UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

SCHEDULE 14A
(Rule 14a-101)
INFORMATION REQUIRED IN PROXY STATEMENT
SCHEDULE 14A INFORMATION
Proxy Statement Pursuant to Section 14(a) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934

Filed by the registrant ☒

Filed by a party other than the registrant  o

Check the appropriate box:

Payment of filing fee (Check the appropriate box):

JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC.
555 MAIN STREET
RACINE, WISCONSIN 53403

January 10, 2020

Dear Fellow Stockholders:

You are cordially invited to join us for our 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be held at the Company’s headquarters, located at 555 Main Street, Racine, Wisconsin on Thursday, February 27, 2020, at 10:00 a.m., local time.

The Notice of Annual Meeting of Stockholders and the Proxy Statement that follow describe the business to be conducted at the annual meeting. Members of our Board of Directors and executive officer team will be present at the meeting and will be available to answer questions regarding the Company.

Your vote is very important. Whether or not you attend the meeting, we encourage you to submit your proxy through the Internet or by mail. This will ensure that your shares are represented at the meeting. Even if you submit a proxy, you may revoke it at any time before it is voted. If you attend the meeting and wish to vote in person, you will be able to do so even if you have previously submitted a proxy through the Internet or by mail.

We appreciate your continued support of our Company.

JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC.
555 MAIN STREET
RACINE, WISCONSIN 53403

NOTICE OF ANNUAL MEETING OF SHAREHOLDERS TO BE HELD FEBRUARY 27, 2020

Shareholders of record at the close of business on Friday, December 20, 2019, will be entitled to notice of and to vote at the annual meeting and any adjournment or postponement thereof. Holders of Class A common stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect three directors and holders of Class B common stock, voting as a separate class, are entitled to elect the remaining directors. The holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock, voting together, as a single class, are entitled to vote on (1) the proposal to ratify the appointment of RSM US LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2020 fiscal year, (2) the non-binding advisory proposal on executive compensation, and (3) the proposal to adopt and approve the Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2020 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan. All shareholders of record are cordially invited to attend the meeting in person. Whether or not you plan to attend the annual meeting in person, please complete, sign, date and return the enclosed proxy in the accompanying self-addressed postage pre-paid envelope or complete your proxy by following the instructions supplied on the proxy card for voting by telephone or via the Internet (or, if your shares are held in “street name” by a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian, follow the directions given by the broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian regarding how to instruct it to vote your shares) as soon as possible.

	By Order of the Board of Directors
	Secretary & General Counsel
Racine, Wisconsin
January 10, 2020

TABLE OF CONTENTS
   

PROXY STATEMENT SUMMARY

This summary highlights information contained elsewhere in this proxy statement. This summary does not contain all the information you should consider, and you should read the entire proxy statement and our 2019 Annual Report carefully before voting.

2020 ANNUAL MEETING OF STOCKHOLDERS

VOTING MATTERS AND BOARD RECOMMENDATION

DIRECTOR NOMINEES

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE HIGHLIGHTS

2019 COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

For more information, visit page 34.

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION HIGHLIGHTS

JOHNSON OUTDOORS INC.
555 Main Street
Racine, Wisconsin 53403

PROXY STATEMENT
For The 2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders
To Be Held On February 27, 2020

Important Notice Regarding the Availability of Proxy Materials for the
2020 Annual Meeting of Shareholders to be held on February 27, 2020:
   
The Notice of Annual Meeting, this Proxy Statement and the Accompanying Annual Report
on Form 10-K are Available at www.proxyvote.com

This Proxy Statement, which is first being mailed on or about January 10, 2020, to shareholders of record as of the close of business on December 20, 2019, is furnished in connection with the solicitation of proxies by the Board of Directors of Johnson Outdoors Inc., (the “Company”), for the purposes set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders, to be used at the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of the Company to be held on Thursday, February 27, 2020 at 10:00 a.m., local time, at the Company’s headquarters, located at 555 Main Street, Racine, Wisconsin, and at any adjournment or postponement thereof (the “Annual Meeting”).

You may vote in any of the following ways:

If you submit a proxy now, your right to vote at the Annual Meeting is not waived should you decide to attend and vote in person.

Shares represented by a properly executed proxy will be voted at the Annual Meeting and, when instructions have been given by the shareholder, will be voted in accordance with those instructions. If you submit a proxy without giving voting instructions, the persons named as proxies on the proxy card will vote your shares: (1) FOR the election of the directors named in this Proxy Statement, (2) FOR the ratification of RSM US LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2020, (3) FOR approval of the non-binding advisory proposal on executive compensation, and (4) FOR the approval and adoption of the Johnson Outdoors Inc. 2020 Long-Term Stock Incentive Plan (the “JOI 2020 LTIP”).

As of the date of this Proxy Statement, the Company does not expect any matters to be voted upon at the Annual Meeting other than the proposals set forth in the accompanying Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders. If any other matters properly come before the Annual Meeting, including, among other things, consideration of a motion to adjourn the meeting to another time or place, a properly executed proxy gives the persons named as proxies on the proxy card authority to vote on such matters. The individuals named and acting as proxies will have the authority to vote on those matters according to their best judgment to the same extent as the person delivering the proxy would be entitled to vote. If the Annual Meeting is adjourned or postponed, a proxy will remain valid and may be voted at the adjourned or postponed meeting.

You may revoke your proxy at any time before it is actually voted by giving written notice to the Secretary of the Company, requesting a ballot at the Annual Meeting and voting in person or by submitting a duly executed proxy bearing a later date. Attendance at the Annual Meeting will not, by itself, revoke a proxy. If you have given voting instructions to a broker, nominee, fiduciary or other custodian that holds your shares in “street name,” you may revoke those instructions by following the directions given by the broker, nominee, fiduciary or other

custodian. If a shareholder properly signs and returns the proxy card but does not specify how to vote, then the shareholder’s shares will be voted FOR the election of the directors listed in the enclosed proxy, FOR the ratification of RSM US LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2020 fiscal year, FOR approval of the non-binding advisory proposal on executive compensation, and FOR the approval and adoption of the JOI 2020 LTIP.

Telephone and Internet voting procedures are designed to authenticate shareholders’ identities, to allow shareholders to give their voting instructions and to confirm that shareholders’ instructions have been properly recorded. Shareholders voting via the Internet should understand that there might be costs associated with electronic access, such as usage charges from Internet access providers and telephone companies that the shareholder must bear.

The record date for shareholders entitled to notice of and to vote at the Annual Meeting is December 20, 2019. On the record date, the Company had outstanding and entitled to vote 8,858,611 shares of Class A common stock and 1,211,602 shares of Class B common stock. A majority of the votes entitled to be cast at the Annual Meeting, represented either in person or by proxy, shall constitute a quorum with respect to the meeting. Holders of Class A common stock, voting as a separate class, elect three directors and are entitled to one vote per share for directors designated to be elected by holders of Class A common stock. Holders of Class B common stock elect the remaining directors and are entitled to one vote per share for directors designated to be elected by holders of Class B common stock. Holders of Class A common stock and Class B common stock voting together as a single voting group are entitled to vote on the proposal to ratify RSM US LLP as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the 2020 fiscal year, to vote to approve the non-binding advisory proposal on executive compensation, and to vote to approve and adopt the JOI 2020 LTIP. The holders of Class A common stock are entitled to one vote per share, while holders of Class B common stock are entitled to ten votes per share on these three proposals. Approval of any other matter not specified in the Notice of Annual Meeting of Shareholders that may properly be presented at the Annual Meeting will require that the number of votes properly cast in favor of such matter exceed the number of votes properly cast against such matter, with the holders of the Class A common stock entitled to one vote per share and the holders of Class B common stock entitled to ten votes per share. Abstentions and broker non-votes (i.e., shares held by brokers in “street name,” voting on certain matters due to discretionary authority or instructions from the beneficial owners but not voting on other matters due to lack of authority to vote on such matters without instructions from the beneficial owner) will count toward the quorum requirement but will not count toward the determination of whether the directors are elected or whether such other matters are approved. The Inspector of Election appointed by our Board of Directors will count the votes and ballots.

PROPOSAL 1: ELECTION OF DIRECTORS

Nine directors are to be elected at the Annual Meeting to serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their respective successors have been duly elected. The Company’s Articles of Incorporation provide that holders of the Company’s Class A common stock have the right to elect 25 percent, or the next highest whole number, of the authorized number of directors and the holders of the Company’s Class B common stock are entitled to elect the remaining directors. At the Annual Meeting, holders of Class A common stock will be entitled to elect three directors and holders of Class B common stock will be entitled to elect six directors. Terry E. London, John M. Fahey, Jr., and William (“Bill”) D. Perez (the “Class A Directors”) are the Board nominees designated to be voted on by the holders of Class A common stock, and Helen P. Johnson-Leipold, Thomas F. Pyle, Jr., Katherine Button Bell, Edward F. Lang, Richard (“Casey”) Sheahan, and Edward Stevens (the “Class B Directors”) are the Board nominees designated to be voted on by the holders of Class B common stock. As indicated below, the individuals nominated by our Board of Directors are all incumbent directors.

Properly completed proxies (whether by Internet, telephone or mail) received from holders of Class A common stock will, unless otherwise directed, be voted for the three nominee Class A Directors and properly completed proxies (whether by Internet, telephone or mail) received from holders of Class B common stock will, unless otherwise directed, be voted for the six nominee Class B Directors. Proxies of holders of Class A common stock cannot be voted for more than three persons and proxies of holders of Class B common stock cannot be voted for more than six persons. Class A Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of Class A common stock and Class B Directors are elected by a plurality of the votes cast by the holders of Class B common stock, in each case assuming a quorum is present at the Annual Meeting. “Plurality” means that the individuals who receive the largest number of votes cast by holders of the class of common stock entitled to vote in the election of such directors are elected as directors up to the maximum number of directors to be chosen at the Annual Meeting by such class. Consequently, the nine directors receiving the most votes, taking into account the Company’s two class voting structure, will be elected to the Board of Directors.

Director Qualifications

The following table provides information as of the date of this Proxy Statement about each nominee for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The Company anticipates the nominees for election as directors will be candidates when the election is held. However, if any of the nominees should be unable or unwilling to serve, the proxies, pursuant to the authority granted to them by the Board of Directors and taking into account our two class voting structure, will have discretionary authority to select and vote for substituted nominees (except where the proxy withholds authority with respect to the election of directors). The information presented includes information each nominee or director has given the Company about his or her age, his or her principal occupation and business experience for at least the past five years, and the names of other publicly-held companies of which he or she currently serves as a director or has served as a director during the past five years. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee regularly evaluates the mix of experience, qualifications, attributes and skills of the Company’s directors using a matrix of areas that the Committee considers important for the Company’s business and its strategic objectives. In addition to the information presented below regarding the nominee’s specific experience, qualifications, attributes and skills that led the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee to the conclusion that the nominee should serve as a director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee also considered the qualifications and criteria described below under “Corporate Governance Matters – Director Nominations” with the objective of creating a complementary mix of directors.

Class A Directors

Terry E. London

Age: 70 Director Since: 1999

Interim President and Chief Executive Officer of Pier 1 Imports, Inc., from January 1, 2017 to May 1, 2017. Mr. London has also served as the non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Pier 1 since June, 2012 and has been a director since 2003. Retired as Chairman of London Broadcasting Company LP, a television broadcasting and media company in June 2015; also served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2007 through 2015. Served as Chairman of LBK Entertainment Holdings, Inc., a company that creates and produces entertainment programming and live events, from 2014 until his resignation in June 2015 and previously served as its President and Chief Executive Officer from 2004 through 2014. Mr. London brings extensive experience in management, corporate transactions and integration and enterprise risk management from his tenure as a President and Chief Executive Officer of various companies. In addition, Mr. London’s experience in entertainment and media content production includes long-running programming for the outdoor industry, with which he has been involved professionally for more than two decades. Mr. London is a CPA and is experienced in financial matters, accounting and auditing, including financial reporting. The foregoing experience led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director of Johnson Outdoors.

John M. Fahey, Jr.

Age: 68 Director Since: 2001

Non-Executive Chairman of the Board of Directors of Time Inc., from June 28, 2017 to April 2018, previously serving as Lead Independent Director. Retired as Chairman of the National Geographic Society, a nonprofit scientific and educational organization, in 2016; served as its CEO from 1998 through 2013. President of the National Geographic Society from 1998 to December 2010. Regent of the Smithsonian Institution and Director of Lindblad Expeditions Holdings. The skills and experience acquired by Mr. Fahey through these positions, which led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director, include leadership, strategic planning, international business, corporate transactions and enterprise risk management, together with familiarity with several of the Company’s markets and industries.

William (“Bill”) D. Perez

Age: 72 Director Since: 2018

Founder of FamGen, a professional services firm specializing in consulting for family owned businesses on all matters from strategy and planning to growth and global expansion. Mr. Perez was formerly with Greenhill & Co. Inc., an investment banking firm, after serving as a Senior Advisor for seven years. He retired as President and Chief Executive Officer for the Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company in December 2008. Before joining the Wrigley Company, he served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Nike, Inc. And, prior to that, Mr. Perez spent 34 years with S.C. Johnson, including eight years as President and Chief Executive Officer. He currently serves on the Board of Directors for Northwestern Memorial Hospital, Johnson & Johnson, and Whirlpool Corporation. In addition, he is a Presidential Counselor at Cornell University and a Member of the Director’s Circle for The Chicago Council on Global Affairs. Mr. Perez’s experience provides him with an extensive background in corporate transactions, international business, operations and manufacturing, financial matters, strategic planning, and brand marketing, all of which led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

Class B Directors

Helen P. Johnson-Leipold

Age: 63 Director Since: 1994

Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of the Company since 1999. Chairman and Director of Johnson Bank and Johnson Financial Group, Inc., Director of S.C. Johnson, a global manufacturer of household consumer products. Chairman of The Johnson Foundation at Wingspread and its Board of Trustees. These experiences, along with 15 years in various executive positions at S.C. Johnson & Son, Inc. and 8 years at Foote, Cone & Belding Advertising, have provided Ms. Johnson-Leipold with extensive leadership and management experience; including, strategic planning, marketing, new product development, market research, operations, manufacturing, corporate communication, corporate transactions, international business, as well as a deep knowledge of the Company’s industry, businesses and strategic evolution, all of which led to the determination that she is particularly qualified to serve as a director.

Thomas F. Pyle, Jr.

Age: 78 Director Since: 1987

Vice Chairman of the Board of the Company since 1997. Chairman of The Pyle Group, a financial services and investments firm, since 1996. Non-Executive Chairman of Uniek, Inc. since 1998. Director of Sub Zero Wolf, Inc. Emeritus Trustee, Wisconsin Alumni Research Foundation, Vice President and Trustee, University Research Park, Inc. and Trustee, Morgridge Institute for Research. These experiences, together with Mr. Pyle’s previous experience as Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer, and principal owner of Rayovac Corporation (a manufacturer of batteries and lighting products), provide Mr. Pyle with an extensive background in corporate transactions, international business, operations and manufacturing, financial matters, strategic planning, enterprise risk management and brand marketing, all of which led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

Katherine Button Bell

Age: 61 Director Since: 2014

Senior Vice President and Chief Marketing Officer of Emerson Electric Co. since 1999. In 2016, she was appointed to Emerson’s Office of the Chief Executive. Past Director and member of the Compensation Committee of Sally Beauty Holdings. Director of the Board of Business Marketing Association from 2010 to 2017, Chairwoman for 2013 to 2014, and Vice Chairwoman from 2012 to 2013. Serves on the Foundation Board of St. Louis Children’s Hospital. Ms. Button Bell previously served as President of Button Brand Development, a strategic marketing consulting firm, and held senior marketing positions at Converse Inc. and Wilson Sporting Goods. Ms. Button Bell’s expertise in global marketing, digital strategy and market research, as well as her outdoor industry experience, led to the determination that she should serve as a director.

Edward Stevens

Age: 51 Director Since: 2016

Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Preciate, Inc., a software-based workplace recognition and feedback solution, since July 2017. Chairman of the Board for Demand Q, a software-based peak demand energy solution since March 2018. Strategic Board Advisor for KIBO Software, Inc., an eCommerce platform from November, 2016 to October, 2017, and Chief Operating Officer of KIBO from December 2015 to November 2016. Founder and Chief Executive Officer of Shopatron, a leading provider of cloud-based, eCommerce order management systems from 2001 to 2015. Mr. Stevens’ extensive experience in digital strategy, ecommerce, and omni-channel distribution, along with his international business strategy skills, led to the determination that he should serve as a director.

Edward F. Lang

Age: 57 Director Since: 2006

Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the New Orleans Saints, a National Football League team, and the New Orleans Pelicans, a National Basketball Association team, since 2012. President of Business Operations and Alternate Governor of the Nashville Predators, a National Hockey League team, from 2007 to 2010. Executive Vice President of Finance and Administration and Chief Financial Officer of the Nashville Predators from 2004 until 2007 and Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of the Nashville Predators from 1997 until 2003. Mr. Lang has broad experience in financial matters, accounting and auditing from his activities as a chief financial officer, together with experience in corporate transactions, operations and enterprise risk management. Mr. Lang also has experience in leisure industries and consumer products. This broad financial and other business experience led to the conclusion that he should serve as a director.

Richard (“Casey”) Sheahan

Age: 64 Director Since: 2014

Chief Executive Officer of Simms Fishing Products LLC, a company engaged in the manufacturing, marketing and sale of fishing related products for anglers to stay dry and protected from the elements, beginning on November 1, 2017. President of Keen Footwear, a company engaged in the business of the marketing, sale and distribution of footwear, from October 1, 2016 to October 31st, 2017. President and CEO of Patagonia, Inc. and Lost Arrow Corporation from 2005 to 2014. Director and member of the Executive Committee of the Outdoor Industry Association from 2009 to 2014. Mr. Sheahan previously held senior leadership and marketing positions at Kelty, Inc., Wolverine Worldwide, Inc., Merrell Outdoor Division and Nike, Inc., and served in a variety of senior positions with several outdoor-oriented publications. Mr. Sheahan’s extensive experience in the outdoor industry, along with his skills in marketing, leadership and sustainable business practices led to the determination that he should serve as a director.

Board of Directors Recommendation

DIRECTORS’ MEETINGS AND COMMITTEES

Meetings and Attendance

The Board of Directors has standing Executive, Audit, Compensation, and Nominating and Corporate Governance Committees. During the year ended September 27, 2019 (“fiscal 2019”), there were 5 meetings of the Board of Directors, 6 meetings of the Audit Committee, 4 meetings of the Compensation Committee, 3 meetings of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and no meetings of the Executive Committee. Each director attended at least 75 percent of the aggregate number of (i) meetings of the Board of Directors held during the period for which he or she was a director during fiscal 2019 and (ii) meetings of the committees on which the director served during fiscal 2019.

Executive sessions or meetings of outside (non-management) directors without management present are held regularly for a general discussion of relevant subjects. In fiscal 2019, the outside directors met in executive session at least two times in accordance with the requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

Name	Executive Committee	Audit Committee	Compensation Committee	Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee
Terry E. London
John M. Fahey, Jr.
William (“Bill”) D. Perez
Helen P. Johnson-Leipold
Thomas F. Pyle, Jr.
Katherine Button Bell
Edward Stevens
Edward F. Lang
Richard (“Casey”) Sheehan

Committees

Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee     Committee Members     John M. Fahey, Jr.    Edward F. Lang Thomas F. Pyle, Jr. Edward Stevens Richard (“Casey”) Sheahan     Number of meetings in 2019: 3	Key Responsibilities
	The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee presently consists of Messrs. Fahey (Chairman), Lang, Pyle, Sheahan and Stevens. The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee provides assistance to the Board of Directors in fulfilling its responsibilities by: (1) identifying individuals qualified to become directors and recommending to the Board of Directors candidates for all directorships to be filled by the Board of Directors or by the shareholders of the Company; (2) identifying directors qualified to serve on the committees established by the Board of Directors and recommending to the Board of Directors members for each committee to be filled by the Board of Directors; (3) reporting annually to the Board of Directors regarding the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee’s evaluation and assessment of the performance of the Board, and (4) taking a leadership role in shaping the corporate governance of the Company.

Charters of Committees

The Board of Directors has adopted a written charter for each of its Committees which may be amended from time to time. The Company makes available copies of each of these charters on its website at www.johnsonoutdoors.com, 24 hours a day and free of charge. The Company is not including the information contained on or available through its website as part of, or incorporating such information by reference into, this Proxy Statement.

CORPORATE GOVERNANCE MATTERS

The Company is committed to establishing and maintaining high standards of corporate governance, which are intended to serve the long-term interests of the Company and its shareholders. The Board of Directors has adopted Corporate Governance Guidelines which the Company has published on its website at www.johnsonoutdoors.com.

Director Independence

The Board of Directors has determined that the Company is a “Controlled Company,” as defined in NASDAQ Stock Market Listing Rule 5615(c)(1). The Board has based this determination on the fact that Helen P. Johnson-Leipold is deemed to be the beneficial owner of more than 50 percent of the voting power of the Company. The Company, therefore, is exempt from certain independence requirements of the NASDAQ Stock Market rules, including the requirement to maintain a majority of independent directors on the Company’s Board of Directors and the requirement to maintain a Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee and a Compensation Committee composed entirely of independent directors. Notwithstanding such exemption, the Board of Directors has reviewed the independence of the nominees for election to the Board at the Annual Meeting under the applicable standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Based upon this review, of the nine nominees, the Board of Directors has determined that each of the following directors was independent under the NASDAQ listing standards:

The Board of Directors determined that Ms. Johnson-Leipold was not independent in accordance with the NASDAQ standards because she is an executive officer of the Company.

Board Leadership Structure

The Board of Directors determines whether it is appropriate to combine or separate the roles of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer depending on the Company’s circumstances at the time. Ms. Johnson-Leipold currently serves as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and as Chairman of the Board of Directors. Ms. Johnson-Leipold possesses extensive experience in the industries in which the Company operates, and in-depth knowledge of the issues, opportunities and challenges the Company faces, and is thus best positioned to develop agendas and highlight issues that ensure that the Board of Directors’ time and attention are focused on the most critical matters. In addition, the Board of Directors has determined that this leadership structure is optimal because it believes that having one leader serving as both the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer provides decisive, consistent and effective leadership, as well as clear accountability. Having one person serve as Chairman and Chief Executive Officer also enhances the Company’s ability to communicate its message and strategy clearly and consistently to its shareholders, employees, and business partners, particularly during times of turbulent economic and industry conditions. Although the Company believes that the combination of the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer roles is appropriate under current circumstances, it will continue to review this issue periodically to determine whether, based on the relevant facts and circumstances, separation of these offices would serve the Company’s best interests and the best interests of its shareholders.

Thomas F. Pyle, Jr., the Company’s Vice Chairman of the Board, serves as the Company’s lead outside or independent director. In his capacity as lead outside or independent director, Mr. Pyle coordinates the activities

of the independent directors and serves as a liaison between the Chairman and the independent directors. Mr. Pyle also presides at the executive sessions of the independent directors and has the authority to call additional executive sessions or meetings of the independent directors.

The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight

The Company has established a Risk Committee, which is primarily responsible for the Company’s enterprise risk assessment and enterprise risk management policies. The Risk Committee is co-chaired by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel and includes various other members of senior management. The role of the Board of Directors in the Company’s risk oversight process includes receiving reports and presentations from the Risk Committee on areas of material risk to the Company, including operational, financial, legal and regulatory, strategic and reputational risks, and any measures taken to mitigate such risks. In addition, the Board of Directors regularly reviews and discusses areas of material risk at its meetings.

As noted above, the Company has established a Risk Committee, which is primarily responsible for the Company’s enterprise risk assessment and overseeing enterprise risk management. Notwithstanding such delegation of responsibility by the Company’s Board of Directors, the Board has reserved to the Company’s Compensation Committee primary oversight responsibility to ensure that compensation programs and practices of the Company do not encourage unreasonable or excessive risk-taking and that any risks are subject to appropriate controls. As part of this process, the Company (with the oversight of the Compensation Committee) designs the Company’s overall compensation programs and practices, including incentive compensation for both executives and non-executive employees, in a manner intended to support its strategic priorities and initiatives to enhance long-term sustainable value without encouraging unnecessary or unreasonable risk-taking. At the same time, the Company recognizes that its goals cannot be fully achieved while avoiding all risk. The Compensation Committee (along with assistance from management) periodically reviews the Company’s compensation programs and practices in the context of its risk profile, together with its other risk mitigation and risk management programs, to ensure that these programs and practices work together for the long-term benefit of the Company and its shareholders. Based on its recently completed review of the Company’s compensation programs, the Compensation Committee concluded that the Company’s incentive compensation policies for both executive and non-executive employees have not materially and adversely affected the Company by encouraging unreasonable or excessive risk-taking in the recent past, are not likely to have a material adverse effect in the future and provide for multiple and reasonably effective safeguards to protect against unnecessary or unreasonable risk-taking.

Director Nominations

The Company has a standing Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee. Based upon the review described under “Corporate Governance Matters – Director Independence,” the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is independent under the applicable standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider director nominees recommended by shareholders. Recommendations for consideration by the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee should be sent to the Secretary of the Company in writing, together with appropriate biographical information concerning each proposed nominee, including the following information: (1) the name, address (business and residence), date of birth and principal occupation or employment (present and for the past five years) of each person whom the shareholder proposes to be considered as a nominee; (2) the number of shares of the common stock (of each class) beneficially owned (as defined by section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) by each such proposed nominee; (3) any other information regarding such proposed nominee that would be required to be disclosed in a definitive proxy statement to shareholders prepared in connection with an election of directors pursuant to section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended; and (4) the name and address (business and residential) of the shareholder making the recommendation and the number of shares of the common stock (regardless of class) beneficially owned (as defined by section 13(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) by the shareholder making the recommendation. The Company may require any proposed nominee to furnish additional information as may be reasonably required to determine the

qualifications of such proposed nominee to serve as a director of the Company. The Company’s Bylaws also set forth certain requirements for shareholders wishing to nominate director candidates directly for consideration by the shareholders. With respect to an election of directors to be held at an annual meeting, a shareholder must, among other things, give notice of intent to make such a nomination to the Secretary of the Company in advance of the meeting in compliance with the terms and within the time period specified in the Bylaws. Pursuant to these requirements, a shareholder must give a written notice of intent to the Secretary of the Company not earlier than the close of business on the 120^th day and not later than the close of business on the 90^th day prior to the first anniversary date of the preceding year’s annual meeting; provided, however, that in the event that the date of the annual meeting is more than 30 days before or more than 60 days after such anniversary date, notice by the shareholder must be so delivered not earlier than the close of business on the 120^th day prior to the date of such annual meeting and not later than the close of business on the later of the 90^th day prior to the date of such annual meeting or, if the first public announcement of the date of such annual meeting is less than 100 days prior to the date of such annual meeting, the 10^th day following the day on which public announcement of the date of such meeting is first made by the Company.

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee will consider any nominee recommended by a shareholder in accordance with the preceding paragraph under the same criteria as any other potential nominee. In identifying and evaluating nominees for director, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee of the Board of Directors seeks to ensure that the Board of Directors possesses, in the aggregate, the strategic, managerial and financial skills and experience necessary to fulfill its duties and to achieve its objectives, and seeks to ensure that the Board of Directors is comprised of directors who have broad and diverse backgrounds, possessing knowledge in areas that are of importance to the Company. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes it is important that at least one director have the requisite experience and expertise to be designated as an “audit committee financial expert.” The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee looks at each nominee on a case-by-case basis regardless of who recommended the nominee. In looking at the qualifications of each candidate to determine if their election would further the goals described above, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee takes into account all factors it considers appropriate, which may include strength of character, mature judgment, career specialization, relevant technical skills or financial acumen, diversity of viewpoint and industry knowledge. At a minimum, each director nominee must have displayed the highest personal and professional ethics, integrity, values and sound business judgment. In addition, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes that the following specific qualities and skills are necessary for all Company directors to possess:

On August 27, 2019, the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee recommended to the Board of Directors the addition of a director retirement age of 75 to the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, excluding from such requirement directors who attained the age of 75 as of the 2019 Annual Shareholder meeting. On September 26, 2019, The Board of Directors approved and adopted this recommendation and accordingly, the Company’s Corporate Governance Guidelines, which are posted on the Company’s website located at www.johnsonoutdoors.com, now include a director retirement age of 75.

Communications between Shareholders and the Board of Directors; Director Attendance at Annual Meetings

Shareholders may communicate with the Board of Directors by writing to the Board of Directors (or, at the shareholder’s option, to a specific director) care of the Secretary of the Company at Johnson Outdoors Inc., 555 Main Street, Suite 342, Racine, Wisconsin 53403. Subject to the conditions described below, the Secretary will ensure that this communication (assuming it is properly addressed to the Board of Directors or to a specific director) is delivered to the Board of Directors or the specified director, as the case may be. Each such communication should indicate that the sender is a shareholder of the Company and that the sender is directing the communication to one or more individual directors or to the Board of Directors as a whole.

All communications will be compiled by the Company’s Secretary and submitted to the Board of Directors or the individual directors on an as needed basis unless such communications are considered, in the reasonable judgment of the Secretary, to be improper for submission to the intended recipient(s). Examples of shareholder communications that would be considered improper for submission include, without limitation, customer complaints, solicitations, communications that do not relate directly or indirectly to the Company or its business or communications that relate to improper or irrelevant topics. The Secretary may also attempt to handle a communication directly where appropriate, such as where the communication is a request for information about the Company or where it is a stock-related matter.

Directors are encouraged to attend the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders. All of the incumbent directors who were serving as a director at the time of the meeting attended the Company’s Annual Meeting of Shareholders that occurred on February 28, 2019.

Employee Code of Conduct and Code of Ethics; Corporate Governance Guidelines; and Procedures for Reporting of Accounting Concerns

The Company has adopted an Employee Code of Business Conduct (the “Code of Conduct”). The Company requires all directors, officers and employees to adhere to the Code of Conduct in addressing legal and ethical issues encountered in conducting their work. The Code of Conduct requires the Company’s directors, officers and employees to avoid conflicts of interest, comply with all applicable laws and other legal requirements, conduct business in an honest and ethical manner and otherwise act with integrity and in the Company’s best interests. The Company has placed a copy of the Code of Conduct on its website located at www.johnsonoutdoors.com. In addition, all directors, officers and salaried employees are required to complete compliance training on the Code of Conduct and certain other subjects.

The Company also adopted a Code of Ethics for the Chief Executive Officer and Senior Financial and Accounting Officers (the “Code of Ethics”), which governs the conduct of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer and its other senior financial and accounting officers and executives. The Code of Ethics supplements the Code of Conduct and is intended to deter wrongdoing and to promote honest and ethical conduct, including the ethical handling of conflicts of interest; provide full, fair, accurate, timely and understandable disclosure in the Company’s public documents; promote compliance with applicable laws and regulations; ensure the prompt reporting of violations of the Code of Ethics; and provide accountability for adherence to the Code of Ethics. The Company has placed a copy of the Code of Ethics on its website located at www.johnsonoutdoors.com. The Company intends to disclose any amendments to, or waivers from, the Code of Ethics on its corporate website.

In addition, the Company has adopted a set of Corporate Governance Guidelines (the “Corporate Governance Guidelines”). The Corporate Governance Guidelines have been established to assist the Board of Directors in the exercise of its responsibilities and to reflect the Board’s commitment to monitoring the effectiveness of policy and decision making at both the Board and management levels. The Corporate Governance Guidelines address issues such as composition of the Board, director retirement requirements, independence criteria for Board members, Board leadership, evaluating performance of the Board, directors’ responsibilities, the Board’s relationship with senior management, Committee matters and director continuing education. The Company has placed a copy of the Corporate Governance Guidelines on its website located at www.johnsonoutdoors.com.

Further, the Company has established “whistle-blower procedures” which provide a process for the confidential and anonymous submission, receipt, retention and treatment of complaints regarding accounting, internal accounting controls or auditing matters. These procedures provide protections to employees who report possible Company misconduct.

Assessing the Performance of the Board and Individual Directors

The Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee is responsible for annually reporting to the Board of Directors regarding the Committee’s assessment and evaluation of the performance of the Board as a whole. This report and assessment is discussed with the full Board and includes specific review of performance areas in which the Nominating and Corporate Governance Committee believes a better contribution could be made. The purpose of this assessment and evaluation is to increase the effectiveness of the Board as a whole and not necessarily to focus on individual Board members.

Hedging and Margin Account Policies

The Company’s stock trading policies prohibit directors and the Company’s employees, including its executive officers, from (i) purchasing any financial instrument that is designed to hedge or offset any decrease in the market value of the Company’s common stock, including zero-cost collars and forward sale contracts; (ii) engaging in short sales related to the Company’s common stock; and (iii) maintaining margin accounts. All transactions in Johnson Outdoors securities by directors and executive officers must be pre-cleared with the Company’s Chief Financial Officer and General Counsel.

AUDIT COMMITTEE MATTERS

Audit Committee Report

The Audit Committee is comprised of four members of the Company’s Board of Directors. Based upon the review described under “Corporate Governance Matters – Director Independence,” the Board of Directors has determined that each member of the Audit Committee is independent under the applicable standards and rules of the NASDAQ Stock Market and the rules of the SEC. The duties and responsibilities of the Company’s Audit Committee are set forth in the Audit Committee Charter, which may be found on the Company’s website at www.johnsonoutdoors.com.

In accordance with its written charter adopted by the Board of Directors, the Audit Committee has oversight responsibility for the quality and integrity of the financial reporting practices of the Company. While the Audit Committee has oversight responsibility, the primary responsibility for the Company’s financial reporting, disclosure controls and procedures and internal control over financial reporting and related internal controls and procedures rests with management, and the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm is responsible for auditing the Company’s financial statements. In discharging its oversight responsibility as to the audit process, the Audit Committee has:

Based upon the above-described review and discussions with management and the independent registered public accounting firm, the Audit Committee recommended to the Company’s Board of Directors that the audited consolidated financial statements be included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 27, 2019 for filing with the SEC.

Audit Committee Financial Expert

The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that at least one of the members of the Audit Committee, Terry E. London, qualifies as an “audit committee financial expert” as defined by the rules of the SEC based on his work experience and education.

Fees of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

The following table summarizes the fees the Company was billed for audit and non-audit services rendered by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, RSM US LLP, related to fiscal years 2019 and 2018.

The Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company considered that the provision of the services and the payment of the fees described above are compatible with maintaining the independence of RSM US LLP.

The Audit Committee is responsible for reviewing and pre-approving any non-audit services to be performed by the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm. These non-audit services are evaluated by the Audit Committee taking into account scope, fees, and applicable laws and regulations (including SEC rules) related to the independence of the independent registered public accounting firm. The Audit Committee has delegated its pre-approval authority to the Chairman of the Audit Committee to act between meetings of the Audit Committee for amounts up to $50,000. Any pre-approval given by the Chairman of the Audit Committee pursuant to this delegation is presented to the full Audit Committee at its next regularly scheduled meeting.

Each new engagement of the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm to perform non-audit services has been approved in advance by the Audit Committee or the Chairman of the Audit Committee pursuant to the foregoing procedures.

PROPOSAL 2: RATIFICATION OF APPOINTMENT OF INDEPENDENT AUDITORS

Our Audit Committee has appointed RSM US LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm to audit the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the fiscal year ending October 2, 2020. Unless otherwise directed, proxies will be voted FOR the ratification of such appointment.

Although this appointment is not required to be submitted to a vote of shareholders, our Board of Directors believes it appropriate as a matter of policy to request that our shareholders ratify the appointment. If shareholder ratification is not received, the Board of Directors will reconsider the appointment, and may retain that firm or another firm without resubmitting the matter to the Company’s shareholders. Even if the appointment is ratified, the Audit Committee may, in its discretion, direct the appointment of a different firm at any time during the fiscal year if it determines that such change would be in the Company’s best interests.

It is expected that a representative of RSM US LLP will be present at the Annual Meeting, will have the opportunity to make a statement if he or she desires to do so and will be available to respond to appropriate questions.

If a quorum exists, the approval of the ratification of RSM US LLP requires that the number of votes properly cast for this proposal exceed the number of votes properly cast against this proposal. Abstentions and broker non-votes will not count toward the determination of whether this proposal is approved and will have no impact on the vote.

Board of Directors Recommendation

STOCK OWNERSHIP OF MANAGEMENT AND OTHERS

The following table sets forth certain information as of September 27, 2019 regarding the beneficial ownership of each class of Company common stock by each director, each person known by the Company to own beneficially more than 5 percent of either class of the Company’s common stock (including any “group” as set forth in Section 13(d)(3) of the Exchange Act), each of the officers named in the Summary Compensation Table in this Proxy Statement (the “named executive officers”), and all directors and current Section 16 executive officers as a group based upon information furnished by such persons or in information otherwise publicly available in filings with the SEC.

The Company has determined beneficial ownership in accordance with the rules of the SEC. Except as indicated in the footnotes, the persons listed below have sole voting and investment power over the shares beneficially owned. Shares of common stock subject to options that are either currently exercisable or exercisable within 60 days of September 27, 2019 or restricted stock units (with each unit representing one share of Class A common stock issuable on such vesting date) which are vested or which vest within 60 days of September 27, 2019 are treated as outstanding (but only to the extent the reporting person has not made an election to defer receipt of the underlying shares as of such vesting date) and beneficially owned by the holder for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of the holder. However, these shares are not treated as outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person, except with respect to restricted stock units that have vested and been issued as shares of Class A common stock. The table lists applicable percentage ownership based on 8,834,169 shares of Class A common stock outstanding as of September 27, 2019 plus restricted stock units which vested within 60 days of that date and 1,211,602 shares of Class B common stock outstanding as of September 27, 2019.

As of September 27, 2019, the Johnson Family beneficially owned 3,571,199 Class A Shares, or approximately 40.4% of the outstanding Class A Shares, and 1,204,946 Class B Shares, or approximately 99.5% of the outstanding Class B Shares.

EXECUTIVE OFFICERS

The following table provides information as of the date of this Proxy Statement about each of the Company’s current executive officers who are not nominees for election to the Board of Directors at the Annual Meeting. The information presented includes information each executive officer has given the Company about his or her age and his or her principal occupation and business experience for the past five years:

EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

Compensation Discussion and Analysis

Overview

This Compensation Discussion and Analysis addresses the Company’s compensation philosophy, objectives, process and actions specific to fiscal 2019, and the first part of fiscal 2020 prior to the date of this Proxy Statement, for the Company’s current Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer. Throughout this Proxy Statement, these two executive officers are referred to as the “named executive officers.” Ultimate responsibility for establishing, implementing and monitoring the total compensation of the named executive officers rests with the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The named executive officers for fiscal 2019 were:

The compensation of these individuals is presented in the tables and other quantitative information that follows this section.

Our Compensation Philosophy

Johnson Outdoors believes it is important to provide compensation that at a minimum reflects base salary levels which are competitive with executive officers in other industry-related public companies of similar structure and size. The Company further believes that it is appropriate and desirable to have meaningful performance-based incentive plans for our named executive officers to help attract and retain high performing individuals and drive positive economic performance and enhanced shareholder value. Further, these incentive plans should constitute a meaningful portion of the total compensation opportunity for the Company’s named executive officers, with a balanced focus on short and long-term performance. This philosophy is the foundation for the following objectives.

Our Compensation Objectives

The objectives of the Compensation Committee in establishing compensation arrangements for the Company’s named executive officers are to:

The compensation program that has been developed and implemented by the Compensation Committee to achieve these objectives for the named executive officers has the following features:

The above noted compensation program features are described in detail in the following sections of this Compensation Discussion and Analysis, entitled “Our Compensation Process,” “Peer Group Benchmarking,” “Components of Executive Compensation” and “Change of Control and Severance Benefits.”

At our 2019 Annual Meeting of Shareholders, pursuant to a non-binding, advisory vote, shareholders approved the compensation of our named executive officers as disclosed in the Proxy Statement for the 2019 Annual Meeting by a vote of 19,548,570 shares in favor to 38,590 against (taking into account the fact that holders of Class B shares of common stock are entitled to 10 votes per share when voting together with holders of Class A shares of common stock). The Compensation Committee has reviewed and considered the results of this advisory shareholder vote and believes it shows support by the shareholders for the Company’s compensation philosophy and the executive compensation programs that implement this compensation philosophy. The Company’s Board of Directors has determined that shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation will occur on an annual basis. The rules of the SEC require that we submit to a vote of our shareholders once every six years a non-binding advisory proposal on the frequency of future shareholder advisory votes on executive compensation (called “Say on Pay” votes). At the 2017 Annual Meeting, a plurality of shareholders voted in favor of annual advisory votes on executive compensation.

As described above under the Section “Corporate Governance Matters - The Board’s Role in Risk Oversight,” the Compensation Committee has primary oversight responsibility to ensure that the Company’s compensation programs and practices do not encourage unreasonable or excessive risk-taking and that any risks are subject to appropriate controls.

Our Compensation Process

Compensation for the Company’s named executive officers and, at the option of the Compensation Committee, other officers and senior managers, is evaluated and determined by the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors. The Compensation Committee consists of four independent directors under the applicable standards of the NASDAQ Stock Market. Thomas F. Pyle, Jr. is the Chairman of the Compensation Committee and the other members of the Compensation Committee are Terry E. London, John M. Fahey, Jr. and Katherine Button Bell. Additional information regarding the Compensation Committee is disclosed under the section “Directors’ Meetings and Committees – Compensation Committee” included elsewhere in this Proxy Statement.

The Compensation Committee views compensation as an ongoing process and may convene special meetings in addition to its regularly scheduled meetings throughout the year for purposes of evaluation, planning and appropriate action. Many key compensation decisions for a fiscal year are made during the fourth fiscal quarter of the prior fiscal year (typically in September) as the Compensation Committee sets certain compensation

targets and objectives for the coming fiscal year or other performance period. Additional compensation decisions are made during the first quarter of the fiscal year as the Compensation Committee meets to review performance for the prior fiscal year and calculate and set target awards under the Cash Bonus Plan and Stock Incentive Plan (and going forward under the JOI 2020 LTIP if approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting) for the current fiscal year or other performance period. Finally, at the first quarterly meeting held after the fiscal year (typically in December of the following fiscal year), the Compensation Committee reviews performance for the prior fiscal year and calculates and confirms bonus payouts, if any, under the Cash Bonus Plan with respect to the prior fiscal year, and calculates the number or amount of equity incentive compensation to be granted, if any, under the Stock Incentive Plan (and going forward under the JOI 2020 LTIP if approved by the shareholders at the Annual Meeting) with respect to the target awards for the prior fiscal year or other performance period. The Compensation Committee held four meetings during fiscal 2019, as well as a meeting held on December 4, 2019 (the first quarter of fiscal 2020) in part to review performance for fiscal 2019. The Compensation Committee typically holds an executive session without management present. The Compensation Committee receives and reviews materials in advance of each meeting, including materials that management believes will be helpful to the Committee as well as materials specifically requested by members of the Committee.

The Company’s management assists the Compensation Committee in its oversight and determination of compensation. Management’s role includes assisting the Compensation Committee with evaluating employee performance, assisting with establishing individual and company-wide performance targets and objectives, recommending salary levels and equity incentive grants, providing financial data on Company performance, providing calculations and reports on achievement of performance objectives and furnishing other information as requested by the Committee. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer works with the Compensation Committee in making recommendations regarding overall compensation policies and plans as well as specific compensation levels for the Company’s executive officers and other key employees, other than the Chief Executive Officer. Members of management who were present during Compensation Committee meetings held in fiscal 2019, and the first quarter of fiscal 2020, included the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, Chief Financial Officer, Vice President – Human Resources, and Senior Managing Director, Legal Affairs. The Compensation Committee makes all decisions regarding the compensation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer without the Company’s Chief Executive Officer or any other member of the Company’s management present.

The Compensation Committee’s Charter authorizes the Committee to engage any compensation consultants and other advisers as the Committee may deem appropriate, and requires that the Company provide the Committee with adequate funding to engage any compensation consultants or other advisers the Committee deems it appropriate to engage. During fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee directly engaged Pearl Meyer, an independent compensation consultant, to assist the Company with reviewing its compensation practices and levels. Pearl Meyer did not provide any other services to the Company or its affiliates during fiscal 2019 or during fiscal 2020 to date and the Company’s Compensation Committee determined that the engagement of Pearl Meyer to assist the Company with reviewing its compensation practices and levels did not create any conflicts of interest. See “Peer Group Benchmarking” below for additional information regarding this engagement.

Peer Group Benchmarking

As noted above, during fiscal 2019 (as well as in prior years) the Company engaged Pearl Meyer to prepare comparative compensation reports for the Compensation Committee to assist the Committee and the Company in setting compensation levels and targets for the named executive officers, directors and other members of senior management. The Pearl Meyer comparative compensation reviews were based upon publicly-disclosed data from a peer group described below, as well as general industry compensation survey data. Pearl Meyer’s reports included detailed analysis showing how the Company’s compensation elements for each of (a) the Company’s named executive officers and senior management, including the base salary, short-term cash incentive compensation, equity incentive compensation and total compensation levels, and (b) the Company’s directors, including the cash, equity and total compensation levels, compared in each case to the peer group companies and general industry data included within the benchmark data. The comparative compensation reports also contained recommendations on the Company’s compensation policies for both its named executive

officers and senior management and for its directors. Pearl Meyer also provided the Compensation Committee with detailed analysis on the Company’s compensation programs in terms of design, metrics and time horizons for payouts (including long-term incentive vesting schedules) to evaluate how the Company’s programs compare with (i) the peer group companies and general industry data included within the benchmark data and (ii) the consultant’s assessment of best practices. Representatives of Pearl Meyer participated in person for two of the Compensation Committee’s meetings during fiscal 2019 to describe and discuss the results of their analysis during such year. The Compensation Committee used the results of these reports and analysis in setting the compensation levels and target compensation awards, including performance- and service-based vesting criteria, where applicable, for the Company’s named executive officers and directors for fiscal 2019 and 2020. See “Components of Executive Compensation” below for additional information.

The companies comprising the peer group in the 2019 Pearl Meyer comparative report were:

While the peer group companies do not necessarily compete in the Company’s specific industry or industries, they generally have similar characteristics to Johnson Outdoors, including in terms of size and scale, a consumer discretionary product focus, the manufacturing of engineered products, and global operations.

Components of Executive Compensation

For our named executive officers, the primary components of total compensation for fiscal 2019 were:

The Compensation Committee evaluates targeted total compensation levels for the named executive officers as well as how each component fits within the targeted total compensation levels. This evaluation is guided by the compensation objectives described above. A large portion of potential compensation for the named executive officers is performance-based. For performance-based compensation, the Company combines annual cash incentives with long-term equity-based incentives. The cash incentives are tied to a combination of annual, company-wide measures of operating performance and individual performance goals. The long-term equity-based compensation for fiscal 2019 was split, for executives other than the CEO, between the issuance of shares of restricted stock tied to service-based vesting criteria and an award of performance-based restricted stock units tied to achievement of certain financial objectives to be measured over a three-year performance period. During fiscal 2019, for the CEO, the long-term equity based compensation consisted solely of an award of performance-based restricted stock units tied to achievement of certain financial objectives to be measured over a three-year performance period. The long-term equity awards help promote our executive retention objectives and provide an incentive for long-term appreciation in our stock price, whereas the annual cash incentives promote short-term financial growth and achievement of individual performance goals over a single fiscal year.

Base Salary. Base salary is a key component of executive compensation. In determining base salaries, the Compensation Committee considers the named executive officer’s qualifications and experience, responsibilities, past performance and goals and objectives, together with salary levels for comparable positions

at peer group companies and other similarly sized companies nationally, as covered in the above-referenced Pearl Meyer comparative report. Base salaries of the named executive officers are reviewed annually by the Compensation Committee to determine whether any adjustments are necessary. Base salary levels for our named executive officers are generally positioned to be competitive with market, as described above.

Annual Cash Incentives. The named executive officers and other officers and senior managers determined by the Compensation Committee are eligible to receive annual cash incentives under the Cash Bonus Plan. While the Company principally relies on this Cash Bonus Plan for annual cash incentives, the Compensation Committee, on rare occasions, may decide to grant discretionary cash bonuses outside of this Plan based on special circumstances. Although no such discretionary bonuses were granted in fiscal 2019, as described below, our Compensation Committee determined to exclude the impact of recently enacted tariffs on Chinese origin goods and components when determining whether the Company wide financial targets under the Cash Bonus Plan were met with respect to our fiscal 2019 financial results.

The purpose of the Cash Bonus Plan is to drive continuous improvement year over year, enhance shareholder value and provide a framework for determining cash incentive compensation for our named executive officers and other officers and senior managers that financially rewards them for achieving various short-term Company and individual performance objectives. As such, the Cash Bonus Plan is generally comprised of the following two components:

The Company financial component promotes achieving Company-wide financial goals. For fiscal 2019, we used a target level of pre-tax income and achieving a specified level of working capital as a percentage of net sales as the Company financial component. The Compensation Committee’s purpose in using various performance measures for the Cash Bonus Plan is to support the attainment of increased shareholder returns while being able to respond to changes both in our business and the overall economic environment each fiscal year. For fiscal 2019, the Company financial component constituted 85% of the named executive officer’s total bonus opportunity under the Cash Bonus Plan.

The individual objectives component is typically tied to financial performance measures that the participant can best impact, including profitability, working capital levels, sales growth, operational efficiency, market share growth, organizational development and innovation. For fiscal 2019, the individual objectives component constituted 15% of the named executive officer’s total bonus opportunity under the Cash Bonus Plan.

The Company financial component and the individual objectives component under the Cash Bonus Plan for the coming fiscal year are chosen and set annually by the Compensation Committee at the last quarterly Compensation Committee meeting for the prior fiscal year (typically occurring in September). Target bonus awards for the coming fiscal year for each named executive officer are also generally approved at this meeting. Target awards for each participant have historically ranged from 55% to 90% of the participant’s base salary. For fiscal 2019, the target was 90% of base salary for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and 55% of base salary for Mr. Johnson. The Compensation Committee believes these target award opportunities are competitive with industry practices as reflected by the Pearl Meyer comparative report described above. The threshold or minimum financial performance level for payment of the fiscal 2019 awards under the Cash Bonus Plan was 70% of the financial performance target, in which event the participant would receive a payout for the Company financial component at 25% of the target bonus amount.

The Compensation Committee retains the final authority to approve individual bonus payments after completion of the applicable fiscal year and may, in its sole discretion, reduce or eliminate bonuses which are otherwise earned during the fiscal year using the foregoing components or formula, including with respect to approving certain adjustments to our financial results in connection with determining cash bonus amounts (such as described below with respect to removal of the impact of tariffs on Chinese origin goods and components in fiscal 2019 results). In determining whether to reduce or eliminate a bonus which was otherwise earned during a given fiscal year, the Compensation Committee considers factors such as a minimum level of Company profitability and return of profits to shareholders.

With respect to awards made before November 2, 2017, the maximum amount payable under the Cash Bonus Plan during any fiscal year to any person whom the Compensation Committee considered a covered employee within the meaning of section 162(m) of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 as amended (the “Code”) was equal to $2,000,000. For the Company financial component of the fiscal 2019 bonus, the eligible bonus could have been paid out from 0 to 200% of the target bonus award allocated to this component. The actual percentage earned inside this range is based on how well the Company performs compared to the goals for pre-tax income and working capital as a percentage of net sales. For fiscal 2019, our Compensation Committee determined to exclude the impact of recently enacted tariffs on Chinese origin goods and components in determining the amount of the Company’s pre-tax income and its working capital as a percentage of net sales when verifying whether bonuses were earned under the company financial component of the Cash Bonus Plan. Accordingly, as adjusted in accordance with the foregoing sentence, for fiscal 2019, the Company financial component exceeded goals and the bonuses were paid at 122% of the target bonus award for this component. With respect to the individual objectives component of the annual bonus, payouts also range from 0 to 200% of the target bonus award allocated to this component, provided that the Company maintains a certain level of shareholder return and a minimum level of net income for the applicable fiscal year. The actual percentage earned inside this range is based on how well the individual objectives are satisfied compared to applicable goals as determined by the Compensation Committee. For fiscal 2019, the individual objectives component of the bonus was paid at 50% of target bonus for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and 85% of target bonus for Mr. Johnson.

Accordingly, for fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee paid the following annual incentive bonuses to the named executive officers under the Cash Bonus Plan, after excluding the impact of tariffs on Chinese origin goods and components on the Company’s financial results for purposes of determining bonuses under the Company financial component:

Based upon Pearl Meyer’s report prepared during fiscal 2019 as described above, the Compensation Committee has decided to generally keep the Cash Bonus Plan in place for fiscal 2020 and to continue to have target awards split between an individual objectives component (15% of total bonus opportunity) and a Company financial component (85% of total bonus opportunity). Additionally, with respect to the Company financial component for fiscal 2020, the Compensation Committee has determined to: (1) continue to use a target level of pre-tax income and a specified level of working capital as a percentage of net sales; (2) set the threshold or minimum level for payouts of bonus awards at 70% of the target financial performance; (3) set the payment or funding amount at 25% of the target bonus amount for financial performance at 70% of target, which is the minimum performance level for payouts of bonus awards; and (4) set the payment or funding amount at 200% of the target bonus amount at the maximum financial performance level. With respect to the individual objectives component of the Cash Bonus Plan, the Compensation Committee has determined for fiscal 2020 to continue to set the payment or funding amount at 0-200% of the target bonus amount for that component provided that the Company maintains a certain level of shareholder return and a minimum level of net income for that fiscal year. The Company believes that the foregoing elements of the Cash Bonus Plan mitigate against potential unnecessary risk taking because the plan contains a payout curve such that there is no one cliff event that has the potential to make a significant difference in the payout opportunity.

Equity Based Compensation. The Company believes that equity-based compensation is an effective means of aligning the long-term interests of Company employees, including the named executive officers with Company shareholders. The Stock Incentive Plan authorizes the Compensation Committee to issue stock options, shares of restricted stock and restricted stock units, as well as other forms of equity-based compensation. With respect to fiscal 2019, awards to the named executive officers (other than the CEO) under the Stock Incentive Plan consisted of an award of shares of restricted stock subject to service-based vesting criteria to promote our retention objectives and an award of performance-based restricted stock units tied to achievement of certain

Company financial objectives to be measured over a three-year performance period. With respect to fiscal 2019, for the CEO, the long-term equity-based compensation consisted solely of an award of performance-based restricted stock units tied to achievement of certain financial objectives to be measured over a three-year performance period.

With respect to the portion of the equity-based award that is tied to Company performance, the Compensation Committee establishes pre-determined financial performance goals for the Company at the last quarterly Compensation Committee meeting held during the prior fiscal year (typically in September). The amount of the target award for each participant is set by the Compensation Committee during the first quarterly Compensation Committee meeting held during the fiscal year (typically in December).

For fiscal 2019, the portion (or the entire award for the CEO) of the long-term equity-based incentive award that is performance-based is tied to three-year sales and operating profit goals aligned with our strategic plan and consisted of an award of performance-based restricted stock units. These performance-based restricted stock units include the following general provisions:

As noted above, the performance-based equity awards granted at the Compensation Committee meeting held in December 2018 to our named executive officers cover a three-year performance period consisting of fiscal years 2019 through 2021, with vesting in December, 2021, depending on whether the performance criteria are satisfied. The Compensation Committee again approved performance-based equity-based awards to our named executive officers at the beginning of fiscal 2020 at the Compensation meeting held in December. These awards consisted of performance-based restricted stock units and also cover a three-year performance period consisting of fiscal years 2020 through 2022 with vesting in December 2022, depending on whether the performance criteria are satisfied.

As noted above, the Company splits the long-term equity-based incentive award for participants other than our CEO between shares of restricted stock tied to four year service-based cliff vesting and performance-based restricted stock unit equity grants described above. With respect to the portion of an equity-based award that is service-based, the Compensation Committee establishes the amount of the target award at its first quarterly Compensation Committee meeting held during the prior fiscal year (typically in December). At the following December meeting, the Compensation Committee reviews each of Company and participant performance for the fiscal year. The Compensation Committee has discretion, depending upon Company and participant performance for the applicable fiscal year, to reduce the value of the equity award which is tied to service-based vesting with respect to any fiscal year. Any restricted shares which are granted for this service-based component are subject to at least four year cliff vesting periods from the date of grant.

On December 4, 2018, consistent with the methodology described above, the Compensation Committee established a $1,000,000 performance award target for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and a $175,000 performance award target for Mr. Johnson for fiscal 2019. For these performance-based awards, the number of restricted

stock units granted was determined using a share price of $71.42 and resulted in a target grant of 14,002 units for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and 2,450 units for Mr. Johnson. The actual number of shares tied to the performance-based awards to be earned, if any, will be determined based on performance over the three year performance period, i.e. fiscal 2019-2021. The Compensation Committee also approved a service-based award for Mr. Johnson at a value of $175,000. The number of shares under the service-based award was determined using a share price of $71.42 and resulted in a grant of 2,450 restricted shares for Mr. Johnson on December 4, 2018.

On December 4, 2019, consistent with the methodology described above, the Compensation Committee established a $1,000,000 performance award target for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and a $250,000 performance award target for Mr. Johnson for fiscal 2020. For these performance-based awards, the number of restricted stock units granted was determined using a share price of $64.505 and resulted in a target grant of 15,503 units for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and 3,876 units for Mr. Johnson. The actual number of shares tied to the performance-based awards to be earned, if any, will be determined based on performance over the three year performance period, i.e. fiscal 2020-2022. The Compensation Committee also approved a service-based award for Mr. Johnson at a value of $175,000. The number of shares under the service-based award was determined using a share price of $64.505 and resulted in a grant of 2,713 restricted shares for Mr. Johnson on December 4, 2019.

The Compensation Committee approved performance-based equity awards to our named executive officers at the beginning of fiscal 2017 with fifty percent of the performance-based award tied to achievement of cumulative net sales over a three year period (fiscal 2017 - 2019) and the remaining fifty percent tied to achievement of cumulative operating profit over the same three year period (fiscal 2017 - 2019). These awards consisted of performance-based restricted stock units covering this three-year performance period with vesting in December 2019, depending on whether the performance criteria were satisfied for this three year performance period. These performance-based restricted stock units were awarded on December 6, 2016, and consisted of a performance award target to Ms. Johnson-Leipold and Mr. Johnson of $400,000 and $75,000, respectively, or 9,278 and 1,740 performance-based restricted stock units, respectively. The performance-based restricted stock units were granted on terms as were consistent with the general terms and conditions described above for the fiscal 2019 performance-based equity award. Under the terms of the award agreements, the payout of these performance-based equity awards could range from 0% to 150% of the target performance restricted stock unit award amount referenced above and were to be paid only if at least 80% of the target level of net sales or operating profit were met and maximum payouts were made if 120% or more of target levels of net sales or operating profit were achieved. In addition, a certain minimum return on invested capital was required, with a reduction to actual awards made if not fully achieved. On December 4, 2019, after reviewing the Company’s performance over the three year performance period ending with fiscal 2019, the Compensation Committee approved payment of these performance-based equity awards at 140.2% of the target award for each of Ms. Johnson-Leipold and Mr. Johnson, respectively, or at 13,008 and 2,439 shares of the Company’s Class A common stock for each of Johnson-Leipold and Mr. Johnson, respectively.

The Compensation Committee approved performance-based equity awards to our named executive officers at the beginning of fiscal 2018 with fifty percent of the performance-based award tied to achievement of cumulative net sales over a three year period (fiscal 2018 - 2020) and the remaining fifty percent tied to achievement of cumulative operating profit over the same three year period (fiscal 2018 - 2020). These performance-based awards consisted of restricted stock units covering this three-year performance period with vesting in December 2020 (following completion of the results for the three year performance period ending with fiscal 2020), depending on whether the performance criteria will be satisfied for this three year performance period. These performance-based restricted stock units were awarded on December 6, 2017, and consisted of a performance award target to Ms. Johnson-Leipold and Mr. Johnson of $700,000 and $175,000, respectively, or a target award of 9,945 and 2,486 performance-based restricted stock units, respectively. The performance-based restricted stock units were granted on terms as were consistent with the general terms and conditions described above for the fiscal 2019 performance-based equity award. Under the terms of the award agreements, the payout of these performance-based equity awards can range from 0% to 150% of the target performance restricted stock unit award amount referenced above and are to be paid only if at least 80% of the target level

of net sales or operating profit are met and maximum payouts are made if 120% or more of target levels of net sales or operating profit are achieved. In addition, a certain minimum return on invested capital is required, with a reduction to actual awards made if not fully achieved. Determination of any applicable awards under these grants will be made in December 2020.

The Compensation Committee approved performance-based equity awards to our named executive officers at the beginning of fiscal 2019 with fifty percent of the performance-based award tied to achievement of cumulative net sales over a three year period (fiscal 2019 - 2021) and the remaining fifty percent tied to achievement of cumulative operating profit over the same three year period (fiscal 2019 - 2021). These performance-based awards consisted of restricted stock units covering this three-year performance period with vesting in December 2021 (following completion of the results for the three year performance period ending with fiscal 2021), depending on whether the performance criteria will be satisfied for this three year performance period. These performance-based restricted stock units were awarded on December 4, 2018, and consisted of a performance award target to Ms. Johnson-Leipold and Mr. Johnson of $1,000,000 and $175,000, respectively, or a target award of 14,002 and 2,450 performance-based restricted stock units, respectively. The performance-based restricted stock units were granted on terms as were consistent with the general terms and conditions described above for this performance-based equity award. Under the terms of the award agreements, the payout of these performance-based equity awards can range from 0% to 150% of the target performance restricted stock unit award amount referenced above and are to be paid only if at least 80% of the target level of net sales or operating profit are met and maximum payouts are made if 120% or more of target levels of net sales or operating profit are achieved. In addition, a certain minimum return on invested capital is required, with a reduction to actual awards made if not fully achieved. Determination of any applicable awards under these grants will be made in December 2021.

Perquisites and Other Compensation. The named executive officers participate in other benefit plans generally available to all employees on the same terms as similarly situated employees, including participation in medical, health, dental, disability, life insurance, 401(k) plans and other qualified and non-qualified retirement plans. These benefits are included in the Summary Compensation Table provided below under the “All Other Compensation” column. In addition, named executive officers also participate in the Company’s discretionary Executive Flexible Spending Account Plan which provides for reimbursement for certain expenses that relate to an executive’s personal financial planning and/or for purchases of office equipment. This program is available to other key executives as well and the amounts typically range from $5,000 to $8,500 of potential reimbursement each calendar year, provided the eligible participant submits the appropriate documentation. Reimbursement under this plan is taxable income. See the notes to the Summary Compensation Table for additional information on payments to the named executive officers during fiscal 2019 in connection with this compensation program.

Change of Control and Severance Benefits

Historically, Johnson Outdoors has not entered into employment agreements with any named executive officers and does not have contractual obligations to provide severance benefits to either of the named executive officers. In the past, Johnson Outdoors has negotiated payment of certain severance benefits on a case-by-case basis with terminated named executive officers. The amount and type of severance benefits provided to these former named executive officers has depended upon the circumstances of the termination, the position of the former named executive officer and certain other performance-related factors. Should Johnson Outdoors pay severance benefits in the future to former named executive officers, we expect to do so on a case-by-case basis in accordance with prior practice.

Tax and Accounting Considerations

Code section 162(m) generally disallows a tax deduction to a public corporation for non-performance-based compensation over $1,000,000 paid for any fiscal year to each of the individuals who were, at the end of the fiscal year, the corporation’s chief executive officer and the four other most highly compensated executive officers, excluding the principal financial officer. Prior to January 1, 2018 there was an exception to this limit for “performance-based” compensation and most grants under the Stock Incentive Plan and Cash Bonus Plan are intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Code section 162(m),

including the requirement that such plans be approved by shareholders. As a result, the Compensation Committee believes that such awards under these plans intended to satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” under Code section 162(m) will not count against the $1,000,000 limit and will be deductible by Johnson Outdoors. Other grants or compensation paid or imputed to individual executive officers covered by Code section 162(m) may not satisfy the requirements for “performance-based compensation” and may cause “non-performance-based compensation” to exceed the $1,000,000 limit, and would then not be deductible by Johnson Outdoors to the extent it exceeds the $1,000,000 limit. Although the Compensation Committee designs certain components of executive compensation to preserve income tax deductibility, it believes that it is not in the shareholders’ interest to restrict the Compensation Committee’s discretion and flexibility in developing appropriate compensation programs and establishing compensation levels and, in some instances, the Compensation Committee may approve compensation that is not fully deductible.

Timing of Restricted Stock and Restricted Stock Unit Grants

Generally, grants of shares of restricted stock and performance-based restricted stock units to employees (other than inducement grants to new employees) are made annually on the date of the first quarterly meeting of the Compensation Committee held in December of each year, after prior fiscal year earnings have been determined, and the amount of the actual grant can be calculated. The grant date is always the date of approval of the grant by the Compensation Committee. Accordingly, to maintain flexibility and promote retention or individual goals, other compensation arrangements such as restricted stock grants and certain annual incentive cash payments are not designed to satisfy the conditions of Code section 162(m) and therefore may not be deductible.

Report of the Compensation Committee

The Compensation Committee has reviewed and discussed the Compensation Discussion and Analysis section of this Proxy Statement with our management and, based on such review and discussions with management, the Compensation Committee recommended to our Board of Directors that the Compensation Discussion and Analysis be included in this Proxy Statement.

Summary Compensation Table

The following table provides information for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 concerning the compensation paid by Johnson Outdoors to the individual who served as our principal executive officer during fiscal 2019 and the person who served as our principal financial officer in fiscal 2019. We refer to these two executive officers as our “named executive officers” in this Proxy Statement.

In determining each named executive officer’s annual incentive cash bonus amount for fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 performance, our Compensation Committee allocated 15% of the target bonus to achieving the pre-established individual objectives component, and 85% to the Company achieving the Company financial component. For each of the individual objectives component and the Company financial component under the Cash Bonus Plan, the eligible bonus can be paid out from 0-200% of the target bonus amount for that component. The target bonus amounts for 2019, 2018, and 2017 for Ms. Johnson-Leipold were $678,708, $656,511, and $633,891, and for Mr. Johnson were $217,961, $211,224, and $201,197, respectively. If either or both components (individual objectives component and Company financial component) are achieved at targeted performance levels, the payout equals 100% of the eligible bonus for such component.

For fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, the annual cash bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan with respect to achieving the individual objectives component was $50,903, $66,472, and $80,821, for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and $27,790, $23,763, and $25,351 for Mr. Johnson, respectively.

For fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017, the annual cash bonus under the Cash Bonus Plan with respect to achieving the Company financial component related to achieving a minimum level of net income and achieving a specified level of working capital as a percentage of sales. See footnote (3) below for a discussion of the payouts during fiscal 2019, 2018, and 2017 to the named executive officers in connection with this Company financial component.

Grants of Plan-Based Awards

The following table sets forth information regarding all incentive plan awards that were granted to the named executive officers during fiscal 2019 including equity-based, non-equity based and other plan-based awards. Disclosure on a separate line item is provided for each grant made to a named executive officer during the fiscal year. Non-equity incentive plan awards are awards that are not subject to FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718 and are intended to serve as an incentive for performance to occur over a specified period, and include performance bonus awards under the Cash Bonus Plan. Equity incentive plan awards include the service-based award to our CFO and the performance-based restricted stock units awarded under the Stock Incentive Plan and are awards subject to a performance condition or a market condition as those terms are defined by FASB Accounting Standards Codification Topic 718. We did not grant any stock options during fiscal 2019.

performance-based award is tied to three-year sales and operating profit goals aligned with our strategic plan. Fifty percent of the performance-based piece of the award is tied to achievement of cumulative net sales over a three year period (fiscal 2019 - 2021) and the remaining fifty percent is tied to achievement of cumulative operating profit over the same three year period (fiscal 2019 - 2021). Awards are only paid if at least 80% of the target level of net sales and operating profit are met and maximum payouts are made if 120% or more of target levels of net sales and operating profit are achieved. The payouts for achievement of the threshold levels of performance are equal to 50% of the target award amount. The payouts for achievement of maximum levels of performance are equal to 150% of the target award amount. Each of the financial metrics receives a fifty percent weighting in determining the aggregate award amount. Awards are subject to downward adjustments in the event the Company has not achieved a specified minimum average return on invested capital per year during the three year performance period. See “Compensation Discussion & Analysis” above for additional information on the terms of the performance-based restricted stock units issued to the named executive officers during fiscal 2019. On December 4, 2018, consistent with the methodology described above, the Compensation Committee established a $1,000,000 performance award target for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and a $175,000 performance award target for Mr. Johnson. The number of performance-based restricted stock units at target was determined using a grant date share price of $71.42 and resulted in a target grant of 14,002 units for Ms. Johnson-Leipold and 2,450 units for Mr. Johnson. The actual number of shares tied to the performance-based awards to be earned, if any, will be determined based on performance over the fiscal 2019-2021 period. The threshold number of shares equals 50% of the target number of shares and the maximum number of shares equals 150% of the target number of shares.

Outstanding Equity Awards at Fiscal Year End

The following table provides information regarding unvested shares of restricted stock or restricted stock units held by the named executive officers at September 27, 2019. Neither of the named executive officers held any unexercised stock options as of September 27, 2019.