable segments disclosed in Note 16, as to which the date is June 17, 2015.


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

     Successor      Predecessor  

(In millions, except share data)

   December 31,
2014
     December 31,
2013
 

Assets

       

Current assets:

       

Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $5 at December 31, 2014)

   $ 228       $ 94   

Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of less than $1 and $4, respectively)

     324         331   

Inventories:

       

Raw materials

     144         128   

Finished and in-process goods

     258         240   

Deferred income taxes (see Note 13)

     33         6   

Other current assets

     60         61   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total current assets

     1,047         860   

Investment in unconsolidated entities

     18         8   

Deferred income taxes (see Note 13)

     14         3   

Other long-term assets

     27         33   

Property and equipment:

       

Land

     75         77   

Buildings

     295         377   

Machinery and equipment

     799         1,582   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     1,169         2,036   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (17      (1,082
  

 

 

    

 

 

 
     1,152         954   

Goodwill (see Note 9)

     218         381   

Other intangible assets, net (see Note 9)

     408         455   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 2,884       $ 2,694   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Deficit

       

Current liabilities:

       

Accounts payable

   $ 223       $ 259   

Debt payable within one year (See Note 10)

     38         3,250   

Interest payable

     11         88   

Income taxes payable (see Note 13)

     7         6   

Deferred income taxes (see Note 13)

     18         12   

Accrued payroll and incentive compensation

     57         44   

Other current liabilities

     82         85   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     436         3,744   

Long-term liabilities:

       

Long-term debt (see Note 10)

     1,163         7   

Pension liabilities (see Note 15)

     352         280   

Deferred income taxes (see Note 13)

     98         77   

Other long-term liabilities

     66         66   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     2,115         4,174   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (see Note 14)

       

Equity (Deficit)

       

Common stock—$0.01 par value; 70,000,000 and 100 shares authorized; 47,989,000 and 100 issued and outstanding at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

     —           —     

Additional paid-in capital

     857         716   

Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income

     (28      202   

Accumulated deficit

     (60      (2,398
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total equity (deficit)

     769         (1,480
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity (deficit)

   $ 2,884       $ 2,694   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-4


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

 

    Successor      Predecessor  
    Period from
October 25, 2014
through
December 31,
2014
     Period from
January 1, 2014
through
October  24,
2014
     Year Ended December 31,  

(In millions, except share data)

        2013     2012  

Net sales

  $ 465       $ 2,011       $ 2,398      $ 2,357   

Cost of sales

    402           
 

 

 

         

Gross profit

    63           

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

       1,439         1,732        1,705   

Selling, general and administrative expense

    80         434         373        392   

Depreciation and amortization expense

       147         171        187   

Research and development expense

    13         63         70        69   

Restructuring and other costs (see Note 6)

    5         20         21        43   

Other operating income, net

    (1      —           —          —     
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Operating (loss) income

    (34      (92      31        (39

Interest expense, net (see Note 10)

    15         162         394        277   

Other non-operating expense (income), net

    8         —           —          (11

Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt
(see Note 10)

    —           —           —          57   

Reorganization items, net (see Note 4)

    3         (1,972      —          —     
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (60      1,718         (363     (362

Income tax expense (see Note 13)

    —           36         104        8   
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Loss) income before earnings from unconsolidated entities

    (60      1,682         (467     (370

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes

    —           3         3        5   
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

  $ (60    $ 1,685       $ (464   $ (365
 

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares outstanding—basic and diluted

    47,989,000         100         100        100   

(Loss) earnings per share—basic and diluted

  $ (1.25    $ 16,850,000       $ (4,640,000   $ (3,650,000

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-5


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE (LOSS) INCOME

 

    Successor     Predecessor  
    Period from
October 25, 2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended December 31,  

(In millions)

          2013             2012      

Net (loss) income

  $ (60   $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365

Other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax:

       

Foreign currency translation

    (29     31        (6     (29

Gain (loss) recognized from pension and postretirement benefits

    1        (71     28        (19

Reclassification adjustment for net fresh start gain related to accumulated other comprehensive income included in net (loss) income

    —          (162     —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income

    (28     (202     22        (48
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive (loss) income

  $ (88   $ 1,483      $ (442   $ (413
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-6


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

    Successor     Predecessor  
    Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended December 31,  

(In millions)

          2013             2012      

Cash flows used in operating activities

       

Net (loss) income

  $ (60   $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365

Adjustments to reconcile net (loss) income to net cash used in operating activities:

       

Depreciation and amortization

    22        147        171        187   

Non-cash reorganization items

    —          (2,078     —          —     

Write-off of unamortized deferred financing costs (see Note 5)

    —          —          81        —     

Loss on the extinguishment and exchange of debt (see Note 5)

    —          —          —          57   

Amortization of debt discount and issuance costs

    4        —          10        18   

DIP Facility financing fees included in net income

    —          19        —          —     

Unrealized actuarial losses from pension liabilities

    15        —          —          —     

Deferred income tax (benefit) expense

    (10     20        86        (10

Unrealized foreign currency losses

    2        99        12        1   

Other non-cash adjustments

    —          5        4        (3

Net change in assets and liabilities:

       

Accounts receivable

    4        (27     (39     16   

Inventories

    52        (95     (1     13   

Due to/from affiliates

    6        —          6        (10

Accounts payable

    (82     68        (7     (36

Income taxes payable

    1        —          6        —     

Other assets, current and non-current

    9        (6     (21     5   

Other liabilities, current and non-current

    34        (44     6        32   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

    (3     (207     (150     (95
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

       

Capital expenditures

    (17     (78     (79     (107

Capitalized interest

    —          (1     (2     —     

Proceeds from sale of business (see Note 7)

    —          12        —          —     

Consolidation of variable interest entity (see Note 7)

    —          50        —          —     

Purchases of intangible assets

    —          (2     (3     (2

Change in restricted cash

    —          —          (5     —     

Proceeds from sale of assets

    —          1        1        7   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

    (17     (18     (88     (102
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities

       

Net short-term debt (repayments) borrowings

    (1     (6     (2     3   

Borrowings of long-term debt

    —          180        419        1,725   

Repayments of long-term debt

    —          (315     (287     (1,533

Repayment of affiliated debt (see Note 7)

    —          (50     —          —     

Proceeds from Rights Offerings (see Note 2)

    —          600        —          —     

Proceeds from capital contribution (see Note 7)

    —          —          102        —     

Long-term debt financing fees

    —          —          (12     (33

DIP Facility financing fees

    —          (19     —          —     

Payments of original issue discounts and tender premiums

    —          —          —          (51
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

    (1     390        220        111   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

    (21     165        (18     (86

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash

    (4     (6     (3     (3

Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period

    248        89        110        199   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period

  $ 223      $ 248      $ 89      $ 110   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

       

Cash paid for:

       

Interest

  $ 1      $ 250      $ 299      $ 237   

Income taxes, net of refunds

    3        12        13        18   

Non-cash investing activity:

       

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable

  $ 20      $ 13      $ 29      $ 17   

Non-cash financing activity:

       

Non-cash capital contribution from parent (see Note 7)

  $ —        $ —        $ 7      $ —     

Conversion of BCA Commitment Premium (see Note 2)

    —          30        —          —     

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-7


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF (DEFICIT) EQUITY

 

(In millions)

   Common
Stock
     Additional
Paid-in
Capital
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Income (Loss)
    Total
(Deficit)
Equity
 
Predecessor            

Balance December 31, 2011

   $ —         $ 605      $ (1,569   $ 228      $ (736

Net loss

     —           —          (365     —          (365

Other comprehensive loss

     —           —          —          (48     (48

Stock-based compensation expense

     —           1        —          —          1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

     —           606        (1,934     180        (1,148

Net loss

     —           —          (464     —          (464

Other comprehensive income

     —           —          —          22        22   

Stock-based compensation expense

     —           1        —          —          1   

Capital contribution from parent

     —           102        —          —          102   

Non-cash capital contribution from parent

     —           7        —          —          7   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

     —           716        (2,398     202        (1,480

Net income

     —           —          1,685        —          1,685   

Other comprehensive loss

     —           —          —          (40     (40

Sale of business to related party (see Note 7)

     —           (3     —          —          (3

Cancellation of Predecessor Company equity (see Note 3)

     —           (713     713        (162     (162
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at October 24, 2014

   $ —         $ —        $ —        $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
Successor            

Issuance of Successor Company common stock (see Notes 2 and 3)

   $ —         $ 857      $ —        $ —        $ 857   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at October 25, 2014

   $ —         $ 857      $ —        $ —        $ 857   

Net loss

     —           —          (60     —          (60

Other comprehensive loss

     —           —          —          (28     (28
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

   $ —         $ 857      $ (60   $ (28   $ 769   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-8


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(In millions, except share data)

1. Business and Basis of Presentation

MPM Holdings Inc. (“MPM Holdings”) is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business through its subsidiaries. MPM Holdings’ wholly owned subsidiary, MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc. (“Intermediate Holdings”), is a holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary, Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and its subsidiaries (“MPM”). MPM Holdings, Intermediate Holdings and MPM are collectively referred to herein as the “Company”. MPM Holdings became the indirect parent company of MPM following MPM’s reorganization and emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). Prior to its reorganization, MPM, through a series of intermediate holding companies, was controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (together with Apollo Global Management, LLC and subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Based in Waterford, New York, the Company is comprised of two reportable segments: Silicones and Quartz. Silicones is a global business engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of silanes, specialty silicones and urethane additives. Quartz, also a global business, is engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of high-purity fused quartz and ceramic materials.

Upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date, the Company adopted fresh start accounting which resulted in the creation of a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, as well as the effects of the implementation of the Plan, the Consolidated Financial Statements on or after October 24, 2014 are not comparable with the Consolidated Financial Statements prior to that date. Refer to Note 2 for additional information.

References to “Successor” or “Successor Company” relate to the financial position and results of operations of the reorganized Company subsequent to October 24, 2014. References to “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Company” refer to the financial position and results of operations of the Company prior to October 24, 2014, which are those of MPM as the predecessor company.

2. Emergence From Chapter 11 Bankruptcy

On April 13, 2014 (the “Petition Date”), Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. (the Company’s direct parent prior to October 24, 2014, “Old MPM Holdings”), the Company, and certain of our U.S. subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization (the “Bankruptcy Filing”) under Chapter 11 (“Chapter 11”) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”). The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re MPM Silicones, LLC, et al., Case No. 14-22503. The Company continued to operate its businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Court.

On June 23, 2014, the Company filed with the Court an amended version of the Chapter 11 plan of reorganization proposed by the Debtors (as amended, supplemented, or modified, the “Plan”) and accompanying disclosure statement (the “Disclosure Statement”). On the Effective Date, the Plan became effective and the Company emerged from the Chapter 11 proceedings.

On or following the Effective Date, and pursuant to the terms of the Plan, the following occurred:

 

   

payment in full in cash to general unsecured creditors (including trade creditors) and holders of claims arising from the $75 senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Cash Flow Facility”) and the $300 senior secured debtor-in-possession term loan facility (the “DIP Term Loan Facility”);

 

   

conversion of the Company’s then-existing asset-based revolving facility into an exit $270 asset-based revolving facility (the “ABL Facility”);

 

F-9


Table of Contents
   

issuance of new 3.88% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (the “First Lien Notes”) and new 4.69% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (the “Second Lien Notes”) to holders of the Company’s 8.875% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (the “Old First Lien Notes”) and 10% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (the “Old Secured Notes”), respectively, and the cancellation of the Old First Lien Notes and the Old Secured Notes;

 

   

conversion of the Company’s 9.00% Springing Lien Dollar Notes due 2021 and 9.50% Springing Lien Euro Notes due 2021 (collectively, “Old Second Lien Notes”) into the new equity of MPM (resulting in the issuance of 11,791,126 shares of common stock), subject to dilution by the management incentive plan and common stock issued in the rights offerings;

 

   

issuance of 36,197,874 shares of MPM common stock (including shares issued in connection with the backstop commitment of the rights offerings (the “Backstop Commitment”)) resulting from the exercise of subscription rights issued to holders of the Old Second Lien Notes in the $600 rights offerings and the “commitment premium” paid in shares to the backstop parties in respect of their backstop commitment;

 

   

exchange of all shares of MPM common stock for common stock of the Company and the contribution by the Company of all shares of MPM common stock to its wholly-owned subsidiary, MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc., a result of which MPM became a wholly owned subsidiary of MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc.;

 

   

cancellation of the equity of the Predecessor Company;

 

   

cancellation of the Company’s 11.5% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (the “Subordinated Notes”);

 

   

a recovery to the holders of Old MPM Holdings’ 11% Senior Discount Note due June 4, 2017 (“PIK Notes”) of $9, which represents the amount of the cash available at Old MPM Holdings as of the Effective Date, after taking into account administrative expenses; and

 

   

appointment of a new chief executive officer, chief financial officer and general counsel.

Backstop Commitment Agreement and Rights Offerings

Backstop Commitment Agreement

On May 9, 2014, the Company entered into the Backstop Commitment Agreement, as subsequently amended (the “BCA”), among the Company, Old MPM Holdings, and the commitment parties party thereto (the “Commitment Parties,” and each individually, a “Commitment Party”). The BCA provided that upon the satisfaction of certain terms and conditions, including the confirmation of the Plan, the Company would have the option to require each Commitment Party to purchase from the Company (on a several and not joint basis) its pro rata portion, based on such Commitment Party’s backstop commitment percentage, of the common stock of the reorganized Company (the “New Common Stock”) that is not otherwise purchased in connection with the Rights Offerings (described below) which were made in connection with the Plan (the “Unsubscribed Shares”). In consideration for their commitment to purchase the Unsubscribed Shares, the Commitment Parties received a commitment premium equal to $30 (the “BCA Commitment Premium”). The BCA Commitment Premium was payable in shares of New Common Stock; provided, that, if the BCA was terminated under certain circumstances, the BCA Commitment Premium would have been payable in cash. Pursuant to the terms of the BCA, the BCA Commitment Premium was deemed earned, nonrefundable and non-avoidable upon entry of the approval order by the Court.

The Company had recognized a $30 liability for the BCA Commitment Premium under the guidance for accounting for liability instruments. This amount is included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Upon application of fresh-start accounting (see Note 3), on October 24, 2014, the BCA Commitment Premium was converted to equity in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

 

F-10


Table of Contents

The Company has agreed to reimburse the Commitment Parties for all reasonable fees and expenses incurred in connection with, among other things, the negotiation, preparation and implementation of the Rights Offerings, the Plan and any related efforts. In addition, the BCA requires that the Company and the other Debtors indemnify the Commitment Parties for certain losses, claims, damages, liabilities, costs and expenses arising out of or in connection with the BCA, the Plan and the related transactions. On June 23, 2014, the Court found that the terms and conditions of the Support Agreement were fair, reasonable and the best available to the Debtors under the circumstances, and issued an order authorizing and directing the Debtors to enter into, execute, deliver and implement the BCA.The Court’s Order approving the Plan, entered on September 11, 2014, also requires the Company and the Debtors to indemnify the Commitment Parties for all fees, expenses, costs and liabilities incurred in connection with certain cases. The indenture trustees for the Old First Lien Notes and the Old Secured Notes commenced actions against certain of the Commitment Parties for alleged breaches of the applicable intercreditor agreement governing the rights and priorities of such parties.

Rights Offerings

On the Effective Date, all previously issued and outstanding shares of the Predecessor Company’s common stock were canceled, as were all other previously issued and outstanding equity interests. On the Effective Date, the Company issued 7,475,000 shares (the “1145 Rights Offering Stock”) of a new class of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company (the “New Common Stock”) pursuant to the rights offering under Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code (the “Section 1145 Rights Offering”) and 26,662,690 shares (the “4(a)(2) Rights Offering Stock”) of New Common Stock pursuant to the rights offering under section 4(a)(2) (the “4(a)(2) Rights Offering”) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act). Additionally, the Company issued 2,060,184 shares of New Common Stock pursuant to the Backstop Commitment, including 1,475,652 shares of New Common Stock issued as consideration for the BCA Commitment Premium. A portion of the 1145 Rights Offering Stock issued to the Commitment Parties, and all of the 4(a)(2) Rights Offering Stock, are restricted securities under the Securities Act, and may not be offered, sold or otherwise transferred except in accordance with applicable restrictions. In addition, upon effectiveness of the Plan, the Company issued 11,791,126 shares of New Common Stock to holders of the Second Lien Notes pursuant to the Second Lien Notes Equity Distribution. Collectively, the Section 1145 Rights Offering and the 4(a)(2) Rights Offering are referred to as the “Rights Offerings”.

In accordance with the Plan, all shares of New Common Stock were automatically exchanged for one share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of MPM Holdings, Inc., which contributed the shares of New Common Stock to its wholly-owned subsidiary, MPM Intermediate Holdings. As a result, MPM is a wholly owned subsidiary of MPM Intermediate Holdings.

The shares of New Common Stock described above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to (i) Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code, which generally exempts from such registration requirements the issuance of securities under a plan of reorganization, and/or (ii) Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act because the issuance did not involve any public offering.

Registration Rights Agreement

On October 24, 2014, MPM Holdings and the Commitment Parties executed a registration rights agreement (the “Registration Rights Agreement”). The Registration Rights Agreement, among other rights, provides the Commitment Parties with certain registration rights with respect to the common stock issued in the Rights Offerings.

Under the Registration Rights Agreement, MPM Holdings was required to file a shelf registration statement (on Form S-3 if permitted) and use its reasonable best efforts to cause the registration statement to become effective for the benefit of all stockholders party to the Registration Rights Agreement. Any individual holder or holders of MPM Holdings’ outstanding common stock party thereto can demand an unlimited number of “shelf

 

F-11


Table of Contents

takedowns,” which may be conducted in underwritten offerings so long as the total offering size is reasonably expected to exceed $50. A registration statement on Form S-1 was filed on December 31, 2014 to satisfy MPM Holdings’ obligation under the Registration Rights Agreement.

3. Fresh Start Accounting

In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, the Company applied the provisions of fresh start accounting to its financial statements as (i) the holders of existing voting shares of the Predecessor Company received less than 50% of the voting shares of the emerging entity and (ii) the reorganization value of the Company’s assets immediately prior to confirmation was less than the post-petition liabilities and allowed claims. The Company applied fresh start accounting as of October 24, 2014.

Upon the application of fresh start accounting, the Company allocated the reorganization value to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values. Reorganization value represented the fair value of the Successor Company’s assets before considering liabilities. The excess reorganization value over the fair value of identified tangible and intangible assets was reported as goodwill.

Reorganization Value

In support of the Plan, the enterprise value of the Successor Company was estimated to be in the range of $2.0 billion to $2.4 billion as of the Effective Date. Based on the estimates and assumptions used in determining the enterprise value, as further discussed below, the Company estimated the enterprise value to be $2.2 billion, which was approved by the Court.

The Company estimated the enterprise value of the Successor Company utilizing the discounted cash flow method. To estimate fair value utilizing the discounted cash flow method, the Company established an estimate of future cash flows based on the financial projections and assumptions utilized in the Company’s disclosure statement, which were derived from earnings forecasts and assumptions regarding growth and margin projections. A terminal value was included, and was calculated using the constant growth method based on the projected cash flows of the final year of the forecast period.

The discount rate of 11% was estimated based on an after-tax weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”) reflecting the rate of return that would be expected by a market participant. The WACC also takes into consideration a company-specific risk premium, reflecting the risk associated with the overall uncertainty of the financial projections used to estimate future cash flows.

The fair value of debt obligations represents $36 of debt payable within one year and $1,166 of long-term debt. The fair value of long-term debt was determined based on a market approach utilizing current market yields, and was estimated to be approximately 87% of par value.

The fair value of pension liabilities was determined based upon assumptions related to discount rates and expected return on assets, as well as certain other assumptions related to various demographic factors.

The following table reconciles the enterprise value to the estimated reorganization value as of the Effective Date:

 

Enterprise value

   $  2,200   

Plus: Excess cash and cash equivalents

     80   

Plus: Excess working capital

     124   

Plus: Fair value of non-debt and non-pension liabilities

     646   
  

 

 

 

Reorganization value of Successor assets

   $ 3,050   
  

 

 

 

 

F-12


Table of Contents

The fair value of non-debt liabilities represents total liabilities of the Successor Company on the Effective Date, less debt payable within one year, long-term debt and pension and postretirement benefit obligations.

Consolidated Statement of Financial Position

The adjustments set forth in the following consolidated Balance Sheet reflect the effect of the consummation of the transactions contemplated by the Plan (reflected in the column “Reorganization Adjustments”) as well as fair value adjustments as a result of the adoption of fresh-start accounting (reflected in the column “Fresh Start Adjustments”). The explanatory notes highlight methods used to determine fair values or other amounts of the assets and liabilities as well as significant assumptions or inputs.

 

     Predecessor
Company
    Reorganization
Adjustments
    Fresh Start
Adjustments
    Successor
Company
 

Assets

        

Current assets:

        

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 162      $ 91 (a)    $ —        $ 253   

Accounts receivable

     335        —          —          335   

Inventories:

        

Raw materials

     131        —          3 (a)      134   

Finished and in-process goods

     315        —          15 (a)      330   

Deferred income taxes

     9        56 (b)      (11 )(b)      54   

Other current assets

     74        —          —          74   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     1,026        147        7        1,180   

Investment in unconsolidated entities

     10        —          8 (c)      18   

Deferred income taxes

     4        —          5 (b)      9   

Other long-term assets

     24        —          —          24   

Property and equipment:

        

Land

     71        —          8 (d)      79   

Buildings

     371        —          (74 )(d)      297   

Machinery and equipment

     1,479        —          (684 )(d)      795   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     1,921        —          (750     1,171   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (1,050     —          1,050 (d)      —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
     871        —          300        1,171   

Goodwill

     358        —          (134 )(e)      224   

Other intangible assets, net

     398        —          26 (f)      424   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 2,691      $ 147      $ 212      $ 3,050   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and (Deficit) Equity

        

Current liabilities:

        

Accounts payable

   $ 260      $ 38 (c)    $ —        $ 298   

Debt payable within one year

     1,850        (1,814 )(d)      —          36   

Interest payable

     6        (6 )(e)      —          —     

Income taxes payable

     5        —          —          5   

Deferred income taxes

     9        —          9 (g)      18   

Accrued payroll and incentive compensation

     44        12 (f)      —          56   

Other current liabilities

     86        (25 )(g)      6 (h)      67   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     2,260        (1,795     15        480   

Long-term liabilities:

        

Long-term debt

     7        1,159 (h)      —          1,166   

Pension liabilities

     133        165 (i)      41 (h)      339   

Deferred income taxes

     55        57 (j)      28 (g)      140   

Other long-term liabilities

     54        9 (k)      5 (i)      68   

Liabilities subject to compromise

     2,026        (2,026 )(l)      —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     4,535        (2,431     89        2,193   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-13


Table of Contents
     Predecessor
Company
    Reorganization
Adjustments
    Fresh Start
Adjustments
    Successor
Company
 

(Deficit) Equity

        

Common stock (Successor)

     —          —   (m)      —          —     

Additional paid-in capital (Successor)

     —          857 (m)      —          857   

Common stock (Predecessor)

     —          —   (n)      —          —     

Additional paid-in capital (Predecessor)

     713        (713 )(n)      —          —     

Accumulated other comprehensive income

     211        —          (211 )(j)      —     

(Accumulated deficit) retained earnings

     (2,768     2,434 (o)      334 (j)      —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total (deficit) equity

     (1,844     2,578        123        857   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and (deficit) equity

   $ 2,691      $ 147      $ 212      $ 3,050   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reorganization Adjustments

 

  (a) Reflects the net cash received as of the Effective Date from implementation of the Plan:

 

Sources:

  

Proceeds from the Rights Offerings

   $ 600   

Uses:

  

Claims paid at emergence

     (11

Repayment of DIP Term Loan

     (300

Repayment of DIP ABL Facility

     (144

Repayment of Cash Flow Facility

     (20

Other fees and expenses

     (34
  

 

 

 

Total uses

     (509
  

 

 

 

Net cash received

   $ 91   
  

 

 

 

Other fees and expenses primarily represent $6 of accrued and unpaid interest and $28 for success and other professional fees which is included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. A portion of the net cash received has been earmarked for future use and was not paid out on the Effective Date.

 

  (b) Represents the deferred tax asset impact of the reorganization adjustments, resulting from recognizing certain reorganization costs deductible in future periods in addition to the change in valuation allowance resulting from the tax attribute reduction.

 

  (c) Represents $53 of claims expected to be satisfied in cash that were reclassified from “Liabilities subject to compromise”. Also represents the payment of $21 of previously accrued professional fees related to the Bankruptcy Filing and the accrual of an additional $6 of success fees.

 

  (d) On the Effective Date, the Company repaid $300 in outstanding DIP Term Loans, $144 in outstanding borrowings under the DIP ABL Facility and $20 in outstanding borrowings under the Cash Flow Facility in full, and issued replacement notes to holders of the $1,100 in outstanding Old First Lien Notes due 2020 and $250 in outstanding Old Second Lien Notes due 2020 (which are classified as “Long-term debt”). The Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes were canceled on account of the subordination provisions set forth in the indenture to such notes.

 

  (e) On the Effective Date, the Company repaid $6 of accrued unpaid interest.

 

  (f) Represents $12 of accrued incentive compensation expected to be satisfied in cash that was reclassified from “Liabilities subject to compromise”.

 

  (g) Represents the reclassification of the BCA Commitment Premium of $30 to equity, partially offset by $5 of other current liabilities that were reclassified from “Liabilities subject to compromise”.

 

F-14


Table of Contents
  (h) Represents the issuance of replacement notes to holders of the $1,100 in outstanding Old First Lien Notes due 2021 and $250 in outstanding Old Second Lien Notes due 2022. The replacement notes were recorded at estimated fair value, which was determined based on a market approach utilizing current market yields.

 

  (i) Represents $165 of pension liabilities that were reclassified from “Liabilities subject to compromise”.

 

  (j) Represents the deferred tax liability impact of the reorganization adjustments, resulting from the reduction of the Company’s tax attributes and tax basis of fixed assets and intangibles as a result of the cancellation of debt excluded from taxable income, net of valuation allowance previously recorded.

 

  (k) Represents $9 of other long-term liabilities that were reclassified from “Liabilities subject to compromise”.

 

  (l) Liabilities subject to compromise were settled as follows in accordance with the Plan:

 

Liabilities subject to compromise (“LSTC”)

   $  2,026   

Cash payments at emergence from LSTC

     (11

Liabilities reinstated at emergence:

  

Pension liabilities

     (165

Accounts payable

     (53

Accrued payroll and incentive compensation

     (12

Other current liabilities

     (5

Other long-term liabilities

     (9
  

 

 

 

Total liabilities reinstated at emergence

     (244

Fair value of equity issued at emergence

     (227
  

 

 

 

Gain on settlement of LSTC

   $ 1,544   
  

 

 

 

 

  (m) Reflects the issuance of 47,989,000 shares of New Common Stock pursuant to the Rights Offerings, Second Lien Notes Equity Distribution and Backstop Commitment.

 

  (n) Reflects the cancellation of Predecessor Company equity to accumulated deficit.

 

  (o) Reflects the cumulative impact of the reorganization adjustments discussed above:

 

Gain on settlement of LSTC

   $  1,544   

Fair value adjustments to debt

     191   

Success and other fees recognized at emergence

     (13
  

 

 

 

Net gain on reorganization adjustments

     1,722   

Tax impact on reorganization adjustments

     (1

Cancellation of Predecessor Company equity

     713   
  

 

 

 

Net impact to Accumulated deficit

   $ 2,434   
  

 

 

 

The net gain on reorganization adjustments has been included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Fresh Start Adjustments

 

  (a) Reflects the adjustments made to record inventories at their estimated fair value, which was determined as follows:

 

   

Fair value of finished goods inventory was determined based on the estimated selling price less costs to sell, including disposal and holding period costs, and a reasonable profit margin on the selling and disposal effort.

 

F-15


Table of Contents
   

Fair value of in-process goods inventory was determined based on the estimated selling price once completed less total costs to complete the manufacturing effort, costs to sell, including disposal and holding period costs, and a reasonable profit margin on the remaining manufacturing, selling and disposal effort.

 

   

Fair value of raw materials inventory was determined based on current replacement costs.

 

  (b) Represents the deferred tax asset impact of the fresh start adjustments, resulting from the recognition of deductible goodwill in the U.S. and foreign jurisdictions, net of valuation allowance.

 

  (c) Reflects the adjustment made to record the Company’s ownership interest in Zhejiang Xinan Momentive Performance Materials Co., Ltd, a joint venture in China which manufactures siloxane, at its estimated fair value.

 

  (d) Reflects the adjustments made to record property, plant and equipment at its estimated fair value. Depreciable lives were also revised to reflect the remaining estimated useful lives of the related property, plant and equipment which range from 1 to 40 years. Fair value was determined as follows:

 

   

The market, sales comparison or trended cost approach was utilized to estimate fair value for land and buildings. This approach relies upon recent sales, offerings of similar assets or a specific inflationary adjustment to original purchase price to arrive at a probable selling price.

 

   

The cost approach was utilized to estimate fair value for machinery and equipment. This approach considers the amount required to construct or purchase a new asset of equal utility at current market prices, with adjustments in value for physical deterioration and functional and economic obsolescence. Physical deterioration is an adjustment made in the cost approach to reflect the real operating age of an asset with regard to wear and tear, decay and deterioration that is not prevented by maintenance. Functional obsolescence is an adjustment made to reflect the loss in value or usefulness of an asset caused by inefficiencies or inadequacies of the asset, as compared to a more efficient or less costly replacement asset with newer technology. Economic obsolescence is an adjustment made to reflect the loss in value or usefulness of an asset due to factors external to the asset, such as the economics of the industry, reduced demand, increased competition or similar factors. The estimated fair value of machinery and equipment reflects an economic obsolescence adjustment of $343.

Depreciable lives were revised to reflect the remaining estimated useful lives as follows (in years):

 

Buildings

   10 to 40 years

Machinery and equipment

   1 to 20 years

 

  (e) Reflects the adjustments made to record the elimination of the Predecessor goodwill balance of $358 and to record Successor goodwill of $224, which represents the reorganizational value of assets in excess of amounts allocated to identified tangible and intangible assets.

 

  (f) Reflects the adjustments made to write-off Predecessor other intangible assets of $398 and to record $424 in estimated fair value of Successor other intangible assets. Fair value was comprised of the following:

 

   

Trademarks of $60 were valued using the relief from royalty income approach based on the following significant assumptions:

 

  i) Forecasted net sales attributable to the trademarks for the period ranging from October 24, 2014 to December 31, 2033;

 

  ii) Royalty rates ranging from 0.25% to 1.5% of expected net sales determined with regard to comparable market transactions and profitability analysis;

 

  iii) Discount rates ranging from 12.0% to 14.0%, which were based on the after-tax weighted average cost of capital (“WACC”); and

 

F-16


Table of Contents
  iv) Economic lives ranging from 6 to 11 years.

 

   

Technology based intangible assets of $105 were valued using the relief from royalty income approach based on the following significant assumptions:

 

  i) Forecasted net sales attributable to the respective technologies for the period ranging from October 24, 2014 to December 31, 2033;

 

  ii) Royalty rates ranging from 1.0% to 3.5% of expected net sales determined with regard to expected cash flows of the respective technologies and the overall importance of respective technologies to product offering;

 

  iii) Discount rates ranging from 12.0% to 14.0%, which were based on the after-tax WACC; and

 

  iv) Economic lives ranging from 8 to 11 years.

 

   

Customer related intangible assets of $223 were valued using the multi-period excess earnings income approach, incorporating distributor inputs, and were based on the following significant assumptions:

 

  i) Forecasted net sales and profit margins attributable to the current customer base for the period ranging from October 24, 2014 to December 31, 2034;

 

  ii) Attrition rates ranging from 5.0% to 15.0%;

 

  iii) Discount rates ranging from 14.0% to 15.0%, which were based on the after-tax WACC; and

 

  iv) Economic lives ranging from 6 to 13 years.

 

   

In-process research and development (“IPR&D”) of $36 was valued using a cost approach based on the following significant assumptions:

 

  i) The estimated cost to recreate the respective IPR&D projects, incorporating a margin based on a reasonable developer’s profit; and

 

  ii) An indefinite economic life until the respective IPR&D projects are completed and placed in service, at which time each project will be assigned an estimated useful life.

 

  (g) Represents the deferred tax liability impact of the fresh start adjustments, resulting primarily from the book adjustment made to property, plant, and equipment that increases the future taxable temporary differences recorded net of valuation allowances.

 

  (h) Reflects the adjustment made to remeasure pension liabilities, which was determined based upon assumptions related to discount rates and expected return on assets, as well as certain other assumptions related to various demographic factors. The resulting adjustment was recoded in “Other comprehensive loss” in the Predecessor Company’s Consolidated Statement of Other Comprehensive Income.

 

  (i) Primarily reflects the adjustment made to record certain environmental liabilities at estimated fair value.

 

F-17


Table of Contents
  (j) Reflects the cumulative impact of the fresh start accounting adjustments discussed above and the elimination of the Predecessor Company’s accumulated other comprehensive income:

 

Establishment of Successor goodwill

   $ 224   

Elimination of Predecessor goodwill

     (358

Establishment of Successor other intangible assets

     424   

Elimination of Predecessor other intangible assets

     (398

Property, plant and equipment fair value adjustment

     300   

Pension liability remeasurement adjustment

     (47

Other assets and liabilities fair value adjustment

     21   

Elimination of Predecessor Company accumulated other comprehensive income

     211   
  

 

 

 

Net gain on fresh start adjustments

     377   

Tax impact on fresh start adjustments

     (43
  

 

 

 

Net impact on accumulated deficit

   $ 334   
  

 

 

 

The net gain on fresh start adjustments has been included in “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

4. Reorganization Items, Net

Incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing, gains on the settlement of liabilities under the Plan and the net impact of fresh start accounting adjustments are classified as “Reorganization items, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The following table summarizes reorganization items:

 

     Successor      Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25, 2014
through
December 31,
2014
     Period from
January 1, 2014
through
October 24,
2014
 

Professional fees

   $ 3       $ 78   

DIP Facility financing costs

     —           19   

BCA Commitment Premium

     —           30   

Net gain on reorganization adjustments

     —           (1,722

Net gain on fresh start adjustments

     —           (377
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 3       $ (1,972
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

5. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Principals of Consolidation—The Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company and its majority-owned subsidiaries in which minority shareholders hold no substantive participating right, and variable interest entities in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s share of net earnings of 20% to 50% owned companies, for which it has the ability to exercise significant influence over operating and financial policies (but not control), are included in “Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Investments in the other companies are carried at cost.

The Company’s unconsolidated investment accounted for under the equity method of accounting is a partial ownership interest in Zhejiang Xinan Momentive Performance Materials Co., Ltd, a joint venture in China which manufactures siloxane, one of our key intermediate materials. The Company previously planned to make additional capital contributions of $26 to this joint venture in 2015; however, the joint venture partners agreed to an alternative whereby the Company did not make such contributions and, as a result, during the year ended December 31, 2014, its ownership interest in the joint venture was diluted from 49% to 25%.

 

F-18


Table of Contents

Income Statement Presentation—As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, management elected to change its accounting policy related to its income statement presentation of costs of goods sold beginning in the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and all periods thereafter. As a result, the “Depreciation and amortization expense” caption has been eliminated and the related expense has been allocated to “Cost of sales” and “Selling, general and administrative expense”.

Foreign Currency Translations—Assets and liabilities of foreign affiliates are translated at the exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income, expenses and cash flows are translated at average exchange rates during the year. The Company recognized transaction (losses) gains of $(8), $(99), $(16) and $0 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, which are included as a component of “Net loss.” In addition, gains or losses related to the Company’s intercompany loans payable and receivable denominated in a foreign currency other than the subsidiary’s functional currency that are deemed to be permanently invested are remeasured to cumulative translation and recorded in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The effect of translation is also included in “Accumulated other comprehensive income”.

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and also the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, it requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The most significant estimates that are included in the financial statements are legal liabilities, deferred tax assets and liabilities and related valuation allowances, income tax accruals, pension and postretirement assets and liabilities, valuation allowances for accounts receivable and inventories, general insurance liabilities, asset impairments, fair value of stock awards and fair values of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in business acquisitions. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and Cash EquivalentsThe Company considers all highly liquid investments that are purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had interest-bearing time deposits and other cash equivalent investments of $2 and $4, respectively. These amounts are included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets as a component of “Cash and cash equivalents”.

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts—The allowance for doubtful accounts is estimated using factors such as customer credit ratings and past collection history. Receivables are charged against the allowance for doubtful accounts when it is probable that the receivable will not be collected. Upon recording the assets of the Company at their estimated fair value in connection with the application of fresh start accounting, the amount of accounts receivable expected to be unrecoverable were written-off, resulting in the remeasurement of the allowance for doubtful accounts to $0 as of October 24, 2014 (see Note 3).

Inventories—Inventories are stated at lower of cost or market using the first-in, first-out method. Costs include direct material, direct labor and applicable manufacturing overheads, which are based on normal production capacity. Abnormal manufacturing costs are recognized as period costs and fixed manufacturing overheads are allocated based on normal production capacity. An allowance is provided for excess and obsolete inventories based on management’s review of inventories on-hand compared to estimated future usage and sales. Inventories in the Consolidated Balance Sheets are presented net of an allowance for excess and obsolete inventory of less than $1 and $23 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Upon recording the assets of the Company at their estimated fair value in connection with the application of fresh start accounting, the amount of excess and obsolete inventory was written-off, resulting in the remeasurement of the reserve for excess and obsolete inventory to $0 as of October 24, 2014 (see Note 3).

 

F-19


Table of Contents

Deferred Expenses—Deferred debt financing costs are included in “Other long-term assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets and are amortized over the life of the related debt or credit facility using the effective interest method. Upon extinguishment of any debt, the related debt issuance costs are written off. At both December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had no unamortized deferred financing costs. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company wrote off $81 of unamortized deferred financing costs as a result of the substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern for the next twelve months and the resulting reclassification of all outstanding debt related to the ABL Facility, the Old First Lien Notes, the Old Secured Notes and the Old Second Lien Notes to “Debt payable within one year’ in the Consolidated Balance Sheets (see Note 10). This amount is included in “Interest expense, net” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Property and Equipment—Land, buildings and machinery and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Depreciation is recorded on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives of the properties (the average estimated useful lives for buildings and machinery are 20 years and 15 years, respectively). Assets under capital leases are amortized over the lesser of their useful life or the lease term. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized. Maintenance, repairs, minor renewals and turnarounds (periodic maintenance and repairs to major units of manufacturing facilities) are expensed as incurred. When property and equipment is retired or disposed of, the asset and related depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is reflected in operating income. The Company capitalizes interest costs that are incurred during the construction of property and equipment. Property and equipment was recorded at its estimated fair value in connection with the application of fresh start accounting, resulting in the remeasurement of accumulated depreciation to $0 as of October 24, 2014 (see Note 3). Depreciation expense was $16, $113, $130 and $144 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Capitalized SoftwareThe Company capitalizes certain costs, such as software coding, installation and testing, that are incurred to purchase or create and implement computer software for internal use. Amortization is recorded on the straight-line basis over the estimated useful lives, which range from 1 to 5 years.

Goodwill and Intangibles—The excess of purchase price over net tangible and identifiable intangible assets of businesses acquired is carried as “Goodwill” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets in the Predecessor period. Separately identifiable intangible assets that are used in the operations of the business (e.g., patents and technology, customer lists and contracts) are recorded at cost (fair value at the time of acquisition) and reported as “Other intangible assets, net” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. Costs to renew or extend the term of identifiable intangible assets are expensed as incurred. The Company does not amortize goodwill or indefinite-lived intangible assets. Intangible assets with determinable lives are amortized on a straight-line basis over the shorter of the legal or useful life of the assets, which range from 6 to 13 years (see Note 9).

ImpairmentThe Company reviews property and equipment and all amortizable intangible assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of these assets may not be recoverable. Recoverability is based on estimated undiscounted cash flows or other relevant observable measures. The Company tests goodwill and indefinite-lived intangibles for impairment annually, or when events or changes in circumstances indicate impairment may exist, by comparing the estimated fair value of each reporting unit to its carrying value to determine if there is an indication that a potential impairment may exist.

Goodwill

The Company performs an annual assessment of qualitative factors to determine whether the existence of any events or circumstances leads to a determination that it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets. If, after assessing all events and circumstances, the Company determines it is more likely than not that the fair value of a reporting unit is less than the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s net assets, the Company uses a probability weighted market and income approach to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit. The Company’s market approach is a

 

F-20


Table of Contents

comparable analysis technique commonly used in the investment banking and private equity industries based on the EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) multiple technique. Under this technique, estimated fair value is the result of a market-based EBITDA multiple that is applied to an appropriate historical EBITDA amount, adjusted for the additional fair value that would be assigned by a market participant obtaining control over the reporting unit. The Company’s income approach is a discounted cash flow model. When the carrying amount of the reporting unit’s goodwill is greater than the estimated fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill, an impairment loss is recognized for the difference.

At both October 1, 2014 and 2013, the estimated fair value of each of the Company’s reporting units was deemed to be substantially in excess of the carrying amount of assets (including goodwill) and liabilities assigned to each unit.

General InsuranceThe Company is generally insured for losses and liabilities for workers’ compensation, physical damage to property, business interruption and comprehensive general, product and vehicle liability under high-deductible insurance policies. The Company records losses when they are probable and reasonably estimable and amortizes insurance premiums over the life of the respective insurance policies.

Legal Claims and CostsThe Company accrues for legal claims and costs in the period in which a claim is made or an event becomes known, if the amounts are probable and reasonably estimable. Each claim is assigned a range of potential liability and the most likely amount is accrued. If there is no amount in the range of potential liability that is most likely, the low end of the range is accrued. The amount accrued includes all costs associated with the claim, including settlements, assessments, judgments, fines and incurred legal fees (see Note 14).

Environmental Matters—Accruals for environmental matters are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the liability can be reasonably estimated. Environmental accruals are reviewed on a quarterly basis and as events and developments warrant (see Note 14).

Asset Retirement Obligations—Asset retirement obligations are initially recorded at their estimated net present values in the period in which the obligation occurs, with a corresponding increase to the related long-lived asset. Over time, the liability is accreted to its settlement value and the capitalized cost is depreciated over the useful life of the related asset. When the liability is settled, a gain or loss is recognized for any difference between the settlement amount and the liability that was recorded.

Revenue Recognition—Revenue for product sales, net of estimated allowances and returns, is recognized as risk and title to the product transfer to the customer, which either occurs at the time shipment is made or upon delivery. In situations where product is delivered by pipeline, risk and title transfers when the product moves across an agreed-upon transfer point, which is typically the customers’ property line. Product sales delivered by pipeline are measured based on daily flow meter readings. The Company’s standard terms of delivery are included in its contracts of sale or on its invoices.

Shipping and Handling—Freight costs that are billed to customers are included in “Net sales” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. Shipping costs are incurred to move the Company’s products from production and storage facilities to the customer. Handling costs are incurred from the point the product is removed from inventory until it is provided to the shipper and generally include costs to store, move and prepare the products for shipment. Shipping and handling costs are recorded in “Cost of sales” and “Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Research and Development Costs—Funds are committed to research and development activities for technical improvement of products and processes that are expected to contribute to future earnings. All costs associated with research and development are charged to expense as incurred. Research and development and technical service expense was $13, $63, $70 and $69 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through

 

F-21


Table of Contents

December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and is included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Restructuring and Other CostsThe Company incurred “Restructuring and other costs” totaling $5, $20, $21 and $43 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. For 2013 and 2012, these costs primarily represent expenses to implement productivity savings programs to optimize the Company’s cost structure. Also included in these amounts for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 are costs related to one-time payments for services and integration expenses (see Note 6). For 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with restructuring our capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing.

Pension Liabilities—Pension assumptions are significant inputs to the actuarial models that measure pension benefit obligations and related effects on operations. Two assumptions—discount rate and expected return on assets—are important elements of plan expense and asset/liability measurement. The Company evaluates these critical assumptions at least annually on a plan and country-specific basis. The Company periodically evaluates other assumptions involving demographic factors, such as retirement age, mortality and turnover, and updates them to reflect the Company’s experience and expectations for the future. Actual results in any given year will often differ from actuarial assumptions because of economic and other factors.

Accumulated and projected benefit obligations are measured as the present value of future cash payments. The Company discounts those cash payments using the weighted average of market-observed yields for high quality fixed income securities with maturities that correspond to the payment of benefits. Lower discount rates increase present values and subsequent-year pension expense; higher discount rates decrease present values and subsequent-year pension expense.

To determine the expected long-term rate of return on pension plan assets, the Company considers current and expected asset allocations, as well as historical and expected returns on various categories of plan assets. In developing future return expectations for the principal benefit plans’ assets, the Company evaluates general market trends as well as key elements of asset class returns such as expected earnings growth, yields and spreads across a number of potential scenarios.

As a result of the adoption of fresh start accounting upon the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, management elected to change its accounting policy related to the recognition of actuarial gains and losses for defined benefit plans. Specifically, such actuarial gains and losses previously recognized as a component of other comprehensive income/(loss) in the Consolidated Balance Sheets will be recognized directly as a component of earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations under the new policy.

Income TaxesThe Company recognizes deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between the financial statement carrying amounts and the tax bases of the assets and liabilities.

Deferred tax balances are adjusted to reflect tax rates, based on current tax laws, which will be in effect in the years in which temporary differences are expected to reverse. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized (see Note 13).

Unrecognized tax benefits are generated when there are differences between tax positions taken in a tax return and amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements. Tax benefits are recognized in the consolidated financial statements when it is more likely than not that a tax position will be sustained upon examination. Tax benefits are measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely of being realized upon settlement. The Company classifies interest and penalties as a component of tax expense.

 

F-22


Table of Contents

The majority of the Company’s non-U.S. operations have been treated as branches of the U.S. Company and are included in the MPM and MPM Holdings Inc.’s U.S. consolidated income tax return. For the purpose of the consolidated financial statements, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the tax provision for all operations has been prepared on a consolidated basis.

Earnings Per ShareThe Company calculates earnings per share as the ratio of net income (loss) to weighted average basic and diluted common shares outstanding. For the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 there were no potentially issuable common shares; therefore, basic and diluted weighted average shares outstanding were the same. The stock options discussed in Note 12 are options to purchase common units in Hexion Holdings, the Company’s ultimate parent prior to October 24, 2014, and are therefore not included in the diluted earnings per share calculation of the Company.

Stock-Based Compensation—Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award which is amortized as expense over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis (see Note 12).

Concentrations of Credit Risk—Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to concentrations of credit risk are primarily temporary investments and accounts receivable. The Company places its temporary investments with high quality institutions and, by policy, limits the amount of credit exposure to any one institution. Concentrations of credit risk for accounts receivable are limited due to the large number of customers in the Company’s customer base and their dispersion across many different industries and geographies. The Company generally does not require collateral or other security to support customer receivables.

Concentrations of Supplier RiskThe Company relies on long-term agreements with key suppliers for most of its raw materials. The loss of a key source of supply or a delay in shipments could have an adverse effect on its business. Should any of the suppliers fail to deliver or should any of the key long-term supply contracts be canceled, the Company would be forced to purchase raw materials at current market prices. The Company’s largest supplier provides approximately 9% of raw material purchases. In addition, several of the feedstocks at various facilities are transported through a pipeline from one supplier.

Subsequent EventsThe Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to December 31, 2014 through March 30, 2015, the date of issuance of its Consolidated Financial Statements, with respect to the Predecessor Company, and updated the evaluation in subsequent events through April 14, 2015 and June 17, 2015, with respect to the Successor Company.

ReclassificationsCertain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform with current presentations.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance and most industry-specific guidance applicable to revenue recognition. According to the new guidance, an entity will apply a principles-based five step model to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period and early application is not permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2014-09 on its financial statements.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-15: Presentation of Financial Statements—Going Concern—Disclosures of Uncertainties about an entity’s Ability to Continue as a

 

F-23


Table of Contents

Going Concern (“ASU 2014-15”). ASU 2014-15 provides new guidance related to management’s responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity’s ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards and to provide related footnote disclosures. This new guidance is effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. The requirements of ASU 2014-15 are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-17: Business Combinations—Pushdown Accounting (“ASU 2014-17”). ASU 2014-17 provides an acquired entity with an option to apply pushdown accounting in its separate financial statements upon occurrence of an event in which an acquirer obtains control of the acquired entity. This new guidance became effective on November 18, 2014. The requirements of ASU 2014-17 did not have any impact on the Company’s financial statements.

6. Restructuring and Other Costs

Included in restructuring and other costs are costs related to restructuring (primarily severance payments associated with workforce reductions) and services and other expenses associated with transformation savings activities and cost optimization programs.

In 2012, in response to the uncertain economic outlook, the Company initiated significant restructuring programs with the intent to optimize its cost structure. Prior to the second quarter of 2012, the Company had recognized significant restructuring costs primarily related to the prior integration with Hexion Inc. (formerly, Momentive Specialty Chemicals Inc., “Hexion”). At December 31, 2013, the Company had substantially completed its restructuring and cost optimization programs.

The following table summarizes restructuring information. These costs are primarily related to workforce reductions:

 

Predecessor

   Total  

Accrued liability at December 31, 2011

   $ 8   

Restructuring charges

     23   

Payments

     (14
  

 

 

 

Accrued liability at December 31, 2012

     17   

Reserve adjustments

     (1

Payments

     (12
  

 

 

 

Accrued liability at December 31, 2013

   $ 4   
  

 

 

 

Workforce reduction costs primarily relate to non-voluntary employee termination benefits and are accounted for under the guidance for nonretirement postemployment benefits or as exit and disposal costs, as applicable. For the year ended December 31, 2012, charges of $23 are included in “Restructuring and other costs” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. At December 31, 2013, the Company had accrued $4 for restructuring liabilities in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. All of the restructuring activity was related to the Silicones segment.

For the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company recognized other costs of $5, $20, $21 and $20, respectively. These costs are primarily comprised of one-time payments for services and integration expenses, and are included in “Restructuring and other costs” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the successor period from October 25, 2014 to December 31, 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with restructuring our capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing.

 

F-24


Table of Contents

7. Related Party Transactions

Administrative Services, Management and Consulting Agreement

The Company was subject to a management consulting and advisory services agreement with Apollo and its affiliates for the provision of management and advisory services for an initial term of up to twelve years. The Company also agreed to indemnify Apollo and its affiliates and their directors, officers, and representatives for potential losses relating to the services contemplated under these agreements. Terms of the agreement provided for annual fees of $4 plus out of pocket expenses, payable in one lump sum annually, and provided for a lump-sum settlement equal to the net present value of the remaining annual management fees payable under the remaining term of the agreement in connection with a sale or initial public offering by the Company. This annual management fee was waived for 2014 and 2013, and the Company recognized expense of $4 under the agreement during the year ended December 31, 2012.

In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11, the management agreement was terminated pursuant to the Confirmation Order, effective as of the Petition Date.

Transactions with Hexion

Shared Services Agreement

On October 1, 2010, the Company entered into a shared services agreement with Hexion (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary under a common parent) (the “Shared Services Agreement”). Under this agreement, the Company provides to Hexion, and Hexion provides to the Company, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, technology development, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement is subject to termination by either the Company or Hexion, without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2015 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party). The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the costs of such services are allocated between the Company and Hexion.

Pursuant to this agreement, for the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company incurred approximately $99, $92 and $148, respectively, of net costs for shared services and during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, Hexion incurred approximately $131, $121 and $155, respectively, of net costs for shared services. Included in the net costs incurred during the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012 were net billings from Hexion to the Company of $49, $31 and $22, respectively, to bring the percentage of total net incurred costs for shared services under the Shared Services Agreement to the applicable allocation percentage, as well as to reflect costs allocated 100% to one party. The allocation percentage was initially set at 51% for Hexion and 49% for the Company at the inception of the agreement. Following the required annual review by the Steering Committee in accordance with the terms of the Shared Service Agreement, the allocation percentage for 2013 was set at 43% for the Company and 57% for Hexion. The Company had accounts receivable of $0 as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, and accounts payable to Hexion of $9 and $4 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. During the years ended December 31, 2014, 2013 and 2012, the Company realized approximately $1, $9 and $31, respectively, in cost savings as a result of the Shared Services Agreement.

In conjunction with the consummation of the Plan, the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations.

 

F-25


Table of Contents

Purchases and Sales of Products and Services with Hexion

The Company also sells products to, and purchase products from, Hexion pursuant to a Master Buy/Sell Agreement dated as of September 6, 2012 (the “Master Buy/Sell Agreement”). Prices under the agreement are determined by a formula based upon certain third party sales of the applicable product, or in the event that no qualifying third party sales have taken place, based upon the average contribution margin generated by certain third party sales of products in the same or a similar industry. The standard terms and conditions of the seller in the applicable jurisdiction apply to transactions under the Master Buy/Sell Agreement. A subsidiary of the Company also acts as a non-exclusive distributor in India for certain of Hexion’s subsidiaries pursuant to Distribution Agreements dated as of September 6, 2012 (the “Distribution Agreements”). Prices under the Distribution Agreements are determined by a formula based on the weighted average sales price of the applicable product less a margin. The Master Buy/Sell Agreement and Distribution Agreements have initial terms of 3 years and may be terminated for convenience by either party thereunder upon 30 days’ prior notice in the case of the Master Buy/Sell Agreement and upon 90 days’ prior notice in the case of the Distribution Agreements. Pursuant to these agreements and other purchase orders, for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company sold $1, $7, $9 and $3, respectively, of products to Hexion and purchased less than $1 of products from Hexion. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company had $2 and $1, respectively, of accounts receivable from Hexion and less than $1 of accounts payable to Hexion related to these agreements.

Other Transactions with Hexion

In March 2014, the Company entered into a ground lease with a Brazilian subsidiary of Hexion to lease a portion of the Company’s manufacturing site in Itatiba, Brazil, where the subsidiary of Hexion will construct and operate an epoxy production facility. In conjunction with the ground lease, the Company also entered into a site services agreement whereby it will provide to the subsidiary of Hexion various services such as environmental, health and safety, security, maintenance and accounting, amongst others, to support the operation of this new facility. The Company received less than $1 from Hexion under this agreement during the year ended December 31, 2014.

In April 2014, the Company sold 100% of its interest in its Canadian subsidiary to a subsidiary of Hexion for a purchase price of $12. As a part of the transaction the Company also entered into a non-exclusive distribution agreement with a subsidiary of Hexion, whereby the subsidiary of Hexion will act as a distributor of certain of the Company’s products in Canada. The agreement has a term of 10 years, and is cancelable by either party with 180 days’ notice. The Company compensates the subsidiary of Hexion for acting as distributor at a rate of 2% of the net selling price of the related products sold. During the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, the Company sold approximately $7 and $22, respectively, of products to Hexion under this distribution agreement, and paid less than $1 to Hexion as compensation for acting as distributor of the products. As of December 31, 2014, the Company had $2 of accounts receivable from Hexion related to the distribution agreement.

As both the Company and Hexion shared a common ultimate parent at the time of the transaction, this sale was accounted for as a transaction under common control, as defined in the accounting guidance for business combinations. As such, the loss on the sale of $3 was accounted for as a capital distribution, and is reflected in “Paid-in-Capital” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Transactions with Affiliates Other Than Hexion

Purchases and Sales of Products and Services

The Company sells products to various Apollo and GE affiliates other than Hexion. These sales were $1, $10, $9 and $16 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor

 

F-26


Table of Contents

period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company had accounts receivable from these affiliates of $1 at both December 31, 2014 and 2013. The Company also purchases products and services from various affiliates other than Hexion. These purchases were less than $1, $13, $19 and $17 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively. The Company had accounts payable to these affiliates of less than $1 and $2 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively. Transactions with GE affiliates are included in the predecessor period only, as GE was a related party prior to the termination of the Cash Flow Facility.

ASM Off-Take Agreement

Through May 17, 2013, the Company was a party to an (i) off-take agreement (the “Old Off-Take Agreement”) with Asia Silicones Monomer Limited (“ASM”), which was 50% owned by GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte Ltd. up until such date, and (ii) a long-term supply agreement with General Electric Company (“GE”) and GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte. Ltd. (the “Old GE Supply Agreement”), which was entered into at the closing of the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. Under the Old Off-Take Agreement, ASM was obligated to provide siloxane and certain related products to the Company through 2014 (or until certain ASM financing obligations were satisfied). Under the Old GE Supply Agreement, GE and GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte. Ltd. agreed to ensure the Company a minimum annual supply of siloxane and certain related products from ASM or an alternative source in certain circumstances through December 2026. Under the Old Off-Take Agreement, the Company purchased approximately $35 of siloxane and certain related products from ASM in 2013. Subsequent to May 17, 2013, the Company continues to purchase siloxane and certain related products from ASM under a new agreement whereby ASM is not a considered a related party.

On May 17, 2013, the Company entered into a new purchase and sale agreement (the “PSA”) with ASM in connection with the sale (the “GE ASM Sale”) by GE Monomer (Holdings) Pte Ltd., an affiliate of the General Electric Company (“GE”) of its equity interests in ASM. As a result of the GE ASM Sale, ASM is no longer an affiliate of the Company. The new PSA provides the Company with a long-term supply of siloxane through 2026 and the option to extend such agreement through 2036. The PSA replaced and superseded the Old Off-Take Agreement and the Old GE Supply Agreement. In connection with the foregoing transactions, Old MPM Holdings received a one-time payment of approximately $102 from GE, which amount was subsequently contributed to the Company.

Trademark License Agreement

Also on May 17, 2013, the Company entered into an amendment to the Trademark License Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2006, by and between GE Monogram Licensing International and the Company, to, among other things, revise the royalty payable to GE Monogram Licensing International and provide for an option to extend such agreement for an additional five-year period through 2023. In connection with the amendment, Old MPM Holdings recorded a gain and related intangible asset of $7. The intangible asset was subsequently contributed to the Company. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, on October 24, 2014, the intangible asset related to the agreement was written-off.

Revolving Credit Facility

In April 2013, the Company entered into a $75 revolving credit facility with an affiliate of GE (the “Cash Flow Facility”) (see Note 10). Prior to entry into the Cash Flow Facility, an affiliate of GE was one of the lenders under the Company’s Old Revolver (as further described in Note 10), representing approximately $160 of the lenders’ $300 revolving credit facility commitment.

In connection with the consummation of the Plan, on October 24, 2014, the Company repaid in full all outstanding amounts under the Cash Flow Facility. Upon making these payments, the Company’s obligations under the Cash Flow Facility were satisfied in full and the Cash Flow Facility was immediately terminated.

 

F-27


Table of Contents

Participation of Apollo Global Securities in Refinancing Transactions

In 2012, Apollo Global Securities, LLC (“AGS”), an affiliate of Apollo, acted as one of the initial purchasers and received less than $1 and $1 in connection with the Company’s sales of the Senior Secured Notes and the First Lien Notes, respectively (see Note 10). AGS also received less than $1 in connection with arranging the issuance of the Senior Secured Notes and $1 in connection with arranging the issuance of the First Lien Notes and the commitments for the ABL Facility (see Note 10).

Transactions and Arrangements with Parent and its Subsidiaries

Prior to June 30, 2014, Hexion Holdings LLC (formerly, Momentive Performance Materials Holdings LLC) (the Company’s ultimate parent prior to October 24, 2014) (“Hexion Holdings”) purchased insurance policies which also covered the Company and Hexion. Amounts were billed to the Company annually based on the Company’s relative share of the insurance premiums and amortized over the term of the policy. Hexion Holdings billed the Company $9 in 2013. The Company had accounts payable to Hexion Holdings of approximately $3 under these arrangements at December 31, 2013.

In April 2014, the Company entered into an accounts receivable purchase and sale agreement with Superholdco Finance Corp. (“Finco”), a newly formed subsidiary of Hexion Holdings. The agreement contains customary terms and conditions associated with such arrangements. On April 7, 2014, under this agreement, the Company sold approximately $51 of accounts receivable to Finco, and received 95% of the proceeds in cash, with the remaining 5% to be received in cash when the sold receivables were fully collected by Finco. The agreement also appointed the Company to act as the servicer of the receivables on behalf of Finco.

Finco was deemed to be a VIE, and the 5% holdback of cash by Finco represented the Company’s variable interest in Finco. The power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the VIE is shared between the Company and the other related party variable interest entity holder. The 5% holdback of cash by Finco previously resulted in the Company absorbing the majority of the risk from potential losses or the majority of the gains from potential returns of the VIE and, therefore, the Company had consolidated Finco in its Consolidated Financial Statements during a portion of the year ended December 31, 2014. As a result, the Company consolidated $50 of cash and cash equivalents and a $50 affiliated loan payable. During the third quarter of 2014, the affiliated loan payable was repaid in full and the 5% holdback of cash was received from Finco. As such, as of December 31, 2014, the Company does not absorb the majority of risk from the potential losses or the majority of the gains from potential returns of the VIE, and therefore, as of December 31, 2014, the Company does not consolidate Finco.

In March 2014, the Company entered into an Employee Services Agreement with Hexion Holdings, Hexion and Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Employee Corporation (“Employee Corp”), a subsidiary of Hexion Holdings (the “Services Agreement”). The Services Agreement provided for the executive services of Mr. Jack Boss, an employee of Employee Corp., to be made available to the Company and set forth the terms with respect to payment for the cost of such services. Mr. Boss was elected Executive Vice President and President Silicones and Quartz Division of the Company effective March 31, 2014. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, the Company agreed to pay 100% of Mr. Boss’ costs of employment which are comprised of “covered costs” including an annual base salary of $585,000, a sign-on bonus of $1.3 million payable between 2014 and 2015, annual incentive compensation, relocation costs, severance and benefits and other standard reasonable business expenses.

In December 2014, Mr. Boss was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company. In connection with the appointment, MPM Holdings assumed from Hexion Holdings the terms of the accepted offer of employment with Mr. Boss. The Company paid less than $1 under this agreement during the year ended December 31, 2014.

 

F-28


Table of Contents

8. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy exists, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:

 

   

Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

   

Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.

 

   

Level 3: Unobservable inputs, that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At both December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had less than $1 of natural gas derivative contracts, which are measured using Level 2 inputs, and are included in “Other current assets” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the natural gas derivative contracts generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay, on a pre-tax basis, to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based on broker quotes for the same or similar instruments. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades in the year ended December 31, 2014 that would reduce the fair value receivable amount owed, if any, to the Company. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 measurements during the year ended December 31, 2014.

The following table summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s non-derivative financial instruments at December 31, 2014:

 

     Carrying
Amount
     Fair Value  

Successor

      Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

December 31, 2014

              

Debt

   $ 1,201       $ —         $ 1,166       $ —         $ 1,166   

Predecessor

                                  

December 31, 2013

              

Debt

   $ 3,257       $ —         $ 3,029       $ —         $ 3,029   

Fair values of debt classified as Level 2 are determined based on other similar financial instruments, or based upon interest rates that are currently available to the Company for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities are considered reasonable estimates of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

 

F-29


Table of Contents

9. Goodwill and Intangible Assets

In connection with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 and application of fresh start accounting, and the resulting allocation of the reorganization value to its individual assets based on their estimated fair values, the Company recorded goodwill of $224 as of October 24, 2014. The Company’s gross carrying amount and accumulated impairments of goodwill consist of the following as of December 31:

 

     Successor      Predecessor  
      2014      2013  
     Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Impairments
     Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
    Net
Book
Value
     Gross
Carrying
Amount
     Accumulated
Impairments
    Accumulated
Foreign
Currency
Translation
     Net
Book
Value
 

Silicones

   $ 205       $ —         $ (6   $ 199       $ 988       $ (700   $ 93       $ 381   

Quartz

     19         —           —          19         149         (158     9         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 224       $ —         $ (6   $ 218       $ 1,137       $ (858   $ 102       $ 381   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

The changes in the net carrying amount of goodwill by segment for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 are as follows:

 

Predecessor

   Silicones     Quartz      Total  

Balance as of December 31, 2012

   $ 412      $ —         $ 412   

Foreign currency translation

     (31     —           (31
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2013

     381        —           381   

Foreign currency translation

     (23     —           (23
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of October 24, 2014

   $ 358      $ —         $ 358   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Successor

                   

Balance as of October 25, 2014

   $ 205      $ 19       $ 224   

Foreign currency translation

     (6     —           (6
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

   $ 199      $ 19       $ 218   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

In conjunction with fresh start accounting, the Company wrote-off existing intangibles assets, net and recorded $424 of new intangible assets, reflecting the estimated fair value of other intangible assets as of October 24, 2014 (see Note 3).

The Company’s intangible assets with identifiable useful lives consist of the following as of December 31:

 

    Successor     Predecessor  
    2014     2013  
    Gross
Carrying
Amount
    Accumulated
Impairments
    Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Book
Value
    Gross
Carrying
Amount
    Accumulated
Impairments
    Accumulated
Amortization
    Net
Book
Value
 

Customer relationships

  $ 223      $ —        $ (8   $ 215      $ 426      $ —        $ (170   $ 256   

Trademarks

    60        —          (2     58        150        —          (64     86   

Technology

    105        —          (5     100        144        —          (56     88   

Patents and other

    36        —          (1     35        67        —          (42     25   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

  $ 424      $ —        $ (16   $ 408      $ 787      $ —        $ (332   $ 455   
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The impact of foreign currency translation on intangible assets is included in accumulated amortization.

 

F-30


Table of Contents

Total intangible amortization expense for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $6, $34, $41 and $43, respectively.

Estimated annual intangible amortization expense for 2015 through 2019 is as follows:

 

2015

   $  37   

2016

     37   

2017

     37   

2018

     37   

2019

     37   

10. Debt and Lease Obligations

Debt outstanding as of December 31, 2014 and 2013 is as follows:

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     2014     2013  
     Long-Term      Due Within
One Year
    Long-Term      Due Within
One Year
 

Senior Secured Credit Facilities:

            

ABL Facility

   $ —         $ —        $ —         $ —     

Old ABL Facility

     —           —          —           135   

Cash Flow Facility

     —           —          —           —     

Secured Notes:

            

3.88% First Lien Notes due 2021 (includes $140 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2014)

     960         —          —           —     

4.69% Second Lien Notes due 2022 (includes $47 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2014)

     203         —          —           —     

8.875% First Lien Notes due 2020

     —           —          —           1,100   

10.00% Senior Secured Notes due 2020

     —           —          —           250   

9.00% Springing Lien Dollar Notes due 2021

     —           —          —           1,161   

9.50% Springing Lien Euro Notes due 2021

     —           —          —           183   

Other Borrowings:

            

11.50% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2016 (includes $2 of unamortized debt discount at December 31, 2013)

     —           —          —           382   

China bank loans at 5.0% and 5.9% at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

     —           32        7         33   

Other at 6.6% and 11.5% at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively

     —           6        —           6   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt

   $ 1,163       $ 38      $ 7       $ 3,250   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

ABL Facility

Upon consummation of the Plan by the Company on October 24, 2014, the Company exercised its option to convert the DIP ABL Facility into an exit asset-based revolving facility (the “ ABL Facility”). The ABL Facility has a five year term and a maximum availability of $270. The ABL Facility is also subject to a borrowing base that is based on a specified percentage of eligible accounts receivable and inventory and, in certain foreign jurisdictions, machinery and equipment.

The ABL Facility bears interest based on, at the Company’s option, (a) with respect to Tranche A Revolving Facility Commitments (as defined in the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility), an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 2.00% or an alternate base rate plus an applicable margin of 1.00% and (b) with

 

F-31


Table of Contents

respect to Tranche B Revolving Facility Commitments (as defined in the credit agreement governing the ABL Facility), an adjusted LIBOR rate plus an applicable margin of 2.75% or an alternative base rate plus an applicable margin of 1.75%, in each case, subject to adjustment depending on usage. In addition to paying interest on outstanding principal under the ABL Facility, the Company will be required to pay a commitment fee to the lenders in respect of the unutilized commitments at an initial rate equal to 0.375% per annum, subject to adjustment depending on the usage. The ABL Facility does not have any financial maintenance covenants, other than a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 that only applies if availability is less than the greater of (a) 12.5% of the lesser of the borrowing base and the total ABL Facility commitments at such time and (b) $27. The fixed charge coverage ratio under the agreement governing the ABL Facility is defined as the ratio of (a) Adjusted EBITDA minus non-financed capital expenditures and cash taxes to (b) debt service plus cash interest expense plus certain restricted payments, each measured on a last twelve months basis.

The ABL Facility is secured by, among other things, first-priority liens on most of the inventory and accounts receivable and related assets of the Company, its domestic subsidiaries and certain of its foreign subsidiaries, and, in the case of certain foreign subsidiaries, machinery and equipment (the “ ABL Priority Collateral”), and second-priority liens on certain collateral that generally includes most of the Company’s, its domestic subsidiaries’ and certain of its foreign subsidiaries’ assets other than ABL Priority Collateral (the “DIP Term Loan Priority Collateral”), in each case subject to certain exceptions and permitted liens.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under the ABL Facility. Outstanding letters of credit under the ABL Facility at December 31, 2014 were $72, leaving an unused borrowing capacity of $198 (without triggering the financial maintenance covenant under the ABL Facility).

Debtor-in-Possession Financing

DIP ABL Facility and DIP Term Loan Facility

In April 2014, in connection with the Bankruptcy Filing, Old MPM Holdings, the Company and certain of its subsidiaries entered into the DIP ABL Facility and the DIP Term Loan Facility. The DIP ABL Facility amended and restated the Company’s previous ABL Facility described below. During 2014, the Company borrowed $300 under the DIP Term Loan Facility, the proceeds of which were used in part to repay the outstanding balance under the Old ABL Facility.

The DIP ABL Facility and the DIP Term Loan Facility were terminated upon consummation of the Plan by the Company on October 24, 2014, at which time the Company exercised its option to convert the DIP ABL Facility into the ABL Facility described above and all amounts outstanding under the DIP Term Loan Facility as of such date were repaid in full.

Prior Senior Secured Credit Facilities

Old ABL Facility and Cash Flow Facility

In April 2013, the Company entered into two senior secured revolving credit facilities: a $270 asset-based revolving loan facility with a syndicate of lenders (the “Old ABL Facility”), and a $75 revolving credit facility with an affiliate of GE, which supplemented the ABL Facility (the “Cash Flow Facility”).

In connection with the Bankruptcy Filing, the Debtors entered into the DIP ABL Facility, which amended and restated the Company’s Old ABL Facility. Upon consummation of the Plan by the Company on October 24, 2014, the Company exercised its option to convert the DIP ABL Facility into the ABL Facility described above and all amounts outstanding under the DIP Term Loan Facility as of such date were repaid in full.

Also in connection with the consummation of the Plan, on October 24, 2014, the Company repaid in full all outstanding amounts under the Cash Flow Facility. Upon making these payments, the Company’s obligations under the Cash Flow Facility were satisfied in full and the Cash Flow Facility was immediately terminated.

 

F-32


Table of Contents

Secured Notes

First Lien Notes and Old First Lien Notes

In October 2012, MPM Escrow LLC and MPM Finance Escrow Corp. (the “Escrow Issuers”), wholly owned special purpose subsidiaries of the Company, issued $1,100 principal amount of 8.875% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2020 (the “Old First Lien Notes”) in a private offering. A portion of the proceeds from the sale of Old First Lien Notes used to repurchase the Company’s outstanding $200 aggregate principal amount of 12 1/2% Second-Lien Senior Secured Notes due 2014, which were redeemed at a redemption price equal to 103.125% plus accrued and unpaid interest to the redemption date. The Company recognized a loss of $51, including $12 of foreign currency exchange losses, on this extinguishment of debt. Included in the loss of $51 is an out of period credit of $4 related to an over expensing of debt discount interest on the Old Second Lien Notes that was not material to the prior years. These amounts are included in “Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Upon consummation of the Plan, on October 24, 2014, the Company issued $1,100 aggregate principal amount of 3.88% First Lien Notes due 2021 (the “First Lien Notes”). The First Lien Notes were issued as replacement for the Company’s existing $1,100 outstanding principal amount of 8.875% First Lien Notes due 2020.

The First Lien Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of the Company’s existing U.S. subsidiaries that is a guarantor under the Company’s ABL Facility and the Company’s future U.S. subsidiaries (other than receivables subsidiaries and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign subsidiaries) that guarantee any debt of the Company or any of the guarantor subsidiaries of the Company under the related indenture (the “Note Guarantors”). Pursuant to customary release provisions in the indenture governing the First Lien Notes, the Note Guarantors may be released from their guarantee of the First Lien Notes (the “First Lien Note Guarantees”). The First Lien Notes are not guaranteed by MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc.

The First Lien Notes and First Lien Note Guarantees are senior indebtedness of the Company and the Note Guarantors, respectively, and rank equal in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company and the Note Guarantors, respectively; senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company and the Note Guarantors and guarantees thereof; and structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of any of the Company’s subsidiaries that do not guarantee the First Lien Notes.

The First Lien Notes and First Lien Note Guarantees have the benefit of first-priority liens on the collateral of the Company and the Note Guarantors other than the ABL Priority Collateral, with respect to which the First Lien Notes and First Lien Note Guarantees have the benefit of second-priority liens. Consequently, the First Lien Notes rank effectively junior in priority to the Company’s obligations under the ABL Facility to the extent of the value of the ABL Priority Collateral; equal with holders of other obligations secured pari passu with the First Lien Notes including other first priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral); effectively senior to any junior priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral) including the Second Lien Notes (further described below) and the Company’s obligations under the ABL Facility to the extent of the value of the collateral that is not ABL Priority Collateral; and effectively senior to any senior unsecured obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral).

Interest on the First Lien Notes is payable at 3.88% per annum, semiannually to holders of record at the close of business on April 1st or October 1st immediately preceding the interest payment date on April 15th and October 15th of each year, commencing on April 15, 2015. The Company may redeem some or all of the First Lien Notes at any time at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The First Lien Notes were recorded at their estimated fair value on the Effective Date, which was determined based on a market approach utilizing current market yields.

 

F-33


Table of Contents

Senior Secured Notes and Second Lien Notes

In May 2012, the Company issued $250 in aggregate principal amount of 10% Senior Secured Notes due October 2020 (the “Senior Secured Notes”) at an issue price of 100%. The Company used the net proceeds to repay $240 in aggregate principal amount of existing term loans maturing May 2015 under the Company’s prior senior secured credit facilities. The Company recognized a loss of $6 on this extinguishment of debt, which is included in “Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

Upon consummation of the Plan, on October 24, 2014, the Company issued $250 aggregate principal amount of 4.69% Second Lien Notes due 2022 (the “ Second Lien Notes”). The Second Lien Notes were issued as replacement for the Company’s existing $250 outstanding principal amount of 10% Senior Secured Notes due 2020 in connection with the Plan and the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11.

The Second Lien Notes are fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior secured basis by each of the Company’s existing U.S. subsidiaries that is a guarantor under the Company’s ABL Facility and the Company’s future U.S. subsidiaries (other than receivables subsidiaries and U.S. subsidiaries of foreign subsidiaries) that guarantee any debt of the Company or any Note Guarantor. Pursuant to customary release provisions in the indenture governing the Second Lien Notes, the Note Guarantors may be released from their guarantee of the Second Lien Notes (the “Second Lien Note Guarantees”). The Second Lien Notes are not guaranteed by MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc.

The Second Lien Notes and Second Lien Note Guarantees are senior indebtedness of the Company and the Note Guarantors, respectively, and rank equal in right of payment with all existing and future senior indebtedness of the Company and the Note Guarantors, respectively; senior in right of payment to all existing and future subordinated indebtedness of the Company and the Note Guarantors and guarantees thereof; and structurally subordinated to all existing and future indebtedness and other liabilities of any of the Company’s subsidiaries that do not guarantee the Second Lien Notes.

The Second Lien Notes and Second Lien Note Guarantees have the benefit of second-priority liens on the collateral of the Company and the Note Guarantors. Consequently, the Second Lien Notes rank effectively junior in priority to the Company’s obligations under the ABL Facility, the First Lien Notes and other first priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral); equal with holders of other obligations secured pari passu with the Second Lien Notes (to the extent of the value of such collateral); effectively senior to any junior priority obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral); and effectively senior to any senior unsecured obligations (to the extent of the value of such collateral).

Interest on the Second Lien Notes is payable at 4.69% per annum, semiannually to holders of record at the close of business on April 1st or October 1st immediately preceding the interest payment date on April 15th and October 15th of each year, commencing on April 15, 2015. The Company may redeem some or all of the Second Lien Notes at any time at a redemption price of 100% of the principal amount plus accrued and unpaid interest.

The Second Lien Notes were recorded at their estimated fair value on the Effective Date, which was determined based on a market approach utilizing current market yields.

Springing Lien Notes

In November 2010, the Company issued approximately $848 U.S. dollar equivalent principal amount of USD 9.0% Second-Priority Springing Lien Notes due 2021 (the “Springing Lien Dollar Notes”) and EUR 9.5% Second-Priority Springing Lien Notes due 2021 (the “Springing Lien Euro Notes” and, together with the Springing Lien Dollar Notes, the “Springing Lien Notes”) in a private offering (the “Springing Lien Note Offering”).

 

F-34


Table of Contents

In connection with the consummation of the Plan, the Company’s Springing Lien Dollar Notes and Springing Lien Euro Notes were converted into the new equity of the Successor Company (resulting in the issuance of 11,791,126 shares of New Common Stock), subject to dilution by the management incentive plan and the Rights Offering Stock. Additionally, holders of the Springing Lien Notes were given subscription rights in the Rights Offerings (resulting in the issuance of 36,197,874 shares of New Common Stock (including shares issued in connection with the Backstop Commitment)).

Senior Subordinated Notes

The Senior Subordinated Notes were unsecured senior subordinated obligations of the Company. In connection with the consummation of the Plan, the Company’s Senior Subordinated Notes were canceled on account of the subordination provisions set forth in the indenture to the Senior Subordinated Notes.

General

The indentures governing the First Lien Notes and the Second Lien Notes contain covenants that, among other things, limit the Company’s ability and the ability of certain of the Company’s subsidiaries to (i) incur or guarantee additional indebtedness or issue preferred stock; (ii) grant liens on assets; (iii) pay dividends or make distributions to the Company’s stockholders; (iv) repurchase or redeem capital stock or subordinated indebtedness; (v) make investments or acquisitions; (vi) enter into sale/leaseback transactions; (vii) incur restrictions on the ability of the Company’s subsidiaries to pay dividends or to make other payments to us; (viii) enter into transactions with the Company’s affiliates; (ix) merge or consolidate with other companies or transfer all or substantially all of the Company’s assets; and (x) transfer or sell assets.

The Bankruptcy Filing, was an event of default under the Old ABL Facility, the Cash Flow Facility and the indentures that govern the Company’s previously outstanding notes. As such, all outstanding debt as of December 31, 2013 related to the ABL Facility, the Cash Flow Facility, the Old First Lien Notes, the Senior Secured Notes, the Springing Lien Notes and the Senior Subordinated Notes were classified as “Debt payable within one year” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets and related footnote disclosures.

As of December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all the covenants included in the agreements governing its outstanding indebtedness.

Scheduled Maturities

Aggregate maturities of debt and minimum rentals under operating leases at December 31, 2014 for the Company are as follows:

 

Year

   Debt      Minimum
Rentals
Under
Operating
Leases
 

2015

   $ 38       $ 17   

2016

     —           14   

2017

     —           10   

2018

     —           7   

2019

     —           6   

2020 and thereafter

     1,350         21   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,388       $ 75   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-35


Table of Contents

The Company’s operating leases consist primarily of vehicles, equipment, land and buildings. Rental expense under operating leases amounted to $4, $16, $15 and $25 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

11. Equity (Deficit)

Common Stock

On the Effective Date, all previously issued and outstanding shares of the Predecessor Company’s common stock were canceled, as were all other previously issued and outstanding equity interests. On the Effective Date, MPM issued 7,475,000 shares of New Common Stock pursuant to the Section 1145 Rights Offering and 26,662,690 shares of New Common Stock pursuant to the 4(a)(2) Rights Offering. Additionally, MPM issued 2,060,184 shares of New Common Stock pursuant to the Backstop Commitment, including 1,475,652 shares of New Common Stock issued as consideration for the BCA Commitment Premium. A portion of the 1145 Rights Offering Stock issued to the Commitment Parties, and all of the 4(a)(2) Rights Offering Stock, are restricted securities under the Securities Act, and may not be offered, sold or otherwise transferred except in accordance with applicable restrictions. In addition, upon effectiveness of the Plan, MPM issued 11,791,126 shares of New Common Stock to holders of the Second Lien Notes pursuant to the Second Lien Notes Equity Distribution.

In accordance with the Plan, each share of New Common Stock was automatically exchanged for one share of common stock, par value $0.01 per share, of the Company, which contributed the shares of New Common Stock to its wholly-owned subsidiary, MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc. As a result, MPM is a wholly owned subsidiary of MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc.

The shares of New Common Stock described above were exempt from registration under the Securities Act pursuant to (i) Section 1145 of the Bankruptcy Code, which generally exempts from such registration requirements the issuance of securities under a plan of reorganization, and/or (ii) Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act because the issuance did not involve any public offering.

On November 7, 2014, MPM effected a reverse stock split and, as a result, 48 shares of the New Common Stock remained outstanding at December 31, 2014. MPM has applied effects of the reverse stock split prospectively from the Effective Date, as the common stock outstanding before such time was ultimately cancelled, and New Common Stock was issued on the Effective Date, as discussed above. At December 31, 2013, common stock consisted of 100 shares of Predecessor Company common stock issued and outstanding with a par value of one cent per share. At December 31, 2013, Old MPM Holdings represented the sole shareholder of the Company.

Paid-in Capital

Additional paid-in capital of the Successor Company at December 31, 2014 primarily relates to the issuance of common stock in connection with the $600 Rights Offerings described above, as well as the conversion of the $30 BCA Commitment Premium and the Old Second Lien Notes into equity of the Successor Company (see Note 2).

Additional paid-in capital of the Predecessor Company at December 31, 2013 primarily related to the excess of paid-in-capital over the par value of the common shares from Old MPM Holdings’ capital contribution of $904 to the Company in 2006, net of $305 in deemed dividend to GE.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, in conjunction with the GE ASM Sale, Old MPM Holdings received a one-time payment of approximately $102 from GE, which amount was subsequently contributed to the Company (see Note 7). Additionally, during the year ended December 31, 2013, in connection with an amendment to the Trademark License Agreement, dated as of December 3, 2006, by and between GE Monogram Licensing International and the Company, Old MPM Holdings recorded a gain and related intangible asset of $7. This intangible asset was subsequently contributed to the Company (see Note 7). Both of these transactions were recorded in “Additional Paid-in Capital” in the Consolidated Statements of Deficit.

 

F-36


Table of Contents

12. Stock Option Plans and Stock Based Compensation

Cancellation and Expiration of Outstanding Equity Awards

As of the Effective Date, in conjunction with the Company’s emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy, all outstanding unvested unit options and restricted deferred units were canceled, effective immediately. In addition, all vested unit options to purchase units of Hexion Holdings (the Company’s prior ultimate parent) were modified to have an expiration date 90 days subsequent to the Effective Date, and on January 22, 2015, all such unit options expired unexercised.

Financial Statement Impact

Share-based compensation expense was recognized, net of estimated forfeitures, over the requisite service period on a graded-vesting basis, and is included in “Selling, general and administrative expense” in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The Company adjusted compensation expense periodically for forfeitures.

The Company recognized share-based compensation expense of $0, less than $1, $1 and less than $1 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

Unit Option Activity

Following is a summary of activity under the Company’s unit option plans for the year ended December 31, 2014:

 

     Hexion
Holdings
Common
Units
    Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
 

Outstanding at December 31, 2013

     10,933,986      $ 2.69   

Forfeited

     (14,184   $ 4.85   
  

 

 

   

Outstanding at December 31, 2014

     10,919,802      $ 2.68   
  

 

 

   

All outstanding options as of December 31, 2014 subsequently expired on January 22, 2015.

The total amount of cash received and total intrinsic value (which is the amount by which the stock price exceeded the exercise price of the options on the date of exercise) of options exercised during the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was $0.

Restricted Unit Activity

Following is a summary of activity under the Company’s restricted unit plan for the year ended December 31, 2014:

 

     Hexion Holdings
Common Units
    Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
 

Nonvested at December 31, 2013

     1,174,860      $ 1.92   

Restricted units forfeited

     (2,955   $ 4.85   

Restricted units canceled

     (1,171,905   $ 1.91   
  

 

 

   

Nonvested at December 31, 2014

     —          N/A   
  

 

 

   

 

F-37


Table of Contents

13. Income Taxes

For the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company’s tax provision was computed based on the legal entity structure, as described in Note 1. Any tax benefit or valuation allowance related to net operating losses (“NOL”) was recognized and evaluated on a stand-alone basis.

The domestic and foreign components of (loss) income before income taxes are as follows:

 

     Successor      Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
     Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended December 31,  
              2013             2012      

Domestic

   $ (9    $ 1,983      $ (251   $ (239

Foreign

     (51      (265     (112     (123
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ (60    $ 1,718      $ (363   $ (362
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income tax expense (benefit) attributable to loss from operations consists of:

 

Successor

   Current     Deferred     Total  

Period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014:

      

United States federal

   $ —        $ —        $ —     

State and local

     —          —          —     

Non-U.S. jurisdictions

     10        (10     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 10      $ (10   $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Predecessor

   Current     Deferred     Total  

Period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014:

      

United States federal

   $ 2      $ —        $ 2   

State and local

     —          —          —     

Non-U.S. jurisdictions

     14        20        34   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 16      $ 20      $ 36   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2013:

      

United States federal

   $ —        $ (15   $ (15

State and local

     —          —          —     

Non-U.S. jurisdictions

     18        101        119   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 18      $ 86      $ 104   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year ended December 31, 2012:

      

United States federal

   $ —        $ (7   $ (7

State and local

     (1     —          (1

Non-U.S. jurisdictions

     19        (3     16   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 
   $ 18      $ (10   $ 8   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-38


Table of Contents

Income tax expense attributable to (loss) income before income taxes was $0, $36, $104 and $8 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively, and differed from the amounts computed by applying the U.S. federal income tax rate of 35% to pre-tax loss from continuing operations as a result of the following:

 

     Successor      Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
     Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended December 31,  
              2013             2012      

Income tax expense:

           

Computed expected tax (benefit) expense

   $ (21    $ 603      $ (127   $ (127

State and local income taxes, net of federal income tax benefit

     —           —          —          (1

Increase (reduction) in income taxes resulting from:

           

Tax rate changes

     —           1        —          2   

Non-U.S. tax rate differential

     4         (1     10        (5

Branch accounting effect

     (23      (22     (50     33   

Withholding taxes

     —           —          1        1   

Valuation allowance

     38         (695     172        96   

Reorganization and Fresh Start

     —           101        —          —     

Permanent differences

     1         27        (4     1   

Bankruptcy costs

     1         40        —          —     

Change in permanent reinvestment assertion

     (5      (20     87        —     

Reserves for uncertain tax positions

     5         2        15        4   

Settlements

     —           —          —          4   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ —         $ 36      $ 104      $ 8   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

A significant portion of the Company’s foreign operations are conducted through entities which are treated as branches of the U.S. and thus subject to current U.S. taxation. As a result, the income or loss of each such branch operation is subject to taxation in its foreign jurisdiction of operation, as well as subject to current taxation in the U.S.

 

F-39


Table of Contents

The rate reconciling item, “Non-U.S. rate differential”, reflects the difference between the tax expense or benefit on pre-tax foreign income or loss at the local statutory rate, which is typically lower than 35%, after consideration of permanent differences, and the tax impact of the same pre-tax income or loss as computed at the U.S. statutory rate of 35%. The impact of the rate differential by jurisdiction was as follows:

 

Successor

   Pre-Tax
Income
(Loss)
    Statutory
Rate(1)
    Rate
Effect
 

December 31, 2014:

      

Germany

   $ (61     31.2   $ 2   

Switzerland

     (6     14.4     1   

Japan

     (14     37.8     —     

Other (2)

     6          1   
      

 

 

 
       $ 4   

Predecessor

                  

October 24, 2014:

      

Germany

   $ (56     31.2   $ 1   

Switzerland

     3        14.4     (1

Japan

     (25     37.8     (1

Other (2)

     32          —     
      

 

 

 
       $ (1

December 31, 2013:

      

Germany

   $ (92     31.2   $ 12   

Switzerland

     1        12.3     —     

Japan

     (30     37.8     (1

Other (2)

     39          (1
      

 

 

 
       $ 10   

December 31, 2012:

      

Germany

   $ (82     31.2   $ 4   

Switzerland

     16        12.3     (4

Japan

     (49     40.5     (3

Other (2)

     31          (2
      

 

 

 
       $ (5

 

(1) The statutory rates included in the table above reflect the total statutory rates applied in each jurisdiction, including the impact of surcharges and local trade or enterprise taxes.
(2) Other significant jurisdictions (and statutory rates) impacting the “Non-U.S. rate differential” includes: Korea (24%), Thailand (20% in 2014 and 2013 and 23% in 2012), Hong Kong (16.5%), China (25%) and Italy (27.5%).

The line item “Branch accounting effect” adjusts the tax rate for the impact of the current inclusion of foreign branch income which is reflected in pre-tax income for US purposes. The branch accounting effect primarily relates to foreign branch losses permitted in local tax jurisdictions and at the US level. The branch accounting effect eliminates this impact. In addition, the “Branch accounting effect” also includes the rate impact related to non-taxable/non-deductible foreign branch losses/income included for U.S. tax purposes. Finally, the “Branch accounting effect” includes the change in U.S. deferred tax assets established against foreign branch deferred tax liabilities.

The change in 2012 versus 2013 of $83 primarily related to swings in non-taxable/non-deductible foreign branch income/losses and the change in U.S. deferred tax assets on foreign deferred tax liabilities. In 2013 and 2012, the non-taxable/non-deductible foreign branch income was $(4) and $59, respectively. The swing primarily related to filing of the 2011 amended return in 2013 related to adopting new tax rules for branch accounting that

 

F-40


Table of Contents

increased the 2011 net operating loss and increased the net operating loss on the return versus the provision in 2012. The change in U.S. deferred tax assets on foreign deferred tax liabilities was primarily related to deferred tax liabilities recorded for foreign exchange impacts associated with APB 23 assertions on intercompany loans.

In the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014, the Company was able to assert permanent reinvestment and recorded the rate impact of the reversal of deferred tax recorded. During the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, the Company reflected the change in foreign currency translation in the period due to the continued inability to assert permanent reinvestment. In 2013, due to going concern considerations, the Company changed its assertion with respect to its intention to permanently reinvest earnings outside the U.S. Accordingly, the tax effect of such change in assertion had been recorded in that year. As many of the Company’s operations are conducted in branch form, the impact of the change in this assertion primarily relates to the recognition of the tax effect of foreign currency gains and losses.

Under the Plan, a substantial portion of the Company’s pre-petition debt securities, revolving credit facilities and other obligations were extinguished. Absent an exception, a debtor recognizes cancellation of indebtedness income (“CODI”) upon discharge of its outstanding indebtedness for an amount of consideration that is less than its adjusted issue price. The Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (“IRC”), provides that a debtor in a bankruptcy case may exclude CODI from taxable income but must reduce certain of its tax attributes by the amount of any CODI realized as a result of the consummation of a plan of reorganization. The amount of CODI realized by a taxpayer is the adjusted issue price of any indebtedness discharged less the sum of (i) the amount of cash paid, (ii) the issue price of any new indebtedness issued and (iii) the fair market value of any other consideration, including equity, issued. As a result of the market value of equity upon emergence from chapter 11 bankruptcy proceedings, the estimated amount of U.S. CODI is approximately $1,709, which will reduce the value of the Company’s U.S. NOL that had a value of $0 after valuation allowance as of December 31, 2013. The amount of CODI in excess of the Company’s NOL will reduce the tax basis in fixed assets and intangibles by $432. The actual reduction in tax attributes does not occur until the first day of the Company’s tax year subsequent to the date of emergence.

The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to significant portions of the deferred tax assets and deferred tax liabilities at December 31, 2014 and 2013 are presented below.

 

     Successor     Predecessor     Successor     Predecessor  
     Domestic     Domestic     Foreign     Foreign  
     2014     2013     2014     2013  

Current deferred tax assets:

            

Inventory

   $ 13      $ 9      $ 4      $ 4   

Vacation

     8        6        2        2   

Provision for expenses related to timing

     5        6        4        4   

Unrealized foreign currency loss

     17        10        3        3   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current deferred tax assets

     43        31        13        13   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current deferred tax assets:

            

Amortization

     24        88        —          5   

Depreciation

     —          29        18        15   

Pension

     134        108        47        31   

Net operating losses

     24        478        124        131   

Branch accounting future benefit

     29        28        —          —     

Reserves

     5        2        —          —     

Deferred interest deductions

     —          —          60        47   

Amortizable financing costs

     7        —          —          —     

Other

     —          27        15        1   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current deferred tax assets

     223        760        264        230   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total gross deferred tax assets

     266        791        277        243   

Less valuation allowance

     (106     (790     (203     (182
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax assets

     160        1        74        61   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-41


Table of Contents
     Successor     Predecessor      Successor     Predecessor  
     Domestic     Domestic      Foreign     Foreign  
     2014     2013      2014     2013  

Current deferred tax liabilities:

             

Inventory

     —          —           9        6   

Provision for expenses related to timing

     —          —           2        2   

Other

     —          —           9        5   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current deferred tax liabilities

     —          —           20        13   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-current deferred lax liabilities:

             

Amortization

     —          —           48        59   

Depreciation

     160        —           58        33   

Other

     —          1         17        36   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-current deferred tax liabilities

     160        1         123        128   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

     160        1         143        141   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net deferred tax liability

   $ —        $ —         $ (69   $ (80
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

NOL Schedule

 

Country

   NOL Value  

United States

   $ 33   

Germany

     234   

Japan

     87   

Thailand

     54   

Other

     15   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 423   
  

 

 

 

For the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, the Company had available approximately $423, $376, $1,759 and $1,428 of gross NOL carryforwards with expiration dates ranging from one year to indefinite that may be applied against future taxable income, respectively. In addition, none of the $33 U.S. NOL carryforwards are subject to dual consolidated loss rules. The NOL for the United States and Japan will begin to expire in 2034 and 2016, respectively. The NOL for Thailand will begin to expire five years from the year the entity generates taxable income. The NOL for Germany has no expiration date.

As a result of exiting bankruptcy, there was a change of ownership for the Company’s German entity. For German tax purposes, a change of ownership would trigger a limitation on the NOL carryforwards as of the date of the change in ownership. The limitation would disallow the entire NOL except for any amount that could be offset against any built in gain that existed at the ownership change. The Company has estimated the built in gain and concluded there is enough to support the NOL at the ownership change. The Company will have a valuation completed of the German business to support the NOL to be recorded on the tax return and true up the NOL carryforward accordingly. Since there is a valuation allowance against the German NOL deferred tax asset, a change in NOL would decrease the deferred tax asset and corresponding valuation allowance.

The Company is currently pursuing permission from the Internal Revenue Service regarding the deductibility of certain foreign losses on its 2013 U.S. federal tax return. If approved, the Company’s NOL carryforward would be increased by approximately $266 as of October 24, 2014. Upon emergence from bankruptcy, the Company generated approximately $1,709 of cancellation of debt income which was excluded from taxable income and reduced the Company’s tax attributes including NOL carryforwards and tax basis in

 

F-42


Table of Contents

fixed assets and intangibles. An increase to available historic NOL carryforwards to offset cancellation of debt income would result in an increase of tax basis in fixed assets and intangibles of $266 and a corresponding increase to the Company’s deferred tax asset and valuation allowance of approximately $93.

The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the scheduled reversal of deferred tax liabilities, projected future taxable income and tax planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the level of historical taxable income and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the net deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will not realize the benefit of most of their net deferred tax assets. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, in some jurisdictions in which there is a net deferred tax asset, the Company has established a full valuation allowance. However, there are exceptions for certain non-U.S. jurisdictions where, based on management’s assessment, it is more likely than not the net deferred tax asset will be realized.

For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded a decrease in valuation allowances of $663, comprised of a decrease in the U.S. valuation allowances of $684, partially offset by an increase in the foreign valuation allowances of $21. The change in U.S. valuation allowances was primarily attributable to the impact of the reorganization adjustments to reflect the reduction in tax attributes as a result of the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy (see Note 2), as well as the application of fresh start accounting (see Note 3). The increase in foreign valuation allowances of $21 was primarily attributable to additional valuation allowances of $33 recorded to reflect current activity of the non-U.S. entities that have previously established valuation allowances, partially offset by the reversal of the valuation allowance previously established against net deferred tax assets in Italy. This resulted in a $12 tax benefit during the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014, as a result of the Company’s emergence from bankruptcy and its ability to continue as a going concern. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded additional valuation allowances of $160 attributable to an increase in U.S and foreign valuation allowances of $105 and $55, respectively, including the establishment of new valuation allowances of $20 in certain jurisdictions, such as Italy, based on its assessment that the net deferred tax assets will likely not be realized.

Under branch accounting, the inclusion of the non-U.S. operations in the U.S. income tax return requires the establishment of a deferred tax asset or liability to offset the foreign affiliates’ tax consequences; eliminating a duplicative deferred tax benefit or expense. The branch accounting future benefit deferred tax asset of $29 and $28 at December 31, 2014 and 2013, respectively, principally represents the offset to the non-U.S. affiliates deferred tax liabilities.

A reconciliation of the beginning and ending amount of unrecognized tax benefits is as follows:

 

Balance at December 31, 2012

   $ 38   

Additions for tax positions of the current year

     6   

Additions for tax positions of prior years

     14   

Statute of limitations expiration

     (2

Foreign currency translation

     (6
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

     50   

Additions for tax positions of the current year

     2   

Reductions for tax positions of prior years

     (1

Foreign currency translation

     (3
  

 

 

 

Balance at October 24, 2014

     48   

Additions for tax positions of the current year

     5   

Foreign currency translation

     (2
  

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

   $ 51   
  

 

 

 

 

F-43


Table of Contents

Liabilities for unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014 relate to various foreign jurisdictions. If recognized, all of the unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2014 would reduce the Company’s effective tax rate.

The Company recognizes interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in the provision for income taxes. As of December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company has recorded a liability of approximately $5 and $4, respectively, for interest and penalties.

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and various states and foreign jurisdictions. In the normal course of business the Company is subject to examination by taxing authorities throughout the world with examinations ongoing in a few of those jurisdictions including Canada, Germany, India, Italy and Korea. Such major jurisdictions with open tax years are as follows: United States 2006-2014, Germany 2007-2014, Italy 2003-2014, Switzerland 2012-2014, Singapore 2006-2014, Japan 2007-2014, Thailand 2011-2014, Hong Kong 2008-2014, Canada 2009-2014 and Brazil 2008-2014. Unrecognized tax benefits are not expected to change significantly over the next 12 months.

The Company is recognizing the earnings of non-U.S. operations currently in its U.S. consolidated income tax return as of December 31, 2014 and is expecting that, with the exception of Germany and Japan, all earnings will be repatriated to the U.S. The Company has accrued the incremental tax expense expected to be incurred upon the repatriation of these earnings. In addition, the Company has certain intercompany arrangements that, if settled, may trigger taxable gains or losses based on foreign currency exchange rates in place at the time of settlement. As a result of the emergence from bankruptcy and the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern, beginning on the Effective Date, the Company is able to assert permanent reinvestment with respect to certain intercompany arrangements previously considered indefinite. The Company has reversed the deferred taxes on the foreign currency impact previously recorded. The change in assertion resulted in a tax benefit of $5 in the period the change occurred.

14. Commitments and Contingencies

Non-Environmental Legal Matters

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business and had reserves of $5 and $4 at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively, for all non-environmental legal defense costs incurred and settlement costs that it believes are probable and estimable, all of which are included in “Other current liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Italian Tax Claim

On June 17, 2014, an Italian tax court of appeals (the “Italian Court of Appeals”) decided against the Company related to its 2003 income tax position resulting from the acquisition by General Electric Company (“GE”) of an Italian company in the same year. GE subsequently sold this Italian subsidiary to the Company as part of the acquisition of GE Advanced Materials in 2006 (the “GE Advanced Materials Acquisition”). Having considered the use of debt financing and other characteristics of the acquisition by GE, the Italian Court of Appeals determined that the goodwill amortization and interest expense related to the acquisition by GE were not deductible for tax purposes. Prior to this decision, the Company had received favorable rulings by lower level Italian trial courts in a series of similar cases regarding the same matter.

On August 7, 2014, the Italian Court of Appeals affirmed the prior decisions of the Italian tax trial courts in the Company’s favor regarding the deductions made in the years 2004 through 2007. On December 29, 2014, the Company filed an appeal before the Italian Supreme Court with respect to the lower courts adverse decision related to the 2003 tax year. On January 10, 2015, the Company received notice of appeal of the favorable decision it received with respect to the years 2004 to 2007. The Company believes it has a considerable

 

F-44


Table of Contents

likelihood of obtaining favorable outcomes for all years contested. As of December 31, 2014, the total potential assessment, including penalties and interest, is €46, or approximately $56, of which €30, or approximately $36, relates to the period of ownership subsequent to the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition.

The Company continues to believe its tax filing position is appropriate and that it is more likely than not this position will prevail upon appeal to the Italian Supreme Court. As a result, the Company has not recorded any income tax liability related to this matter as of December 31, 2014. Additionally, in conjunction with the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition, the Company and GE entered into an agreement providing for the indemnification by GE for tax matters related to the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this agreement on its potential exposure.

Purchase Commitments

The Company has signed multi-year agreements with vendors in order to obtain favorable pricing and terms on products that are necessary for the ongoing operation of its business. Under the terms of these agreements, the Company has committed to contractually specified minimums over the contractual periods. A majority of these contractual commitments are related to the off-take agreement with ASM (see Note 7). As of December 31, 2014, future contractual minimums are as follows:

 

Year

   Total  

2015

   $ 137   

2016

     122   

2017

     121   

2018

     121   

2019

     106   

2020 and beyond

     738   
  

 

 

 

Total minimum payments

     1,345   
  

 

 

 

Less: Amount representing interest

     (169
  

 

 

 

Present value of minimum payments

   $ 1,176   
  

 

 

 

Environmental Matters

The Company is involved in certain remediation actions to clean up hazardous wastes as required by federal and state laws. Liabilities for remediation costs at each site are based on the Company’s best estimate of discounted future costs. As of December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the Company had recognized obligations of $13 and $6, respectively, for remediation costs at the Company’s manufacturing facilities and offsite landfills. These amounts are included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Waterford, NY Site

The Company currently owns and operates a manufacturing site in Waterford, NY. In 1988, a consent decree was signed with the State of New York which requires recovery of groundwater at the site to contain migration of specified contaminants in the groundwater. A groundwater pump and treat system and groundwater monitoring program are currently operational to implement the requirements of this consent decree.

Due to the long-term nature of the project and the uncertainty inherent in estimating future costs of implementing this program, this liability was recorded at its net present value of $8, which assumes a 3% discount rate and a time period of 50 years. The undiscounted liability, which is expected to be paid over the next 50 years, is approximately $17. Over the next five years the Company expects to make ratable payments totaling $2.

 

F-45


Table of Contents

15. Pension and Postretirement Benefits

Domestic Pension Plans

Most U.S. employees participate in the Company’s U.S. defined benefit plan, with a pension formula based on years of service and final average earnings. The plan was frozen for salaried exempt employees in 2012. Effective December 31, 2013 the plan was frozen for non- grandfathered employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated in 2013. Effective December 31, 2014, benefits in the U.S. pension plan were frozen for all non-grandfathered employees covered by a collective bargaining agreement negotiated in 2014, and the plan was frozen to all new entrants.

Substantially all U.S. employees may also participate in the Company’s defined contribution plan. Under this plan, eligible employees may invest a portion of their earnings on a before or after tax basis, with the Company matching between 50% of the first 7% of eligible earnings and 100% of the first 5% of eligible earnings. In conjunction with the freeze of the U.S. pension benefit, the Company enhanced its defined contribution plan for impacted employees by providing a Company match up to 5% of the eligible compensation. The Company also provides an annual retirement contribution to employees not eligible to earn pension benefits, which is a contribution ranging from 3% to 7% of eligible compensation that is be deposited in the accounts of eligible employees each year based on years of service. Finally, the Company also instituted an achievement match for employees not eligible to earn pension benefits, which is an additional employer match up to 1.25% that will be deposited into the accounts of eligible employees each year if global incentive targets are achieved.

Foreign Pension Plans

Outside the U.S., the Company maintains its principal defined benefit pension plans in Germany, Japan, the Netherlands and Switzerland (collectively, Foreign or Foreign Pension Plans). The Company maintains additional defined benefit pension plans in various other locations.

The Company’s defined benefit pension plans in Germany cover substantially all of its employees. These plans are not funded and benefits are paid directly by Company to retirees. The benefit is based on a cumulative benefit earned over the employee’s service period. Benefits vest upon five years of service and the attainment of age 25.

The Company’s defined benefit pension plan in Japan covers most employees, but was frozen to new entrants in 2012. The benefits of the Company’s Japanese pension plan are based on years of service and the employee’s three highest years of compensation during the last 10 years of employment. The pension plan assets are managed by a variety of Japanese financial institutions. Employees hired after 2012 are eligible for benefits under a defined contribution plan.

In Switzerland, the Company’s defined benefit plan provides pension, death and disability benefits to substantially all employees. Benefits are based on participants’ accumulated account balances plus an annuity conversion factor established by the Swiss government. The pension liability is administered through a collective foundation.

The Company also offers a defined benefit pension plan to its employees in the Netherlands. The plan has a career average formula and is funded through an insurance company. The Company’s pension expense associated with contributions to these pension plans was less than $1 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, and for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

F-46


Table of Contents

Postretirement Plans

The Company’s U.S. health and welfare plan provides benefits to pay medical expenses, dental expenses, flexible spending accounts for otherwise unreimbursed expenses, short-term disability benefits, and life and accidental death and dismemberment insurance benefits. Retirees share in the cost of healthcare benefits. The Company funds retiree healthcare benefits on a pay-as-you-go basis. The Company uses a December 31 measurement date for this plan. The Company also provides non-pension postretirement benefit plans to certain Brazilian associates. The Brazilian plan became effective in 2012 as a result of a change in certain regulations, and provides retirees that contributed towards coverage while actively employed, with access to medical benefits, with the retiree being responsible for 100% of the premiums. In 2014, the plan was amended such that 100% of the premiums of active employees are paid by the Company.

The following table presents the change in benefit obligation, change in plan assets and components of funded status for the Company’s defined benefit pension and non-pension postretirement benefit plans for the years ended December 31:

 

    Pension Benefits     Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits  
    2014     2013     2014     2013  
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
 

Change in Benefit Obligation

               

Benefit obligation at beginning of period

  $ 164      $ 156      $ 178      $ 162      $ 81      $ 1      $ 91      $ —     

Service cost

    9        7        9        7        2        —          2        —     

Interest cost

    8        5        8        4        4        —          4        —     

Actuarial losses (gains)

    44        35        (28     8        8        —          (13     (1

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

    —          (20     —          (6     —          —          —          —     

Benefits paid

    (2     (4     (3     (4     (4     —          (3     —     

Plan amendments

    —          (1     3        —          (3     —          —          2   

Plan curtailments

    (1     —          (3     (3     —          —          —          —     

Plan settlements

    —          —          —          (12     —          —          —          —     

Other

    1        12        —          —          —          (1     —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Benefit obligation at end of period

    223        190        164        156        88        —          81        1   

Change in Plan Assets

               

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of period

    105        24        91        34        —          —          —          —     

Actual return on plan assets

    6        3        13        6        —          —          —          —     

Foreign currency exchange rate changes

    —          (2     —          (4     —          —          —          —     

Employer contributions

    7        5        4        4        4        —          3        —     

Benefits paid

    (2     (4     (3     (4     (4     —          (3     —     

Plan settlements

    —          —          —          (12     —          —          —          —     

Other

    —          6        —          —          —          —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of period

    116        32        105        24        —          —          —          —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Funded status of the plan at end of period

  $ (107   $ (158   $ (59   $ (132   $ (88   $ —        $ (81   $ (1
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-47


Table of Contents
    Pension Benefits     Non-Pension
Postretirement Benefits
 
    Successor     Predecessor     Successor     Predecessor  
    2014     2013     2014     2013  
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
 

Amounts recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31 consist of:

                   

Other current liabilities

  $ —        $ (2   $ —        $ (3   $ (4   $ —        $ (4   $ —     

Long-term pension and post employment benefit obligations

    (107     (156     (59     (129     (84     —          (77     (1

Accumulated other comprehensive (income) loss

    —          (1     5        33        —          —          (1     —     
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net amounts recognized

  $ (107   $ (159   $ (54   $ (99   $ (88   $ —        $ (82   $ (1

Amounts recognized in Accumulated other comprehensive income at December 31 consist of:

                   

Net actuarial (gain) loss

  $ —        $ —        $ (12   $ 35      $ —        $ —        $ (19   $ (1

Net prior service (benefit) cost

    —          (1     2        (3     —          —          8        2   

Deferred income taxes

    —          —          15        1        —          —          10        (1
 

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net amounts recognized

  $ —        $ (1   $ 5      $ 33      $ —        $ —        $ (1   $ —     

Accumulated benefit obligation

  $ 207      $ 181      $ 153      $ 149           

Accumulated benefit obligation for funded plans

    182        57        135        54           

Pension plans with underfunded or non-funded accumulated benefit obligations at December 31:

                 

Aggregate projected benefit obligation

  $ 223      $ 190      $ 164      $ 156           

Aggregate accumulated benefit obligation

    207        181        153        149           

Aggregate fair value of plan assets

    116        32        105        24           

Pension plans with projected benefit obligations in excess of plan assets at December 31:

                 

Aggregate projected benefit obligation

  $ 223      $ 190      $ 164      $ 156           

Aggregate fair value of plan assets

    116        32        105        24           

For U.S. pension plans, the net losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income decreased by $5 due to net unrecognized actuarial losses of approximately $52, net of tax, as a result of the decrease in the discount rate at October 24, 2014, partially offset by favorable asset experience. These net unrecognized actuarial losses were subsequently eliminated and remeasured to $0 as a result of the application of fresh start accounting (see Note 3). For Non-U.S. pension plans, the net losses recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income decreased by $34 due primarily to net unrecognized actuarial losses of approximately $20, net of tax, as a result of the decrease in the discount rate at October 24, 2014, partially offset by favorable asset experience. These net unrecognized actuarial losses were subsequently eliminated and remeasured to $0 as a result of the application of fresh start accounting (see Note 3).

Beginning in the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014, as a result of certain accounting policy changes adopted in connection with fresh start accounting, actuarial gains and losses previously recognized in accumulated other comprehensive income are recognized directly as a component of earnings in the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

The foreign currency impact reflected in these rollforward tables are primarily for changes in the euro versus the U.S. dollar.

 

F-48


Table of Contents

Following are the components of net pension and postretirement expense recognized for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

 

     Pension Benefits  
     U.S. Plans  
     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
 through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October 24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
 
         2013     2012  

Service cost

   $ 2      $ 7      $ 9      $ 18   

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

     1        7        8        7   

Expected return on assets

     (1     (7     (7     (6

Recognized actuarial loss

     4        —          —          —     

Amortization of net losses

     —          —          —          1   

Curtailment gain

     —          —          (3     (1
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net expense

   $ 6      $ 7      $ 7      $ 19   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Pension Benefits  
     Non-U.S. Plans  
     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
 through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October 24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
 
         2013     2012  

Service cost

   $ 1      $ 6      $ 7      $ 6   

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

     1        4        4        4   

Expected return on assets

     —          (1     (1     (1

Recognized actuarial loss

     11        —          —          —     

Amortization of net losses

     —          1        1        —     

Curtailment gain

     —          —          (1     —     

Settlement loss

     —          —          1        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net expense

   $ 13      $ 10      $ 11      $ 9   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits  
     U.S. Plans  
     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
 through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October 24,
2014
     Year Ended
December 31,
 
          2013      2012  

Service cost

   $ —        $ 2       $ 2       $ 2   

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

     1        3         4         5   

Amortization of prior service cost

     —          —           1         2   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net expense

   $ 1      $ 5       $ 7       $ 9   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Pension and postretirement expense related to non-U.S. non-pension postretirement benefits was less than $1 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012.

 

F-49


Table of Contents

The following amounts were recognized in “Other comprehensive loss” during the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014:

 

     Pension Benefits     Non-Pension
Postretirement Benefits
     Total  
     U.S.
Plans
     Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
     Non-U.S.
Plans
     U.S.
Plans
     Non-U.S.
Plans
 

Prior service benefit from plan amendments

   $ —         $ (1   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ (1
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gain recognized in other comprehensive loss

     —           (1     —           —           —           (1

Deferred income taxes

     —           —          —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Gain recognized in other comprehensive loss, net of tax

   $ —         $ (1   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ (1
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following amounts were recognized in “Other comprehensive loss” during the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014:

 

     Pension Benefits      Non-Pension
Postretirement Benefits
    Total  
     U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
     U.S.
Plans
     Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
 

Net actuarial losses arising during the year

   $ 42      $ 20       $ 10       $ —        $ 52      $ 20   

Amortization of prior service cost (credit)

     1        —           —           (1     1        (1

Amortization of net losses

     (1     —           —           —          (1     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss (gain) recognized in other comprehensive loss

     42        20         10         (1     52        19   

Deferred income taxes

     —          —           —           —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss (gain) recognized in other comprehensive loss, net of tax

   $ 42      $ 20       $ 10       $ (1   $ 52      $ 19   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The amounts in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” at December 31, 2014 that are expected to be recognized as components of net periodic benefit cost during the next fiscal year are less than $1.

Determination of Actuarial Assumptions

The Company’s actuarial assumptions are determined based on the demographics of the population, target asset allocations for funded plans, regional economic trends, statutory requirements and other factors that could impact the benefit obligation and plan assets. For our European plans, these assumptions are set by country, as the plans within these countries have similar demographics, and are impacted by the same regional economic trends and statutory requirements.

The discount rates selected reflect the rate at which pension obligations could be effectively settled. The Company selects the discount rates based on cash flow models using the yields of high-grade corporate bonds or the local equivalent with maturities consistent with the Company’s anticipated cash flow projections.

The expected rates of future compensation level increases are based on salary and wage trends in the chemical and other similar industries, as well as the Company’s specific long-term compensation targets by country. Input is obtained from the Company’s internal Human Resources group and from outside actuaries. These rates include components for wage rate inflation and merit increases.

The expected long-term rates of return on plan assets are determined based on the plans’ current and projected asset mix. To determine the expected overall long-term rate of return on assets, the Company takes into

 

F-50


Table of Contents

account the rates on long-term debt investments held within the portfolio, as well as expected trends in the equity markets, for plans including equity securities. Peer data and historical returns are reviewed and the Company consults with its actuaries, as well as the Plan’s investment advisors, to confirm that the Company’s assumptions are reasonable.

The weighted average rates used to determine the benefit obligations were as follows at December 31:

 

    Pension Benefits     Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits  
    Successor     Predecessor     Successor     Predecessor  
    2014     2013     2014     2013  
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
    U.S.
Plans
    Non-U.S.
Plans
 

Discount rate

    4.1     1.9     5.1     2.7     4.1     11.3     4.8     12.0

Rate of increase in future compensation levels

    3.3     2.8     —          2.6     —          —          —          —     

The weighted average assumed health care cost trend rates are as follows at December 31:

                   

Health care cost trend rate assumed for next year

    —          —          —          —          7.0     11.5     7.3     11.5

Rate to which the cost trend rate is assumed to decline (the ultimate trend rate)

    —          —          —          —          4.5     7.3     4.5     7.3

Year that the rate reaches the ultimate trend rate

    —          —          —          —          2023        2022        2023        2022   

The weighted average rates used to determine net periodic pension expense (benefit) were as follows for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively:

 

     Pension Benefits  
     U.S. Plans     Non-U.S. Plans  
     Successor     Predecessor     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
    Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
 
         2013     2012         2013     2012  

Discount rate

     4.4     5.1     4.2     5.0     3.6     2.8     2.4     3.0

Rate of increase in future compensation levels

     3.5     3.5     3.5     4.3     2.9     2.6     2.4     2.3

Expected long-term rate of return on plan assets

     7.5     7.5     7.5     7.5     2.1     2.3     3.3     2.7

 

     Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits  
     U.S. Plans     Non-U.S. Plans  
     Successor     Predecessor     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
    Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
 
         2013     2012         2013     2012  

Discount rate

     4.2     4.8     4.0     4.6     12.0     12.2     —       —  

 

F-51


Table of Contents

A one-percentage-point change in the assumed health care cost trend rates would change the projected benefit obligation for U.S. non-pension postretirement benefits by $4 and service cost and interest cost by a negligible amount. The impact on non-U.S. plans is negligible.

Pension Investment Policies and Strategies

The Company’s investment strategy for the assets of its North American defined benefit pension plans is to maximize the long-term return on plan assets using a mix of equities and fixed income investments with a prudent level of risk. Risk tolerance is established through careful consideration of plan liabilities, plan funded status and expected timing of future cash flow requirements. The investment portfolio contains a diversified blend of equity and fixed-income investments. For U.S. plans, equity investments are also diversified across U.S. and international stocks, as well as growth, value and small and large capitalization investments. Investment risk and performance is measured and monitored on an ongoing basis through periodic investment portfolio reviews, annual liability measurements and periodic asset and liability studies.

The Company periodically reviews its target allocation of North American plan assets among the various asset classes. The targeted allocations are based on anticipated asset performance, discussions with investment professionals and on the projected timing of future benefit payments.

The Company observes local regulations and customs governing its European pension plans in determining asset allocations, which generally require a blended weight leaning toward more fixed income securities, including government bonds.

 

     Actual     Target
2015
 
     Successor     Predecessor    
     2014     2013    

Weighted average allocations of U.S. pension plan assets at December 31:

        

Equity securities

     52     60     59

Debt securities

     47     38     41

Cash, short-term investments and other

     1     2     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     100     100     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Weighted average allocations of non-U.S. pension plan assets at December 31:

        

Equity securities

     26     33     24

Debt securities

     22     19     20

Cash, short-term investments and other

     52     48     56
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     100     100     100
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair Value of Plan Assets

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Fair value measurement provisions establish a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. This guidance describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:

 

   

Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

   

Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. Level 2 equity securities are primarily in pooled asset and mutual funds and are valued based on underlying net asset value multiplied by the number of shares held.

 

F-52


Table of Contents
   

Level 3: Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.

The following table presents U.S. pension plan investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

     Fair Value Measurements Using  
     Successor     Predecessor  
     2014     2013  
     Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for

Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Unobserv-
able

Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total     Quoted
Prices in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Unobserv-
able

Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total  

Large cap equity funds(a)

   $ —         $ 34       $ —         $ 34      $ —         $ 26       $ —         $ 26   

Small/mid cap equity funds(a)

     —           5         —           5        —           18         —           18   

Other international equity(a)

     —           21         —           21        —           19         —           19   

Debt securities/fixed income(b)

     —           55         —           55        —           41         —           41   

Cash, money market and other(c)

     —           1         —           1        —           1         —           1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ —         $ 116       $ —         $ 116      $ —         $ 105       $ —         $ 105   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents non-U.S. pension plan investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

 

     Fair Value Measurements Using  
     Successor     Predecessor  
     2014     2013  
     Quoted
Prices  in
Active
Markets

for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Unobserv-
able

Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total     Quoted
Prices  in
Active
Markets

for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
     Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs

(Level 2)
     Unobserv-
able

Inputs
(Level 3)
     Total  

Other international equity(a)

   $ —         $ 14       $ —         $ 14      $ —         $ 11       $ —         $ 11   

Debt securities/fixed income(b)

     —           13         —           13        —           7         —           7   

Pooled insurance products with fixed income guarantee(a)

     —           4         —           4        —           5         —           5   

Cash, money market and other(c)

     —           1         —           1        —           1         —           1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ —         $ 32       $ —         $ 32      $ —         $ 24       $ —         $ 24   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(a) Level 2 equity securities are primarily in pooled asset and mutual funds and are valued based on underlying net asset value multiplied by the number of shares held.

 

F-53


Table of Contents
(b) Level 2 fixed income securities are valued using a market approach that includes various valuation techniques and sources, primarily using matrix/market corroborated pricing based on observable inputs including yield curves and indices.

 

(c) Cash, money market and other securities include mutual funds, certificates of deposit and other short-term cash investments for which the share price is $1 or book value is assumed to equal fair value due to the short duration of the investment term.

Projections of Plan Contributions and Benefit Payments

The Company expects to make contributions totaling $7 to its defined benefit pension plans in 2015.

Estimated future plan benefit payments as of December 31, 2014 are as follows:

 

     Pension Benefits      Non-Pension
Postretirement  Benefits
 

Year

   U.S.
Plans
     Non-U.S.
Plans
     U.S.
Plans
     Non-U.S.
Plans
 

2015

   $ 3       $ 5       $ 4       $ —     

2016

     4         5         4         —     

2017

     5         6         5         —     

2018

     6         6         5         —     

2019

     7         6         5         —     

2020-2024

     53         37         24         —     

16. Segment and Geographic Information

The Company’s segments are based on the products that the Company offers and the markets that it serves. At December 31, 2014, the Company’s had two reportable segments: Silicones and Quartz.

The Silicones business is engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of silanes, specialty silicones and urethane additives. The Quartz business is engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of high-purity fused quartz and ceramic materials. The Company’s segments are organized based on the nature of the products they produce.

The Company’s organizational structure continues to evolve. It is also continuing to refine its business and operating structure to better align its services to its customers and improve its cost position, while continuing to invest in global growth opportunities.

Following are net sales and Segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) by segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash items and certain other income and expenses. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by the Company’s senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the board of directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. Segment EBITDA is also the profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals. Other is primarily general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the segments, such as shared service and administrative functions.

In 2015, we redefined our internal reporting structure and now allocate additional administrative functional costs to the operating segments. The current presentation of Segment EBITDA includes a Corporate component rather than the Other component previously disclosed. Corporate is primarily corporate, general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the segments, such as certain shared service and administrative functions. Segment EBITDA for the successor period from October 25, 2014 to December 31, 2014, the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 and October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was retrospectively revised to conform with the current presentation.

 

F-54


Table of Contents

Net Sales(1):

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October  24,
2014
     Year Ended December 31,  
              2013              2012      

Silicones

   $ 431      $ 1,866       $ 2,197       $ 2,136   

Quartz

     34        145         201         221   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 465      $ 2,011       $ 2,398       $ 2,357   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Segment EBITDA:

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014

through
October  24,
2014
     Year Ended December 31,  
              2013             2012      

Silicones(2)

   $ 44      $ 213       $ 241      $ 205   

Quartz

     6        17         35        43   

Corporate

     (4     (38      (38     (34
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 46      $ 192       $ 238      $ 214   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Depreciation and Amortization:

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October 24,
2014
     Year Ended December 31,  
              2013              2012      

Silicones

   $ 18      $ 127       $ 150       $ 162   

Quartz

     4        20         21         25   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 22      $ 147       $ 171       $ 187   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital Expenditures:

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
 through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October 24,
2014
     Year Ended December 31,  
          2013      2012  

Silicones

   $ 20      $ 52       $ 73       $ 80   

Quartz

     4        10         18         18   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 24      $ 62       $ 91       $ 98   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

F-55


Table of Contents

Total Assets as of December 31(3):

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     2014     2013  

Silicones

   $ 2,536      $ 2,428   

Quartz

     301        257   

Corporate

     47        9   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,884      $ 2,694   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Inter-segment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.

 

(2) Included in the Silicones segment’s Segment EBITDA are “Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes” of $0, $3, $3 and $5 for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, respectively.

 

(3) Deferred income taxes are included within other as reconciling amounts to the Company’s total assets as presented on the Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to Net (Loss) Income:

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
    Year Ended
December 31,
 
         2013     2012  

Segment EBITDA:

          

Silicones

   $ 44      $ 213      $ 241      $ 205   

Quartz

     6        17        35        43   

Corporate

     (4     (38     (38     (34
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 46      $ 192      $ 238      $ 214   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Reconciliation:

          

Items not included in Segment EBITDA:

          

Non-cash charges and other income and expense

   $ (46   $ (114   $ (12   $ (7

Unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits

     (15     —          —          —     

Restructuring and other costs

     (5     (20     (21     (43

Reorganization items, net

     (3     1,972        —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     (69     1,838        (33     (50

Interest expense, net

     (15     (162     (394     (277

Income tax expense

     —          (36     (104     (8

Depreciation and amortization

     (22     (147     (171     (187

Loss on extinguishment and exchange of debt

     —          —          —          (57
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net (loss) income

   $ (60   $ 1,685      $ (464   $ (365
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Items Not Included in Segment EBITDA

Not included in Segment EBITDA are certain non-cash and other income and expenses. For both the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014 and the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these charges primarily represented net realized and unrealized foreign currency transaction losses and expenses from retention programs. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these charges also included losses on the disposal of certain assets. For the years

 

F-56


Table of Contents

ended December 31, 2013 and 2012, these amounts primarily represented net unrealized derivative and foreign exchange losses, stock-based compensation and gains and losses from the disposal of certain assets.

Unrealized losses on pension and postretirement benefits represented non-cash actuarial losses recognized upon the remeasurement of our pension and postretirement benefit obligations, which after the Effective Date, are recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, and were driven by a decrease in discount rates, other demographic assumptions and asset performance. Restructuring and other costs for all periods primarily included expenses from our restructuring and cost optimization programs. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with restructuring the Company’s capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, and were partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement. Reorganization items, net represented incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these amounts were primarily related to certain professional fees. For the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014, these amounts included certain professional fees, the BCA Commitment Premium and financing fees related to our DIP Facilities, as well as the impact of the Reorganization Adjustments and the Fresh Start Adjustments (see Note 3).

Geographic Information:

The following tables show data by geographic area. Net sales are based on the location of the operation recording the final sale to the customer. Total long-lived assets consist of property and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, intangible assets, net of accumulated amortization and goodwill.

Net Sales(1):

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
     Period from
October 25,
2014
through
December 31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
     Year Ended
December 31,
 
        2013      2012  

United States

   $ 187      $ 617       $ 775       $ 744   

Germany

     105        629         657         644   

China

     37        174         320         293   

Japan

     67        254         215         263   

Other International

     69        337         431         413   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 465      $ 2,011       $ 2,398       $ 2,357   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Sales are attributed to the country in which the individual business locations reside.

Long-Lived Assets as of December 31:

 

     Successor     Predecessor  
   2014     2013  

United States

   $ 794      $ 522   

Germany

     262        410   

China

     344        374   

Japan

     193        147   

Other International

     185        337   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,778      $ 1,790   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

F-57


Table of Contents

17. Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

Following is a summary of changes in “Accumulated other comprehensive income” for the successor period from October 25, 2014 through December 31, 2014; the predecessor period from January 1, 2014 through October 24, 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2013:

 

Predecessor

   Defined
Benefit
Pension and
Postretirement
Plans
    Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
    Total  

Balance at December 31, 2012

   $ (65   $ 245      $ 180   

Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications, net of tax

     23        (6     17   

Amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (1)

     5        —          5   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income (loss)

     28        (6     22   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2013

     (37     239        202   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax

     (72     31        (41

Amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (1)

     1        —          1   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive (loss) income

     (71     31        (40

Elimination of Predecessor Company accumulated other comprehensive income

     108        (270     (162
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at October 24, 2014

   $ —        $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Successor

                  

Balance at October 25, 2014

   $ —        $ —        $ —     

Other comprehensive income before reclassifications, net of tax

     1        (29     (28

Amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax (1)

     —          —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive income

     1        (29     (28
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at December 31, 2014

   $ 1      $ (29   $ (28
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Amount Reclassified From Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income
        
      Successor     Predecessor         
Amortization of defined benefit pension and other
postretirement benefit items:
   Period from
October 25,
2014
 through
December  31,
2014
    Period from
January 1,
2014
 through
October  24,
2014
     Year Ended
December 31,
     Location of Reclassified
Amount in Income
 
        2013      2012     

Prior service costs

   $ —        $ 1       $ 3       $ —           (1)   

Actuarial losses

     —          —           2         —           (1)   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total before income tax

     —          1         5         —        

Income tax benefit

     —          —           —           —           Income tax expense   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

Total

   $ —        $ 1       $ 5       $ —        
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income components are included in the computation of net pension and postretirement benefit expense (see Note 15).

 

F-58


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)

 

(In millions, except share data)    March 31, 2015     December 31,
2014
 

Assets

    

Current assets:

    

Cash and cash equivalents (including restricted cash of $4 and $5, respectively)

   $ 190      $ 228   

Accounts receivable (net of allowance for doubtful accounts of less than $1)

     339        324   

Inventories:

    

Raw materials

     140        144   

Finished and in-process goods

     280        258   

Deferred income taxes

     35        33   

Other current assets

     53        60   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current assets

     1,037        1,047   

Investment in unconsolidated entities

     19        18   

Deferred income taxes

     12        14   

Other long-term assets

     29        27   

Property and equipment:

    

Land

     75        75   

Buildings

     292        295   

Machinery and equipment

     789        799   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     1,156        1,169   

Less accumulated depreciation

     (39     (17
  

 

 

   

 

 

 
     1,117        1,152   

Goodwill

     216        218   

Other intangible assets, net

     387        408   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 2,817      $ 2,884   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Equity

    

Current liabilities:

    

Accounts payable

   $ 219      $ 223   

Debt payable within one year

     36        38   

Interest payable

     24        11   

Income taxes payable

     8        7   

Deferred income taxes

     16        18   

Accrued payroll and incentive compensation

     66        57   

Other current liabilities

     75        82   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current liabilities

     444        436   

Long-term liabilities:

    

Long-term debt

     1,169        1,163   

Pension liabilities

     342        352   

Deferred income taxes

     104        98   

Other long-term liabilities

     58        66   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     2,117        2,115   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (See Note 7)

    

Equity

    

Common stock - $0.01 par value; 70,000,000 shares authorized; 47,989,000 shares issued and outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014

     —          —     

Additional paid-in capital

     857        857   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

     (71     (28

Accumulated deficit

     (86     (60
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total equity

     700        769   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 2,817      $ 2,884   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-59


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
(In millions)    2015           2014  

Net sales

   $ 579           $ 605   

Cost of sales

     479          
  

 

 

        

Gross profit

     100          

Cost of sales, excluding depreciation and amortization

            434   

Selling, general and administrative expense

     74             79   

Depreciation and amortization expense

            41   

Research and development expense

     18             20   

Restructuring and other costs

     4             4   

Other operating income, net

     (7          —     
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Operating income

     11             27   

Interest expense, net

     19             76   

Other non-operating expense, net

     4             —     

Reorganization items, net

     5             —     
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes and earnings from unconsolidated entities

     (17          (49

Income tax expense

     10             8   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Loss before earnings from unconsolidated entities

     (27          (57

Earnings from unconsolidated entities, net of taxes

     1             1   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (26        $ (56
  

 

 

        

 

 

 
 

Weighted average common shares outstanding — basic and diluted

     47,989,000             100   

Loss per share — basic and diluted

   $ (0.54        $ (560,000

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-60


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS (Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
(In millions)    2015           2014  

Net loss

   $ (26        $ (56

Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:

         

Foreign currency translation

     (43          (15

Gain recognized from pension and postretirement benefits

     —               1   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Other comprehensive loss

     (43          (14
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Comprehensive loss

   $ (69        $ (70
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-61


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
(In millions)    2015           2014  

Cash flows used in operating activities

         

Net loss

   $ (26        $ (56

Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:

         

Depreciation and amortization

     37             41   

Deferred income tax expense

     4             6   

Unrealized foreign currency losses (gains)

     7             (23

Amortization of debt discount

     6             —     

Other non-cash adjustments

     (2          —     

Net change in assets and liabilities:

         

Accounts receivable

     (26          (30

Inventories

     (34          (22

Accounts payable

     14             —     

Due to/from affiliates

     (5          3   

Income taxes payable

     (4          —     

Other assets, current and non-current

     3             10   

Other liabilities, current and non-current

     23             3   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

     (3          (68
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Cash flows used in investing activities

         

Capital expenditures

     (27          (27

Purchases of intangible assets

     (1          —     
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (28          (27
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Cash flows (used in) provided by financing activities

         

Net short-term debt (repayments) borrowings

     (2          4   

Borrowings of long-term debt

     —               105   

Borrowings from parent

     —               9   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net cash (used in) provided by financing activities

     (2          118   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

(Decrease) increase in cash and cash equivalents

     (33          23   

Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents

     (4          (1

Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted), beginning of period

     223             89   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Cash and cash equivalents (unrestricted), end of period

   $ 186           $ 111   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information

         

Cash paid for:

         

Interest

   $ 1           $ 64   

Income taxes, net of refunds

     7             2   

Non-cash investing activity:

         

Capital expenditures included in accounts payable

   $ 11           $ 11   

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-62


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF EQUITY (Unaudited)

 

(In millions)    Common
Stock
     Additional
Paid-in
Capital
     Accumulated
Other
Comprehensive
Loss
    Accumulated
Deficit
    Total
Equity
 

Balance as of December 31, 2014

   $ —         $ 857       $ (28   $ (60   $ 769   

Net loss

     —           —           —          (26     (26

Other comprehensive loss

     —           —           (43     —          (43
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance as of March 31, 2015

   $ —         $ 857       $ (71   $ (86   $ 700   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

 

 

See Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

 

F-63


Table of Contents

MPM HOLDINGS INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (Unaudited)

(In millions, except share date)

1. Business and Basis of Presentation

MPM Holdings Inc. (“MPM Holdings”) is a holding company that conducts substantially all of its business through its subsidiaries. MPM Holdings’ wholly owned subsidiary, MPM Intermediate Holdings Inc. (“Intermediate Holdings”), is a holding company for its wholly owned subsidiary, Momentive Performance Materials Inc. and its subsidiaries (“MPM”). MPM Holdings, Intermediate Holdings and MPM are collectively referred to herein as the “Company”. MPM Holdings became the indirect parent company of MPM following MPM’s reorganization and emergence from Chapter 11 bankruptcy on October 24, 2014 (the “Effective Date”). Prior to its reorganization, MPM, through a series of intermediate holding companies, was controlled by investment funds managed by affiliates of Apollo Management Holdings, L.P. (together with Apollo Global Management, LLC and subsidiaries, “Apollo”).

Based in Waterford, New York, the Company is comprised of two reportable segments: Silicones and Quartz. Silicones is a global business engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of silanes, specialty silicones and urethane additives. Quartz, also a global business, is engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of high-purity fused quartz and ceramic materials.

On April 13, 2014 (the “Petition Date”), Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Inc. (the Company’s direct parent prior to October 24, 2014) (“Old MPM Holdings”), the Company and certain of its U.S. subsidiaries (collectively, the “Debtors”) filed voluntary petitions for reorganization (the “Bankruptcy Filing”) under Chapter 11 (“Chapter 11”) of the U.S. Bankruptcy Code (the “Bankruptcy Code”) in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of New York (the “Court”). The Chapter 11 proceedings were jointly administered under the caption In re MPM Silicones, LLC, et al., Case No. 14-22503. The Debtors continued to operate their businesses as “debtors-in-possession” under the jurisdiction of the Court and in accordance with the applicable provisions of the Bankruptcy Code and orders of the Court through the Effective Date.

Upon emergence from bankruptcy on the Effective Date, the Company adopted fresh start accounting which resulted in the creation of a new entity for financial reporting purposes. As a result of the application of fresh start accounting, as well as the effects of the implementation of the Plan, the Consolidated Financial Statements on or after October 24, 2014 are not comparable with the Consolidated Financial Statements prior to that date. References to “Successor” or “Successor Company” relate to the financial position and results of operations of the reorganized Company subsequent to October 24, 2014. References to “Predecessor” or “Predecessor Company” refer to the financial position and results of operations of the Company prior to October 24, 2014.

The unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts of the Company, its majority-owned subsidiaries in which minority shareholders hold no substantive participating rights and variable interest entities (“VIEs”) in which the Company is the primary beneficiary. Intercompany accounts and transactions are eliminated in consolidation. In the opinion of management, all adjustments consisting of normal, recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair statement have been included. Results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of results for the entire year.

Year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”).

Pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission, certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP have been condensed or omitted. These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the audited Consolidated Financial Statements and the accompanying notes included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

F-64


Table of Contents

2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Use of Estimates—The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, and also requires the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements. In addition, it requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Subsequent EventsThe Company has evaluated events and transactions subsequent to March 31, 2015 through June 17, 2015, the date of issuance of its unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.

Reclassifications—Certain prior period balances have been reclassified to conform with current presentations.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09 supersedes the existing revenue recognition guidance and most industry-specific guidance applicable to revenue recognition. According to the new guidance, an entity will apply a principles-based five step model to recognize revenue upon the transfer of promised goods or services to customers and in an amount that reflects the consideration for which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The tentative revised effective date for ASU 2014-09 is for annual and interim periods beginning on or after December 15, 2017, and early adoption will be permitted. Entities will have the option of using either a full retrospective approach or a modified approach to adopt the guidance in ASU 2014-09. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2014-09 on its financial statements.

In January 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-01: Income Statement-Extraordinary and Unusual Items (Subtopic 225-20): Simplifying Income Statement Presentation by Eliminating the Concept of Extraordinary Items (“ASU 2015-01”). ASU 2015-01 eliminates from U.S. GAAP the concept of extraordinary items and removes the requirement to present extraordinary items separately on the income statement, net of tax. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. The requirements of ASU 2015-01 are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-02: Consolidation (Topic 810): Amendments to the Consolidation Analysis (“ASU 2015-02”). ASU 2015-02 amends the existing consolidation guidance related to (i) limited partnerships and similar legal entities, (ii) the evaluation of fees paid to a decision maker or a service provider as variable interest, (iii) the effect of fee arrangements on the primary beneficiary determination, and (iv) the effect of related parties on the primary beneficiary determination. ASU 2015-02 simplifies the existing guidance by reducing the number of consolidation models from four to two, reducing the extent to which related party arrangements cause an entity to be considered a primary beneficiary, and placing more emphasis on the risk of loss when determining a controlling financial interest. The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period. The requirements of ASU 2015-02 are not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Board Update No. 2015-03: Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs (“ASU 2015-03”). ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, and also requires that the amortization of such costs be reported as interest expense.

 

F-65


Table of Contents

The guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015, including interim periods within that reporting period, and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the potential impact of ASU 2015-03 on its financial statements.

3. Reorganization Items, Net

Incremental costs incurred directly as a result of the Bankruptcy Filing are classified as “Reorganization items, net” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, “Reorganization items, net” primarily included professional fees and rating fees for the new first and second lien notes issued on the Emergence Date.

4. Related Party Transactions

Transactions with Hexion

Shared Services Agreement

In October 2010, the Company entered into a shared services agreement with Hexion (which, from October 1, 2010 through October 24, 2014, was a subsidiary under a common parent) (the “Shared Services Agreement”). Under this agreement, the Company provides to Hexion, and Hexion provides to the Company, certain services, including, but not limited to, executive and senior management, administrative support, human resources, information technology support, accounting, finance, technology development, legal and procurement services. The Shared Services Agreement establishes certain criteria upon which the cost of such services are allocated between the Company and Hexion. The Shared Services Agreement is subject to termination by either the Company or Hexion, without cause, on not less than 30 days’ written notice, and expires in October 2015 (subject to one-year renewals every year thereafter; absent contrary notice from either party).

In conjunction with the consummation of the Plan, the Shared Services Agreement was amended to, among other things, (i) exclude the services of certain executive officers, (ii) provide for a transition assistance period at the election of the recipient following termination of the Shared Services Agreement of up to 12 months, subject to one successive renewal period of an additional 60 days and (iii) provide for the use of an independent third-party audit firm to assist the Shared Services Steering Committee with its annual review of billings and allocations.

Pursuant to the Shared Services Agreement, during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company incurred approximately $25 of net costs for shared services and Hexion incurred approximately $31 and $33, respectively, of net costs for shared services. Included in the net costs incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, were net billings from Hexion to the Company of $17 and $9, respectively, to bring the percentage of total net incurred costs for shared services under the Shared Services Agreement to the applicable allocation percentage. The allocation percentages are reviewed by the Steering Committee pursuant to the terms of the Shared Services Agreement. The Company had accounts payable to Hexion of $6 and $9 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, and no accounts receivable from Hexion.

Purchases and Sales of Products and Services with Hexion

The Company also sells products to, and purchases products from Hexion, pursuant to a Master Buy/Sell Agreement dated as of September 6, 2012 (the “Master Buy/Sell Agreement”). The standard terms and conditions of the seller in the applicable jurisdiction apply to transactions under the Master Buy/Sell Agreement. The Master Buy/Sell Agreement has an initial term of three years and may be terminated for convenience by either party thereunder upon 30 days’ prior notice. Additionally, a subsidiary of the Company has acted as a non-exclusive distributor in India for certain of Hexion’s subsidiaries pursuant to Distribution Agreements dated as of September 6, 2012 (the “Distribution Agreements”). The Distribution Agreements had initial terms of three years and was terminated by mutual agreement on March 9, 2015. Pursuant to these agreements and other purchase

 

F-66


Table of Contents

orders, during both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, the Company sold $2 of products to Hexion and purchased less than $1. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had less than $1 and $2, respectively, of accounts receivable from Hexion and less than $1 of accounts payable to Hexion related to these agreements.

Other Transactions with Hexion

In March 2014, the Company entered into a ground lease with a Brazilian subsidiary of Hexion to lease a portion of the Company’s manufacturing site in Itatiba, Brazil, where the subsidiary of Hexion will construct and operate an epoxy production facility. In conjunction with the ground lease, the Company also entered into a site services agreement whereby it provides to the subsidiary of Hexion various services such as environmental, health and safety, security, maintenance and accounting, amongs others, to support the operation of this new facility. The Company received less than $1 from Hexion under this agreement during the three months ended March 31, 2015. No amounts were transacted under these agreements during the three months ended March 31, 2014.

In April 2014, the Company sold 100% of its interest in its Canadian subsidiary to a subsidiary of Hexion for a purchase price of $12. As a part of the transaction the Company also entered into a non-exclusive distribution agreement with a subsidiary of Hexion, whereby the subsidiary of Hexion will act as a distributor of certain of the Company’s products in Canada. The agreement has a term of 10 years, and is cancelable by either party with 180 days’ notice. The Company compensates the subsidiary of Hexion for acting as distributor at a rate of 2% of the net selling price of the related products sold. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, the Company sold approximately $7 of products to Hexion under this distribution agreement, and paid less than $1 to Hexion as compensation for acting as distributor of the products. As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had $3 and $2, respectively, of accounts receivable from Hexion related to the distribution agreement.

Transactions with Affiliates Other Than Hexion

Purchases and Sales of Products and Services

The Company sells products to various affiliates other than Hexion. These sales were less than $1 and $3 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Receivables from these affiliates were less than $1 and $1 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Company also purchases products and services from various affiliates other than Hexion. These purchases were $1 and $3 for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The Company had accounts payable to these affiliates of less than $1 as of both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

Transactions and Arrangements with Parent and its Subsidiaries

In March 2014, the Company entered into an Employee Services Agreement with Hexion Holdings, Hexion and Momentive Performance Materials Holdings Employee Corporation (“Employee Corp.”), a subsidiary of Hexion Holdings (the “Services Agreement”). The Services Agreement provided for the executive services of Mr. Jack Boss, who was then employed by Employee Corp., to be made available to the Company and set forth the terms with respect to payment for the cost of such services. Mr. Boss was elected Executive Vice President and President, Silicones and Quartz Division of the Company effective March 31, 2014. Pursuant to the Services Agreement, the Company agreed to pay 100% of Mr. Boss’s costs of employment which are comprised of “Covered Costs” including an annual base salary of $585 thousand, a sign-on bonus of $1.3 payable between 2014 and 2015, annual incentive compensation, relocation costs, severance and benefits and other standard reasonable business expenses.

In December 2014, Mr. Boss was appointed as Chief Executive Officer and President of the Company, In connection with the appointment, MPM Holdings assumed from Hexion Holdings the terms of the accepted offer

 

F-67


Table of Contents

of employment with Mr. Boss. The Company paid less than $1 under this agreement during both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014.

5. Fair Value Measurements

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. A fair value hierarchy exists, which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:

 

   

Level 1: Inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets.

 

   

Level 2: Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets included in Level 1, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date.

 

   

Level 3: Unobservable inputs, that are supported by little or no market activity and are developed based on the best information available in the circumstances. For example, inputs derived through extrapolation or interpolation that cannot be corroborated by observable market data.

Recurring Fair Value Measurements

At both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had less than $1 of natural gas derivative contracts, which are measured using Level 2 inputs, and are included in “Other current assets” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets. The fair value of the natural gas derivative contracts generally reflects the estimated amounts that the Company would receive or pay, on a pre-tax basis, to terminate the contracts at the reporting date based on broker quotes for the same or similar instruments. Counterparties to these contracts are highly rated financial institutions, none of which experienced any significant downgrades that would reduce the fair value receivable amount owed, if any, to the Company. There were no transfers between Level 1, Level 2 or Level 3 measurements during the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Non-derivative Financial Instruments

The following table summarizes the carrying amount and fair value of the Company’s non-derivative financial instruments:

 

     Carrying
Amount
     Fair Value  
        Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Total  

March 31, 2015

        

Debt

   $ 1,205       $ —         $ 1,209       $ —         $ 1,209   

December 31, 2014

        

Debt

   $ 1,201       $ —         $ 1,166       $ —         $ 1,166   

Fair values of debt classified as Level 2 are determined based on other similar financial instruments, or based upon interest rates that are currently available to the Company for the issuance of debt with similar terms and maturities. Fair values of debt are based upon the aggregate principal amount of each instrument, and do not include any unamortized debt discounts or premiums. The carrying amount of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and other accrued liabilities are considered reasonable estimates of their fair values due to the short-term maturity of these financial instruments.

6. Debt Obligations

As of March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had no outstanding borrowings under its senior secured asset-based revolving loan facility (the “ABL Facility”). Outstanding letters of credit under the ABL Facility at March 31, 2015 were $67, leaving an unused borrowing capacity of $203.

 

F-68


Table of Contents

As of March 31, 2015, the Company was in compliance with all the covenants included in the agreements governing its outstanding indebtedness.

Debt outstanding at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014 is as follows:

 

     March 31, 2015      December 31, 2014  
     Long-
Term
     Due
Within
One Year
     Long-
Term
     Due
Within
One Year
 

Senior Secured Credit Facilities:

           

ABL Facility

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ —     

Secured Notes:

           

3.88% First-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2021 (includes $136 and $140 of unamortized debt discount, respectively)

     964         —           960         —     

4.69% Second-Priority Senior Secured Notes due 2022 (includes $45 and $47 of unamortized debt discount, respectively)

     205         —           203         —     

Other Borrowings:

           

China bank loans

     —           32         —           32   

Other

     —           4         —           6   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total debt

   $ 1,169       $ 36       $ 1,163       $ 38   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

7. Commitments and Contingencies

Non-Environmental Legal Matters

The Company is involved in various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business and had reserves of $6 and $5 at March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, for all non-environmental legal defense costs incurred and settlement costs that it believes are probable and estimable, all of which are included in “Other current liabilities” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Italian Tax Claim

On June 17, 2014, an Italian tax court of appeals (the “Italian Court of Appeals”) decided against the Company related to its 2003 income tax position resulting from the acquisition by General Electric Company (“GE”) of an Italian company in the same year. GE subsequently sold this Italian subsidiary to the Company as part of the acquisition of GE Advanced Materials in 2006 (the “GE Advanced Materials Acquisition”). Having considered the use of debt financing and other characteristics of the acquisition by GE, the Italian Court of Appeals determined that the goodwill amortization and interest expense related to the acquisition by GE were not deductible for tax purposes. Prior to this decision, the Company had received favorable rulings by lower level Italian trial courts in a series of similar cases regarding the same matter.

On August 7, 2014, the Italian Court of Appeals affirmed the prior decisions of the Italian tax trial courts in the Company’s favor regarding the deductions made in the years 2004 through 2007. On December 29, 2014, the Company filed an appeal before the Italian Supreme Court with respect to the lower court’s adverse decision related to the 2003 tax year. On January 10, 2015, the Company received notice of appeal of the favorable decision it received with respect to the years 2004 to 2007. The Company believes it has a considerable likelihood of obtaining favorable outcomes for all years contested. As of March 31, 2015, the total potential assessment, including penalties and interest, is €45, or approximately $48, of which €30, or approximately $32, relates to the period of ownership subsequent to the acquisition of GE Advanced Materials in 2006 (the “GE Advanced Materials Acquisition”).

The Company continues to believe its tax filing position is appropriate and that it is more likely than not this position will prevail upon appeal to the Italian Supreme Court. As a result, the Company has not recorded any

 

F-69


Table of Contents

income tax liability related to this matter as of March 31, 2015. Additionally, in conjunction with the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition, the Company and GE entered into an agreement providing for the indemnification by GE for tax matters related to the GE Advanced Materials Acquisition. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this agreement on its potential exposure.

Environmental Matters

The Company is involved in certain remediation actions to clean up hazardous wastes as required by federal and state laws. Liabilities for remediation costs at each site are based on the Company’s best estimate of discounted future costs. As of both March 31, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company had recognized obligations of $13 for remediation costs at the Company’s manufacturing facilities and offsite landfills. These amounts are included in “Other long-term liabilities” in the unaudited Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

Waterford, NY Site

The Company currently owns and operates a manufacturing site in Waterford, NY. In 1988, a consent decree was signed with the State of New York which requires recovery of groundwater at the site to contain migration of specified contaminants in the groundwater. A groundwater pump and treat system and groundwater monitoring program are currently operational to implement the requirements of this consent decree.

Due to the long-term nature of the project and the uncertainty inherent in estimating future costs of implementing this program, this liability was recorded at its net present value of $8, which assumes a 3% discount rate and a time period of 50 years. The undiscounted obligations, which are expected to be paid over the next 50 years, are approximately $17. Over the next five years the Company expects to make ratable payments totaling $2.

Subsequent Event

In April 2015, we entered into a new long-term purchase agreement with Unimin, a major supplier of sand used in the Company’s Quartz business. The agreement is effective as of January 1, 2013 and expires on December 31, 2016.

8. Equity Plans and Stock Based Compensation

Management Equity Plan

On March 12, 2015, the Board of Directors of MPM Holdings approved the MPM Holdings Inc. Management Equity Plan (the “MPMH Equity Plan”). Under the MPMH Equity Plan, MPM Holdings can award no more than 3,818,182 shares which may consist of options, restricted stock units, restricted stock and other stock-based awards. The restricted stock units are non-voting units of measurement which are deemed to be equivalent to one common share of MPM Holdings. The options are options to purchase common shares of MPM Holdings. The awards contain restrictions on transferability and other typical terms and conditions.

On April 10, 2015, the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors of MPM Holdings approved grants under the MPMH Equity Plan of restricted stock units and options to certain of the Company’s key managers, including the Company’s named executive officers.

 

F-70


Table of Contents

9. Pension and Postretirement Benefit Plans

The following are the components of the Company’s net pension and postretirement benefit expense for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

 

     Pension Benefits      Non-Pension Postretirement Benefits  
     Three Months Ended March 31,      Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor      Successor           Predecessor  
     2015           2014      2015           2014  
     U.S.
Plans
    Non-
U.S.
Plans
          U.S.
Plans
    Non-
U.S.
Plans
     U.S.
Plans
     Non-
U.S.
Plans
          U.S.
Plans
     Non-
U.S.
Plans
 

Service cost

   $ 2      $ 2           $ 2      $ 2       $ —         $ —             $ 1       $ —     

Interest cost on projected benefit obligation

     2        1             2        1         1         —               1         —     

Expected return on assets

     (2     —               (2     —           —           —               —           —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

        

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net expense

   $ 2      $ 3           $ 2      $ 3       $ 1       $ —             $ 2       $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

        

 

 

    

 

 

 

10. Segment Information

The Company’s segments are based on the products that the Company offers and the markets that it serves. At March 31, 2015, the Company’s had two reportable segments: Silicones and Quartz. The Silicones business is engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of silanes, specialty silicones and urethane additives. The Quartz business is engaged in the manufacture, sale and distribution of high-purity fused quartz and ceramic materials. The Company’s segments are organized based on the nature of the products they produce.

The Company’s organizational structure continues to evolve. It is also continuing to refine its business and operating structure to better align its services to its customers and improve its cost position, while continuing to invest in global growth opportunities.

Following are net sales and Segment EBITDA (earnings before interest, income taxes, depreciation and amortization) by segment. Segment EBITDA is defined as EBITDA adjusted for certain non-cash items and certain other income and expenses. Segment EBITDA is the primary performance measure used by the Company’s senior management, the chief operating decision-maker and the board of directors to evaluate operating results and allocate capital resources among segments. Segment EBITDA is also the profitability measure used to set management and executive incentive compensation goals.

In 2015, the Company redefined its internal reporting structure and now allocates additional administrative functional costs to the operating segments. The current presentation of Segment EBITDA includes a Corporate component rather than the Other component previously disclosed. Corporate is primarily corporate, general and administrative expenses that are not allocated to the operating segments, such as certain shared service and administrative functions. The presentation of Segment EBITDA for the three months ended March 31, 2014 was retrospectively revised to conform with current presentation.

 

F-71


Table of Contents

Net Sales(1):

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
     2015           2014  

Silicones

   $ 532           $ 557   

Quartz

     47             48   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total

   $ 579           $ 605   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

 

(1) Inter-segment sales are not significant and, as such, are eliminated within the selling segment.

Segment EBITDA:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
     2015           2014  

Silicones

   $ 52           $ 58   

Quartz

     11             7   

Corporate

     (10          (10
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total

   $ 53           $ 55   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Reconciliation of Segment EBITDA to Net Loss:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
     2015           2014  

Segment EBITDA:

         

Silicones

   $ 52           $ 58   

Quartz

     11             7   

Corporate

     (10          (10
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total

   $ 53           $ 55   
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Reconciliation:

         

Items not included in Segment EBITDA:

         

Non-cash charges

   $ (4        $ 18   

Restructuring and other costs

     (4          (4

Reorganization items, net

     (5          —     
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Total adjustments

     (13          14   

Interest expense, net

     (19          (76

Income tax expense

     (10          (8

Depreciation and amortization

     (37          (41
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Net loss

   $ (26        $ (56
  

 

 

        

 

 

 

Items Not Included in Segment EBITDA

Not included in Segment EBITDA are certain non-cash items and other income and expenses. For both the three months ended March 31, 2015 and March 31, 2014, non-cash charges primarily included net unrealized foreign exchange transaction gains and losses related to certain intercompany arrangements. Restructuring and

 

F-72


Table of Contents

other costs primarily included expenses from restructuring and costs optimization programs. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, these amounts also included certain other operating charges. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, these amounts also included costs associated with restructuring our capital structure incurred prior to the Bankruptcy Filing, which were partially offset by a gain related to a claim settlement. For the three months ended March 31, 2015, reorganization items, net included professional fees and rating fees for the new debt issued on the Emergence Date.

11. Changes in Other Comprehensive (Loss) Income

Following is a summary of changes in “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014:

 

     Three Months Ended March 31,  
     Successor           Predecessor  
     2015           2014  
     Defined Benefit
Pension and
Postretirement
Plans
     Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
    Total           Defined Benefit
Pension and
Postretirement
Plans
    Foreign
Currency
Translation
Adjustments
    Total  

Beginning balance

   $ 1       $ (29   $ (28        $ (37   $ 239      $ 202   

Other comprehensive (loss) income before reclassifications, net of tax

     —           (43     (43          1        (15     (14

Amounts reclassified from Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income, net of tax

     —           —          —               —          —          —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net other comprehensive (loss) income

     —           (43     (43          1        (15     (14
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 1       $ (72   $ (71        $ (36   $ 224      $ 188   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

        

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no reclassifications from “Accumulated other comprehensive (loss) income” for either the three months ended March 31, 2015 or March 31, 2014.

12. Income Taxes

The effective tax rate was (59)% and (17)% for the three months ended March 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The change in the effective tax rate was primarily attributable to the amount and distribution of income and loss among the various jurisdictions in which the Company operates. Economic pressure and volatility within certain foreign jurisdictions, including Germany and Japan, were largely responsible for the change in distribution of income between 2014 and 2015. The effective tax rates were also impacted by operating losses generated in jurisdictions where no tax benefit was recognized due to the maintenance of a full valuation allowance.

For the three months ended March 31, 2015, income taxes included unfavorable discrete tax adjustments of $3 pertaining to a change in tax law in Japan and the resolution of certain tax matters in non-U.S. jurisdictions. For the three months ended March 31, 2014, income taxes included unfavorable discrete tax adjustments of $8 pertaining to related party transaction costs, unrealized gains on intercompany transactions and the resolution of certain tax matters in U.S. and non-U.S. jurisdictions.

The Company is recognizing the earnings of non-U.S. operations currently in its U.S. consolidated income tax return as of March 31, 2015, and is expecting that all earnings, with the exception of Germany and Japan, will be repatriated to the United States. The Company has accrued the incremental tax expense expected to be incurred upon the repatriation of these earnings.

 

F-73


Table of Contents

 

 

39,305,467 Shares

 

LOGO

MPM Holdings Inc.

COMMON STOCK

 

 

PROSPECTUS

July 2, 2015

 

 

 

 

 


Dates Referenced Herein   and   Documents Incorporated by Reference

This ‘424B1’ Filing    Date    Other Filings
12/31/34
12/31/33
12/15/17
6/4/17
1/1/17
12/31/16
12/15/16
10/24/16
12/31/15
12/15/15
Filed on:7/2/15
6/17/15S-1/A
5/31/15
5/26/15
5/8/15
5/5/15
4/30/15
4/15/15
4/14/15S-1/A
4/10/15
4/1/15
3/31/15
3/30/15
3/12/15
3/9/15
1/22/15
1/10/15
12/31/14S-1
12/29/14
12/15/14
11/25/14
11/18/14
11/11/14
11/7/14
10/25/14
10/24/14
10/23/14
10/1/14
9/30/14
9/16/14
9/15/14
9/11/14
9/2/14
8/7/14
6/30/14
6/23/14
6/17/14
5/9/14
4/13/14
4/7/14
3/31/14
1/1/14
12/31/13
12/1/13
10/1/13
5/17/13
5/1/13
1/1/13
12/31/12
9/6/12
8/31/12
1/1/12
12/31/11
3/17/11
3/11/11
12/31/10
10/1/10
6/30/09
1/1/09
1/29/07
12/4/06
12/3/06
1/1/05
 List all Filings 
Top
Filing Submission 0001193125-15-244399   –   Alternative Formats (Word / Rich Text, HTML, Plain Text, et al.)

Copyright © 2024 Fran Finnegan & Company LLC – All Rights Reserved.
AboutPrivacyRedactionsHelp — Tue., Apr. 16, 12:15:24.2pm ET